Tuesday, January 17, 2012

"What's that about no Disney World in a Segregated Florida, Mr. Jesse Jackson?"

The whole world of Black-Run America (BRA) could come crashing down and end tomorrow.

It won't.

But it could.

I'm just one, largely insignificant person. I can be ignored. Or I can be destroyed.

Memo to Jesse Jackson: Walt Disney selected Orlando for the future home of Disney World when it was still segregated
But tomorrow, were I one of the GOP contenders for POTUS, a press conference would be called to address some recent accusations of Jesse Jackson. The Republicans, unlike the Democrats, haven't given up on the white working class in America though they could care less about defending that groups interests. In fact, the Republican Party exists solely because of the white vote (though their dispossession continues unabated courtesy of these largely septuagenarian white career politicians) and to maintain its position as a national party must continue to increase its share of the white vote.

Before we continue, let's take a look at what Jackson stated:
The Rev. Jesse Jackson says he wants to hear the candidates at the Republican presidential debate tonight - Martin Luther King Jr. Day - discuss racial issues, which the civil rights activist says the GOP hopefuls have avoided throughout the campaign.

“I want to hear from them — do they support Dr. King and the New South movement? Do they appreciate Dr. King’s legacy?” Jackson told POLITICO. “These candidates talk about free enterprise, but do they understand that there would be no Boeing plant in South Carolina if blacks and whites couldn’t work together? That you couldn’t have CNN with a segregated Atlanta, or a Disney World in a segregated Florida?”
“I’ve not seen one of them with African-Americans in their ads or going to an African-American church,” Jackson said of the 2012 hopefuls. “It is an irony that they are having a debate on Martin Luther King Day, when all of them are running on state’s rights.”
According to Jackson, by embracing states’ rights, all of the GOP candidates are running campaigns whose platforms run counter to the very reasons Dr. King is hailed a national hero. “The Tenth Amendment was a rationale for southern segregation,” he said. “All of [the candidates] are running on states’ rights, when precisely the cause to defeat states’ rights chose the Thirteenth Amendment.”
What does Jackson mean by the 'New South movement'? Does he mean white people fleeing major cities like Birmingham, Memphis, Atlanta, Montgomery, Miami, Orlando, Jackson, Charlotte, and Columbia to settle in safer areas where they can raise their families ensconced in unmentionable whiteness? 

And what does Jackson mean about not having a Walt Disney World in a segregated Florida? Walt Disney himself scouted the land when segregation was still in full-effect down south, using dummy corporations to buy the land that would become the Magic Kingdom in Dixie in as early as 1963:
Walt Disney flew over the Orlando site (one of many) in November 1963. Seeing the well-developed network of roads, including the planned Interstate 4 and Florida's Turnpike, with McCoy Air Force Base (later Orlando International Airport) to the east, Disney selected a centrally-located site near Bay Lake.

To avoid a burst of land speculation, Disney used various dummy corporations to acquire 27,443 acres (11,106 ha) of land.

In May 1965, some of these major land transactions were recorded a few miles southwest of Orlando in Osceola County. Also, two large tracts totaling $1.5 million were sold, and smaller tracts of flatlands and cattle pastures were purchased by exotic-sounding companies such as the Latin-American Development and Management Corporation and the Reedy Creek Ranch Corporation (Some of these names are now memorialized on a window above Main Street, U.S.A. in the Magic Kingdom). In addition to three huge parcels of land were many smaller parcels, referred to as "outs."

And there wouldn't be a CNN without an integrated Atlanta? Didn't Ted Turner personally fund Gettysburg and Gods and Generals, two movies that glorify the cause of secession? Didn't he even sing the song "The Bonnie Blue Flag" in the latter film?Has Jackson ever been to Atlanta? The white suburbs of metro-Atlanta surround the city like some perversely unfinished puzzle; when one county - like Clayton County - starts to go majority Black, white people flee farther and farther away from the downtown area in hopes of finding a county system with "good school" (read: all-white).

But Jackson is right; the mere reason we celebrate the "contributions" of Martin Luther King is because of the totalitarian reach of the federal government, which has decided a national agenda of BRA-enforcement is more worthwhile than a policy of building a strong national infrastructure.

Because of the dismissal of the 10th Amendment, we have seen the legacy of King in the fall of a northern city once known as "The Paris of the West." Eighty-four percent Black Detroit and its current dilapidated state is courtesy of an intense desire to maintain the illusion that King was a national hero.

Philadelphia, the birthplace of this nation, is transforming before our eyes into Detroit. The Liberty Bell's silence in 2012 tolls for us all, a reminder that liberty and freedom have utterly failed. The repudiation of the 10th Amendment directly correlates to the decline of the northern cities, where a Black majority now lords over a once shining metropolis in Detroit which resembles the decimated "emerald city" from the strange movie Return to Oz.

BRA could end tomorrow, if instead of Ron Paul whining about the number of Black people incarcerated (it's because they commit more crime, dear doctor, not because of justice system bias), or Newt Gingrich bemoaning Black reliance on government handouts (it's because a disproportionate amount of Black people have no discernible job skills, Newty, even in a nation ruled by BRA), a candidate just said this:
Jesse Jackson has long been hailed as the voice of Black America. Recently, he attacked the candidates for the Republican nomination for president for failing to address the concerns of Black South Carolinian's and, all Black Americans. 


Mr. Jackson, thank you for once again reminding the American people that no matter what they do to help Black America, well, it will never be enough. 


The Democrats have all but abandoned trying to be the political party of the white working class, instead targeting Black people and recent immigrants to serve as their political base. Because of the federal governments refusal to defend our borders and enforce immigration policy, we have seen individual state budgets rise to extreme deficits in a bid to care for the costs of illegal immigration. 


My first act as president will be to remove from the Department of Justice all of the attorneys who have engaged in the suing of the various states that dare enact the type of laws the federal government should be enforcing. The good people of Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina are only doing what the federal government refuses to do. 

My second act will be to start deporting all illegal aliens residing in our jails. My third act as president will be to permanently remove from one of the Democratic Party's future voting blocks by starting the mass deportation of illegal aliens. 



Instantly, jobs will open up that this endless supply of cheap labor keeps from providing good wages for Americans to be able to raise a family on. This will work to help reduce the  unemployment rate across the nation - especially the Black unemployment rate, as the Democrats desire to elect a new people surpasses their desire to actually help Black America. 


Black America. Jesse Jackson has long been one of the premier voices of this monolithic group. Recently, he attacked my fellow candidates for the Republican nomination because of our use of rhetoric that harkens back to states rights and a defense of the 10th Amendment. 


(Pause here for dramatic effect)


The 10th Amendment is the most important of the original Bill of Rights. That we as a people have forgotten this, is precisely why our nation is now falling behind other nations and why our children's future is jeopardized by the dreams of lesser men.


The Founding Father's of our great country understood that government, if left unchecked, would be the greatest threat to freedom and their liberties. Considering that Barack Obama's Department of Justice is now suing individual states for daring to pass immigration legislation that the federal government refuses to enforce shows you the sagacity of the dead white men we no longer even celebrate. 


(Pause again as the media gasps)


Mr. Jackson, the American people want to be left alone. They no longer desire turning to Washington D.C. for the answers, where an army of lobbyists and bureaucrats oscillating from one party affiliation to the other keep any real signs of hope bottle-necked in a sea of inertia. 


More importantly many of the American people throughout this great nation, who work hard, who save money to provide for their families, who go to work and take pride in their community, and who pay their taxes, have long hoped someone would say what I'm about to say. 


The only reason someone like you matters is because no one ever just got off their knees and said, "No more."

Well, "no more."


Were we to truly embrace the legacy of Dr. King, that would mean to judge people by their character. He's our national hero after all. 


So starting with you Jesse Jackson, I choose to judge you by your character. And I don't give a damn what you, as the voice of Black America, have to say. 

And neither do the American people. 


(The candidate takes no questions, walking off like President Andrew Sheppard from that stupidly Disingenuous White Liberal movie The American President)
Yeah, so a candidate would never say this. Doesn't change the fact that were a candidate to state it, he'd be elected. Oh well, at least we know Walt Disney wanted to build Walt Disney World in Orlando when segregation was still predominant there.

24 comments:

Eric Hale said...

Hurrah for the Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star!

Hurrah for Paul Kersey. Men like you, now on the edges of the blogosphere, will be heroes someday.

Statues, elementary, jr highs, and high schools will be dedicated to national heroes like you, Jared Taylor, and many more. I'm seeing white people wake up ever so subtly all across my sphere of influence. The high-tide of white guilt has passed. Obama's election was a phyrric victory for the white-hating elites, they are softer and weaker than they have been in 20 years...and they don't even *know* it yet.

Keep it up. Wake the kids up. It's morning in America again. White America. Our America.

HW said...

Heads up on Kill-adelphia:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/01/17/national/a070955S80.DTL

Apuleius said...

Thanks, indeed and hurrah for the Bonnie Blue Flag and for Paul Kersey!

Deo Vindice

Ben N Indiana said...

Off topic . . .



AIDS/HIV stats (USA)

• 46% are black

• Blacks comprise <13% of the population






AIDS/HIV stats (UK)

• 28% are black

• Blacks comprise <1% of the population

Porter said...

It’s apt that you mention the 10th amendment. For its evisceration is the legal plank upon which “BRA” walks. Before its exile, the constitution limited the range of federal powers to those enumerated in Article 1 Section 8. The 10th Amendment assured that all those not catalogued therein would accrue to the states. Thus what is not specifically prescribed to the federal government is the purview of the states alone.

I encourage all readers to familiarize themselves with the relevant article, if for no other reason than to comprehend the extent to which our learned solons have given both the chartering document and us their collective middle finger. Some powers within Article 1 Section 8 that one will search for in vain: the power to establish “civil rights;” "diversity mandates," and "hate crimes;" or to provide food (EBT), housing (Section 8), healthcare (Medicaid/care), or retirement (social security).

Imagine black America without a federally mandated white teat upon which to suckle. And then imagine a white America not rendered legally defenseless to protect itself. You are now imagining life with an active 10th Amendment.

And finally, we should ask ourselves this question: When those 39 white men signed the constitution with a stated purpose in its preamble to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity…whose posterity were they talking about?

Anonymous said...

Truly one of your best posts, Paul. If only there was a politicican with the "balls" to speak such truths, I would vote for him regardless of party affiliation.

Zenster said...

Paul, as always some solid food for thought. I've come to expect nothing less from you.

First off, your political diatribe is stupendous. Rarely am I at a loss for words (don't all speak up at once now), but my immediate response to your fictitious debate oratory is this:

RIGHT OR WRONG, HURTFUL OR HELPFUL, THEY ARE WORDS, IDEAS AND QUESTIONS WHICH ARE SO LONG OVERDUE IN AMERICA'S PUBLIC DISCOURSE THAT THEIR PLACE IS DEMANDED BY EVERY LAST COMPONENT OF REASON AND SANITY.

Finally, myself being a product of intense propagandizing with respect to America's Civil War, your trailing video segment forced me to consider how things might have turned out had not mid-nineteenth century America sacrificed the flower of its youth on an altar of misplaced universiality and inadequately justified egalitarianism.

The Civil War's attrition of White American men allowed for an unprecedented surge in population percentage with respect to Blacks whereby there is no telling how things might have played out in the absence of such an abrupt demographic offset.

Again, Paul, some deeply insightful work that obliges thoughtful response at every turn.

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/probation_for_cart_smash_kid_qsaR5ItA0SOQrGg0Eq2d4K

Anonymous said...

Ironically, Osceola County, home of much of Disney, is now majority Hispanic, and the primary language is now Spanish. Whether that is better than Ebonics is a big question.

Anonymous said...

Ben N Indiana, a black coworker of mine from Atlanta, once mentioned the number of black men engaging in same sex intercourse was extremely high. He said they weren't homosexuals though. Okay then what are they? You find blacks disproportionately represented in both ends of the spectrum (many when few would be good and few where many would be good).

Anonymous said...

I visit your website every day. I think you are doing wonderful work. However, you are mistaken in accusing Ron Paul of "whining" about the number of blacks in prison. How about doing a bit of your famed research, Mr. Kersey? What proportion of the blacks are incarcerated not for violating any real "crime," but merely for violating the anti-drug laws, which Ron Paul opposes, as should every libertarian?

Anonymous said...

This site is so much better when the subject is not football.

Anonymous said...

Check out this article from the 1910 Encyclopedia Britannica on 'The Negro':

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/021463.html

Anonymous said...

"What proportion of the blacks are incarcerated not for violating any real "crime," but merely for violating the anti-drug laws, which Ron Paul opposes, as should every libertarian?"

Who gives a fuck? When more negroes are in jail, violent crime rates drop, and streets are safer.

Anonymous said...

That you couldn’t have CNN with a segregated Atlanta,

Re-segregate Atlanta!
Get rid of this lousy organisation!

Californian said...

Imagine black America without a federally mandated white teat upon which to suckle. And then imagine a white America not rendered legally defenseless to protect itself. You are now imagining life with an active 10th Amendment.


Here's the thing: were states' rights taken seriously, you could have any number of arrangements among the races and so everyone might be happy. For example, one state might outlaw affirmative action, might expel all illegal aliens, might allow for freedom of association.

Another state might have the full range of liberal social engineering, might open its borders (perhaps with taxpayer funded flights to the third world to import more immigrants), might even have white people dressing in sackcloth and ashes. Whatever.

The thing is, if you do not like the way your state is run, you could move to a state which is more to your tastes. Thus, one might have a state made up entirely of DWLs, minorities and illegal aliens. Imagine what jolly fun that would be!

Of course, should the liberal states attempt to export any of their "enrichment," the non-liberal states could meet them at the border with bayonets fixed.

Discard said...

Anon at 5:22 AM: Drug laws are a surrogate for anti-dirtbag laws. They provide a pretext for rounding up a lot of trash before they do real harm to others. Would you really want all the dopers in jail to be turned loose into normal society? That's the real issue, not individual freedom. Libertarianism is a parlour game, only suitable for civilized people.
Many of the Founders might have expressed ideas you regard as libertarian, but they also lived in a world where an impertinent fool could be horsewhipped to teach him manners. One way or another, the healthy elements in a society have to keep order, lest the unhealthy take over.

Porter said...

Californian,

Were we actually living in a constitutional republic, states would still be unable to import their cherished third world diversity due to apportionment and reciprocity.

Though your core point is correct. Under a federalist approach, we would conceivably have 50 different societal frameworks from which to choose. Yet having forsaken this gift for a unitary approach, we now all get to spend America's remaining years at each other’s throats warring in vain to mold the entire country in our preferred image. Instead of having a menu of options that would make everyone happy, we get one option that makes no one happy.

Thanks so much you progressive asshats.

Porter said...

Californian,

Were we actually living in a constitutional republic, states would still be unable to import their cherished third world diversity due to apportionment and reciprocity.

Though your core point is correct. Under a federalist approach, we would conceivably have 50 different societal frameworks from which to choose. Yet having forsaken this gift for a unitary approach, we now all get to spend America's remaining years at each other’s throats warring in vain to mold the entire country in our preferred image. Instead of having a menu of options that would make everyone happy, we get one option that makes no one happy.

Thanks so much you progressive asshats.

Anonymous said...

The "Rev'run" Jesse Jackson is nothing more than a toxic waste product from the 60's, still spewing out tired racial rhetoric in order to keep the "race industry" alive.

DJ crackahata said...

hey californian, you already *live* in a state full of dwls, minorities, and illlegals!

Unfortunately thats the precedent for the rest of what used to be our nation.

My only consolation is that the damage was done in '65, before I was born.

Between you and me, they've won. Realistically there's no going back to a european population of 88%. The borders were erased long ago and the north american union created.

Too bad voting doesn't matter.

I accept the US I knew no longer exists, grudgingly. I'll still do everything I can to better it.

I just wish we had a state of our own.

Maybe Idaho? Maybe we'll have some balkanization and associated war befor this is all done.

Maybe it'll be better for whoever survives. Maybe.

YIH said...

Anonymous said...
Ironically, Osceola County, home of much of Disney, is now majority Hispanic, and the primary language is now Spanish. Whether that is better than Ebonics is a big question.
January 18, 2012 3:22 AM
A few things to clear up:
First, having used to work there, there was no indication that Disney World was ever intended to be segregated in any way. And I've been through about 85% of the complex, including the parts that began construction prior to the 10/71 opening.
Second, the majority (about 75%) of the land is in Orange County FL. Until the beginning of the Celebration (city) project in '99 the Osceola County section was wilderness/cattle grazing land and up to that time was, in fact, never intended to be developed at all. Part of the land 'buffer zone' between the resort and 'the outside world'.
The majority Spanish in Osceola County part however is true. Mostly Peurto Rican.

rjp said...

Let's rewrite this (no offense meant Paul):

Were we to truly embrace the legacy of Dr. King, that would mean to judge people by their character. He's our national hero after all.


So starting with you Jesse Jackson, I choose to judge you by your character. And I don't give a damn what you, as the voice of Black America, have to say.


Were we to truly embrace the legacy of Dr. King, that would mean to judge people by their character. He's our national hero after all.


So starting with you Jesse Jackson, I choose to judge you by your character. You're a f*cking scumbag. You live off providing nothing but news coverage of your self to "your people". You are a shake down artist. You do remember how you got City Beverage of Chicago, don't you? You, Mr. Jackson are a thief. And I don't give a damn what you, as the voice of Black America, have to say.

Anonymous said...

THEY ARE ON THE DL [DOWN LOW]

'Anonymous said...

Ben N Indiana, a black coworker of mine from Atlanta, once mentioned the number of black men engaging in same sex intercourse was extremely high.
He said they weren't homosexuals though. Okay then what are they? You find blacks disproportionately represented in both ends of the spectrum (many when few would be good and few where many would be good'