Monday, May 19, 2014

The NRA's "America's 1st Freedom" Magazine Profiles Detroit Police Chief James Craig: Not Once Does the Article Mention Detroit is 83 Percent Black

I am not the NRA. 

Nor should you be. 

Gun rights are being eroded across the nation, almost exclusively tied to demographic change and the Democrat hegemony - democracy in action - that accompanies such a loss of whiteness.

Pretty soon, the National Rifle Association (NRA) will be a bunch of elderly white males - cheering on their sufficiently black avatar, Colion Noir - trying to hold forth some reverence to the U.S. Constitution  in a handful of states. 
Meet the Future president of the NRA, Detroit Police Chief James Craig: Not once in the June 2014 cover story in America's 1st Freedom magazine does the NRA editorial team allowing the reader to know Detroit is 83 percent black...


Georgia, Alabama, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Indiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Montana, North Dakota, Idaho, Utah... that's about it. 

Demographic changes in North Carolina, Virginia, Florida, Texas (but... but... we're Texas you say?!? Go spend an hour in Houston and Dallas and tell me if you hear anyone speaking English, bub), Minnesota, and virtually every other state will go the route of California, Connecticut, Maryland, New Jersey and New York.

The good people at the NRA won't dare mention demographics, believing the next generation of black people or recent invaders (illegal immigrants) will provide sufficient tax-deductible donations to keep the organization afloat in one of the few remaining states not hostile to the 2nd Amendment. 

As long as the NRA can produce slick videos showcasing the urban gun enthusiasts Colion Noir, the 2nd Amendment will be safe!

No. 

That's not it all. 

Demographics is destiny. 

Though the June 2014 issue of the NRA's flagship magazine, America's 1st Freedom, offers a cover-story on a man many in the overwhelmingly white male funded gun-rights organization would gladly make the 21st Century version of Charlton Heston: Detroit Police Chief James Craig. [Craig stands by 2nd Amendment support in wake of NRA magazine cover story,The Detroit News, 5-19-14]:
Police Chief James Craig on Monday reiterated his support for the Second Amendment in the wake of a National Rifle Association magazine cover story that featured the chief advocating for gun rights.
During a one-on-one interview with The Detroit News, and a press conference outside police headquarters later Monday, Craig said he not only supports the right to bear arms, but Michigan’s Open Carry law, which allows licensed gun owners to carry their firearms in non-restricted areas, as long as they’re not concealed.
“It’s the law, and I support the law,” he said. “The Second Amendment was written more than 200 years ago. It’s not a James Craig law. “

“We’ve heard instances of accidental discharges; or guns getting into the hands of children,” Craig said. “That’s terrible. But we’re talking about law-abiding, responsible citizens. ‘Responsible’ is the key word here.”
Community activist Ron Scott issued a press release Monday criticizing the NRA article.
“In a time when the citizens of Detroit are trying to find their way out of the current cycle of violence, this is not the time for the Department to use the Chief's public persona to unify with the political posture of the National Rifle Association,” Scott said. “This is a public safety and community issue, not simply a Second Amendment issue.”
Craig said he doesn’t understand why anyone would have a problem with a police chief saying he supports the Constitution.
“I’m pro-life,” he said. “I’m pro-safety. I support law-abiding citizens’ right to protect themselves against imminent danger.”
Responding to reports that the NRA is considering holding its annual convention in Detroit, Craig said: “I don’t see a problem with that. Organizations that hold conventions in Detroit help the economy.”
Craig’s stance on guns, unusual for big-city police chiefs, made national news after he told The Detroit News in January that responsible gun owners could deter crime. 

Craig, in a candid question-and-answer session for the NRA magazine America’s 1st Freedom insists he is not responsible for a rash of at least eight incidents in which residents have shot home intruders since January. He said self-defense shootings “actually started before I arrived here.”
“I believe responsible, good Americans have a right to protect themselves from an immediate threat to their life or to the life of another,” Craig says in the June web article titled “A Show of Courage in Detroit.” “I believe our focus should be on how to keep guns out of hands of criminals and those who aren’t responsible.”
Craig said he has noticed a “culture of violence” in Detroit since arriving in July as the top cop. In another statement, which is featured on the magazine cover next to his photograph he stresses: “We’re not advocating violence. We’re advocates of not being victims.”
And residents are listening, the magazine said, saying that “average citizens in harm’s way seem to have taken the advice to heart. ...”
“It does appear more and more Detroiters are becoming empowered,” Craig says in the article, adding that he didn’t expect his stance to generate the controversy that it has. “I really didn’t, because it’s a Second Amendment-protected right.”

But who is responsible for all the "blight" in the background of the photo? Not the same who people who were responsible with building the infrastructure and creating the jobs that attracted blacks from the southern states to Detroit to begin with...

You remember Chief Craig, who is in charge of the police force in America's black metropolis... that 83 percent black city, home to America's most violent, criminal populace? He became a hero to gun enthusiasts everywhere only a few months ago, when he came swinging in defense of the 2nd Amendment.  [Police chief encourages armed homeowners to fight back: 'You’re not going to have time to dial 911', Yahoo.com, 3-11-14]

Once, Chief Craig was chief of police in 83 percent white Portland, Maine, where everyone concealed carry. 

Virtually no violent crime or gun crime. 

He was openly critical of the 2nd Amendment then. 
Coming June 2014: The sequel to Escape from Detroit. Detroit: The Unauthorized Autopsy of America's Bankrupt Black Metropolis (a book that does mention Detroit is an 83 percent black city)


The same sentence cannot be written about 83 percent black Detroit, where the violence, gun crime, and complete collapse of civilization there is all attributable to the blackness of the city. 

Now, he's quite taken with gun rights, with the evidence mounting of just how rotten the 83 percent black population in Detroit is on a daily basis. [Detroit council initiative to tackle issues facing black men, Detroit News. 3-31-14]

Not once in the fawning article on Chief Craig that the NRA will soon publish in America's 1st Freedom does the word black or african american appear. [A Show of Courage in Detroit: Motor City Police Chief James Craig stands out among major metropolitan chief in encouraging residents to arm themselves for their own defense, America's 1st Freedom, June 2014]:
Detroit's woes are no secret. Joblessness, poverty, gangs, illiteracy and crime now plague the once-thriving hub of the automotive industry. In July 2013, the city became the largest municipal government ever to file for bankruptcy. Studies estimate 25 percent of Detroit's population have departed, reducing the city to numbers predating the Industrial Revolution.  
Those who remain have watched Detroit decay into one of the most dangerous cities in the United States. In 2012, the Detroit Free Press reported 386 homicides - the highest in two decades , and nearly as many as New York City, whose population is more than three times larger. The same year saw 1,263 non-fatal shootings, more than 400 rapes and nearly 5,000 robberies.  
In 2013, a New York Times report found police response times to Level One priority calls in Detroit were a staggering 58 minutes. The rate of cases solved stood at a mere 8.7 percent. Some police officials even took warning visitors that if they came to the city, the should "enter at their own risk."
But whose responsible for creating this inhuman conditions in Detroit, NRA? 

Black people! 

It's as if the NRA editorial board is afraid of linking "Detroit" with "black" in the article, which might fire a few brain synapses of the readers of America's 1st Freedom, causing them to think critically for once. 

Detroit is an 83 percent black city. 

In many parts of the city, you can go for miles without seeing a white face (they are all ensconced in the fort known as the GM Renaissance Center... working).

One of the surest ways for a black individual to immediately punch his ticket to success with the almost entirely white Conservatism Inc. crowd is to take a "courageous" stand on an issue like guns, Obamacare, or in support of the US Veterans. [Police Chief James Craig: 'The things I've seen in Detroit I have not seen in other places, Michigan Live, 4-17-14]:

Detroit Police Chief James Craig, on a day when another citizen -- it appears -- shot and killed a criminal in the act of breaking into their home, addressed criticism that his support for armed citizens constitutes advocacy of vigilantism. 
One of his critics, Ron Scott, founder of the Detroit Coalition Against Police Brutality, didn't like the use of Craig's language identifying "good" versus "bad" citizens, which he believes creates unnecessary divisiveness. 
Craig addressed some of the criticism he's heard at Thursday's Detroit Police Commission meeting: 
Last week, the issue of vigilantism, as I've publicly said and I'll say it again: I do not promote vigilantism. In fact, I vehemently object, It's cowardly. Vigilantism is self-appointed law enforcement. They're not authorized to engage in law enforcement activities and when they do engage in that they should be punished. 
However, I do support the Constitution of this United States. I didn't write the laws or write the Second Amendment but I happen to be an advocate of self defense. Self defense when someone's faced with imminent, the emphasis on imminent threat to their life or someone else, they have the right to protect one's self. 
My critics have taken my words out of context ... this is in now way saying the police can't do their jobs. Realistically police officers, I don't care what city in American, cannot be on at every corner at every moment of the day. And when an individual, a community member, is faced with a threat, they sometimes have to react to that threat ... 
The whole business of good Americans, good Detroiters, I think there are many more good Detroiters than bad Detroiters, and I'll give you an example, the 19-year-old young man who was fatally killed last week ... by gang members. I describe them as cowards, they're violent and they are not good Detroiters. It's just that simple. I make no apologies for that statement ... 
My position is based on 37 years of experience ... The things I've seen here in Detroit I've not seen in other places. There is certainly a culture of violence that many Detroiter have become numb to or desensitized to. 
I'll give you a great example: An elderly woman, 70 years old at home, home invasion, suspect comes in and the suspect beats her with a 2-by-4. He robs her of $70 and then he continues to beat her ... These crimes in other places would create a serious outcry that this is just not acceptable and it's almost like some of this is the norm.

"The things I've seen here in Detroit I've not seen in other places. There is certainly a culture of violence that many Detroiter have come numb to or desensitized to."

The "culture of violence" is black-in-origin. Nicholas Stix cited a Time magazine article from April 21, 1958, which included this tidbit about the criminal nature of the then 75 percent white city. "The Negro Crime Rate: A Failure in Integration" included this fact about a city that was only 25 percent black in 1958:
Detroit (25% Negro). Two out of three prisoners held in the Wayne County jail are Negroes. Last month 62% of the defendants presented for trial in Recorder's Court were Negroes. Of last year's 25,216 arrests resulting in prosecution, excluding traffic cases, Negroes accounted for 12,919.
With white flight (or in the absence of whites) Detroit assimilated to the culture of blacks.

A most violent culture indeed

Chief Craig can retire from his role of police chief of one of America's blackest (and brokest) cities, and immediately co-host a show with Colion Noir on NRA TV or get hired by Glenn Beck to talk about fictional black founders of the United States. 

But Detroit will remain an 83 percent black city, with white people understanding the lesson of Steve Utash is one in why they should avoid traveling (or doing business) to the city. 

Hilariously, Chief Craig told America's 1st Freedom this about his hope for Detroit:
"I believe that Detroit, because of the resilience and the can-do attitude of the people who live here, that Detroit will regain its luster. It will be on these premier cities... I'm excited personally about the future of Detroit."
Ha.

I'm not personally excited about the future of either Detroit or the United States of America.

If Detroit's 83 percent black population has a "can-do" attitude, why it the center of the ruin porn industry, producing more high quality pictures of "blight" than a Kardashian video could ever hope to replicate in nudity?

If Detroit's 83 percent black population has a "can-do" attitude, why do so few pay their property taxes? [Half of Detroit property owners don't pay taxes: News analysis finds $246.5M in taxes went unpaid last year, Detroit News, 2-21-2013]

If Detroit's 83 percent black population has a "can-do" attitude, why are there $260 million in delinquent water bills? [Detroit plans mass water shutoffs over $260M in delinquent bills, Detroit News, 3-21-2014]


I am not the NRA. 

Nor should you be. 

Gun rights are being eroded across the nation, almost exclusively tied to demographic change and the Democrat hegemony - democracy in action - that accompanies such a loss of whiteness.

And yet the NRA, in the June 2014 issue of America's 1st Freedom sings the praise of a black police chief, in charge of policing America's most dangerous city... without mentioning the dangers, homicide, non-fatal shootings, crime, and rape are found in an 83 percent black city. 

I am not the NRA. 

94 comments:

Dissident said...

You can rest assured that the NRA will sell out once its politically expedient to do so.

I don't trust them any more than I trust Obama or Holder.

The only thing that's going to stop this slow burn of our natural, God-given rights is a war.

Us against them.

D. said...

your "enemy" ain't this guy. the "enemy" is the proggtards. they be a "rainbow" coalition of clowns.

Anonymous said...

Just like the Tea Party, bowing down to be seen as politically correct. Such a shame because both groups have the right ideology other than that. Maybe one day some non politically correct, no BS groups will take center stage and not apologize for anything they say. Its coming too, just about every White I know is ready for some real change. God Bless

NC Guy

Jay Santos said...

I don't know PK, I'm not sure of the value of your position here, which seems to be that the NRA is insufficiently race realist? I know they've got their limitations as a 2nd amendment organization, but what are you asking for? Yea, the attention given to this Colin Noire character is absurd. But the statist/leftist/DWLs are extraordinarily effective at demonizing the opposition and a little negro pandering insulates them a bit. Just a practical move really.

make it rain TRUTH said...

It's not that the NRA is a bunch of sellouts that will turn on us law-abiding white gun owners in a second when it is politically expedient for them (though they are..)

It's that they wish to fight for rights without recognizing a major reason why they are having to. They are unwilling to admit that ramoant, random gun violence is almost exclusively a BLACK problem. The odd white guy shooting up the place is less about guns and usually more about mental sickness. Witness the stabbing psycho recently at a Pittsburgh school.

Whereas the gun violence that paralyzes civilization is entirely a black culture entity. Crippling then ultimately consuming cities or any other areas where blacks reach a critical mass. Black undertow is an apt descriptor.

Until the NRA is willing to recognize this crucial cause for why Joe and Jane soccer parents think "gun violence" can be stopped by ridding law-abiding peoples (nearly all whites and a few blacks) of guns... they'll never win.

Anonymous said...

http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2014/03/10/progressive-racism-the-hidden-motive-driving-modern-politics/

Zombie makes the case that DWL and YKW have their own solution-equation.

What's interesting is that Zombie's take (deep from the heart of the Bay Area) is that they see the same facts on the ground -- inre Blacks -- but have collectively decided to go with Big Government.

&&&

I've pondered as to why American Jewry finds ANY common cause with Black Americans. For no greater concentration of anti-Semites exists in the American polity.

Al Sharpton should be their poster boy for ethnic relations.

In fact, absolutely NO-ONE comes to mind, thinking of Black cultural leaders, who is NOT openly anti-Semitic!

And yet it's said that Jews are smart. (!)

The only theory that makes any sense is that wealthy Jews see that they are almost uniquely benefiting from the welfare state.

1) Big time Section 8 landlords.

2) Medical profession paid by Uncle Sugar to attend to bullet prone Blacks.

3) Legal profession paid by Uncle Sugar to attend to defendant Blacks.

4) Non-profits paid by Uncle Sugar to 'up-lift' dependent Blacks.

5) Broadcasters paid by Uncle Sugar, Government Motors, and the rest to propagandize dull Blacks.

6) Ad agencies paid by the cronyist corporations to hype Blacks as consumers.

7) Government staff attorneys paid by Uncle Sugar to enhance the BRA status.

And in each of these sectors American Jewry is over represented if not wildly over represented.

Let's call it disparate impact.

So, whereas it's obvious that Blacks are the direct recipients of Uncle's sugar -- YKW actually end up with the money when it's all said and done. The monies just don't stay in the 'hood.

This is SO OBVIOUS that Black leaders are anti-Jewish to a man.

Some of their screeds are on video -- but don't make it to the small screen because they don't 'fit the narrative.'

(Famously, Maxine Waters ranted in committee about Jews moving in on Watts (her turf) to sweep up all of the rock bottom real estate in the late 90s before the boys in the 'hood realized that prices could go only up and that liars could get loans on the cuff. All that they needed was melanin. Her mike was cut off half-way through.)

Anonymous said...

Love the subtitle "autopsy of a city", pk is the Coroner of Race Realism & as such is constantly discovering interesting "things" & thanks so much for sharing your "findings", very enlighening !!!

BTW - until such time as YT 'murcan's realize that their only salvation is national socialist leadership & revolution, I just don't see anything positive happening to stop the Madness.

/H hypie out H\

Southron said...

In defense of the NRA, it would be suicide for them to speak of blacks being responsible for Detroit's destruction openly.

I know that a lot of regulars here don't like how the Tea Party, NRA, Rush Limbaugh, and others on the right won't talk about the elephant in the room.

They can't. At least not right now.

The leftists hold the high ground right now, and have their artillery trained on us. Say what you want about them, but they are organized very well. We aren't.

The minute one of us makes a move towards openly advocating race realism, you get shelled into oblivion. The end result is that you are fired, ostracized, bankrupted, and discredited.

Paula Deen admitted to saying "nigger" so long ago that the internet didn't even exist, and she was lacerated. Imagine what would have happened if she said that blacks are what they are, and will never improve?

The fact is that what we are saying here in SPBDL isn't ready for primetime. The zeitgeist isn't on our side right now. I know it isn't what people that think like us want to hear, but it is going to take a long time before we get to a point where a public figure or politician can openly discuss what blacks have done and will continue to do, and keep their job.

If we shun everyone and everything because they don't openly talk about blacks the way we do here, then it will be like what Elrond said in The Fellowship of the Ring "Our list of allies grows thin."

Anonymous said...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_POLICE_COMMISSIONER_RACIST_REMARK?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-05-19-14-21-23

I just wish that when somebody finally does standup to them, that they wouldn't apologize. This one resigned. Sickening. He said he wouldn't apologize and now this. Shit. I am so pissed. When I heard about him on national radio, I cheered out loud in my car.

Now sad. Very.
Neanderthal Girl.

senatortombstone said...

While I don't believe that one good apple can salvage an otherwise rotten barrel, Chief Craig does seem like a decent man. The problem is that GOP has pretty much enlisted all of the decent blacks there are. Five percent of the black vote is about all they will ever get. Take it, be happy, and start going after the white vote.

Samuel Thompson said...

I'm not particularly surprised he was 'critical' of the second amendment while part of Portland PD. If the city shared any similarities back then to its current self then it would make sense: full of pompous brain-addled progressives who would shit themselves at the mere mention of a firearm. (I have a feeling that my Magpul and GOA stickers on my car contributed to some bitch engaging in road-rage with me recently....)

Nevermind the fact that Maine has 3 firearms for every one person....

And that police throughout the state know to tread lightly when approaching any dangerous situation, because anyone living in this state who is worth their salt owns some manner of firearm, typically a high-power rifle.

Time will tell how this plays out for the NRA. I was considering reinstating my membership. I think I'll hold off for now.

As for Chief Craig, I hope he enjoys Detroit. It's easy for him to hate on established rights when surrounded by pussified progs who have never stepped foot outside their city block within their life. Now that he's among his own people, he can see why people possess such weapons in the first place.

We should ask him what crow tastes like.

Anonymous said...

The NRA is limited in what they can publicly say. I suspect that many of the white people that used to live in Detroit never made a racist public statement but fully realized what was happening. They correctly assessed that the situation would become unmanageable and left. The Federal government would like NRA member's guns gone during a collapse crisis because lets face it - a great many NRA members can hit small things that are far away with powerful rifles. It would be far easier to implement a totalitarian state for the sake of the homeland if there was less armed resistance. The NRA must therefore be careful what they say and be strategic when playing the PR game since they are a target of the government as well.

10mm AUTO said...

Senator Tombstone, with all due respect, Chief Craig is not a "man", but an Orc that has changed his tune to save his job.

He was against the 2nd living with the Whites, now he is pro when his black officers can't get to the scene in 58 mins and have a clearance rate of 8%.

He is an entirely different species than you. He thinks differently, reacts to medicine differently, has a different growth and gestation cycle and dies earlier than you, is more susceptible to diseases than you and hates you to the core. His organs can't even be transplanted without rejection into you.

Just Saying...

Mr. Rational said...

the 19-year-old young man who was fatally killed last week

As opposed to all those non-fatally killed.  What are the numbers for that?

Even when a groid's heart is in the right place, the head just isn't up to snuff.

Anonymous said...

Southron said...

"The leftists hold the high ground right now, and have their artillery trained on us. Say what you want about them, but they are organized very well. We aren't."

The left has effectively rounded up society's misfits under their tent. Groids don't like homosexuals, and Hispanics don't like groids. Yet they all vote in lockstep with TWMNBN at the head of the parade. Until they turn on one another, the status quo shall remain.
--------------------------------
Neanderthal Girl said...

"This one resigned."

I imagine the pressure that was brought to bear on this guy was considerable.
--------------------------------
Anyone who joins the NRA deserves what (s)he gets. A database that is subject to discovery during legal proceedings should be worrisome. Giving your money to a lobbyist is idiotic.

--NB with IPMS

Anonymous said...

>>10mm AUTO said...
""""""""""""""Senator Tombstone, with all due respect, Chief Craig is not a "man", but an Orc that has changed his tune to save his job."""""""""""""

Way way wait. Hold it. Hold it there. How exactly is being pro 2nd in Detroit gonna save his job? It's 83% groid and they generally don't like the NRA even though they have plenty of guns.



"""""""""now he is pro when his black officers can't get to the scene in 58 mins and have a clearance rate of 8%.""""""""""

Or maybe you mean he's trying to save his job with the state gov who control the city now since Detoilet can't be expected to competently run the city.

A clearance rate of 8%. First thought that had to be a typo. That's incredible. It's not like its all his fault anyway but then, if he's not part of the solution....

Wonder what his credentials were that would make Lansing hire him to run DPD?

Hire him, cause he sure cleaned up Portland, Maine? The crime rate had inched up to about 4% with 18 homicides in '11 and 17 in '13! (even though 88% of Maine's homicides were committed by groids in both yrs. Some things never change).

Or maybe it was: Hire him, because he's a relatively competent groid who doesn't have a reputation for corruption or stealing from the dept's pension funds. His record indicates that he's never accidentally shot anyone so he can be trusted to handle his own weapon.

But honestly. He's gotten so used to running safe whitopias that he had no idea, NONE, of just what he'd be up vs in Detoilet.

Philly Mike, at least your city has a fighting chance. If we were both in Detoilet, forget about it. 83% groid, that's all anyone needs to know.

If anyone's still there, head for the hills while you still can!

And haven't forgotten about YOU, Indy! What the hell has happened to your city? Olympic Gold Medalist and everything but your mayor's selling you down the river by meeting with gangs.

What the hell, Indy. You used to be way better than that! If you don't wake up and start giving a damn like Philly Mike you're gonna be next in line after Detoilet falls.



Anonymous said...

Several times I've read about the 2700 armored personnel carriers/tanks purchased by the DHS, part of our Stasi complex. For what? They won't be used abroad. Certainly not on the Mexican border. Of course not in the "inner cities" (that would be racist). I guess they're intended for YOU, along with billions of rounds of hollow-point ammo.

And don't join anything.

E. Newton said...

--NB with IPMS said...
Southron said...

"The leftists hold the high ground right now, and have their artillery trained on us. Say what you want about them, but they are organized very well. We aren't."

The left has effectively rounded up society's misfits under their tent. Groids don't like homosexuals, and Hispanics don't like groids. Yet they all vote in lockstep with TWMNBN at the head of the parade. Until they turn on one another, the status quo shall remain.
--------------------------------
Neanderthal Girl said...

"This one resigned."

I imagine the pressure that was brought to bear on this guy was considerable.
--------------------------------
Anyone who joins the NRA deserves what (s)he gets. A database that is subject to discovery during legal proceedings should be worrisome. Giving your money to a lobbyist is idiotic.

--NB with IPMS


Anyone who contributes to probably the major organization defending your established right to own a firearm is an idiot? So you're living in a cave and trading pelts for your sugar? This site does attract some truly wacky people. If you're that concerned about "discovery" and your subsequent persecution, then you are way, way over due to get off your ass and take some serious action. Right, or do you just type?

Anonymous said...

>>Southron said...
""""""""""""In defense of the NRA, it would be suicide for them to speak of blacks being responsible for Detroit's destruction openly.""""""""""""""

Agreed. There's some strong truth in what you're saying. Thing is, they don't have to openly encourage it by actually putting one on the cover of their magazine. They can at least do their part and not go all into the "we need to reach out to blah blah blah." Come on. It's not like there's a big demand among groids to want to be part of the NRA. Don't encourage it, is all we're saying.

Otherwise it's just one more attempt to copy Conservative Inc.'s latest outreach.

QUESTION: How come no one ever says "We need to do an outreach, to WHITE voters? Or at least say We need to reach out to the lower middle class whites? How come?



""""""I know that a lot of regulars here don't like how the Tea Party, NRA, Rush Limbaugh, and others on the right won't talk about the elephant in the room.""""""""""""""""""""""


Can't speak for the Tea Party. Rush has been AWOL on tons of issues. He won't openly discuss immigration. But oh boy, get ol' fatso to talk about the minimum wage and why it shouldn't ever be raised and he's in hog heaven.

REMEMBER: Rush was and still is FOR NAFTA. He helped sell lots of good people down the river cause its not his job being taken by Philipe, Pepe, Jose, or Pablo, no Sir! He's not a man of the people, he's always been about himself and increasing his wallet and if that means talking about nothing of real concern to the majority of his audience, then so be it.

Ask him to talk about tax cuts. Hoo boy, and that man's in hog heaven for days.

Ask him to discuss the illegal aliens and how come he didn't when George W was President for 8 yrs?

ASK HIM: How come he wants JEB Bush to be the next GOP in '16?? What the f is in it for him anyway??

It's good to be the king.


Ok, Southron, all that to say this: Uh, WHICH elephants in the room exactly CAN "our" side publicly discuss????

Cause honestly, it doesn't look like they're willing to discuss anything of substance at all while the Left discusses what they want quite explicitly and immediately demonize and bogeymanify their ol' standby target: WHITES (usually those who follow traditional religious conservative values)

We see CONservative Inc. making out like bandits not discussing anything of substance while increasing their personal bank accounts. How exactly are they representing us? On any given issue, how exactly?

Anonymous said...

I believe that PK missed the mark on this post. Apparently he and some others posting on this website don't understand the NRA. As an organization the NRA doesn't give a shit what color, religion, sexual orientation, gender or anything else that a person is so long as they support the 2nd Amendment. The fact that James Craig shifts positions regarding the 2nd Amendment as his career proceeds means that he is either a hypocrite or that he got religion when he found himself in a black hellhole. This is no different than a DWL discarding his or her lofty beliefs about the magical Negro once they live among them. There is nothing wrong with the NRA using the prestige of any 2nd Amendment supporter to spread the word about the importance of the 2nd Amendment, and whether or not you like Craig, he has prestige in some circles at this moment in time.

The NRA isn't interested in alienating any group of people who support the 2nd Amendment. They aren't attempting to fix the black problem, the gay problem, the drug problem, climate change, save the trees, or fix any of the multitude of other problems that many people feel are important. If you will take the time to read their grade reports on politicians running for office, you will see that politicians with high grades will include Democrats, Republicans, Gays, Blacks, and probably some drug users. A politician gets support from the NRA solely based on their actions or statements related to the 2nd Amendment. As a politician's actions or words change during his/her career regarding the 2nd Amendment so will their grade.

Everyone poster on this blog should be grateful for the work that the NRA does to protect their constitutional right to bear arms. When that right disappears, this blog will disappear, so will everyone's dream of a white homeland, and your ability to defend yourself against the Orc and the other perils of today's society will also disappear.

We might want to compare the effectiveness of the NRA that is careful not to alienate any group of people who will support their specific cause compared to the effectiveness of groups like us who tend to antagonize every race except white as well as many whites when most of us are primarily concerned with the problem of blacks. Regarding the discovery of the NRA membership by the government - most members of the NRA couldn't care less if the government knows who they are because these are the same people writing letters to politicians, attending rallies, attending gun shows, and generally making quite a bit of noise. And yes, it is possible that I'm a member of the NRA, and I highly recommend that you become a member if you are interested in remaining armed.

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure what's more fascinating: the fact that the NRA - America's preeminent white (ostensibly alpha) male clubhouse - was too chickenshit to mention that 83% black factoid, or the fact that black Detroiters actually go out of their way/pay to obtain a weapons license.

I also would be interested in seeing a link to Chief Craig's comments on his opposition to the 2nd Amendment while serving in Maine. Will research later and post if I find it.

Sierra Nevada.

Anonymous said...

Ret'd LAPD here. I knew Jim Craig when I was still on the job and I am baffled by his turnaround. I knew him to be self serving but then again most high ranking cops were, angling for a promotion. He hated the idea of guns in the hands of the public. Now that he is police chief in Destroit, I find this 180° change very shocking. It's not as if he's trying to placate or hoodwink a White populace; he stresses armed self defense in a thoroughly black crime city. I look forward to an incident where a White guy shoots a Trayvon clone with a legally carried concealed pistol, and Jim Craig publicly affirms the decedent was a viable threat and defends the shooter as not wanting to end up like Steven Utash or worse. Again, he is stressing armed self defense when he knows the body count of Destroit's finest thugs will consist of those that are the same hue as he is. He won't be winning any hearts and minds of those in the 'hood so maybe he did have a wakeup call. There just isn't any White ass to kiss in Destroit so I hope this is a heartfelt epiphany.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Southron said...

"The leftists hold the high ground right now, and have their artillery trained on us. Say what you want about them, but they are organized very well. We aren't."

The left has effectively rounded up society's misfits under their tent. Groids don't like homosexuals, and Hispanics don't like groids. Yet they all vote in lockstep with TWMNBN at the head of the parade. Until they turn on one another, the status quo shall remain.
--------------------------------
Neanderthal Girl said...

"This one resigned."

I imagine the pressure that was brought to bear on this guy was considerable.
--------------------------------
Anyone who joins the NRA deserves what (s)he gets. A database that is subject to discovery during legal proceedings should be worrisome. Giving your money to a lobbyist is idiotic.

--NB with IPMS


The DOJ is now engaged in an effort to shutdown access to banking (loans, account services) for businesses involved in firearm manufacture, sales, ammunition, etc. The DOJ is pressuring lenders and banks in general to be aware that these firearms and related businesses represent "reputation risk" to them. The concept of reputation risk is gigantically important to banks. It's huge and understandably, the banks spend great time and money in protecting their risk in this area.

The feds know this and it's an ideal area in which to apply extortion (it's known in the gov as operation "choke point"). The feds are not stupid, they're loaded up with lawyers who have studied nothing but this kind of thing. Just weeks ago, the same tactic emerged under the FDIC. Obama and Holder are going to end your 2nd amendment rights, one way or another. Once they inflict real restrictions there, then you'll be getting a visit from the homies and your latest reparations payments will be due.

Anonymous said...

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/shock-fedgov-court-ruling-police-can-kick-in-your-door-and-seize-guns-without-warrant-or-charges_05192014

SolInvictus said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...
I suspect that many of the white people that used to live in Detroit never made a racist public statement but fully realized what was happening."

The white people I've talked with that live in the Detroit area are very awake about what the problem is. And these are sub-30 yo's that you'd think the left would own.
Nope.
Proximity fosters unavoidable admission of reality.

Anonymous said...

There is no law,or remedy that will cure genetic inferiority.

Jefferson said...

Detroit is so Black that it makes Oakland look like the Whitopia Portland, Oregon in comparison.

Detroit is so Black that not even Jesse Jackson would feel comfortable moving there.

Detroit is so Black that the only way the crime rate would decrease significantly would be if Skynet style robots like you see in Terminator 2 Judgment Day were invented by the government to patrol the neighborhoods there in order to keep Black thugs in check.

Anonymous said...

In case you didn't know but the NRA is the oldest gun control organization in the US. They supported the 1934 National Firearms Act which at the time effectively banned machine guns and short barreled rifles and shotguns from being owned by the common man, by requiring a $200 tax to register them. Although the $200 tax today is affordable by the common man, in 1934 it was several months worth of wages. From the NRA's own magazine (American Rifleman):

"The NRA supported The National Firearms Act of 1934 which taxes and requires registration of such firearms as machine guns, sawed-off rifles and sawed-off shotguns. … NRA support of Federal gun legislation did not stop with the earlier Dodd bills. It currently backs several Senate and House bills which, through amendment, would put new teeth into the National and Federal Firearms Acts." —American Rifleman, March 1968, P. 22


And even nowadays they continue to support gun control:

"We think it’s reasonable to support the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act. … We think it’s reasonable to expect full enforcement of federal firearms laws by the federal government. … That’s why we support Project Exile -- the fierce prosecution of federal gun laws … we think it’s reasonable because it works. … We only support what works and our list is proud." - NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre Congressional Testimony, May 27, 1999


Wayne LaPierre has since become the CEO in addition to the Executive Vice President of the NRA, and collects an income in excess of $1 million for his efforts to regulate your guns. Just keep this in mind the next time they make you an offer to become a member, or a merchant asks you to participate in the NRA's round up program.

Anonymous said...

The funny thing is, if Detroit was still a great city and not a complete shithole, the MSM would be mentioning it's 83% black population non-stop.

Of course this could only ever happen in an alternative universe where black people aren't a cancer on society.

Anonymous said...

Indianapolis: 6 separate shootings including the shooting of a child in Indianapolis' third-world westside black ghetto.

http://www.wthr.com/story/25559267/2014/05/19/two-killed-in-west-indianapolis-shooting

No mention of race, naturally.

Anonymous said...

The Indianapolis convention was geared toward women and minorities. White men don't care about their demographic replacement or the holy terror their children will have to endure.

Anonymous said...

"Gun rights are being eroded across the nation"

Not really. In a few places that already had awful gun laws, they got worse. In most of the nation, gun rights have been expanded.

Anonymous said...

"So, whereas it's obvious that Blacks are the direct recipients of Uncle's sugar -- YKW actually end up with the money when it's all said and done. The monies just don't stay in the 'hood."

Once black get hold of a dollar, it is gone within a few days. Blacks don't save or invest, they spend to not look poor to other blacks. It is expensive to mimic whitey and his high culture.

They only live in the moment. As soon as they get a few bucks, they blow it on rented furniture, trips to Disney World, auto leases, $200 sneakers, rims, hair weaves, and designer bags.

The ghettos are the perfect place for the laundering of money because of the greedy black preachers, the "no snitch" policy, and the fact that it is a no-go zone for Whitey, who is quite comfortable and not paying attention to black from his safe, clean suburbs.

SUCKERS!

Anonymous said...

@ Jefferson Jesse "Hymie Town" Jackson had his pimpmobile SUV stolen in Detoilet! LOL!

Join the NRA? Why would a person agree to be in a database that NOG will be able to look into at anytime?
Groups are for infiltrating by feds and building dossier databases.

Anonymous said...

Agreed. It's like that saying "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." I would suspect many NRA members are race realists.

The PDK Herald/Crier Project said...

Liberals were once thought of as the have nots by academia. This is not the case anymore.

Since the last quarter of the 18th century, the new liberalism, the liberalism of the immature and insane, manifested and immediately began their pursuit of their superiority achieved, without pursuing their maturity.

Therefore when they achieved their superiority, they became the immature and insane in charge and giving the orders.

Liberals have always decried totalitarians, until they achieved their superiority, were in charge and giving the orders, and now liberals embrace their own totalitarianism.

Liberals enforce their ideology/illusion via a headhunting, jackboot arm and fist policy of persecute to crucify dissenters.

Anyone or anything, dissenting from white liberal ideology is targeted for extinction. This includes the NRA.

Moreover, outlawing guns in America destroys our Constitution, which in turn destroys our nation-state, which finally paves the road for globalism, one of the white liberal ideology's dream of dreams.

The negro is by the nature of his r selective gene pool of a physically smaller, lower IQed cerebrum.

His natural place is in the negros low culture of the primitive savage, not the white man's higher culture of civilization.

The negro not only wants to enjoy the whites high quality of life, but wants also to pilfer white genes that one day there will be a negro race with a white cerebrum, and then the war will begin.

The only solution for non-liberal whites, the matured whites, is to separate out and away from white liberals and their allies which includes the negro, secede by declaring independence via abrogation, and never allow anyone that is not a non-liberal white into our new White Homeland.

The failure to begin acting on this today, yokes our white posterity to eventual extermination and extinction.

From the Sanctuary, I'm PDK: Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said ”. . . Join the NRA? Why would a person agree to be in a database that NOG will be able to look into at anytime?
Groups are for infiltrating by feds and building dossier databases.”


If the database frightens you, the problem might not be insurmountable. Send cash in an envelope with no return address, go to a local NRA meeting and they will take your cash, attend a gun show where signing up for NRA membership gets you in free and use a bogus name. Seriously, if you want to support the 2nd Amendment through the NRA and the database issue has you stymied, there is probably very little that you can do to change anything.

Hell_Is_Like_Newark said...

Everyone poster on this blog should be grateful for the work that the NRA does to protect their constitutional right to bear arms.

When I first joined the NRA (early 90's) it was the time of rifle bans, purchase limits, and waiting periods.

Very different today: There are only a few states now that restrict concealed carry. Even IL is issuing CCW permits! That was due to the efforts of the NRA and other pro-2nd groups.

CCW with Stand-your-ground (23 states so far) makes if far harder to commit black on white intimidation and violence. When armed, you don't have to run away to keep yourself safe.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said ”Agreed. It's like that saying "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." I would suspect many NRA members are race realists.”

Great analogy, and your suspicions are almost certainly correct. For reasons I don't fully understand, support of the 2nd Amendment isn't something that generates enthusiasm within the undertow. I suspect that it has something to do with the lack of forward time orientation which makes it impossible to see any reason to support something that doesn't immediately generate gibmedats. Race realists don't have this disability.

10mm AUTO said...

"When that right disappears, this blog will disappear, so will everyone's dream of a white homeland, and your ability to defend yourself against the Orc and the other perils of today's society will also disappear."

Dude, no offense, but the NSA spying, the complete abeyance of Constitutional protections from searches to seizure. The hollowpoints and the requests for machine-guns by the Dept of Agriculture (along with 30 or 40 other non-LEO Depts), the court cases and current asset seizure law; leave little to save. If you conservatives were going to scrap off the "We Support Our Troops" bumperstickers off your cars and start shooting Troops (i.e. actually use your guns) it should have been years ago, say with the asset seizure laws or the warrantless searches laws. They have a Court to Prison pipeline all ready for the gun owners, with fat Deputies just dribbling at the mouth over seizing big collections (cuz some evidence might not make it to the Courtroom, know-what-I-mean?). Deputy dog can't wait to get his hands on that really nice WWII Luger he has always wanted or that nice LaRue Tactical rifle set you have.

Basically Whites have no rights before the Crown at all. Wasn't Zimmerman a lesson? He has been driven from the Country by a Fatwa issued by the TWMNBN, implemented and blessed by the State and backed by the Negros! It was classic. BUT BY GOD YOU STILL HAVE YOUR GUNS!

The world is aghast that the FUSA can record every communication on Earth and we keep doing it. Worse we have Complete monitoring of conversations of every phone call, text message and FAX in "areas of High interest" like Bermuda (because of off-shore banking there). BUT BY GOD YOU STILL HAVE YOUR GUNS.

Basically the NRA and most gun owners keep saying don't touch their guns or there will be Revolution, but what will be left?

Suppose we end up here in 10 years with 60 million illegals (instead of the 30 we have now) and twenty fallen cities instead of just Detroit and complete monitoring of the population al'la 1984 and 2 or 3 hundred dead Whites every night due to negro predation and continued use of the State to crush or "investigate" Conservative political groups and more and more negros building up special rights and larger and larger penalties for a normal person to defend themselves. BUT BY GOD YOU STILL HAVE YOUR GUNS!

You might consider that this blog will disappear shortly, once the new "Internet hate crime" legislation goes through, with the blessing of both the R-Jersey's and the DTeam. Even now, what is said on many websites is monitored and "nudged" by teams of propagandists, a tech brought to fruition by Cass Sunstein (TWMNBN). While filthy websites calling for the destruction of Whites in every conceivable way are allowed (See: BlackFootsoldiernetwork), a website that is pro-White is vilified, deleted and harassed, not by the Government, but by the Website carriers themselves.
BUT BY GOD YOU WILL STILL HAVE YOUR GUNS!

You think the newspapers will print powerful, objective reporting on black crime (even though now they cover much of the crime up as possible) once they have a federal mandate to conceal it? BUT BY GOD YOU WILL STILL HAVE YOUR GUNS!

Will you wait while your neighborhood is infiltrated by hood rats that you have to bribe every week so they turn in a good report on you via Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing? What will you say to the SheBeast that is your "Block Grandmother" when she asks if you have been recycling, paying your taxes and have your kids going to da non-discrimination GLT Obama Youth? BUT BY GOD YOU WILL STILL HAVE YOUR GUNS.

Keep your guns. Move to the Northwest, join the Northwest Front.

Jay Santos said...

OT: PK, maybe you want to consider doing a piece based on Michelle Obama's most recent "look at me, I'm black" moment.

The Princeton scholar, Michelle Obama is telling high school students to monitor their family members for signs of racism. The gigantic First Lady was addressing high schoolers in Topeka, Kansas on the occasion of the anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education decision and had this to say:

(You've got to imagine her saying this with great sincerity, using her I'm sad face)
“[O]ur laws may no longer separate us based on our skin color, but nothing in the Constitution says we have to eat together in the lunchroom, or live together in the same neighborhoods,” she said. “There’s no court case against believing in stereotypes or thinking that certain kinds of hateful jokes or comments are funny.”

“Maybe that starts simply in your own family, when grandpa tells that off-colored joke at Thanksgiving, or you’ve got an aunt [that] talks about ‘those people,’” she said. “Well, you can politely inform them that they’re talking about your friends.

“Or maybe it’s when you go off to college and you decide to join a sorority or fraternity, and you ask the question, how can we get more diversity in our next pledge class?” she added. “Or maybe it’s years from now, when you’re on the job and you’re the one who asks, do we really have all the voices and viewpoints we need at this table?

“But no matter what you do, the point is to never be afraid to talk about these issues, particularly the issue of race,” she said.

There you have it, do not be afraid to speak on issues of race. No matter how many innocents are murdered, beaten, raped, robbed and set on fire by negroes, you should never be afraid to talk about race. No matter who calls you a racist, don't be afraid to talk about race. She's black, she the authority and she said it.

Anonymous said...

E. Newton said...

"So you're living in a cave and trading pelts for your sugar? This site does attract some truly wacky people. If you're that concerned about "discovery" and your subsequent persecution, then you are way, way over due to get off your ass and take some serious action."

Maybe it's the fumes from tanning these pelts, but I don't understand your connection. Because I'm concerned about my name and address turning up during the discovery phase of some gun enthusiast witch hunt promulgated by our Lovin' Gubmint, then I need to "take action?" Is that "action" a donation to the NRA? Maybe the GOP? Maybe I should write my "representative..."

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to checking my traps. I'm almost out of sugar.

--NB with IPMS

Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO said ”Dude, no offense, but the NSA spying, the complete abeyance of Constitutional protections from searches to seizure. The hollowpoints and the requests for machine-guns by the Dept of Agriculture (along with 30 or 40 other non-LEO Depts), the court cases and current asset seizure law; leave little to save. . . “

No offense taken. You have nicely listed a number of major problems facing good Americans, but I missed the paragraph where you propose solutions unless it is the valediction referring to the “northwest front” that exists only in our minds. This imaginary area will disappear as soon as the government becomes interested in populating it with undertow unless it can be resisted by means more forceful than drawing some boundaries on a map. If the sky is going to fall, I would prefer to deal with it armed as opposed to unarmed.

The “rash of at least eight incidents in which residents have shot home intruders since January” in Detroit, and the encouragement by their Police Chief to continue doing so while basically acknowledging that government cannot protect everyone is some of the best news that I have read of late. It is actual progress, and I can't think of a more exemplary demonstration of the value of the 2nd Amendment.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

"It is actual progress, and I can't think of a more exemplary demonstration of the value of the 2nd Amendment."

All the more reason Operation Choke Point is being implemented. The intermediate goal is to price guns and ammo out of the reach of taxpaying folks. The only ones who'll be able to afford to be armed will be the rich (via their security detail) and groids (via disorganized crime).

--NB with IPMS

CENTURION said...

The NRA is not stupid.

They are HATED, totally HATED by the Media. It is bad enough they are defending the right of old White men to protect themselves and their families.

The last think the NRA needs is to be labelled racist or conspiracy nuts. This is why they knowing DID NOT mention race.

The fact that they avoided race 100% is there way of pointing out race.....clever...

It is also why they stay out of the One World Government idea while they warn us about the UN.

Perhaps the author of this blog should meet and talk to the leaders of the NRA, in total privacy with respect for each other. Keep it 10% secret.

I know some people at the NRA due to my varied background and life. Believe me. They know and they know not to talk about it.

That is why we have other blogs and organizations to discuss race. The NRA chooses to stick with "one issue" since it is enough to deal with.

We loose the right to own guns and we will be rounded up and put in extermination camps that will make previous camps look like Club Med.

(For the younger ones here. Club Med was a really really neat place to go in the 70's and get drunk, naked and party.......ah, I am so glad I was young then.....)

Anonymous said...

I don't care how many "race realists" are in the NRA, they are just cowardly white men.

They refuse to speak openly and honestly about the fact that the NRA is a white advocacy group, and gun violence in America is 100% black/Hispanic. We have a BLACK problem not a GUN problem.

They refuse to admit that black gun culture = gangs, crime, and violence, and white gun culture = NRA, Second Amendment, CCW, SYG, and self-defense. VERY different. Blacks don't give a shit about the Constitution because it was not written for them and they know it. We need to stop this nonsense.

I bet the retards at the NRA believe that Jim Crow and the enslavement of negroes were the two absolute worst parts of American history.

NRA promotes the magical dim Colion Noir negro to appear diverse, even though their membership is nearly 100% white. That disgusts me.

They continue to pander to women and non-whites, making claims that "blacks are the #1 victims of violence in their neighborhoods." Blah blah blah, and women must be able defend themselves against rapists (who are commonly black men, the ones to whom they pander for new membership.)

Just like the GOP, I have dumped the NRA because they REFUSE to appeal to their historic white base. I pay them so they can pander to people who hate me?? So that blacks can join the NRA and turn it into another black advocacy group?

No way. No thanks.

10mm AUTO said...

Solutions? There are few as the flow of History is like a Tide, strong and irresistible. Some men have discussed reversing such:

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Or here:

"Fear must have been the prevailing motivator in the regime. How could an officer commit such monstrous crimes against his own countrymen? For fear that something even worse would happen to him. The Khmer Rouge atrocity seems to follow a time-honored recipe for genocide: the obsessive desire to reach a religious or political ideal coupled with a healthy dose of madness. Why don't we learn? It seems as if past atrocities of genocide haven't served as a warning, but instead as a blueprint for how to repeat them."

Wen Ho Thu-

or here:

"If all the barbarian conquerors had been annihilated in the same hour, their total destruction would not have restored the empire of the West: and if Rome still survived, she survived the loss of freedom, of virtue, and of honour."

- The History of the Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, Edward Gibbons, Chapter 35

Solution? To survive. To carry the burning torch of civilization forward without quenching it to a new land, not alone and at bay like a bear before the Hounds. Whites face genocide, however resistance IRA style can divert our fate from those Civilizations that have fallen before to create White Homeland. Twice before we have given up this land. The Solutrean were genocided out, the Vikings under Lief Eriksson could not reclaim our birthright and were driven back and then we Conquered with firearms and numbers; only to suffer from the "Socialist disease" of religious equality to the denial of reality.

Must the White die out, or can we bring a new Homeland; an American "Switzerland" to birth here in the North American Continent. We must set these ideas in motion NOW, before we become weaker, more tentative, more afraid. As I said, Keep your Guns! But do not try to save Mississippi or Detroit or think of them as "successes". The machinery is in place to destroy the great White defendant and consume him and after him, all his kin. Don't be that guy. Come to a place of strength, a "Helms Deep" if you will, for if it is to be our End, "I would have it be SUCH an End as to be worthy of remembrance."

Thank you PK for allowing this discussion.

CENTURION said...

One more point.

At least the NRA does something. Not like other entities that talk and comment and do nothing.

And yes, NSA, CIA, FBI, Obama, etc. I am a member of the NRA and own guns and am a White Male....but you already know that and I know that someday you will kill me.

Californian said...

This topic is a "target rich environment." Lots to be said.

First of all, the issue of: if you join the NRA you'll be on some government watch list. Ergo, don't join. Stay off the government radar. Minimize your risk.

My response: In any political struggle, there is going to be risk. Lots of it if you plan to win. Let me give one example:

Years ago I knew a guy who was a medical marijuana advocate. He was a cancer patient who needed all sorts of meds to stay functional. He got into medical marijuana because he claimed by smoking his daily joint he could dump most of the meds. Whether or not this was a placebo effect, I can not say. The point is this: he took considerable risk in openly pushing for medical marijuana. The local narcotics officers had him on their "list."

Well, one day California did pass its Medical Marijuana initiative (in part because of activists like him). And within a few weeks, the narcotics officers launched a sting operation against him. He ended up in jail. And being in jail as a cancer patient was not the most pleasant of things. There are cases of such patients dying in jail owing to lack of medical attention. Yet this fellow was willing to take that risk. And many more people were also out there taking the same risks to get medical marijuana legalized. And in the end--they won.

Here is my point: if a bunch of potheads are willing to take it to the limit, what about race realists?

Seriously.

If you start off by believing that the government is gonna getcha, you're defeated before the battle ever starts. Read Sun Tzu on this.

Yeah, there are risks. But one way to reduce the risk is to get organized. Form groups which are on your side so when they start kicking down doors at 2AM you have other people fighting for you.

Yeah, the NRA might not be the optimal organization. But it does have millions of members. It has publications which are openly published and read. It does get some legislation passed. It does hold conventions in the heart of enemy territory. Can the same be said about race realists? And if you do not like the NRA, try Gun Owners of America.

It goes back to the primary failure of white people in the last half century: the failure to organize.

Californian said...

QUESTION: How come no one ever says "We need to do an outreach, to WHITE voters? Or at least say We need to reach out to the lower middle class whites? How come?

ANSWER: Because white people do not organize.

Anonymous said...

Blacks have no sense of private property rights because they own nothing. And they enjoy mob violence and crime.

Black flash rob in DC. NO mention of race.

http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/25553934/video-flash-mob-robbery-strikes-dc-convenience-store#axzz32B53KpKK

Californian said...

Regarding the NRA's support for Chief Craig:

There are tactical advantages in this move. If a prominent black politico is willing to break ranks with the Obama administration on gun control, this undermines the opposition. Subvert the enemy's alliances per Sun Tzu.

This also give gun owners more territory, physical and political, in which they can practice their rights. And few tears are to be shed about John Q. Thug being shot down in the course of a home invasion. Saves a lot of court and prison costs.

Strategically, where is this going?

OK, so we have Detroit's citizens blazing away at each other in an urban wasteland. Not exactly the vision of the future we all grew up with ala 2001: A Space Odyssey or Star Trek. More like Mad Max.

What we are seeing here in Detroit and other cities is a holding action. True, the NRA can expand the rights of gun owners. There's lots to be said about concealed carry, etc. But the real issue comes back to race. Unless there is a recognition of the racial aspect of all this, we're treading water.

Again, it gets back to the necessity for white people to organize.

Jay Santos said...

Californian said...

…..

It goes back to the primary failure of white people in the last half century: the failure to organize.


Dependably cogent input always (DCIA), from Cali.

White folks are afflicted with the individuality gene. An admirable trait, but they bicker over many petty things. In fact, I'd go so far as to say they're argumentative. And while they bicker, the wolves pick off their stragglers.

Anonymous said...

There are two kinds of whites. Those who live around blacks, and those who don't.

If I had my way, I would REQUIRE that all white people live in a black ghetto for one year. Then they would become realists.

The problem with the white folks is thanks to white flight, they have had the luxury of not living close to blacks, not having to witness their vile culture, their degeneracy, noise, and violence, and not having to directly confront blacks and sanction their behaviors.

We have forgotten who the blacks are. Blacks have not changed, but white people's perception of blacks has changed.

I blame white Baby Boomers like my parents, who hated their parents for being "racists", marched with the negroes for "Civil Rights" in the 1960s, broke up the white family with feminism and easy divorce, and who now use their big piles of retirement cash to fund the SPLC and the Democrat party, which in turn use violent ghetto blacks to destroy white privilege and white civilization.

Baby Boomers. Top on my list.

Anonymous said...

No, white folks are afflicted with Pathological Altruism, Passover Syndrome, and and a quest for self-annihilation.

And the Conservative Repukes are the worst.

We are doomed.

Mutant Swarm said...

Anonymous said...

In case you didn't know but the NRA is the oldest gun control organization in the US. They supported the 1934 National Firearms Act which at the time effectively banned machine guns and short barreled rifles and shotguns from being owned by the common man, by requiring a $200 tax to register them. Although the $200 tax today is affordable by the common man, in 1934 it was several months worth of wages. From the NRA's own magazine (American Rifleman):

"The NRA supported The National Firearms Act of 1934 which taxes and requires registration of such firearms as machine guns, sawed-off rifles and sawed-off shotguns. … NRA support of Federal gun legislation did not stop with the earlier Dodd bills. It currently backs several Senate and House bills which, through amendment, would put new teeth into the National and Federal Firearms Acts." —American Rifleman, March 1968, P. 22


And even nowadays they continue to support gun control:

"We think it’s reasonable to support the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act. … We think it’s reasonable to expect full enforcement of federal firearms laws by the federal government. … That’s why we support Project Exile -- the fierce prosecution of federal gun laws … we think it’s reasonable because it works. … We only support what works and our list is proud." - NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre Congressional Testimony, May 27, 1999


Wayne LaPierre has since become the CEO in addition to the Executive Vice President of the NRA, and collects an income in excess of $1 million for his efforts to regulate your guns. Just keep this in mind the next time they make you an offer to become a member, or a merchant asks you to participate in the NRA's round up program.

May 20, 2014 at 1:23 AM
_____________________

Pardon the pun, but this post is the money shot of the whole blog entry. The NRA is no longer about supporting our rights, but keeping their own personal gravy train rolling. Just like any other big organization.

I once went to a class to become an NRA certified firearms instructor, sometime around 1990 if memory serves. The instructors all admonished us to not call firearms "weapons." They even had a coffee can that we were supposed to put a quarter in if we "slipped."

Well, one hard as nails Vietnam vet went to the bank on the lunch break and got a roll of quarters. During his group's three minutes instruction presentation, he used a whole roll of quarters in less than his allotted one minute. And walked straight out of the room and never returned.

AnalogMan said...

It's true the NRA panders to negroes. It's true the NRA avoids discussion of race. I once attended a gun show in Virginia and was disgusted to see the NRA's book on unarmed self-defence with a cover illustration showing a well-dressed, confident negro defending himself against an attack by a masked White man. So I have a lot of sympathy with Anon @ 9:29 who writes " Thing is, they don't have to openly encourage it by actually putting one on the cover of their magazine... Don't encourage it, is all we're saying.

However, I can't agree with those who say "Don't join anything". Sure, many organizations have some bad policy positions. Most that could be useful are infiltrated. None is ideologically perfect. But we're in no position to be picky.

Look at how we got into this situation. The famous "long march through the institutions". The "progressive alliance". "No enemies to the left". The negroes hate the mexicans, they also hate the sodomites, the feminists hate everybody, but mostly the fake "transgendered" women, the Jews hate the moslems, the moslems hate the feminists, the sodomites and the jews; lately it seems everybody hates the jews. They have one thing in common: they all hate White men. Fractious as they are, they have been so far an unstoppable tide.

Secondly, they are organized. For every new atrocity you read about, there is a press conference or statement by some Institute or Society or Association that you've never heard of. There are Black organizations, and Hispanic and Gay and Women's and Green and innumerable Jewish ones. What have we got? The Republican Party? They would be horrified.

We need to get organized. You can't corral us all in one club; we're like cats that way. Support organizations that don't openly attack us - and by "openly" I include subtle attacks like Hollywood's. Create organizations to push narrow planks in our platform. Don't try to get total newbies to swallow the whole truth in one gulp.

The lone wolf is a glamorous figure, but unless you're planning to do something illegal, or otherwise requiring secrecy, you can do more with organization.

So, Hypie likes national socialism? Let's all rip that evil Nazi to pieces, right? Wrong. I'm not concerned with anything but White survival. We can survive Nazism, Communism, Democracy, Catholicism, Mormonism, even Islam, but extinction is forever.

It would be a tragedy if our White European heritage were lost. Imagine if this were your heritage? I'd contest the will, for sure. But, defective as that poor specimen is, he carries the DNA of the race that gave us Newton, Da Vinci, Beethoven, Aristotle, Alexander... Twist that kaleidoscope again, and who knows what may emerge? That's what we can't afford to lose. Focus, people.

10mm AUTO said...

Agreed Cali! Failure to organize, because before this last 50 years, it WAS a Whitopia and is now no longer. We are a Race dethroned. Whatever the reason, no enemies to the White of me.

Even if you disagree with the idea of the Northwest Imperative, don't inhibit it either.

Support fellow Whites in their hobbies and societies, whether numismatic or firearms or a women's quilting bee.

And it's not just money. How many of the eloquent here have given positive reviews to Paul's books or other books on race realism at Amazon? 10 mins of your time might generate for sites you support several sales; sales that leads to more people coming to the fold. We can all here defend ourselves from negro animals, but can we be Fishers of Men as well?

bubo said...

Hey guys, we are all wrong. According to Lisa Bloom, daughter of Gloria Allred, it's actually white people who are the criminals. It's white people who make neighborhoods dangerous and schools fail....cuz......serial killers, Tim McVeigh and Whitey Bulger. I wonder where this bitch lives?

http://www.alternet.org/books/white-people-commit-most-heinous-crimes-so-why-america-terrified-black-men

Bogolyubski said...

Anon retired LAPD:
Ret'd LAPD here. I knew Jim Craig when I was still on the job and I am baffled by his turnaround. I knew him to be self serving but then again most high ranking cops were, angling for a promotion. He hated the idea of guns in the hands of the public. Now that he is police chief in Destroit, I find this 180° change very shocking. It's not as if he's trying to placate or hoodwink a White populace; he stresses armed self defense in a thoroughly black crime city. I look forward to an incident where a White guy shoots a Trayvon clone with a legally carried concealed pistol, and Jim Craig publicly affirms the decedent was a viable threat and defends the shooter as not wanting to end up like Steven Utash or worse. Again, he is stressing armed self defense when he knows the body count of Destroit's finest thugs will consist of those that are the same hue as he is. He won't be winning any hearts and minds of those in the 'hood so maybe he did have a wakeup call. There just isn't any White ass to kiss in Destroit so I hope this is a heartfelt epiphany.

I doubt there's any epiphany with this groid. I expect he's just looking for fresh opportunities for career advancement - Detroilet being a no-win situation. He can stand up for the right of self-defense in the cesspool of the Great Lakes with little danger of losing his job. In fact, this newfound belief in the 2nd amendment (which can be abolished with a single supreme court ruling) opens numerous doors for a much nicer job in some whitopia where the Tea Party Patriotards are the voter base. All he has to do now is switch to the Gay Old Pedo Party and he could soon be on his way to congress, a governorship, or even the readership of the teleprompter (the leader of the "free" world).

Mr. Rational said...

He can stand up for the right of self-defense in the cesspool of the Great Lakes with little danger of losing his job.

In Detoilet, the people defending themselves against the Black thugs are also Black.

In Maine, they were White.  Never forget the question:  who/whom?

whisker child said...

Oh yes, I am the NRA. And you should be too.

I am a 58 year-old woman who is a proud gun owner.

Don't want the NRA being only old white guys?

Then train your children to be gun owners and 2nd Amendment lovers.

I am sick and tired of the 'all is lost' attitude on this blog and others.

I think more states than you mentioned are highly motivated to keep their Constitution intact.

What else do you have? So support it, fight for it, and bring it back.

Instead of whining about the NRA, why don't you fix it?

Is it supposed to be handed to you on a silver platter?

Californian said...

Question: supposing the NRA leadership sat down with you and asked this question--"What political line would you recommend we take in order to get the message out about black crime in America?"

What would you say?

Race realists have to develop political lines which can carry over into the mainstream. Let me throw the question open. What would work in the real world? Do we have ideas here?

Californian said...

I want to emphasize that my last post was a practical question. I wanted to open up a discussion on practical ideas about bringing the issue of race into the real world, specifically how to win over gun rights organizations to this viewpoint.

Does anyone have any ideas?

Californian said...

whisker child said...
I am sick and tired of the 'all is lost' attitude on this blog and others.


Agreed.

There is too much defeatism.

To win, you start with an attitude of quiet confidence that victory will be ours in the long run.

Anonymous said...

bubo said ”Hey guys, we are all wrong. According to Lisa Bloom, daughter of Gloria Allred, it's actually white people who are the criminals. It's white people who make neighborhoods dangerous and schools fail....cuz......serial killers, Tim McVeigh and Whitey Bulger. I wonder where this bitch lives?”

Bloom is a fullblood DWL always looking for a cause.

”. . . She is the only child of famed attorney Gloria Allred, and the legal analyst for Avvo. Bloom received a bachelor's degree from UCLA and a Juris Doctor (J.D.) from Yale Law School. Early in her career, she earned a reputation as a champion of victims' rights. Among Bloom's many high-profile lawsuits, she unsuccessfully sued the Boy Scouts of America for sex discrimination on behalf of Katrina Yeaw, a girl who wanted to join the organization. She also filed a child sexual abuse case suit against the Catholic Church, and sued the Los Angeles Police Department on several occasions. Bloom is a television legal analyst on CBS News, CNN and HLN, who also makes frequent appearances on The Early Show, The Insider, Dr. Phil, Dr. Drew, The Situation Room, Reliable Sources, The Joy Behar Show and Issues with Jane Velez-Mitchell. . .” - https://www.tmz.com/person/lisa-bloom/

There is no doubt that crimes are committed disproportionately by blacks, but I must admit that the whites seem better at committing the big ones. The self proclaimed “sleeping giant” Christopher Dorner planned his big one for quite a while and even prepared a grandiose 8th grade level manifesto. However, when it came time to execute the plan everything he did turned to crap. After he couldn't rent or steal an escape boat he broke his vehicle on the road and then holed up in a cabin until LE found and fried him supposedly after he committed suicide. During his quest to “change and make policy” he managed to kill a young woman and her fiancée after ambushing them in a parking garage in addition to killing a couple of police officers during the ensuing manhunt. Another notable big one committed by blacks that I can easily recall would be the DC sniper killings where the black killers racked up a tally of around 17 dead.

. . . The blue line will forever be severed and a cultural change will be implanted. You have awoken a sleeping giant.
I am here to change and make policy. The culture of LAPD versus the community and honest/good officers needs to and will change. I am here to correct and calibrate your morale compasses to true north. . . “
- extract from Dorner's manifesto.

Anonymous said...

whisker child said ”Oh yes, I am the NRA. And you should be too.

I am a 58 year-old woman who is a proud gun owner. . . “


We need more like you.

Anonymous said...

>>Californian said:
"""""""""""""""""Race realists have to develop political lines which can carry over into the mainstream. Let me throw the question open. What would work in the real world? Do we have ideas here?"""""""""""""""


This is the question of 2014 (so far), and one that directly relates to the John Wayne image, the motto, and everything we're trying to accomplish as a movement at large.

One suggestion: First start with a practical question and then offer a practical solution BUT let those you ask come to their own conclusions don't bow beat them with the answer.

EXAMPLE for a real world, practical SBPDL type of question.

Ask them about crime in their local areas. Ask them to carefully watch the news for reports of the crime as well as descriptions of the perps. Also, ask them 'what part of town is the most dangerous in your area?'

Most likely, the most dangerous area of town (filled with groids) and the evening news crime stories (odds are very good and strong that most perps are going to be groid).

Then ask them 'What similarity is there between the evening news' crime stories AND the worst parts of town in your area?

Even the most obtuse brain dead will eventually be able to figure it out, especially if they watch enough evening news crime stories for about a wk, since most people tend to know which areas in their own part of town to avoid and WHY to avoid those areas. They know why to avoid them, they do.

Its just they haven't put 2 +2 together. By taking them thru this simple question, =4 will slowly begin to register in their minds.

Well, Californian, that's one suggestion. Someone else should take it from here.

Anonymous said...

Californian said ”Question: supposing the NRA leadership sat down with you and asked this question--"What political line would you recommend we take in order to get the message out about black crime in America?"

What would you say?

Race realists have to develop political lines which can carry over into the mainstream. Let me throw the question open. What would work in the real world? Do we have ideas here?”


A good question, but such a request is unlikely to be made by the NRA. They have no reason to get mired down in racial issues that will distract them from addressing the 2nd Amendment topics which are challenging in themselves. It doesn't seem likely that the NRA would be inclined to conclude that pointing out the fact of disproportionate crime rates by blacks would increase membership and support for pro-2nd Amendment legislation. It makes more sense to sell the benefits of pro-2nd Amendment legislation to all victims of crime, including blacks who are victims.

You are absolutely correct that we must develop political lines which can carry into the mainstream, but I don't think that there are many significant special interest groups willing to saddle up with us. The criminal nature and incompetency of blacks will speak for itself if we can find a way to expose people to it. Perhaps we could start by pushing for reporting laws requiring agencies to report all crimes in an unbiased manner including the race, age, gender and other relevant statistical information of perps and victims in States likely to support such reporting. Requiring the media to report such information would seem to be in the best interest of the public and could probably be required by the FCC if enough people demanded the information.

I don't know where to start, but I strongly agree with you that we need to do something tangible right away.

Anonymous said...

Haha, whisker child is one of those finger-wagging Tea Party Patriotard Freepers who does not live anywhere near an authentic black ghetto.

Rah-Rah Amuurica!

LOL.

Anonymous said...

But black violence IS a 2A issue because when white and ONLY white shoots that poor negro yoof his living room at 2am, he is sure to be charged with and prosecuted for murder.

Or have his house burned by the deceased negroes black relatives in retaliation.

There is nojustice, because blacks get a free pass from the DOJ to murder/rape/rob/maim us, and we get prosecuted for fighting back with our 2A rights. The NRA should be directly advocating for WHITE PEOPLE and they aren't. They stay neutral like cowards and set a very dangerous precedent.

This is totally fucked up, in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

STFU, 5:39. The only thing wrong with whisker child is her name. Almost every time she posts, I see her name and think "Oh here we go again", then I read it, am pleasantly relieved that it was sensible, then I look back at her name and realize that it wasn't Whiskey after all.

Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO, you're still the man (despite my preference for the .45 ACP)!

You are absolutely correct: The CONtards have lost almost everything worth preserving over the past 50-60 years, but BY GOD THEY STILL HAVE THEIR GUNS! And Manuel to mow their lawns and easy money dividend income from Chinese investments.

A little over a year ago I was in a nice little gun store in Lake Havasu, Az. The owner, who had recently lost his bid for the Az state legislature, was a former Californian who had left the state in the 90s due to its increasing problems. He regaled me on my duty to convince the state's remaining yuppies, women, and “people of color” on the need to preserve the 2nd Amendment and “grow” the California gun rights movement. Of course I was struck by his hypocrisy in leaving the state. But I got lucky in stumbling upon the very thing you have eloquently pointed out – that is, since almost everything valued by California's white CONservatives has been lost except the right to own firearms, when will they start using their firearms in the manner intended by the forefathers to take back what has been lost? The guy was speechless, at first, then began rambling about the illegality of what I suggested and how firearms are intended for self-defense and recreational use. I pointed to his “Cold, Dead Hands” stickers and asked how serious he was about their meaning. He quickly informed me that the stickers were intended for sale, that I could give them any interpretation I wanted to, and that I should strongly consider leaving the store if I wasn't going to buy anything.

In my opinion he was typical of many/most gun owners, in California and elsewhere. He'd sell me out in a heart beat. This matter of selling out is key to the question of why whites don't organize in their own interests. We all know that Orcs won't back us up. But we also know that white men who say they have your back will likely turn on a dime when pressed by the enemy or if doing so advances their position relative to yours. In fact, the person screaming loudest for your blood will likely be another white man of conservative political bent. It's a most unfortunate situation.

Left Coast White Guy said...

I second these sentiments.

Anonymous said...

Oh baloney ! Remember a few years back hearing about the federal govt. ordering '800 railroad cattle cars with handcuffs on the walls to transport assholes to fema camps '? What ever became of that ? Besides there is nobody here in the us to even drive apc/tanks.All our soldiers are busy chasing ghosts in the middle east and afghanistan.Worry about reality-no need to manufacture or borrow trouble.

Anonymous said...

There will always be plenty of guns in the US no matter what is done to manufacturers.With 3d printers guns will be easy for anybody to make.The 'government' is becoming obsolete .

Anonymous said...

Living about 115 miles south of Portland Maine I believe this part of the country will remain majority white for a long time, at least the areas outside the cities. One big reason is the climate, blacks and non-whites in general don't do well in the cold, they certainly don't enjoy it. Portland Maine was basically all white until the '90s when Somalis were imported into Lewiston Maine and a few other places. These "refugees" were supported overwhelmingly by local churches (no, not Catholic churches) which to this day collect a handsome stipend from the taxpayers (not them) for bringing vibrant diversity to Maine. People in Maine are actually very nice people but very reserved in a traditional Yankee way; "I'll mind my business and you mind yours". The Somalis of course brought additional crime to Maine such as gangs and drug dealing which either was minimal or non-existent before the diversity came. Most people in Maine would rather see the Somalis deported tomorrow along with all the other multicultural types but they have no say in the matter like the rest of us. Outside Portland there is basically no random crime and very little crime at all, things are very peaceful. That actually is true throughout New England, the exception being the cities with a street named MLK boulevard like everywhere else. That's one reason there are so many DWLs in this part of the country, they never mingle with diverse types except under carefully controlled conditions assuring maximum safety for them, that and too many college types full of communist indoctrination.

Anonymous said...

Agreed.The name similarity is unfortunate.The 2 could not be more different than one another.Whiskey's "all Whites worship black affletes" shtick is like a broken record and is way past getting old.
Whisker Child,you rock on !

10mm AUTO said...

In fact, the person screaming loudest for your blood will likely be another white man of conservative political bent. It's a most unfortunate situation.

May 20, 2014 at 7:12 PM

The NF teaches that your total response to LEO contact should be summed up in 5 words (I have nothing to say.) or "I want a lawyer" (4 words). Anything more and you give them a chance to rattle your cage. I agree with your assessment, though those who know the score, usually ex-military, don't break bad on you or surprisingly, fellow church members. Unless they are gossips.

I always cringe when the reporter asks the guy standing there shaking, "What happened" and the guy says:

"I killed him."

What he means is that the Orc was in his kitchen, lunged at him with the kitchen knife he had picked up out of the kitchen block and when the White man appeared, thought he could stab him and get away, except as he tried to do this, the 12ga went off and 1 ounce of slug entered just beneath his addam's apple, severed his spinal cord and blew out a piece of his spine the size of a Tennis-ball and he stopped breathing.

Reporter writes story as "Homeowner kills burglar". Negros march because "he didn't have a weapon" because they say the racist White put the kitchen knife in his hand and he MEANT to kill the Orc. "He said so hisssef!"

Trial.

With any contact with LEO other than a speeding ticket, Please just say, "I have nothing to say and I want to speak to a lawyer." NOTHING will be solved at the scene! Anything you say to reporters, especially a negro reporter, will count against you.

Anonymous said...

I don't think anybody here is claiming that 'they' represent any of us.Exactly what are 'conservatives' conserving,anyway ?

Californian said...

You are absolutely correct that we must develop political lines which can carry into the mainstream, but I don't think that there are many significant special interest groups willing to saddle up with us.

This is something we need to explore further. It just may be that groups like the NRA are so single issue they will not move outside a narrow set of parameters. Still, we have to look at this in order to make inroads into the mainstream.

Anonymous said...

Joblessness causes blacks
poverty causes blacks
gangs cause blacks
illiteracy causes blacks
crime causes blacks!

WTF is wrong with you racists that you cannot see this obvious BRA truth? Ron Unz shows a .9 correlation between blacks and crime. It *cannot* by definition be that blacks cause all of these things, therefore when you see one and ALWAYS see the other, it is that these things are causing blacks.

We all know that if you put white people into these same decayed urban warzones that you wouldn't start seeing "urban renewal" and farmer's markets, a picking up of trash, and a removal of blight. You would see the same thing as you see here, BLACKS. Because the crime and blight and joblessness would CAUSE blacks. So the whites must turn into blacks due to the effects of all these things that "plague" cities like Detroit (like Godzilla or Grendel "plague" cities).

The GOP wants a black candidate to legitimize itself. The NRA wants blacks to legitimize themselves. Whites have permitted, by being pussies, the delegitimization of EVERYTHING we have ever done. It's time to start pushing back and agitating.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon asks a very astute question:
Exactly what are 'conservatives' conserving, anyway ?

The 'leaders' are conserving the advances made towards the shiny equalitarian utopia made by their team-mades in the L-squad. The followers are largely made up of the classic 'useful idiots'. (Think Tea-Party Patriotards, Pro-Lifers, Christians, etc.). The name of the game is to keep the useful idiots from coming to the realization that there is nothing left to conserve, because (as Sam Donaldson helpfully reminded us It's their country now).

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Oh baloney ! Remember a few years back hearing about the federal govt. ordering '800 railroad cattle cars with handcuffs on the walls to transport assholes to fema camps '? What ever became of that ? Besides there is nobody here in the us to even drive apc/tanks.All our soldiers are busy chasing ghosts in the middle east and afghanistan.Worry about reality-no need to manufacture or borrow trouble.

May 20, 2014 at 8:54 PM

%%%

You're bringing back memories: the infamous box cars were entirely constructed to haul brand new cars from the factory lots to major regional distribution hubs.

The tie-downs were for CARS.

The big West Coast distribution hub is just north of the bridge (I-680) as it crosses the strait -- next to the Mothball Fleet. Detroit ships cars by rail to this one location (all makes) and then truckers pick them up and shuttle them off to Portland, Reno and San Jose.

This is why most have never seen dedicated automobile railroad cars.

The famous cars were on tracks in New Jersey -- the major hub that served the greater New York area. (tri-state) Not surprisingly, there were no end of empty cars to be photographed.

I believe that the Jersey hub feeds cars all of the way up to Maine.

Up state New York and New Jersey have massive warehouses to sustain the tri-state area. They are in the sticks, but along the railroads.

As for driving APCs: Bradleys and the rest use conventional driving controls!

If you can drive a car, you can drive these beasts.

MANRAPS are just big 'buses.' Again, their driving controls are plain vanilla. Anyone can drive them with 30 minutes of instruction.


Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO writes,

“The NF teaches that your total response to LEO contact should be summed up in 5 words (I have nothing to say.) or "I want a lawyer" (4 words). Anything more and you give them a chance to rattle your cage. I agree with your assessment, though those who know the score, usually ex-military, don't break bad on you or surprisingly, fellow church members. Unless they are gossips.”

While I agree with you on how to handle LEOs and, in general, about white ex-military men knowing the score to degrees higher than the average Joe CONservtheNRA baby boomer, I have huge reservations about church members in suburban California. Dispensationalism rules! Now be advised that I am atheist, so perhaps the treatment I've experienced from conservative Christians was due to the lack of a religious connection. But then that is another problem. When reaching out to others I don't place religious belief (or disbelief) between myself and another white man. However in my experience, Christian white men in my age group do exactly that.

Surprisingly, my sons are far more successful than I am. They work part-time in a gun store and meet other young veterans who are very knowledgeable, physically fit, reasonably intelligent, and quite above average in matters concerning Orcs and the third world condition of this state. Some of these young vets are religious, others are not. There is a huge degree of comfort in the perception that religious belief doesn't stand in the way of young men in these matters like it does between myself and my fellow Boomers. So perhaps you are referring to younger church members?

Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO and Anonymous on May 21, 2014 at 5:51 PM -

Anonymous said ”. . . I have huge reservations about church members in suburban California. Dispensationalism rules! Now be advised that I am atheist, so perhaps the treatment I've experienced from conservative Christians was due to the lack of a religious connection. . .”

I'll throw in my 2 cents if you and 10mm AUTO don't mind. It seems to me that you are both correct but talking about slightly different scenarios. 10Mm AUTO is referring to a situation where an Orc bites the dust under the following condition: ”the Orc was in his kitchen, lunged at him with the kitchen knife he had picked up out of the kitchen block and when the White man appeared, thought he could stab him and get away, except as he tried to do this, the 12ga went off and 1 ounce of slug entered just beneath his addam's apple, severed his spinal cord and blew out a piece of his spine the size of a Tennis-ball and he stopped breathing.”

I agree with 10mm Auto that there wouldn't be much danger of ex-military or fellow church members attempting to turn this incident into a Zimmerman circus. Fellow church members fall into the category of friends, and although the ex-military might be strangers most of them would tend to support vigorous self defense. Unless some outside influence came into play, neither of these groups would be expected to sell you out.

Your scenario triggering betrayal was different in that it involves turning “on a dime when pressed by the enemy or if doing so advances their position relative to yours.” In your case the third party has skin in the game, but in 10mm AUTO's scenario the third party is more of a spectator. Sadly, if a third party's interests differ from yours, you cannot ever count on them having your back other than possibly people who are extremely trusted friends or family.

On a final note, you should presume that all unrelated politicians like the one you discussed in the gun store should never be counted on to do anything that isn't in his/her best interests. That is how politicians function.

Anonymous said...

THE MILITARY

Re, a gun store and meet other young veterans who are very knowledgeable,

Unless Desperate, why would a White youth go in the military?
WHY SUPPORT THE SYSTEM?

WHY DIE FOR DIE VERSITY?

Anonymous said...

Joblessness causes blacks
poverty causes blacks
gangs cause blacks
illiteracy causes blacks
crime causes blacks!

WTF is wrong with you racists that you cannot see this obvious BRA truth? Ron Unz shows a .9 correlation between blacks and crime. It *cannot* by definition be that blacks cause all of these things, therefore when you see one and ALWAYS see the other, it is that these things are causing blacks.


This statement is Enlightenment at work. The socio-economic-institutional-racism conditions cause us to see blacks according to the color of their skin instead of the content of their character. Our society assigns beautiful black people to these socio-economic-institutional-racism conditions, which is why beautiful black people are totally marginalized.

Whoever "Anonymous" is, he/she would make a welcome guest lecturer at my university.

I.M. Klewless, MFA
Cultural Relativism and Peace Studies

Brooklyn Born said...

Blacks are a "Protected Class" in this country, and until that is repealed, there will be no end to this madness.

Look what happened to that white kid that played the knockout game on them. Same game, played exactly by the same rules, different outcome. Civil rights violations on a federal level.

We need to find a way through the courts to end affirmative action and Protected (Kill YT permits) Class status.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous (May 21, 2014 at 8:52 PM) writes:

“I'll throw in my 2 cents if you and 10mm AUTO don't mind. It seems to me that you are both correct but talking about slightly different scenarios.”

No, I don't mind. In fact, the distinction you've provided has answered my question in its entirety. Thank you.

Anonymous (May 21, 2014 at 10:07 PM) writes:

“THE MILITARY; Re, a gun store and meet other young veterans who are very knowledgeable,

Unless Desperate, why would a White youth go in the military? WHY SUPPORT THE SYSTEM? WHY DIE FOR DIE VERSITY?”

I agree with you on not supporting the system and not chance dying for “die versity.” One problem, however, is that sometimes white lower middle-class and working-class youth age 18 and over go against their parents' wishes when balancing the perceived need to obtain world-class occupational training and college funding for free against the chance of dying or suffering major injury/handicap in fighting Amurrica's little wars for the nation of Israel. And having raised confident young men (as opposed to the yuppie, emo, metrosexual, and sensitive sherb-types that get all the good press in California), they simply loved pointing to their father's long-time service in the U.S. Marine Corps, which began at the end of the Vietnam war for the same reasons – that is, to obtain occupational training and college funding – as an example of Dad's hypocrisy in the matter. So, sometimes the “Do as I say, not as I do/did” tactic just plain doesn't work. And when I went on to tell them that “there was no major mobilization for war during my service,” well, that little factoid went into one ear and out the other. So, I admit to failure. Thank goodness it's over and they are safe and whole!

(to be continued)

Anonymous said...

(continued from above)

But in complete honesty there is another side to all this, much of which is hindsight. All men of substance have passed through a period of severe testing at least once during their lives. Call this period “the crucible,” if you like. Sometimes men don't come out of it alive, whole, and sane. That is always the risk. My mistake, if you can call it that, was in raising my sons I inculcated in them a warrior ethos. As my political thinking changed I inculcated in them other things. For example, they always had the benefit of knowing that the flag they “served” was not their own. Amurrica was never their nation, it is a multiracial empire, and they live here only because this is where they were born and there is no other place to go in the white world – the entire West is afflicted with the same poison. My sons never salivated to the sight of the stars and stripes as “patriotards” do. They know the Old Republic was dead and cannot be resuscitated. But they had the warrior ethos from a young age, and warriors require lifelong practice. The world-class training they received through U.S. military service shaped them into mercenaries of a different stripe than was my case as a post-Vietnam enlisted man in a new, all-volunteer military. Once again: My sons were never patriotards ambivalent about race. I, on the other hand, as a 'tard back in 1974, was ambivalent about race, and had decades of 'tardish CONservasewer thinking to undergo before awakening.

So, going back to the original matter of whom to trust: 1. The first candidates are family members, and 2. The next candidates are long-time friends. All potential family members and long-time friends come from pools of acquaintances that have, over time, undergone a selection process involving character. In 10mm AUTO's judgement and my own, the best pool of candidates from which to draw are acquaintances who have undergone the crucible of testing that is U.S. military service. My sons have my back. The long-time acquaintances whom they classify as friends may have my back. I say this because my time-scale is longer than my boys'. I am open to taking calculated risks, however. The miltary-shirking, easy money-grubbing CONservatard of Boomer-age next door, on the other hand, does not have my back. Period. Full stop.

Californian said...

There reasons to join the military. One is to gain the warrior ethos. Another is to get an insight into how the world works from the military perspective. There are also skills to be picked up which may be useful in the future.

Anon at 12:12 sums up the pros and cons nicely. And there are cons, but the pros outweigh them, at least for now. And yes, we are in a crucible.

Anonymous said...

NRA's job is not to fight for race realism.

NRA's job is to fight for the second of the ten rights in the Bill of Rights.

It's hard enough to stand up for the Constitution in the liberal insanity of the mass media. So now they're supposed to grab the adderbasket of race realism by the handles and dip their head in?

Can we hit the pause button on stupid here?

Since when does an organization that lobbies for constitutional law write articles that go into the demographic breakdown of US cities whatever the topic? The answer to blacks being violent is law abiding people shooting the crap out of them when they attack. The blackness will get sorted out by focusing on the violent.

THAT WAS THE WHOLE INTENT OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT! Our oppressors change--at one time they were white guys in lace shirts from Britain. In the future they will be Chinese. Now they are black degenerates. THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS LARGER THAN HISTORICAL CONTINGENCY.

You're just being silly now, and coupled with your increasingly purple prose and histrionic style, I'm finding it harder and harder to raise interest in coming to your blog. Even though I've read it from the beginning and used to look fwd to it.

Glaivester said...

Gun Owners of America is not race realist, but they do understand the role of demographics in gun rights and are fighting the most insidious threat to gun rights: immigration amnesty.

http://gunowners.org/a04262013.htm