Friday, December 5, 2014

#WhiteLivesMatter -- Remembering Megan Boken

Never, ever forget the callous words of St. Louis Police spokesman (woman for those gender-suprmacists) Schron Jackson, when she described the rationale behind Zemir Begic's murder. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported her describing the circumstances surrounding his lynching, by four black youth armed with hammers, thusly: 
“We think it was wrong place, wrong time,” police spokeswoman Schron Jackson said.
How many... how many other homicides of white children, grandchildren, brothers, sisters, mothers, aunts, fathers, uncles, grandmothers, and grandfathers have been described in a similar manner by a police spokesman when the suspect in the murder happened to share the same racial background of the killers of Begic? 
Megan Boken, slain in broad daylight on the streets of St. Louis in 2012: The police called it a "robbery gone wrong."


"...wrong place, wrong time."

That any person reading this could have a family member or friend whose final moments on this earth are described in a similar manner by a police spokesperson (quickly printed by the local newspaper and buried forever before further examination) is sorry reminder that life as a white person in 2014 Black-Run America - BRA - is the, "...wrong place, wrong time."

Which brings us to remember another white St. Louis resident who found herself in a situation not unlike the one Begic unwittingly encountered: the 2012 murder of Megan Boken.

At the time a recent St. Louis University graduate, Boken would be murdered by two black males in broad day light (at roughly 2 p.m.) for no other reason than her killer just wanted to rob her. 

Jonathan Esters and Keith Perkins (who strike an uncanny resemblance to the hypothetical son President Barack Obama never had...) were those two black males. 

In attempting to steal her phone in a brazen, daylight robbery, they stole her life (the Daily Mail described it as a "robbery gone wrong"). 
The two individuals who would both be charged for the murder of Megan Boken

Her final moments on earth went from engaging in a casual conversation with her on a cell phone to fighting for her life in what would be remembered as... a "robbery gone wrong." [Police question person of interest in death of volleyball player Megan Boken, FoxNews.com, 8-23-12]:
Dave Marzullo, a police spokesman, said earlier that there was no evidence Boken knew her assailant. 
"We don't know whether the suspect was in the vehicle and got out and shot her or if he opened the door and shot her. There are conflicting statements," Marzullo said. But "we are investigating this as an attempted robbery." 
Boken, who graduated from Saint Louis University last year, was shot roughly two miles from where she was to play that afternoon in an alumni game on the university's campus. 
Boken was talking to her mother when "the phone went static" about the time of the gunfire, her former coach, Anne Kordes, told the Chicago Tribune. Friends grew nervous after Boken failed to appear for the game and they learned from her mother that "something weird happened" during their phone conversation, Kordes said. 
"I think everybody was in a frantic mode wondering where she was. Parents were out combing the neighborhoods," she said.
"...wrong place, wrong time."

"...robbery gone wrong." 

Back when this story first broke, the current mayor of St. Louis, Francis Slay (who was so quick to declare no racial angle to the hammer execution of Zemir Begic by four blacks), said this of Boken's murder: 
“Nothing irritates me more, nothing worries me more when I go to sleep at night and when I wake up every morning than to think about these thugs that are out there, trying to victimize innocent people in our city,” St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay said.
Just who are those thugs terrorizing St. Louis? Each year, the City of St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department releases an Annual Report to the Community. This report breaks down violent crime and the overall percentage of the racial group arrested for each offense. For our purposes, we'll look at the yearly breakdown of those arrested for aggravated assault, robbery, murder, and forcible rape (the data goes from 1999 - 2012, omitting 2001 with 2013 yet to be made available to the public). 

Remember, out of 318,000 people, St. Louis is 49.2 percent black 43.9 percent white (as of 2010 US Census). 

Here's the breakdown 1999:

  • 84.94% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 1999 were black.
  • 91.74% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 1999 were black.
  • 90.2% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 1999 were black.  
  •  88.89% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 1999 were black.
Here's the breakdown for 2000:
  • 85.18% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2000 were black.
  • 90.33% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2000 were black.
  • 91.67% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2000 were black.  
  •  85.19% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2000 were black.

Here's the breakdown for 2002:

  • 86.26% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2002 were black.
  • 91.02% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2002 were black.
  • 94.78% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2002 were black.  
  •  91.06% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2002 were black.

Here's the breakdown for 2003:

  • 85.51% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2003 were black.
  • 89.21% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2003 were black.
  • 96.77% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2003 were black.  
  •  94.19% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2003 were black.

Here's the breakdown for 2004:

  • 86.26% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2004 were black.
  • 91.02% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2004 were black.
  • 94.78% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2004 were black.  
  •  91.06% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2004 were black.
 Heres' the breakdown for 2005:
  • 86.97% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2005 were black.
  • 90.59% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2005 were black.
  • 91.55% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2005were black.  
  •  87.37% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2005 were black.
 Here's the breakdown for 2006:
  • 85.7% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2006 were black.
  • 89.9% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2006 were black.
  • 91.8% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2006 were black.  
  •  90.02% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2006 were black.
Here's the breakdown for 2007:
  • 85.7% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2007 were black.
  • 80.1% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2007 were black.
  • 92% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2007 were black.  
  •  91.2% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2007 were black.
Anything different in 2008? No:
  • 87.2% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2008 were black.
  • 85.6% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2008 were black.
  • 97.7% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2008 were black.  
  •  88.8% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2008 were black.
2009? Is it still almost all-black? Yes:
  • 87.3% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2009 were black.
  • 92.7% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2009 were black.
  • 97.1% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2009 were black.  
  •  88.2% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2009 were black.
Please, tell me 2010 is different...:
  • 86.9% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2010 were black.
  • 92.7% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2010 were black.
  • 92.4% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2010 were black.  
  •  78.1% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2010 were black.
 2011? Same old song:
  • 86.7% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2011 were black.
  • 90.3% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2011 were black.
  • 92% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2011 were black.  
  •  86.2% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2011 were black.

According to 2012 Metropolitan Police Department, City of St. Louis: Annual Report to the Community:

  • 84.7% of those arrested for aggravated assault in St. Louis in 2012 were black.
  • 91.8% of those arrested for robbery in St. Louis in 2012 were black.
  • 97.6% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2012 were black.  
  •  78.6% of those arrested for forcible rape in St. Louis in 2012 were black.
Those thugs worrying you at night, Mayor Slay, out there victimizing the city of St. Louis are almost invariably of the same racial background as the killers of Begic in 2014 and Boken in 2012.

For those protesting police and demanding #BlackLivesMatter, take a good look into data combed from the SMLPD Annual Report to the City to understand why the black community is the only one needing a community relations pipeline with police: without a black community in St. Louis, it's hard to imagine the city needing much of a police force at all.

For then, homicides brushed aside by police spokesman as either the victim being in "...wrong place, wrong time," or a case of a "...robbery gone wrong," would no longer be part of the vernacular.

RIP Megan Boken.

RIP Zemir Begic.

96 comments:

Anonymous said...

My town is sure a Fuxated Hell Hole thanks to the Sons of Obama. Pray for a North St. Louis City and County Asteroid strike.

Eddie in St. Louis

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, white lives do not matter to the elite white liberals who control the national discourse and the education of our children. Even in a predominantly white state like New Hampshire, an elite boarding school hired a Harvard educated racist to teach English, one who wrote the following drivel in which she literally curses white children:
http://damemagazine.com/2014/11/30/what-it-means-me-teach-your-white-privileged-kids
This is why most whites will grow up to be sheep like that kid from Georgetown who wrote an article apologizing for his white privilege to the black criminals who mugged him at gunpoint.
Remember: no one ever marches for white victims of black violence, or holds "die-ins" at venues frequented by blacks to protest this slaughter.

Brooklyn born said...

Ah the 800 lb gorilla rears it's ugly bead.

By all metrics, remove the black population in any predominantly black city and crime virtually dissappears.

Even the conservative black darlings on fox news can't bring themselves to utter those sentiments. Giuliani had the stones to call it out, but even he waffled by stating it was black lives he saved by reducing the murder rate by 75%.

We need to get beyond qualifying our arguments with platitudes in order to soften the tone. Political expediency in order to gain acceptance or avoid being marginalized.

The enemy is bold and in our faces. They double down when confronted. We need to do the same.

Anonymous said...

Obviously we need to apply to crime the same rules Obama and Holder are inflicting on schools and school districts:

Just stop arresting blacks for doing wrong things! It'll get rid of those pesky disparate statistics for good!

D-FENS said...

"Wrong place, wrong time"
"Hang around with the wrong crowd"
"Robbery gone "

Negro=wrong

Anonymous said...

A Bosnian woman dragged out of her car and beaten by blacks in St Louis.If I know my backwards,primitive Balkans look for a huge number of unsolved homicides of blacks in the near future.

Anonymous said...

I'm really starting to believe that they are a different species from us.

The constraints of PC don't exist in Asia. Sooner or later, this issue will be answered, one way or another.

Anonymous said...

The pics, as usual, say it all. The blacks are always heavy lidded, sullen and angry, and their White victims are always smiling and evoke intelligence. How people can maintain that 'race is a social construct' rather than a genetic fact deserve their fate when they interact with their pets.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone remember Detective Melvin Santiago? He was a Jersey City police officer who was shot to death just a month ago, on July 13th. Santiago was white. His killer, Lawrence Campbell , was black. Does anyone recall Obama appearing before national television and calling for justice for Officer Santiago's family? Does anyone recall Eric Holder rushing to Jersey City to see that justice was done?
How about Officer Jeffrey Westerfield? He was a Gary, Indiana police officer who was shot to death on July 6, 2014. Officer Westerfield was white, his killer, Carl LeEllis Blount, Jr. was black. where was Obama? Where was Holder?
Officer Perry Renn was an Indianapolis , Indiana police officer who was shot to death July 5, 2014, the day before Officer Westerfield was killed. Officer Renn was white. His killer, Major Davis, was black. I don't recall any mention by Obama about the untimely death of Officer Renn. and, I doubt that Eric Holder rushed to Indianapolis to make sure justice was served.
Vermillion Parish Deputy Sheriff Allen Bares was gunned down by two men June 23, 2014 in Louisiana . Deputy Bares was white. His two killers, Quintlan Richard and Baylon Taylor were black. was Obama outraged? Did Eric Holder rush to Louisiana to make sure that the family of Deputy Bares found justice?
Detective Charles Dinwiddie of the Killen, Texas Police Department was murdered on May 11, 2014 by Marvin Lewis Guy, a black male. Officer Dinwiddie was white. Do you recall seeing anything about that on the news? Certainly, the white citizens of Killeen didn't take to the streets to loot and burn businesses. Do you recall any mention of Obama or Holder here?
Then, there is Officer Kevin Jordan of Griffin , Georgia Police Department. He was gunned down on May 31, 2014. Officer Jordan was black, his killer, Michael Bowman was white. This was a white man murdering a black police officer. Where was Jesse Jackson? Where was "The Reverend" al Sharpton? Was there looting and burning on the streets of Griffin , Georgia ? No, in fact, we don't recall hearing about this one in the news as well. Why? You can draw your own conclusions.
Over the past 60 days, there have been five reported deaths of police officers by gunshot in the U.S. Of those, four were white officers who were murdered by black men. Blacks complain that white officers treat black men more aggressively on the street. You can draw your own conclusions on that one, as well.
A US President that tries to divide this republic, needs to be removed from office!

When will a national network quit reporting about protests and only report the number of blacks killed daily by other blacks?

Anonymous said...

Brooklyn born, you are correct. They are in our face, loud, proud, no shame in their game, and us whites need to do the same. A "robbery gone wrong" is exactly what happened to Mike Brown- except he was the perp. Now they are trying to make the (white) victim here look guilty by having the nerve to be in a place where she was robbed. Backwards deadly logic that cannot persist in a same world.
Just call me L.

Anonymous said...

Nothing but silence, cover up, coddling, and excuses. The thin blue line protecting our precious pets from white taxpayers.

That BRA uniform and paycheck comes at a price. You must tow the party line. Correct use of the terms "random", "wrong place, wrong time", various things "gone wrong", and the obligatory "not racially motivated".

The courage it must take to wear the uniform of the enemy, compromise the truth and the values of western society day after day. Zero sympathy from me when the beast eats one of it's own.

Not a one of these cowards will just quit and come out and tell the truth publicly. If you value money and "security" more than what's right and the future of the white race I have no use for you. Traitors to the white race, traitors to the truth, and traitors to the rule of law.

Seriously the likely future of any white cop in Ferguson is Darren Wilson if they're lucky enough to kill the charging beast before they are killed.

Ricky Tucker said...

I gotta give 'em one thing...they ARE out there protesting...we can bullshit ourselves with ''I have a job'' or ''wait 'til 2016'' or whatever else helps you sleep at night. THEY are out there.

Truth Corps said...

We will see tremendous change in the next 20 years. Most of it bad for whites.

Similar to an addict or alcoholic, we will have to hit our "rock bottom" before we accept our own fault in allowing this, then muster the strength & courage to act.

Yes, the negroes will murder white children & infants with impunity before this "bottom" is reached.

Prepare accordingly.

TC2

Anonymous said...

Megan Boken, like so many others, cut short by a savage. And yet these protestors are out blocking traffic, causing chaos everywhere they go, because "black lives matter".

Wanted to give a shout out to poster Bernice, didn't know you were close by. Walter Jones is the man! He's been on The Political Cesspool a time or two, look those interviews up you'll enjoy them.

Safe weekend to all SBPDLer's!

NC Guy

-And as my Uncle said today. It may not be today, or tomorrow, but the Bosnian's will NOT forget. There will be revenge in some form, at some time.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
The pics, as usual, say it all. The blacks are always heavy lidded, sullen and angry…


I've been watching the First 48 via the net and I find it incredibly revealing of the negro mind. The show tracks homicides and as you know 90% of the homicides involve a negro. The most interesting and instructive part of the shows are when the various negroes are interviewed by the cops. The negroes lie in such a spectacularly stupid way. They have no fear of the system and they have nothing that we would know as human empathy for the victim. The negro is truly a killing machine. If they are not killing a person, they are destroying a city. I predict that when the Chinese finally arrive to take over, they will eliminate them all. Limited comfort from that ultimate scenario I guess.

Anonymous said...

What really gets me is that it's always the nice pleasant white people they slay.. It's like they have a radar for whites that have a good education, ate highly productive, are loved by their community, have great teeth and a great smile!!

Look at the killers, they are disgusting.. I think they murder these white people out of pure racist jealousy.

Philadelphia Mike said...

OT

Great video. It should be made the official anthem for White European Unity.

A remake of the Gates of Delirium by Yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QukX9I6ZLsM

White Lives Matter

Philadelphia Mike

Anonymous said...

D-FENS said...

"Wrong place, wrong time"
"Hang around with the wrong crowd"
"Robbery gone "

Negro=wrong


This is a good meme!

Bogolyubski said...

As Jared Taylor pointed out in his recent talk on Fergudishu, facts don't matter any more. You can cite all the hate-facts you like, and it will not make one iota of difference to those who control the narrative, or those who listen to it (still the majority of whites). The STL police just proved my earlier point (that they are there to only protect the negro rioters) when they arrested the guy in the mini-van who fled the mod in a mini-van. As I stated before, if they were not continuing to believe in the Disney fairy-tales, they'd simply all contract a sudden massive case of Blue-Ebola. Instead, they arrest a white guy fleeing the mob - while they allow the mob to continue its campaign - exactly as they've been ordered to do.

Just this year an even worse example surfaced in the UK, when the 10-year campaign of cover-up of a Musloid prostitution ring targeting white English girls as young as 8 or 9 was finally exposed. Has a single one of the treasonous criminals been brought up on criminal charges" Hell, no. Have the local English (thoroughly disarmed) rebelled and hanged the police, magistrates, social-workers and assorted government officials who aided and abetted these crimes? Not in your life. In fact, the only arrests have been those of those parents who objected to the coverup. They had their own kids seized by the same officials. You see where this is heading? Our enemy is never going to stop. There is no point at which they'll be satisfied short of every white person on the planet being dead or enslaved.

Even now, in the face of a narrative that should have completely collapsed for all the damned lies, most whites - especially the "conservatives" - cannot face reality. They really are bitter clingers. It's not God or guns they're clinging to though, it's the lie of equality. They cannot cast aside their negro god, no matter how many innocents die at the hands of the wild animals let loose. They cling to the Mia Loves, their Ben Carsons and their Allen Wests, not to mention the Saturday people wholly devoted to their extermination. It's the sheer madness of religion, not the one of their ancestors but the new one where the negro is their god and equality their gospel.

Anonymous said...

They are as different from us as a wolf is from a domestic dog. And they are much more dangerous than the wolf.

Anonymous said...

My question to all my brothers here: with all this trash going on about white cops killing poor, sweet, innocent and unfairly treated blacks; why would any sensible white man subject himself to pinning on the badge and strapping on that sidearm to be a target and at a huge disadvantage now??????? Tell me please!!!!!

With all the stats shown in the above article with 9 out 10 blacks committing a vast array of crimes with all the heavy hitting crimes is there any wonder why more blacks are arrested? Has to do with simple math! Nothing more or less.

Is there any wonder knowing the 9 out 10 rule cops and civilians alike are more on guard when it comes to dealing with the Obama peeps? Hell no! Makes common sense.

Even growing up around a heavily populated black area I saw with my own eyes how they behaved, interacted and dealt with people. It was ostensible even being young they are far different than whites.

I recall being in elm school in the seventies when the first blacks started attending they tended to be way more aggressive, boisterous, annoying, in your face and just a pain to be around. Even trying to trade items with them they would try to screw you or just outright steal from you if given a chance! I learned early on be aware.

Do I hate most blacks? Hate is a strong word and it is not good to hate anyone. But I certainly will say I prefer to be around my own kind and live and work the same.
I don't hate blacks.... But yes I am a race realist and segregation would be heavenly bliss.

Elliot Foley said...

"...wrong place, wrong time."

"...robbery gone wrong."

Made me think of young, white Amber Long who was walking with her mother in Philly earlier this year, when they were mugged and robbed of their purses.

Amber didn't let go of her purse quick enough apparently, because one of the two representatives of Black culture shot her dead. She died in her mothers arms.

Police Response:

"It was very random." -Captain James Clark

Looks like they still haven't caught the savages, even though they have them on video...

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Woman-Shot-Killed-after-Attempted-Robbery-241111101.html

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. Thanks for recalling the Megan Boken murder.

Another point the apologists for black crime refuse to recognize is that black on white homicides usually occur in "safe" areas. Megan Boken was attacked and murdered in the afternoon near a college.

The pathetic euphemisms are always trotted out. "Wrong place, wrong time." "Random assault." "Robbery gone wrong." Etc, etc.

Anonymous said...

The blacks are always heavy lidded, sullen and angry, and their White victims are always smiling and evoke intelligence.

I wonder if this is a factor in these attacks...the perpetrators can not stand the fact that the victims are full of life? So they attack them to destroy what they can not be.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

The pics, as usual, say it all. The blacks are always heavy lidded, sullen and angry, and their White victims are always smiling and evoke intelligence. How people can maintain that 'race is a social construct' rather than a genetic fact deserve their fate when they interact with their pets........

Okay

LBJ s Great Society.
the blacks bite the hand that feeds them.
the killed or their parents worked to pay taxes that support the undertow.

bernicegreenbaum said...

Let's just face it. The placards are wrong. Black lives don't matter. They really don't. They don't matter to other blacks, and whites certainly see blacks as outdated, obsolete, rusty farm equipment. And that's okay. We just have to, as a society, acknowledge that fact.

Tonight at a Christmas party given by a very successful couple in their late 50s, the hostess a sweet, diminutive blonde, blue eyed lady in a rather immense McMansion(?), stated in a conversation to me, all wide-eyed and in disbelief, that our downtown renovated movie theatre in which she has been a patron and held charity auctions, "Believe it or not,(those were her VERY WORDS) the theatre actually segregated blacks into the balcony of the theatre, including a separate back entrance."

Well, you should have seen the excellent job I did of holding my tongue. I never mentioned how different behavior expectations during Jim Crow made this an ideal solution to co-existing with the negro. I simply smiled at her, nodding my head, and gazed intently at her, waiting for her to continue. And she did. She went on to say, "Now they're renovating that part of the theatre and it's going to be exclusive seating for patrons willing to pay for upper balcony seating." I had to again bite my tongue because I wanted to say, "You mean all this time, 1927 to today, blacks had the best seats in the entire house.......and they were STILL BITCHING??????????? Mind you, even in 1927 in the South, they did have air conditioning in movie theatres. Goes to prove, blacks are NEVER HAPPY. And (rich) white libs will never tire of bending over backwards to accommodate their whims and desires. Truly negroes are a lesser, pampered, coddled, mollified, overfed, degenerate race, doomed to annihilation after the last white man has taken his last exhausted breath.

10mm AUTO said...

Anonymous said...

A Bosnian woman dragged out of her car and beaten by blacks in St Louis.If I know my backwards,primitive Balkans look for a huge number of unsolved homicides of blacks in the near future.

December 5, 2014 at 5:56 PM""

Wait There! I think you had a little too much to think!

The Official Party Line from Nation of Islam on the (White) Bosnian people living here in the USA is that they are Interlopers, intruding on the ability of the black man to take the Land (via Land Contract) so that another black nation can be built. They are not citizens. The are not illegals. They are targets of opportunity and "illegal interlopers." (See: http://youtu.be/zxgRIHCiUfg )

This woman goes a far in her negro nut case ramblings to start reciting the lines to "If I had a Hammer". Please understand. It is nutty to us, completely understandable to them and written in stone.

That this comes so swiftly after the first Bosnian hit shows that their was political pressure to bear to make some recognition that White people brought here (St Louis?) from war torn lands have the same rights as other citizens.

The message is as evil as it is black. No discernment, no mercy, (in fact mockery!) for those already injured. Death to the Rest as intruders, interlopers, home invaders. The title of the Video is "Ferguson, Bosnian Death Immigrant Warning!" and it ends with the special "Alemak-al Shalom" of Nation of Islam.

I encourage all race realists to listen to the implacable face of the enemy. The Saxon must steel himself for great things if we are to break off enough land to be ourselves. Those that wait and dither should look into the eyes of the enemy and decide.

"A Eruchîn, ú-dano i faelas a hyn an uben tanatha le faelas."

(Show them no mercy, for you shall receive none.)

Anonymous said...

The fact remains, white lives do not matter. White lives are the cash cows of society, nothing more or less. The psychological warfare aimed at making anything white, a bad thing, is in full swing.

Everything bad in the past, present or future for the low life, low character, uneducated hood negro is Y.T's fault. If your a minority, Y.T's out to get you. The propaganda is working just fine,...... because it WORKS!

Why not? We don't do anything about it.

Anonymous said...

Carolina Cicero-

As someone so said, ever notice when Obongo and Pravda(CNN) get wound up....something else...isn't being said?

Yeppers. BBC, Drudge, et al: China now leads the worlds with the NUMBER ONE ECONOMY.

And where be dis place, y'all? Guess! Uh-huh, and probably working hard to become #74 before too long...

Wednesday said...

Bantus: Wrong people. Wrong Continent.

Remove them. With extreme prejudice.

bobco said...

Repeat After Me:

Multiculturalism begins as a bargain made from guilt and ends as a bargain made from fear.

Anonymous said...

Reading the article, and comments, brings back memories of so many whites killed by the negative force.

In 2012,the stats are 36,000 +white women were raped or assulted by the negros. This is a very hard figure for me to wrap my mind around.

Between zero to 10 black women were raped by white men in 2012. In other words to few to count.

Thank God for Ferguson, the sleeping whites are really starting to awake...

Anonymous said...

"Wrong place, wrong time"

"Random"

"robbery gone wrong"

1.) This is actually WORSE than being specifically targeted because how can a person defend themselves against a totally random occurence. How can they prevent a robbery from going wrong? When the police and the politicans proclaim these events to be random what they are really proclaiming is their complete, and total uselessness.

2.) No criminal picks their victim at random. They always size them up and choose carefully, even if it is at an instinctual level. Any policeman knows this and the when cops say it is "random" they are lying and, if fact, enabling most criminality.

People should realize that the mission of modern police is to protect non-White criminals like illegal immigrants and black rioter and prevent the inevitable backlash, a' la the Tulsa Race War of 1921.

Anonymous said...

You will never hear a word about these killings from the msm networks however, you can bet that police agencies across the country are keeping the score(rightfully so).

Anonymous said...

"Robbery gone wrong" in other words for police a robbery can go right and for the perps too, I guess. For the police not as much paperwork, and the cops can always say, "Look you are lucky. It could have been a robbery gone wrong." That will make the victim feel better, and the cops can get back to the doughnut shop.

CENTURION said...

Rape is a date gone wrong

Anonymous said...

And that's nothing to be ashamed of however in America, we are constantly bombarded by these eternal victim, anti white groups, shoving this racial diversity, PC drivel down our throats while teaching our kids that it's hip to accept white guilt. Just look at all the scores of white kids at these protests. Truly disgusting.

Anonymous said...

Very true. The First 48 did such an outstanding job of showing the true face of violent and senseless crime that the show's producers were told to hit the road from the Memphis council. Apparently, it's now racist to publicize black crime. http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/local-news/memphis-police-end-relationship-first-48

Anonymous said...

Re, boarding school.

THE 'HARVARD PROF' IS A BLACK FEMALE MARXIST.

Even in a predominantly white state like New Hampshire, an elite boarding school hired a Harvard educated racist to teach English, one who wrote the following drivel in which she literally curses white children:

Awakend White said...

@ 9:35 hate wouldn't be the right term more like despise.

'wrong place, wrong time'
I guess even being in your home is wrong place, wrong time.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said ”. . . Over the past 60 days, there have been five reported deaths of police officers by gunshot in the U.S. Of those, four were white officers who were murdered by black men. Blacks complain that white officers treat black men more aggressively on the street. . .“

Excellent post. One reason the blacks focus on the issue of white officers killing blacks as opposed to simple white on black crime (although almost nonexistent) is that the actions of police against blacks are equivalent to actions of the government against blacks. This allows the blacks to disregard all of the black on white and black on black crime because is doesn't pertain to the problem of the evil white police arm of the government abusing blacks. In general, civil rights protects blacks from the oppressive white government, not the reverse.

I continue to believe that it comes down to the value of the black voting block. If blacks didn't vote or if their vote wasn't unified, they would be of no use to any politician, and few politicians would tolerate their behavior. Without their vote, keeping blacks around makes as much sense as keeping a dog that attacks its owners, eats a lot, shits all over the yard and welcomes intruders.

Until this voting feature of blacks can be disrupted, circumvented, or offset by some other voting block they will continue to receive special treatment. Because their influence is so strong at the federal level it becomes much more difficult for areas not under direct black control to act in a race realist manner. For example, every broadcasting company in the US probably relies on the approval of the FCC to stay in business. It is difficult to foresee the FCC permitting broadcasts clearly showing the true negative contribution that blacks make to society as well as the disproportionate amount of black on white crime. A broadcasting company offering programs presenting information along the lines of SBPDL with the related comments would be shut down very quickly as not providing a valuable public service. I seriously doubt if a broadcasting company could even present crime statistics along the lines of The Color of Crime without losing its license.

In addition to federal regulation of most forms of mass communication, crime statistics are largely compiled by federal agencies. All of the statistics compiled by federal agencies will continue to be skewed to show blacks in the most favorable light. I don't see how one can avoid reaching the conclusion that it is in the Administration's best interest to preserve the black voting block while concealing the problems associated with blacks to prevent the alienation of a large number of white voters.

Now Obama and Holder want to set policy for how black criminals and suspects are to be treated by the police, and there is an effort to set policy in schools regarding the discipline of blacks. All of these policies are being pushed as necessary to stop discrimination against blacks, but their true intent is to exempt blacks from the laws and rules of society that all other races are expected to follow. The goal is to pacify the blacks with more privileges while convincing the whites that they are still holding the blacks down.

It isn't surprising that the government is attempting to obtain regulatory control of the Internet. I recently read of some effort by the government to start watching Internet traffic to identify unsuitable content. If we permit it, the government will soon be regulating the Internet just as the FCC regulates broadcasting.

Although I have not yet voted for a black person, at one time I would have considered voting for a black over a white if the black appeared to be the most qualified candidate. After Obama, I would only consider voting for a black if there was no other tolerable alternative. If anything good has come from Obama's tenure as prez, it might be that it has removed the black option from the minds of more voters.

Pat Boyle said...

Bogolyubski cited Jared Taylor who said the facts don't matter any more.

A lot of the media commenters are also confused that the black rioters don't seem to pay much attention to facts as revealed by the various Grand Juries. Why do these blacks not listen to reason? Why do they hold such clearly wrongheaded opinions?

The answer is simple and you already know it.

The average black in America has an IQ of 85. That means that all other things being equal we should expect half of any group of blacks to contain around half of the people with IQ below 85.

But other things aren't equal. The smarter blacks in Ferguson and elsewhere will be staying home. They won't be burning down buildings.

So I's likely that the average IQ of those protestors you see marching on TV is more like 75.

So why don't they listen to reason? They simply don't have the capacity to listen to reason.

You as a average white American have an IQ of about 102. People who follow the news are a bit smarter - lets say 115. That's about the range of a High School graduate. College graduates are higher yet.

So we are trying to carry on a dialog between people on one side with IQs of 110 or more and people with IQs of 75.

So now you know why there seems to be a gulf between white opinions and black opinions. Most readers here understand that blacks fail in school and can't get good jobs because of their mental deficiencies. But those same mental limitations also lead to the kind of group stupidity we have seen on the nightly news.

Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain.

Pat Boyle

Anonymous said...

"Wrong place, wrong time"

"Random"

"robbery gone wrong"



Still waiting for MSM to apply these terms to Ferguson's own Michael Brown.

Californian said...

Bogolyubski said...

Even now, in the face of a narrative that should have completely collapsed for all the damned lies, most whites - especially the "conservatives" - cannot face reality. They really are bitter clingers. It's not God or guns they're clinging to though, it's the lie of equality.


Here's the thing: the gun lobby has stated numerous times that an armed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny. Yet America does have an armed citizenry, and the system is more tyrannical than ever. At what point will people "wake up?" Is the NRA going to march into Ferguson and restore order? We've seen the Oath Keepers try this, but they've been outmaneuvered politically by the System's agitprop apparatus (mainstream media, academia). Which points up the need for race realists to have their own agitprop machine.

There's a concept which is well known by revolutionaries at least as far back as the American Revolution: it is called Armed Propaganda. The mere possession of firearms is sufficient motivation for people to think of resistance...and perhaps act!

It can be argued that an armed citizenry has blocked the system from gaining total control. Gun clubs or whatever are small islands of freedom in an otherwise total system. We can see how the disarmed subjects of Rotherham had no choice but to hand over their daughters to a Pakistani sex ring. The real criminals, of course, are the people pushing third world mass migration into England and then justifying it via the ideology of multicultism.

The dilemma is that for resistance to work, guns are not enough. You also need an ideology, or the weapons themselves become useless, so many rusting pieces of metal sitting at the bottom of a footlocker. In 1776, Americans had the ideology of liberty. Today, what ideology do white people have?

Many people understand there is something "wrong" with the system. Many people might be willing to get active if there were a pro-white ideology. I think something of an ideology is being hammered out today by the alternative right, race realists, white nationalists, and so forth. And not just in America, but in the Western world as a whole. Which is one reason that websites like this one are vital in providing a front for serious political analysis.

CENTURION said...

Gee, was John Kennedy in the wrong place at the wrong time?

Anonymous said...

"Very true. The First 48 did such an outstanding job of showing the true face of violent and senseless crime that the show's producers were told to hit the road from the Memphis council. Apparently, it's now racist to publicize black crime"

The "unfortunate" display of the Truth about sub-saharan life & culture here in Ameridishu has finally been "corrected"

Now, you can watch YT "criminality" on full display on tv show "North Woods Law"

Watch as depraved YTz hunt & fish without a license. Watch YTz who are too stooopid to even count, catch fish "over the limit". Watch evil YTz shoot dead Bambi & other critters "out of season". Watch YTz sneakin' round the woods just looking for a chance to victimize & brutalize "wildlife", flora & fauna.

Yep, "North Woods Law" is a real eye-opener.

Obviously, YTz are primitive savage criminals & they need to be rounded up & dealt with severely.

/H hypie out H\

Anonymous said...

Here’s a question that has probably occurred to many of us. Why does it so often seem when interacting or arguing with leftists, that they are irrational, unreasonable, unwilling to meet us half-way, unconcerned with finding out what is actually and objectively true, dismissive of and intolerant to our viewpoints, even insane?

We need to consider possible reasons for this. It’s possible that what we are dealing with, in at large number of “leftists” / “liberals” / “progressives” is not rational belief at all, but a kind of political religion. For example, I have often wondered why they assume that white people have some kind of “original sin”, i.e., what they like to call “racism”. This looks an awful lot like a religious notion, doesn’t it? I can’t take credit for this explanation, but I want to point you to an article that explains it much better than I could.

This is not an all-encompassing explanation for how things work. It does not, for example, take into account the unbelievable hatred today’s “left” has for white people, which at times seems to be their main motivating factor, but it’s one piece of the large puzzle. It’s going to be difficult to figure it all out, but I think this is a good start.

CENTURION said...

Abraham Lincoln was in the right place at the right time......

MMP said...

re: The comments about 48 hours & the show Cops........BOTH have had similar charges leveled against them.

BOTH came back to prove that they actually UNDERREPRESENTED black crime.

Truth hurts

Avoid the groid

MMP
Out

Bogolyubski said...

Excellent point, Californian. This is exactly what is needed. You really hit the nail on the head. Whites need to first have their delusions (what I refer to as Disney fairy-tales) destroyed but they - even more importantly - need a vision to look forward to. We should avoid utopian notions and keep it simple. If you read the Gregory Hood article I linked to above, he takes the position that I made in my post: despite all the hoopla, most whites continue to believe the fairy-tale. The facts on the ground tell us that the fairy-tale is just that - a total fantasy. Republicans need to change their name to the Dindu Nuffins party. The Christians, and others in the potential white remnant need to wholly dumb their mythologies because they're prevented from seeing the hideous reality by them.

White police need to understand that the society they're upholding is not their country any more. The negroes are never going to be anything other than an opportunistic enemy, whether it's St. Swisher Shitavious or Dr. Ben Carson. They are ultimately betraying their own families by continuing to uphold this system, which is actually devoted to erasing them and their families. That's why I cited the example of James Kilgore in the previous thread. Even full-bore murder one is no impediment to a lucrative 6-figure per year teaching gig for the connected - and as plain-vanilla white guys, they will never be connected. Learn to recognize the enemy - both greater and lesser.

AnalogMan said...

Anon said

I don't hate blacks.... But yes I am a race realist and segregation would be heavenly bliss.

I didn't hate them either - until they destroyed my country. You will learn to hate them, too. But it will be too late.

CENTURION said...

Thank goodness MLK,Blvd,Jr. was on the right porch at the right night......


We could have avoided all this Ferguson rioting if society had just said Michael Brown was....let's say it together...
"IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME..."

I can hear President Franklin Roosevelt's quavering voice saying: "Yesterday, December 7th, 1941, the United States Navy was in the wrong place at the wrong time...."

Give me a fucking break.

Anonymous said...

Delaware dude. well, last night the feral bunch reached the 2010 record of homicide here in kill me ton, Delaware. 2 other feral types were given lower body ventilation and some leg warmer to help that selective amnesia. they held another vigil Wednesday and what was in the background? why a store front with bars on the windows, www.1150wdel.com. hope they continue the record pace and make that hell hole number 1 in the nation.

Mr. Anon said...

Would it be fare to characterize black crime in America as a case of "slavery gone wrong"?

Anonymous said...

They report it ws a robbery gone wrong. Wrong place, wrong time. So the victim has to bear some of the guilt for being......what? An uncooperative robbery victim? Being unarmed when confronted by Africans?
What has gone wrong is "justice gone wrong." Why was Miss Boken attacked? Why was the Bosnian immigrant attacked? Besides being white, the Africans have no fear of facing justice.
Don't get caught by the Africans without your justice dispenser.

J.J.

Anonymous said...

Kind, loving, beautiful, trusting Whites are judged as weak pushovers by the coloreds. These Whites set themselves up to be statistics, they are the type to knuckle under or shy away from colored terrorists. They get talked over, interrupted, disrespected, shoved aside physically, murdered, or worse. Much of these things happen in schools, colleges, and the jobsite. Start conditioning yourselves to trust no coloreds, take a krav maga class, carry a good knife you have mastered well, and introduce black run America to the bastards who run this land. Support the law, they might patronize you or be rude, but remember the crap they have to wear and slog through. You see the lies and hoaxes blasted on the media, look after yourselves and those you trust.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps the time is now for LEOs to simply resign, keep and bear arms, form well regulated militais, and fight fire with fire. Thugs, criminals, communists, self hating Whites, believers of the HOAX of michael brown have formed well regulated violent assemblies and protests, why not form well armed militias and rid the landscape of these liars and destroyers of the West?!?!

CENTURION said...

A few minutes ago I read this over at the blog SECOND CITY COP:

"Irony at its finest:
I was out there tonight on Lake Shore drive while the white Protestors. And a few Black Protestors were filming us and yelling. I seen a White Girl with her camera phone filming us. She was holding the camera in the air. Then some black guy grabbed the girls phone and took off into the crowd. The girl then approached the cop next to me and stated that this black guy just grabbed her cell phone. The cop next to me raised his arms up and stated 'Don't call the police'. I started laughing and she turned to me and asked why I was laughing.I stated you don't like or want the police around so you go chase that black guy. She stated that's your job to protect me and my Property. I stated you are protesting me from doing my job. She walked away crying"

If this is really true it is funny as hell and real as hell. Could PK or somebody else verify this? It is just too damn funny/good to be true?

Anonymous said...

"Detective Charles Dinwiddie of the Killen, Texas Police Department was murdered on May 11, 2014 by Marvin Lewis Guy, a black male. Officer Dinwiddie was white. Do you recall seeing anything about that on the news?"

This occurred during a no knock search warrant raid at 5:30AM. No drugs were found. More here:

http://reason.com/blog/2014/09/17/texas-wants-to-execute-man-who-killed-ho

Kicking in someone's door in the middle of the night and invading their home is obviously going to be an inherently dangerous activity. The surprising thing is that more cops aren't shot doing this. Yet, there are plenty of more dangerous occupations than being a policeman; according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics it's not even in the top ten.

OTOH, the amount of police "justifiable homicide" of civilians is much greater than police occupationally-related deaths and isn't completely known. The partial stats kept by the feds (about 750 agencies contribute to the database, a fraction of the 17,000 law enforcement agencies in the United States) show a little over one "justified" police killing of a civilian a day. It's simply a fact that police are indicted and tried for these homicides almost never, let alone convicted. We must conclude either that police are always totally innocent, or there's a silent understanding between the police and the public that permanently ridding society of problematic citizens is part of their job description.

Anonymous said...

" For example, I have often wondered why they assume that white people have some kind of “original sin”, i.e., what they like to call “racism”. This looks an awful lot like a religious notion, doesn’t it?"

As Christianity naturally fades away in the science-oriented environment of a technological society, white people, still needing the emotional comfort religion provides, unconsciously grope for a secular replacement. Marxism, with its utopian vision of the future, its comradeship, its anti-racism, its demonology and victimology, and its emphasis on elevating the downtrodden and sharing, is a perfect substitute. It's a science-friendly "Christianity without Christ" that requires only a slight adjustment in worldview.

Anonymous said...

What happens to this country when the average white person wakes up and recognizes that the forces of their own govt are lined up against them? Does anyone wonder if newly awakened whites will find their interests served better by groups that the current govt perceives to be enemies?

Anonymous said...

These low IQ Black savages are what Obama/Holder/Lynch are intent on using as their "private army." Just think TSA ! Its power is expanding, White-hating vicious Blacks like rabid dogs foaming at the mouth eager to LEGALLY assault YTs. As cops? Why else the intimate co-operation of Obama with bobble-head, sewer-mouth, White-hating, riot-fueling Sharpton? These Black savages have Obama's complete support, and they will loyally follow his criminal leadership.

Anonymous said...

The negro is like a A-BOMB going off in any city.

Fact is "you cant live with them and you cant live with them.."

Remember BLACK LIES MATTER...

Anonymous said...

Playbook guidelines for successful protests and riots:

BRANDON DARBY BREAKS DOWN CRITICAL RACE THEORY AND HOW LEFTIST PROTESTS OPERATE
by ROBERT WILDE 3 Dec 2014

Darby sharpened his political teeth on the left as a wide eyed and bushy tailed “average participant,” beginning his journey in what is called the green group of the leftist movement. According to Darby, the institutional left breaks down leftist activists into three separate groups: green, yellow, and red.
The former liberal activist says that he was greatly influenced by leftist organizer Lisa Fithian (a.k.a. Professor Occupy) who organized the leftist movement into the three groups. He pointed out that it was the same way she organized the 2008 Republican presidential protests.
Darby explained that the green group shows up at rallies and are your basic law abiding liberals, while the yellow group, who take things a bit further, is willing to “lock-down” and get arrested for the cause. However, when the left needs heavy lifting, they call upon the red group, which Darby refers to as the “thugs, the violent people, the looters, the people who burn things down, who wear the masks and throw the rocks and the molotovs.”
With great deception, Darby explained, after the red group conducts their mayhem, they will take off their masks and blend into the green group. When the police come looking for the violent perpetrators within the green group, the average participant feels as though the cops are harassing them “for no reason because they were there peacefully, not realizing that they themselves are there as part of a larger plan.” This distraction allows the yellow group an opportunity to further obstruct or “lock down,” as Darby would say.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2014/12/02/Breitbart-Brandon-Darby-Breaks-Down-The-Left-and-Warns-America-Against-Complacency

james m said...

Insightful, and cleverly stated

SKIP said...

"Anonymous Truth Corps said...We will see tremendous change in the next 20 years. Most of it bad for whites."

Wishful thinking, things are going to break within the next 16-18 months. Whites should arm up and be prepared for the worst.

Whiskey said...

The saddest thing about MLK is that he was assassinated. Had he lived the full life of say, Marion Barry, he'd be regarded as the same. With palimony suits, paternity suits, assault suits, galore.

Philadelphia Mike said...

They always revert to the black mean.

The Swedish police recently released a map of 55 areas where they publicly admit to having surrendered control to the criminal gangs. These areas have long had problems with mailmen, fire trucks and ambulances being attacked when trying to enter, which has led to them routinely requesting police escort. Now it’s the police being attacked outright.

http://swedenreport.org/2014/10/29/swedish-police-55-official-no-go-zones/

http://dailyeuropa.wordpress.com/2014/11/21/swedish-police-55-official-no-go-zones/

Philadelphia Mike

Long Island Guido said...

Great job Bernice. That takes alot of dicipline to not go off on idiots like that!

Anonymous said...

A negro "teen" rendition of the old Peter, Paul, and Mary song:

If I had a hammer,
I'd hammer in the morning,
I'd hammer in the evening,
All over this land,
I'd hammer up danger,
I'd hammer without warning,
I'd hammer hate and bloodshed, attack all the white folk,
All over this land.

They are NOT like us. They are DANGEROUS.

Always be on your guard.

TMH said...

Californian said...
...In 1776, Americans had the ideology of liberty. Today, what ideology do white people have?…

Bogolyubski said...
...Excellent point, Californian. This is exactly what is needed. You really hit the nail on the head. Whites need to first have their delusions (what I refer to as Disney fairy-tales) destroyed but they - even more importantly - need a vision to look forward to…


Californian has made the most important point. We have no ideology. None presently articulated anyway. The ideology of a "white homeland" without any other qualifications is juvenile. The ideology on which we were founded, liberty, nourished and kept this country vital for hundreds of years. Then we began to gradually let liberty and responsibility be crushed by the state. The ideology is still there, we just have to revive belief in it. The corollary of responsibility is just as important. We've got to stop feeding people who won't contribute. The black underclass comes to mind.

Now, I find the suggestion from Bogolybski that we need a vision to be absolutely hilarious. This particular commenter has posted hundreds (thousands?) of comments ridiculing people who have got "tea party" or liberty orientations. He calls them tea party retards or other insults. In his words, they're rubes. Cynical rejection of everything is not an ideology. Well, it's not an ideology that would motivate anyone but Bogolyubski.

Anonymous said...

Californian: "We can see how the disarmed subjects of Rotherham had no choice but to hand over their daughters to a Pakistani sex ring."
I can't tell if you were being sarcastic, but this is defeatist thinking, and no man should ever deem himself powerless, simply because he lacks a firearm. Even if his enemies have superior firepower (those Pakis, the Rotherham Council and P.D.), an average Joe can cause staggering devastation with stuff purchased off the shelf, for not much money.
The root problem, as you continued to say, is all mental: If you believe you are defeated, then you already are. Suppose a Viking and his family were swept up in a time-bending tornado, and landed in 2010 Rotherham. Do you think that man would let any fucking Paki, or yellow-coated Bobby, or butch lesbo TWMNBN Councilwoman mess with his family, or stand in his way if his daughter was in distress? Just because he can't buy whatever weapon he used to own? Next time you're in a Walmart or a hardware store, take notice of every object you see there (try to ignore the hideous fat beasts) and imagine what you could do with it, if you were in dire need. Look through the eyes of a certain Saxon (maybe two readers here will know what I mean.)
A good example might be the 19 hijackers, who according to legend, crashed a trillion-dollar economy with a set of razor blades. I'm not saying they didn't have outside help, but you get the picture.

Anonymous said...

Media Distraction Playbook:
Obamanator really needed a glory-to-me event, right now, especially in commemoration of Dec.7 on Sunday. It didn't work out as planned. Al-CIA-duh didn't get the message to stand down so the courageous SEALs (any Blacks?)could make sure the Big 0 could go apeman live on TV. BTW, OBL died in Dec. 2001 of kidney failure. Because the CIA missed their chum so much, he has been resurrected many times since then.
Proof that Osama bin Laden Was CIA and Died in 2001! Bush - Laden - CIA Connections
http://humansarefree.com/2011/05/proof-that-osama-bin-laden-was-cia-and.html
Osama bin Laden, A.K.A.
CIA Asset "Tim Osman"
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/binladen_cia.html

Details Surface of Rescue Raid To Free Luke Somers….
Posted on December 6, 2014 by sundance
President Obama made the right call. President Obama approved the best chance to rescue Luke Somers. Period.
(CNN) — Al Qaeda militants killed two Western hostages in Yemen — an American photojournalist and a South African who was employed by an aid group — during a raid conducted by U.S. forces, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Saturday.

President Barack Obama ordered Friday’s mission to save the American, Luke Somers, because “there were compelling reasons to believe Mr. Somers’ life was in imminent danger,” Hagel said.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/12/06/details-surface-of-rescue-raid-to-free-luke-somers/

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....I am still waiting for news of NY being set on fire. I want to hear about Macy's being looted and lit up. Fifth Avenue is lined with fancy high dollar stores where the jigs could be doing some late night shopping. So why hasn't Al $harpton sent in the commies to burn down Harlem like what was done in Ferguson. Al should go where he is needed.

The Plaza Hotel has not been set on fire so the protestors could get even with all those rich capitalist and oppressors of black people. No trash cans are burning on Madison Avenue which is the least they could do. Shit...any good sports riot has burning garbage cans. No firetruck sirens screaming through the night. No high rise office buildings blazing away as columns of black smoke fill the sky line. No cops and National Guard troops shooting and killing arsonist. Fuck....they didn't even light up Newark.

All those cars on the streets and in parking garages and none are set on fire. 34th Street and Broadway is lined with discount electronic stores run by Arabs and NO LOOTING took place. J. C. Penny untouched. NBC building and the Times buildings sit there unscathed. What kind of SOCIAL JUSTICE protestors are these shit faced white punks. Not even any Donald Trump property got booted and looted. Just a bunch of amateur chicken shits that are so lame they didn't even burn down any STORE FRONT CHURCHES. A real disappointment.

So alright all ready...if they didn't burn and loot uptown they could have at least hit the discount stores on Canal Street or trashed those sidewalk cafes on Broadway where the wall street yuppies sip their $8.00 glasses of wine.

There are so many really cool places in NY that would have made really good news footage. Smashing in bank windows on Wall Street would have pleased the viewers and brought up the ratings. Al and his commie cronies should have sent in the real pros from St. Louis and East St. Louis that burned down the Dollar Stores and pizza shops in Ferguson.

I am really upset with these stupid pussy faced white protestors. I wanted to see the streets lit up with raging fires as the cops beat and bashed in the heads of those pencil neck geek liberals. No "die ins", but real bodies of Columbia University Marxist lying in the streets. So many opportunities for total carnage and mayhem and all these pale-faced commies punks did was block traffic. Don't get me wrong. I haven't given up hope. Maybe they can soon burn down the ghettos in Cleveland or Baltimore. It's always good to have a dream.

Anonymous said...

Whiskey: "The saddest thing about MLK is that he was assassinated. Had he lived the full life of say, Marion Barry, he'd be regarded as the same. With palimony suits, paternity suits, assault suits, galore."
The hell are you talking about? Did blacks ever stop supporting Marion Barry? No matter what he did, they'd never turn on The Very Arch Bishop Junior King PhD. Never.

Californian said...

I can't tell if you were being sarcastic, but this is defeatist thinking, and no man should ever deem himself powerless, simply because he lacks a firearm.

I was being ironic. The real disarmament is not the loss of weapons, but of the will to power. There has to be a moral rearmament of white people--then resistance can occur. That will seems to be slowly building up. Let's see where this is headed over the next decade.

JC said...

Blacks today are disproportionately perpetrators of violent crimes
against whites and against other blacks. According to data from the
FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in 2009, “whites” — a category that
includes Hispanics — were known to be responsible for 5,286 murders.
Blacks, a mere 13% of the population, were known to be responsible for
5,980 murders.

In 2005, the New Century Foundation’s “Color of Crime”
report found that “Blacks commit more violent crime against whites
than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43
percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit
violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.” Also in
2005, the Department of Justice reported that one-third of rapes
committed against white women (approximately 37,000) were perpetrated
by blacks, while less than ten — statistically zero — rapes of black
women were committed by whites.

Fact -- blacks kill 7 times more than whites kill. Fact -- blacks kill
whites 20 times more than whites kill blacks. Fact -- blacks mug or
commit group crime against whites 50 times more than whites commit
against blacks. Fact -- blacks rape white women 2000 (yes 2000) times
more than whites rape black women.

Anonymous said...

"We have no ideology. ... The ideology is still there, we just have to revive belief in it."

It's no accident that the belief in freedom is dying. Modern technological society can only exist with the closely regulated and monitored cooperation of millions of people; in other words, a condition of unfreedom. The freedom of 1776 could be restored, but only by restoring its technological context, a project without popular appeal.

"The ideology of a "white homeland" without any other qualifications is juvenile."

There used to be a white homeland, but it broke down. Understanding why it broke down is an indispensable first step for anyone hoping for another one.

Racial egalitarianism is very deeply embedded in the moral foundation of the West. Even in colonial times, Christian America was always at an uneasy peace with the racial inegalitarianism of slavery. Stress built up along this fault line until the Civil War resulted. A voluntary return to racial inegalitarianism would entail nothing less than a wholesale, society-wide rejection of the myth of human equality that has inspired the West for two thousand years. Not likely.

Anonymous said...

Pat Boyle said ”. . . So we are trying to carry on a dialog between people on one side with IQs of 110 or more and people with IQs of 75. . . “

I am certainly not claiming to be a statistician or psychologist, but I have attempted to visualize the impact of IQ differences and have not yet managed to get a feel for it. I suspect that as IQ diminishes there is a somewhat linear decline in the performance of many thought processes, but it also seems like there might be a rather abrupt shut off of certain aspects of mental performance. For example, is there some IQ threshold where an individual completely lacks the capacity to solve differential equations or other thresholds where future time orientation or the capacity for rational thought is no longer possible? It seems reasonable that the threshold for solving typical engineering problems could be an IQ around 100 because of the near absence of competent black engineers. A black with an IQ of 100 is rare, yet an engineer with an IQ of 100 would probably be a marginal engineer which could explain the extreme rarity of competent black engineers.

Sometimes changes in variables do not correspond to proportional changes in the related performance or power. For example a decrease in sound pressure from 70 decibels to 60 decibels is perceived as becoming half as loud. It would be helpful when attempting to communicate with blacks to know what they are capable of processing. If mental power is related to IQ in a similar manner as loudness is related to decibels a drop from an IQ of 110 to an IQ of 75 might correspond to an almost catastrophic loss of mental power. On the other hand, if IQ has a more exponential relationship to mental power, an IQ change of a few points would not correspond to a large change of mental power.

Until we can find a way to get rid of blacks or segregate both physically and economically, our remaining choice is to deal with them. To deal with them we need to understand them. I don't know if their behavior is merely an adaptation to their environment of dependency and societies lack of expectation of anything positive from them, or if they have truly hit a genetic brick wall and can go no further. I suspect the former is the case because because the articles related to the 1921 Tulsa race riots discuss the thriving black community consisting of many businesses, and they accomplished this while dealing with far more racism than they do today. It appears that in the past blacks have functioned marginally in society which suggests that they should be able to do it now unless the IQ required to function in modern society has increased to a point beyond the IQ they possess. Until we know why they don't function in modern society as well as ascertain their potential performance level we will only be guessing at solutions.

Most of us will probably agree that changes favorable to whites are not going to happen without the intervention and active involvement of whites. We should play the hand we've been dealt as well as we can, and we should be prepared for something other than an easy win. I cannot think of any change favorable to whites that will be welcomed by blacks so preparation for defense of family and property during the period of adjustment should definitely be part of the plan. I think that the guy in the vehicle with the pistol dealing with the mob in the roadway set a pretty good example.

Vanishing American said...

'Anonymous' @ 8:25 - the Northern states had a problem with ''inegalitarianism'' while the Southern states did not. And most of the Founding Fathers were Southern, notably Thomas Jefferson who wrote the notoriously misinterpreted (by later generations) phrase about ''all men'' being ''created equal.''
Most Americans, until the mid-20th century, did not believe in radial egalitarianism; some differences were recognized to be innate and not subject to being banned by liberal laws.

As to the need for an ''ideology'', ideology is not our friend. Ideology implies something that is a systematized set of ideas and abstractions. We should make the real world, not abstractions, our touchstones. Liberals and libertarians have ideologies; the rest of us should avoid their example and rely more on observable reality and pragmatism, what is practical and doable.

Anonymous said...

Excellent comment. Too bad most people don't see the Ferguson incident as a case like that.

Anonymous said...

As long as white nationalists are pro-capitalists who worship wealth they will always be marginalized and manipulated.

Wednesday said...

Dear Anonymous at 10:49

Multiculturalism is a State Religion--the State Religion of the NWO, a supranational matrix of control. The One World movement is an attempt at creating a truly global Empire. Thus, its official ideology of Multiculturalism says that everyone can belong. And thus everyone can be ruled.

Not by a Nation-state, not by a particular crown or country. Reading Robison's Proof of a Conspiracy, citing source documents, we can see that one of the 5 primary goals of the Illuminati was the eradication of nation-states. The multikult religion serves this purpose, as well as creating a belief system under which all people of the world can be governed.

It is the State Religion of an evolving global Empire.

Anonymous said...


My small East coast city has been slowly dying over the last 20 years due to the criminality of the Black undertow. It has gotten really bad in the last 2 or 3 years to where we do not go into the City proper any longer unless absolutely necessary. Businesses are dying and people are leaving with no end in sight. It appears hopeless.

Anonymous said...

"Does anyone wonder if newly awakened whites will find their interests served better by groups that the current govt perceives to be enemies?"

Which is likely the reason such groups are considered enemies.

Anonymous said...

Vanishing American...I went to your website and wanted to comment, but the posting function requires a login from a menu of programs.

Can you instead implement an open blogging system such as the one on SBPDL?

Thanks.

AnalogMan said...

Vanishing American said:

ideology is not our friend... We should make the real world, not abstractions, our touchstones.

With much respect, VA, the reason why ideology is not our friend, as Wednesday explains two posts below yours, is that we don't have one, and they do. And they are kicking our butts.

Yes, our leaders, our actions, need to be reality-based. But you can't build a movement on the intelligentsia; they are too few. We need something to grab the attention, the emotions of a people.

Which people? Why, White people, of course. If we want to appeal to a racial group, our appeal must be racial. We have no interest in black intellectuals who can perceive reality like a White man; our whole purpose is explicitly to enable ourselves to live apart from them, and they are by definition smart enough to know that.

We have an ideology. Call it racism, racialism, race realism, HBD, or what you will. Our problem is that we start every defence of our ideology by denying it. "I'm not a racist, but..."

But it's turning. It has turned. The pendulum is still very far from our side, but it is swinging. This is evident in news stories and comments on the net, and in public.

I refuse, on principle, to wear any clothing with writing on it; but if I were a T-shirt philosopher, mine would say -

"I was Racist before it was cool."

Trust me, that will be a fashion hit in our lifetime. You read it here, first.

PS - for any readers not familiar with Vanishing American, she is one of my favourite bloggers, who retired some time back, but is now, thankfully, back. I urge you to follow the link from her comment to her new blog.

Pat Boyle said...

To the anonymous at 10:16 PM.

I'm a sort of statistician or I used to be. I went through grad school paid for by various fellowships for math modeling. I taught statistics (mostly undergraduate stat) for five years too. But I never created by own tests or did any original theoretical work. Stat is in fact a very static field.

So is psychology. When I got my undergraduate degree in psychology - lo those many years ago - I considered going for a doctorate. But in fact with just a simple BA I knew nearly as much psychology as was known. That's still the case. There simply isn't enough psychological knowledge to justify the Ph.D. degree.

If you doubt this tell me what great psychological insights have been garnered in the quarter century. Science ain't dead but psychology sure is.

Just last year Svante Pääbo published his findings in ancient DNA. Earth shaking. When I was an undergraduate we could have never believed that such a thing could happen. There have been discoveries of similar impact in physics, biology and many other fields but not psychology. I was wise to get out when I did.

There has been only one great discovery in the whole history of psychology - IQ. Nothing however that anyone knows now about IQ was not known to me in the mid sixties. But society has been reluctant to embrace the reality of a tool of IQ that reveals racial differences.

The idea of IQ is sometimes said to be the only idea that ever emerged from academic psychology that was worth a damn. But since students who want to study IQ differences are punished - what career prospects face prospective psych grad students?

If you dare to study mental abilities you become an excommunicate.

The whole field has shriveled and died. I escaped just in time.

Pat Boyle

Anonymous said...

"'Anonymous' @ 8:25 - the Northern states had a problem with ''inegalitarianism'' while the Southern states did not. And most of the Founding Fathers were Southern, notably Thomas Jefferson who wrote the notoriously misinterpreted (by later generations) phrase about ''all men'' being ''created equal.''"

Pre-Civil War Christian America was also pre-Darwin America, which meant they had no scientific understanding of race, only a spiritual one. Christianity asserts the radical spiritual equality of all men (see Galatians 3:28) regardless of race, sex, or freedom or slavery.

The implications of this bothered many whites, including such southerners and slave holders as Jefferson and Robert E. Lee. The South even had its own Abolitionists, and it's no accident that these people were very commonly Christian religious fanatics. See, for example:

http://renegadesouth.wordpress.com/2010/01/19/moncure-conway-southern-abolitionist/

"Most Americans, until the mid-20th century, did not believe in radial egalitarianism; some differences were recognized to be innate and not subject to being banned by liberal laws."

AT NO TIME did Christian America ever believe in a spiritual difference between whites and blacks. AT NO TIME has the Christian conception of man included a distinction between man's mind and his "soul"; for the Christian they are the same thing. Therefore, to believe in spiritual equality is the same thing as belief in equality of mental capacity. This belief is the essence of radical egalitarianism.

"As to the need for an ''ideology'', ideology is not our friend. Ideology implies something that is a systematized set of ideas and abstractions. We should make the real world, not abstractions, our touchstones. Liberals and libertarians have ideologies; the rest of us should avoid their example and rely more on observable reality and pragmatism, what is practical and doable."

Of course, pragmatism is itself a philosophical system, a way of seeing and interacting with the world, and therefore also an ideology of sorts. Ideology expresses how man sees reality. Disagreement about what is or isn't reality is the crux of the matter; such disagreements are essentially ideological differences. You could even say that as racists we inhabit quite a different reality than DWLs.

Anonymous said...

Have some faith not all conservativesare blind. I was such a person until recently lol thanks to a feral negroe I've a scar on my face that can't be ignored when I talk to other white people.I speak quite candidly about the obvious negroe violence.

Anonymous said...

Multiculturism aka diversity isn't a strength but rather a weakness for it makes a Country more easily divided. This was the real goal not unity. Divide and conquer was the real objective not utopia. Open borders to invite diversity and further divide. Hardly enrichment. This is what we need t be discussing with our own.

CENTURION said...

ANON at 10:16

You error in one major area. A "civilization" is a result of the group IQ.

When the negro was forced to live among themselves, then the higher IQ africans (the "talented 10%) were also forced to live with their racial brothers. THEY were the ones that created the businesses you mention.

BUT, that 10% is not sufficient to maintain a higher, more complex, society. You can see that in Africa. Even the "most modern" of african cities are horrid by our standards. It is just that without the "talented 10%, there is no hope at all.

And, don't forget, the "talented 10%" were the lighter skinned, mixed race members and were never the full 100% negro.

Only segregation will force the talented 10% to live with their fellow tribesmen. Would YOU want to live with them when you can live in the White Society and date/chase/rape/marry White women? Please, the successful black man wants to get as far away as he can from the hideous black female.

CENTURION said...

Analog Man:

Not to be a total jerk, but I was using the phrase:

"I was racist when racism wasn't cool"

for a long time now.

I, myself, stole it from a country song that had the line: "I was country when country wasn't cool", which was a remark about the "URBAN COWBOY" fad in the late 1970's.

I don't know the name of the lady singer.

Anyway, don't take my snotty comment as an insult to you. We are all in this together and anything I come up with is fair game. It is just that I, being thin skinned and narcissistic, have a need to pee and mark my turf.

AnalogMan said...

CENTURION:

Hell, no, no offense. I never expected that that would be original. Nothing new under the sun, as they say. I happily yield the copyright to you (if you can keep it, as Ben said).

There was also one of those bumper-sticker style "memes" circulating about being anti-Obama before it was cool.

Even my handle, which is derived from the title of a science novel by Damon Knight, I found out later, is the registered trade mark of a company that makes electronic gadgets for guitars.

I believe the lady you're thinking of is Barbara Mandrell.

Anonymous said...

As I have said before, all of the "random violence" "wrong place wrong time" and "robbery gone wrong" wordage is contrived and very calculated disinformation designed to further cognitive dissonance in the mind of the listener. As in the thirties in Germany where it was "Jude, Jude " all the time. Sooner or later you give up the beaten down ghost and agree...yeah it was just random.
Of course, the whole trick I to further illogical thinking. Because if the murderer knew the guy it would be personal, and therefore non-racist; but if he didn't know the guy it would be random, and therefore non-racist. So it cannot be anything other than non-racist if perpetrated by a black; yet conversely and paradoxically it cannot be anything other than racist if the "crime" - which includes suspending a violent student - I perpetrated by a white, even if the white person is legally entitled (self defense) or legally required (Darren Wilson). Where this will all end is murky, but I suspect since the federal powers are attacking the rights of police to enforce the law and to protect themselves I think civil unrest will intensify.

White Spelling Matters said...

*toe the line
*its own