Monday, June 4, 2012

When the Lights Go Down in the City: "Escape from Detroit" Reviews

Detroit in 2012 is 90 percent Black. No one can hear you scream in Detroit
Escape from Detroit:The Collapse of America's Black Metropolis is reviewed at Vdare by Peter Bradley, who writes:
The 1967 riots helped usher in the ultimate death blow to Detroit – political control by blacks. By 1973, the city had a narrow black majority and the mayoral election was essentially a racial headcount. Black Democrat Coleman Young campaigned against “police brutality” while his white opponent John Nichols ran on a law and order platform. Young won by a few thousand votes and would begin a 20 year reign that finished off what was left of Detroit.
The city became the crime capital of America in the 1970s and Young implemented massive affirmative action for city employment. To give an example of the kind of leader he was, here is Young, quoted by Kersey, on affirmative action:
“Some people say affirmative action is discrimination in reverse. You’re damned right. The only way to handle discrimination is to reverse it.”
Brett Stevens of Amerika.org reviewed the book here, writing:

Even more importantly, as this book points out time and again, for whatever reason that the white middle class left the city, the city then became ruled by African-American leaders for the African-American majority. This point is perhaps the most important one this book makes. If Kersey has time to do more analysis for a second version of this book, it would behoove him to include an economic history of the auto industry in Detroit to debunk this correlation that is often trumpeted as causation for Detroit’s decline. His analysis of black leadership may be more important, in that he shows how African-American poverty was not alleviated by African-American leadership:
Young was quoted as telling Rose in Detroit’s Agony:
In this country, Black people are victims of racism. It’s not accidental that cities around the nation that have the largest percentage of Blacks, have the largest percentage of poverty, have the largest percentage of crime, and the largest percentage of unemployment.
Immediately after making this assertion (which is true, because once a city goes majority Black, the Visible Black Hand of Economics takes over), Rose points out:
But in Detroit, Blacks aren’t just the majority. They’re the authority. They run the police, the courts, the schools, and city hall. But Black political power has not meant Black economic prosperity.
(245)
This paradox underscores much of the book. If white rule was oppressive, removing that white rule would alleviate the problem, we think. Clearly it has not, and Kersey will give any thinker a run for their money because his analysis of this gap is diligent and thorough. The evidence is overwhelming: since the advent of white flight and African-American government, we haven’t heard much from Detroit. The city is known worldwide for “ruin porn,” or photographs of its once-grand buildings and homes now in decay. Most people find such images depressing because they show abundant potential put to waste.
Kersey draws a distinction between Black-Run America (BRA) or the liberal plan for wealth transfer to poor black Americans at the expense of everyone else, and Actual Black-Run America (ABRA) which he uses to describe the leadership in Detroit and thus to illustrate the negative future offered if BRA succeeds. His thesis seems to be that African-Americans are incapable of self-government, and that a liberal plan to introduce Black-Run America will thus introduce Detroit levels of destruction across the United States. This idea contradicts the notion that most Americans are applying to race, which are expressed most clearly in the Kerner Report (253). This report, like most mainstream news sources and government, argues that since people are equal, the only source of African-American poverty is white racism. Further, the thinking goes, the solution is to spend large amounts of money on “Great Society” styled programs designed to bring equality to people through welfare, education and empowerment programs.
Both Bradley and Stevens nail it when it comes to understanding why this book was written: it serves as a warning to people who (erroneously) believe that as whites become a minority, they will instinctively start uniting and fighting for their rights a group. Plus, it shows that Black people will justify all levels of present - and future - discrimination on the past inequities their ancestors suffered at the hands of white people's ancestors.

In particular, this review at OD by Hunter Wallace put the entire project of SBPDL into perspective:
Escape from Detroit:The Collapse of America's Black Metropolis is really a personal meditation on political theory, economics, sociology, and history. The real significance of this book is the vocabulary and the theoretical context that Paul Kersey has created to describe the process by which the “Paris of the West” was inexorably transformed into the “Mogadishu of the West.”


This arsenal of concepts include Black Run America (BRA), Actual Black Run America (ABRA), Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs), Black Undertow, Climate Change, Structural Inequality, The Black Imprint, Detroit-ed, “Those Who Can See,” and The Visible Black Hand of Economics.


There are plenty of race realist websites which dwell on subjects like racial differences in intelligence, morality, and behavior. What’s rare is Paul Kersey’s willingness to go beyond race realism, to take race realism as a given, and to explore its implications for the broader liberal paradigm.
The forthcoming book on Atlanta (Black Mecca Down: The Fall of the City too Busy to Hate) will be the second in a planned trilogy on America in the post-Civil Rights world. We already live in South Africa; just a lot of mini-South Africa's where white people pay taxes that go to support the proliferation - and betterment - of every race but their own.

Well, in 90 percent Black Detroit, half of the street lights are about to be turned out:
Detroit, whose 139 square miles contain 60 percent fewer residents than in 1950, will try to nudge them into a smaller living space by eliminating almost half its streetlights.  


As it is, 40 percent of the 88,000 streetlights are broken and the city, whose finances are to be overseen by an appointed board, can’t afford to fix them. Mayor Dave Bing’s plan would create an authority to borrow $160 million to upgrade and reduce the number of streetlights to 46,000. Maintenance would be contracted out, saving the city $10 million a year.
Detroit's white population left, leaving Black people in control of their own - proverbial - destiny, free to completely control the city council and every public service (fire, police, city hall, public schools, water board, etc) job in the city. In 2012, 90 percent Black Detroit resembles what happens when Black people are left in charge of a major metropolitan area for 40 years.

There's a saying that, "when the last white person leaves a [any city, county, or nation] to be sure to turn the lights out." In Detroit, there is no need for this: Black people lack the capacity (or industriousness when it comes to entrepreneurship) or adroitness in terms of maintaining a civilization to even bother with trying to help keep alive the spark of hope.

Prometheus once gave fire to man, and for that, he was punished. With Detroit in 2012, we see a world that Prometheus himself couldn't bring light too. Because we can't discuss the real reason for 90 percent Black Detroit has failed (it's not because of Democrats), we are all punished, with an increasing number of cities and counties across America doomed to share the same fate as "Mogadishu of the West."

74 comments:

W. C. Taqiyya said...

You only say all these things because they are true.

So CAL Snowman said...

It's funny, I never realized WHY the show "Home Improvement" was set in Detroit until this very moment. Look an All American White family living and prospering in the motor city! Tim is always wearing Detroit Lions gear and is a total gear head, subtly reinforcing the message that the White man and the auto industry have ties to Detroit. In real life would the "Taylor's" suburb be 20, 30 or 40 miles outside of Detroit proper? (I'm not familiar with the area)

Zenster said...

The city is known worldwide for “ruin porn,” or photographs of its once-grand buildings and homes now in decay. Most people find such images depressing because they show abundant potential put to waste.

Whereas, unlike "Most people", Blacks who see these dispiriting images celebrate by applauding vigorously with much ooking and eeking.

Californian said...

You advance a startling thesis: that what makes or breaks a polity is not the economic policy but the composition of its populace. The thesis is startling because it is outside the mainstream analysis, which is an endless debate over big versus small government, taxes, and subsidies. But if what you propose is correct, then the current debate over American economic policy is not facing up to the real issues. If so, then American will never be able to implement a realistic urban policy.

The point is also made that polities which are run by whites will succeed, even if they impose socialistic programs (e.g., Oregon, Scandinavia). You can even look at the difference between a white-run Rhodesia and a black-run Zimbabwe. Or Israel versus most of the Arab states.

All this is contrary to liberal and conservative economic determinist models. What you are saying is: where white peoples rule (or higher-IQ peoples who have assimilated white values, per East Asia), there will be general prosperity and progress. And where they do not rule...well, we see the results in Detroit.

It might be interesting to look at the impact of third world immigration on the quality of life in Europe. We see the occasional reports of parts of cities becoming no-go areas for emergency services and casual strollers. And we have seen the rioting last year in Britain. Is this a permanent state of affairs, parts of Western countries becoming, in effect, enclaves with permanently depressed quality of life and hostile gangs (sort of like various barbarian peoples setting up shop in parts of the Roman Empire in the 5th century AD)?

There is a disturbing implication here: as more of the world is abandoned by white peoples, we will see the continuing disintegration of the cities, a rollback of civilization as it were. Or perhaps new civilizations will fill the vacuum. Already, China is moving into Africa, big time. Meanwhile, most Americans and Europeans continue to live in their self-constructed Matrix.

Anonymous said...

Turn the lights out when you leave. !!Fantastic!!

Lily White said...

The thought of a mini South Africa in the US is utterly depressing, if not, sadly, accurate. The mention of SA got me to thinking, though. Remember when anti-apartheid fever gripped America in the latter part of the 20th century? It was terrible, horrible, and shameful that a majority black country should be subjected to white rule. The majority should be in charge, dammit! And who but those same people are the ones who say it isn't fair for whites to run the US, a majority white country. The minority should be in charge, dammit! And they even say both with straight faces.

Anonymous said...

Might also be a thing of knowing right from wrong and doing what is right even though there is no one around seeing what you do.

Anonymous said...

"the nature of our business.." that a man would get killed for a 40oz malt beverage is a sad reality in urban areas.

Anonymous said...

Excellent article.
Truly...black majority/black rule equals ruin. If ANYONE reading my comment disputes that statement, PLEASE provide me with ONE example of a black-run political entity in the history of mankind that has been prosperous and successful. ONE. ONE. If you can name one then I'll eat my previous words regarding blacks being capable of sustaining a prosperous society.

Swamp Fox said...

So Cal Snowman,
The Taylors' would reside on 40 Mile Road ( Detroiters will get this).

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

Paul Kersey says:

"Why this book was written: it serves as a warning to people who (erroneously) believe that as whites become a minority, they will instinctively start uniting and fighting for their rights a group"

All too true. It's in the nature of whites to leave when it hits the fan. We moved around Europe, tamed the inhospitable Northern lands, moved into Russia, Canada, Australia, and, of course, the US. We move and fight like badgers only when no other option exists.

We're happy to abandon the ship when there's an island nearby. When there's no island - nowhere to run - that's when "it gets real."

It's function of space. When we can't get away, we'll get it together.

YIH said...

@So CAL Snowman:
Although in reality Home Improvement was likely shot within a 100 mile radius of you, from what I recall of the show the setting appeared to be a suburb of Detroilet like you surmise. Notice all the fellow cast, Whites. Notice the typical 'backyard scene' where Tim would chat with his White neighbor. Notice what you didn't hear in the background, like sirens or gunshots. Notice nothing ever seemed to get stolen. Notice the only destruction was of the cartoonish kind that was the running joke of the show. Notice when Tim or one of the kids went to the Emergency Room the waiting area was clean, quiet, not very busy and no ebonics.
If ''Tool time'' was done IRL, the studio would likely be nearby where Tim lives and after the show's shooting the tape would be sent by courier to a Detroit TV station for post-production and distribution. And despite the sports gear, did you ever hear him mention actually attending a game? Not me.

YIH said...

In Mr. Bradley's review VDARE linked to a rather old site about Detroit Central Station.
I recently found a much better (and more stark) example at an Economics blog:
''360 Degree Photo Tour

Please take a look at this amazing 360 degree photo tour of several spots in or around Detroit, including the abandoned Michigan Central Train station.

Reader "Rick" who sent the link suggested "It looks like a scene from the movie Escape from New York"

Give the images time to load. They first load in black-and-white, then color. You can use the mouse to pan around but it is easiest to use the left and right arrows on the image.''
Now I have no way of knowing if ''Rick'' has ever heard of ''Paul'' or SBPDL or Escape from Detroit but after seeing enough photos of Detroit the comparison is obvious.
In fact in the past I've suggested turning Detroilet into a prison anyway, just build walls and guard towers around it.

expat said...

"Taylor's" suburb be 20, 30 or 40 miles outside of Detroit proper? (I'm not familiar with the area)

Taylor, also know as Taylortuckey, is about 25 miles south of Detroit. It held out for a long time is a white neighborhood of mostly descendants of poor southerners that came up from the south during the depression to work in the auto industry. Detroit, at one time had suburban cities ringing the city of the old "those that can see" evil racist southerners. Now today, it is one of the undertow black sububurbs.

expat said...

Taylor, Ferndale, part of Oak Park and Hazel Park, kept the black under tow in Detroit of decades. As Soulman Young said: those evil white racists are in the suburbs with their guns just waiting to attack us. He was real genius and used race as his leg up to power. The blacks were and still are too stupid to realize they are just useful idiots

Beth said...

Oh my. I [probably] so shouldn't be leaving this comment which is really sort of kind of off topic but not [with regard to "them"]. In all seriousness, is there ONE single attractive black woman who is an elected official - anywhere?!? After reading WZ's post about gwen moore [go to Weasel Zipper's place, you'll find it], and thinking about sheila jackson lee and maxine waters [stephanie tubbs-jones, former], my gosh?!! Got to give it to them for having the cojones to speak up sans brains... Regardless, it is just baffling that they are all so lacking in both brains and beauty... [Both "them" as part and parcel of the democRAT party and democRAT women in general. Has there EVER been a study done on how and why it is that conservative women tend to be more attractive?!] Oh, and I purposely do not use capital letters for democRATs, ever. Ditto for muslims and islam. Gives them all far more than the teeny tiniest iota of respect they deserve.

"1951" said...

And the book looks damned good, too!

Anonymous said...

Zenster said...

The city is known worldwide for “ruin porn,” or photographs of its once-grand buildings and homes now in decay. Most people find such images depressing because they show abundant potential put to waste.

Whereas, unlike "Most people", Blacks who see these dispiriting images celebrate by applauding vigorously with much ooking and eeking.


Monkey see monkey doo doo.

Ivan Shatov said...

Anonymous Californian said...

You advance a startling thesis: that what makes or breaks a polity is not the economic policy but the composition of its populace. The thesis is startling because it is outside the mainstream analysis, which is an endless debate over big versus small government, taxes, and subsidies. But if what you propose is correct, then the current debate over American economic policy is not facing up to the real issues. If so, then American will never be able to implement a realistic urban policy.

The point is also made that polities which are run by whites will succeed, even if they impose socialistic programs (e.g., Oregon, Scandinavia). You can even look at the difference between a white-run Rhodesia and a black-run Zimbabwe. Or Israel versus most of the Arab states.

All this is contrary to liberal and conservative economic determinist models. What you are saying is: where white peoples rule (or higher-IQ peoples who have assimilated white values, per East Asia), there will be general prosperity and progress. And where they do not rule...well, we see the results in Detroit.

It might be interesting to look at the impact of third world immigration on the quality of life in Europe. We see the occasional reports of parts of cities becoming no-go areas for emergency services and casual strollers. And we have seen the rioting last year in Britain. Is this a permanent state of affairs, parts of Western countries becoming, in effect, enclaves with permanently depressed quality of life and hostile gangs (sort of like various barbarian peoples setting up shop in parts of the Roman Empire in the 5th century AD)?

There is a disturbing implication here: as more of the world is abandoned by white peoples, we will see the continuing disintegration of the cities, a rollback of civilization as it were. Or perhaps new civilizations will fill the vacuum. Already, China is moving into Africa, big time. Meanwhile, most Americans and Europeans continue to live in their self-constructed Matrix.

June 4, 2012 4:43 PM

Hello?! Of course it's the composition of the population that is the single most important determinant of social decay. That's what Paul has been saying since Day 1!!

What education problem? Subtract the non-Europeans and the USA has some of the highest performing students in the world?

What crime problem? Subtract non-European crime and the USA has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

Urban sprawl and inner city decay? Subtract non-Europeans and this problem disappears.

Illegitimacy? Subtract non-Europeans and this problem would soon disappear.

Pornography, abortion and homosexuality? Subtract non-European populations and these problems would again regress to levels present in the 1940's.

Of course you subtract those who dare not be mentioned as well and the USA would be heaven on earth.

YIH said...

Who here remembers Mystery Science Theater 3000? This film would have been a good candidate for that treatment
[spoiler] If you watch closely, you'll see something that might look familiar [/spoiler]
That was Detroit then. This is Detroilet now.

Bogolyubski said...

Zenster: Whereas, unlike "Most people", Blacks who see these dispiriting images celebrate by applauding vigorously with much ooking and eeking.

That sound might more accurately be described as "hootin' and hollerin' - but it will be loud whatever other characteristics it might have.

Californistani: You advance a startling thesis: that what makes or breaks a polity is not the economic policy but the composition of its populace. The thesis is startling because it is outside the mainstream analysis, which is an endless debate over big versus small government, taxes, and subsidies. But if what you propose is correct, then the current debate over American economic policy is not facing up to the real issues. If so, then American will never be able to implement a realistic urban policy.

Bingo. This is exactly why PK's work is so completely revolutionary. As one of the book's reviewers noted, it goes beyond race realism into the societal implications of what the destruction and persecution of race-realist thought will bring - Detroit writ large.

Blacks have now controlled Detroit for four solid decades. It is a complete, dysfunctional ruin. The whole western world is on this path. The voices of resistance are few and weak. In places like the UK-okrug of the EUSSR, they are literally putting whites in jail for remarks made on twitter or on the subway. The pathetic rubber-stamp monarch, now celebrating six decades of surrender, nominally presides over a land that could only be described as "totalitarian". That's not even the worst part of it. Nobody cares that's it's totalitarianism.

Whiskey said...

I am both optimistic and pessimistic. Optimistic in that technology kills, and those that use technology best, drive it forward constantly, newer, better, more powerful, than before, win. That has been the Western European advantage, since about 1300. Including being willing to tear apart most of society to USE the technology, in ways Asians and other peoples have not been.

Pessimistic in that there will be as Enoch Powell predicted, rivers of blood. Simply because the Black and Hispanic populations for the most part require massive welfare wealth transfers, and that is not in the cards as economic growth ceases and the drag of non-productive non-White populations increase. In short, very quickly we are going to see a huge spoils battle, because about money, well that's DIFFERENT.

Up until now, Whites have been able to flee, not fight, and not really hand over THAT much money. The huge growth in particular of Hispanic populations and their desire to be "conquerors" and extract wealth transfers will lead to hard conflict. Fights over money always end that way, and numbers don't always count.

Power might come from a barrel of a gun, but the gunmen must be paid, and the guns don't just create themselves. What matters is the ability to cooperate, create wealth, and industrial machinery. However, I fear that any reasonable effort will be put off, because its cheaper and easier to avoid conflict until it is too late. As a middle class White guy, I don't like my chances too much, so I have a personal interest here. I'd rather avoid violence since I figure I have a high probability of being a victim fairly early.

After all, if China simply just wants Africa, what is there to stop them? Bantu spears? Burning tires? Throwing stones?

MuayTyson said...

Off topic but will science be able to hide the truth of our forefathers?

please watch:
http://www.ted.com/talks/juan_enriquez_will_our_kids_be_a_different_species.html

Celebrate Homogeneity said...

Zenster wrote: "Whereas, unlike "Most people", Blacks who see these dispiriting images celebrate by applauding vigorously with much ooking and eeking."

Maybe SOME do. But I have this gnawing feeling that most of the Detroit blacks stare blankly at the ruins. They cannot fathom why it is that all these buildings are crumbling, when, in the white-majority and segregation days, they were all in good repair.

They cannot associate 1967; shouts of "kill whitey!". moving in and then destroying neighborhoods; and injuring white school kids, with the departure of the very people who paid for the beauty, splendor, and order that used to exist.

They cannot associate a brick hurled through a window causing the glass to shatter, that in turn lets in the rain that rots the carpet and causes mould on the ceilings, and falling plaster. ( tinyurl.com/4uv56sk , pictures 3, 6 )

That stealing the wiring and the ballasts (called "transformers" in the news) for street lights causes them to go out. That's if the drug dealers haven't shot them out first.

They cannot associate their lack of impulse control resulting in destroyed lobbies, smashed furniture, more broken windows. That overturning and kicking at a grand piano* will break it.

They cannot understand why some insurance company, manufacturer, call center, distribution point, or trucking terminal does not want to locate where they labor pool is illiterate, where their trucks might be hijacked, their vehicles vandalized or torched, and where female employees are afraid to wait at the bus stop or walk to the parking lot alone.

* That picture of the ruined room with the overturned piano ( tinyurl.com/4uv56sk , pictures 5 and 14 ) has a lot of symbolism for me, and just about makes me cry. It symbolizes the destruction of a culture we once had.

nameispointless said...

PK, your book is brilliant.
I have two copies, one for work, one for home.
As someone mentions, you have accomplished a major feat: providing a voice replete with an intelligent, pragmatic, race realism vocabulary where none existed, except that which DWLs and black racists could easily "refute" as lunatic fringe rhetoric.
Eric '"my people'™ we need to talk about race," Holder will never address race realism at this level.
He is a race-blinded troglodyte and bigot, who, with his partner in the divisive crime that seeks to destroy our culture and Constitution, fiddles while Rome burns.
In my book, you are a star. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
News Flash from Milwaukee:
Another potential Trayvon case, in Milwaukee/

nameispointless said...

YIH says: "Who here remembers Mystery Science Theater 3000?"

I do. Every Saturday night, family gathered around the 24 inch? TeeVee, hugged bowls of popcorn and yukked it up watching those two hilarious, wise-cracking guys.
Agree, your film would be a perfect fit.
Nominate you to coordinate the effort.

Anonymous said...

"They cannot associate their lack of impulse control resulting in destroyed lobbies, smashed furniture, more broken windows. That overturning and kicking at a grand piano* will break it. "

Yes, great point. This is just one of several biological differences between whites and blacks. I don't they they have any ability to plan ahead or predict consequences of their behaviors. Also, since Whitey provides everything they need in life - infrastructure, food, housing, roads, cars, smart phones, internet, schools...they have never had to create anything on their own, or learn to appreciate or value anything.

Why should they feel guilt for breaking everything that Whitey gave to them?

In their minds, everything belongs to the white man, and he keeps the best for himself. Blacks get Whitey's crumbs.

Mutant Swarm said...

On that Huffington-Puffington Post slide show, photo #7 of the East Methodist Church, there is an inscription on the rail that says this:

"And You Shall Say God Did It."

Somehow, I think God had nothing to do with it. Either that, or God is a spoiled six year old who broke his toys after He got tired of playing with them.

Anonymous said...

In places like the UK-okrug of the EUSSR, they are literally putting whites in jail for remarks made on twitter or on the subway

Liam Stacey got 8 weeks for comments deemed racist bby a judge but not by those who saw them. A legal secretary got 21 weeks for racist language and in a cruel irony two chimpettes brutally attacked a different legal secretary, hey all white legal secretaries look the same to chimps, was brutally beaten and her attackers got nothing because they had learned their lesson that attacking people is wrong just as the judge in Maryland saw the content of Tennoa Mae Brown's heart was good and her lesson learned which was the same sentence that the 4 somali attackers of Rhea Page got. Rhea Page had to leave her job due to PTSD.

The Emma West showtrial is on 6 6 2012.

Anonymous said...

It's hilarious beyond words that the Hope president is a black man when blacks are ultimately incapable of providing hope.

Anonymous said...

“Innocent children do not deserve to die! I don’t care what the situation is, death and killing is not the answer!” Rev. Leondis Fuller of the New Covenant Baptist Church said.

He got that right.

Trayvon Martin was wandering to the place he was staying and when he got the chance he went 70 yards out of the way to sucker punch George Zimmerman who was forced to shoot the purple drank drinking burglar.

Jaquare Cortes Wilson 13 was shot because he went to carjack someone at 9:00PM and he was shot by a guy defending himself. Babymomma insists the driver should have driven away. If only the driver knew that would have been enough.

Fort Worth's Trayvon was innocently tapping on the back window of a house with a crowbar as youths often do when the owner pulled back the curtain went to get his gun put in a magazine chambered a round and shot him. Babymomma insists that the owner should have warned her "trayvon" but if you are too stupid to realize what a magazine is being put in a gun for and a round chambered then a career as a burglar is not for you. Although the youth was unlucky. If it had gone through his spine he could have been a real cripple.

Obama's sons obamassoning.

Anonymous said...

Saying that white civilizations thrive regardless of type of govt, monarchy, socialism, republic, is not quite true. Look at the horrific slaughterhouse that 20th c. Russia became under the Soviet Union; even now, white orphans live in empty buildings, surviving by prostitution and drug dealing. Americans adopt these children but we can't bring them all here.

Yes, you can blame a certain ethnic minority for forcing Marxism on the country, but the fact that the native population did not overthrow this group will remain a black mark on them for eternity, as the native Russian population continues to shrink dramatically. They can look at themselves in the mirror as the source of their troubles, just as black Detroiters can blame themselves for their city's current low estate, but won't.

Anonymous said...

@YIH: Yes, Tim Taylor did attend sporting events in Detroit. There was at least 1 episode where a Detroit Lions game was involved and he went to the auto and boat show every year. I assume that was in Detroit proper.

i'm all white,how are you? said...

the funny thing is people like shaboz(world's ugliest black panther)will have his followers think that this is a result of the white man's hatred for his kind. or the blame will go right to the republican gov. knowing full well it's cause his black skined hero's in the detriot city council have done this to that once proud city. it hasen't been worth a god damm since the white's left these pig's to their own doing. again the truth is in the BLACK pudding. black's will never blame themselves, just look at obama he is the f-ing king of the finger pointing game. hey detriot how's that black pride thing working out for you. you would think it's located in north korea. it won't be long before they cut the lights out in oakland ca.! another fine black panther hotspot! it's funny you know what they say about blacks and their electric bills. now we have proof of that stero-type! good luck suckers. oh and on a lighter note tell all blacks to smile after dark so we can see em!

Anonymous said...

I had a leftist history teacher who claimed Nubia was a great civilization that rivaled Egypy in Ancient times. The problem is that evil white racist archeologists won't investigate in what is now Ethiopia and the Sudan. I got a good laugh out of that. Don't you think if there was some advanced African kingdom leftists would have funded expeditions by now?

RobertB said...

Anonymous said...

" Turn the lights out when you leave. !!Fantastic!!"

That was a wide spread sentiment back in the 1970's when flight to the suburbs began in earnest. People either phrased it as not wanting to be the last one in (any given city) to be there to turn the lights out, or stating it as "the last one in (a given city), please turn the lights out".

Its usage was quite widespread and was said without glee, but rather remorsefully--as if it was inevitable that whites would abandon the city and, when they did, it would go dark without them there.

It was in the midst of this, I believe, that the monies, for the so called "Great Society", were expanded greatly. Had the American taxpayer been actually charged directly for this, he/she would have revolted. They were already being forced into two income households to pay for it, anymore would have meant devastation. So the "government" simply sold debt to pay for it all. By selling the debt, they lessoned the impact in the here and now, as it was then, and put off the day of reckoning.

The immediate effect was to slow the death of the cities--but time marches on. So does the Liberal desire for destruction. With Bill Clinton in the White House and a Democrat controlled congress and only a marginal opposition put forth by Republicans, the March gained new force and direction. The slow death march was accelerated--blacks were allowed to buy houses they couldn't afford and the borders were thrown wide open--but only to non-whites.

With Dubya, came the fruition of his father's will--"compassionate conservatism" and the willful desire to Hispanasize America. Now we can see, that the whole of the housing bubble, was nothing more than a thinly disguised form of "reparations" designed to give houses to minorities at Yt's expense.

The debt is so large and so vast, there isn't enough money in the whole rest of the world to pay for it.

negro fatigue said...

there is something interesting mentioned here, that I have thought about and observed first hand, I've noticed that when blacks take over, darkness seems to follow, for some reason, light seems to flea from them, I've noticed that from 1994 onwards the slow ebb of light away from the black hordes, I've always noticed that phenomenon, light seems to dislike blacks, but now the artlicle mentions cutting street light amount in half.this seems to bolster my theory, that light shys away from blacks.

In johannesburg, there is less light at night as compared to the apartheid regime, the freeways are darker too.

I've always said from 1st hand experience, that blacks have lack of everything even light.

They lack health, money, manners, joy, hope, freedom, happiness, dynamism, freewill, controll, and light.

Why is it where ever blacks are darkness takes hold, not only in south africa, but 15000 miles away in the usa.

Do they have something against light that they chase it away.

Same thing for money, it flees from them, I have no idea why.

They either chase it away or it flees from them.

Light and money.

There is never abundance around blacks, unless its abundance of bad things, why, why.

That's why whites don't want to be around blacks, they chase away the good, and badness takes its place.

Do they do it on purpose, cause I'm starting to think the do, its as if they are a cursed ppl.

Keep well away, unless you want to share the curse.

The only thing that is not lacking among black communities, is lack itself

RobertB said...

I won't go along with the idea that "any" white run society will be successful--especially using European Socialist countries as an example. Are you forgetting the utter failure of the Warsaw Pact countries and their economies?

People forget how much the American taxpayer has subsidized the European economies over the last 67 years. It began with "Lend Lease" in the late 30's, accelerated with "The Marshall Plan" in 1945 and continued with trade subsidies, military protection and yes, even now, the military presence in the Middle East. America only gets 10% of its oil from there, but Western Europe gets most of its from there.

Even the Soviet Union was kept afloat by the American taxpayer vis-a-vis wheat sales, subsidized by the American taxpayer, to the Soviet Union when they could no longer feed themselves--beginning in the 70's.

Oregon has a systemic 10% (in good times) unemployment rate as does most of Europe--France somewhere around 12%. Almost all of Europe (Germany being the lone success, at this point) is near economic collapse. England itself has been bailed out four times by America in the last 100 years. The last time the American taxpayer bailed out the Bank Of England was in 1994, if memory serves correctly.

Military protection of Western Europe, post WWII, cost the taxpayer trillions of dollars in adjusted monies. Had Europe had to pay for it's own protection from the USSR, it would never have been able to support its socialist programs. Had Europe not had American military might guaranteeing the flow of Middle Eastern oil, its economies would have collapsed. Had the American taxpayer not subsidized the wheat sales to the USSR, they would have either gone under sooner, or been forced to invade Western Europe.

We did the same thing in Asia. We also kept China's food economy afloat. Korea, Japan--same thing. Even South America has been propped up, repeatedly, by the U.S. taxpayer.

Face it, the whole Utopian Nightmare of the last 60+ years was funded by white Americans. It's over now--or will be soon. There is no more accumulated wealth to plunder. It's gone. This time period is akin to the calm before the storm--a moment where the whole of Western Man, takes a deep breath. The only question is, will he take another breath--ever.

Bogolyubski said...

Paul's Biggest Fan: All too true. It's in the nature of whites to leave when it hits the fan. We moved around Europe, tamed the inhospitable Northern lands, moved into Russia, Canada, Australia, and, of course, the US. We move and fight like badgers only when no other option exists.

We're happy to abandon the ship when there's an island nearby. When there's no island - nowhere to run - that's when "it gets real."

It's function of space. When we can't get away, we'll get it together.


I see quite a bit of this self-confident triumphalist type of post both here and at other sites like Alt-Right, Unamusement Park, etc. While historically true, whites are facing a spiritual crisis of self-loathing - generated and fostered by their own elites - which we've never seen the likes of before. Look at South Africa right now. Whites are being killed off there. It's outright open-season genocide. One would think that at least the Afrikaners - who have a real military tradition - would be making the ANC and its friends bleed in a serious way. Boers would be fully justified in using deadly violence against the ANC and anyone who supported that regime - even passively - anywhere on the planet. Instead, they are peacefully going along with the ANC plan for their complete eradication. How do you explain this?

Let's take another recent case, of the Irish exchange student in Tokyo raped and murdered by a groid rapper. She goes abroad to study in one of the more groid-free cities on the planet, but pays money to attend a vile, degenerate "hip-hop" concert of groid "artistes". Worse, she and her roommate voluntarily get into a limo with groids to go and "party" (have sex) back at the groids' hotel, with a completely predictable result. Auster calls this type of thing, which is extremely common, the Eloi tax. It's actually worse than that, though. In large numbers, white females are voluntarily offering themselves as human sacrifices on the monstrous altar of "diversity" and "equality". Again, what is the explanation for this?

Californian said...

One assertion I see being made in various other places is that economic prosperity can be stimulated by lowering taxes while reducing regulations. And related to this, that Detroit's economic meltdown was the result of high taxes and regulations.

This would mean that were there to be no taxes or regulations in, say, Haiti, such a place would immediately become an economic showcase. But have the advocates of this position ever bothered to check what the levels of taxation/regulations are like in Haiti? Or Detroit? or Liberia? Or, etc? And assuming that these places' taxes were to be lowered, would their peoples magically spring forth with new businesses?

For that matter, has anyone checked the other side of this, that high taxes and regulations significantly deter business? Apartheid era South Africa had lots of regulations and taxes, but it was a an economically and scientifically advancing country, with nuclear and space programs. And this despite economic sanctions and a low level insurgency. Today, how is SA doing?

It comes down to a crude economic determinism, the belief that taxes are a kind of valve you can turn to stimulate business. And that's all there is to it. That gets back to Detroit. It seems that the government there has effectively lost control of parts of the city. If so, why then don't we see entrepreneurs moving in and creating cutting edge businesses, or better, the citizenry creating an urban renaissance?

Well, we know the answer to that. It's the thing that dares not speak its name in 21st century America.

Anonymous said...

I think part of the strategy behind massive miscegenation and the promotion thereof is to blur the race lines to the point of confusion.

There have-been or are many intelligent "blacks" in positions of power who are actually be half-white: Malcom X, Obama, Powell, etc.

When you make generalizations of the whole group, trends are undeniable. Liberals blame white racism or pick and chose exceptions or highly-intelligent blacks on the far right of the bell-curve. Liberals see increasing miscegenation as a necessary step to Utopia by eliminating visible distinctions and making it hard for evil racists to point out the truth.

Bogolyubski said...

Speaking of Mogadishu, those who think they are safe from the black undertow in places like North Dakota might want to consider the type of high-quality folks being imported there under the "refugee" racket being run by Catholic, Lutheran and Jewish organizations with your tax dollars.

This also ties in to my previous post. Another white female who willingly tossed herself upon the flaming altar of diversity in an act of sutee that ended up consuming her immediate family as well.

Anonymous said...

For those who keep asking, I know of at least one political entity that has been run by black people and is reasonably successful. The Bahamas has had a black government for the past 46 years and they are the third most prosperous country in the Western Hemisphere behind the US and Canada. Not that the Bahamas hasn't had it's screw-ups and there are prominent white people in the economy (white population is about 15% or so), but black people have been running the government. In the past 20 years in particular, the country has done well. Unlike American blacks,the Bahamian black people mostly have their shit together. They don't spend all their time worrying about white people - they just go out and make a living.

Anonymous said...

What you say about the Bahamas is not necessarily true. Please see Hunter Wallaces OD's Caribbean Project at:

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2012/05/12/caribbean-project-poverty-in-paradise/

This talks about the reasons for the "successful" black-run islands

Zenster said...

Californian: The point is also made that polities which are run by whites will succeed, even if they impose socialistic programs (e.g., Oregon, Scandinavia). You can even look at the difference between a white-run Rhodesia and a black-run Zimbabwe. Or Israel versus most of the Arab states.

Of possibly greater importance is how, in the presence of a consensual goal, White cultures are able to make governments of all stripes function to some degree or another. However, once a certain amount of "diversity" is introduced and given equal political footing in those systems, a decline in that functionality is almost guaranteed.

While all cultures have some sort of "social contract", only White Western civilization has refined this concept into one that conferred a maximum latitude of individual rights without abrogating the larger community's ability to exist.

Once large minority populations are inserted into White cultures there arises an almost automatic divergence in political goals. One of the few explanations for this is that these minorities seek to install their own style of government which, all too often, is at odds with the White body politic, transparent or accountable government and freedom in general.

A rare instance of this not being so was in South Africa where the imposition of Apartheid legally barred its Black population from asserting any meaningful influence upon that nation's political process. Thus was the more common divergence of political goals avoided. Once that restraining force was removed, the shift over to Black-style politics, or what passes for them, was instantaneous along with concomitant rises in murder, rape and other violent crime.

All of which points towards a resurgence in Jim Crow-type segregation being one of the only ways of remedying this divergence of political, social and cultural goals.

There is a disturbing implication here: as more of the world is abandoned by white peoples, we will see the continuing disintegration of the cities, a rollback of civilization as it were.

What's being highlighted is how de jure segregation may be one of the only answers. Reversing the integration or a "Dis-Integration" of America is the basis of my essay and, for all the self-segregation that goes on anyway, a return to Jim Crow is not such a fundamental leap as it might seem.

Zenster said...

Lily White: And they even say both with straight faces.

Faces that are in sore need of a mailed fist.

Mutant Swarm said...

RobertB said:

"...Face it, the whole Utopian Nightmare of the last 60+ years was funded by white Americans. It's over now--or will be soon. There is no more accumulated wealth to plunder. It's gone. This time period is akin to the calm before the storm--a moment where the whole of Western Man, takes a deep breath. The only question is, will he take another breath--ever."

This is the problem in a nutshell, stated brilliantly. We can no longer hide the fact that the cookie jar is empty, and will not be refilled any time soon. No matter how much they "chimp out," no matter much extortionists like Je$$e and Al harangue guilt-ridden DWLs, no matter how much Mr Hope And Change™ flops his head from side to side every 2.35 seconds along with the TelePrompTer, The cookie jar wil still remain empty.

They may beg and plead for more cookies, but no more cookies will come out.

They may lay on their back and kick and scream like petulant three year olds, but no more cookies will come out.

They may grab the cookie jar and throw it on the floor in a fit of rage, but still, no more cookies will come out.

Reality is about to bitchslap these people upside the head. Get ready to ride out the storm and rebuild.

Zenster said...

negro fatigue: There is something interesting mentioned here, that I have thought about and observed first hand, I've noticed that when blacks take over, darkness seems to follow…

Why is it where ever blacks are darkness takes hold, not only in South Africa, but 15000 miles away in the USA?


Although they are strong leaders in the field, it isn't Blacks alone who are responsible for this lack of light. The single largest contributor to the darkening of our nighttime world is corruption.

Please take a minute to view the images in my essay, "The Dark Side of Corruption".

Absent such unpopulated tracts as Australia's "outback", the correlation between corruption and lack of municipal illumination is, literally, 1:1.

So, seeing as how Blacks tend to perpetuate some of the world's most corrupt regimes, it shouldn't be much of a shock as to how these incompetent grafters and thugs give an entirely new meaning to "The Dark Continent"; much less how darkness follows Blacks wherever they go like a used bit of toilet paper clinging to the heel of their shoe.

Those images of North Korea are the most striking of all. They should come as no surprise considering how their "Dear Leader", Kim Jong Il, possessed the world's largest private inventory of $200.00 per bottle Hennessey Cognac even as North Koreans were starving to death and resorting to cannibalism.

Zenster said...

RobertB: Military protection of Western Europe, post WWII, cost the taxpayer trillions of dollars in adjusted monies. Had Europe had to pay for it's own protection from the USSR, it would never have been able to support its socialist programs. Had Europe not had American military might guaranteeing the flow of Middle Eastern oil, its economies would have collapsed. Had the American taxpayer not subsidized the wheat sales to the USSR, they would have either gone under sooner, or been forced to invade Western Europe.

Excellent point, RobertB!

Had Europe been obliged to shoulder their fair share of Cold War era defense spending they never would have had the economic breathing room to finance such utopian societies with their free universities, low cost health care, ubiquitous mass transit and luxurious social benefits.

Allowing Europe's experiment with Socialism to go unchecked by defense budget realism, in combination with not demanding that post-Cold War era Soviet leaders be executed for their crimes against humanity, helped ensure that Communism and Socialism were never discredited in the scathing manner they so richly deserved.

The upshot of this is that, amidst their crumbling economies, modern day Socialists still feel no shame when they screech about how "Communism (or Socialism) just hasn't been done right, yet!" No mountain of corpses, be it Stalin's or Mao's, will ever dissuade them of their fascination with Social Engineering or their unshakable and fatal belief that mankind can be forcibly perfected.

Jay Santos said...

RobertB said

the so called "Great Society", were expanded greatly. Had the American taxpayer been actually charged directly for this, he/she would have revolted. They were already being forced into two income households to pay for it, anymore would have meant devastation. So the "government" simply sold debt to pay for it all. By selling the debt, they lessoned the impact in the here and now, as it was then, and put off the day of reckoning.


This is the real issue. As a whole, negroes are different than non-blacks. They're characterized by a host of qualities that may have had some selective advantage in Africa. But they're a disaster for states based on cooperation, planning, order and general delayed gratification.

It's the political class, the media and the administrative class that props them up and distorts all normal societal order in support of them. You can avoid the street thug. But you can't avoid the street thug being glamourized through the media. You can't ignore the street thug when his family is moved next to yours via section 8. You pay for the street thug at the point of the government's gun. You can't avoid paying for the thug through current tax and huge national debt futures.

You can almost understand the mind set behind the Great Society thinking back in the early 1960's. The nation was remarkably wealthy with no end to prosperity in sight. But by the early 1970's only a fool would have continued to believe that the nation's wealth could endlessly support a dysfunctional under class with apparently unlimited needs.

But they kept growing the programs through the 1980's and '90's. And they opened the borders. A nation cannot have open borders AND a welfare state.

The politcal class and their sycophants in the media are the ultimate guilty party when we look at the decline of this country.

AmericanGoy said...

"Californistani: You advance a startling thesis: that what makes or breaks a polity is not the economic policy but the composition of its populace. The thesis is startling because it is outside the mainstream analysis, which is an endless debate over big versus small government, taxes, and subsidies. But if what you propose is correct, then the current debate over American economic policy is not facing up to the real issues. If so, then American will never be able to implement a realistic urban policy".

Ding ding ding!

This invalidates the endless debates arguing about the kabuki theatre of American politics. Both sides are for the FIRE economy, both are for BRA, both are pro Mexican invasion, both are pro Wall Street thieves, both for job outsourcing...

Only small things differentiate them; nothing important, but minor issues like the incredibly unimportant gay marriage.

What is the most important, number one thing for a civilization?

Safety. Crime kept to a minimum.

Without safety, with high violent crime, no society, no civilization can prosper.

Both parties in America are arguing inanities while we have cannibals roaming the streets...

To be fair, the republicans (some of them) are making noises about "entitlement society"... one such example was a representative Walsh, with the Channel 9 sending a black woman "reporter" to give him the evil eye as she interviewed him, expecting him to get on his knees and beg for forgiveness, using the "I am not a racist" (he didn't)...

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/rep-joe-walsh-jesse-jackson-is-a-race-hustler-just-like-al-sharpton-is/

But he is a small guy, and the guys who really matter, the bushes, the Romney's, well, I do not hold much hope for them to even speak an "un-PC" phrase, much less implement policies that could save this nation...


What always amazes me is that this third world immigration is pushed not just in the USA, but in France, Holland, Germany, Sweden, Norway...

And it is never the cream of the crop that are allowed to settle, but always the dumbest, most violent, most useless ones...

Like if there was a plan to destroy civilization on this planet...

AmericanGoy said...

One more thing...

While shopping in local grocery stores (Jewel, Dominick's), I notice more and more older White guys packing groceries.

We are talking 70, 80 years old - their hands are shaking, they can barely stand, they perspire...

They should be retired, and in a saner system they would be, but alas, this is America...

My mother asked me how does this country allow such a thing?

I answered: "They are working, so that Shaniqua does not have to, and can pop her 15th kid with father number ten".

Anonymous said...

The next books will be:

Escape from Atlanta
Escape from Memphis
Escape from Chicago

White flight is alive and well in 2012.

Anonymous said...

"You advance a startling thesis: that what makes or breaks a polity is not the economic policy but the composition of its populace. The thesis is startling because it is outside the mainstream analysis, which is an endless debate over big versus small government, taxes, and subsidies."

This is exactly correct. No matter what economic system -- capitalist, socialist, state-property, etc --Iceland has, it would still be a decent and safe society to live. Conversely, No matter what economic system Haiti has, it would always be a hell hole.

So CAL Snowman said...

PK, I have been mulling over your assertion that "We could have been on Mars if not for BRA." I don't think this is true because that implies that we were once "free" to do as we pleased as a society. I don't think we have ever been free. Look at WW1 and WW2. No one in the United States wanted those wars except the Politicians and Business Elite. And what did those wars accomplish? NOTHING but the wholesale SLAUGHTER OF THE YOUNGEST AND BRIGHTEST EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN WHITES. Look at the Civil War, brothers fighting brothers, fathers fighting against sons to the tune of 600,000+ American lives lost, MORE THAN ALL OTHER U.S. WARS COMBINED. No my friend, we could not have been on Mars regardless of BRA. We could have used all of that protection money we paid Europe to go to Mars. We could have used all of that money spent on Vietnam, Iraq 1 & 2 and Afghanistan to go to Mars. We could have used all of that money developing hydrogen and neutron bombs to go to Mars. The Elite DO NOT WANT US TO LEAVE. We are prisoners on our own planet despite the technology and resources to expand exponentially into the universe.

A very interesting person in history is Nikola Tesla. There is no telling where we would be right now if J.P. Morgan and Edison had not run him into the ground financially and stolen all of his technology. Here was a man who dreamed of providing FREE and UNLIMITED ENERGY to the people of the world. Tesla (despite owning over 300 patents world wide) died penniless and alone, subsisting on a box of Nilla Wafers in his final days.

List Of Nikola Tesla Patents

Tesla's Free Energy Inventions Suppressed

Wireless Electricity Of Nikola Tesla


BRA is just the modern form of the eternal sledgehammer waiting to crush White civilization at a moments notice. Isn't it funny that for all of our intelligence and ingenuity, our civilizations just keep crumbling and falling no matter how Powerful they seem? I mean hell it TOOK LESS THAN 200 YEARS to kill the United States (1776-1965).

Anonymous said...

Do they have something against light that they chase it away.


We have seen various epidemics of theft of copper wire, and the shooting out of streetlights. And since the ANC took over in SA, there has been considerable mismanagement of power utilities, with rolling blackouts.

Hmmmm...

Ivan .M said...

Adherents of different social ideologies and economic philosophies, whether plausible or ridiculous, usually assert their chosen paradigms to be the essential political fault line running through the entirety of history.

Localism vs Centralization
Patriarchy vs Sexlessness
The Individual vs The Collective
Reason vs Religion
White Supremacy vs Ethnic Equality

It would seem to me that the only real political fault line of fundamental importance is the schism between those who view human nature, in its various aspects, as being largely fixed, and those who believe that human nature is mostly arbitrary and highly changeable.

Sex cannot be made not to matter. Age cannot be made not to matter. Individuality cannot be made not to matter.

And certainly, race cannot be made not to matter anymore in BRA than it could in the final years of barbarian-ridden Rome.

Egalitarianism, the post-Christian religion of the West, is perhaps the ultimate expression of that fallacious and deranged way of thinking.

So CAL Snowman said...

Even Hollywood Liberal "A" listers that hang out with and are good friends with Negroes are prime targets for the psychotic PC Marxist machine.

Gwyneth Paltrow Slammed For Using N-Word in Tweet

Anonymous said...

Off topic but not really....

http://onlineathens.com/local-news/2012-06-02/kids-can-eat-free-clarke-county-summer

kas

RobertB said...

I haven't time just now to respond to the person who wondered why whites are committing suicide so willingly. But I will. It's quite simple, really, and, like everything else, it was financed by white middle class America.

I think it's necessary to spell it out particularly for those too young to remember the 60-80's--the 1980's having been the last decade in which it was great to be white. A decade where almost no white people gave a hoot about non-whites and we all called illegals "wet backs" and "mules"--"mules" because even the media was willing to admit that their primary purpose in crossing the border was as mules for the drug cartels in hauling their contraband across the border.

Anonymous said...

"The point is also made that polities which are run by whites will succeed, even if they impose socialistic programs (e.g., Oregon, Scandinavia)."

I will modify the thesis - A negro run socialistic society will run out of other people's money much sooner than a white run socialistic society.

Anonymous said...

Here is a corollary to the modified thesis - It is impossible for a negro run society and a system of personal liberty and free enterprise to co-exist.

Anonymous said...

Re Californian "Already, China is moving into Africa, big time..."
It is a fact, although not a well known one, that China put a huge fleet to sea which almost made landfall in East Africa. This was well before Columbus.
I wonder if, racial memory being what it is, the Chinese are not feeling predestined to master Africa, and this time for keeps. I cannot envision a successful counter-argument (for instance staged in the UN) against a Chinese neo-colonial project. Simply put, in a stressed and starving world the resources Africa has cannot be wasted. If fate requires China to rule Africa, so what? And who, by the way, would be able to stop them? We, the guys that owe them trillions?
It is the "Lebensraum" argument all over again. This time, however, with all due deference to Adolf, there is a much more compelling case which can be made. If the Chinese don't decide to manage Africa we'll probably be stuck trying to do it, but we don't have the numbers or the will. Hell, we can't even manage to colonialize Mexico.

Anonymous said...

PK...

I'm looking forward to reading your latest tome. Perhaps an autographed copy?

If you haven't already done so, check out the TV show Hardcore Pawn. It's about a large pawn shop in downtown Detroit. The staff's encounters with rude and aggressive customers, namely negroes, would be hilarious if they weren't so typical. At this point they've really become parodies of themselves. Hardcore Pawn should be mandatory watching for DWLs and is sure to give race realists a slight sense of vindication.

-Ulick Varange

Zenster said...

So CAL Snowman: Look at WW1 and WW2. No one in the United States wanted those wars except the Politicians and Business Elite. And what did those wars accomplish? NOTHING but the wholesale SLAUGHTER OF THE YOUNGEST AND BRIGHTEST EUROPEAN AND RUSSIAN WHITES.

This is absolutely true and there is no need of any conspiracy theories to prove it. America and Europe's financial and corporate elite made slathers of money, often, in times of conflict, while providing both sides with weapons, materiel and funds (at a profit, of course).

Cecil Rhodes' Round Tables at the Royal Institute of International Affairs were a British counterpart of America's Council on Foreign Relations and both oversaw efforts to impose their agenda of One World Government (aka the New World Order) through a process of covert fomenting and instigating both World Wars plus other later disputes.

I also agree that these bred-up conflicts dispatched the flower of 20th century White male Christianity which, as is so clear in hindsight, represented a fundamental bulwark against the constant erosion of individual liberties being sought by Big Government on both sides of the Atlantic.

Where we might be now and how the overall demographic composure of our respective societies would have evolved would likely have borne little resemblance to today's anemic and vulnerable, rapidly dwindling White majority in both America and Europe.

While it may have been more the case of simply overcoming popular opposition to those conflicts which then amassed so much wealth for the war mongers, there certainly does not seem to be an iota of grief by them over how White Western civilization was stripped of its most promising generations ever.

These lost generations could just as easily have gone on to become rank and file of deeply Conservative and nationalistic citizens, all of which would have stood in direct opposition to the stated aims of today's Transnational Globalists. Whether this is coincidence or not will be the task of historians to divine, should they be so fortunate as to have unfettered access to the pertinent records.

Again, none of this is any sort of conspiracy. It is a convergence of mutual goals among secretive, non-transparent groups and the result of what are essentially non-interference pacts between these various cabals as they make their drive down field.

Anonymous said...

http://onlineathens.com/local-news/2012-06-02/kids-can-eat-free-clarke-county-summer

Imagine someone targeting one of these programs. Imagine someone slipping a bunch of ricin into the food, which would not show effects for a couple of days. Or the right mercury compound, which might not show effects for weeks. Imagine the welfare population of an entire metropolitan area dropping 50% in a couple of months, and the crime by as much or more.

A nightmare, not a dream. But is it preferable to the nightmare we are living in today?

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

Bogolyubski says, "In large numbers, white females are voluntarily offering themselves as human sacrifices on the monstrous altar of "diversity" and "equality". Again, what is the explanation for this?"

Hmm. An interesting point. I'd say it's more an individual thing - possibly self-loathing, rather than on a large-scale thing (interracial dating is still uncommon on the whole). I don't know. You've given me something to consider.

JB said...

Kersey,

It seems I can't post here nowadays. I suspect it's my computer system.
At any rate, your excellent work continues unabated. Thanks again for doing so much of the heavy lifting.
I see from some of the more perceptive comments that others feel you may have an historical role with all of this...like I've said numerous times before.
These are the times that try mens' souls, after all.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous: Imagine someone targeting one of these programs. Imagine someone slipping a bunch of ricin into the food, which would not show effects for a couple of days. Or the right mercury compound, which might not show effects for weeks. Imagine the welfare population of an entire metropolitan area dropping 50% in a couple of months, and the crime by as much or more.

A nightmare, not a dream. But is it preferable to the nightmare we are living in today?


Here's the problem with scenarios the one above:

1) It would not work in the way intended (imagine the welfare population of an entire metropolitan area dropping 50% in a couple of months, and the crime by as much or more). Even if the parasite population dropped by 50% in the short term as a direct result, BRA regime would simply re-settle more parasites in the area once they carried out a witch-hunt against all opponents of BRA - whether they supported such actions or not. You're forgetting that BRA is not the same as ABRA. BRA has a tremendous concentration of wealth and power. Groids are the boots on the ground for BRA, but they are not the ones issuing the directives. They lack the power, wealth and intelligence to control and operate BRA. While enemies for sure, it must be remembered that they are the lesser enemy.

2) The negative reaction among whites would set back the possibilities of increasing the numbers of those who can see for decades. Take a look at what has taken place in Norway since Breivik's little escapade last year: The Norwegian version of BRA has doubled down - with huge support among the native Norwegians. I am fairly convinced that Breivik was a false flag operation, part of whose purpose was to discredit nationalist sentiment in Europe. It seems to have largely worked in this respect.

Discard said...

Anon at 5:42 PM said "If the Chinese don't decide to manage Africa, we'll probably by stuck trying to do it, but we don't have the numbers or the will".
The Africans are a doomed race, because the typical full-blood Negro has the intellectual capacity of an average White 12 year old. To a determined conqueror, they are no more of an obstacle than the buffalo herds that once filled the Great Plains. They are sitting on resources that they haven't the brains to use, including farmland. They'll be shoved aside by somebody, and it ought to be us. Have no doubt that China and India both have got people working on plans to grab a share.
Whites could go there tomorrow, on the pretext that Whites are being eradicated in South Africa or that we need to protect the food we give them from being hijacked, and the rest of the world would say "Naughty naughty", and think, "Damn, the Whites got to it before we did".
Have we the will? If we can come up with the will to throw off BRA, yes. A good culling would do wonders for us, and one victory leads to another. Going to Africa would be a lot easier than going to Mars.
Have we the numbers? Easily. The British took over the place with a few thousand men armed with single shot breechloaders. Today, ten million Whites could control the area from Kenya down to Capetown. I don't mean ten million soldiers, just ten million White people, men women and children. There's a lot of good land there, and no reason that East Africa could not become another part of the West, like North America, Australia, or New Zealand.

Anonymous said...

RE Discard
No we won't conquer Africa, and for the reason I mentioned. Example Mexico.
History is a good predictor of the future. The more recent the history the better the predictor.For instance compare the way China handled Tibet to the way the USA "handles" Mexico.Yes it is a cold and unfeeling way to analyze but we are talking here about conquest in the Gengis Khan sense and not in the David Petraus sense. China has no guilt complex about the slave trade, which means that they have no hesitancy about taking what they must, and leaving the hindmost to the natives. But for the pure PR of it all, they'll frame their conquest in terms of "making Africa productive for the good of the world" or something similar. We will go along because we have already established ourselves as master exploiters and thus are suspect from the first.

Discard said...

Anon at 6:19 PM: If we can cast off BRA, all things are possible. The last century has seen radical transformations. In a period of 15 years, for example, Berlin went from the degeneracy capital of Europe to uber-fascism and then to doctrinaire Marxism. In my lifetime, China has gone from chaotic warlordism to Maoism and then to hyper-capitalism. The changes are not over yet.

Anonymous said...

Origins of political correctness

It has always been Cultural Marxism but in the US it became derided as "Political Correctness" and just as in the UK where Prime Minister was originally a term mocking The First Lord of the Admiralty it was adopted by its target because they liked the sound of it.

Anonymous said...

It would not work in the way intended (imagine the welfare population of an entire metropolitan area dropping 50% in a couple of months, and the crime by as much or more). Even if the parasite population dropped by 50% in the short term as a direct result, BRA regime would simply re-settle more parasites in the area once they carried out a witch-hunt against all opponents of BRA

A slow-acting agent would take months for symptoms to appear, then more time before anyone understood what was going on. By the time anyone had an idea that it could have been an attack, the evidence would be long gone. Had Breivik hit his targets anonymously people would be blaming islamic terrorists.

Municipal water systems are vulnerable to this too. Are you charcoal filtering all your drinking and cooking water? It could be wasted effort, or it could be cheap insurance.

It would be impossible to re-settle parasites after a large-scale attack. None would dare to come because they'd be afraid of it happening again; if they can be killed by the goodies they come for, there is nothing to come for. The survivors would run away as fast as they could go. If this happened in Los Angeles the Mexican population would be back in Mexico within a year.

The time to use a fast-acting agent would be right after a massive chimp-out. The public would see it as the justice that the government refuses to admininister, and the attackers would have many sympathizers. In that atmosphere, witch-hunts would be very difficult. The agents of BRA might even get tossed out of office before they could get anywhere, because law and order would suddenly be a very moderate position compared to terrorism. Terrorism is what it would be, but riots and mob attacks and torture-murders and gang rapes are terrorism too. If nobody has enough water, fighting fire with fire is all that's left.