Sunday, February 3, 2013

The 11th Plague of Egypt Overwhelms Detroit and Chicago



Black migrants from the south borrowed Old Testament stories to describe their quest for freedom; 2013 Chicago and Detroit represent the culmination of this mythical march northward

With news that the good Rev. Jesse Jackson has called upon Homeland Security to patrol the war-torn streets of black Chicago, it’s important to look back at the “Holy” (in hindsight, ‘unholy’) migration of black people to Chicago, which had Biblical undertones.

Allan H. Spear’s Black Chicago: The Making of a Negro Ghetto 1890- 1920 is considered one of the seminal books on “The Great Migration” to the Windy City. Important to note that in 1890, Chicago had a population of one million people; only 14, 000 (or 1.1 percent) were black; by 1920, Chicago had a population of 2.7 million people, of which only 109,000 (or 4.1 percent) were black.

Those black people, who now represent the majority population of Chicago (33 percent) are the descendants of a Biblical migration, with Spear writing:

The early migrants had only vague notions of what they might expect at their destinations, and they often headed north with visions of fantastic wages and unbounded liberty. Moreover as the image of the North filtered south through the promises of agents, the glowing letters of friends, and the appeal of the Negro press [Chicago Defender], it took on a mythical quality that gave to the migration an almost religions significance. The rhetoric of the migration was highly charged with biblical imagery; the Flight out of Egypt; Bound for the Promised Land; Going into Canaan; Beulah Land. A party of migrants on their way from Mississippi to Chicago held solemn ceremonies when their train crossed the Ohio River; they stopped their watches, knelt down to pray, and sang the gospel hymn, “I Done Come out the Land of Egypt With the Good News.”

The lure of the Promised Land was particularly compelling for the younger generation. The emotions engendered by the exodus was closely linked to a growing Negro race consciousness. Despite the wide variety of individual motives, the migration developed a certain coherence; it grew out of the Negro people’s common historical experiences and common grievances. (p. 130 -131)


Well, “I Done Come out the Land of Egypt With the Bad News,” black residents of Chicago; you are threatening to completely destabilize one of the nation’s last remaining great cities.

Having already devastated Detroit with a plague conveniently left out of the Bible for the misery it can produce (black political rule), Chicago now is threatened with the same fate. Though black people don’t politically control Chicago, the ideology of Black-Run America (BRA) does, meaning that almost exclusive black violence found in Chicago can’t be properly addressed without pointing out that black people have created hellish conditions in the Second City.

In a city where 94 percent of gunmen who shot and wounded people didn’t get charged in 2012 (and stats show that overwhelmingly amount of people pulling the triggers of guns in Chicago are black; especially those who get caught), the streets run with blood in a manner far worse than any story from the Old Testament ['War on black youth': Former neighborhood resident reflects on violence that killed Hadiya Pendleton, shook city, Chicago Tribune, 2-1-13]:

Jameel Abdur-Rafia came to Harsh Park on Thursday to think about the meaning of it all.
He parked his SUV — a Honda Pilot with an "Eracism" bumper sticker — then walked into the little park and stood alone.
He looked around. The orange slides. The swing set. The metal canopy where Hadiya Pendleton and her friends had sought shelter from Tuesday's rain.
"Another little baby gone," he said when I approached.
He didn't know Hadiya or her family. Neither apparently did the few others who trickled past in the early afternoon, two days after Hadiya, who was 15, was shot in the back by a killer as yet uncaught.
Synira Allen, who lives a few blocks south, tucked a card behind the elephant. She was nudged toward the park, she said, by "a sense of urgency."
"It seems like a war on black youth in Chicago."
The war isn't new, and you could argue that it's not really worse than ever; it only feels that way lately. Allen, who remembers the organized gangs that ruled when she was in high school in the late 1980s, isn't sure it's worse or that Chicago is unique.
"This is going on in every urban city in America," she said. "Chicago's just being highlighted."
But Abdur-Rafia thinks some things have gotten worse since he was growing up not far away in the Clarence Darrow Homes, now demolished.
Over here on Oakenwald Avenue, he said, things were always different.
"This was always the nice part of the neighborhood."
Standing in the park, named after an African-American librarian, he looked up the street, at the mix of houses, brick and stone, mostly in good shape. "The dramas were a little bit west."
When the drama leaked onto this street Tuesday, taking another child's life, devastating another family, shaking the city deeper, the familiar cry rose: Why? What to do?
On Thursday, the mayor announced that 200 police officers would be reassigned to the streets. Abdur-Rafia had another suggestion.
"Jobs," he said. "People are just fighting for money. They want a nice car, a nice pair of shoes. We can send robots to Mars, and we can't stop the violence on the South Side of Chicago?"

It’s a melancholy thought to contemplate where white civilization (Western Civilization) could have sent humans were we not so busy funding the proliferation of a people whose greatest contribution to civilization has been the mandatory growth of a police state to patrol the ‘communities’ they create.

We could easily stop the violence on the South Side of Chicago, where those black migrants from the south – guided by delusions biblical in nature – set up shop and called it ‘home’. But what does it look like today? [Chicago murder rate far worse than during Al Capone 'gangland' days, ABC 7 Chicago, 2-2-13]:


The surprising stats show the city is worse off now in the category of murder than at the height of the era that has driven Chicago's reputation for almost a century, Capone's "gangland" Chicago.
Let's compare two months: January 1929, leading up to the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, and last month, January 2013. Forty-two people were killed in Chicago last month, the most in January since 2002, and far worse than the city's most notorious crime era at the end of the Roaring Twenties. January 1929 there were 26 killings.
Even though the image of Chicago, perpetuated by Hollywood over the years, was that mobsters routinely mowed down people on the streets, the crime stats tell a different story. January 2013's bloodshed has caught the attention of Chicagoans, politicians, the White House and people around the world.
Forty-two people were killed in Chicago last month, the most in January since 2002, and far worse than the city's most notorious crime era at the end of the Roaring Twenties.
With Friday's fatal gunshot attack on a vehicle on a Lake Shore Drive, February is starting as January left off. But if the current murder rate continues, February 2013 will far exceed February 1929, when there were 26 killings, and that number includes the attack known around the world, the St. Valentine's Day Massacre. In that single slaughter, seven people were lined up against a warehouse wall on North Clark Street and gunned down. It was a bootlegging dispute between North and South Side mob gangs.  


Remember the words of Allan H. Spear, “The early migrants had only vague notions of what they might expect at their destinations, and they often headed north with visions of fantastic wages and unbounded liberty.”

Behold, the horsemen of the apocalypse, unbounded by the liberty present in the northern cities like Cleveland, Detroit, and Chicago, they have unleashed a plague on earth more gruesome then the stories of the Old Testament.

Instead of instantaneous death like that which befell Sodom and Gomorrah, we watch Detroit slowly fade into the nether like an Alzheimer’s patient whose body and mind withers away, no longer capable of remembering all of his former glories.

Now we do the same with Chicago, for in BRA no one can dare point out it is black people themselves to blame for the sorrowful conditions they create in their communities.
Even the good Rev. Jesse Jackson, who bragged “It’s our turn now,” on the night Harold Washington was elected the first black mayor in 1983, is calling for Homeland Security to patrol the South Side of Chicago – the very area of Chicagoland where those ‘modern-day Egyptians’ called home when they were granted their freedom [Chicago marchers urge Obama to come home to address gun violence, Reuters, 2-2-13]:

Civil rights leader Jesse Jackson and relatives of victims of fatal shootings in Chicago urged President Barack Obama on Saturday to come back to his hometown and address the gun violence plaguing the city.
Before a march on the city's South Side, Jackson, a former Democratic presidential candidate, said America's third most populous city needed more help than Mayor Rahm Emanuel and police superintendent Garry McCarthy could offer.
"When the president shows up, it shows ultimate national seriousness," said Jackson, a Chicago resident. He also called for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to help patrol the streets of Chicago.

The Ten Plagues of Egypt has described by the Old Testament have nothing on what is going on in Chicago and what already has come to pass in Detroit. The Promised Land that white people created in both cities, which attracted black migrants in the 1920s, is now has gone through plagues worse than boils, hail, locusts, blood, frogs, or darkness.

While the Chicago Tribune once lamented the ‘Odds Stacked Against Young Black Males’ (11-24-1991), they did so without placing any of the blame for black dysfunction on black people themselves.

So if the ‘Great Migration’ of black people to places like Chicago, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Detroit and Buffalo were peppered with biblical allusions, it’s time to point out the obvious: the 11th Plague of Egypt is “Manifest Destruction.”

71 comments:

Bogolyubski said...

It's Ground Hog Day! Same stupid criminality over and over followed by the same stupid DWL platitudes over and over. The only rock-solid absolute constant in this farce is that groids and their DWL masters will always find a way to blame YT for this. It's always and forever YT's fault. Those who pull the triggers, and the legions of morons who vote for the same mountebanks (folks with names like Jameel who flit about in shiny SUVs with Eracism bumper stickers) over and over, are never ever responsible.

Don M said...

Boy, oh boy do I hope DHS takes on the mission of patrolling groidland in Chicongo!

Imagine the monetary drain! Imagine the casualties they'll incur!

It'll be like Harare, Durban, Baghdad and Kabul all rolled into one deliciously insane fruitcake!

Anything that bleeds the hated Empire is a good thing for us!

(Plus, we'll get to see their TTPs on full display and use our superior, human intellects to develop countermeasures.)

panjoomby said...

i'd love to hear a black say "it's b/c generally we're not as smart & we're more impulsive than whites." alas, the truth cannot be said.

Californian said...

Powerful stuff, PK, powerful stuff.

Mainly because what you say is true.

"It seems like a war on black youth in Chicago."

An Orwellian inversion. A Randian anti-concept. It's black youth who are responsible for the war. They are the ones pulling the triggers, doing the gangbanging, and generally making the city unlivable. But put it through the alchemy of DWL ideology and -- presto! -- black youth suddenly become the victims, not the perpetrators.


The surprising stats ...


Surprising to who? Not to anyone who knows anything about BRA.

...show the city is worse off now in the category of murder than at the height of the era that has driven Chicago's reputation for almost a century, Capone's "gangland" Chicago.

Here's a thought. Why not bring back Prohibition era gangsters to patrol Chicago's mean streets? They would be far more efficient in ensuring order, and you probably could get a drink cheaper!

PDK said...

Well fellow non-liberal whites it is finally here, it has finally returned, that one month of the year here in America dedicated to blacks as black history month. I think the month of February was chosen as it has the fewest days of any month of the year which is similar to, or reminiscent of, the black cerebrum which has the fewest brain cells of any sub-species of humans.

There are two competing histories of blacks and blacks here in America. The first and most well-known of the two, and is the liberal enforced zeitgeist of our age, comes from white liberal, revisionist elites and their ally the blacks, both of whom prefer illusion over truth and further prefer an illusion that targets their intended conclusion of the evil white man and the persecuted black man illusion. It is here that we all learn that whitey is so evil he persecutes and holds blackie down simply and only because he has a different skin color.

We all know from this historical account that evil whitey cruelly enslaved blacks and cracked his whip across the back of blacks to make them pick cotton. We know that evil white men desired, lusted for and raped black women slaves. We know this because this is what liberal and black ideology promotes as the truth.

The other history, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the whole truth of history is not part of liberal ideology and therefore is not allowed to become the American zeitgeist which we must all breathe deep and pretend we believe in. Black Africans and their worldwide people are born of a gene pool that evolved to favor a more animalistic form of a lower IQed human sub-species. They never technically evolved beyond the Mesolithic Stone Age on their own.

Some other facts:

1, Blacks enslaved blacks both in Africa and here in America.

2, Whites freed the blacks here in America twice.

3, It was a black man who started slavery in America, his name was Anthony Johnson.

4, Most mullatoes were born of a white woman and a lustful black man.

5, Tom Jefferson’s salve concubine Sally Hemming was ¾ white, of very fair skin, with long black hair, flowing down her back.

6, In 1830 America’s 319,000 plus free blacks owned 12,700 plus black slaves.

7, Black crime and gang attacks were common during the slavery years, just as they are today, including an attack on Abe Lincoln and a friend in 1828 by 7 Negroes.

8, In 1860 the largest slave holder in South Carolina was William Ellison, a free black man and plantation owner.

9, Many black slaves voluntarily served in the confederate army as soldiers.

10, Between 1882 and 1968, about 1/3 of all lynching victims were white, 1,297 were white while 3,446were black. The good people lynched the bad people, not the black people.

11, Abe Lincoln, in the white house, told prominent black men that whites did not want enslavement of blacks but further went on telling them that the races are not meant for cohabitation and strongly suggested that after the war they migrate to Latin America.

12, Currently there are as many black on black homicides every 5 months as there were in the 86 years of black lynchings.

Finally, contrary to the black illusion, it is not white men lusting for and raping black women, but rather, black men lusting for and raping white women and many times after raping white women they then proceed on to murder the white women.

Blacks are losers because of their genetics. They choose to parasitize our white culture and our white gene pool.

This among other realities calls for non-liberal whites to seek out a white nationalist, free enterprise Republic through secession, outlawing and or disenfranchising the “Alliance” of white liberals, blacks, browns, Islamics and Amerindians, that is all those currently working to destroy our America while pursuing a socialist democratic Dystopia. Thank you.



Paul's Biggest Fan said...

I can't shake the belief that:

1) Latinos are preferable to blacks in any given area;
2) Latinos dislike blacks more than whites do AND they seem to be willing to act on that;
3) Latino actions cannot in BRA be "racist."

Is it short-sighted for me to cheer on the immigrants? Am I wishing to exchange one invasive species for another?

I guess it's because, as a kid, I preferred "Chico and the Man" to "Good Times."

10mm AUTO said...

I hear that China is going to put up the largest, tallest skyscraper in the world soon, even making it modular so it can be duplicated anywhere.

Whites invented the skyscraper. But now we can't even build needed power plants in our own land or a critically needed pipeline let alone a skyscraper because of Marxist/Feudalism and the feel-goods. Private Property is controlled, licensed, regulated and taxed so that NO ONE dares again to excel.

Whites are beaten by other races and the MSM take the side of the attackers, covering for their crimes. To even discuss a "White Homeland" is to be cast as a Nazi, a Thought Criminal, a Judas and be broken professionally and personally. No White can form White professional organizations, while "Hispanic" and "Black" organizations riddle the landscape, even to the seats of power in the Government. No area can be White through Diversity Mandates, while the negros lay claim to an entire continent and the "Hispanics" lay claim to South and Central America. In Europe, White countries are flooded with the spawn of black and brown who live off the White taxes while raping their children and trying to impose their vile religion and destroy their societies. White women of childbearing age are down to 3% of the Worlds population while Feminists squeal about more Abortion, lesbianism and getting the mothers of the race "out of the home", as though the function of motherhood was vile. Government taxation and inflation are so bad, one man can't work to support a family, let alone fill the cradles we must if our race is to prosper, let alone grow. We Must Fill those Cradles.

At work Whites everywhere are watched and punished for "politically incorrect" thoughts, such as defending their nation (Like the BNP) or even rejecting illegal immigrants. If they speak, they are targeted for "sensitivity Training" at the cost of their livelihood if they don't attend; or if they speak too egregiously, they lose their business or professional licenses and are cast into poverty. It is only the blessing of the internet that allows Whites to gather and know that their are others who see as we do. The hammer of "racism" is unable to reach through the electronic screen, so far.

Forgive my rant, but Whites live in a time of anti-civilization, but when I was growing up, it was not so. We must turn it around.

Anonymous said...

10mm-

That's why the states such as Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, the Dakotas are seeing growth. Low to none state income tax and almost zero groids BUT the challenge is to keep those states that way.

Cold too, but hey, if there are no groids , no third world turds and peace, I can deal.

White Mom in Turdburg aka WDC

Anonymous said...

No immigrants. We must close our borders.

Just exchanging one set of problems for another. Immigrants drive wages down and displace American citizens.

pat said...

I just finished reading a new book on Jewish history called "The Chosen People" by Richard Lynn. But alas it says nothing about Moses. It confines almost all of its attention to the Middle an Modern Ages.

However I have my own theory about Moses. And that theory is more similar to the real facts of the black Great Migration than is the biblical one.

Warning: the following is not accepted history. Many would call it a "crank" theory.

The ancient Egyptians lived on the "black" earth and spoke a Hamitic language. The black earth was that narrow strip of land that the Nile inundated each year. On both sides was the "red" earth - the desert which could not support life.

Mesopotamia suffered nearly continuous warfare because there were no natural boundaries separating the various kingdoms. But Egypt was isolated from other peoples. It was never invaded until the Hyksos came in on chariots.

The Semitic speaking Hyksos conquered and ruled Hamitic speaking Egyptians and the Egyptians were none too happy about it. But eventually the Egyptians learned how to make their own chariots and expelled most of the Semites.

The Jews were one of those Semite peoples. I think the Egyptians drove many of the other Semite tribes off the black earth into the desert. We don't know because those tribes vanished. The Jews were the one tribe that survived and later became literate. Historians call this survivorship bias.

When the Jews five hundred years later recounted these events they told a story of voluntary and heroic migration not the real story of being driven ignominiously into the desert.

The story of the migration of blacks in Mississippi going north was also not voluntary and heroic.

Rust invented a machine that picked cotton. His great innovation was to wet the spindles. That one tiny change made 79 out of 80 black field hands superfluous.

Blacks were, like the ancient Jews, driven off the land.

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

"We can send robots to Mars, and we can't stop the violence on the South Side of Chicago?" - putting a robot on mars is easier than dealing with the realities of r-selection without offending anyone's sensibilities.

PDK said...

There is of course one big difference between the Hebrews of ancient Eygpt and blacks of America today.

The Isrealites were of high IQ, and in following the demands of their one God, sought prosperity at their own expense. While blacks with a more animalistic, lower IQ seek out prosperity at someone else's expense. This is commonly called parasitism.

Fotunately for the blacks of America there is the savior of white liberals, the whites who fail to mature, and the ideology that is born of that immaturity.

Further fortunately for all those of the alliance, all those who vote democrat, our Founding Fathers limited enfranchised democracy has been transmogryfied into a fully enfranchised democracy.

This, among other realities, allows the losers to become the winners and "run the ball", or "rule the roost".

Most unfortunately for all humanity, when the losers are in control, civilization goes downhill.

Goodbye my prosperous country of liberty, wealth and happiness, hello my multiculteral, diverse and intergrated country of tyranny, poverty and misery.

We are doomed. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

"Is it short-sighted for me to cheer on the immigrants? " - If hispanics were replacing blacks it might not be totally idiotic, but they are merely displacing them to elsewhere which is ultimately if not immediately more harmful.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous@2:29 Yes it's short-sighted of you to cheer on immigrants. White neighborhoods get Section 8 bombs while Asian and Mexican neighborhoods(at least in LA)become almost 100% of their respective group without anyone bothering them. These aren't really hostile to whites but they aren't overly concerned what happens to whites either.

Anonymous said...

So Jesse wants to bring the troops down on his people and declare martial law in Chicago. I hope realizes that with this would come a loss of many of the freedoms they enjoy now, not to mention their civil rights. Or maybe has some kind of special lenient martial that is sensitive to the special circumstances of the black criminal. No search and siezure without warrants, just a few Homeland security vans driving around giving people violence tickets. In a way I would like to see Jesse get his way, because if DHS were to open fire on group of unruly youths Jesse could kiss his career goodbye. But alas to enact marshall law on just blacks would be to racist.

Lily White said...

I'm going to conclude that Jesse Jackson is going to say he wants Homeland Security patrolling the streets of Chicago right up to the moment that the first black thug gets shot (back at) by an agent. At which point, ol' Jesse will insist that the government is picking on the poor, pitiful black populace of Chicago, and act like it wasn't his idea in the first place. And the media, of course will play right along.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....There is no cure for the black problem and that IS THE PROBLEM. The bleeding heart dumb liberal assholes have been fixing the problem for 50 years and all it does is get worst. Nothing works. Forget trying to fix it. It is like using kerosine to put out a fire.

The blacks are in the process of self-destruction. They are killing each other in droves and I do not see that as something that the white man should try and cure. Fuck them. They are living and dieing in a world they created and it is not the white man's job to fix it.

I am strongly against disarming the black population. The more guns in the hood the better. We are dealing with cold blooded murderers who enjoy killing each other and we should not be interfering in the carnage. There are no innocent BLACK VICTIMS when their own children are doing the killing. They are all in it together. When they turn a modern city into a killing field that is no ones fault but their own. No one can help them because they are beyond help. The black population is on a downward slide into their own death and destruction. Why is it that the ones that caused the problem are always the ones calling for help to fix it. They shit in their own nest now let them sleep in it.

Anonymous said...

see Drudge today.

(Reuters) - Civil rights leader Jesse Jackson and relatives of victims of fatal shootings in Chicago urged President Barack Obama on Saturday to come back to his hometown and address the gun violence plaguing the city.

Before a march on the city's South Side, Jackson, a former Democratic presidential candidate, said America's third most populous city needed more help than Mayor Rahm Emanuel and police superintendent Garry McCarthy could offer.

"When the president shows up, it shows ultimate national seriousness," said Jackson, a Chicago resident. He also called for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to help patrol the streets of Chicago.

Gun violence in Chicago has been in the national spotlight over the past year, with 506 murders in 2012, an increase of 17 percent from the previous year. As of Thursday, there were 42 homicides and 157 shootings so far this year, according to Chicago police.

Anonymous said...

No immigrants. We must close our borders.

Just exchanging one set of problems for another. Immigrants drive wages down and displace American citizens.

February 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM

Immigrants are tools of the left
and hurt working people..
including the blacks the dems love so.

Bogolyubski said...

White Mom:
That's why the states such as Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, the Dakotas are seeing growth. Low to none state income tax and almost zero groids BUT the challenge is to keep those states that way.

That will not be possible unless the machine which feeds, maintains and expands BRA is destroyed. You came under fire here for skipping out on debts, but the machine which makes BRA possible is founded on the principle of debt-slavery. That's why another name for it is the slave power (a term which has roots in the abolitionist movement of the 1800s). Average whites like the ones described so well by ex-NY are not really prosperous. They only appear to be prosperous because of the massive debt load they are under. If large enough numbers of white debt and tax slaves simply stopped payments the machine would seize up and crash. That will not happen unless sufficient numbers realize - at a gut level - that the system they are participating in is designed to enslave and ultimately exterminate them, their kids and their grandkids.

The great challenge we face is getting these folks to stop buying into the system. It is actually a system which is designed to loot them and leave them peniless and ultimately in literal slavery to the squids and their loyal nomenklatura. Ex-NY described how these white folks in flyover country, who generally only see groids on TV, cannot turn off the frickin' TV. How many millions will spend this evening glued to a mindless (probably rigged) game enacted between squads of groids between ads from squid-owned entities? The media machine needs to be destroyed completely. It would be far better for such people if the airwaves had nothing but white noise. The media propaganda machine has developed ways to program folks at an emotional level which makes them quite immune to all of the hard facts and empirical evidence most of us here bring forth. We need to develop methods to counter the emotional programming. Trouble is, the squids and their always-loyal TWMNBN nomenklatura have been at this programming since the 1920s.

PDK said...

A cautionary word of wise advice to all fellow non-liberal whites; trading one problem, blacks, for another problem, browns, almost always ends in two problems.

The unintended consequences of good intentions usually end in folly. For example, when the rats disboarded the white ships ported in the Hawaiian Islands back in the 18th century, they quickly multiplied. So in an effort to curtail the problem, the mongoose was imported to take care of the rat infestation.

Unfortunately, the mongoose hunts during the day but the rats come out at night. Therefore Hawaii now has two problems. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Je$$e wants your pension funds to transfer to low income (black) people:

PUSH!

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/jesse-jackson-proposes-creation-of-a-new-lender/?nl=business&emc=edit_dlbkam_20130131

Anonymous said...

Bogolyubski:

I completely agree. I don't care that I came under fire here, I just hope I made people think.

Whites have to stop paying credit cards, their mortgages, their car payments, their student loan payments. Just stop.

Anytime I meet whites complaining about debts: students, my friend with seven kids...I tell them to get schooled on the entitlements and stop paying. I mentor them...a big piece is FEAR. We start by chipping away at the fear. Be fearless.

The problem is twofold here: 1) the white society is so divided, haves or really in debt people putting on the dog so to speak versus working class whites, and then of course, the elites; and 2)the gaslighting or brainwashing of whites into thinking "if only I just pay this bill or if only I work harder.". Everyone is so busy trying to keep up with the Jones so to speak. In the process, white procreation is slowing and white culture is dying.

It takes a complete paradigm shift in thinking. Believe me, I had a nearly 700 credit score on 2005-2006, then when everything crashed I said fuck it...its them (the banks) or me...and it is going o be me.

Blacks are a BIG part of the problem, BUT whites must free themselves from their previous paradigms and do a complete shift in their thinking. We must stop being divided in our community. Embrace ANYONE white, regardless if they are gay, lesbian, single, married, divorced, receiving welfare.....we must do this while collectively striking our debts.

Blacks got power back in the 60's because they unified. They still unify through don't snitch, as messed up as it is...

You have got to fight fire with fire and we are under fire so it is time to fight. There is nothing to FEAR!

White Mom in Turdburg

Anonymous said...

Not even Obama wants any part of Chicago, or any black city for that matter. Each one is no less than a never-ending social black hole that produces nothing. Even actual black holes create superheated jets of matter. Black cities do nothing but consume the time, effort, and money of anyone foolish enough to become entangled in them.

PDK said...

Obama, just as Danny, bad mouthing whites, Glover, hate white people, but they won't leave the supposedly white America, why? because they are not stupid, they are just Aholes, capeesh? thanks.

Anonymous said...

Tawana Brawley NY Post

Pagones will never see a dime.


EXPOSED: Tawana Brawley had been living in hiding in Virginia until The Post tracked her down.


Infamous hoaxster Tawana Brawley — whose outrageous rape lie 25 years ago inflamed racial tensions nationwide — yesterday was finally slapped with a court order to settle a hefty defamation case against her.

“For at least 25 years, she has been living a major lie,” said former Dutchess County prosecutor Steven Pagones, who was falsely accused of raping Brawley in 1987 and finally tracked her down, thanks to The Post.

“To me, this has always been about responsibility and accountability,’’ added the former ADA, who won the $190,000 defamation lawsuit against Brawley, 40, now a nurse in Virginia, more than a decade ago.

At 9 percent interest, that debt, which Brawley never attempted to pay off, now totals $431,492, according to the wage-garnishment papers filed in Virginia’s Surry County Court.

Californian said...

I'm going to conclude that Jesse Jackson is going to say he wants Homeland Security patrolling the streets of Chicago right up to the moment that the first black thug gets shot (back at) by an agent. At which point, ol' Jesse will insist that the government is picking on the poor, pitiful black populace of Chicago, and act like it wasn't his idea in the first place.


Same with the War on Drugs. Black leaders demanded that the government crack down on drugs, and when the government did, complained about police repression in the inner cities. It's all demagoguery, playing to the passions of the moment and then when it hits the fan, laying the blame elsewhere.

Business as usual in BRA...

Jay Santos said...

Sending Homeland Security to patrol the streets of Chicago is an excellent idea. What we have in Chicago and many other cities is nothing less than a war on African-american youth. If the President can bring the expertise of the DHS to bear on this problem, we can save the lives of countless African-americans.

I believe once DHS is present on every street and every business and begins a concentrated effort to search and question Chicago residents, we will begin to see a reduction in the horrible violence inflicted on our African-american youth. Let us begin to treat this problem with the seriousness it deserves. We can not afford to lose these black youth to violence. These young African-americans are our future.

I urge you to copy the text above and send it to your representatives. We must have Chicago occupied by the DHS.

City resident said...

The point about 94% of shooters getting away with it is something not to be overlooked. Because of the focus on the homicide body count people forget that getting shot also has quite an impact. Plenty of them end up in wheelchairs or with other lifelong disabilities. The bill for this can be tremendous, hundreds of thousands spent for hospitalization, rehab, and permanent disability checks. Millions and millions of dollars spent just to rescue worthless gangbangers.
Blacks do not want police protection. They have a hostile attitude towards them and have marched against them continually. Every day they march about some baloney or other. They never cooperate. Spend tax money where it'll do some good and that's in the white areas where the money originates to begin with.

PDK said...

I also read about Tawana and Pagones; Pagones in an earlier statement said if she apologises thats good enough for him.

I wonder what she wiil choose? choose to pay, or come clean. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Sometimes when I read the few race realist websites I wonder if there is ANY hope for my people at all.

Rant and rave, blacks this, browns that. On and on and on.

Of what use is it?

Let me draw you an analogy. Let us envision physicians with a patient suffering from a bacterial infection. These physicians rant and rave about how bad these bacterium are. Terrible terrible bacterium! Look at how they eat the healthy flesh, destroying everything good and healthy in their path. Bad bacterium! Then the physician sends the patient home with instruction to say, "Bad bacterium!" until he eventually dies from the infection.

That's what we are doing. That's ALL we are doing.

What is the point in stating the obvious? What is the point in blaming an African for behaving as and having the mental attributes of ... (Wait for it) ... Yes! An African! Or in blaming Indians (as our Mexican neighbors primarily are if we could only give things their proper name) for behaving as Indians? Will this fix our problem? Can this ever fix our problem? Or is this about as helpful as Joe Sixpack sitting on his ass watching gangs of non-whites play children's games on television?

Why can't we determine WHY we have this problem and then focus on that? Instead of yelling bad names at the bacterium, let's figure out why the bacterium has infected us and devise a means then of ending whatever encouraged its invasion? And please, no pathetic Jew-blaming. "Those bad men wearing beanies did this to us" is perhaps more pathetic than Joe Sixpack cheering on a pack of thugs that would rape his daughter and beat his son to death.

How did the Africans get here? The same way the Mexicans are currently getting here. Greedy short sighted whites who placed personal gain ahead of EVERYTHING. Cheap labor. And a public that preferred cheap goods and services so they could sit on their asses and watch Africans play games with balls.

In other words, look around you. Your neighbors. Your fellow churchgoers (especially if your church engages in "refugee resettlement"). Your boss. Your co-workers. Maybe YOU.

You want to stop all this? Begin by stopping EVERY thing you do which encourages it. Stop watching television. Stop buying crap from people who employ Mexicans (most Africans are state funded now so all we can do there is tax revolt). Publically BURN any professional sports trinkets, college sports trinkets, etc. SHAME your friends and neighbors who refuse to do the same. SHUN those whom you cannot shame.

Our ancestors did this to us. Our fathers and grandfathers. Shame THEM! And then make the hard choices, choose the hard work, DO something to ensure you are not contributing to the genocide of your race. Most importantly, remember to fight the disease and not the symptom. Africans will always be Africans. You cannot "fix" that. But whites who embrace the African MUST be stopped or we will become extinct.

Stan Mute

deconstructingleftism said...

The original idea in the 80's of Mexican immigration was to replace blacks. It didn't work.

Californian said...

Why can't we determine WHY we have this problem and then focus on that?

To some degree that is a purpose of a website like SBPDL, and of many more which are appearing on the Internet. It's to gain an understanding of the factors leading to our current situation. And also to develop a political line which can guide action.

You are right in stating that scapegoating people will not work. What is needed is intelligent political action.

As you note, turning off your TV, stopping worshiping at the temple of professional sports, and so forth, are all things which the average person can so.

Eventually, this has to move into lawfare and such, for example: bringing suits in the court to end discrimination against white people, forming white advocacy groups, etc.

It's like any other insurgency: if white people can take the long view and build a movement, they can swing a victory down the line.

Jassi said...

Way off topic-

Here is an open question to any white folk who wish to answer. I was actually considering going to the Amren Convention this year to ask this question to any of the speakers but I'll put it up here as well.

There is an inherent pro-White and sometimes pro-Christian component to most talk about the national problem of black usurpation of political and social power.

I am married to a woman from North India and I am of the Sikh faith.People often assume that I'm a liberal or hippy being that I wear a beard and a turban,yet I'm quite conservative and agree with essentially everything that I read on sites like SBPDL and many Alt Right forums.Many here have said they married Japanese or Koreans and I can assume there are other whites with some slightly different lifestyles.Where do those of us who have married interracially and those who may not follow a traditional Christian lifestyle fit into any potential future white nation?

It probably sounds strange, but even many of us who are married to foreigners still prefer to live amongst whites, and would want to take part in,and potentially fight for,a white homeland.

While creating nations,dividing land etc. we are dividing people. There must be some pretty well defined in groups and out groups. What might be the criteria?

Mr. Rational said...

Anonymous said:  Let us envision physicians with a patient suffering from a bacterial infection. These physicians rant and rave about how bad these bacterium are. Terrible terrible bacterium!

But that is not analogous our situation.  What we have instead is a raging bacterial infection, and our faith healers are saying "You have a racist spirit, go home and pray until you have purified yourself".  They have specifically said that recognizing the actual problem makes you a bad person.  If you say that you need an antibiotic, they call you evil.

Once we get over the issue of naming the problem correctly, fixing it becomes relatively easy.

What is the point in stating the obvious?

Because it is taboo, that's what.  The taboo must be broken first.

Anonymous said...

Jesse is NOT a reverend!

I'll never understand why the media continues to call him that.

At least the Reuters reporter got one thing right, but screwed up when she called him a civil rights leader.

A lot of people despise him for his role in the MLK assassination, including the MLK family.

He doesn't care for civil rights, unless it affects his pocketbook, and even so, no one sees him as a leader anymore.

Stephen said...

It's easy Jassi, permanent banishment of race traitors and their descendants from all White nations. You're a two-faced hypocrite if you claim White sovereignty and betray your own race by copulating with non-whites.

Bogolyubski said...

At 9 percent interest, that debt, which Brawley never attempted to pay off, now totals $431,492, according to the wage-garnishment papers filed in Virginia’s Surry County Court.

Chump change for a squid like Soros. He wouldn't even feel it missing. Good for Pagones for tracking that lying sheboon down. I hope he collects. At least that will be a half million the squids won't have to spend on "anti-rayciss" activities. I wish there were a way we could bleed them billions.

europeasant said...

"The blacks are in the process of self-destruction. They are killing each other in droves and I do not see that as something that the white man should try and cure."

Even though blacks are killing each other at great rates they are reproducing themselves at even greater rates. This is being helped by our socialist system through section 8 housing vouchers, food stamps, school lunches, state and federal social programs.
The population of blacks in 1800 was 1 million. By 1900 it was 8.8 million, in 1950 it jumped to 15 million. Today it currently stands at 40 some million. So even though some claim that the percent has not increased beyond 12 or so per cent, we see a constant increase in total even though the white population might be as low currently as 60%.
By the way, the African population of sub Saharan blacks at the turn of the last century (1900) was around 100 million. By the year 2010 that population is expected to reach 1 billion. Let's not even look into how many blacks live in the Caribbean area.
Bottom line. The blacks are a very sexually aggressive race. Their fertility rate is much more than ours. At the same time they are always crying about how poor they are and how much they need our help.
Stupid white people are just contributing to the population explosion of blacks. I say, let nature take her course. Of course there are too many stupid white people who believe in nurture over nature.

Bogolyubski said...

Jassi:
Where do those of us who have married interracially and those who may not follow a traditional Christian lifestyle fit into any potential future white nation?

I don't think most Alt-right or WNs would care that much, though some might be annoyed. The chief thing we seek is self-preservation in the broadest sense of that term. Since Christianity as it is presently constituted is actually part of the genocidal enemy - I fail to see why Sikhism (or even Islam - pace Zenster) constitutes a greater threat. When the head of a major Evangelical Christian organization like Focus on the Family advocated that "there needs to be more families like President Obama's" (e.g. white-black pairings) - he's essentially advocating the eradication of whites via miscegenation. Sikhs and Asians, though certainly different, are racially and temperamentally closer to whites than groids will ever be.

Anonymous said...

Now we know what those 4 billion rounds of hollow points that Obama bought for dhs army are for....begin game here.

Zimri said...

Where do those of us who have married interracially and those who may not follow a traditional Christian lifestyle fit into any potential future white nation?

If it were a federated "white" republic, people like us would fit in those states which tolerated people like us. It might even tolerate a few black-oriented states.

Such a republic wouldn't be a democracy, of course. It might not even be a republic. (But I'm fine with that.)

Anonymous said...

They can free themselves by not going into debt in the first place. It is immoral and unethical to deliberately take on debt with no intention on paying it back. That is called STEALING!
8th commandment....you shall not steal!
If everyone wanted to starve the beast, they could do out by not taking out loans. No one forced you to take loans then reNIG.

Californian said...

Jassi, you raise a good point. Let me give you my thoughts...

Realistically, a white republic or Christian America or even return to a strict construction of the US Constitution is so far in the future as to be utopian.

What is needed today is an alliance of all peoples who are fighting against the "system." Race realists will not get anywhere by themselves, at least not in the immediate future. They currently lack the numbers, the funding, and the connections.

A lesson might be taken from the leftist playbook: form coalitions of groups which who have similar interests in undermining the power structure. Black power advocates, radical feminists, jihadis, secular marxists, etc., all march together. They unify, they carve out power niches, they get control of that university, corporate foundation and political party.

There's a leftwing tactic called Points of Agreement. You get various dissident groups together, find a small number of issues they all agree on, and hammer out a platform based on them. Jettison all the ideological squabbling; concentrate on what can be accomplished in the real world. This is one reason the left is able to leverage small numbers into big power. It's why they can get their man into the White House.

Today in America, it is just not race realists who realize that something's wrong with the system. It's men's rights activists, gun owners, Ron Paul followers, anti-Jihadis, Tea Party marchers, Internet activists, Oath Keepers, and just a lot of plain ordinary folk of all persuasions. I'd even say there are populists in what's left of the anti-globalization movement who don't particularly cotton to what the system is up to.

But often, pointless ideological differences keep these groups divided. As a result, they generally make little progress or if they do, their efforts dissipate (see the Tea Party). Their power base is not wide enough to radically change the system.

The immediate tactical problem is to create sufficient power such that the system can be challenged. It would be entirely possible for a coalition of groups to set up a legal defense organization which would initiate lawsuits against affirmative action, or fight censorship of Internet sites such as SBPDL, or whatever. Similarly, you could have a network of online broadcasters who promote issues common to all anti-system movements. Or even a nationwide alliance of gunowners drawn from all these movements.

What is needed is realistic political action, which means living up to the American Revolutionary slogan: "Unite or Die!"

Anonymous said...

Well Jassi there are two ways it will likely go. The first, a return to the post great era of migration immigration system will simply close off future immigration, and small groups that are already here will be largely ignored. If one the other hand things are pushed to their breaking point, take your pick of historical examples, all of them tend to be negative though.

Anonymous said...

Good link...but the government has dibs on those funds.

eah said...

surprising stats

How could these statistics be in any way "surprising"?

And not only because Chicago has a large number of Blacks, whose criminality -- especially murderous, violent criminality -- is known to be very high (as so well exposed and documented here on this site).

But also because over the last several decades Chicago has become significantly Hispanic, most of them from Mexico. Per this country per capital murder rate Wikipedia page, the per capita murder rate in Mexico is approx 5x that of the US. And you have to remember that the per capita rate in the US is boosted by the aforementioned ├╝berviolent Blacks as well as the Hispanics already here.

Anonymous said...

Jassi said...There must be some pretty well defined in groups and out groups. What might be the criteria?

I'd call for people to act in such a manner as to maintain a civil society:

* No demands for affirmative action, forced busing, minorities-only contracts/scholarships, or any other program based on color-of-skin.
* Violent crime rates must be within reasonable national averages.
* Individual responsibility, meaning no taxpayer bail outs for mass illegitimacy, trashed cities or Wall Street con games.
* Respect for education.
* Maintaining neighborhoods as livable places (i.e., thou shalt not lower thy neighbors' property values!).
* No race hustling, guilt tripping, demands for special history months, and etc.
* And certainly no more burning down sectors of cities if you do not get your way.
* Last but not least: respect the US Constitution as strictly constructed.

These standards are entirely realistic and were largely in force up until the mid-20th century. Mayflower descendants, Ellis Island immigrants, even many blacks could live up to them.

Today, collectively, blacks or at least their leaders (and we have to include many disingenuous white liberals among them), have tossed these standards out the proverbial window. SBPDL documents this with dreary regularity. I mean, how is it that black majority rule can trash a city like Detroit in a mere few decades?

This is what creates such polarization among race realists. The collective pathologies of BRA make many white people want to circle the proverbial wagons and hoist the flag proclaiming "Whites Only!" To be cliche, a lot of babies get thrown out with the bathwater.

danaigh said...

Jassi:

Every town in America has it's in-group and out-groups. Even within a 90+ % white demographic there are divisions by; income, age, education, kinship, religion and personal traits among others. If there is a 'white' consciousness among whites is is buried under mountains of deceptions and disguises.

However, you will always find friends and groups that accept you as you are. But sadly you will meet those who are very clannish and boorish. That is a fact of life.

My advise: Cherish your friends. Something along the advise given in Desiderata.

From: An old white guy.

Anonymous said...

@Stan Mute

Excellent post sir! I agree...the time for action is now. I would URGE all my fellow reader here to turn your TV off forever...I haven't watched mine for close to a year now. If it is on somewhere, I leave the room. And it's not even the programming so much...it's the commercials most of all. They are insidious propaganda that still affects your mind even if you are aware of it!

Anonymous said...

The Latino question is an interesting one when you take a more global view. If one looks at the birthplace of Latino culture (Spain and Portugal), one sees little difference with the remainder of Europe. Madrid, Barcelona, and Lisbon aren't much different than other European cities.

In the western hemisphere, those Latin nations that have a higher concentration of Europeans or at the very least have Europeans in control of the machinations of society (Argentina) also enjoy a higher level of culture.

Those countries that have a larger Indian population (Mexico) have a society that has far more corruption and moral decay. The countries that have the additional burden of African descendants (Brazil, Dominican Rep.) are even further in the toilet.

Dissident said...

In response to Jassi.

My thought is that we could all potentially get along together if all races and all different cultures would embrace the traditional Western/Christian/ European style civilization.

Regardless of where we come from, my idea is that when in Rome do as the Romans. I am unapologetically in favor of the style of civilization that we have formerly had in this country and it used to be that foreigners coming here would assimilate as opposed to integrate.

Todays Multicultural meme is that it's now racist to even suggest such a thing. This is the death knell of any advanced society.

Western countries; through purposeful design-via immigration policies, has allowed non-European majorities to entrench themselves into the host nations with ferocity. When the native population complains, they are brow beaten by that nations elite and their bought and paid for media.

To summarize: Unless we have a common idealogy of liberty and a strong sense of justice then we're finished as an advanced nation. We're going to be relegated to fighting demogogues and tribalistic enclaves of people with no common foundation. No legacy of history to draw upon.

No foundation of freedom.

Anonymous said...

"Why can't we determine WHY we have this problem and then focus on that?"

Here is what I have done so far:

homeschool my kids to avoid schools and pop culture (check out Mindweapons blog)
grow food, use manual tools, get off grid
no debt
moving to cash-only and bartering
teach kids TRUE American history
healthy food, avoid doctors and drugs
avoid stores like Target which hire only black thugs
avoid Mexican restaurants, immigrant businesses
support local white farmers at market
stop donating to charities, unless local or vets.
turn off TV, movies, etc.
try to convert friends and family from liberalism
call in to local radio talk show with comments
send links to friends and family
learn how to use a firearm for personal defense
become more aware of my surroundings
teach my kids real skills

So in other words, we are doing things to help the situation.

What exactly are you doing, Anon? I would like to know how you are helping to eliminate the bacteria.

Anonymous said...

Paul Kersey,

It would be interesting for you to do a couple of articles comparing old school Jewish, Irish, and Italian(mostly Sicilian) organized crime and African-American gangs of the last 40 years.

With the old-time gangsters if some hot head gangster shot up the streets killing innocent bystanders in a drive by or engaged in unauthorized killings of civilian "snitches" for "personal not business reasons", they themselves were killed.

Famous prime examples being:

Mad Dog Cole and Albert Anastasia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_Dog_Coll#Alleged_child_killer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Anastasia#Boss

Jewish, Irish and Sicilian gangs had their share of sociopaths and psychopaths, but there was enough discipline and organization that urban neighborhoods where these gangs operated were relatively chaos free. The fact that the older generation white gang leaders frowned on drug dealing and would not tolerate hard drug use among members probably helped a lot.

Sure, Jewish, Irish and Italian organized crime were notorious for shaking down their neighborhood's legitimate businesses for "protection money". Paying for protection was a "street tax" but small business owners would gladly pay it in return for being assured that if any unconnected street hoodlum was dumb enough to attempt to rob or assault them, the punk would be dealt with. Not only that, but the some Irish, Italian and quite a few Jewish mobsters were able to create perfectly legitimate businesses with their illegal profits.

The only "businesses" black gangsters seen to be able to create, are fronts for receiving government handouts. Think the infamous "El Rukn" founder Jeff Fort and his numerous scams.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almighty_Black_P._Stone_Nation#History

Even today Hispanic gangs to some degree are able to run "protection" rackets and therefore allow for legitimate small business to thrive in their gang turf.

Many of the today's worst crime ridden neighborhoods in Chicago, especially on the west side were once prime haunts of the old white ethnic gangs of the 20's through 50's.

My point being is that blank gang members are far more likely to be from the far left regions of the bell curve in terms of IQ, time preference, and psychopathy vs empathy than their historical white counterparts.

Anonymous said...

Many of the today's worst crime ridden neighborhoods in Chicago, especially on the west side were once prime haunts of the old white ethnic gangs of the 20's through 50's.

My point being is that blank gang members are far more likely to be from the far left regions of the bell curve in terms of IQ, time preference, and psychopathy vs empathy than their historical white counterparts


The parasites always and everywhere slay the hosts?

Jassi said...

You could also look to the yakuza and find a similar code of ethics in organized crime.
Yamaguchi Gumi has legitimate business in the stock exchange.

andros said...

Jassi isn't sikh and north indian virtually the same genetically.

I know india is very caste driven. We've determined that the european culture is the culture that is most beneficial to the largest audience exposure.

We have to answer the question, why do so many non whites want to live in white communities?

Because those communities florish they are stable and its a pleasant environment, most humans want that sought of life, but because of genetic traits, that lifestyle isn't possible,

All we ask is for humans to adopt those precepts, its what everyone wants afterall.

We see north indians that lived and worked in silicon valley take these universal precepts with them back to north india, and those suburbs because of the universal truths start producing a community that is stable, respectful, technological, and somewhere where humans want to live in.

Now compare those north indian silcone vally legacy neighbourhoods to the rest of india, and the difference is like night and day.

If everyone adopted these universal ways, the world would be better.

All we ask is ppl to adopt them, like those indians that returned from silicon valley back to india, as do the japanese, and south koreans.

All humans want the basics deep down, a warm safe dry place to sleep at night, enough food, pleasant neighbours, nothing mysterious really

This should be easily achievable

pat said...

There is of course one big difference between the Hebrews of ancient Egypt and blacks of America today.

The Israelites were of high IQ


That doesn't seem to be true. Jews have high IQs now but didn't seem to have had them then.

Yesterday I read the newest book by Richard Lynn "The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement". It's not a very big book so it's a quick read. It documents Jewish intellectual accomplishments. But those accomplishments seem to have only begun in the High Middle Ages not in classical antiquity.

The main evidence for the Jews not being particularly smart before about the year 1000 is Vegetius and Josephson.

Vegetius, the vastly influential military theorist, wrote an analysis of the brain power of the various peoples in the Roman Empire. He concluded that the Greeks were the smartest and never even mentioned the Jews. Joshepson the Jewish traitor, sycophant to Vespasian and historian never mentions any remarkable Jewish brain power in his large history of the Jewish peoples.

Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending have a book in which they claim that Jews underwent selective pressure for intelligence. Personally I always though the Jews got smart in the mid fourteenth century when they went through a evolutionary choke point. At such times a small number of survivors can reestablish a population with drastically different characteristics from the previous population. These are called "founder's effects".

Alas it couldn't have been in the fourteenth century. Lynn cites too many cases of Jewish achievement earlier than that. So I was wrong.

Lynn's book is comprehensive and exhaustive but still doesn't really explain the mystery of Jewish intellect IMHO.

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

I would URGE all my fellow reader here to turn your TV off forever...I haven't watched mine for close to a year now.

Good to see you dumping the "boob tube!"

Anonymous said...

I've always considered blacks to be a biblical 11th plague. There is one glaring difference though- the 10 biblical plagues came and went. The black plague goes on and on and on and increases in virulence over time.
The Mestizo plague is exactly the same and could well be termed the 12th Plague. Having lived in Los Angeles both prior to and after the Reagan Amnesty, I've seen the full effects of that plague and moved back east as I didn't want to live in freaking Tijuana Del Norte. The major company I worked for sold out to a south american conglomerate and was dissolved/destroyed and turned into a series of hispanic owned and operated mama and papi type stores that wouldn't hire anyone unless they spoke fluent spanish.
For the past 25 years, I've lived in a predominantly white area which is quite clannish and does not easily accept outsiders. Even whites have a hard time if they aren't from the area and have no relatives in the area. Breaking through the barriers takes time and effort and one has to earn acceptance. It's 10 times harder for groids, Mestizo's and libtards as the area is conservative and those groups find themselves more or less shunned by the majority.
No matter what the government does, they can't force us to befriend those groups, force us to accept and associate with them or treat them as if they were long lost friends.
Over the years, I've heard numerous complaints in public places by members of such groups about how difficult it is here and how "unfriendly." I recall with great satisfaction hearing one groid screeching about it and saying, "Fuck dis place! I'm going to Atlanta!" The casual visitor might not find it glaringly unfriendly but if they are "inspired" to move here, that all changes dramatically.
Whites need to get clannish as hell and that will drive the undesirables out as they'll head for "greener" pastures where things "be easier." That being said, there's no hope for places that have already allowed themselves to be over-run.





josh said...

Exactly WHO is the Homeland Security army? Do they have one? Who would be patrolling the shtreets? The TSA?(Thugs Standing Around)Are they gonna create some kind of urban security squad. You wnat that? And WHO is gonna be hired to be in the squad?? So they hire black males and give them guns and radios and cars and authority...I dont know,something doesnt seem right.What the guy said about the rats and the mongooses. (Mongeese?)

Anonymous said...

Exactly what is the expertise of the DHS? They seem to be an agencey of titles no foot soldiers to speak of. They seem to be information gatherers.

panjoomby said...

successful parasites keep their hosts alive indefinitely, but in a weaker state. stupid parasites kill their hosts immediately.

panjoomby said...

hispanic gangs have a code of honor, & are violent only when it's business (similar to mafia). hispanic gangs keep neighborhoods safe (again - similar to mafia).
Conversely...
black gangs commit random violence & make neighborhoods worse.

Bob1313 said...

And the Chocolate Jesus importing 50,000 Somalis a month sure as hell isn't helping, he's basically replacing all of the little government funded, aborted little hood rats....

Anonymous said...

They will follow. They always do. The standard for wealth in the US is a white one. The bottom of the barrel blacks are ignorant and greedy. Whites build something nice and blacks come and destray it. Disneyworld will very soon look like the free neighborhoid carnivals that they drive for miles to overun with disorder and violence or Chuck E Cheese. When Obama was elected this last bastion of decent enjoyment started showing the creep of low pants, foul language and falling out while the giant women expect special mobility vehicles

Anonymous said...

JJ and his made up words. Must not have been enough black crime and violence in the news that day.

Anonymous said...

You wouldn't happen to be from a certain part of PA would you? :)

Discard said...

Albertosaurus: My guess on the matter of Jewish intelligence is that widespread Torah study was a good way to sort by intelligence. A poor boy who proved able at learning the Hebrew scriptures could have a bright future within the Jewish community, maybe even marry a rich man's daughter if he was real smart. Do that for a thousand years and you get a higher average IQ.
This, btw, is not an idea that I came up with myself, but I think it makes a lot of sense.

Discard said...

Regarding non-Black minorities: We Whites have been extremely generous to non-Whites for the last fifty years and been shit on for our decency. Any tolerance of non-Whites ought be dependent on the recognition of White supremacy. Non-Whites could be perhaps allowed some kind of second class citizenship, an absolute limit on the proportion of non-Whites in the population must be established, no further non-White immigration for any reason should be accepted, and any other condotion Whites feel is necessary. If you don't like it, go build your own civilization elsewhere.

Discard said...

Regarding non-Black minorities: We Whites have been extremely generous to non-Whites for the last fifty years and been shit on for our decency. Any tolerance of non-Whites ought be dependent on the recognition of White supremacy. Non-Whites could be perhaps allowed some kind of second class citizenship, an absolute limit on the proportion of non-Whites in the population must be established, no further non-White immigration for any reason should be accepted, and any other condotion Whites feel is necessary. If you don't like it, go build your own civilization elsewhere.