 |
| No, he wasn't. He was for the institution of "Racial Democracy" |
pretty much sums up why black people support the Democratic Party (p.178):But most black Detroiters do not measure their lives, or their city, by the yardsticks of the American middle class. [Mayor Coleman Young -- the first black mayor of Detroit; elected in 1973] Young may not have provided them with the safest streets or most efficient services; nor has he been able to raise their standard of living. But he has given his constituents something even more valuable: a feeling of empowerment and personal worth. Detroit is one of the few places in the country where blacks can live in a sympathetic, black-oreiented milieu.
"Detroit is an environment where you can forget about being black," said Cassandra Smith-Gray, who heads the city's welfare department."Empowerment." What happens when you "empower" black people (never forget that Coleman Young famously said he was "Black first, Democrat second.") is documented in the collapse of Detroit
: regardless of the perilous nature of a city like Detroit, Atlanta, Gary (Indiana), or Newark under black-political control, the point is simply that blacks still control the city.Black elected officials look out for black interests, knowing that the good for the collective is greater than the combined good of the individual. Once, when America was, well, America, white elected officials didn't need to campaign on protecting "white interests": all policies were looked at on how they benefited and built a better life (and future) for "Americans"... white people.
But this institution of "a feeling of empowerment and personal worth" to black people isn't indigenous to Detroit; it's located in plentiful amounts wherever black-control of a city has transpired (curiously, so our those unsafe streets, inefficient streets, and lower standard of living that plagues 90% black Detroit).
Richard Arrington (a Democrat) was the first black mayor of Birmingham. Elected in 1979, his memoir There's Hope for the World: The Memoir of Birmingham, Alabama's First African American Mayor
basically insinuates that before a black man was elected mayor of Birmingham, the world was doomed; "hope" finally being unleashed from Pandora's Box at just the precise moment when people went to the polls to cast their votes for Arrington.He writes (p.80) of the glories of working to create a monochromatic public labor force:
The success of the city in increasing the number of blacks in its labor force was outstanding over the next two decades. By the end of my tenure, black city employees made up 50 percent of the total labor force. By 1995, 60 percent of the city's black employees had some supervisory responsiblity. The number of black department heads during my tenure as mayor increased from one to twelve out of twenty-four department heads.
The hiring and promotion of women also increased signficiantly. By 1999 the City of Birmingham had the most diverse labor force, both in terms of gender and race, of any government in the State of Alabama.
"Empowerment." Augmenting "personal worth" in the City of Birmingham, for 'his' constituents. Of course, as Birmingham (and the world) prepares to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the events of 1963 - "But for Birmingham," Fred Shuttleworth recalled President John F. Kennedy saying in June 1963 when he invited black leaders to meet with him, "we would not be here today" - there is no room for discussion of what happened to Birmingham since Democrat Black-political control became enshrined as uncontested state-power in the city.
Though blacks living in Birmingham have fared poorly since black-political control of the city emerged in 1979, blacks are still in political control.
We live in a nation where all non-whites are encouraged to play the game of "racial democracy," so that they may feel 'empowered' and a greater sense of 'personal worth' -- regardless of the consequences of their actions.
Now you know why blacks vote as a monolith for Democrats.
66 comments:
Blacks vote democrat because they equate Republicans with "whiteness", and democrats with "non-whiteness".
(Which means that white democrats are not really "white-white".)
Blacks hate whites, and they despise anything that represents "whiteness" (like education, morality, marriage, lawfulness, independency, etc).
Sure, there will always be exceptions (Mia Love, Allen West, etc), but by and large, blacks will always vote democrat, because they will always hate whitey.
Simple.
but why do whites vote for democrats? that's the real question
Which brings up a point: elections used to be (supposedly) about putting the best candidate in office, or voters supporting a party plank. Now it simply comes down to people voting for their ethnic group. Sorta like what goes on in elections in sub-Saharan Africa, where voting (when it occurs) is usually along tribal-ethnic lines--political parties being openly organized to promote a particular tribal-ethnicity's interests.
What does this have to say about politics in America? Are we seeing the end of the traditional American democracy? Instead of voting being about politics, it is about race. We are going to have each race voting according to the color-of-skin of the candidate? If so, then there is little point in actually having a campaign plank or any kind of real politics.
Conservatives frequently claim that the GOP is better for blacks for assorted reasons (low taxes being equated with business formation and economic advancement). But if blacks or other groups are going to vote according to color-of-skin, then who cares about the rational side of the debate? Perhaps this is one reason political debates have become stylized affairs. Serious issues, such as the ongoing American wars and the PATRIOT ACT, go by the boards. Instead, it all comes down to pandering to racial interests.
In any event, black politicians do bring in the loot for their constituents: AA, minority contracts, federal funds, and the rest of the rackets. What do conservatives have to offer in competition other than long term investment, studying hard in school, and competition on a level field?
This puts white people in a difficult position. If they think about it, they may have to vote for a white candidate simply to prevent the black race hustlers from looting the polity. But this means often supporting candidates who are otherwise adverse to one's interests (e.g., a McCain).
Well, the US was founded as a republic, not a democracy, because they understood way back when that democracies have a tendency to self-destruct into demagoguery.
Why Do Blacks Vote as a Monolith for the Democratic Party?
They are self-destructive morons who cannot rise above a tribal brand of "gibsmedat" mentality. Period.
Skin color-based entitlement is their universe and DWLs have only served to reinforce that notion over the last 50 years.
But he has given his constituents something even more valuable: a feeling of empowerment and personal worth.
Even as rat bastard Black politicians strip mine every municipal resource and lard departments through rampant nepotism and cronyism. All of which, of course, totally disempowers and destroys the personal worth of average Black people.
Detroit is one of the few places in the country where blacks can live in a sympathetic, black-oreiented milieu.
What remains unsaid is how the price of being able to "live in a sympathetic, black-oreiented milieu" is a rather abrupt return to Third World living conditions. But, hey! Better sitting in a diaper full of sh!t just so long as it's Black sh!t rather than have Whitey in office. Plus, pouting among the smoking ruins is a much better opportunity to whine and complain than if there was a functioning economy that provided [gasp!] work. Perish the effing thought.
"Detroit is an environment where you can forget about being black," said Cassandra Smith-Gray, who heads the city's welfare department.
That's only because the average Black is more stupid than a bag of hair. Otherwise they'd recognize how "Detroit is an environment" of failure and economic deprivation. But, hey! It's Black-run and that means everything to moron Blacks.
… "hope" finally being unleashed from Pandora's Box at just the precise moment when people went to the polls to cast their votes for Arrington.
Is it any mystery that someone else more recently ran a campaign based entirely on "hope" and change? It's curious how, in each case, the results are astonishingly similar.
Maybe that's because Black "empowerment" has nothing to do with progress and everything to do with lording whatever power they have over everyone else. This is a pattern of behavior that permeates Black mentality at all levels; be it the street thug, Black Liberation Theology or the way 0bama countenances and encourages a totally unconstitutional pro-Black bias in the Department of Justice.
Has anyone paused to think that 0bama's conspicuous inaction regarding the Benghazi embassy attack might not have been just his usual Islamic @ss-kissing but also a chance to make sure several Whites paid the ultimate price at his whim?
Though blacks living in Birmingham have failed poorly since black-political control of the city emerged in 1979, blacks are still in political control.
The inability of Blacks to see past race-based voting is its own reward. POVERTY. Grinding, endemic poverty. Everywhere Blacks hold the scepter, the jungle slowly (or not-so-slowly) creeps back in, both literally and figuratively.
Ape-like thugs maraud in the streets and all infrastructure becomes overgrown. The jungle, indeed.
Now you know why blacks vote as a monolith for Democrats.
Paul, you left out one vital fact. By creating hordes of multi-generational welfare addicts, DWLs—who are almost unanimously of the Democratic Party—knowingly construct mendicant voter plantations. These enclaves of economic slavery are so vast that even Section 8 relocation of Blacks and minorities into the suburbs cannot dilute the pro-Democrat voting strength of blighted urban cores.
There's no better proof of this than how Hispanics—whose pro-life Catholic background should align them with Republicans—nonetheless vote for Democratic candidates. The Hispanic vote is one of the crucial blocs necessary for 0bama to get reelected. What perfect timing to have a natural disaster at hand on election day so that 0bama can be seen handing out all the goodies.
Just look at all things "Black". Take a good look at any Black culture anywhere in the world. Hellish.
Now, what makes anybody think Black rulers, of any type, can do better than White rulers?
Yet, the media, the socialists, the Liberals have orgasms just thinking about a Black Mayor or Governor, etc.
Then, they have to make excuses when this Black Savior Leader's city crashes into a dump.
"but why do whites vote for democrats? that's the real question" - They live far enough away from blacks.
Trial junkie here. Back in the 1960's, I saw this quote by a black man:
"They can put a donkey at the head of the Democratic ticket and I'll still vote for it. I vote for the man who will put money in my pocket."
If I remember my history correctly: before the Civil Rights movement, blacks voted for Republicans.
I vaguely remember reading how the machine (in this case Republican, not Dem) in southern New Jersey would rely on black votes to hold power. This was the 1920's.
Californian: Instead of voting being about politics, it is about race. We are going to have each race voting according to the color-of-skin of the candidate? If so, then there is little point in actually having a campaign plank or any kind of real politics.
This was the point I made in part II of my essay, "The Dis-Integration of America":
It is already apparent that neighborhoods with a higher degree of racial “diversity” inherently will experience more divergent political and personal interests which can just as readily compromise any existing sense of social cohesion. Divergence of this sort is an automatic predictor of potential conflict.
One immediate outcome is an “atomization” of personal relationships. A community’s fabric loses its tightness of weave and thereby, its strength. This frequently promotes the sort of anonymity more commonly associated with urban environments. Such "facelessness" is a vital ingredient for criminal activity that is more often suppressed in tightly knit communities where an individual’s reputation has a greater effect upon their social and financial standing.
This fracturing of social unity more strongly affects Whites than it does other minorities specifically because they are minorities and already experience differing goals from both other ethnic groups and Whites as well. The inherent fragmentation of minority interests is merely a fait accompli while it is an absolute poison for White society. On an increasing basis any protest regarding this purposeful dismantling of White solidarity is hysterically shouted down with screeches of “racism”. [emphasis added]
Racial diversity automatically introduces divergent political and economic goals. At least it does when these diverse groups feel no overarching sense of being American instead of proclaiming their hyphenated ethnicity. I'd wager that there is an almost perfect correlation between increased non-Eurpoean immigration and the political fracturing being noted by Californian. [to be continued]
Conservatives frequently claim that the GOP is better for blacks for assorted reasons (low taxes being equated with business formation and economic advancement).
That is based on a false belief that Blacks pursue entrepreneurial projects. The infintesimal number of Black technology startups stands in direct contradiction to this notion.
But if blacks or other groups are going to vote according to color-of-skin, then who cares about the rational side of the debate?
There is no reason and it's why Romney is a total idiot to waste his time and funds pursuing the Black vote. Whites should be paying close attention to this because it is a stark indication of just how much Mittens buys into PCMC (Politically Correct Multi-Culturalism).
Perhaps this is one reason political debates have become stylized affairs. Serious issues, such as the ongoing American wars and the PATRIOT ACT, go by the boards. Instead, it all comes down to pandering to racial interests.
I wish it were that simple. Instead, both Blacks and Whites are totally consumed with non-political fashion statements that have turned presidential campaigns into beauty contests. Yet another triumph of style over substance.
In any event, black politicians do bring in the loot for their constituents: AA, minority contracts, federal funds, and the rest of the rackets. What do conservatives have to offer in competition other than long term investment, studying hard in school, and competition on a level field?
That's all genuine Conservatives have to offer and it's the reason why they should openly dismiss the Black vote in general. As if that will ever happen.
This puts white people in a difficult position. If they think about it, they may have to vote for a white candidate simply to prevent the black race hustlers from looting the polity. But this means often supporting candidates who are otherwise adverse to one's interests (e.g., a McCain).
A fine summing up of why Whites must, nonetheless, cast their vote for a blatant race traitor like Romney.
It was LBJ that signed the 1965 Civil Rights Act and said, "If we pass this act we'll have the niggers in the Democratic camp for 100 years"
Truth, read your history...
Part of the black preference for the democrats has to do with the so-called "Southern Strategy" employed by Nixon. Before that a huge percentage of blacks voted Republican, the party of Lincoln.
I don't exactly know what the Southern Strategy was, perhaps another poster can explain it, but I've seen it many many times described as the watershed event in bringing blacks to the dems. I think the dems built a propaganda campaign around it. They were able to make blacks forget that democrats were their main tormentors in the old days. They tapped into black people's fondness for conspiracy theories.
Californian's post t 1:09 is excellent. There's no gravity to politics anymore. Things that were important in the past slide on by now. When the POTUS tells the president of a former enemy and the world's largest nuclear power "wait until I'm re-elected and I can give you what you want" and it's ignored, how far have we come? Are we that unserious? I'm sure many of the older posters can think of innumerable examples. For example, Clinton didn't get away with seizing the Gonzales kid or burning up the Waco group without media criticism. Obama and the democrats can do whatever they want without fear of media and public outrage. The republicans get away with it too. I need to be equal opportunity here. It just seems we live in an age of short memories, where no past policy nor precident or history means a thing. We are not really able to have coherent nation policy or any real discourse on policy.
"What do conservatives have to offer in competition other than long term investment, studying hard in school, and competition on a level field?"
Literally laughed out loud at this. Not at you personally Anon, just at the continued pervasiveness of this idea.
If only this WERE the deal offered by conservatives...
No, the deal that todays CON-serve-themselves offer to whites is: "You idiots will continue to vote for us because we're the only alternative to the Democrat's Racial Socialism, while we depress your wages by importing laborers from Latin America and high-tech workers from India and East Asia!"
In the CONservative scheme, the only place for whites is to serve as officers and NCOs in Amerika's mercenary armed forces where you will fight endless wars for a small, hostile alien power.
NEITHER party cares about us. The elites in both parties actually DESPISE us.
But, out day will come...
Zenster said...
Why Do Blacks Vote as a Monolith for the Democratic Party?
They are self-destructive morons who cannot rise above a tribal brand of "gibsmedat" mentality. Period.
Absolutely perfect. No need to ever add another word on the topic.
-Sweep the leg-
Californian said...
"Which brings up a point: elections used to be (supposedly) about putting the best candidate in office, or voters supporting a party plank. Now it simply comes down to people voting for their ethnic group. What does this have to say about politics in America?"
A very interesting assessment. I look at it like this; Americans will riot over a baseball game, or a football game or a basketball game. Yet they will NOT riot over things that really matter and affect their lives like QE3, the Patriot ACT, the NDAA, unending third world immigration, Trillion dollar deficits, etc. Americans have this huge emotional attachment to shit that is of no importance like sports. If they applied the same level of passion to their politics as they did their trivial sports contests, the USA would have had a full scale revolution by now. By turning politics into a bastardized beauty contest you are removing the passion and zeal from the electorate. The MSM have succeeded in tying American self worth to the success of the local sports teams or some other trivial bullshit instead of the State of our Nation and its well being.
@ Zenster
"Detroit is an environment where you can forget about being black," said Cassandra Smith-Gray, who heads the city's welfare department.
That's only because the average Black is more stupid than a bag of hair. Otherwise they'd recognize how "Detroit is an environment" of failure and economic deprivation. But, hey! It's Black-run and that means everything to moron Blacks."
That was classic, along with the rest of that commentary at 2:03. Really, really good stuff.
There's no gravity to politics anymore. Things that were important in the past slide on by now.
Here's another thing to consider: third parties will never have a chance given the current situation. Libertarians have tried to get the black vote to no avail. Despite the libertarian argument for freedom, blacks are thinking, mostly, in collective and statist terms of redistribution of other people's income. Just consider how even with the full support of government and corporate America, black business start-ups are miniscule. How much worse would it be if there were none of these support systems in place? (OK, the libertarian argument is that lower taxes and reduced regulation would encourage more business, but is this a white thang?)
The Greens are too esoteric for blacks. Arguments over the environment, or sustainable economies, have their appeals mainly to white people, especially those of the college grad and upper middle class. I have known Greens who have tried to organize minorities and they report epic fails. Why? Well, they are told, "As blacks, we have always voted for the Democrats, it's just the thing to do."
In any event, the Greens can not offer the loot that the Dems can. And other third parties, such as the Constitution Party, are too rightist to appeal to many blacks.
This is placing whites in a real dilemma. Suddenly the "lesser of two evils" argument starts to have utility. If the Dems are going to redistribute and socially engineer and the rest of the rackets, then survival might just dictate holding your nose and voting GOP.
In the long run, this means nothing fundamentally will change in America. We'll be locked into the current system, in perpetuity. The country will keep spirally downwards. And then maybe the time will come for that man on a white horse...
Trial junkie here. Zenster has hit several more home runs.
Don,
This post needs to be repeated over and over and shouted from the rooftops. Every time I think people are beginning to wake up, here comes an election with all the whites waving flags with stats in their eyes saying the next new guy is going to reverse Roe v.Wade and return America to the innocent whitetopia that they remember from their childhood.
They refuse to wake up and see that both parties are selling us down the river. "Oh, I know the red pill will allow me to see reality for what it is, but I'll take the blue pill just the same, thank you"..... Damn lotus eaters
Left Coast White Guy
Ex New Yorker here....A black people will vote for any body that promises them a free lunch. Period.
I will unfortunately vote. I have lost my passion for this country. My only passion is for my family. The white middle class and other like thinkers are in survival mode now. We must continue to survive while striving to thrive. How do we do this? Be the change. Disengage the morass of asses. Live simply. Try to insulate yourself from the bs while disengaging from the outdated mantra that the good ole USA and its stupid gubbiement is on our side. We win by making a cognitive shift. Look, I think most immigrants these days are idiots who have been hoodwinked. They think Americans don't work blah blah. The blacks think every white person has privilege. Yeah that's right, it's a privilege for me to pay for my own schooling and work at a job that barely covers my student loans while I get taxed out of oblivion. We whites must take a mafia approach. Cash business between like minded whites only. How do we accomplish such a secret society? We need a plan.....
To SoCal Snowman re why don't people riot?
Good question. I think so many Americans have been silently seduced so sto speak via online gaming, porn/sex, fantasy and real life football that their mental fortitude and resistance had been worn down. It struck me at the park with my kids one day how fat, rude, and sullen so many Americans are. There is no sense of community; that has been skillfully dismantled. How do we put it back together? Men hate women now. Women hate men. Blacks hate whites. Whites hate blacks. Immigrants hate anyone born here, especially American winnings because we think our poon is gold so to speak. So what do we do? It is like a generation or two has been lost. We cannot get them back. Immigrants don't riot because they don't want to get sent back to their shitholes. Everyone and their brother has a criminal record as America is becoming a police state.
We must do what our forefathers did and start a secret society. We like minded must meet in person.
Someone brought up in the boards about coordinating riots etc. via Twitter. Think about how things were coordinated with the London riots - a prior post mentioned this.
There is no such thing as an African American,the fact is they are AFRICAN,
If a Goat is born in a stable does that make it a Horse ?
Blacks vote democrat because they are natural communists. They aren't learned communists, as dem/commie whites are, but genetic communists when placed in a large western society built by whites. Huge difference. Why is this?
To observe why this is, one only has to compare isolated white communities and isolated black communities.
An isolated white community will quickly put structures of self-government in place, build businesses, and become independently productive. Left to their own devices, a community populated with indigenous western Europeans or Jews will become a model low crime community without any need for support from others. They can educate and deliver medical services to their own, maintain infrastructure, and generally progress at a rapid pace. They wouldn't care if other groups practiced segregation against them, and they might even prefer it, because it doesn't matter if others refuse to mix with them. They don't need anyone else. Hence, they are natural conservatives as they don't require a larger community of 'others' to latch onto for survival. A perfect example of low-tech whites who accomplish this to an exemplary standard are the Amish, lest any opponent of my view be tempted to make a comment about blacks not having the necessary resources compared to white communities. Yes, the Amish don't educate past 8th grade and they need outside medicine for rare events, but these needs are vastly overshadowed by their wild community success by every meaningful measure. A myriad of alternative white communities, ranging from the low tech Amish, and moving across the scale of modernity, can be held up as similar successful examples.
An isolated black community of any meaningful size fails to adequately govern or police itself, fails to adequately maintain its infrastructure, fails to procreate and raise its children responsibly, and fails to adequately educate or deliver full medical services to it's residents. Adequate sewer, water, and food supply is considered an accomplishment if there are no outside groups to provide services or supervise. The quality of life is low.
Blacks at large, whether they consciously admit it to themselves or not, are aware of the reality that I just presented. They know that if left to themselves, they will fail to thrive. Thus, they know that it is necessary to be ever-parasitic on more successful groups. Hence, they are communists. Instead of pursuing the futile effort of improving their people's plight by independently improving all relevant parameters of their communities, they simply aspire to mesh into more successful communities, all the while claiming das racist and asking for race based preferences, making their strategy all the more obvious, clumsy, and prone to passionate and completely justified resistance.
"Detroit is an environment where you can forget about being black," said Cassandra Smith-Gray, who heads the city's welfare department.
That is a statement that is pregnant with information which has not been plumbed. What she is telling you is that integration is an unnerving experience with devastating consequences for blacks; so horrible that it is better to live in squalor than to face a constant daily reminder--which judgement they are making themselves--of their shortcomings. Segregation, northern or southern style, witnessed intact families,a far better quality of citizen, and greater opportunities to be legitimately excellent, not the pet of some DWL.
Brown vs. Board of Education. How did that work out?
MLB. When Jackie Robinson, who was an excellent individual, integrated baseball, dozens of black teams would be disbanded, along with their black fans. Most black players are now Hispanic, and none of the fans are black.
If the object were to debase and destroy black Americans,the KKK couldn't have worked it out so well as the DWL has, and they are never finished with their work.
Modern news coverage and sensational storms on the TV all the time and "reality" shows are the modern substitution for Nero's games in Rome to distract the population from the real problems in the country....it works!
OT.... NCIS did a while brands new show dedicated to the montford point marines (africans) being awarded the cmh and made it like they weren't awarded it previously because of racism. Any one have non pcmulticult info on this?
Libertarians have tried to get the black vote to no avail.
Libertarianism is a path to communism. There is no other end-result possible. Think, and figure out why.
It's a communist vehicle, the same as democracy, hoodwinked as a conservative movement and designed to get conservatives to move the social climate of the country toward one that is conducive to communism. ALL politics is fought in the social realm, not the economic. The individualization effect of libertarianism is the same as that of communism. Conservatism is actually the community oriented philosophy(albeit racially/mono-culturally oriented). Conservatism brings the interests of a group together for true and powerful political power. Communism is an amalgamation of differing groups, stripped of their racial/cultural unity and therefore their political power, with the false/paper-thin unity of the 'worker' used as a powerless placeholder for real unifying community characteristics.
Its genetic, that's why dictatorships florish in africa, blacks are still tribal, its woven into their core, no amount of education, mercedes cars, designer labels, trapping of a sophisticated western lifestyle, will change their tribal genetic predispositions.
The balcks in south africa vote for the anc even in the face of job destruction, poverty, they are like unreasoning hommonids, no thought process goes into the act of electing a chief that will overlord them into diseas poverty and eventual death, its just the way they are, look at the zimbabweans, they are buying 2nd hand used underpants, that the chinese are throwing away, and they are starving, and they still vote for mugabe
Elections are far too noble and lofty for the limited understanding, even the young black professionals, that read these posts, will vote with nary a synapse activated.
Hence africa looking like africa, and haitti like africa, and detroit like africa, because africans predominate
Obama is the condensate of the 3rd world vapour that has been wafting around the western world since 1945
A white leader will never be elected in africa, even if he gives the black masses money for nothing, and their chicks are already free, diseased but free.
The 3rd world will start condensing in western countries now, how long untill a muslim becomes prime minister in the UK
Whites are complicit in their own destruction, I do not understand that.
Many times in the savage shithole that is africa, I cannot do things that are genetic to western whites.
For eg if a black child comes and begs for money, I cannot give it to him, my genetically inherited mind and heart tell me to give him a small amount of money cause he is hungry, but my mind knows, that a child pimper knows that whites are soft and he manipulates that, if I give that child money it in ables that pimp to get more children to pimp, making him wealthier.
So my friends the 3rd world has brought about the realisation, that the more prevalent it becomes, the more animal like 1st worlders have to become in order to survive.
Poverty is interlaced in black genetics, where ever they go they unlease it, money destructs in their presence.
Look at the untold misery and poverty mandela has unleased in south africa, blacks are faring worse now than under apartheid, the majority, a minority have prospered, that is all that is needed to keep the masses voting for the anc, the might have the odd chance of striking it rich.
To Californian: ROGER THAT to the rider of the pale horse analogy!
I've seen a couple of posters here make the remark that groids started voting Dem in the wake of the 1960s 'civil rights' era. That's not exactly true. The shift got under way in the 1930s under FDR's proto-Marxist regime. Section 8 and other welfare programs actually had their beginnings in that era - to be vastly expanded by LBJ and his pals.
The black vote was overwhelmingly Repub a century ago, but the initial moves towards the Dems came with the takeover of official black leadership by WEB Dubois (a communist) and the NAACP following the death of Booker T. Washington. By the 1960s, blacks were already voting Dem 2/3 to 1/3. The civil rights era saw the final shift to the present situation, where groids vote Dem 90% or more. This never slows down the stupid party in its moronic attempts to promote diversity, however.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/florida-youth-football-coaches-busted-gambling-games/story?id=17602034#.UJD57h_39ok
Niggaz...
No, the deal that todays CON-serve-themselves offer to whites is: "You idiots will continue to vote for us because we're the only alternative to the Democrat's Racial Socialism,
There it is and 'conservatives' i.e. whites continue to convince themselves it is the only real choice they have. Therefore once again voting for the 'lessor of two evils' who in NO WAY will do anything to support whites. In fact should Romney win he will continue to support anti-white laws, policies and positions. But at least we will have 'won' the election!
Can anyone tell this foreigner what percentage of blacks voted in the last general election?.
Not the percentage who voted for Obama but the number who cast their ballots?.
Yes, blacks are of a tribal mentality and once they take over an area, all other ethnicities will be kicked into the gutter and treated as persona non grata and reviled.
As I've said before, blacks only screech about equal opportunity and equal rights when they're in a position of disadvantage but once they acheive critical population mass and gain political control, they quickly becomes a thousand times worse than anyone they ever complained about and will happily shit on the rest of the non black population with great zeal.
That is always their goal. That is what black power means.
"There it is and 'conservatives' i.e. whites continue to convince themselves it is the only real choice they have."
Perhaps you'll explain why pissing my vote away on an unknown third party candidate is preferable.
I moved from Gwinnett County to Douglas County in Georgia. Then Douglas County was only 7 percent black. Now it is 33 percent black, from the black undertow from Atlanta and from the North, places such as NYC and the midwest such as Detroit.
Blacks are moving to take over here in Douglas County, law enforcement and city government. They can do that although the county is still 57 percent White. Blacks know they can take over because Whites will vote for qualified candidates or the best person in their mind. Whites will vote Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Independent, Green, etc. splitting up their 57 percent majority votes while blacks will vote 100 percent for any black person. The only "qualification" needed is that that person be black. So the black 33 percent of the county population becomes a majority vote for Kershon Washington, Quadzilla Jasmine or Jeter Willie Green.
The blacks here have already seized a number of county and state seats using their racist votes.
My once almost all White subdivision has long since gone. I haven't had a congressional representative in years. The black in there now rarely ever responds to my emails, faxes, and phone calls and when he does it's always in the negative.
Happy Halloween Everybody.
Californian said......"Instead, it all comes down to pandering to racial interests."
And it seems all interests get full media coverage and plenty of air time with special considerations, ALL, except the white interests. {White interests & considerations = RACISIM.
The part that gets my goat, is all the whites that believe white interests & considerations = racism too. Go figure.
LOL: "Kershon Washington, Quadzilla Jasmine or Jeter Willie Green." --- I LOVE IT. That's hilarious! Oh wait...I bet those are real folks after all!
LOL: "Kershon Washington, Quadzilla Jasmine or Jeter Willie Green." --- I LOVE IT. That's hilarious! Oh wait...I bet those are real folks after all!
james wilson:
Per Cassandra Smith-Gray: "Detroit is an environment where you can forget about being black"
That is a statement that is pregnant with information which has not been plumbed. What she is telling you is that integration is an unnerving experience with devastating consequences for blacks; so horrible that it is better to live in squalor than to face a constant daily reminder--which judgement they are making themselves--of their shortcomings. Segregation, northern or southern style, witnessed intact families,a far better quality of citizen, and greater opportunities to be legitimately excellent, not the pet of some DWL.
Excellent observations. That same statement by Cassandra Smith-Gray really stood out when I read it, too.
Just the sheer existence of Whites is a standing rebuke to Blacks. Consciously or not, they know this and act accordingly. It's why they would prefer to live in wretched poverty rather than have Whites run the show, because then there is no possible way to avoid recognizing their failure.
With some HNIC to point at, they can delude themselves that they've built some fragment of civilization; when, in reality, all they've done is mark out their territory like a dog with an over-active bladder.
Anon 9:37
Libertarians have tried to get the black vote to no avail.
Libertarianism is a path to communism. There is no other end-result possible. Think, and figure out why.
Care to explain? How is self-reliance communist?
Romney didn't persue the black vote to get the black vote, but to encourage white voters who are terrified of voting for a racis that he isn't one.
Why do blacks vote for blacks? Because doing so is intelligent. At least that's what Joseph Lowery says.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/pastor-who-prayed-at-obamas-inauguration-says-all-white-people-will-go-to-hell/article/2512272?custom_click=rss#.UJHC-JWuXww
Artist: Nixon's "Southern Strategy" was the plan to win over the southern Whites who had voted for George Wallace in 1968. For over a hundred years, the southern Whites had voted Democratic, but Nixon convinced them that the GOP was a better vehicle for their interests. Actually, the Democrats who passed the civil rights laws convinced them. Now, southern Whites are almost as reflexively GOP voters as Blacks are Democrats.
Self-government, republic or democracy, can only work within a fairly homogenous community. A man can accept losing a vote if he knows that the winners are still his people, who at worst are merely mistaken. But a man will not be willing to place his future existence or that of his children on the ballot.
The great mass of non-Whites who inhabit our country are here to feed off Whites and the society we've built. Most contribute far less than they put in, and are happy about it. Even the Mexicans who work hard don't work smart or productively, and receive far more than they contribute. They like the golden eggs and couldn't care less about the White goose that laid them. Are we to have an election, with hosts and parasites having an equal say?
Mourn the American Republic or the European "democracies" if you want, but their time has passed. New forms of government for the White race are needed, ones that, at a minimum, do not hate their own peoples.
My guess was someone confused libertarianism with liberalism.
Gosh, and y'all wonder why we avoid voting people in power who are probably just as racist as you guys.... scary
And double wow... This site has a moderator. Considering all the racist stuff I see here, I was surprised this was 2012 and the disclaimer states,"All comments must be approved by the blog author.".. Super funny. I guess if you don't preach hate, you have no place on this blog. Damn, just when you thought it was safe to be an American (say it like JAWS MOVIE)
Blacks don't vote just because they are black.... It's only the .....1st or 2nd time in American history, AMERICAN HISTORY..we know you whites we have had a black man on the ballot....don't really want us in your politics.. but you brought us here. We only don't like you racist people. Just like our white brothers we fight fire with fire. but everybody else no problems
Care to explain? How is self-reliance communist?
My guess was someone confused libertarianism with liberalism.
There is no confusion.
Due to the fact that the only politics that matter are social and not economic (economic policy can be changed in a day, with the flick of a pen, while the social sphere takes generations to change) we must look at the social effects of any political movement in order to correctly categorize it. Specifically, we must look at whether a particular movement has a social individualizing effect or a social effect that strengthens community bonds in a real and lasting manner.
First, you must be disabused of the notion that individuals have power. They do not. Only groups have power. From the plains and tundras on which we evolved, to the modern day ballot box, only cohesive co-operating groups are able to muster the necessary power for long term influence, success, and survival. A co-operating group could eliminate your self-reliant ass rather quickly, either in a physical sense or a political sense. Self-reliant people cannot defeat armies of any ilk, due to the fact that they render themselves powerless by purposely separating from others (politically, physically, financially, racially, etc.).
The long-term net effect of individualizing political movements (communism, liberalism, libertarianism) is to create endless islands of political self-interest from what used to be large politically effective cohesive groups. The resultant individuals are powerless against the remaining monolithic co-operating groups(s). Communism/liberalism achieves this, overtly, through massive multicultural mixing, creating a society wherein the people find it impossible to form a cohesive unit that can muster any significant political power. This is because the traditional inter-generational bonds of ethnic and racial unity are no longer available, to a significant degree, in broader society. Which brings me to my next point: if power cannot be transferred inter-generationally, then it will be defeated by groups who can pass political power on inter-generationally. No other bonds offer this except those of race and certain inward turning religions. White people in the USA, today, have zero political power because they have zero cohesive bonds that translate into significant political power. Politicians cater to certain majority white religious minorities, but that's as close as it gets. Which is pathetic and unsustainable. Your kids are just as likely to vote Democrat as they are republican, because it is nothing for the media to convince them to do this due to the fact that they have no significant social bond that gives them any meaningful connection to other whites, many of whom also vote for their destruction.
"Self reliance" as a political theory is an utter sham and its for the slave class. All 'self-reliants' will ultimately be slaves to a cohesive group. Its hoodwinked liberalism, period. Traditional socially conservative values, practiced en masse, are the only hope for whites. Those in power are trying their damnedest to make sure that doesn't happen. Just monitor television content to reaffirm this. Those with meaningful and effective bonds, however, are resistant to liberal influence even when it is in their face every day. Look at certain religions to see this in practice.
Anon: Gosh, and y'all wonder why we avoid voting people in power who are probably just as racist as you guys.... scary
Instead, Blacks usually vote into power politicians who are far more racist than Whites. You don't see any Black politicians rolling back Affirmative Action or minority hiring quotas even as White officials strengthen them, do you?
Even funnier is how, more than any other demographic, the one group hurt worst by 0bama is the Black middle class.
What's your brilliant response to this?
Blacks Vote For Obama Simply Because He's Black
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Gosh, and y'all wonder why we avoid voting people in power who are probably just as racist as you guys.... scary
Gosh, and y'all wonder why we do not avoid voting people in power who are probably just as racist as you guys.... scary
I think you will find that Obama is the president so I fixed it for you.
Modern definition of an (anti black) racist: A.)Anyone who clearly sees the reality of black dysfunction and destructiveness and wishes to avoid it or prevent it while refusing to make excuses for it. B.)Any non black person who expects black people to be accountable for their own condition instead of blaming the world and everyone else in it for that condition. C.) Any non black person who expects blacks to be self sufficient and self supporting and objects to billions of dollars of "gibsmedat" being funneled into da hood (at the taxpayers expense) generation after generation.
If a racist politician gets into office, God Forbid! Shaniqua the Sowapotamus might be deprived of her Section 8 house, her EBT card,welfare payments, free cell phone and all the other gibsmedat she relies on! Da worthless to the world bitch might actually have to get an education and a job and support herself and her fatherless bastard chilluns who gots to get dem free brekfusses and lunches at da skool.
Dat's rayciss!
Anon at 10:37 PM: Well said. Don't know that I entirely agree that libertarianism is a step towards communism, but it's something to chew on for awhile.
Here we go again...
Blacks don't vote just because they are black.... we know you whites we have had a black man on the ballot....don't really want us in your politics.. but you brought us here. We only don't like you racist people. Just like our white brothers we fight fire with fire. but everybody else no problems
Whites "brought" you here? Are you a Somali imported by white liberal church groups to bring the joys of the Horn of Africa to this culturally impoverished country?
What about immigrants from Somalia, or from Haiti, or Congo, or etc? They chose to come to the USA and endure it's terrible racism when they could be living in their black majority rule paradises in Africa or the Carib.
As for whites not wanting blacks in their politics: then how do you explain the fawning adulation for blacks of the white liberal media, universities, churches, corporate foundations? Remember, it is white liberal church groups which are importing thousands of your brothers from Africa into America. Just as white liberals are giving you your affirmative action, black studies departments, minority grants, news censorship of black-on-white crime, MLK holiday and, come to think of it, their votes for Obama simply because of the color-of-his-skin (tm).
Here we go again...
Of course we do. What did you expect? If either Blacks or liberals were capable of learning, they would change their behavior and/or agenda and we would not be in our current predicament.
Mr. Rational: If either Blacks or liberals were capable of learning, they would change their behavior and/or agenda and we would not be in our current predicament.
As Ann Coulter paraphrased from Joseph McCarthy's sarcastic comment about George Catlett Marshall:
"If Liberals were merely stupid, the laws of probability would dictate that part of their decisions would serve America's interests."
Of course, nothing of the sort pertains. Just as damning is that the exact same thing can be said of American Blacks as well.
blacks vote their self interest.
as one said:
he gives me stuff.
they dont know theres no free lunch.
'they deserve it' .....reparations.
' Anonymous said...
Ex New Yorker here....A black people will vote for any body that promises them a free lunch. Period.'
THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH
THEY DONT GET DEFICIT SPENDING
Socialism works great in a small country with one ethnic group. Example:Denmark.
Anon @ 10:37 - There is no confusion.
I second Discard's comment: well said. Please get yourself a handle and stick around.
I always considered that communism and liberalism were both humanistic (i.e. humans are the supreme beings), with the difference being that the liberal approach is individualistic (the individual man is supreme), whereas the communist aproach is universalistic (the human collective, the state, is supreme). Your insight that both result in the atomisation of people is interesting. Makes sense. Thank you.
That makes sense because blacks have nothing in common with the values that the democratic party claim to have, such as racism,the invironment,and homosexuals. Blacks as a group are the most racist people on the planet, they dont give a shit about pollution, and they hate gay people with a passion. The main thing they care about is getting as much as they can for nothing, and the dems are a way to achieve that. They have evolved into a race of moochers. They will eventually cause there own extinction when suck the freebie well dry.
This is true in fact in the early days of the 20th century the democratic party consisted of the likes of the ku klux klan.
That is something I never understood, how they can tell what percentage of a certain race votes for what candidates. I dont think there is a box on the voting ballot that asks what your race is. They must call a thousand people up and ask what color they are and who they are voting for.
I saw adisturbing story last year about a way that foriegn workers are cashing in at american tax payers expense, its the child tax credit. Since anyone who works in this country must file US tax returns. This makes them eligible to use the child tax credit. So mexicans have been claiming all their nieces and nephews as dependants, in some cases as many thirty children. Since the IRS has no jurisdiction they cant verify these dependants. That allows a foriegner to recieve tens of thousands of dollars on an income tax refund. Most of the time the refund is much more than they earned at there job.
I am black I always vote conservative but your narrow minded commentary only reflects your ignorance of black people and exposes your own hatred of black people. generally speaking when it comes to " whitey". it's more like distrust of whitey. why you say?not only history but the fact that people who think like you are supervisors.mangers etc.. imagine if came into an interview with you could I get a job? maybe you should meet some bl in real life
Post a Comment