Wednesday, March 20, 2013

"Being Black in Philly": W.E.B. DuBois Knew in 1899 what White People Refuse to Know Now


In the now famous “Being White in Philly” article published by Philadelphia magazine, Robert Huber concludes with these words:
"Meanwhile, while I drive through North Philly to visit my son, I continue to feel both profoundly sad and a blind desire to escape. Though I wonder: Am I allowed to say even that?” 
Crime has always been a black problem in Philadelphia -- even in the 1890s when the city was 3-4 percent black
Just as in 2010 when Buffalo News editor Margaret Sullivan dared publish the reality of black criminality in Buffalo – causing the black community to demand an apology from her, threaten to burn down the offices of the paper, and demand the right to yell at her in a public hearing – Huber and Philadelphia magazine editor Tom McGrath were forced to endure a “Negro Inquisition” for daring to offend the sensibilities of black people in Philadelphia and try and have a two-way conversation about race:
For the second night in a row, the editor of Philadelphia Magazine and the author of its "Being White in Philly" cover story willingly endured a barrage of criticism and some harsh accusations about the controversial piece. 
Round Two delivered more punishment for editor Tom McGrath and writer Robert Huber as they faced the Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists at a meeting Tuesday at the offices of The Inquirer, the Philadelphia Daily News and philly.com. 
A vice president of the association accused both men of being racists. They were subjected to mockery from some of the questioners and threatened with a boycott of the magazine's advertisers. 
As they did Monday at the National Constitution Center, McGrath and Huber responded politely to questions and criticisms. Their answers often did not satisfy the audience. 
Some speakers accused the magazine of long-standing racial insensitivity while others demanded that it hire more minorities. 
McGrath said more diversity on the editorial staff, which is all-white, "would bring a richer experience to the magazine." 
He was asked about a commentary piece published Sunday in The Inquirer written by Adrienne Simpson, an event planner who is the only full-time black employee at the magazine. In the article, she called the cover story a "lopsided, conflagrant editorial - that teetered on the brink of fear mongering."

Silly white people – don’t you know white people aren’t allowed to speak at the table of brotherhood in America? Their only job is to pick up the tab after all other races finished their meal and finished blasting whitey for his past, present, and future evils.

The only right whites have in Black-Run America (BRA) is to act upon the thought Mr. Huber had and escape the horrors of urban America – horrors created by black people.

In Philadelphia, where black people are 43 percent of the city population in 2013, crime has always been disproportionately a black problem. It could be said W.E.B DuBois wrote the equivalent of “Black in Philly” with his book The Philadelphia Negro.

Reading through it offers a glimpse into a world we aren’t supposed to acknowledge, since black crime and the regression of black culture is always tied to the “Great Society” and the Welfare State (some black conservatives call it “The Liberal Plantation”):
Moreover, in the case of the Negro there were special causes for the prevalence of crime: he had lately been freed from serfdom, he was the object of stinging oppression and ridicule, and paths of an advancement open to many were closed to him. Consequently the class of the shiftless, aimless, idle, discouraged and disappointed was proportionately larger. 
In the city of Philadelphia the increasing number of bold and daring crimes committed by Negroes in the last ten years had focused the attention of the city on this subject. There is a widespread feeling that something is wrong with a race that is responsible for so much crime, and that strong remedies are called for. One has but to visit the corridors of the public buildings, when the courts are in session, to realize the part played in law-breaking by the Negro population. The various slum centres of the colored criminal population have lately been the objects of much philanthropic effort, and the work there has aroused discussion. Judges on the bench have discussed the matter. Indeed, to the minds many, this is the real Negro problem. (p. 241)  

It seems plain in the first place that the 4 percent of the population of Philadelphia having Negro blood furnished from 1885 to 1889, 14 percent of the serious crimes, and from 1890 to 1895, 22 ½ percent. (p. 249)  

It cannot be denied that the main results of the development of the Philadelphia Negro since the war have on whole disappointed his well-wishers. They do not pretend that he has not made great advance in certain lines, or even that in general he is not better off today than formerly. They do not even profess to know just what his condition today is, and yet there is a widespread feeling that more might reasonably have been expected in the line of social and moral development than apparently has been accomplished. Not only do they feel that there is a lack of positive results, but the relative advance compared with the period just before the war is slow, if not an actual retrogression; an abnormal and growing amount of crime and poverty can justly be charged to the Negro; he is not a large taxpayer, holds no conspicuous place in the business world or the world letters, and even as a working man seems to be losing ground. And this local problem is after all but a small manifestation of the larger and similar Negro problems throughout the land. (p. 43, chapter titled Influx of the Freedmen, 1870-1896)


Ethnicity, Race, and Crime: Perspectives Across Time and Place, edited by Darnell Hawkins, would go even further in discussing what “Being Black in Philly” meant in the 1890s:
Dubois’s examination of public documents in Philadelphia revealed little consistent concern for black crime until after slavery was abolished in Pennsylvania in 1780. He interpreted such lack of concern to be some indication of a relatively low rate of black crime before 1780. After 1780, freed blacks came to Philadelphia in relatively large numbers from elsewhere in Pennsylvania and other states. This influx of migrants was accompanied by a rise in the city’s crime rate. By 1809 black churches united in an effort to suppress criminal activity. The efforts met with little success, largely due to the effects of a series of race riots and the disenfranchisement of blacks by the Pennsylvania legislature in 1837. The later was initiated largely out of the increasing fear of blacks among whites after the Nat Turner rebellion. 
 DuBois reports that these changes in black-white relations led to the increasingly disproportionate representation of blacks among persons sentenced to the state penitentiary between 1830 and 1850. The level of racial disproportionality in rates of imprisonment and arrest declined after 1850, but showed a return to earlier levels around 1895. 
 DuBois’s study of black life in Philadelphia provided the first insight into the plight of what is now labeled the black urban underclass… DuBois and his associates saw little need to question the accuracy of data showcasing the overrepresentation of blacks among those arrested and sentenced for crime. They recognized that racial discrimination played a role in the administration of justice during this period, but their concern was with the etiology of criminal conduct rather than bias. After analyzing national imprisonment data, DuBois and associates say: 
It seems fair to conclude that Negroes in the United Sates, forming about 1/8 of the population were responsible in 1890 for nearly 1/5 of the crime.
 Commenting on city crime rates, Monroe N. Work notes:

It is recognized that the crime rate of Negroes is greater than that of whites. In 1900 the rate of Negro arrests and commitments was from one and a half to ten time greater than that of whites. The peculiar conditions of the Negro, past and present, tend to keep his crime rate high. 
DuBois and others saw their task to be that of providing social explanations for the comparatively high rate of black crime. For DuBois the overinvolvement of Philadelphia blacks in crime was a natural product of not of their genetic makeup but of the degradation and social disruption caused by slavery: 
From his earliest advent the Negro, as was natural, has figured largely in the criminal annals of Philadelphia… Crime is a phenomenon of organized social life, and is the open rebellion of an individual against his social environment. Naturally then, if men are suddenly transported from one environment to another, the result is lack of harmony with the new conditions; lack of harmony with the new physical surroundings leading to disease and death or modification of physique; lack of harmony with social surrounding leading to crime. (p. 13-15)
Civilization quickly retreats in cities controlled by predominately black governments (with public employment run as a job programs for otherwise unemployable blacks) – in Detroit, where civilization was just springing forth 100 years ago in a 99 percent white city, civilization is now fading away in a 90 percent black city.

There is no reason to believe that 100 years from now, 50 years for that matter, Philadelphia won’t see the same scenario unfolding in 2013 Detroit today. 

Maybe even 10 years.

With the reaction to the “Being White in Philly” article, we know the expectations for white people in an increasingly non-white nation – “sit down, shut up, and keep paying taxes to keep this system afloat.”

Freedom was already a burden on Philadelphia back in the 1890s, just as it was in the 1990s ["Being White in Philly" -- Didn't Buzz Bissinger Touch on This in 'A Prayer for the City'].

W.E.B. DuBois painted a picture of black dysfunction in Philadelphia back in the 1890s that he blamed on the legacy of slavery; funny, the same black dysfunction today, which was present in the 1890s (though only greater), still relies on this legacy to explain it away.

What it all boils down to is simply this: White people in America don’t owe black people anything – but the truth.

And in speaking the truth, we see how quickly black people utilize the old “racism” card in attempting to stifle speech, because the narrative of ‘racism’ must be controlled.

It is a one-way street, where a continuous pile-up on white people must occur, with no rebuttal allowed or tolerated.

And yet, as W.E.B DuBois pointed out in his book on blacks in Philadelphia at the end of the 19th Century, nothing new or out-of-the-ordinary is occurring in Philadelphia in 2013. What say you about DuBois' comments on blacks, Mayor Michael Nutter

Should his writings be reviewed by the Human Rights Commission of Philadelphia? 



85 comments:

Jay Santos said...

Negroes as mayors. Makes perfect sense to me. There's such history of stunning success there, we should make a negro ruler of the whole country. And I don't mean 1/2 negro. I mean a full on negro.

james wilson said...

One-eighth commit one-fifth? Them's the good old days. You should see us now, W.E.B.

10mm AUTO said...

Astonishing Paul....you continue to knock them out of the Park.

Race riots in 1837 or 2013! Black Churches banding together to fight black crime only to fail in 1837 or 2013. Liberals and DoGooders wailing about the "negro problem" saying that the courts and jails tell the story in 1837 or 2013.

Negros...over and over the same pattern whether it is 1813 or 2013.

We either need to eliminate the negro population here with Depo-Provera for Welfare or form a Homeland of our own. I am demanding physical separation for the good of both races. Even CF must see that single parent sow to School/Penitentiary to real Penitentiary is merely the same as slavery. From chains and slavery to cuffs and Penitentiary the circle has gone for 200 years just in Philadelphia alone. We can't raise our children around them because of the rape and violence and they can't stand our "uptight" White Man's law.

Anonymous said...

Okay, then I would expect the descendants from the worst of the POW camps (i.e. Andersonville, N. Koreans, Japanese, gulags, etc) to also be totally dysfunctional due to maltreatment significantly worse than what blacks experienced during slavery. That isn't the case.

Blacks are responsible for their behavior 100%. Whites are responsible for their behavior 100%. Asians are responsible for their behavior 100%. So, by giving blacks a walk for their inability to be responsible we're directly contributing to their antisocial behavior. Cut off the government teat for the multi-generational welfare parasites.

As a whole I am tired of their 'gibs me dat' when they are unwilling to do what it takes to succeed in this country.

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

as usual the truth hurts! now that the lib-turd's taught the blacks how to shame the white folk and get their way! this will be handled the same way! the acorn playbook I bet! funny thing is our head negro in the white house has taken that same "shame-game" and perfected it! that's why his white liberal friends love him so!

Reverend Bacon said...

I've said this before, but I don't think any of the angry blacks read the article. The article itself is a hope-triumphs-over-experience, upbeat piece that only begins to shine a light on the true evil that is black Philadelphia. I think Nutter's recent remarks were far harsher, more didactic, and although equally true, they present blacks in a far worse light than this article did.

I lived in a Philadelphia ghetto during the so-called Crack Epidemic. It wasn't nearly as nice as the article paints it. And there was no room for optimism; no hope that the blacks would somehow fix their broken society.

As for the angry blacks in the video, angry that some news medium had pointed out that some dead gangsters were gangsters: boo freaking hoo. This is a new low in trying to profit or otherwise exact some gain from the death of a family member.

Did the Italian mafiosi whine to the press when one of their capos got whacked? You know the press was always there with the rap sheets and the whispers about everyone, from Jimmy Hoffa to all these guys here: http://listsoplenty.com/blog/?p=11291

The code word "ignorant" is also amusing. Whenever someone speaks truth about wholesale black dysfunction, this word comes out. Do they mean "ignorant of the fact that truth-sayers will be vilified and ostracized?"

Mr. Rational said...

The code word "ignorant" is also amusing. Whenever someone speaks truth about wholesale black dysfunction, this word comes out.

The fact that Blacks are ignorant of the meaning of the very word is one of the ironies of our PC/crypto-Marxist, multi-culti overlords.

Melanie said...

At least it puts to rest the lie that negroes, in and of themselves, used to be more law-abiding and functional. The only time negroes have ever been "law-abiding" is when the heavy hand of (white) enforcement forced them to be. Just as in South Africa. The only time they weren't dysfunctional is under segregation, and they were dysfunctional then, the difference was that whites had the good sense to keep the dysfunction well away from ourselves.



Has there ever in history been a race so suicidal as whites? After all we have given the world as a race, now we seem to see fit to exit the stage? As I've said before, my one comfort in this is that with us, goes all our characteristics and qualities, which no other race can replace. If the whole world is going to become Africa, or Africa under Chinese rule, I'd just as soon not live in it anyway.



Whatever happened to Zenster? I miss his comments. Also, Gwinnett Gladiator. His comments are like reading a field report from the front lines.

Anonymous said...

Reading through it offers a glimpse into a world we aren’t supposed to acknowledge, since black crime and the regression of black culture is always tied to the “Great Society” and the Welfare State (some black conservatives call it “The Liberal Plantation”):

In the absence of white overlords, negroes regress to animal behavior due to the simple fact that category of animals is what they are. Any semblance of civilization is nothing more than mimicry of whites.

You would not expect your pit bull to understand that he won't be fed if he chews off masters hand. Negroes do not understand that they won't be fed if they drive YT away.

It is our duty as whites who care, truly care, about providing proper evolutionary pressures on the negro population to stop the EBT card, and to defund Detroit, Atlanta, UAB...

A comical negro lashed out yesterday asserting that all of us old men would die before there would ever be enough white moral courage to wage war on negroes. This comical negro does not understand that it takes far more courage to exercise self restraint and discretion in the face of increasing evidence that negroes have no chance to succeed outside of the jungle. The day is rapidly approaching, as in this summer, perhaps, when whites simply give up on negroes and conclude that enough restraint has been exercised, enough patience has been wasted, the future of this country has been placed in peril long enough, and that negroes must be removed from society.

At this place in my argument, comical negro may be assuming I intend to suggest race war. Nothing of the sort will be suggested, only predicted, and the race war will be instigated by negroes upon whites.

They will lose.

The triggers for this race war constitute a triple witching hour.

(1) The EBT card has run out. It is funded by foreign loans to our Treasury. These loans are increasingly hard to come by, and the Treasury often buys it's own T-bills, a process also known as printing money. If the Euro crises continue, such as the incident just recently in Cypress, then a cascading financial failure will engulf the dollar. The world reserve currency will be, for a time, a mish-mash of ryals, rials, renminbi, rubles and euros.
(Rubles will probably win.)

When the EBT card buys enough to feed a family of 10 for half a day, then groids will riot.

(2) George Zimmerman will be (a)found guilty, (b)or he will be acquitted, (b)or there will be a mistrial.

In event (a) negroes will riot in celebration. In event (b) negroes will riot in protest. In event (c) negroes will riot out of frustration.
In short, negroes will riot.

(3) The third component is suggested by the article. White patioence has run its course. Negro fatigue has set in. Unlike negroes, whites, who are people, bide their time and wait for an opportunity.

Negro excess due to (1) and (2) provide that opportunity. The negroes will be allowed to express their joy, anger or frustration, along with their hunger, by rioting so long as they destroy only other negroes.

If Eric holder tries to employ selective prosecution, I think the Senate has enough dirt on him to take both him and Obongo out of action during the duration.

Enjoy the irony - a negro president and a negro AG preside over the decimation of negroes at their own hands.

Lionel said...

Where is it going? We probably can't go back to segregation and Jim Crow laws even though the citizens of this nation have NOOO problem with collateral damage of our bombs overseas.

Where is it going? I have a hunch that the generation that is so indoctrinated with political correctness is going to turn on it. I hope I am right that the light bulbs will go on in their heads.

countenance said...

This throws cold water over the hobby horse theory that blacks were better behaved "back then."

Atlanta Admirer said...

I was wondering also if the blacks read the article at all. This is like Oprah reading material- uplifting and love conquers all. The harsh reaction from they Mayor is not in proportion to the well written article.
What am I missing here?

Atlanta Admirer

Anonymous said...

There will be no "dialogue on race" with the black collective. It will be a shouting match, with whitey getting no words in edgewise, and then a demand for more shakedown money. Blacks will never admit that they are the cause of most of the cultural decline.

When the local arts council DWLs in my city decided to hire a black sculptor to create a modern remake of a negro slave sculpture, the narcissistic black community went nuts because the art council DWLs did not "consult" them first. The blacks wanted a "less gorilla/slave looking negro" image, or something more flattering to blacks such as Rosa Parks.

The stupid DWLs suspended the project, and held a series of "community dialogue" sessions. The blacks showed up in huge numbers and started bullying and shouting everyone down, including the artist. They shouted, cursed, accused the whites of racism, called the black sculptor names, and created utter chaos. It was a typical TNB sideshow act.

The project was canceled, money lost, the blacks won the shouting match and the DWLs caved in to black rage and greivance.

http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/36108/proposed-public-sculpture-of-freed-slave-inflames-indianapolis-residents/

http://www.indyculturaltrail.org/E_Pluribus_Unum.html

Erika D. Smith, Indy Star: http://www.indystar.com/article/20130126/NEWS19/130126024/Erika-D-Smith-Being-part-process-may-come-price-art

"Disagreements about the work came to a head at a community talk on Tuesday night, which saw impassioned debate among the 350 attendees who congregated in the Madame Walker Theater. "Making art is not a collaborative process," artist Fred Wilson told the crowd. "It's been birthed at this point."
To which someone in the (black) crowd replied, "It can be aborted."

chimpin said...

Blacks acting like blacks, sounds like a snake has been let loose in the chimp cage.

Why does anyone want to have an open discussion on race with blacks, keep well away, a voluntary act of self segregation.

No amount of discussion will change anything, we know the truth, they know we are right, and that pisses them off real bad.

Let them self destruct, CF's task of improving his people is a lost cause, in the name of freedom and with false saviours they have shackled themselves to self destruction all on their own.

They bought into the lie, being the gullible minds they are, and I just find it amusing that they worse off now than they were.

They slaves and they can't help it, oprah is a slave to her ego in that she has to appear on every single cover of her O magazine.

They have to get themselves out of slave mode, all by themselves, no amount of do gooding will help.

The ghetto still has a ways to go, before it truly resembles, haiti, harare, or mogadishu.

That's what they are capable of.

Californian said...

And in speaking the truth, we see how quickly black people utilize the old “racism” card in attempting to stifle speech, because the narrative of ‘racism’ must be controlled.


The civil rights movement was a revolution against free speech. In Philadelphia one can not state the truth even when it is kicking down your door. The Orwellian termed "Human Rights Commission" sounds like some censorship panel. Then again, the civil rights revolution led to a massive explosion in state power (as George Wallace predicted). And has led to various other restrictions on individual freedoms, such as right of association.


It seems fair to conclude that Negroes in the United Sates, forming about 1/8 of the population were responsible in 1890 for nearly 1/5 of the crime.

This factoid ought not be allowed to escape down the memory hole. In 1890, at a highpoint of segregation, blacks committed "1/5" of the crime in America? Only one fifth!? Compare that to today's FBI stats which has them committing something like 50% of violent crime.

Granted, criminal justice statistics back in the 1890s were not collected as efficiently as today. And it just may be that a lot of crime was not being recorded. But even so, it appears that black criminality today is several times worse than it was at a time when the "legacy" of slavery-segregation was much higher.

(An alternative explanation is that white people have become much more civil in the intervening decades and are committing that much less crime. Maybe.)

But all this ought to give the lie to claims that black criminality is a response to "racism." We have had 50 years of civil rights and war on poverty programs. And do the stats indicate that any of this worked to reduce black criminality? The reality appears to be the opposite.

Another thing to consider: even at the highpoint of the Roaring '20s wave of gangster crime, the USA did not require militarized law enforcement: SWAT teams, no-knock raids, prison-industrial complex, surveillance cameras all over the homeland, and now drone wars. Yet all of that has become a necessity simply to keep the lid on, never mind actually restore law and order. What's changed in America so radically in the last five decades?

PK calls it BRA.

Don M said...

Civil Rights Group Urges Fox to Cancel 'Cops'

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/civil-rights-group-urges-fox-cancel-cops-exclusive-050000455.html

"In its criticism of Cops, ColorOfChange points to research it says media representations such as those on Cops can lead to stigmatization of black men."

I really cannot add anything in terms of a comment...

DailyKenn.com said...

Similar crime rates exist in Congress.

"According to a 2012 National Journal study, five of the six lawmakers under review by the House Ethics Committee were Black Caucus members. Yet just one in 10 House members belong to the group."

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/13-of-congressional-black-caucus-members-were-named-in-ethics-probes/

Jay Santos said...

Californian said…

…Another thing to consider: even at the highpoint of the Roaring '20s wave of gangster crime, the USA did not require militarized law enforcement: SWAT teams, no-knock raids, prison-industrial complex, surveillance cameras all over the homeland, and now drone wars. Yet all of that has become a necessity simply to keep the lid on, never mind actually restore law and order. What's changed in America so radically in the last five decades?


You can't overstate how important that your basic observation is. Why? Here's a simple swipe at it:

- Fundamental moral decline in the nation, could say religious collapse
- unrestricted immigration from places with very different cultural standards
- blacks emboldened and taking the moral decline to their more natural level
- unrelenting government growth and need to project power and control
- weakened justice system, weakened criminal punishment
- growth of anonymity associated with large metro areas

But it all amounts to something really remarkable when you look at how the nation has changed in just the last 50-60 years.

Anonymous said...

If any Blacks read this, I have a questions for you:

Since you all find fault with us Whites (racists, slavers, bigoted, etc.) why do you have anything to do with us?

Why not avoid us Whites since we are so damaging to you?

Anonymous said...

They are a cancer. And there's no way to get rid of them, because we're not even allowed to talk about the problems they cause. We're just supposed to keep our heads down meekly and agree to all of their ridiculous terms, absorb their childish insults, and keep funding their self-perpetuating playground of horrors.

Jesus.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. Yes, blacks were far more criminally inclined than whites before 1960 and back to the 18th and 19th centuries.

Anonymous said...

This article needs to hit the mainstream sites. Well done.

-Ulick Varange

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Don M said...

Civil Rights Group Urges Fox to Cancel 'Cops'

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/civil-rights-group-urges-fox-cancel-cops-exclusive-050000455.html

"In its criticism of Cops, ColorOfChange points to research it says media representations such as those on Cops can lead to stigmatization of black men."

I really cannot add anything in terms of a comment...
-----------------------------------

Made even more amazing by the fact that the producers of COPS have admitted to editing the program to show more white criminals than "minority" criminals.

World_War_Me said...

Reverend Bacon, you hit a nerve with the word "ignorant". That word makes me cringe. It is one of my pet peeves. You expressed perfectly the motivation behind the black's and DWL's use of that word. It's almost like certain words contain some sort of magic that deflects reality and protects them from the truth: IGNORANT! UNEDUCATED! RACYYYYCIST! NAZI! REDNECK! TRAILER PARK!

You know when they start vomiting these mantras, the "dialogue on race" is over.

panjoomby said...

reality is stigmatizing to blacks.

World_War_Me said...

"Has there ever in history been a race so suicidal as whites?"

Melanie, you raise an interesting point. I realize you're speaking of Whites in general, but if you visit the website mydeathspace.com (I know, I'm a horrible morbid person), on an individual level, you would be amazed at the number of Whites committing suicide these days.

When one thinks of suicidal people, one tends to think of the depressed goth, the bullied nerd, etc. But this website features mostly middle and upper class, suburban, teenagers, moms, dads, etc. People you'd never suspect by looking at their photos that they'd be capable of taking their own lives. In fact, they all seem like over-achievers, either academically or athletically. Girls- and boys-next door. Smiling moms. Happy looking dads. But they're hanging and shooting themselves all over the place. Also, there are lots of deaths by drug overdoses and car accidents.

Of course, the black deaths reported are almost always "Boo got shot" kinda cases.

Anonymous said...

All the one hour t shirt shops would go out of business without gang shoitings. In Chicago the community is already in the airbrushed photo memorial tees in front of teddy bears and ballons by the time the news arrives fir interwiews

Anonymous said...

Okay, I have got to get some sh*t off my chest. If Paul decides not to post it, at least I know another good man read it and decided to leave it be left to his brain and not on his blog. Either way, here it is (and, I will try to keep it pithy):

I am so muthaeffin' tired of nigs with white blood in them crying racism when they have white blood running through their ugly @ss ghetto veins and the only good that white blood did was lighten up their I.Q. so they could learn to use a computer and 'network' flashmobs on white people. The problem with white DNA & Black DNA admixture is that the black thuggery DNA and black FUG almost always wins and the few and far between outliers do not constitute the masses of slightly higher thinking admixture negroids who still have no desire to work their brains to do good rather than deal drugs/prostitute/steal/kill/rape.

One might even ponder out loud if one dared... Is this about good and evil? Is it not purposely ironic and obviously historic that 'black' means evil and 'white' means good?

Ultimately, all of this makes me sad in the end because caging up people who are racially so behind the rest of the world and trying to make them learn haswhat takes more than just nurturing but rather survival is not going to work.

And, if the whole 'out of Africa' shtick is true, it means the smartest people [er 'Africans'] got the hell out of Africa and survived even the harshest of conditions to leave the dregs and the ass munchers and the child rapists and the head hunters and the witch doctors, and the scalp collectors and the skull keggers and the monkey-f*ckers and the tribal mofos and the evils of said groups of savages and got the hell outta Dodge.

You have to laugh at the idea that we 'are all out of Africa' theory is really saying, "The brightest of the bright got the hell out of Africa and survived much harsher conditions than 'low hanging fruit' to relieve themselves of the scum of the earth.

I have more to say...maybe later if Paul allows. lol

/rant off

Anonymous said...

Rioting in 1809????? Are you fuckin' serious? I can't believe it!

Anonymous said...

Excellent post especially the excerpt from DuBois. It used to be African American leadership was concerned about the image Blacks projected to the wider community. For him to be concerned about what was back then a relatively minor disproportionate black criminality rate is intriguing.

Especially when you contrast his sentiment to today when Blacks make up 12% of the US population and half of the murder suspects yet we are not supposed to notice.

Anonymous said...

"Out of Africa"

The original "White flight"

ELL OH ELL

Anonymous said...

Amazing - I read the article in question and to say it's "racist" indicates you have some pretty thin skin. In other words, I'm not at all surprised that the black professional grievance mongers immediately siezed upon it. Amazing, they know that their people willingly foul their own nests and prey mainly upon each other (we don't even need to get into the levels of black on white crime for purposes of this discussion, they are animals and that is just expected). Blacks kill each other with impunity, but any attempt to at least point out black criminality is immediately shouted down. To them, being black is more important than creating safe stable communities. And I know why - deep down inside these blacks know their own people can never be more than they are. That's in part why they hate whites so much, they see what they can never become. So it's easier to just cry racism and collect the spoils doled out by white apologist politicians. Disgusting. Eventually they'll just make it illegal to criticize black people, or even tell them the word "no".

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. An oddity about the article is the white people quoted appear to live in "mixed" neighborhoods or close to blacks.

This is something the typical DWL and white people in general carefully avoid.

So CAL Snowman said...

What a goddamned joke! Blacks are criminals and cannot achieve in society (relative to the White man) because of slavery? So how do these people explain the rise of France or Germany? The Gauls were conquered by Julius Caesar and many were enslaved. How then did the descendants of the Gauls go on to create the French Empire? The Germanic tribes were conquered and enslaved by the Romans. How did the descendants of these people go on to create a unified Germany which gave us some of the world's greatest minds? I can assure any blacks and liberals reading this that Roman slavery was far more brutal and horrifying than ANYTHING that happened in the United States to black slaves. It's such a massive CON GAME that I can scarcely believe that they pulled it off. The TV and the MSM is the ONLY reason why they were successful. Imagine trying to push the "equality" nonsense on the populace via newspaper or radio! Yes sir Negros are just like us, I read it in the New York Times. . .

It's almost like some nefarious entity MANUFACTURED blacks and placed them in White nations specifically to destroy them. I cannot think of another force that would be more deadly to Western Civilization (save for infectious disease) than the african. Is it really that hard to believe that africans were CREATED to destroy everything else? There is NO GOD DAMN WAY we are all "out of africa." OR do you honestly believe that all life on planet Earth is derived from a single - celled bacteria in the ocean?

“We gaze continually at the world and it grows dull in our perceptions. Yet seen from another's vantage point, as if new, it may still take the breath away.”

- Alan Moore

Melanie said...

@ Anonymous March 20, 2013 at 12:33 PM-



I have asked that question of blacks at least a hundred times, and never gotten an answer, except for the couple of times I received this as an "answer"-"Wherever whites go, we wll follow, even to the moon". And that's it-no reason is given, though a couple of reasons are implied-either they will stick to us like ticks on a dog out of pure spite, apparently the supposed "oppression" and "racism" visited upon them isn't onerous enough to make them want to stay away from us when whites are perfectly agreeable to the scheme, or-they are perfectly aware that they cannot survive in the first world to first world standards without whites being around to create first world conditions. Those are the only two logical answers, and the first one is self-defeating. If whites are so oppressive, if whites are the obstacle holding them back from being the glorious people of achievement they could otherwise be, then they're cutting off their noses to spite their own faces by following us around. I suspect that the second is true, because I can hardly credit that even negroes, as stupid as they are as a race, would choose to spite whites over the alternative of rising to some level of greatness of which they claim to be capable. The truth is, they know, and they know that we know, that they're not capable of rising to any greatness, therefore they have no choice but to plant their lips firmly to the rears of whites in order to go along for the ride. Never mind that the extra weight holds whites back from being even better than we are presently. That's of no concern to negros-what do they care if we can no longer strive for the highest and the best, since they can't do so and it would mean nothing to them anyway, as long as they can live a minimal life as dead weight on whites?



Amongst all their other lack of character, they have no pride-no real pride, the pride that comes from striving for greatness. They have a "mimic" pride, such as killng each other over worthless, dirty, vandalised territory that they don't even own. Their "gang battles" over territory that they take oh so seriously to the point of indiscriminately killing each other over it, is a puzzle to observers from a distance. What qualifies as having "won" the territory, and what's it good for once they do, since they don't own it?

Anonymous said...

Poor offended Negroes! How dare the truth be spoken about the results of black culture.

Anonymous said...

The older I get the less tolerance I have for black whining about racism and how insenstive Whitey is. How can these ignorant black ingrates not realize that without white civilization, the Negro would still be living in African mud huts and eating hyena guts?

Anonymous said...

@ Melanie.

For your first question, think of negroes as the simian version of lamprey eels to which our response should be, "As government derives its power from the people, the people who make it possible, whites, desire to be left alone and free of negro parasites."

For your second question, negroes are creatures of the jungle, and most of their behavior can only be understood as survival behavior, instinctive, and unsuitable for civilization. Negroes fight over turf because to them, neighborhoods are the same as jungle, where food is to be taken. Sadly, the brains of whites counts as food as evidenced when negroes play knockout, then slam the head of the victim into the concrete. This is instinctive behavior, but don't be around when the EBT card runs out.

Melanie said...

@ Anonymous March 20, 2013 at 5:25 PM-

Even after whites have been present and created a civilised region, once the whites are run out, the area quickly reverts to practically stone-age existence. The examples of South Africa amd Zimbabwe are well-known, as are American cities, but an even more pointed example of this is the Congo-there is an excellent series of articles on this occurrence at the blog "Unamusement Park", including a copy of an article from Time magazine of the Fifties describing the the strides made during that time towards civilisation. The series describes the rapid degredation and descent from that height once the whites left. It's now almost as if they'd never been there, except for having left behind more efficient means of killing than the machete. Any knowledge or veneer of civilised ethics is as if they'd never existed-once again, cannibalism, mutilation, infant rape, disease, are features of life, the remnants of the roads lead to jungle, and jungle and squatters have taken over the few buildings which haven't disintegrated or been demolished.

Google "Unamusement Park" and then use the site's own search feature to find the Congo series-it is very informative, and reinforces everything PK has written about American cities, only at warp speed and to an even lower level of destruction.

But then, with the influx of Haitians to the US, I imagine more of the same things are happening here than we will ever see reported by the MSM.

Anonymous said...

A curse of modern times is the fact that the Negro and his gutter culture has been unleashed on white Western civilization.
To protest is to be called racist. To not protest will result in the dilution and demise of white civilization.

Call me racist.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
A comical negro lashed out yesterday asserting that all of us old men would die before there would ever be enough white moral courage to wage war on negroes. This comical negro does not understand that it takes far more courage to exercise self restraint and discretion in the face of increasing evidence that negroes have no chance to succeed outside of the jungle. The day is rapidly approaching, as in this summer, perhaps, when whites simply give up on negroes and conclude that enough restraint has been exercised, enough patience has been wasted, the future of this country has been placed in peril long enough, and that negroes must be removed from society.

At this place in my argument, comical negro may be assuming I intend to suggest race war. Nothing of the sort will be suggested, only predicted, and the race war will be instigated by negroes upon whites.


The war has been underway for several decades already, anon. The duranties who work for the Ministry of Truth have gotten away with shoving it down the memory hole since at least 1948. YT is more clueless than ever. The vast majority have glugged the equalitarian Kool-Aid offered by Rev. Bankstein and his endless list of minions. Take a look at South Africa. Three million whites there. Whites more-or-less openly targeted for genocide and most of them still support the regime. Have any of the SA regime honchos gone down in a bomb blast or a hail of bullets? Hell no. Whites still work in the ranks of the police and military there to destroy any scintilla resistance from other whites. The farmers - with one of the worst rates of murder victimization on the planet - still hire blacks because they're cheaper. If whites ever wake up, they might actually be able to do something about all this if they wake up before most are exterminated of miscegenated out of existence.

The comical troll isn't the problem really. Yes, he and his brethren serve as the boots on the ground but the real power behind all this are the elite squids and their vicious nomenklatura - most of whom are white. Rand Paul just completely caved on amnesty for Mexican invader-parasites - and he's the darling of the Tea Party, the supposed resistance to BRA.

Melanie said...

@ Anonymous March 20, 2013 at 5:48 PM-

Yes, I can agree with those answers. The thing is, I've never been able to get a rational answer, or more usually any answer at all, from negroes who are asked that question. The only answer, of any kind, from negroes is the spiteful one that they will follow whites to the ends of the earth, just so that we can never escape their presence. Well, in light of their eternal claims of white oppression and racism, how does that make any sense for them? They'd rather do their own race in to spite whites? I grant that it is a uniquely negro aspect of looking at things, and that it also implies (though they'd almost die before admit it) that they can't survive in the first world, in anything approximating a frst world manner, without whites present to create and maintain that first world. But this is not what they say, when they reply at all.

More usually they just ignore the question, because if they have any brains whatsoever and give that answer, they know perfectly well what it implies. So they just ignore the question.

It boils down to the fact that they are a parasitic race and see whites as a host, even though they're not smart enough to realise that killing that host also means their demise. Their leftist backers realise this, which is why so far they've tried to quash the conversation, lest these truths be-horror of horrors!-openly admitted, to the edification of unaware whites.

Anonymous said...

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/discovery-docu-special-uncovers-the-secrets-of-the-kkk--exclusive-video--221434864.html

Honestly, I can't believe the Discovery Channel didn't air this during Black Hiztree Munf.

Anonymous said...

Off topic but noteworthy:

Food stamps put Rhode Island town on monthly boom-and-bust cycle

WOONSOCKET, R.I. – The economy of Woonsocket was about to stir to life. Delivery trucks were moving down river roads, and stores were extending their hours. The bus company was warning riders to anticipate “heavy traffic.” A community bank, soon to experience a surge in deposits, was rolling a message across its electronic marquee on the night of Feb. 28: “Happy shopping! Enjoy the 1st.”

In the heart of downtown, Miguel Pichardo, 53, watched three trucks jockey for position at the loading dock of his family-run International Meat Market. For most of the month, his business operated as a humble milk-and-eggs corner store, but now 3,000 pounds of product were scheduled for delivery in the next few hours. He wiped the front counter and smoothed the edges of a sign posted near his register. “Yes! We take Food Stamps, SNAP, EBT!”

“Today, we fill the store up with everything,” he said. “Tomorrow, we sell it all.”

At precisely one second after midnight, on March 1, Woonsocket would experience its monthly financial windfall — nearly $2 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps. Federal money would be electronically transferred to the broke residents of a nearly bankrupt town, where it would flow first into grocery stores and then on to food companies, employees and banks, beginning the monthly cycle that has helped Woonsocket survive.

Three years into an economic recovery, this is the lasting scar of collapse: a federal program that began as a last resort for a few million hungry people has grown into an economic lifeline for entire towns. Spending on SNAP has doubled in the past four years and tripled in the past decade, surpassing $78 billion last year. A record 47 million Americans receive the benefit — including 13,752 in Woonsocket, one-third of the town’s population, where the first of each month now reveals twin shortcomings of the U.S. economy:

So many people are forced to rely on government support.

The government is forced to support so many people.

The 1st is always circled on the office calendar at International Meat Market, where customers refer to the day in the familiar slang of a holiday. It is Check Day. Milk Day. Pay Day. Mother’s Day.

“Uncle Sam Day,” Pichardo said now, late on Feb. 28, as he watched new merchandise roll off the trucks. Out came 40 cases of Ramen Noodles. Out came 230 pounds of ground beef and 180 gallons of orange juice.

SNAP enrollment in Rhode Island had been rising for six years, up from 73,000 people to nearly 180,000, and now three-quarters of purchases at International Meat Market are paid for with Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards. Government money had in effect funded the truckloads of food at Pichardo’s dock . . . and the three part-time employees he had hired to unload it . . . and the walk-in freezer he had installed to store surplus product . . . and the electric bills he paid to run that freezer, at nearly $2,000 each month. . . .

More:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/food-stamps-put-rhode-island-town-on-monthly-boom-and-bust-cycle/2013/03/16/08ace07c-8ce1-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_print.html

Dan said...

The out of Africa theory suggests that 200 people left in one group. Crossing on rafts between Eritrea and Aden at the south of the Red Sea. No-one else got out until the historical period.

All Asians and Europeans are from this group of 200. They were the first whitish flight on record.

I think that they were running from a King Nignog.

Anonymous said...

4 million hate-ians in US and Canada..re:

Google "Unamusement Park" and then use the site's own search feature to find the Congo series-it is very informative, and reinforces everything PK has written about American cities, only at warp speed and to an even lower level of destruction.

But then, with the influx of Haitians to the US, I imagine more of the same things are happening here than we will ever see reported by the MSM.

Anonymous said...

out rag eous...
these folks aint black:

http://radishmag.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/1-6-mulatto-history-month.jpg

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous March 20, 2013 at 4:01 PM said: Excellent post especially the excerpt from DuBois. It used to be African American leadership was concerned about the image Blacks projected to the wider community.

One does not have to go back 100 years for this. St. Marchin' Luther King would vomit with disgust if he glimpsed 2013 Blackdom.

I do not know why the magazine editor or writer would attend any "meeting" with the "Human Rights Commission". It just sounds like an invitation to be treated rudely with shout downs, simian howling and chimpouts. Who cares what these negroes think?

Great article SBPDL, thanks.

Anonymous said...

@ Mr. Clean
"Who cares what these negroes think?"

Nice mantra. Mind if I edit it?

Who cares what negroes think?

Or as Socrates said, "The unexamined life is not worth living." Socrates had it in the bag, and if Mayor Nutter (Groid) criticizes the White in Philly article for its ignorance, is joined by a howling of groids (collective noun) all denouncing the article, and all refusing, it appears, even to read it, it is safe to conclude that groids will never examine their own lives.

Groids refuse to examine their own lives. Unexamined, all. Worth living, none.

Let them starve, or subsist on "long pork" when the EBT card runs out.

Anonymous said...

That same "Human Rights Commission " once brought Joe Vento (RIP) , owner of Genos Steaks, in for some good old fashioned Star Chamber treatment. His offense? Posting a sign asking that customers "please speak English when ordering". The sign also has an American flag on it (the horror!) . Vento was cleared of any wrongdoing once the commission noticed that their stupid hearing caused Vento's business to triple overnight.

Also in the Philly Follies, come on up to the clothespin statue at 15th & Market on a Friday afternoon. Thee, you can be the subject of racial epithets spewed by some 'groids who are wearing comical robes, yelling Bible quotes (allegedly) into a bullhorn, while standing in front of a poster of "black Jesus ". Who knew that Jesus looked like Dennis Rodman?

Comedy gold.

rjp said...

Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists at a meeting Tuesday at the offices of The Inquirer, the Philadelphia Daily News and philly.com.

Did all three show up?

vice president of the association accused both men of being racists. They were subjected to mockery from some of the questioners and threatened with a boycott of the magazine's advertisers.

Guess what. I boycott advertisers too. Best way to get my business? Don't advertise at all.

As they did Monday at the National Constitution Center, McGrath and Huber responded politely to questions and criticisms. Their answers often did not satisfy the audience.

As always. A negro can never be satisfied unless he is receiving a check.

Some speakers accused the magazine of long-standing racial insensitivity while others demanded that it hire more minorities.
McGrath said more diversity on the editorial staff, which is all-white, "would bring a richer experience to the magazine."


The check request ......


He was asked about a commentary piece published Sunday in The Inquirer written by Adrienne Simpson, an event planner who is the only full-time black employee at the magazine. In the article, she called the cover story a "lopsided, conflagrant editorial - that teetered on the brink of fear mongering."

10mm AUTO said...

"The out of Africa theory suggests that 200 people left in one group. Crossing on rafts between Eritrea and Aden at the south of the Red Sea. No-one else got out until the historical period.

All Asians and Europeans are from this group of 200. They were the first whitish flight on record.

I think that they were running from a King Nignog.

March 20, 2013 at 7:37 PM"

The Remaining crew of Crashed Starship "Actella" finally make it out of the terrible Continent and cross the water in improvised rafts. Captain dead, eaten by the terrible black man/beasts along with most of the others. The crew decides to split into two groups so as to increase their chances. One group heads North into the giant Continent they had seen from Orbit, the others stick to the Coast, founding a city they call Sumer. Stranded forever, they seek to make a living on a new and Hostile world called Earth.

The novel practically writes itself.

Jim said...

Why is it that the vast majority of small businesses in the hood are owned by non-blacks, namely, Koreans?

That speaks volumes for the ineptitude of the negro.

Anonymous said...

@10mm Auto

The theory is that modern humans who left Africa before the last glacial maximum learned how to survive harsh winters in the steppes of Eurasia. Advance planning, conservation of resources, social organization are all qualities required to survive in that time and place, and are qualities whites and Asians have and negroes do not.

At this time comical negro asks, "What, no muh dick?" No, bongo, that would have gotten you kicked out of the tent and you would have frozen your sorry-ass nigger wannabe ass to death.

Anonymous said...

Outdoorsman here:

Why do Negroes "follow" Whites? Here is a zoological explanation:

Due to his genetics, determined by survival requirements incumbent upon the migratory primitive social units to which his antecedents belonged in the resource-poor, inhospitable ecosystems of Africa and the natural selection resulting wherefrom, the Negro has developed evolutionary- and survival strategies and instinctual behaviors that are inherently harmful and potentially fatal to other species which allow the Negro to dwell within their areas of habitation, even if these species practice more complex evolutionary strategies and posses more advanced forms of social organization.

Specific traits and behaviors of the Negro that are displayed in a societal setting which includes beings of other species, as well as the very imperative which axiomatically drives the Negro to dwell within the habitats of other species, closely mimic evolutionary and survival strategies commonly seen in other known invasive and parasitic species found in nature, including Zebra Mussels, Kudzu, Fire Ants, Coqui Frogs and Cuckoos.

1) Negroes are migratory and identify, latch onto and follow other species that are successful in obtaining food and shelter and seek to enter and occupy their habitats and nests.

2) The Negro seeks to divert the wombs of females of other species to the service of its own propagation, adding their reproductive capacity to those of its own species while subtracting it from the host population. This is commonly done via the behavior called "rape" in a manner similar to but more violent than those strategies employed by certain avian brood parasites, such as the cuckoo.

3) The Negro considers possession of resources by other species as a threat to the Negro, even if the Negro has not previously dwelled within that species' area of habitation. The Negro’s "emotions" of envy and infantile narcissism, combined with ruthless disregard for the survival needs of other species, can be seen as an evolutionary adaptation.

4) When another species is weakened by the establishment of Negro colonies within its habitat, the Negro escalates the level of competition by killing or violently driving out all of the other species’ members without exception. After the consumption of all moveable resources accumulated by the formerly dominant species, the nest is then physically destroyed and the Negro migratory cycle in search of new host species to follow and host nests to invade begins anew.

5) Sophisticated Negroes appropriate western political and religious doctrines to argue that Whites are morally bound to allow themselves to be defeated by Negroes. This incorporates and distorts features of the host/victim’s own social organization and mores to serve the requirements of the invasive parasite, similar to the manner in which parasitic Nematodes alter the behaviors of host snails to make the latter more susceptible to predation by birds, which then spread the parasite in their own migrations.

The White species is a sedentary species of nest building and husbandry characterized by complex forms of social organization. The Negro species is a species of migratory land-strippers and brood parasites with rudimentary social organization. Collective Negro interaction with other species can be likened to the effects of locusts and cuckoos on other species.

rjp said...

Anonymous said...
If any Blacks read this, I have a questions for you:

Since you all find fault with us Whites (racists, slavers, bigoted, etc.) why do you have anything to do with us?

Why not avoid us Whites since we are so damaging to you?


Can't do that. Can't panhandle, scam, or shakedown other negroes.



World_War_Me said...
Reverend Bacon, you hit a nerve with the word "ignorant". That word makes me cringe. It is one of my pet peeves. You expressed perfectly the motivation behind the black's and DWL's use of that word. It's almost like certain words contain some sort of magic that deflects reality and protects them from the truth: IGNORANT!

Actually the word is Ignant, don't mean to criticize.

Bogolyubski said...

Paul Kersey, you had better stop posting hate facts or the Human Rights Kommissars will be hauling you in.

The fact that this crap has been going on since the early 1800s in Philadelphia is telling. It blows a massive hole in the entire "liberal plantation" theory of Conservatism, Inc. The most that can be said in favor of their standard argument is that leftist policies make the intrinsic problem even worse.

Artist said...

Regarding the question being posed "why do they follow us?", I think the answer is obvious. They are policing us.

Simply put, everything must be integrated. Didn't Holder say this nation would only be healed when we all had integrated Sunday dinner?

Look at the case of that lawyer in Boston who took John Kerry's seat. He was going to set up all his black friends to invade and occupy and whole host of targeted restaurants and bars and and pubs. He said something to the effect that whites should never be allowed to be left alone, to be in a "safe" zone of their own kind.

Three years ago I was a guest at a high-toned Main Line wedding in the Philly suburbs. I ended up seated next to a black attorney. A nice guy on the surface. except once I opened up and became friendly he ran game on me much of the night. He was subtle, and it was the type of thing most unseeing whites would find vibrant. He constantly angled conversation to see if I voted for BHO or if I was a conservative. After awhile he mentioned spending a lot of time in Georgia. I asked about the south and race relations. He was my age, so I was able to say things have changed quite a lot in our 55 years. So I said you'all like to go back south a lot, have the nasty racist whites of the past changed? Being a lawyer, he acknowledge OUTWARD change, but the reality is, they are are still Bull Conners in their hearts. He then said the way racism is REALLY expressed is that whites keep moving away and forming NEW associations, neighborhoods, golf clubs, etc.. He said that's wrong and can't be allowed.

So there you have it. From a lawyer no less.

And in Dineesh DeSouza's "The End of Racism", it is explained how the NAACP was formed to use the legal system to sue us into submission.

Everyone who visits here should read the "End of Racism".

Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._E._B._Du_Bois

seems like a bad guy...a mulatto who visited Mao.

Was there at start of the dreaded UN.

Jim said...

Outdoorsman, you da man!

It was difficult for me read through your comment due uncontrolled laughing disruptions.

In all seriousness, we know how to control zebra mussels and locusts. Could similar devices be used upon the subject invasive species? Or, perhaps, powerful antibiotics.

Anonymous said...

"3) The Negro considers possession of resources by other species as a threat to the Negro, even if the Negro has not previously dwelled within that species' area of habitation. The Negro’s "emotions" of envy and infantile narcissism, combined with ruthless disregard for the survival needs of other species, can be seen as an evolutionary adaptation."

I am pissing my pants!!!!

Nonhumans said...

Its the same reason that shows such as it and the First 48 dont stay on the air for very long. They clearly illustrate the sad realities we are forced to tolerate and that is offensive to the nonhumans, as well as contra to the libtards and ministry of truth's agenda.

Anonymous said...

A small, but not so small, off-topic realization:

I noticed last year that some of the radio sports (live) broadcasts of games have 2 announcers. One is a White guy doing the play calls and then a Black guy, speaking with a real hood black accent, making comments throughout the broadcast.

First, I thought this was just a fluke since I was listening to the Florida Seminole game. BUT, I am listening to NCAA March Madness and I hear it again.

I would not be surprised if BRA is forcing the networks to use an African WITH THE EBONICS accent on purpose to force it mainstream. It is obvious they want you to know the speaker is African due to the accent.

Sickening. I am totally fed up. I want the Africans away from me and if we have to do what I think we have to do, then we do it.

It is going to get to the point that is will be "us or them" and it is not my fault the Squid is forcing this.

Melanie said...

I'll say one thing for this blog-it has made me no longer consider myself to be a person "on the right" of the political spectrum, though I am certainly not on the left, and my personal principles are conservative. I don't think that I believe in the American political system at all anymore. I don't know of any political system that I could believe in, So in the strict sense, I am now apolitical. But anyhow, thanks to you commenters for getting my "eyes wide open" regarding Conservatism Inc. It takes me aback to read a certain conservative forum which I once regarded with respect, and now realise how naive most of it sounds.

Extropico said...

Outdoorsman, that was a spectacular posting. One of the best I've seen. We will get to the point where we explicitly recognize that parasites must be contained in order for us to survive.

Melanie said...

@Artist March 21, 2013 at 11:15 AM-



The conversation you relay here is maddening. HOW do we point out that if there can be black this, negro that, then there must be allowed white this and that? Or would it be futile if we could get the megaphone long enough to make the point? Which ties into what



Anonymous March 21, 2013 at 1:06 PM says-



Sickening. I am totally fed up. I want the Africans away from me and if we have to do what I think we have to do, then we do it.



It is going to get to the point that is will be "us or them" and it is not my fault the Squid is forcing this.

Artist said...

Melanie,

I've become similar to you. I've completely lost faith in politics. I'm looking for another way. Not sure what it will be. One possible route (for me and my wife) is to disassociate ourselves from conservatism and republicanism to simply be a critic. To borrow from Alinskism: isolate, ridicule, mock the target. Call out the opponent on their "morals" and hold their feet to that fire.

Of course that's a personal stance. What will develop nationwide? Something needs to happen. The Tea Party has been poisoned by the media. Whatever rises up next, it will be very very important to thwart the MSMs attempts to poison it. They are already sharpening their knives against Dr. Carson. Watch them open their playbook.

Surveying my evolution it dawned on me I've never really been much of a republican. I'm really an opponent of leftism in all it's forms. Being a student of history teaches us systems of the left, of collectivism, etc., ALWAYS END BADLY. Look at the road we're on, add in Agenda 21, and we're headed to a totalitarian hell-on-earth that was unimaginable just 10 years ago. And so many people have already bought in.

And Outdoorsman,

THAT WAS THE POST OF THE YEAR!!!!!!!

danaigh said...

@10mm Auto, March 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM

Talk about mind reading! My thoughts to a 'T'. I've even considered whether we, mankind, is native to this planet. Or, are some 'races' of man not native to Earth?

More questions than answers:

The June 2011, National Geographic has an article on an elaborate, 9600 BC temple found in Turkey, Gobel Tepe. The quarrying and movement of massive stone pillars and the detailed artwork done during our supposed pre-neolithic era raises more questions than answers regarding man's pre-recorded history. The magazine article ponders these issues too.

Also a documentary available on Netflix of cave paintings, 'Cave of Forgotten Dreams'. The artwork from over 40,000 years ago could have been done today.

Evolution indeed. Some questions:
Are all races destined by genetics to always be at war?
Some races are just more efficient at killing than others, so is there any species on this planet as bloodthirsty as ours?
Where did we really come from?

Your scenario seems as likely as any.

Melanie said...

@ Artist-

I get mocked a bit here for this, but the one thing I hold on to is my Christian faith (conceding that organised Christianity has played a role in the problem, though not so much my particular "denomination"-it's not a denomination, strictly speaking, as each church is utterly independent-Independent Baptist. Some, like mine, have never given into the whole "white guilt" and miscegenation ideology. Of course we can't broadcast that fact). I can recognise the role organised Christianity, especially the co-opted leftist-flavored mockery of a brand, has played, while still believing in the "pure faith" of the Bible.

Other than that, I am disengaged from the larger culture, it's absolutely poisonous. Mostly I feel like I'm standing back, watching, and waiting for the other shoe to drop. I am especially interested in what's going to happen once Obama's second term is up-I can't even begin to guess where America is headed after that.

My husband is very cynical about all of it, and I'm afraid that influences me a bit.

I am thankful that we have the resources and place to "bug out" to the boondocks when the time comes, and a large family with the combined skills to manage that life.

@Outdoorsman-

Allow me to add my kudos for your brilliant post!

Melanie said...

Oh, and regarding Dr Carson,
1)As soon as the usual suspects at the conservative forum I read began to jump on his bandwagon, my antennae went up. With a little research, I found that he is not a strong proponent of the 2 A, which is fundamental to me. It is the guarantee of all our other rights, our lives, our security, and our property. So that would have crossed him off my list if nothing else had.

2)As a matter of principle, I will never support a black in power, no matter how superior they may be as an individual. I have seen time and time again, a black supported as the "great black conservative hope" only to watch as he/she (as was to be expected) fell back on race when it came to the crunch. I don't even fault them for doing so, I wish whites would do as much, but I won't be complicit in giving any black any power in any capacity over the future of whites. And anyway, however superior any individual black may be, I don't believe that there's been one born that didn't have his equal or his superior in a white man. I'll save my support for that white man, if one comes along (keeping a "weather-eye" out for antichrist types, lol).

So CAL Snowman said...

@ Outdoorsman

THAT was awesome! Saved and saved, one of my favorite posts of all time.

Caiden said...

Melanie,

Regarding whites being suicidal I think we're going through an existential crisis brought on by liberal culture. The left wingers have always destroyed a culture before taking it over, the commies killed millions to take over Russia, same thing happened in every commie country. The NAZI rounded up a lot of German citizens, not just jews. the left survives by setting countryman against countryman.

For decades we've been taught whites are the only ones guily of crimes, so mentally many whites are unarmed. They're taught to not fight, while black culture encourages rape and murder, so a white couple won't think about a group of blacks coming towards them, they've been taught to 'look past color' while the blacks have learned they can get away with anything.

More and more people are waking up, and getting angry, I guess the best scenario is a few states succedding from the dictatorship of the Democrats.

I know for some reason people here ignore the liberal, and Demorratic, efforts to destroy white culture and the white middle class, but we're foolish to do so. Yes it's the blacks committing the crimes, but it's the liberals hiding the truth, and taking the few white shooters and airing them nonstop to give the illusion white crime is as frequent as black crime. Democrats tax white people to give section 8 housing ruining white neighborhood so a few blacks can be lazy around whites instead of other negroes. The liberal run schools that teach kids white culture is destructive, and great white literature is worthless because it's written by dead white men, and instead heap praiseon Maya Angelou who writers like a child with simple rhymes.

Bogolyubski said...

Outdoorsman:
Sophisticated Negroes appropriate western political and religious doctrines to argue that Whites are morally bound to allow themselves to be defeated by Negroes. This incorporates and distorts features of the host/victim’s own social organization and mores to serve the requirements of the invasive parasite, similar to the manner in which parasitic Nematodes alter the behaviors of host snails to make the latter more susceptible to predation by birds, which then spread the parasite in their own migrations.

The so-called sophisticated negroes never came up with this argument on their own. They are merely parroting an argument which has been concocted by another far more dangerous parasitical species - the vampire squid. It's a perverse form of quasi-religious morality tale. A reader named Discard put it quite nicely a few months ago over at Vox Day's site:

"White guilt is a marketing tool, crafted to suit a once Christian people. Fill them with intolerable guilt, then offer atonement through racial self-abasement. Just like selling deodorant, once you've convinced people that they stink, the product sells itself."

This is an amazingly good summary of the psychosis. The trouble is that the vast majority of whites who identify as Christian are buying the "deodorant" sold to them by the usual suspects - apparently unaware that the stuff they're putting on every day reeks of shit - so they just keep on buying it over and over again.

Melanie said...

@Caiden-

I guess the right gets hammered so hard here for their misdeeds because they really have gotten a pass on their role in what's happening. It's obvious to all who "see", as we do, that the left has been pushing this agenda for decades. The right's role wasn't obvious-indeed, the formula in the public square is that "the left=diversity, the right=racism". What's becoming more obvious is that while the left may be the engine behind the agenda in the political sense, the right has stood aside and allowed it, once they saw the advantages. For the right, it's not so much an ideology, it's their cynical pragmatism. That's why conservatives have had to repeatedly fight "their own" party over immigration. One thing the left is wrong about, in contemporary politics-the Republican establishment is not racist. They follow the money and the power, from wherever it springs to wherever it leads. These days, there's no percentage in being racist, for the establishment. They may have written blacks off both as voters and as drones, but here come the Hispanics! Now there's a minority they can get on board with! But if you're going to get into the business of pandering to "minorities", you can't pick and choose-they only come as a package deal. Otherwise you won't have credibility with the targeted minorities.

The rank-and-file Republicans, of course, have never wanted to see themselves as "racist". They make big hay over Lincoln being a Republican, and that the Democrats were the ones who opposed snivel rights at the start. They've got the white guilt as bad as any leftist, they just disguise it by saying things like "the left is bigoted by not expecting as much from blacks as they do from whites" and "Democrat plantation", as you say. They too are aghast at the very idea of whites having any common interests as whites, and won't even entertain the idea that blacks are not like us.

I am hoping (small hope) that the negros will get so arrogant, show so much audacity in attacking whites with impunity, that indeed a majority of whites will finally start seeing the danger, that they'll quickly shed their white guilt.

Then I remember that blacks did all these things in the late Sixties/Seventies during the heyday of "black power", and all whites did then was ask them "what else do you want?" and meet their demands.

Maybe it will make a difference that we've been meeting their demands for decades now, and if they're anything, they're worse. But I don't know why I would believe that, because it's also that much more time the media has had to fine-tune and finesse how whites are to blame no matter what, and this being a nation of sheeple who only know what they heard on the TeeVee, that will be their truth.

Maybe if enough real-life, average Joe people are affected by themselves or their loved ones feeling the effect-that's possible, the blacks themselves proclaim that "it's a black world now" under Obama...I just don't know. It will need to be average, working people who get a taste of the out-of-control black violence, because when lefties get attacked, or their daughters raped or their sons murdered, they just go set up a scholarship for the savage feral animals and have them over for tea.

Dan said...

The people who made the crossing were special already. The strait is about 11 miles wide. 8 miles wide in that time. These 200 were efficiently organized as a tribe. The crossing carried out in one go IMHO. No small family would have dared to go it alone on a strange shore. We are descended from a group that was pretty coherant and capable of building a rudimentary fleet.

Blacks don't build ships. They do not venture out into water.

Anonymous said...

Don't worry. I'm not going anywhere! I'm just struggling to keep up with what PK and everyone else has to say, let alone contribute anything. Having to drive 70 miles each day for work just to avoid groid crime and the section 8 cancer doesn't make it any easier. Only to realize that it's still all around me.

I miss Zenster too, though. I also wish Ray Scissom would chime in more. When he let loose several weeks ago, what he had to say really resonated with me.

Gwinnett Gladiator

eah said...

These pathetic black 'journalists', who seem more interested in censorship than journalism, are emboldened by a society that puts them on a pedestal (how else to explain the existence of something called the "Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists" -- is there a Philadelphia Association of White Journalists?), and by the media which ignores everyday black dysfunction, which really has become a 'The Emperor Has No Clothes' phenomenon in BRA.

Bogolyubski said...

While Caiden is correct about the genocidal anti-white nature of leftists and Dems in general, the so-called "Conservatives" are really no different. Big shot Freeper mmehring is naturally TWMNBN (try to imagine my surpirse!).

Old Mr. Voltaire certainly had it right:

If you want to know who rules over you, find out who you may not criticize.

Anonymous said...

"I have asked that question of blacks at least a hundred times, and never gotten an answer, except for the couple of times I received this as an "answer"-"Wherever whites go, we wll follow, even to the moon". "

I'll take a shot at it. Blacks have no respect for private property rights. That is a white concept. Also true for individual freedoms and liberties, and individual sovereignty.

This is why they don't care who funds their EBT, just as long as it gets funded. They don't live somehere, they "stay" somewhere. They don't save, or own anything, and are dependent on the state from day to day. Most of what they actually own is a pile of junk that could fit into a plastic garbage bag.

My city is developing a huge black teen violence problem at the shopping malls. Our local black hustler radio personality blames Simon Property Group, which owns and operates the malls for providing the "lure" for the black teens who loiter and steal the pretty expensive things.

He says that Simon should expect that black teens will want to hang out at the "world class" malls, and should take the responsibility for providing security, handling the crowds in a sensitive way, etc.

This is why black believe they can walk down the middle of the street, talk and curse loudly in public, grab their dick in front of your grandma, shoplift, enter late to movies, disrupt everything, jay walk, piss on things, cut through your yard, steal the furniture off your porch, play loud rap at intersections, etc. They are narcissists who believe that everything in the world belongs to everyone in the world.

No boundaries.

Of course whites create more beautiful things, and blacks create crap, so they want those first because they are materialistic as a group. They like the shiny things. The Constitution and rule of law are the white man's inventions and don't apply to them.

Anonymous said...

Blight of the Living Dead

http://takimag.com/article/blight_of_the_living_dead/page_2#axzz1uHQi1JwW

Californian said...

Gwinnett Gladiator, glad to see you are still onboard.

Anonymous said...

I don't want to live withinb 20 milees of a major city. Now I realize that a 100 miles is required as a safety zone. Along with a shotgun, SLR, and a small revolver.

Why blacks tolerate this behavior condemns them. And this is true worldwide. Look at London, Jamicia, France, Scandinava. This has nothing to do with slavery. It is genetic.

nameispointless said...

Pleased to see you posting again, Gwinnett Gladiator. I always enjoy your vivid commentary from the front line.
Sorry about the ghetto avoiding commute, but understand. It's frustrating and time consuming; you deserve better.
Do what you can here, GG, you are appreciated.
Thanks.

Anonymous said...

That is sad to see Philadelphia get Detroited by wonderful vibrant diversity. During my dad's last of 32 years in the army in 1986 I spent the summer there. The Philadelphia Phillies and Veterans Stadium were my daycare and baby sitting. Now the stadium is long gone and walking across the highway from the army/navy base is probably a taking life in your hands undertaking. Forward to the glorious free and equal (were all miserable and broke together) utopia!

Discard said...

Thanks for the nod, Bogo. I endeavor to give satisfaction.