Friday, December 9, 2011

Freedom Failed: The New Orleans Black Crime Wave

PK note: There will be two posts today. I'm in a vendetta kind-of-mood. Next week you'll get The Walking Dead/Atlanta piece and a big article on why The Hunger Games is a vital book for understanding the world we live in now. I'd argue that the world of Black-Run America (BRA) is far worse than the one Katniss Everdeen encounters in District 12. Thanks to each of you for helping make this week a big one at SBPDL. The comments have been excellent. Again, this site continues to grow because of you, the reader.  I say it repeatedly, but this site started as a joke... it's important to laugh, but for me the joke is over (The Walking Dead piece will prove that point with an exclamation mark). 


Next week the cover for SBPDL Episode II will be unveiled. No more talk of next week: let's roll.

We already know that the United States Military utilizes Baltimore and Cincinnati for training trauma response teams, emergency personnel, and doctors who are about to be deployed to war zones across the world. The bellicose nature of The Black Undertow (mind you,the Black crime rate was just as bad in 1921 as it is now) provides these trauma units with an experience that the "real" war zones can't replicate. Understand that the lethal combination of Black-Run America (BRA) - which makes it impossible to hold Black people accountable for their actions, because they point to the "legacy of slavery" as the source of all their problems - and a desire in the Black community to protect Black criminals in their midst through no snitching campaigns will doom any hope of ever turning dying cities into a Green City.
Why wasn't this movie released in theaters?

It was Hurricane Katrina that ripped apart every lie promulgated by Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) and Crusading White Pedagogues (CWP) regarding racial matters. It is a testament to the power of DWLs and CWPs that the reality of what transpired in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina has been brushed neatly under the rug. But it's important to understand that that rug is already bursting with other Hate Facts that have a tendency to come bursting out when they are least desired.

New Orleans of 2011 is a war zone. It's a war zone because the citizens of the Black Undertow in a city with the mantra "Laissez les bons temps roule" have been granted unlimited freedom, because people are fearful of the consequences that would accompany pointing out the obvious: New Orleans doesn't have a crime problem; New Orleans has a Black problem.

 Across the nation, affluent Black people are escaping migrating away from citizens of The Black Undertow, just as white people have been doing for years. Regardless of the city, what is left behind is a facsimile of New Orleans.


If you've noticed, Freedom Failed has become a new theme here. You didn't have to be inside the Super Dome in New Orleans back in September of 2005 to realize the truth of this statement. Every citizen of New Orleans had the freedom to leave the city before the hurricane hit; it was those who failed in exercising that freedom who turned New Orleans into an even more lawless version of its self.

Black crime has always been bad in New Orleans, but the recent outbreak of violence has shocked the editors at The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. For anyone who views WorldStarHipHop, you know this outbreak of violence is celebrated in the Black community, videotaped, and uploaded for the world to see.


So what's happening in New Orleans that has fine folks at The New York Times shocked?:
Of all the challenges facing the city of New Orleans, none is as urgent or as relentlessly grim as the city’s homicide rate. It was measured at 10 times the national average in 2010, long before shootings on Halloween night in the crowded French Quarter revealed to a larger public what was going on in poor neighborhoods around the city every week. There were 51 homicides per 100,000 residents here last year, compared with less than 7 per 100,000 in New York or 23 in similar-size Oakland, Calif. 

“From September of last year to February of this year,” said Mayor Mitch Landrieu in a recent speech, after reciting a litany of killings from one city high school, “a student attending John McDonogh was more likely to be killed than a soldier in Afghanistan.” 

New Orleans has long been a violent town; in 1994, there were 421 killings here, one of which was a hit ordered by a police officer. With federal intervention, the homicide rate dropped precipitously but began rising again around 2000 and has been fluctuating since Hurricane Katrina. The killers and their victims are overwhelmingly young black men, according to an analysis of homicide cases by outside experts last March, and sponsored by the federal Bureau of Justice Assistance. As police officials frequently point out to the anger of some families, most victims and offenders had prior contacts with the police, often for violent crimes. Less than a quarter were listed as having a steady job. 

The narrower causes are less clear. There are no large organized gangs in town, nor are there major drug wars, though some killings are turf disputes over the drug market, made worse by the drastic reshuffling of the urban poor after Hurricane Katrina and the demolition of public housing projects. 

Many killings in New Orleans are a result of conflicts and vendettas among small, loosely organized groups, the analysis concluded, but in nearly half the cases, the experts listed the primary motive as uncertain or unknown. Only about half the homicide cases are cleared. 

City officials have been pushing what they call a public health approach, a “paradigm shift,” they say, in a city that has been known for soaring arrest and incarceration rates.
Back in 1921, the Black homicide rate in New Orleans was 46.7 per 100,000. Not much changes, does it? What would a paradigm shift look like? Have the New Orleans Saints play a game every day (during the run to the Super Bowl title in 2010, there were no murders during their games!)?

So even during the evil days of Jim Crow, Black people made the streets of New Orleans unsafe. Almost 100 years later, not much has changed.

Douglas McCollam of The Wall Street Journal shares with us this information:
The violence left New Orleans Police Superintendent Ronal Serpas strapped to the hot seat. Appointed by Mayor Mitch Landrieu in May of 2010, Mr. Serpas—the former police chief of Nashville, Tenn.—came into office vowing to stem a tide of violent crime and reform what he called "one of the most dysfunctional police departments in American history." In Mr. Serpas's first 18 months more than 60 officers have been fired or have resigned under investigation, including members of the department's top brass. Overall, nearly 200 officers have left for a variety of reasons. (PK NOTE: Nashville has a horrible Black crime problem, which Serpas worked to cover up)
Over the same period, the city's murder rate has risen. As of this week, 164 homicides have been committed in New Orleans in 2011, on pace to eclipse last year's total of 172. To put that number in perspective, New York City, with more than 20 times the population of New Orleans, had 536 murders last year. If New York had New Orleans's homicide rate, more than 4,000 people would have been murdered there last year, about 11 every day.
In response to public outcry over the bloodshed, Mr. Serpas has offered a plethora of reform ideas. His public statements are peppered with references to his 65-point plan to remake the department, the adoption of crime-interdiction strategies such as Project Safe Neighborhoods, and enhanced community policing efforts to help repair the police department's tattered image. 

In March, the Justice Department (which is negotiating a consent decree regarding court supervision of the New Orleans Police Department) released an analysis of the city's crime problem that did contain some insights. Contrary to popular perception, it found that New Orleans' overall crime rate—including its rate of violent crime—is lower than that of other cities of comparable size. It's even lower than the crime rate in such family-friendly destinations as Orlando, Fla. (PK NOTE: what a coincidence, the Black Undertow in Orlando is more criminal than New Orleans)

But that news comes with a giant caveat: The Big Easy's homicide rate (52 homicides per 100,000 residents) is 10 times higher than the national average and almost five times that of other cities of its size. 

Why is the city such a murder outlier? In many jurisdictions, the Justice Department notes, gangs and drugs are principal drivers of the murder rate. Not so in New Orleans, which has comparatively little gang activity or organized violence related to the drug trade. Nor do the killings tend to happen in back alleys or vacant buildings as they often do in other places. More often they occur in residential neighborhoods in close proximity to witnesses. And more often the motivation is not random robbery, but revenge or argument. 

In short, the killing in New Orleans is personal. "What appear to be different about homicides in New Orleans are the circumstances of the events," Justice Department investigators noted. "In reading the narratives of the offenses, one is struck by their ordinariness—arguments and disputes that escalate into homicide."
 Wait, isn't New Orleans the same city that a Department of Justice study found that too many Black people are being arrested? Why yes it is. The DoJ has made a consent decree with the city in an effort to bring about massive reforms, such as these:

    The U.S. Department of Justice issued a 115-page report last March outlining what it sees as systemic problems within the NOPD. The findings will be the basis of the federal consent decree that city officials will soon begin negotiating. The report concluded New Orleans police:
  • Use too much force against civilians, often don't report it and, when it is reported, too often fail to investigate the incidents thoroughly.
  • Stop, search and arrest civilians without sufficient cause.
  • Disproportionately arrest African-Americans compared with white residents.
  • Fail to sufficiently engage and police the city's Latino and Vietnamese communities.
  • Discriminate against women by failing to properly investigate sexual assaults and domestic violence.
  • Have subpar recruitment and training programs.
  • Use a paid detail system that is a potentially corrupting influence.
  • Inconsistently discipline officers, while conducting inadequate internal investigations.
  • Fail to sufficiently embrace community-policing strategies.
Why won't white people commit crime in New Orleans? Can't some of the criminality found in The Big Easy be redistributed - like tax dollars are - from the Black community to the white community?

Steve Sailer also noted that the Obama Administration issued a report that noted the unpleasant nature that all 27 instances of police using deadly force in New Orleans in the past few years was on Black people:
From WWLTV:
The [Department of Justice Civil Rights Division's] report found from 2009 to 2010 all 27 incidents of NOPD deadly force were against African Americans, and in 2009 the department arrested 500 black and 8 white males under age of 17, which diverges "severely" from national data.

Disparate impact, I tell you!

In 2000 (the most recent data I can find), the NOPD was 51% black. I can't find anything in the Obama Administration's report on the racial identity of these NOPD police officers they are criticizing. That seems like a bit of an omission for a Civil Rights Division report, no? How often does that division forget to mention the racial makeup of an organization they are criticizing?


Back in 2009, McCollam was high on the prospects of turning New Orleans into the Portland of the South for Stuff White People Like (SWPL) white people:
The Saints' arrival in a refurbished Superdome in the fall of 2006 marked a symbolic resurrection for the team and the city. Since then an unmistakable halo of optimism has hovered over both. The city's population has rebounded to about three-fourths of its pre-storm level. And after decades of losing its best and brightest to the wider world, the city's brain drain has become a brain gain. Dedicated 20 and 30-somethings from around the country are showing up in force, in part to aid with the still ongoing rebuilding effort, but drawn also because New Orleans, in its post-Katrina incarnation, has become something of a testing lab for new ideas. 

In the battered Ninth Ward, hot young architects work with groups such as Brad Pitt's Make It Right Foundation to build ecofriendly housing. Teach For America and other organizations have taken over large swaths of the derelict school system, helping push it to the forefront of America's charter-school movement. Tax incentives and an arts-friendly environment have turned the city into a Hollywood hub, with more than 40 films shot in New Orleans in the past two years. Recently, TV auteur David Simon began filming his upcoming HBO series "Treme" around town, a show focusing on the lives of New Orleans musicians after Katrina.

 Why is America dying? Why are our major cities in need of Jack Kemp approved enterprise zones? Because people are afraid to shop there, which means businesses are uninterested in investing capital for building new stores in places like New Orleans. All of this is due to Black Undertow.

Worse, the Department of Justice is going after cities where too many Black people are being arrested (though FBI stats for 2010 show that 53 percent of known murders were committed by Black people, who represent only 13 percent of the population).


City Journal published this about New Orleans, which underscores why so many consumers are now using online shopping outlets -- because they don't want to drive into shopping centers, outdoor malls, etc., that are also frequented by the Black Undertow:
Day in and day out, Katrina or no Katrina, New Orleans is America’s most dangerous city. But the numbers don’t tell the whole story. White and black residents, rich and poor, of good neighborhoods and bad, are afraid to go out at night beyond the clear boundaries of well-patrolled areas like the heart of the French Quarter—and night means 6:00 pm, not 2:00 am. Everyone in New Orleans knows someone who has been violently mugged—and everyone knows someone who knows someone who has been violently killed.

The violence is often random but never surprising: a young mother and her seven-year-old daughter shot to death in their home. A 90-year-old former school principal, the widow of the former chancellor of Southern University, and her adult daughter shot and stabbed to death in their home. A Vietnamese immigrant murdered in her grocery store. A middle-aged craftsman shot to death and burned in his home. A young, mentally impaired man shot as target practice in a housing project. A tourist bludgeoned to death near his business-district hotel.

Freedom failed.

There's a movie I've been dying to see called Sinners and Saints about a white cop and his struggles during Hurricane Katrina. It's my belief the producers of the film can't find a studio to release it because the movie depicts some of the truth that DWLs and CWPs like swept under the rug.

Worse, our Department of Justice is actively trying to place more yes-men into police departments across the nation who will work to make a more BRA-friendly organization, undermining the safety of civilians in the process.

The United States of America will have another "Katrina" moment (it is my belief it will be based around EBT Cards/Food Stamps). This time, it won't be an act of nature that shows us the truth; it will be an act that could have been avoided but one that BRA made inevitable


79 comments:

mr_evergreen said...

New Orleans was a violent city before Blacks got there. It was a city settled by France's prison population and pirates.

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

Dude,

I don't mind you posting, but please show some statistics to back up your merit-less claim.

Australia was largely populated by white criminals (the lucky ones who got to leave the leftist police state that is England) and look what they built.

What could America's Black prison population build?

Maybe a Lego toy that was marketed for children six and younger?

Baldowl said...

Ahahahahahaha! Thank you, moderator. I think we've learned about all we can from Mr. Evergreen (nothing), so I encourage us all to refrain from engaging him any further.

Anonymous said...

I loved Jared Allen's comment on going to Detroit and New Orleans. LOL he makes sure he has a flak jacket to go to New Orleans.

Anonymous said...

"New Orleans was a violent city before Blacks got there."

What a fucking moron.

Evergreen, if you want to believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, you are free to do so.

But please, spare the rest of us your negro stupidity.

You have been fed a MONSTROUS LIE, and like a fool, you have accepted it without question, and you continue to accept it.

This blog is for Those Who Can See. If you are uninterested in the truth, then please go away, you do not belong here.

Anonymous said...

And some of you guys accused Evergreen of being white???

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Anonymous said...

Blacks took control of NO in 1978 when the first black mayor took over.Before it was a southern paradise controlled by white people.It will take decades or even longer to right it back again-if ever,and the damage that has been done is irrevocable.

Ben N Indiana said...

Australia was largely populated by white criminals (the lucky ones who got to leave the leftist police state that is England) and look what they built.

What could America's Black prison population build?


That's why I love this site!

Ben N Indiana said...

(A little black history from New Orleans)

• True or False: Slaves were routinely beaten with impunity by brutal White slave owners

Answer: False

Logic, alone, should be sufficient to dissuade thinking people from the perennial myth that black slaves were brutalized by their White owners. Slaves were expensive property. As such, slave owners were careful to protect their investments. Beating a slave was simply not in the owner's best interest.

There were exceptions.

In 1838 Harriet Martineau visited New Orleans where she heard tales of a particularly abusive slave owner. At issue was slave owner Delphine LaLaurie who resided in a mansion at 1140 Royal Street. "Martineau reported that public rumors about LaLaurie's mistreatment of her slaves were sufficiently widespread that a local lawyer was dispatched to Royal Street to remind LaLaurie of the laws relevant to the upkeep of slaves." The attorney found no evidence of wrong doing.

Nonetheless, LaLaurie was forced to forfeit nine slaves after a subsequent investigation found her guilty of slave abuse.

It was later rumored that one of LaLaurie slaves intentionally set fire to the mansion to draw attention to ongoing abuse. Bystanders forced entry to squelch the fire and discovered "seven slaves, more or less horribly mutilated ... suspended by the neck, with their limbs apparently stretched and torn from one extremity to the other."

Tale of the abuse quickly spread throughout New Orleans. An angry mob of White residents descended on the mansion and "demolished and destroyed everything upon which they could lay their hands."

LaLaurie fled the mob violence, escaping to Mobile, Alabama and then to Paris.

What we learn from the historical LaLaurie episode is that:

1. Laws protecting slaves from abuse were enforced.
2. White residents did not tolerate owners who abused their slaves.

Sources:

Wikipedia | NOLA.com | cogitz.com

Anonymous said...

I don't read comments by Mr. Evergreen or any other groid. Honestly, it's a waste of time. Not once have any of them contributed substantively to the discussion. Sometimes, I will accidentally read a comment posted by a groid, but it doesn't take long to figure out the source.

I would recommend that we all ignore the groids. Their posts are a waste of time.

Anonymous said...

"Logic, alone, should be sufficient to dissuade thinking people from the perennial myth that black slaves were brutalized by their White owners. Slaves were expensive property. As such, slave owners were careful to protect their investments."

Not to mention, slave-owners had a vested interest in keeping their workers healthy, therefore they were well fed, housed, and cared for.

Also, contrary to popular myth, owners generally did NOT break up families, because intact slave families were better workers and more stable.

Ben N Indiana said...

A little more black history from New Orleans:

In 1860 there were 3,000 free blacks in New Orleans who owned black slaves.

That's a bit of history you won't be hearing come February, Black History Month.

"The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city."

SOURCE

Anonymous said...

slavery was a reasonable attempt to deal with negroes in a constructive manner. the jim crow laws were another reasonable attempt to deal with negroes in a constructive way. both kept the negroe penchant for crime away from more law-abiding white people. Brown vs. Board of Ed thru the current regime have been destructive for negroes as well as whites.

mr_evergreen said...

"Dude,

I don't mind you posting, but please show some statistics to back up your merit-less claim"

I got the sources mixed up. This is where I got some of the information.
http://megan-b-wyatt.suite101.com/the-history-of-mardi-gras-a87366

http://www.quyrx.com/roadtrip/history.htm#010

There is some information about French prisoners going to Louisiana and continuing criminal behavior. There were also pirates in the region. Blacks would arrive soon after.

I would also check these links out. It has to do with Meroe, an ancient Black African society.

http://www.ancientsudan.org/meroe_gallery/index.htm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/africa/features/storyofafrica/3chapter4.shtml

mr_evergreen said...

"slavery was a reasonable attempt to deal with negroes in a constructive manner. the jim crow laws were another reasonable attempt to deal with negroes in a constructive way. both kept the negroe penchant for crime away from more law-abiding white people. Brown vs. Board of Ed thru the current regime have been destructive for negroes as well as whites"

I disagree. These were all pathologies about control. It was all about using people for personal gain(while the parties being used got no return on their forced investment) and then trying to throw people away when they were thought to be useless.

Van said...

Here is a the only relevant portion I found in Evergreen's link:

"The French -- soldiers, settlers, prisoners, and casket girls (girls of good reputation who were given transportation and a casket, i.e., trunk of household items) -- made up the bulk of the population for most of the eighteenth century. Africans were first brought to New Orleans in the 1720's and sold as slaves, mainly to planers. The labor shortage was so acute in the countryside that few African-Americans lived in the city. Even by 1803, there were probably fewer than 5,000 African-Americans in New Orleans with more free men of color than slaves."

A brief mention of prisoners, along with soldiers and settlers; no information on percentages, and certainly nothing about the actual crime rate.

From this little piece of information, Evergreen assumes that (1) criminals were a significant portion of the population, and (2) the crime rate was high.

Typical negro "logic" - even the smart one display an amazing inability to actually think.

Ben N Indiana said...

Mr Evergreen said,

These were all pathologies about control.

Are you admitting that black families who owned slaves were pathological?

Are you admitting the black slave owners who supplied America with 90 percent of it's slaves were pathological?

If that's what you are saying, then I would agree.

source

source

ps - Please google 'new orleans history'

Anonymous said...

"I would also check these links out."

YOU check out the links, since YOU made the bullshit claim.

mr_evergreen said...

53 percent of the murders may have been committed by Blacks, but over 50 percent of the murder victims are Black. By that assessment, Black people are the most likely to be victims of murder.

Ben N Indiana said...

Anonymous wrote . . .

Not to mention, slave-owners had a vested interest in keeping their workers healthy, therefore they were well fed, housed, and cared for.

A friend visited the slave auction in Charleston, SC a few years ago. The tour guide told him that the auction was owned by a black family.

I've not been able to validate that assertion with documentation.

• There are two black histories regarding slavery in America.

There is the Roots/Gone-with-the Wind version which has the credibility of TV Westerns.

And there is the truth.

Anonymous said...

"53 percent of the murders may have been committed by Blacks, but over 50 percent of the murder victims are Black. By that assessment, Black people are the most likely to be victims of murder."

And the rest are mostly white, you excuse-making fucking asshole.

mr_evergreen said...

"And the rest are mostly white, you excuse-making fucking asshole."

Actually, the term "White" could also mean Hispanic because many Hispanics put "White" when filling out the census. You might want to check that.

Anonymous said...

45 minutes into Saints And Sinners, so far we've got the "multiracial gang", the "intact two-parent black family", and of course, most of the killers are white.

Good lord...

Playing Roots Backwards said...

I agree that America has another Katrina Moment in its future, but I don't think it's going to require anything as large as a breakdown of the gravy train to set it off. It could start from something as small as a cannibal picking on the wrong White guy's kid.

I personally know dozens of White people who are well-armed and wound way too tight. A few years ago I would just stop by and surprise people if I happened to be in their neck of the woods. Now I call first.

The folks who were able to escape to rural areas are not likely to fire the first shot of the war, but the people who are trapped in cities in mortgaged homes they can't sell in neighborhoods that are being blessed with Section 8 induced diversity could very well respond to TNB in a way that leads to carnage.

My crystal ball has it like this: YOUTHS come to home of well-armed, fed up White Man to beat up his son over a perceived slight. White Man shoots shitload of YOUTHS. YOUTHS' friends, uncles, brothers and suspected fathers run get their .380's and .25 Ravens to take on White Man's home-converted select fire AR15 with multiple 90 round snail drums. Police arrive. YOUTHS and associates shoot at police. White Man does not shoot at police. Police shoot shitload of YOUTHS and associates. Nationwide anger. Whites attacked by YOUTHS. YOUTHS attacked by armed Whites. Police arrive. YOUTHS shoot at police. Whites do not shoot at police. Police kill shitload of YOUTHS. Whites punish Coal-burners and enemy collaborators. Urban Blacks eat contents of convenience stores, then each other. Jails have to be segregated. Whites who were held back by fear of going to Black Run Jails turn into John Fucking Rambo and the party never ends.

It may never happen, or it could be just one TNB incident away.

Californian said...

Tale of the abuse quickly spread throughout New Orleans. An angry mob of White residents descended on the mansion and "demolished and destroyed everything upon which they could lay their hands."


I wonder if Delphine LaLaurie was counted among the victims of lynch mobs?

Ben N Indiana said...

I find this interesting.

18 years after Roe V Wade the juvenile homicide rate began to drop dramatically year after year.

Is there a connection?

Here the chart

Here's the source

Could it be that would-be black killers were aborted? Did that affect the homicide rate?

Anonymous said...

I love New Orleans, it's a beautiful and historic town, too bad it's been completely ruined by the groids

YIH said...

Sheesh, mr_evergreen when I think of New Orleans I think of things like:
The Saints finally winning the big one.
How the Utah Jazz got it's name. The NBA is officially b(l)ack (I must have been a bad boy this year, I asked Santa for the whole season to be wiped out).
And what happened during and after Katrina.

A little gif(t) for 'ya Paul, a way to improve public transportation!

Noexit101 said...

SBPDL is by far my favorite website to frequent. Thank you so much for creating it. The information that you provide is needed now more than ever. As our culture is collapses as more and more idiots descend into the abyss of the Black Undertow, decent Americans need voices such as the ones found on SBPDL. Thanks!

Van said...

Evergreen:

"By that assessment, Black people are the most likely to be victims of murder."

True and irrelevant. If blacks and whites interacted equally, more whites would be murdered (I won't even entertain the idiotic "fear of massah" hypothesis). The high level of black violence is the reason to STAY AWAY from blacks - otherwise, we'd simply replace some of those black victims with white one.

The bigger issue is the broader consequence of crime - not just on the victims, but society as a whole. The cost of increased police, courts, and jails/prisons. Increased retail prices due to costs of security and lost inventory. Etc, etc.

Blacks, collectively, are net tax beneficiaries. The benefits received by blacks are greater than the taxes paid. Whites are net tax payers. We pay the financial burden of your people's inability to adopt civilized behavior.

I may not ever be the direct victim of a black criminal since I avoid places blacks go as much as I can. But my bank account is certainly suffering due to black criminality.

All whites are victims of black crime. And all blacks - in some way or another - are guilty of aiding and abetting black criminality.

Most of those not committing the crimes make excuses for it. Those who don't make excuses still minimize its existence and impact, and insist on forcing whites to interact with blacks - placing the black need for provision over the right of self-determination and free association. Not a one of you is completely guilt free in the black destruction of white civilization.

Van said...

Evergreen:

"Actually, the term "White" could also mean Hispanic because many Hispanics put "White" when filling out the census. You might want to check that."

Calling oneself white doesn't make it so. A descendent of the Aztecs is obviously not white. Might want to check that.

Anonymous said...

"Actually, the term "White" could also mean Hispanic because many Hispanics put "White" when filling out the census."

Police do not look at the census when they identify murder victims, you imbecile.

W74 said...

Correct me if I'm wrong but 51 divided by 100000 comes out to 0.00051. Move the decimal place right two places to get a percentage and you'll see that you have just slightly greater than a 1/200 chance of being murdered in N.O. in ANY GIVEN YEAR.

Not odds I'm willing to take.

Now, multiply that out by the life expectancy of a healthy white person (we'll say 80 which is comparable to that of Japan or Norway, which we'd attain without blacks with poor health habits) and it comes out to 0.0408, or roughly a FOUR PERCENT (1/25) chance that you'll be murdered in New Orleans AT SOME POINT during the course of your life.

Holy Shit that's a problem. We have a black problem.

Evergreen, do you dispute my math?

Anonymous said...

HOORAY!!!! HOORAY!!!! In just a few short years, most American cities will be completely uninhabitable for law-abiding whites, and blacks will have dey revenge for whitey being so racis'. HOORAY!!!! HOORAY!!!!!

W74 said...

Correct me if I'm wrong but 51 divided by 100000 comes out to 0.00051. Move the decimal place right two places to get a percentage and you'll see that you have just slightly greater than a 1/200 chance of being murdered in N.O. in ANY GIVEN YEAR.

Not odds I'm willing to take.

Now, multiply that out by the life expectancy of a healthy white person (we'll say 80 which is comparable to that of Japan or Norway, which we'd attain without blacks with poor health habits) and it comes out to 0.0408, or roughly a FOUR PERCENT (1/25) chance that you'll be murdered in New Orleans AT SOME POINT during the course of your life.

Holy Shit that's a problem. We have a black problem.

Evergreen, do you dispute my math?

Anonymous said...

I live 20 min outside Houston,Tx and have been here in these suburbs for almost 25 years. The Katrina refugees have turned this place into something unbearable. Decent black people from here were amazed at the ignorance and brutality of the blacks from New Orleans.

As for myself,black Americans....I'm done, I'm spent,bored of their excuses,sick of their so called African American culture. My wife is from Europe and in the next 4 months her and I will be moving there and I won't be coming back. Born and raised in USA, will always love my country, but soon, watching from a great distance, all I can say is...Good luck America...good luck.

My wife has traveled the world and lived for a short time in South Africa and has told me that in all her travels she has never witnessed anything like "African Americans"

They are a breed all their own.

I so look forward to a future free from the Hip Hop culture.

Good luck America, your going to need it.

W74 said...

Correcting myself on my own math. It's more like a 1/2000 chance any given year, not 200. Really it's 1/1960.

Still multiply that out over the course of a lifetime, assuming the murder rate remains unchanged, (80/1960 since there was 1 murder for ever 1,960 people) and you still have a 1/24.5 chance of being murdered in N.O at some point over the course of a lifetime.

Still over a 4% chance.

Still Holy Shit. Wake up America and the West.

You know what else is (not so) funny? We're only talking about one type of crime here. It may be the worst one, but what about all the rapes, robberies, and assaults that also occur on a daily basis? Will you wait for it to happen to YOU, or your wife or you child...?

Anonymous said...

You should do a similar article on Philadelphia.

Its an interesting city because the demographics are almost even, with the population being split into roughly 40% black, 40% white, and the rest comprising Hispanic (about 10%), Asian (About10%)and other. The real numbers have blacks edging out whites by 3-5%, I believe, but both populations are close enough to 40%.

We tend to have 350-400 murders per year in the city.

Every year, blacks commit just about 80% of those murders.

So, we have and even number of blacks and whites living in the same city, with the same opportunities (actually, blacks have an overwhelming advantage in getting city work in this black run city - mostly due to point advantages given on civil service and departmental tests for being black), yet blacks commit 4x the number of murders of whites. Most of the whites in the city are poor. Sure, there is an upper class. But most live on the same economic level as blacks. And even if that weren't true, the average black or white person could pull themselves out of their family situation int heir lifetime, through applying themselves and getting the requisite education, facilitated through he government loans available to everyone. Many whites and some black kids do pull themselves out of poverty this way. However, as a group, and acknowledging equal or even advantaged opportunity, blacks commit the majority of murders, numbering 4x those of whites. There is no excuse for this in terms of multi-generational poverty or the residual results of slavery. The opportunities are there. However, the group behavior persists and will continue to exist. Its the culture, and perhaps more. It's not the History. At this point, that much is obvious to everyone who isn't only familiar with blacks through their diversity education.

We all have our hurdles, but you don't get to excuse 4x as many murders due to the travails of your ancestors of 5 or more generations ago.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, but Mr. Evergreen, no whites view Hispanics as white. they might be able to claim it on a form, but that doesn't make it true in a cultural sense, in a genetic sense, or in any other meaningful way. Once more, the crime rate of "non-Hispanic" whites is much lower than that of Hispanic "whites". Therefore, no sane white person would ever choose to include them in our group as a matter of group-preservation, as well as due to the fact that we aren't going to take responsibility for their behavior.

That's a nice trick that minorities have been trying to pull on whites for years, though.

Its a shame for the Hispanics that we don't agree, and never will.

MuayTyson said...

In the last post as a response to me Mr. Evergreen stated that there were always "No Go" zones in America.

As I am in the middle of moving into my new apartment here in Asia would anyone be so kind to dispute him?

I cannot believe he would equate a rough part of the Irish side of town in the early 20th century to what we have now in most of our cities large and small.

Thanks

eh said...

Holder's people -- he must be so proud. He'll no doubt bring all this up next time he goes before Congress. And promises to 'tell the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'. Or something like that.

Zenster said...

"In reading the narratives of the offenses, one is struck by their ordinariness—arguments and disputes that escalate into homicide."

This pretty much says it all.

"Poor impulse control" doesn't even begin to describe the readiness to engage in violence that most Blacks, and Black males especially, exhibit.

Low IQ can explain part of such an empty problem-solving toolbox but not all of it. At day's end it becomes increasingly difficult not to attribute a feral nature to this sort of behavior.

This is even more the case with "wilding" incidents, utterly random assaults like "knockout king" and the calculated cruelty of crimes like the Christian-Newsom murders in Knoxville. Further proof of this was the behavior of Blacks while occupying the Superdome during hurricane Katrina.

As it stands, New Orleans ranks as one of the most corrupt cities in America second only, perhaps, to Chicago. It should come as no surprise that Black crime and homicides trail in the wake of this one glaring statistic.

These same factors apply to Detroit and it becomes tempting to assume that corruption acts as a magnet for Black undertow and the economic death spiral that so often ensues. It is only New Orleans' status as a tourist destination that probably protects it from becoming another Detroit.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: 53 percent of the murders may have been committed by Blacks, but over 50 percent of the murder victims are Black. By that assessment, Black people are the most likely to be victims of murder.

Let us be thankful for small mercies. Evidently, Blacks are better than any other race at chlorinating their own geen pool. Yet another mystery for the ages.

Anonymous White Male said...

Mista_everblack and his fellow nigra D. Freeape like to imply that “they” are not criminals but are instead that statistical anomaly, the “good” negro. The poor negro race is not genetically predisposed to violence and stupidity. They are just the recipients of random White lynchings of “poor, law-abiding negroes” and the intolerable evil of Jim Crow. Somehow, Whites not wanting to be around negroes is why negroes are such emotional and psychological cripples. It is completely unrelated to genetics.. As SBPDL points out:

“Back in 1921, the Black homicide rate in New Orleans was 46.7 per 100,000. Not much changes, does it? What would a paradigm shift look like? Have the New Orleans Saints play a game every day (during the run to the Super Bowl title in 2010, there were no murders during their games!)?

So even during the evil days of Jim Crow, Black people made the streets of New Orleans unsafe. Almost 100 years later, not much has changed.”

And before Jim Crow, White slave owners constantly beat their chattel just to keep their pimp hand strong. As one poster pointed out:

"Logic, alone, should be sufficient to dissuade thinking people from the perennial myth that black slaves were brutalized by their White owners. Slaves were expensive property. As such, slave owners were careful to protect their investments."

According to our resident subhumans, Whites are entirely responsible for blacks criminal and violent proclivities and poor negroes are just an eyelash away from random lynchings, if negroes and their retarded liberal owners don’t continue to be ever vigilant. The truth and negro behavior belies these hypocritical ravings.

Even the lynchings that occurred (more than 1/4th of those lynched were White) didn’t occur because Whites liked to see coons dance on the end of a rope. There actually was a reason. They were in response to some perceived injustice. And just because the Whites that performed the lynchings took the law into their own hands, they knew something that negroes know and DWL’s don’t. Blacks only respect force. When there were lynchings imposed, blacks stayed in line. Now that there aren’t any, blacks are out of control. We are told how bigoted, prejudiced, and racist Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, and lynchings were. Unfortunately for negroes and DWL’s, they also WORKED. Negroes knew their place and it wasn’t around Whites. They accepted this, up until the media and our enemies made it a special project to let the animals out of their cage.

This parallels what occurred in South Africa and Rhodesia. When Apartheid was the law, these were the two greatest countries in Africa. Once the West imposed their will on these countries, they have been destroyed. The lesson to be learned is not that blacks are our equals and only need Whites to give them everything they want. The lesson is, blacks are not White and should be barred from having anything to do with them. We hear nigs make excuses and claim that it is only White racism that is responsible for their failures (even the failures from centuries before blacks came in contact with Whites). We never hear any blacks claiming the opportunity to create their own societies, free of our interference. The reason for this is the same reason lynchings, Jim Crow, and Apartheid worked. Blacks actually do know the truth that they are incapable of creating anything of values. They are just congenital liars and won’t admit it.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (December 9, 2011 2:48 PM): Police do not look at the census when they identify murder victims, you imbecile.

Brevity and crystal clarity in a single sentence.
I'm jealous!

Zenster said...

Anonymous White Male: They are just congenital liars and won’t admit it.

Again, yet another parallel between Blacks and Muslims.

As mr_evergreen has so amply proved, even marginally intelligent Blacks believe their own propaganda to the point where they are breathing their own exhaust.

Skin color has enabled Blacks to obtain so many unmerited and unearned privileges whereby they have come to believe that they are above reproach.

In this respect, Blacks have gone beyond any congenital disposition to prevarication and entered the realm of delusional behavior.

Muslims exhibit much of this same disposition with their belief that a barbaric Iron Age credo is suited to rule the world.

This artificial sense of superiority is all that shields either of them from the bleak reality of how both cultures have achieved essentially squat over the past thousand years, if not even longer in the case of Blacks.

AmericanGoy said...

Ouououou!

What an opportunity to spam my blog, uhh, I mean, add to the conversation!

Did y'all know that the American military conducted, and I quote, "Combat Operations" in New Orleans post Katrina.

In all seriousness, this is one of my best pieces, about a forgotten (and lied about) period of our national history.

http://americangoy.blogspot.com/2011/09/modern-history-hurricane-katrina-racism.html

PS
I am not kidding about "Combat Operations". When I wrote about this, I compared the knowledge I learned from what was reported on MSM and printed in newspapers, and how much was hidden and muzzled.

Even I was shocked.

It was a pacification campaign by American troops on American soil in an American city.

Whiskey said...

As perhaps the only person here who actually lived in New Orleans (pre Katrina) these are my observations:

1. New Orleans has always been violent, go read Louis Armstrong's painfully typed out and non-ghostwritten memoir, it is searingly honest about crime in New Orleans during the 1890's early 1900's. [Louis left in about 1920 and did not come back until 1965 briefly when he was treated shamefully in a still segregated city.] Nevertheless both Armstrong and Jell Roll Morton (shamefully libeled by August Wilson in "Jelly's Last Jam" as an Uncle Tom) note (you can listen to a re-release of Morton's recollections to the Library of Congress -- it came on Rounder and your local library may have a copy, well worth your while) note the everyday violence and aggression in New Orleans, circa 1890-1925 or so. Extremely violent. Black men could also go all day not even speaking to a White guy -- New Orleans had Black lawyers, doctors, dentists, accountants, mechanics, barbers, grocers, pharmacists, pretty much everything.

Secondly, from the beginning slaves outnumbered masters significantly, and slaves retained West African voodoo as a result, Catholicism in New Orleans White or Black is thinly disguised voodoo with a Catholic face (think St. Expedite, when you need help "really fast.") Congo Square in the Quarter was traditionally given over to Slaves to do what they wanted on Saturday night.

Third, New Orleans Black juries (an acquaintance was a DA) routinely fail to convict, when the victim, cops, and DAs are all ... BLACK. Criminality (this extends to the Whites there too) is in the blood there. Even Whites subject to corruption there complain about how it just infests everything, and how much better life in non-corrupt places really is.

Anonymous said...

There's a good reson the Army/Navy game is white.You have to actually be smart to attend these top academies and academic ability takes top priority, football is a sideline. If you fail in your studies you'll be expelled and they don't fool around since they are training the top leaders for the future in the military. No instructor is going to pass you if you don't make the grade. You don't get to study sociology or some easy crap and even here the instructor has to be very lenient when dealing with football player in the average college so they don't fail and get thrown out.
West Point is near me and these guys are fit not 300lbs of blubbery monster called "the refrigerator". I'm surprised that any of these cadets even have the time to practise for what is really just a game because they have so much real studying ond other things to do.

Anonymous said...

@11.42-Australia may have been mostly populated that way but most of these people were only petty criminals or poachers etc There probably were real criminal types but most were just poor people who committed crimes to survive and would have worked if they could.There were no programs back then to get an education or get yourself set up in business unlike today with affirmative action and other opportunities for the inner city Negro.
Most of these blacks on college football teams today are not much different from some ghetto gangbanging thug and the pro teams are the same. Read the newspapers.They just happen to be big and fast so playing football is just a better racket for them than working at a real job and being a thug is dangerous. Few even have the brains to do anything above a very menial job.

Anonymous said...

mr. evergreen, have you ever seen the film, Mandingo? Looks like you got most of your knowledge from it lol

Anonymous said...

Gee, you take away the segregation, give out assistance with housing- childcare-food-employment-starting a business-going to college/junior college-etc, create a whole section of the Justice Dept hell bent on destroying "white privilege" (which is more accurately described as "white success"), create all sorts of federal benchmarks for govt contractors- You must have X amount of (insert oppressed group here) to be eligible for this contract....And things haven't changed one bit.

Anonymous said...

Australia was a pretty hellish place until the Crown started shipping women convicts to penal colony, with women added to the mix families sprang up and with families came civilization...


Black Families, well we have only to look at the proud examples set by Herman "Gotta Grab em All" Cain, Shaquille O'Neal, Koby Bryant, The Jackson Family, Marvin Gaye's Family, and my personal favorite Harlem's Fernando Brazier- Nothing quite as classy as committing suicide hours after getting married.

Black Civilization only goes about as far as Tintin in the Congo..

Van said...

"You should do a similar article on Philadelphia..."

I spent some time in Phillie years ago, when I still was more/less an anti-racist, but beginning to question things. I drove back and forth through an area looking for an address, mostly apartments and row-houses. I kept noticing that when I passed a certain street that I went from very clean to absolutely dirty. Litter everywhere and a small amount of graffiti; dirty windows with a few broken. There was a clear dividing line, but I couldn't see what was different that would cause this. At that time, my first thought was income - but the building were the same (identical, part of the same construction project) and the cars parked on the street were the same (decent sedans and SUVs, not luxury cars).

Then I saw the difference: in the clean area, everyone walking to/from a car or home was white. In the dirty area, they were all black. I've seen the same thing many times since then, but never so clearly demarcated by a single street.

Anonymous said...

Thought you'd like this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ipe-5tFVP4c&feature=watch_response&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DeIbArGu5nCg

And we're paying for their tuition and expenses.

Van said...

"even marginally intelligent Blacks believe their own propaganda...they have come to believe that they are above reproach...and entered the realm of delusional behavior.

"artificial sense of superiority"

Being that I was formerly such a strong anti-racist, I was often thought of as "one of the good ones" by many blacks (even told so on several ocassions; what an honor!!). I've managed to keep this image, and I'm amazed at the insight I get from blacks I've worked with.

Middle class and upper middle class blacks believe all the oppression myths. Their success in the US doesn't give them cause to question it. Even the current president doesn't (polls showed blacks vaguely "more optimistic" but that's relative; they still believe they are greatly oppressed).

Blacks don't believe that AA is favorable treatment.

A successful black believes he succeeded despite massive systematic oppression in a hostile society. They stroke their massive egos daily in this false belief.

They believe BO fought his way into the White House, with racism at every step of the way. They don't understand that, the way the political system is designed, it would be impossible for a candidate to overcome racism. His success absolutely proves that the US is not a particularly racist society.

Blacks are amazingly egotistical. They don't believe in racial equality, they believe in black superiority. Physically superior, morally superior, intellectually equal (or superior). They rarely come out and say it, but putting the puzzle pieces together, its there.

They believe that their superiority, and the natural order with them on top, was somehow subverted; that only a massive conspiracy could keep them down.

They believe they are winning a fight with whites; instead of the reality that they are regularly handed the keys to the kingdom.

genericprofile9000 said...

Could you please ban Evergreen from posting? His posts are inane and contribute nothing to the conversation. Nobody is really that stupid. He's a white troll

Anonymous said...

@ genericprofile9000

I don't care if he's Black or White, he's totally useless to this blog, and his discourse is blatantly tiresome & repetitive. "Inane" is an understatement when referring to this sad clown.

YIH said...

Zenster: ''It is only New Orleans' status as a tourist destination that probably protects it from becoming another Detroit.''
Tourism doesn't make much difference. That concentrates in 'pockets' that can be carefully policed and well-guarded. The French Quarter in NO, International Drive (Sea World, Universal Studios FL) in Orlando (Disney World is about 30 miles away and from Walt's experience with Disneyland surrounded by a huge 'buffer zone' of land). Move away from the 'safe' resort area and you have Detroit.
(PK NOTE: what a coincidence, the Black Undertow in Orlando is more criminal than New Orleans).
You'll see a even more stark example Summer 2016, the Olympics in Rio.

10mm AUTO said...

I Love your "Freedom Failed:" series. Well Done.

As to "Sinners and Saints", a White Crusader shooting down feral negroids with submachineguns and a Kimber 45 Auto (Good pistol by the way) will never be released. It would open the discussion about what really went on in NO duing Katrina (see: http://www.amren.com/ar/2005/10/index.html)

By the way, Mr Evergreen! you should read it, if just for the perspective of the British Tourists and the Australian and German students who avoided being raped and killed only by organizing against the negroid undertow during those hellish three days.

Zenster said...

Van: Blacks are amazingly egotistical. They don't believe in racial equality, they believe in black superiority. Physically superior, morally superior, intellectually equal (or superior). They rarely come out and say it, but putting the puzzle pieces together, its there.

Thank you for so capably expanding on this topic. Black delusions of adequacy rank right after "no-snitch" as one of their most crippling traits.

They believe that their superiority, and the natural order with them on top, was somehow subverted; that only a massive conspiracy could keep them down.

In doing so, Blacks make the most terrible of mistakes imaginable. As the old maxim states:

Never attribute to conspiracy that which can be explained by simple stupidity.

They believe they are winning a fight with whites; instead of the reality that they are regularly handed the keys to the kingdom.

Time to change the locks. 'Nuff said.

Zenster said...

YIH: Tourism doesn't make much difference. That concentrates in 'pockets' that can be carefully policed and well-guarded. The French Quarter in NO, International Drive (Sea World, Universal Studios FL) in Orlando (Disney World is about 30 miles away and from Walt's experience with Disneyland surrounded by a huge 'buffer zone' of land). Move away from the 'safe' resort area and you have Detroit.

Why am I not surprised?

Anonymous said...

"artificial sense of superiority"


Well, when you're stupid and believe nonsense abut Negroes flying around the pyramids in spaceships in NE Africa and that there was an advanced civilisation in the west in Timbuktu where the US Negro came from what can you expect.
The fact of the matter is that ancient Egypt was a Caucasian culture and was always taught in courses as part of Western civilisation (it's changed a bit ver the last 3k years just as Detroit changed in 1% of that time)
Timbuktu only dates from the 13th century abd was an Arab Muslim area for slave trading.
Then they think that Cleopatra was a Negro even thoiugh all intelligent people know that the Ptolemy family ruled Egypt for a few hundred years and they were Macedonians which is in the Balkans.In fact,she was the last queen and the only one who even learned Egyptian.
To the dopey US Negro when you mention Africa they think black. They're nt smart enough to see that the Saharra that covers Africa and is 800 miles wide is the real dividing line between Europe and black Africa.
Out of Africa 100k years ago? These were just White people migrating from nrth to south to north during periods of cold weather. 10k years ago the entire pop. on earth was 1 m people and they were all White except for a handful in the far East and a handful on the west coast of Africa. They didn't even cross Africa to the East so how could Negroes be migrating into Europe 100k years ago?
Furthermore, the oldest human footprints in the world are in Roccamonfina, Italy and are 350k years old.
No one has any idea why humans were so isolated from each other on the earth. Perhaps the pop. of the earth was high at one time and then some natural disaster separated people and they developed separately. Or perhaps humans just developed from different bloodlines.
Negroes may have evolved from Homo sapiens idaltu an extinct and very closely related species to Homo sapiens sapiens. Clsely related species are able to mate like the lion/tiger, dog/ wolf etc
In today's PC world you will never hear any discussion of this because the official mantra is'all humans on earth today are the same species" Of course it is complete nonsense because even the same people originally will develope into subspecies if isolated and left alone for a long period of time.

Anonymous said...

New Orleans was a violent city before Blacks got there. It was a city settled by France's prison population and pirates.


And dinosaurs used to live in that area one time.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
"You should do a similar article on Philadelphia."

You should read financial analyst James Quinn's pieces on "The Burning Platform" on his many trips driving to his university job (strategic planner) through what he's dubbed "30 Blocks of Squalor." His observations are priceless. He is one of the most brilliant, riveting writers/patriots I've ever come across, and I've been a voracious reader and activist most of my adult life.

He also has written a five-part series themed around Clint Eastwood movies that is, IMHO, the best, most damning criminal case ever compiled and written on the ongoing wealth transfers to the criminal central banksters and Wall Street shysters and obliteration of the largely productive White middle-class.

The Middle Class Caught in a Pincer Movement
Politics / US Politics
Oct 11, 2010 - 03:39 AM
By: James_Quinn


A MODEST PROPOSAL (excerpts)

My understanding of our economic system has changed over the last couple years. I've come to the conclusion that the middle class of this country has been caught in a pincer movement by two armies. My definition of the Middle Class is households making between $50,000 and $150,000 per year.

The Free Shit Army is attacking us on the left. The middle class has been the backbone of the country, doing the heavy lifting in this country. They get up every morning and trudge off to work to support their families. The Free Shit Army sleeps in. They have chosen to not educate themselves in order to advance in our society.


Politicians have enabled them to stay in poverty by providing welfare, disability, food stamps, and tax incentives that make their lives just comfortable enough to not work. If you provide money to people who are classified as disabled, you get more disabled. The Free Shit Army has 50% more disabled than the general population. If you pay people for not working, why should they work? The middle class works and pays their taxes. These taxes are then redistributed to the Free Shit Army.

The second pincer movement on the middle class has been conducted by a stealthier army. This army has experts in propaganda, misinformation, and obfuscation. I call them the Ruling Elite Army. The generals are the ultra-wealthy CEOs of Wall Street banks and mega-corporations. Their armor divisions are manned by the corporate mainstream media. They are excellent at laying down a great smoke screen before blasting away. The infantry is manned by 535 Congressional officers with thousands of corporate lobbyist foot soldiers. This army has been given the mission to capture the supplies of the middle class.

The middle class were not prepared for the assaults they have been fending off. They became soft and satisfied. They stopped training. They became distracted by their gadgets, delusions of home wealth, and fear of phantom terrorist enemies behind every bush. The propaganda machine of their true enemies has convinced the middle class that foreign enemies are massing. The enemy is within.

The middle class will need to sacrifice and go to war against two enemies. Are they up to the task? I'm not sure.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23398.html

Voir Dire

P.S. Keep up your great work, Paul. Always a pleasure reading your own blood-boiling pieces and am enjoying two of your books when time permits.

The Fighting Whitey said...

"The United States of America will have another "Katrina" moment...This time, it won't be an act of nature that shows us the truth; it will be an act that could have been avoided but one that BRA made inevitable "

And the media will hide that truth, like they did about Katrina.

Something has got to change....

Zenster said...

The Fighting Whitey: "The United States of America will have another 'Katrina' moment … This time, it won't be an act of nature that shows us the truth; it will be an act that could have been avoided but one that BRA made inevitable"

As JFK made clear,"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

Any questions?

W74 said...

Zenster and YIH,
"Tourism doesn't make much difference. That concentrates in 'pockets' that can be carefully policed and well-guarded...."

Baltimore and D.C. are EXACTLY the same way. What's funny is that both cities rely on tourism dollars. D.C. has tourism and government as it's economy, neither of which are going away any time soon. Baltimore is a little more diversified but tourism is getting shaky as whites are abandoning even some of the larger annual events.

Baltimore (we all heard about the 4th of July stabbings) has a safe zone in the inner-harbor near the aquarium, shops, high-end restaurants and government and banking high-rises, and it's two Stadiums (i.e. coliseums). Just a couple blocks outside this ring and you get this: http://g.co/maps/knd4h

I think this proves that no matter how many millions in taxpayer dollars you spend to build a stadium you cannot revitalize an area as long as it has blacks living in it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
D.C. has a safe zone extending from the Marine Barracks in the east to the Jefferson Memorial in the West. You might be alright going up Massachusetts Ave. to the hotel district but you wouldn't walk down most of D.C.'s streets at night. Crime map here: https://www.crimereports.com/

Be sure to type in "1600 Pennsylvania Ave, D.C." as the nearest address. You'll see hundreds within walking distance.

Due to Oodles of government money being poured into D.C. and the large amount of easily attainable diversity jobs it's hard to find areas of complete abandonment. Plus, diversity seeking liberals LOVE D.C. the way that gays love San Francisco. This helps keep property values up. The PTB have an incentive to keep D.C. physically intact.

Zenster said...

W74: Plus, diversity seeking liberals LOVE D.C. the way that gays love San Francisco.

Why did Washington DC get all the lawyers and San Francisco get all the gays?

San Francisco had first choice.

Anonymous said...

Everyone knows that Europeans are guilty for the African countries being poor and corrupt since
(1) they colonized them
(2) drawing the borders regardless of native cultures, and
(3) the minority rule of whites prevented their societies from developing.
These claims are easy to verify by noting that
(1) the two African countries that were never colonies, Ethiopia and Liberia, are undeniable success stories, and
(2) Somalia, the purest nation state among all former colonies, has flourished since becoming independent, and
(3) South Africa, the country where the white minority ruled over the black majority the longest, is known for its poverty and despotism compared to its wealthy and democratic neighbours.

Especially for the guy who tells us that $32 000 US is worth less than $200 in Zimbabwean Dollars.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (December 11, 2011 12:51 PM): (2) Somalia, the purest nation state among all former colonies, has flourished since becoming independent

Ah, yes. Somalia, the land of genocide and what the UN terms the “world’s worst humanitarian disaster.”

The land of terrorist warlords and murdering pirates.

The land of child rape and Muslims recruiting child soldiers.

The land of famine and Muslim ethnic cleansing of Christians.

Only a complete and total idiot could say that post-colonial Somalia has "flourished".

Anonymous White Male said...

Zenster: I think if you will re-read Anonymous from 12:51 PM's post again you might see it dripping with the sarcasm it was written with.

Lucille said...

18 years after Roe V Wade the juvenile homicide rate began to drop dramatically year after year.

Is there a connection?


Well, since "juveniles" are legal minors, if a drop in "juvenile crime" was caused by easy access to abortion, it should have shown up less than 15 years after RVW.

Zenster said...

Anonymous White Male: Zenster: I think if you will re-read Anonymous from 12:51 PM's post again you might see it dripping with the sarcasm it was written with.

Thank you, AWM. Due to how spectacularly dense some of our Black participants are, it is sometimes difficult to discern when the ALT/SARC function is in operation.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for seeing Orlando as the crime pit that it really is. There is a whole lot more town besides the theme parks. There is a whole lotta crazy in that town. Do not move to Orlando if you are not white. You will not do well there. Do not move to orlando unless you like pain pills. Prescription drugs are big there. The messed up thing about Orlando is they hide the crime well on all levels. Its there, you just don't see it. Its not nasty like detroit. The majority of the town is new-or newer, so its not like the slums are 1800's era housing or anything. The town is spread out so the pockets of crime are pretty much all over. You just gotta figure out what pocket you are in. Orlando is a pit with horrible crime, but at least it has nice weather most of the time. The county lock up looks like something out of a movie. It blows me away when I look at it. Its deep on the lot and big. Its dark and huge like a space ship. It holds more people than the state of wyoming. It holds more people than montana and kansas. It is often full. It has an international wing for drunk tourists. The minute the undertow starts jacking with precious tourists and it starts getting media attention, it will be big news and shut down pretty fast. I honestly believe the cops allow a level crime to go on in the town because they have other issues.(like labor and pay for starts).

Rusty Mason said...

Great articles, thank you. One thing, though: your phrase "Freedom Failed" doesn't sound quite right. As I see it, if we had real freedom -- the freedom of association, the freedom to rule our own communities, as America used to be --, then we could decide who was "in" and who was "out" of our neighborhoods and businesses. THAT would be true freedom. What we have now, however, is BRA forced on everyone by the government.

Andymon said...

Ben N Indiana wrote:

In 1838 Harriet Martineau visited New Orleans where she heard tales of a particularly abusive slave owner. At issue was slave owner Delphine LaLaurie who resided in a mansion at 1140 Royal Street.

I remember seeing this house featured on an episode of Haunted History. Lawdy lawdy dem niggers ain't at peace.

WarriorClass said...

mr_evergreen said, "I would also check these links out. It has to do with Meroe, an ancient Black African society.

http://www.ancientsudan.org/meroe_gallery/index.htm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/africa/features/storyofafrica/3chapter4.shtml"

This is correct, consider Genesis 10 and the second fall of man. The second fall began with Ham, who took delight in tearing down his righteous father before the people. He was an iconoclast and took delight in that. This is an early picture of Satan before the Throne of God accusing the saints (Rev 12:10b). Nevertheless, Noah didn't curse Ham, he cursed Ham's son Canaan. Why didn't he curse Cush? Apparently it was Cush's son Nimrod that started the city of Babylon. Apparently all of Ham's sons rebelled against the God of Noah.

What was indicated in Ham's derision of Noah was fully realized in his children who rebelled against God Himself. We have immediate confirmation of this in Nimrod, who started Babel. Actually Nimrod means "rebel," and was probably not his real name. He fits the person Gilgamesh of Sumerian / Babylonian mythology, which indicates that Nimrod was actually a nephilim and started the tower of Babel and was king of Babylon (this legend fits neatly with the Greek myth of mount Olympus and the nephilim, Hercules). He put himself "before the Lord," Gen 10:9. This is a picture of what would happen with Canaan, who Noah cursed. So why did Noah specifically curse Canaan? Probably because Canaan was more directly a problem for the Sons of Seth, and cause problems for them, especially the Hebrews later and would try to block the Anointed One from finding a fully human person to be born to. BTW, Cush means "black," and he is the father of the black race.

Anonymous said...

You're all so ignorant, excluding mr. evergreen;) Of course, all of you sad, sad people will reply to this in with snark and ignorant comments and I won't reply because you're all to birdbrained to have a decent conversation with. Also, you're all delusional; if, just for the sake of your small-mindedness, educate yourselves.