Sunday, March 17, 2013

EBONY magazine says "Enough" to Black Violence in Chicago -- Uncomfortable Truth: The Only Way to End Misery in Chicagoland is to Remove Black Population

Do we even need a 'caption'?
EBONY magazine is upset -- Chicago, the cultural epicenter of blackness in America, is awash in black criminality, murder, and mayhem. Though EBONY writers and editors will not point out the cause of this misery - and why whites, Asians, and Hispanics do everything possible to avoid living near black people in Chicagoland - we at SBPDL have no problem in shining a revealing light upon the people responsible with turning the Windy City into.. Chi-raq? [Introducing ENOUGH: Chicago and the Tragedy of Urban Violence:
EBONY.com's latest series takes on the crisis in our hometown, Ebony.com, 3-13-13]:
Black death and Black pain are far too familiar to the city of Chicago. A city that should not be viewed through the lens of tragedy. A city founded by a Black man, John Baptiste Point du Sable. A city that has cultivated Black icons and Black excellence, from Lou Rawls to Derrick Rose, Gwendolyn Brooks to Jennifer Hudson. From Harold Washington to Common, Lorraine Hansberry to Michelle Obama. Fred Hampton, Nat King Cole, Redd Foxx and the list goes on…
In fact, it was in Chicago where a young Arkansas transplant by the name of John H. Johnson became one of the most successful Black men in history with the founding of the Johnson Publishing Company. For EBONY, Chicago is and will always be home.

 ENOUGH
will examine the factors contributing to the crisis in Chicago—educational disparities, unemployment, the ever-shifting gang culture, mental health issues, etc. We will talk to survivors and those who have lost loved ones, while also exploring the other violent crimes taking place in our hometown that don’t garner the same level of attention as the homicide rate. We’ll take a look at just where the violence is taking place and how so many guns make their way on to Chicago’s streets. ENOUGH will also highlight the activists who are working to make things better. And yes, we will discuss solutions.
 
Chicago is not "Chi-raq." We can't own or embrace that. Our city is an epicenter of Black culture and Black life. It is a reflection of our people not just in the Midwest, but across the country. Chicago is home and it is time to say “ENOUGH."
 Comparing the violence in Chicago (overwhelmingly black violence, in a city that is 33 percent black, 32 percent white, and 28 percent Hispanic) to Iraq is an affront to the Iraqi people -- their nation was awash in violence because it was an actual war-zone... Chicagoland is awash in violence because black people (like the nine-year-old who engaged in a armed robbery of McDonald's and a carjacking) engage in behavior on a daily basis that can only be referred to as 'tribal' and completely incompatible with the civilization and standard of living white people created in the city -- which, not coincidentally, was what attracted blacks to the city in the first place.

Comparing the violence in Chicago to say, the black violence in South Africa is a much better analogy; to compare Chicago violence to the violence in Iraq is, as stated, grossly underestimating the civility of the Iraqi people.

Luckily, EBONY has been nice enough to break down crime in Chicago by race, establishing just who is responsible for creating the conditions in a city egregiously compared to Iraq:
People are outraged by the senseless ways that most of the Chicago murders happen, the reckless use of hand guns, the high number of young people as both victims and offenders, the record number of unsolved cases, and the added strain on mainly Black and Hispanic communities, with no clear solutions to the killings in sight. Additionally, the 24-hour news cycle, the proliferation of social media and the fact that our president is associated with the South Side of Chicago have subjected the city to additional media attention. However, its important to understand the numbers to get a better picture of what's going on in the city. 
Chicago Murders From 1991-2011*
-Prior to 2012, murders in Chicago had decreased by 53% over a 20 year period, with 928 murders in 1991, and 433 in 2011—the City's lowest since the 1960s.
-Chicago is is 231 square miles and has 25 police districts. Of the city's 2.7 million residents, over 887,000 are Black.
Cases Cleared (1991-2011)
-Clearance is when an arrest is made and the offender is prosecuted, or when the police know who committed the crime and have enough evidence, but for some reason, they cannot be arrested, charged, or prosecuted (i.e when the offender is dead).
-On average, Chicago police cleared 46% of murder cases, with the highest clearance rate of 67% in 1991, and the lowest happening over the last two years, with 28% in 2010, and 30% in 2011.
Chicago Communities With The Highest Murder Rates (2007-2011)
-There were 2,289 murders in Chicago between 2007 and 2011.
-Fifty percent of those murders happened in 6 (24%) of the City's 25 police districts.
-The average Chicago murder rate was 21 murders for each 100,000 residents.
-The 6 districts with the highest murder rates had as many as 38 to 67 murders per 100,000 residents. 
-These high murder police districts are on average 94% African American. Four of them (districts 2, 3, 6, and 7) are next to each other on the eastern section of the South Side.  This includes nine communities: Grand Boulevard (former location of the Robert Taylor Homes public housing project), Washington Park, Woodlawn, Greater Grand Crossing, South Shore, Englewood & West Englewood (home of Derrick Rose and Jennifer Hudson), Auburn Gresham, and Chatham. The other two Chicago police districts with the highest murder rates (districts 11 and 15) boundary each other on the central section of the West Side and include the four communities of Austin, Humboldt Park, West Garfield Park, and East Garfield Park.  
-Although there are differences among them, 32 % of the residents of those 13 communities live below the poverty level, compared to 20% citywide. 
The Victims (1991-2011)
-On average, men have been 86% of the murder victims, and women 14%. In 1991, men were 86% of victims, and in 2011 they were 90.1%, the highest for this 20-year-period. 
-On average, Blacks have been 76% of the victims; Hispanics 17%; and Whites 7%. Over the past 20 years, the percentage of Black victims decreased by 1%, Whites decreased by 5%, and Hispanics increased by 5%.
-Persons between the ages of 17-35 make up the majority of murder victims, with 63% in 1991, and 72% in 2011. 
-In 1991, 69% of victims were shot, and 17% stabbed. In 2011, 83% were shot, and 7% stabbed. 
The Offenders (1991-2011)
-Most of the known murder offenders are also between the ages of 17-35, they were 74% in 1991, and 79% in 2011.
-The percent of female murder offenders has been as low as 4% and as high as 12% during the period, but were 10% in both 1991 and 2011.
-On average, Blacks have been 76% of the known offenders; Hispanics 19%, and Whites 4%. The percentage of Black offenders decreased by 11%, Hispanics increased by 11%, and Whites decreased by 2%.
Why can't people understand that if a community is violent, then businesses are probably going to stay away from opening in this area? Those that do open, operate in an environment resembling a war-zone, with security cameras, barbed-wire, and bullet glass windows protecting/shielding employees from the wanton nature of violence in these majority black communities.

"Racial Oppression in the Global Metropolis: A Living Black Chicago History," is a book - basically an angry screed - by Paul L. Street, which is nothing more than a running gag of statistics to show how black people are economically discriminated against in Chicago.

The result? They kill other black people, rob from other black people, and do nothing more than turn their neighborhoods into the poster-child for what criminologist James Q. Wilson spoke of when he put forth his 'broken-window' theory of crime... Doesn't make much sense to turn your community into a 24/7/365 war-zone, where neighbors are afraid to go out during the day, and the only business that stay open are there to offer high-interest loans on your paycheck, liquor, or perhaps that winning lottery ticket.

But back to Mr. Street's book and those "horrible" statistics that showcase how white people continue to oppress black people in Chicagoland:

  • A fourth of the Chicago metropolitian area's black households were officially poor, compared to just 5.6 percent white and 16 percent of Latin households. Sixteen percent of Chicago's blacks lived in what researcher call "deep poverty" - at less than half of the federal government's notoriously low and inadequate poverty level. More than a third of the metropoloitan area's black children lived in poverty, compared to just 5 percent of white kids. [PK note: why allow these people to have children? If you receive government aid, a mandatory Depo-Provero shot should be included]


  • Of the city's fifteen poorest neighborhood's, with poverty measures ranging from 32 to 56 percent, all but one was disproportionately black and eleven were at least 94 percent black. Of the city's top fifteen neighborhoods for child poverty, with rates ranging from 55 to 71 percent, ten were disproportionately black and none were disproportionately white, the rest being disproportionately Latino.


  • All but one of the 15 Chicago neighborhoods where more than 25 percent of the kids were growing up in deep poverty had a black population percentage considerably higher than the city average. All but 3  were at least 94 percent black. There were six predominately black neighborhoods - Oakland, North Lawndale, Washington Park, Grand Boulevard, Douglas, and Riverdale - where more than 40 percent of the children were deeply poor and in Riverdale it was actually more than half. [PK Note: You always hear conservatives attack "Progressives" for running these country -- the apt word is "Regressives": what insane group of people who want to see the proliferation of black poverty and crime from one generation to another?]


  • Seventy-two percent of the 107 Chicago public elementary and high schools that reported 97 percent or more of their students as "low income" were 90 percent or more African American. 


  • Blacks were 37 percent of Chicago's total population (2000) but 56 percent of the city's unemployed. 


  • Between 1990 and 2000, 98 percent of the Chicago metropolitian area's job growth as measured by the Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES) took place outside Chicago. Just 2 percent occurred within the city, home to more than 2/3's of the area's African Americans. 


  • More than 95 percent of the region's job growth outside of Chicago took place in communities with black percentages smaller than the suburban average.


  • Communities that became significantly more African American during the 1990s tended to lose jobs. Of the 10 communities for which IDES data exists and that saw their black percentage rise by 10 percent or more, five lost jobs between 1991 and 2000. 

  • Overall, the city's 19 disproportionately black zip codes lost 18,080 IDES-recorded jobs between 1991 and 2000. By contrast, the 15 Chicago zip cods that were 75 percent or more white in 1990 collectively gained 19,215 such jobs during the same period. The total job gains of the seven zip codes that were 90 percent or more white was equivalent to nearly 90 percent of the city's overall job growth. 


  • In 2003, of the nearly 32,000 Chicago households that relied on federal "Housing Choice Vouchers" ("HCV's", formerly known as "Section 8 Vouchers") to meet their housing costs, 26,826 (84 percent) were African American. Just 11 neighborhoods - one seventh of the city's seventy seven community areas - were home to 50 percent of Chicago's HCV households, and they were all 90 percent or more black.


  • From 2000 through 2002, a quarter of the state's (Illinois) released prisoners - more than 20,000 each year) returned to just 10 predominately black zip codes on Chicago's West and South sides. 

  • In North Lawndale, the West Side neighborhood that Martin Luther King briefly inhabited in the summer of 1966, fully one-third of the adult residents were "incarcerated and therefore out of the community" at the end of the last century. The adult neighborhood population left behind by mass imprisonment was 59 percent female and 41 percent male- typical of the city's overall black male deficit that high black male mortality and rampant black incarceration generates. A generation after the rise and fall of the Chicago Freedom Movement, the community area from which King had hoped to headquarter his struggle for racial justice in Chicago was under massive criminal justice occupation and supervision. (p.202-209)

Mr. Street compiled those facts in "Racial Oppression in the Global Metropolis" to show how 'white privilege' creates a culture of oppression for non-whites; in actually, he helped illustrate the "Visible Black Hand of Economics" to showcase why self-segregation of racial groups (away from large clusters of black people) takes place in Chicago: looking at the data, there is no greater threat to private property value, the health of a community, and the integrity of the businesses within that community than the proportion of black people found there.

Economic activity accelerates when the proportion of black people is less than 10 percent; conversely, economic inactivity accelerates when the proportion of black people is greater than 90 percent.

We agree with EBONY magazine -- 'ENOUGH!'

Enough lies, enough hatred, enough killing, enough closing of businesses, enough moving to avoid crime, enough, enough, enough!!

It's time to take off the white privilege bracelet America, and think long and hard about the true source of calamity in the black community in Chicago, and why - in the absence of black people - the quality of life immediately soars...

68 comments:

Anonymous said...

The way to end this violence is simple.

GUN CONTROL.. BLACK GUN CONTROL. Make it illegal for any black to own any weapon.

This should not be difficult. It was never the intentions of the White Men who created this nation for Africans (non citizens) to ever vote nor own guns. That was a right for "the people" and the people were White Men.

So, it is constitutional to deny these non-citizens not only the vote, but the gun.

Senator Feinstein should immediately enter a bill to remove guns from the Africans. She certainly wants to end gun crime (she swears she does......), so this is perfect for her.

And, a sister bill to require all White Men to own guns would better keep the peace.

Africans, who can not create nor maintain a civilization, have no rights within a civilization created by and for White People. IF they wish to be here and clean our toilets and wash our cars and pick tomatoes for us (even though the MExicans can pick them better), they must obey Massa White Man.

Anonymous said...

Another point. This article begins with pointing out all these "great blacks'. But what did they do? Sing and dance. Nothing more. Nothing less. BUT what made it possible was SEGREGATION.

When the gifted 10% are FORCED to live amons the other 90% retards, then they have an effect on the blacks. Segregation FORCED blacks to deal with blacks and be role models (as best they could) with other blacks.

With the end of natural segregation, and the creation of FORCED unnaturual integration, the "talented" 10% ran off to get white women and thus left the remiaing retarded 90% to fight and kill each other.

Only with natural segregtion can we FORCE the blacks to stay away and FORCE them to live with each other. If left to themselves they will do all they can to get away from each other and get to the White ares, which is where the money and the white women are.

Since the White world is where all other non-whites DEMAND to live (whether they be Arabs, Asians, Jews, Muslims, Africans, Mexicans, etc) only we White are forced to use FORCE to keep our areas White. You will notice no White demands to live with all these opther NON-Whites groups, but ALL of them DEMAND to live with us. Sick.

So, we need to arm out people and give ourselves the right to defend our borders and cities and do what is necessary when any non-white is found in our future nation.

Folks, face it. The future is going to be ugly and violent and this is so BECAUSE these non-Whites will not leave us alone.

homophobe said...

no entry for this?

Steubenville High School football players found guilty of raping 16-year-old girl

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/highschool--steubenville-high-school-football-players-found-guilty-of-raping-16-year-old-girl-164129528.html

Inside a small Steubenville, Ohio, courtroom filled with sobbing and exhausting emotion, Judge Thomas Lipps found Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond guilty Sunday of raping an intoxicated 16-year-old girl. Lipps sentenced both defendants to a minimum of one year in a youth correctional institute with the determination for a longer sentence coming from child-service experts.

Mays received an additional year for transmission of nude photos, to be served after his rape sentence is completed. Mays and Richmond also will have to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives.

"It provides a great incentive to do well," said Lipps, who could have ordered Mays and Richmond to remain behind bars until they turned 21.

Mays, 17, and Richmond, 16, both wept, at times uncontrollably, as the verdict was announced. Mays buried his head in a handkerchief as defense attorneys rubbed his back. He later hugged his parents goodbye.

Richmond was able to stand and approach the victim's family and deliver a tearful apology before breaking down into the arms of court manager Fred Adballa Jr.

"I'm sorry," Richmond said through gasps and cries, "for putting you guys through this. I'm sorry."

Anonymous said...

The way forward may be to challenge some of the "improvements" to our laws over the past fifty years.

Challenge EOC on the basis of "best service for the consumer." If I go to a pharmacists, I want to know this person was not placed ahead of a hundred others based solely on the color of her skin.

Challenge anti-discrimination on the basis of "the right to form communities, and to preserve personal wealth." If I work and save, and buy a house, I do not want the value of that home to be destroyed in the name of diversity. Diversity is not important; my retirement security is.

Challenge mixed education on the basis of "the right to offer the best for our own children." Diversity is not as important as education.

The current philosophy of government seems to be very similar to the attitude of the King in England, where the rights of commoners were subservient to the rights of the King. We revolted.

In this country, the principle was that government derives its power from the people. If the people do not want their children to experience "diversity" then the government has no right to impose it.

Anonymous said...

A city that has cultivated Black icons and Black excellence, from Lou Rawls to Derrick Rose, Gwendolyn Brooks to Jennifer Hudson. From Harold Washington to Common, Lorraine Hansberry to Michelle Obama. Fred Hampton, Nat King Cole, Redd Foxx and the list goes on…

...o pleeze, they aint out 'icons'
and thats show biz, including Mochelle.

any one else offering thoughts?

homophobe said...

"Comparing the violence in Chicago to say, the black violence in South Africa is a much better analogy; to compare Chicago violence to the violence in Iraq is, as stated, grossly underestimating the civility of the Iraqi people."

you may want to check out rapejihad.

http://muslimrapewave.wordpress.com

muslims and pakis in UK Europe Australia, and hindu on hindu in India, rape women. i think you're overestimating the civility of Iraqis.

@anon

there are fairly sizable numbers of whites and indians and blacks living in and working in the east asian nations of japan korea china

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi1SWnOSQsk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2yckPcUSC4

make it rain TRUTH said...

Look, I'm not going to lay this entirely at the feet of the Progressive movement and Progressive government that rules this country.

But it certainly plays a large role.

Bottom line, no bullshit: until the government gets out of the business of rewarding derelict and deleterious behaviors, you are only going to see their continued proliferation. Of course this impacts the black community the fastest and mostest since much of that community comprised the "poor" at the beginning of The New Deal America.

Couple that with white guilt that has allowed blacks to NOT be judged on the content of their character, but instead to have their every anti-social behaviors excused and you get the problem we have on our hands today. No civilization can withstand promotion of bad behaviors. White civilizations didn't attain their levels by doing it, and white civilizations dragging minorities (who are never allowed to be criticized due to white guilt) along for the ride CERTAINLY aren't going to reach for the stars doing it.

Anonymous said...

Another great post! And I look forward to seeing what Ebony magazine puts forth as "solutions."

Anonymous said...

Do not help the blacks. Do not hinder the blacks. Let them rise or fall on their own merits.

Anonymous said...

In your lifetime, you will probably never hear about anything involving blacks that doesn't have to do with whites. Quite simply, there is no black person without the foundation of "white oppression".

Blacks define themselves solely through their alleged victimization. If whites ceased to exist, what would they talk about? Look inwards and see their own foulness?

Anonymous said...

@ first commenter (anon):

Add violent, backwards, low i.q. third worlder hoards to that mix of 'those who should be disarmed' too.

But, we know the whole idea of 'disarming' is a joke anyway. Sane, decent folks follow laws, not thugs and gangstas and they will always have ways to get their weaponry illegally.

Laws are only made for people who respect and abide by them. Laws are inevitably going to be broken by the cowardly, the evil, the ne'er do wells, rapists, murderers, scum o' the earth, violent retards on the planet.

Do we 'make more laws' or do we do away with a huge chunk of the 'problem' causing us to create such 'laws' in the first place? That's not a conundrum of your conscience and your empathic nature when ten of them are in a dark alley and you have to decide how you plan on living or dying.

Anonymous said...

You can't teach shame, honesty, truth, dignity, self-reliance or decency to people who have never evolved to develop an exterior and interior conscience and an innate 'sense' of morality.

There are still many Darwinian challenged savages amongst us and trying to integrate them into a higher thinking society is rife with painfully, woefully obvious FAIL.

We are only as strong as our weakest link and feeding and importing more and more weaker links is self-defeating insanity writ large.

Anonymous said...

It's not the guns that are responsible for Negro deaths...it's guns in the hands of other Negroes....

Anonymous said...

"A fourth of the Chicago metropolitian area's black households were officially poor, compared to just 5.6 percent white and 16 percent of Latin households."

Damn, YT is GOOD! We are able to target the negro with near surgical precision. Hell, we are even able to target him in Africa or wherever he may be. But shouldn't it be asked why YT is not as successful in holding down the Latins, who presumably have greater language and cultural barriers as well as the attention of the (cue villainous organ music) anti-illegal immigrant bigots? Is YT lying down on the job?

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. Concerning the low (according to the tables presented) number of white murder suspects and victims, it means the white people left in Chicago are largely affluent and live in well-guarded residences.

Also, a mainly nonwhite city like Chicago doesn't have the white criminal underground it did generations ago.

Anonymous said...

In short, who cares about Chicago or Detroit or Birmingam or Philadelphia etc. The masses of groids and turd worlders don't care about whites. They really believe that you have oppressed them and that the reason why they are miserable is because you. For example, my section 8 turd neighbor below complained when my laundry machine broke. She lied and said that water leaked in her place, although she would not let anyone in management see her place. She told the maintenance man that I broke my machine on purpose. Really. That is how ensconced the black victimization schema is in these turds' psyches. And let me tell ya, therapy won't fix that!

In closing, it is irrational to reason with those who are irrational. You/ We will not change the government or homeland security or anything. The die is cast. Our psychic energy should be spent on secession and creating a nation for whites. America is not ours anymore.

Okay, look at this way, our America has died and we are grieving. The stages if grief are

Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance


We have lost America. We must accept this as we have no control over the government's actions BUT we have gained insights and these will lead us to free ourselves from this mess. It is a state of mind and we must have the courage to strike out on our own. It is a drastic paradigm shift. When I said eff it to my bills- my home! ... It was a paradigm shift. We must burn the ships so to speak and not look back.

White Mom in the District of Craptopia

Kathy M said...

We just want to be left alone. Is that too much to ask for? I don't think so. Do nonwhites need white folks? Can they survive without white folks? Why do they flood into white nations?

Segregation is the way to peace for white folks. The only way. Have a nice day groid.

Anonymous said...

Horseshit. The jive talkin' editors of Ebony should look at the "affluent" Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C., and ask themselves why rates of property crime and violent crime are so high in these suburbs.

Anonymous said...

Kathy M said...

We just want to be left alone. Is that too much to ask for?


I think the current Chief Justice would think the right to be left alone is fundamental.

Dan said...

Adjustments for poverty do not cover the amount of Groid violence. Poverty doesn't produce this level of violence in apalachia and apalachia is poor.

Anonymous said...

Ghetto violence is not impossible to control. When police were free to use their weapons, blacks were afraid of them. Before the 60's, cities didn't have the monumental crime problems they do now. The people who suffer the most often are other blacks, but until they start condemning their fellows and demanding strong police action--and sticking with these demands--they cannot solve the situation their own race has created. At some point, the chaos will get so bad that the national guard will have to do what the cops used to do.

Anonymous said...

Probably 20,000 aspiring rappers. Bunch of Lil B's and the like.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....The blacks living in America are the most WELL FED poor people in the world. There are places on this planet where people scrounge for food out of garbage dumps. If the blacks are so poor and hungry why do most of the women have big fat asses.

Constructive Feedback said...

THANK YOU Paul Kersey.

You are a White people's "Malcolm X".

You are valuable to my cause because - the more that the Black Racial Services Machine seek to obfuscate around the issue - a force like you stands in the backdrop threatening to offer blow back.

I do not need to accept that you have no kind regard and intentions for Black people - to see the need for a "White Conservative Wolf" checkmate to the "White Progressive Cheshire Fox Ally" that works in cahoots with the "Embedded Black Fox Confidence Man".

OF COURSE - we both know, sir, that while your focus on "The Negro" is quite entertaining - the vessel called "America" has forces far greater than what the American Negro could manage to direct your way that threatens to smash the ship upon the rocks.

Anonymous said...

OT: Hoping the blog owner does an article on the current controversy in Philadelphia regarding the magazine article called 'Being White in Philly' Link here: http://www.phillymag.com/articles/white-philly/

Anonymous said...

IN CAPS
OFF TOPIC

THIS IS WORTH READING

MAYOR FINDS WHITE PEEPS VIEWS 'DISGUSTING'?

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2013/03/15/controversial-article-published-in-local-magazine-has-mayor-nutter-asking-for-investigation/

Anonymous said...

UNConstructive Feedback said...

I do not need to accept that you have no kind regard and intentions for Black people - to see the need for a "White Conservative Wolf" checkmate to the "White Progressive Cheshire Fox Ally" that works in cahoots with the "Embedded Black Fox Confidence Man".

I don't think Paul or any of us whites who want you away from us owe you any 'kind regards or intentions' no matter how convoluted your tiny little hamster brain tries to spin that we should somehow care for you.

Those of us who don't, don't. GTF over it. Posting about the evils and sickness of your race does not equate 'caring' for your pathetic @sses, it's about caring about OUR butts, but, of course, you're so self-absorbed that you would think we actually give a damn what happens to you.

Anonymous said...

off topic



FILE PHOTO: Mayor Michael Nutter speaks on stage during the final day of the Democratic National Convention at Time Warner Cable Arena on September 6, 2012 in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Mike Dougherty

what was so 'disgustin'?

Reporting Mike Dougherty
k Hollywood Ink
Sou
By Mike Dougherty

PHILADELPHIA (CBS) – A controversial article published in Philadelphia Magazine this month has the attention of the Nutter Administration.

The article, titled “Being White in Philly,” features a series of interviews with anonymous white residents from different areas of the city who share stories about their interaction with black residents.

Mayor Nutter calls the article’s tone “disgusting,” and he’s asked the Human Relations Commission to investigate some of the sensitive racial issues explored in the piece.

Anonymous said...

n said...

Adjustments for poverty do not cover the amount of Groid violence. Poverty doesn't produce this level of violence in apalachia and apalachia is poor.

Bangladesh is dirt poor, and a lot safer than many / most cities where
blacks / browns live in USA.

Anonymous said...

Whites seek out Jewish areas in suburban Boston and New York and Los Angeles for the quality of schools and the low crime. For example certain towns in Weschester county New York have public schools equal to the best private schools, due to heavy Jewish enrollment

Anonymous said...

A quick scan if twitter and facebook tell the tale of many blacks very proud to say they "stay" in "Chiraq".
Only the Gold Coast area is white and affluent with a few exceptions like some of Beverly. Working and middle class whites only live maybe in 5 out of 22 neighborhoods, and alot of those folks are City workers who are required to live in Chicago. If the city ever changes that requirement then Chicago will fall like Detroit. Mt. Greenwood, Beverly, Museum Campus/south loop, Printers Row, Portage Park, Edgewater and Uptown.

Anonymous said...

There used to be two huge black hair product plants and the Ebony Jet Offices and print works on the south side. Thise businesses left town for Atlanta, if I am not mistaken. It's not just white owned companies like USSteel, Jay's that abandoned the southside of Chicago. Posner, Johnson Products and Ebony Jet did too

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
The way forward may be to challenge some of the "improvements" to our laws over the past fifty years.

Challenge EOC on the basis of "best service for the consumer." If I go to a pharmacists, I want to know this person was not placed ahead of a hundred others based solely on the color of her skin.

Challenge anti-discrimination on the basis of "the right to form communities, and to preserve personal wealth." If I work and save, and buy a house, I do not want the value of that home to be destroyed in the name of diversity. Diversity is not important; my retirement security is.

Challenge mixed education on the basis of "the right to offer the best for our own children." Diversity is not as important as education.

The current philosophy of government seems to be very similar to the attitude of the King in England, where the rights of commoners were subservient to the rights of the King. We revolted.

In this country, the principle was that government derives its power from the people. If the people do not want their children to experience "diversity" then the government has no right to impose it.


Good luck with that. This approach might have had a prayer half a century ago, before the entire legal system was taken over by the nomenklatura who serves the ruling oligarchy. I do wish folks would get it through their thick heads: There is no rule of law in Amerika. The country once known as the USA is a Banana Republic. No non-elite white person has any direct influence over the system - which is quite heavily rigged against them.

Time to start thinking out of mythological boxes. White Mom has the corrrect basic idea: Scorched earth. Let the squids rule - over a mountain of dung.

Bogolyubski said...

Destructive Feedbag:
OF COURSE - we both know, sir, that while your focus on "The Negro" is quite entertaining - the vessel called "America" has forces far greater than what the American Negro could manage to direct your way that threatens to smash the ship upon the rocks.

Believe it or not - he's actually "getting it" better than some of the white folks here who are still in the denial stage. The great slave galley with its vampire-squid overlords and its wicked nomenklatura overseers needs to be smashed upon the rocks, CF. The faster and more thoroughly, the better.

Remnant said...

Quote of the day regarding Detroit, courtesy of Derb:

"Since no-one else wants to say it, I will: The ruin of Detroit is what you get when whites leave and blacks take over. Ask a Rhodesian."

http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/RadioDerb/2013-03-16.html

Well, I wouldn't say _no-one else_ would say it: Paul Kersey will say it (and has been for a while).

Johnny See said...

Constructive Feedback... my God, man you are anything but.
Seriously, what the fuck are you on about? You obviously speak white man English, but how is your comprehension?
Can you not see that we do NOT hate you because you have a different color skin? Can you not understand that we hate behavior that is repugnant?
I do not give a good God damn whether it is a punk in the ghetto or a banker in a corner office; I HATE bad behavior. Simple, right?
Obviously not to you.
We white people have a code of conduct we are usually raised under, and it comes down mostly to what Grandma would approve of or not. We respect our elders, because we usually know them, and know them well at that.
You should focus on increasing cohesiveness in the so-called black community. Maybe after that you could work on enhancing community within the community. Jesus H fucking Christ do you yet begin to understand how ultima-fucking-far-behind-the eight ball you people really are?
CF, I do NOT hate you. I wish you well, whether or not you wish to believe that. The problem we BOTH face is the evolutionary deficiency of the people you and I BOTH wish to see advance. They simply cannot absent the advantage of time. CRAP! That is where we are.
I guess you may have noted the rather large amount of frustration building in relation to this impasse.
So, please stop haranguing Mr. Kersey, and me, and others here, and just take some solace that we agree with you on some level, and that we are not so intellectually lazy as to hate you for something you did not choose: your skin color.
We didn't choose ours, either.
We want peace, we want prosperity, and you know what? We know how to achieve those things. We are happy to share them with like-minded folks, but we deeply resent being told we must carry a parasitic burden.
Work your magic negro-ness, CF, please, work it in your community. We SO wish that you all would just BE instead of demanding equality.
BE equal, Dammit!!!
... and hurry up about it, we have been waiting some time for you to catch up. We are all the same, right? What the fuck are you niggers doing?!?

MuayTyson said...

White Mom,
I do not think for one moment that the black living below you thinks that she is a victim. You do not need a 100 IQ to realize when you cry people listen. Children do it all the time. Hell my cat cries for food and to play.

The black below you is conditioned to stimuli. Something goes wrong blame Whitey, lie, cheat, and steal to get what you want it is easier than working for it.

Blacks have been given so much and are so removed from any actual racism or bias they only know to crow for their dinner.

Blacks are so resistent to education not only do they have subpar intelligence they are also incredibly ignorant. I do believe that the majority of blacks like it this way. The less they know the less they will have any conflicted feelings attaching them to reality.

Again we only have ourselves to blame and the skillful way we were manipulated into allowing blacks to become parasitic.

Anonymous said...

Don't take the guns away from the blacks. We should be arming them. They are great at killing their own kind. They are also good at killing white yankees in chicago. So let them run free

Anonymous said...

I lived in Philly for four years in Brewerytown. I plan on responding today to that article. I think whites in all cities should write a response to this article based on their experiences in their locales dealing with the groids. We need to show that groid dysfunction and it's effects on whites' life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness is a country wide phenomenon.

White Mom

Don M said...

Bogolyubski said...

"Destructive Feedbag:
OF COURSE - we both know, sir, that while your focus on "The Negro" is quite entertaining - the vessel called "America" has forces far greater than what the American Negro could manage to direct your way that threatens to smash the ship upon the rocks.

Believe it or not - he's actually "getting it" better than some of the white folks here who are still in the denial stage. The great slave galley with its vampire-squid overlords and its wicked nomenklatura overseers needs to be smashed upon the rocks, CF. The faster and more thoroughly, the better."

Yeah, Feedbag gets the existence of the Squids on some level, but he doesn't see the role of his people in the whole evil system.

Blacks and other Turd-worlders are the hydraulic press that squeezes the White middle class against the anvil of The State. The Squids have their hand on the lever and their blood funnels ready to lap up the pressings.

If BRA goes down, whites will turn into Chechens over night. This would be very bad for Feedbag and his people...

Anonymous said...

Black people have proven that a huge percentage of their population is incapable of existing responsibly in a state of freedom. They've squandered all opportunities and descended into African tribal barbarism while blaming the world for their having done so. They have no one to blame but themselves and deserve each other and the fates they inflict upon themselves. I have zero sympathy and simply wish to see their violence and destructiveness contained in their communities and punished in the harshest manner possible when they "bring it out of da hood."
The best course of action is segregation. Let them stay in their own communities and rise or fall according to their own efforts absent white support dollars. If the government would stop feeding and breeding the bastards, they wouldn't have the population numbers necessary to take over entire cities such as Chicago and Detroit and ruin them. If people had the freedom to choose whom they live around, many places would have restrictive covenants to preserve the integrity of their neighborhoods.
As I go through my daily life, it would not bother me one bit to never see a black person at the store, in a restaurant, at the gas station or any other location including on the job. They would not be missed nor would I feel deprived of "cultural enrichment through diversity" as libtards so mistakenly believe.
All desegregation did is deprive people such as myself of the right to associate with whom we choose and force unwelcome and unwanted contact. Why should I (or anyone else for that matter) have to live next door to some section 8 groid loser who has five bastard children who misbehave and has 3 baby daddies (and thug relatives) visiting all hours of the day and night as they all feast off of EBT cards? How is that better than having a responsible white family living next door and how does it add to the neighborhood? It doesn't.
Forcing such unwelcome and unwanted contact only creates a deep well of anger and resentment against such government intrusion as our right to choose and right to self determination is stripped away. As the government rushes to kiss black ass until their collective lips are chapped and bleeding from doing so, I have to wonder if their is a cure for their addiction. Perhaps some enterprising entrepeneur could create a lifesize rubber model of a black ass for every libtard to affix to the wall near their front door so they could kiss it upon entering or exiting their house. Maybe that would satisfy their craving.

ordus dei said...

But CF's motivation isn't demasking the ogliarchs, CF's motivation is justifying his peoples dysfunction, by saying that the real problem is the power elite, and not his ppl

He won't admit that the elites use his people's dysfunction as a weapon, against whites and more importantly against themselves.

CF will not agree that the black activism was a ruse, with which to enslave black people more than they ever were.

CF is excusing his people's behaviour on elitist manipulations, the same excusing that ghetto blacks use to excuse each others dysfuntional behaviour, by blaming white, or lack of education or lack of father figure etc etc, CF is still excusing.

Anonymous said...

Father of slain man tells truth about killer, "His thought patterns are different than ours."

6 savage blacks were "bored", killed young white man on his way home from work. Mother of killer "loves my son", he was a good boy dint do nuffin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5vJwhm7uQtg

Anonymous said...

Amos Brown: Black teens are just "bored". The state needs to provide more opportunity so that they don't riot, loot, wild, rape, rob and kill other people. And it is the fault of the "showcase mall", Circle Center of Indianapolis downtown, that is the root of the problem. Simon Property Group needs to pay for more programs.

http://m.indianapolisrecorder.com/mobile/opinion/article_f3fac11e-7154-11e2-9ca5-0019bb2963f4.html

acbrown@aol.com

Bogolyubski said...

Don M (responding to my remark at Feedbag)
Yeah, Feedbag gets the existence of the Squids on some level, but he doesn't see the role of his people in the whole evil system.

Blacks and other Turd-worlders are the hydraulic press that squeezes the White middle class against the anvil of The State. The Squids have their hand on the lever and their blood funnels ready to lap up the pressings.

If BRA goes down, whites will turn into Chechens over night. This would be very bad for Feedbag and his people...


Yes, I've noticed that particular railroad tie in Feedbag's eye (while he chides those here for small specks). There is also a real possibility that the squids will depart once a certain level of blood has been sucked from YT - leaving an infuriated white remnant to deal with groids, et al. while they abscond to the sunny beaches of exotic locales. If sufficient numbers of YT actually open their eyes to the blood funnels, the squids will likely book.

That great awakening seems awfully long in coming. Go over to a place like RimJob's FreeRepublick and you'll see the same BS that was there 6 - or even 10 - years ago. How we need to keep on invading the ummah because of all them scary Musloids (ignoring the fact that the very folks leading the invasion cheerleader-squad are simulatneously bringing the Musloids to places such as Minnesota). When someone points out this hypocrisy - they're immediately shouted down for being a "leftist troll" or even a "rayciss". Voltaire's axiom right there before your eyes. Feedbag, noxious as he may be, actually has a slightly better grasp of reality than folks such as those I just characterized - who automatically dismiss all mention of squids and banksters as "conspiracy theories".

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous observes:
Whites seek out Jewish areas in suburban Boston and New York and Los Angeles for the quality of schools and the low crime. For example certain towns in Weschester county New York have public schools equal to the best private schools, due to heavy Jewish enrollment.

Obviously these areas could benefit from some cultural vibrancy. Perhaps we should raise some money to build some fine Section 8 condos in such neighborhoods, and resettle some nice Somalian "refugees" along with a smattering of Iraqis and Afghanis to stir the pot. Maybe we could even get some "faith-based" federal funds to put up a nice mosque.....

I'll bet if anyone attempted this rather Alinskyite strategy in such a neighborhood, they would be absolutely gobsmacked at all of the arcane laws, regulations, building codes, town ordanances and the like which would miraculously prevent any of it from happening - not to mention the very long and distinguished list of leftist blackrobes who would find non-rayciss rationales to uphold every one of these regs and ordanances along with a remarkable unwillingness among normally avaricious attorneys to persue the matter even a little.

Bogolyubski said...

Ordus dei:
But CF's motivation isn't demasking the ogliarchs, CF's motivation is justifying his peoples dysfunction, by saying that the real problem is the power elite, and not his ppl

He won't admit that the elites use his people's dysfunction as a weapon, against whites and more importantly against themselves.

CF will not agree that the black activism was a ruse, with which to enslave black people more than they ever were.

CF is excusing his people's behaviour on elitist manipulations, the same excusing that ghetto blacks use to excuse each others dysfuntional behaviour, by blaming white, or lack of education or lack of father figure etc etc, CF is still excusing.


That's very perceptive, od. You've done an excellent job of explaining CF. I think you really nailed it.

Don M said...

"Go over to a place like RimJob's FreeRepublick and you'll see the same BS that was there 6 - or even 10 - years ago. How we need to keep on invading the ummah because of all them scary Musloids (ignoring the fact that the very folks leading the invasion cheerleader-squad are simulatneously bringing the Musloids to places such as Minnesota)."

Ah yes, moi Dorogi Bratt, the Raytheon and Northrop-Grumman patriotards... They certainly are thick over on Likud-Thinker and Kosher Review Online.

These are the types that will ignore all of PK's meticulous research and unassailable logic to tell you that Blacks are the way they are because of the "Democratic Plantation". They fall for any Black charlatan who purports to share CONservative values, no matter how ridiculous.

I would like to think that their numbers are dwindling. The convulsions wracking CONservatism Inc. seem to suggest that.

pat said...

I'm reading Jared Diamond's current pop anthropology book "The World Until Yesterday". It's instructive to consider our so-called urban violence problems in the light of the non-urban violence of primitives.

Of course Diamond doesn't use the term 'primitive' he calls them 'traditional people'. What is clear is that all of them have a tradition of violence.

Up until the mass bombing of WWII, the most violent day in world history was probably at the battle of Cannae. About 70,000 Romans died in one day. More recently at the first day of the Somme the Brits lost 30,000. Yet even so, caualties among civilized peoples are trivial compared to those of clans and tribes like the Yamomamo or the !Kung.

These paleolithic remants live lives of continuous warfare. Or is it murder? They have lots of both. Diamond makes no bones about the level of violence among the primitive. Oddly enough he still recommends that we draw lessons from these appaling people. For example he seems to approve of them killing innocent drivers who happen run over a jay walker. More than that, they try to kill anybody associated with the unlucky driver - like a cousin or a neighbor or in the specific case he cited - the man's employer. Naturally this kind of jungle justice leads to endless cycles of revenge and retrobution. Human violence is for most of these tribes the major cause of death.

I thought to myself "Where in the modern world is there any such barbarity?" Of course that's pretty much the way the world works in any black ghetto. Diamond calls it "traditional warfare" when it happens in the New Guines highlands. We call it "gang violence" when it's in our cities.

Diamond never seems to entertain the idea that these people he studies might carry within themselves this propensity for violence. We certainly know that the Maori and the Aborigines are very violent even when supposedly civilized. Diamond, like a black politician, alway attributes bad behavior to something else.

Read his book and you too may conclude that paleolithic behavior is just something you can expect from paleolithic people.

Albertosaurus

Dan said...

Diamond is wrong on many things.

Diamond asserted that whites were just lucky punks who domesticated the right animals, designed guns and were biological warfare specimens.

Instead I'd say that whites had:

Clockwork, Guttenberg and Galleons. Clockwork was the key to macniery and navigation. Guttenberg mean cheap mass literacy. Galleons were like the Imperial Battle Cruiser or Carriers of their day.

Dissident said...

I too agree, that CF constantly makes mental amends for his people.

Also, I harbor absolutely no resentment against CF for coming into hostile territory to try and enlighten us. He's just doing what many of us in his shoes would probably also do. I'd like to think that if I were in his shoes, that I'd have the intestinal fortitiude to call a spade a spade, but who knows.

I certainly have no problem calling out the pathetic white trash that I regularly see. I'll be honest and admit right now that white liberals disgust me more than black militants. I can kind of understand the radical black, but I CAN NOT understand the white liberal, at all!

In reference to the shadowy elite; I feel there is no denying the existence of those at the top of the proverbial pyramid of power. But, like others have said, these creatures have no power unless we it give it to them, absolutely none.

The power brokers use the blacks as pawns and the DWL's as their foot soldiers in the war against the civilized West.

Anonymous said...

OT: Black people, take a "nigga buddy":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UCsNcsZJq6c

Anonymous said...

Look.

Negroes are never more than a few generations from savagery. Most never left it, except when coerced into it by superior species. Nowadays under BRA & the multikultur, one is not allowed to coerce Negroes into going to school, providing for themselves, or otherwise acting civilized, and they are quickly reverting back to form.

When Livingstone, Burton, et al. made their expeditions into interior Africa in the 1800's, they found illiterate, stone-age cannibals. In. the. nineteenth. century.

Think about that. While Europeans and Asians were building cities, and sailing ships, Africans built mud huts, used stone tools, and ate other Africans. In the absence of Homo Sapiens, they still do.

When The Founders of America were writing the Constitution, H. africanus (ie, H. erectus) was writing, well, nothing.

Think about that. Let it sink in. That is the gap between us and them. I say this not as invective or hatred, but as simple scientific, historic fact.

They are a distinct species, a primitive, unevolved population of genus Homo, and are not now, nor ever will be equal to H. sapiens. Whatever advancement H. africanus has made, has come by the intervention of H. sapiens; from the weapons in his hand, to the shoes on his feet. If we did not build their homes, they would sleep upon the ground. If we did not make their clothes, they would be naked. If we did not give them twitter, they would be banging drums.

Think about that. That is the gap; not merely IQ averages or crime statistics. This is race realism 101. Pre-Franz Boas, it was known as anthropology. Homo africanus is the Missing Link between apes and humans. Full stop. They do not belong in our civilization and cannot contribute anything to it. A few talented, admixtured outliers can the mimic higher order functioning provided by H. Sapiens, but the rest are capable of nothing more advanced than animal behavior. And that is what we are witnessing within our cities, wherever H. africanus resides, animal behavior.

The choice for H. sapiens vis a vis H. africanus is whither quarantine or extermination, not equality and integration. We will suffer their depravity and savagery until we face this fact. There will be blood..

World_War_Me said...

Hrmmm...would ENOUGH happened to stand for "Ebony Negros Ourtraged - Urban Groid Hell"

Dan said...

Did anyone respond to Diamond and offer up another theory as to why whites did so well?

I do not think it was because of disease, violence and steel. Steel at least is like saying chemistry or metallurgy. But fugging disease? Others had guns.

Clockwork/robotics/cybernetics/ Then printing, which meant literacy spread rapidly and universally. Shakespeare for example was a grammar schoolboy. Finally the Galleon. The synthesis of sail, wood, steel, gunpowder as a mobile fighting platform, trading vessel and navigational pilot.

World_War_Me said...

LOL @ the "villainous organ music". NICE

World_War_Me said...

Speaking of Al Capone, his men, and what one commenter said earlier about the "Chicago doesn't have the white criminal underground it did generations ago.", maybe a strategy in our favor would be to bring back the white gangster. I know I have far more respect for them than DWL men.

Dan said...

Bring back the white gangster!

Fugging yeah!

Anonymous said...

Some interesting points here. I have always wondered why the brown people here (most of whom are from other countries) are able to integrate with society very well even though they speak another language, have different religions and have distinctly different cultures.

You don't hear about black equality and oppression from the UK. Why is it that American blacks refuse to integrate?

American blacks are so in-your-face about being black. I live in Chicago and there's just about every race here. None of the other races force you to accept their ways which in turn, allows me to enjoy their's at my own pace and without resentment.

Partly why I enjoy other cultures is because their's aren't about being a badass.

Music: I was raised on rock n roll which had a melody you could sing to and lyrics about love, existentialism and partying. Blacks, with their flashy double-speak, call rappers "artists" who rap about money, thuggin, demeaning sex with bitches, guns, violence and drugs.

Bogolyubski said...
Destructive Feedbag:
OF COURSE - we both know, sir, that while your focus on "The Negro" is quite entertaining - the vessel called "America" has forces far greater than what the American Negro could manage to direct your way that threatens to smash the ship upon the rocks.

Believe it or not - he's actually "getting it" better than some of the white folks here who are still in the denial stage. The great slave galley with its vampire-squid overlords and its wicked nomenklatura overseers needs to be smashed upon the rocks, CF. The faster and more thoroughly, the better.

CF does what a typical black person does: justifying bad behavior because there is somebody doing something worse. That is grammar school reasoning.

Bogolyubski talks about a slave galley.
Seriously, slavery was a long time ago. I should be carrying on about the bubonic plague that affected my ancestors 700 years ago. Or the slavery of my people (I'm of Celtic decent) by the Romans. I've had it up to here hearing about how slavery affects blacks 140+ years later.

I find American blacks to be a paradox and cartoony. I have pity for them. Their self-damning culture promotes having it all and having it now without care for the future or having a broad scope. Their quest for bling and status is what, I believe, taps into their primal violence. I too believe they are still in the hunter/gatherer mode.

There are a minority of American black people who are socially integrated but the majority are ignorant and content to stay that way. I've had friends from both sides. I have hope for them but they've got to get their heads out of their asses and take some responsibility.

Anonymous said...

One of the premises of programs like sec 8 is that when removed from the hood the beneficiaries would assimiliate to the social norms of thier new white hood. Such is not the case, they don't work so they arebored and invite thier hood friends over all day, cause they got all day while thier white neighbors are busy wirking and nurturi g thier kids. They let thier kids roam cause it's a safe area. So they don't assimiliate.
I still believe that boarding schools are the answer. Boarding schools like in Europe, not some politically correct US crap. If gradma just raises the kids them she is raising the next gen of the drug addicts and cri
Inals she raised on her first attempt. It dosen't work. It's like the Harvard experiment-hoid kids get free ride to Harvard and most still end up failing. It's culture.
I grew up poor in crappy hoods. My boat people neighbors were the only kids I was allowed to play w thier kids went to MIT, I went to IIT, other kids in our crap apt building went to prison, they were mostly black. I got a black eye in kindergarten first day cause I was the only white kid.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous writes:
One of the premises of programs like sec 8 is that when removed from the hood the beneficiaries would assimiliate to the social norms of thier new white hood. Such is not the case, they don't work so they arebored and invite thier hood friends over all day, cause they got all day while thier white neighbors are busy wirking and nurturi g thier kids. They let thier kids roam cause it's a safe area. So they don't assimiliate.

You're confusing premises with the front story here - making the common mistake of assuming leftists are acting in good faith and just mistaken about the outcome of their programs. This fairy take is what is sold to idiots via the Ministry of Truth, etc. It's charity! For the children! (with other peoples' money!) Such good intentions might be true of the dumbass church ladies who help install "refugees" from some third-world shithole in a clean little town in the mid-west (the dolts who actually believe the bullshit which emanates from the cathedral and its minions). By contrast, the Bloombergs, Banksteins, Emmanuels and all the other Section 8 moovahs-n-shakaaz would pull out an amazing bag-o-tricks to make damned certain one of these hoodrat rookeries is never set up anywhere near their own very exclusive communities.

Section 8 serves a dual purpose, like many other aspects of the looting racket known as BRA. It destroys the neighborhood and housing values of the cathedral's targets (non-elite whites) and serves as a source of guaranteed revenue to either themselves directly or via their many proxies in the real-estate bizniss. Tax dollars go to pay the owners of the property (in some cases) or the property-management firms who administer government-owned units directly. The groids don't usually have to pay monthly rent in cash or checks. Needless to say, only the connected get to stick their snouts in the trough of cash. It's another reason groups like the $PLC, ACLU, La Raza, ADL, etc. have vast sums of money to buy off politicians while a site like VDARE struggles to stay online.

World_War_Me said...

Tragedy is relative.

World_War_Me said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
World_War_Me said...

Dan, thank you for your support!

Anonymous said...

We should provide them with "opportunities" like picking up trash, covering over grafitti, pulling weeds from sidewalk cracks, mowing the empty lots, filling dumpsters with debris from destroyed buildings, or using the rubble to build fences, and hoeing the empty lots to plant gardens.

Oh, that's "acting white."

Maybe we can just have them make big rocks into very small rocks.

Anonymous said...

Wow! Ebony celebrates Fred Hampton, a terrorist ?

Playing Roots Backwards said...

Change absolutely nothing except the ridiculous government policies that encourage trash of all colors to breed like there aren't any consequences.

Remove the programs that inadvertently (or maybe not) teach a young poor girl that the way to get her own place is to start churning out little unwanted babies and the thug population will stabilize through attrition.

By the way, THIS is the original PLAYING ROOTS BACKWARDS.

farkward B said...

The Democratic Party runs/controls all the major ghettos in America.