Sunday, December 21, 2014

Obama Sent Three Officials from his Administration to Michael Brown's Funeral: How many will he send to New York City for the Funerals of Two NYPD Officers?

It's important to read this ending paragraph from a long rant by a black male ready for revolution, prepared to carry the flag of Ferguson into battle. [In Ferguson, New York Review of Books, January 2015]:
Yet the Ferguson movement has promised that the situation cannot go back to normal, to the way things have been. Everybody knows what racism is. The problems needn’t be explained over and over. They can’t be deflected by saying that Michael Brown took some cigars from a store, that he broke the law and therefore it was proper to kill him with six bullets, although he had no weapon. This is the kind of thinking that racism hides behind. Ferguson feels like a turning point. For so many, Brown’s death was the last straw. Black youth are fed up with being branded criminals at birth. Ferguson was the country stepping back in time, or exposing the fact that change hasn’t happened where most needed, that most of us don’t live in the age of Obama. “It’s a myth that we’re a fair society,” [Reverend Osagyefo] Sekou said. “We have to take that needle out of our arms.”
President Obama's address on November 24, 2014 (delivered after grand jury returned verdict in Michael Brown/Darren Wilson case) includes this line Ismaaiyl Brinsley probably agreed with:  "And so, we need to accept that this decision was the grand jury’s to make. There are Americans who agree with it, and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It’s an understandable reaction."
 All of society lives in the age of Obama, where black people (and many white liberals) have gladly put a needle into their arms and pumped an endless supply of Bull Connor, Emmett Till, To Kill a Mockingbird, A Time to Kill and Jim Crow into their veins. 

Ferguson wasn't the country stepping back in time; it was the country being forced to confront a future where the honesty of The Bell Curve is censored, the genetic reality for 'income inequality' replaced with the dishonest narrative of never-ending white supremacy holding the black population down. 

Never, ever forget the President of the United States sent three officials from his administration to 67 percent black Ferguson to attend the funeral of Michael Brown (after Attorney General Eric Holder ventured to the city and said, 'I Am the Attorney General… but I'm Also a Black Man'). Three officials... [President Obama sending three White House officials to Michael Brown’s funeral: Leading the group for Monday's service will be the chairman of the My Brother's Keeper Task Force, Broderick Johnson., New York Daily News, 8-24-14]

On December 20, 2014, two non-white police officers found out what 'living in the age of Obama' (the words of New York Review of Books author Daryl Pinckney) means, when a black man shot them dead. 

Perhaps the black murderer of the two white cops also saw Ferguson as "the last straw," deciding to take up Louis Farrakhan's call to black arms. [Farrakhan On Ferguson: ‘We’ll Tear This G**damn Country Up!’, Daily Caller, 11-29-14]:
Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan went on a fiery tirade about Ferguson on Saturday — threatening that if the demands of protesters aren’t met, “we’ll tear this goddamn country apart!” 
Farrakhan stated in his speech — given at Morgan State University, a black college located in Baltimore, Md. — that violence was justified in response to the decision not to indict officer Darren Wilson and peaceful protests are only in the interest of “white folks.” 
“We going to die anyway. Let’s die for something,” the radical figure told the crowd to roaring applause.
Was Ismaaiyl Brinsley in attendance at Farrakhan's speech when he pleaded with the black crowd, "Let's die for something?"

No matter: it's highly unlikely anyone from the Obama Administration will be in attendance when the two New York City Police Department officers are laid to rest, nor would it make sense in this "age of Obama."

His indifference to the shooting of death of two cops in New York City is "an understandable reaction" when you consider the President's track record of throwing police under the bus if it means deflecting the blame of black dysfunction to any other source but blacks themselves. 

108 comments:

dio cletian said...

If he does plan to send any the families of the murdered officers should tell them to stay away. Obama has just as much blood on his hands as de Blasio.

Johnlenzini said...

If I was a NYC cop, I would go very very slow on all future calls.

Let the nogs get finished with there dirty work first, then move in to clean up the mess.

Joe Magarac said...

If I were an NYC cop, I wouldn't want any of Obama's officials gloating at the funeral.

Anonymous said...

You can't take the bark out of the dog, the jump out of the frog, or the nig out of the nog.

Blacks and orderly law abiding society simply don't mix. The futility of trying to civilize these animals is proverbial.

Let's not pretend this is about "whitey" or "cops". The sub Saharan African is a mindless violent beast. What they do to "us" or the symbols of our law is nothing they won't do to their own kind or even their own family.

We will never have peace as long as they are near.

Pat Boyle said...

Where are we now?

One thing is clear - we are further along than I expected. I expected that we were headed inevitably toward full scale race war ending with the complete elimination of black people in America. But not quite yet.

I have tried to say that a couple times in the comments section of this blog but Paul has always quashed my comments. And he may again quash this comment. That's his right - it's his blog.

But the dual cop shooting seems to indicate that we are a little further along the road to race war than I expected. I thought it was still twenty or thirty years off.

Let me mention our local issue. Here in Oakland we have a white cop named Patrick Gonzales who you would think would be a universally recognized hero. Five years ago a black guy named Moxon shot and killed two cops in a traffic stop. He then arranged an ambush and shot and killed two more cops. Gonzales himself got shot while killing Moxon.

There was a sign erected near my house honoring the four dead officers but yesterday someone tore it down. Gonzales is a marked man. There is a web site that accuses him of being a murderer and that vows revenge.

This directly effects me. The local cops are wary about responding to 911 calls. When the earthquake hits - as it surely will - and chaos reigns the Oakland cops are rightly worried about showing up for duty on that day. Oakland is the home of both the Black Panthers and the Black Muslims. I and my neighbors will have to defend ourselves at least for a time.

So the 'War on Cops' has begun. The 'War on Blacks' will soon follow. We seem to be rushing towards the end game.

Pat Boyle

MMP said...

The cops weren't even white....One Asian, the other Hispanic....

They were murdered simply for the uniform they wore.

Anonymous said...

Blasio is the worst type of White person.

Totally self-loathing and always trying to appear sensitive and liberal.

His minori-wife looks selected for political reasons. http://assets.dnainfo.com/generated/photo/2013/08/de-blasio-family-1376604225747.jpg/extralarge.jpg

I bet he doesn't like women. When gays in politics or television marry a beard there is always something off with their choice. They never look like a natural couple.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Beard

Philadelphia Mike said...

Anonymous MMP said...
The cops weren't even white....One Asian, the other Hispanic....

They were murdered simply for the uniform they wore.

December 21, 2014 at 12:08 PM

Philadelphia Mike, here.

I know that this is a point of contention among us...but ALL of us NON-blacks are in this together against the reign of black terror.

As many already know, I'm from French/Swiss/Italian/Sicilian forefathers that came to the USA about 120 years ago. I am proud of my heritage. And I'm in awe...each day...of our people's accomplishments throughout the millennia.

But as much as I am a White Europhile, I will also stand united side by side with any other non black group that is trying to restore civilization and law back into our land.

Get used to it, people. United we non-blacks stand. Divided we fall. This is not just a clash between the European Whites and the negroes. The negro is hostile towards all non-black ethnic groups.

The Great White Dragon is awakening.

Philadelphia Mike

Philadelphia Mike said...

When I first came out as a race realist, I borrowed the rally cry of the gay community (Silence = Death) and changed it to White Silence = White Death.

Well...it seems as though the White silence is breaking.

How long have I waited for my people to wake up. With each day...with each new horrific act committed by the negroes...more and more of us are seeing the truth.


Truth Corps said...

NYPD & Cops in general should take this as the Declaration of War that it is.

Now that the Declaration is out of the way go forth & wage war. So who is the enemy? Lets see... Black militants, White liberals, gays, lesbians etc. pretty much everyone except the majority of whites & in particular, white males.

Cops: stop responding to calls in the hood. (have a flat tire) Stop investigating crimes of black on black murder, assault, rape & theft. They hate you anyway so why bother? Same goes for the other supporters of the black militants & professional black ass kissers.

Make them swim in the cesspool of black dysfunction they have created. They depend on you to come to the rescue. Fuck them. Start looking out for those who look out for you: Conservatives, white families that work & pay taxes that pay your salaries, fellow first responders who know the truth (Fire/EMS etc.)

Now is the time. Be vocal, be unafraid. Make the word racist carry zero weight when used against a white.

You want to see cop hate? Go over to WRSA and read what a very few vocal "patriots" think of cops. Notice a prevailing opinion of blacks as well. There's an old saying, "when you're getting flack-you're over the target".
LINK

Anonymous said...

The beginnings of a backlash have started. Thanks to the internet more Whites are reading about the reality of racial differences and how *undisputed* facts are deliberately kept from the public for political reasons.

I came across a Catholic forum recently and there was a debate about race and genetics.

I'd say about half the comments were leaning towards realism.

In a Catholic forum. Half the comments. 5 years ago that was unthinkable.

I've also noticed more newspapers are turning off comments. Sorry libs and conservative inc but the discussion will take place SOMEWHERE. Your days of controlling the conversation are coming to and end.

Melanie said...

Joe Magarac said...

If I were an NYC cop, I wouldn't want any of Obama's officials gloating at the funeral.



December 21, 2014 at 11:21 AM




^^^^^^This^^^^^

Anonymous said...

Spread the word, I do every day, tell your frieds to look beyond the mainstream media and read the real news. It's there, it's fact

Anonymous said...

Pat Boyle said . . . But the dual cop shooting seems to indicate that we are a little further along the road to race war than I expected. I thought it was still twenty or thirty years off. . . So the 'War on Cops' has begun. The 'War on Blacks' will soon follow. We seem to be rushing towards the end game.”

It certainly appears that we are quickly approaching a racial event, but I'm not convinced that it will be a race war. Your original estimate that we could be looking at a war in 20-30 years sounds more likely to me because of the numbers. Presently, a larger than usual number of blacks might have declared a unilateral war on whites, but they simply don't have the numbers to participate in a real war where non-blacks seriously return fire. In 20-30 years this could change. It is difficult to predict the number of whites who would side with blacks in an actual war as well as the number of blacks who would side with whites, but this cross over could accelerate or delay the end game.

Presently, the only response that I expect from LE and most non-blacks to the attacks by blacks is to take a more aggressive, while remaining defensive, posture. Attacks by blacks will probably trigger a few isolated retaliatory attacks by a few whites. Blacks will find it more difficult to violate the 21ft rule and future protests might be better regulated. It seems possible that there could actually be a partial clamp-down on black misbehavior although this could enrage the blacks and temporarily lead to more violence. In the unlikely event that black violence reaches a level sufficient to actually trigger a declaration of war by whites within the next few years it won't last long. The blacks aren't prepared for a real war and they have no infrastructure to support a war. There would be a couple of 1921 Tulsa type of events and the blacks would scamper away. The blacks are convinced that they are the target of violence by whites, but there are few blacks living today who actually know what it is like to face the wrath of very large group of truly angry whites.

I don't know how long a beat down such as the 1921 Tulsa race riot subdues blacks, but I suspect that this is a process that must be repeated occasionally in a society with a significant black population.

MrGJG said...

MMP said...

The cops weren't even white....One Asian, the other Hispanic....

The point is, they symbolize the so called "white power structure".
Make no mistake, this is all about a war on whitey and only whitey. Everybody else is just collateral damage.

Anonymous said...

Hey Pat, the cop killing Negro wasn't named Moxon, it was named Lovell Mixon. Let's also remember Maurice Clemmons, another rampaging Negro, who shot 4 White cops to death all in one sitting in Parkland, Wa., 5 years ago.

Anonymous said...

They are having a press conference about this right now on the Communist News Network. Saying a pray. How ironic.

Scot Irish

Anonymous said...

Predictably, the NAACP says this shows the need for "sensible gun control" when we know what we really need is sensible negro control.

Mutant Swarm said...

Pat Boyle said...

"...Oakland is the home of both the Black Panthers and the Black Muslims. I and my neighbors will have to defend ourselves at least for a time..."
___________________________

Nellie's on Mountain has good coffee. They're open at 8:00 am.

Anonymous said...

CNN has dredged up a snake headed Bantu to represent the BGI. Black Grievance Industry.
Scot Irish

Anonymous said...

There's no race war coming and the great white dragon is not rousing. The Super Bowl is coming up not to mention college bowl games. Whites will go back to their usual distractions (ESPN, any stupid bravo tv show etc). No we will be a nation of detroits before whites actually try to change anything.

Lord chaos

Anonymous said...

The most appropriate comment I've seen on this is whoever said, "It's time for the police to decide which side they are on."

Anonymous said...

A big well done and internet high five to the cops who turned their back on DeBolshevik when that commie RAT POS entered the room for the press conference.
The great zero known as Chicago Jesus will send zero regime officials to the funeral service of the officers slain while on duty.
He is upset that the cops were not YT crackas.
The Black Guerrilla Family gang is also located in Baltimore but I'm sure that is just concidence. (not really)

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 12:47

No man could ever be hard up enough to lay with that fugly silverback sheeboon.
Same thing with Bathhouse Barry and his shemale tranny beard.

rex freeway said...

I wonder what would happen if a White leader said "Were gonna tear this goddamn country apart". I'm thinking he wouldn't be free for long. As far as a Race war goes, all it will take is for the Blacks to lose respect for law officers and the justice system. Oh wait, Yea uh it's already here. What really fanned the flames was the Halfrican in the oval office and his side kick Eric "is Obama's wang" Holder. I hold both responsible for for the deaths of the policemen who were gunned down.
One word of advice to all. Conceal carry permit.

Anonymous said...

Very simple: Police, stop responding to black neighborhood calls. Flat tire, out of radio range, etc. Let them feast upon themselves; from their black hearts comes the demon that seeks your blood. Leave it where it belongs; do not sacrifice yourself by encountering the beasts.

juvenal said...

Did you know tha his so-called " wife" is an" ex lesbian" radical feminist ( notice the quotation marks around the ex part). Either way, Hillary and Michelle have more testosterone in their pinky fingers than he'd ever had in his whole life

Anonymous said...

Black History Month is coming up. Let's not forget that great black hero David Burke, who shot his boss for firing him, then walked up to the cockpit and killed both pilots of PSA Flight 1771. He then put the plane into a dive and crashed it, killing all 43 aboard. There is a really good YouTube video about it called, "I'm the problem."

Anonymous said...

SC native,

I haven't tried to post in awhile because my post haven't been getting through. Perhaps they were too inflammatory and were filtered out, I respect the rules since this is PK's blog.
I think Pat Boyle is on the right tract somewhat but history seems to tell us that when the negros get uppity then a show of brut merciless force ie. redemption of the south from reconstruction or the Tulsa Race Riots seem to fix things for a while. Blacks must be ruled not governed, government is for the civilized not the savage. However this time around after 50 years of cultural Marxist trash the reaction is going to have to be very very strong.
I'm sick for the men and women in blue, my hope is they don't let these attacks continue. It looks like nypd is on the warpath and that's a positive sign.
I also agree with Philadelphia Mike, all people of civilization are in this together, this is coming from an evil YT bonified slaveholder decendent with over 400 years of ancestors on these shores. It doesn't matter if you're white, asian, or whatever. This is civilized against the savage, some may disagree but that's just my opinion.

Anonymous said...

To the killer, the white system is the target. The cops are the protectors of the white system it does not matter if the cops are white, black, Asian or Hispanic.

D. said...

the klu klux kongo line dances

Anonymous said...

SC native said ”. . . I also agree with Philadelphia Mike, all people of civilization are in this together, this is coming from an evil YT bonified slaveholder decendent with over 400 years of ancestors on these shores. It doesn't matter if you're white, asian, or whatever. This is civilized against the savage, some may disagree but that's just my opinion. “

I'm with Philadelphia Mike and SC native on this one. Blacks are a problem for every civilized race, and I know of no race that wouldn't like to see blacks return to Africa. We certainly don't need to turn away civilized realists and supporters for not having the correct shade of white skin or lineage. This alliance doesn't prohibit people from maintaining the racial purity of their bloodline.

Bogolyubski said...

Truth Corps:
NYPD & Cops in general should take this as the Declaration of War that it is.

Will they, though? How about refusing to protect people like "DeBlasio" (not his actual name). This lying POS is surrounded by machine-gun toting police, just as the filthy squid Bloomberg before him was. They should all simply stay home with the blue Ebola.

Let the nogs burn the whole damned city down. All the white trust-fund hipsters who voted for DeBlasio fully deserve to experience die-ver-city up close and personal. The loathsome creatures who inhabit Wall Street - even more so. The badges and uniforms the cops wear are those of the Banana Empire. Time to think about taking them off. Your paymasters are perfectly happy to let you eat bullets if it serves their purpose.

Anonymous said...

When will yahoo close its comments section?

http://news.yahoo.com/xenophobia-mushrooms-shadow-berlin-tower-blocks-071512279.html

The judgmental word, “Xenophobia” has become a catch word of the Left/Liberal intended to place a negative connotation on those who have objections to their culture and traditions being overrun by invited and uninvited foreigners brought into their midst. The use of the word is intended to summarily dismiss those objections as being of no consequences, unworthy of recognition, and best ignored. When "Xenophobia" is seen in a headline, it is automatically an indication that the story is not a news story, but will carry a Leftist/Liberal slant and will be a piece of propaganda to push forward a Leftist/Liberal agenda.

Not wanting masses of people with different cultures and values, who have a strong tendency to try to change everyone else wherever they settle, is not xenophobia. Not wanting to support people who chose to break our immigration laws is not racist nor is it anti-immigrant. Disagreeing with a president, while having a different color skin from his, is not racism. And having differing and even opposing opinions is not hate.

Quit trying to change words to stifle free and open discussion

Anonymous said...

Yes the turnoff comments movement has been gaining steam. The media masters are aghast that the unwashed still have opinions that run counter to their orthodoxy.

Anonymous said...

I just saw Deblowsio hugging Al Sharpton... Deblasio will suffer a traitor and conspirator's fate one day.

This is just out of control.

I'm subtly letting my views be known on social media. Many whites are awaking from their slumber. They are agreeing. They see through the Sharptons and Deblowsio's.

If you're a government troll reading this site looking for evil 'racisits that will deny civil rights', you won't find them here. We're realists. We're ahead of the curve. We see and say what the masses won't. That's changing... Get on the right side.

Good day from MA

Anonymous said...

"Link , Sun 12/21 White Like Me: White Priviledge. Series/ Special. Educator Tim Wise uncovers myths and misconceptions: exposes rasism's impact on society."

I choked through an hour of this B.S. and can't believe people are allowed to spread this crap. We have to add this Tim Wise to the list of charactors, race traders, and morons.

"Black youth are fed up with being branded criminals at birth."

The bone head "Cop Killer" was arrested 15 times since 2001. The black youth are celebrating this guy, honoring him, glorifying him, some will want to copy cat his actions. ( I'm fed up with that!)

The violence was justified?..... “We going to die anyway. Let’s die for something,” the radical figure told the crowd to roaring applause."

The "roaring applause" speaks louder than words. Be carefull what you wish for Mr. offendeed black man, you just might get it.

[N.Ga]

weisse frau said...

Wow, you won't believe what happened at the NYT's.
Last night, on the front page, was an article about how segregated schools would have saved Brown. And how we should end segregated schools.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/sunday-review/why-are-our-schools-still-segregated.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

The thoughtful comments from so many DWLs who knew firsthand that the children at black schools cannot learn and are too disruptive made the NYTs quickly hide the article on the bottom of the opinion page.

I will just repeat what the people there were saying. My kid needs to learn. My kid can pick up bad habits fast. My child under age 12 will not spend 5 minutes out of my sight with anyone who will drag down his manners, social skills, habits, desire to learn.

Anonymous said...

Germans are waking up to unchecked immigration.
Some whites are waking up to BRA here in the Kwanstain.
Will enough wake up in time?
Lamestream media is your enemy, always has been and always will be.
Learn and know your enemy but don't go any further than that.
Your headspace is too important to let the enemy in rent free.

Anonymous said...

More riots OTW?

http://news.yahoo.com/no-charges-against-milwaukee-ex-police-officer-fatal-152251877.html

Anonymous said...

comments closed?


‘Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.’

Bill Buckley

Anonymous said...

The good revrem is a man of peace:

http://baystateexaminer.com/mass-state-rep-claims-al-sharpton-wanted-nyc-police-killed/

Sheila said...

Bogolyubski -
THIS. I said last night to my spouse that while cops turning their backs to De Blasio during a photo op is fine posturing, there won't be any real backlash. Whoever's on his guard detail will still show up. No one's going to physically block him or his representative if they show up at the funerals. Hell, the families of the dead cops (Asian and Hispanic) apparently welcomed him with tears. (Sorry, Philly Mike, but I find you good-hearted but naive regarding other races - they may dislike Negroes, but will never miss an opportunity to get one over on Whites.)

Unless a massive number of NYPD agree to take joint action, anyone trying to make a stand - alone - will merely be picked off. Fired. They still value their jobs and salaries and see them as vital to their families. Until Whites have NOTHING LEFT TO LOSE, I don't see much of any real backlash happening. My husband disagrees, but I just don't see Whites taking organized action as a group until it all hits home. And as long as people can and will move away, or send kids to private schools, etc., it won't truly hit home. It's still all talk. I can only relate it to times in my own life, when I've taken a stand - and all those who previously verbally said they were with me, stood silently while I took the hit. Never count on most people and you won't be disappointed - cynical but proven true through the ages.

10mm AUTO said...

""We certainly don't need to turn away civilized realists and supporters for not having the correct shade of white skin or lineage. This alliance doesn't prohibit people from maintaining the racial purity of their bloodline.

December 21, 2014 at 8:12 PM""

For What Country? I agree that other races have to deal with their negros and eventually expel them FROM THEIR HOMELANDS to bring their society back to level, but that is assuming they have a homeland in the first place. A Thai can always go home to Thailand and recharge. East Indians (Call Center) sending their daughters home to find an East Indian Hubby is legend. The Chinese can always go see the Great Wall and touch their roots.

All these are living in a White culture distorted by the violence of the negro. In 1965 we were 90% White in the USA. By the end of this Century, we will be gone (or so small a percentage as to be a near exterminated minority with little political power). These other "race Realists" also realize that race is genetic...well duh! They have always known! It is only here in America that it is taught that negros are just like us. Do you actually think that in Japan, the Japanese think that negros are "just like them"?

Non-White race realists are living in a foreign White Culture, here to make money. They have no reason to want to throw their lives or their children's lives into the fan of negro dysfunction to secure America for the White.

Whites are on our own on this. We might get moral support from the few Countries who get it (Japan, China) but if we want this as a White homeland, then Whites are going it alone.

White Homeland! Northwest Front!

Anonymous said...

weisse frau said...
Wow, you won't believe what happened at the NYT's. Last night, on the front page, was an article about how segregated schools would have saved Brown. And how we should end segregated schools.


Bestest comment on that article....written by an intelligent (excellent grammar and syntax) BLACK woman:

"Our bottom line was that we would never send our kids to any school (regardless of racial makeup) that did not meet our standards for academics, safety, facilities etc. At the moment, this usually means attending a majority white school."

Melanie said...

@ Sheila



Never count on most people and you won't be disappointed - cynical but proven true through the ages.



December 22, 2014 at 9:42 AM




Truer words were never spoken. If one isn't prepared to stand alone, they'll never make a stand.

Anonymous said...

Do you actually think that in Japan, the Japanese think that negros are "just like them"?

Nope.

No one thinks this outside of DWL.

And I doubt if DWL do much in the way of "thinking," anyway. It's all about their feeeeeeelings. It's that newtime religion, Crystal Methodism.

And to any trolls reading this, I have to ask: "Can you tell us what services, goods or material advantages a country would gain by importing blacks that could not be had much more cheaply and involving far less collateral violence than provided by other groups?"

QED.

Anonymous said...

Hey, Obama you stupid negro fuck:

COP'S LIVES MATTER

Anonymous said...

Aww the poor little victim is the good reverend, such a VIP should have secret service protection:

http://nypost.com/2014/12/21/sharpton-i-got-death-threats-after-nypd-cops-were-executed/

P.S. did you notice the snivelling shit liberal scrunt tone of that Bay State link?
Know your enemy and hate them.

Bogolyubski said...

10 MM Auto:
Whites are on our own on this. We might get moral support from the few Countries who get it (Japan, China) but if we want this as a White homeland, then Whites are going it alone.

This is so damned true - yet so hard to get through the wall of indoctrination whites are subjected to from pre-school. Look at the Tea-Party Patriotards. While something like 97% are whites, they resolutely refuse to support any leader who explicitly admits that whites have legitimate interests and basic rights. Instead, they endlessly chase after a new magic-negro "savior" (today it's gun-grabbin' Ben Carson, previously Allen 'Pigford' West, tomorrow perhaps Bill Crosby). Either that or a magic-hispanic (Mark Rubio, Ted Cruz), or a magic-asiatic (Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley). The only whites they dare support in even a minor way all sing from the same equalitarian squid-hymnbook to diversity (Mittens the Underwear-Bankster, Jeb Al-Shrubbery, Caribou Barbie, Miss Lindsay 'Sweet Swisher' Graham, Juan 'Batshit' McStain).

Given their ethnic backgrounds, the two slain cops were odds-on supporters of "De-Blasio" - proving the basic point of my earlier post even more. Is the pension really worth it? Most whites still seem stuck in this notion that there is a rule of law (there is absolutely not) and that police, military, etc. are there to uphold it - which is simply untrue. Those who wear the badges and uniforms of the Banana Empire are there to enforce the dictates of those who own and control the empire. If there were any actual patriots in the ranks of the military who understood that the constitution they swore to uphold and defend has been overthrown by a cabal of criminals, Sodom-on-Potomac and NYC would have been reduced to smoldering craters decades ago.

Barnhardt woke up to the fact that it was dead when she noticed Corzine's ability to skip away with 1.2 billion in customer funds a couple of years ago. It's been dead longer than that however - so long it doesn't even stink so much. There have been a number of important milestones which should have served as warnings (and didn't). One was FDR's executive order for everyone to hand in their gold to the government (1933). This was completely lawless and under any functioning rule of law the order would have been immediately declared lawless and unconstitutional by the Supreme Court with a rejoinder that anyone attempting to enforce the order could themselves be charged with treason.

Another deadly blow came in 1942, when the Supreme Court ruled that a farmer cannot grow food crops on his own land, for his own consumption without Federal permission (Wickard v. Filburn, 1942). The perverted reasoning is that this effects "interstate commerce". This also effectively abolished private property. The list goes on and on. We're not going to be able to vote these criminals out of power. If you're wearing the uniform, you need to understand that you are there only to enforce decrees issued by a lawless, criminal and genocidal oligarchy. The prime objective must be to weaken them and bring about the collapse of the system which keeps them in power - by any and all means.

So, again, I await to see if the self-styled fearless defenders of public order in the NYPD who surround the criminal who presently resides in Gracie Mansion will walk away from their task of ensuring his looting program (and that of those who he serves) continues undisturbed. My bet is that they wouldn't dare. Like Gollum in LOTR, the "precious" (their pensions) are far too important to them to let go. At least the mercenaries of old used to demand payment in real money, not just a puffed-up promise blown from a bankster's ass.

Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO said...I agree that other races have to deal with their negros and eventually expel them FROM THEIR HOMELANDS to bring their society back to level....

Supposing white people wake up and take sane racial attitudes. Let's say that the USA and Europe expel all blacks to Africa, or perhaps carve a homeland for them out of several states of the former USA (with whites getting the vast majority of the territory). Let's also assume a policy of no border crossing. No blacks can move into white homelands, no whites can move into black homelands. (I believe Harold MacMillan once proposed walling off Africa in this manner.)

What would the world look like in a century?

You'd have white civilization reaching for the stars, literally and figuratively. Asians would be doing their thing.

And the black homelands? Would they all degenerate into Super-Liberias? Most likely this would be the case, given the fact that even with massive amounts of foreign (white) aid and (white) NGOs and (white) missionaries, black "countries" are largely failed states.

Here is one more thing to imagine: what would be the fate of the Oprahs, the Sharptons, the Holders, the Bishop Tu Tus, et alia in such a homeland? Would they end up like Mugabe or Bokassa, ruling in opulance over a self-destructing populace. Remove white economic aid, education, disease control and (most importantly) discipline--and how long would before a black homeland reverts to the level of pre-colonial savagery?

In her old age, would Oprah vaguely remember a time when she could flip something called a "light switch" and the darkness would fade? Or when her Benz limo didn't jostle her as it ran over the corpses in the streets? Or when the smell of burning human flesh was not part of her every day existence?

A century down the line, would the great-grandchildren of Oprah, et alia, squat around campfires in the ruins of what were once cities and tell fantastic tales handed down about how they once lived in magic kingdoms, but were expelled because eeeeeevil YT did not appreciate the magic brought by Africans?

Something to think about in the coming crises ahead...

Anonymous said...

“Democracy too is a religion, it is the worship of jackals by jackasses”

“Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance”

(H.L. Mencken)

Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO said...

. . . . Non-White race realists are living in a foreign White Culture, here to make money. They have no reason to want to throw their lives or their children's lives into the fan of negro dysfunction to secure America for the White.

Whites are on our own on this. We might get moral support from the few Countries who get it (Japan, China) but if we want this as a White homeland, then Whites are going it alone.

----------------------------------

Excellent summation of our predicament, never count on any of the wogs for help, they are not our allies, especially the Aztec/Mayan hordes. They will side with the nogs when the big meltdown happens or wait to see if YT is going to be victorious then throw in on our side after the victory is won. They would just as soon see us eliminated too.

non-DWL from NE.

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 11:34

Orca the imaginary black best friend of DWL scrunts everywhere has GMO ads in her magazine while claiming to be an organic farmer.
A family member gave an Orca book for Christmas and I sold it to the used bookstore for pennies on the dollar to put towards the new box of ammo fund.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
Supposing white people wake up and take sane racial attitudes. Let's say that the USA and Europe expel all blacks to Africa, or perhaps carve a homeland for them out of several states of the former USA (with whites getting the vast majority of the territory). Let's also assume a policy of no border crossing. No blacks can move into white homelands, no whites can move into black homelands. (I believe Harold MacMillan once proposed walling off Africa in this manner.)

What would the world look like in a century?

You'd have white civilization reaching for the stars, literally and figuratively. Asians would be doing their thing.

And the black homelands? Would they all degenerate into Super-Liberias? Most likely this would be the case, given the fact that even with massive amounts of foreign (white) aid and (white) NGOs and (white) missionaries, black "countries" are largely failed states.

Here is one more thing to imagine: what would be the fate of the Oprahs, the Sharptons, the Holders, the Bishop Tu Tus, et alia in such a homeland? Would they end up like Mugabe or Bokassa, ruling in opulance over a self-destructing populace. Remove white economic aid, education, disease control and (most importantly) discipline--and how long would before a black homeland reverts to the level of pre-colonial savagery?

In her old age, would Oprah vaguely remember a time when she could flip something called a "light switch" and the darkness would fade? Or when her Benz limo didn't jostle her as it ran over the corpses in the streets? Or when the smell of burning human flesh was not part of her every day existence?

A century down the line, would the great-grandchildren of Oprah, et alia, squat around campfires in the ruins of what were once cities and tell fantastic tales handed down about how they once lived in magic kingdoms, but were expelled because eeeeeevil YT did not appreciate the magic brought by Africans?


Dang, anon, You should go to Mel Gibson's island and pitch that scenario as a movie. It would be awesome. Set it loose for free on the net.

Anonymous said...

Breaking-Comrade Bill DeBolshevik has called for the end of all protests.
Now you will see the Chicago Jesus walk across the water to reprimand DeBolshevik for not staying the course.
Looking for a non pinko commie rat link now.

Archie im das Bunker

Anonymous said...

As I read through all of these very well-written comments, I am reminded of the fact there exists a fundamental difference between those on the left, those on the right, and those of us here who seem to be able to, for whatever reason, see the state of things for what it actually is.
When I went to the gym today there were some teen-agers playing full court. I live in a majority white part of town and, therefore, there were only two homies in the mix. As I worked out, I noticed that every dispute, foul, shout, raised voice or other example of bad sportsmanship was initiated by, or exacerbated by said minority. They ruin every damned thing that they come into contact with….period.
I am no prophet, but there is definitely something in the air these days. Regarding our nation today, there is no doubt that we as a people would be well on our way to much greater scientific advances, space exploration, etcetera without the bottom-dredging anchor of the negro wrapped around our forward-thinking necks. It’s as if the pause button on the universal remote of civilization was pressed 200 or so years ago.
Spencer Finn

TMH said...

Bogolyubski said...

Blah, blah….

magic-hispanic Ted Cruz…

Blah, blah

... If there were any actual patriots in the ranks of the military who understood that the constitution they swore to uphold and defend has been overthrown by a cabal of criminals, Sodom-on-Potomac and NYC would have been reduced to smoldering craters decades ago.

Blah, blah

So, again, I await to see if the self-styled fearless defenders of public order in the NYPD who surround the criminal who presently resides in Gracie Mansion will walk away from their task of ensuring his looting program (and that of those who he serves) continues undisturbed.


Classic Bogolyubski. He can forgive Auster's Jewishness, but not Cruz's Hispanicness. Yea, Cruz is the enemy.

And then we have the battle hardened commenter demanding heroic combat action from the military and the NYPD. It's always someone else that has to battle the forces of evil. Bobolyubski will make himself another cup of hot chocolate and play with his mouse.

I sincerely tried to take my own advice and leave him alone for the Christmas season. It's just impossible.

Philaelphia Mike said...

Someone had posted a link to an article in the NYT about the problem of "apartheid schools" in St. Louis.

When addressing busing, the author wrote: Today, about 5,000 (black) students get to escape the troubles of the St. Louis public schools — a small fraction of the number who apply for the privilege of doing so.

1st comment: "Escape?" Yes a very apt term. But who are these blacks trying to escape from? Why(!)from themselves, of course. The reality is that blacks can never escape from themselves. They are...who they are. Plain and simple. They just can't seem to catch on, can they. Latch on...yes. Catch on...no.

2nd comment: "apply for the PRIVILEGE of doing so". Again that magic word. Privilege. You bet your ass it's a privilege to be educated among the hard working, law abiding, self accountable, tax paying Whites.

So, black folk, when your children are being bussed into the White school districts, don't forget it that you have been extended a privilege which you haven't earned nor deserve!

Philadelphia Mike

Anonymous said...

RexHymens here:

Eric Garner was not choked to death by a cop for being black. He was taken down in the safest most effective way the cop could, and his morbidly obese asthmatic body failed him. Had he not started a physical interaction with the cops he would still be alive, assuming some other negroe wouldn't have killed him for "disrespekkin" or some other niggotry.

Michael Brown was not shot to death by a cop because he was black. He physically assaulted the cop, bashing him in the head TWICE before wresting the cop for his gun, all in response to being told to "get the fuck on the sidewalk". He then CHARGED the officer after opining loudly that the cop was "too much of a pussy to shoot". If he had just gotten the fuck on the sidewalk instead of attacking the cop he would still be alive, assuming of course that some other negroe wouldn't have killed him for "disrespekkin" or some other niggotry.

Trayvon Martin was not shot to death by a neighborhood watch captain because he was black. He physically attacked the neighborhood watch captain because he was attempting to ask him who he was and why he was in the neighborhood. He then mounted the guy and started bashing his head into the concrete after promising to kill him, and since the neighborhood watch captain was legally armed he was able to save his own life by shooting the enraged feral negroe in Self Defense. Not Stand Your Ground, simple Self Defense. Had Trayvon simply spoke to the neighborhood watch captain and had a short civil conversation he would still be alive today, assuming of course that some other negroe woukdn't have killed him for "disrepekkin" or some other niggotry.

In closing, the negroes and coddlers are arguing that ANY attempt at enforcing the Law on them, or ANY attempt to defend yourself against an enraged feral negroe is RACISM. Racism used to mean hanging niggers from trees for dating white girls. Now racism means shooting an enraged feral negroe that is trying to kill you.

This utter nonsense of white guilt and political correctness and negroe worship has to stop or America is lost. I am of the opinion that America is lost. The beginning of the end was in the 1960's and it's been a downhill disaster ever since.

My advice is to get out now. I am in the process of selling my home and 3 rental properties to move to the whitest country I can find. Soon this entire country will be one big ghetto.

Anonymous said...

Well the Marxists coined "white privilege" so why not call the escaping savages on their privilege. Perhaps civilization privilege is a good name?

Anonymous said...

I've been skipping over Bogo's repetitive, convoluted, alternate nomenclature-filled rants since about the third day on this site. Sorry, Bogo, try just saying what you want to say without what you perceive to be cute and/or intelligent coding. Or start your own inane blog for your ilk.

Jassi said...

A single example =/= always.

Many examples =/= never.

Being that the same illogical points continued to be made about homelands etc I have to mention these extremely simple things.

A white homeland cannot be the heaven you envision simply because of whites. If this were the case, you wouldn't have a need to start a homeland since tons of almost 100% white countries already exist, and many of them are really terrible places to live. If you truly, truly believe that whiteness, and whiteness alone with not a single miniscule particle of a drop of non-white blood, are the answer to problems, then you're a liar for not having moved to an all white country.

Second, a single Asian person doing something bad is proof of nothing. If millions of whites making dysfunctional dystopias is not submitted as evidence of anything concerning white behavior, then how is the behavior of one Asian person?

Ethnogenesis is the answer in my opinion. Make a super race, be Polish/Belarussian/etc, be a negro, or die. Trying to solve a global level issue is wasting time.You don't have the capability or the support. Make a clan, align with other clans, get into positions of power.

Anonymous said...

Pointing out black dysfunction is racist. Not wanting them to murder your daughter is racist. Not giving them your iPhone 6 is racist too. We can't win.

Anonymous said...

He's the kind of racist that gives us racists a bad name. I really wish Paul would ban him.

Anonymous said...

SC Native,

Perhaps some of you are right and race realist whites should trust no one that isn't one of us. I'll defer to others on most races since I don't live near them.
Here's something to throw out there, in the south it's whites that get the inbred label but the dirty secret is that negros are far more inbred than people seem to know outside of the south. I've heard plenty of stories about incest in the negro community. Apparently it's somewhat accepted and as a child I had the product of a few father daughter, brother sister muh dic pointed out. Could this be part of the negro problem? I know it has to be very common and inner city ghettos have to be worse.

Anonymous said...

@ anon - I totally agree. Reading 1984 and stranger in a strange land doesn't make you any more qualified than the rest of us. And as PK has said many times, this site is about black people. Not squids or those who won't be named or whatever.

Anonymous said...

"Another deadly blow came in 1942, when the Supreme Court ruled that a farmer cannot grow food crops on his own land, for his own consumption without Federal permission (Wickard v. Filburn, 1942). The perverted reasoning is that this effects "interstate commerce". This also effectively abolished private property. The list goes on and on."

Private property is a myth, and has been for a long time. Property taxes, zoning laws, and thousands of other regulations limit what can be done on one's own property. The reasoning in Wickard was actually quite sound, though admittedly inimical to individual freedom. Public policy was to support wheat prices, and the wheat that was grown, even if for on-farm consumption, did limit the amount that otherwise would have been purchased.

This creeping loss of freedom is a necessary thing in a technological society, which would be impossible without it: the greatest good for the greatest number, and all that. Technological societies inevitably are drawn into socialism.

Californian said...

1st comment: "Escape?" Yes a very apt term. But who are these blacks trying to escape from? Why(!)from themselves, of course. The reality is that blacks can never escape from themselves. They are...who they are. Plain and simple. They just can't seem to catch on, can they. Latch on...yes. Catch on...no.

It's like something out of H.P. Lovecraft.

Blacks must flee from a chthonian menace which has devastated their homelands--leaving cities in ruins, littering broken pavements with corpses, turning education and the arts into primitive tribal raps, lighting up the night skies with the flames of burning businesses, and creating hordes of glaze eyed survivors shambling about with rumors of cannibalism and worse....

To escape, blacks migrate/invade into more civilized climes, inevitably followed by those same chthonians, while DWL are enraptured by their own morphine of egalitarian ideology and open the gates.

Thus, the cycle of devastation spreads from city to city and continent to continent without anyone recognizing its source. The menace is so terrible that blacks can not even look upon its face--because they would see reflected back their own countenances!

Lovecraft, by the way, held common racial views for his days, i.e., he was a race realist.

Anonymous said...

Correct. This site is Stuff Black People Don't like, not Jews Run The World.

Californian said...

Michael Brown was not shot to death by a cop because he was black. ...If he had just gotten the fuck on the sidewalk instead of attacking the cop he would still be alive...
...In closing, the negroes and coddlers are arguing that ANY attempt at enforcing the Law on them, or ANY attempt to defend yourself against an enraged feral negroe is RACISM.


This is exactly why the "activists*" have made Michael Brown into a hero. They didn't choose an innocent citizen who was gunned down in his home by a SWAT team on a no-knock raid. They aren't talking about a woman in an isolated mountain cabin who is picked off by an FBI sniper as the result of a sting operation "gone wrong."

They're talking about hardcore criminals whom they want to turn into the shock troops for The Revolution. To win, they have to disarm the police physically and psychologically. If the cops hesitate to pull the trigger next time around, then the revolutionaries can storm that metaphorical Winter Palace.

Really, the Ferguson Fracas is an extension of the tactics of the civil rights era. Martin Luther King, jr., promoted civil disobedience, disobeying the law to gain political power. Sit-ins, refusals to disperse, illegal marches were the order of the day. The civil rights movement took its next step with the Long Hot Summer Riots of the 1960s. When the government capitulated (implementing the war on poverty and other stuff), the insurgency quieted down for a few decades--though low level guerrilla warfare continued in the form of gangbangnig, escalating into flashmobs as they tested their strength and YT's resolve.

In 2014, it's being taken to a new level of struggle with Trayvon Martin and now Michael Brown. The revolutionary avante garde whips up the masses with agitprop over a martyr. The masses take to the streets on cue. The cops effectively stand down. The mainstream media fans the flames. DWL beat their breasts. Conservatism, Inc., continues to prattle about "enterprise zones." Ferguson goes up in flames. Revolutionary mobs spread the struggle to other cities by disrupting traffic. A couple of NYPD officer's are gunned down by a "teen." A white woman is set on fire somewhere in the Homeland. All part of a pattern. Be interesting to see where this is going.

Meanwhile, YT Q. Taxpayer continues to stare into the telescreen and finds meaning in pro athletes and dancing stars.


* Footnote: by "activists", I include everyone from the New Black Panthers to the teleprompter-reader-in-chief.

Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO said ”. . . Whites are on our own on this. We might get moral support from the few Countries who get it (Japan, China) but if we want this as a White homeland, then Whites are going it alone.”

I'm not criticizing your desire for a white homeland and concern for the white race, but it is my opinion that the white homeland option has little chance for success.

For purposes of this comment when I refer to white homeland I mean a white homeland sufficiently large to support and protect a large percentage of the white population from all other races rather than a small white oasis. The decision for whites to go it alone or as one race among several races suffering from negro fatigue depends on one's goal. If our goal is a white homeland to the exclusion of all non-whites, we will need a different strategy than if our goal is just to handle the problem with blacks.

If we compare the black population vs non-black we have about 13.2% vs 86.8%. Without a doubt, a significant percentage of non-white non-blacks will support the blacks, but it is still pretty good odds for non-blacks. I would guess that most of the 86.8% is suffering from negro fatigue. There is actually a reasonable opportunity for this large of a majority to cause change sufficient to solve the problem with blacks.

Now if we demand a white only homeland and assume that we will anger many non-blacks who are not white, we might be looking at odds in the range of 13.2-39.4% vs 60.6% or worse depending on how many of the non-white non-blacks throw in with the blacks after being shunned by the white whites and how many of the white whites believe that the notion of a white homeland is too extreme of an idea. When we combine these percentages with the facts that less than 50% of the children under the age of 2 or so are white and the white population is older and dying more rapidly than other races it is pretty obvious that white adults will soon be outnumbered by non-white adults. So if we are going for the white homeland, we should probably do it within the next five years or it will probably never happen. I'm still looking for a white homeland in South Africa or any other country where whites are a minority for a successful pattern to follow.

Further compounding the problem with creating a large white homeland, as I see it, is that a white homeland cannot exist until the problem with blacks is solved.

I favor actually reaching the attainable goal of solving the problem with blacks as opposed to dreaming of creating a white homeland. It is my opinion that the pursuit of a white homeland will fail and we will still be dealing with blacks in addition to the non-black non-whites that we pissed off during our pursuit of failure.

Anonymous said...

"My advice is to get out now. I am in the process of selling my home and 3 rental properties to move to the whitest country I can find. Soon this entire country will be one big ghetto."

Iceland? Patagonia? Well, there are probably some Incas/Spaniards there. New Zealand? Wait they have Maori.

Best of luck with your endeavor. I'll have to stick it out to the bitter end.

Scot Irish

Anonymous said...

Someone had posted a link to an article in the NYT about the problem of "apartheid schools" in St. Louis.

Would that they really did have apartheid in St Louis schools! The children might learn more under disciplined white tutelage than the current Afrocentric regime.

And if there were apartheid in St Louis, you wouldn't have black mobs running amok and invading white areas. Makes you realize why whites had the "pass" system for blacks to travel into cities in SA.

Medic Bear said...

I'm sure he, Holder, Jarrett, Johnson and all the other anti-White racist pigs are laughing with glee over this.

He made some BS statement, as I bet his handlers told him he had to, but he was as insincere as can be.

I so feel for anyone who puts on a badge. Be safe and know that there are SOME people who support you and what you do.

Melanie said...

@ Anonymous December 22, 2014 at 2:58 PM--

The cops on the Second City Cop blog have actually talked about this in entries on the demise of the Cabrini Green, et al, Chicago projects. That blacks were very inbred due to so many not knowing who their baby daddies, hence their siblings, were. I can well see how this could lead to quick dysgenic conclusion.

Anonymous said...

PK wrote: "Ferguson wasn't the country stepping back in time; it was the country being forced to confront a future where the honesty of The Bell Curve is censored, the genetic reality for 'income inequality' replaced with the dishonest narrative of never-ending white supremacy holding the black population down."

That statement was just brilliant. Unfortunately, I think the people who are ready to deal with that reality head-on are still vastly outnumbered by those who are not.

There are eyes slowly opening, but there is also a lot of denial going on. Your first realization that the paradigm you've lived within your whole life is broken is a long way from thinking hard about exactly what part of it is broken, and what can be done about it.

I think evidence that the race-related assumptions underpinning our society are false must continue for some time before the majority tries to save itself.

Sheila said...

My gracious, Paul - why are we all suddenly treated to these marvelous suggestions by all these terribly brave and bright "anonymous" commenters? You know, the ones who cannot possibly fathom who "TWMNBN" are or are experts in detecting the paranoia of regulars here, or who confidently proclaim how Whites are their own worst enemy and needlessly alienating all those hard-working, all-American Indians, and Chinese, and Mexicans! Why, I had NO idea!

Meanwhile, I'll continue commenting under my own name (last name removed to protect husband and children from the oh-so-tolerant left and the benevolent government authorities). As a Christian and a White nationalist of ethnic Jewish DNA, I'll continue to expose (and support others who expose) the massive damage that immigrants (including my own relatives) have done to this country. I'm a realist who's not afraid of the truth or the facts, and they support what I've said, and what Bogolyubski's said.

Perhaps our fearless anonymous commenters could also go provide useful suggestions to all those willing listeners at Salon, or Dailykos? Perhaps it's the cynic in me, but somehow all these purported Whites insisting that it's blacks and only and always blacks and never anyone else that's the problem remind me, oh, I don't know . . . of the mainstream press insisting that repukes (I'm not one) cannot possibly win elections without appealing to DIEVERSITY?

Yes, this is SBPDL, and this is Paul's blog, and this blog serves a specific purpose. That said, over the YEARS I've been reading and commenting, Paul has also allowed quite a bit of criticism of other groups and has certainly not objected to others seeing links where they were obvious to all but the blind. No one needs to ride his personal hobby horse with comments ad nauseam, but I for one am absolutely tired of the loathsome apologists who are now frequenting this blog.

Sincerely, an evilracistnaziantisemitemouthbreathinginbredhomophobe(i.e.Sheila)

Anonymous said...

My world consists of accountants, bankers and finance people. There are about zero Blacks in my business and associated businesses.

All of us are talking about Blacks. It's all negative. We don't care anymore and are getting much more vocal. I'm sure this is happening in other businesses and non-Black industries.

Do you want to get shot, robbed or raped? Do you want to be sued for discrimination or have vandalism done or drugs sold in your neighborhood? Of course not.

Avoid Blacks. Live where they aren't. If you see one in public, don't talk to them or look at them and move away.

The race hustlers are right. Nothing has changed. We know who Blackie is and what he wants.

D-FENS said...

We need to remember that the negroes have been weaponized as a tool to control us. If the negro wasn't around, the hispanic or gay etc. would have the starring role.

The interesting question is why so many White countries have implemented the open borders-diversity theme? It's no coincidence particularly since it always seems to span the acceptable spectrum of political parties in each nation.

I think it's pretty clear that history demonstrates that multiculturalism (particularly when combined with popular elections) disintegrates nations. The elite certainly know this. At least the think-tanks that advise them know this.

Anonymous said...

I don't personally know any Japanese, but the Chinese I've known and worked with unanimously hated the blacks.I lost count how many times I was asked by them why Whites put up with blacks and support them.I had no answer then or now. Trust me, the Chinese definitely get it.Better than most American Whites.

Anonymous said...

"Make a super race, be Polish/Belarussian/etc, be a negro, or die. "

Making a biological race is a process that could take thousands of years and requires a relatively closed gene pool. Technological civilization has brought about the opposite condition: barriers to gene flow have consistently been broken down. This destroys the races of man it took nature millennia to create.

"Trying to solve a global level issue is wasting time."

I'd say the reverse is more nearly true. As Thoreau said, there are a thousand men hacking at the branches of evil for every one hacking at its root. If the problem is global, then how can the solution not be? All solutions begin with seeing the problem clearly. To articulate a real solution is the first step, even if it's not immediately attainable.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Bogoyulbski,
When you're hot, you're hot. Wow.

Like Gollum in LOTR, the "precious" (their pensions) are far too important to them to let go. At least the mercenaries of old used to demand payment in real money, not just a puffed-up promise blown from a bankster's ass.

Race said...

Then expel all parasites. No northwest front, return America to it's historical and massive majority.

Race said...

Melanie and Sheila,
God bless you both sisters.

Bogolyubski said...

Amusing to see the various trolls at work - likely on the government payroll or that of folks like Adelson or Zuckerberg. TMH, who seemed particularly infuriated at my shot at Ted Cruz, seems to have forgotten that he's married to Goldman-Sachs. That really tells us all we need to know about him. Cruz, the magic-hispanic, is a typical Repuke: always the plastic smile on his face as he thrusts the knife in YT's back.

At this point, even Kim Jong Un is looking sane compared to the folks supported and defended by TMH and the various anon trolls. Wickard v. Filburn is excellent law indeed - if you're a damned communist. As for all the magic-hispanics who TMH and his ilk are here to tell us are our salvation from the negro, just keep in mind the reaction of all those nice "natural conservative, traditional-Catholic (in the Hi-Fellatin' Franny vein), fambly-values" folks in the wake of the railroading by BRA of the "white" Peruvian zambo (octaroon) George Zimmerman: Every single professional hispanic organization backed the narrative of St. Skittles. Your shit-sandwiches aren't selling so well, TMH.

AnalogMan said...

Nice to see Melanie commenting again. I thought we'd lost you. Also Sheila, you've been scarce lately.

Anon 3:27 (with several others concurring) said:

The decision for whites to go it alone or as one race among several races suffering from negro fatigue depends on one's goal. If our goal is a white homeland to the exclusion of all non-whites, we will need a different strategy than if our goal is just to handle the problem with blacks.

This is correct. I've explained before, and I think I'm not alone, that my goal is the continuation of the White race. Whatever else we may lose can be rebuilt. Only extinction is final.

This goal can't be achieved without an exclusive territory of our own. We've all had this demonstrated over the last century or so. Defeatism, doubt about the possibility of achieving it, are self-defeating. Maybe the odds are against us, but as the man said, it's the only game in town. If we don't try, we've already lost.

I take comfort from the two lessons I've learned from history:

1. The unthinkable happens.

2. It can turn on a dime.

Never say never.

PS Bogolyubski, pay no attention to the ankle-biters.

juvenal said...

That's right!! I think they might be waiting outside your door at this very minute. Quick! somebody call Paul Craig Roberts.

Anonymous said...

Until today I had never considered the inbreeding issue as perhaps one of the main components of Black incompetency. It makes sense and answers the Big Question "Why CAN'T Blacks seem to run things when they become the majority in a city? Why does it unravel so fast?" The genetics of this contribute to low IQs, low impulse control, bad decision-making (poor morals), criminality - all of it. The end result is they are so easily manipulated and have been weaponized by those with a sinister agenda.

Anonymous said...

Exactly right. Gun control, use both hands, negro control, front sight on target.

J.J.

Anonymous said...

I don't watch that crap anymore. Use that time to go to the range when its nice out.

J.J.

Anonymous said...

Hahahahahahahaha!!! You're exactly right! Everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as its just like theirs! Hahahahahahahaha!!!

J.J.

World_War_Me said...

Beautifully put, Sheila!

These anti-Bogolyubski Anons are 2 edgy 4 me!

Seriously, Bogolyubski is not the only one here who holds cynical views (particularly toward TWMNBN) yet he is the only one constantly harassed for it. In my eyes, that only lends him more credibility.

I would guess these Anons/TMH are the same individual. Their comments lack subtlety at best and are diversionary at worse. I mean, it would be one thing if it were one anti-Bogolyubski comment every blog post or so, OR if the troll(s) picked a fight with another commenter who holds similar opinions to Bogolyubski, but no, it's one anti-Bogolyubskis comment after another. Obvious troll(s) are obvious!

The anti-Bogolyubski commenters are calling for the censorship of Bogolyubski's comments. That only makes me MORE suspicious of the anti-Bogolyubskis. Criticizing a commenter's opinion is one thing, but demanding censorship? That reeks of desperation.

Anonymous said...

"We will never have peace as long as they are near."

You said it brother, now what are we going to do about it?

I think our German brethren are getting the ball rolling for us: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11309449/Record-numbers-rally-against-Islamisation-in-Germany.html

Anonymous said...

Regarding Asians, Hispanics and possibly Middle Easterners now in the USA: there may be room for white nationalists to make a tactical alliance with them against blacks. Today, white nationalists are not strong enough to go it on their own. There is no mass white movement, no mainstream white advocacy organization or media. Anything that can divide the opposing coalition is good. And certainly Asians, etc. have a healthy racial instinct, and have been victimized enough by black criminality.

There are two problems with such an alliance. One is short term: these groups will not align themselves with white nationalists until whites are willing to take the fight off of the Internet and into the realworld. If white people will not stand up for themselves, then why should other groups stand up for them? Right now, Asians, etc., can gain much more political capital by being "anti-racist."

There is the long term: assuming a white homeland is created. What happens to Asians, Hispanics, etc? As a thought experiment, perhaps America could be broken up into several countries: one a white homeland, another a massive reservation for blacks, a third a multi-cultural "paradise" where all races can be "enriched" by "diversity." Certainly, such a paradise would be a good place to consign DWL.

I do not have an easy answer here, and this matter requires serious discussion.

Californian said...

D-FENS said...The interesting question is why so many White countries have implemented the open borders-diversity theme? It's no coincidence particularly since it always seems to span the acceptable spectrum of political parties in each nation.


This is a good question. There are any number of answers. All of them need to be considered, no matter how off-the-wall:

Conspiracy theory. It's the result of hostile elites. The CFR/Bilderbergers/Trilateral Commission/Insiders/Inner Party/Federal Reserve/Et Alia. These groups have pushed for world government for decades. They have the money and the power, and it's all finally paid off. So they give orders to the governments, political parties, media and NGOs. Borders open, national identities are erased, multicultism becomes the mass ideology—and elite power is consolidated worldwide.

Globalization. Capital is international, markets are international, resources are international, information is international—so why shouldn't humans be international? Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, there is no serious force opposing globalized capitalism. The corporations promote multicultism as a means to overcome national opposition to global control of industry, and to break down the white middle class which might just unionize and oppose them.

Crystal Methodism (for a lack of a better term) or the Amy Biehl Factor. Your average white person wants to love humanity, and wants to be loved in return. I have an acquaintance who is an exemplar of this. He's of “good nordic descent,” politically middle-of-the-road, but his philosophy is, “If I am nice to the blacks, they will be nice to me in return.” He sees it as a point of moral superiority that he loves mankind. He's not one of those (perish the thought!) racists. It's a childlike belief in the goodness of a common humanity like unto a drug. And the addicts will keep on believing in it even as they are being cut to pieces by their black objects of affection—e.g., Amy Biehl.

Incompetency on the part of the right. The rightwing has failed to organize agitprop on the scale of the leftwing. The left creates massive media machines, sets up political front groups, organizes students, infiltrates institutions, takes it to the streets. The right goes about with a “business as usual” attitude (can't do anything that would look bad on the country club application) while the left is fighting a war. I have been involved in conservative student organizing, and I've seen this up front—leftwing groups have massive resources behind them, often subsidized by major corporations. And when all is said and done, leftists are willing to break the law, confront the cops, and go to jail in pursuit of their goals. The right tries to play it by the rules and thus is outmaneuvered

[continued]

Californian said...

[continued]

Suicide of the West. I'll do my usual plug for James Burnham's epic book on this topic. It's a Spenglerian thing. Western Civilization reached a point some time in the mid-20th century when it went through the decline phase. Too many white people were killed in the world wars, especially among the healthy younger demographic. Western elites could not deal with communism, the exploding third world or dysgenic demographics which are prone to crime. So they recast liberalism as an ideology to rationalize away the defeats.

e.g., European countries no longer have the will to fight colonial wars in Africa? Surrender Algeria and Rhodesia and Angola and South Africa to terrorist insurgents and call the result "majority rule" and "democracy.” White countries no longer have the will to defend their own frontiers? Open up the borders and glorify the resulting invasions for bringing "diversity" and "vibrancy." Third worlders burn down cities from Malmo to Ferguson? This is really an advance for human rights as the protesters are standing up against injustice and for equality. And so it goes...


Above all else, the primary cause of the decline has been the failure to understand the racial nature of the struggle. Therefore, effective policies can not be implemented. At best, conservatives can tinker with some of the symptoms. But the vast majority of the threats to the Western world – the waves of violent crime and rioting, the torture-murders in SA and now in America, the failure of inner city schools, the outsourcing of industry and undermining of the middle class, the decline of the American manned space program, the No Go zones staked out by third world invaders in Europa, the destruction of entire cities like Detroit – all come down to one thing: race.

Something to think about in the continuing crisis...

Melanie said...

Hi all, I need help, quick, please. I saw a stat recently regarding cops killed by blacks, and mentioned it at a site elsewhere, and now I can't find the stat. Anyone have it, for any parameter of time? And with a "mainstream" link would be cool too. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

"Wickard v. Filburn is excellent law indeed - if you're a damned communist."

All supporters of technological civilization are socialists to an extent. Such societies can only work if large numbers of people coordinate their activities very closely; in other words, they can exist only in a condition of unfreedom. Redistribution of wealth and property is part of this. You're not really stupid enough to believe that you live in a free country, are you? Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) is another decision that is sound when considered from the point of view of "the greater good", but inimical to individual freedom. "They" can take your private property any time they want. "The greater good" will always be the justification.

The United States is a de facto socialist country, the USSA. Though it's still paid lip service, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights ceased to have any real force a long time ago. This isn't the result of a conspiracy, just another side effect of technological development.

Anonymous said...

"Above all else, the primary cause of the decline has been the failure to understand the racial nature of the struggle."

Some would say that there are people, many of them white, who understand it only too well. In his fireside chat of June 5, 1944, Roosevelt stated that "the United Nations [Roosevelt's phrase for what we would now call the Allies] are determined that in the future no one city and no one race will be able to control the whole of the world."

http://millercenter.org/president/fdroosevelt/speeches/speech-3334

The West has had an official policy of racial suicide for quite some time. As you detail in your post above, there are lots of reasons for this, and it would be a mistake to see them as mutually exclusive.

Truth Corps said...

Anonymous posted, My world consists of accountants, bankers and finance people. There are about zero Blacks in my business and associated businesses.

If you want your workplace to be from from blacks, find a job/career that requires:

1. Background check
2. Drug screening
3. Swim qualification

My good friend retired from underwater welding with a six figure pension & lives on a 100 acre ranch in the Midwest. I go hunting out there annually.

TC2

Mr. Rational said...

The reasoning in Wickard was actually quite sound, though admittedly inimical to individual freedom. Public policy was to support wheat prices, and the wheat that was grown, even if for on-farm consumption, did limit the amount that otherwise would have been purchased.

Not "apparently" inimical, it was actually murderous.  People were STARVING because food cost more than they could pay, and FDR's policy was to make this worse.  Filburn was trying to do something about that by making pork cheap enough for people to buy by cutting out the middleman for grain.  Wickard killed people by starvation.

We're seeing similar things today, especially with "Green" energy that costs far too much for people to afford and simply isn't there when needed.  Had the SCOTUS properly decided in favor of Filburn, none of this would be happening.

This creeping loss of freedom is a necessary thing in a technological society

Tell you what, you live on wind and solar energy exclusively (including for driving and working) and tell us how well you do.  Then tell us that Wickard telling us where we can buy our food and for how much was the right decision for everyone.

Anonymous said...

"Not "apparently" inimical, it was actually murderous. "

You don't read very carefully, do you? I wrote "admittedly", not apparently.

"Then tell us that Wickard telling us where we can buy our food and for how much was the right decision for everyone."

You've also missed the point. Just because, with the advantage of hindsight, you disagree with the policy, doesn't mean it was a bad decision at the time. There will always be policy disagreements, and hindsight will always be 20/20. The point you're missing, and the whole problem, is that technological society requires that there be such policies, and that these policies will always come as restrictions on individual freedom. Government's role as caretaker of the public good acts to undermine all individual freedoms, yet without it performing this role technological society becomes impossible. Here's a brief history of agricultural price supports:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_policy_of_the_United_States#Beginning_of_price_supports

Notice how they inexorably expand into other areas:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_policy_of_the_United_States#Increased_comprehensiveness

The pursuit of "Green" energy may or may not be a misguided policy, and I'm not sure how you see the decision in Wickard as bearing on it. But that there is such a policy at all is further proof of my point. A government concerned with managing all aspects of the economy for the public good necessarily becomes an enemy of individual freedom.

Mr. Rational said...

The point you're missing, and the whole problem, is that technological society requires that there be such policies, and that these policies will always come as restrictions on individual freedom.

Technological society didn't require supply restrictions on wheat when people were starving.  Reading them into the Constitutional powers of FedGov was a stretch that should have been denied, and history shows what a disaster it was.  The problem with "policies" is that the policy-makers can be stupid, pre-occupied or corrupt, and are certainly ignorant of facts that people in the market know.  The simple fact is that there are things the government shouldn't be trying to do, because it cannot do them well and will push out non-government actors who'd do a better job.

The pursuit of "Green" energy may or may not be a misguided policy, and I'm not sure how you see the decision in Wickard as bearing on it.

A great many Greens see it as a way to restrict the use of energy (which they see as either damaging or as a moral evil) by driving up the price.  Without Wickard v. Filburn, they would be deprived of the biggest legal tools they have for doing so.

Race said...

I'm the about the last person one would expect to defend bogo add he always attacks Christianity and generalizes and doesn't recognize Christians like myself who doesn't fit his mold. Having said that, don't come on this blog and attack us under an anon moniker. Unless you give yourself a name in going to assume all these anons are the same person pretending to be more.

Anonymous said...

Race said ”I'm the about the last person one would expect to defend bogo add he always attacks Christianity and generalizes and doesn't recognize Christians like myself who doesn't fit his mold. Having said that, don't come on this blog and attack us under an anon moniker. Unless you give yourself a name in going to assume all these anons are the same person pretending to be more.”

Interesting assumption, Race, if that is your real name. You would be the last person we could expect to defend bogo, yet the possibility that that there might be more than one Anon who might criticize bogo cannot be considered. I'm going to assume that you and bogo are one and the same.

Anonymous said...

"Technological society didn't require supply restrictions on wheat when people were starving."

I understand what you're saying, but how would letting the price of wheat fall and letting the wheat production suffer (and, presumably, letting the wheat farmers go bankrupt) necessarily keep people from starving? There is a school of thought that an important cause of the Great Depression was a too-restrictive monetary policy; that commodity prices fell because there wasn't enough money in circulation. It doesn't matter what the price of pork is if people don't have enough money to buy it. Besides, if people were starving, then the most direct approach would be to just give them food. This is frank socialism, yet there's no logical stopping point to government intervention once it starts.

"The simple fact is that there are things the government shouldn't be trying to do, because it cannot do them well and will push out non-government actors who'd do a better job."

On the other hand, the Great Depression resulted from unregulated markets. That's the crux of the problem. Regulate, and destroy individual freedom, or don't regulate, and allow things to devolve into chaos (i.e., freedom).

Mr. Rational said...

how would letting the price of wheat fall and letting the wheat production suffer (and, presumably, letting the wheat farmers go bankrupt) necessarily keep people from starving?

People were starving already.  The policy of restricting wheat production to increase the price (which too many people couldn't afford to pay) was observably wrong, as well as being an over-reach of Federal power.  Many Okies were thrown off their land when banks foreclosed on loans they couldn't repay; instead of trying to prop up commodity prices, maybe loan repayments should have been suspended in order to make farming affordable.  But that would have affected bank(st)ers... the owners of the FDR regime.

There is a school of thought that an important cause of the Great Depression was a too-restrictive monetary policy; that commodity prices fell because there wasn't enough money in circulation.

And it was not the first time that a policy of easy money to make loans easier to fulfill (in debased money) was a political issue.  It had even been a campaign issue before.  Of course, if all you're doing is inflating asset bubbles it doesn't help.

It doesn't matter what the price of pork is if people don't have enough money to buy it.

Filburn would have been able to feed more willing buyers if he hadn't been forced to buy wheat at a higher cost than he could grow it himself.  He may even have been able to hire workers to grow wheat for him; it's better to be paid in room and board than to starve, so all would have been better off.  FDR stopped him.

if people were starving, then the most direct approach would be to just give them food.

Food obtained from whom, by what means?  If by printing money, why not just give it to the starving and let them buy from willing sellers?

the Great Depression resulted from unregulated markets.

Wrong.  The Great Depression resulted from bad policy, including interest-only mortgages (which we saw repeated before the 2008 crash).  All of those things could have been avoided, but policy was deliberately crafted to bring them about.

Regulate, and destroy individual freedom, or don't regulate, and allow things to devolve into chaos (i.e., freedom).

Thank you for reprising the Hegelian dialectic.  I'm wise to that.