Thursday, March 7, 2013

Into the Mind of the White Liberal: Birmingham, Alabama Edition


Notice the population of not just whites, but black people since the election of Birmingham's first black mayor in 1979; Birmingham went from being 61% white in 1960 (58% white in 1970) to being 22% white in 2010

The saga of African American liberation is perhaps the most thrilling in our country’s history, biblical in its subtexts and angles of moral instruction. But even though this book traces the Movement through its prime in Birmingham (an offers a somewhat unorthodox, pre-glory view of Martin Luther King), it is not merely about the civil rights struggle. I hope it also sheds insight on the segregationists and the respectable underpinnings of their violent resistance. Because of the city’s industrially stratified demographics, the influence of class was more pronounced there than in other places in the South. The conflict made Birmingham America’s racial Armageddon in 1963 was the “class warfare” that had always threatened the confidence of a young nation founded on the preposterous principle of equality. (Carry Me Home, p. 17, Diane McWhorter, New York City, September 2000)


These words, written by a white woman, are written in the preface to Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama -- The Climatic Battle of the Civil Rights Revolution.

We always hear and read about the events leading up to “Birmingham  America’s racial Armageddon in 1963” (especially seeing the pictures/video of dogs and water hogs), but curiously we never read about what happened after 1963. Even McWhorter dances away from this subject in her book, spending exactly two pages (out of 752!) discussing life in post-1963 Birmingham.

For her, all that mattered was that black people were liberated.

Leaving Birmingham, by the late Paul Hemphill, is an instructive window into the heart/brain/thinking of a huge southern white liberal writer. Spending the entire book attacking white people who dare consider whites as having interest (interests besides bending over backwards to uplift black people, the only type of ‘white interests’ Hemphill believed exists), he writes this glowing praise of his daughters correct views:
My three daughters couldn’t be more different from each other. Lisa, at 30, is married to a co-worker in the Family Ministry of the Crusade for Christ, sort of a feel-good yuppies-for-Jesus organization; once her husband finished seminary in Dallas, they’ll settle in Little Rock and start a family where it’s safe. Molly is turning 21 and about to graduate from Rhodes College in Memphis, in sociology and anthropology, and she won’t be long for Birmingham; she’s a liberated woman, tall and beautiful – made a beeline to Dachau when she arrived in Germany to study… And then there is Martha, the most fortunate of them all dude to her parent’s marriage; 14, slim and quick, being educated at one of the best schools in Atlanta (private, but 25 percent minority), absolutely color-blind when it comes to race. (p. 329) 
When a quest for a correct balance of minority exposure trumps all, you know there's something vastly different with Hemphill, his brood, and those like him. 

Paul Hemphill, a poster-child for the good white liberal, had an estranged relationship with his father. Much of Leaving Birmingham is about the formers view of civil rights and the impending destruction of Birmingham if blacks took over, and Paul’s view that freedom, justice, and democracy meant whites capitulating with glee to this change.
A white liberal writes about his proudest moment in Birmingham: knowing a black family had purchased his late father (who was a 'racist') last home...

The last home his parents lived in Birmingham was purchased by a black family, the Baylor’s, which Paul took a special delight in thinking how this act would have infuriated his late father.

We learn this story at the end of the book, after Hemphill has spent the entirely of the narrative blasting white people for abandoning the city to head “over the mountain” and live in suburbs like Vestavia Hills, Mountain Brook, and Hoover – all prosperous and thriving because of a lack of black people.

Hemphill pays the Baylor’s a visit, and we get a glimpse into the “Soul of White Liberal Folks”:
My father would have been interested to know that the Baylor’s had fled their rapidly decaying neighborhood across town in West End because, although they certainly didn’t put it that way, the “niggers” were taking over. They had integrated that neighborhood, too, in fact, in the mid-seventies, but it had steadily declined and now had become a place of drugs and crime and poor schools.” “We had our share of West End” is how Lawrence Baylor put it. (p. 348)

Odd that the arrival of one black family would precipitate such a huge “climate change” in an area that was once nice – and white; but once it went black, the property value, quality of life, and quality of schools all collapsed.

Correlation? Not to Hemphill.

But here’s the crescendo of white liberal in the book, the last few words Hemphill writes relating the joy – the rush of endorphins perhaps? –  of leaving the Baylor’s home and realizing the transformation of Birmingham into a black-run metropolis was all worth it:
If there was a single moment of my entire stay in Birmingham when I felt that the struggle had been worth it, this was it… but now, as my parents’ last house faded away in the rearview mirror, I felt an elation – a feeling that all of the blood and the tears shed over all of the years had been worth it, that finally justice had prevailed. It appeared to me that the new owners of the house at 403 North Eighty-ninth Street had found peace there, had taken their rightful place in the world, and that they weren’t likely to be leaving Birmingham any time soon. (p. 351)
Elation?

What kind of person is overjoyed by such a turn of events, happy in the fact their “racist” late father’s last home he ever lived in had been sold to black people?

How about the same kind of white people who would voluntarily place their children into perhaps the worst run school system in America, all so they can be exposed to diversity [Long After Civil Rights Movement, Whites Integrate Birmingham City School: Despite System's Stigma, Avondale Elementary Attracts Professional Families, WBHM.org, 9-24-12]:
Birmingham’s public schools are 95 percent black and 90 percent on free or reduced lunch. The system has been under state control since June and has been hemorrhaging students for decades. And at this point, it’s certainly not just white flight: many poor black families do what they can to enroll their kids elsewhere. To put it mildly, Birmingham schools have a stigma. 
So it was unusual when Laura Kate Whitney enrolled her four-year-old, Grey, in pre-K at Birmingham’s Avondale Elementary. 
“Our neighborhood school hosted an open house, and we were completely shocked, in a good way, as to what we saw,” says Whitney. 
She and her husband are white middle-class professionals and part of a group of two dozen similar families who are not buying the conventional tradeoff — that if you live within city limits and have means, you send your kids to private school, period. 
Whitney’s friend Elizabeth Brantley also enrolled her four-year-old at Avondale, which last year was four percent white. But Brantley grew up in nearby Mountain Brook, one of the whitest and wealthiest communities in America. Her impressions of Avondale might come as a surprise: 
“The minute we walked in, we were like, ‘this is just a normal school. This feels like the kind of school that I went to when I was little.’” 
These parents want convenience and higher property values, but they also really believe in diversity. Whitney says she’s not concerned with her child being in a place where he looks different from the other kids. 
“I feel like at this age, they don’t really see color,” she says. “They go straight to playing together, and learning about each other and talking and sharing snacks. I want him to have those types of experiences. I mean, we live in a city that is extremely diverse.” White students bring more fiscal resources, parental involvement, and subconsciously, higher expectations, say researchers. And according to Tondra Loder-Jackson, Associate Director of the Center for Urban Education at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, integrated schools confer many other benefits. 
Summarizing a body of research, she says, “White graduates from those schools believe that they’re more open-minded about race and less likely to stereotype. The black graduates, they’re more confident about competing with whites, and they’re also not as likely to see whites as being categorically racist.” 
But the white parents coming to Avondale aren’t counting on a love-fest. One possible stumbling block is that inner-city schools tend to be more authoritarian, more “old-school,” relying on teacher-centered models of instruction as opposed to more progressive methods favored by many middle-class parents, methods that involve kids initiating more of their learning.
The saga of African American liberation in Birmingham always ends in 1963 -- what happened afterwards?

How about these inner-city schools being hopelessly pathetic, all because they all filled with black students and run by hopelessly corrupt black administrators, whose members of the board of education have no problem fighting one another at meetings?

Yes, that’s right – the black board of education members fight one another at meetings [Alabama School Strife Strikes Outside Of Class, NPR, 4-19-2012]:
Alabama is near the bottom of the country's academic rankings. The state has problems with test scores, school improvement ratings and dropouts. But the district in Birmingham has a different kind of issue. The state recently took over the school board because of infighting on the board. The move has triggered cries of racism. MELISSA BLOCK, HOST: 
You're listening to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. 
Now, to Birmingham, Alabama, where the state has effectively taken over the local school board. It's not because of academic issues, but because the board is widely seen as too inept to function. 
As Dan Carsen of member station WBHM reports, the intervention has triggered cries of racism in a city with a long history of racial tension. 
DAN CARSEN, BYLINE: Do an Internet search on Birmingham school board and dysfunction, and you'll find more reading material than you know what to do with. Board members have assaulted each other, police have gotten involved, and now armed security guards are fixtures at meetings - not just to protect board members from the public, but from each other. There are allegations of secret gatherings. And even in public meetings, the infighting is intense.
This is a glimpse into the type of leadership both Diane McWhorter and Paul Hemphill praise when they wrote glowingly about the racial transformation of Birmingham in their respective books.

More to the point, the white Whitney family profiled above – who happily enrolled their white daughter in the Birmingham City School system – have knowingly endangered their child and should have child services called on them. It is a sick person who would put their child’s education behind their hopes and dreams of racial liberation and acceptance.

Besides the black administration of the Birmingham City Schools being hopelessly corrupt, the remaining students in the BCS system are – struggling. Thirty-one of the 51 schools in the metro Birmingham area that are classified as “struggling” are in the city of Birmingham. And the 95 percent black students of the BCS system produce test scores rivaling those of the almost entirely black Detroit Public School system[Birmingham Education Foundation summit outlines challenges and opportunities for city schools, Birmingham News, 11-9-12]:
In Birmingham, the number of students living at or near the poverty level is nearly twice the national average and well above the state average. What's more, as students have left the school system, the percentage of students living at or below poverty level has climbed. 
In Birmingham, the number of students who will move from one school to another in a given year is 25.3 percent, meaning teachers and principals have trouble establishing relationships with many students. 
In Birmingham, test scores have fallen and student achievement has faltered. The average ACT score among students is 18. UAB requires a score of 21 from its applicants to enroll, Froning said. The school system has a high school graduation rate of 55 percent.

How do those test scores compare to those of white high schools in the white suburbs surrounding Birmingham?[I shouldn’t have
to private school’, Birmingham News, 2007]:
More than 7,300 students have left the Birmingham City Schools since 2000. The system faces school closings and hundreds of layoffs to cope with plunging enrollment. The city touches four of the state’s five top-per- forming school districts: Hoover, Mountain Brook, Vestavia Hills and Homewood. Yet Birmingham lags significantly behind its suburban neighbors. It is one of 19 school districts across the seven-county metro area, 12 of which are in Jefferson County. 
Birmingham’s average ACT assessment score was 17.3 in 2005-06, compared with 23.7 in Vestavia Hills, 22.8 in Hoover, Homewood’s 22.3 and 25.4 in Mountain Brook. A perfect ACT score is 36.
It’s hard to understand what motivates a white person like the Whitney family in Birmingham (who happily enroll their white child in a school system that is 95 percent black, with 90 percent of the students on the free/reduced lunch program – a powerful sign of the poverty found in Birmingham); a McWhorter, who writes of the racial revolution in America without mentioning what black-rule unleashed in Birmingham; and a guy like Paul Hemphill, whose great ‘elation’ was knowing a black family moved into the last house his “racist” father lived in, in Birmingham.

White liberals are incapable of seeing the devastation their policies produced, because all that matters to them is that their policies produced the liberation of a downtrodden minority group – any and all people who stand in the way of “progress” are seen as vestiges of the past that was thankfully overcome.

Meanwhile, 74 percent black Birmingham continues to collapse into its own footprint, with the black population abandoning a city that has been politically controlled by blacks since 1979.

Birmingham has lost roughly 12% of its black population since 2000, with these black people seeking a better life in the neighborhoods/communities/cities that the whites who abandoned Birmingham built in places like Vestavia Hills, Mountain Brook, and Hoover.

But the white liberal will continue to celebrate 1963 as the crowning moment in the history of Birmingham, without ever considering what was unleashed in this victory.

“The saga of African American liberation” rests in the ruins of Birmingham, post-1963. 

58 comments:

Anonymous said...

OT

Negroes do not understand the concept of "law." AG Eric Holder told congress that it was "good use of prosecutorial law" to imprison Eric Scwartz for six months, or else the onerus 35 year prison term they had threatened him with, on shaky grounds, would have looked bad.

In other words, the negro can never look bad.

Rand Paul wants to know if Holder and Obongo think they have the right, as negroes, to kill Americans on American soil without due process. Holder and Obongo have not yet answered.

They do not understand how a law could prevent office holding negroes from killing at will.

Negroes are creatures of the jungle. They evolved to take the low hanging fruit without working for it.

Anonymous said...

There are now many, many white people in the 25 to 35 year old age bracket who have shaky careers at best AND sky high student loan payments. Some of those tree-lined streets in the city look really nice if you just casually drive through. They buy a house dirt cheap and try to make the best of things.

If you teach your child to read before he starts kindergarten, there is little academic harm in leaving him in an underperforming school up through the third grade. If he is smart, he can catch up even as late as fourth or fifth grade.

I seriously doubt that these liberal do-gooders are going to send little "Grey" to an urban middle school, and I think that there is an excellent chance that Grey will be in a parochial school within a few years. Either that, or a group of parents will start a charter school or a homeschooling group.

There are some ultraliberal nutcases who dump their children into a ghetto hellhole school and then pretend that there aren't any problems, but these are relatively rare.

Anonymous said...

Maybe the Whitney family figures their daughter is sure to be the valedictorian...but she'll be a valedictorian graduating high school with a sixth grade education.

At the same time, would a 95% black high school with a mostly black staff want/let a white girl be valedictorian?

Anonymous said...

Not to sidetrack, but look at this article on the Detroit Free Press...

http://www.freep.com/article/20130307/NEWS01/130307046/3-people-found-fatally-shot-in-abandoned-Detroit-home

Can anyone guess from the picture who might end up dead next? What is wrong with white chicks? Seriously.

Anonymous said...

It'd be interesting to see how long the Whitney family keeps little Grey in all-black schools. I bet it doesn't last past 1st or 2nd grade at most. Even liberal whites don't want their little kid getting all gangsta. I hope the parents learn their lesson good and hard and their innocent son is saved from his parents stupidity.

Anonymous said...

White Valedictorian at 96% Black school?
that be raycyst.


'These parents want convenience and higher property values, but they also really believe in diversity. Whitney says she’s not concerned with her child being in a place where he looks different from the other kids. '
HOW LONG WILL THEY LUV DYVERSTY?
And what if the 96% does not luv back?

THEY HAVE A CHEERY, LIBERAL NOTION.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous asks:
What is wrong with white chicks? Seriously.

They have been indoctrinated since the time they were toddlers that black males are strong, honest, virtuous protectors and providers and that white males are weak, effeminate weasels incapable of taking care of themselves. It's there on TV, movies and magazines (all owned by guess who) 24 x 7 x 365. In the government school gulag most attend, there is an active and ongoing war against white boys to make them into precisely the weak, effeminate weasels seen on TV while there is a simultaneous agenda to "empower" black males and females. This program has been under way for at least two decades, but few dare to describe what it actually is: genocide.

Those of us who advocate doing away with the TV and anything produced by the squid owned media and entertainment machine (which is basically all of it) are deadly serious about this. We've been ridiculed and pooh-pooed for years, called "conspiracy theorists" (a favorite Marxist method to shut down conversartion), etc. It gets tiresome making the same points over and over. How many times do folks have to be confronted with something to see that it is really there?

Anonymous said...

This article nauseated me. Hemphill Jr. et al. are nothing short of deranged. Sickening, it's a shame they procreate.

Californian said...

Same old story. DWL ideology trumps reality.

The thing about SBPDL is that it shows the inevitable results of ideology in the driver's seat: the destruction of entire cities.

They had integrated that neighborhood, too, in fact, in the mid-seventies, but it had steadily declined and now had become a place of drugs and crime and poor schools.”

What a statement.

The neighborhood "declines." Drugs and crime and poor schools mysteriously appear, like some plague of locusts or a series of sinkholes. No connection between the people who inhabit a place and the physical-social conditions which they create.


White liberals are incapable of seeing the devastation their policies produced, because all that matters to them is that their policies produced the liberation of a downtrodden minority group – any and all people who stand in the way of “progress” are seen as vestiges of the past that was thankfully overcome.


Sums it up nicely.

But here's another aspect: why do DWLs see blacks as being the group to be liberated? If we went back a century, progressives and even communists saw the working class as being downtrodden. But working class issues have long since gone out the window. Even though today the American working class is being dismantled...and to a large degree as a result of DWL policies on race. You wreck traditional white working class neighborhoods, you displace unions with third world helots, and etc., you end up with a shrinking middle.

Perhaps it's political for DWLs. By the mid-20th century the working class showed itself to be a little too patriotic, a little too supportive of rightwing politicians -- DWLs still gnash their collective teeth over American workers supporting Nixon and Reagan. So DWLs had to find some new front group to do their dirty work. Blacks filled the bill.

But there is something deeper at work here.

It's a bizarre relationship between DWLs and blacks. There's something psycho-sexual about it. As if DWLs see blacks as some sort of "alpha" personalities to whom they must supplicate and excuse all wrongdoing. Like abused spouses who defend violent partners, who even sacrifice their children to the relationship. As in sending their kids to inner schools.

Come to think of it, look at the parents of Amy Biehl.

Mr. Ken said...

Horses. Effective march 11, 2013, the federal government has announced that horses are equal under the law. Horses will be allowed to roam the streets, and shit wherever they please. You will not clean up their horseshit, it is their cultural tradition. in the event they are blocking vehicle traffic, you will wait. It is culturally insensitive to rush them. Stiff fines or jail will be imposed on citizens not complying with the horse equal opportunity law. A new 10% tax will be imposed on all income to feed the horses. This is an involuntary tax, If you do not like horses, that's too bad. you will pay anyway. If a horse wants to eat your grass and shit all over your well kept yard, he will. because we said so. You owe the horses for years of abuse and neglect from all white people, whether you rode a horse or not. Welcome to Obamerica.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. I remember Paul Hemphill when he had a monthly column in Sport magazine in the early 1970's. Like a good many white liberals, he started out as a sportswriter.

Around 1972, a prominent sports columnist for (I believe) the AJC was shot in the parking lot after an Atlanta Falcon game. He recovered.

Hemphill wrote a hand-wringing column for Sport that pulled out all the DWL stops.

"You have to raise people up," was the tone.

Anonymous said...

So that is what the race to the bottom is all about so DWL's can think highly of themselves.

Anonymous said...

"(Children) don't see color" - yeah, right! When I was little, I learned very quickly what black kids were like: arrogant, loud, bossy and prone to violent outbursts for seemingly no reason. Never had a black friend my whole life, don't feel like I've missed anything.

10mm AUTO said...

Sadly, this is a liberal obsession, like the actors that adopt niglets from Africa or give to "Anti-racist" drives. These are the kind of people who say they hate "religion", yet their allegiance to Cultural Marxism is more profound than those who follow a Cult leader.

This is child abuse of the highest order, the exact thing sane Whites engage in White Flight for. Whites sell their houses, change their jobs, neighborhoods or State to avoid because they see the razor wire, the metal detectors, the gang recruitment, the drug problems, the shootings and the beaten/abused/broken/burned Whites that stay or the mental damaged kids that turn Wigger just to survive. How can any White family do this to their children; turn them into a sociological experiment when the system they are entering their children into IS ALREADY BROKEN? This is not something sane people would do to puppies, let alone their own offspring. When little Grey starts having "problems" her family will get out the professional therapists to get her mind "right" and blame daddy or "White Privilege".

By the way, more than a little projection in that her name "Grey", huh? White mixed with black and a color usually associated with depression. Can't wait to see the grandchildren!

Mason_Arrow said...

Meanwhile, in the other Birmingham:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289518/This-man-worrying-bus-Prophetic-tweet-16-year-old-girl-month-stabbed-death-journey-school.html

Via Drudge. For all his faults Matt Drudge has done a great job subtly pointing out those pesky racial realities that must never be spoken of.

I could go into details about my own experiences with these "people" on public transit. But really - what is left to say?

FYT said...

Liberalism (in males) is always rooted in father-hatred.

And you can be sure Ms. Whitney will have pulled her daughter out of the public school system long before she finishes elementary school. The bullying will be constant by third grade and the outright assaults will be regular by fourth grade.

Anonymous said...

@ Mr. Ken -

Horses? These lefty psychos are already trying to grant "human rights" to primates! I'd rather step in a little horseshit than fight off chimpanzees any day.

Can you imagine ... walking down the street one day and a full-grown male buck chimpanzee scampers over to you from out of an alleyway and begins having a raging chimpout? You can't understand its ooking and screeing, so you run. But it chases you. You pull out your Glock - BANG! You think the nightmare is over, but then ...

Police at your door at 4 a.m. The poor "Primate-American" merely wanted your hot dog, and you MURDERED him! A scandal worse than Trayvon, itz. Since you refused to even learn the language of this newly-arrived minority, you couldn't understand that all he wanted was some food. And now he's dead. So what if he was going to tear your arms off to get at your food? That's just his CULTURE, and no culture has any more or less value than any other. Etc, etc.

Think it can't happen? Bet you didn't think we'd have a black president, either ...

Melanie said...

@ Anonymous March 7, 2013 at 11:30 AM-

I saw the picture above the article before reading it, and didn't even bother. I was mildly distressed at myself for feeling a sense of "they had it coming", but the feeling only lasted a couple of seconds before my rational mind took hold again. Even the most oblivious whites can't be unaware, after the past couple of years, that the undeclared war on whites has been escalated.

As to PK's article-specifically the woman who is pleased with her sanctimonious self-righteousness for using her innocent helpless child as a tool for her self-esteem-I wouldn't wonder if she, like Amy Biehl's parents, will hug that smug superiority even tighter to herself by dedicating a scholarship in her child's name for the benefit of the murdererous tribe.

Apparently the story, still fresh in the news, of Bailey O'Neill, went right through the space between her ears where her brain should be.

Melanie said...

If children "don't see color", then I wonder what the point of all those studies where white and black children were asked to choose a doll, and a majority of children of both races chose the white doll, was? If children "don't see color", then why does the institution of public education (indoctrination) try to get 'em at younger and younger ages so they can begin indoctrinating the natural instinct out of them?

Californian said...

Those of us who advocate doing away with the TV and anything produced by the squid owned media and entertainment machine (which is basically all of it) are deadly serious about this. We've been ridiculed and pooh-pooed for years, called "conspiracy theorists" (a favorite Marxist method to shut down conversartion), etc. It gets tiresome making the same points over and over. How many times do folks have to be confronted with something to see that it is really there?

Television has got to go.

You have the obvious DWL agitprop being promoted by the tube. Look at how popular television programs such as the original "Twilight Zone" were intentionally written to promote liberal messages. And even series which start off as potentially anti-liberal (such as "New Battlestar Galactica") slid into the warm-and-fuzzy zone. Or the blatantly anti-white coverage during the struggle over apartheid. Or the deliberate censorship of black-on-white crime.

Since I got rid of my television, I am not quite in a position to comment on the content of current programming, but from what I understand Bogolyubski sums up the medium's message quite nicely.

But beyond the message is the passivity which television engenders. People sitting in front of a box for hours when they could be doing something politically constructive, or at least educating themselves. And television locks people into the consumerist cycle which further indentures them to the system of debt and pointless hedonism. And more than that, it locks people into a general passivity in which they assume because they "watched" something happen they too are actors in the real world. There is something pathological about programs calling themselves "reality TV" as if the world no longer is the material but instead the flickering images. It's Plato's shadow shows for cave dwellers, it's Videodrome, it's The Matrix.

http://www.turnoffyourtv.com/

Which is why I believe we need a cultural insurrection whose first act is to get everyone to kill their televisions.

FYT said...

Californian: "It's a bizarre relationship between DWLs and blacks. There's something psycho-sexual about it."

I think it's more of a religious impulse. DWL's seek absolution for the Sin of Whiteness through supplication of forgivness from Blacks.

Those that control the culture have taught them since birth that whites are born with this eternal guilt and that blacks are a Sainted People closer to God.

For the DWL, anything they can do to show the absence of any negativity towards blacks or any positivity toward their own race helps to separate them from morally inferior whites and speeds them on their path to Heaven - the place where they no longer have to live in shame of who they are.

Californian said...

By the way, more than a little projection in that her name "Grey", huh? White mixed with black and a color usually associated with depression. Can't wait to see the grandchildren!

Yeah, I got that too.

I suppose it's also a "gender neutral" name. Can't oppress the kid with a name that might imply gender is not a just a construct. Plus "Grey" is morally neutral. No more black or white issues, no more value judgements, just everything a warm-and-fuzzy shade of grey. Slide into a common humanity where everyone sings kumbayah, drinking Coke in perfect harmony.

Believe brothus and sistus, believe!

PDK said...

Liberals, the scourge and cancer of whites, are the immature. Immaturity denies reality and substitutes a preferred illusion in said reality’s stead. The liberal’s preferred illusion is protected, defended and supported by all liberals. Every argument by liberals will cherry pick the facts that logically or naturally deduce the liberal targeted conclusion of illusion. Further, if there are no facts to cherry pick, liberals simply manufacture the necessary “facts” from whole cloth. There is also the tendency to efface facts that naturally deduce the truth of reality.

The immature traits such as cowardice, selfishness, sloth and envy most notable course deep through the veins of the body liberal, as they manifest themselves in liberal ideology whilst said liberal ideology rebuts reality. The coward who feigns courage by standing up to a friendly, one of their own, while feigning noblism by championing the cause of others they are cowardly afraid of is made manifest by liberals such as “Chappaquiddick” Ted Kennedy, Jimmy “the coward” Carter or Janet “do nothing” Napolitano.

These three amigos, liberal cowards all, have done exceptional damage to whites, the white gene pool and our Founding Fathers free enterprise Republic, but they look like the “Pearle of Humanity” whilst wallowing in the luxuries of power, fame and fortune.

No sooner does the tyrant Hugo Chavez pass and Sean Penn, liberal, socialist, anti-American and hypocrite comes out to praise the dictator as having been a great man and friend of all humanity.

However, Sean talks the liberal talk, but he will not walk the walk of the liberal talk. He would not renounce his American citizenship; he would not become a citizen of Venezuela; he would not give his millions to the poor; he will not even live amongst the non-white people, Haitians, Venezuelans, he apparently thinks so much of.

Does the white gene pool have an immaturity gene flawing the maturation process? Or are liberals just cowardly afraid of, or too lazy to, embrace their personal responsibility to mature?

Because blacks, browns, Islamics, Amerindians and others, all display the immaturity phenomenon I’ll guess it to be a failure in nurture not nature.

Liberals are the ones targeting the illusion of Utopia, where everyone has the same amount of everything, except of course themselves who will be the good Shepherd leading and tending their flock, living the highlife of power, fame and fortune.

Sounds like communist Russia of the red scare days to me. In fact I believe their Utopia is actually a Dystopia where the entire flock flounders at the bottom of the turbid waters of tyranny, poverty and misery.

In Biblical lore, the wise Solomon, attempting to resolve a dispute between two women and one child, suggest cutting the child in half that both women may have their fair share of the one child. One says yes the other no.

The real mother would say no and instead give her child up rather than see her child destroyed, but the “have not” mother would yes as she just wanted her envy satisfied.

In today’s world the real mother represents non-liberals, the have not mother represents the liberals.

Liberals, progressives, socialists and Yankees are all peas in the same pod. Their desire to laud over a flock of hoi polloi, all exactly the same quality people and this also intends a merging of all the gene pools into one, is the glue that bonds them into their brotherhood of dementia.

Unfortunately, they are winning. They control the thought process, they control the public school system of indoctrination, they control the LMSM, and they have created our fully enfranchised democracy that gives all those “have not” mothers the right to divide our baby in two.

Our window of opportunity, to forge a new, non-liberal white, nationalist, free enterprise Republic is narrow and closing. Time is an enemy.

We need the courage of moral resolve achieved and perhaps some Devine Providence, to help stimulate and guide us to what just could be the last Promised Land on planet Earth. Thank you.

whoresoftheinternet said...

White liberals are incapable of seeing the devastation their policies produced, because all that matters to them is that their policies produced the liberation of a downtrodden minority group – any and all people who stand in the way of “progress” are seen as vestiges of the past that was thankfully overcome.

---So damn true.

This is why I believe that leftism is a cult. Not a religion, a cult.

One behavior of cult-members is the inability to see any negative consequences of the cult's actions. This mental blindness thus forces them to rationalize any negative consequence as the work of some "other" out to destroy them.

Religions , by and large, do not have this problems. Fanatics, of course, do, but the average religious person (i.e. regular church or synagogue goer) recognizes the flaws of their religious leaders and their actions. Cult members cannot.

The average lefty cannot ascribe anything bad to lefty policies. No economic ruin, no hardship, etc. It is why they consistently fail at Turing tests for conservatives---because they attribute any action by conservatives towards liberals as motivated by evil. In short, they cannot get out of their own shoes and into another's.

White liberals v. race are acting exactly like cult members. Any white person who opposes their "liberation" is seen as purely evil and/or stupid---too blind to see the "glory" of the cult's goals.
Crime and IQ statistics are merely "hate facts" that are smokescreen "lies" by "enemies of the cult."

I'm currently writing a series on my hypothesis of Leftism as a Cult on my blog.

Anonymous said...

This would be me and all of the other white parents in DC.

White Mom

Jay Santos said...

Californian said….

"It's a bizarre relationship between DWLs and blacks. There's something psycho-sexual about it."


I'm reluctant to share something I came across yesterday on http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com

But it does relate to Californian's observation and certainly does illustrate how incredibly dangerous negroes can be. It's a real disturbing story. While I wouldn't suggest evil is limited to blacks, when negroes manifest evil, it is an incredible level of horror and depravity.

The story of Prince Maryland

Jim said...

Anonymous' comment about being confronted by the "Primate-American" put me into a laughing fit. Thanks for the humor.

Let me add some humor. A writer referred to "Chappaquiddick” Ted Kennedy. I have it on good authority that right before the accident, Mary Jo asked Kennedy "But Ted, what if I'm pregnant?" His response was "We'll cross that bridge when we come to it."

Bita-bang!

Anonymous said...

I agree wholeheartedly with you. I think the other side of the equation in the legions of white women shown on porn also contributes the socially engineered genocide via media

White Mom

So CAL Snowman said...

"Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the Comedian is the only thing that makes sense.

-Alan Moore "Watchmen"



Anonymous said...

The concept of Left and a Right...a Liberal and a Conservative are all but pretty much over. The commies won. Many commies infiltrated the 'conservative' hemisphere many moons ago and it's only in the last decade or so that these a-holes are called out as the RINOs they are.

Commie or 'commie light™" is like being a little bit pregnant and we are all going down the rabbit hole faster than a drone can target your ass while you're texting that you just witness a crime by the police against an innocent citizen.

Welcome to the Matrix with many shades of Orwell...

Anonymous said...

Santos:

I touched on this psychosexual stuff on the blog back when there were discussions re: football, bakaball (Gwinnett Gladiator term). There is a homoerotic thing with this DwL male obsession with black athletes. Likewise the tango between DWLs and blacks is laden with psychosexual stuff. You see, it is all about objectification... Passive aggressive violation. The libs in their minds are 'freeing'' the groids, who will the be beholden to them spiritually and psychosexually. I know I am getti g zfreudian here... Also, I think PDK mentioned about black men wanting to dominate white women.. By fucki g white women, they get back at the white man. Someone mentioned on this board cuckoldporn where black guys violate white women in front of their husbands. It is Freudian psychosexuali through and through.


When this blog highlighted Haiti, there was historical reports mentioning white French women being forced to wed black slaves. Over and over in wars throughout history, the domination through poon takes place.

This psychosexualism is also alive in the attempted castration of the white race by having us work to the bone without the possibility of heirs- a strategy someone mentioned here used by Arab slave owners who would eunichsize their slaves. Many people actually have to work for a living must put off having kids. The black panthers of today along with that dumbass Rev Wright talk of killing white babies.

That is why I say all the time in this damn board just to get busy so to speak and have kids. That is how we win. That is what the Mormons did- it was a conscious strategy on their part.

White Mom in Turdsburg aka WDC

danaigh said...

In a follow up to ' whoresoftheinternet'
Orwell had it figured out by the 1930's.

From the Newspeak Dictionary:

crimestop - Orwell's definition: "The faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc (BRA), and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. In short....protective stupidity."

PDK said...

3:06:

That is what I believe and therefore rarely use the term conservative any more. I now usually say non-liberal. Liberals have won, they have all murdered off America.

Jim, nice, but sad anecdote. If anyone so chooses, read what the officer in charge said about how Mary Jo died. Grueling tibbit to Chappy's legacy, which by the way his widow wants white taxpayer dollars, tens of millions I'm sure, to erect testaments to his Godliness.

Can you believe it, along with LBJ, the staggeringly stupid; Chappy did the most to destroy white America and therefore America herself. Thanks.

PDK said...

Hemphill; is that like pot on the mountain? Maybe the guy's been smoking African black instead of Panama red?

Marijuana and liberals are like fric and frac. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

From the article, and a few of the comments, one might get the impression that "liberals" routinely send their own children to schools with large numbers of blacks. But nothing could be further from the truth. I have worked in education more or less all my working life and I can state categorically that "liberals" are more keen that their own children attend the whitest schools than are parents of a conservative bent. For instance, Ex PM Tony Blair sent his own sons to a school on the other side of London in order to avoid blacks. Liberals know that if their children are not to be racially prejudiced then they must be brought up as far away from blacks as possible.

Anonymous said...

Um.

Ex-felon McKinley running GOP for Jesse Jackson Jr.'s seat.

GOP? Really????

"When the Jackson's was in charge, we din have no jobs."

Listen how he blames the "machine" for the plight of Chicago blacks, and tells them they are "second class citizens" in Chicago. This man is a moron.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qj6mZ7bKdGk#!

This is embarrassing for Breitbart.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/03/06/GOPs-McKinley-Gaining-Support-in-Chicago-Democratic-Strongholds

Anonymous said...

Paul Kersey - you have to see this video.

He wants the trauma center back for his black community:

Paul McKinley, GOP candidate in Chicago for Jesse Jackson's senate seat.

Listen to his grammar. Unreal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=IPivw3wYg9M

Anonymous said...

So true. When I worked as a school counselor in Philadelphia I had an older white male acquaintance who had three kids who he sent through city schools. His thought process here was that his kids needed to be exposed to I. His words 'what we whites are up against'.

My son goes to pre k now in WDC and he is in the minority in his class. Now it is fine but in a year or two it won't be. I think it is a good experience for my son in that he will not be afraid of Afroturds. These things feast on fear.

White Mom

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 1230 there hasn't been a black president yet. There is a halfbreed mutt son of a communist gangbang whore but that doesn't count. DWL's would never let a coal black speaking ebonics anywhere near the levers of power.

Anonymous said...

Paul McKinley Chicago GOP Debate Opening Statement

Hold your vomit bag close.

Anonymous said...

Walmart is still sold out of ammo.

Anonymous said...

White mom,

The hypocrisy of the liberals drives me nuts as well. How can you celebrate blacks or any 3rd world culture when their culture is the antithesis of liberal ideology? They don't give a shit about your utopian dreams of world peace. They come from cultures where the strong man rules, the sexist, the misogynist. Look up the study on female preference for males in underdeveloped countries compared to that of developed nations. The women in underdeveloped countries prefer the man who has the balls to stand his ground. When the the third worlders come here or individuals of impoverished communities that are here, the only thing they have come to respect is strength and hard power. However, the liberal's path to power and control is supplication and passivity much like Nietzsche described. Let me tell you the pacifists in history don't always come out on top. Read one of the first chapters of Guns, Germs, and Steel. The egalitarian moriori are slaughtered by the warlike and aggressive maori. So it all comes down to power and the means in which you use to acquire it. I believe hard power and soft power are necessary, but to use one exclusively is futile.

Don M said...

Grey will be another white child sacrificed to the dark gods on the altar of diversity.

My heart aches for her.

YIH said...

Looks like Destructive Feedblack is now using his own blog to troll SBPDL now.

panjoomby said...

power & rule with an iron hand is all that works in african "nations" -- that guns germs & steel book about made me puke, tho - somewhere in the first 20 or 30 pages - he relies on mere anecdotal info to explain how new guineans are as smart or smarter than whites, & dismisses a century of consistent data & good research b/c it doesn't go along with his liberal egalitarian beliefs. & the new egalitarian means all groups equally good except whites are bad! it turns the world on its head!

Californian said...

I touched on this psychosexual stuff on the blog back when there were discussions re: football, bakaball (Gwinnett Gladiator term). There is a homoerotic thing with this DwL male obsession with black athletes. Likewise the tango between DWLs and blacks is laden with psychosexual stuff.

A common DWl critique of white "racists" is that there is an obsession with black sexuality: that whites feared an integrated society because black women would be more sexually available than white women, and that black men would steal away white women.

But it just may be that DWLs are projecting their own subconscious impulses onto other whites. Modern liberalism goes way beyond the verbally stated politics and appears to reflect a lot of weirdness percolating under the DWL exterior.

Thoughts?

Californian said...

The DWL psycho-sexual thing needs to be explored further. Look how one group dominates another over the history of the world. It's usually not by numbers or superior weapons. Rather, there are underlying relationships, perhaps related to the human "pecking order."

I have observed a strong overlap between DWL males and male feminists. Many (but not all!) are of the squishy sort of feminized male, to put it crudely, the "p-whipped" variety. They buy into feminism because it justifies their own lack of assertiveness. They'd rather go along to get along than stand up for themselves.

I've seen this point demonstrated too many times in political discussions. The same males who buy into the radical feminist agenda -- even to the point of accepting their own dispossession from their children and homes -- are also the ones who have told me that they would not shoot in self defense to protect themselves from a crime. They'd rather see themselves robbed or brutalized than pull the trigger. Why? Because shooting might mean risking their own lives if the perpetrator was also armed.

It's not that they are pacifists. Often, they have no problem with the military killing people remotely by drones, or having rough men guard them while they sleep. It's simply that they themselves lack that will-to-power.

I'm tempted to get into the Hegel master-slave dialectic ala:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_dialectic

I think this is one reason that DWLs have to create a media fantasy land in which blacks are the heroes and whites the villains, a world in which there are no black flash mobs but "racist skinheads" are under every bed. DWLs can not face up to the primal confrontation so they subordinate themselves to blacks and disparage those white men and women who do have the will-to-power.

This is also why DWLs must shower such hatred and fear on "racists." It's the natural antipathy of the slave for the free man.

Really, "racism" means believing that the freedom of one's own people, family and self are the most critical thing. It's summed up on the American Revolutionary slogan of "Liberty or Death!"

josh said...

"Black people", as you call them,abandoning Birmingham: It really disgusts me to see that these "blacks" utterly destroy a town and then "toyne" around and say,its not a good place to live,I'm a go to a WHITE town--and the disease continues.

pro-me said...

Californian,

I like where you're going with this point. I just want to add that the DWL types never could assert themselves amongst alpha white males. This creates the resentment that we see today and the support for alpha males amongst minorities that can challenge white male power. The enemy of my enemy is my friend so to speak.

Anonymous said...

Summarizing a body of research, she says, “White graduates from those schools believe that they’re more open-minded about race and less likely to stereotype



Well Thank God

Anonymous said...

These parents want convenience and higher property values, but they also really believe in diversity. Whitney says she’s not concerned with her child being in a place where he looks different from the other kids.


WOW.

Some should study her and her kind. I want someone to check in on her every 3 years and report back.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. I remember Paul Hemphill when he had a monthly column in Sport magazine in the early 1970's. Like a good many white liberals, he started out as a sportswriter.



Closet gay. Likes black cock

Anonymous said...

When little Grey starts having "problems" her family will get out the professional therapists to get her mind "right" and blame daddy or "White Privilege".



Mommy will leave daddy long before this. BBD..... And dope

Californian said...

pro-me said... I just want to add that the DWL types never could assert themselves amongst alpha white males. This creates the resentment that we see today and the support for alpha males amongst minorities that can challenge white male power.

Good point.

DWLs may just be using black males as muscle against white "alpha" personalities. This was a point made in "Gang Leader for a Day," that the Chicago Democratic machine was using gangbangers as muscle (one reason the pols will never crush the gangs, by the way, as they need them to counterbalance all those armed white people!).

But DWLs are also making an assumption that they can control those same black males. DWLs are in the position of Roman patricians of the 5th century AD who have invited in Huns or whatever across the Rhine to counter their imperial rivals. But now that they have a tiger by the tail, what do they do? Crank up the agitprop machine with more Ministry of Truth images of compliant blacks as detectives, doctors, scientists and wise politicians.

Again, all very fascinating stuff.

Anonymous said...

Tell you a little story about some "teach for America" types I have met. One I warned about going to Philadelphia to attend Penn. Medical School. Told him to be very very careful in Killadelphia! He scoffed at me a bit and wound up getting jumped and almost killed by .....you know who.... He only watched sports on TV therefore had a large dose of "mainstreaming" So he has been brainwashed his entire life and the first realist he runs into is me. Turn off the TV folks the ads the characters the magical people are even on TCM. Read books and network and prepare for.... the day.

Moondoggie said...

It is comical when a liberal gets a nice dose of diversity. Well, they are just outraged that this really happened to them and feel a sense of betrayal in all that brainwashing. "how can this be possible" / "I had no idea" / "those people are animals" etc., etc. Some of them turn the corner and get re-programed almost instantly. I get kick out this, because I can say "now do you understand"

The ones that refuse to re-program themselves typically pay for it with their lives or a trip to the ER.

These nigger lovers will deserve everything they get. You reap what you sow. Just remember that you liberals, you haved been forwarned over and over an yet..... we are the stupid ones? WE are amazed at your ignorance !

I am just warming up my arm. DTAL

Anonymous said...

I spent the first two years of my elementary education in a mostly black (about 99%) school. It wasn't any political stand on my parents' part; my dad was pastor of the church and that was the school that we went to. It took me a year to catch up after black riots drove us out of the city. I don't remember, but my mother told me I would come home crying from the new school. I was already so far behind. They had better not let their kids marinate there too long.

Anonymous said...

These authors are looking for a payday and they don't appear to care who or what they must slime to get published/paid - even their own families. A white person writing that his own race is bad and responsible for all the bad things that happened to blacks is likely attractive blacks. Having a white person assert blacks are more noble, long suffering, and deserving of recompense feeds the equality mantra liberals and blacks crave.