Monday, October 20, 2014

The tragic consequences of ignoring the contents of The Bell Curve; for as life in St. Louis proves, the bell curve will not ignore you

Confession time. 

The idea of black-on-black crime has never bothered me, nor has the tendency for the black community to practice "no snitching"and protect black criminals in their midsts. 

What does bother me is the loss of real estate due to high rates of black-on-black crime, requiring white people to vacate the land where this internecine fighting takes place for either residential or business purposes. 
From the October 19, 2014 St. Louis Rams-Seattle Seahawks NFL football game: The Bell Curve City beats down whites in the city (a perfect metaphor for life in Black-Run America)


What does bother me is the loss of ability to utilize public transportation, for the fear of being the victim of a crime, living/shopping near a bus or metro/train stop offers too great a risk and too little a reward for riding. 

It's sad individual black people lack the future time-orientation and impulse control to refrain from participating in the type of violence that destroys black lives and demolishes property value wherever a black community is found; but it's a fact of life in America that no matter the money pumped into an initiative to offer jobs training, midnight basketball, or whatever other "My Brother's Keeper" program promises to do, the violence remains. 

Take this hilarious story out of metropolitan St. Louis, which lets slip one immutable truth of what the black undertow imports: the price per square foot in 67 percent black Ferguson (remember: Ferguson was 76 percent white in 1990) was already trending down before the Darren Wilson/Mike Brown encounter. [Riot or not, homes are selling in Ferguson, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 10-19-14]
St. Louis has been called the ultimate Bell Curve City, and there's no greater social metric of this fitting moniker than the monopoly blacks have on ensuring the city has a homicide problem.

Because of high rates of black homicide in the city, the Families Advocating Safe Streets was founded with only one goal in mind: a support group for friends and relatives of black homicide victims. [FAMILES TO HUNT KILLERS GROUPS SAYS POLICE, MEDIA PAY LITTLE HEED TO BLACKS, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 8, 1993]:
Four families of black murder victims have hired a private detective to find the killers of their loved ones, saying police and the media have not given them enough attention because of their race or social status. 
 Families Advocating Safe Streets, a support group for friends and relatives of black homicide victims, called a news conference Sunday at Northland shopping center to denounce what its members consider to be less concern and effort by homicide detectives and news organizations when it comes to black murder victims. 
"There is some concern that there is not an equal sense of outrage with respect to black homicide victims," said William Oliver, an assistant professor of criminology at the University of Missouri at St. Louis. Oliver cited the flurry of attention that the media and police gave a double homicide this year in Ladue and the disappearance of a white waitress who worked at Union Station.  
"Those cases received a great deal of attention, as they ought to have received," Oliver said. "On the other hand, there haven't been any black cases resulting in such scrutiny." He then introduced two mothers whose children were murdered.  
One, Patricia Fedrick, said she did not even know if homicide detectives were still investiging the death of her son, Demetrius, 18. 
He was shot in the head three months ago as he waited for a bus at Kingshighway and St. Louis Avenue. Homicide detectives could not be reached to comment Sunday.  
Fedrick said she last heard from police two weeks ago. Police offered her moral support and said they would put their best detectives on the case, she said, "but as far as concrete, tax-paying actual facts, I haven't received any."  
Demetrius Fedrick apparently was killed over a gold bracelet. "My son worked two jobs, graduated high school and started trying to become a man, but he was robbed of that also," his mother said.
Supply and demand, in action: the supremely high rate of homicide in the black community of St. Louis leaves police jaded to trying to solve a seemingly insolvable problem versus the extreme rarity of white homicide in the city leading to immediate calls to solve the horrible crime (if black homicides were actually considered "horrible" by the black community, then they work overtime to end the so-called 'senseless' killings). 

 When taxpayer funded police departments have overwhelmed (and overburdened) with trying to investigate homicides of blacks and navigating the murky waters of a black community protecting suspects because they don't trust the police, you'll have the problems the Families Advocating Safe Streets runs into every single day of the year. 

And every year the organization holds a vigil to read the names of those murdered during the prior in St. Louis, with the true casualty being the actual city of St. Louis. [VIGIL HONORS SLAIN, COMFORTS THOSE WHO MOURN, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, January 1, 2002]:
The Rev. Earl Nance, president of the St. Louis Clergy Coalition, said blacks must take more responsibility to help police fight "black-on-black crime." 
"I understand people who holler about the police," Nance said. "There are bad police officers, just like there are bad preachers and bad politicians. But I'd like to see more of these characters out there (protesting) on the streets when we kill each other."
No matter the promises made year after year, the same theme runs through each vigil. The same common dominator.['Let's try to get it straight': Speakers at annual vigil implore community to work harder to curb violence that claims lives, ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, January 1, 2008]:
Veteran activist Anthony Shahid said, "What's happening in our community is that we are losing our black youth like it's going out of style."
 No, the real cause for concern is how many sections of the city of St. Louis become uninhabitable to a family in search of a peaceful community to raise their children or a business looking to relocate in search of higher profits.  [Homicides are down, but the pain lives on: FAMILIES GATHER AT ANNUAL CANDLELIGHT VIGIL., St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 1-1-2012]
"In an ideal world, this vigil would not be necessary, but here we are," Mayor Francis Slay told a crowd of about 100 mourners, officials and preachers gathered Saturday at Williams Temple Church of God in Christ in the 1500 block of Union Boulevard. 
Slay called on residents and family members to teach young people "the value of life." 
Most of the homicide victims were young African-American men killed during shootings. 
James Clark of Better Family Life, a nonprofit job training and social services provider, told the group that black-on-black violence has become "too serious for words" and that action is needed. 
"We cannot talk or rally our way out of this one," he said. "Last time around it was us versus them. This time it's us versus us. … It's time to put down the pistols."
So it never gets better and though the Families Advocating Safe Streets offers a great photo-op for white politicians and public servants to cozy up to the black community, the violence continues to drive away any of the civilization that only the former racial group and create/sustain/proliferate in St. Louis. 
Conversely, the violence of the black community is only a problem as long as its primary source, the black population, goes unaddressed. [Mourners and community leaders gather for annual candlelight service for victims of homicides, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 12-31-13]:
St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay began his remarks by recalling city’s 119th victim this year, Clara Jean Walker, who was inside her home Sunday when she was killed by a stray bullet that rocketed through a window. 
“It’s a tragedy that never should have happened,” Slay said. “All of us should pledge to do everything we can to reduce the senseless shooting and violence. That includes telling police anything and everything we know about the person or people who were on Ms. Walker’s street” or in any crime. 
“St. Louis is awash with guns,” the mayor said. “This has got to stop.” Of the 120 murdered in the city in 2013, 98 were men. At least 105 were African-American.
Guns don't kill people, Mayor Slay. 
A gun is an inanimate object, similarly to how a formerly robust community that goes from majority white to majority black is no longer animated with commercial life or blessed with rising property values. 

Which brings us to a story that defines the Bell Curve City. [Brother and sister die in shootings blocks away from each other, Fox2Now, 10-19-14]:
 A Berkeley family is reeling from two separate murders. St. Louis Metropolitan Police say 35-year-old Margaree Dixson was shot and killed Saturday night. Her brother, 29-year-old Jermaine Jones, died at an area hospital a few hours later. He was also the victim of gunshots. 
Dixson’s body was found near the intersection of Lillian and Plover. Officers were called for a shooting at approximately 11:40p.m. Saturday. Police say she was shot in the head, chest, arms and hand. Witnesses heard several gunshots. 
Approximately 2 ½ hours later, police responded to a shooting near Saloma and Wren. Jones was shot multiple times and taken to an area hospital where he died Sunday morning. According to police, Jones’ acquaintances were standing with him when shots started coming from an unknown male. Police recovered two firearms from the victims’ vehicle. 
Family members did not want to speculate on a motive for the shootings but they are pleading for help and calling for an end to violence. 
“There’s too much violence going on,” said Nicole Rice, sister of Dixson and Jones. “I can’t sleep. I can’t think. It can’t work. I can’t do anything wondering if my son will be a victim to the streets.” 
“When you lost two kids at one time it’s tough,” said Ann Carlson, family friend. “I mean the same night, back to back, it’s painful. 
She said family members are now left to care for the victims’ children without any money. 
“They don’t have any insurance,” said Carlson. “If anybody could help them or help us out, it will help.”
The idea of black-on-black crime has never bothered me, nor has the tendency for the black community to practice "no snitching"and protect black criminals in their midsts. 

What does bother me is the loss of real estate due to high rates of black-on-black crime, requiring white people to vacate the land where this internecine fighting takes place for either residential or business purposes. 

No white community in America has ever founded anything resembling the Families Advocating Safe Streets group in St. Louis as blacks have done, a reminder of the tragic consequences of ignoring the contents of The Bell Curve; for as life in St. Louis proves, the bell curve will not ignore you. 



112 comments:

Anonymous said...

This piece offers further insight into the child-like retarded mindset of the average negro where violence just happens. Like a thunderstorm or earthquake just happens. And apparently there's too much violence. Well what is the appropriate level of violence a 1st world American should expect then? Huh Ms. Negroid? Violence is a paramount tenant of blackness the world over. Oh shit! I'm late for tonight's peace and lawd jesus anti-violence prayer vigil! Talk to u guys later.

WI Resistor

Anonymous said...

The NFL's gotta be loving this ... you pay $200+ to go see their trained baboons shuck and jive, then walk outside and get brutally assaulted by even MORE baboons!

What an experience! Sundays have never been more exciting!

Anonymous said...

Cops shoot and kill one of three masked armed thugs attempting to rob a Gamestop video game store at the 3000 block of South East Street and National on Indy's Southside.

http://fox59.com/2014/10/20/police-identify-man-fatally-shot-during-gamestop-robbery-charge-two-accomplices/

http://fox59.com/2014/10/20/safety-leaders-weigh-in-after-eight-people-were-shot-over-the-weekend/

Anonymous said...

PK wrote: 'Veteran activist Anthony Shahid said, "What's happening in our community is that we are losing our black youth like it's going out of style."'

Um, exactly when were these aspiring gangsters IN style, Tony?

"Veteran activist" - isn't that the only kind? Do we ever hear of a "neophyte activist"? And, isn't the fact that he's still activizing after all of these bodies have piled up an indication that his activism is of little value? Maybe he should just paint houses or rake leaves, so that his exertions are of some tangible benefit.

Enoch Powell

Anonymous said...

Look at the sows in that video; they live in supposed poverty, yet they can still afford:

-gold teefs

-gold jurry

-hair weaves

-fancy nails

Keep working, whitey ... millions of fat black women depend on you!

pissedoffpilot said...

bloody creatures the both of them.

male and female both look the same...black lesbians/gay black men look just like your average ghetto thug.

no wonder the coon males want any women but their own!

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. I've seen cases of truly innocent black homicide victims. However, the Community is completely indifferent to them.

I've never or at least almost never seen blacks get very upset about black on black murder.

Anonymous said...

I love when they say.."lost our sons to the streets".

Like if the streets just magically brainwashed their sons, made them evil and murdered them. GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK!

Anonymous said...

GUNS!

The GUNS are the problem! These racist guns are just floating around shooting blacks!

Why won't sumbuddy DO summfin bout deez gunz!?

Odd.

I own guns. My guns have NEVER shot anyone. (Thankfully)

My guns have never committed any violence.

How can it be that all the guns the blacks communities can be causing all of this mayhem, while the guns in human communities behave responsibly?

How did my friends and family, and neighbors get peaceful guns, but all of these negroes get all of the violent racist guns?

It's baffling, isn't it?

Californian said...

"The tragic consequences of ignoring the contents of The Bell Curve; for as life in St. Louis proves, the bell curve will not ignore you"

Nice riff on the line usually attributed to Trotsky. ("You may ignore war, but war will not ignore you.") And it is a war in American cities. But a curious war in which only one side is fighting, and the other side refuses to believe a war is taking place.


James Clark of Better Family Life, a nonprofit job training and social services provider, told the group that black-on-black violence has become "too serious for words" and that action is needed.


O-K.

Let me ask the obvious question: why has black-on-black violence become "too serious for words?" Here we are after 60 years of desegregation, war on poverty, affirmative action, "diversity" indoctrination, positive role models on the telescreen, MLK holidays, a black man (sorta) in the Oval Office, and you can add in the rest of the laundry list. So why do things get progressively worse? Why were these levels of black generated crime not seen prior to Brown vs Board of Education (or at least not seen in white majority cities)?

Rhetorical question: what wisdom did they have back prior to 1954 which kept a lid on this sort of violence?

Lisa D. said...

When you bring up the black on black murders, blacks don't wanna hear it. Also if you do, they bring up the white on white murders.

Southron said...

“There’s too much violence going on,” said Nicole Rice, sister of Dixson and Jones. “I can’t sleep. I can’t think. I can’t work. I can’t do anything wondering if my son will be a victim to the streets.”

No, Nicole. You son won't be a victim of "da skreets". He'll be a victim of another worthless, shiftless, angry negro. In all likelihood, your son will, or already has victimized several people.

I'm so tired of hearing about the streets, the neighborhood, and bad zip codes being responsible for negro violence.

There is only one cause of negro violence--the negro himself.

Anonymous said...

There's a storm brewing in this country...

Anonymous said...

Funny at the local Sack n Save on the first and fifteenth the poor downtrodden noble magic negro pulls up in a Cadillac Escalate (ebonics spell) with $250 nike air chocojesus shoes on and the latest sail fawn and proceeds to load the cart up with lobster and steaks.
As an extra added bonus they pull up to the 15 items or less self-checkout lane and proceed to take 30 minutes until the attendant at the computer kiosk comes over and helps out while never telling them it is a 15 items or less lane.
Man that waycism is terrible isn't it? How dare those YT crackas give out free sail fawns and welfare checks and treat them like a lost child at the grocery store.

Anonymous said...

We can ignore reality but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.

Ayn Rand

*Note to Rand haters-Atlas Farted in your general direction.*

Californian said...

Violence is a paramount tenant of blackness the world over.

It's not so much the violence but the senseless violence. One can understand violence that is part of a war or revolution. But the type of black violence you see globally today makes little rational sense. Consider gangbanger driveby shootings or flashmob attacks. They're not (usually) done as part of a robbery, they're just violence for the sake of mindless violence. Look at Africa: child soldiers, torture-murders, and so forth. We're not even talking traditional tribal blood feuds, which have at least some kind of code, and a means to buy out (like paying a certain number of cattle).

Please note that this has gotten worse after blacks have gotten everything they have demanded: whether it is an end to segregation in the USA, majority rule in Africa, or mass immigration into Europa. It's when the repression has been lifted that blacks really start going to town with senseless violence.

I think part of it is that (many) blacks can not deal with modernity. When given an opportunity to partake in white civilization (equal education, open housing, AA jobs, one-man-one-vote) they are confounded by their inability to integrate themselves. This may be due to the usually cited factors of low median IQ, lack of future time orientation, etc., all accelerated by the dysgenic policies of the welfare state (in America) and food/medical aid (in Africa). The least capable sectors breeds the most, expanding the demographic incapable of functioning in modern society. When confronted with the complexities of that society, they respond in frustration via senseless violence. You can see the pattern whether in St. Louis or the favelas of Rio or Johannesburg or the burnt out neighborhoods of London.

And folks, it ain't gonna get any better, at least not under the current regime.

Anonymous said...

I love when they say.."lost our sons to the streets".

Sidewalks gone bad...

Neanderthal Girl said...

On topic

This is from a Yahoo article about Obama give 100k Hatians a free pass to the US. Outstanding. Comment post. Hope millions read, and comprehend.

IQ (intelligence) is inherited and not equally distributed among human races. Multiple IQ tests conducted world-wide over several decades have been normed for every conceivable variable and Blacks always rank at the bottom, even in non-verbal tests. There has never been an IQ test administered anywhere in the world where the racial rankings were different than; Jews, Asians, Whites, non-White Hispanics and then American Blacks and African Blacks.

Racial activist groups have tried to create their own tests to demonstrate intellectual parity of the races and attack the integrity of existing tests but the rankings are always the same; African Blacks average a 70 IQ (only 2% of Whites score this low), American Blacks are 85 (due to mixing with Whites, 20% on average), non-White Hispanics are 87, Whites 100, Asians 106 and Ashkenazi Jews at 115. Blacks have never ranked anything other than last on any IQ test ever created.

Even using culture-free, unbiased testing designed by Black psychologists, no amount of testing or wishful thinking shows any improvement in Black IQ. Raven’s “Progressive Matrices” is completely non-verbal yet even the brightest of the African Blacks (South African university students) still score only 85 -- a whole standard deviation above sub-Saharan Africa but it’s also a whole standard deviation below Whites.

In the United States, self-identified Blacks and Whites have been the subjects of the greatest number of studies. They state that the Black-White IQ difference is about 15 to 18 points or 1 to 1.1 standard deviations which implies that between 11 and 16 percent of the black population have an IQ above 100 (the general population median). Consistent results were found for college and university application tests such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test and Graduate Record Examination, as well as for tests of job applicants in the corporate sector and in the military.

Neanderthal Girl said...

Cont..
The mean intelligence of American Blacks (who themselves are a standard deviation above African Blacks due to White admixture) is much lower than for American Whites. The least intelligent ten percent of Whites have IQs below 81; forty percent of Blacks have IQs that low. Only one Black in six is more intelligent than the average White; five Whites out of six are more intelligent than the average Black. These differences show in every test of general cognitive ability that anyone, of any race or nationality, has yet been able to devise. They are reflected in countless everyday situations. “Life is an IQ test.”

Further, only one-in-3.5 million (.00003%) of African Blacks have an IQ of 140 or higher (genius level). But one-in-83 (1.2%) of U.S. Whites is a genius. Therefore the per capita genius rate for U.S.-resident Whites is 41,000 times higher than it is for African Blacks.

Incidentally, though the average IQ of East Asians is 6 points higher than the average non-Jewish White, the percentage distribution of East Asians with IQ's above 140 is slightly lower. The reason for this is that the range of cognitive variation among Whites is greater than among East Asians. Specifically, Asians' IQs are more clustered around the mean.

Psychometricians generally regard IQ tests as having high statistical reliability. A high reliability implies that although test-takers may have varying scores when taking the same test on differing occasions, and they may have varying scores when taking different IQ tests at the same age, the scores generally agree with one another and across time. Like all statistical quantities, any particular estimate of IQ has an associated standard error that measures uncertainty about the estimate. For modern tests, the standard error of measurement is about three points. Clinical psychologists regard IQ scores as having sufficient statistical validity for many clinical purposes.

IQ scores have been shown to be associated with such factors as morbidity and mortality, parental social status, and biological parental IQ. IQ scores are used as predictors of educational achievement, special needs, job performance and income. They are also used to study IQ distributions in populations and the correlations between IQ and other variables.

There is a strong correlation between IQ and success. Economists have started taking an interest in the value of human capital, particularly the factor that psychologists call cognitive ability. In other words, it’s the ability of a person to solve a problem most efficiently. Not with violence, but by thinking. It is worth noting here that Blacks possess 10x more of the dysfunctional MAOA gene (or "warrior gene") that is associated with violent and/or impulsive behavior.

Researchers collected information on 90 countries, including far-off lands from the U.S. to New Zealand and Colombia to Kazakhstan. They also collected data on the country’s excellence in science and technology—the number of patents granted per person and how many Nobel Prizes the country’s people had won in science, for example.

They found that intelligence made a difference in gross domestic product. For each one-point increase in a country’s average IQ, the per capita GDP was $229 higher. It made an even bigger difference if the smartest 5 percent of the population got smarter; for every additional IQ point in that group, a country’s per capita GDP was $468 higher.

Neanderthal Girl said...

Cont.

For example, some of the highest National IQs:

Hong Kong 107
South Korea 106
Japan 105
Taiwan 104
Singapore 103
Austria 102
Germany 102
Netherlands 102
Italy 102
Austria 102
Netherlands 102
Luxembourg 101
United Kingdom 100
Switzerland 101
Luxembourg 101
China 100
United Kingdom 100
Norway 98
Iceland 98

And the lowest:

Lesotho 72
Swaziland 72
Cameroon 70
Angola 69
Cen. African R 68
Eritrea 68
Somalia 68
Nigeria 67
Gabon 66
Zimbabwe 66
D. Rep Congo 65
Sierra Leone 64
Senegal 64
Gambia 64
Liberia 64
Guinea 63
Equat. Guinea 59

Blacks are the only racial group with no DNA from the large-brained Neanderthals who lived in Europe. Modern humans did not come out of Africa; the African humanoids came out and mated with the Neanderthals and Denisovans to create a composite hybrid that is modern man. Forensic scientists determine race by cranium shape; Blacks have a small frontal lobe and sloping frontal plane and a smaller cranium-to-mandible ratio. Caucasoids have the largest craniums, an almost vertical frontal slope and a massive frontal lobe. The mongloloid is very similar and also more evolved. It is the frontal lobe that separates our behavior most from the animals and is responsible for language and rational thought.

When humans evolved from Blacks they mated with the large-brained Neanderthals in southern Europe and created an increase in cranium capacity. At least 20% of the Neanderthal genome made its way into the 5% of human non-Black DNA. This is significant because there is only 2% difference between human and chimpanzee DNA. Blacks are the only race with no Neanderthal genes. According to studies of brain weight at autopsy, endocranial volume of empty skulls, head size measurements by the U.S. military and NASA, and two dozen MRI volumetric studies Blacks' brain size is 5% smaller than Whites, and 6% smaller than Asians and Jews. There is a correlation of brain size with IQ of about 0.40 and that these racial differences in brain size are present at birth. Larger brains contain more neurons and synapses and process information faster; by adulthood, Asians average 1 cubic inch more cranial capacity than Whites who average 5 cubic inches more than Blacks. This is a genetic trait because even malnourished Asians from poor countries have a larger brain on average than well-fed Blacks from western countries.

Neanderthal Girl said...

Cont. and the finish. All in Yahoo.

Further, this reflects what we observe in real life (including the so-called "Achievement Gap"). People have made long-term observations of the different races and reached rational conclusions; the more White a society is the more prosperous, inventive and safe it is. 19 of the 20 poorest countries are African (Haiti). In sub-Saharan Africa the only countries that could be considered successful were White-governed, (Rhodesia and S. Africa). To this day they still can't even feed themselves even though they are the oldest race and therefore had a head-start. In fact they never even created a written language or a physical structure taller than one story until White colonizers did it for them. A Black in America has twice the lifespan of a Black in Africa. It would be longer except the top cause of death for 16-34 year-old Black males is another Black male killing them. Whites are 17 times more likely to experience violence at the hands of Blacks than the other way around.

IQ distribution by race:

• Ashkenazi Jews = 115 (Jews are a race and a religion)
• Asian = 106
• White = 100
• Non-White Hispanic = 86
• American Blacks = 85 (average 20% White mix)
• Sub-Saharan Blacks = 70 (Only 2% of Whites score this low)

Blacks have the lowest IQ of any race because they are the only race with no DNA from the large-brained Neanderthal who lived in Europe. Europeans have about 6% Neanderthal DNA, Asians also have about 4% Denisovan DNA. This is what caused the dramatic increase in cranium capacity (and brain size as MRIs reveal), brain function and nervous system development as humans evolved from Blacks and migrated out of Africa.

It is worth noting that some groups succeed all the time, everywhere. Some have never succeeded anywhere. Blacks are the oldest race so they should be expected to be the most advanced, but they have never been successful anywhere.

Google: "race and IQ", "national IQ", "race and MAOA gene", "Neanderthal DNA", "smaller black brains", "achievement gap", "IQ correlation to achievement"...

Let's hope the kids can read and comprehend.

Lisa D. said...

Just imagine what the blacks will act when the Grand Jury makes a decision on the Mike Brown.

> agree not go to trial

Blacks will literally destory anything and might harms whites.

> agree go to trial but Darren Wilson gets off

> Blacks will probably burn everything down to the ground.



Anonymous said...

http://www.mybudget360.com/not-in-the-labor-force-transfer-payments-one-third-supporting-population/

Anonymous said...

I sincerely hope so! That might be the final straw that breaks the camels back. The PC sanitized msm will have no choice but to air the rampage done by these uncivilized miscreants. They're are in for one hell of a rude awakening!

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....All these black mothers crying for justice.

Poor Daleesha in L.A. crying because after DeShawn git shot and he git that $20,000.00 wheelchair paid for by the city and now the Mexicans stole the aluminum wheel chair ramp and sold it for scrap metal and poor DeShawn can't go visit his banger buddies and it be taking the city a month to git a new ramp and DeShawn have to sit at home and play video games by himself and sheet.

Heartbroken Pussishta be crying and screaming in the court room because her baby Jamal be guilty of murder because he kilt his girl friend and threw her 6 months old baby out a 7 story window and now be doing life in prison and she be waiting for welfare to git her a new car because her drunk boyfriend smashed up the Cadillac and she can't visit Jamal in prison and sheet.

Leedasha be rolling around and crying on the hospital floor because Tyrone was in the operating room with two bullets in him when the kids from another gang stormed in and put six more bullets into him while he was being operated on and he was a good boy and was a good student at school and she didn't know he be in a gang and sheet.

Nay Nay is in grief because her crack head doper boy friend git shot and her 9 year old daughter Sissy Lou is dead because a car load of drug dealers fired over 50 rounds of ammo into her house and now she wants people in the neighborhood to help her find out who did this because her daughter was an honor student and the church will be having a candle light prayer vigil on her front porch next week and sheet.

This crap just keeps going on and on with no end in sight and white people are paying the bills. I sometimes think it might be money well spent.

Anonymous said...

"but as far as concrete, tax-paying actual facts, I haven't received any."

Sure. Like she pays any net taxes.

Anonymous said...

What does bother me is the loss of real estate due to high rates of black-on-black crime, requiring white people to vacate the land where this internecine fighting takes place for either residential or business purposes.

The medical bills are also a problem since YT picks up the tab. Surgery is very expensive and then there are all the rehab related bills.

The best way to cut down the violence is to lock them up from 18-30 when their aggression levels are highest. Of course libs and libertarians oppose this idea but letting them run wild clearly isn't working. Conservatives complain about prison costs but we could bring back work gangs and let them sleep in tents. Execute the worst and hard labor for everyone else. You'd see a lot of the groids go back to "afternoon chillin" instead of gangbanging if prison meant hard labor.

Anonymous said...

@Neanderthal Girl there is a strong correlation between IQ and academic success. The correlation drops precipitously when applied to other definitions of success. In a way this is more damning since indications are that low IQ can apparently be overcome by effort as far as non-academic success is concerned.

Anonymous said...

As an extra added bonus they pull up to the 15 items or less self-checkout lane and proceed to take 30 minutes until the attendant at the computer kiosk comes over and helps out while never telling them it is a 15 items or less lane.

You forgot the part about splitting the cigarette and beer into a separate order. Then each order can be under 15.

Libs can cry all they want but EBT reform will come eventually. Polls have shown there is majority support for limiting it to the basics.

Anonymous said...

Forget about what the blacks will do if Wilson is not indicted. Imagine what the whites will do I if Wilson is murdered like ol' Mike Mike's uncle is advocating. That might really be the watershed moment. If I were a black leader I'd be demanding that Wilson be provided with police protection 24x7.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
The NFL's gotta be loving this ... you pay $200+ to go see their trained baboons shuck and jive, then walk outside and get brutally assaulted by even MORE baboons!

What an experience! Sundays have never been more exciting!

^yeah really. the truth is, if we cease to fund the NFL, the NBA and all over predominately black pro sports that's the end for these people. They cannot compete anywhere else in any aspect of life. stop supporting the NFL and NBA.

Anonymous said...

Brilliant!

Anonymous said...

Doesn't the photo in the article say it all? There's a negress (?) beating up on long-suffering YT with his own flag turned upside down. Seems to me that's BRA in a nutshell, blacks and their trainers using our own nation to destroy us.

Anonymous said...

They are extremely dumb. They are very violent. They are incredibly aggressive. Their natural hate and bitterness and their reproduction itself is made possible totally by your tax dollars.

There it is. Time to close the web site, because there is nothing more to be said on the subject.

Anonymous said...

["There is some concern that there is not an equal sense of outrage with respect to black homicide victims," said William Oliver, an assistant professor of criminology at the University of Missouri.]

Well Jebus, Willy- If humans spent their efforts on an "equal sense of outrage" for black "victims" of crime, we wouldn't have time to do anything else-- like work to pay for your ilk's food, water, housing, & birf contr...well never mind the last one.

Look, I realize your just an assistant primate full of, I mean "with a", B.S. in chimponology, but I think it's clear why your kind doesn't summon much outrage at all. Blame dem skreets or desensitization by numbers, not YT's media.

-Lil Doodie Mouf

Anonymous said...

https://www.voteno594.com/

8mm

Tick, tick, tick..

bubo said...

Blogger Lisa D. said...
When you bring up the black on black murders, blacks don't wanna hear it. Also if you do, they bring up the white on white murders.


Oh you bet they do. Never mind that being murdered by another white person is somewhere between choking on pretzels and bathroom accidents for most young white people.

For blacks, violence is the leading cause of death between 16-30. More than car accidents, more than cancer. For a population sample as large as that, tens of millions, it is an astounding figure.

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

GREATWHITES,

Ho hum, another brother & sister with two different last names. Go figure?
And in this time of family sorrow the family doesn't want too speculate on the reasons of the killing's! I will speculate for them..... Not paying your drug debt's! And now that family is left too care for the dynamic duo's children! Without any money mind you!(no you don't say!) And the duo didn't even have insurance!(what no O'bammy insurance?)
So T.V. audience if any of you liberal bleeding hearts or any of you hating honkey's that want to repent like the police officer's in Ferguson, Mo. it would help the typical negro bank account of $0.00 dollars.
There will be a movement in all the broke ass hoods in America for fast Gov't cash to bury their belated beloved negro that owns a typical negro bank account of $0.00 dollars. Drugs are more important than saving for a rainy day. That's what them Honkey's do. Besides that's what the Gov't is for to the average negro. Section ape, gas, light, EBT, and newly rebuilt condo's style homes!
And on the ghetto council wish list are subsidized water bills, and my good son got killed and we broke and can't bury his aspiring rapper ass monies.

Can't take too much more of this B.S.! It's gotta end soon or our country will end sooner!

GODSPEED/SEGREGATION NATION!!!

Anonymous said...

@Neanderthal girl:

1. As far as blacks being the oldest race, that's not quite entirely accurate. Blacks, like the other races, shared a common primate ancestor (e.g. Apes, chimpanzees, etc) so don't make it sound as if they didn't evolve from primates because in fact they did. To state that they are the oldest race is speculation since they still had to mate from primates.

2. Also, what about the already existing Neanderthals living in Europe at the same time as blacks in Africa? Just as science has managed to group modern man by race one day science will equally be able to categorize the different "tribes" or subsets of Neanderthals. Perhaps one subset mated with two groups to form the white and the asian races.

3. Finally, your quoted sections on IQ are excellent. But one question remains. Given that on the whole whites average a standard deviation higher than blacks in IQ, why on earth would some white girls choose to mate with black men? Perhaps you could shed some light on this where others have been unable to do so.

As a white woman's best bet would be to hook up with a white man, why is it that some white women choose not to do so? By any yardstick available when it all comes down to it, hooking up with one of their own kind would afford them greater rewards.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of the bell curve and intelligence, this one is always worth the read, James Watson's Inconvenient Truth.

My favorite is from the summary:
These are facts, not opinions and science must be governed by data. There is no place for the ‘‘moralistic fallacy’’ that reality must conform to our social, political, or ethical desires.

Anonymous said...

Classic photo! One for the ages. Sums up BRA perfectly - a White man being beaten by savage blacks with his own flag!

Oh man, a hard rain is gonna fall...

Anonymous said...

So, our Ebonican friends complain about the evil White racist cops killing their fine black youth in droves?

OK, let's do two things: 1) No non-black cops to patrol black neighborhoods. 2) Death Penalty for those who commit inter-racial crime (with a three month max deliberation period). That make you happy Negroes? We'll pass those laws asap.

Anonymous said...

Curious if you have a youtube channel Paul. You could post anon if you want using voice generation technology to read the script and animation software to provide a "face". I think that stuff is free on the net. Would help spread your message. Would love to see a message from you like Jared does at AmRen.

Anonymous said...

is to lock them up from 18-30 when their aggression levels are highest

17 year old Treyboon Martin says you are a year out.

Anonymous said...

The Crime rate would go up even more.

Anonymous said...

Absolutely! I AGREE AND IT SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED!.

Anonymous said...

Yep..thats a fact Lisa!

Anonymous said...

Even if they won't publicly admit it, I think a huge percentage of whites really don't give a damn what negroes do to each other or what happens in their "commmunities." They just want to be far removed from it all and not be affected by it in anyway. Which, of course, is the primary motivating factor behind white flight.
In essence, the negro community is an incurable basket case and people are sick of their violent, feral, dysfunctional behaviors coupled with their demands for gibsmedat and being taken care of. People are sick of hearing them whining about their self created problems and their demands that people rush in to "solve da problems."
That's because it's all so pointless to even try. The negro community is like that drunken, idiot relative that's always getting arrested for DUI's, shoplifting or some other offense and who winds up on your front porch whining for help. They don't want to change, they just want someone to serve as a rescue squad to get them out of their "troubles" and once they're "rescued" they're all happy........until the next time they wind up on your front porch whining for help because their stupidity is on an eternal repeat mode. Like the chronic alcoholic, they don' want to change their behaviors, they just want to be rescued from the consequences. If you refuse to help (being sick to death of it all) you're hateful, mean, cruel, uncaring and a monster- or in the case of the black community, a racist.
Just as there are chronic alcoholics, there are chronic communities and the black community is a perfect example of a chronic community. You can't help them, you can only serve as an enabler of the dysfunctions. All the programs aimed at uplifting the black community have done nothing but enable their dysfunctions to become far worse.
It's time to tell the chronic to get off our front porch and not come around here no more. It's called segregation.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 12:36 AM said "Given that on the whole whites average a standard deviation higher than blacks in IQ, why on earth would some white girls choose to mate with black men? Perhaps you could shed some light on this where others have been unable to do so."

This speaks to the self-imposed unavailability of white men more than anything else. Many don't ask the girl out to begin with and if they do ask her out, they don't ask a second time. My take is that it speaks to some absurdly high appearance expectation that's been reinforced by the TV culture since TV culture began. In real life, Vivian Vance (Ethel Mertz) complained that she would NEVER have been married to a Fred Mertz (Bill Frawley). He was more than 20 years older than she was.

Think of TV shows throughout the years and how common it is to see a very attractive woman the spouse or girlfriend of a man who is not physically attractive. What percentage of white men have the George Costanza mentality about what they deserve in a woman's looks?

Sorry to say, I think it explains a lot of the white girls with black men.

Anonymous said...

Paul, there is a football expose book you might like.
'100 Yard Lie'.

Anonymous said...

Common sense.

Anonymous said...

I hope so.

Anonymous said...

I am in total agreement with your statement. Give'em a little, they want more. Give'em everything, they'll breed like rats and the rats will want it all.
They'll not realize until it's too late when they have everything, there will be no one to give it to them.

Anonymous said...

Very informative. We all know/knew blacks were lacking in intelligence but now we know why and its not just the blacks in America.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 12:36 AM said "Given that on the whole whites average a standard deviation higher than blacks in IQ, why on earth would some white girls choose to mate with black men? Perhaps you could shed some light on this where others have been unable to do so."

There was a study a while back that showed married couples tend to be close in intellect. A white woman with an average intellect is not going to crave the stimulation or challenge that an upper level white male can provide. Women also don't purely select mates for raw intelligence and neither do men.

Where I live for most of the mixed couples the male is black and the female is white and obese.

Like the other poster said I think it is a question of accessibility. The white males that hit on them are either non-existent or perceived to be low quality. Obese women will often take the first batter that steps up to the plate. It's not like they went black after rejecting a list of upper class white males.

There are also women that don't believe that race or inherited intelligence exist. But they are the exception as most women over a certain age are keenly aware that smart men are more likely to father smart babies. Even most liberal women accept this even if they aren't able to apply the principle to population genetics because of social conditioning.

Brooklyn born said...

This white girl should have crossed the street after seeing what was approaching.

I guess she didn't want to appear racist.:


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ff8_1413848463

Anonymous said...

What will the Spanish-speaking archaeologists of the future make of these countless graves filled with African skeletons, marked by English writing, and having Roman and Arab names? They're going to be very confused. Just like we are.

Anonymous said...

"Rhetorical question: what wisdom did they have back prior to 1954 which kept a lid on this sort of violence?"

Even in colonial days, slaves and free blacks were causing trouble. Whites knew they had a problem on their hands, but never had the courage to do anything about it.

Whites have a problem. The genes that make us great are recessive, and are lost when breeding takes place with darker races and ethnics. At the same time, whites and Asians have this tendency to "go native", to be influenced by and to adopt the ways of other races. Time after time, whites conquered foreign lands, but were absorbed by the races that lived there. Breed with a black and your children will identify as black. Allow foreigners into your lands, and they will grow and displace you. We seem to be unable to maintain ourselves as a people, and when combined with excessive out-group altruism, this tendency leads to inevitable destruction.

An ancient Chinese emperor saw that the explorers who traveled to Africa and other places brought back corrupting influences that were making the Chinese less Chinese. He called the explorers home, and burned their ships. He cut his civilization off from innovation, but preserved his people. There is wisdom in that trade.

Separation is the only answer. That was the wisdom we had before 1954. But we have a fatal tendency to ignore the knowledge and wisdom of the past.

Anonymous said...

This happened last June in Baltimore:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/10/bus_driver_organizes_black_mob_violence_against_white_family.html

Anonymous said...

What percentage of white men have the George Costanza mentality about what they deserve in a woman's looks?

George Constanza syndrome describes it perfectly. Even worse is when these guys have unrealistic expectations AND don't want to put in the effort of going out and meeting women.

But there is a similar problem of unattractive white women holding out for a Carey Grant. I have noticed it tends to be higher IQ white women expecting not only a college educated white male but also one with minimal looks, height, sexual ability, etc. The problem is that any white male that meets their standards can find other options. I would bet that a lot of liberal female activists fall into this category. They have a higher intellect but are unsatisfied with their dating options which causes a sense of frustration. Most women at least will lower their standards by a certain age but those that don't become bitter and are just a pleasure to deal with if they are in your family or workplace.

Anonymous said...

Another great posting with some great comments by many.Thanks so much everyone ! Something I have noticed over a long period of time is the recurring notion of 'they have gone too far...surely this latest incident will be the turning point,the last straw so to speak...'
Somehow,it never is the last straw.On and on and on it goes,and things only seem to get worse.The only long -term solution is:
Ending the unlimited 'breeding fo dollas ' insanity.
Ending 'cradle to grave' giveaways,handouts,freebies,
afirmative action etc.
Allowing only net contributors to society the right to vote.
Segregating of schools according to academic abilities.
Aggressive regular sweeps of ghetto problem areas for guns,criminals,etc.
Basically turn up the heat on them to 'Broil' and keep it there.By turning up the heat I mean only holding them to reasonable standards of behavior.
Race hustlers and the nog grievance bozos should be loudly called out and ridiculed every time they speak-this is long overdue.
I am sure many could add to this list-it is just a start.
Thanks everyone for being here-I have learned a lot and continue to learn here. Richard Cranium

Anonymous said...

This white girl should have crossed the street after seeing what was approaching.

I guess she didn't want to appear racist.:


Another poster child for why you shouldn't walk in a black area at 2:30 AM. Hell you shouldn't walk in a black area at all unless it is business related and you are carrying a handgun.

What still surprises me about black criminals is how poor they are at making risk/reward calculations. A young white girl in a black area at 2:30 AM is most likely partying and not going to have much cash and the sale of Samsung Galaxy split 3 ways is a lousy payoff.

In my area we have white criminals but they aren't foolish enough to bother with street robbery. They do things like construction supply theft where they can assess the potential payoff and sentence if caught. Most are strung out drug addicts and yet can still make vital observations about risk and reward.

Anonymous said...

O/T: I see the Daily Caller has a story that Indiana intends to cut off food stamp benefits to the lazy.

"If able-bodied adults without children do not find work or participate in a 20-hour-a-week job training program, benefits will be strictly limited to a three-month period. Workers usually receive $131 a month from the food stamp program."

Of course the key is without children, but if you're just a baby daddy ignoring your offspring, I wonder how that applies. Anyone want to take a guess at who's going to be affected by this?

Anonymous said...

Separation is the only answer. That was the wisdom we had before 1954. But we have a fatal tendency to ignore the knowledge and wisdom of the past.

That wisdom never left the South because whites there actually have to live and work next to blacks.

The problem is with Northern whites that can live away from blacks and retain their childish belief in paint theory. Couple that with anti-white sickos in politics like LBJ and we have the current situation. You get an alliance of the naive and the hostile.

But I'm not pessimistic about the current situation. The left has had decades of black college graduates and then they go batshit crazy over a mulatto candidate that can speak proper English. What does that tell you? Nature is not on their side.

Sheila said...

A number of you have noticed the standard line of "losing" their kids "to the streets," as though this were inevitable and the "streets" were active and malevolent forces. Another group seem to think that in addition to segregation keeping black mayhem under control, the blacks themselves were not as criminally inclined.

As Paul has shown in past posts (you can do the googling), black crime has always been a problem. As far back as we have kept records and statistics, blacks have been causing problems. It still took a great deal of time and effort to keep them under some degree of control. Even the myth of their purportedly "intact" families of yore don't detail all the kids with grandparents or broken families. Just read about a few of the talented 1/10 - Thomas Sowell, or loud-mouth Oprah. Plenty of illegitimacy and affairs and grandparents or aunts and uncles stepping in. There may have been a better surface of respectability, but still a large degree of typically reckless and irresponsible behavior behind it all.

The "streets" line caused me to dig out a book (largely liberal, I must admit) I bought years ago - called "Ever Since Eve: Personal Reflections on Childbirth." It's a collection of quotes from various people and places about pregnancy and children. The book itself is from 1984. It includes a snippet from a 1964 book (we're talking 50 years ago, folks) called "Children of Crisis" by Robert Coles. Again, book published in '64 so written BEFORE all the riots and the worst of BRA came into being.
Continued . . . .

Californian said...

Even in colonial days, slaves and free blacks were causing trouble. Whites knew they had a problem on their hands, but never had the courage to do anything about it.

This has been a blind spot in too many whites for the last 400 years: the belief that blacks could somehow be controlled. Well, maybe when blacks were in small numbers. Maybe when you had a planter aristocracy backed with armed white militias. Maybe when white weaponry could keep the natives in line. Maybe if white people were keeping their eyes open and not letting themselves be deluded by egalitarian ideology.

But all it takes is for whites to show the slightest weakness, and blacks bring in mass violence and dysfunction. True in post-colonial Africa, true in American cities, true in Europa today.

The fault is, in part, due to those whites who believe that blacks can be controlled, whether by slavery or missionary preaching or the welfare state. Nowhere in the world has any of this proven successful for very long.

Yet there has been this inane drive in many white people to invite in blacks, whether by using them for cheap labor or because of humanitarian concerns. And there's no consideration of the consequences, even with the abject lessons from Haiti, Liberia, Detroit and etc.

Sheila said...

Here's the 1964 quote re "the streets" from "a black woman who came to Boston from Georgia" -

"They came telling us not to have children, and sweep up, and all that . . . they tell you you're lazy . . . Then they say we should eat different . . . I tell them about the prices, but they reply about "planning" - planning, planning, that's all they tell you."

Gee, ring a bell, anyone? Lack of future time orientation? Lack of self control? Excuses?

Let's continue:
"To me, having a baby inside me is the only time I'm really alive. I know I can make something, do something."

To the negro, the mere act of sex and conception is something THEY can DO (no concept of anything else being involved, no sir, they themselves have created life!) to prove they're capable.

"Even without children my life would still be bad - they're not going to give us what they have, the birth control people. They just want us to be a poor version of them, only without our children and our faith in God and our tasty fried food or anything. . . They'll tell you we are "neglectful"; we don't take proper care of the children. But that's a lie, because we do, until we can't any longer, because the time has come for the street to claim them."

Straight from the horse's mouth 50 years ago. Those darned "streets" just keep taking black kids and turning honor students into thugs. Who'd a thunk it?

"So I turn my eyes on the little children, and keep on praying . . . the school teachers have time to say hello and give him the lessons he needs . . . (education is something "given," not something you acquire for yourself) . . . "and when the men can find work - because they can't have children, and so they have to drink or get on drugs . . . to find . . . some hope about things."

Passive agents at the mercy of a cruel world - that's your poor black American - yesterday, today, forever . . until YT regrows some backbone - or another part of the male anatomy.

Anonymous said...

@ anon 9:57

A historical correction is coming either a 1860 or 1929 style one.
I thought one third of the population was on free mommygov programs it turns out one third of the population is paying for gov transfers to the other non-productive parts of the popluation.
I'm all for helping people who have geniune health or physical problems but things that can't go on forever will not continue forever.

Anonymous said...

"3. Finally, your quoted sections on IQ are excellent. But one question remains. Given that on the whole whites average a standard deviation higher than blacks in IQ, why on earth would some white girls choose to mate with black men? Perhaps you could shed some light on this where others have been unable to do so."

Some of this relates back to feminism, modern feminism in particular, which seems to preach both to hate white males, and at the same time to try to emulate them sexually, to not stop and think and be responsible, but instead to do it in the road if it feels good - this is why we have "a woman's right to choose" in our faces. So when Shitavious with the muscular body and the potential for a bigger tool comes along, bold, telling her just what she wants to hear because lying doesn't bother him, he plays up to her and gets a piece of ass.

I've literally seen this in action, for several months one year a black guy would turn up at the night club around last call and go around and talk to every girl that wasn't obviously with a guy. Eventually he found one tall, full figured but pretty girl and had success with her; they dated for a while, saw them as a couple a few times; haven't seen her since; I presume she now has a bastard halfbreed child to take care of. I don't know that I've seen him either, but I probably wouldn't remember anyways.

And some of it is the female version of George Costanza syndrome, the same women who don’t want to be judged for their looks have unrealistic expectations of who they will date. The buck again is bold enough to hit on her, because he will muh-dik anything right on down to a bad transvestite, so she goes there over the white man who doesn't quite meet her expectations.

But then you could dedicate multiple websites to the hypocrisy and illogic of women and modern feminism, there's no sense delving too deeply into it here.

(continued)

Anonymous said...

(continued from above)



"What percentage of white men have the George Costanza mentality about what they deserve in a woman's looks?

George Constanza syndrome describes it perfectly. Even worse is when these guys have unrealistic expectations AND don't want to put in the effort of going out and meeting women.

But there is a similar problem of unattractive white women holding out for a Carey Grant. I have noticed it tends to be higher IQ white women expecting not only a college educated white male but also one with minimal looks, height, sexual ability, etc. The problem is that any white male that meets their standards can find other options. I would bet that a lot of liberal female activists fall into this category. They have a higher intellect but are unsatisfied with their dating options which causes a sense of frustration. Most women at least will lower their standards by a certain age but those that don't become bitter and are just a pleasure to deal with if they are in your family or workplace."


The other problem is a lot of women are just messed up in the head; you don't find out right away; a friend for instance is breaking up with his partner of four years and mother of his son because she got back into drugs and made $50,000 vanish into thin air. He wonders now if she got pregnant as a means to latch onto him; that wouldn't be a first for her either. It's taken him a lot more money and hard work to try to keep custody of his son - usually as the man in a divorce is a losing proposition no matter how awful she is; the courts are heavily biased in favor of women. I, with my future time orientation, look at this and see a huge hassle I don't want to deal with. So consequently when I do meet women, generally the first signs of trouble I'm out, and so many are so screwed up, I don't put forth a lot of effort simply because it's a waste of time.

But, again, this is a topic well covered by boards elsewhere. I suppose you could lay the blame back at the feminists and the socialists trying to destroy the family unit for whites just the same as with welfare they did for the blacks.

Anonymous said...

http://dailykenn.blogspot.com/2014/10/students-brawl-at-robert-e-lee-high.html


http://m.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/10/what-if-black-america-were-a-country/380953/

8mm

Both news reports showcase the same predictable outcome, a cesspit of regress to their mean genetic baseline.

Anonymous said...

James Watson's "Inconvenient Truth" is an excellent read. One thing that stands out for me is that the evidence shows that no matter how many social programs, entitlements or gibsmedat is thrown at negroes (in the search for "equal outcomes") that this is, in fact, utterly foolish and a waste of time as such can never be achieved.
It's no wonder liberals and others of their kind rant, wail and gnash their teeth when all their pet programs result in failure. It's equally no wonder that they then lash out at the world in frustration because they didn't get the result they wanted and flail about trying to find other non-reality based excuses for it(blame whitey!) when the answer is right in front of them. The factual, scientific evidence conflicts with their belief system/delusions and that threatens everything they hold "sacred." Thus they endlessly demand more programs, more entitlements, more gibsmedat for negroes in the fruitless search for equality and equal outcomes.
Just as Ponce De Leon believed fervently in the existence of a "Fountain of Youth" and wasted all his time searching for that which did not exist, so too the liberals are on a fool's crusade looking for a Fountain of Equality and Equal Outcomes that also does not exist. Just like Ol' Ponce De Leon, no matter how many expeditions they make, no matter how fervent their belief, they are doomed to failure. Yet they expect everyone of us to fund an endless procession of "expeditions" and believe that one day if they just keep trying they'll reach their goal. If you tell them the truth, they just denounce you as a racist just as they denounce the science behind the truth/facts as racist.
Like a child who doesn't want to believe the cookie jar is empty and screams, "There are so too cookies!" and then (when shown the empty jar to prove the point) screams, "There are so too cookies! You took them! You hid them!"....well, that's a liberal screaming about the failure of all their programs aimed at creating equality/equal outcomes for negroes and denying the scientific proof/facts and blaming you for it all.
Sorry, libs. The cookie jar is indeed empty, and neither the Fountain of Youth nor the Fountain of Equality/Equal Outcomes exist and your tantrums will not change that.
I'd simply laugh at liberals if the consequences of their deluded beliefs fell solely upon their own heads but the problem is they create mass havoc in society because of their "religious" fervor vis a vis the negro via their Fool's Crusade.



NY Girl said...

Margaree Dickson.

Jermaine Jones.

Nicole Rice.

The fact that none of these siblings has the same last name should clue the Black Community in to part of the problem.

Anonymous said...

http://madworldnews.com/22-jihad-camps-fbi/

8mm

Because the negro turns mohammedian rather easily and gains an additional layer of legal protection and justification.

James Bondo said...

"Anonymous said...

We can ignore reality but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.

Ayn Rand"


Oh no. Not Rand again. I don't what to go into a diatribe. I did try reading her novels. Really I did.
I had them all stacked up on a shelf collecting dust. Then one day they fell on my head.

Moral of the story: We can ignore Ayn Rand but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring Ayn Rand.

I guess it was just one of those things. I case of random book violence.

Anonymous said...

OT

I have noticed on links, etc. that damn near every single TV station's local news anchor or co-anchor is a black female now.

The lengths they all must go to to find a semi-attractive, non-ebonics speaking female that can read a teleprompter are incredible.

I give credit where it is due.

Anonymous said...

https://governor.mo.gov/news/speeches/ferguson-commission-announcement


Transcript of Gov Nixon's sppech/news conference three hours ago. 10/21/2014

I suggest a new abbreviation, KBA.
Kiss Black Ass.

Anonymous said...

@ James Bondo

All of her books should be burned in a bonfire as thoughtcrime.
That way all the thoughts inside will go down the memory hole.

P.S. the 1974 Nova looks sharp in bondo.

Californian said...

It's worth taking a look at this:


http://m.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/10/what-if-black-america-were-a-country/380953/

OK, so what if black America were a country? Well, we do have the examples of black majority countries globally, as well as black run cities in the USA. And it's the same old story (crime, corruption, poverty, infrastructure collapse, endless mayhem, blame YT blah blah). Truth is, without whites to prop things up, black countries would be even bigger epic fails than they already are. And so why would anyone think it any different for a black American country?

Granted, American blacks have had more education, and perhaps a higher median IQ than their African cousins. So maybe if the USA were partitioned into a white country and a black country, the black country would be better off than, say, Haiti. But notice the trend in black run countries towards choosing the worst sort of Big Man leader--whether a megalomaniac like Bokassa or a marxist like Nyerere. Regardless of the ideology, they proceed to run their countries into the ground. And what do we see in Detroit or Birmingham or wherever which would show things to be different?

Also, note that whatever inequalities may exist for blacks in a white run country are minimal compared to the situation in black majority countries: these tend towards kleptocracies with grinding poverty, lofty talk of one-man-one-vote with non-stop massacres. But cheer up, oh noble liberal white man/woman--were a black American country to rise, you would have plenty of opportunity to send it your tax dollars, as well as your children, to uplift it.

Anonymous said...

I have noticed on links, etc. that damn near every single TV station's local news anchor or co-anchor is a black female now.

Kill
Your
Television

Anonymous said...

Good one, I think:

Moral of the story: We can ignore Ayn Rand but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring Ayn Rand.

Anonymous said...

It's sometimes pointed out that East Asians have a few more points of (median) IQ than whites in the USA. Let's assume that the testing is accurate and there is no significant cheating (as has been reported). Here is one potential reason:

I, with my future time orientation, look at this [divorce system rigged against men] and see a huge hassle I don't want to deal with. So consequently when I do meet women, generally the first signs of trouble I'm out, and so many are so screwed up, I don't put forth a lot of effort simply because it's a waste of time.

I wonder how much of the current Asian lead in median IQ scores is due to really intelligent white guys dropping out of the mating/reproduction pool owing to an objective evaluation of their future survival in a hostile system? i.e., are high-IQ white genes being bred out of the demographic pool?


But, again, this is a topic well covered by boards elsewhere. I suppose you could lay the blame back at the feminists and the socialists trying to destroy the family unit for whites just the same as with welfare they did for the blacks.

One thing to consider is a united front between race realists and men's rights activists against the current system which is working against both men and white people.

Californian said...

A number of you have noticed the standard line of "losing" their kids "to the streets," as though this were inevitable and the "streets" were active and malevolent forces.

There is something Lovecraftian about this sort of reasoning, blaming malevolent, quasi-supernatural forces for violence, "bad" schools, poverty, et alia. What is lacking here is any sort of understanding of human agency.

The reason the streets are "mean" is because of the people who walk them: gangbangers, welfare junkies, race hustlers, and so forth. And who is raising these people? Well, blacks who are not taking responsibility for their own actions, and the actions of their children. It gets back to the failure to connect cause and effect.

Now, there have been mean streets in the past. Certainly, many American cities had their slums and their Hell's Kitchens. But white people saw the problem and cleaned them up. White Americans worked to improve their own lives, and those of their children. They could create honest government, build industry, create decent neighborhoods.

Look at it this way: supposing the city of Detroit lost its entire populace in 1962; the US government then imports one million European refugees from post-colonial Algeria and settles them in Detroit (with the stipulation that blacks can not move into the city). Now imagine Detroit in 2014, with five or so decades of white rule. Think the city would be bankrupt, bereft of industry, riddled with crime, etc? Of course not. White people would, as they have done elsewhere, maintained the city and expanded it to even greater glories.

Never mind cleaning up a city--even when handed a fully functional city, blacks can not maintain the level of civilization of whites. On the day that whites handed over power to blacks in Detroit (back in the 1960s), the "streets" were not generating the level of crime and chaos you see today. You could even turn on a faucet and clean water came out of the tap. It wasn't the "streets" that wrecked the infrastructure. It was the people who inhabited the city who wrecked the streets, both figuratively and literally.

This ought to explode the liberal myth that environment (or "zip codes") is everything. But liberalism is an ideology which refuses to consider evidence from the real world. Consequently, it drags down entire countries with it.

Anonymous said...

Yes as you've noticed most news stations in the U.S. have at least one negro co-anchor. Mainstream Media loves pairing the cute blond white chick with the feral black male. That's just nasty and goes against nature. We see it MSM, you're not fooling anyone. So even though blacks are 14% of the population they comprise 50% of news anchors. Seems a bit racist to me. Why aren't the latinos complaining? They outnumber blacks so where is their representation? Add to this any black female news "anchor" you see will have their "white wimmens hair" neurosis on full display. Guess what black woman, we can all tell that's not your natural hair! You suffer from self-loathing issues that are obvious to the public and your viewers. You don't think we notice because of your double digit IQ but we do. Too obvious.

Anonymous said...

There is the Ayn Rand as portrayed on Libertarian websites and then there is the real Ayn Rand who denied group differences in ability, vehemently opposed collective racial action by whites and also borders. She also had a crush on child murderer William Hickman. Yea that don't mention those tidbits in Libertarian meetings.

So anyone who values Rand probably shouldn't be in here.

Anonymous said...

One thing to consider is a united front between race realists and men's rights activists against the current system which is working against both men and white people.

An interesting idea but I actually don't think a men's right aspect is needed.

Racial realism naturally undermines all forms of Marxism including feminism. If it became widely accepted that black/white inequality has a natural genetic component then the entire charade will fall apart. It would lead to both white men and women working in their own best interest which would naturally include a skeptical view of feminism.

The Marxists have lost the economic argument and now they rely on the great lie of group equality (with the white male holding everyone back). They wouldn't have anything left to stand on and many of their own members would break ranks. Racial realism dissolves everything they stand on which is why they have made it a thought crime to even question their assumptions. They want equal outcomes by any means necessary and widespread acceptance of group genetic inequality completely destroys their plans.

eah said...

This story is more than a year old, but still applicable:

'Knockout game' widow tells of lonely life after husband's murder

Apparently killed by one punch in a 'knockout game' incident. By an unarmed black "teen". And the puncher was no 300lber. Remind people of that the next time they go on about Michael Brown, the "unarmed" teen. As if that means he was harmless.

Anonymous said...

"Racial realism naturally undermines all forms of Marxism including feminism."

Nonsense. Socialism has been designed by the ultra-elite as the most efficient way to enslave the masses by making them all victims and/or dependent on their table scraps.

I assure you the groups that are historically behind socialism/communism have absolutely zero negroids in their upper ranks and virtually none even as window dressing. They are a means to and end only (and the ends always justify the means). You're looking at the same folks who brought you the Reign of Terror in France, the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, World War 1 and 2, the American revolution and war between states, and virtually every other horror in the last 500 years or arguably more.

Their agenda is three-fold:
1. The abolition of all nation states.
2. The abolition of all religions except their own (secular humanism/Mystery Babylon).
3. Enslaving the mob in a one world, totalitarian, socialist "benevolent dictatorship". AKA "New Atlantis", "New Age", or "New Order".

I've found it very interesting which 'race realist' websites have blocked me from commenting when I've start naming these organizations.

Let's see if this one is printed as a test and a little white rabbit for those to follow who are interested. It is an interesting fact that the same person who founded B'nai B'rith (parent organization of the $PLC/ADL) is the same person who founded the KKK.

eah said...

The correlation drops precipitously when applied to other definitions of success.

Like what other "definitions of success"?

Absurd. High IQ people are on average more likely to be wealthy, healthy, happy, physically attractive, to live longer, etc etc.

Mangan's blog has a tag on IQ posts with some evidence for all of the above, and more.

Pat Boyle said...

Neanderthal Girl posted a series of items on IQ. She is mostly right about everything. I have a few inconsequential quibbles and one major objection.

It is refreshing to read someone her who is obviously well read and intelligent.

The only major flaw in her posting that I see is acting as if it is established science that the higher intelligence of whites is traceable to Neanderthal admixture. It is possible that that's true but to date it is just a hypothesis among many.

Personally I'm 2.9% Neanderthal - slightly higher than average. These kind of analyses are now possible since Svante Pääbo sequenced the Neanderthal genome. It's good to remember how recent these findings are. I'm currently reading Jared Diamond's book 'The Third Chimpanzee' in which this much admired science popularizer unequivocally states that Anatomically Modern Humans (AMH) never interbred with Neanderthals. He of course was totally wrong but that book was written in 1992 when lots of people thought that.

Gregory Cochran about that time predicted that there would be some admixture on local traits. Europe was cold and Africa was hot. But the brain size difference was probably not one of those traits.

Wolves have larger brains than dogs just as Neanderthals have larger brains than humans. Both species also have different shaped brains. The domesticated species have higher more compact brains while the wilder type have longer brains.

The bodies of AMH did not alone make these people fully modern. AMH bodies evolved in Africa about 100,000 to 150,000 ago. But the mental changes that distinguish true moderns only came about in the Middle East about 37,500 to 40,000 years ago. The first real fully modern humans the Cro-Magnon were very much advanced over the Neanderthals they met in Southern Europe.

The brains of Africans and African Americans are modern style brains. They are just smaller and a bit more primitive as you said.

Pat Boyle

Anonymous said...

Nonsense. Socialism has been designed by the ultra-elite as the most efficient way to enslave the masses by making them all victims and/or dependent on their table scraps.

I don't see how that negates my claim that racial realism undermines all forms of Marxism.

Racial equality is the current foundation of Marxism. Without it whites will naturally question why they should subsidize government programs to elevate the equality of blacks when it is genetically impossible. Without that foundation it becomes difficult for Marxists to push their other plans like feminism. But feel free to disagree because unlike Marxists, liberals, Libertarians and conservatives I am open to discussing the race question.

Anonymous said...

Californian posted

"Rhetorical question: what wisdom did they have back prior to 1954 which kept a lid on this sort of violence?"

Laughter!!! White Folks knew what they were dealing with back then!

Great work PK and SBPDL!
Scot Irish

Pat Boyle said...

Black brains are inferior brains but it isn't just IQ. For example there are several well known genetic syndromes that cause profound loss of intelligence. In many of the cases however the victims are less violent than normals.

The most obvious case is that of Downs syndrome. Another is Williams syndrome.

It is often remarked that a person entering a ward with Downs syndrome (trisomy-21) will soon have all the little victims holding their hand. The Downs sufferers are loving and sweet. So too are Williams patients. Williams patient are also musical. They were probably the basis for legends about fairies and elves.

Both Downs and Williams patients are very retarded but their parents and strangers typically love them. So it isn't true that all low IQ peoples are vicious and violent.

Blacks are probably violent because of low repeat MAOA. Blacks have an significant incidence of low repeat MAOA. But whites have none at all. Low repeat MAOA is closely associated with violence. It is also seen in Maoris.

An as yet unexplored avenue of research is MAOA in common chimps and bonobos. Common chimps - those that live south of the Congo river - are very nasty creatures. They hunt and kill each other. They eat the chimp babies from other groups. Adult chimps have torn the faces off humans as well as bitten off fingers, noses, and genitals. But Bonobos which look identical to the non-expert eye are reputed to be always sweet an loving. Some anthropologists attribute this to their obsession with sex. They seem to taken to heart the old slogan - "Make love not war".

We need to understand why the apes north of the Congo river act so differently from those on the southern bank.

I'll give you a hint - it ain't 'The Legacy of Slavery'.

Pat Boyle

Polar Bear said...

To paraphrase Leon Trotsky, "You may not be interested in BRA, but BRA is interested in you."

Anonymous said...

"I don't see how that negates my claim that racial realism undermines all forms of Marxism. "

The examples of the French and Bolshevik revolutions are clear evidence that the socialist conspirators can and will implement their system without muds.

Also when you look at the people who bankroll socialist agendas they are largely very anglo-centric (in the case of Rosicrucian factions such as RIIA, Bilderberg Group, CFR, TLC, and other "round table" groups).

Consider Cecil Rhoades who founded the original round table group (and founder of Rhoades Scholarship *Bill Clinton was a Rhoades Scholar*). Certainly as race-realist as you can get.

I would suggest that at the very top of the power structure virtually nobody really believes the "equality" line. Few if any power brokers would live anywhere near muds, allow their children to marry them, or send their children to school with them.

I would grant that race realism undermines one of their greatest weapons against western nations, but it's certainly not the silver bullet to end the socialist movement.

Also I'm excited that my last post didn't get censored. The comment on the common origin of KKK and B'nai B'rith was enough to get me banned from posting on AMREN.

james m said...

we could call those who seek to impose equality when 60 years of evidence point to its impossibility
Equa-Lunatics as a catch all phrase

James Bondo said...

All of her books should be burned in a bonfire as thoughtcrime.
That way all the thoughts inside will go down the memory hole.


One more.
Fear of Ayn Rand is the beginning of wisdom.

Anonymous said...

""Rhetorical question: what wisdom did they have back prior to 1954 which kept a lid on this sort of violence?""

"Separation is the only answer. That was the wisdom we had before 1954. But we have a fatal tendency to ignore the knowledge and wisdom of the past."

Not quite true. The wisdom of segregation was NOT ignored. Integration was forced by federal law on America by a liberal White Congress and Presidential administrations.

Anonymous 12:36 AM said "Given that on the whole whites average a standard deviation higher than blacks in IQ, why on earth would some white girls choose to mate with black men? Perhaps you could shed some light on this where others have been unable to do so.
One White, cute, petite blond model in England advertised on Facebook for a "suitable" male "companion."
Among the responses she got was a very, physical, muscular Black martial arts instructor, whom she chose. She really thought he would satisfy her intimacy cravings. First opportunity, he beat her up and raped her. Then later, he got a Black buddy to throw acid in her face, vastly damaging her head. She wanted the excitement of controlling him in a "relationship." He only wanted the opportunity to vent his beastly power on her in order to flaunt his success to other Black males. White females partake of the forbidden fruit because they assume it is more lush, especially when it is deceptively and readily available.

Anonymous said...

"Maybe if white people were keeping their eyes open and not letting themselves be deluded by egalitarian ideology."

It seems unlikely to happen now, if it couldn't happen 150 years ago, when the white race was much less polluted with non-white genetics, and mass media wasn't nearly as powerful.

Whites believe in egalitarian ideology for a variety of historical, psychological and sociological reasons. No modern state anywhere codifies into its law an acknowledgement of racial differences. Either one must believe this is the result of a worldwide conspiracy, or something else is at work here.

The last major attempt to integrate the idea of significant racial differences into the technological system ended in the disaster of WWII. It would appear that modern civilization has no use for racial differences and is trying to eliminate them as quickly as possible. Perhaps this is because, despite the problems of multiracial states as they transition to panmixia, it eases the burden of the state to be able to treat all citizens equally. It only needs to wait until race-mixing destroys race permanently.

Anonymous said...

"White females partake of the forbidden fruit because they assume it is more lush, especially when it is deceptively and readily available."


Again, this is pure bullshit. It's an incident not an actual explanation.

Among the better answers that could explain some of it is the George Costanza attitude among some white men. They think they deserve better that what their beta-ness station might normally entail. After all, Woody Allen is about as beta looking as you can get and the girls he got were clearly above his league.

Only thing, Woody Allen is way more rich and famous than the typical beta white male!

Most groids have no hangups or neurotic lack of confidence regarding themselves so in a sense there is the confidence angle and yes, women tend to be drawn to confidence.

But in all: It STILL DOES NOT ENTIRELY OR MOSTLY ACCOUNT FOR WHY these pairings occur.

After all, given than whites average a full IQ standard deviation above blacks, that also means that in most interracial pairings, the white woman is going to probably average higher in IQ than the groid she's with.

Given that, why couldn't she simply choose a white guy? Over the long haul they certainly have a lot more to offer them.

Someone also commented that women don't chose IQ, but they do like confidence as well as a combination of the best option and having an above average IQ will afford them the best option available.

Granted, for the most part, most good looking women tend to have more options and also tend to choose white men (for the most part) since at that status level they'll definitely find plenty of whites to choose from.

But still the question remains. Why? Knowing that they are more likely to be born out of wedlock, have family members in prison (or will soon be in imprisoned themselves) and don't have a good track record of staying faithful. It simply doesn't add up.

Over the long haul for a long term relationship, a white woman's best option still remains choosing a white man.

Anonymous said...

Ayn Rand was a race traitor. She wasn't vs Civil Rights per se and certainly not vs BRA either. When it came down to it, she would've chosen the standard family of mankind albeit with selfishness as the highest noble good, regardless of race, but when push came to shove, she wasn't pro white per se, just pro-selfishness. Well, as Lenin used to say about those kind of traitors: "We'll sell the last capitalist the rope to hang themselves with."

THAT...is Ayn Rand. Race traitor and AWOL on historical white America.

When you look at the likes of the Tshirt makers for Ferguson about racism, that's Ayn Rand, always the businessperson even in the midst of a crisis.

Nor was she opposed to open borders.

Today she'd be seen as a standard liberal and certainly not a conservative even though Dineesh D'Souza would like to claim her for Con Inc.

Anyone else find strange the idea that the likes of D'Souza is going to claim to speak for historical white America? How'd that ever happen?







Anonymous said...

How did my friends and family, and neighbors get peaceful guns, but all of these negroes get all of the violent racist guns?

Because white people take responsibility for their actions. Blacks engage in magical thinking in which inanimate objects take on lives of their own. It's not just guns, but the very sidewalks (aka "streets") which can claim the lives of aspiring rappers.

Mr. Rational said...

The last major attempt to integrate the idea of significant racial differences into the technological system ended in the disaster of WWII.

Nonsense.  Race differences were not the only, or even primary, cause of WWII.  WWII was primarily driven by two things:  Japanese imperialism and the onerous (to the point of being genocidal) settlement forced on Germany after WWI.  Many Western nations, including the USA and Sweden, had active eugenics programs before Germany did.  We didn't go to war against each other.

After WWII, YKW used Germany to demonize everything that smacked of eugenics or racial difference, while keeping themselves racially separate.  They practice what works while smacking down anyone else who tries to.

It would appear that modern civilization has no use for racial differences and is trying to eliminate them as quickly as possible.

No, that is the program of modern elites.  The condition of civilization under their mis-rule shows just how ridiculous their proposition is.

Johnny See said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
I love when they say.."lost our sons to the streets".

Sidewalks gone bad...

October 20, 2014 at 6:39 PM

Bwahahaha!

Do you mean 'gone bad' like that funny-smelling food that's past the sell-by date?
I don't see how else you could mean it... niggers don't USE the sidewalk!
Maybe we need to affirmatively further fair sidewalks. You know, the kind that some how draw the oppressed to them for automatic shoe cleaning, maybe? Strip lights on the side that disinfect bakkaball shoes as they pass?

Personally, I would build brand-new greenways and further those damned sidewalks right off a short pier.
Rockfish party!

Anonymous said...

I would bet that a lot of liberal female activists fall into this category. They have a higher intellect but are unsatisfied with their dating options which causes a sense of frustration.

In New York the Carries et al are Dems who want to marry rich Reps. The richer the better.

Anonymous said...

But still the question remains. Why [do white women hook up with black men]? Knowing that they are more likely to be born out of wedlock, have family members in prison (or will soon be in imprisoned themselves) and don't have a good track record of staying faithful. It simply doesn't add up.

When I was in Germany I asked an Army friend why there were so many attractive German women dating black men. He told me that these women saw blacks as exotic and romantic. There was also a political element: women could show how "anti-racist" they were. And like a lot of people in love (or in love with an image), they refuse to see the truth until it runs over them like an 18 wheeler.

Bear in mind that most women (and men) have never heard the stats on black crime, fidelity, IQ, etc. And if they did, the liberal ideological filters would screen them out. They do not quite understand what they are getting into until it is too late.

I suppose on some subconscious level, white women are turned off by white men kowtowing to blacks. They can sense that being with the physically dominant racial group is going to give them a certain prestige--after all, their telescreen tells them it is the cool thing to do. And it will be better for their genetic inheritance (children). Those half-black kids these women pop out will gain the advantages of affirmative action and the rest of the race rackets. And who knows, white female a generation from now will be lining up to go out with those progeny?

Look at (white) actress Charlotte Theron. She adopts a black child. The Internet has plenty of photos of her fawning all over the kid. This gives her "anti-racist" cred (she is, after all, from South Africa, that country which used to have the terrible, terrible system of apartheid). And I imagine she thinks that if she sports a black kid in the stroller, blacks are less likely to make her the victim of one of their torture-murders.

Dindu Nuffins said...

Sorry.
I just don't "get" all the Ayn Rand bashing.
If more people adopted her principles of doing for yourself/self-realization/accomplishment/achievement/happiness, etc. etc. and not depending on others this world and country would be a far better place.
That's that.
Talk about conjecture and nit-picking.

Anonymous said...

"Bear in mind that most women (and men) have never heard the stats on black crime, fidelity, IQ, etc. And if they did, the liberal ideological filters would screen them out. They do not quite understand what they are getting into until it is too late."


Nope, it won't wash. In 2014 people generally know that most blacks are born out of wedlock and have a higher crime rate than other races. Facts are facts are facts. No, they don't know the exact percentages and can't break it down but they do know the big picture.

Most white girls don't grow up living around tons of blacks so the only places they'll meet them are at College or in some kind of PC church.

While they may listen to hip hop they certainly know that most black rappers are no good from a relationship standpoint.

That basically leaves sports. RG3 got one, and even someone from Indy (gold medalist) hooked up with groids. So in US, the worship of sports does not simply end to white males sitting on the couch drinking beer during gametime.

Sounds like they want their own private game time.

These are possible explanations but not entirely. For their best option they'd be advised to go for their own kind.

Anonymous said...

"Dindu Nuffins said...
Sorry. "

No you're not.



"I just don't "get" all the Ayn Rand bashing.
If more people adopted her principles of doing for yourself/self-realization/accomplishment/achievement/happiness, etc. etc. and not depending on others this world and country would be a far better place."


All you need is love, all you need is love, love is all you need, oh, I thought you were riffing on some cliched 60's mantra about how we all need this in our lives to make it a better place.

Get real and grow up.

FACT: Life is brutish, nasty, and short. In their naturally evolved states, mankind is not very nice toward most people (even within their own race, tribe etc). It's taken these many millions of yrs of human development to get this far and still we have some tribes (e.g. groids) who aren't there all the way as of yet.

FACT: The groids actually follow these principles of self self self doing for da self and they're quite happy. Just ask them. They don't commit suicide very much. They are very much happy, happy, and happy. If they were allowed to just be themselves and keep it real by doing what they just loooove to do, (raping, robbing, shootin' people up, etc) their world IS a much better place. If only they could find a way to get YT out of the picture, cause deys plenty happy! All the time!

See, there's a bit more to just being for yourself. That doesnt actually build a stable coherent society in the long run. In man's natural state millions of yrs ago, the world was as Randian as you could get. Guess what? It didn't work. So there's more to it than just that.

Rand was no ally to white america. Sorry if that bursts your bubble but she wasn't. She was also pro-open borders so she didnt give a f'ing shit about US's traditional historical people, culture, etc.



"That's that."

That's a bunch of shit. She was anti-America, anti white people survival America.

Not gonna drink the Randian culture Koolaid. Fundamentalism tends to taste gross and disgusting when its poured from devious sources; from a disuniting traditional US, she was as devious as one could get.

What's so great about her anyway? Who'd she ever beat? She wanted to be totally selfish. OK, then, so why do folks here have such a problem with Swisher Sweets, Travyon's Twin, and every other gangbanger? They're just following in Rand's footsteps. Oh, maybe they haven't read the ideology's actual fine points, but in practice, the groids make the best objectivists possible.

And no one likes them for it. In fact, most seem to have quite the problem with how the principles are applied in practice.

If happiness equals the greatest good, then you can't complain when someone's definition of happiness doesn't match your own. It's all the same, it's all equal. The survival of the fittest and the strongest wins the struggle.

Swisher Sweets won the struggle vs the QT owner but lost the ultimate struggle vs Wilson.

Win some, lose some.



"Talk about conjecture and nit-picking."

She wasn't all that. She was AWOL on America and didn't do nothin' to help stem the tide of illegal immigration.

Why not at least choose an actual race realist who saw life as it really is, like Francis Galton? Or Darwin's book The Descent of Man?

Now those lessons are well worth learning.





Anonymous said...

"Race differences were not the only, or even primary, cause of WWII."

There are always a lot of causes for complex events such as wars. But if you don't think Nazi race theory was important as a cause of WWII, you don't know very much about this subject.

"Many Western nations, including the USA and Sweden, had active eugenics programs before Germany did. We didn't go to war against each other."

You're right to point out that the effort to integrate race into the technological system extended beyond just Germany. However, Germany's actions brought the problem to a head because their race theory especially targeted members of the world's wealthiest minority. We must also notice that after the war, these eugenics programs were abandoned. For Western elites, the question had been settled. Race and tribal loyalties, which are virtues in an ethnostate, would henceforward be demonized and repressed. Race-mixing would be encouraged, eventually resulting in the elimination of distinct races altogether.

"After WWII, YKW used Germany to demonize everything that smacked of eugenics or racial difference, while keeping themselves racially separate. "

This demonization couldn't take place without the active cooperation of white people. In fact, the war itself was fought mostly by whites against other whites. It was depicted by the Allies as a war to save "civilization" from Nazi "barbarism". Also, you should try to see this in context. For example, YKW had very little to do with the American Civil War. The Civil War was a prototype, the inflection point when America turned 180 degrees. Begun as a white supremacist ethnostate, under the influence of modernity it transmogrified itself into a "proposition nation", actively repressing race loyalties. Just about all of it was done by white people to other white people. YKW's help wasn't needed.

Anonymous said...

I've seen videos of blacks in Africa burning "witches" by the side of the road. As for modern medicine, to this day African believe more in spells and curses as the source of illness. Not to mention the penis shrinkers.

Ace

Anonymous said...

"Excessive outgroup altruism." That is a powerful observation. That said, I think identification of and suspicion of foreigners is an innate human trait.Somehow whites don't have normal reactions now. Something other than OGA seems to be involved.

Prosperity, normalcy bias, infantilization, hedonism, horrible education? Some white moon calves emrace OGA but I think something else has emasculated white men. Damned if I know what it is.

Ace

Ace