 |
| Expect to see much more of this headed to Europe... soon. |
Remember WikiLeaks? We learned that those in power of the United States worried about the treatment of the immigrant populations in France that enjoy setting cars on fire far greater than do assimilating:
Comments in diplomatic cables released by whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks and published by the daily Le Monde show frustration over France's record in assimilating minority groups and highlight concerns the problem could be deepening.
"France not only has a problem with integration or immigration; it also needs to act to give Muslims a sense of French identity," the U.S. embassy in Paris said in a secret diplomatic cable to Washington dated Aug. 17, 2005.
The comments foreshadowed a wave of violent clashes in December that year between youths, many of them second-generation immigrants, and police in the gritty suburban housing projects that ring major French cities.
Television footage of burning cars and rioting youths was beamed around the world, casting a spotlight on tension between the French government and descendants of immigrant groups, many of whom belonged to France's 5-million-strong Muslim community.
"The real problem is the failure of white Christian France to view its dark-skinned and Muslim compatriots as citizens in their own right," the U.S. embassy told Washington in a cable dated Nov. 9, 2005. Craig Stapleton was U.S. ambassador to France under the administration of President George W. Bush.
A succession of WikiLeaks releases has exposed the inner workings of U.S. diplomacy and revealed at times frank views of foreign leaders, prompting charges of irresponsibility from countries including France.
The cables published by Le Monde date back to mid-2005 and cover the presidencies of both Mr Bush and Barack Obama, but there is little variation in U.S. attitudes toward France and its policies on immigrants and minorities.
"French institutions appear insufficiently flexible for a population that is growing more diverse," said a cable from Jan. 2010. Charles Rivkin is currently U.S. ambassador to France.In 2007, The New York Times reported that Libya was attempting to normalize relations with Europe and part of this arrangement found that nation stopping illegal immigrants from reaching Italy by boat, using force if necessary to stop the peaceful invasion from transpiring unabated:
Italy’s job has been, in many ways, more difficult: Facing resistance in a Parliament it controls only narrowly, the center-left government has not made any major changes in immigration procedures. And Libya, the launching point for many of those heading to Italy, is far less reliable than more democratic nations like Morocco or Senegal.Now we are engaged in a limited aerial bombardment of Libya for reasons that aren't quite clear to us, nor have they be defined in an honest manner. We at SBPDL have a theory as to the real reason we are bombing Libya, but first a warning from the Colonel:
Libya has in recent months, however, been more helpful, possibly because it is working toward a closer relationship with Europe. Its leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, has forged informal agreements with Italy to crack down on smugglers and patrol its own borders to keep those fleeing other African countries from entering and then heading north from its shores.
Libyan leader Moammer Khadafy played the race card Monday, warning Europe that if he falls they will be deluged by hordes of illegal African immigrants.
"There are millions of blacks who could come to the Mediterranean to cross to France and Italy, and Libya plays a role in security in the Mediterranean," he told the France 24 television station.
"Libya may become the Somalia of North Africa, of the Mediterranean," Khadafy's son, Seif, added. "You will see the pirates in Sicily, in Crete, in Lampedusa. You will see millions of illegal immigrants. The terror will be next door."
There are perhaps millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions of Africans who would do anything humanly possible to make it to Europe, not realizing that once they inundated Europe they'd merely extend the problems that plagued their nation of origin.
The United States of America, governed by the edicts of Black Run America (BRA), admonished the French government for not making enough concessions to a massive population that absolutely hates the indigenous, white French population. These foreign populations openly flout French law and burn Paris with reckless abandon.
Libya offered a buffer from an endless sea of humanity that desires a better life in Europe.Unable to attain a better life in African countries -- because these populations have an inability to create anything even remotely near what Europe has to offer -- Africans would risk everything to join their fellow Black people in burning cars in the suburbs of Paris.
Libya offered to keep these people at bay. Now the United Nations has passed a No-Fly Zone over that nation, whose leader warned of the desire consequences to Europe if his rule were to fall.
By bombing Libya, the United States prepares to open the floodgates of Africa and ensure that the problem of those Muslims and Black people in France who are having trouble assimilating will quickly have that hindrance removed. With the inundation of France (and all of Europe) by tens of millions of Africans the Libyans kept at bay, it will be the white populations of those nations assimilating to the mores and culture of the invading Africans.
Much the same as Americans are expected to do in the face of the Hispanic tsunami in this nation.
This is the reason we join other nations in bombing Libya. Not for some abstract ideas like "freedom" or "democracy," but to stop that nation from keeping millions of Africans from participating in The March into Europe.
61 comments:
Wow...what a depressing day. First the Irish Savant posts this story:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1368066/Miss-Ireland-Were-love-dont-care-racists-say-us.html
And now this from you.
I think you are right........how horrifying.
fyi: I live in Europe currently.
SBPDL,
Isn't Libya a member of OPEC? Coincidence? Maybe.
-Black guy
Say what you want about gaddafi but he's right on this one..
What are the millions of blacks gonna do when they are in europe? Work hard and look for a job or just live off a cheque every month?
Whenever the MSM does a news story, my immediate thoughts are what are they really trying to say. In other words, what's their angle. I think that you're right on with this piece SBPDL. I like the way you've pulled back the curtain to see the wizard. The wizard says,move along, nothing to see here!
The power elite want unbridled "immigration" (invasion) into all western countries. Period! This is about the dilution of not only the white race, but western style culture as well. Make NO bones about it.
This is an agenda, plain and simple.
An English veteran of WWII once said that if they could have seen what would become of their country 40 years later, the troops under the banner of the Union Jack would not have bothered to advance the final forty yards to the German beach.
Imagine if you could create a rift in time, go back to the 18th century where the framers were gathered around that document, and right before they signed, you shouted, "Halt!" You produced a small LCD screen from your pocket and said, "Behold, America in the 21st Century." You show them the Katrina riots, Obama's ascension, the miasma from south of the border, and then you close your contraption.
Benjamin Franklin shakes his head morosely. Hancock drops the quill from his hand and throws it across the gallery. Jefferson shrugs and says, "Call King George. Tell him he can have it back. Country's cancelled."
SBPDL, thanks for a great, albeit terrifying, post.
There are a few things in which we may be certain: whatever 0bama does in any situation, his intent is to weaken the United States, destroy our society's Judeo-Christian underpinnings and our traditional,uniquely American culture, and transfer white wealth to dark skinned leeches.
The Second Amendment is America's last best hope for survival.
@ SBPDL re your Paris/ France immigrants point
Just got back from Paris on saturday. It was a total latrine. On only about two occasions did i feel like i was in France whilst i was there.
Get off the Eurostar and you are in the Gard du Nord. The place is teeming with unemployed africans and Romani scammers pretending to be deaf mute. Walk towards Sacre Coure and you have to wade ankle deep through the trash. All walls are covered in graffiti. Use Chateau Rouge metro station and i kid you not you, will find more than one lepper begging there. The metro will stink of urine at all times.
Also there are whole streets now that are pretty much wholly devoted to African hairdressers. Some of which i noticed were asian owned just like in the US.
I thought the point of the Banileues was to keep that stuff contained outside the city. Much of central Paris is now one big Banileue
Jefferson shrugs and says, "Call King George. Tell him he can have it back. Country's cancelled."
The Native Americans would be free, and they'd actually exist in this country still. Yes!
"The real problem is the failure of white Christian France to view its dark-skinned and Muslim compatriots as citizens in their own right,"
They're not "compatriots" or "citizens", they're Cancerous Parasites.
"The Native Americans would be free"
They are free, just like you.
You know, I leave, and I come back to this place. And I see that Desiree is still running her illogical, black mouth.
"The Native Americans would be free, and they'd actually exist in this country still. Yes!"
Sorry boo, but Native Americans ARE free. None of them live in slavery. And they still do exist. I think that you are confusing a resonable black person (which no longer exists) with a Native American, or as I call them, Indian.
Ofcourse, Desiree also forgets that if this country did not exist, her black ass would still be in Africa. There she would be running around with her breats flopping about, a bowl in her lip, covered in dust and flies, and bathing in zebra piss. All the while, she would have to avoid being raped, or killed with a machete.
YES!
Racial dialogue with white people might be possible, if the following steps are taken:
1. UNLIMITED IMMIGRATION OF PEOPLE OF COLOR to white ruled nations: white ruled nations (Israel, Amerikkka, the UK, France, Germany, etc.)must allow unlimited immigration from PEOPLE OF COLOR.
2. RADICAL REDISTRIBUTION: All jobs, land, political positions, resources, must be redistributed in white ruled nations on a racial basis. Furthermore, this redistribution should be conducted on the basis of world wide demographics. For example, if BLACK PEOPLE make up 13% of the world’s population, they should receive 13% of the jobs, resources, and political positions in Israel.
3.VOTING POWER: All PEOPLE OF COLOR should have the power of enhanced voting. For example, each BLACK PERSON’S vote in Amerikkka should equal 10 white votes.
racial apportionment scheme might be, lamentably, unworkable. Therefore, I propose an alternative method for achieving racial justice, (all proposals are limited to the western world) :
1. The west must have open borders and allow unlimited numbers of foreigners to enter into the country.
2. Any people who are in the west are automatically citizens, with the right to vote.
Since the overwhelming majority of the people who will immigrate to the USA under this plan will be PERSONS OF COLOR, the country will have a majority POC electorate within, at a conservative estimate, 10 years of its implementation. this POC dominated electorate will be able to pass any laws that it desires, as the white minority will be completely impotent. Indeed, the political structure of the USA will then resemble South Africa or Zimbabwe. Whites will have no say at all. The beauty of this plan is that many elements on the right (libertarians, corporate interests, the Wall Street Journal)will actively support it. Little do they suspect that they will be cutting their own throats, as a POC ruled USA will mark the end of conservatism and the death of the Republican party as a political force.
"The Native Americans would be free, and they'd actually exist in this country still. Yes!"
And maybe by the 25th century AD they would stop slicing the fingers and toes from their enemies using seashells, and they might begin to discourage their children from eating the flesh of their enemies:
http://www.ohio.edu/orgs/glass/vol/1/14.htm
And who knows, by the next millenia they might have created a written language:
http://www.robinsonlibrary.com/america/indians/general/eliot.htm
Alas, if it weren't for the savage paleskin!!!
"Racial dialogue with white people might be possible if"
Black civilization might be possible if...
"...Desiree is still running her illogical, black mouth. "
It is what all black women do very well.
Black women, who have found that they are mostly invisible and irrelevant in our society, and with feelings of low self-worth and lack of home training, must insert themselves into every situation, dominate each and every personal encounter, verbally chastise and put everyone into their place with attitude to spare, and make sure that we all hear their lengthy and loud opinions over and over again, even though no one cares what they have to say.
I daily encounter these women in low wage and government jobs, as do all of you. Desiree has been trained by the best, no doubt.
Can't tell a black woman nothin'.
"Black women, who have found that they are mostly invisible and irrelevant in our society, and with feelings of low self-worth and lack of home training"
Of all racial/ethnic groups, black women are LEAST likely to be married, no sane man wants to put up with their bullshit. Even black men are marrying outside of their race in increasing numbers.
Desiree "The Native Americans would be free, and they'd actually exist in this country still. Yes!"
Doubt it. The Japanese would have probably annexed it turned the natives into serfs. Once the Japanese learned that the natives weren't sturdy enough for forced labor they would have just dispatched them.
South East Asian said...What are the millions of blacks gonna do when they are in europe? Work hard and look for a job or just live off a cheque every month?
They'll do what the ones there already do. Collect welfare while breeding at an astronomical rate, with most children living past 2 unlike Africa. Besides that they will form gangs, kill each other and any unfortunate Europeans that encounter them. Oh and rape white women. Can't forget that.
Dear Hirsch !
In your post of March 21, 2011 4:30 AM you wrote:
"An English veteran of WWII once said that if they could have seen what would become of their country 40 years later, the troops under the banner of the Union Jack would not have bothered to advance the final forty yards to the German beach."
I understand what you meant, but wasn't it French beach ? See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Normandy
Your truly, Florida resident.
It is amazing and yet predictable the way the New York Times depicts both the calamity in Japan and the protests in the Arab Turd World:
Japan : old and increasingly irrelevant, the only way this country can survive is to import non-Japanese and become more "diverse;"
Arab Turd World: since all people and all cultures are exactly identical, the stirrings in the Arab world for an "Arab Spring" are a beautiful and jubilant expression of an oppressed people's desire to become European overnight.
In Africa, every paved roadway, every structure taller than one story, every conceivable piece of technology that makes modern life possible, is the product of Western Civilization, directly of indirectly.
And yet the turd world does not seem very grateful, does it?
No, all these stone-agers want is to sneak into Europe and like leeches suck on the wealth that was created by Westerners.
These boatloads of dirty, hoodied, low-IQ 25-year-old Muslims with thoughts of jihad on their mind and very creepy sexual ways are truly something straight out of Camp of the Saints.
And the worst part is that liberal dogma is a default ideology among whites, and enables these high-fertility turd worlders to possess the moral high ground.
Example: last night at a dinner party the topic of slavery came up. I helpfully pointed out to the properly inebriated liberals at the table what very people know: i.e. that during the 400 years of the transatlantic slave trade, some 11 million black africans were brought to the New World. Of these, only about half a million wound up in the US. The VAST majority wound up in Brazil.
Now, these figures are extremely easy to verify (just Google "transatlantic slave trade"). And yet, one guest was so aghast at my presentation of hard data, that he actually left the table.
I caught up with him later, and explained (lied) that I thought slavery was just as terrible as he did, but that it is a little known fact that the United States plaid a relatively minor role in it.
Again, not only did he refuse to listen, he almost started a fight. I will probably never have a friendly conversation with this fucknut again.
Facts are racist, and to report the truth is racist, too !
crimesofthetimes.com
It is finished:
http://www.sappho.dk/interview-a-continent-of-losers.htm
(...)
Of course France has 2 children per woman, but out of five newborns, two are already Arabic or African. In Germany 35 per cent of all newborns already have a non-German background, and non-Germans commit 90 per cent of violent crimes. As I have said — mothers are paid to put children into the world and so are their daughters, whereas the men take to crime.
(...)
The Native Americans would be free, and they'd actually exist in this country still. Yes!
And you,my dear-would almost certainly not.
Ex Gladio Libertas
CWN,
Welcome back. Having read "Scalp Dance" a few years ago and never having the same mythologized view of Indians as many people do (courtesy of DWLs and CWP), I have no qualms in saying that yes, I'm glad white people defeated the various --small in number-- Indian tribes who were already warring with one another before the white man showed up.
The various Indians tribes were brutal people, barbaric and they have been canonized by those who vanquished them, with major cities, US military weaponry and sports teams proudly displaying their names centuries after they were defeated.
It is only white people who glorify vanquished foes by naming important landmarks after them. Black people, once they take over school districts, remove the names of dead white males from schools and replace them with Civil Rights agitators and Underground Railroad conductors.
Never, ever mention the Indians here in terms like you have: You paint the Indians with some docile brush where such views are grossly untrue.
Had white people never come to what is now North America, the varying bellicose tribes would have wiped out the tribes unprepared to defend their way of life.
Desiree, I don't care about the Indians other than the fact they offer a tragically poetic example of what open borders ultimately means.
The idea of the 'noble savage' that liberals love to perpetuate is just more one sided make believe. What gets me is the number of whites who are almost totally ignorant of history and who feel compelled to allow non-whites and Marxist to dictate to them how they should feel, believe and behave. To hold whites to standards that other tribes have never ever come close too.
Ultimately they can take their hypocritical victimization & 'you owe me' attitude and put it where the sun don't shine.
SBPDL:
That is your point of view that the Native Americans were barbarians but I am sure you'd defend in a heartbeat the savagery that seems intrinsic in white pillagers and colonizers, that is was 'for a reason'. It's almost ironic that you'd defend the pointless barbarism of the founders and bash these groups of peoples for theirs. Wow!
I don't care about the Indians other than the fact they offer a tragically poetic example of what open borders ultimately means.
Wow! So, a Native American-like 'end' to America would be terrible but a Native American-like 'end' of actual Native Americans was 'good'?
That does it: you are an insane hypocrite, SBPDL. WOW!
@ CWN:
Wow, CWN's back and all is right in my world! I've missed you, sweetums.
Sorry boo, but Native Americans ARE free.
If you think rotting in impoverished reservations is 'freedom', I don't want to know what you view as bondage. I suggest a great film called 'Broken Rainbow' which discusses the displacement and horrible, horrible mistreatment of the Navajo tribes.
Native Americans are nearly extinct in the United States. What they have now is either completely abandon their ancestral roots and integrate into American culture--if you watch the aforementioned film, you'll see how hard this seemingly simple task is--or rot in those poor slums, plagued with high rates of alcoholism and violence.
It's criminal.
Ofcourse, Desiree also forgets that if this country did not exist, her black ass would still be in Africa. There she would be running around with her breats flopping about, a bowl in her lip, covered in dust and flies, and bathing in zebra piss.
Wow! Just wow. The level of ignorance in this comment is simply astounding. You do realize that there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of different tribal groups in Africa, not to mention they look different?
Just an FYI for you, CWN. God forbid you come off looking like an uneducated, knuckle-dragging, racist turd!
;-D
@ Hirsch:
So, you are in agreement that had the 'framers' (LOL) did exactly as you wrote, the Native Americans would be free to roam their homeland (America)?
Good to see we are finally agreeing on something.
Alas, if it weren't for the savage paleskin!!!
Yes, they are better off dead and made into sports mascots than alive and living in their ancestral lands as they had done for thousands of years.
I suggest you exercise a little cultural relativism, Joesy. Looking from hindsight, Viking pillaging seems barbarian, but it was merely warfare and the precursor to the savagery of Rhodes, Leopold, and our 'founders'. Nothing any of us would grimace over had we been Vikings.
Cannibalism, for example, was the horror story the Spanish brought back to Europe but as the Central and South American Indians performed it, it was not savage at all, but ritual, religious, purposeful, edifying, unlike the practices of gruesome torture and executions hordes of Europeans gathered around to see!
Nothing a group of people could do could be so horrible as to deserve utter annihilation for cultural displays that harm no one (yes, human sacrificial victims were willing participants in Aztec culture, for example).
All native peoples have the right to be angry. Native Hawaiians HATE white people because they were savagely displaced.
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2009/fall/prejudice-in-paradise
SBPDL
Yes, too many people have this romantic view of indians. Forgetting that for all the whining about whites killing them. They had no problem killing one another. And there is dispute as to whether or not they were even the first people living in America.
Even if they were, they were not productive people. They were always at war with one another and sure as hell were not going to turn America into a thriving nation. Ofcourse I do not condone the killing of innocent women and children ever. But people forget that indians had no problem going after innocent whites, including women and children.
This image of the innocent little native and the big bad white man is bogus crap.
Desiree
Indians are not forced to live in reservations. They can live wherever they wish. They have the same rights as any other American. If they live in poverty and drunkardness, then that is their fault. Nobody forces bad behaviors onto people. Every group must be accountable for their own people. And as far as the government abusing people, what is new? The government is not your friend. You cannot rely on the government to be honest, or to do anything for you.
"What they have now is either completely abandon their ancestral roots and integrate into American culture"
Wait now, I thought America was supposed to be some big utopian melting pot. Isn't everyone supposed to assimilate and ignore race, unless that race is white? Are we not supposed to be a multicultural wonderland? Tsk. tsk. are you saying the natives are not capable of assimilating? Are you a racist?
"Wow! Just wow. The level of ignorance in this comment is simply astounding. You do realize that there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of different tribal groups in Africa, not to mention they look different?"
There is nothing ignorant in what I said. Africa is a sess pool, full of wild acting people who rape and murder. You could have a million tribes and this fact would be the same. Africa is a third world rotting corpse.
"Just an FYI for you, CWN. God forbid you come off looking like an uneducated, knuckle-dragging, racist turd!"
Uneducated, knuckle dragging, racist turd? Oh the irony.
"Nothing a group of people could do could be so horrible as to deserve utter annihilation for cultural displays that harm no one (yes, human sacrificial victims were willing participants in Aztec culture, for example)."
Too bad the black culture is not similar. Or maybe it is with black on black crime.
"All native peoples have the right to be angry. Native Hawaiians HATE white people because they were savagely displaced."
Yeah, because living in a backwards society is always something to strive for. The natives wish to turn back the clock and become savages again. Natives hawaiians hate white pepople because we are superior. It is called jealiousy.
"Native Hawaiians HATE white people because they were savagely displaced."
Displacement of peoples by other, stronger peoples, savage or not, has been ongoing all over the world since before recorded time, yet only the white man is demonized? This is nothing less than envy, the hateful envy of all those races and cultures who've never figured out how to not live in shit, who could never compete with the white man, and who could only conceive of anything close to a civilization in their wetest dreams. May the hatred of which you speak be returned in spades upon those "Peoples of Color" and the white elite who've enabled them when the ongoing savage displacement of whites has reached the tipping point.
emarel
"If you think rotting in impoverished reservations is 'freedom',"
They're not "rotting" you idiot, they live there by choice...freedom of choice. And those who choose not to, simply move out.
"Native American-like 'end' of actual Native Americans was 'good'?"
It was the birth of the most advanced, freest, and wealthiest nation known to man, also known to you as "home". If you feel guilty about living on Native land, then move out, preferably to Africa.
"plagued with high rates of alcoholism and violence."
LOL @ "plagued".
Black people are also "plagued" with high violent crime, high illegitimacy, high AIDS, high illiteracy, etc.
It's not their fault. You can't blame them for their own behavioral choices.
It's a "plague".
New Flash...illegal immmigrant have already migrated to Europe. Just left Europe March 18, while there I found myself embarrassed to be black. The Africans in Italy and Greece are like the Mexican in America; except they boldly sell knock-off designer items (purses,wallets, watches etc.) in broad day view.
The local despise them because they pay no taxes and contribute nothing to society. When immigration control get close, one blows a whistle to warn the other illegals to disburse. During the carnival celebration in Venice, they stood at four corners of each section hassling people- particularly blacks who don't look African-to by there illegal product. I just found their boldness atonishing.
The worse part...Italians view all blacks the same. It isn't until one spends money and speak that Italians change their attitude; somewhat. Yet, they still stared at us.
"the savagery of Rhodes, Leopold, and our 'founders'."
You have to laugh when Diarrhea speaks of "savagery", while we are all surrounded by subhuman negro savagery on a daily basis.
Cannibalism, for example, was the horror story the Spanish brought back to Europe but as the Central and South American Indians performed it, it was not savage at all, but ritual, religious, purposeful, edifying, unlike the practices of gruesome torture and executions hordes of Europeans gathered around to see!
Since it was all that,and a cup of coffee,can we look forward to you edifying yourself by volunteering to be the main course at the next ritual?
Since we seem to be on the subject of misunderstood customs,would you care to defend the practice of suttee for the likes of us pale types? Why not go try it out and report back to us?
Ex Gladio Libertas
Lol. Desiree defends cannibalism. I told you a long time ago, SBPDL, to do an entry on this topic. ;)
"Isn't Libya a member of OPEC? Coincidence? Maybe."
What a dumb statement. If this was all about oil we wouldn't be bombing Gadhafi's guys, we would be bombing the "rebels". Even though Gadhafi is a heartless, brutal dictator he has kept the country stable enough for decades to export oil.
"Cannibalism, for example, was the horror story the Spanish brought back to Europe but as the Central and South American Indians performed it, it was not savage at all, but ritual, religious, purposeful, edifying, unlike the practices of gruesome torture and executions hordes of Europeans gathered around to see!
"Nothing a group of people could do could be so horrible as to deserve utter annihilation for cultural displays that harm no one (yes, human sacrificial victims were willing participants in Aztec culture, for example)."
Possibly the most awesomely hilarious paragraphs ever written.
desiree, the only thing that tribalism accomplishes, whether it is in America, Africa, or Afghanistan, is a stasis of barbarity and brutality for its members. There is no such thing as the noble savage, no matter how many semantic tricks and no matter how much historical revisionism you attempt to peddle.
You then make the mistake of equating a clash of qualitatively different cultures with brutality. While brutality includes violence, in set theory the reverse is not true, so erroneously conflating them is simply a parroting of the propaganda and overgeneralized narratives you have uncritically been fed in today's schools.
Regarding native americans (and of course blacks too), you are stuck in the endless loop of bleating that white racism is the first cause, the next cause, and the cause after that of every bad result under the sun. There is no such thing as personal responsibility in desiree's world, as ostensibly proven by whatever critically-acclaimed leftist propaganda is the movie-du-jour.
Regarding different African tribal groups, barbaric tribalism is barbaric tribalism, no matter how many permutations and combinations there may be. If the bowl fits, wear it.
We can now summarize desiree's latest fact-free rants with the following:
- She doesn't believe in a qualitative hierarchy of cultures (with one exception), because hierarchies involve making distinctions and so 'it be rasisss'; the one exception involves what is posited by cultural Marxism, in that any white culture is automatically bad, while all non-white cultures are not only good but equally good.
- Since all non-white cultures are equal, the only thing that affects which one comes out on top is sheer power, i.e., might makes right. This is a baleful conclusion, but inevitable once you accept progressive assumptions. Essentially then, your vaunted multiculturalism is leading us all back to a society of tribes. Well honeychile, the current white tribe is firming up a consensus on that same viewpoint, so better get ready to be kicked off the progressive plantation. Do you really expect something different from the madness that you yourself are championing?
FROM desiree: "Nothing a group of people could do could be so horrible as to deserve utter annihilation for cultural displays that harm no one (yes, human sacrificial victims were willing participants in Aztec culture, for example)."
THAT has to be the most profoundly deluded, historical revionist diatribe that I've EVER read in my life!.
Ummm, Desireck, if you knew ANYTHING of history you would know that the primary reason the Spaniards overcame the Aztecs with such ease is because of the COUNTLESS Amerind allies that the Spanish had aquired!. Why you may ask did so many other tribes ally themselves with the Spanish?. Becuase the Aztecs sent raiding parties into their villiages & nabbed countless captives to be used in human sacrifice!. They DID NOT go willingly!!
With each passing day whatever is left of your credibility is chipped away. Many of us here are now convinced after these statements that you are obviously mentally ill!..Please seek help, ASAP!!.
Desiree said...All native peoples have the right to be angry. Native Hawaiians HATE white people because they were savagely displaced.
Ah the righteous anger of "displaced" savages. No way better to show exercise your righteous rage than to have "kill a haole" to attack white schoolchildren or to beat white senior citizens senseless then have the cops, who are most likely relatives, threaten them.
The Hawaiian islands can all be wiped out by a tsunami and I wouldn't give a god damn. Please, you think that these Hawaiian thugs that listen to rap music and do meth give a damn that they aren't a "sovereign nation" led by a King? Nope. They hate whites for the same reason blacks do. Years and years of leftist indoctrination that blames their every failure, of which there are many no doubt, on white racism.
BUBO
I have had the pleasure to travel to the Hawaiian island often over the last seven years.
At Pearl Harbor, I was shocked to see primarily Japanese tourists.
On most of the islands, the native Hawaiians find white people intolerable, save the money they help infuse into the economy.
I have horror stories of my visits to Hawaii that I could share, but I'll leave those for later.
I'll be headed to Kona in a couple of months and am trying to find a way out of that trip.People should divest from Hawaii.
Don't get me started on Puerto Rico.
This was an excellent post, though it doesn’t capture the perfidy of the US government in quite its full bloom. The Wikileaks cables also describe in some detail US efforts to subvert French culture, media, and institutions in order to replicate our own “Whites Off Earth Now!” project.
American Whites labor not only to fund our own dispossession, but now also that of our European cousins. While the war against us may continue into perpetuity, our subsidizing of it will not. And when the reckoning comes, it won’t be just pale cheeks showing tear tracks.
Free condoms for everyone! Most of the world's problems solved (assuming people actually use them...)
Race doesn't really exist, bleat the self-appointed progressive intellectuals, it's just a social construct. Now for the first time ever, I will use that same distorted logic to proclaim the following:
Racism doesn't really exist, it's just a social construct in the fevered imaginations of its supposed victims.
What's good for the goose, etc. So disarray, now that I have, by your own assumptions, proven that you have no argument worthy of consideration, please go away and seek some help for both your mental and spiritual deficiencies, which in your case appear to be endless.
"Cannibalism, for example, was the horror story the Spanish brought back to Europe but as the Central and South American Indians performed it, it was not savage at all, but ritual, religious, purposeful, edifying, unlike the practices of gruesome torture and executions hordes of Europeans gathered around to see!"
Disarray, you are a degenerate.
"All native peoples have the right to be angry. Native Hawaiians HATE white people because they were savagely displaced."
You're almost right, Disarray. White people, as the natives of the USA, have the right to be angry at black people. White people have a right to hate black people for savagely displacing them from inner cities and peaceful neighborhoods.
SBPDL:
Great theory and post - you are astutely on-point, sir.
Wow! Is it not funny as hell to watch the descendants of the only 'tolerable' savages defend their forebears savagery?
Yes, ironic, and hypocritical on all of your parts. Shame on you.
There is a lot of talk that 'displacement' is something that's been going on for centuries, since the dawn if human history. Well, I guess popularity is a measure of good taste, isn't it? Western culture has repeatedly been the culture to naysay about customs, to decide which custom is right and which is wrong. Yet when that practice is used against its own adherents, you want to get haughty.
Talk about hypocrisy.
Listen: let's talk 'cultural relativism'. If you claim displacement was the tactic du jour for millennia, so was many of the customs across the world that you call 'barbaric'.
That's how it goes; this is not the time to cherry-pick, although willful blindness is a common feature of most people blinded by ideology and inflicted with the mental illness that is racism.
Again: "White Racism" by Feagin & Vera is recommended reading.
Since the West likes to prop itself above other cultures by virtue of Christianity, by Christianity's tenets, we must evaluate the West's sins. Violently displacing people with a bloodlust and hunger for capital and land under the fallacious guise of "Jesus" is against the Word. Thus it is savagery.
Africa was fine before Western conquest, regardless if you believe its tribes practiced unsavory rituals.
The Americas was fine before Western conquest, regardless if you believe its tribes practiced unsavory rituals.
The South Pacific was fine before Western conquest, regardless if you believe its tribes practiced unsavory rituals.
Do you see a pattern, folks?
If Europeans were not parasitic with their own land (Europe) they would not have had to colonize like vermin every corner of the globe.
Imagine how you'd feel if all of a sudden China decided that it liked Georgia peaches and thought this was perfect reason to invade America and colonize for 'peaches'. Yes, you'd think it was stupid. But that would be you guys being hypocrites again.
I personally like eating with a fork; having an intact clitoris; burying, over eating, my dead; and having a dog as a pet instead of as dinner. However, don't fucking act like America and the West did not savagely colonize every corner of the globe and usurp land and resources from people freely living in their own lands, post 'Christian tenets'.
This is not a culture ranking thing, because I like Western culture; I am an American. But you can at least acknowledge her sins, as I have done, and, you'd agree, not one of you would like to be 'displaced'.
On most of the islands, the native Hawaiians find white people intolerable, save the money they help infuse into the economy.
Yes, as long as 'money' is flowing, savagery is atoned for.
All countries inhabited by so-called 'savages' were not in need of 'money' before Western Capitalism. Native Hawaiians have every right to be angry; it won't change history but it is their right to be pissed.
White people, as the natives of the USA, have the right to be angry at black people. White people have a right to hate black people for savagely displacing them from inner cities and peaceful neighborhoods.
Textbook hypocrisy right here. (1) Blacks are just as 'native' to the US as whites; (2) Blacks were put into ghettos and slums (former 'inner cities') because whites wanted them to be there. You are a tool, and your degeneracy has already been established, remember, 'Disarray anonymous'? Yes.
"Ofcourse, Desiree also forgets that if this country did not exist, her black ass would still be in Africa. There she would be running around with her breats flopping about, a bowl in her lip, covered in dust and flies, and bathing in zebra piss. All the while, she would have to avoid being raped, or killed with a machete."
Well said! Bravo, sir ... bravo.
I'm growing quite weary of Desiree's rants, but I understand the importance of documenting her endless contradictions, half-truths and inexhaustible babble - she is the African, the African is her.
Just one question for Desiree.
Would this society still function if most or all whites left and went back to Europe today? We both know the answer to that don't we?
The parasitical races would die because they wouldn't have their host to live off of, am I wrong? You ticks, leeches, and troublemakers wouldn't last more than a couple of weeks without the hard work of me and my ancestors to take care of you.
You blame your state of arrested development on everyone but yourself. That's a shame, because with that attitude there's no hope for your advancement, except through the largesse of the white man. I'm sick and tired of working so hard to take care of lazy, unappreciative, dangerous, and vile people.
@Dissident -
At least the other parasitical races would die off quietly..
Black people will probably follow white peopleback to europe and keep complaining about racism and "gibs muh dat" LOL
"Wow! Is it not funny as hell to watch the descendants of the only 'tolerable' savages defend their forebears savagery?"
It's even funnier watching you try to defend the modern-day savagery of your brethren.
Desiree, you talk about racism as if it's a *bad* thing. What's up with that?
"the practices of gruesome torture and executions"
The Wichita Massacre? The Knoxville Horror? The Pearcy Massacre? Anne Pressly?
Horrific, gruesome murders all committed by Diarrhea's brothers and sisters.
""Wow! Is it not funny as hell to watch the descendants of the only 'tolerable' savages defend their forebears savagery?"
It's even funnier watching you try to defend the modern-day savagery of your brethren."
T-O-U-C-H-E'!
Desiree said,
"This is not a culture ranking thing, because I like Western culture; I am an American. But you can at least acknowledge her sins, as I have done, and, you'd agree, not one of you would like to be 'displaced'."
Damned right sistah! And that's why this Blog exists, and that's why we're on here day-after-day fighting for our survival as white people. Don't you see that?
You say you like "Western culture" That's Christian culture you're referring to correct? Or is it something else? What's your definition of "Western culture". Western Culture comes from Europe and was practiced with a magnitude of success, before Socialists,Marxists, Monopoly Capitalists, race hustlers and agitators, etc. ruined it.
We're in a post "Western Culture" now wouldn't you agree? BTW, culture arises from homogeneous society, NOT a mutli-cultural, hodge-podge, cess pool, of competing languages, religions, ideas, etc.
Diversity is fools game and only fools would fall for it's poison. Go ahead and drink the Kool-Aid, sistah!
Disarray:
The USA is fine after Western conquest, regardless if you believe its conquerors practice unsavory rituals.
Do you see what I did there, black trash?
Damned right sistah! And that's why this Blog exists, and that's why we're on here day-after-day fighting for our survival as white people. Don't you see that?
Amen! We fight to survive. Lest we never forget.
If only you guys had staid home in EUROPE! What goes around comes back around. You progeny of the NEFILIM shall finally be banished from this world.
Us people of color shall be free at last,,,,,,
JEHOVAH, JESUS, MOSES, BUDDAH, MUHAMMED, None of these people were Europeans, or Americans. None of them give a rat's ass about so-called Western civilization...... The don't need gold, oil, diamonds, cars, Wall Street,Hollywood, none of that soulless bullshit. They only needed, and promoted, the raw rhythm of life.
i love being a moderate in the middle. watching you nuts off on your far left and far right ends picking and choosing what to believe and not to believe, when it all really comes down to attainable knowledge and compassion and empathy and self awareness and run-on sentences that makes us good. not race.
P9
P9,
You're not actually a moderate in the middle. Sometimes the mean does not equal the average, capice? You're actually a fucking moron. Why don't you attain some of that knowledge and compassion yourself?
"i love being a moderate in the middle. watching you nuts off on your far left and far right ends picking and choosing what to believe and not to believe, when it all really comes down to attainable knowledge and compassion and empathy and self awareness and run-on sentences that makes us good. not race. "
Being a moderate sometimes just means that you're a fence sitter. Afraid to commit to any ideology or take a stand.
Your "self awareness" won't amount to shi!! when your culture and your way of life has been destroyed.
valium pills buy valium online no prescription needed - valium with other medication
Post a Comment