Friday, February 8, 2013

Great Moments in Black History -- George Brown and The Tuskegee Airmen: Branded with a "K"

George Brown, one of the first black elected lieutenant governors in America, claimed he was branded with a "K" by a white racist in Alabama when his plane crashed while training to be a Tuskegee Airmen...
George Brown is a name most people have forgotten. Though he was one of the first blacks elected to a lieutenant governorship in America (Colorado, 1975), Brown was a member of the Tuskegee Airmen in World War II, a feat which places him among the greatest aviators in history and, more importantly, part of the warrior Red Tails who defeated the Axis Powers by themselves.

But it was speech he gave at the Lieutenant Governor's Conference in Point Clear, Alabama that will forever cast a haunting shadow on the actual tales of those lauded Red Tails. From George Derek Musgrove's Rumor, Repression, and Racial Politics: How the Harassment of Black Elected Officials Shaped Post-Civil Rights America, we learn about a 'branding' incident that happened in the dark woods of backward 1940s Alabama:

At the gathering, he delivered an impassioned speech on the topic of his relationship to Alabama and contemporary race relations. Although he had trained in Alabama during World War II as a Tuskegee Airmen, he had not returned since. His reluctance stemmed from a crash during a 1943 training exercise. In the crash, Brown claimed, he was knocked unconscious and discovered by a white farmer. Rather than help the young pilot, this alleged member of the Ku Klux Klan, chained, beat, and branded Brown on the chest with a K. In a dramatic flourish, Brown ripped open his shirt exposing a keloid “K”: proof, he claimed, of the alleged assault. Brown then stated that his ability to return to Alabama as the lieutenant governor of Colorado showed how far the country had come in the past three decades. The speech electrified the conference. Soon after Brown stepped from the podium, the assembly elected him vice chairman. (p. 73)


Great story complete with the all the essentials required to induce the greatest amount of “white guilt” from whoever come in contact with the tale of just another Alabama bigot standing in the way of progress.

But, none of George Brown’s story was true:


The following day, reporters from the Denver Post began to check Brown’s facts. Brown had worked at the Post for fourteen years, and no one in the newsroom could recall him having told such a story. Under scrutiny, the lieutenant governor’s tale began to unravel. Brown had been branded not by a white farmer in Alabama during World War II but by his Kappa Alpha Psi fraternity brothers, at his own request, in college. The revelation created a media firestorm in Colorado. Backtracking in the face of criticism, Brown claimed that his words were misconstrued, that he had mistakenly conflated a story of his having been beaten with that of another pilot who had been branded.

“The incidents I referred to were correct,” Brown stated to reporters. “I told of an incident of a cadet who was branded. I told a personal incident of how I was badly beaten.”

He apologized if “there was any merging [of the stories], either actual or implied.” Brown’s mea culpa may have ended the controversy if it were true, but it was not. Though several had been threatened and insulted, no Tuskegee Airmen was ever branded in Alabama during World War II.

Though he did not say so at the time, in a 2002 interview with the author Brown admitted that the branding story was a rumor that circulated among black Army Air Corps cadets stationed in Alabama. “I heard it,” Brown said. “I didn’t know whether it was true or false.” (p. 73-74)

So, Mr. Brown – the first black lieutenant governor of Colorado –tried to pass it off as a factual event, one that happened to him, in order to gain sympathy from his white lieutenant governors.

None of it was true.  The "K" branded on his black skin was from a voluntary act he willingly participated in...

It’s a story like that of Mr. Brown and his ‘branded with a ‘K’” tale that makes you question the whole Tuskegee Airmen narrative.

And this has been another great moment in black history.

74 comments:

10mm AUTO said...

In addition to all the words and phrases that Whites can no longer use (Black-hole, in the black, Niggardly, tar-baby, etc) that soon we will have to abandon the letter K completely. It will play hob with the English language, but who can stand in the way of the rights of those poor dear downtrodden orcs.

This negro was simply following his blood, he needed a schtick (sorry about the K) to get himself a wave of sympathy to sweep him to power. Imagine if you can, Chuck Yeager getting out of the Bell X-1 and saying to a newspaperman:

"Well, she jumped around a bit, but I held her together even though I have these broken ribs and that made the flight a little uncomfortable. They are broken because I was mobbed in town by a bunch of negros and they busted my ribs calling me a SLave-owning cracker!"

And then later on it turned out to be a lie. It would be a world class embarrassment.

Whites look for accuracy and courage, negros look for the most impressionable thing to say at the moment. Examples of things negros say when their child is caught stealing/raping/murdering/shooting:

1. He didn't do nuffings! (Don't mind the forensic evidence)

2. He is a good Boy! (Despite his 12 prior convictions)

3. He is an Honor student! (At the school for special education he attended for 2 weeks before dropping out)

4. He is/was turning his life around! (The bodies on the floor helped him make his decision)

5. He was/is an aspiring rapper! (He was trying to say enough anti-White violent rhetoric in a rhythmic enough way to get other blacks to buy it, as opposed to getting a job.)

And on and on. Every excuse, every dodge, every evasion of reality looking to gain a better position. GOD! We know that they can never understand honor, duty, bravery, courage, Heart and sacrifice the way Whites do. This is a perfect story and encapsulation of Orcs in America.
All the Tuskegee Airmen had to do was perform. Instead they came back and have lied so much it has taken years to unravel it all. They didn't lift up their race, they Augered in.

Jefferson said...

When is Paul Kersey going to talk about the Black ex-cop turned serial killer Chris Dorner ?

Bogolyubski said...

According to the Marxist doctrines taught in places such as Haaaavaaahd Law School nowadays, "truth" is only a construct - an agreed-upon fabrication - so the fact that Brown's account differs from the white man's truth does not render it invalid. On the contrary, the fact that a black man rendered this narrative automatically makes it more valid than any rendered by whites.

What is this magic power which keeps BRA going? The example of leftist reasoning I gave above is not an exaggeration by any means. This is really the type of thing which is taught in all universities in the west, and down into the secondary and even elementary schools. So, the type of empirical evidence brought up by our host largely falls upon ears unable to hear and eyes unable to see. Nevertheless, we must continue to put it forth. We need other weapons though, which can break through to the brainwashed on more of a metaphysical level.

White Noise said...

Have you ever seen that move? Its enough white guilt to choke a horse.

White Noise said...

Why do you have to moderate comments? Let the chips fall where they may man. Only by seeing what the DWL are saying can we all learn how to refute their narrative

City resident said...

This is why credence should never be given to any of these stories told by blacks about themselves. They just make things up. This would be race hoax # two-billion. The ravings of the spree-killing ex-cop in Cal should be seen in this light, the product of a demented, paranoid and sick mind claiming to have been persecuted. The mainstream media seems to be treating some of his claims as though they might have some merit simply because he is black. No one bothered to think that what the Joker shooter said had any grounding in reality and thus dismissed it.

Anonymous said...

Such nordic profiles on those "black" airmen ...

Oh well, everything else about Tuskegee is bullshit, so why not pretty up the characters a little bit, too?

Anonymous said...

Comrades the Tuskegee Airman shot down the entire Luftwaffe, sank the Bismark and killed Hitler in a fierce strafing run on the chancellery! It is all true because it was on teevee, a movie and professor Hymie Schwartz told me during a diversity studies course.

Anonymous said...

Christopher Dorner = Constructive Feedback

Beyond The Political Spectrum said...

Interesting!
Beyond-The-Political-Spectrum

Anonymous said...

Paul Kersey,

If you really want to expose black victimization mythology turn white guilt insanity, why not write about the gospel of YT bad indoctrination and DWL sanctimony, To Kill a Mockingbird? After all, many DWLs will tell you that their favorite work of fiction is To Kill a Mockingbird, less a novel than a political fable that is barely suitable for 6th graders. It's hardly a great work of literature.

Harper Lee has been a virtual recluse for the last 50 years. She has steadfastly refused to give interviews on the degree to which her novel is a heavy fictionalized account of her childhood and her father's legal and journalism career, the inspiration for Atticus Finch.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1289793/Dont-mention-mockingbird-Meet-Harper-Lee-reclusive-novelist-wrote-classic-novel-mesmerised-40-million-readers.html#axzz2KNm0xMvu

As far as I know nobody has actually researched the life of Harper Lee's father Amasa Lee Coleman and the actual true trials that inspired . It seems so obvious that Harper Lee wrote a novel precisely calculated to appeal to prejudices of the leftist Manhattan Upper West Side literary clique she and her close childhood friend Truman Capote traveled in. The same literary crowd that tells America that Richard Wright's work of Marxist propaganda Native Son, a heavily fictionalize account of the "Brick Moron" serial killer, is a masterpiece.

It is possible that Harper Lee aimed to write a more factual account of her childhood employing many of the true crime/trial novel elements that she assisted her close confidant Capote in developing for his later landmark novel In Cold Blood. The New York lefty's want no such thing from her, so Harper Lee sold her soul for fame and fortune which is the source of her embarrassment and reclusiveness.

Anonymous said...

More on the leftist political fiction that is To Kill a Mockingbird

From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_Kill_a_Mockingbird#Autobiographical_elements

Lee has said that To Kill a Mockingbird is not an autobiography, but rather an example of how an author "should write about what he knows and write truthfully".[11] Nevertheless, several people and events from Lee's childhood parallel those of the fictional Scout. Lee's father, Amasa Coleman Lee, was an attorney, similar to Atticus Finch, and in 1919, he defended two black men accused of murder. After they were convicted, hanged and mutilated,[12] he never tried another criminal case. Lee's father was also the editor and publisher of the Monroeville newspaper. Although more of a proponent of racial segregation than Atticus, he gradually became more liberal in his later years.[13] Though Scout's mother died when she was a baby, Lee was 25 when her mother, Frances Cunningham Finch, died. Lee's mother was prone to a nervous condition that rendered her mentally and emotionally absent.[14] Lee had a brother named Edwin, who — like the fictional Jem — was four years older than his sister. As in the novel, a black housekeeper came daily to care for the Lee house and family.

Lee modeled the character of Dill on her childhood friend, Truman Capote, known then as Truman Persons.[15][16] Just as Dill lived next door to Scout during the summer, Capote lived next door to Lee with his aunts while his mother visited New York City.[17] Like Dill, Capote had an impressive imagination and a gift for fascinating stories. Both Lee and Capote were atypical children: both loved to read. Lee was a scrappy tomboy who was quick to fight, but Capote was ridiculed for his advanced vocabulary and lisp. She and Capote made up and acted out stories they wrote on an old Underwood typewriter Lee's father gave them. They became good friends when both felt alienated from their peers; Capote called the two of them "apart people".[18] In 1960, Capote and Lee traveled to Kansas together to investigate the multiple murders that were the basis for Capote's nonfiction novel In Cold Blood.

Down the street from the Lees lived a family whose house was always boarded up; they served as the models for the fictional Radleys. The son of the family got into some legal trouble and the father kept him at home for 24 years out of shame. He was hidden until virtually forgotten; he died in 1952.[19]

The origin of Tom Robinson is less clear although many have speculated that his character was inspired by several models. When Lee was 10 years old, a white woman near Monroeville accused a black man named Walter Lett of raping her. The story and the trial were covered by her father's newspaper which reported that Lett was convicted and sentenced to death. After a series of letters appeared claiming Lett had been falsely accused, his sentence was commuted to life in prison. He died there of tuberculosis in 1937.[20] Scholars believe that Robinson's difficulties reflect the notorious case of the Scottsboro Boys,[21][22] in which nine black men were convicted of raping two white women on negligible evidence. However, in 2005, Lee stated that she had in mind something less sensational, although the Scottsboro case served "the same purpose" to display Southern prejudices.[23] Emmett Till, a black teenager who was murdered for flirting with a white woman in Mississippi in 1955, and whose death is credited as a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement, is also considered a model for Tom Robinson.[24]

Anonymous said...

Anything and everything in black America is a lie. Any accomplishments have to be conjured up. And of course they want white guilt, when DWL stop feeling guilty the gibs me's will stop.

Anonymous said...

More background on the historical basis for To Kill a Mockingbird

From

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110818201512AApp7Rh


Lee has said that To Kill a Mockingbird is not an autobiography, but rather an example of how an author "should write about what he knows and write truthfully".[11] Nevertheless, several people and events from Lee's childhood parallel those of the fictional Scout. Lee's father, Amasa Coleman Lee, was an attorney, similar to Atticus Finch, and in 1919, he defended two black men accused of murder(Note - They robbed and murdered a white storekeeper). After they were convicted, hanged, and mutilated,[12] he never tried another criminal case. Lee's father was also the editor and publisher of the Monroeville newspaper. Although more of a proponent of racial segregation than Atticus, he gradually became more liberal in his later years

....

The origin of Tom Robinson is less clear, though many have speculated that his character was inspired by several models. When Lee was 10 years old, a white woman near Monroeville accused a black man named Walter Lett(note Left had been a convict) of raping her. The story and the trial were covered by her father's newspaper, and Lett was convicted and sentenced to death. After a series of letters appeared claiming Lett had been falsely accused, his sentence was commuted to life in prison. He died there of tuberculosis in 1937.[20] Scholars believe that Robinson's difficulties reflect the notorious case of the Scottsboro Boys,[21][22] in which nine black men were convicted of raping two white women on very poor evidence. However, in 2005 Lee stated that she had in mind something less sensational, although the Scottsboro case served "the same purpose" to display Southern prejudices.[23] Emmett Till, a black teenager who was murdered for flirting with a white woman in Mississippi in 1955, and whose death is credited as a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement, is also considered a model for Tom Robinson.[24]

Anonymous said...

Paul Kersey,

Did you accidentally delete my comment on the ultimate work of DWL white guilt propaganda To Kill a Mockingbird?

If you really want to get to the heart of the "White Guilt" phenomena there is probably no better place to start.

Author Harper Lee has been a recluse for 50 years and refuses to discuss the fictionalization of historical events involving her father's legal and journalistic career.

I believe that a honest investigation of the historical facts that formed the foundation for ultimate work of DWL propaganda would be material for dozens of SBPDL articles.

Folks can start here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_Kill_a_Mockingbird#Autobiographical_elements

Anonymous said...

I worked for a Negro who had belonged to the same Negro fraternity. The guy was a bigoted, sexist asshole. Four young women, one white and the rest black, who had worked for him as well all quit their jobs in a four-month period. He was that bad. Asshole fired me, but that's OK as two years later I now have a great job working for a brilliant, white conservative.

Anonymous said...

It was the benefit of slavery, racism, segregation and Jim Crow that created The Tuskegee Airmen (T.A.). In other words, this "achievement" of the Negro only came about due to the grace of the White Race.

It was the fact Whites were smarter back then and did not want to lower the standards nor destroy the moral of the White fighter crews that they (Whites) created the T.A. If we did not have moral and correct segregation, like we once had, then there would be no T.A.

Then, what would all the blacks have to talk about? Be proud about? SEGREGATION created the T.A. This is why there is nothing after them that blacks can claim as fame.

So, next time an Afro talks about them, I want that same Afro to thank the White Man for the benefits of segregation. Same goes for what Harlem used to be and what every pre-1965 black area.......There was a glory time for Afros when they were FORCED to live among themselves and were FORCED to maintain some type of civilization. Segregation made that possible.

Mr. Ken said...

My descendants came to the USA in 1930. Every man on both my father and mothers side of the family served in the US military, as I do. I have no "white guilt" about slavery or any other trial or tribulation blacks have endured. In fact, I don't give a F**K. It's no excuse.

10mm AUTO said...

Anon, your literary views on the origins of "To Kill a Mockingbird" are fascinating, but irrelevant here. This is SBPDL, a blog devoted to exploring the idiosyncrasies of the negro species. While DWL guilt and various enablers are tangentially related to the theme, I would be more interested in your assessment of the negro propensity to embellish, lie and distort for their own racial interest. A novel is a novel. Negros neither read nor are articulate. The best black writers (right most tail of the I.Q. curve of their racial representatives) are not very creative or logical (See Constructive Feedback or the vile Desiree). Even the best of the best writers such as Thomas Sowell are largely derivative, with scant creative thought. Sowell's strength is that he is a black man in a Conservative venue, so he can say things Whites can not say in print.

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

10 mm AUTO for the win again.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. A good many DWLs, including those I know personally, think "To Kill a Mockingbird" is a true story.

One time I told a DWL friend that Atticus Finch was a fictional character who never existed. He was somewhat perplexed as he had never thought from that angle.

josh said...

I once came across a bit of Black Studies crap at scribd.com.It discussed runaway slaves being boiled in oil,branding--what is it with the colored and branding??--and the endless rape of black womens.I am sure Black Studies(BS) is just that. Its loaded with the most ctazy lies. It brings to mind the tales from ANOTHER outspoken minority group about the depredations THEY suffered,including the boiling in oil(!)--tho I heard oil was in short supply at that place & time,lol. Blacks are liars by nature,they have no respect for the truth. Again,it brings to mind aNOTHER group...

Anonymous said...

Reply to 10mm AUTO,

Allied with every failed black majority municipality are the DWL run local newspaper and television media and white political establishment co-conspirators. It both hilarious and sad to see interviews where newspaper editors, lawyers and DWL politicians claim that the book that most influenced them was To Kill a Mockingbird. TKaM combines a perfectly fine childhood memoir with some of the silliest contrived YT-Bad propaganda imaginable. Much of TKaM would have been just fine for its intended 6th grade audience. But instead of Harper Lee sticking to the compelling autobiographical facts of her father's legal and journalism career, she composed calculated pious fiction to win the support of the New York lefty literary crowd. For any journalist or lawyer not to be able to see through or behind TKaM's contrivances is a pretty telling indicator of the decline of their professions.

As I have asked here before, why are all the major newspapers in Northern Alabama owned by ultra-liberal Newhouse family controlled Advanced Publications based on Staten Island, NY? Does any black on the Birmingham City Council really fear being exposed as corrupt or incompetent when local media is dominated by the agenda of gutless deluded DWL's headquartered a thousand miles away.

Non-Blank Slaters know that nature and nurture(Culture) both influence each other in a continually dynamic fashion.
The DWL dominated culture combined with insane social welfare policies have helped to promote an unnatural selection of the less intelligent and socially disciplined left half of the black bell curve to reproductively dominate the right for 50 years or more. As long as there is a welfare state blind to the realities of both the bell curve and the genetic origins of intelligence and character, devolution and idiocracy are more likely than human progress.

pat said...

By a strange cooincidence I'm reading my second book this month on the Pointblank Directive. The Tuskeegee Airmen were a small part in this major operation.

The first book I read two weeks ago was called "The Pointblank Dierective" the one I'm currently reading is the "Engineers of Victory". Both recount how the Brits engaged in nighttime bombing while the Americans bombed during daylight hours.

The first book was written by an American the second by a Brit. That matters because to this day the world has qualms about the British bombing practice. Many considered the safer but much less effective nighttime bombings to be a terror tactic.

In marked contrast we Americans bombed not civilians in their homes but specific strategic targets like ball bearing factories. The price for our method was terrible casualties. In late 1943 we were losing huge numbers of pilots and crews.

That turned around. We won the air war and there was no Luftwaffe presence on D-Day. The British author of "Engineers of Victory" likes to attribute the change to insertion of the Rolls Royce Merlin engine into the P-51 Mustang. The American author attributes the turn around to American courage and determination.

The Tuskeegee Airmen were a minor part of the American story.

It's almost impossible now to figure out what really went on. The history of these black pilots is now so encrusted with moral leasons that the truth is totally obscured. Ten years ago the literature was divided. Half the accounts told the story such that it was a battle against white racism in which the blacks triumphed against all odds. But back then there were also accounts of the contemporary criticism. The blacks were criticized during the war for lacking discipline. They had good eyesight and reflexes but were not so good at following orders.

In mid 1943 the doctrine was for the fighter escourts to stick with the bombers in their box formations. Apparently the black pilots routinely broke formation and chased after the Nazi Bf-109s and Fw-190s individually.

But doctrine changed. Doolittle decided to free the fighters from close escourt duties. The American fighters thereafter were freed to pusue the Germans and kill them. This policy turned the air war around. Everyone thereafter acted like the Tuskeegee pilots had acted before.

It probably only worked because by this time American fighter pilots were vastly better than the Germans. The bombing of German cities had required the Nazis to pull fighters from the Eastern Front. That tilted the outcome in the East in Stalin's favor. The Nazi aces had had tremendous success against the communist pilots. Many had over a a hundred kills. But American fighters proved to be much tougher than the Soviets. In just a few months almost all of the Nazi super Aces were shot out of the sky. The Nazi replacements were barely trained and lost to Americans in dog fights at a ratio of better than four to one.

The Tuskeegee Airmen wer given the newest best fighter we had - the P-51 Mustang - and sent up against a failing Luftwaffe. They did well as did all the white pilots too.

I have no doubt that many black pilots suffered a racial insult or two. But let's keep this in persepctive. The air operation against Germany was perhaps the most dangerous of any in all of WWII. We nearly gave up at the end of 1943 because of the unsustainable casualty rates. But our equipment got better, and our men soldiered on. The tide turned.

Much the same thing happened in the Pacific theater. No Allied fighter could dog fight with a Zero at the time of Pearl harbor. But better planes and better trained pilots led to a complete turnaround by the time of the "Marianas Turkeyshoot".

These were dramatic and heroic times. The fact that after the tide had turned a handful of blacks got to participate in the destruction of our enemies is not the story we should remember. Getting to be a fighter pilot with the best planes against a weakend opposition is a "perk".

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

Remember when the author of Roots was confronted over his
"story" and defended it by saying that it was neither fact nor fiction but instead what he termed as "faction?"
The truth doesn't matter to black people- it's the narrative that counts and as long as that narrative plays to the crowd, that's all that matters. The "I dun been dun wrong by dem evil whitey's" narrative is, of course, the most popular one of all.
They seem to be most offended when that narrative (as in cases such as the Red Tails branding hoax and others) is revealed to be pure nonsense and rubbish- and not by the fact that it was a pack of lies to begin with.
I've witnessed black people caught telling outrageous lies/stories a number of times and instead of feeling any embarassment or shame, the response is always outrage and is followed by an infuriated screech of, "Why you gots to make me look bad?"
Image is more important to them than substance and the false narrative is more important to them than the truth.
Any story told by a negro should always be taken with a pound of salt as it's sure to be full of fabrications, ridiculous embellishments and fantasy. Whether one wants to chalk that up to moral failings or simply to cultural differences is really a moot point as the result is the same~ a pack of lies offered up as the gospel truth and defended to the bitter end with all the attendant outrage, resentment and hostility when that defense fails.
The same principle can be seen playing out when some baby momma screeches that her dead thug was "a good boy, turnin' his life around, and was an aspiring rapper" when a reporter reveals that the little angel had a rap sheet a mile long and was headed to nowhere but to state prison or death row. The pretense,the fantasy,the self delusion, the false narrative is destroyed and that is the offense. You done made dem look bad! This also plays out when someone debunks black invention myths and shows those claims to be a 10 pound bag of B.S.
Tell the truth and you're a racist.
For DWL's, telling the truth , the whole truth and nothing but the truth (when it destroys black fantasies, lies, false narratives etc) is "being insensitive" and "engaging in hate speech" as one must defend the fragile ego of the negro at all costs and "be accepting." Do otherwise and you're a monster on the same level as someone who tells a group of 5 year olds that Santa Claus isn't real.

Dan said...

The issue of white men raping halve slave can easy be solved
By looking at mitochondrial white DNA in the black population. If widespread white male on black female took place you would see a relatively intact black mitochondrial strain. I'm not a geneticist but I'd expect to see mulattos with black Mitochondria and white Ydna. Dollars to donuts you will find that the blacks with white ancestors will have a very diverse, possibly even primarily white mitochondrial profile. Most of the high yellows will prove to have been born from wayward white women or white women raped by black men. The whelps from these unfortunate unions will have been set up with an education and some money to make a go of their lives.

Dan said...

Pat,

You are wrong about fighter escort policy.

The Tuskegee were not prone to pursue German interceptors. They stuck by the bombers like glue. Probably cowards.

The white fighter/escort pilots were the aggressive ones who would pursue and destroy the German interceptors.

Additionally the British bombing was the near equivalent of nuking Hamburg, Berlin, Cologne, Aachen, Frankfurt, Dresden... Etc etc etc. of course this worked to destroy Germany. It also sucked away 88mm cannon and night fighters from the front and killed off Germany's most skilled interceptor pilots in an attrition battle that crippled the luftwaffe. In addition to the Lancaster the Brits had Mosquitos which could bomb individual installations with such precision that they could shut down a factory or prison at will. The Mosquito was so fast it didn't need defensive armament just a bomb payload. So precise were the crews that they bombed a specific wall in a Danish prison to free dozens of resistance fighters. Fucking Tuskeegee bullshit.

Anonymous said...


Reply to Trial Junkie

To Kill a Mockingbird is a highly fictionalized account of Harper Lee's father, Amasa Lee Coleman's legal and journalism careers, the struggles he faced and their effect on her family.

Mr Coleman was not the heroic liberal of the book or Hollywood movie. In real life, Coleman was apparently more a pessimist than wild eyed idealist. Perhaps, what we today would call a race realist but not a racist. Coleman did apparently believe strongly in equality before, and the rule of law in the justice system along with the appeals process. He was strongly opposed to lynching and the death penalty for rape.

If Harper Lee stuck to the facts of her father's life, she would have written a fine book, but probably not the runaway bestseller that is today, part of the mandatory politically correct indoctrination in 3 out of 4 school systems in the land.

Harper Lee never wrote another novel after TKaM. She did assist Truman Capote in writing In Cold Blood, which by sticking to the facts is far greater novel.

Anonymous said...

*most impressive thing*

(great comment otherwise)

Anonymous said...

It seems that most situations and narratives involving blacks and other "disadvantaged" ethnic groups are framed in purely emotional terms. You rarely see any attention paid to the actual truth or falsehood of events.

For example, witness the complete silence from either side of the mainstream political arena about the fact that illegal aliens take jobs from Americans, as well as receiving many times more social benefits than they pay in taxes. That these facts are valid statements of important truths has no bearing on the permitted dialogue. The only thing that matters is the howls of outrage that would arise from ethnics and liberals if any accepted figure dared to even allude to them. Therefore, despite our precarious economic situation, we will continue to import millions of illegal aliens and allow them to continue sucking jobs and billions of dollars from our economy.

I'm also reminded of a recent internal study conducted by British police administrators which found that Pakistani and other "South Asian" police officers were approximately ten times as likely as white officers to be the subject of corruption and misconduct complaints from the public. Police leaders sat on the study for quite some time, undoubtedly terrified by the consequences of releasing its findings. When the study was finally released, the howls of outrage from every ethnic special interest group impacted by the findings were deafening. Not once did I see any interest directed toward ascertaining if the findings were true or not: the entire point was that the study made certain minority groups look bad, and that absolutely could not be allowed.

Anonymous said...

There is also a good deal of well-founded suspicion among those on the literary scene that the entire book may actually have been written by Truman Capote.

Bogolyubski said...

10mm AUTO:
Anon, your literary views on the origins of "To Kill a Mockingbird" are fascinating, but irrelevant here. This is SBPDL, a blog devoted to exploring the idiosyncrasies of the negro species.

I respectfully disagree, 10mm. To Kill a Mockingbird was a major element in preparing the road for the erection of the looting scheme known as BRA - and BRA is even more at the center of what this site is about than TNB like chimpouts, flash mobs, the zebra intifada and corruption. The whites of earlier eras developed ways of dealing with TNB, while BRA has brought us TNB on steroids - unchained.

Exposing the truth behind the massive foundation of lies upon which BRA is erected is very important. Back to the point of my earlier post - other ways are needed of exposing the truth which work on a different level than hard facts and empirical evidence. The millions of white females (and not a few males) out there who have drunk deeply of the DWL koolaid need to ingest something which will enable them to see and hear. As I said before, the truth has been out there for some time now. It does little good to tell it over and over to those who are deaf and blind.

Anonymous said...

I disagree. I found his comments both worthwhile and highly apposite to the purposes of this website. The novel he mentioned is an important work as both a cornerstone and justification of current liberal doctrine. Without a thorough understanding of the liberal mindset, we cannot defeat them. All relevant information toward that goal is good.

Bogolyubski said...

Since others have raised the issue, I hereby suggest a new topic for Paul Kersey's ongoing educational series in honor of negroid history month. How about the great negro tradition of literary fraud?

We have numerous examples of plagiarism from the hand of His Holiness St. Martin the Adulterer, including his doctoral dissertation - much lifted from some guy named Boozer.

There's always the amusing case of Saint Alex Heley and Roots. The great literary lyin' ended up losing a copyright infringement suit and having to shell out a substantial portion of his windfall thanks to his lifting of substantial chunks of another's work.

There's also the tall tales and fraudulent accounts of real life done by DWLs such as To Kill a Mockingbird, Native Son, etc. The distinguished "journalism" of Jayson Blair and others. One could do a series of articles on this topic alone.

Of course an even more interesting topic might revolve around who was in charge of all those publishing concerns, newspapers, movie houses, etc. and how much money was made in selling such fraud to gullible Americans - which certainly stands as proof of Mencken's observation that nobody ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the American public. Readers should also keep in mind that much of the fraud goes back to the days before the indoctrination centers known as public schools were the exclusive fiefdom of Marxists they have been for the last four decades or so.

Melanie said...

What I have yet to hear one single black person answer, is this question-why, if whites are so hateful and oppressive, do they have a fit when whites attempt to live self-segregated lives, away from them? In their own white communities, in their own white workplaces and churches, etc? For me, it's a rhetorical question, because I suspect I know the true answer. But I have yet to hear a black answer it in any way. If they're so supremely talented, yet so supremely held down by whites, why wouldn't they want to be left alone by whites, to create all the "vibrancy" of which they are capable, without our presence "oppressing" them?

Anonymous said...

What 'To Kill a Mockingbird' Isn't

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703561604575283354059763326.html

Harper Lee's contemporary and fellow Southerner Flannery O'Connor (and a far worthier subject for high-school reading lists) once made a killing observation about "To Kill a Mockingbird": "It's interesting that all the folks that are buying it don't know they are reading a children's book."

rjp said...

Bogolyubski said...
Since others have raised the issue, I hereby suggest a new topic for Paul Kersey's ongoing educational series in honor of negroid history month. How about the great negro tradition of literary fraud?


Barack Obama?

.... a 1990 New York Times profile on Harvard’s first black editor caught the eye of a hustling young literary agent named Jane Dystel.

Dystel persuaded Obama to put a book proposal together, and she submitted it. Poseidon, a small imprint of Simon & Schuster, signed on and authorized a roughly $125,000 advance for Obama’s proposed memoir.

With advance in hand, Obama repaired to Chicago where the University of Chicago offered him an office and stipend to help him write. Obama dithered.

At one point, in order to finish without interruption, he and wife Michelle decamped to Bali. Obama was supposed to have finished the book within a year. Bali or not, advance or no, he could not. He was surely in way over his head.

According to Osnos, Simon & Schuster canceled the contract and likely asked that Obama return at least some of the advance.

Dystel did not give up. She solicited Times Book, the division of Random House at which Osnos was publisher. He met with Obama, took his word that he could finish the book, and authorized a new advance of $40,000.

http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/did_bill_ayers_write_1.htm

Dan said...

About 15% of MDNA in American blacks is from white sources. This indicates a very heavy overlap between the early black population and white women in the US.

However 2x as much European derived Ydna is also present. Approx 30%. Which indicates an overlap that is quite considerable. It could be that white Ydna was a fairly good competitive advantage too. Rather than widespread rapine.

Anonymous said...

The negroes have no written history (which requires the ability to write). So they rely on oral traditions and legends forgetting that YT DOES have master recording of history and until recently, had the logic to correctly interpret that history. So the negro goes on with his storytelling and never imagines that it will be recalled and shown to be nonsense.

Anonymous said...

This is how blacks talk among themselves. Make up anything you want and if it sounds good and pushes the right buttons, it becomes gospel.

It's pretty odd that anybody actually checked the man's story and called him on it. That's not the style of PC journalism we have all come to know and love.

Won't be long before calling any black man a liar will become a crime, unless you're higher on the victimism totem pole, or unless the black man ain't PC.

Anonymous said...

Melanie: You know the answer. Even the Africans know.

Without the White Man the blacks would starve. They starve today all over the world. They are starving in Africa. The black race can not feed itself but must rely on the intelligence and grace of the White Man.

That is why they hate us. They will call us racccisssst and kill us and rape us and rob us, but they will never, ever leave us. That is instant starvation or slavery to another black. They will kill and die and burn their own homes if we don't let them live with us. They are like sick rabid dogs who have to have a host neighborhood to feed upon.

This will not last much longer.

Anonymous said...

I offer no apologies for the slaves my g grandfather owned or the yankees he killed.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Kersey, OT

Here's something to consider for your website

"Circle of Six", a book chronicling a detective's efforts to bring down the killer (who was a member of Farrakhan's Mosque) of a NYC patrolman. In this book, you have the then-mayor John Lindsay (a DWL if there ever was one), striking a deal along with five others in this circle, to impede an investigation into the crime.

You won't believe what happened.
http://www.amazon.com/Circle-Six-Notorious-Killer-Everything/dp/1932857850

Also, this is a link to a very upsetting story coming out of Fairfeld, CA. It's yet another case of the war against white females, this time a young girl, and no CNN/MSNBC/Inside Edition coverage like there was for Travon Martin last year.

Warning: Very upsetting - http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/fairfield-police-make-arrest-teens-murder-case/nWKHL/

Anonymous said...

Shorter Tuskegee airman/politician story:

Negroes lie.

Anonymous said...

"Won't be long before calling any black man a liar will become a crime, unless you're higher on the victimism totem pole, or unless the black man ain't PC."

Anyone know what the current hierarchy is? My guess is:

Any of TWMNBN
Negro female
Negro male
Illegal alien
LGBT
Remaining minority females
Asian
White females

Tied for last we have (White males, gun owners, taxpayers, anyone that honestly lives off their own efforts and talents)

nokangaroos said...

What is it you have with these syphilitic airpersons? Their list of exploits is about as long as the list of African inventions ...
Patent #1: It is possible to stick a bone through your nose.
Patent #2: Maybe sharpen bone first.

Should any samesaid airperson or their offspring be reading this:
If you are wont to shooting up refugee women and children by the hundreds just because you are bored, it is exceedingly bad policy to paint your machines a distinctive pattern. We have not fogotten Attnang-Puchheim, April 21, 1945.

Jordan Appleyard said...


Anonymous said...February 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM


I offer no apologies for the slaves my great-grandfather owned or the Yankees he killed.


You'd be closer to a promoter of multicultrualism than a White Separatist and we must deport you to Africa with the DWLs in tow with all the "African Americans". Most Yankees didn't die to free slaves either, by the way.

Brett Dilfer said...

I'm waiting for your take on "Christopher Dorner: Manifest Destruction Manifested"

Discard said...

Dan: I seriously doubt that the White DNA in most Blacks comes from White women. Any Black who raped or had consensual sex with a White woman would assuredly been killed in the slave- owning South, Reconstruction South, or Jim Crow South. The DNA comes mostly from Black women who willingly offered themselves to White men, In hopes of better treatment for themselves or a brighter future for their offspring.

Discard said...

Regarding Black fighter escorts: The Blacks did not fly long-range fight escort missions until mid 1944, because they were flying short-ranged P-40s until then. By the time they got P-51s, the German Air Force was pretty well beaten. They got the newer planes later because they were not part of Doolittle's 8th Air Force, but part of the 15th Air Force, stationed in the Medditerranean. The 8th, stationed in England, was the Army Air Force's showcase outfit and had priority over other units.
If the Red Tails were prone to stick close to the bombers, it's likely because they had no business trying to chase down the Luftwaffe individually in P-40s.
They weren't supermen, nor cowards, just average. For Blacks, that's an achievement.

Discard said...

Regarding Black fighter escorts: The Blacks did not fly long-range fight escort missions until mid 1944, because they were flying short-ranged P-40s until then. By the time they got P-51s, the German Air Force was pretty well beaten. They got the newer planes later because they were not part of Doolittle's 8th Air Force, but part of the 15th Air Force, stationed in the Medditerranean. The 8th, stationed in England, was the Army Air Force's showcase outfit and had priority over other units.
If the Red Tails were prone to stick close to the bombers, it's likely because they had no business trying to chase down the Luftwaffe individually in P-40s.
They weren't supermen, nor cowards, just average. For Blacks, that's an achievement.

Anonymous said...

I know that these Tuskegee Airman were all mulattoes, not really representative of the real negro, but their appearance on the coin is so White-looking as to be ridiculous.

Melanie said...

@Anonymous February 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM-

Yet another young white female victim at the hands of yet another negro savage. This is of course not a "hate crime".

The media of course will sweep it under the rug-no marches and calls for "justice" here, even though this crime is much more heinous and much more epidemic than a thug gangbanger in the making getting shot for attacking a man and beating his head into the sidewalk.

It would undermine the indoctrination of young white females which trains them to ignore, to squelch down their instinctive (and wholly justified) wariness of black males.

There have been, will be thousands of these of these rapes and murders of white females, whose ages range from mere children to elderly women. The media is an accessory to murder for covering them up while spinning their narrative of a "war on black teens" by whites. The real potential victims don't even get the information they need to protect themselves, instead they are bombarded with lectures to leave themselves more open to these negro predators than they otherwise would in the name of being "non-discriminatory".

That poor baby. If it were my daughter...even more, if it were my husband's daughter-let's just say he wouldn't go out alone, and the animals who did it wouldn't go out fast or easy.

Anonymous said...

I think the PC hierarchy is more like:

Queers
Illegal Aliens (I put them above Negros because they've managed to guilt the nation into accepting amnesty, something the Negros never could do about "rep-ray-shunz")
Negro Females
Negro males
Other "minority"females
White Females
"Minority" males
White Males
Christian White Males
Southern White Males
Southern Christian White Males (the absolute lowest of the low. "Crazy Crackers" as I've heard them described.)

Anonymous said...

To be fair, racism will do strange things to its victims, even if the racism is an ineffective white defense mechanism to a real but incomprehensible problem.

pat said...

Dan thinks I'm wrong about the Tuskegee Air-men's practice and performance in battle. I'm sorry but it's not possible for me to be wrong. I wasn't stating what actually happened but only what I had read.

A dozen years ago I read a criticism of them that was written in 1942 or 1943 that they were undisciplined. They were said to break formation. I can no longer find any such references. Now everything is laudatory. As I originally wrote, it is impossible to really know now what was the real case. Today all the contemporary criticisms of them - and there were many - is dismissed as simple racism. I'm sure there was some racism but as to whether those criticism had any merit - who knows?

The Tuskegee Airmen seem to be at least normally successful in the air. It is important to always consider when engagements took place. In 1942 and early 1943 the Luftwaffe was very successful against American air-power. Our bombers were being decimated on a daily basis. Later the situation turned around and the Luftwaffe was shot out of the sky. In the early days the bomber crews feared to see the Luftwaffe fighters come up. Later the tactic was to induce the fighters to engage because our American fighters were by then dominant. Some of that dominance was the P-51 but most was from superior American pilot training. So a score run up late in the operation didn't mean as much as an early score did.

Much the same thing happened on the ground too. Patton's tankers by the Battle of the Bulge were much better trained than the Germans in the Panzers. Germany had lost all the tanker aces that had overrun Poland and France. They were rushing barely trained youths into combat.

Before Doolittle's policy change the role of the escort fighters was to try to drive away the enemy. An Fw-190 might be driven away only to land, refuel and re-engage. After the policy change, the American pilots pursued and killed them - and strafed the Nazi airstrip too.

One thing we can say with certainty is that this group of black pilots were given the absolute best and newest planes. It is not commonly appreciated that the P-38 could actually fly further than the P-51. It was also faster and flew higher. It had three disadvantages. It was bitterly cold because the pilot's cabin was separated from the engines. It cost twice as much to build as a P-51 (and consumed the strategic material tungsten). Finally it required twice as much training to learn how to use properly. The p-51 was a cheap, easy to fly long distance fighter. If someone was serious about sabotaging the black pilots they would not have put them in the new P-51 Mustangs. It looks to me as if they were given every opportunity to succeed.

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

@10mm Auto:"Imagine if you can, Chuck Yeager ... I have these broken ribs and that made the flight a little uncomfortable. They are broken because I was mobbed in town by a bunch of negros"

One problem: no one back then would have believed that a mere "bunch of negros" could have beaten him. Chuck Norris' Beard pisses its pants if it hears two words that even sound like "Chuck Yeager."

Anonymous said...

Funny how you left the number one from the last list off your list completely!

Anonymous said...

According to the Stephen E. Ambrose book, "The Wild Blue" the primary role of the Tuskegee Airmen based in Italy in 1944 were to use their specially configured P-51s to fly TOP COVER protection support on very long range B-24 missions against Nazi Oil fields and refineries in Romania( Ploiesti ) and the synthetic fuels plants in East Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia. These strategic bombing missions against German fuel supplies in eastern and central Europe, are now widely agreed on as having played a greater role in winning the war than the strategic missions flown by US and English bombing units based out of England against Axis manufacturing.

Top Cover meant flying thousands of feet above the B-24 formations at altitudes at around 35,000 feet in an unpressurized single seat fighter with a primitive by today's standards cockpit environment(oxygen, heater etc). That was dangerous enough. Even on missions with no aerial combat it's likely Tuskegee airman died or were captured simply due to the mechanical or cockpit environment failures.


The job of the Tuskegee was to provide protection against the limited number of German high altitude fighters like the Dora version FW-190 and the Me-262 jet fighters by insuring that if the bombers spotted formations of German fighters their P-51s could dive on them and drive them away. Other US fighter units could then home in on the scattered German fighters while the Tuskegee Airman would then climb back to TOP COVER. It was a very successful tactic, but one that did lend itself towards to lots of individual kills for the Tuskegee airmen.

See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focke-Wulf_Fw_190#High-altitude_developments

That black pilots did a good job in this role is widely accepted. The unit even recorded several Me-262 jet kills by gaining enough steep diving speed in a P-51 to intercept them. However, since the Me-262 jet had limited flight time and mechanical overheating issues, many of them were shot down after having been driven off by Top Cover units. The other fighter units would trail the jets back to their bases and shoot them down as they had to slow down while trying to land. The great Chuck Yeager shot down a Me-262 this way and said it was one of his easier kills.

With out the ridiculous Hollywood hype and politically correct Racial Marxism, the Tuskegee Airman played an important role in WWII strategic bombing campaign.

Anonymous said...

Thread winner!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Any astute student of history knows that when Hitler and his government found out that The Tuskegee Airmen would be flying over the Fatherland, they immediatley started a dialogue about unconditional surrender, so great was the terror in their hearts.

The Tuskegee Airmen went on to wage war against the Axis Powers, and they single-handedly caused the defeat and surrender of Nazi Germany. The free world as we know it today owes its very existence to The Tuskegee Airmen.

America's racist educational system has only just recently started acknowledging the crucial role The Tuskegee Airmen played in saving Western Civilization.

Anonymous said...

He must have just watched "Red Tails".

Discard said...

Pat Albertosaurus: The Blacks flew P-38s before they got P-51s? I did not know that. I just did some internet research, and it seems that the different squadrons flew different aircraft at different times, including P-38s, P-40s, P-47s, and P-51s. Serves me right for reading the MSM and trying to make sense of it.
Nor were all the Black fighter squadrons even part of the same Air Force. Some were, for a time, part of the 12th Air Force, which did not fly long range missions at all. There's even less to the Red Tail myth than even I imagined. Just an average bunch of pilots.

Anonymous said...

CORRECTION

It was a very successful tactic(TOP COVER), but one that did NOT lend itself towards to lots of individual kills for the Tuskegee airmen.

Dan said...

I'd like to address a few things.

1. Mdna in African Americans that is of European origin must come from white women who bred with black men. That's understood to include 15% of AA Mdna.

2. Ydna came from white men breeding with black women. This is about 30% of African American Ydna.

Those are the facts. The amount of Mdna indicates a steady overlap of white women sleeping with black men.

On the Tuskeegee airmen. The Luftwaffe was long beaten by the time they got into the fighting. The best German interceptor pilots were deployed against Allied bombers originating from the UK. This is where the battle of of Europe was decided.

Now, was the fight against the Nazis worth it? Looking at the fuxation of Europe today? Id say our granddads wasted their lives in a suicidal clusterfluck. the blacks were but bit part players. Buchanan was right to summarize ww2 thus: whites fought for the right of blacks to procreate with white women.

Dan said...

War against Germany was on reflection a dubious policy. I honour my ancestors for fighting hard but sadly it appears to have been a complete waste of effort. Their children and the younger warriors went on to sell out their grandchildren to orcs.

SKIP said...

"They got the newer planes later because they were not part of Doolittle's 8th Air Force, but part of the 15th Air Force,

If memory serves, the 15th AF did get the P51s first in the form of the 354th and that unit was loaned to the 8th for the experiment that became the long range escort. The 354th was loaned to the 8th for so long that it appears to have been part of the 8th but it was not. Of course, I could be wrong.

Dan said...

One last point.

The air war in the end was about crippling German airforce assets. So that the ground forces could have free reign. The Tuskeegee effort came long after that was decided.

The DDay landings could not have been conducted unless the British and American navies could with confidence expect to see no aircraft opposing them. The landings took place in June in the English channel. The black escort squadrons were activated in the Mediteranean in July and saw limited combat. And by comparison to other allied escorts did very little to affect the outcome. Many Tuskeegee were trained as bomber pilots and never deployed. This is interesting because bomber crews were the elite of all airforces. All the best pilots and crew were channeled into this task. Yet no Tuskeegee units were trusted in this role in actual combat. Very telling. Otoh the RAF was fully integrated and competent blacks from the Empire were welcome on crew if thy were good enough. I'm not against black pilots if they are good, but these segregated all black units were Potemkin experiments.

SKIP said...

"The Tuskegee were not prone to pursue German interceptors. They stuck by the bombers like glue. Probably cowards.

Not defending blacks as I am certainly no fan of them BUT! STAYING WITH THE BOMBERS was policy until late 44' for ALL escort assignments, other units were tasked with other things including ground attack. SQUADRON SIGNAL Pubs has a number of concise and well written (with photos and art work) by knowledgeable people and are easy reads and they are generally NOT PC.

Dan said...

I'll retract that coward comment. A statement made flippantly. Definite mistake to train blacks to shoot whites though.

AnalogMan said...

Dan @ 11:25 caught my attention with this:

In addition to the Lancaster the Brits had Mosquitos which could bomb individual installations with such precision that they could shut down a factory or prison at will.

Of course, the RAF had many bombers besides the Lancaster, but I'd never considered the Mosquito as a bomber. This was a small plane, made of wood and canvas, with a crew of two - pilot and navigator. I'd considered it mainly a reconnaissance plane, with a small role as a fighter - in particular, as a night fighter. So, I looked it up, and,indeed, there was a bomber version. Aviation fans can read about it here.

Fisk Ellington Rutledge III said...

I've read several first-person accounts by American WWII aviators who fought in the European theater, and they all more or less state that the Black fighter squadrons were fairly hopeless. Some of the authors were aware enough of leftist tyranny to make excuses for the Black pilots, but nobody said that they were even adequate as escorts for bomber formations.

In the Smokey Yunick autobiography, Smokey flatly states that the Black fighter pilots were no good at all. Smokey flew bombers from Italy that targeted places held by the Germans in the Balkans and Central Europe. He said all the bomber pilots dreaded being escorted by Black units, because, apart from being bad combat fliers, they were also inefficient in other ways; bad navigators, bad team players, etc.

Yunick was also a prominent member of the American automobile racing community for decades. He saw numerous attempts by Blacks to race automobiles and, according to Smokey, they just couldn't cut it. They didn't have the ability to juggle all of the variables needed to be a successful racing driver; mechanical limitations, team strategy, hitting the proper line through corners, feedback from the car, etc.

This glorification of the WWII Black fighter pilots is just another Leftist lie in order to support the Leftist narrative, which is based entirely on several lies and false assumptions. It was under Roosevelt that the Leftist pathology was first injected into the U.S. mainstream culture.

The Tuskegee Airmen lie is an early symptom of the societal disease that has now become terminal with the election of that affirmative-action parasite, Obonzo.

Dan said...

The Mozzie was possibly the best aircraft of ww2. Ground attack versions, bomber versions etc... The speed was incredible for the payload.

ingrid said...

Wow, there is alot of hate on this website. I knew racism still existed, and now I finally have the proof in writing!