Sunday, June 16, 2013

It's Time for a Divorce



It’s time for a divorce.

No longer should white America’s future be wedded to that of black America.

In re-reading Coleman Young’s autobiography (you know, the first black mayor of Detroit), I came across a chilling passage that leapt from the page with a greater force than a viewing of the fine documentary Africa Addio.


Published in 1994, Hard Stuff: The Autobiography of Mayor Coleman Young – the era of The Bell Curve, Alien Nation, Pete Wilson and Prop 187, the LA Riots, and an actual backlash against affirmative action and Organized Blackness – Mayor Young let slip the truth of what the Civil Rights Era had birthed: Black-Run America (BRA):

My whole life, I’ve been the first black person to do this and enter that – one of the first blacks in the Catholic school, one of the first blacks to venture into the white officer’s club, the first black official in the CIO, the first black mayor of Detroit, the first black member of the Democratic National Committee – and every time, I was merely raising the old quota by one. We need to continue raising it. If quotas are the only way to keep the white folks honest, let there be quotas. Let us build on their long and revered heritage in this country to which I can personally attest. Put in the historical context, it’s obvious that all the carrying-on about quotas really isn’t about quotas at all; it’s about turf. A lot of white folks don’t want to give it up. And if they must, which they know they ultimately will, they’re not going to give up any quicker than they have to.

To a great extent, I regard the civil rights slowdown of the last two decades as a predictable middle-class, Republican reflex to retard the reform movement that swept them off their feet in the sixties and early seventies. When the black and other politically enlightened communities set out to reverse Jim Crow, the results (the Great Society programs, anti-discrimination laws, and especially affirmative action) were assailed as merely Jim Crow of a different color – which of course they were. But I have a problem with anybody who has a problem with any type of legislation that might try to atone for the generations of suppression and indignity systematically inflicted upon a race of people. Our sluggish white friends have to understand that aggressive measures like affirmative action are the only way to make up for the deep-seated wrongs of the past.

On that point, the common response from many white people these days is that they’ve personally done nothing to keep the blacks down; but the fact is, they’ve all benefited incalculably from the discrimination and inhumanity imposed by their ancestors. Affirmative action does not ask why society to pay for the social crimes of its ancestors, only to give back what has been wrongfully obtained and passed down. If the hypothetical sale of my great-grandfather, for example, brought $500 dollars on the auction block, he was a form of primitive capital with which a landowner improved his property and net worth…

Since you have money to spend – my money – shopping malls have sprung up in your neighborhood, which has prospered as a result. There is very little evidence of hopelessness or desperation where you live; very little crime, drugs, social decline. Your children have gone to safe, well-funded schools and then to college. Meanwhile, my neighborhood has been abandoned and neglected. There is little money with which to improve our situation, and few businesses are interested in moving into an area that they consider blighted. (p. 307-308)


“Jim Crow of a different color.”

After 40 years of black political rule, Detroit is in ruins.

Were the black population (currently 90 percent of the cities occupants) to magically disappear and be replaced with white people, the city of Detroit could come back in less than a year.

Rebuilt. Refurbished. Reenergized. An influx of capital would come pouring into the region, only held back by the current occupants of the city – whose lack of economic viability is visible in the crumbling infrastructure of Detroit.

Instead, the black population of the failed black city begins to migrate out of Detroit, threatening the stability of whichever community they move to ['It's not my fault you paid $250,000 and I paid a buck': Long-time residents not always pleased by new neighbors who buy foreclosed properties, NBC News, 2/28/2011]:

Three years ago, Lamar Grace left Detroit for the suburb of Southfield. He got a good deal — a 3,000-square-foot colonial that once was worth $220,000. In foreclosure, he paid $109,000.
The neighbors were not pleased.
"They don't want to live next door to ghetto folks," he says.
That his neighbors are black, like Grace, is immaterial. Many in the black middle class moved out of Detroit and settled in the northern suburbs years ago; now, due to foreclosures, it is easy to buy or rent houses on the cheap here. The result has been a new, poorer wave of arrivals from the city, and growing tensions between established residents and the newcomers.
"There's a way in which they look down on people moving in from Detroit into houses they bought for much lower prices," says Grace, a 39-year-old telephone company analyst. "I understand you want to keep out the riffraff, but it's not my fault you paid $250,000 and I paid a buck."
The neighbors say there's more to it than that. People like John Clanton, a retired auto worker, say the new arrivals have brought behavior more common in the inner city — increased trash, adults and children on the streets at all times of the night, a disregard for others' property.

 Divorce is painful.

It is messy.

But most often in a failed marriage, it is necessary.

The late Mayor Young’s views on the true role of the Civil Rights movement are undoubtedly shared by a large percentage of the black community, and their allies we’ve labeled Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs), who utilize black anger and resentment to gain favor (and revered social status) against less progressively-minded whites in the status game that is modern America.

What black people in America and DWLs have never, ever been told, is a simple, one-word response:

“No.”

We now have powerful evidence of what happens when white people give up their ‘turf’ --- 2013 Detroit, Atlanta, Memphis, Birmingham, Gary (Indiana), St. Louis, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, and Camden offer a glimpse into a world where the perpetual, unending war of the Civil Rights revolution is waged against whites.

When formerly white turf is ceded to blacks, the proverbial sod they inherit dies quickly. 

Just look to Chicago...

The resentment and hatred so many blacks feel for whites is put into vengeful prose by the late Coleman Young, allowing those willing to see – those willing to listen – that there can be no peace.

Only separation. 

In the end, always remember white America owes black America nothing. 

Nothing at all. 

It’s time for a divorce.

78 comments:

Anonymous said...

A fu@kin men!

Anonymous said...

It certainly is time for a divorce, actually it should have occurred years ago. No matter what White people do for blacks it will never be enough, it will never be right, it will never be good enough, no matter what. Blacks need to be given some territory of their own and left to their own devices. Like you said, PK, we would of been walking on Mars now if it wasn't for blacks and the people who made Whites fork over their hard earned money.

Anonymous said...

EPIC post, Mister PK.

EPIC.

I actually got a little weepy.

God bless you, my man. God bless you.

This needs to be told and read and emboldened.

Don M said...

Its time for more than just a simple, amicable divorce. Its time for a restraining order.

Look, I'm white. I'm married to a white woman. My entire family is white. I know white people.

I am prepared to admit it: we white people are incorrigibly evil. The threat we pose to not only the rainbow peoples of vibrant diversity, but also to our Hebraic brethren cannot be understated.

In order to protect the aforementioned groups from our inherent wickedness, I am ready to accept a state of permanent segregation of European-descended peoples form them.

Furthermore, I personally am willing to migrate to a whites-only reservation carved out of the U.S. Even If we were required to remove ourselves to the ruins of the former industrial powerhouse of Detroit, I could accept it. I only hope that others of my race are conscientious enough to join me in the wilderness, utterly deprived of the cultural enrichment of diversity.

It will be horrible. But we deserve it.

Mr.Ken said...

Sign the papers, BRA. You want freedom, you got it. But don't expect the ambulance when you're sick, the fire truck when you smell smoke, or the policemen when you hear a noise late at night. You see, these things cost money. you must PAY for them by contributing to the community and paying your fair share. They are not free. No one owes you anything. Good riddance.

Anonymous said...

Africa Addio is shocking, and I don't shock easily, as in never. Africa Addio will shock and horrify even the most callous among us. It is playable on google videos.

The other documentary worth watching is VICE's "Cannibal Warlords of Liberia"

Cannibal Warlords of Liberia is actually more fitting to our current dilemma as it was created for repatriated slaves under Monroe, and it's capital is named after him "Monrovia"

The country was set up for them even with a constitution mirrored on our own. Just look what happens when they are left to their own devices.

It is way past the time that we separate from them forever.

Things aren't much better with the brown peoples from south of the border, not much better whatsoever.

We have a long way to go.


Anonymous said...

You know I saw it said on another site, why are blacks in WORSE shape the farther they get from slavery time wise? It really does make you wonder.

They cannot do anything unless it involves getting it or taking it from whites. That is literally all they fucking know. To hell with em.

Californian said...

"Gimme, gimme, gimme!"

That sums up Coleman Young's argument in three words.

All of his verbiage is simply a justification for shaking down The Man. Simple as that.

I'll raise the obvious point--the USA has had "Great Society programs, anti-discrimination laws, and especially affirmative action." And yet the situation of black Americans is materially worse today in many ways than it was under segregation. And more than that, black rule has run cities into the ground (again, Detroit). I could make a quasi-conservative argument that this demonstrates that government programs reward dysfunction and failure, but then again, many government programs do create success (for ex: the federal Interstate Highway system, built during the last gasp of the segregation era).

It just may be that the problem with blacks is in their wretched leadership, with Mayor Young being a leading example.

Californian said...

Let's look at the details:

But I have a problem with anybody who has a problem with any type of legislation that might try to atone for the generations of suppression and indignity systematically inflicted upon a race of people.

We'll start with the collectivism. To Young and his comrades, it's not about individual rights and responsibilities (the foundation of American jurisprudence), but a collective racial issue. It's a sort of dumbed down marxism. Black to white = worker to capitalist.

But if one is to hold whites collectively accountable for slavery-segregation, then should blacks be held collectively accountable for their abnormally high violent crime rates, for trashing major American cities, for their welfare dependency, etc., etc., etc?


Our sluggish white friends ...

White people are "sluggish?" Does he mean that the median white IQ is lower than that of the black? Perhaps he can provide examples of all those black Nobel Prize winners?


...have to understand that aggressive measures like affirmative action are the only way to make up for the deep-seated wrongs of the past.

Note the term "wrongs of the past." A strict legalist might point out that slavery and segregation were not crimes during their times, whatever the moral issues which might have been involved.

Moreover, if slavery was a "wrong," then I take it that Africans, Muslims, Amerindians, etc., who were involved in the slave trade were also "wrong," and thus they owe all sorts of government extracted goodies to the descendants of their slaves?


On that point, the common response from many white people these days is that they’ve personally done nothing to keep the blacks down;

I wonder how many of those white people later reconsidered their support for integration when they found out that "equality" was one big race hustle?

Californian said...

[continued]

...but the fact is, they’ve all benefited incalculably from the discrimination and inhumanity imposed by their ancestors.

But of course, blacks have benefited from that "the discrimination and inhumanity." Just check the average standard of living of American blacks with that of blacks in sub-Saharan Africa. And we might also note the standard of living, education, civic order, etc., of blacks under segregation as opposed to today's BRA.

Using Young's line of reasoning, one might assume that he is asking to be repatriated to Africa. (I wonder, though, if any African country would have wanted him?)


If the hypothetical sale of my great-grandfather, for example, brought $500 dollars on the auction block, he was a form of primitive capital with which a landowner improved his property and net worth…

Using this logic, one can argue that people whose ancestors were serfs (a heck of a lot of Europeans) are owed big time by people whose ancestors were nobility.

Anyway, whatever wealth was built by slavery in America was destroyed in the Civil War. But Young seems to be laboring under the assumption that slavery created the wealth of the North and West, not to mention the post-Civil War South, an obvious absurdity. We have seen what has happened to cities like Detroit where all that black labor, unleashed from the heavy hand of slavery-segregation, built...what?

To take this further: if the hypothetical importation of blacks into a neighborhood via busing, Section 8 housing, AA, etc., results in that neighborhood seeing a decline in property values, then do blacks collectively owe homeowners for the loss?


Since you have money to spend – my money – ...

A real leap in his argument here. What is this "my money" which he claims to exist? Had there not been slavery, the Coleman Youngs of the world would be living in Africa, where they would have had neither money nor capital as we understand them (other than as imported by European colonists).


...shopping malls have sprung up in your neighborhood, which has prospered as a result. There is very little evidence of hopelessness or desperation where you live; very little crime, drugs, social decline.

In the last half century:
* Blacks have inherited fully functioning shopping malls, factories, schools, business districts, museums, etc., and what has happened to the prosperity?
* Blacks have had all sorts of white wealth redistributed to them via the government and corporate sectors, and what has happened to their rates of crime, drugs and social advancement?


Your children have gone to safe, well-funded schools and then to college.

"Safe" because of differences in violent crime rates. Well-funded because they produce graduates who can go into STEM and business fields, and not affirmative action candidates for makework jobs.


Meanwhile, my neighborhood has been abandoned and neglected. There is little money with which to improve our situation, and few businesses are interested in moving into an area that they consider blighted.

"Abandoned" because business was driven out by crime. "Neglected" because the residents don't seem to have whatever it takes to keep up the property value. "Blighted" because of vandalism, illegitimacy, drug addiction, gang-banging, ad nauseam.

As for "little money," we might rightly ask what happened to all that cash from the War on Poverty, affirmative action jobs, minority business contracts, Bill Gates scholarships, and so forth and so on.

D=FENS said...

Never forget the theoreticians behind BRA. The negro is too stupid and tribal to do this all on his own.

Anonymous said...

I just had a V-8 moment -

why my local DWL pols are pushing so hard for a billion dollar mass transit system across state lines

to make it easy for blacks (low income) to invade our small, mostly white community

it's never about reducing traffic congestion

San Mack said...

Every single person in the Black part of town is drunk on malt liquor or buzzed on drugs. They don't do anything, they aren't productive. They sit on their porches s***faced saying "Barack Obama got my back." "Burn baby, burn!" and "No justice, no peace."

They contribute nothing, they add nothing to anything. Consumers and parasites angry as hell.

It's way past time to get a divorce.

Anonymous said...

To anonymous @ 1:55 pm.
It always has been the underlying theme behind mass transit. Imagine what they could really do with that money?......what a waste.

D-FENS said...

Mass Transit: Conveyor belt for criminals.

Anonymous said...

U.S. Census Announces Those People Will Be Majority By 2043

http://www.theonion.com/articles/us-census-announces-those-people-will-be-majority,32810/

10mm AUTO said...

I posted this to Anon earlier, but this seems a good place to put it as well.

Anon @ 1:29

As to moving, (here comes a long post) a practical man would move to an area where he is surrounded by allies, where his enemies are few and where, when bad times come, his children will still be safe and he will still be free to shape his own destiny. For reasons I have often outlined here in this blog, I have chosen the Northwest. I do not believe the East Coast can hold many more years, let alone decades. La Raza is poised to carve off the lower southwest, Amnesty will simply make it official. The present poison of PC will continue to rot the East till Whites are paralyzed and surrounded at every turn. Hunkering down is not an answer, for if you use force to repel a negro, you face the Zimmerman problem and bankruptcy or Jail. Your comment about carrying is a perfect example. You are a Westerner, a supposedly free man, yet you have less rights than an Iraqi citizen, who may carry a fully automatic AK-47 and those rights backed by the law. In the FUSA, as the occupying forces increase (gangs of over 300,000 are not "gangs" but racial militia) your rights will be prescribed further and further till you are helpless before your enemies. The intention by TWMNBN is to force a feeling of helplessness, to render you speechless and naked before your enemies. Why else in God's name do they actively cover the horrors of black on White crime.

Don't do it.

The Whites of the Northwest learned long ago that those without guns could still die from them (Tolkien!). Waiting for slaughter in your home saves no one and none can alone survive the darkness which is sweeping over these lands. Do not fight and die in a land you cannot call your own, but in a land that can be made free. If you must stay, then I wish you all the best and God Willing, sanity will return to the White Soul soon. The black beasts are gathering their strength, the browns are readying their forces and it is clear that the Government of the USA is merely giving the White Man sleeping pills, drifting us off, while any who wake are stripped of their jobs, humiliated with the cries of "racism" and their children stamped with the blood libel of "White Privilege". This while Whites are killed, beaten and raped on the street in their own Country under banners of "Beat Whitey Night" and "Polar Bear Hunting" and "I wuz just Bored" while the "criminal justice system" cycles them through, training them to be even worse killers.

You must make decisions NOW for the long term future of your family and your children and grandchildren. Good Luck.

Danny said...

Consider a genetic possibility as root cause. Observing any, and I mean ANY, African society untouched by white influence, is like returning to the Stone Age. African Americans, left to their own devices, tend toward the same behaviors and societies as their genetically related African brethren. Same violence. Same lack of impulse control. Same lack of sexual restraint. Same primitive behaviors and beliefs. Should we really expect much else from them?

Anonymous said...

Is it possible we could be put in FEMA camps by the gov.?

Anonymous said...

Great article. And Happy Father's Day to all of the hard-working, tax-paying dads out there. Here's a Father's Day Joke for all:


Q: What is the new Webster's Dictionary defintion of the word "confusion?"

A: Father's Day in Harlem.

Anonymous said...

Divorce??? Are you kidding?
Without the white American taxpayer to support them, blacks will be resorting to cannibalsim in order to survive.

rjp said...

My whole life, I’ve been the first black person to do this and enter that .... and every time, I was merely raising the old quota by one.

Makes one wonder how old he was when he raped his first white female. Maybe while in Europe as a Tuskeegee "Airman".

If quotas are the only way to keep the white folks honest, let there be quotas.

Quotas to keep white people honest? Really what they want are quotas so every black can be equal to even the most successful white, quotas to keep them out of trouble in school, quotas in arrest rates .... Yeah it's white people that are dishonest? No, it's black people that can't be honest with themselves.

Put in the historical context, it’s obvious that all the carrying-on about quotas really isn’t about quotas at all; it’s about turf. A lot of white folks don’t want to give it up. And if they must, which they know they ultimately will, they’re not going to give up any quicker than they have to.

After the creation of "cibil rights" laws, whites seem to cede territory very quickly. And they gave the black people what they wanted, homes in their neighborhoods. Only these neighborhoods became blacks' neighborhoods, in other words, they became exactly what the black left to move into the formerly white neighborhoods.

Our sluggish white friends have to understand that aggressive measures like affirmative action are the only way to make up for the deep-seated wrongs of the past.

Our sluggish white friends? Who is it that works at the pace of snails? Who is it that monkey walks around town with their pants half-way down their legs? Who is it that lies on their back for any male treating their vagina as an EBT machine, then continues to lie on their backs in front of the "TB"?

Your children have gone to safe, well-funded schools and then to college. Meanwhile, my neighborhood has been abandoned and neglected.

Our children have "safe, well-funded schools and then to college" because of us, and because of a lack of you.

"They don't want to live next door to ghetto folks," Lamar Grace says.

Nobody wants to live next to ghetto folk, not even ghetto folk.

Californian said ...

As for "little money," we might rightly ask what happened to all that cash from the War on Poverty, affirmative action jobs, minority business contracts, Bill Gates scholarships, and so forth and so on.

What happened to the money?

From Wiki: Young's Police Chief, and political ally William L. Hart, served for 15 years as Detroit Police Chief before being indicted and convicted for stealing $1.3 million from police undercover funds. Hart was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment & ordered to pay back the money. Deputy Chief of Police Kenneth Weiner, also a close associate of Young, was charged and convicted in a separate case involving investment fraud & stealing an additional $1.3 million from the same fund. Young was never charged with any crime.

I think we all know what happened to the money. Would anyone honestly believe Coleman Young was not getting a piece when his police chief and deputy chief when they were grabbing $1.3 million each from the secretive fund?

Anonymous said...
I just had a V-8 moment -
why my local DWL pols are pushing so hard for a billion dollar mass transit system across state lines


That's why Obama so wants to build highspeed rail between Detoilet and Chicago. Chicago isn't sufficiently done. Highspeed rail between the two would be nothing but criminals and teenage prostitutes.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here......I agree with the post by 10MM AUTO. The area I live in has more horses than people. Everyone is armed and the place is filled with wild game and cattle. When the tourist are gone in the Winter I can drive into a bigger town for supplies and encounter maybe one or two cars every 5 miles. Home, home on the range. Some of the towns South of me with a crime problem also have Mexicans. The cops don't put up with their bullshit.

You do not live in a country. You have been living in a corporation for the last 100 years. Your vote don't mean shit. The current CEO's (aka..Congress and Senate) has decided they need a more loyal and cheaper work force. The old slaves are being replaced. They call it Amnesty. The plan is for the Whites, Mexicans and Blacks to kill each other off while the fat cats sit in their underground bunkers filled with food, wine and pussy. The niggers are out dated farm equipment and the whites are out dated factory workers who have been replaced by robots. The college kids will work off their school debts by working for the machine. Poor saps.

Pedro will be fucking your daughters and Rashnesh in India will be running the computers that are spying on you.

The shipping companies bringing in that crap from China are going back empty. The gooks are now paying double shipping coast. That is why your $8.00 telephone now cost $16.00. Pedro will have a nice job when the old factories re-open. Don't feel bad. You will be able to buy telephones for $8.00 again.

Anonymous said...

If quotas are the only way to keep the white folks honest, let there be quotas........

o fukin pleeze...WHAT DO BLACKS INVENT? where are they in the Sciences?

Anonymous said...

off topic:

ust last month, Secretary of State John Kerry quietly sent Egypt an additional $1.3 billion, even though Egypt has failed to live up to democracy standards. That largesse didn’t stop a prominent Egyptian politician from talking about Egypt’s “enemy” the United States in what some pundits are classifying as a classic and embarrassing “hot mic” moment.
President Mohammed Morsi gathered a group of politicians last week who thought they were speaking privately at a parliamentary meeting. But as seen in an Egyptian television video of the meeting — excerpts of which were later translated by the Middle East Media and Research Institute (MEMRI) — they were actually on live television, cringingly discussing secret ways to stop Ethiopia’s Nile River dam project which threatens water flowing to Egypt.
The New York Times blog reports:
Unaware that their words were being broadcast live on a state-owned television channel, many of those seated around the table said the dam was in fact a secret American and Israeli plot to undermine Egypt that must be stopped at all costs.
The participants learned they were on live TV only after Magdi Ahmad Hussein, chairman of the Islamic Labor Party, suggested that all present vow not to leak any information to the media. Before being told he was on television, Hussein described the U.S. as an enemy [emphasis added]:
I’m very fond of battles. With the enemies, of course – with America and Israel, but this battle must be waged with maximum judiciousness and calm. Even though this is a secret meeting, we must all take an oath not to leak anything to the media, unless it is done officially by sister Pakinam [el-Sharkawy, a Morsi aide]. We need an official plan for popular national security, even if we…
The viewer sees him being handed a note, which presumably points out that his words are not confined to the room. Hussein laughs, then continues with the anti-American and anti-Israel rhetoric: “Okay… Fine… The principles behind what I’m saying are not really secret… Our war is with America and Israel, not with Ethiopia. Therefore, engaging in a war… This is my opinion…

Anonymous said...

" Bill Gates scholarships"
I wonder how many Blacks [not mulattoes] score REALLY high on the [now dumbed down] SAT?

Those are the ones that should get a SCIENCE scholarship from mister
'one world gov' gates.

Any info available PAUL?
how many black geniuses are there?

Anonymous said...

Paul, in yr list of 'places to avoid'
you forgot Macon and many other places.

Silent Running said...

U.S. Census Announces Those People Will Be Majority By 2043

1) The United States of America won't exist in 2043.

2) The people who crow happily that America will be majority mestizo in a few decades are indulging in a vast assumption. Namely, that everything will continue to run more or less smoothly right up to 2043, that the trains will run on time, that the mail will be delivered, that pensions will be paid, and, most importantly, that there will be no large-scale violence. That is never how these things come to pass. Somewhere along the line, the new majority will attempt to exterminate the old majority. The continued importation of third-worlders guarantees a race war, and when it gets here democratic ideals like majorities will no longer apply. Military competence will. Ironically, those poor saintly brown people harangue us with tails of our colonialism while conveniently forgetting that in most of those endeavors, the "natives" never stood a chance.

Anonymous said...

Danny said...
Consider a genetic possibility as root cause.

That's a given here.

Anonymous said...

Outdoorsman here:

"On that point, the common response from many white people these days is that they’ve personally done nothing to keep the blacks down; but the fact is, they’ve all benefited incalculably from the discrimination and inhumanity imposed by their ancestors."

Would those "ancestors" have done this prior to 1865 or after? Would they have been equally wealthy, and speak the same language?

This moronic black troglodyte had obviously never heard of the great wave of immigration from southern- and eastern Europe that began in the 1880's (two decades after nigger emancipation) and lasted into the 1920's. Nor has he apparently heard of the southern rural whites who lived and thrived under harsher conditions than those experienced by many negroid slaves.

The above mentioned European immigrants enjoyed the inherent white privilege of working for starvation wages in the industrial sweatshops of the North and the coal mines of Pennsylvania. These white immigrants enjoyed the privilege of exposure to caustic chemicals, sixteen hour workdays, dangerous equipment with no safety features and working as child labor, with no affirmative action or bilingual education. These white immigrants also enjoyed the benefits of regular beatings by the ruling class's police as they attempted to ameliorate these appaling working conditions.

The official line of BRA, spouted by this pompous but sophomoric negroid, is that THESE people and their descendants "owe" the nigger and will have to pay for holding the nigger down (actually, it is nature that has done that, but that's another story).

This "line" is the official policy of the USA and was cooked up by the perverse coalition of pseudo-bluebloods from Amurika's so-called "old money" upper-classes (descendants of industrial robber barons, abolitionists and trancendentalist puritan proto bolsheviks) and TWMNBN, who champion the non-white cause while demonizing northern white ethnics and southern rural whites.

This african "intellectual" and leader in their war against us is making it abundantly clear that whitey is to be indicted as one cohesive GROUP, in complete disregard of cultural variations, economic and class factors and historical facts. GOOD! As BRA turns up the heat, that should educate a few of the waverers and fence sitters almost as much as a savage mugging by a street nigger.

It's obvious that the imagined nigger grievances against whitey are beyond rational discussion and analysis and can be satisfied only by our deaths. We in turn will not survive unless we view the nigger in equally TOTAL terms, unrepentantly and with scientific clarity.

Anonymous said...

"Q: What is the new Webster's Dictionary defintion of the word "confusion?"

A: Father's Day in Harlem."

Can we please impose a moratorium on this joke?

I first heard it 50 years ago in grade school, and I chuckled.

I've read it here om SBPDL more times than I can count, and it has now become excruciating.

Please stop.

D-FENS said...

@ Anonymous 5:23 - Don't you find it just a little strange that Israel has said very little about about our aid to the Syrian rebels who are supposed to include radical Islamists? And what the Israeli's have said has been in favor of aiding the rebels. Why would they not vehemently object to a policy that, if successful, could install a fundamentalist Islamic state on it's border?

The usual Israeli amen corner here in the US (McCain, Graham, Feinstein etc.) have complained we are not providing enough help to the rebels. Of course they justify it as fighting WMDs, human rights etc. Oh, and calling for us to resettle Syrian refugees HERE.

The conclusion is that Israel sees a secular Syrian govt. in control of its territory as a greater threat than a chaotic state, even if ruled by Islamists.

Just like BRA, government policy does NOTHING that helps the US citizen and justifies it with lies to hide who benefits.

I don't know which Conservatism, Inc. site you cut and pasted your post from (FrontPage?). But if you think these folks are our friends, you are deluding yourself.

Don M said...

"The conclusion is that Israel sees a secular Syrian govt. in control of its territory as a greater threat than a chaotic state, even if ruled by Islamists."

Judging by your handle and some of your earlier posts, you've had some involvement with Amurkistan's intelligence/security services, so you know the above to be absolute fact.

Additionally, "The road to Tehran leads through Damascus," is a common Neo-Cohen refrain. Iran is the main course. Syria is just the appetizer.

I'd like to think that a U.S. military consisting primarily of vibrant, diverse, newly minted citizens will do most of the bleeding in this next round of wars fought for our friends in Tel Aviv...

But as Paul has informed us numerous times, the real Combat Arms MOS's are almost all lily white.

Aside from marrying and having kids, I can think of no better service to our people than dissuading young whites from joining any branch of Amurkistan's Globocop Foreign Legion.

Anonymous said...

"This moronic black troglodyte had obviously never heard of the great wave of immigration from southern- and eastern Europe that began in the 1880's ...

The above mentioned European immigrants enjoyed the inherent white privilege of working for starvation wages in the industrial sweatshops..."

True, but not every immigrant had it so bad. And when the government isn't constantly telling you you're poor and "disadvantaged", you somehow get on with life and make do.

My grandparents came in that "great wave". Each found or made a job for themselves, despite knowing little English. They were poor, but by the time I was born they had decent houses and comfortable lives, without ever going on "relief" (aka welfare). And none of them ever wronged a Negro.

The civil rights, voting rights, and immigration acts of the 1960's, along with LBJ's Great Society programs, were the worst things ever to happen to blacks - and America.

Anonymous said...

Meanwhile, my neighborhood has been abandoned and neglected.

Yes, it has. But tell us, Mr. Young, who has neglected it?

Whiskey said...

No, Israel has consistently backed Assad as the lesser of the evils of AQ-controlled Syria. Just as Sharon advised Bush to leave in place Saddam, as a counterweight to Iran.

Israel is a small country that generally seeks to avoid war, it can't take many casualties, cannot sustain fighting for long, and when is unavoidable they have sought a decisive victory to shorten any war. Against Hezbollah they at best got a draw or worst got defeated -- against basically a dug in Iranian trained militia.

Bibi advised to keep Mubarak in power, and was disregarded. Both Israel and Saudis are afraid of Morsi/the Muslim Brotherhood, the latter for seeing correctly the Brothers as the main regime threat outside Iran; Israel and the Saudis have a discreet but well known tactical alliance against Iran, but Israel prefers people it knows like Assad over AQ hotheads the Saudis are arming.

Had Israel wanted it could have destroyed Assad's airforce fairly quickly and assured a rebel victory -- Israel would most like status-quo ante (Assad in power, constrained, not war-ambitious), failing that a constant grind to kill both Hezbollah and AQ -- a win-win for them.

Israel fears most of all an Iranian first-strike to destroy them to force defacto ally Saudi to pump radically less oil and turf the US Navy out of the Gulf, giving Iran control of the Gulf oil production. It is all about oil, what else did you think it was?

And there are no secret villains or heroes, just the obvious stuff. Neither Bush nor Obama paid Israel much heed, and McCain/Grahamnesty's push to arm the Syrian rebels is something demonstrably Israel does not want (again had they wanted to aid them they could have destroyed Assads air force). Israel's only major red line is missiles to Hezbollah likely to rain down on their towns and cities, understandably so.

Whiskey said...

And I'll not Israel is itself struggling with the issue of deporting lots of Black people, migrants from Africa. Shown below, the link to 972 Mag details the experience of a transnational, upper class Jew attending an anti-African immigrant rally.

The Israeli upper class is no different from ours, save one: they NEED the lower classes in a fight for survival. Like here, an oligarchic set of families runs pretty much the entire economy. Like here, good places to live cost a lot. Like here, the university and media and government and much of the military is fairly hard left (which is to say, run by upper classes).

HOWEVER they face annihilation which is undeniable on all sides: 99% of Egyptians want them ALL dead, as do Jordanians, Lebanese, Syrians, and atomic-armed Iranians.


If you want to know why this stuff happens, look to class, it is as old as the Greeks and Romans.

Ah, HERE it is, the link I was talking about:

"Later, I thought we were lucky none of us stumbled. This may have served as a signal for an assault, and I’m not sure we would have been able to get up on our own. Let’s put it this way: after Tuesday, I prefer Sudanese refugees to proud Jews. I feel safer with them.

...

First, there’s the economic hardship, which prevents people from getting an education and getting the hell out of there. Above it, we find Jewish supremacism, the concept of a Chosen People, “every Jew is the son of a King.” Proud Jews are often people whose Jewishness is the only thing they can be proud of. The blow I received came after I was asked if I am a Jew, and replied in the negative.

The speeches of Ben-Ari and others enraged the crowd. Ben-Ari spoke of Sudanese who allegedly urinated on synagogues, that is polluting the holy sites of Jews, and this was infuriating to people I suspect would have a hard time recalling how a synagogue looks from the inside. Another speaker screamed that the refugees are not here accidentally, that it was a plot by the Arab countries to inject a fifth column into Israel, which will help the Arabs during the next war.

Racism, particularly active racism, is common among people who believe life screwed them. It’s a very useful conspiracy theory: you’re not responsible for your failure, someone else is. You deserved, deserve, better, but dark forces – Masons, Communists, hidden Muslim armies, the Joooz, the New Israel Fund – take what is rightfully yours."

Bear in mind, this is a Jew talking about his own people. They're "losers" for not wanting to compete against the Third World invading their own country. Even Jews or especially Jews are prone to this class-ridden conception, late Roman history was full of Roman aristocrats disdaining the commoners and preferring Visigoths, Franks, Vandals, and Saxons to their own.

Anonymous said...

Did anyone think 20 years ago so many hidpanics would come here? No
One bad dictator in a white eastern europe could solve this.
So could closing the boders! But blacks will never be the majority and they were here before hispanics

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

You do not live in a country.... Your vote don't mean shit. The current CEO's (aka..Congress and Senate) has decided they need a more loyal and cheaper work force. The old slaves are being replaced. They call it Amnesty…


You know the TSA is not really there for "terrorists", the growth of the DHS itself is not there to make your "homeland" safer. The NSA is collecting your information, not the Tsarnev brothers. The 1965 Immigration Act and LBJ's Great Negro Society began their war against you. Depending on how old you are, you've paid for your own destruction for 45 years now. Once they push their latest immigration "reform" plan into law, that's it. That's the finale, they legalize 20-30 million mostly Mexican and central American peasants and they begin to import their families. It's full on wealth confiscation somewhere within 10 years, pensions, 401(k)'s, bank accounts, and real property as the feds begin to default on their debts. Those in the governments, federal and states along with the corporate buddies are in looting mode at this point. They're trying to keep up the appearance of normality while they steal everything that's not nailed down.

The average American has been distracted with their TV, and/or interested in being a good passive Christian. They're going to get what they deserve.

Bogolyubski said...

Oh, there are a number of us who would be quite happy to be divorced from this monstrosity of a marriage. I seriously doubt we'll be allowed to peacefully depart though. Even if a clear majority of whites suddenly awakened from their massive decades-long bender and asked for the divorce, those who now completely control the whole game will not allow it. It could only take place via force, with much suffering and horrendous costs. Think Soros, Bloomberg and the other Banksteins are going to just let us walk away from it? It's been a very lucrative marriage for them. They - and their fiercely fanatical white nomenklatura - have even more to lose from such a departure than the groids do.

What percentile of the white population living in the Banksta Banana Republick of Amurika comprehends that the regime and its puppet masters have no intention of letting them go and are thoroughly dedicated to their ultimate extermination? There is even a reader here who serves in the poppyfields of Pashtoonistan as a poorly-paid mercenary for the squid-oligarchs. How many of his white comrades comprehend that they would literally have to turn their weapons upon their commanders and hand over the groids, Mexicans and others who wear the same uniform to the Taliban (who would actually know what to do with them), then somehow fight their way back home? How many comprehend that the goat-humpers are actually the lesser enemy? The goat-humpers are actually defending their homeland, which is more than can be said for any white soldier over there. Sorry to be so blunt, but it's the hideous truth. Can you face it?

The ruling squids have deemed this to be a covenant marriage - blessed by Satan himself - between the groid and YT, parted not until death (and it's YT's death they're planning on). Yet how many of the intended victims even at this late date acknowledge the existence of the oligarchy, of the completely rigged economic, political and judicial system? The greatest irony is that we were not left without warning about what would happen, from Jefferson himself no less. Yet even now the majority of YT simply cannot be bothered to stop borrowing, to turn off the TV, stop sending their offspring into the maw of the regime's publik skool gulag. They simply cannot stop drinking the Kool-Aid and digging their own graves. These simple actions require no violence, no guns, no explosives, no spilling of blood and yet few will take them. How much fewer will be willing to take actions such as those of Washington, Adams and Jefferson?

Anonymous said...

Blacks and their DWL apologist/exploiters have to exist in a racial economic fantasy to justify their theft of non-liberal Whites hard earned treasure.
It's a form of political schizophrenia, i.e., a split from racial reality.

Of course, the biggest delusion is racial equality.
Liberals want people to believe that Whites having to survive tens of millenniums of brutal desolate cold winters did nothing to weed out the mentally weak and create an enchanced breed of people. The fact is that Whites have genetically paid our dues by surviving and then thriving in infinitely tougher conditions than anything black slaves had to deal with.

Here's some telling statistics:

GDP(PPP) per capita.
USA $48,112

What about our relatives over in Europe?

Norway $60,392
The Netherlands $42,779
Sweden $41,484
Ireland $40,868
Germany $38,723

What about black's relatives in resource rich sub-Saharan africa?

Senegal $1,871
Ghana $1,809

And finally, those ancestors of liberated American slaves.

Liberia $585

White people need to forcefully, unapologetically, and repeatedly remind everyone of racial economic reality no matter how much tension it creates or how much backlash we get. We won't get the divorce unless we have a very aggressive and sustained truth offensives in order to wake general White America out of its' liberal induced TV fantasy world.













Anonymous said...

He should be so worried about white honesty? Between the dumbed down news, schools and ingeneral ignirance if anything that is not hood, there is little room fir anything honest in black hoods.

italian guy said...

I'm happy that you guys know about Africa Addio (goodbye Africa) I talked about it in the comments some time ago, but you should search the original italian version, because the english one is heavily censored... it's an eye opener for Europeans.

Nonhumans said...

Head of the Nail... You just scored a Bulls-Eye!

D-FENS said...

Whiskey doth protest too much.

http://old.post-gazette.com/World/20021002netanyahu2.asp

Put down FrontPage and sober up.

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

this weekend in chi-congo 12 ngr's dead and 35 injured. I guess they didn't call time-out this weekend now did they rombo? funny how blacks matter when one of them dies at the hand of a pretend white man oops I meant hispanic guy! also has the mother of the dead cat burglar hoodie boy get her millions yet? she loved her son so fucking much that she copyrighted his fucked up name didn't she? GODSPEED/SEGREGATION NOW!!!

Anonymous said...


Paul, have you seen this?:

"Students Forced To Stand For "Black National Anthem"'

http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/13861-students-forced-to-stand-for-%E2%80%9Cblack-national-anthem%E2%80%9D

If the mandatory singing of the "BNA" in a public school doesn't epitomize the explicit trajectory of BRA then nothing does.

Apologies if you've already covered this on your blog; a search of SBPDL: archives
using the terms "Black National Anthem" and "Clinton Giles", (the black principal of the school in question) turned up nothing.

Anonymous said...

-Fireforce- here.

>>>Africa Addio is shocking

Yes it is. It's meant to shock and titilate*, and it does the job very well. But it's important to keep in mind that much of this film is staged or out and out faked.

For example there is one scene that purports to show the camera crew being detained and threatened by black african soldiers. (I forget which country is supposed to be occuring in) But the "soldiers" are all wearing Italian camouflage uniforms in the pattern that was worn by the Italian military in the post-WW2 years. Likewise they carry Italian military rifles. Both of these were not commonly used in Africa and were no doubt props brought by the Italian film makers. It's also amusing that every gun shot in the movie is over-dubbed with the stock sound effect that was used in "Spagetti Westerns" of the time!

That being said, make no mistake about it. Africa Addio is an interesting film and there is a lot of very real stuff in there. In fact I found the footage that depicted Mike Hoare's mercenary troops in the Congo very useful as a uniform guide when writing the section on the Congo Crisis for my most recent book. But you do have to keep in the back of your mind that some of what you are seeing have been recreated, staged, or even faked.

*-Yes, you read that right. Some of the material is designed to arouse and titilate rather than shock. For example, the section that purports to expose the inequality of Aparthide Era South Africa spends something like five minutes on loving long shots of pretty young scantly clad Afrikaner girls jumping on trampoleans and cavorting on the beach!

Anonymous said...

I live in SF,Ca.I had been taking two beautiful young ladies (3years old) to Precita park,basically a quarter-mile-Iong strip of land across the street from a parochial school.Almost an exclusively white neighborhood.Kids from said school go there to play after school,almost all of them are with their parents.The parents engage in friendly,generic chit-chat.One day I caught the tail-end of a very rare exchange.Keep in mind the people that call this area home have mostly been there for many years,and are arty,'social,, justice' types.Basically some nig woman from the projects had apparently been dropping off little Moncheezious at the playground while she disappeared for several hours.All the other kids are younger,and luckily supervised by caring parents.Well shock of shocks,nig began to nig! The day I caught this,nig mom pulls up in a smoking K-car to pick up Moncheezious.White older woman across from park walks up to nig's car,and without losing composure,proceeds to tell nig mom to go home,take little shithead with you ,don't come back-We don't want you here.White woman never once brought race into it.Naturally nig immediately starts on a racist monologue.After nig woman stops to catch her breath,white woman calmly says that's why we don't want you here-listen how you talk in front of children! It was wonderful,and to look at this woman you'd never have guessed she had it in her.I spoke to her briefly afterwards and she said 'They fucked up everything we gave them/made for them,andd now they want to come here and ruin ours ! Now if this lady in this neighborhood said/did this,it gives me hope.

Californian said...

Bogolyubski said...
What percentile of the white population living in the Banksta Banana Republick of Amurika comprehends that the regime and its puppet masters have no intention of letting them go and are thoroughly dedicated to their ultimate extermination?


Years ago, a friend summed it up: "The problem is, most people do not see a problem. Or if they do, they think the problem is malcontents who refuse to go along with the system [e.g., race realists]."

No doubt about it, any struggle for white rights is going to be tough. A big problem is dispelling the illusion of normalcy, that somehow the country can be "retaken." Were this the case, the Bush administration would have at least rolled back some of the major elements of BRA and countered globalization.

As for "extermination," one need only look at the fate of white people in Rhodesia-South Africa for the future--unless current trends are turned around. The thing is, even when white people want to treat blacks decently, and give them everything they demand, black behavior turns against whites. Whether it is politics (Big Man rule) or violent crime or illegitimacy, the result is that white people end up at the short end. And the ensuing chaos is then exploited by the elites to expand their power.

(Mike Smith's website had an extensive analysis of this, though he has gone on sabbatical to write a book. South Africa is a microcosm of how the process works.)

[continued]

Californian said...

[continued]

Standard radical analysis shows that for a major political change to take place, you need the following:

* A divided ruling class.
* A middle class which has been alienated from the system.
* A radical movement which understands the situation and is ready to exploit the above.

Right now, the ruling class is pretty much unified around globalization, BRA and the war on terror (among other things).

The middle class...there is some discontent. Too often it takes the form of mainstream politics (Tea Party, bless 'em) or falls into conspiracy theory. Still, there is potential.

As for a race realist movement: more has to be done in the real world. The critical thing is to have activists who do not function under the illusion of normalcy. Instead, you have to have a cadre which is ready to break with the past, mobilize the middle and divide the elites. Some things which could be done:
* A student movement to push white rights on campus.
* A legal defense organization to uphold the free speech rights of race realists.
* A cultural organization to promote the glories of white civilization.
* A united front with groups which are potential allies in the mainstream (pro-gun, anti-tax, pro-border control, anti-affirmative action, whatever).
* An alternative media to provide independent coverage of the news.

Thoughts?

Anonymous said...

Agree, but the powers that be would never let this happen, not peacefully, at any rate.

Many Blacks themselves may hate whitey but some of those at least understand, on some level, that their standard of living and, in some cases, outright survival is depdenent on us. They would not tolerate the idea of a true divorce - socially AND financially. They'd sooner see us dead than be able to live apart from them and not have to see our tax dollar support them.

Artist said...

Californian,

Good post on what we need to have a chance at change.

I concur.

One thing we need, that the left has in abundance, is law fare.

The right, the forces of tradition, lacks law fare.

Anonymous said...

Law fair? A job fair for lawyers? Kinda like well fair?

Silent Running said...

Aside from marrying and having kids, I can think of no better service to our people than dissuading young whites from joining any branch of Amurkistan's Globocop Foreign Legion.

And those Caucasians currently serving should be encouraged to desert. There may soon be a need for an underground organization that harbors and protects deserters.

They were poor, but by the time I was born they had decent houses and comfortable lives, without ever going on "relief" (aka welfare). And none of them ever wronged a Negro.

My people came here right around the time of the French and Indian War. It's possible they owned slaves. Are my people responsible for black dysfunction? Should I pay reparations?

What percentile of the white population living in the Banksta Banana Republick of Amurika comprehends that the regime and its puppet masters have no intention of letting them go and are thoroughly dedicated to their ultimate extermination?

If the commentary under virtually every news article is any indication, more than you're willing to credit (no surprise there). People aren't cleaning out gun stores because they think secession/revolution will be peaceful.

Anonymous said...

That depends-would you go willingly?

Anonymous said...

Fake controlled opposition phoneys on the radio will never mention race in the destruction of Detroilet. A local AM station owned by FUX news added a black host on Saturday when no one is listening. He rambles on about the increase of violent crime but never mentions race. Hmmm...I wonder why that might be. (rhetorical)

Anonymous said...

Love the last paragraph from esteemed party member comrade Coleman. Your neighborhood is fuxxored because of who lives there dumbass. Ebil whitey neighborhoods are whitopias until some vibrant diversities move in then it all turns to shit in a hurry. 20% rate is too high even a 5% rate of vibrant rainbow diversity ruins whitopias before you can say gibsmedat.

D-FENS said...

"I can think of no better service to our people than dissuading young whites from joining any branch of Amurkistan's Globocop Foreign Legion."

This is a sentiment increasingly being expressed on neocon FreeRepublic. Of couse they feel this way because they believe Obongo is a marxist homosexual muslim. What Obongo is in reality a frontman. His whole CV has been crafted (the spycraft term is "legend") by Banksters and TWMNBN. He serves as misdirection. While everyone is bitching at Obongo, he is still carrying out essentially the same policies as Bush did and as McCain or Romney would have. Next election cycle we will probably be offered a "conservative" but it will be the same tune.

Moondoggie said...

Remember you have to cut off the head first. Our financial, political, entertainment, and media elites must be dealt with first. Know your enemy.

This whole "game" is to destroy the white middle class. Yes, that includes you democommies also contrary to your brainwashed opinion.

To the young folk, if you want a future for yourselves and your offspring please start using your brain for what it was meant for. Critical thinking and deductive reasoning. Your eyes and ears won't lie to you.

Anonymous said...

Silent Running said...

U.S. Census Announces Those People Will Be Majority By 2043

1) The United States of America won't exist in 2043.

2) The people who crow happily that America will be majority mestizo in a few decades are indulging in a vast assumption. Namely, that everything will continue to run more or less smoothly right up to 2043, that the trains will run on time, that the mail will be delivered, that pensions will be paid, and, most importantly, that there will be no large-scale violence. That is never how these things come to pass. Somewhere along the line, the new majority will attempt to exterminate the old majority. The continued importation of third-worlders guarantees a race war, and when it gets here democratic ideals like majorities will no longer apply. Military competence will. Ironically, those poor saintly brown people harangue us with tails of our colonialism while conveniently forgetting that in most of those endeavors, the "natives" never stood a chance.


The USA will exist in 2043

Mestizos will not be the majority

I cannot fathom why people on the right wing often make up blatant untruths even on a website where the right wing dominates, I simply don't get it.

Anonymous said...

The Liberians did what...they set up plantations and took....slaves to work them. Moral negro superiority right thurr

Anonymous said...

@Silent Running: "My people came here right around the time of the French and Indian War. It's possible they owned slaves. Are my people responsible for black dysfunction? Should I pay reparations?"

Yes. You should pay reparations -- to White Americans, for your ancestors' culpability in bringing the Black Plague to our shores.

Anonymous said...

Open your mind. Evolution and nature don't see black degeneracy as what we see it as. To nature, this is reproductive success.

We whites were NEVER supposed to support an alien species, we were supposed to have made them extinct. This is simply gd'd NATURE. Life competes. Rodents didn't care that they outcompeted lizards and that most reptiles went extinct as a result. Clinging vines don't care if they strangle the bush that provides them basic erect structure.

Whites are committing suicide over principles that are a violation of natural law.

Anonymous said...

How about some Hindu whining over all that came to the Americas against their will? This is why certain Caribbean places are so much less violent...high proportion Indo-Aryan.

Every race had members who were chattel slaves at some point

Anonymous said...

Primitives only respect force.

Anonymous said...

Blacks will always bitch, whine and complain (as Coleman Young does) when they see the glaring disparity between their communities and those of whites. They can't stand the idea that white communities will keep their tax money (derived from their jobs/property taxes etc.)and use it to improve their own communities~ NO! Dat money should be split up, donated to da nigga's so they can habs da same kind of community that whites do without any financial input or effort on their part. Just more nigga gibsmedat.
If (as a kid) you worked mowing lawns and saved your money so you could buy ice cream when you wanted it and a bicycle to ride, the nigger is the one who sees that and says,"Why I can't habs dat ice cream and dat bicycle? It yo' fault I don't gots dat!" The entitlement mentality of the nigger is that you should give him half your ice cream and gibs him the right to use yo' bicycle 4 days out of seben even though he's done nothing to deserve it. His resentment comes from your rightful and justified refusal to comply~ which, of course, makes you a "rayciss" and it be yo' fault he don't gots no ice cream and no bicycle. You is jes a white motherf*cker dat be holding da black man down and being all selfish and sheeit!

Anonymous said...

" On that point, the common response from many white people these days is that they’ve personally done nothing to keep the blacks down; but the fact is, they’ve all benefited incalculably from the discrimination and inhumanity imposed by their ancestors. Affirmative action does not ask why society to pay for the social crimes of its ancestors, only to give back what has been wrongfully obtained and passed down. If the hypothetical sale of my great-grandfather, for example, brought $500 dollars on the auction block, he was a form of primitive capital with which a landowner improved his property and net worth…" - The south was burned to the ground during the civil war, any wealth so created was destroyed in the process of freeing your great-grandfather. There are areas that were poorer in 1960 than 1860. What is further, the entirety of the south was turned over to black governance until you screwed up so badly that the north had to tacitly admit it was wrong.


"Since you have money to spend – my money – shopping malls have sprung up in your neighborhood, which has prospered as a result. There is very little evidence of hopelessness or desperation where you live; very little crime, drugs, social decline. Your children have gone to safe, well-funded schools and then to college. Meanwhile, my neighborhood has been abandoned and neglected. There is little money with which to improve our situation, and few businesses are interested in moving into an area that they consider blighted. (p. 307-308)" - No it isn't your money you sociopath. clean up your own neighborhood and capital can pool there without getting destroyed. Then you start getting to have nice things.

Silent Running said...

I cannot fathom why people on the right wing often make up blatant untruths even on a website where the right wing dominates, I simply don't get it.

Enlighten me, professor. What will your country look like in 2043?

Yes. You should pay reparations -- to White Americans, for your ancestors' culpability in bringing the Black Plague to our shores.

Awwww, sniffle sniffle. I guess you missed the part where those same ancestors helped to carve the country out of the wilderness while yours were still in Europe waiting for the project to get finished, but no matter. When so many things are going our way, picking a fight with your fellows is strategically brilliant and definitely in your best interests.

The point I was making, and which was obviously lost on you, is that whenever you make the point that post-1865 immigrants are innocent of any wrongdoing when it comes to blacks, you imply that those of us who were here before then are guilty. You're throwing a sizable portion of Caucasians under the bus to make a point that niggers won't care about anyway. It's pathetic.

Anonymous said...

All we need is to elect the kind of people with the balls to serve the papers.

Mich Mike

Melanie said...

Then everybody owes everybody reparations, because at some point in the history of the world, every group was either enslaved or slaveholders. What's maddening is that only American blacks have managed to make an entire industry out of getting paid for their particular period of enslavement in the United States. No other people, at no other time, in no other place, have managed such a feat.

Of course, American negros couldn't have managed it either if not for DWL and their white guilt propaganda which was force-fed in academia from kindergarden through university level. The DWL drove this agenda, and Americans, looking for a reason to be relevant on this earth because as a people we've had it better materially than any other people in history, rushed to swallow it hook line and sinker. Our ancestors were too busy literally trying to survive to bother with this kind of poppycock. Only a people such as Americans since WWII , who enjoyed unprecedented prosperity in history, would have been ripe for the picking for the architects of white guilt and what we "owe" a people-negros-who left to themselves, never had enough brain power or initiative to invent the wheel.

Only a people who were as a whole, prosperous enough to engage in navel-gazing and search for "causes" to give their lives meaning, would have done what we've done to ourselves. The negros never rose up and forced whites to do anything without the complicity of whites. Now we've unleashed the Kraaken.

bosears@resistingdefamation.org said...

On June 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Californian urged five things needed to be done, ranging from campus issues, free speech rights for race realists, cultural promotion, alliances based on special interest groups, and and independent alternative to existing news organizations, and asked for thoughts.

The glaring omission he or she made was that we need our own Anti-Defamation League. Look around you...films, media, politicians, and ethnic groups are not just lying to you about their objectives, they are lying to you and your children in every school & university in America about you...your history, your culture, your character. Where is our ADL?

sephone said...

On that point, the common response from many white people these days is that they’ve personally done nothing to keep the blacks down; but the fact is, they’ve all benefited incalculably from the discrimination and inhumanity imposed by their ancestors.

I personally love arguments like this. Forget that a good deal of free blacks had slaves, that the Irish were slaves once upon a time and heavily discriminated against in later generations, that Yankee carpetbaggers ruined the accumulated wealth of a great deal of the Southerners that had benefited from slavery, that 90% of slaves were owned by the top 10% of the population. Forget that there are plenty of whites living in the hood, plenty of poverty in Appalachia.

But none of that fits the narrative and allows for the constant playing of the race card.

Anonymous said...

Po',Po' "oppressed" blacks; dey git wut dey wawnts( Cities and lands free of da White debbil ), den dey lose wut dey haaaaad.

....and then blame every race but themselves.

Whiteyman

Anonymous said...

almost none of your arguments have any legitimacy whatsoever...

there are plenty of "white" areas that suffer the same ailments as poor "black" areas do, cry for the same entitlements, and argue that they are poor not because of their skin color (which is nothing more than a handy excuse), but because their "area" is poor and they need handouts to make it batter and "repair" the damage done to them by the rich.

They take their handouts and buy meth, or malt liquor, or crack, or whatever their fellow losers say is "cool", and put no effort into making any actual improvements to their lives.

This isn't a color problem, it's an attitude problem, and it spreads like cancer among neighborhoods of any color.

The only reason black communities appear to suffer more is that blacks rally around people like sharpton, who holler for "solidarity" among "their people", and further encourage them to segregate themselves...

I know plenty of people who happen to be black, who have more honor, and contribute more to society, then a bunch of folks on the internet spouting racist garbage about needing a "divorce from blacks"...

We need a divorce from laziness, socialist welfare (of ALL colors), and most of all, ignorance.

White Men Welcome said...

BLACK PEOPLE : Study hard in school. Get good jobs. Build your own communities. You have all the advantages in the world and have-so for decades. What's your excuse now with "Affirmative" Action and a "President" who obviously favors you?

Anonymous said...

This post is correct on so many levels. Time for a divorce. Why give any money to those committed to destroying us?

Dan Pflaum said...

There's a lot you can give to black people to help them, but the one thing you can't give them and which they've never once possessed is the will to care. W/o that there is nothing but destruction and chaos, which is black America in a nutshell.