Monday, December 15, 2014

The Tribe Has Spoken...

(PK Note: Christmas 2014 Fundraiser is ongoing. Please consider making a donation (you can make a tax-deductible donation to the PK VDare Fund in the right-hand column of this site - via the PayPal button - which will help fuel SBPDL growth in 2015. Or purchase an item through Amazon here, and SBPDL will get commission!)

If this story doesn't put a smile on your face, then moments of elation are impossible for you. [African Liberation Group Plans To Convene 'Black People's Grand Jury' Against Darren Wilson, St. Louis Public Radio, 12-12-14]:
Events in Ferguson and St. Louis continue to illustrate the American Experiment is nearly extinguished 
Activists connected to the Leadership Coalition for Justice (formerly called the Justice for Mike Brown Leadership Coalition) and the African People’s Socialist Party announced Friday that they are convening a symbolic grand jury in January to decide for themselves whether former Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson should be charged with a crime for killing Michael Brown. 
The group organizing the symbolic grand jury is called the International People's Democratic Uhuru Movement, a group that seeks to liberate and empower people of African descent around the world. 
“In the face of the inability of the justice system to work for our people and our community, in the face of the grand jury’s inability to see what the whole world has been able to see about the murder of Mike Brown on August 9th … clearly it is time for African people to begin to take matters in our own hands,” said African People’s Socialist Party leader Omali Yeshitela. “In that regard I’m here to announce that on January 3rd and 4th black people will have our own grand jury.” 
According to Yeshitela, the grand jury will be selected based on their reputations as upstanding members of the community and will make their decision following existing laws after being presented with the same evidence and testimony given to the official grand jury. 
But, said Yeshitela, the “Black People’s Grand Jury” will be open to the public and will look at the death of Brown in context of “the history of black people in this county, in this country, and see whether or not it is likely that Darren Wilson or any instrument of state power in this country would murder an 18-year-old unarmed teenager.” 
When asked about the goal of this grand jury, given that it will have no power to arrest or discipline Wilson, Yeshitela said that highlighting that lack of power was the whole point. 
Yeshitela was joined Friday by Kennethia Miller and two other St. Louis women affiliated with Yeshitela’s Uhuru Movement, which seeks (among other things) to put black people in charge of the hiring of police in communities where mostly black people live. 
“We think it’s extremely urgent that we hold the black people’s grand jury and build a campaign for black community control of the police,” Miller said. “As a mother, I’m outraged and deeply concerned about the ongoing law enforcement-based violence that’s taken the lives of our children.”
St. Louis averages roughly 33 firearms-related incidents each week [Outrage after bloody night in St. Louis leaves 18 shot, one stabbedSt. Louis Post Dispatch,  6-11-2013], with the nearly all of these shootings involving a black suspect. Miller isn't outraged or deeply concerned by these 1,716 firearm-related incidents that occur every year, which are instrumental in driving down property value and convincing the new owners of Budweiser - InBev - to completely divest from the city of St. Louis.

After the hostile takeover of the King of Beers in 2008, InBev cut roughly six percent of Budweiser's workforce, a harbinger of the company moving all of the operations out of St. Louis. Only days ago, InBev announced Budweiser U.S. Sales and Marketing would move to New York City, a much more accessible (and safer) city than St. Louis. 

Remember: Just as 83 percent black Detroit has few corporations providing tax-revenue (as well as a minority of property-owners actually paying their property taxes), a Budweiser-less St. Louis will be reliant on a majority black population to provide the taxes to fund the public payroll and bankroll civic improvements...

Not to mention, the promise of pensions for those retired public employees evaporating as the new black majority can no longer sustain a first-world economy once taken for granted of when middle-class whites built and maintained it (the Visible Black Hand of Economics never fails to appear). 

With the black population exclusively working to make St. Louis uninhabitable for the law-abiding (and eroding the opportunity for corporate growth - or chances of corporate relocation - in the city), no one should lament the call for a new, all-black grand jury. 

Whatever outcome these black boobs deliberate upon, their findings will have no legal bearing on the case; however, no amount of evidence would ever convince them the actions taken by Officer Darren Wilson on August 9, 2014 represented the correct one. 

From a purely racialistic (instead of legalistic) line of reasoning, they've already castigated Officer Wilson for the crime of murder their black comrade Michael Brown, damn the evidence!
Moments such as this [African-American grand jury to examine evidence in the Michael Brown shooting, Fox2Now, 12-12-14] represent a window into the future; a world where the evolution of Anglo-Saxon law (Magna Carta, English Common Law, the Bill or Rights, Habeas Corpus, etc.) devolves to the law of the jungle. 
Because the law of the jungle quickly mandates tribes form for protection, so civilization can slowly be introduced to an area where it has all but disappeared. [St. Louis police say they'll discipline officer who wore 'Wilson' name tag at City Hall protest, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 12-13-14]:
A city police officer stationed at City Hall when protesters showed up Friday to protest police brutality drew the attention of demonstrators because the officer wore a “Wilson” name tag on his sleeve in a show of solidarity with former Ferguson Officer Darren Wilson. 
Now that officer also has his department’s attention. 
In an interview Friday, Chief Sam Dotson said the “officer clearly violated our policies and will be disciplined.” 
“I couldn’t be more disappointed,” Dotson said. “We spend a lot of time working on professionalism and building a bridge in the community.” 
Jeff Roorda, business manager for the St. Louis Police Officers’ Association, said the officer at issue was transferred Friday from 
District 3 to District 6, which Roorda said has the highest crime in the city. 
“For months, the U.S. Department of Justice has been calling violent protests where officers were shot at and had Molotov cocktails thrown at them ‘constitutionally protected exercises of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of expression,’” Roorda said. 
“Now a police officer does nothing more than wear another officer’s name on his sleeve, an officer who has been exonerated of any wrongdoing, and is being told that his passive statement is constitutionally prohibited free speech. There is something wrong with this picture.”
Oh, there is something incredible wrong with the picture of Ferguson, St. Louis, Missouri, and the United States of America in 2014.

Very, very wrong: That white police officers would still talk about building a bridge to the "community" (black community) and not completely abandon the task of trying to bring law and order to a people more inclined to practice the art of "no snitching" in protecting their criminals.

Never, ever stand in the way of those making hilarious demands for racially-exclusive courts, for it's only a positive step in the direction of racial separation.

90 comments:

Anonymous said...

I just found out why Comrade Deblasio of Shit York City had a bigger fence added to the people's mansion, Fergtard protestors have a twatter campaign called number sign mansion shutdown and they are protesting there right now with their demands listed on signs.
Trying to find a story on lamestream media pages but they are too busy in a marxist bongload circle jerk to report on it.

Eddie in St. Louis said...

A-B in St. Louis is in the midst of a major automation upgrade. There will be less and less employment at the Bevo Plant here in town, unless you are a highly trained technician. The jobs for low skilled Blacks and Whites just won't be there in the future and with automation there is no make work B.S. The stockholders would not allow it.

Eddie in St. Louis

14Ω said...

It is a sign of what is to come as more whites fight back against black crime. Facts don't matter, only emotion. It won't matter if it is a black convicted felon with an AK-47 breaking down a door, if the white intended victim kills him, the message has been sent loud and clear that the anti-white activists will go to any lengths to destroy anyone who dares resist black crime.

We can keep moving to "safer" areas but only those who can afford to move will do so and will leave behind those who can't but who still deserve to live in peace and safety.

Moving is just fleeing in surrender and abandoning your folk. Sooner or later you'll run out of places where you can move. Sooner or later the time will come to make a stand when your back is against the wall and there is no place left to run.

Philadelphia Mike said...

“In the face of the inability of the justice system to work for our people and our community, in the face of the grand jury’s inability to see what the whole world has been able to see about the murder of Mike Brown on August 9th … clearly it is time for African people to begin to take matters in our own hands,” said African People’s Socialist Party leader Omali Yeshitela. “In that regard I’m here to announce that on January 3rd and 4th black people will have our own grand jury.”


Philadelphia Mike, here. I've rewritten this paragraph, applying it to our own Euro/White crisis.

“In the face of the inability of the justice system to work for our people and our community, in the face of the law makers' inability to see what the whole world has been able to see about the murder of White people by negroes...clearly it is time for the White people to begin to take matters in our own hands.”

That be racissst? Nope. As they say, what's good for the good is good for the gander.

Philadelphia Mike

Anonymous said...

Texas here:

Bahaahaahahaaha!

The harder these people try to look serious/intellectual/educated, the more foolish they look.

Monkey see, monkey do. Just like a cargo cult.

Y'all have a great night.

And Merry Christmas! (That's also what I say to every idiot that says Happy Holidays to me.)

Philadelphia Mike said...

“We think it’s extremely urgent that we hold the black people’s grand jury and build a campaign for black community control of the police,” Miller said. “As a mother, I’m outraged and deeply concerned about the ongoing law enforcement-based violence that’s taken the lives of our children.”

Another re-write:

“We think it’s extremely urgent that we hold the White people’s grand jury and build a campaign for White community control of black violence against Whites,” Mary Sue McMillan said. “As a mother, I’m outraged and deeply concerned about the ongoing black violence and lawlessness that’s taken the lives of our children...all of our loved ones.”

This IS an Alice in Wonderland world. Jabberwocky seems to be the vernacular language these days.

Keep up you strength. We are the torch bearers of civilization.

Philadelphia Mike

Anonymous said...

"a world where the evolution of Anglo-Saxon law (Magna Carta, English Common Law, the Bill or Rights, Habeas Corpus, etc.) devolves to the law of the jungle."

PK, you forgot the original origins of Anglo-Saxon law:
Ancient Greek democracy and the Roman republic.

Jim Crow said...

Black lives DO NOT matter if it is taken by another black.

Black lives ONLY have value when it is a White person doing the shooting.

Now, if that ain't racist........

This is proof to me that blacks exist in a world saturated, in their minds, with White Thangs. Everything, and I mean everything, to them revolves around Whiteness. What a miserable existence they must have it they must go through life like that.

You would think they would want to get as far away from White people as possible. But, even though they are intellectually stupid as hell, they instinctively know that without proximity to White people they would starve, freeze and disease themselves to death.

Anonymous said...

Whites are starting to fight back in Long Island.

http://whitegenocideproject.com/new-york-prison-guards-to-protest-anti-white-rants-by-affirmative-action-official/

Remember that old Karen Carpenter song, "We've Only Just Begun."?

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....I fully support the forming of a black jury. I know what the verdict will be and then they can go on the warpath again. Hopefully they will find more property to burn down. If there are no businesses still standing they can light up their own cars and houses. Since the new battle cry is LIBERATION they can burn down some of the apartment buildings owned by the racist pig landlords that are ripping them off by charging rent.

I know it will be hard deciding which street gang members will make the best cops. Hopefully being on parole won't be a hindrance.

I have noticed over the years that victims like to share their anguish by forming large mobs so they can share THEIR PAIN in public. It is extremely fulfilling for them when the TV cameras are there to show the world their misery and torment and how they are forced to live because of all the racism in America. NOBODY LIKES TO SUFFER ALONE.

My guess is with the right kind of press coverage and enough professional agitators these demonstrations and PEACEFUL PROTEST should last at least another six months. If done right they can go on for another year. I hope too many white people don't start moving out here into the Free Zone. I don't want my taxes to go up.

Anonymous said...

I can see in the near future killing a nog that breaks into your home will get you thrown in jail. By being well off it is to overwhelming of a temptation for a poor bush monkey. And you white girls try not to look so rapable its more than the average black male can withstand. In fact you will be endanger from black shitavias for looking to good,and those bitches can very cruel and sadistic.
All of this sounds ridiculous but with more of these American negroes teaming up with ragheads we will be in for some tough times. Somewhere sanity and reason must take a stand. The police and military will get tired of being shit on by the likes of Obama, Fienstien,and Sharpton. I am sure that there are those in the Military making plans as we speak. I just hope thy are not to late.


Mich Mike

Anonymous said...

When asked about the goal of this grand jury, given that it will have no power to arrest or discipline Wilson, Yeshitela said that highlighting that lack of power was the whole point.

Maybe I-thought-he-resigned Kommissar Holder can give them legal powers after all the whole system is just criminals with protection of law but the criminals have a cute name called politicians or bureaucrat.
My personal favorite is public servant. You can always bend over and get some service on April 15th comrade.

Woodsy InNYC said...

According to Yeshitela, the grand jury will be selected based on their reputations as upstanding members of the community...

I want them all tested for drugs.

...and will make their decision following existing laws after being presented with the same evidence and testimony given to the official grand jury.

And this will be playing in the background the entire time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9S7yhD5M9A

Objections and rebuttals will be provided by The Sesame Street Muppets followed by finger painting and coloring books.

Orange juice and cookies will be served.

bernicegreenbaum said...

Blacks are a race ruled by their passions. If you dangle something bright and shiny in front of them they "wants me summa dat!" Consequently it's easy to manipulate blacks by giving them small tokens, feeding them, housing them, and securing their votes come election time. Apart from them pulling the lever each November 4th, there really is no use for them. Machines can now do what we used to have to pay them to do.

Separation would be sweet, but despite the negroes' lament about him "yearning to be free", what he really wants is a free poke chop, a blunt, and a Colt 45 every few minutes. The negro is most successful at blindly breeding. Without the white man, he is doomed. In his heart of hearts, he knows this. To take his mind off of his dependency, he creates these pseudo dramas in his head and puts them into play with these mock trials. The Law of the Jungle is what he is most comfortable with. The race card can and must be played at all times.

Californian said...

Something I'd like to see investigated is: who is organizing these agitprop exercises, demonstrations and urban guerrilla warfare blowups? I know from experience that radical communist groups have been involved with anti-cop protests in the past--Revolutionary Communist Party and ANSWER Coalition. They exploit black grievances to radicalize the "masses." And then use the "masses" as cannon fodder.

Unlike black initiated riots of the past, the Ferguson Fracas has continued to build for months. This indicates there is some higher organization/funding is going on. Of course, the mainstream media has been doing its part to fan the flames. And the Obama administration has not taken any decisive action to crush the "uprising." Compare this with the government's massive deployment of law enforcement over the Bundy Ranch incident (where the protesters were largely non-violent). Or with the confiscation of weapons from citizens in the aftermath of Katrina (for those whites who think that the GOP is going to be on their side).


From a purely racialistic (instead of legalistic) line of reasoning, they've already castigated Officer Wilson for the crime of murder their black comrade Michael Brown, damn the evidence!

That sums it up. Blacks see this as all part of a racial struggle. SBPDL has posted photos of blacks taking it to the streets in Ferguson which could be out of South Africa during the apartheid years, or Liberia, or Rwanda or etc., etc. Communists see this as part of a revolutionary struggle. Put them together, and you get a prolonged insurgency in the streets of America.

Anonymous said...


I don’t recall seeing any unsubstantiated slurs against “the Jews” here at SBPDL, but do agree the focus is what the blog title says it is. That would be the articulation of what various & sundry Black people do. Here is a short list of some of the noticeable characteristics of many, but not necessarily all, Negroids, Mulattos, and/or Blacks-

===================
Teach their offspring to hate, scam, demonize, and lie about non-members of the racial group, and to consider them as evil sub-humans to be enslaved or killed by the tribe.

Mutilates the genitals of their male babies in various ways up to and including cannibalism. This early trauma may be part of the racial/tribal bonding and perverting of their young.

Have a fixation with basic bodily functions, particularly the penis, the anus, and excrement (“and sheet”). Constantly referring to these things in their communications and comedy.

Consider crimes committed by members against non-members- Whites in particular- to be righteous acts.

Constant whining about past injustices- real or imagined- done by Whites to their tribal-racial-ethnic group.

Demanding racially-discriminatory reparations for alleged past injustices.

Never any guilt about anything their people might have done in the past or in the present to other ethnic groups. No presentation of remorse, a common attribute of the psychopath.

Constant and perennial psychological projection of crimes of their own onto Whites.

Often creates false flag events (e.g. Duke rapist story) that appear to have been done by Whites or other non-members.

Prefer scamming to working for a living.

Makes war primarily by deception, only uses force when assured of victory.

Inability to operate a successful, non-dependent State.

Small and primitive ability to create and build things- no great architecture, music, art, or literature. Primitive, childish, cartoonish versions only.

Parasitizes the White races.

Often enjoys the torture-killing of members of other races.

Communicates in colorful, over-the-top similes and imagery, especially when describing imaginary crimes.

Aggression indicia includes stock retorts, racially-oriented battle cries (e.g. “never again”, “that’s racist”), racial demonization (e.g. “angry White Man”, “WASP”).

Wants their own geopolitical regions with only tribal members for government officials.

Quick to chimp out when any of the above is pointed out.
======================

To clarify, I don’t disparage the Negroids for wanting their own geopolitical areas and for circling the wagons around members of their own racial group. I’m simply pointing out their noticeable behavioral characteristics, some of which are admirable, others not so much.

-Beyond Hatred

Mr. Rational said...

This comment keeps not appearing, and it's the kind of thing PK normally approves, so I'm trying a third time in case it's Blogger:

The harder these people try to look serious/intellectual/educated, the more foolish they look.

Monkey see, monkey do. Just like a cargo cult.


That is exactly it!  It's like the crazy African-built airplane that could never fly.  You can see the mental disconnect:  these people cannot grasp that there is a substance behind the form, and the substance is the important part.  They try to duplicate the form, and of course it doesn't work.  (If they're in the West, then they cry "racism!".)

If we actually had a science of psychometrics, there would be tests to determine whether individuals lacked this capability.  Those with this deficiency function on the mental level of a European child, and should not be allowed to vote, hold office, own or possess firearms, and a host of other things that require actual mental and moral functioning to do in a free society.

Anonymous said...

I wonder how they will deal with evidence like Mike's blood in the police squad car. Or all 3 autopsy reports agreeing the shots all came from the front. or the blood evidence on the pavement that showed Mike doing a u-turn and charging the officer.
They must be holding meetings now trying to figure out how they can explain away all the evidence. Not to mention all 7 witnesses testimony.
It simply amazing these people have so much time on their hands and all this creative abilities, yet they choose to waste them on crap like mock kangaroo trials.
I guess it's meant as an object lesson showing everyone how "trials" are really conducted in communist countries.
The rule of law be damned.

Don M said...

Off Topic (but just for now)...

Hey everyone!

I inadvertently just saw a trailer for "F*ckin' fo Jeebus" oops, um, I mean "Selma" on the Squid Box. (Mrs Don M was watching it, can't quite ween her off)

It looks positively ghastly! I hope PK will be brave enough to suffer through it and review it for us.

We know the ending though, Martin's dream came true. Just look at Ferguson, Detroit, Memphis, etc.

P.S. Is there a PO Box we can send a donation the old fashioned way to?

Anonymous said...

Hello Lost-in-Miami here,

Ye-shit-ela . . . Priceless! If it weren't for jokes your Shines would be completely useless.

Anonymous said...

Their discovery of evidence and opening statements will be like a recent CEDA debate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrK1a-MT-VI

Philadelphia Mike said...

IMPORTANT

I just found an online memorial page of black on White murders.

http://topconservativenews.com/memorial-wall-black-on-white-murders-in-2014/

It's new...and under construction...and much more detailed than my In Memoriam list.

Please create an icon of it to your desk top. Spread the word.

Philadelphia Mike

Anonymous said...

How do the socialist revolutionaries think anybody will be provided for after they win? The economy will crash, anybody with the means will escape before the borders are closed, and it will be a bloodbath for those who remain. "After the revolution, there will be peace." (The peace of the graveyard.)

Revolution 2014; sponsored in part by International ANSWER and he Revolutionary Communist Party. (Look at who's been providing the printed signs to demonstrators.)

Anonymous said...

I suppose the PD does have a technicality to throw at an officer, for having a non-uniform uniform (by definition, they're all supposed to look alike). People have noticed other standards dropping, wrt tattoos and piercings and such nonsense; so perhaps those officers should get "Wilson" tattoos on their arms (or necks)? Or even a temporary henna inscription, if they lack the lifelong commitment. Or put a deflated football or volleyball in their patrol cars, prominently displaying the name "Wilson".
Or maybe their bosses should just be thankful they aren't showing the ultimate solidarity, by shooting another Mentle Giant.

Anonymous said...

Excellent.

Ace

Anonymous said...

The black guy in the video wears a cap with a commie badge and some colored scarves that probably express solidarity with all things African. The perfect combo: subversion, revolution, Africa, commie.

These kinds of blacks are an indigestible lump. Segregation is the solution but worse ones wait in the wings.

Ace

Anonymous said...

You are at war. Your enemy, among many, is some absurd group calling themselves the International People's Democratic Uhuru Movement. Their armed faction is now the U.S. government. The U.S. government under the Obama administration is using the DOJ and the DOJ's Community Relations Services (originated during the LBJ administration) to bolster these groups.

The goal is modest enough. They want to make negro violent crime less dangerous to violent negro criminals. This may seem incomprehensible to you, but they have a constituency, negroes.

Negroes are now in control of the political process of the nation. Not because of their numbers, though their numbers are undoubtedly greater than the 13% that the census reports. They are in control simply because they demand it. They are aggressive and assertive and that always wins, in case you were confused by that.

What do you do about this? I don't know. I watch a lot of TV, especially sports, because the negro ball players are awesome. I also buy a lot of team hats. I wear them backwards or sort of cocked to the side. I suggest you do the same and just relax, or chill, as your country descends into the inevitable chaotic negro rule.

Anonymous said...

Carolina Cicero-

And how many whites will be on this nig grand jury, pray tell?

0.

Will they be fair?

Is the pope Jewish?

If they find for a trial, are they gonna or better, who do they send out to arrest the man?

Unknown at this time.

Is all of this solid proof that the buttholes are demanding a war?

Lock and load, kids!

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

GREATWHITES,

So i'm guessing that their EBT cards will pay for all the expenses that will come up in the mock grand jury trail? Someone will have to pay for the piece of chalk for the outline of the dead negro lying in the street!


GODSPEED/SEGREGATION NATION!!!

Anonymous said...

I wish the Westboro baptist church would spend some time protesting the deaths of michael brown, trayvon Martin and Eric garner and maybe this ridiculous grand jury. Now wouldn't that confrontation be something to see????

Anonymous said...

I believe we have found a family relation of shitavious. Yeshitela.

North Floridian.

Anonymous said...

It amazes me that anyone has discussions about negroes nowadays without immediately discussing genetics and behavior. With what we now know, all negro dysfunction is completely explained by their differing arrangement of alleles in their genome. It's no mystery. And unless they breed the stupid/violence out of their line, they are doomed to eternal low IQ etc status. It's the Genome, stupid.

Steppenwolf said...

I recently had a conversation with a colleague about the black plague. Though acutely aware of the danger to his family therefrom, armed and alert, he felt obligated to declare that he was not a racist. Gently, I pointed out that the only people indoctrinated in the ways of multi-culti, are whites; the rest of the world—historically and presently—is tribal.

The trends have been discernible for a long time: An aging white population, failing to reproduce; America being overrun by imported third world savages. Political ideology pales next to blood and soil issues.

Unless action is soon initiated, the outlook for white America is filled with ugliness. The question, of course, is what precisely is the necessary action to take, and who will be the leaders.

Anonymous said...

Race card? More like a hand full of spades!

Anonymous said...

A black thug tries to kill a policeman after the black thug had robbed a store and assaulted the owner, but the policeman kills the black thug and now it's hire only blacks for police. yeah that makes sense in this country now.

Anonymous said...

Men of Harlech, stop your dreaming...can't you see their spear points gleaming...

World_War_Me said...

Speaking of Selma, and as a resident of Alabama, it delights me to point out to my friends here that Selma is #4 of the top ten most dangerous places in Alabama: http://www.movoto.com/al/most-dangerous-places-in-alabama/

While I'm skeptical of this list due to the fact that Montgomery isn't listed, it still gives me great satisfaction to know "Sail-Muh" is a hell hole. Take that, Opruh!

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@BerniceGreenbaum
despite the negroes' lament about him "yearning to be free", what he really wants is a free poke chop, a blunt, and a Colt 45 every few minutes.

I think you have the solution to Negro crime. I wouldn't give the Colt 45 for the number of people killed by drunks either with cars or guns, but imagine if we gave free pot to every young male negro with the "Warrior Gene?" It would be cheaper than prison, and safer than letting them wander the streets until they earn the right to go to prison. Free pot to age 35.

No money for children birthed on welfare, however.

Long Island Guido said...

Wont happen in this bizzaro world. They only protest shit that makes white people angry.

Long Island Guido said...

Can we just solve this one big fucking problem with forced segregation already!!

We KNOW thats the only possible solution. Everyone wants it anyway..whether they say they do or dont.

Anonymous said...

Philly Mike,

Could you contact that site and see to it that the name of Jon Swoveland Jr. is added? He was the White toddler (2 years old) shot to death while playing in his front yard in South Bend, Indiana, last April. 8 misunderstood gang members in a turf war shot at each other and missed, and the bullet slammed into Jon's chest a few blocks away. He died in his mother's arms.

Anonymous said...

After watching numerous First 48 episodes I understand (but do not condone) the "stop snitching" mentality.

Blacks criminals make too many mistakes for a modern justice system. It's unbelievable as to how many hold on to direct evidence or tell a girlfriend about their activities. Pressuring witnesses is often their only avail.

CENTURION said...

If africans "snitched" on each other, ALL of them would be in jail.

Californian said...

Men of Harlech, stop your dreaming...can't you see their spear points gleaming...

There's some consideration that the movie "Zulu" (1964) was intended as a metaphor for the explosion of the third world against white civilization, especially in Africa.

The movie shows the battle of Rorke's Drift (1879) where a company of British soldiers (plus some Boer scouts) hold off several thousand Zulu warriors. "Men of Harlech" is sung by the white soldiers at one inspiring point. The movie does show what a small number of white people can do...if they put their minds to it.

Californian said...

How do the socialist revolutionaries think anybody will be provided for after they win?

The purpose for The Revolution is the seizure of political power. To consolidate power, the revolutionaries annihilate their "class enemies." This is done by gulags and enforced starvation--that's been the pattern with the Bolsheviks in Russia, the Communists in China and Cambodia, and assorted "African socialists" (e.g., Mugabe). The destruction of the old society is what they want. If it means killing several millions people, or turning them into refugees, it's a small price to be paid for the revolutionaries driving brand new Benz. Besides, they can always count on the useful idiots in the capitalist world to bail them out with food and medical aid, as well as honorary degrees from liberal universities.

Same pattern (to a lesser degree) here in the Homeland where blacks seize power. Again, let's look at Detroit. Black majority rule has destroyed what was once one of the greatest of American cities. Wrecked it economically, socially, culturally. But to black revolutionaries the destruction of Detroit was a victory because they consolidated control over a chunk of territory. They have driven out YT. And now they drive their fancy cars to city council meetings. True, the lights may not be working and even the chief of police has admitted that civil order has totally broken down. But then again, the new black ruling class can count on Mr and Mrs YT Taxpayer to bail them out, while DWL choruses sing hosannas to equality.

And this is what is going on in Ferguson. Most likely, the city will never recover economically. Most likely, white people will continue to be ethnically cleansed. But you're going to see a black mayor and a black PD and Afro-centric indoctrination in the schools and ministries, plus plenty of blacks-only contracts handed out to the commissariat. So it's a victory.

The thing to grasp is that the destruction is part of the revolutionary process. Only by annihilating the old order can a new one arise. The communists have been quite open in their use of the tactic of class warfare. And they really mean it.

Whether it's Stalin's purges, or the killing fields of Cambodia, or farm attacks in southern Africa today, or Ferguson tomorrow...it's the same old story. The struggle is about power. Political power.

This is something that race realists need to learn.

Anonymous said...

CENTURION said... If africans "snitched" on each other, ALL of them would be in jail.

Good point.

questioning said...

I C whut U done did thar......oy vey!

Anonymous said...

Know your enemy. Here is the forgotten manifesto of communist-terrorist William Ayers who launched the political career of Barry Barack Soetoro Obama from his Chicago living room:

http://zombietime.com/prairie_fire/

Jassi said...

"It's unbelievable as to how many hold on to direct evidence or tell a girlfriend about their activities."

Or post video of their crimes on facebook, or tell reporters about what they did, or create entire websites dedicated to showcasing their criminal activities.

The majority of blacks are literally retarded. Were they white they'd be assigned a social worker and be discouraged from breeding.

Funny how people talk about oppression and privilege as causes of the violent behavior, but how can you not notice the utter stupidity of posting a rape or beating on social media? There is no excuse but stupidity and possibly pride.

Anonymous said...

http://www.newsforage.com/2014/12/next-big-surge-of-refugees-to-hit-us.html

Radio free USSA reported 100,000 muslime refugees per month coming to the Kwanstain, now looking for a link.

CENTURION said...

Californian:

A few years ago a South African singer wrote a really powerful song called De La Rey. Listen to it.

here is the link to youtube, I hope:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=429AUoAWQdY

It is written and sung in "Afrikans" but you will get the message. There are other videos of this song with English subtitles. It has more impact in the Afrikans language.

It is a "anti-British" song about the Boer war. They call the British soldiers "Khakis" as in the color of their uniforms, but it can be changed easily to "Kaffir" which is a word that means "beetle", which is a slur about africans. We could change it to the N word since it involves 2 syllables. Aren't we White people clever?

We Whites, world-wide, have something is common. Our DNA. We need to survive.

(I'm listening to this song as I write this and I am so proud to be a intolerant bigoted redneck crackerass racist pig. I thank GOD for that)

Anonymous said...

Communism and "Africanism" do not mix. The history of African Communism, supposedly grounded in Liberation, Is a squalid story of native fools gulled by KGB operatives for the benefit of the Russian or Chinese treasuries. No hope for the people and no progress politically. It's the same old "We need a strongman they us,"

Anonymous said...


Californian said...

The purpose for The Revolution is the seizure of political power. To consolidate power, the revolutionaries annihilate their "class enemies." This is done by gulags and enforced starvation--that's been the pattern with the Bolsheviks in Russia, the Communists in China and Cambodia, and assorted "African socialists" (e.g., Mugabe). The destruction of the old society is what they want. If it means killing several millions people, or turning them into refugees, it's a small price to be paid for the revolutionaries driving brand new Benz...

Same pattern (to a lesser degree) here in the Homeland where blacks seize power...

The thing to grasp is that the destruction is part of the revolutionary process. Only by annihilating the old order can a new one arise. The communists have been quite open in their use of the tactic of class warfare. And they really mean it.

Whether it's Stalin's purges, or the killing fields of Cambodia, or farm attacks in southern Africa today, or Ferguson tomorrow...it's the same old story. The struggle is about power. Political power.

This is something that race realists need to learn. December 16, 2014 at 10:03 AM

Exactly. And the Revolution always has to have a scapegoat, the demonic Outsider that is preventing the attainment of Utopia. For the proto-Marxist Jacobins the Outsider was the French aristocracy, for the Communists, the bourgeois and the kulaks, for Pol Pot the intellectuals and anyone who wore glasses. And for the politically-correct "Homelanders" (whatever the fuck that means*) the demon is the White Man.

This is why they call it Cultural Marxism, it is all the same formulae of the Communist horrors with the scapegoat switched out. An economic class has been replaced by an entire race/species of human. Another, perhaps more accurate term is "Racial Marxism".

So only by annihilating the White race can the racial Utopia be attained, as the Racial Marxists have stated over and over in no uncertain terms.

*Homeland is a gender-neutral term for Fatherland or Motherland.
A governmental Department in the US is the same type of organization as a Committee in the USSR.
The translation of KGB is
Committee for Motherland Security.
Department of Homeland Security.

-Beyond Hatred

Long Island Guido said...

More evil twisted behavior from Deblasios sons.

Anonymous said...

The thing to grasp is that the destruction is part of the revolutionary process. Only by annihilating the old order can a new one arise. The communists have been quite open in their use of the tactic of class warfare.

Revolutionary process? That implies an underlying plan which does not exist.

Liberals don't actually want the destruction seen in Detroit. Their fantasy is a city with equal racial representation in all areas of life. They are children that want to believe race is only skin deep and that Black cities would flourish if not for the meanie White racist devils that hold them back. Liberals certainly support class warfare but don't want Black dysfunction at the Detroit level since it undermines their theories.

There is no political plan in places like Detroit or Ferguson. It's just the natural result of having a government dominated by children. That also includes "race-blind" conservatives. Both parties are dominated by children that can't even be bothered to spend an hour reading about ESTABLISHED brain differences. We have a government of 10 year olds.

Bogolyubski said...

The Bluegum Tribal Council is thus seated. Welcome to your new "rule of law" in the Banana Empire, comrades. Betcha most of the brave white guys in Banana Empire badges will enforce their decrees once some blackrobe affixes its signature.

Woodsy in DeBlasio City:
I want them all tested for drugs.

The higher the better. Stupefied to the point of hooting and grunts is best of all. Won't stop all the Jessica Coalburners hipster SJW's and their pathetic white weasel wannabe wiggaz from cheerleading, but hardly anything ever does short of death.

@Californian 10:03 A
A most eloquent description - and completely truthful. The pattern is there and its being repeated before our eyes. Point this out and all the ankle-biters and trolls point-and-sputter "conspiracy theories" - demonstrating yet again their fine public-schul edumcation of historical illiteracy.

Radio free USSA reported 100,000 muslime refugees per month coming to the Kwanstain, now looking for a link.

Thanks Repukes. One thing you can always count on from the Gay Old Pedos and their Chamber of Commerce rope-seller supporters is a knife in the back. Look on the bright side. The Musloids holy book even mentions how the rocks and trees themselves will say: "Oh mujahedin, there is a TWMNBN hiding behind me! You should come and kill him."

Centurion notes:
It is written and sung in "Afrikans" but you will get the message. There are other videos of this song with English subtitles. It has more impact in the Afrikans language.

It is a "anti-British" song about the Boer war. They call the British soldiers "Khakis" as in the color of their uniforms, but it can be changed easily to "Kaffir" which is a word that means "beetle", which is a slur about africans. ...


Actually those here who are interested in learning something should study this little war - which was really a crime against humanity. The British - who were the squids' willing servants and step-n-fetchits at the time - sent their military to crush and starve fellow white Christians at the behest of their TWMBN masters, even enlisting negroes for this purpose, because the Banksteins wanted control of the gold and diamonds in SA (which they control to this very day). Afrikaner women and children were herded into concentration camps by the tens of thousands and were raped, killed and starved in great number. The identical behavior was seen recently in Rotherham, UK among whites wearing the uniform. You can't have solidarity with traitors, Centurion. There's only one just punishment for treason.

You might want to ask AnalogMan about this sordid tale, as I expect he knows much more than me. Suffice it to say, the Boer War serves as a perfect example of whites' willingness to betray, murder and commit all manner of atrocities against their fellow whites for the sake of promises made by non-whites who are paying them for their criminal activities. In the Boer War, the Banksteins had to pay in real money. Now they can pay with notes backed up by clown-farts. All my points about the unreliability of those who persist believing fairy-tales and in wearing the badges and uniform of criminal empires wholly devoted to our extermination are supported not only here but throughout the intervening 120 years.

Anonymous said...


Correction-
"Homeland is a gender-neutral term for Fatherland or Motherland.
A governmental Department in the US is the same type of organization as a Committee in the USSR.
The translation of KGB is
Committee for Motherland Security.
Department of Homeland Security."

Not quite, sorry. KGB translates as
Committee for State Security.
The KGB motto was "Loyalty to [Communist] Party, loyalty to Motherland (Rodina)", which is probably the source of the confusion. Notice Party comes ahead of Rodina, just like in Orwell's 1984.

When DHS was formed, they quietly imported at least one (the #2 man), probably more, former KGB high officials as DHS advisers. Maybe he advised them to stand by in Ferguson, so as not to let a good crisis go to waste.

Bogolyubski tells us the story about not being the first one to stop applauding during a standing ovation to Stalin, lest you be hauled off to the gulag. Apparently this also extended to not being the first to start applauding-

"...(comedian) Raikin’s recognition became universal and incontestable after Stalin ipse heard his performances and was so impressed that he invited Raikin to perform at his birthday party, where the guests were literally shocked by Raikin’s boldness, and all refrained from applauding the comic, when they saw that Stalin himself was not applauding. While everybody was stiff in tense apprehension of what was to follow, Stalin looked around bemusedly, then slowly raised a glass of wine and proposed a toast to Raikin’s best of health. After this charming entr’acte, came a roaring applause, as Stalin’s guests could let their deep emotion go, directed probably mostly toward Stalin’s grand gesture, but some of it trickling down to Raikin as well."

There's so much we can learn about how to behave these days by studying the other depraved communist dictatorships of the past. Be very careful about the details of timing of your applause in BRA.

-Beyond Hatred

CENTURION said...

What has happened to the Boer(farmers)/Afrikaners of South Africa is our future.

They kept slaves when they first arrived there. Then, when the moved north to get away from the British, they took their slaves with them. Now look where they are.

If/When we ever migrate to the NorthWest, we will just be putting all of ourselves in one easy area to nuke. And nuke us they will.

Thus, today the Boer/Afrikaner is the slave. They are ruled by the very race they used as farm tools. How is that for injustice.

The curse of the White man is his greedy desire for cheap labor. We used the negro, then the chinaman. Look who outnumbers us and out produces us and from whom we have to borrow large sums of our own money.......

So, any future White Homeland MUST ONLY CONTAIN WHITE PEOPLE. If not, we will visit this mess again. Letting chinamen or aztecs or "good" ones in, as adopted children or spouses, will only guarantee this hell again.

How many times will we have to endure this?

White Only or let us just slit our throats now and end the joke.

Anonymous said...

DUM (Democratic Uhuru Movement) has it exactly right.
I am in complete agreement with them.

Black cops for black people.
Say it one mo' time...

Black cops for black people.

Black people in black areas should be policed solely by black cops....along with black courts served by black judges, black DA's, prosecutors, defense attorneys, bailiffs and court stenographers.
Next is black schools. After that a glorious black homeland.

At some point maybe we can wall off the black malignancy from white civilization.

Californian said...

A few years ago a South African singer wrote a really powerful song called De La Rey.

It's worth studying the Boer War to see how white people could take on an empire. Granted, the British won in the end, but the Boers gave them a run for their money. Eventually South African whites did establish a white nationalist state.

I have a little experience in that part of the world. A point made to me by a number of South Africans was that they made two fundamental errors:
(1) They should have displaced the native population (like white Americans did with the Indians). Instead, South Africans created the conditions which allowed the black populace to explode in numbers.
(2) They should have opened up white immigration from Europe after World War II. This would have gave them the numbers and the combat vets to take on all comers.

As it was, white troops in South Africa, Rhodesia and Portuguese Africa were able to win most of the battles against black insurgents during the Cold War. Of course, the real struggle was political and in Moscow, London, Wall Street and DC.

This is all something we need to consider today.

Anonymous said...

"Can we just solve this one big fucking problem with forced segregation already!! "

At one time there was segregation, but it ended. Anyone calling for it to return needs to understand very clearly why it ended. I see no sign that anyone here (or elsewhere, for that matter) ever has tried to seriously address this. The most I ever see is conspiracy theories -- it's not you, and certainly not me, it's that man behind the tree. But blaming others for this white problem is futile, since it is clear that other races and ethnic groups only get away with what whites allow them to get away with. Viewed in this way, it can be seen that the problem of the slow genocide attendant to the end of segregation, or the failure of whites to (re-)establish a racial homeland, is ENTIRELY a white problem. The problem is solved just as soon as whites collectively change their behavior.

It may be tempting to see this as saying a political solution is possible; that we should attempt to build a movement or coalition. Nothing could be further from my meaning. Rather, we must understand that there are reasons, to some extent probably based in genetics, that whites will not and cannot collectively change their behavior. But I also don't believe that all is necessarily lost. There are options, but all are predicated on first understanding our situation.

bernicegreenbaum said...

Californian said:

Whether it's Stalin's purges, or the killing fields of Cambodia, or farm attacks in southern Africa today, or Ferguson tomorrow...it's the same old story. The struggle is about power. Political power.

This is something that race realists need to learn

*****
Well said. It is easily a divide and conquer game. I try not to play into that. You're right about the larger picture. This continues until Mr. & Mrs. White America stop paying for it with their taxes. If enough people pare down their income to a bare minimum, the serpent's head instantly gets cut off. I'm not saying starve to death, but for heaven's sake SACRIFICE! This is for your kids and any survival of the White race.

DD-762 said...

It is my understanding that attorney Algonquin J. Calhoun is going to coordinate the faux grand jury.

If you are not familiar with Mr. Calhoun, Goggle him.

rex freeway said...

If the grand jury is made up of the likes of this ilk, then we already know the outcome.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmO-ziHU_D8

Anonymous said...

We must segregate. Every race on the face of this great earth knows that a large percentage of blacks are a blight on our society.

Anonymous said...

I so wish I could put word to paper. Like you people. I sometimes want to jump up after reading PK and the comments. Don't throw rocks at me. But, wish we had a like button!

Anonymous said...

Empires that crumbled at the hands of savage cretans. Food for thought friend

10mm AUTO said...

Wow, everyone is really focused and on point.

Bogo, Californian, et al., I want to interject that the most stable state available to us as a model is the one we are using for the Homeland in the Northwest, which is Switzerland. While other trading kingdoms, Empires, and powers have come and gone, the Swiss stay. The Swiss have learned (as have the Amish and some others) to kill the "Revolutionary engine" in government. I am sure there is an entire book that could be written on the subject. Please note that both the Swiss and the Amish are MONO-RACIAL.

However, your comments about the Saturday people and their influence in meddling in anti-YT wars/money/politics are spot on. I am waiting as well for AnalogMan's comments about South Africa.

With the Constitution set up for Whites in the Northwest, we hope to live the same lives as the Swiss. We will watch from behind our mountains and deserts as the USA multiculturally "bleeds out" one city (Detroit, St Louis), one County (Clayton County, LA County, St. Louis County), one State, one Region at a time. I do not believe they will nuke us, any more than the negros in Detroit want to nuke the Pennsylvania Dutch, though they do want to rape Amish women.

In a way, the anti-White Race Hate movie "Elysium" is a perfect metaphor for what we want to accomplish. Even the word "elysium" means "blessed islands" or "blessed fields" and is a area separate and apart from Hades in the old Religion. We simply want a place apart.

Also, in the movie "Elysium" the Untermensch which have left the world a hellhole by brown and black overpopulation and pollution have killed all the Whites in the World except for Matt Damon. Given this, the ethical responsibility is not on Whites (who are all dead except for Elysium) but on the hordes. However, the hordes lay a moral claim to White technology and "citizenship" to Elysium by mere pathos (a desire for medical technology) and not any legitimate claim for land or necessities; indeed the negros and the brown have literally conquered the entire Earth.

Anonymous said...

Anheuser Busch left St Louis due to black terrorism, Stroh Brewery left Detroit due to black terrorist ethics, now these pseudo intellectual africanus savants pose as a mongoloid jury. Priceless. Be aware be prepared

TMH said...

Bogolyubski said…

blah, blah, TWNDWB, Tea Party, Repukes, blah, blah


Never mind the mind numbing details. Bogoblyskski said the Jews did it.

For the dumbest among us, that's all you need. It's pretty bad and the Jews did it.

See, that frees you from doing anything to right this country. You can go back to the TV, comfortable in the fact that Jews are doing all this and there is nothing whatsoever that you can do about it.

AnalogMan said...

Wow.

These comments today are on fire. So much to address. Where do I start? This will probably take several comments.

First, a hearty round of applause for Beyond Hatred. That was cleverly done.

Let's address the easy points next. Small points of historical fact about South Africa.

The term "kaffir" doesn't mean a beetle. It's an Arab word meaning infidel, or unbeliever. That's still what moslems call non-moslems.

When the earliest Portuguese explorers rounded the Cape, they encountered the Babuntu, and also Arab sailors who traded with the Babuntu for slaves, ivory and so on. From the Arabs they learned that the Africans were called kaffirs. They understood this to be a racial designation, and so for centuries it was universally understood in Europe, without any pejorative connotation. Even in scientific terms; e.g. the tree formerly known as a kafferboom (Afrikaans - kaffir tree) still bears the embarrassing botanical name Erythrina caffra.

White men never made slaves of Babuntus in any significant numbers, and certainly never took many, if any of them on the Great Trek.

White men never saw a Babuntu until they penetrated several hundred miles into the Eastern Cape, at the Great Fish River. The indigenous population they found at the Cape of Good Hope were Khoi/San, like the Bushmen; they named them Hottentots, in imitation of their speech. These were useless as slaves, therefore they imported slaves from Malaya.

Britain annexed the Cape Colony in 1805 and abolished slavery in 1835. This was one of the causes of the Boer migration known as the Great Trek which resulted in the establishment of the Boer republics: the Orange Free State between the Orange and Vaal (grey, or gray, if you must) rivers, and the Transvaal republic. The Anglo-Boer War was fought between the British Empire and these two republics. I had ancestors on both sides.

This war was the origin of the concentration camp. The Boers fought a guerrilla war, hitting the Brits and melting back to their farms. In order to deny them the support of their womenfolk, the Brits rounded up the women and children and put them in camps. I can't believe that there was widespread rapine in the camps, but certainly many died of disease and deprivation. My great grandmother was held in a camp and lost a child there. This is still an issue that causes great bitterness among the Boers.

More background and a short biography of De la Rey here: http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2010/04/koos-de-la-rey.html

Enough for now...

Anonymous said...

re, Please note that both the Swiss and the Amish are MONO-RACIAL.

NONSENSE.
Swiss just voted for immigration and SL has blacks and mussies.

AnalogMan said...

There's a lot of insight in this thread. Too many great comments to quote.

I think we're all agreed, with Jefferson and Lincoln, that we can't live in the same polity with Africans. I think we all agree with 14Ω that we can't run away forever.

There are supporters of the Butler Plan - the Northwest Front. Others point out the vulnerability of a White homeland to nuclear devastation. All valid points. I think Vox Day got to the crux of the matter with a very insightful post, where he said;

"The only thing that is keeping the country together at this point is that the white middle class is still doing just well enough to maintain hope that things are going to turn around eventually. Once that hope is entirely gone, they will be willing to begin taking the risks that they are presently unwilling to take."

Ladies and gentlemen, this is what's killing us. Those good old Christian virtues. "And now abideth Faith, Hope and Charity...", but Hope is the evil sister. Hope keeps us coming back time after time for yet another disappointment. Maybe this time... If I vote Republican, maybe they'll reverse this insanity... maybe if we spend a little more on education, negroes will become just like us... maybe if we move to the new suburb, the negroes won't follow, at least in my lifetime... maybe my pension will still be there when I retire... maybe Jesus will come again and make it all right...

There comes a time when we have to face up to the fact that there is no hope. Nobody's going to give us anything. There is only force, or the credible threat of it. Nothing else can change anything. We can act in our defence, and risk losing everything, or we can hope for the best, and lose everything, slowly.

We know what we need: a White Zion. So, how do we get it, and how do we keep it?

It seems obvious to me that we have to start with a territory where we already dominate, that is big enough and has enough resources to maintain our world-wide population, and that we can defend. Europe would seem to be the obvious choice, but ironically may be too polluted with darkies already to be reclaimed in the short term. Wherever it is, the one non-negotiable condition is that everybody else has to go. That may be the determining factor.

So, let's say for the sake of argument that we take the Pacific Northwest states of the USA when that entity breaks up in the inevitable Balkanization to come. How to we take it, and how do we hold it?

Those who doubt that it can be done might like to read up on Fourth Generation War. In the middle east ISIL has come from nowhere and carved out a fair piece of territory from several sovereign states in the area. In Ireland, the IRA were estimated to have no more than fifty active fighting members, yet they held 50,000 British troops occupied and were eventually bought off by the British government for a few government jobs. Oh, yes, it can be done. We could also consider another example of an ethnostate, but that one may not be mentioned.

continued...

AnalogMan said...

Continued...

So, we come to the clincher: what good is it all if you're just concentrating all your fish in one barrel, to mix a few metaphors?

Consider a hypothetical case, a small ethnic state surrounded by hostile neighbours. Say, this state needed to deter a possible attack in overwhelming numbers that it couldn't survive. It might devise a strategy, which it might call the Samson option. It might say to the world, "We have concealed a nuclear bomb in each of your capital cities. If ever our country is destroyed, no matter by whom, we have agents who will detonate those bombs. It would be in your interests to try to avoid that eventuality."

Fanciful? Hell, yes. So, give me some more ideas. We need to think outside the box. Mostly, we need to stop thinking in terms of stop-gap solutions.

We need to give up Hope.

Californian said...

I wanted to respond to the following post, since it raises some valid questions:

Revolutionary process? That implies an underlying plan which does not exist.

Liberals don't actually want the destruction seen in Detroit. Their fantasy is a city with equal racial representation in all areas of life. They are children that want to believe race is only skin deep and that Black cities would flourish if not for the meanie White racist devils that hold them back. Liberals certainly support class warfare but don't want Black dysfunction at the Detroit level since it undermines their theories.

There is no political plan in places like Detroit or Ferguson. It's just the natural result of having a government dominated by children. That also includes "race-blind" conservatives. Both parties are dominated by children that can't even be bothered to spend an hour reading about ESTABLISHED brain differences. We have a government of 10 year olds.


My comments:

* Groups such as the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) and the ANSWER Coalition (a communist front organization which exploits the antiwar movement) actively support minorities as the new revolutionary class. Somewhere in the late 20th century, many communist organizations switched gears from calling for a working class revolution to agitating among minorities. These groups have extensive infrastructures in the US, with solidarity groups working internationally. They have gotten thousands of people out into the streets over various issue, with Ferguson the most recent.

* Marxist-Leninists such as Noel Ignatiev (formerly of Harvard) have called for the "abolition" of the white race, or more diplomatically, the ending of "white privilege." Their movement has taken root on campuses nationwide. Let me note that when Marxist-Leninists call for the abolition of a class enemy's "privilege," they mean destroying that enemy via everything from denial of rights to consignment to the gulag. True from Lenin's USSR to Mugabe's Zimbabwe.

* Black radicals have openly stated that the various urban riots since the 1960s have been "uprisings" against white domination. Granted, there is hyperbole in their rhetoric. Nonetheless, black city governments have pushed policies which force whites out of the cities their ancestors built (review various articles in SBPDL for details). Add to this the open black-on-white violence in the form of flashmobs and gangbanging, all of which would constitute ethnic cleansing under other circumstances.

* Race based non-white groups, such as the NAACP, Black Student Unions, La Raza, and etc., all receive funding from corporations, universities and the government (i.e., the taxpayer). They all advocate for their own very real legal privileges (e.g., affirmative action, legalization of "undocumented" aliens on a racial basis, etc.). And they are in bed with the ACLU and other liberal advocacy groups. Ask yourself: "Supposing that white activists had chapters on every major university campus, and were subsidized with tens of millions of dollars, and had a national legal organization backing them up?" Wouldn't that white organization be a serious political power, one capable of making revolutionary changes?

* Every major campus has black and other "studies" departments which openly push hatred of whites, and are centers for political agitation. Again, ask: "Supposing there were white advocacy departments on every major university?" Wouldn't that be a serious political power, one capable of making revolutionary changes?

[continued]

Californian said...

[continued]

* It just may be that in the past all that what I described above was all on the fringe. But in recent years these movements have become increasingly powerful. Professional revolutionaries would call it a "protracted struggle." It takes years or decades of agitation and guerrilla warfare to bring about the overthrow of the system. Ferguson represents an escalation to the next higher stage of the struggle.

* Many mainstream institutions support anti-white policies. It has been reported that the YMCA (!) supports the Wisconsin "UnFair" campaign. This is a campaign to demonize white people as bearers of the "sin" of racism. Critical race theory, as taught on universities across the Homeland, claims that only white people can be racist and that all white people benefit from segregation-slavery.

* Many mainstream institutions have been subverted. You have Leninist style commissars on the job and in the classrooms pushing the party line on “diversity.” Check out the recent "Atlantic" magazine which demanded reparations for slavery. We're talking mainstream media here, folks, not some mimeographed pamphlet cranked out by communist hacks.

* White people are today denied many of their Constitutional rights: Free speech (try talking about "white pride" on the job and see how long you last); association (not in the face of "open housing"); equal protection under the law (hatecrime legislation is not intended to protect whites); and we can go down the list.

* Sam Donaldson sums it up in his diktat to the Tea Party: "It's Not Your Country Anymore." How much more clearer do we want it other than a spokesman for the "mainstream" media informing white people that it is time for them to get out of Dodge?

[continued]

Californian said...

[continued]

* As for liberals: they live in a delusional world. I'll put in my usual plug for James Burnham's "Suicide of the West," probably the best single dissection of modern liberalism on the market. Broadly, modern liberalism creates a fantasy world which rationalizes away defeats for white/Western peoples and turns them into "victories" for equality. Whether or not liberals want the destruction seen in Detroit (or Ferguson or Newark or Birmingham or Mogadishu or Johannesburg or Europe's banlieues, or etc.), they have done nothing to resist the forces which have trashed these cities. An ideology, by its nature, is impervious to evidence, reasoned argument, or even the collapse of a civilization.

* Are liberals showing any sign of recanting on their liberalism with the evidence of the aforementioned destruction? Even when black majority rule leads to the destruction of much of the continent of Africa, liberals refuse to draw the lessons of the reality of race. Instead, they are hellbent-for-leather to import increasing numbers of black Africans into the heartlands of America and Europa.

* As for conservatives: for the most part, they have demonstrated themselves to be ineffectual in stopping the rising tide of color. The best they can do is come up with arguments that nobody listens to. They prattle about the "Liberal Plantation" without considering that maybe it's not blacks who are the new servile class--but themselves.

* As for the ruling elites in the Western world: there are all sorts of speculations as to why they support the radicals, most of which are in the realm of conspiracy theory. It just may be a rational calculation that the black underclass can be used as muscle against the white middle and thus enhance elite power. Or the entire show may be lunacy gone global. Regardless, it is real, and white peoples need to be prepared to fight for their nations.

Anonymous said...

Re analog man
I do not get the same reassurance as you do when fantasizing about a homeland in the Pacific NW. A shiver of fear runs thru me as I think of Randy Weaver, Waco, and other disastrous outcomes between rebellious "right wing" white folks and the three-letter federal agencies.
How do you overcome such fear? I am not unsympathetic to your thinking but the weight of precedent seems to be against you.
We may indeed live in dangerous times when it comes to race and low-level crime evolving into mid-level terror, but it seems to me as long as the forces of government are confronting them and not us, bluntly put, I am not rooting for Apocalypse.
It sounds mundane but slow and steady cultivation of friendly forces in government is a more intelligent approach than revolutionary rhetoric.

Californian said...

AnalogMan said... Fanciful? Hell, yes. So, give me some more ideas. We need to think outside the box. Mostly, we need to stop thinking in terms of stop-gap solutions.

First, it is important to have a vision to inspire people. A White Homeland is one such vision. It's a way to get people to think big. A White Homeland may not be the only or even optimal solution, but for now it's an idea which has some traction. There are other ideas out there, of course, so let's not limit the debate.

Yes, a White Homeland would come under siege from the federal government, from the UN, from DWL activists. Just look at the jihad waged against white-run South Africa. So a white Homeland would have to be prepared to fight. But then again, struggle is an inherent part of freedom. Look how white-run Rhodesia and South Africa were able to stand off insurgents and thrive. South Africa had its own nuclear and space programs. The dilemma was that in both countries, whites lacked the numbers. Blacks became an uncontrollable majority. This means that any White Homeland would have to be just that, white.

There's the military struggle, defending the frontiers. This, I believe, would not be too difficult. Small numbers of white Rhodesian and South African troops were able to defeat large numbers of black insurgents in the 1960s to 1980s. Read any accounts of the Rhodesian bush war or Angolan border war for ideas.

There's the economic struggle. Transnational corporations have promoted globalism for their own interests. A White Homeland could not rely on cheap foreign labor. It could not let its industries be treated as pawns on a globalized chess boards. There are any number of ways a national economy could be worked, a matter for separate discussion.

There's the political struggle, smashing the multicult. Sweden, Norway, and many more European countries were white ethnostates until recent years. But they lost out on the agitprop front and now are opening their frontiers to third world invaders. A White Homeland must have control of its own media and schools to promote a healthy racial outlook. It must support organizations which promote a healthy racial outlook. (Consider how today corporations, governments and universities support anti-white groups such as the NAACP, La Raza, the UnFair Campaign, ad nauseam...then ask: "what if all those millions of dollars were available to pro-white groups?")

This also means dealing with subversives...and this raises some real issues of civil liberties. I wouldn't want to live in a police state, but the internal enemy must be combated. Here's one idea: any white person promoting open borders or importing African "refugees" would be immediately deported to the third world hellhole of their choice (Haiti, Liberia, Congo, Zimbabwe, Detroit, the Malmo No-Go zones...).

There are plenty of lessons to be learned from recent struggles. Yes, the federal police put the hammer down on Waco and the Weavers. But at the time, there was little in the way of organized resistance to the feds. The aftermath of these actions led to the rise of the militia movement and self-help organizations. This has paid off in such confrontations as the Bundy Ranch.

Race realists might study the Ferguson Fracas: learn how to organize, to take it to the streets, to get the media to kowtow, to get the cops to stand down. Race realists need to "hit the books" and study information warfare, psychological operations, netrocentric organization, the tactics of civil disobedience, Fourth (and Fifth) Generation Warfare, and all the rest of it.

This last point is vital. There is a science to political struggle. This should be a topic for every race realist website.

AnalogMan said...

Anon @ 3:28,

Indeed there is no assurance in fantasizing about a homeland. That was the whole point of my comment: that nothing will be done until we are prepared to take risks; which will not happen as long as we have any hopes of "friendly forces in government". Face it: there are no such forces.

I've been down this road before. My country is gone. Your country is all but finished. It won't be saved without bloodshed, and many casualties. But you (collectively) won't accept that as long as you have hope that maybe things will work out OK. That's human nature.

It's also human nature to look back afterwards and say, "If only...".

Quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn

"At what exact point, then should one resist the communists? ... How we burned in the prison camps later thinking: what would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if during periods of mass arrests people had simply not sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand. ... The Organs [police] would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers ... and notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt."

Anonymous said...

I see no one has attempted to answer my question about why segregation always breaks down. Instead, everyone only wants to rehash failed strategies and suggest they be tried again, the very definition of insanity.

Recall that in America legal segregation lasted for less than 60 years. Now you want people who couldn't even keep negroes out of their children's schools to suddenly develop enough concern for their race to form their own nation state? That's simply not realistic.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said ”. . . It may be tempting to see this as saying a political solution is possible; that we should attempt to build a movement or coalition. Nothing could be further from my meaning. Rather, we must understand that there are reasons, to some extent probably based in genetics, that whites will not and cannot collectively change their behavior. But I also don't believe that all is necessarily lost. There are options, but all are predicated on first understanding our situation.”

I'll throw out a couple thoughts for consideration. To believe that whites are genetically locked into a death spiral of permissive genocide because they cannot change their behavior seems unlikely although it might be possible. I have read that some characteristics of white people have been present for approximately 70,000 years, and that modern white people appeared about 12,000 years ago. During that period of time the white race has clashed with and encountered many other races, yet we are here today. We have probably extinguished a number of other races and we have a proven record of conquering and enslaving non-white races. It seems unlikely that our generation is the unlucky generation to see the single blip in the historical record of whites where we simply decided to lie down and die.

So if we assume that we remain genetically capable of protecting ourselves, we might ask why we aren't doing so. We might ask ourselves what is different about the most recent 50 years from the previous 12,000-70,000 years that is keeping us from reacting. Perhaps this is the first time in our history that our enemy is within our own ranks and therefore not recognized by many whites. I'm confident that even with our Muslim president, if terrorists from another land started killing Americans and destroying our property at the rate of our black population, there would be a fearsome response by whites.

It is almost as if blacks are the humanoid version of the aids virus. They live among us and are destroying our society from within, yet many whites cannot recognize them as an invasive species just as a human body cannot recognize the aids virus as a danger. Perhaps this is the first time in our history that conditions led to our tolerating an invasive species within our society long enough to be considered by many to actually be part of our family and therefore exempt from summary expulsion or destruction. If this is the case, the solution is to find a way to trigger white society's immune response so to speak. If this response can be triggered, the necessary changes to society can be forced to occur politically for the simple reason that whites are a significant majority. My opinion is that the solution will be an end to the tolerance of black dysfunction, AA and other black privileges rather than forced segregation although there could be an end to forced integration.

Anonymous said...

After the last fifty years of trying to "uplift" the negroe with: Food Stamps, AFDC checks,SSI disability checks, Housing projects, Section 8 housing, Affirmative Action, EBT,
Medicade, Head Start programs,integration of the public school system, Earned Income Credit....... I have come to one inescapeable conclusion, to "uplift" the negroe one must first have rope.

AnalogMan said...

to "uplift" the negroe one must first have rope.

Too true.

Anonymous said...

First, thanks for your thoughtful reply.

"We might ask ourselves what is different about the most recent 50 years from the previous 12,000-70,000 years that is keeping us from reacting. Perhaps this is the first time in our history that our enemy is within our own ranks and therefore not recognized by many whites. ... Perhaps this is the first time in our history that conditions led to our tolerating an invasive species within our society long enough to be considered by many to actually be part of our family and therefore exempt from summary expulsion or destruction. If this is the case, the solution is to find a way to trigger white society's immune response so to speak."

One thing of relatively recent advent that has changed the picture dramatically is the enormous growth of technology. Instead of being peripheral to human life, over the last century or so it's become central. In any case, it's clear that without this metastasis of the technological system, the white race would have remained confined to its ancestral homelands, protected from other races by expanses of deserts, oceans, and steppes. At the present time, it also is clear that if that system were to suddenly disappear, there would be an immense die-off, primarily in the non-white world, and things would probably return to the status quo ante pretty quickly.

Two thousand years of Christianity have also had a mollifying effect. It's a raceless religion with central doctrines of tolerance, forgiveness, and universal brotherhood. It's made whites quite a different, softer people than we were even two thousand years ago. Some may think this is too short a time for evolution to work its effects, but Cochran and Harpending (The 10,000-year Explosion) have shown that even in such a short time frame there can be significant genetic change. For example, the Romans thought nothing about committing genocide on competing tribes, and were so blood-thirsty that they even made death into public entertainment. After the Spartacus slave revolt they crucified the defeated slaves along a 300 mile stretch of roadway from Rome to the sea at Brundisium, putting up about one crucified slave every 100 yards or so as a lesson to the rest. It's hard to imagine the white race having the collective will to perpetrate any such thing today on its internal enemies.

Nevertheless, the destruction or collapse of the technological system on a global basis would also disintegrate the American police state, which is highly dependent on technological means of control, and which is at this point essentially the only thing forcing the races together. However, abandonment of the technological system could never happen as a voluntary measure as it would mean incredible hardship; yet it seems to me that anything short of it won't result in a permanent separation of the races.

Anonymous said...

Watching COPS and the police chase a guy into a canal in Broward County and drag his still resisting ass to the safety of dry land with him shouting "I can't breathe". So that is the origin of those resisting arrest chant comes from.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said ”Nevertheless, the destruction or collapse of the technological system on a global basis would also disintegrate the American police state, which is highly dependent on technological means of control, and which is at this point essentially the only thing forcing the races together. However, abandonment of the technological system could never happen as a voluntary measure as it would mean incredible hardship; yet it seems to me that anything short of it won't result in a permanent separation of the races.”

I can't disagree that an abandonment of the technological system would force a reset a number of ways including the weakening of what you view as the American police state. Where our opinions might differ is that I view the police as a tool used by the government rather than an autonomous entity controlling the population for its own purposes. The police will operate within the limits set by law, and the laws are enacted by politicians who are elected by voters. The source of the problem might not be the tool used by the government, but the way that the tool is used by the government. The way the government uses its tools is still determined by the voters, but unfortunately many of these voters are addicted to the entitlement programs doled out by the government and they will vote to extend these programs at the expense of all else.

Rather than deliberately crash the entire system and rely on chance that the system rising from the ashes will be better for the survivors than what we have today, I would prefer to find a way coerce the government to govern responsibly. To do this we will have to change the reasons people cast their votes. We need to either disrupt the black voting bloc or form a larger white voting bloc. I'm not suggesting that this can be done peacefully, but I do believe that it can be accomplished without starting a new civilization from scratch. If this can't be accomplished, a crash will probably occur on its own when the money runs out.

I don't believe that a separation of races by government action will happen in our country under our current constitutional framework, but I do believe that it would be constitutional to permit people to self-segregate themselves and businesses, and I see no reason why individuals shouldn't be permitted to discriminate as they please. Discrimination by non-government entities might be un-PC or against some views of public policy, but I've never understood how it can be unconstitutional. The constitution was intended to protect people from the government, not people from people. Presently, almost all discrimination is prohibited because it would be detrimental to blacks and blacks have that pesky tendency to vote as a bloc. This prohibition is usually by law, and laws can be changed so long as they are constitutional.

Anonymous said...

We disagree, but I would say that anyone who doesn't believe that America has become a police state hasn't been paying attention. It would be easy to show that we live in what is very much a post-Constitutional era, long past any chance of serious political reform. Even our words here are almost certainly being monitored, catalogued, and assessed for threats by various police agencies. That this situation will only get worse with continued technological "progress" is also easy to show.

Evidently you believe that despite this, racism will again soon become fashionable among whites. I see no sign of it, and all history, I think, contradicts you. The two political manifestations of white racism in the last 150 years, the American Civil War and WWII, both turned out badly for the racist side. It's clear that the trend is very much in favor of race mixing, or in other words, slow genocide for whites. This is to be expected as it follows a familiar and invariant pattern: diverse races encounter each other and establish an economic relationship, which then causes social mixing between them, which then always ends in genetic mixing.

I also wouldn't expect a random financial collapse to have the desired effect. The system has great resilience, and in all likelihood would continue to grind along in the same direction, albeit perhaps more slowly. This is true with even greater force for a localized collapse as opposed to a global collapse. A strictly financial collapse could even be used as a further excuse for globalization; for example, to introduce a global currency. Such a development would only hasten our national and racial destruction.

Californian said...

This is a good thread and needs to be continued.

So if we assume that we [white people] remain genetically capable of protecting ourselves, we might ask why we aren't doing so. We might ask ourselves what is different about the most recent 50 years from the previous 12,000-70,000 years that is keeping us from reacting.

I'd offer several ideas:

* The rise of a pervasive agitprop apparatus which promotes egalitarianism: This operates in the mainstream (as TV, "education," et alia) and on the fringes (as communist revolutionary action). The agitprop has been relentless and has overwhelmed all political-cultural competition. A major error of the pro-white faction in America was in failing to understand the power of television in shaping mass opinion during the critical period of the 1950s-60s.

* The dysgenic effects of upper and middle class population stabilization/decline: This has allowed the genetic underclass to gain an edge in numbers. This was something well understood a century ago (see Lothrop Stoddard among others). One aspect of this is that a white family with one or two children is less likely to want to risk them in armed conflict, leading to a general passivity of white people in the face of black militancy.

(Regarding this last point: I have discussed the car burnings and rioting in Europe with people I know in England. I've pointed out that this is one reason you need a right to bear arms--to defend yourself and your property. Their response has generally been: "Better to let the rioters do some pillaging than risk our own lives in gunfights." Talk about a collapse of the will to power! But it makes some short term sense--if you have only one kid, you can not risk all your genetic inheritance too much. The answer might be in whites having larger families, but various things are working against that, at least for now.)

* The messianic vision of post-modern liberalism: This is the belief that the world has reached the "end to history" and thus we are on the verge of a universal human civilization. This is an illusion which is propped up by destruction of all rivals to liberal democracies (like Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia). Liberals can indulge their belief in a "global citizenship" because for now, black and third world depredations are containable, or can be rationalized away (e.g., The Ferguson riots, which are now nationwide, are really, really protests against discrimination by oppressed blacks who are demanding social justice).

* Globalization: Corporations act trans-nationally, and are less likely to have a stake in a national economy or a national work force. It's in their interests to treat everyone as exchangeable units in a producer-consumer economy. And it's also in their interests to finance minority political groups which break down the white middle class with its patriotism and tendency towards unionization. Again, we might ask, what if all the moneys that corporations pour into minority advocacy groups were instead given to pro-white organizations? Gets back to that agitprop apparatus.

Now, none of this is final. A pro-white movement could deal with it, but it would take a major organizational + agitprop effort, and a considerable period of struggle. There have been massive revivals of the Western world over the millennia: the Crusades, the White Man's Revolution post-Reconstruction South, the overthrow of communism in Eastern Europe. It's something to work for!

Anonymous said...

"Misery loves company."