Sunday, January 15, 2012

The Dream Deferred: Marching on Michigan Gov. Rick Synder's Home in the Name of Defending Black-run Detroit

PK Note: This week, SBPDL is going to provide a look at the Tuskegee Airmen that you'll find nowhere else. Yes, you've seen a number of articles on the subject published here already. There is more, much more that must be published. Like George Lucas, one of the biggest influences on my life was reading Joseph Campbell. The power of myth is, undeniable. And that's all the Tuskegee Airmen story is, a myth that has been repeated over and over again without any real scrutiny. Until now. 

We have also been providing a look at Detroit's impending collapse, an event that is a long time coming. In reading The Science of Success by Charles Koch, I've come to realize the importance of prioritizing in order of importance. 


 So in honor of communist agitator (who moonlighted as a Tuskegee Airmen - but never was deployed overseas - and mayor of Detroit) Coleman Young, let's take a quick look at the last few days of freedom before the "Arsenal of Democracy" under Black-rule turns out to be nothing but a dud in the end.

There's no need to sugarcoat what is about to happen in Detroit. Arguably the greatest city in America as recently as 60 years ago, a massive Black riot in 1967 sparked the demise of the city. Courtesy of white flight helping decimate the white voting base, radical Black racialist Coleman Young was elected mayor in the early part of 1970s, and the Africanization of Detroit was cemented in stone.

We are mere weeks (maybe even days) away from the culmination of Young's true legacy: that being the takeover of 82 percent Black Detroit by the state of Michigan. Perhaps it's fate that Young served with the 477th Medium-Bomber Group during World War II, part of the famed Tuskegee Airmen (more on this Tuesday). Though he would never be deployed overseas to bomb Germany, it would be difficult to convince anyone who visited Detroit in 2012 that a massive aerial bombing campaign didn't occur there.

Comparing Detroit 2012 to Dresden in 1945 isn't a logical leap, knowing that Young was a trained bombardier. Only that could explain the burned-out buildings, abandoned portions of the city, and demoralized population. Instead, the circumstance we find Detroit in is due primarily to the power of Black-Run America (BRA), a ruling ideology that mandates Black people are never responsible for their actions (or the consequences of those actions).

Well, that or years of the greater social experiment in the history of mankind finally ending (though the usually sound scientific method's conclusions will be disregarded) with a whimper, as Black-run Detroit ends. The conclusion should be that removing the population that created, innovated, built, and sustained a city and its infrastructure and replacing it with one whose sole claim to fame is the invention of the supersoaker isn't sound advice for the health of community.

MSNBC's own Rev. Al Sharpton's livelihood revolves around being one of the primary agitators for Organized Blackness, so in the final days that equality-derived freedom reigns in Detroit, it's no surprise that he is leading the lynch mob to save The Black City:
The Rev. Al Sharpton on Sunday joined the chorus of opponents to the emergency manager law and pushed plans for a peaceful protest in front of Gov. Rick Snyder's home on Martin Luther King Day.
Sharpton, who joined U.S. Rep. John Conyers, D-Detroit, ministers and members of the Occupy Detroit movement, said Public Act 4 is a "sick" law that unfairly targets urban cities. He said protestors who gather at Snyder's Ann Arbor home should be peaceful but resolute in their opposition to the law.
"Just like Wisconsin started union busting and then it went to Ohio and Indiana, " he said, "…This will be the beginning of governors nullifying the rights of people and they will say municipal elections don't mean anything," said Sharpton at a news conference at the King Solomon Baptist Church on the city's near west side. "You can vote for who you want but the governor will remove them if he wants to. This precedent must be stopped.
"If Snyder gets away with it here, it will spread nationally."
The 4 p.m. march on Snyder's home is expected to draw busloads from urban centers all over the state and organizers say they have cooperation from the Michigan State Police to have streets blocked off.
Sharpton and the Rev. Charles E. Williams II, pastor of King Solomon Baptist Church, planned on visiting a couple of church congregations Sunday to help gather signatures to repeal the law. Williams said they have more than 170,000 signatures, more than the 161,000 minimum required to freeze the law and place it on November's ballot.
So far, cities such as Benton Harbor, Flint, Ecorse, Pontiac and Detroit Public Schools are under emergency managers. The state is considering placing Detroit under an emergency manager and is currently conducting a fiscal review of the city's troubled finances.
Conyers, who has been a fierce opponent of the emergency manager law, said he's still waiting for U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to respond about the constitutionality of Public Act 4 but to him it's a clear violation and should be repealed.
"I think my case of unconstitutionality is clear," Conyers said. "If he has a different view, he's going to have to express it and we'll have to draw our own conclusions."
Zachary Steve, a member of the Occupy Detroit movement, said the law is a clear affront to hard-working citizens who have the right to elect their officials to make their own decisions.
"We have the governor taking away the consent of the government from local communities and school boards and giving that absolute power to one individual," Steve said. "The constitution established a credo for divided power, a legislative, an executive, a judiciary branch. This law removes that divided power. It takes away the consent of the government."

Eric "My People" Holder will probably agree with Conyers that Public Act 4 is a "sick law" and it's not inconceivable to see the Department of Justice intervening on behalf of 82 percent Black Detroit. Indeed, the Department of Justice has been intervening on behalf of 13 percent of the population for more than half a century.

Like his wife, Conyers should be in jail. The fact that for almost a century, Wayne County residents have helped reelect this man again and again to represent them in Washington D.C. shows you why the concept of democracy is a failure.

Then again, Holder might have more in common with Conyers then were he in jail:
According to Department of Justice whistleblower J. Christian Adams, AG Eric Holder has a certain something in his wallet. It is a quotation — and he has carried it for decades. It essentially says, to quote Adams, "Blackness is more important than anything, and the black US attorney has common cause with the black criminal." It's not surprising that Holder would feel this way about black lawyers and criminals.
Because in his case they're one and the same.
Not one major conservative will use the collapse of Detroit (nor will they take on Eric "My People" Holder) to broach the subject of race, though The Motor City has been a veritable Petri Dish for Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) to watch their beliefs unfold in real-life, to their melancholy conclusion.

Though Coleman Young protested this next sentence throughout his hilariously triumphant autobiography Hard Stuff, Black people were incapable of sustaining the civilization that whites left them (well, abandoned to them) in Detroit.

Memo to Al Sharpton: it was Black people who ruined Detroit, once a city that was the shining example of American ingenuity, where a true middle-class flourished and thrived; where arts and culture abound; and where dreams of the city's inhabitants for the Detroit their children would inherit resembled the world of the cartoon The Jetsons, as opposed to the nightmarish existence that Black people have brought to the city, making it resemble an almost all-Black version of The Flintstones.


The dream of equality was never deferred. At the tip of Federal guns, it came true in America. Look no further than the fate of Detroit, to see where every city in America is eventually headed.

Courtesy of the only Climate Change that truly poses a threat to mankind's future.

77 comments:

Ben N Indiana said...

I still think they should convert Detroit to a farm and give it to White S Africans and Rhodesians.

~AV~ said...

1001...Fantastic post...

Detroit was founded on capitalism and destroyed by affirmative action government employed black union member leeches...and the leeches having nothing left to latch onto...

Mauing mauing the governor isn't going to fly anymore...not enough white people left in Detroit to play the guilt card on and to play the classic race hustle...

Zenster said...

The Rev. Al Sharpton on Sunday joined the chorus of opponents to the emergency manager law…

I say we should give this race-bating wannabe warlord pimp his wish and not intervene.

Let Detroit crumble into ruins so that all of America can witness the ultimate result of what happens when Blacks are given control over anything more complicated than a ballpoint pen.

Anonymous said...

"Sharpton, who joined U.S. Rep. John Conyers, D-Detroit, ministers and members of the Occupy Detroit movement, said Public Act 4 is a "sick" law that unfairly targets urban cities."

It unfairly targets, ahem, "urban cities."

Urban cities.

I give up.

Anonymous said...

Not enough whites left in Detroit to fleece.

Anonymous said...

Funny that negroes always seem to organize when they believe they are being persecuted by Whitey.

Yet when it comes to obeying the law, staying in school, or getting married before having children...or any other self-critical analysis of their own irresponsible and self-destructive behavior...they simply don't give a shit.

It's always about Blaming Whitey.

Anonymous said...

Maybe the gov should just say okay, Detroit, you're on your own; oh, and by the way, no more state tax-payer money coming to ya. Let the RWPP pay for your upkeep.

Anonymous said...

Detroit is reverting to farmland. http://hantzfarmsdetroit.com/introduction.html

Now imagine how bizarre this truly is.

Silicon Valley used to be orchards.

Imagine Silicon Valley reverting to farmland.

Casper said...

"The conclusion should be that removing the population that created, innovated, built, and sustained a city and its infrastructure and replacing it with one whose sole claim to fame is the invention of the supersoaker isn't sound advice for the health of community."

That was a stroke of genius Paul. Zenster too nailed it. Let Detroit continue its death spiral for the whole world to see. Keep it in the hands of the bruthas.

Never thought I'd agree with Al Sharpton on anything but on this I do.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 15, 2012 6:54 PM): It's always about Blaming Whitey.

Well, who else are they going to blame?!?

Certainly not themselves. As if!

Anonymous said...

Not enough white tax payers left to pay for and nurture the groids like parents watching after their own children.

What will the groids do? How can they survive without white mommy and daddy?

Anonymous said...

Yep and the economy is tanking, the next bubble is government, the one place blacks could get a job that required no brains, or work ethic, government, will be ending soon. Fun, fun, joy, joy, when those food stamps get eaten up by inflation. 40 million hungry people with no real skills to survive looking for food. Get ready.

Anonymous said...

Hope that fat fuck chokes on a KFC biscuit.

make it rain TRUTH said...

Leaving Detroit, as well as any other city/muni, to reap what it has sown WOULD work were it not for the incestuous relationship between governments at all levels.

If each city, county, and state were left to it's own devices independent of the government above them.... then you wouldn't see these problems cropping up.

Towns run poorly, ala Detroit, would collapse LONG before they got to the scale of misery that is Robocop Detroit. And the people would either move to other towns, or be forced to rebuild Detroit WITH IDEAS THAT ARE DIFFERENT AND DON'T FAIL.

Instead, the incestuous relationships between governments means the local county is roped into bailing Detroit out.... then when they can't do it any longer it's the state..... then it's Uncle Sam.

In other words, it's people that AREN'T causing the problem being forced to pay for it. And that's why these things go from molehills of failure to colossal megaton fur-lined bathtub failures.

Just like when mom and dad bail out junior in his idiocy. Instead of small failures leading to course corrections for life...... he's able to bankroll his way up (with parents cosigning) to life-destroying disasters.

Anonymous said...

"The constitution established a credo for divided power, a legislative, an executive, a judiciary branch. This law removes that divided power. It takes away the consent of the government."

I think he meant 'consent of the governed'. Where have these people been since 1861? States Rights is bad but "urban rights" is good? Does that mean that we can take our cities back and receive their support against federal or state intervention?

Anonymous said...

Funny that negroes always seem to organize when they believe they are being persecuted by Whitey.

Yet when it comes to obeying the law, staying in school, or getting married before having children...or any other self-critical analysis of their own irresponsible and self-destructive behavior...they simply don't give a shit.

It's always about Blaming Whitey.


I will add to this the subject of immigration. You'd think by now blacks would understand that mass hispanic immigration would not be good for them especially given what is happening to them in LA. But black leaders seems to think that if whites are so upset about it, then it must be good for them. This is going to turn out to be very bad for them. It will probably be even worse for them than for whites.

Whiskey said...

There was a race riot in 1943, involving Blacks and Whites, thousands fought in the streets and FDR had to send in the Army. The Japanese used the incident to urge Black troops not to fight. There were riots in 1863 over race as well, with Black people fighting Whites.

With the massive Black exodus from the rural, segregated, and poor South up to Detroit and northern cities via the railroad during WWI, to take the place of drafted White workers, the conflict over who would rule and run Detroit (and other places) was inevitable.

Anonymous said...

It would be interesting if one with more time and energy on their hands than I could plot on a graph the percentage of blacks in Detroit vs perhaps falling income levels over the last few decades. By doing that maybe one could pin-point the tipping point/point-of-no-return with population levels...

Professor Woland said...

What does Al Sharpton think white people will gain by controlling Detroit? The place is a money pit which is one big reason white people left it in the first place. Somebody would have to be really stupid to hold a City of Detroit bond.

MuayTyson said...

Paul and the other great posters a hearty Thank You is in order.

I think if BRA is to fall it will be due to people like you. Paul K. people have called for you to come out and use your real name. I am going to join the chorus. Please think about what it is you do and how much it actually means. If no other thing is accomplished by SBPDL and your books it is the act of truthfulness.

If you come out maybe you can be the spearhead to end all this madness. Think about it anyone born after 1965 has spent their whole lives in BRA and it is no place to live.

I am living in Korea now bought a business and I'm living my life. I wish I was in America but it feels alien to me now.

We must all be vigilant because these tiny Liberal seeds were planted and now there is a Behemoth of evil. I'm not sure if this is the Hell of goodly paved intentions or if this was all planned I just know it must end.

I am beginning to see it start here in Korea. Yes, I am aware Korea is a mostly homogenous society and people are fiercely nationalistic but cracks are showing.

I am now seeing commercials about Sub-Sahara Africa and it's starving poor. UNICEF is placing well meaning youngsters in the subway with the posters of skinny black children.

This is how it began in America too. I remember fat Sally Struthers pleading to feed the poor for the cost of a cup of coffee a day. Even then I said, "What about our poor?"

Trust me I tell every Korean or expat I meet, "Until all your children, Grandmothers and Grandfathers are fed and sleep under a warm roof do not give a dime!" "Money will only encourage those vermin to breed." "Money has been given for decades and nothing has changed what makes you think it will change now?"

Okay I'm rambling but thanks to you Paul and to the rest of you "who can see."


.

svigor said...

Sharpton has a point. Governors shouldn't be stepping in to run municipalities unless they demand it.

On the other hand, Governors shouldn't be giving municipalities one thin dime unless their demands (e.g., emergency takeover) are met.

Anonymous said...

I foresee an entire academic industry-anthropologists, archeologists, historians of all stripes, various (fill in the blank)"studies" and "theory" people- devoted to the ruins of Detroit in the next several decades. It will be North America's Chichen Itza.

svigor said...

Funny that negroes always seem to organize when they believe they are being persecuted by Whitey.

Yet when it comes to obeying the law, staying in school, or getting married before having children...or any other self-critical analysis of their own irresponsible and self-destructive behavior...they simply don't give a shit.

It's always about Blaming Whitey.


Actually, follow your logic all the way out, there:

It's always about the (easy) money. Stop paying them to blame Whitey, and most of the whining would dry up.

Never thought I'd agree with Al Sharpton on anything but on this I do.

Nah. Al wants 'em to send the checks and keep their demands to themselves.

the next bubble is government

Very well said.

"The constitution established a credo for divided power, a legislative, an executive, a judiciary branch. This law removes that divided power. It takes away the consent of the government."

I think he meant 'consent of the governed'. Where have these people been since 1861? States Rights is bad but "urban rights" is good? Does that mean that we can take our cities back and receive their support against federal or state intervention?


Right. But leftoids don't have to worry about that stuff. "Who-whom?" They use the argument when and how it suits them, then scream "RACIST!!!" if you turn it around on them. Or point at their Narrative and sputter. Consistency, logic, and honesty are for squares.

I will add to this the subject of immigration. You'd think by now blacks would understand that mass hispanic immigration would not be good for them especially given what is happening to them in LA. But black leaders seems to think that if whites are so upset about it, then it must be good for them. This is going to turn out to be very bad for them. It will probably be even worse for them than for whites.

Exhibit A for the lie that is Black racial solidarity. Their leaders sell them out first chance they get. They're all bought and paid for. Black "leaders" shake down Whitey because their Masters approve. They don't pursue closing the borders, even though it's in their ethnic interests, because their Masters don't approve.

They don't acquiesce simply because "Whites are upset about it, so it must be good." They acqueisce because that's what the leftoid power structure wants. They don't have many thoughts that aren't put there by the MotU.

What does Al Sharpton think white people will gain by controlling Detroit? The place is a money pit which is one big reason white people left it in the first place. Somebody would have to be really stupid to hold a City of Detroit bond.

You kidding? Control is what gov't does for a living. Big problem? Gov't types see dollar signs where you see "big problems." Money, jobs, prestige.

YIH said...

Happy Plagiarism Day!
What'd He Do?

We're not saying that King wasn't an incredible person who did more to advance the human race than most of us can ever hope to do. We're just saying that he was also a plagiarizing butthole.

What's the Problem?

For starters, his own university admits that his doctoral thesis, the very foundation of his career, was significantly plagiarized. Seriously. They had an official inquiry and everything.

"We had many of the same professors, we worked in the same atmosphere during our graduate studies," said John Cartwright, an MLK scholar and member of the committee that investigated his plagiarism allegations, "under no circumstances would the atmosphere under which he did his work condone what Doctor King did. It's incredible. He was not unaware of the correct procedure. This wasn't just done out of ignorance."

Despite clear findings of plagiarism, the committee did not recommend he be posthumously stripped of his title, due to Dr. King's incredible services to the world. And due to their extreme fear of being beaten and castrated by hordes of angry MLK groupies.

The first allegations of King's plagiarism were hushed up, denied, or 'excused' by academia. However, the accusations continued to flow in. This timeline shows how the realization of King's plagiarism unfolded. Not only was his dissertation plagiarized, but many of his student papers and sermons were stolen in whole or in part from other writers.

The staff of the King Paper's Project at Stanford even admits that, "King's plagiarism was a general pattern evident in nearly all of his academic writings."

Is That All?

Perhaps the most notable example of King's plagiarism was the general tone, and several select lines from his famous "I Have a Dream," speech. Theodore Pappas presents a detailed accusation in his book, Plagiarism and the Culture War. Most of the issue centers around the closing lines.

Here's how King's speech ended;

"This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a new meaning, 'My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.' And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring."

Compare that to a much earlier speech by another Civil Rights activist, Archibald Carey:

"We, Negro Americans, sing with all loyal Americans: My country 'tis of thee, Sweet land of liberty, Of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, Land of the Pilgrims' pride From every mountainside Let freedom ring!

That's exactly what we mean--from every mountain side, let freedom ring. Not only from the Green Mountains and White Mountains of Vermont and New Hampshire; not only from the Catskills of New York; but from the Ozarks in Arkansas, from the Stone Mountain in Georgia, from the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia--let it ring not only for the minorities of the United States, but for the disinherited of all the earth--may the Republican Party, under God, from every mountainside, LET FREEDOM RING"

Shamelessly cut'n'pasted from Cracked.com :)

Eric said...

here is lovely EBTroit for you...

http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/local/mich.-family%3A-grandmother-assaulted-at-chuck-e.-cheese%27s-20120116

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Ben N Indiana said...

I still think they should convert Detroit to a farm and give it to White S Africans and Rhodesians.

January 15, 2012 5:01 PM

That's what I was thinking...all the "refuge" they give people from third world countries, it makes perfect legal sense on paer! Let White S. Africans and Rhodesian Seek Asylum in Detroit - One Million of them!

Midwestern said...

"What exactly is meant by “civil rights,” anyway? Is that a nice way of saying, “The utter obliteration of the right to freely associate?” Define these indefinables, please. What is meant by “equality”—and how much will this cost me? What do you mean by “racial justice,” “social justice,” and just plain “justice,” and have you done any price-shopping on it? What’s the planned completion date for this ambitious public-works project? How long does my term of indenture last? When will the debt be paid? Do I have a basic human civil right not to pay?"

http://takimag.com/article/im_so_bored_with_mlk/print#ixzz1jdMwdzs3

Anonymous said...

Detroit was a lesson for those too busy to read Atlas Shrugged.

Anonymous said...

What a befitting statement on MLK Day...the state take-over of a black ruined city. Remember a couple of years back when New Jersey had to assume control of Newark's school system? Can anyone provide other examples state control of black ruined entities?

Unknown said...

@ Midwestern:

"...What do you mean by “racial justice,” “social justice,” and just plain “justice,” and have you done any price-shopping on it?"

“Racial justice,” “social justice,” and just plain “justice" are code words for "revenge." And it will cost everything White people have, and then some.

Anonymous said...

Great site. We really need articulate none stormfronterish type people to put forth these arguments. I try to argue this stuff on the Huffington Post. The media flack is pretty amazing there. I have noticed that if I keep an even tone, use facts(without pushing things too far)and speak objectively without getting angry I usually get through the moderators. I mention this in case people want to deliver the message to a wider audience.

If Detroit simply crumbles and plunges further decay maybe some enterprising person could buy an armored vehicle and create some kind of urban safari. I'd be willing to pay a couple hundred bucks to venture into the war zone, camp out in a hollowed out theater and pick off stray zombies. A thought anyeay...Does anyone think that "Zombie" movies are actually addressing fear of social order devolving into a Liberia-type scenario?

Anonymous said...

Typical ignorant thinking on this blog. First of all, Detroit's problems started long before Coleman's term. The demise of the auto industry, was the catalyst. Just like you would like to blame the poor economy on Obama instead of a lying, hypocritcal inept Republican Party, you want to attribute the failing of a city on one mayor and one race of people? Get real. Salt Lake City, Utah is considered one of the ten worse cities, reason? What about Oklahoma City, Oklahoma? What about Columbus, Ohio? When a city (or a country) is failing, you call in a black person to run it. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

Ryu said...

Thank you Paul. Very good. You're doing a great job here, and one day we'll all get what we want.

Anonymous said...

Not a post - but a message to the blog author:

You should check out the editorial in this past Sunday's (January 15th) New York Times. Page 9 of the relevant section.

It's entitled :

"What's Race Got to Do With It"? by Lee Siegel

It's 100% racist against whites and the white utopia often idealized amongst the readers of this blog, using his "analysis" of the presidential candidates as the substrate for his anti-white opinion. Typically, he castigates Ron Paul as a fringe loony, primarily focusing on his isolationist ideals. You won't be sorry that you went to the effort of digging up the editorial. The rhetoric seems to be getting increasingly desperate.

Anonymous said...

"Typical ignorant thinking on this blog."
Typical unoriginal negro comment.

"First of all, Detroit's problems started long before Coleman's term."
True. It started when white people fled the black undertow. After enough white people fled, then a black mayor was elected, and the steady descent into hell began.

"The demise of the auto industry, was the catalyst."
No. Pittsburgh's steel industry died, but the city survived, because it's citizens and city government are mostly white.

"Just like you would like to blame the poor economy on Obama"
Obama has taken a bad economy, and spent 5 trillion dollars to make it worse. In case you haven't noticed, black unemployment is at historic levels.

"instead of a lying, hypocritcal inept Republican Party"
If you are troubled by lying, check out this site:
http://obamalies.net/

"you want to attribute the failing of a city on one mayor and one race of people?"
Yes, along with Birmingham, and others.

"Get real. Salt Lake City, Utah is considered one of the ten worse cities, reason?"
No. It isn't.
However, black neighborhoods are usually terrible, even in Utah.

"What about Oklahoma City, Oklahoma? What about Columbus, Ohio? When a city (or a country) is failing, you call in a black person to run it. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't."
When a city becomes majority black, it begins its downward spiral.

There is not a place on earth where quality of life has IMPROVED by increased black population.

The truth hurts.
Thanks for playing.

Midwestern said...

Some of my white FB friends are chanting anti-racist MLK BS today. This quote is the truth about the man's "legacy":

"To those of King’s own political views, then, the true meaning of the holiday is that it serves to legitimize the radical social and political agenda that King himself favored and to delegitimize traditional American social and cultural institutions — not simply those that supported racial segregation but also those that support a free market economy, an anti-communist foreign policy, and a constitutional system that restrains the power of the state rather than one that centralizes and expands power for the reconstruction of society and the redistribution of wealth."

from "The King Holiday and Its Meaning"

http://amren.com/ar/1998/02/index.html#cover

Anonymous said...

black people have lots of kids

white people do not


game over

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

White people pay for black fecundity; blacks do not. When this ends, game over you POS troll

Celticsempai said...

Paul:

Congrats…This is THE site to go to !!!....Plus Amren……Great articles and posters ...some very thought provoking, with wit, satire and intelligence….and a dose of reality.

Speaking of De-riot…..Philly is not far behind…Another vicious beating last night in OLD CITY a supposedly nice area..trendy bars, near the historic sites…a 23 year old Temple Grad……Here we go again….. 20 murders in Killadelphia #1 in the nation. The comments from the people afterwards are telling of the state of how things are….

http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/news/local_news/beating-victim%E2%80%99s-mother-talks-to-fox-29

Businesses in Philly are leaving in droves…..I don’t like to go downtown. It is only going to get worse. The arch diocese of Philly is closing over HALF the catholic elementary and high schools in the city. This is where all the remaining whites and some blacks trying to get away from the public school hell in the city send their kids, there will be another mass exodus of whites to the suburbs…..its going to get very ugly…..

Anonymous said...

"What about Oklahoma City, Oklahoma? What about Columbus, Ohio? When a city's team is failing, you call in a black person to run it. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't."

Hue Jackson, Raheem Morris, Art Shell.

Anonymous said...

'White people pay for black fecundity; blacks do not. When this ends, game over you POS troll'

Chindia has 3 BILLION hungry people.
I see more chinese and Indians in
so cal...
and Mexicans.
SBPDL..did you know USA now has about 30% of all Haitians,
they have moved here. yikes

~AV~ said...

Unknown said...
@ Midwestern:

"...What do you mean by “racial justice,” “social justice,” and just plain “justice,” and have you done any price-shopping on it?"


“Racial justice,” “social justice,” and just plain “justice" are code words for "revenge." And it will cost everything White people have, and then some.



IN BRA...

It is spelled "JUST-US"...not justice

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 15, 2012 9:17 PM): But black leaders seems to think that if whites are so upset about it, then it must be good for them. This is going to turn out to be very bad for them. It will probably be even worse for them than for whites.

Which all goes to show how that "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" bullcrap only goes so far.

Trust Blacks not to learn history's most basic lessons.

~AV~ said...

Anonymous said...
black people have lots of kids
white people do not
game over

***********************************

Luckily whites are smarter and healthier as a race, and the best part...

all the lil black bastard chirrens if they don't kill one another for chinese made $25.00 shoes, will kill each other over something as seemingly worthless...while we watched as amused spectators...

for the black bastard chirren will be the future TARGET of white distain and austerity cuts...doncha' know?

breed on you worthless slack jawed simians...breed on!

in the end...as we have see in Detroit, your demise will be left up to you...when the black bastard chirren mouths open and cry for fried chicken and grape drank...you will have no plantation keeper to run to...

As we can see, the plantation of Detroit...requires overseers, and in the end, these people won't be black, you as a race are incapable of anything BUT f*cking like animals and crying out for scraps of food from whitie...

americathedead said...

"black people have lots of kids"

...and animal numbers increase when there is abundant food available.

Reduce the food and the numbers will decrease. The answer may be harsh but it is perfect in it's simplicity.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 16, 2012 8:08 AM): Detroit was a lesson for those too busy to read Atlas Shrugged.

Thread winner!

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 15, 2012 10:02 PM): It would be interesting if one with more time and energy on their hands than I could plot on a graph the percentage of blacks in Detroit vs perhaps falling income levels over the last few decades. By doing that maybe one could pin-point the tipping point/point-of-no-return with population levels...

I have already issued this challenge >here<

The example I have provided gives the escalating population percentages and behavioral changes common to them, only for Muslims, not Blacks.

Anonymous said...

You should write an article that dares to ask the question: MLK Day; Does it mean more to white people than it does to black people?

I will not be surprised by the answer, but would hope someone with a little more intelligence than I, could really tap into this holiday and what it means to the SWPL/DWL crowd versus the black flash mob/welfare crowd.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 16, 2012 10:36 AM): black people have lots of kids

white people do not


game over


Don't you just love these solemn pronouncements by wannabe pundits who clearly have ZERO understanding of the situation?

As always, like the so-called "Palestinians";

Blacks never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.

In this case they miss the opportunity by having children that slaughter each other with total abandon. Any hope that Blacks might have of demographically replacing Whites is automatically canceled by their complete and utter dependence upon White technology and productivity to survive.

There is no finer example of this than Detroit.

SAVANT said...

If I were the governor I'd say 'great - the city's yours. Now off you go and don't bother us for help antime soon'.

Both sides get their wish. Seems simple to me.

Anonymous said...

Check out the link Eric gave to the Chuck E. Cheese incident outside Detroit.

The news video clearly shows the victims where white though no mention of the perps was made. However, from the background images the place looks like it has a lot of black patrons. So I would not be surprised if the perps were black.

In short a white family is celebrating their kid's 7th birthday when the grandmother asks the people at a neighboring table to not use foul language. She got her answer in the form of a beat down and ended up in the hospital. Based upon the location of this place, I'd place good odds that the perps where black.

Whiskey said...

I will be upfront, I admire King. Not as a plaster saint, but as a real man of real physical courage, and fantastic political instincts. Unlike Saul Alinsky, who accomplished nothing, King was able to use White divisions, principally those in the North and West and Midwest elites, and the masses in the suburbs watching TV, to get the end of Segregation and just as importantly, shape its successor Affirmative Action.

That was a brilliant and amazing political campaign, using mostly TV, and manipulating White opinion and opponents, that Radical Reconstructionists with the entire Union Army, brave men like Homer Plessy, the NAACP, W.E.B. Dubois, George Washington Carver, Paul Robeson, the American Communist Party, and others all failed at. King understood how TV, the suburbs, and private cars had reshaped America, and knew how to use it.

Was he a plagiarist? Sure. Washington owned slaves. Was he a womanizer? Certainly. So was FDR and Ike. Did he beat his wife and girlfriends, Ike Turner style? I don't know. Patton slapped soldiers, and he was a great man. Flaws do not detract from greatness, everyone has them. Actions define greatness, King was great in his political skills coupled with ungodly physical courage.

HOWEVER, his tragic flaw was that he could not see that Affirmative Action, White population decline, sustained hard times, would create White fight after White flight became impossible. For King, America would always be in an expanding, prosperous economy, built on "morally bad things" and thus amenable both politically and morally to wealth transfers. He could not see how America would as it had in the past enter sustained hard times, which coupled with White population declines would obliterate fairly rapidly consensus on wealth transfers and non-White preferences. So like Bismarck and the Sun King, he built a great empire. That after him, the deluge.

~AV~ said...

Whiskey...

MLK will be tossed into the dustbin...along with other blacks that were ONCE held in high esteem...by DWLs...and older blacks used to play by the rules...

for the new black man only wants to be represented by THUGS...Waters, Holder, Jackson-Lee, Obama, Sharpton, Jackson and others who reject the white man's societal rules and embrace WELFARE rights as the replacement for civil rights...

Should have never promised the negro fools 3 acres and a mule...

~AV~ said...

...and oh...to all you YTs out there who have purged you white guilt....

Happy Buckwheat's Birthday!!!!!!

Brother Anonymous said...

@Anonymous -- "The rhetoric seems to be getting increasingly desperate."

I think this is right. They'll continue to apply the theory of disparate impact to everything they can think of, until people are forced to make a choice. For instance, Krugman in the NYT today arguing that wealth inequality is the new racism. An Untouchable White like Krugman apparently feels these sorts of arguments won't affect him, but readers presented with these ideas will eventually be forced to make a choice, and that choice will at least be partially motivated by their own sense of self-preservation. As the left goes more insane, more fence-sitters -- who like to think of themselves as "good people," but otherwise don't want to make trouble -- will increasingly understand the outcomes of left-wing racial politics.

Ben N Indiana said...

Off topic . . .

What happens to Whites when 'planted' in 3rd-world cultures?

Watch this interview with Miles Romney (Mitt's kin) who was born, raised and lives in Mexico.

It's very enlightening how White folks thrive in Mexico. The exact inverse of many Mexicans in America!

Mitts kin in Mexico

Anonymous said...

Stuff black people don't like: Weather forecasters

http://amren.com/news/2012/01/south-africa-weather-forecasters-threatened-with-jail-if-predictions-wrong/

Sorry for being off topic but this is hilarious.

countenance said...

Before we start making a hero of Gov. Rick Snyder, realize that he's for open borders and more immigration. Don't blame me, I would have voted for Mike Cox (who endorsed the anti-affirmative action measure in Michigan in 2006 when no other major statewide politicians would).

Anonymous said...

Zenster's right. Don't intervene (with white tax dollars) and let them rot.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 16, 2012 4:37 PM): Don't intervene (with white tax dollars) and let them rot.

Thank you. This endless no-win situation has to stop.

Intervene and we're paternalistic racists.

Don't intervene and we are uncaring.

The bastards had better STFU with this crap.

They need to come crawling on their hands and knees begging for help before one speck of it is sent their way. It's long past tea for Black America to get a solid glimpse of where their "leaders" (i.e., shakedown artistes like Sharpton), are taking them.

You read it here first: Before the end of this decade, stories of human cannibalism will emerge from Detroit.

Anonymous said...

"Thank you. This endless no-win situation has to stop."

Every time I hear these debates in which blacks play the victim card from both sides of the argument, I think my head is going to explode.

There is no greater example than the death penalty.

Fact: Most murderers are black.
Fact: Most black murder victims are killed by black offenders.

On one hand, blacks complain that the death penalty is handed-down disproportionately to blacks.

On the other hand, blacks complain that a black life is "less valued", because the murderer of a negro is less likely to be executed than the murderer of a white.

WTF? Did you get that??????

If not, read it again.

They are complaining that too many blacks are being executed while simultaneously arguing that not enough blacks are being executed.

For fuck's sake, you can't have it both fucking ways!!!!

Cap'n Crunch said...

DAY by DAY inches a little bit closer to the cutoff of the EBT card.
Several offices have not only consolidated but have CLOSED here in the BOSTON area. It may not be tomorrow; but be advised the day is coming, and coming up fast. I for one, can't wait.

Gentrify America said...

There is a way out for Actual Black Run cities to restore a white population and economic growth. This is accomplished through the complex and infamous art and science of gentrification. In the United States, there is only one modern example of a city that has reversed the tide of the black undertow and that is Washington, DC. While the black undertow still exists in large parts of the city, it is clear that it no longer dominates daily life in much of Washington, DC as it had for several decades.

DC always had a significant black population due to importation of slaves since it's inception. Blacks composed nearly a third of the population from DC's founding until the 1910s when the population started to rise in DC. The white share of the population peaked in 1920 at 74.7%, and begin a 70 year slide. White people in DC kept a well maintained society through rigorous enforcement of segregation, especially in the schools. This all ended in the 1954 school year, when the city officially desegregated. Black students, who were in the most poorly performing schools in the nation, where now attending all white schools which were some of the top in the nation. Fights began to break out, and white students at two DC high schools even had strikes due to the conduct of blacks who now attended their schools, including; who could have guessed it; blacks bumping into white girls in the hallway and touching them "suggestively."

To dispel the notion that violent black flash mobs are a 21st century phenomenon, we see where they started:

"Racial tensions erupted at a Washington Post-sponsored Thanksgiving football game in 1962. The game featured the winners of the parochial league, St. John's, whose supporters were predominately white, and the public school league, Eastern, whose supporters were mostly black. After St. John's defeated Eastern, thousands of blacks rioted and beat up white spectators."

Gentrify America said...

With the exception of the upper northwest part of the city, most of the rest of the city had experienced white flight to Arlington County, VA, and Montgomery and Prince George's County, MD. The White population dropped to 27% in 1970, while the black population rose to a super majority of 71%, ushering in the era of the "Chocolate City."

During the 80s and 90s, the white share of the population stopped going down, but their absolute numbers continued to decrease as whites escaped the city at the same rate as blacks. At the height of the black crack epidemic, homicides jumped from 147 in 1985 to 482(!) in 1991. In a 5 year span, nearly 2000 people were murdered, dubbing DC the "Murder Capital."

Then something happened. Just like it's always darkest before dawn, during that period some of the most violent criminals must have killed each other. That, combined with rapid expansion of the police force; a changing of policy in DC courts where murderers began receiving 25 years to life sentences instead of reduced charges, 5 to 10 years for manslaughter; and one of the highest abortion rates in America saw a huge decline in the amount of black crime from the highest in America to what you would normally associate with a majority black city.

Simultaneously, white urban pioneers, many of which were gay, began "settling" in formerly nice neighborhoods which were relatively close to white neighborhoods, sparked the opening of new bars, restaurants and shops. DC, even though run by a majority black city council and mayor decided to also destroy a large percentage of its public housing and encourage the inhabitants to move to inner-ring suburbs in Prince George's County. They gave some token concessions to black housing activists by requiring that a small percentage of any new development on former public housing land including a small amount of reduced rate units.

Areas close to downtown DC that had a thriving night scene became popular with 20 and 30 somethings from the suburbs, and many decided to move in. With a stable population, grocery stores began opening again, which further made the city more hospitable for normal white people to live in again.

Gentrify America said...

With a huge decline in the amount spent on social services and public schools combined with large amounts of federal money, DC finally had money to invest in repaving sidewalks, roads, reopening abandoned parks, filling and opening pools again in the late 90s. They started building new libraries and constructed a massive new convention center. When the Wizards and Capitals moved into the new MCI center in 1998 to a degraded part of Downtown, bringing in thousands of white patrons for games, shows, and concerts, businesses began to opening. This sparked the full-on condo boom, with even more retail, services, restaurants and bars opening to fill the new demand. The same thing is now happening to the area around Nationals Park.


From 2000-2010, the white share of the population grew .8% per year, and the black population share declined about 1%. Dc is officially considered less than 50% now, with official numbers to come out soon. The white population is probably growing even faster now, as there is an even more explosive construction boom in DC than in the late 90s-2007. Not only are new condos, apartments and town homes being built, old buildings and homes are being renovated into new housing at an even faster pace than new housing is being built. New offices and retail is being built as well. Many restaurants, bars and retail are opening up in formerly run down buildings. People in DC are more optimistic than ever in the cities future. The only thing lagging is the schools, but there are already several that accelerated track programs that are majority white.


For cities to reverse the oppressive experience of climate change, they probably need to be a destination, big name city like DC, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Tampa, Detroit, Dallas, Cleveland, Los Angeles etc. I have a hard time imagining a place like Birmingham experiencing gentrification, but I could be wrong.

As there is a tipping point when it comes to climate change, there is also a tipping point in reversing it. Once the white population increases enough, and the black population decreases enough, money is freed up to actually improve things to make a normal civilized existence, and optimism on the retail, employment, and real estate front shoot up. The more it goes up, it reaches a point of critical mass where it is nearly unstoppable.

DC has just breached this point of critical mass. The Black Tide is retreating out to sea (Prince George's County), and a shining new city is growing brighter every day.

Anonymous said...

For cities to reverse the oppressive experience of climate change, they probably need to be a destination, big name city like DC, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Tampa, Detroit, Dallas, Cleveland, Los Angeles etc. I have a hard time imagining a place like Birmingham experiencing gentrification, but I could be wrong

D.C. could undergo this process because the driving wheel of the economy-i.e.,the Federal Government-wasn't going anywhere. Those condos and nightclubs are bought and patronized by a stream of policy wonks that will probably never end. As soon as one generation retires,another one is already in place to take over the leases and reserve tables. And this will most likely stay that way until the latest equivalent of the Mongols ride through the gates of the city and start stacking up heads at the major intersections.

Other cities don't have the luxury of a sugardaddy that's never going to ever go away. Once a large company leaves,trying to get it to move back is almost impossible. And without some way to make a living,those urban pioneers can't show up and start making inroads.

I can go along with the assertions you're making up to a point,but the gentrification process can probably only work in places with a large government-and possibly university-employment base,because governments and universities tend not to do much moving around. If a city is NOT blessed with a large and more-or-less steady source employer,and the place implodes due to black misbehavior and the resulting white flight,then I'm going to say that at that point,it's too far gone to save.

Anonymous said...

Has US black population doubled since..THE GREAT $ GIVE AWAY?

Gentrify America said...

"D.C. could undergo this process because the driving wheel of the economy-i.e.,the Federal Government-wasn't going anywhere. Those condos and nightclubs are bought and patronized by a stream of policy wonks that will probably never end. As soon as one generation retires,another one is already in place to take over the leases and reserve tables. And this will most likely stay that way until the latest equivalent of the Mongols ride through the gates of the city and start stacking up heads at the major intersections."

You raise a good point about the presence of the Federal Government, from the 50s until the 90s Federal Angencies were being outsourced to the suburbs of DC, like the Defence, FDA, USDA, NASA, CIA, NOAA, etc. This was draining jobs from the central part of DC, and the feeling was that the Federal Government would slowly entirely relocate to suburban areas save for the symoblic seats of government like the Capitol, White House, Supreme Court, the Smithsonian museums, National Archives (a large chunk of which was relocated to the suburbs) and all the national monuments. There were a lot of special interest groups that fought to reverse the tide of job loss out of DC. They worked with the local DC government, and lobbied Republicans and Democrats in Congress to work to keep federal headquarters in DC. Once they stemmed this tide, federal contractors and other private employers began building again in DC.

The point is that DC proper was on the verge of becoming a bombed out ghetto citywide, with no jobs and no decent housing/retail/services save for a few enclaves. The federal government would have and does to an extent run fine in Arlington, Fairfax, Montgomery and Prince George's Counties.

Also, until 1997 there was no legitimate concert venue for big time acts to perform, and the Bullets/Wizards and Capitols played in Landover a few miles from DC in Maryland. Ironically the Redskins moved to Landover the same season the Wizards/Capitals moved into the Verizon nee MCI Center in Chinatown. This sparked huge development in the area, much like what is happening in near Southeast/Capital Riverfront by the Nationals Stadium.

At the very least we can learn from Washington, DC as the only modern example of a city which successfully began reversing climate change. A major American city that was once 71% black is on pace to become majority white again within the decade.

Anonymous said...

At the very least we can learn from Washington, DC as the only modern example of a city which successfully began reversing climate change. A major American city that was once 71% black is on pace to become majority white again within the decade.

I'll have to do some looking. Austin,Texas has been doing the downtown gentrification thing for about a decade now,but since I live a couple of towns away and hate the traffic there,I only go to the place when an expedition can't be avoided.

I don't know how well that gentrification has succeeded,although I do know that some of the once very pleasant small towns to the north of the city have been overrun with weave shops,nail shops,and rim shops.

Austin,however,is non-typical. It's got a large population of state government employees,the attendant large population of lawyers,and it's the home of the University of Texas,so you can throw in a bunch of academics,as well as the folk that actually do some physical work on the campus and keep the roofs from leaking and the potholes from reaching Congolese standards.

Thus,the gentrification process is largely reliant on Other People's Money,and I have very grave reservations when trying to decide if the techniques used can work in places that don't have a heavy proportion of government,or quasi-government jobs. I can see the scales tipping back towards civilization,IF one has that job base that can't easily be relocated to another place,but lacking that,I can't see it happening.

Anonymous said...

I live in the ATX, I can comment. Friend of mine lives downtown, two blocks from 12th and chicon...the heart of darkness.

It's truly eye-opening to be there on the first of the month when they all have money. Black folks everywhere, shambling around like zombies.

It hasn't gotten violent yet, but it's become a little uncomfortable for the hipsters there. It's funny to see one on a bicycle, swerving around a crackhead. Or a broke pimp trying to holler at a UT coed.

The other day I was at a gas station in that area. I ignored two black kids as they kept asking me for money. They had an old black guy with him and one point he said "you think you in the wrong neighborhood huh?"

It's a little uncomfortable now. If it gets bad and kids start taking people's money instead of asking, a lot of young white eyes will open.

Anonymous said...

I live in the ATX, I can comment. Friend of mine lives downtown, two blocks from 12th and chicon...the heart of darkness.

Thanks for the input! I have my trails on the occasions I have to make my expeditions,but 12th and Chicon isn't on any of them,and I confess to following the advice a friend gave me years ago,which boiled down to "Do NOT go east of I35 if you're south of Airport."

The few times I've had to do it,I did it in broad daylight and as quickly as I could.

And what damn fool would let his daughter live around there??? Are there really UT students in any number living around there? And if the answer is "yes",has the APD increased their presence in that area? I should hope they would,unless they want to be trying to track down rapists and other undesirables.

Anonymous said...

Interesting discussion. I really like the idea of "weaponizing Conscience". That perfectly describes what I lacked the words for regarding how militant Islam used our culture against us.

I somewhat disagree that DWLs are intentionally trying to destroy Western culture. I think they really believe or deceive themselves into thinking that we are "all the same". The concept of Democracy is built on us all being equal. Unfortunately, we are not. The defining trait that separates Sub-Saharan Africans from Eurasians seems to be the ability to empathize and the ability to empathize seems crucial to establishing a society where we "are all equal". We are all the same in our ability to understand "we are all the same". If you can't recognize that then you are different. DWLs refuse to acknowledge this difference.

I don't blame Africans for being un-empathetic any more than I blame a lion for killing the young of its competitor. That is just how they are for the most part. The fundamental differences are so obvious once you open your eyes. We have Africans in Liberia, Europe and North America committing the same atrocities. Is this somehow due to interaction with white people as DWL's and they African pets would tell us? Hardly a reasonable conclusion given the general behavior of white people. That kind of cruelty rests firmly on the ability to not empathize at all with the victim.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 20, 2012 5:46 PM): Interesting discussion. I really like the idea of "weaponizing Conscience". That perfectly describes what I lacked the words for regarding how militant Islam used our culture against us.

I drew that comparison from an article by counterjihad writer, Fjordman, titled "Recommendations for the West". In it he cites work by Raymond Kraft:

Writer Raymond Kraft explains Western softness very well: The Islamic movement “has turned the civility of the United States and Europe into a weapon and turned it against us. It has weaponized niceness, it has weaponized compassion, it has weaponized the fundamental decency of Western Civilization. We have become too civilized to defeat our enemies, perhaps too civilized to survive.”

As another denizen of SBPDL put it, "DWLs are weaponizing Blacks to use them against us".

I somewhat disagree that DWLs are intentionally trying to destroy Western culture. I think they really believe or deceive themselves into thinking that we are "all the same".

You may wish to read a piece by blogger, Hesperado. He has done some heavy lifting in analyzing the origins and function of PCMC (Politically Correct Multi-Culturalism).

This PC MC machine would not be able to be mainstream and dominant throughout the West, as it is, were it merely the province of Leftists. No: over the past 60-odd years, it has won the hearts and minds of millions of non-Leftist Westerners too -- Centrists, Conservatives, Elites and ordinary people of all walks of life, of all economic levels, of all social classes.

It has not won the hearts and minds of millions throughout the West because it is essentially pernicious. Nor has this emotional and intellectual conquest, this paradigm shift in worldview, occurred as the result of some dastardly cabal of evil elites machinating Macchiavellianly on the masses. It has not been imposed from without, as some kind of coup d'├ętat: it has been a more or less voluntary change -- a coup de state of mind. Thus, this paradigm shift has not been an intrusion of some alien ideology. It has evolved organically out of the goodness of Western heritage that has its roots in the four pillars of Judaeo-Christian Graeco-Roman wisdom. For all that, however, it is obviously not good in any simplistic sense: it is paradoxically a process of excess health -- "too much of a good thing".


[to be continued]

Zenster said...

You are correct in noting how cultural relativism (e.g., we're all alike), has perverted legal equality into some lunatic form of universalism.

The defining trait that separates Sub-Saharan Africans from Eurasians seems to be the ability to empathize and the ability to empathize seems crucial to establishing a society where we "are all equal".

If not "ability", I would suggest "capacity". Blacks might be able to empathize but not in sufficient quantity to build high-functioning civilizations.

DWLs refuse to acknowledge this difference.

That's because it would pull the foundations out from under their already shabby house of philosophical cards.

Is this somehow due to interaction with white people as DWL's and their African pets would tell us?

This is quite possibly true. I examine this idea in one of the forthcoming parts of my essay, "The Dis-Integration of America". In an oversimplified form; White Flight essentially triggers a prey response in Blacks that puts them into predator mode.

When in their typically more impoverished native circumstances Blacks merely revert to their habitual criminality. Injected into a "target rich" White environment, they present a sort of criminal megalomania.

That kind of cruelty rests firmly on the ability to not empathize at all with the victim.

All of which certainly argues in favor of your assertion that it is a matter of ability and not just capacity.

Discard said...

I disagree, Zenster, with your link Hesparado, that the Multi-cult is not an alien ideology imposed on us by an evil elite. Were it not an impostion, why would we require political correctness to enforce obedience?
The multi-cult is a synthetic social virus, concocted by leftists, that mimics the values of Western Civilization in order to displace them. It is modeled on the Christian tradition of guilt and repentance, and much thought and effort has gone into this seamless hijacking. Every institution teaches racial guilt to Whites, and then offers relief from the burden: Repent and be saved. Renounce the ways of sin (racism) and become part of the Elect. These dumb-assed SWPLs are just a bunch of ignorant and sanctimonious fundamentalists, but they are following some extremely slick and malignant preachers, who know exactly what they're doing.

Zenster said...

Discard: I disagree, Zenster, with your link Hesparado, that the Multi-cult is not an alien ideology imposed on us by an evil elite.

My point in linking to Hesperado's work was to provide one of the few explanations for why Political Correctness is embraced by Liberals and Conservatives alike. Now, it may well be argued that many so-called Conservatives who support PCMC (Politically Correct Multi-Culturalism) are RINO (Republican In Name Only), Senator Lindsey Graham being a prime example.

However, if PCMC was some arch conspiracy, there would be a trail of breadcrumbs to follow with regard to its implementation. To date, there just isn't much in the way of it past original demoralization work by the KGB. Too many people voluntarily adopt this stricture for it to be solely attributable to some "evil elite".

Were it not an imposition, why would we require political correctness to enforce obedience?

Then please explain how Politically Correct measures like so-called hate speech and hate crime laws were enacted with bipartisan support.

Please understand that I regard the output of Ivy League schools, regardless of partisan affiliation, to be hopelessly infected with PCMC by their time of graduation.

The multi-cult is a synthetic social virus, concocted by leftists, that mimics the values of Western Civilization in order to displace them.

Then what about the modern Christian church's wholehearted adoption of this Leftist "social virus"? The Left is so often totally anti-religion that this almost effortless dovetailing of their agendas, with respect to PCMC, defies easy explanation.

It is modeled on the Christian tradition of guilt and repentance, and much thought and effort has gone into this seamless hijacking.

I'd prefer to stick with your "social virus" explanation as it readily encompasses the evolution of Political Correctness from being a behavioral modifier in Soviet Russia to its transmutation over to its current manifestation as a deconstructionist tool for dismantling Western civilization.

Every institution teaches racial guilt to Whites, and then offers relief from the burden: Repent and be saved. Renounce the ways of sin (racism) and become part of the Elect. These dumb-assed SWPLs are just a bunch of ignorant and sanctimonious fundamentalists, but they are following some extremely slick and malignant preachers, who know exactly what they're doing.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

Again, I dispute just how much most academic Liberals actually comprehend the efficacy of PCMC. More likely, they see it deliver over the desired results and it is left in place because of that.

As I continue to insist:

Never attribute to conspiracy that which can be explained by simple stupidity.

Occam's razor applies:

Never multiply entities needlessly.

It's more familiar form being:

The simplest explanation is usually the likeliest one.

Your formulation of PCMC in a religious format is appropriate. It requires a similar faith and even zealotry as Anonymous (January 21, 2012 5:53 PM) noted over in the "Coleman Young's Detroit" thread:

They love to think of themselves as "truth tellers" and yet, at the same time, they exclude facts that don't suit their dogma. They are, therefore, religious zealots, not the followers of science and reason they pretend to be.

It is what I labeled "selective empiricism". The long-awaited death of Communism forced Liberals to adopt a new banner to march under. The terms "social justice" and environmentalism are code words for this same old anti-Western Communist drivel and both of them elicit near-religious fervor from their adherents.

How else to explain those say that we should "jail or execute global warming deniers"?

Just as often these new causes of "social justice" and environmentalism motivate their followers to engage in human sacrifice. Be it sending their children off to die in Africa at the hands of those they sought to uplift or rain forest environmental protests that turn deadly, Leftists continue to hurl their children into the political furnace of Liberal "thinking".

Please feel free to respond, Discard, as I would enjoy whittling this down to a mutually agreeable nub.