Friday, February 22, 2013

Guns, Blacks, and Steel: John Lott on the Witness Stand

John Lott is loved by a lot of people. 

A lot. 

"More guns, less crimes," he claims. 

Wrong. 

It's "More blacks, more crime; Less blacks, less crime."


Gun Violence in U.S. Cities Compared to the Deadliest Nations in the World (yes, there is a correlation to the size of each cities black population)

Especially when guns are involved.

Luckily for us, Atlantic Monthly has cobbled together a breakdown of major American cities and the rates of gun violence found there. Mr. Lott, pay attention; there will be a quiz when we're done [Gun Violence in U.S. Cities Compared to the Deadliest Nations in the World, Atlantic Cities, 1-22-13]:
"We can't put this off any longer," President Obama implored the nation last week as he introduced 23 executive actions designed to reduce gun violence in America. While the United States has the highest level of gun ownership per capita in the world, its rate of gun homicides, about three per 100,000 people, is far lower than that of Honduras, the country with the world's highest gun homicide rate (roughly 68 gun murders per 100,000 people). But America's homicide rate varies significantly by city and metro area, as I pointed out here at Cities a few weeks ago.
The map below compares the rate of gun murders in American cities to nations around the world. Building upon Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data used in that post, Zara Matheson of the Martin Prosperity Institute compiled additional data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and other sources collated by The Guardian. (While international crime data suffer from significant reporting and comparison issues, homicide data is more reliable. As the Urban Institute's John Roman points out, it is the one type of crime that is "hard to fake" and also most likely to be reported.)
The pattern is staggering. A number of U.S. cities have gun homicide rates in line with the most deadly nations in the world.
  • If it were a country, New Orleans (with a rate 62.1 gun murders per 100,000 people) would rank second in the world.
  • Detroit's gun homicide rate (35.9) is just a bit less than El Salvador (39.9).
  • Baltimore's rate (29.7) is not too far off that of Guatemala (34.8).
  • Gun murder in Newark (25.4) and Miami (23.7) is comparable to Colombia (27.1).
  • Washington D.C. (19) has a higher rate of gun homicide than Brazil (18.1).
  • Atlanta's rate (17.2) is about the same as South Africa (17).
  • Cleveland (17.4) has a higher rate than the Dominican Republic (16.3).
  • Gun murder in Buffalo (16.5) is similar to Panama (16.2).
  • Houston's rate (12.9) is slightly higher than Ecuador's (12.7).
  • Gun homicide in Chicago (11.6) is similar to Guyana (11.5).
  • Phoenix's rate (10.6) is slightly higher than Mexico (10).
  • Los Angeles (9.2) is comparable to the Philippines (8.9).
  • Boston rate (6.2) is higher than Nicaragua (5.9).
  • New York, where gun murders have declined to just four per 100,000, is still higher than Argentina (3).
  • Even the cities with the lowest homicide rates by American standards, like San Jose and Austin, compare to Albania and Cambodia respectively.
Yes, it's true we are comparing American cities to nations. But most of these countries here have relatively small populations, in many cases comparable to large U.S. metros.  
The sad reality is that many American cities have rates of gun homicides comparable to the some of the most violent nations in the world.
The sad reality is that many American cities are no longer filled with Americans; they are filled with black people. According to 2010 US Census information:

Consult the map of the United States and compare the gun violence in cities replete with black citizens and those with a paucity of black citizens. 

Notice any... trends?

Now, for those believing "More guns, less crime" as espoused by Mr. Lott, let's look at South Africa [Guns Are Everywhere in South Africa. But South Africans Don't Feel Safer Because of It, Slate, 2-14-13]:
It’s surprising to learn that an Olympic athlete stands accused of murder, but there’s nothing new about gun violence in South Africa. While the country’s gun-related violent crime rate has dropped in the wake of 2000’s Firearms Control Act, The Guardian reports that “many people say they live in fear of crime in South Africa, with Johannesburg still listed as one of the five most dangerous cities in the word, along with Mogadishu and New Orleans.” In a Globe and Mail article today, Geoffrey York reported:

South African airports and casinos have prominent signs directing people to storage rooms to deposit their weapons. Criminals assume that their victims have guns. When they break into a house, their first step is to search for the owner’s gun.

Guns are widely used in the most common crimes here: they are used in 77 per cent of house robberies and 87 per cent of business robberies, and they are the cause of death in more than half of all murders, reports say.

Fear of guns is why South Africa’s middle classes are hidden behind three-metre-high electrified fences and walls, in compounds with motion detectors and metal-barred doors. They hire security companies with gun-toting guards, who promise “immediate armed response” to every activated alarm.

As that last paragraph suggests, many South Africans don’t trust the police to protect them. GlobalPost has noted “growing frustration over this country’s corrupt and incompetent police at seemingly every level of the system, from traffic cops soliciting a bribe for a “cold drink” to the controversial appointments of some of the country’s highest-ranking police officials.” In 2012, The Economist reported that:

Last year 5,869 formal complaints were laid against the police, mainly for assault and attempted murder. Police statistics concede that 566 people, including innocent bystanders, were shot dead or otherwise killed by the police in 2009-10; another 294 died in their custody.

Police corruption and venality breed lawlessness, and it also prompts citizens to start taking protection into their own hands. The Guardian reported that “six out of 10 South Africans feared burglary more than any other crime,” and that many people relied on private security services to pick up the police department’s slack. Pistorius’s apartment complex seems to have been a veritable fortress; the New York Times reported that the buildings were “protected by high walls and razor wire.”
Some early reports indicated that Pistorius may have accidentally mistaken his girlfriend for an intruder. (The police have dismissed this theory.) This wouldn’t have been the first time he made such a mistake; late last year, he tweeted about having thought his washing machine was a burglar. The facts of this particular case are still in dispute, but a defense of mistakenly firing at a perceived intruder is more plausible in corrupt, gun-infested South Africa than it might be elsewhere. “And that is a particularly South African mistake, that we are so paranoid you are ready to fire off bullets when you don’t know what is coming,” an acquaintance of Pistorius’s told the Times this afternoon. “We are such a messed up country in some ways, and every now and then it comes to the surface with events that bring it into such stark relief.”
 South Africa was once the jewel of the continent of Africa; when it was controlled by white people. 

Actually, it was a nation built by white people. 

Today -- though guns are everywhere, crime and mayhem is everywhere. 

Today -- South Africa is 79% black and 9% white.

John Lott is loved by a lot of people. Especially conservatives.

A lot of people.

"More guns, less crimes," he claims. 

Wrong. 

It's "More blacks, more crime; Less blacks, less crime."

178 comments:

Anonymous said...

More whites more pedophiles,,more mass murders, more tortures, more pornorgraphy, more gays, more insider trading,

Anonymous said...

South Africa's murder rate is probably 3x what they advertise. Their morgue bodycount suggests that.

Gun control is a new thing there, as is the case any time blacks take over a government. They insist on being disarmed, because they know that the addition of a weapon is EXACTLY the type of "wrong place, wrong time" element that turns one of them into a werewolf.

For whites, it is inconceivable that you could be in a wrong enough place at a wrong enough time for felony murder to ensue, but for blacks, this is an everyday part of the experience of controlling their own impulses.

Misunderstanding the qualitative differences between populations, along with sheer ignorance, is why so many white people struggle to understand TNB. It's really just the way they ARE.

SwampThizzle said...

To be absolutely clear, it's: more guns in trained law-abiding hands, less *black criminals.* If I lit some nigger thug up and he was still moving, I'd execute him (preferably via asphyxiation; it doesn't show up in autopsies and it's silent) and I'd even be willing to kill any witnesses if I had to. Even any dumbass white witnesses who I decided couldn't be trusted to keep their fucking mouths shut.

Anonymous said...

Hell yea the United States of Zimbabwe. Yes we can!

Anonymous said...

Listen well White America, a storm is coming. Never, ever give up your guns. You are going to need every single rifle, shotgun, handgun and ammunition you can obtain.
Hide a few, bury a few, but keep some close.
Know how to use them. Your family is counting on YOU.

City resident said...

One problem with the rankings is that the homicide rate for the cities counts all the residents. Take the case of Chicago. About one third of the population is black yet the vast majority of homicides emanate from that group, followed by Hispanics. The white rate is rather negligible. They should break it all down by demographics. For example, Detroit blacks versus Chicago blacks, who scores the highest?

Jay Santos said...

Call me crazy, but I'm really starting to doubt this 12.7% nationwide negro population number. As destructively dysfunctional as they are, it's hard to believe that they can be a mere 12.7% of our population and yet be at the root of so much horror and be so ubiquitous across our culture. How can so many major metro areas be overwhelming black? Is it possible that the census bureau has been lying about this for years? You've got businesses spending huge amounts of money to market to 12.7% of the population, most of which would seem to have limited discretionary income. The entertainment industry tailors movies and TV products for them. 12.7% of the electorate is now swinging elections? None of it makes any sense.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....The black population is on a one way road to total self-destruction and no one can do anything to stop it. By spending money to "fix the problem" will only cause it to get worse. It is like having a building with termites and you try fixing it by putting on a new tin roof.

The only thing that white liberals and black people have in common is neither one can tell the difference between the lies and the bullshit. The truth is that the problems of a majority of black people can not be fixed and the stupid white liberal does not have a clue about the situation. Forget about it. Give it up. White people have their own problems to take of and they should no longer waste time trying to solve the problems of people who are hell bent on their own death and self-destruction.

Get as far away from blacks as you can and find a safe place to ride out the storm.

Anonymous said...

Lott can't speak the reality of blacks and crime or the DWL/Squids will bury him. But he can promote firearm ownership for whites. That I'll take. I hope he keeps it up. And everyone should buy more ammo.

Anonymous said...

I've heard it theorized that a people who would be incapable of inventing a technology or tool cannot coexist peacefully with it.

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

I understand Jay's doubt about the black population number (which is slightly over 13% these days). Remember, they cluster in areas, especially urban ones east of the Mississippi (it's less than 7% for San Diego, Los Angles, and San Francisco counties). If you're near one, you're likely near many. The adage that "to the drowning man, the world is made of water" applies here. If you see a lot of blacks, the US population is made up of them. It's not really so - nationwide.

It's just in the worst place you can imagine, my friend - near you.

Anonymous said...

I tend to believe you Santos. Look, the census is conducted by who...government employees...and like they are so on the level. Please. They are the biggest backstabbers and liars. This country and every organization that takes part in running it is corrupt. The police are corrupt. There is no order anymore. None. And more chaos is going to ensue. We are on our way to being South Africa. Believe that.

I am so moving to the mountains. My family and I will be left alone. I want no part of what is happening to this country. And now the libtards are trying to extend their grasp to the Middle (per my last post on North Dakota). These people cannot live and let live. They just can't leave others alone...just like the groids. They just follow and follow.

Why can't they just leave the Whites alone?

White Mom in the District of Craptopia

Anonymous said...

More whites more pedophiles,,more mass murders, more tortures, more pornorgraphy, more gays, more insider trading,

Pedophiles, pornography and gays are protected by liberals .he same liberals that sponsor BRA.

Torture? WTF are you talking about? Obama has continued and expanded Bush's policies.

Insider trading? I suppose since insider trading requires an asset to trade - something negroes are unable to accumulate. Exhibit A are any negro NFL or NBA affletes.

Now let's talk about welfare/EBT fraud. Something negroes have mastered.

Anonymous said...

The 12.7% might be high. First, it's in BRA's interest to inflate the numbers. Plus don't forget all the illegals.

They ARE far more destructive than we can imagine.

Bob1313 said...

Gotta agree with Jay, the bastards are like cockroaches, imagine how bad it would be if the morons weren't getting 80%+ of the abortions in this country, via government funding of course, the one damn thing the government does right.

I say put a government funded abortion clinic on every corner, make em more available than 7-11's

Anonymous said...

Here in Indianapolis, our local talk radio conservative Greg Garrison likes to sermonize about how public transportation such as light rail is just a silly liberal idea. Like lots of PC Conservative INC types Garrison is also very fond of John Lott's more guns less crime slogans.

What is great about SBPDL is that it just as tough exposing timid PC Conservative flap doodle as any DWL denial and Racial Marxist idiocy.

Truth is there nothing wrong with public transportation. Used the CTA or Metra almost everyday when living in Chicago. It was very efficient and saved lots of money. Public transportation in many place could turn a profit or would require a dramatically decreased subsidy if it was not for the mostly back underclass.

Being fervently pro-gun is often just a politically correct way of saying one needs to take precaution against the black underclass.

Why can't we just say that we will no longer stand for the further breeding of a next generation of underclass at the public expense.

Anonymous said...

off topic:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/heroin-hidden-in-butt-561324

a lot of heroin..100 bags

countenance said...

The better way to think about it is this:

The more white people guns, the less crime overall.

But...that's not a gun argument, that's a race argument.

The more I see of John Lott, the less impressed I am. He's just another race denier. Ironically, tribal based race interests want nothing to do with him.

Anonymous said...

Jay Santos:

lets sya you are 50 + y o a.
or older.

Back in the ghood old days there
were 10,000,000 working, normal
Blacks...
then LBJ ruined USA.

now there are 43 million and
Obongo has diversity visas to bring in more.

there are 4 million Haitians [IQ 70?] here and Canada...
haiti has like 9 million people...
yet YT sends more food asnd $
and that means more Haitians.

Anonymous said...

@Jay Santos:
Regardless of what percentage of the population Blacks comprise, it is college-eductated, unmarried, professional white women that are also part of the demographic.

Mention to almost ANY woman from the above demographic even a hint of racial bias and it will be like advocating wife-beating.

It is practically religion to professional white women that Black males be granted dominant position/status in everything, even if they are corrupt, incompetent or criminal. It is part of the Moral Superiority Complex.

It won two elections; who could argue with that?

rex freeway said...

What do law makers do when they see facts such as these? Ignore them? Or dismiss them as racist rhetoric? What is sad is Negro's are born half wild animal. Liberals choose to coddle them in the name of.......... hell if i know.

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said... at 4:54 PM

More whites more pedophiles,,more mass murders, more tortures, more pornorgraphy, more gays, more insider trading, "

Apparently you are a disgruntled colored person with a programmed pea-brain used to explain away your people's criminal behaviors.

I understand that facts have ruffled your feathers there Jango but before you tap dance because of your perceived victory with that idiotic conclusion, I offer you a short documentary which will put cement in your dancing shoes:

***The Cannibal Warlords of Liberia (Full Length Documentary***

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRuSS0iiFyo

Every single one of your myths will be crushed within seconds there Jango.

Now I bet that Popeye's drumstick in your greasy fingers all of a sudden has turned from "finger lickin' good" to tating like puke.

But Jango, facts are facts. Just because you are a complete ignoramus or choose to avoid uncomfortable facts about your "tribe", reality is reality and your bloodshot and yellow spidery eyes can't change it.

Anonymous said...

Because the pedophilia outbreak in the UK is from whites. Blacks in the US have a higher pedophilia rate than whites, too. Mass murderers like that Korean in VT, Dorner in LA, Muhammed the DC sniper? Even the white mass murderers are wildly liberal or even communist. Pornography is from TWMNBN. Iceland is motioning to ban porn with the UK not far behind. More blacks are on the "down low" than most know about, and blacks are "prisn gay" quite a bit but still claim to be straight. And insider trader is an elitist thing that does not reflect the masses and is also TWMNBN. If blacks were smart enough, they would try to insider trade, as well.

Your points are flawed, tired, and hold no water.

Would you rather live in Germany or Nigeria? Denmark or Ghana? Italy or Congo?

'Nuff said. You loose.

Anonymous said...

Call me crazy, but I'm really starting to doubt this 12.7% nationwide negro population number.

Its much, much worse than this. Negro males aged 14 to 55 are the most likely to commit violent crime within the Negro population. They are less than 2% of the total US population. Then you have to factor out the ones that are already in prison, overseas in the military, the pansies, and the few decent ones. Realize that its the quality not the quanity. These viloent Negroes are dedicated. Crime is a way of life. Its their entire culture, aided and abetted by the entire "community" of witch the Gangsta's are the pillars. They are the most repected, the most emulated. Their most popular songs are in tribute to them. And the fact is they'll commit a tremendous amount of crime before they are put away. There were 1800shootings in Chicago last year and in 91% of the cases no charges were filed at all. I think that if law were applied fairly almost all male Negroes and alot of the females would be in prison and there is no way that would happen in BRA. As to why you see Negroes faces on TV so much its to condition the American sheeple to accept friednly neighborhood Negro as their superior not as the out of control savage he really is.

Mutant Swarm said...

Anonymous said...

More whites more pedophiles,,more mass murders, more tortures, more pornorgraphy, more gays, more insider trading,

February 22, 2013 at 4:54 PM
____________________________

Desiree, you are confusing Whites with some other ethnic group.

Anonymous said...

Jay Santos, a family member of mine used to be a homicide detective in a major American city. Of the over 800 murders he investigated, only 11 involved whites as victims; all the rest were blacks. And this was in a city that was split about 50-50 white and black.

Blacks have a greater propensity towards violence than do whites. Much, much greater.

Do not ever doubt this.

Anonymous said...

"Fear of guns is why South Africa’s middle classes are hidden behind three-metre-high electrified fences and walls, in compounds with motion detectors and metal-barred doors."

Wrong. It's fear of blacks with guns that is the reason middle class South Africans are hidden behind three-meter-high electrified fences and walls...

Anonymous said...

"More blacks, more crime; fewer blacks, less crime." is correct, unless you mean to grind blacks up into Soylent Black, in which case you could say less.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here.

To Anonymous 4:54 PM,

Blacks by percentage of the population are more prone than whites to crimes like pedophilia, serial murder, white collar crime, etc, etc.

Whiskey said...

Jay Santos --

I tend to believe it. The point about Black political control of major metro areas is that fraud is easy and often. It is different if the 12.3% were pushed out to every place, evenly distributed.

And the primary audience for Blackness is White people. Oprah, the NFL, the NBA, etc. Black-only stuff fails, constantly. Milestone Comics, etc. Guys like Tyler Perry have to make their movies so cheap they get lawsuits from their workers saying wages/benefits were illegally denied.

Anonymous said...

The first comment begins with "more whites, more pedophiles." Laughable. Know what continent leads the world in pedophiles and has since the statistics started?

Africa.

And to add to that; since 2000, blacks lead the mass-murder category in America, as well as torture.

Anonymous said...

More Whites equals more science, more engineering, more skilled trades, more civility, more industriousness, more thriftiness, more sexual responsibility, more peace and quiet, etc, etc.
More Whites gives you Pittsburgh, more blacks gives you Detroit.

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous 5:24 PM saidKnow how to use them. Your family is counting on YOU.

Wise words, but have you seen ammo prices and availability lately? Unbelievable.

jetsgiants said...

More cures,inventions.beautiful women, handsome men, creative music, higher education,arts , exploring, And getting away from your kind Anon 4.54 pm

Anonymous said...

Jay, you must live in the Western US or a rural part of the Northern US. Blacks seem like a larger percentage of the population than they are because the numbers are skewed toward urban areas in the eastern half of the country.

A friend of mine from Los Angeles recently did a huge roadtrip across all of the eastern US from Chicago to New York down to Florida. His biggest culture shock was the huge amount of black people in every major city and metro area and the relative lack of "moreno" Mexicans.

I love visiting Southern California primarily because I can go a week without seeing a single black person in Orange County or northern San Diego County. Here in this half of the country, it's almost impossible to go a day without seeing more than a few in public.

Anonymous said...

Europeans everywhere are growing tired of false accusations and the moniker of white supremacist or racist for simply standing up for our right to protect ourselves from roving bands of gun toting criminals who have shown a blatant disregard for the laws, rules and traditions of their host societies. I’m confident the Zionist press will be indicted for Hate Crimes for provoking other races to hate and attack us. The main stream media would never call Asians, or Africans, supremacist, or racist.

Anonymous said...

It's not a people with guns problem, but a blacks killing people problem. There's insanity when a white kills. The white brain evolved in civilization. The way the negroid brain evolved in the jungle, it is working correctly when negroes kill.

Anonymous said...

To Anon @ 4:54
You are wrong on all counts except the last, a little research would tell you that. Most Black girlshave been molested by Black "men", drive by mass killings are ubiquitous in Ghettos. Blacks delight in torture far more than any other group, it is easy to find even though the MSM tries to cover it up. Blacks buy pornography as much or more than anyone else. And it appears that most Black males are on the "Down Low".
But you are right about insider trading, you have to be literate to be an insider trader.

Anonymous said...

"12.7% of the electorate is now swinging elections? None of it makes any sense."

The voter participation rate in presidential elections is only about 55%, when you go down to the local level such a mayoral in Chicago, the rate is under 25% (if you assume there is no voter fraud). The blacks are also up to 13.1% of the population now, not 12.7%. Assuming all blacks participated in elections, they would make up about 40-50% of the vote in a presidential election, and over 100% in a mayoral election in Chicago. All these figures assume that no blacks are felons either.

Californian said...

Call me crazy, but I'm really starting to doubt this 12.7% nationwide negro population number. As destructively dysfunctional as they are, it's hard to believe that they can be a mere 12.7% of our population and yet be at the root of so much horror and be so ubiquitous across our culture. How can so many major metro areas be overwhelming black? Is it possible that the census bureau has been lying about this for years? You've got businesses spending huge amounts of money to market to 12.7% of the population, most of which would seem to have limited discretionary income. The entertainment industry tailors movies and TV products for them. 12.7% of the electorate is now swinging elections? None of it makes any sense.

A small, violent minority can dominate much larger groups, especially when the larger groups are made up of wusses (to be uncharitable). Certainly this has been the case in barbarian invasions which have conquered civilized peoples. The DWLs who compose much of America's elite class are especially hobbled by their pathological guilt complex and magical thinking syndrome.

But you do indeed make a point. And this issue is worth exploring further.

Anonymous said...

I should have said "...they would make up about 40-50% of the DEMOCRATIC vote in a presidential election..."

Anonymous said...

Jay Santos:

I've questioned the 12.7% number before, and I think it comes down to 2 possibilities:

1) The negro is concentrated in lager metropolitan areas and thus appear to have greater numbers. Around 2/3 of the American population live in an urbanized area. This close proximity creates the illusion that there is a groid around every corner.

In a similar way, this is why so many people think that the sodomite population is much larger than it is. Homosexuals account for about 3% of the population, but the perception among many is that up to 25% of the population are fags.

Much like White Mom, I am squirreling away money to make the move away from the population centers. Urbanization allows a government to control it's citizenry with greater ease.

2) The other theory is that they grossly under count the black population that is incarcerated. The number of negroids behind prison walls is a source of great embarrassment for BRA, so fudging the numbers would not be altogether surprising.

And with the revolving door of the US penal system, there is always a fresh supply of "good boys" being set loose for every animal that gets thrown in the clink.

Anonymous said...

.Anonymous said...
More whites more pedophiles,,more mass murders, more tortures, more pornorgraphy, more gays, more insider trading,
February 22, 2013 at 4:54 PM.
The content of your comment suggests you are of the sickle cell persuasion. Although I understand that asking you to comprehend a second level logical process is comparable to asking a Mallard duck to solve a calculus problem, I don’t have anything to do right now so I will try.
You are making a common mistake. Most of the offenses you associate with whites are not typical behavior and are illegal. Those offenses are isolated and not genetically hard-wired into the structure of typical white behavior. Clearly there is no group or individual survival benefit to being a pedophile.
Now the baseline behavior of 95% of blacks reflects the 200,000 years of adjustment to the circumstances and region where they evolved. There was no need to develop nations, only tribes. There was no need to learn ship building or navigation, only dug-outs. There was no need to develop and maintain roads, only jungle trails. No need to understand concepts that required writing, math, strategy, banking, architecture, or science. Period. So comparing isolate white pathology to typical black behavior is as unsuccessful as a handless man unzipping to pee.
Blacks are notably the tree squirrels of world-wide human societies; rummaging around, fighting, mouthing off, stealing from each other, breeding, residing (physically and mentally) in herds, and looking for handouts. They add nothing but a distraction for entertainment or sports. As a race, they are incapable of maintaining, much less creating, an infrastructure that defines human civilization.
Our political dialogue has allowed them to regress to their lowest energy state. And you get what? Detroit. Stratified corruption, fraud, misapplied resources, crime, administrative nepotism and chaos, and, unbelievably, victimization.
So, my melanized, dred-locked, gold-rimmed, rap-azz friend, understand that apples are $1.00 per pound and oranges are $1.50 per pound. Apples and oranges. Classic hard-wired black behavior versus atypical, pathological behavior of a few whites. Are you making a valid comparison?

Anonymous said...

@Jay Santos

Far from crazy. That’s a brilliant observation. I couldn’t agree more and have been thinking the same thing for a long time. Are we to believe that 12.7% of 300 million people (ballpark) or 23.62 million negroes is worth the focus of all national advertising campaigns? That would imply that white guilt is trumping even the nature of capitalism, lest any of America’s corporate giants be perceived in any way as rayciss.

To take your point further, what kind of buying power does that alleged 12.7% have? I suppose that, given all the gubmint handouts, it is probably grossly disproportionate to their actual income, but that’s thanks to (evil, rayciss) YT. I mean, if you live in a house that ACTUALLY costs $2K/month, but you only pay $400, and then work at McDonald’s (365Black Mecca), one could conceivably have a fair amount of disposable income. I sure as hell know I would if I didn’t have to pay my expenses at their actual cost. Of course, we really shouldn’t generalize about negroes. For me to suggest that all negroes work is extremely stereotypical, as we know that millions of negroes simply collect YTs welfare, sell drugs, steal, etc.

This stellar article from AmRen is right on point, and should be interest to all at SBPDL: http://www.amren.com/features/2013/02/when-home-is-no-longer-home/

Gwinnett Gladiator

Anonymous said...

Ever noticed that when you are driving on a multi-lane road, and you pass a ni66er, invariably that same aforementioned ni66er will speed up to pass you back, and then slow down again?? EVERYTHING is a fucking challenge to their "turf". And the REALLY stupid will hang out in the left lane, totally oblivious to the cars behind them honking and flashing their headlights, then having to pass them on the right. Makes me want to "put 'em into the wall" with a pitt manuever.

Dan said...

On pedophilia.

What is teen pregnancy if it's not child abuse? Which segment of our population habitually has teen pregnancy. The Black population. on its face the blacks are using their teens as cum dumpsters.

Anonymous said...

More white pedophiles? Google "blacks rape children to cure AIDS". Last year 22,000 children were raped in South Africa alone. These idiots this raping a child will cure their AIDS. Horrible creatures.

Anonymous said...

The reason there aren't more black pedeophiles reported is because blacks dont go to the police. Its the culture of not snitching. A white child reports being molested to a family member and cops are called. A black will do nothing.

Anonymous said...

Its too bad a policy of sending these criminals to Liberia could not be implemented. Convicted of a crime or murder then you forfeit your citizenship and we are sending you to africa.

Dan said...

What is the black percentage of 11-12-13-14 year old pregnancies? What is the white percentage of the same? The stats at planned parenthood would suggest that black teenage females are being regularly molested and raped (statutory or otherwise) by their menfolk.

Anonymous said...

Bible teachings about not mixing races is just as valid today as it was thousands of years ago.

Anonymous said...

I saw an article today that was quite amusing. It seems that many black "leaders" are up in arms over Obamas gun control proposals. They equate gun control as another attempt to control blacks, because out of all the people in America blacks are the ones who need guns the most, because of the multitude of violent racists bent on black genocide.I can see their point not only do they need it for protection from each other but it is an essential tool that makes it easier far tham to make a living in their chosen profesion.

Anonymous said...

Guam is dropping tainted mice from airplanes to control their snake populations. Maybe we could drop specially treated EBT cards ????

Sarah Bloch said...

This begs a question about those who brought black slaves to the United States. Why didn't they do their own work in lieu of bringing black slaves to do their work in bondage? This problem if it is a real problem could have been solved hundreds of years ago by a mass migration of whites, willing to work, coming to the new World rather than whites who sought to profit from the suffering of those racially different from them.

As a white Progressive female I feel that the crimes being perpetrated by blacks on their own race are simply a product of poverty and ignorance and I think much will happen culturally in the black community via education and growing the black middle class to bring this ignorance and poverty to an end. Less blacks aren't the solution unless you are a bigot; less black and white poverty and ignorance is the solution.

Anonymous said...

In reply to Mr Clean,
Yes ammo prices have skyrocketed. I have been buying and stockpiling for years.
I convinced my wife this year that ammo is a better investment than any other (not that I'd sell any).
The prices are slowly coming down. I highly recommend buying as much as possible in bulk if you meet an.
The GOV is going to figure it out soon and ammo will be priceless.
Stay safe. Prepare. Our race will survive the coming storm but not without sacrifice and pre-planning.

Don M said...

Anonymous: "It is practically religion to professional white women that Black males be granted dominant position/status in everything, even if they are corrupt, incompetent or criminal. It is part of the Moral Superiority Complex."

In reality its the "Desdemona Complex"

Don M said...

Sarah Bloch said...
This begs a question about those who brought black slaves to the United States. Why didn't they do their own work in lieu of bringing black slaves to do their work in bondage? This problem if it is a real problem could have been solved hundreds of years ago by a mass migration of whites, willing to work, coming to the new World rather than whites who sought to profit from the suffering of those racially different from them.

As a white Progressive female I feel that the crimes being perpetrated by blacks on their own race are simply a product of poverty and ignorance and I think much will happen culturally in the black community via education and growing the black middle class to bring this ignorance and poverty to an end. Less blacks aren't the solution unless you are a bigot; less black and white poverty and ignorance is the solution.


Desdemona Complex personified by Sarah Blochhead.

Can't make this shit up folks...

Nick O'Siggers said...

More white pedophiles? Google "blacks rape children to cure AIDS". Last year 22,000 children were raped in South Africa alone. These idiots think raping a child will cure their AIDS. Horrible creatures.

Horrible, yes. Perhaps if they ramp this up it will cure the source of AIDS: blacks.

Jim said...

Regarding Jay Santos' comments about the percentage of blacks in the US.

For years, I have doubted that mere a 13% of the population could create such havoc and cost to a nation.

Remember the stampede/riot by African-Americans in the Mall of America in Minnesota? According to census figures, the groid make up 5.4% of the state's population. Minnesota has a vast land area. Did they get bussed into the mall?

Look at the black crime rates in northern border states. I didn't think they liked cold weather.

I shudder to think what the actual population really is. Maybe that is why the Black Power Structure is so against Voter I.D. Laws.

countenance said...

"Pedophilia"

40-year old white man is caught in bed with 13-year old white girl. Cops get called. White man gets convicted. NCIC records an instance of pedophilia.

40-year old ghetto black man is caught in bed with a 13-year old ghetto black girl. "It's jus' one of dem things." Cops are not called. No criminal conviction, no pedophilia recorded in NCIC.

Anonymous said...

Indianapolis Anon on Greg Garrison WIBC:

"Truth is there nothing wrong with public transportation. ..."

I live near downtown Indy. Have you looked around to see who is waiting at the bus stops? Have you used public transit in Indianapolis at all? I have. Never again. Never again.

I had to endure the aspiring young rappers, the filthy language including MuhFucker and nigga this nigga that, loud cell phone conversations, angry stares, child abuse, nasty black female drivers, and the usual TNB. It was frightening.

I don't want to export these animals into Hamilton County where my friends live either, and a transit expansion would do just that. The suburbs don't have the law enforcement capability to handle in the influx of black crime. The whites don't know how to handle it either. The imports will demand low-income housing, minimum wage jobs, and school vouchers to go with their expanded public transit. The Hamilton county shopping centers will simply die as the whites flee.

Have you read about Indy Connect and its relation to UN Agenda 21? The plan is to move everyone into the densely populated urban core in mixed-use housing. Look up the Midtown Indy project website.

No thanks. I choose life.

WIBC's Greg Garrison is RINO liberal idiot. He is a big blowhard, and is completely clueless about the issues, especially racial issues. He encourages his county white population to open their minds to social liberal ideas. He loves him some Mayor Greg Ballard too.

He is a negrophile, and an apologist for black behavior. He calls them "people of color". He has the black civil rights legend shakedown artist Bob Woodson on his show regularly, who works in the reparations hustle to transfer white people;s money to fix the ghettos.

Garrison touts himself as "just a simple country white boy" from the sticks, and says that blacks are a vibrant and colorful yet "marginalized" people. His Presbyterian church has programs for African mission work.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
More whites more pedophiles,,more mass murders, more tortures, more pornorgraphy, more gays, more insider trading
Lets start with the pedophiles off the top of my head, R. Kelly, Michael Jackson, Tupac, Wayne Williams, Baruti Tompson, and any of the many thousands of blacks that be pimp`n. Serial killers are clasified differently than mass murderer, mass murder is the killing of more than three people in a incident or spree. Since we already know that most blacks that are involved in drug or gang activity would be reqired to be mass murders as a part of their job these would include hitmen, and gang foot soldiers, but lets not forget about the many atrocities africans in africa have committed against their fellow africans for stupid reasons such as lighter skin, being originated from another tribe,or having wider noses. But I assume you mean serial killers when you say mass murderers. So here is a list of black serial killers Lonnie Franklin ten people, Wayne williams 18 young black males, anthoyy sowell, John Mohamad and his accomplice 17 year old Salvo, Derrrick Todd Lee, Coral watts, Mathew macons and the list is really to long to post. Pornography really? Insider trading, Ill point to any black Polotition. he examples I give are just the tip of the iceberg. The real tragedy is the medias refusal to report these crimes and if they do they dont mention race.

Jim said...

Re: Anonymous:

I happen to know of a Mallard duck who is very good a calculus. So there!





LOL

J. Frank Parnell said...

As a white Progressive female I feel that the crimes being perpetrated by blacks on their own race are simply a product of poverty and ignorance and I think much will happen culturally in the black community via education and growing the black middle class to bring this ignorance and poverty to an end. Less blacks aren't the solution unless you are a bigot; less black and white poverty and ignorance is the solution.

Purest horseshit.

Prince George's County in Maryland, going by median income, is one of the most affluent counties in the nation, and is overwhelmingly black, but they still behave like wild animals there--just take a look at the crime rate.

I'd be very interested to see a graph comparing the crime rates of different races when controlled for social class and age (young people commit more crime across the board than older people and the average age of some races in this country is considerably lower than that of others.) I'd be willing to bet that on such a graph the difference in crime rates between whites and other non-blacks would even out considerably, but the black crime rate would still be sky-high.

Niggers are just savage animals. That's the problem with them. No amount of affirmative action or head start programs is going to fix them.

Anonymous said...

Sarah Bloch (so called)

Are you for real? Your post reads like a parody of something written in the 1960s (that is 50 years ago) which I strongly suspect it is. But in the very small chance the whole post is not a set up, please look into something called "reality". The United States has spent TRILLIONS in anti poverty programs since the 1960s. TRILLIONS on education and special programs for minorities, TRILLIONS in government spending to employ minorities (to create an artificial middle class). It has forced businesses and municipalities to hire minorities at the risk of lawsuit, it has forbidden businesses to do criminal background checks, it has made high schools and colleges lower standards of admission and graduation. Schools are filled with programs that have lasted several generations designed to do one thing - bring up the socioeconomic standard of minority communities. And the result of this stupendous effort, an effort exceeding the Moon landing and DDay and the building of the first Atomic Bomb? Well look around you - this is after 50 years. It is getting worse "Sarah" not better. But again, I do not believe this was a real post anyway.

Jay Santos said...

Anonymous said...
@Jay Santos:
Regardless of what percentage of the population Blacks comprise, it is college-eductated, unmarried, professional white women that are also part of the demographic.

Mention to almost ANY woman from the above demographic even a hint of racial bias and it will be like advocating wife-beating.

It is practically religion to professional white women that Black males be granted dominant position/status in everything, even if they are corrupt, incompetent or criminal. It is part of the Moral Superiority Complex.

It won two elections; who could argue with that?


It's an important point. Unfortunately, statist-leaning white women are a huge force multiplier in this whole mess. That innate maternal instinct to protect the weak, that we all benefited from as infants, is horribly misdirected in supporting the poor, innocent, blood-thirsty negro. Maybe at some distant point in the future, the rapes and beatings at the hands of blacks will begin to reverse this trend, or maybe not.

Appreciate all the response to the question.

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race in Progress!

Sarah Bloch said...
This begs a question about those who brought black slaves to the United States.


* No white person today brought any slave into the USA. It is against the letter and spirit of American jurisprudence to hold people accountable for the "crimes" of others.
* The foundation of the slave trade was blacks capturing other blacks; as well, there was a massive Islamic slave trade. Should the descendents of those blacks and Muslims be held accountable?
* If you believe that bringing black slaves to the US was such a great evil, then are you saying that blacks should be deported to Africa? Would that make you happy?

Why didn't they do their own work in lieu of bringing black slaves to do their work in bondage?

Slavery was part of human society for thousands of years. It wasn't until white people invented the Enlightenment that slavery was considered wrong. Even then, it took international campaigns--including military action--by white people to end slavery in much of the world. So black people owe white people a massive debt which they need to repay.

This problem if it is a real problem could have been solved hundreds of years ago by a mass migration of whites, willing to work, coming to the new World rather than whites who sought to profit from the suffering of those racially different from them.

Supposing we went back in time and prevented the enslavement of blacks. Which would mean no blacks in America. All those American blacks would be living in black majority rule "paradises" such as Congo, Nigeria and Liberia. America would not have the problems of the descendents of those slaves causing massive amounts of crime, illegitimacy, educational failure, race hustling, and city trashing (ala Detroit).

Is that what you are advocating?

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race in Progress!

As a white Progressive female I feel that the crimes being perpetrated by blacks on their own race are simply a product of poverty and ignorance and I think much will happen culturally in the black community via education and growing the black middle class to bring this ignorance and poverty to an end.

This has been the standard progressive party line since at least the mid-20th century: underclass dysfunction is caused by ignorance and poverty. Well, the USA has had over half a century of war on poverty, civil rights legislation, minority-only contracts, federalization of education, redistribution of income, black studies, "diversity" indoctrination, positive black role models on the screen, hatecrime laws, MLK holidays, etc., etc., etc. Plenty of anti-poverty and education programs there, folks.

And all these programs have been epic fail.

Today, blacks have an illegitimacy rate of 70+% (three times that of whites); commit well over half the violent crime in the USA (including a disproportionate amount of inter-racial violence); drop out of school in huge numbers; trash entire cities (e.g., Detroit); and endlessly hustle whites instead of producing wealth.

As for the black middle class: this is a Potemkin Village propped up by affirmative action and government make-work jobs. For example, despite massive government and corporate spending on minority-only contracts and grants, blacks have a much lower rate of serious business formation than whites (especially when it comes to major corporate enterprises).

The progressive agenda was implemented.
It failed.
Next?

Less blacks aren't the solution unless you are a bigot;

Now you can not make a rational argument, so you resort to name calling. It's one more example of how progressives are the very thing they claim their opponents are: ignorant people who can only make pathetic attempts to shout down the opposition.

If the points made on SBPDL are wrong, then can you sow us where?

Anonymous said...

Reply to February 23, 2013 at 8:44 AM

concerning: Greg Garrison WIBC

My point still remains. Just as your experience with public transportation in Indianapolis testifies, the primary problem is the black underclass. As Paul Kersey has stated many times, in urban areas with limited black underclass, ie Portland, public transportation is well supported and requires often minimal subsidy.

Using Public transportation on Chicago's North and Northwest lines is not a real issue. Using the suburban Metra is not a problem.

Likewise, for many, the obsessive desire to own or buy guns in case of a future need is to insure protection from the black underclass, the left hand of the black bell curve. Folks should be able to drop the PC 2nd Amendment blather and honestly state the truth.

My point is the same as yours. Greg Garrison is a hamstringed by the conventions of Conservative Inc Racial PC conventions. Of course WIBC being owned by EMIS communications controlled by prominent Indiana Democratic donor Jeff Smulyan probably does not help.

Garrison is also an out of touch 80's era Christian Conservative who is obsessed with abortion and feels the need to pander to his aging religious conservative audience. Garrison to the bitter end believed the likes of Michael Barone, Dick Morris and Karl Rove that by running a dated campaign based on upper class tax cuts, anti-abortion pandering and Invade the World, Invite the World, in Debt to the World Bush Republican rhetoric, Mitt Romney stood a chance of winning.

Nonetheless Garrison at times seems to understand that its is New Left's Racial and Cultural Marxism PC agenda, the growth of the Black and Hispanic underclass and the Open Borders Demographic tsunami are the real threats to the country.

Garrison still has a long way to go to connect with an under forty generation of conservatives who don't care about abortion, but do want to stop the growth of the bastard underclass.
No more bastards, No more baby mamas, No more EBT without a depo-provera shot.

Jim said...

Here are my thoughts about socio-economic conditions = black crime. If ever some thug is holding a gun to my head, I am sure I would not be comforted by the fact that he/she may have grown up oppressed.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon (in response to Sarah Bloch)
Are you for real? Your post reads like a parody of something written in the 1960s (that is 50 years ago) which I strongly suspect it is. But in the very small chance the whole post is not a set up, please look into something called "reality". The United States has spent TRILLIONS in anti poverty programs since the 1960s. TRILLIONS on education and special programs for minorities, TRILLIONS in government spending to employ minorities (to create an artificial middle class). It has forced businesses and municipalities to hire minorities at the risk of lawsuit, it has forbidden businesses to do criminal background checks, it has made high schools and colleges lower standards of admission and graduation. Schools are filled with programs that have lasted several generations designed to do one thing - bring up the socioeconomic standard of minority communities. And the result of this stupendous effort, an effort exceeding the Moon landing and DDay and the building of the first Atomic Bomb? Well look around you - this is after 50 years. It is getting worse "Sarah" not better. But again, I do not believe this was a real post anyway.

The Sarah Bloch troll is entirely plausible. She is the epitome of what happens after 20 years of 24 x 7 x 365 indoctrination from a) the government school gulag, K through graduate school; b) media and entertainment; c) most of what is termed as "Christianity" in the Banksta Banana Republick. Oh, and it's likely that the majority of private schools - especially the religious ones - likewise toe the cultural Marxist line of racial matters.

As I mentioned in a previous thread, Antonio Gramsci's infamous "long march through the institutions" is a done deal now. One of the nomenklatura even trumpeted this in the wake of the D'Won Mocha Messiah's reinstallment as HNIC: It's our country now. Note that Sarah Bloch's little bleat is really just the parroting of a series of naked assertions - backed up by the same treasure as a Federal Reserve Note (e.g. nothing at all) - first made my Marxists nearly a centuy ago. What you are seeing here is an example of a totally indoctrinated mind - one incapable of looking at reality. There are many millions like her, manufactured in the falsehood fabrication facilities funded with money taken out of the pockets of their parents - who themselves were too clueless about what has been going on.

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]Anonymous said...
More whites more pedophiles,,more mass murders, more tortures, more pornorgraphy, more gays, more insider trading,
[/quote]

This is not the REAL "Anonymous Of SBPDL" who posted this. This is another "Anonymous" - Little Pinky Toe Swipe!

MR Kersey - MY DEAR FRIEND.
You know that the Black folks that you have so graciously allowed to be among your "Fellow Posters" are watching and reading all of your arguments.

While all may not be as adept at putting forth the proper framing before they accept your supposition - you INDEED have a "Diversity" of viewpoints on your illustrious blog.

WHY do you accept a "Per Year" framing, Mr Kersey?

What if we did a "Murder Count - per DECADE or PER CENTURY?

WHY do you appear to value "Inter-personal Murder" over STATE HOMICIDE in the theater of war?

Isn't a declared war done in the context of a formally recognized legislative body?

WHAT IF THE AMERICAN NEGRO declared a "Shadow American Government" and then DECLARED WAR on anyone that he chose to MURDER?
Would THIS allow you to exclude his "Blood-letting" as you do not include "State Wars" and "Drone Bombing" in on the "WHITE KILL LIST"?

What name do you post under Mr Kersey?
I see you feeding the articles to your V-Dare friends on the board but I don't recall ever seeing you respond.

OR maybe its just my blind Negro eyes that has not allowed me to see your full "White Greatness" in your rebuttals?

My "affirmative action" goal in life is to agree to have Mr Kersey agree to meet with me at "Grinds And Wines" on GA 74 in Peachtree City GA.

I would like to do an interview with him in support of a book and documentary.
Fellow authors should support each other - regardless of their racial distinctions.


Anonymous said...

cojo here.

More on the S. African genocide of whites:

http://www.thetruthaboutsouthafrica.com/p/white-genocide-in-south-africa.html

YIH said...

From an econ blog:
Half of Detroit Properties Have Not Paid Taxes; Update on Detroit Bankruptcy
.
The hollowing out of Detroit is nearly complete. All that's left is a bankrupt shell of a city with no services and scattered citizens that do not pay taxes.
{snip}
In bankruptcy, restrictions go out the window. So do union contracts and pensions. Since all of that needs to go out the window, what's holding the governor back?

That of course is being asked as a serious (not rhetorical) question.
I'm guessing if you are reading this, you know it is a rhetorical question. And what the answer is.

Anonymous said...

Black history in the USA: A banned cartoon.

h/t Moonbattery

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jJyKTilOQXA#at=73

josh said...

Re Bob 1313 and black "aboshun":You must enjoy those conservative/religous guys who scream about abortion being bad--and they surely have a point!--but they try to butytressn their idea with PC by raging about black "aboshuns","Its genocide against the black community!! Oh dear Lord,bklacks rae being murdered!" Riiiiiight!!We need Lashiqa and Shitavious to spit out every possible sprog!!!Theyre the future workforce,acc to Queen Obama!

pat said...

Sarah Bloch is a blockhead. She wrote: This begs a question about those who brought black slaves to the United States. Why didn't they do their own work in lieu of bringing black slaves to do their work in bondage?

Let me relate the appropriate history. First of all virtually all societies adopted slavery along with the Neolithic Revolution. Opposition to slavery was much more rare. Wang Mang - a first century Han dynasty emperor - was the first person I know of to oppose slavery. He failed in his reform and slavery persisted in China. Saint Patrick was more successful but the Irish Church itself failed.

So at the time of Jamestown every nation had slavery or indentured servants. The colony expected to work the the fields with indentured poor whites from London. The leading land owner - Abraham Piersay - brought over many such whites who would be freed after seven years. They needed to work off the cost of their passage.

But Piersay found that none of the whites lived much more than six months in the sub-tropical Virginia fields. The white colonists had previously tried to enslave Indians but that didn't work either. They were in more danger of the Indians enslaving them.

The colony governor asked Piersay to save the colony by acquiring black slaves. He did and the colony was indeed saved.

Much the same thing happened all over the Western Hemisphere. In the Caribbean and Brazil the whites first tried to use whites and Indians as field hands but reverted to blacks. There would not have been much of Western Hemisphere without the importation of black labor.

It wasn't that the whites were lazy. It was that they died.

Blacks also contributed to their comparative advantages in the tropics by carrying tropical diseases. Black have various levels of immunity to the three most common types of malaria. They also seemed to have introduced Yellow Fever into the Americas. Once Yellow Fever took hold it strengthened the fitness of blacks vis-a-vis Europeans. This proved decisive in Haiti where Yellow Jack killed Napoleon's army.

If you were to antropomorphize these events you might say that the white strategy was to spread by conquest and the force of arms and the black strategy was to spread by being agricultural slaves. Both strategies worked.

In truth whites also prospered by their comparative immunity to disease. Smallpox helped conquer the Indians. Whites would have probably still prospered in the New World without smallpox but blacks would not likely have ever gotten a foothold in the West except for their utility as field slaves who could resist mosquito borne disease.

This is Black History Month. Let's honor the contributions of those hardy black field slaves who were once so vital to this nation.

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

Don't forget public transportation in East Coast cities are giant jobs programs for Black. For example Blacks make up 97% of DC Metro employees.

This drives up the costs too.

Anonymous said...

Re: Bloch
Realist = Bigot.
Millions of blacks will die if their Givmint hand outs dry up. They would have never been born, to start with, if not for LBJ. These are simple facts.

Anonymous said...

The best thing that ever happened to Blacks was American slavery. They benefited from it.

Anonymous said...

Californian

Liberia would have not been created if negroes had not been brought out of Africa.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberia
I've had several conversations with people who have been to Liberia They tell me that the trip was entertaining.
The negroes apparently never developed much if any past the date they were reloacated.
Just sayin.

Anonymous said...

Sarah you and white women like you are the real problem. Blacks are harmless left to their own devices.

We have tried it your way for 60 years and have nothing to show for it. When will you admit you're wrong?

Anonymous said...

BLACKS ATTACK IN PLANO TEXAS..
LINK AT DRUDGE



Will these be considered hate crimes or would that be racist?

It's only a hate crime when a Caucasian is the perpetrator. Eric Holder and Thomas Pererz (DOJ/Civil Rights) could care less re the numbers of murders/attacks when it is minority vs minority crime.




Sadly, that is all too true


Anonymous said...

RE:

One problem with the rankings is that the homicide rate for the cities counts all the residents. Take the case of Chicago. About one third of the population is black yet the vast majority of homicides emanate from that group, followed by Hispanics. The white rate is rather negligible. They should break it all down by demographics. For example, Detroit blacks versus Chicago blacks, who scores the highest?

MOST MURDAS IN USA ARE FROM 2? OR 3 % OF OUR TOTAL POPULATION.

Anonymous said...

OFF TOPIC...FROM CNN


Cherry, an aspiring rapper known as Kenny Clutch, was driving his Maserati on Thursday when someone in the Range Rover fired several shots at his car as it headed north on Las Vegas Boulevard.

The Maserati continued into the intersection of the boulevard and Flamingo Road and collided with a taxi, which caught fire, killing cab driver Michael Boldon, 62, CNN affiliate KVVU said.

"It is gut-wrenching," Boldon's younger brother, Tehran Boldon, tearfully told KVVU. "My life mission will be to see them punished and brought to justice for the senseless thing they did."

In a separate interview Friday with CNN, Tehran Boldon said that his brother's son is a limousine driver on the Las Vegas Strip and he called his father to warn him to avoid the area after seeing a car afire -- not realizing that the taxi on fire belonged to his father.

"He saw the accident and he tried to warn his dad to say avoid Flamingo (Road)" because he knew his father was nearby at the Rio casino, Tehran Boldon said. "He called and he didn't get a response. So his father was the fatality in that accident that he was being warned to avoid.

"We lost a real patriarch and brother," said Tehran Boldon.

The son, 36, works the same shift as his father did. The father's body was burned beyond recognition and was identified by his cab assignment, Tehran Boldon said. He is also trying to provide the coroner's office with his brother's dental records, he said.

A passenger in the taxi also died. A passenger in the Maserati and three others were injured in the pileup, Sheriff Douglas Gillespie

Anonymous said...

the sub-tropical Virginia fields?

REALLY?
SUB TROPICAL?

I read the life span of an Irish Slave..ooops..I mean Indentured servant
was 6 years upon arrival in new world.
Poverty
over worked
infectious diseases
flu
etc

it wasnt the hot weather..
the rich in their hiomes in virginny did OK? yes?

Anonymous said...

Shorter Guns, Blacks:

Guns shoot.
Negroes murder.
Negroes with guns murder with guns.

Anonymous said...

I find it so sadly ironic that the Trolls and blacks who post here will trash us whites but DEMAND to live with us. In fact, they will KILL to live with us.

Meanwhile, we Whites who trash blacks do so demanding that we can get away from them. Notice the irony?

Blacks say we whites be rayciss. They are mad at us. We Whites agree that we be rayciss and we want to get away from Blacks and not harm them with our raycississsm. BUT, they get made if we want to leave them alone.

So, we be rayciss, they be unhappy. We suggest we or they leave and they get ANGRY and demand to live with us rayciss Whites.

Why? The answer is so simple. The stupid African knows intuitively that he will starve without us. Though they could be free of us rayciss White HonkeyAssRedneckCrackers, they can not feed themselves and would prefer to live with us, through force, scream RAYCISS, than have a Black nation.

Which one of our races is more sick?

Anonymous said...

WHAT IF THE AMERICAN NEGRO declared a "Shadow American Government" and then DECLARED WAR on anyone that he chose to MURDER?

Oh you mean this?
http://nationalblackfootsoldiernetwork.blogspot.com/

Melanie said...

@ Anonymous February 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM-

Excellent point. In fact, to me it's the most important point, and the one for negros and their apologists never have a cogent answer, in fact, they almost always ignore the point when put to them as a question. The only very few times I have ever seen an answer to it-right now, I can only think of one-when the Detroit mayor gave an answer which made no sense other than pure, self-defeating spite-that negros will follow whites to the ends of the earth, wherever we go, or some such nonsense. He himself knew it was pure spite when he said it, because the rest of the time it's non-stop bitching and moaning from negros that whites hold them back and we're the sole reason they can't raise their standards. Now, wouldn't any sane person think, that being the case, that the very best thing negros could wish, could pray for, would be the very segregation which sane whites try every which we can to get around the law to give them? What possible rational reason could negros have for wishing to follow the very people they claim hold them back and oppress them with our racism? Wouldn't it be a dream come true for whites to segregate ourselves in one region of the present USA, and let them run as they see fit, another region all to themselves, with no evil oppressive racist whites to do them in?



But no, in spite of the oppressive evil ways of whites which are all that is preventing the negro Enlightenment and Renaissance, the great flowering of science and art such as the world has never seen, they follow us as night follows day. Their DWL apologists make convoluted, sophist arguments as to why this is necessay, but none pass muster for rationality.



All that remains is the truth-that negros are a parasitical species which cannot survive in any fashion without the white host. But even at that, they're too stupid to realise that once they kill off the white host, the remaining races won't have even the teensiest vestige of race guilt towards them, and no self-inflicted "moral burden" to assist their survival. Only whites have convinced themselves that negros have any intrinsic value, we're their only hope.



If negros had only an iota of sense, they'd realise that all they have to do is leave us alone and let us live our white lives in our white world, and there would be enough of us willing to pay a reasonable "negro tax" for the compromise. They could live their negro lives in their negro world as they pleased. The only string-we pay, they stay away.



As things are now, we pay out the azz and still have to have the negro world intrude into ours. This won't continue, whites aren't going to continue to pay with no return on investment at all, even just simple peace and security. That was the unspoken agreement in the past, but it's been broken now.



I'd like to see just one negro answer the question, "why do you insist on living amongst whites, your evil racist oppressors who have been holding you down all these years? Why wouldn't you be thrilled that we would live segregated away from you, allowing you to be all you can be?"

Californian said...

CF said...WHY do you accept a "Per Year" framing [of murder rates], Mr Kersey?

Probably because annual crime statistics are a standard tool of criminology. But since these stats demonstrate the high rates of black initiated violent crime in America, I suppose they will have to be discredited. Can't have reality contradicting ideology, after all.

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]I find it so sadly ironic that the Trolls and blacks who post here will trash us whites but DEMAND to live with us. In fact, they will KILL to live with us[/quote]

Actually - we are happy that a DEATH SENTENCE is no longer the punishment for moving next door to you in "Levittown".

IT HELPS that if you aspire to climb up the corporate ladder and all of your co-workers can go to the "All White Golf Course" - that YOU as a non-White won't have to go through the servants entrance.

*WHITE PEOPLE seek to live in safe communities that retain their property values and have good schools

* BLACK PEOPLE seek to live in safe communities that retain their property values and have good schools

WHAT YOU CAN'T SEE is that ALL PEOPLE can "SEEK WHAT THEY WANT TO" - but when "The Blacks with POWER" team up with the DWLs because they read V-DARE and operate with the "Enemy Of My Enemy Is My Friend" theory then ..........

* The Blacks can be lulled into believing that they need to "close ranks" and not perform the normal governance in which incompetence is punished BECAUSE a confidence man can convince them that by purging this person - V-DARE has bagged another "30 point black buck"

* The DWLs can learn the scheme and agree to NOT REPORT on this situation in "Black Run America" BECAUSE "The Negro" is STILL useful in his larger fight against VDARE And Associates

* VDare And Associates - gets stuck into a spiral. They keep bashing Black people with STATISTICS - a good portion of which are true - BUT their only intention is to malign Black people and they end up being vulnerable to demographic changes.

** IF The VDARE LEADERSHIP changed their ways and MADE IT PLAIN AND CLEAR that their goal is to SEND ALL WILLING BLACKS BACK TO AFRICA - BUT with the mandate that every "Negro must FIRST go through an apprenticeship program that was contracted by VDARE employees - preparing "The Blacks" to build up basic infrastructure in Africa - (electricity, natural gas distribution network, petroleum supply chain - with the caveat that American equipment suppliers be used - THEN......

the good ole American capitalism can be used to employ "The Good White Folks" in Nebraska, Idaho and Montana - while the gap between the "Americanized Blacks" and those who are presently in many parts of Africa would be spanned.

Once they leave they must yield their American citizenship.

NOTHING that has been proposed above is outside of the history of the USA.

You "Good Ole Boys" already survived a Black President - what else CAN'T you endure?

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race in Progress!

Sarah Bloch, if you are still reading this, here is a question for you:

Can you show us where "via education and growing the black middle class," black run/black majority cities in the USA have higher standards of living, lower crime rates, better educational outcomes, and less dependency on the welfare state than equivalent white cities?

e.g., Detroit? Birmingham? Newark? Baltimore?

Can you show us this outcome anywhere in the world?

South Africa, under white rule, had considerable education for blacks, as well as programs to create a black middle class (you might have missed this owing to the anti-apartheid propaganda against SA). Yet today under black majority rule, that rainbow nation is disintegrating into crime, economic stagnation, epidemic AIDS levels, and ethnic cleansing of whites. Let us note that under white rule, SA had these dysfunctions under control.

The point is, we have had plenty of experiments in education and growing the black middle class in the USA and abroad, but the outcome generally seems to be the same: a collapse of standards set previously by whites.

Why have progressive policies failed so miserably?

Anonymous said...

yay pat albertosaurus! blacks were more resistant to warm weather diseases. also, plenty of yankee new englanders did their own work. plenty of southerners, too.
sara bloch would die if she knew slavery was actually a decent way for a black to live - & be taken care of into their old age. blacks have never done a good job of caring for themselves. after 1865 it was a nice surprise that as many as 20 or 30% of them can get by in society without any help! - panjoomby

White Guy said...

Re: Jay Santos
All that advertising targeting blacks is to get hold of their disposable cash created by all their various subsidies. Think about those high-margin Nikes. It also brainwashes whites at the same time. They always show the black passing judgement on some idiotic white. Obama couldn't have been elected once, if not for the decades of this brainwashing. 40% even voted for him the 2nd time!

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 2:08 Ding ding ding Thread Winner you are on fire! Way to cut through all the pc bravo sierra crap. BTW Do you know who started political correctness? Lenin did back in the 20s and 30s.

Hannibal said...

Anecdotal evidence, but none the less:

I have yet to see one black at a Mensa meeting. Ever.

Anonymous said...

12.7% of the electorate is now swinging elections? None of it makes any sense.




They allowed to vote numerous times

Anonymous said...

Blacks will never admit the truth about their disfunction culture. Just ask one who is angry about slavery if they would be better off as a race if they were never brought to this country they will use jesse jacksons fovorite copout "it`s a moot point" when in reality it would not have helped them in the long run. Look at the society they have been able create for themselves by playing on racism and white guilt. Imagine no slavery no slave descendants ruining Detroit Chicago Atlanta, etc, no Spike lee no Denzel washington, no BEEEEYOUNCEY, no fitty cent, all those great black athletes all living in huts in africa never heard of the NCAA no NAACP, makes me want to invent that time machine.

Jim said...

Regarding African ingenuity, I will never forget a trip I made to an Amish area in Lancaster, PA about 30 years ago.

We visited a 300 or so year old mill built over a stream. This contraption was definitely a Rube Goldberg affair. It had wheels, cogs, shafts, pulleys, water wheels, levers, etc.
I had no idea how it worked.

Anyway, one function of the contrivance was to pour dried corn kernels into the top, and, after some complicated stuff, cornmeal would drop through one side and corn pericarp out the other side. One was fed to the livestock, the other for human consumption.

Fast forward to a TV documentary I watched about modern Africa.

It, proudly, displayed morbidly obese sheboons pounding corn kernels with a rock. WTF?

See the difference.

We "Ice People" keep whining and complaining about this, but their is not a fu***ng thing we can do about it.

Oh, wait! We can vote the rascals out of office, or we could ..........never mind; can't talk about that s**t.

So much for the 1st Amendment .

Mr. Rational said...

I'll give Repulsive Throwback this much:  he lobs lots of softballs.

WHAT IF THE AMERICAN NEGRO declared a "Shadow American Government" and then DECLARED WAR on anyone that he chose to MURDER?

The Nation of Islam has already done this.  Several murderers were prosecuted, but the organization as a whole was not designated the center of the conspiracy and taken down.  All the leadership should have disappeared into high-security prisons, its assets confiscated and its members treated as a criminal gang.

If White people ever get sufficiently fed up to aim their rifles at the Blacks who declare themselves a separate, hostile nation within US borders (and anyone else identifiable as being on the Black side), there wouldn't be much left of the Blacks.  There are 9-yr-old White girls who can put rifle bullets through bullseyes at 100 yards; Black gangbangers spraying with their 9's are no match even without body armor or cover.  Since the Whites will be shooting from blinds, the Blacks will never see Death coming.

* BLACK PEOPLE seek to live in safe communities that retain their property values and have good schools

Ironically, the only place that Black people can find these things is where Whites have created them.  When Black people come to leech off what White people have created, they destroy it.  Repulsive, it's time for you to face the utter failure of your race.

My "affirmative action" goal in life is to agree to have Mr Kersey agree to meet with me at "Grinds And Wines" on GA 74 in Peachtree City GA.

"Get used to disappointment."—The Man in Black, "The Princess Bride"

Mr. Rational said...

Pat (Albertosaurus) is as historically inaccurate as Repulsive is incoherent:

The colony governor asked Piersay to save the colony by acquiring black slaves. He did and the colony was indeed saved.

There were no slaves in the Virginia colony until long after the death of Abraham Piersay in 1628.  It wasn't until Anthony Johnson won a suit to be declared the owner of John Casor in 1655 that chattel slavery existed in the British colonies in America.  From 1619, Africans brought to Virginia were treated as indentured servants and given 50 acres of land after working off their passage.  This is almost certainly how Anthony Johnson, who sued to be declared owner of John Casor, got his own start.  It shows just how readily the Black man will stab his Black brother in the back.  This also shows that the Black lack of social capital is innate, not a consequence of White "oppression".

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here......I do not know why some people waste their time responding to people like Sarah Bloch and other such morons. Ignore them. I know a lady in town that calls herself a "progressive liberal free thinker" and she sprouts the same bullshit. It is almost word for word what Mama Bloch just posted. "They need an education...blah..blah...blah". These idiots are under an hypnotic spell because THEY WATCH TELEVISION.

I see this quite often in people. When they talk it is like they are all reading from the same movie script. These are the brain dead SHEEPLE. The sleeping masses are everywhere and it seems to be getting worse by the day. Stay away from them and do not waste your time trying to ENLIGHTEN them. They are fucking zombies. The pod people on steroids.

Anonymous said...

Slightly OT but I just found this from our local newspaper, I'm just so disgusted, no mention of the massive rise in drugs, murders, etc at all. Not to mention even the less violent ones are rude, obnoxious, loud, trashy, and demanding. At least people aren't afraid to tell them off to their faces around here, for now

http://timesleader.com/stories/Diverse-but-still-a-long-way-to-go,265155?search_filter=diversity&town_id=1&sub_type=stories

I knew we'd be targeted soon for being too white

Discard said...

if you're from northwest Europe, the American South is sub-tropical. I understand that British diplomats get paid something extra for serving in uncomfortable environments, jungles, deserts, whatever. And they get that extra pay when assigned to Washington D.C.
And if you're a California boy like I was when I first stepped off the plane into a Dixie summer, you know it's tropical. Even the Army gave us ten minute breaks every hour during field marches.

Californian said...

CF said...* BLACK PEOPLE seek to live in safe communities that retain their property values and have good schools

Here is what is so exasperating: were the above statement to be the case, then why are the black sectors of cities such as Chicago marked by high violence and miserable educational achievement? Why do we see black-run cities such as Detroit disintegrate? Why has black-majority-rule in Africa led to one-party dictatorships and human rights catastrophes?

If black people want safe communities, etc., then why do they behave in such a manner as to create crime, undermine education and lower neighborhood property values, not to mention drive off investors? I mean, how do you go about wrecking a city like Detroit in just a few decades? Or a country like Rhodesia-Zimbabwe?

Surely black community leaders must look at the situation, rub their chins, and say something like, "Maybe we ought to get our act together because crime is going up, property values are going down. Hmmmm."

Consider the much touted stat that blacks have an illegitimacy rate of 70+%. Illegitimacy is one cause of poverty, crime, school drops outs, etc. And when the vast majority of a demographic has this kind of dysfunction, we have to conclude this is a community standard. If the community standard is behavior which causes unsafe streets and nosediving property values, then how does this jibe with the statement that blacks collectively want the same thing that whites do?

Again, our hypothetical black community leader might rub his chin and say, "Hey, folks, let's stop all this unsafe sex and start getting married and raise our children to respect education."

This does not appear to be happening, aside from the occasional press release from Cosby.

Look at one of the most common statements posted on race realist websites: "I used to be a liberal on race until blacks moved into my neighborhood and then [fill in the catastrophe]." White flight did not get started because people did not like blacks because of the color-of-their-skin(tm). It was because of the crime, school trashing, rioting, etc., which seems to correlate with large numbers of blacks in a community.

What is that keeps blacks from recognizing their own role in the general havoc being wrought? Do they really not understand the cause-effect here? Is there something perceptual in the black mindset? Or is it political, all just one big race hustle?

C'mon, CF, time for you to answer some questions.

Californian said...

I do not know why some people waste their time responding to people like Sarah Bloch and other such morons.

Because:

Supposing you are in a classroom or the workplace or out with some friends, and someone makes the kinds of arguments which Sarah Bloch makes. What do you do? Do you ignore her and thus let her convince your classmates or co-workers or friends that only DWLs have a case?

Or do you make logical, rational arguments which will win over people. Do you show people that race realists have something going for them while it is the DWLs are talking out of their hats?

The Sarah Blochs, Desirees, etc., are to be found all over the Homeland. Their arguments prevail where there are no counter-arguments. By making responses on SBPDL, myself and other posters are providing the intellectual ammunition to demolish the DWL position.

One sign of this is the increasing number of race realist arguments which you see appearing in mainstream websites. The fact that DWL media has often had to close comments on news stories because of (ooooh) "racist" posts shows how effective race realism is becoming. Race realism is becoming an offensive weapon against DWL domination of the "dialog on race" (tm). And DWLs have no response other than to close themselves down, ceding race realists the high ground.

I believe the Pentagon would call this very effective information warfare.

MuayTyson said...

California and others,
Blacks do want safe comunities they are just unable to create or maintain them. A lot of people want a lot of things. I am sure Benny the Down Syndrom kid wants to be an Astronaut but he is totaly unable to undertand how to become one.

Our wonderful society has determined that yes indeed Down Syndrom kids should be Astronauts because they want to be. If they are not allowed to be because of complete incompetence then their feeling would be hurt and we can not have that!

Everyone gets a medal.

Californian said...

There is another reason to respond to the Sarah Blochs. There are many middle of the road people who read SBPDL and related websites. They want to see the other side of the official party line on race. By demolishing a Sarah Bloch's arguments, we discredit the DWL party line. We demonstrate that race realists have the reasoned, logical position. And that DWLs are incapable of original thought.

Notice how DWL arguments are, for the most part, a rote repetition of a few standard slogans and policy planks, all of which are easily disproved by citing real world stats and cases. And notice that DWLs can not engage in a sustained debate without resorting to smears: calling people "bigots" and the like. This point is not lost on many casual readers who see DWLs as intellectually bankrupt. But to make this work, race realists have to show themselves to have the intellectual high ground.

If you can convince just one casual SBPDL reader that race realism is correct, then you have won a battle.

The power of the Internet and social media is well understood in the halls of power. Look at the Arab Spring as one example. If race realists want to get a seat at the table, then they have to engage on this front in an intelligent manner.

Jay Santos said...

I have tried on many occasions to read and make some sense of Constructive Feedback's posts. I'm not trying to insult the individual, but there's never been any point to them that I can discern. I honestly don't understand what he is saying. The words are English, there's some punctuation and general adherence to basic grammar. But I do not understand what point he is trying to make. I'm being totally sincere about this.

Anonymous said...

What is [it] that keeps blacks from recognizing their own role in the general havoc being wrought?

The Dunning-Kreuger effect.

Do they really not understand the cause-effect here?

If they do, the political necessity to Blame YT overrides it.

They must be denied anything but the fruits of their own work.  Throw the lot of them into Detroit, Gary, Birmingham, and the like; if they can't even grow their own greens from truck gardens, give them a choice between exile to Africa and a captive-bolt shot to the (underdeveloped) forebrain.

Anonymous said...

Jay Santos said...

I have tried on many occasions to read and make some sense of Constructive Feedback's posts.The words are English, there's some punctuation and general adherence to basic grammar. But I do not understand what point he is trying to make. I'm being totally sincere about this.

I know it's like shooting monkeys in a barrel but I liken reading CF's Schizophasiastic prose to Oswald Bates' word salad tossing of 'In Living Color'.

Mind numbingly inane but mildly amusing in a 'silly retard being a silly retard again' way nonetheless.

Anonymous said...

THANK YOU ALL for your comments. It's such a relief to come here and find my observations validated. I was forcefed PC crap growing up, and the worst think you could be was "prejudiced." I know better now. Hang in there, ya'll, and thanks again.

Discard said...

Californian is right about responding to the racially unaware. The point is not to convince the fool, but to convince the onlookers. It's vital work, and sometimes I take a turn, but it is sooooo tedious to explain the obvious to the oblivious. I don't always have the energy.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps CF's discourse is hard (impossible) to follow is because English is not his native language which is probably Jive or Ebonics. Furthermore, Aristotlean logic is a "White Thang."

Again, I want to thank him for providing a distinct avatar which allows me to scroll past his rambling.

SKIP said...

"Throw the lot of them into Detroit, Gary, Birmingham, and the like;

HELL!!! throw them into a bon fire and use the rendered fat to make candles as to get some use out of them. To do otherwise as so many suggest is to ignore the problem in that they will continue to breed and multiply to our own demise so anything other than total, ruthless, no prisoner GENOCIDE will be effective in anything other than a feel good short term moment, the solution MUST be permenant or our children will suffer badly for it.

Anonymous said...

I have tried on many occasions to read and make some sense of Constructive Feedback's posts.

I believe CF is trying to say something like this: the common enemy of both black and white Americans is the financial elite. Accordingly, SBPDL should not exposing black dysfunction and instead attack the elite.

CF may be sincere in this, or he may be trying to stop PK from continuing his very effective series of exposes on BRA.

Charles E. Winchester, III said...


Anonymous (February 22, 2013 at 6:32 PM):

"Ex New Yorker here....The black population is on a one way road to total self-destruction and no one can do anything to stop it."

Thank you! I was really longing fore som good news.

"By spending money to "fix the problem" will only cause it to get worse."

At last a good reason to try to fix the problem...

Charles E. Winchester, III said...


Anonymous February 22, 2013 at 6:39 PM:

"I've heard it theorized that a people who would be incapable of inventing a technology or tool cannot coexist peacefully with it."

While those capable to do so can't, won't or shouldn't try to coexist peacefully with the aformentioned group?

Anonymous said...

I actually think the consecutive terms of Obama have awoken more people than anything else. The claims of "racism" kind of become a joke when you have a black president for 8 years.

The baby boomers are dying off, and generation Y and onwards are mostly libertarians who want nothing to do with fake white guilt.

Anonymous said...

Jay Santos said...

I have tried on many occasions to read and make some sense of Constructive Feedback's posts. I'm not trying to insult the individual, but there's never been any point to them that I can discern.


CFs inability to make rational arguments demonstrates the concept of negro logic. He is an asset.

Charles E. Winchester, III said...


Gwinnett Gladiator (February 23, 2013 at 5:51 AM):

"Of course, we really shouldn’t generalize about negroes. For me to suggest that all negroes work is extremely stereotypical, as we know that millions of negroes simply collect YTs welfare, sell drugs, steal, etc."

Well, perhaps it would be reasonable to describe drug dealing, stealing etc. as work, too. Although illegal, it certainly takes some time and effort, and may bring a profit.

You know, the infamous "jobs that Americans won't do"...

SKIP said...

"I'd execute him (preferably via asphyxiation; it doesn't show up in autopsies and it's silent)

You might want to speak to an experienced ME on that, I think different things happen in the lungs and larynx when air is cut off by any means, it could make a clean shooting turn into a homicide and if the person you shot is black a GUARANTEED investigation of a hate crime will ensue. I'm on your side though.

Mr. Clean said...

Jay Santos said...You've got businesses spending huge amounts of money to market to 12.7% of the population, most of which would seem to have limited discretionary income. The entertainment industry tailors movies and TV products for them.

I think the marketing you are referring to is geared toward a fickle age group, not toward a race. And many of the whites among the current crop of that age group do have the discretionary funds.

SKIP said...

Sarah Bloch is in a great deal of danger and doesn't have a clue what that danger is. I hope you have a concealed carry permit.

nordic caucasoid said...

seems like those s.african ngr's are going after no-leg's whole family now. maybe that leg-less man killed his girl I don't know? but you and I both know that there is no-way in hell is he gonna get a fair trial. not for all those poor negroes in the apartheid days. I have read that most of the ngr's would prefer those days to now-a-days in a Johannesburg minute! hey SBPDL when will a national newspaper/newsroom run those stats that you have shown in this article? I hate the liberal media in the U.S.A. godspeed whites and segregation now!

Mr. Rational said...

The words are English, there's some punctuation and general adherence to basic grammar. But I do not understand what point he is trying to make. I'm being totally sincere about this.

That's because, more often than not, they are "word salad".  This is something you will hear from people with senile dementia; the grammar-forming parts of the brain are still functional, but the higher-order thought processes are disrupted.

I've gone over things that I've written when I was blind drunk, and they're better than the Throwback's scribblings even on his best day.

Sarah Bloch said...

Alert! Dialog on Race in Progress!

Sarah Bloch, if you are still reading this, here is a question for you:

Can you show us where "via education and growing the black middle class," black run/black majority cities in the USA have higher standards of living, lower crime rates, better educational outcomes, and less dependency on the welfare state than equivalent white cities?

e.g., Detroit? Birmingham? Newark? Baltimore?

Can you show us this outcome anywhere in the world?

South Africa, under white rule, had considerable education for blacks, as well as programs to create a black middle class (you might have missed this owing to the anti-apartheid propaganda against SA). Yet today under black majority rule, that rainbow nation is disintegrating into crime, economic stagnation, epidemic AIDS levels, and ethnic cleansing of whites. Let us note that under white rule, SA had these dysfunctions under control.

The point is, we have had plenty of experiments in education and growing the black middle class in the USA and abroad, but the outcome generally seems to be the same: a collapse of standards set previously by whites.

Why have progressive policies failed so miserably?


I can address these topics. In South Africa there was a repressive regime that kept blacks as an underclass much as the America kept blacks as an underclass after Reconstruction. I cannot begin to go into why the slaughterhouses against democracy exist without going back into history to show the far and wide reaching laws that were placed on the books to "keep blacks in their place." The goal was to keep wealth and power in the hands of whites from day one. Allow me to ask you a question. Had blacks come to America as equals in the American Dream would we be having this discussion at all?

Anonymous said...

Don't forget George Banks 13 people, his numerous girlfriends and brood of illegitimate children

Mr. Rational said...

Had blacks come to America as equals in the American Dream would we be having this discussion at all?

They did.  From 1619 to about 1655, the status of Blacks in the Virginia colony (and presumably elsewhere) was exactly the same as Whites:  if they didn't pay their own passage, someone else paid in return for their service under intenture.

What changed this was a decision in a lawsuit... filed by Anthony Johnson, a Black man born in Africa who argued that it was his right to own John Casor as a chattel.  In other words, Black people created the problem for which you're blaming Whites.

Mr. Clean said...

Sarah Bloch said...The goal was to keep wealth and power in the hands of whites from day one

That wealth and power (and technology, culture, etc.) was created by whites. You get a little shiny silver star for use of the word "keep".

Now that there has been a program to redistribute wealth and power to blacks for 40-50 years... what are the results?

Sarah Bloch said...Had blacks come to America as equals in the American Dream would we be having this discussion at all?

How in the world would blacks have come to America in the 18th century (or at any time, really) "as equals"?

Wasn't there equality for blacks somewhere, at some time, back in the muddaland? Aren't they (at least) equals somewhere in Africa today? Aren't they (more than) equals in negro-infested areas of the US today? How has that worked out?

Yes, yes, I know, black dysfunction is the result of mistreatment by other races in the past, and if only we spend more resources and give them more time, they'll fly right eventually. Right....

I am confident that negro fatigue is steadily increasing. If the economy tanks, you will see the boil-over.

Anonymous said...

http://music.yahoo.com/news/police-suv-vegas-strip-shooting-crash-found-012154651.html

Good news! The police may be close to solving the murder of the "aspiring rapper" Kenny Crash. Amazingly, the suspect isn't in the KKK, or a skinhead.

Anonymous said...

This will allow everyone to get a better idea of where Sarah Bloch is coming from:
http://thedisbrimstonedailypitchfork.wordpress.com/

Thoroughly enlightened socialist progressive with typically superior intelligence. She just did a hit piece on PK, but without addressing any of the factual assertions on SBPDL - exactly as she has failed to do here in response to Californian.

I'm sure she knows all about Section 8, though, and samples diversity daily. There are obviously no differences between races, and we are all ignorant, intolerant bigots. White = evil oppressor, non-white = all that is good and just. See aforementioned documentary on Liberia for further information.

Sarah - perhaps it would be helpful for you to interview Brittany Watts to gain some additional perspective.

Gwinnett Gladiator

Anonymous said...

Here is a Hannity video of John Lott discussing guns:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GbKFz7o7H-A#!

Anonymous said...

I can address these topics. In South Africa there was a repressive regime that kept blacks as an underclass much as the America kept blacks as an underclass after Reconstruction. I cannot begin to go into why the slaughterhouses against democracy exist without going back into history to show the far and wide reaching laws that were placed on the books to "keep blacks in their place." The goal was to keep wealth and power in the hands of whites from day one. Allow me to ask you a question. Had blacks come to America as equals in the American Dream would we be having this discussion at all?

The "repressive regime" in SA was put in place to protect Whites and for good reason, just look at the carnage that is now SA. What laws after reconstruction are you talking about? Provide references/links. Jim Crow laws were also put in place to protect Whites not to keep wealth and power in the hands of Whites for it was Whites that exploited other Whites as well (think robber barons).

Had Blacks come to America as equals would we be having this discussion? No, because if they had been truly equal they would have similar IQ's, invented sailing vessels, and come here and been able to act like civilized beings. I suggest you look through National Geographic magazines circa 1900. While America, Europe, and many other parts of the world had developed modern organized societies, sub-Saharan Africans were still very primitive.

I, at one time, was sympathetic to black folk's cause. After growing up in mixed neighborhoods and going to schools that were ~70% black I was intimately familiar with black culture. I too used to think that more money and education could fix many of the problems of the black community until I started to sift the black experience through the filters of biology, psychology, sociology, and even economy. I came to the conclusion that the role of the biological dice had determined their genetic futures (through no fault of their own) and that they, for the most part, are not suited for modern societal living. It is not my responsibility to lift them up. That ultimately is their responsibility and the best thing that I can do is to separate myself from them so that they have the freedom to do that and not at the expense of me. I have remained open to other information to prove otherwise but none has been forthcoming since people like you, Sarah, only resort to name calling when someone questions your assertions

Anonymous said...

sara bloch's brilliant: the reason blacks in africa had no written language & no buildings is b/c whites telepathically discriminated against them, centuries before meeting them.
pamjoomby

Anonymous said...

There are always people who will seek to blame black dysfunctionality on the rest of the world (while they conveniently ignore the fact that Africa was always an uncivilized, stone aged and horrific environment courtesy of black people)as attested to by historical records dating back to before any white man ever stepped foot on the dark continent.
No other race in the world is responsible for typical african behavior and backwardness anymore than they are for the primitiveness and backwardness of Australian aborigines.
If Africans were capable of the creation and maintenance of higher cultures, they would have already done so the same as every other race on the planet and the evidence would be widespread throughout Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, the historical record speaks for itself~ no higher culture ever existed in any purely black indigeonous areas. THEY HAD NOT EVEN INVENTED THE WHEEL. If not for the intervention of other races and cultures, black africa today would look the same as it did thousands of years ago.
Yet DWL's ignore the historical reality and when viewing the abject failure of blacks to succeed in a modern first world environment, immediately start flailing about trying to ascribe these failures to racism, discriminatory laws of the past and a lack of "equality."
Blacks in first world countries can succeed individually by adopting the trappings of a 1st world culture but cannot create it as a group. They can only regress to the mean and create shitholes such as Detroit. Remove all the trappings of a 1st world civilization from Detroit and all the artificial supports and you'd have the people living in the same conditions as their ancestors a thousand years ago in Africa or (at best)as they do today in the slums of every major african "city."
Even when the subject of IQ comes up, DWL's flail about trying to ascribe the obvious subnormal intelligence of blacks to "racist tests."
If DWL's could somehow contrive to blame other races for the failure of blacks in Africa thousands of years ago prior to any contact with other races, they would do so just as they blame everyone else for the failures of blacks everywhere today.
For DWL's, 2+2 will always equal 5 and don't you dare say differently!


John Henry said...

Muslims and Niggers (same thing really) along with their Liberal supporters have ruined our world. It's all over folks. White people are now only 9% of the global population and they are not breeding.

Soon this entire world will be like South Africa ... enjoy.

Mr. Rational said...

I posted a question on Sarah Bloch's blog, asking her where and how PK is factually or logicall wrong (as opposed to politically incorrect).

I suspect that she will delete it, which confirms all the speculations about her nature and motivations above.

Anonymous said...

"Call me crazy, but I'm really starting to doubt this 12.7% nationwide negro population number." - No, it is 12.7%, but people naively discount the effects of bringing 50M foreigners here since 1960 in the calculation of just how many people that is. The black population has doubled since then, and the non-white population as a whole is around 100 million.

Anonymous said...

Sarah I read the blogpost on poverty and its use by the evil corporations, and I largely agree with that. But, here is the sixty four thousand dollar question? By what mechanism did the evil corporations drive wages and opportunities down for every American?

The very same one you applaud in that very piece.

Californian said...

She [Sarah Bloch] just did a hit piece on PK, but without addressing any of the factual assertions on SBPDL - exactly as she has failed to do here in response to Californian.

Exactly.

If SBPDL is wrong, then can we see a demonstration of where? Can Sarah Bloch name those black-run cities or countries which are up to the same standards as similar white-run re public safety, economic growth, educational standards, etc., etc?

Of course, she can not, so she will then have to shift into ideological mode. She might concede that a Detroit or a Rhodesia under black rule has disintegrated by objective standards. But then she will blame the failure not on blacks but on whites: slavery-segregation-apartheid and (oooooh) racism.

We know how the script works.

The danger is that as whites are increasingly scapegoated for black dysfunction, blacks will increasingly attack whites. This is well documented by Internet sites such as SBPDL: whether it is "Get Whitey Night" at the Wisconsin State Fair, or ANC minions chanting, "Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer!"

Gets back to my point that black-on-white violence globally is political.

And we have seen massive amounts of black-on-white violence over the last half century: the Zebra Killings, the Long Hot Summer riots, the drive-by shootings, the Congo bloodbaths of the 1960s, the farmer murders in South Africa, the English urban brew ups of 2011, the flash mobbings of today, etc.

Perhaps Sarah Bloch is not aware of the criminal justice statistics which demonstrate that blacks commit the majority of violent crime in the USA? A quick check of SBPDL articles will provide the information. Or maybe she is ware of the stats but is in denial.

Consider how white progressive females flagellate themselves over Alabama church bombings that are half a century old. Yet when it comes to a Chris Dorner or Omar Thornton or Zebra Killers -- crickets.

As long as the killers can claim to be "fighting racism" then white progressive females will go through any number of ideological convolutions to justify that violence and divert blame away from the perpetrators and instead place it on white people. And since the violence they justify will eventually come around to haunt and destroy them, we have to conclude that white progressive females are motivated by self-destructive impulses. Being a progressive white female has proven no defense against a flash mob.

"Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide."--James Burnham

Bogolyubski said...

The lie which underlies Sarah Bloch's historically illiterate assumptions is that equality exists. It doesn't exist - and never has. Equality is nothing more than a utopian dream of Marxists like herself. There are mountains of corpses and rivers of blood created by folks like Sarah Bloch in their insatiable utopian ideologies.

The only folks who were even superficially successful in establishing a very limited form of the concept (equality under the law) were the English. As can be readily seen from looking at the history of the last century, it has failed utterly. England itself is now nothing more than a laughable totalitarian province of a Soviet-style entity ruled from Brussels by plutocrats. Its former colonies with majority English populations (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) are likewise shamelessly totalitarian in nature - one can be arrested and jailed for making a less than obsequious comment about a designated sacred cow. The former colony now known here as the Banksta Banana Republick is rapidly on its way to becoming a monstrously totalitarian Vampire-Squid Empire.

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race in Progress!

Sarah Bloch posed this question, let us see if she is up to that much ballyhooed "dialog on race:"

Sarah Bloch said...Allow me to ask you a question. Had blacks come to America as equals in the American Dream would we be having this discussion at all?

How would have blacks "come to America as equals?" Can you give us a scenario in which this might have happened?

You mean in the 17th century blacks would have sailed from Africa, landed in America, and formed colonies? You are aware that blacks did not have sailing ship technology.

You mean in the 18th century? The European Enlightenment was spreading among white Americans. Black Africans were generally part of slave holding societies. Why would they come to a country where slavery was coming under attack?

How about the 19th century? Blacks in Africa would suddenly have gotten the pioneering spirit, packed their kits, booked passage on trans-Atlantic liners, moved to America, crossed the prairies where they would start farms and building modern cities? (Why didn't blacks do any of this farming or city building in Africa?)

As for the American Dream: blacks in Africa were slaveholders. Had they come to America, they would have brought with them slavery. Slavery existed in black Africa and the Muslim world even after white Americans abolished the peculiar institution in 1865. So bringing black Africans to America would have expanded the political base for slavery. Who knows, perhaps a Confederate-African slaveholder alliance would have defeated the Union and we would still have slavery in America today!

Today, blacks are a legally privileged group: civil rights laws, affirmative action (de jure and de facto), protection via hatecrime laws, MLK holidays, the adulation of white progressives. Yet blacks have very high rates of violent crime, school drops outs, welfare dependency, etc., all documented on SBPDL and other websites. We might look at cities such as Detroit as how half a century of progressive politics can run a city into the ground.

Let us note that Jews and East Asians--and even many non-Anglo European immigrants--faced considerable discrimination once upon a time in America. This did not prevent them from attaining high levels of academic and financial success. They've achieved the American Dream, and this without massive progressive programs rigging the system for them.

Here's a last question: if the USA is such a "racist" country, then why do endless numbers of blacks from Haiti, Somalia and just about everywhere else want to come here? Surely they must know they will be the victims of "racism?" Why do they build their own African Dream in their majority rule paradises?

Care to explain?

Silent Running said...

There are a lot of very high-quality comments in this thread. All I have to add is this: I think the number of white women who are truly beyond saving is very small, a hard core of fanatics (most of them wizened crones to boot). White women are the most precious treasure on the planet; we have no future without them. So, Ms. Bloch, as vile and backward as you currently are, I would cut a swath through a horde of blacks to save your life, even at the cost of my own.

And I don't really care if you want to be saved or not.

Silent Running said...

It's all over folks.

Oh, this is far from over. Caucasians are about to enter another crucible; horrors will be witnessed daily, and great deeds again performed in response. But if you wish to despair on this forum, bare your breast and rend your garments, there is an honorable way out.

Anonymous said...

Californian said...

...Gets back to my point that black-on-white violence globally is political. ...


It is political in its effect, but black-on-white violence is inherently genetic. Negroes are genetically predisposed to kill and eat whites.

Silent Running said...

Who knows, perhaps a Confederate-African slaveholder alliance would have defeated the Union and we would still have slavery in America today!

Technology would have defeated slavery eventually, probably prior to 1900. Anyone who brags that whites ended slavery in the War Between the States is inadvertently undermining states' rights and the right of secession, which was the real cause of the rebellion.

Union chest-thumping in 2013 makes no more sense than those who insist that they can't be held accountable for slavery because their people immigrated after 1865, implying that those of us who are descended from Confederates are to blame for it. This "them, not me!" attitude is part of the reason we as white people have failed to stick together and protect our rights.

We are one. Let's start acting like it.

Mr. Rational said...

blacks in Africa were slaveholders. Had they come to America, they would have brought with them slavery.

Blacks DID bring slavery with them to America; it was Anthony Johnson's successful suit to be recognized as John Casor's owner-for-life that introduced chattel slavery to the British colonies in America.

dave said...

I'd like to know how diverse is Sarah Bloch's zip code is. Does she practice what she preaches?

Dan said...

What is your religious ethnic background Ms Bloch?

Now, South Africa. It was a great country whilst whites ruled as whites. Before they came the local blacks were hunter gatherers. Once the whites established commercial farms and mines they allowed Bantu in from across the Zambezi. Eventually the civilization fell. Same thing is now happening to Europe and North America. It will require fascist measures to preserve western civ. partly because liberal twits have been indulged for decades. Rhodesia and SA are warnings about our eventual fate as cannibal meat.

Anonymous said...

OUT OF IT SARA BLOCH

Had blacks come to America as equals in the American Dream would we be having this discussion at all?

MORE NEGROES HAVE MOVED HERE AS FREE MEN THAN
The 1? million imported slaves.

4 million Haitians in US and Canada..
obongo [negro in chief, or 1/2negro]
HAS DIVERSITY VISAS TO BRING IN MORE FERAL/LOW IQS...kinda
LIKE OMAR AND ZETUNI..HIS CLOSE RELATIVES.

Charles E. Winchester, III said...


Californian (February 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM):

"Slavery was part of human society for thousands of years."

Why the past tense?

Charles E. Winchester, III said...


Bob1313 (February 22, 2013 at 7:10 PM):

"I say put a government funded abortion clinic on every corner, make em more available than 7-11's"

Word.
Better yet: Pay them to have abortions!
Ideas for advertising:
"Have 10 fetuses aborted, and you'll receive a brand new set of 22" rims! For 20 or more abortions; you get a complimentary sterilisation."

Anonymous said...

From Jay Santos:

"It's an important point. Unfortunately, statist-leaning white women are a huge force multiplier in this whole mess. That innate maternal instinct to protect the weak, that we all benefited from as infants, is horribly misdirected in supporting the poor, innocent, blood-thirsty negro. Maybe at some distant point in the future, the rapes and beatings at the hands of blacks will begin to reverse this trend, or maybe not."

Back to you Jay Santos:

Anonymous here again.
Just wanted to say that you have a point up above but I think there may be more to it.

Modern women (feminists, beta-male rejectionists and dominant harpies) crave thuggish male behavior, as well as a chance to REBEL against social conventions (male authority); which primarily means upsetting/irritating/shocking Daddy.

What better way to do this than to fall in love with angry, violent, dominant, aggressive black males (and the counter culture they represent)?

Just my two cents...

10mm AUTO said...

"I would cut a swath through a horde of blacks to save your life, even at the cost of my own.

And I don't really care if you want to be saved or not.

February 24, 2013 at 2:14 PM"

Proud to read this, SR. I would watch your back. Even if we were to fall, by God we would not show up at the Ferrymen without an impressive HonorGuard.

Anonymous said...

"As a white Progressive female I feel that the crimes being perpetrated by blacks on their own race are simply a product of poverty and ignorance"

You've got it backward.

Poverty and ignorance are the result of low IQ.

Even a child can figure out that a two-parent household is significantly less likely to be impoverished than a single-parent household, yet blacks continue their habit of 70+% illegitimacy and fatherless homes.

haitian said...

skip
HELL!!! throw them into a bon fire and use the rendered fat to make candles as to get some use out of them. To do otherwise as so many suggest is to ignore the problem in that they will continue to breed and multiply to our own demise so anything other than total, ruthless, no prisoner GENOCIDE will be effective in anything other than a feel good short term moment, the solution MUST be permenant or our children will suffer badly for it.

you're the military guy that likes DR people but not Haitinas right?
must suck to way up everyday in Afganastin and take orders from blacks while they putting big time crime on you here in America.

but i do agree with you witht the genocide. i actually told someone else that was the only solution. but only time will tell if white people have any balls left. lets see. blacks do beat whitey, kill whitey, rape whitey, shoot whitey, and your white women still fuck black men.

Dan said...

IgnoranceTM.

The left loves to throw that word out, while they ignore the evidence that confronts them every fucking day on the morning news.

Mr. Rational said...

Better yet: Pay them to have abortions!

Nah, just pay 'em for the sterilization up front.  Every illiterate, felon, habitual drug user (and many other other unemployables) between the ages of 11 and 45 should be eligible.  Give 'em a pile of money and bling.

Imagine if Angel Adams had been offered $5000 cash to get fixed after her first child was born.  Better yet, imagine if she was offered $10,000 to get fixed BEFORE her first child was born.  Tote up the savings, and weep... especially those of you who ever thought Margaret Sanger was a monster, not a visionary.

Anonymous said...

I almost left a comment at the blog linked to in the profile of "Sarah Bloch". However I noticed all the baseless name calling, excessive profanity, and gratuitous nudity (at least one of which is a still from the beastiality movie "A Summer's Day") feature on the site and realised I was dealing with someone completetly lacking in class/ good judgement and decided against it.

In any event I see that no comments have apeared over at Sarah Bloch's blog although several commenters here have mentioned that they left them. That's no suprise really. Leftist usually will not tolerate opposing views.

-Fireforce-

Anonymous said...

Lived in Chicago all my life, 44 years. Have not seen a white employee of CTA since 1978

Charles E. Winchester, III said...


Mr. Rational (February 25, 2013 at 5:53 AM):

"Better yet: Pay them to have abortions!

Nah, just pay 'em for the sterilization up front. "

Why not both?

"Every illiterate, felon, habitual drug user (and many other other unemployables) between the ages of 11 and 45 should be eligible."

Why restrict it to those "between the ages of 11 and 45"?

"Imagine if Angel Adams had been offered $5000 cash to get fixed after her first child was born."

I can't. I have no idea who she is.

"Tote up the savings, and weep... especially those of you who ever thought Margaret Sanger was a monster, not a visionary."

Aye. A visionary - and a true heroine.

Anonymous said...

Education cannot be sucessful when the population is against it. CPS is the perfect example. $$$$$ programs, breakfast, lunch and dinner but momma at home either won't bring the kids or as thier first teacher mKes sure they understand that is the White man's evil and ignore it.

Anonymous said...

Slavery does not justify any of that. Black thug culture is destroying blacks and they act helpless about it.

Anonymous said...

"BLACK PEOPLE seek to live in safe communities that retain their property values and have good schools"

LOLOLOL

Reality check:

Black people bring crime, violence, despair and misery to any place they move into.

Your opinion of what they "seek" is frankly fucking irrelevant.

Mr. Rational said...

Sarah Bloch and company have finally approved some comments.  Bloch's single response to PDK is absolutely substance-free, e.g. calling UCR statistics "pseudoscience designed to arrive at an end comfortable for those who hold a racial hatred."

YJCMTSU.

Charles E. Winchester, III said...


Silent Running (February 24, 2013 at 2:14 PM):

"White women are the most precious treasure on the planet; we have no future without them."

I agree fully on the last part. However, I believe that we (white men) are just as precious, if not more. I believe we are fewer, smarter and more innovative than them. Perhaps somewhat more honest and reliable - not to mention less likely to support evil, insane and Socialist ideas, values and parties. I also believe that we are more likely to take hard, difficult, risky jobs, and that on average we die a few years younger. If it's so, the average man will be slightly more valuable than the average woman.

For that reason, in the highly unlikely and unpleasant case that I had to choose between saving a man's life and a woman's, I think I would save the man's - providing that those two individuals seems to be equal in everything but gender.

Constructive Feedback said...

Mr Kersey - you assemble the best and brightest people here.

AND they have wonderful imaginations and taste for cherries that they pick.

[quote] Mr. Rational said...
Had blacks come to America as equals in the American Dream would we be having this discussion at all?

They did. From 1619 to about 1655, the status of Blacks in the Virginia colony (and presumably elsewhere) was exactly the same as Whites: if they didn't pay their own passage, someone else paid in return for their service under intenture.
[/quote]

Thanks - I needed the laugh over history.

Anonymous said...

"Mr Kersey - you assemble the best and brightest people here."

Kersey doesn't "assemble" anyone.

Visitation and participation here is an individual choice, as evidenced by your presence.

"AND they have wonderful imaginations and taste for cherries that they pick."

And you attempt to make your case by cherry-picking a comment.

How funny.

White Guy said...

Re: Californian at 716pm
Blacks started ruining Detroit back in the 30's. The National Guard had to be called in. Then in 1947, the case of Shelley vs. Kraemer flung the door wide open. I encourage everyone to read about it in WikiPe. There were 4 FDR appointed lawyers, from God's Chosen Ones, who argued the case before the Sup. Ct. They hid their identities because they knew it would hurt their case!
This was the beginning of the gov. attack on Christian whites.

Dan said...

Go back to Africa you ungrateful retard.

Silent Running said...

Proud to read this, SR. I would watch your back. Even if we were to fall, by God we would not show up at the Ferrymen without an impressive HonorGuard.

I greatly appreciate that, hombre. If we ever meet I'll give you an obol-equivalent for burial purposes.

IgnoranceTM.

Try alt-0153

Ignorance™

In any event I see that no comments have apeared over at Sarah Bloch's blog although several commenters here have mentioned that they left them.

She posted two comments by PDK and one by Charles Winchester. As Mr. Rational pointed out, her response to PDK was some babbling about eugenics (note the liberal scare word) and brainwashed rightists.

For that reason, in the highly unlikely and unpleasant case that I had to choose between saving a man's life and a woman's, I think I would save the man's - providing that those two individuals seems to be equal in everything but gender.

All your points are correct, but for me it's mostly visceral. I don't even like to watch movies where white girls get hurt, but I can watch white men getting blown up without feeling much. Don't be surprised if Nature gets in your way and the protective instinct takes over.

Melanie said...

@ Mr Rational February 25, 2013 at 8:19 AM-

LOL. She's callng FBI, Justice Dept, and city LE statistics "pseudoscience"?

Melanie said...

The negros who were brought here against their will had a fully-paid ticket back to Africa in a country of their own-Liberia-if they were so homesick for Mother Africa. That only a miniscule few took advantage of the free trip shows that they had enough animal cunning and survival instinct (and learned dependence upon whites) to know which side of their bread was buttered.

Californian said...

Sarah Bloch said...In South Africa there was a repressive regime that kept blacks as an underclass ...

Sarah, would you want to live in a one party dictatorship? Or a country which is the scene of massacres, mass rapes, economic collapse, and endless civil war? Would you like to see your country turned into another Congo or Liberia or Zimbabwe or Ghana or Uganda or Sudan or Somalia?

Yes?

No?

Well, South African whites sure did not want to see their country destroyed by black majority rule. This is why they had apartheid. Black-majority-rule in the vast majority of cases leads to dictatorship or human rights debacles in Africa.

You seem to know very little about South Africa.

Until whites showed up in what became South Africa, there were no universities, no factories, no mines, no cities, no power plants, no television, none of the amenities which you take for granted. Blacks were living at a Neolithic level.

These were all built by whites (with an assist by Asians).

White South Africans provided blacks with schools and hospitals and jobs and public housing. Whites uplifted blacks from their primitive cultures and tried to get them into the 20th century. Far from being a "permanent underclass," blacks in South Africa had higher standards of living than anywhere else in sub-Sahara. The objective was to create a sufficiently large black middle class which could eventually participate in a first world country.

There were millions of blacks and Asians in the old South Africa who saw apartheid as a preferable system to the human rights disasters which result when you have black majority rule. Millions of foreign blacks tried to immigrate into apartheid era South Africa. i.e., even blacks realized that black-majority-rule could not provide them with the standard of Living that white-rule could.

The people who have created a permanent underclass in Africa have been blacks, especially of the progressive stripe (such as avowed marxist Bob Mugabe). They have wrecked the economies of once prosperous white-run colonies. They have turned their countries into one-party police states.

You are aware of this, right?

Since the end of apartheid, South Africa has seen a massive wave of black violent crime -- violence which had been kept in check by white-rule (one more reason for apartheid). Rainbow South Africa is now one of the rape and murder capitals of the world. A major target of black violence has been progressive white females. Look at Amie Biehl. Or Nadine Gordimer.

You're OK with that?

The reality is that apartheid protected progressive white females, allowing them to indulge in their political fantasies. Now that apartheid is gone, progressive white females are among those being ethnically cleansed.

Something to think about ...

AnalogMan said...

Silent Running (February 24, 2013 at 2:14 PM):

"White women are the most precious treasure on the planet; we have no future without them."

Absolutely true. However, as evidenced by Miss Bloch, that is not sufficient reason to allow them to vote.

Mr. Rational said...

LOL. She's callng FBI, Justice Dept, and city LE statistics "pseudoscience"?

Yes, Melanie, it appears that she is.  Of course, the rest of PDK's boilerplate that he included gave her a lot of other targets to justify ignoring the numerical facts; I wish he'd self-edit.