No, he's not talking about diversity initiatives or quotas.
No, he's not talking about the nationwide scheme to promote non-whites on the basis of "inclusion" or fighting disparate impact.
|"The Tragedy" is coming to a city near you. Former Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's words punctuate this depressing fact...|
The former Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner only spoke Black-Run America (BRA) truth to power when he told a nationwide audience whiteness equals success, and that the government has a duty to change this, since it "should worry all Americans."[Geithner: ‘How Well You Do in Life . . . Depends Too Much on the Color of Your Skin’, CNS News, May 19, 2014]:
Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday said how well one does in life “depends too much on the color of your skin and how rich your parent is.”Geithner is a perfect example of the type of individual promoted by the ruling class, one completely dedicated to struggle against whiteness; one completely oblivious to the fact 'whiteness' sets a standard of achievement that 'blackness' can't replicate, without government assistance; one completely dedicated to ensuring the facsimile of the conditions found in 83 percent black Detroit occur nationwide.
“How well you do in life today, how good your education is, how good your health care is, depends too much on the color of your skin and how rich your parent is. And that’s something that should worry all Americans,” said Geithner. “Now, those are things government can do things about.
Courtesy of the United States government.
This belief, that whiteness continues to be the barrier by which success is garnered, is held by virtually every individual holding a position of power in the Federal Government ("now, those are things government can do things about," is the chilling reminder of just how far the government's ruling class is willing to go to rectify the perceived inequities caused by whiteness).
Promotion up the ladder requires a blind devotion to this ideology.
It's the ultimate 'moral behavior' in Black-Run America (BRA) for white people - of ruling class status or those hoping for a seat at the table or near the table of power - to believe the inherent evil of whiteness and work assiduously to wage an full-scale war on white privilege.
Hence the reason JP Morgan will commit 1/10 of a billion dollars to aid 83 percent black Detroit, a city whose present morbid condition is a reflection of the quality of life the black individuals there collectively create.
The lack of whiteness in the city is blamed as the reason for the porous societal (lack of social capital) found in the black capital of America. [JPMorgan Committing $100 Million over 5 Years to Aid Revitalization in Detroit, New York Times, May 21, 2014]:
JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s biggest bank, will provide $100 million to help debt-ridden Detroit with housing repairs, blight removal, job training and economic development projects over the next five years, according to two people with direct knowledge of the plans.
The investment, a mix of loans and grants, will add to a growing pile of money from outside private institutions as the city nears the final, painful stages of the nation’s largest municipal bankruptcy proceeding. Detroit filed for bankruptcy protection in July, with an estimated $18 billion in long-term debt. This summer, a federal judge will decide whether to approve a plan that would allow the city to exit bankruptcy court by mid-October.
Falling income tax receipts in the late 1970s - early 1980s, correlating directing with the rise of the black population and fall in the white population, meant Detroit relied heavily on grants and aid from the federal government to pays its growing bills...In recent days, the city has been lobbying to secure nearly $200 million in funding from Michigan lawmakers, who are wary of setting a precedent by using taxpayer dollars to bail out a major metropolis. If approved, the state funding would be part of a so-called grand bargain that would also include hundreds of millions of dollars from philanthropic foundations. The money would be used to cushion pension cuts for Detroit retirees and avert the sale of the city’s art collection. The Legislature is weighing a package of bills regarding the outside funding this week.
Bankrupt today, no organization, corporation, individual, or government agency can dare deny 83 % black Detroit a line of credit or a sizable grant if they want to maintain a seat at the table of BRA power.
That's the height of 'moral behavior' in America.
JoAnn Watson, a Detroit City Council member, spoke BRA truth-to-power when she said it was time for President Obama to bail out the 83 percent black city in late 2012. "Bring home the bacon..."
Don't worry... that's the height of 'moral behavior' in BRA, the transferring of white wealth to non-whites as punishment for the eternal, un-payable debt of the standard of civilization blackness can't replicate, sustain, or even maintain.
Those words have a far different meaning to Robert A. Heinlein, the author of the 20th Centuries most important piece of fiction, Starship Troopers.
In 1973, Heinlein gave the James Forrestal Memorial Lecture to the Brigade of Midshipmen at his alma mater, the United States Naval Academy.
The Pragmatics of Patriotism.
In our time, where the promotion of blackness is the highest moral virtue, the individual - like Tim Geithner - knows his seat at the table of the ruling class is derived by the complete devotion to the BRA, though no one dares point out the end result of such devotion will always be the conditions found in 2014 Detroit.
It's in Heinlein's speech, The Pragmatics of Patriotism, we realize the evolutionary dead end has already occurred in America; people like Geithner, who believe the government's greatest purpose is the eradication of white privilege, has already assured a defective morality is pervasive among the ruling class.
A ruling class accessible only by swearing an oath to the promotion of policies ensuring Detroit's condition is spread from sea-to-shining-sea...
Let us now read the most important passage of Heinlein's talk from 1973, given on April 5th of that year. The city of Detroit was still six months away from electing Coleman Young as the first black mayor...
Very well, as individuals we all die. This brings us to the second half of the question: Does homo sapiens AS A BREED have to die? The answer is: No, it is NOT unavoidable.
We have two situations, mutually exclusive: Mankind surviving, and mankind extinct. With respect to morality, the second situation is a null class. An extinct breed has NO behavior, moral or otherwise.
Since survival is the sine qua non, I now define “moral behavior” as “behavior that tends toward survival.” I won’t argue with philosophers or theologians who choose to use the word “moral” to mean something else, but I do not think anyone can define “behavior that tends toward extinction” as being “moral” without stretching the word “moral” all out of shape.
We are now ready to observe the hierarchy of moral behavior from its lowest level to its highest.
The simplest form of moral behavior occurs when a man or other animal fights for his own survival. Do not belittle such behavior as being merely selfish. Of course it is selfish. . .but selfishness is the bedrock on which all moral behavior starts and it can be immoral only when it conflicts with a higher moral imperative. An animal so poor in spirit that he won’t even fight on his own behalf is already an evolutionary dead end; the best he can do for his breed is to crawl off and die, and not pass on his defective genes.
The next higher level is to work, fight, and sometimes die for your own immediate family. This is the level at which six pounds of mother cat can be so fierce that she’ll drive off a police dog. It is the level at which a father takes a moonlighting job to keep his kids in college — and the level at which a mother or father dives into a flood to save a drowning child. . .and it is still moral behavior even when it fails.
The next higher level is to work, fight, and sometimes die for a group larger that the unit family — an extended family, a herd, a tribe — and take another look at that baboon on watch; he’s at that moral level. I don’t think baboon language is complex enough to permit them to discuss such abstract notions as “morality” or “duty” or “loyalty” — but it is evident that baboons DO operate morally and DO exhibit the traits of duty and loyalty; we see them in action. Call it “instinct” if you like — but remember that assigning a name to a phenomenon does not explain it.
But that baboon behavior can be explained in evolutionary terms. Evolution is a process that never stops. Baboons who fail to exhibit moral behavior do not survive; they wind up as meat for leopards. Every baboon generation has to pass this examination in moral behavior; those who bilge it don’t have progeny. Perhaps the old bull of the tribe gives lessons. . .but the leopard decides who graduates — and there is no appeal from his decision. We don’t have to understand the details to observe the outcome; Baboons behave morally — for baboons.
The next level in moral behavior higher than that exhibited by the baboon is that in which duty and loyalty are shown toward a group of your kind too large for an individual to know all of them. We have a name for that. It is called “patriotism.”
Behaving on a still higher moral level were the astronauts who went to the Moon, for their actions tend toward the survival of the entire race of mankind. The door they opened leads to hope that h. sapiens will survive indefinitely long, even longer than this solid planet on which we stand tonight. As a direct result of what they did, it is now possible that the human race will NEVER die.
Many short-sighted fools think that going to the Moon was just a stunt. But that astronauts knew the meaning of what they were doing, as is shown by Neil Armstrong’s first words in stepping down onto the soil of Luna: “One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”
I must pause to brush off those parlor pacifists I mentioned earlier. . .for they contend that THEIR actions are on this highest moral level. They want to put a stop to war; they say so. Their purpose is to save the human race from killing itself off; they say that too. Anyone who disagrees with them must be a bloodthirsty scoundrel — and they’ll tell you that to your face.
I won’t waste time trying to judge their motives; my criticism is of their mental processes: Their heads aren’t screwed on tight. They live in a world of fantasy.
Let me stipulate that, if the human race managed its affairs sensibly, we could do without war.
Yes — and if pigs had wings, they could fly.
I don’t know what planet those pious pacifists are talking about but it can’t be the third one out from the Sun. Anyone who has seen the Far East — or Africa — or the Middle East — knows are certainly should know that there is NO chance of abolishing war in the foreseeable future. In the past few years I have ben around the world three times, traveled in most of the communist countries, visited many of the so-called emerging countries, plus many trips to Europe and to South America; I saw nothing that cheered me as to the prospects for peace. The seeds of war are everywhere; the conflicts of interest are real and deep, and will not be abolished by pious platitudes.
The best we can hope for is a precarious balance of power among the nations capable of waging total war — while endless lesser wars break out here and there.
I won’t belabor this. Our campuses are loaded with custard-headed pacifists but the yard of the Naval Academy is not on place where I will encounter them. We are in agreement that the United States still needs a navy, that the Republic will always have need for heroes — else you would not be here tonight and in uniform.
Patriotism — Moral behavior at the national level. Non sibi sed Patria. Nathan Hale’s last words: “I regret that I have but one life to give for my country.” Torpedo Squadron Eight making its suicidal attack. Four chaplains standing fast while the water rises around them. Thomas Jefferson saying, “The Tree of Liberty must be refreshed form time to time with the blood of patriots–” A submarine skipper giving the order “Take her DOWN!” while he himself is still topside. Jonas Ingram standing on the steps of Bancroft Hall and shouting, “The Navy has no place for good losers! The Navy needs tough sons of bitches who can go out there and WIN!”
Patriotism — An abstract word used to describe a type of behavior as harshly practical as good brakes and good tires. It means that you place the welfare of your nation ahead of your own even if it costs you your life.
Men who go down to the sea in ships have long had another way of expressing the same moral behavior tagged by the abstract expression “patriotism.” Spelled out in simple Anglo-Saxon words “Patriotism” reads “Women and children first!”
And that is the moral result of realizing a self-evident biological fact: Men are expendable; women and children are not. A tribe or a nation can lose a high percentage of its men and still pick up the pieces and go on. . .as long as the women and children are saved. But if you fail to save the women and children, you’ve had it, you’re done, you’re THROUGH! You join tyrannosaurus rex, one more breed that bilged its final test.
As noted by Geithner's comments, "patriotism" in BRA means the type of behavior where you place the welfare of everyone but the historic majority population of America - indeed, the founding population - ahead of your own, even if it cost all white people not just their heritage, but in the end the forfeiture of their life.
For isn't that the only way to eradicate whiteness?
Though few dare to admit it, America has reached its evolutionary dead-end.