Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Expressed: Black University of Florida Football Players Poke Fun at Whitey from Ohio State

PK Note: The whole concept of SBPDL was started as a joke. When I sat down to write The Crucifixion of Tim Tebow that appears at Takimag today, I reflected on how far this blog/site has come. People have come to rely on SBPDL, depending on what is written here. Finding value in it. One website went as far to call the writing here some of the most innovative since the start of the Internet.


Ridiculous praise, but knowing that people hold what you do to such esteem makes you want to work harder and harder. In the coming months, you're going to see what is meant by that "work harder and harder" remark.I am to misbehave.


The war for truth on Red Tails. Detroit's collapse. Obama's War on White America. I HAD people. The continued violence from the Black Undertow. The Hunger Games. Black people's reliance on the social construct of Black athletic domination to provide the only positive examples of their community. Black Fictional Heroes Month during Black History Month. 


For too long, our guilt has outweighed our anger. The day is coming when our anger outweighs our guilt. 


If SBPDL plays any part in helping this occur, then it was because of readers like you who helped spread the message.

University of Florida "special admit" athletes made fun of white Ohio State players
Out of a population of more than 50,000 students, the University of Florida is proud to have enrolled at the school roughly 5,000 Black students who help make the Gator Nation as the second best school in the nation for awarding Black people undergraduate degrees. What an accolade for a school that 40 years ago had maybe 500 Black students.

Part of the effort to accommodate Black students at every turn, the University of Florida football team has resorted to recruiting predominately Black students in the hopes of fielding a team that resembles the Historical Black College and University (HBCU) that sport embarrassing graduation rates of 50 percent or less. If HBCU's can't provide an education to Black students, a Predominately White Institution (PWI) can lower academic standards to help out a brother in need:
Football and men’s basketball players on the nation’s big-time college teams averaged hundreds of points lower on their SATs than their classmates, and some of the gaps are so large they call into question the lengths to which schools will go to win.

The biggest gap between football players and students as a whole occurred at the University of Florida, where players scored 346 points lower than the school’s overall student body. That’s larger than the difference in scores between typical students at the University of Georgia and Harvard University.

These numbers are from 2008; your average UF football player posted an SAT of 890. It's a safe assumption that most of the Black athletes on the squad - did we tell you that in 2010, the entire football recruiting class was Black? - require 'special admission' status, with many of these players qualifying as learning disabled because of their pitiful scholastic aptitude (fitting that Disingenuous White Liberals have stated that it is inhumane to execute a criminal with an IQ under 70; they have no problem admitting them to college if they can run, jump, or catch a football). Then again, isn't that SAT 'culturally biased' or something:
An Atlanta Journal-Constitution study of athletes’ admissions qualifications partly confirmed Hewitt’s point. On average, black and white students arrive on campus with much different academic backgrounds and graduate at much different rates. Athletes’ experiences reflect those differences, and those differences affect the statistics for athletes as a whole.
Blacks are far better represented on the playing field than in the classroom. Only about 1.8 percent of white students were scholarship athletes, compared with 6.4 percent of black students. Some schools’ athlete-student demographic differences were huge. For example, about a third of the black students in Colorado’s 2002 freshman class were scholarship athletes.
The SAT has been criticized as racially biased, and black students as a whole enter college with lower scores than white students. The difference in the average scores for white and black students was 149 points at public universities in the six Bowl Championship Series conferences, an AJC study showed. That explains part of the average 124-point gap between an athlete’s SAT score and the score for a typical student on his or her campus.
ESPN's Outside the Line program did a special investigation of UF's main rival Florida State University (FSU), a university under head football coach Bobby Bowden that relied exclusively on "special admit" Black athletes to win games.

Turns out, more than a third of FSU's football players were listed as "learning disabled":
ESPN reports that Florida State University uses diagnoses of “learning disabilities” to provide extra help to athletes struggling with their schoolwork. The investigation, by ESPN’s Outside the Lines program, aired yesterday and was based on interviews with a former learning specialist at Florida State who is now suing the university. Athletes with learning disabilities are able to receive more-intense academic support and are eligible to apply for waivers from the NCAA that relax certain academic requirements. More than a third of Florida State’s football team, and three-quarters of its men’s basketball team, have received such diagnoses, ESPN reported.

They aren't "learning disabled"; they're just Black.Regardless of trillions of dollars spent over the years to help alleviate the racial gap in learning, Black kids still fail at astonishing. If they can play football, they fail upwards it seems.

Which brings us to the story of the 2012 Capital One Bowl game between the Florida Gators and the Ohio State Buckeyes. Just like Black Tennessee Volunteers who made fun of Jacob Hester, the white running back from LSU, who said he should be "playing for Air Force"; and just like all the majority Black defenses in the NFL who made fun of Peyton Hillis, the white running back from Cleveland, in 2010, Ohio State's Tyler Moeller said the almost all-Black Florida Gator team hurled bigotry at the white guys on his team:
Trash talking is as old as football itself. A player baiting another player with a taunt or threat is usually par for the course during any game, especially a game between rivals or with championship significance.
So, it was no surprise that Monday's Gator Bowl between Florida and Ohio State — two teams that have loved Urban Meyer — had a little more vitriol than usual. What was surprising was the type of caustic comments being said.
Ohio State linebacker Tyler Moeller said Florida players hurled racial slurs at him throughout the game and that that sparked some of the chippiness during the 24-17 Florida win.


"They're classless. That's the way I'd put it," Moeller said, according to Marcus Hartman from Buckeye Sports Bulletin. "I've never seen more people swing at our players and call us racial slurs. I've never been called a 'cracker' more in my life than I have today. So I don't really have much respect for them in terms of that but they're a good team. They came out and outplayed us today."

I'll be the first to admit I've never heard a player complain about this in terms of reverse racism (which is still just racism) and really, you rarely hear about this type of thing at all on the collegiate level, though it probably exists. I'm sure there was a slew of unsavory things said on that football field, but who knew the "C-word" was still a racial slur that anyone used?
Breakdown from 2008 SAT scores in SEC. How low must the Black scores be?
I'm not trying to make light of the situation, but I thought it went out of style after comedian Chris Rock ran the slur into the ground during his HBO special in 1999. The word is probably as relevant now as some of the words used in the infamous 1975 Saturday Night Live skit "Racist Word Association Interview" with Chevy Chase and Richard Pryor.
I do wonder what other things he and other players were called and what they might have yelled back? I'm sure there was some profanity dropped that probably drew more anger — and some colorful rebuttal — than the "C-word."
Ohio State defensive back Travis Howard, who is from Miami, told Hartman that that kind of trash talk is common in the state of Florida.
It's interesting that in other leagues, especially soccer leagues where there are many different ethnicities on one field, this kind of stuff is severely punished. Unfortunately, this will probably go relatively unnoticed.

What's new in Black-Run America (BRA)? This episode will never be made into a movie, but an inverted episode will be written into the script of a major Hollywood film that was released a few years back. The Express, telling the story of the first Black Heisman Trophy winner Ernie Davies, utilized overzealous writers to fabricate examples of white racism (the only kind that exists) toward the integrated Syracuse football team, even though it didn't happen in real-life:

A few intense scenes of racial bigotry in "The Express" -- Hollywood's portrayal of the former Syracuse University football star -- have prompted some of Davis' former teammates to say the filmmakers fumbled the ball.

"As a work of fiction, the movie is terrific," said Ger Schwedes, captain of the 1959 SU national championship team. "But that's not the way it was."


In a letter to this newspaper, published today, Schwedes lists 11 factual shortcomings in the movie, which is based on Davis' heroic and tragic life.


"Because so many of the '59 members have called, e-mailed and written to me with their objections, I'm compelled to set the record straight," he writes.
 

Schwedes said the letter reflects the consensus of 39 ex-teammates who returned to Syracuse for the movie's world premiere Sept. 12. About 12 later reviewed the letter before it was submitted.

"You won't find any dissent over what I've written," he said.

Schwedes said the former teammates bristled over what they view as unfair portrayals of racism at West Virginia and SU.

At one point, during the film's gala opening last month in Syracuse, some players grew so upset at the emerging story -- including its depiction of coach Ben Schwartzwalder -- that they nearly left the theater before the closing credits, according to two players.

"The Express" opened nationally last weekend and ranked sixth at the box office. It generated $4.5 million, about a quarter of the revenue of the nation's top-grossing film, "Beverly Hills Chihuahua."

But "The Express" -- showing powerful images of a racially divided America in 1959 -- was always destined to generate far more debate than the usual popcorn movie.

During one seven-minute sequence in the film, SU's racially mixed team faces an angry white crowd at West Virginia, where fans shout slurs and throw garbage, and even the referees are corrupt. Schwartzwalder, played by actor Dennis Quaid, warns his team to stay helmeted, fearing they will be hit by beer bottles.

"That's the way they do things down here," the coach says.

The movie sets the date of the game as Oct. 24, 1959.

Trouble is, it never happened.

The record book shows Davis, a sophomore, had a breakout game in 1959 against the Mountaineers, rushing for 141 yards. But the game took place in Syracuse.

The teams did play in Morgantown, W.Va., on Oct. 22, 1960. Behind Davis, SU won 45-0, delivering the worst home defeat in West Virginia history. Newspaper accounts mention no racial incidents, though such issues rarely made newsprint in that era.

Though racial conflict at the 1960 Cotton Bowl game, in Texas, has been well-documented, West Virginia critics say the filmmakers seem to have picked their school arbitrarily to serve as the film's composite face of racism.

"The dialogue itself is deplorable, stereotype propagating works of slanderous fiction that both never happened and are nothing but attacks on the state," the West Virginia campus newspaper, The Daily Athenaeum, recently argued.

Several former SU players from that era -- including Schwedes, offensive tackle Bob Yates, tackle John Brown and quarterback Dick Easterly -- have stated publicly that they recall no such racial incidents in Morgantown.

Brown, an African-American, said he never experienced a regular season crowd or game like that during his time at SU.

Nor is there mention of any West Virginia ruckus in Robert C. Gallagher's 1999 book, "The Express: The Ernie Davis Story," on which the movie is based.

The book does note one anecdote from the 1960 game: On Davis' first three runs, a Mountaineer linemen twisted his ankle in the pile-up. Davis smiled at the guy and asked what he was trying to do.

Writes Gallagher: "The tackle, expecting a violent response, became embarrassed and said, 'Ernie, I'm sorry.' That was the last time Ernie's ankle was twisted that day."

The complaints bear a striking resemblance to those filed by Central New Yorkers in 1990, after filmmaker Oliver Stone's film, "Born on the Fourth of July."

That movie, based on the story of Vietnam vet-turned-war-critic Ron Kovic, showed Syracuse police beating peaceful protesters at a rally. In fact, the record showed that no attacks occurred -- at least, in Syracuse.

After receiving protests, Stone issued a public apology to the Syracuse police.

Film director Gary Fleder has not commented publicly on the West Virginia criticisms.

In a pre-premiere promotional video, Fleder described how he believed an early script for the movie lacked focus. He spent an hour with Jim Brown, the great running back who preceded Davis at SU, to discuss the movie.

"He (Brown) talked me through the real stuff ... the times, what he went through as a player, what Ernie went through as a player," Fleder said. "I thought, 'That's the story.'"

The 1959 team also quarrels with the portrayal of Schwartzwalder by Quaid, the movie's star. Quaid plays the coach as a good-hearted, slightly bigoted football genius who by the movie's end has been redeemed through his genuine concern for Davis.

Yates, who lives in Texas, said Quaid took too many artistic liberties with the former coach, to whom the team remains loyal. Yates said Schwartzwalder would never swear at a player, never drink alcohol in front of his team, never tolerate inequalities -- as Quaid's character does. The coach kept a strict honor code, and nobody ever overruled his edicts -- as Davis does several times in the movie.

"We as a team are truly appalled at the complete falsity of the portrayal of our coach," Yates wrote, in a letter to NBC sports host Bob Costas. "It was very hard for those members of the '59 team in attendance at the premiere not to leave en masse, as we had done before, after the 1960 Cotton Bowl, because of the injustice to Ernie."

Overall, the movie treats the coach kindly -- not mentioning later controversies, such as the 1970 walk-out by African-American athletes, which decimated the program.
That walk-out by Black players is a story for another day. The Express also tried to show racism toward Syracuse and the school Black players at the 1960 Cotton Bowl against an all-white Texas University team. Problem: there was none.

White guys on the football field should just be the kicker, place-holder, punter, and long-snapper. Maybe the quarterback. In a world where Black people are such great athletes, why should we believe white players can even compete with them?

That's what has happened at places like Florida, Florida State, and Alabama, where alumni and students have been conditioned to believe that only ebony athletes can help provide the spark for a solid football foundation. This helps them overlook the fact that that same ebony spark makes cities like Birmingham, Mobile, Tallahassee, Miami, Montgomery, Orlando, and Tampa incredibly unsafe to live in.  

Well, it takes "special admission" status to even get these "great" Black athletes enrolled in school.

There's your Gator Bait, Gator Nation. College football is the Opiate of America.

93 comments:

Anonymous said...

Black people need to friggin chill.

Anonymous said...

I've got "Serenity" on DVD, watched it a million times.

Awesome f'ing movie.

bubo said...

You can't watch these bowl games without that embarrassing NCAA commercial that extols black "collegiate student athletes" and praises them for graduating at a level 10 percent more than non athlete blacks. Imagine that, schools that have a vested interest in keeping these retarded blacks eligible to play football and basketball just happen to be graduating them too.

Anonymous said...

I am glad that people are beginning to stand up to this double standard!

Porter said...

Regarding the article on racial insults directed toward the white Ohio State linebacker…

It’s interesting (as in interesting how the sun rises in the East each morning) that the author’s first impulse is to downplay the black-on-white insults…as of course he would have done had the races been reversed: I’m sure plenty of naughty words were used on the football field, but who knew that “nigger” was still a racial slur that anyone used?

And then, “I'm not trying to make light of the situation.” This phrase, as any sentient being knows, is the standard preamble for one who is about to make light of a situation. And of course this is precisely what he proceeds to do.

He then muses, “ I do wonder what other things he and other players were called and what they might have yelled back?” Ahh well, the author is in luck, as I am privy to exactly what the white player yelled back. He yelled, Fuck off you slope-headed, flat-nosed, saucer-lipped, gold-toofed, man-animal hybrid, piece of obsolete farm equipment. He then marched back to the defensive huddle and called an inside tackle stunt with two-deep zone coverage.

But that’s not what he yelled back, is it? What he yelled back was………Nothing. Because had he responded in kind, he knew a predetermined chain of events would have been cast into motion as inexorable as any chemical reaction.

Those events would have unfolded as follows: 1) Every black on the Florida team (that is to say, the Florida team) would have attacked him immediately. 2) Every black on his team would have attacked him. 3) While he was convalescing in the hospital, or preparing to have his remains lowered into his cemetery plot, he would be notified of the revocation of his scholarship and expulsion from the university. 4) He would be forever shunned by polite society as “a hateful reminder of our racist past.”

So after about four nanoseconds of consideration, he sucked it up and just took it. As whites everywhere just take it. Every single day.

Whiskey said...

The Collegiate Athletes thing is both real and misleading. It counts: White female track and cross-country stars, volleyball stars, badminton, rowing, fencing, and other minor sports which DO give scholarships and often for White women (who tend to have higher grades than everyone but Asians of both races). If you are say, a cross country runner or fencer and not an Olympic elite your grades better be good because there is no pro career for you. Often these girls are quite intelligent and disciplined.

Four hard-studying White girls running Cross Country can counteract the miserable grades of a typical D1 Black football player.

Anonymous said...

Chinese vs Blacks in Montreal

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/viral-video/montreal-restaurant-brawl-756092

It's everywhere!

bobn said...

utilized overzealous writers to fabricate examples of white racism (the only kind that exists)

Well, there's a new default assumption in town.

See also this.

Even white folks - even "recovering liberals" - get tired of the crap.

KEV said...

'Though the rabbi later removed this statement from his online post,

this the type of attack launched on Gibson before his Passion of the Christ.'



DO YOU MEAN AFTER THE FILMS RELEASE???

Anonymous said...

This is off-topic, but have yall ever seen the "Mapping America" interactive web tool at the New York Times? It is a great and easy-to-use tool that will show you the demographic makeup of every census tract of the United States of America.

http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/explorer

You can put in addresses, intersections, zip codes, etc. and get a map that shows you the racial demographics of each census track.

I have found this tool to be very helpful for when I am reading a news article on the internet about some crime in the USA that I suspect might have something to do with the "black undertow", but when the DWL "journalists" deliberately leave out certain politically incorrect facts, such as what race the dangerous violent at-large apprehended criminal is.

For example, consider the following article about a shooting of a teenage girl in West Seattle, WA, on Dec. 27, 2011.

According to the NY Times' Mapping America tool, the neighborhood in West Seattle where this shooting took place is 21% black. That is REALLY HIGH for Seattle, since Seattle is only 6.8% black (new census numbers, Seattle has gotten less black in the last few years) and really high pretty much anywhere, since the USA is only about 12% black.

The shooting happened at:

32nd Ave SW & SW Juneau St, Seattle, WA 98126

The girl who got shot "wasn’t cooperative with patrol officers", which equals "no snitching", which is pretty much a dead giveaway that this shooting involves blacks. Not all articles will have such dead giveaways that blacks are involved! That is when the "Mapping America" tool comes in really handy.

http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattle911/2011/12/27/teen-girl-shot-in-west-seattle/

Dec. 27, 2011

Teen girl shot in West Seattle

A teen girl was shot in the thigh, but investigators say she wasn’t cooperative with patrol officers and the shooter remained at large Tuesday night.

The incident happened shortly after 6:30 p.m. near 32nd Avenue Southwest and Southwest Juneau Street in West Seattle. The bullet went through the girl’s leg, and, though she was rushed to Harborview Medical Center, the wound was not believed to be life threatening.

Police believe the girl was shot by suspects in a vehicle. Additional details were not available.

Anonymous said...

Crime Blog - Dallas Morning News

Former Cowboy faces life in prison if convicted of cocaine charges

By Avi Selk/Night Reporter

aselk@dallasnews.com | Bio

9:22 PM on Wed., Jan. 4, 2012 | Permalink

A grand jury charged former Dallas Cowboy Sam Hurd with cocaine violations Wednesday that could put him in jail for the rest of his life.

After five years with the Cowboys, Hurd signed with the Chicago Bears in July -- one day after Homeland Security agents first questioned him about the case and less than five months before his arrest.

That summer, according to a criminal complaint, a federal informant arranged to meet Hurd's alleged accomplice, Toby Lujan, in Dallas. The informant told agents Lujan wanted to buy several pounds of cocaine for Hurd to take up north.

On the day of the meeting, the complaint states, authorities seized tens of thousands of dollars from a vehicle owned by Hurd and driven by Lujan. Agents questioned Hurd about the cash, but didn't hold him.

After months of investigation, the informant and an undercover agent allegedly met Hurd at a Chicago restaurant on Dec. 14 and gave him a kilogram of cocaine. According to the complaint, the wide receiver told the two he already distributed drugs in Chicago and wanted more -- up to 22 pounds of cocaine and a half ton of marijuana a week.

Officers arrested Hurd outside the restaurant. The jury indicted him and Lujan with one count of conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, and one count of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of the drug.


http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2012/01/former-cowboy-faces-life-in-pr.html

Prof. Woland said...

A good way to have some fun with this would be to start recording racist black trash talk with those super telesonic listening devices then downloading it on youtube for the world to see and hear. You know, the ones they don't use now because of all the foul language that is used during the games that cannot be televised.

Now over to you Dan. Wow, that was some hit on that MoFo cracker, wasn't it Bill? Sure was Dan.

Anonymous said...

Old-line SEC fan here. There isn't very much on the internet about the C-word incident.

This is a second-hand anecdote. About 15 years ago, a white athlete walked on at an SEC school. He told someone I know that the players as a group were "a bunch of thugs." He said you have to "stand up to them and not back down." This is the only way to deal with them.

Anonymous said...

Whiskey, what counts with the grades is graduation rate of the individual teams. The woman's rowing team doesn't counteract the mostly black basketball team. The NCAA is reducing scholarships for teams that have low graduation rates.

The more interesting concept to look at is why almost every women's sports team is composed primarily of scholarship recipients, but for most men's teams the majority of athletes are walk-ons. The same goes with black male athletes. 90% of black males are receiving some form of scholarship. If they didn't get it, they wouldn't be out there doing the sport.

While white men receive more scholarships across all sports than black men, there are an incredible amount of white men who play these sports without getting a dime.

Zenster said...

Blacks are far better represented on the playing field than in the classroom.

Why? Is there any reasonable explanation for this? Aside from sheer greed?

Turns out, more than a third of FSU's football players were listed as "learning disabled"

If "learning disabled" means that “surrogates” can sit in class for them and take tests in their place, then this is an obscenity and it should represent actionable cause for other more academically qualified students to take their positions on collegiate sports teams. Gah!

They aren't "learning disabled"; they're just Black.

Le bingo!

I've never been called a 'cracker' more in my life than I have today.

To quote Louis CK:

“What can you really call a White man that really digs deep? “Hey, Cracker!” “Oh, ruined my day. Boy, shouldn’t have called me a “cracker”. Bringing me back to owning land and people. What a drag!”

I'll be the first to admit I've never heard a player complain about this in terms of reverse racism (which is still just racism) …

How nice to see the prevalent meme of “reverse racism” being dismantled in a media broadcast.

That movie, based on the story of Vietnam vet-turned-war-critic Ron Kovic, showed Syracuse police beating peaceful protesters at a rally. In fact, the record showed that no attacks occurred -- at least, in Syracuse.

Why let facts get in the way of a traditional Liberal narrative? The nerve!

That movie, based on the story of Vietnam vet-turned-war-critic Ron Kovic, showed Syracuse police beating peaceful protesters at a rally. In fact, the record showed that no attacks occurred -- at least, in Syracuse.

But was the scene ever cut from Stone’s movie? Enquiring minds want to know!

Yates, who lives in Texas, said Quaid took too many artistic liberties with the former coach, to whom the team remains loyal. Yates said Schwartzwalder would never swear at a player, never drink alcohol in front of his team, never tolerate inequalities -- as Quaid's character does.

What narrative?

In a world where Black people are such great athletes, why should we believe white players can even compete with them?

Because they can.

Zenster said...

Baldowl: Black people need to keep this sort of thing up, along with their riots and typical savagery; it's some of their best work, and we'll all be better for it in the long run. Each incident opens more white eyes to the odious reality of Black America.

If this is the only alternative to crashing our entire system, then I could not agree with you more.

Let Blacks rip the mask off of BRA.

What more could anyone ask for, besides Blacks, that is?

The only other alternative is some supremely violent racial conflicts that will only see more Blacks than Whites suffering because of it.

The same thing applies to Muslims. Whatever MSM concealment of their anti-Western hostilities happens only increases the level of violent retaliation that awaits them.

Anonymous said...

Thousands on the Internet know the truth about these events; millions, however, will see and believe these ridiculous movies.

I don't think much will change any time soon. White people are lost in the funhouse.

Anonymous said...

yeah, why am I not surprised you're a Browncoat.

Anonymous said...

If black people wants to make fun of whites/asians/others atheletic abilities, it's fine!

However, in turn, whites/asians/others should be allowed to make fun of their intelligence.

Anonymous said...

Ummm.... But an 890 SAT isn't all that bad for a black colludge stoodent.

Consider that (self-proclaimed) business genius Herman Cain's alma mater:

http://collegeapps.about.com/od/collegeprofiles/p/morehouse-college.htm

Morehouse College is an all-male liberal arts college located in Atlanta, Georgia. The college has one of the most impressive histories of any historically black college -- Martin Luther King Jr., Maynard Jackson, Spike Lee and many other world-changing African American men attended Morehouse. Indeed, Morehouse is often thought of as the best school in the country for educating African American men.

And take a look its awesome SAT scores:

Test Scores -- 25th / 75th Percent
SAT Critical Reading: 460 / 570
SAT Math: 470 / 580

With scores like that... wow, its surprising that only 10% of Morehouse graduates go on to Medical School.

Herman's scores were on the low side, even for Morehouse, and look how well he turned out. SATs be raysiss.

While most black affleets might need special admissions as "marginally retarded" at most major universities, they are plenty good enough for regular admissions to even the very best HCBUs. From which they could go on to high-paying prestigious careers in business, law or medicine (think, say, of that world-changing cadiologist & HBCU graduate Dr. Conrad Murray).

SBPDL really needs to be a little more cognizant of the great personal sacrifice these black affleets make for us by playing feetsball for real universities instead of coasting through an HCBU, a black medical school, and then spending 40 years "treating" patients on the medicaid/Obamacare gravy-train. I mean, the kid they don't "treat" might be yours.

YIH said...

"The Express" opened nationally last weekend and ranked sixth at the box office. It generated $4.5 million, about a quarter of the revenue of the nation's top-grossing film, "Beverly Hills Chihuahua."
LOL
Sounds like two flicks that ain't even worth torrenting

On a related note: This is the second racially-charged incident of the season, as Philadelphia Flyers forward Wayne Simmonds had a banana thrown at him by a spectator during an exhibition game in London, Ont. in September.
Of course, the answer is simple; Hockey should be strictly ''Humans only''.
The NHL does not need to become the NBA on ice!
They do not need ''die-versity''.

Anonymous said...

I would suspect that anti-white attitudes are fairly common amongst black football players, since so many of them come from "ghetto" backgrounds. I would suspect one of the reasons for the lack of white players in football is that coaches know that putting them on these same teams with these blacks will only cause trouble.

eh said...

I'll be the first to admit I've never heard a player complain about this in terms of reverse racism...

Like it would do a lot of fucking good. Either vis-a-vis the law, or for the player's reputation (nobody likes a whining crybaby). I mean, didn't Holder say Civil Rights law was not meant for, and did not apply to, Whites? And how many of those Mahogany Mobsters were charged with hate crimes? Despite the clear racial animosity displayed. Even if guys like Moeller were inclined to make some kind of formal complaint -- which I can't imagine -- what good would it do? Blacks can say anything they want -- everyone knows that. It's their right. Part of the 'legacy of slavery'. Just trash talkin'. Etc.

You are right to mention soccer (football) in Europe. They really go apeshit over there -- it is absolutely absurd. They talk about "racism" in football; with all those millionaire black players running around down there on the field? We're supposed to believe there's racism worth worrying about?!

Lastly, regarding SAT scores, a couple of very interesting facts (in case you had not seen them):

Black children from the wealthiest families have mean SAT scores lower than white children from families below the poverty line.

Black children of parents with graduate degrees have lower SAT scores than white children of parents with a high-school diploma or less.

For the next time someone starts talking about 'deprived backgrounds' etc.

Anonymous said...

On the other hand , you can admit an affirmative action non athlete, such as Barack Obama or a guy that can haul the pigskin.

Both probably will show failure after college, but the former didn't generate those needed revenues to pay the coaches.

Anonymous said...

Racism is prejudice with power - minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist. Privileged white folk are such cry-babies........

Anonymous said...

Luis Suarez got a seven match ban for apparently biting an opponent and an eight match ban for apparently racially abusing an opponent who had been trying to wind him up by trash talking him in what he believed to be Spanish.

Because Frenchman Patrice Evra plays for Manure he was believed.

Anonymous said...

For the next time someone starts talking about 'deprived backgrounds' etc.

The african heritage is the deprived background.

Anonymous said...

Of course if the races were reversed and the 'N' word got thrown around, this is all we'd be hearing about from the MSM. This world sucks!

Artist said...

A black culture along with verbal and sometimes physical abuse is why American born whites no longer play basketball. I played for over 20 years until the gym culture became too nasty. When I was was much younger I wanted my children to play the sport. By the mid-90s when it was time to sign them up the sport was lost.

Now we have all of this crap destroying football. As Paul Kersey points out there are certain college coaches who will not recruit whites any longer. In 10 years over 50% of NFL QBS will be black due to the tinkering with the rules and revised expectations of the QB position.

Isn't odd that football has instituted combines with all their drills and contests so they could reduce everything to scientific data (AKA facts) and then when the scientific instruments indicate a white is just as fast we get introduced to a mythical unmeasureable concept called "burst"?

And to the jackass calling out whites for whining, I guess this proves this is what you wanted, a reversal of the bad old days, that is good new days where you can fearlessly say and do whatever you want. You'all never wanted to share. You wanted revenge, the goal of social justice.

Your (lack of) character is showing.

Anonymous said...

"minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist."

With thinking like this, I'm really not very convinced that you should go around using complicated conceptual words like "therefore." You might hurt yourself.

"Privileged white folk"

Ain't no such thing, me lad. White folk planned, built, operated and defended this civilization. Nothing we do here is our privilege, it is rather our right.

I can think of some types of "folk," though, who are indeed "privileged" because they did none of the above and yet continue to enjoy the "privilege" of being permitted to stay, in spite of themselves.

Dissident said...

"Racism is prejudice with power - minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist. Privileged white folk are such cry-babies........"


BULL SHIT detector pegged the needle when I read this piece of Afro-centric verbiage. Hey, why don't you take a look in the mirror and contemplate your own unique form of RACISM (TM). Your incessant whining about privilege is tiresome, you being a person 'of color' ( I hate that BS phrase) should know that you have more privilege than most whites these days. Whites have to work, you guys get your Nike's through theft and welfare money-not to mention drug cash.

So, in essence, what you're saying is thus: whites can be Racists(TM), but blacks cannot? Blacks can be prejudicial though, but not Racists (TM)?

stonelifter said...

trash talking isn't as old as football. I played D1 back in the day and it wouldn't have been tolerated

Now I compete in strongman and power-lifting at a very high level. It's all White and no trash talking. And when we do "trash talk" each other it's about getting the other guy to do better

Discard said...

Anon at 6:53 AM Jan 5: When a 60 year old White man is kicked to death by two Blacks in their early twenties, the Blacks have power. When a White woman is gang-raped by Blacks, the Blacks have power. Your slogan is bullshit that is easily refuted. Better find another.

Anonymous said...

"Racism is prejudice with power - minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist."

Okay, let's look at this under more scrutiny.

Proposition 1: "Racism is prejudice with power."

Where did you get this definition? Why is this definition more accurate, more "privileged" as it were, than other definitions? Does it have some mathematical or logical inevitability, like say A(squared) plus B(squared) equals C(squared)? If so, from what logic does your definition derive?

Moreover, if as an abstract definition it is indeed a constant, does that mean that the constant may be universally applied?

Which is to say, if racism is "prejudice with power," then by the transitive property of equality, I can also posit that "prejudice with power" is racism. Does that mean that say, the English Protestant prejudice against the English Catholics during the reign of Henry VIII (combined with royal English power) was racist? Was the Chinese Communist Party's mid-20th-century "prejudice" against the (also Chinese) bourgeoisie (backed up by CCP/PLA power) also racist? If so, why? If not, why not?

It seems to me that your definition is merely designed 'a priori' simply to yield your pre-approved result, "minorities cannot be racist."

Therefore, turn in your "therefore"-using badge immediately.

Proposition 2: "Minorities have no power (as a group)"

Demonstrably false. This entire website stands as Exhibit A, inasmuch as it is dedicated to outlining in painstaking detail the extent of minority power in America (as a group).

If (1) is true, and (2) is false, thus invalidating the total syllogism, does that mean in your eyes that minorities can indeed be racist after all?

Now let's look at it another way: let's grant both your propositions and then examine them in the particular real-world case of South Africa and Zimbabwe.

Racism per your construct is "prejudice with power": the ANC and the Mugabe regime both hold undisputed power, and both are consciously prejudiced, as blacks, against whites. The ANC is the living breathing definition of "prejudice with power".

"Minorities have no power (as a group)": whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe demonstrably have no longer any meaningful power as a group.

Would you therefore concede that the white minority cannot, as a matter of logic per your definition, be racist, and that the black majority must perforce be racist?

Show your work.

Anonymous said...

"Racism is prejudice with power"

No. It isn't.

rac·ism   [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

Anonymous said...

That movie, based on the story of Vietnam vet-turned-war-critic Ron Kovic, showed Syracuse police beating peaceful protesters at a rally. In fact, the record showed that no attacks occurred -- at least, in Syracuse.


Speaking of which: Re the Sean Penn movie "Casualties of War" -- I have seen it posted somewhere that the incident it was based on -- where American soldiers in Vietnam raped a young woman -- actually involved blacks, not whites as shown in the movie.

Anyone know if this is the case?

Anonymous said...

"Racism is prejudice with power"

LOLOL Negroes are so pathetic.

Anonymous said...

"I have seen it posted somewhere that the incident it was based on -- where American soldiers in Vietnam raped a young woman -- actually involved blacks, not whites as shown in the movie."

They were white.

Californian said...


Racism is prejudice with power - minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist. Privileged white folk are such cry-babies........


The usual parade of cliches (assuming that the poster was not being ironic). Actually, a mantra repeated endlessly to justify the dispossession of white people and the seemingly endless demands of blacks.

Some thoughts:

* Why should blacks have "power" at all? Look at black majority rule countries in Africa. Or Haiti. Or cities such as Detroit or Birmingham. Or London's recent conflagration. It seems that when blacks do get "power," they end up creating dysfunctional societies.

* Compare this to societies where white people really do have "power:" say in Europe or North America (at least until recent times). Or Rhodesia versus Zimbabwe. Whites run the show, and you end up with modern, advanced countries. And let us note that these countries have far more respect for civil rights than does a Congo or Liberia or any number of black-majority-rule countries. If whites have "privilege," then perhaps they deserve that privilege.

* "Racism" is being defined arbitrarily: "prejudice with power." This is a typically Orwellian redefinition of the language. What this says is, in effect, as long as minorities can chant "We have no power" (no matter how true or untrue that statement may be), they have the right to act along racial lines. Moreover, they can heap any amount of abuse on whites because, by defintion, minorities can not be racist. Meanwhile, white people must sit back and take it. But why would any white person in their right mind accept this arrangement (other than DWLs, who, one suspects, are not in their "right minds")? It's nothing more than an ideological justification for a race war against themselves.

* The claim is made that "minorities have no power." Then explain why blacks have been able to get people terminated from their jobs for as little as a casual comment, e.g: Don Imus, Laura Schlesinger, even Rush Limbaugh. (Also, explain why blacks, for all the blather about "civil rights," have no respect for First Amendment Rights.)

* Insofar as there are white people in "power," they do not promote the interests of other white people. The government, academia, the media, the corporations, even much of the clergy, all promote what SBPDL terms Black Run America (BRA). Consider how they have pushed through affirmative action, and forced busing, and black history months, and Section 8 housing, and hate crime laws, and Bill Gates' whites-need-not-apply scholarships, and et alia. Also consider how the media covers up black pathologies, such as violent flash mobs, and makes endless movies and TV programs glorifying black achievement and denigrating whites.

* Blacks have every level of organization: NAACP, black studies departments, Congressional Black Caucus, etc., etc. They are also backed up by ACLU. Can you name any mainstream organizations which are devoted to advocacy for white people; say, eliminating affirmative action or supporting whites who are being attacked by blacks in the rainbow nation of South Africa?

* As one example of the power which blacks have in America, blacks were able to push through the destruction of white run South Africa and Rhodesia. In this, they were supported by the media (all the anti-apartheid movies and news reporting), by much of corporate America (via divestment), and the US government (sanctions). Of course, now that blacks are turning these countries into the usual fiascoes, there is scarcely a cluck of protest.

[continued...]

Californian said...


Racism is prejudice with power - minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist. Privileged white folk are such cry-babies........


The usual parade of cliches (assuming that the poster was not being ironic). Actually, a mantra repeated endlessly to justify the dispossession of white people and the seemingly endless demands of blacks.

Some thoughts:

* Why should blacks have "power" at all? Look at black majority rule countries in Africa. Or Haiti. Or cities such as Detroit or Birmingham. Or London's recent conflagration. It seems that when blacks do get "power," they end up creating dysfunctional societies.

* Compare this to societies where white people really do have "power:" say in Europe or North America (at least until recent times). Or Rhodesia versus Zimbabwe. Whites run the show, and you end up with modern, advanced countries. And let us note that these countries have far more respect for civil rights than does a Congo or Liberia or any number of black-majority-rule countries. If whites have "privilege," then perhaps they deserve that privilege.

* "Racism" is being defined arbitrarily: "prejudice with power." This is a typically Orwellian redefinition of the language. What this says is, in effect, as long as minorities can chant "We have no power" (no matter how true or untrue that statement may be), they have the right to act along racial lines. Moreover, they can heap any amount of abuse on whites because, by defintion, minorities can not be racist. Meanwhile, white people must sit back and take it. But why would any white person in their right mind accept this arrangement (other than DWLs, who, one suspects, are not in their "right minds")? It's nothing more than an ideological justification for a race war against themselves.

* The claim is made that "minorities have no power." Then explain why blacks have been able to get people terminated from their jobs for as little as a casual comment, e.g: Don Imus, Laura Schlesinger, even Rush Limbaugh. (Also, explain why blacks, for all the blather about "civil rights," have no respect for First Amendment Rights.)

* Insofar as there are white people in "power," they do not promote the interests of other white people. The government, academia, the media, the corporations, even much of the clergy, all promote what SBPDL terms Black Run America (BRA). Consider how they have pushed through affirmative action, and forced busing, and black history months, and Section 8 housing, and hate crime laws, and Bill Gates' whites-need-not-apply scholarships, and et alia. Also consider how the media covers up black pathologies, such as violent flash mobs, and makes endless movies and TV programs glorifying black achievement and denigrating whites.

* Blacks have every level of organization: NAACP, black studies departments, Congressional Black Caucus, etc., etc. They are also backed up by ACLU. Can you name any mainstream organizations which are devoted to advocacy for white people; say, eliminating affirmative action or supporting whites who are being attacked by blacks in the rainbow nation of South Africa?

* As one example of the power which blacks have in America, blacks were able to push through the destruction of white run South Africa and Rhodesia. In this, they were supported by the media (all the anti-apartheid movies and news reporting), by much of corporate America (via divestment), and the US government (sanctions). Of course, now that blacks are turning these countries into the usual fiascoes, there is scarcely a cluck of protest.

[continued...]

D. Freeman said...

Why is this man still on the sports kick when there is an election going on?

Shouldnt you guys be quietly rallying behind Ron Paul and not worrying about Tim Tebow syndrome?


Seriously though, what is it about Ron Paul that Garners him so much support from SOOOO many fringe populations of this country?

Californian said...

[...continued]

* I will state the obvious point: what if whites simply get tired of all this nonsense and decide to stand up for their rights and privileges. What are you going to do?

* Let me ask the poster a final question: where would you prefer to live: a country where whites have power (USA, Canada, UK) or a country where blacks have power (Uganda, Congo, Somalia, Zimbabwe, Haiti)?

Think about it.

Anonymous said...

Racism is prejudice with power - minorities have power (as a group), therefore, can be racist.

Such as the fact the hoops that employers have to go through before they can fire a minoratah they have to pay them to do nothing.

Privileged minoratah folk are such cry-babies........

YIH said...

Whiskey said...
The Collegiate Athletes thing is both real and misleading. It counts: White female track and cross-country stars, volleyball stars, badminton, rowing, fencing, and other minor sports which DO give scholarships and often for White women.

The reason is simple: Title IX. If an NCAA school wants to do 60 scholarships for the football thugs (err, team) they got to provide a matching 60 scholarships for female athletes. And even the most hard-bitten munchers realize they can't do that for football.
So that's how the badminton and softball teams get 'em.

YIH said...

Quiz time!
Detroit or Mogadishu?

Zenster said...

Artist: Isn't [it] odd that football has instituted combines with all their drills and contests so they could reduce everything to scientific data (AKA facts) and then when the scientific instruments indicate a white is just as fast we get introduced to a mythical unmeasureable concept called "burst"?

It's not at all "odd" when the Liberal propensity to indulge in Magical Thinking™ is taken into account.

Insert some magical coefficient >here< and suddenly the empirical data fits those rigged Liberal equations.

Quel mystère!

YIH said...

Moar for the Detroilet file:
Video: Detroit ambulance stranded, surrounded by gunfire.
I've read about that happening in moslim ''no-go areas'' in Europe as well.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 5, 2012 8:28 AM): With thinking like this, I'm really not very convinced that you should go around using complicated conceptual words like "therefore." You might hurt yourself.

Isn't self-injury the hallmark of Black behavior?

As to that "minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist", horseradish, I refer you to UoD's orientation seminar that gabbled on about how "all whites are racist". As in:

“A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. ‘The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….’”

Sound familiar?

White folk planned, built, operated and defended this civilization. Nothing we do here is our privilege, it is rather our right.

You do realize that this rather simple formulation will be an utter mystery to all freeloading mentalities, don't you?

Zenster said...

Dissident: BULL SHIT detector pegged the needle when I read this piece of Afro-centric verbiage.

I didn't even know mine had a siren until now.

So, in essence, what you're saying is thus: whites can be Racists™, but blacks cannot? Blacks can be prejudicial though, but not Racists™?

There, doesn't that look nicer?

Sport, please accept a belated Christmas gift. It's what I call my "Alpha Set". They're the special characters that prove useful in prettying up my comments. Here they are, use them as you see fit.

― å ä â æ ç é ö ô ñ ø ü
Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ï Ö Ø Ü
© ® ° ∞ ℅ № → ™
¼ ½ ¾ ⅓ ⅔ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞
µ ¢ £ ± ‰ ÷ €

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 5, 2012 10:10 AM): Therefore, turn in your "therefore"-using badge immediately.

I suspect you are the same Anonymous that submitted such a fine assessment of Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged". Go ahead, prove me wrong.

Once again, GET A FRICKIN' HANDLE so I don't miss any comments of yours. Emkay?

Zenster said...

Californian: Also, explain why blacks, for all the blather about "civil rights," have no respect for First Amendment Rights.

In your dreams!

* I will state the obvious point: what if whites simply get tired of all this nonsense and decide to stand up for their rights and privileges. What are you going to do?

Get down on all fours and take it as if they like it. That's what.

* Let me ask the poster a final question: where would you prefer to live: a country where whites have power (USA, Canada, UK) or a country where blacks have power (Uganda, Congo, Somalia, Zimbabwe, Haiti)?

Think about it.


Actually, they'd better not. Their heads might explode.

Most excellent comment, Californian. As usual.

Zenster said...

D. Freeman: Shouldnt [sic] you guys be quietly rallying behind Ron Paul and not worrying about Tim Tebow syndrome?

All of which shows just how totally ignorant you are of modern institutionalized racism against Whites. Get a life, you moron!

Anonymous said...

Bread and circuses for the masses.

D. Freeman said...

@Zenster

Well please help me understand further institutionalized racism against whites. Surely I must be a moron to have missed such a hot button topic in the nations consciousness... o wait

I am honestly quite oblivious. Its amazing that you guys can have institutionalized racism against you yet manage to hold every position of power in this country (except 1 of course) and all of the wealth, energy resources, valuable property, businesses, award committees, college boards, religious imagery, Major literature, rock bands, serial killers, reality TV show contests winners(except American idol), porn-stars, voice actors, celebutaunts, "hate"groups, artists, bakery shops, millionaires, and pretty much anything else that doesnt include a ball, a turntable, or a prison cell.

You guys have managed to get a lot done despite institutional racism, i guess you guys are just that damn good!

Anyway, seriously back to Ron Paul. Why is he so popular among "fringe" groups in America, from he far right to the far left. I dont quite get it. I guess you guys in particular like his small gov stance and feel that doing so will remove much of "BRA" as shrinking the gov will shrink black jobs as well as welfare etc.

But that doesn't seem like much more than any republican would do. Id really like to get the pulse of this community about something that actually matters. The sports stuff is getting tired. The only time he gets any real discussion is when Black folks like me come in and stir the hornets nest.

So lets go in a different direction that is a bit more meaningful than racial slurs. Who is the worst candidate in your eyes (outside of Obama of course) and why?

Anonymous said...

NAACP

That is so out dated shouldn't it be NAAAA these days?

Whiskey said...

Paul says Martin Luther King is his hero and wants Open Borders. So I'd guess he's a big NO for most here at SBDL.

Crosstabs on the WSJ yesterday show Paul got about 50% of his Iowa votes from those who identify as something other than Republican. In other words Dems and non-affiliated independents put him over his 2008 numbers of around 8%.

As far as who wields what power today, well culture matters. And culture denigrates ordinary White guys, while celebrating Black guys and "special" White elites.

It is a pose that elites impose on ordinary Whites, in their eternal war on Joe Average White guy. See Cardinal Mahoney, or Chris Matthews, or Maureen Dowd. Meanwhile when it comes to achievement OFF the athletic field, world-class companies are Black/Hispanic exclusionary zones.

Apple Computer was built ... with ZERO contributions from Blacks and Hispanics.

Microsoft was built (though the Gates Foundation has scholarships open to only non-Whites) by Whites and Asians and Indians only. No Blacks or Hispanics contributed anything of importance to Microsoft.

Oracle was built by White, Asian, and Indian contributions alone. Same for Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Ebay, Twitter, Amazon, and most of the tech world.

Even in retailing, Starbucks and Whole Foods and Trader Joes have lily-White management teams and mostly White staffs. Starbucks does not go out recruiting in the hood and barrio, because their money is made off being the "third place" in their lingo, between work and home. A hangout with caffeine not booze, in other words.

You might well ask, if Blacks can and do dominate the NBA, NFL, and much of music, movies, and TV, why can't they do better where performance is all? Why are not Blacks on Wall Street, or Apple Computer? Where smartness is everything? Why wasn't Facebook founded by a Black or Hispanic guy?

YIH said...

Californian said...
why blacks have been able to get people terminated from their jobs for as little as a casual comment, e.g: Don Imus, Laura Schlesinger, even Rush Limbaugh
Imus, yeah and Rush (being told 'forget it' in his bid to buy into the Rams) but Dr. Laura's exile to XM was her own damn fault.
Declining ratings/stations due to increased competition, and something that's not commonly known. Clear Channel Communications (AKA Premier Radio Networks) has had a ''No Nigger'' policy written into every contract. Rightly or wrongly, if your employer says ''you can't use (or allow guests/callers to use) the word 'nigger' on the air or we have the right to void (or not renew) your contract'' guess what? The first amendment doesn't matter. They could just as easily say ''wiener'' is off-limits (hot dog is OK). She either didn't read her contract or didn't care.

Dissident said...

Zenster.

Hey, thanks for the Alpha Character set--much appreciated! Now, if you could help with grammar, editing, style and content as well.

Tip o' the hat, sir!

Dissident said...

"Anyway, seriously back to Ron Paul. Why is he so popular among "fringe" groups in America, from he far right to the far left. I dont quite get it. "

What's not to get Freeman?? It's simple, Paul embodies an idea of liberty and freedom. What's hard to understand about that? You, as a black man, should be able to relate to these idea's, am I wrong?

How is it you can relate to the half-blood prince named Obama? Care to elaborate on that some? Care to broach his anti-freedom, anti-liberty, BIG GOVERNMENT policies? Tit for tat.

I'll talk Paul, if you'll talk Obama! Let's go!

Zenster said...

D. Freeman: I am honestly quite oblivious.

Quite the frank admission. How unexpected.

You guys have managed to get a lot done despite institutional racism, i guess you guys are just that damn good!

Another unexpectedly frank admission and, yes, we Whites are "that damn good". Do you see any African nations landing a man on the moon or fabricating solid state microprocessors?

Perish the thought that sub-Saharan Africa could even put a stop to cannibalism much less halt its countless genocides, HIV/AIDS epidemic and rampant corruption.

You can pretend to be unaware of the war being waged on White middle-class America all you want. None of that will change how the tipping point is fast approaching when Whites lose the guilt and find their anger.

Woe betide anyone engaging in TNB when that happens. The words "nasty, brutish, and short" won't even begin to apply.

Zenster said...

Whiskey: Apple Computer was built ... with ZERO contributions from Blacks and Hispanics.

Microsoft was built (though the Gates Foundation has scholarships open to only non-Whites) by Whites and Asians and Indians only. No Blacks or Hispanics contributed anything of importance to Microsoft.

Oracle was built by White, Asian, and Indian contributions alone. Same for Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Ebay, Twitter, Amazon, and most of the tech world.

Even in retailing, Starbucks and Whole Foods and Trader Joes have lily-White management teams and mostly White staffs.


Are you paying attention, D. Freeman?

Whites and other non-Black races do perfectly well without Blacks around.

Detroit, Zimbabwe and South Africa are pluperfect examples of what happens to Blacks when Whites are not around to change their diapers.

Zenster said...

Whiskey: You might well ask, if Blacks can and do dominate the NBA, NFL, and much of music, movies, and TV, why can't they do better where performance is all? Why are not Blacks on Wall Street, or Apple Computer? Where smartness is everything? Why wasn't Facebook founded by a Black or Hispanic guy?

A quote for your delectation.

In the long run, there is not much discrimination against superior talent.

― Carter G. Woodson ―

Anonymous said...

@D Freeman

Ignoring your hyperbolic assertion about material resource and business ownership (and there are white sub-groups, remember, that operate on their own), you claim that we hold all of the porn stars, literature, rock bands, and bakery shops?

You should craft your position more carefully before you post here.

I wasn't aware that I had all of the wealth. Good to know. I'll let the black people that live better than me, down the street, know.

First, you can buy anything that you wish. Go buy some real estate, an deep sea oil drill, or a copper mine and gain some wealth or energy resources. No one will care that you are black if you pay them the going price, and you can then begin to build wealth and energy resource ownership "for your people". You guys do share and co-operate with one another, right?

Of course, there is no deeper cultural reason to believe that your efforts won't be carried for the good of the black race, right?

Your opinion lacks reason and therefore, you are scaring white people again.

Perhaps its time that your people crafted some rock music, wrote some literature, did some porn(?) and learned to bake. All of these accomplishments are attainable through the development of skill. If you can play music, write, or bake to the standard that the masses demand, then you will sell your product.

Or maybe whitey should somehow make rock music, baking, writing, and resource acquisition affirmative action as well?

Anonymous said...

"Racism is prejudice with power - minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, cannot be racist. Privileged white folk are such cry-babies."

So, where are the white group institutions and anti-black laws that represent white group power, again? I forget what they are, exactly.

Accordingly, I also forget what the black group power institutions and ant-white laws are. There are a couple, no? Perhaps some of the posters here can help me out.

Anonymous said...

@Zenster

You occasionally make a couple of good points, but you write beyond your rhetorical ability - in terms of volume. Its a little embarrassing for the rest of us white folks. Tone down the frequency a bit, buddy, until you have something well crafted and poignant to write. Thanks.

I believe the problem lies in the fact that you believe yourself a little more articulate and well thought out than is reflected in reality. That's a common problem. I continue to hold that there is no one more annoying than is someone with a slightly high verbal IQ with otherwise average ability to reason.

Ben N Indiana said...

D. Freeman said...

Shouldnt you guys . . .


How can you be so insensitive as to refer to White people as "you guys".

Recall 1992 when Ross Perot addressed the NAACP. He dared utter the racist phrase, "you people".

Please!! Let's refrain from using such racist terms as:

Negro/Caucasian
black/white
Sambo/Bubba
colored people/non-colored people
coon/cracker
darkie/whitey
porch monkey/white trash
jungle bunny/redneck
brillo head/peckerwood
Uncle Tom/Uncle Morris Dees
spook/honky
oreo/Eminem
you people/you guys

Rather, we shall limit terms such as:

people of color/people of non-color
African Americans/European Americans

:-)

Ben N Indiana said...

@Zenster

You always make excellent points, and write with rhetorical flare - as well as volume. Its particularly honoring for the rest of us white folks. Increase the volume, buddy, as your musings are well crafted and poignant. Thanks.

I believe you are articulate; your opinions and well thought. It's a matter of reality. It's a uncommon gift. I continue to hold that there is nothing more refreshing than a extraordinary verbal skills and above average ability to reason.

Ben N Indiana said...

Does this make sense?

"Racism is prejudice without power - minorities have no power (as a group), therefore, must be racist. Black folk are such cry-babies."

Anonymous said...

Zenster, keep up the good work. You're getting under the bastards' skin.

Zenster said...

Ben N Indiana: Increase the volume, buddy, as your musings are well crafted and poignant. Thanks.

You are totally welcome, Ben N Indiana, and your support is sincerely appreciated.

I am the first to admit to being prolex and will leave it up to Paul if he sees any need for me to curtail my commenting.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (January 5, 2012 5:57 PM): Its a little embarrassing for the rest of us white folks.

Judging from the numerous favorable comments I have been graced with since beginning to comment and contribute here at SBPDL, your opinion seems to be in the minority.

It is also just a wee bit difficult to take seriously some unconstructive criticism from anyone who hides behind the skirts of an anonymous screen name. You could just as easily be some enraged Black (redundant, I know), who wishes to stifle my discomfiting comments.

Pick a screen name, stick with it for a while and I might manage to take your admonishments to heart but not until then.

Anonymous said...

Anyway, seriously back to Ron Paul. Why is he so popular among "fringe" groups in America, from he far right to the far left. I dont quite get it. I guess you guys in particular like his small gov stance and feel that doing so will remove much of "BRA" as shrinking the gov will shrink black jobs as well as welfare etc.

What the heck. It's a slow evening,so I'll toss out my answer to this inquiry like a few others before me have.

It's simple,really. Paul,whatever else is or isn't wrong with him as a potential President,doesn't like the concept of pointing guns at people and taking their money so that said money can be given to a bunch of other people who've never done anything to earn it.

And if he still espouses Libertarianism (I no longer follow politics,obviously) he should be in favor of legalizing-or at least decriminalizing-most drugs and drug usage. I confess that I don't know if this is still his position,but that was the Libertarian party line for years.

What that means,Freeman,is that the black population would be able to smoke dope without worrying about getting arrested and sent off for a spell.

However,if drugs were de-criminalized tomorrow,the prices would drop to the point where there probably wouldn't be enough money in drug dealing to support one's self very well. And since Paul doesn't like the idea of welfare very much,those EBT cards just might quit working.

So I can see where blacks are reluctant to support Ron Paul.

On the one hand,they'll be able to smoke all the blunts they want and not get sent up for it any longer. On the other hand,they won't be able to sell enough dope for enough money to pay the rent.(Do you really think all those nice,whitebread college kids are going to drive to the hood to buy their weed when they can get high grade,organically grown,PETA-friendly product right down the hall in their dorms?) And if the EBT cards quit working,or the balance gets lowered to the point where babymama has to boot babydaddy out on his tailbone,babydaddy has to go back to taking his chances robbing liquor stores again.

Alas,under a Ron Paul Presidency,robbing liquor stores will still be just as illegal as it is now,and since Libertarians have always been big supporters of an inalienable right to shooting back,it's going to be quite a bit more dangerous than it used to be.

So I can see where The Community is less than enthusiastic about Paul. I wouldn't lose too much sleep,though,since the mess we have now took 3 generations to pile up,and unpiling it will take at least as long,if it can be unpiled at all,which I doubt.

D. Freeman said...

Anon- 5:47

Im sorry its hard for me to post here seriously, no one else does. I've tried on several occasions to enter into reasonable discussion with individuals here but it never adds up to much. Even when i can actually get a serious discussion going with a few reasonable people the thread ends up buried under more Tim Tebow love letters.

That said the point of my silly statement earlier was to show how silly the idea that there was systemic racism against whites considering the overall state of white America. Despite the complaining here, as a whole White America isnt doing that bad and i doubt many would trade positions with any other racial subgroups. There's a pretty clear indicator of racial dynamics in this country. So please feel free to disregard my statement aside from hopefully pointing out some specific elements of institutional white racism. You know the thing i asked of good ol Zenster who surprisingly avoided my question...

Californian said...

Well please help me understand further institutionalized racism against whites.

Let's see...

* Affirmative action.
* Minority only grants, scholarships and business programs run by the government and corporations (check out Bill Gates' scholarships which deliberately exclude whites).
* University harassment of white/conservative students who try to organize.
* University divestment campaigns and boycotts against white-run Rhodesia and South Africa.
* Taxpayer subsidized black studies and university fee supported black advocacy groups on campuses, with no corresponding white studies or advocacy groups.
* "Hate crime" laws which do not allow whites to make complaints against minority assailants.
* The US government resettling Somali (black!) refugees into the heartland of America, while ignoring the persecution of white Rhodesians and South Africans.
* Mandatory university, government and corporate "diversity" indoctrination.
* The mainstream media promoting the black view of the Civil Rights struggle; vilifying white Southerners; covering up black-on-white crime (e.g., flash mobs).
* Clear Channel Communications (AKA Premier Radio Networks) having a "No Nigger" policy written into every contract--a clear example of how a major media institution bows down before the forces of BRA!

Kylie said...

"I continue to hold that there is no one more annoying than is someone with a slightly high verbal IQ with otherwise average ability to reason."

Agreed. But I don't think that applies to Zenster. Both his verbal abilities and reasoning ability are considerably above average.

Californian said...

Its amazing that you guys can have institutionalized racism against you yet manage to hold every position of power in this country...

Who are "you guys?"

Surely you do not think that the whites who run the government, the media, the corporations, the universities, etc., have anything in common with average white people, especially those of the working class? The aforementioned institutions are dominated by DWLs.

DWLs use blacks and other minorities as muscle to squeeze out the middle. Consequently, they push every manner of social engineering to destroy the white middle class: affirmative action, busing, Section 8 housing, importation of third worlders for cheap labor, importation of even more third worlders to be settled in the heartland, ad nauseam.

And DWLs have been pretty effective insofar as the white working class is eroding. Certainly we see little in the way of white working class union activism, or other challenges to the power structure. And there has been a decline in working class wages. If nothing else, whites are being displaced in jobs for which they are otherwise qualified via AA. Meantime, you have a growing population of blacks who are dependent on the system for everything from EBT cards to Bill Gates' scholarships. They're not challenging the system, are they?

You can ask why whites have succeeded, despite the institutional racism against them. But what you really need to ask is why blacks have failed to succeed, despite all the institutional advantages given them via the laundry list I posted above.

And why do whites succeed? Well, whites do not take themselves out of the competition by having high rates of illegitimacy/welfare dependency, school drop outs, serious crime commission, and race hustling as do certain other groups.

Californian said...

Why is [Ron Paul] so popular among "fringe" groups in America, from he far right to the far left.

Probably because Paul is seen as an outsider. Possibly because there are no other serious challengers to the system. And there is his message of liberty, which still has some resiliency in America.

I think more deeply people realize that only radical changes will make a difference. We've seen "conservatives" such as Bush (even Reagan), and "liberals" such as Clinton and Obama, come and go, yet nothing changes.

What did Jefferson say we needed every 20 years or so?

YIH said...

It just doesn't get any better than this!
"They stole my stolen money,"
TNB squared.

rjp said...

anonymous posted that some HBCUs (i.e. a shit college) have awesome SAT scores and Affirmative Action med school acceptance of 10%.
:


Test Scores -- 25th / 75th Percent
SAT Critical Reading: 460 / 570
SAT Math: 470 / 580


Who the fuck wants to see a 950 SAT doctor?

See a negro doctor at your own risk. I have seen two in my life, actually one was as a dentist, other was a derm, Brooke Jackson, M.D., who tried to bill for biopsies that never happened. The negro female derm, Brooke Jackson, M.D., I saw in Chicago is running an insurance scam scheme and also has posters on the buses promoting her charity.

When I called to complain to BC/BS of Illinois I got the impression they just didn't care. So apparently BC/BS of Illinois is fully supportive of negroes ripping them off .... well ripping off the white people that pay premiums so they can bill Medicare and Medicaid.

Patty Mudd said...

Hell, I took the SAT when I was in sixth grade and scored higher than 950. You mean I could have been a teenage niggerd doctor? LOL

The great one said...

Let's be honest. Ordinary whites are obsolete. Their white elite counterparts no longer care for them and they are slowly slipping into these white trash ghettos scatted across the nation. Ordinary whites or SBPDL's whites don't create any value. Companies like Apple, google, Microsoft are composed with DWL and SWPL whites and just don't hire any ordinary white. That is why scholarships like the (Gates Fund) don't support low IQ average whites. White elites try their hardest to distance themselves from low IQ whites in every way. Why do you think the cost of living is high in every major city that matters? My question is why do low IQ wants be near elite whites when they .
If SBPDL's white had any intellectual capacity or intelligence, they would creating institutions to counteract DWL's influence. But since SBPDL can't, they can only vent online.

Zenster said...

YIH: "They stole my stolen money"

From the linked article:

It appeared that all of the $1.3 million re-stolen portion remains missing.

Hokay, so now we must endure the upgefucked concept of "re-stolen" as something worthy of genuine indignation?

Has the notion of "honor amongst thieves" lost all meaning?

TNB squared.

Ah yup.

Zenster said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Zenster said...

D. Freeman: You know the thing i [sic] asked of good ol [sic] Zenster who surprisingly avoided my question...

Nice try, but it takes more than riding the short bus to school if you want to put one over on me.

I answered your question of "institutionalized racism against whites" with several different references to the comments of other contributors.

Your patent inability to take away useful information from them is more of an indictment of your stupidity and not any sort of negative assessment with respect to my contributions.

Don't Blink said...

@"The Great One"(which remains to be seen BTW)

90% of the posters on this blog are honest, honest with themselves, honest with each other, honest with society in general. The fact is that we lump our "white elite counterparts"(DWLs) in with what is so unbelievably wrong with society today.

You obviously don't consider yourself on of the "low IQ whites" even though your own personal inability to check your grammar makes me lump you into the low IQ class without much prompting.

Normally I don't respond to trolls who have been carrying a blogger handle for 5 years and have less that 100 views...stop insulting yourself.

Dissident said...

Zenster, is a tour de' force of articulation and analysis. He and so many others on this site bring a wealth of detail to this discussion that I could only dream of having.

Whomever, was being critical is just nit-picking. The guy displays and intellectual acumen befitting a member of MENSA for goodness sakes.

JB said...

Kersey,

Anyone who repeatedly uses the phrase "le bingo" is probably a little...
Aw, come on, you know...

JOKING!

But seriously...

Anonymous said...

Recall 1992 when Ross Perot addressed the NAACP. He dared utter the racist phrase, "you people".

It is their own fault for not updating their name to something modern.

Had it been the National Association for the Advancement of African Americans then he would have addressed " you Americans" wouldn't he?

Anonymous said...

Apple Computer was built ... with ZERO contributions from Blacks and Hispanics.

Espinoza for one says no but then the past is a foreign country when Mexicans came to the US to work.

Discard said...

Don't Blink, I believe that THe grEaT oNe is a Black fellow, not a DWL.

Zenster said...

The great one: Ordinary whites are obsolete.

Tell that to Osama bin Laden. Snugly ensconced on the doorstep of Pakistan's largest military academy, some "Ordinary whites" sauntered in and capped his diabolical ass.

Their white elite counterparts no longer care for them and they are slowly slipping into these white trash ghettos scatted across the nation.

And that's why they have had to add the word "exurb" to the dictionary.

Ordinary whites or SBPDL's whites don't create any value.

Clinging bitterly to your Etch-a-Sketch™ and shoe-sized IQ, are you?

Whites built this entire nation and will continue to do so regardless of cynical lowbrows like you.

Companies like Apple, google, Microsoft are composed with DWL and SWPL whites and just don't hire any ordinary white.

Don't get all fritterpated now. Open Source code will slowly eat their lunch. Until then there is the internet to self-educate and share with.

That is why scholarships like the (Gates Fund) don't support low IQ average whites.

Ah, the old cart-before-the-horse thingy. Just like over 90% of Liberal idiocy, Bill Gates' misplaced philanthropy will see countless Africans die a slow death. As he sets about curing malaria, nowhere is he putting in place the necessary productivity (a White thing, wouldn't you know?), to feed all the Africans who will manage to survive the reduced threat of that disease.

White elites try their hardest to distance themselves from low IQ whites in every way.

What has that got to do with "Ordinary whites"? Stay on topic and don't use debate-and-switch tactics, or you can expect nothing but derisive ridicule here.

Why do you think the cost of living is high in every major city that matters?

I'll go out on a limb here and venture that it might have something to do with that Quality of Life thingy we've heard so much about.

My question is why do low IQ wants be near elite whites when they .

You'll need to pose coherent questions if you're hoping that anyone will bother answering them. If that isn't too much to ask. Emkay?

If SBPDL's white had any intellectual capacity or intelligence, they would creating institutions to counteract DWL's influence.

Can't see the forest for the trees eh, Nimrod?

SBPDL is such an institution. But don't let that un-fog your glasses.

But since SBPDL can't, they can only vent online.

Like any good strategy, SBPDL is altering the intellectual landscape the only way that ever really works; ONE MIND AT A TIME.

PS: Consider choosing a more appropriate screen name. You don't come up to Jackie Gleason's shoe tops. "The Great One" (a moniker bestowed upon him by no less than Orson Welles), was one of Hollywood's last true Renaissance Men. Let's look at a list of his talents:

● Comic Genius
● Television Star
● Television Producer
● Tony Award Stage Performer
● Oscar Nominated Film Actor
● Musical Recording Artist
● Author and Screenwriter
● Orchestra Bandleader
● Jazz and Classical Composer
● Film and Television Score Writer

Plus guest host for such luminaries as Edward R. Murrow, Arthur Godfrey and Ed Sullivan.

Judging from the grammatical content of your post, Gleason could have eaten you for breakfast and still come away hungry.

Zenster said...

Thank you, Dissident, for such a generous appraisal of my efforts. Your kind words are very much appreciated.

Zenster said...

JB: Anyone who repeatedly uses the phrase "le bingo" is probably a little...
Aw, come on, you know...


Projecting a little, are we?

I've got your le bingo right here next to my Nebraska-sized hypothalmus.