Thursday, November 15, 2012

Racial Democracy: The GOP and "Urban Areas"


Paul Ryan and the GOP: Insane when it comes to understanding 'urban areas'
P90X. It’s a great workout. Defeated candidate for Vice President of United States, Paul Ryan, is apparently a big fan of weight training regime. So am I.

Changing up your workouts - engaging in muscle confusion - is a smart way to kick-start the metabolism and ensures muscle growth/fat loss.

Engaging in the same routine day will only result in muscle growth stagnation.

Someone once said the definition of insanity is “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

This could refer to doing the same routine in the gym day in and day out and expecting to build a new body, or, perhaps they it refers to the GOP’s strategy of minority outreach.

Maybe Mr. Ryan was mentally and physically exacerbated from a P90X workout when he [Ryan Surprised by Voters in ‘Urban Areas’, New York Times, by Michael Shear, 11-13-12]:
…blamed Democratic turnout in “urban areas” for the loss by the Republican presidential ticket last week, saying he was surprised that he and Mitt Romney did not do better in the nation’s big cities. “The surprise was some of the turnout, some of the turnout especially in urban areas, which gave President Obama the big margin to win this race,” Mr. Ryan said in an interview with WISC-TV. “When we watched Virginia and Ohio coming in, and those ones coming in as tight as they were, and looking like we were going to lose them, that’s when it became clear we weren’t going to win.” The remarks prompted scorn from some liberals who viewed Mr. Ryan as blaming inner-city minorities for the Republican defeat. “Paul Ryan emerged from dustbin of nothingness 2 blame his & Romney’s defeat on “urban” vote,” one person tweeted. “These 2 losers continue 2 demean minorities.”

Surprised? Do these GOP nitwits (and their high-priced campaign consultants) never, you know, consult the history of mayoral elections in cities where a black candidate ran against a white candidate?

Ample data exists about mayoral elections in ‘urban’ settings from Coleman Young’s race for mayor in Detroit; Maynard Jackson’s bid for Atlanta’s mayor; Carl Stokes in Cleveland; and Harold Washington in Chicago that would have provided empirical evidence of what to expect in the race for the White House between the black Barack Obama and the white Mitt Romney.

In a racial democracy, black people will unanimously side with the black candidate, knowing that he will fight for their interests; whites will side with a white candidate, despite that candidate fighting any and all accusations of racism (which, strangely, are accusations black candidates never face).

An important essay from the Contemporary Patterns of Politics, Praxis, and Culture: National Political would have provided sufficient evidence to the GOP of the folly of “minority” outreach:
As Chicago’s African American and Hispanic populations grew, combined reaching roughly 54 percent of the population by 1980, the glaring discrepancy between the size of the minority vote in the Democratic coalition and what minorities received in exchanged became more and more difficult to defend. The breakthrough came in the 1983 Democratic primary when Mayor Jane Byrne and Richard M. Daley, the son of the late mayor, split the white vote and Harold Washington squeaked to victory with 36 percent of the vote. With little history of true biracial coalitions and with Washington threatening to reform city government and the machine, white ethnics lined up behind his Republican opponent, Bernard Epton. In one of the most racially divisive campaigns in urban history Washington won a narrow victory, receiving  99.7 percent of the black vote, about 75 percent of the Hispanic vote, but only 12.3 percent of the white vote. The suffocating effect of dominant political machines were true even of Gary, Indiana, on of the first two major U.S. cities to elect a black mayor. Gary had a strong political machine that kept blacks subordinated until the late 1960s when African Americans were approaching an electoral majority. Richard Hatcher was able to win the Democratic primary in Gary in 1967 only because of a split in the white machine fueled by a corruption scandal. In a threeway primary, Hatcher narrowly won a plurality of the total vote (40 percent), received 75 percent of the African American vote but only 5 percent of the white vote. He then went on to win in the general election against a white Republican candidate by less than a 3 percent margin. The election had a very high turnout, and was highly polarized as Hatcher received 96 percent of the African American vote but only 10 percent of the white vote.
Since Democrats outnumbered Republicans nine to one, party labels turned out to be meaningless. In a city that was almost evenly divided by race at the time, Hatcher won because of the massive mobilization of African American voters, which was necessary because of the decades long subordination of African Americans by the city’s Democratic machine.  [Contemporary Patterns of Politics, Praxis, and Culture: National Political Science Review, by Georgia Anne Persons, p. 60]

Gary, Indiana died when ‘urban’ voters elected a black mayor; this ‘democratic’ action convinced white people it was time to flee the city. The civic, economic, and overall quality of life found in Gary now reflects the majority population (88 percent black) that is tasked with creating/sustaining a community.

 Chicago was on its way to death when ‘urban’ voters elected Washington, but he had the indecency to die in office, allowing the city (already with a terminal level of diversity) to stay on life-support for another couple of decades.

But it was only a momentary ‘stay of execution’ for the Second City.

The GOP will only engage in effective national minority outreach when white people become the demographic minority of the United States. As we have seen from mayoral elections in Philadelphia, Gary, and Chicago… this is what we can expect in a racial democracy.

Perhaps Paul Ryan and the consultants he has hired to advise him and the GOP on ‘minority outreach’ should ditch P90X for the Insanity workout.

The term aptly describes the current state of Conservatism Inc.

92 comments:

Anonymous said...

Kersey- it's simple. Ryan and Romney are engaging in the psychological defense mechanism called denial. Then they narcissistically expect their followers and/or supporters to follow suit. Ryan and Romney got socked with reality: blacks vote black, Hispanics want to be Hispandered to, and whites do not have a voice in major cities. Wake up White America.

Anonymous said...

Adding on to the last comment...,Ryan's and Romney's reaction shows how our of touch they are...

Anonymous said...

I think Ryan and Romney's problem is they are listening to the wrong people. The Washington consultant class are some of the most bland, boring,inside the beltway too long group of people to come along in some time. They believe in nothing! C'mon do you think Obama would have even been elected in 2008 if Lee Atwater had still been alive? We Americans are stuck with a President who has a very good chance of crippling 4 generations of Americans. The people who ran Romney's campaign just shrug their shoulders and find another star to hitch their wagon to. Romney and Ryan can blame urban people all they want but what sane person wouldn't have already counted their votes as lost and spent more time appealing to Americans who are still at their core very much conservative.

PDK said...

Many have heard the story of the Catholic nuns teaching school where those students who preferred their left hand for writing had that left hand slapped until the student learned to write with the right. A mark of the devil it was.

More recently liberals have used this old truth to showcase their illusion about the stupidity of religion. In the grand design of liberal ideology the state shall become the religion, therefore the need to besmirch, and end, the reign of, religion.

Not oh so long ago, culture was ahead of technology. A prime example of that realty was back in the day were culture recognized the danger and disgust factor of human excrement, but had not technically invented/perfected toilet paper. For many, the simple solution was to eat with one hand and wipe with the other.

A small problem arose, as some people were right handed and some were left handed, and further as each individual preferred to eat with their favorite hand, when the two met in public the embracing of hands would inadvertently pass one person’s excrement onto another person’s eating hand. This created problems.

Because 90% of humans are right handed and 10% are left handed, it was decided by the culture that the 10% change to the 90% position rather than the other way around. This makes both common, and intuitive, sense. The whole culture benefited with this stratagem in practice.

In America today, many” left handed people”, such as gays, lesbians, feminists, blacks, Hispanics, Islamics and DWLs, have banded together in an alliance to make the” right handed people” conform to their position, instead of they themselves conforming to of more natural, and naturally arising, right handed created culture. This is the sign of immaturity, low quality cerebrum, or both.

Because of our fully enfranchised democracy, this unnatural culture may materialize. Further, were it just a case of handedness, it probably would not matter, however, as it turns out, it is a matter of parasite/host and it does matter, so much so, that the life of the host is in jeopardy of death, which in turns kills off the parasite. This is ultimately a lose/ lose situation.

As our culture, through a fully enfranchised democracy, both materializes and makes this reality manifest, aka, continues “forward”, a socialist term, our culture proceeds over the precipice and into the abyss as this strategy is culturally unsustainable.

Currently, the people of our culture, are indoctrinated into liberal ideology from the tender time of entrance into public education, and further, said indoctrination continues all through one`s complete LPE, liberal public education. Further still, liberal indoctrination is constantly reinforced with Nazi like procedures, from other sources such as the LMSM, and of course, liberal Hollywood`s illusory truths and factualized fiction.

The best for the culture is what is best for all, and what is best for our culture is what non-liberal whites say is best.

Therefore, disenfranchising all but non-liberal whites is, in reality, what is best for everyone, especially the minority with the smallest, lowest IQ cerebrum, the blacks, who further continually demonstrate and make manifest an inferior cerebrum for higher culture creation, and higher culture maintenance.

As Paul points out by documenting BRA, or perhaps, as I sometimes like to say to an unbeliever, those increduled, just move to Detroit. Thank you.

PS, that was Einstein who stated tyring the same thing over and over, but expecting different results, was insane.


Anonymous said...

Or they just really don't care...

Anonymous said...

When the anti-white white people die out, the whites that are left in their place (those evil conservative whites that breed white kids lol) will vote for their people. Nothing could be better than losing all the left-wing whites. They don't breed, they won't be around in 2040 USA. I didn't vote romney because he is a neo-con, and a moderate left-winger, same as that joke that leads the house. Ryan is a good guy, but he should understand that blacks will always vote democrat 90% of the time no matter what.

Anonymous said...

The best way to cure Ryan and his ilk from their suicidal delusions is for them to take a nice long walk alone in any major city after dark, in the "urban area".

His PBX90 body will do him little good when facing the teaming mobs of diversity who will rip him to shreds.

A good ass kicking usually jolts some sanity into these progressive retards.

Anonymous said...

It's silly that R&R wasted their time trying to win "urban" votes. I agree with the poster above who said that Republican candidates need to stop listening to Beltway types. And I hate to say it but Republicans didn't have much of a choice this year as far as "charismatic" candidates go; the average low-info voter isn't going to find Santorum or Gingrich appealing, and Romney looked like a damn statue. Unfortunately, in the end, people vote with their emotions, not their brains. George W Bush, however you feel about him, had loads of charisma; so did Reagan, obviously. Clinton did too, and yes, Obama. People vote for who they think they "trust", without analyzing too hard just what that exactly means.

Bogolyubski said...

First of all, this plays into the Ministry of Truth meme that the groids and Mexicans won the beauty contest for Hussein. That is simply untrue. Mittens' poor performance amongst whites is why he lost the contest.

For those interested, look at the exit poll breakdown. Hussein's re-incoronation as HNIC teleprompter-reader was primarily due to the following white groups voting for him:

1. single white women
2. Younger whites (Generations X and Y)
3. White working class in rust-belt states

As Sailer pointed out, Hussein's folks ran devastating attack ads pointing out that Mittens was an out-of-touch banksta billionaire who outsourced jobs to China. This is not entirely untrue. Add to this the lopsided votes of Asians (3 to 1 for Zero), "Hispanics" (70% for Zero), and groids - not to mention the massive and sophisticated vote fraud (now there are numerous reports of more votes cast in precincts than registered voters). Mittens only managed to capture a bot more than 50% of the single white males.

It's telling that the Repuke establishment absolutely insisted on putting up the very faceless banksta who the Democrats wanted to run against. So the bosses of Repukedom now follow the requests of Dems on who to "nominate". That's one hell of an "opposition" party.

Romney and Ryan weren't merely "listening to the wrong people". They were dutifully playing the part assigned to them by those who control single ruling party, who obviously wanted Zero to read their decrees for another term so they can ramp up their looting. Yes, it's undeniable that the white share of the total electorate has gone down since Reagan's era - thanks in no small part to the 1986 amnesty signed by Reagan and passed with Republican votes. Stop playing by the enemy's rules. Republicans are the enemy.

Anonymous said...

Gosh I thought Ryan's prior experience with the chocolate pootang would have given him an edge in the urban areas. Oh well...

Anonymous said...

http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2012-11-15/story/17-arrested-jacksonville-id-theft-tax-fraud-banks

So predictable. Give blacks jobs and expect these results. Every time.

Willffed Tiberius Fergeson said...

Ryan needs some whey protein, he looks about 140. I can break that bitch in half.

On another note, jesse jackson jr. Is acting as expected. GIBSMEDAT SHEEIT MAFUCKA!!!! Ah be holin' yo hizzie of representatives and sheeit up.

Anonymous said...

off topic:

via Drudge:

FOLKS....READ AND REPSOND, PLS:

NSNews.TV

If Every Food Stamp Recipient Voted For Obama, It Would Account For 75% Of His Total
By Ron Meyer
November 14, 2012
Subscribe to Ron Meyer’s posts

If all 47 million food stamp recipients voted for President Obama, it would account for 75.4 percent of Obama’s 62.3 million votes.

Harry Hopkins, FDR’s close adviser who ran the non-defunct Works Progress Administration (WPA), once described Roosevelt’s strategy as “tax & tax, spend & spend, elect & elect.” He believed that if Roosevelt put everyone on the federal payroll, either through aid or federal jobs, that Roosevelt would never lose. FDR won four presidential elections in a row before his death removed him from office.

Did Obama use his idol’s model to win this election?

Food stamps rolls have grown by nearly 50 percent-by more than 15 million recipients-under the Obama administration. During that same time, the unemployment rate has stayed the same. Either those outside of the workforce have been decimated by the Obama economy or this administration is making a conscious effort to get more Americans reliant on government. Or both.

Anonymous said...

http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2012-11-15/story/17-arrested-jacksonville-id-theft-tax-fraud-banks

So predictable. Give blacks jobs and expect these results. Every time.


EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 17 suspects is black. Every single one of them. My, my.

Jay Santos said...

I’d like to make the plain case that this nation is engaged in an act of prolonged suicide for the apparent “benefit” of negroes.

1. LBJ’s “Great Society” has directed untold sums of money to the “poor”, who are still “poor”
2. Entire cities of the most wealthy, powerful society have been abandoned to blacks
3. Affirmative action in education and the work place has led, particularly in education, to a diminished education system as standards are lowered and lowered
4. The criminal justice system, the prisons, continue to deal with predominately negroes, where patterns of criminal behavior are becoming more violent, more predatory
5. Beginning with the Community Reinvestment Act and through the real estate collapse in 2009, the Federal government forced lenders to abandon lending risk management in order to accommodate the “poor”. This pattern of meddling in the system of capitalism and risk management nearly collapsed the global economy
6. The Affordable Health Care act has as one of its goals, insuring that every “poor” person be guaranteed health care. Valerie Jarrett commented, “health care reform…will disproportionately help African-Americans”. The nation is about to destroy the world’s most advanced health care system for the “benefit” of negroes.
7. The 2012 Presidential election exhibited the largest and most blatant instances of vote fraud in the nation’s history. The fraud was committed largely by blacks and for the benefit of the incumbent black President. There will be neither meaningful investigations into this nor prosecutions. What is arguably the oldest democracy on earth is being discarded for negroes.

I find these patterns to be so obvious and the outcome of them so clearly leading to the further destruction of this nation. Am I stretching on any of these items or exaggerating the outcomes? It seems manifestly plain to me.

Bogolyubski said...

On a previous thread, an anonymous poster put up a link to an absolutely brilliant appeal by Gregory Hood entitled:

Waking Up from the American Dream -
A White Nationalist Memo to White Male Republicans


It's not very often that I'd characterize something as a must-reed, but this one is really extraordinary.

Anonymous said...


1. LBJ’s “Great Society” has directed untold sums of money to the “poor”, who are still “poor”


Basically nursing GENERATIONS of poor and shiftless people to procreate, and whose offspring continue being poor and shiftless. There are people who are what, third- or fourth-generation welfare recipients? Their mothers and grandmothers and great-grandmothers were all on it too. I can't deal with how we are throwing our money away on the lowest common denominator.

6. The Affordable Health Care act has as one of its goals, insuring that every “poor” person be guaranteed health care. Valerie Jarrett commented, “health care reform…will disproportionately help African-Americans”. The nation is about to destroy the world’s most advanced health care system for the “benefit” of negroes.

I agree with all your other points, but I have to disagree that we have the most advanced health care system. The data out there says otherwise. However, the main problem is that Washington let the insurance companies take over health care and make it out of reach for nearly everyone except the rich and gov't workers. Republicans have no right to bitch about Obamacare because they did NOTHING to fix this problem themselves when they had the chance. Obamacare might suck but to most people's minds it's better than nothing at all or going bankrupt if they have to go to the hospital--whether you agree with this or not, that is the perception out there; Obama has won the narrative on this. The Right does NOT seem to get this at all, and I believe that is one of the reasons why we lost the election, even though no one is talking about it. But I agree with your point that Obamacare will disproportionally benefit negroes, and that's probably the main reason why Obama fought for it so hard.

Anonymous said...

Ryan pointing out that they lost badly in urban centers is not quite the same as complaining. Trying to make him look like a fool; i.e. as though he had no idea, is just trash talk plain and simple.

Jay Santos said...

Bogolyubski - thanks for re-posting that link. An excerpt:

"We need revolution if ordinary people ... are to have anything even close to a moral and pleasurable life. And it makes more sense than spending your rapidly diminishing days shuffling through this horrifying nightmare that used to be your country."

It is a great piece. "Shuffling through this horrifying nightmare that used to be your country", that sure does capture my mood.

Jay in DC said...

I agree with all your other points, but I have to disagree that we have the most advanced health care system. The data out there says otherwise. However, the main problem is that Washington let the insurance companies take over health care and make it out of reach for nearly everyone except the rich and gov't workers. Republicans have no right to bitch about Obamacare because they did NOTHING to fix this problem themselves when they had the chance.

Agreement. Comrade Zero is an enemy of the state, but his general idea on this issue is salient, if not very flawed.

Healthcare in the States is fundamentally broken, and you have outlined the broad strokes as to why. A huge part of it has to do with the big business and the ultra rich, as always. Insurance companies are one of the most powerful lobbies in politics and are a juggernaut of money. The Repukes did not address this because they LOVE trickle up economics. The more than can fuck you out of claims and paying the money flows upward from denied claims like mana from heaven.

Zero's plan though, while good in theory, will ultimately fail for one reason. Infrastructure. Hospitals and clinics in many areas are stretched to the breaking point already in many communities. This is once again where feel good politics and rhetoric are all that matters for your average American bobblehead to busy jerking off to porn on his iToy or buying useless shit they don't need.

When the "bamacare" goes into effect the gibsmedats will FLOOD, literally flood an already overtaxed healthcare system. 'Bamacare has no clauses in it whatosever about hiring more clinicians, building additional facilities, etc. Who needs to worry about such trivialities when you can just promise Free Shit to Sheep?

Anonymous said...

Ryan is just a goof who did nothing for the ticket. A hypocrite who benefitted from Social Security survivors benefits but yet later acted as if the program should be eliminated. Millions of elderly white people have paid into it their entire lives and depend on it and he seemed to imply it was just welfare. Having had a black girlfriend should have clued everyone in that he was an unreliable, untrustworthy man.

So CAL Snowman said...

@ Bogolyubski

Thanks for posting that link, really really good stuff.

"Do you get it yet? America, your America, is finished. But you don’t have to be. It’s time to fight for what comes next. It’s time to fight for a country of our own.

It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again." AMEN

I am a White Man, NOT an American.

Jay Santos said...

To Jay in DC and Anon:

I wrote "the world’s most advanced health care system". On that point you can't argue. Your points seem to be that it's not cheap. Its cost is driven by government intervention and complete government intervention is not going to make it less expensive to the middle class patient.

MuayTyson said...

As a fitness professional confusion principle has limited use. Unpredictable training yeilds unpredictable results.I tell people to choose specific goals and train for them.
This is the GOP stratagy. You would think that they know single women,the young, and minorities vote Democrat but since they have not tried all possible stratagies they figure"keep throwing things at the wall and see what sticks."

Had the GOP candidate come from a position of strength he/she would have picked up more youth. Come out against very obvious things like policing the world, immigration, and the economy period. Hammer these points and hammer Obama on all his faliures and lies. Three core positions and points and attack, attack, atttack.

Oh well, I'm just a dumb jock what do I know?

Anonymous said...

Exactly. America was the white hope. The hope that whites could live in a civilized nice place free from groids, third world turds, turban heads, and any other mish mash excuse for a homo sapien. Now the elites want to be kings of the turds. They wrecked this country. Let them eat turd sandwiches

So CAL Snowman said...

Jay in DC said:

"When the "bamacare" goes into effect the gibsmedats will FLOOD, literally flood an already overtaxed healthcare system. 'Bamacare has no clauses in it whatosever about hiring more clinicians, building additional facilities, etc. Who needs to worry about such trivialities when you can just promise Free Shit to Sheep? "

That is really an excellent point that the MSM and the liberals NEVER address when gushing over obamacare. What happens when all of the entitled hordes compete for dwindling services? What happens when your typical wait time at the ER and local physician turns into DAYS? What happens when all of the entitlement hordes flood the already strained and crippled health infrastructure? What happens when doctors and surgeons start leaving the big city hospitals en masse? I think what will happen is that "under served" minorities will be bussed into affluent White Suburbs for treatment. You will see small town hospitals flooded with third world people entitled to treatment under obamacare. This in turn will create resentment in the White suburbs and small rural areas which can then be construed by the MSM as even more White racism. Or perhaps when the system is so overloaded, and White people are seeking effective care/treatment with private insurance, private insurance will be outlawed.

Sheila said...

That linked article (many thanks Bogolyubski and others) is phenomenal. Share it widely, people. Print it out. Put it in your Christmas cards. Stop being afraid to declare your beliefs, or worry that someone may "unfriend" you on useless social media. Be openly and proudly White.

Anonymous said...

Its cost is driven by government intervention and complete government intervention is not going to make it less expensive to the middle class patient

No. There is a difference between government intervention and handouts. I dislike government over-regulation of every damn thing, but in the case of healthcare, which should be a right and not a privilege, Washington--BOTH parties--should have prevented the insurance companies from pricing out the working class. People pay vast premiums per month, but then when they get sick, the insurance companies give them the finger. Where do you think all that money's going? Sure, some of it is going to the doctors and the tests, etc; but that which isn't paying for $3 an aspirin (yes, that is real) and suchlike, it's going to line the pockets of the insurance companies. THAT is why insurance is so expensive. Govt should have kept that crap from happening. That would be an example of useful intervention. Then we wouldn't be in this gibsmedat Obamacare morass that we're in now and, as Jay in DC pointed out, for which we have NO infrastructure.

Anonymous said...

Blacks, for all practical purposes, are now in charge on almost every level. Certainly,on the federal level, which I still am trying to comprehend, but also on local levels. Most towns/cities (and related departments such as school boards, etc.) are now headed by inept black governments. I never would have dreamed that the power structure would be in black control this soon. I lament America's demise. Am seriously considering returning to the land of my ancestors (the UK).

Californian said...

Waking Up from the American Dream -
A White Nationalist Memo to White Male Republicans

http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/11/a-white-nationalist-memo-to-white-male-republicans/

It's not very often that I'd characterize something as a must-read, but this one is really extraordinary.


Powerful stuff there. It's worth thinking about even if you do not agree with Counter Currents' overall philosophy. Gregory Hood brings in the bigger picture. Morpheus offering the Red Pill.

Anonymous said...

OT
The new movie "Lincoln" is being advertised heavily. Looks like more liberal slanted race jive

Anonymous said...

From the Irish Savant:

“…how America is heading for Turd World status:

1) A President [and top law enforcement position (attorney general)are both black

2) [Both of the above committed to a black agenda]

3) A President who ignores his country’s Constitution as a matter of course

4) [Supression of freedoms in the name of protecting "minority rights"]

5) Emails, phone calls and text messages can be intercepted without a warrant

6) Legislation that might literally make it a felony to peacefully protest

7) A President who can order the seizure of food, land, energy resources from anyone and requisition skilled labourers to work on projects at his pleasure

8 ) Massive corruption

9) A [hopelessly] bankrupt treasury

10) A debasement of the country’s currency to fund grandiose projects

11) Many, many of the country’s major cities reverting to lawless jungles

[12) Children having children (overwhelmingly black on both counts)]

13) [Societal acceptance and tolerance for # 13]

Anonymous said...

"whites will side with a white candidate"

Are you kidding??

Millions of DWLs voted for Obama.

Anonymous said...

"Ryan and Romney are engaging in the psychological defense mechanism called denial."

Just like most white people, they are blind to the pack-mentality of non-whites. Unfortunately, it's particularly common in white devout Christians.

Anonymous said...

"Mittens' poor performance amongst whites is why he lost the contest."

This is correct.

Astoundingly, Romney got LESS votes than John McCain.

Anonymous said...

To the people who wrote me back on the November 12th post: I read your comments and acknowledge some good points.

MORPHEUS:
I never left this site. I've been reading, researching, and reflecting.

And I think I am beginning to see..

In light of this, I am now left with this question. Why are blacks considered the enemy?

Sincerely,
AA Woman

Anonymous said...

"Blacks, for all practical purposes, are now in charge on almost every level."

I disagree. The negroes are a front. The power resides with those that put them there and keep them there. BRA is about letting us know who is in control. Its the same deal as when:

Al Gore says we have to abandon the internal combustion engine yet he jets around the world as has a $10000 a month electric bill.

When the neocons say we have to send US troops around the world to fight terrorism but say nothing about the Somalis we import or the fact that we are compelled to subsidize illegal immigrants.

Obama pushing for integrated neghborhoods yet his hous in Chicago is not exactly "in da hood."

Or the anti-terror nuts who pushed the TSA on us when it is you and I that must get groped to get on a plane.

Or the drug warriors that push for money laundering laws that get turned against us when you want to carry cash.

Or the bankers that push for a monetary system based upon debt that penalizes saving and rewards their friends with bailouts.

It's all about control. They do it because they can do it and they don't want you to forget it.

Anonymous said...

I keep reading comments here about the insurance companies pricing health care out of reach.

You're buying into Obama's BS. Look under the rock and you'll see slimy lawyers crawling around. There's your cause of super escalation of health care rates along with hospitals being forced to treat illegal aliens for which they do not get paid a dime.

The cost of malpractice suits and treating illegals gets tacked onto the bills of those who have insurance. The insurance companies pay those inflated bills and pass the cost along.



Now, why doesn't government do anything about those two major problems?

1-Most lawmakers are coincidentally, lawyers as well, and they're not going to harm their own profession.

2-The illegals are votes for democrats and if a Republican goes after illegals, he's racist.

I'm of the opinion that lawyers should not be allowed to hold public office. They write laws to keep themselves and their brethren working.

Don't worry though. Insurance companies will all be driven out of business by Obamacare within a few years. It's part of the plan.

Ex-Detroiter

Anonymous said...

The Republicans continuously make the stupid ass mistake of nominating older milquetoast statesman for the extremely grueling sales job of being a presidential candidate.
They need to get over Old Man Syndrome and run younger more dynamic candidates who can aggressively sell the Conservative ideology of economic freedom and self reliance.

The Republican candidates, also, need to carefully start injecting Racial Realism into their pitch. It
needs to be completely in the defense of innocent hard working White America and not a condemnation or ridiculing of non-Whites.

For example, a Republican candidate should aggressively point out that there's a stealthy Racial Socialist agenda in the works that will financially bleed them and their children.

White Americans have ample reason to be infuriated with the course this country is taking, but they need to be informed.




SKIP said...

" and complete government intervention is not going to make it less expensive to the middle class patient.

Da gubmint intends to remedy that by doing away with the middle class and making everyone LOW class which is what the gubmint thinks of us anyway! Just gonna make it official.

SKIP said...

Did everyone see that a black 4 star general has been demoted to a 3 star for.....wait for it....acting like a Detoilet mayor LOL

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]This could refer to doing the same routine in the gym day in and day out and expecting to build a new body, or, perhaps they it refers to the GOP’s strategy of minority outreach.[/quote]

Mr Kersey - you are an "Incredible Mind" in my book.

Do you see that link to "Field Negro" on your "Right Hand Frame Of Shame"? Regardless of your differentiated race and subject matter - you two are of the very same spirit.

Your common fixation on your "religion" and how you mold every story as a "worship session".

Yet when someone dares to inspect the PROPORTIONALITY of your fixation to the scale of the problems that the entity that you claim to care about the most - you see that it is your "skewed religion" is the problem that impacts your perception.

Filled Negro's entity is "Black Progressive Political interests" dressed up to be BLACK COMMUNITY INTERESTS

Paul Kersey's entity is "provincial White Communal/Cultural interests" that are dressed up to be "American interests"

The affairs of DETROIT that are apparent to you in PHYSICAL FORM (run down infrastructure, crime and "PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT who are BLACK" leadership that controls every seat of power - are EASY TO SEE because they appear on the news every day.

The forces of POWER that deal in GLOBAL POLICY and SOVEREIGN CURRENCY that is today merely a string of electronic codes in a globally connected computer network is in truth: THE NINJA WHO IS GOING TO ULTIMATELY BREAK THROUGH YOUR FRONT DOOR AND EXACT REVENGE ON YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY.

This POWERFUL FORCE OF GLOBAL FINANCE, Mr Kersey is going to have its away with you while you are looking through your back window in your kitchen at the little Black kid who is mowing the lawn for your neighbor - with you making sure that he doesn't STEAL anything of value from the community.

Just as you are pissed that you see a $100 bill transacted with this Black kid - the FINANCIAL NINJA will be walking across the hardwood floors of your kitchen, about to strike you.

Do YOU survive this scene, sir?

Anonymous said...

This deconstruction and Detroiting of America is going to go full throttle. You haven't seen anything yet.
Even as bad as it is, it's going to have to get a hell of a lot worse before the majority of whites wake up enough to strike back. By that time, things will be so damn horrible that it will require a full scale violent revolt to undo the damage. And you won't be able to count on any support from any current political party as they're too invested in the system as it is.
Whatever arises from the ashes will be far different from what America was.

Anonymous said...

"...healthcare, which should be a right and not a privilege..."

This is negro logic. How can something that must be provided by someone else be a right?

Anonymous said...

The true befuddlement of the GOP lays in not knowing who they were fighting against: The Chicago Machine. The Machine has been stealing elections for centuries. They have it down to a science. Forget the blacks. It was the Fraudsters.

PDK said...

CF this includes you.

Would like to point out to all the disingenuous non-whites who visit SBPDL, that as the host parasite duality works exceptionally well for the parasite, it works equally and proportionally harmfully for the host.

The reality of life, the truth, whole truth and nothing but the whole truth, as measured by ones eye, or by science, makes clear the superior, inferior cerebrums born of the separate gene pools of whites and blacks.

My eye has noticed, wherever blacks reside on the planet, they gravitate to low man on the cultural totem pole. Even when they inherit a beautiful, complete culture, it is always but a matter of time before the said beautiful, complete culture is destroyed. Take a look at South Africa and just try to enter into denial, just try to blame the whites who first created, then maintained the culture, for the hell hole it has become since blacks took control back in 1994. By the way, blacks have murdered more than 3,200 whites since then in an anti-white racist bloodletting.

Science has determined that the human neotenous development pattern lasts longer for whites, (hypermorphosis), than for blacks, (progenesis), and further this in turn generates a larger, higher IQ for white cerebrums, and a smaller, lower IQ cerebrum for blacks.

This however is not the entire story. For in the realm of nature/nurture, there is not just the physical brain but the psyche or mind that may mature or may remain immature.

All white liberals, 40% of whites prefer to shun their personal responsibility to mature, while 95% of blacks prefer to shun their personal responsibility to mature. Worse the two enter into an alliance that parasitizes the non-liberal white, which further, ultimates in the total destruction of the culture.

Because of the nature of our different, white/black cerebrums, because further of the difference in our white/black ratios of accepting the maturation process, blacks gravitate to a fully functioning parasitic lifestyle. Further, I believe blacks, subliminally realize, and reflect this realization, by keeping their percentage of the population at 13%, a percentage the host can sustain and tolerate, and a percentage that keeps the parasite population healthy.

However black parasitism is now conjoined with Hispanic and Islamic parasitism, and collectively the parasites are killing the host, white, non-liberal Americans.

The problem with a fully enfranchised democracy is of course the parasites. Voting always and only to take from non-liberal whitey and give to themselves ultimately kills the culture that supports those that are the host, and those that are the parasite.

Therefore, all parasites should be disenfranchised, that means all blacks. If you do not like it, go parasitize someone else, go to Africa and create your own culture.

White liberals, the immature, 40% of whites use blacks and other parasites, as a means to achieve the end of political and social power, and for the BS freebies you get, including a false sensation of superiority, you will gladly accept this status, and inadvertently or not, you will help the DWLs kill off the host upon which you live.

We non-liberal whites cannot afford to sustain you any more, you suck too much off, and foster too much negativity on our whiteness, check out the Eve Carson story, there are thousands more beautiful young white women with her very same story and we are exhausted of your animal behavior.

Your disingenuous attempt to "understand" us is a mockery. Go back to the black blogs and help them embrace their personal responsibility to mature.

Lastly, a mixing of white genes with blacks lessens our white gene pool created, larger and more intelligent cerebrum. No thanks.

Thank you.

PDK said...

Hey CF, what black kid mows lawns, I mowed lawns as a kid, 3 lawns a week, for 7 years, 8-15, I remember how much work it was.

That 9 year old black kid with his, "if Romney win, we goin back to the fields" baloney looked to me as though he never worked a day in his life. Further it looked as though he never missed a free lunch or breakfast, all courtesy of whitey at whitey`s family`s expense.

I`m sorry for you that your ancestors enslaved their fellow blacks twice, but you are not grateful to me that my white ancestors freed your black ancestors twice.

I have tried to believe in the DWL`s and the black`s illusion mightily, however the truth of objective reality, as seen through both my own eyes, and through science, no longer allows for me to pretend I think the BS illusion is truth.

If you really believe the BS you pretend you believe, have faith in your BS illusion. Coming here to sharpen your argument, while feigning genuine dialog, renders you as the proverbial gadfly, shoo gadfly, shoo.

I`ll not waste my time on your BS, non-sensical illusion anymore.

Think about going away, embracing your personal responsibility to mature, and become the best adult your nature can allow.

There is an old adage, "the pot, calling the kettle, black", but here, what I see, is the parasite, calling the host, abuser.

No more, no more. Goodbye. Thank you.

HalfElf said...

Healthcare is not a right access to healthcare is a right. Healthcare is available, but if you buy insurance after you become ill, you are not gambiling on staying healthy you are trying to sperad your cost among a larger pool. Insurance uses preexsisting conditions as a disqualifier because they are in the buisness of buisness, and it would be like buying a car with a blown engine. Possibly you could restore it, but it will be costly.

Thom Jefferson said...

50% of whites stayed home and didn't bother to vote. White people work for a living and people like Romney pack up what used to be good jobs and ship them to China.

If they don't do that they are for immigration from 3rd world Mexico, which has the effect of cutting wages of jobs that remain.

The scales have fallen from their eyes and they know he is an as***le that could not give a s**t about them. The whites that voted for Obama I would bet know that they may soon not have jobs partially because of people like Romney and their actions in the past. They need a safety net and need treat as well.

There is a saying give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish etc. Well white Americans have trained, retrained, educated,reeducated, and as***les like Romney have drained the lake and invited people to fish in it without permits as well.

I hope there is a special place in hell for Mitt and his like.

nameispointless said...

PDK to CF: Go back to the black blogs and help them embrace their personal responsibility to mature.

Thank you, PDK. I second that emotion.

Anonymous said...


Constructive Feedback, is "mowing the lawn" some kind of code? My guess would be SELLING CRACK!

Zenster said...

PDK: Because of our fully enfranchised democracy, this unnatural [LGBT] culture may materialize. Further, were it just a case of handedness, it probably would not matter, however, as it turns out, it is a matter of parasite/host and it does matter, so much so, that the life of the host is in jeopardy of death, which in turns kills off the parasite. This is ultimately a lose/ lose situation.

What does ultimate survival mean to a sub-culture of people who—in the absence of affordable human cloning—have a near-zero chance of transmitting their DNA? Reproduction is the only genuine form of long-term survival and, to the LGBT community, it is of almost no consequence. This is reflected in how they sneeringly call heterosexuals, "breeders".

A suicidal parasite is, perhaps, the most dangerous of all. In many ways, Blacks fall into this same category due to their promiscuity and internecine violence, as neither behavior contributes to the formation of meaningful bloodlines or heritage.

Any truly beneficial solution to this is going to very difficult for Whites to tease out. Providing government incentives for large, stable nuclear families will only encourage more breeding by Hispanics and Muslims, both of which are groups largely hostile to White Western civilization.

Given these factors, it is easy to see why so many people here at SBPDL support secession. Be that as it may, it remains truly difficult to imagine the federal government sitting still as one or several states break away from the union. There is way too much wealth at stake which the care and feeding of pet minorities depends upon.

PS: I am so enjoying your contributions here, PDK. They are pertinent, erudite and routinely entertaining. Welcome aboard!

PDK said...

Thank you for the kindness Zenster.

Constructive Feedback said...

PDK:

If I didn't know any better I would think that you don't like me and its for no other reason than I am BLACK.

So let me get this straight.
While "The Blacks" in South Africa who have been beaten down by the White Majority (not trying to steal any "White Guilt" out of you - just stating facts) - YOU argue that the Post-Apartheid attempts to bring more people into the economy is "Destroying A Great Thing"?

I guess some things are only GREAT if you are not occupying the toilet bowl as someone tells you "There is a lot of undigested food in this feces. What are you complaining about?"

You see PDK - you keep arguing as if YOU and 99% of the other WHITE FOLKS - would be able to pick up and replicate the SCIENTIFIC/TECHNOLOGICAL, FINANCIAL, MILITARY advancements that a small class of WHITE FOLKS can be attributed with.

Do you think if I put the cast of "Jersey Shore" on one desert island and the cast of "Real Housewives Of Atlanta" on another similar island that the RESULTS would be much different because of some intrinsic difference in IQ? PLEASE!!!

You keep trying to lump me in with the IDEOLOGY and LEADERSHIP of Detroit. I 100% REPUDIATE the antics that are in full display and the damning results that they generate.

Yet - as the forces in South Africa and Detroit that took over the reigns of the institutions that they were left but then act in SELF-SERVING WAYS - please tell me - HOW does this differ from the famous "Trust Fund Babies" that take their family fortunes, their parents having failed to provide the proper inculcation of business savvy, and they end up blowing through the fortune and crashing all that was built up for their benefit?

Why is it that they don't assume the mantle of WHITENESS per your analysis but when a group of Blacks - who I can articulate MY DISAGREEMENTS with - do the very same thing it becomes a BLACK ATTRIBUTE?

The key point that you all can't seem to get across into your minds is that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA on on the verge of going through a SUPER-DUPER BOOPER LOOPER DETROIT-type meltdown as $16 Trill to $22 Trillion of debt makes Detroit's $4 to $10 billion problem look like a teenaged pimple compared to a brain tumor.

I DON'T BELIEVE THAT I COULD EVER ANSWER ANY OF YOU to the point at which you see me and my life experiences as INDIVIDUAL as I would tend to see that in General Patraeus' girl friend doing what she did to a married man with power - ALL WHITE WOMEN ARE NOT SLUTS with no RESPECT FOR THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE.

Can we at least agree TO AGREE that "I AM NEVER GOING TO BE YOUR 'BROTHER IN LAW', welcomed into the family. That I DON'T WANT TO BE your brother in law. That while YOU GET NO ARGUMENT FROM ME that some Black people are no good and will kill ya for a set of iPhone headphones in your pocket - there are some WHITE FOLKS that have far more power and can kill far more people in pursuit of things that are far more VALUABLE than the headphones that they little Black fellow who you made the mistake of allowing to cut your lawn is capable of doing?"

Do you see the point about my "Black Superiority" challenge with some of you all?

"The Blacks" are such a POWERFUL CONCERN to you that you end up demoting the threat of what YOU NEED TO BE WATCHING OUT FOR.

Californian said...

By the way, [South African] blacks have murdered more than 3,200 whites since then in an anti-white racist bloodletting.

3200 is just the number of whites killed by blacks in farm attacks (which is bad enough!). The total number of black-on-white murders since the end of apartheid in 1994 is estimated at 70,000. See:

http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com/2012/05/70000-racist-murders-of-whites-in-south.html

Here's an interesting comparison: how many blacks were lynched during the segregation era? The number is estimated at 3500 (another 1200 whites/others also lynched). See:

http://www.nathanielturner.com/lynchingandracialviolencepr.htm

SA blacks have in 18 years murdered about as many whites just in farm attacks as blacks were lynched in 70 years of segregation, and killed 20 times as many overall.

Then we can compare to the number of white people murdered (and tortured!) by blacks in the USA, SA, and now in Europa. And ponder how black-one-white violence in cities such as Detroit drove out white people – and not incidentally led to the destruction of many metropolises.

Blacks and their DWL handlers can beat themselves up into a frenzy over racial killings which happened a century ago, but ignore the bloodbath that is going on today, globally, carried out by blacks.

"Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide."--James Burnham

Anonymous said...

This is negro logic. How can something that must be provided by someone else be a right?

You are an idiot. Instead of making accusations of being negro and using some absurd talking point, you could have responded coherently as HalfElf did below:

Healthcare is not a right access to healthcare is a right.

Correct, I should have stated it that way to begin with.

Anonymous said...

Constructive Feedback is so ignorant he can't even see how ignorant he is. I'm pretty certain he's incapable of either logic or reason, and it's clear he doesn't even understand either Paul's posts or the comments therein.

Jay in DC said...

You see PDK - you keep arguing as if YOU and 99% of the other WHITE FOLKS - would be able to pick up and replicate the SCIENTIFIC/TECHNOLOGICAL, FINANCIAL, MILITARY advancements that a small class of WHITE FOLKS can be attributed with.

Do you think if I put the cast of "Jersey Shore" on one desert island and the cast of "Real Housewives Of Atlanta" on another similar island that the RESULTS would be much different because of some intrinsic difference in IQ? PLEASE!!!



You are taking point samples out of a massive an overwhelming body of collective data. I.E. You are picking morons.

Where the numbers bear out better is when you take the respective populations AS A WHOLE, Caucasian and Negroid and look at the overwhelming avalanche of evidence as to the general cerberal power of both groups.

I do not read that PDK thinks any one of us would be the next Thomas Edison or Henry Ford. What he posits, is that we, collectively, create a stable enough economic society that ALLOWS for those of high merit to share their creativity and genius with others. Blacks, for all the reasons PDK listed in his inital post cannot do these things because they are fundamentally incapable of building the societal infrastructure. "Social Capital" as our host often likes to coin the phrase. Cultural Marxist DWLs are particularly poisonous in this manner since if someone succeeds well beyond a flattened bell curve, they must be artifically held back from any additional accomplishments they may produce that skews the curve even more. For this reason, they will be first against the wall when this whole thing goes south. They are the most egregious offenders by far.

Tangentially, yes there are trust fund babies like Paris Hilton and other that were born into vast wealth with low IQ. Again, point samples, and statistically insignifcant.

What is the true high water mark of a civilization is what has any group accomplished as a whole, based on the society they were able to promulgate, vis a vis for Caucasians nearly every modern invention of the 19th and 20th centuries.

Anonymous said...

Given these factors, it is easy to see why so many people here at SBPDL support secession.

I have a question about secession. I'm serious now. If your state or states were to secede, what would you do with the negroes? Presumably you'd do something with them. Would you stick them in ghettos? Would you kick them out? Would you merely circumscribe the "gibmedats" so that they'd want to leave on their own? The third option would probably work fairly handily.

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race in Progress!

Constructive Feedback does raise some points, despite his over-use of CAPITALS. So here we go...

While "The Blacks" in South Africa who have been beaten down by the White Majority ... YOU argue that the Post-Apartheid attempts to bring more people into the economy is "Destroying A Great Thing"?

Whites were a minority in South Africa, not a majority. They could see what happened in the rest of sub-Saharan Africa when black majority rule went into effect, which was the general disintegration of countries, rise of dictatorship, and purging of whites. Look at Congo in the 1960s.

Blacks in SA were not "beaten down." It may sound cliche, but they were being civilized. Prior to the arrival of white Europeans (and later Indians) blacks had built no cities, paved no roads, developed no literacy, generated not a single watt of electricity. White people created all those things in SA. And tried to bring blacks into the 20th century by building for them schools, hospitals, jobs, and the discipline needed to function in a modern society. Because just about everywhere else in Africa where blacks were given any power, they proceeded to wreck everything built up by white civilization. See Congo, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and ad nauseam.

You can not simply hand the keys to a modern civilization to blacks who were living at a Neolithic level and then expect society to function or civil order to be maintained.

As for bringing more people into the economy: these are code words for discrimination against white people via AA and BEE. Regardless of the ideological doublespeak, blacks in power tend to drive out whites whether by AA, agitprop, or open violence. It's true in South Africa post-apartheid, in Detroit since the civil rights revolution.

... you keep arguing as if YOU and 99% of the other WHITE FOLKS - would be able to pick up and replicate the SCIENTIFIC/TECHNOLOGICAL, FINANCIAL, MILITARY advancements that a small class of WHITE FOLKS can be attributed with.

White people have replicated all these things even in the most extreme situations. Look at Iceland. Or Rhodesia under white rule. Why? One reason is that white people have higher median IQs, with enough numerous really high IQs to provide the critical mass to create the scientific/technological, financial and military advancements.

Do you think if I put the cast of "Jersey Shore" on one desert island and the cast of "Real Housewives Of Atlanta" on another similar island that the RESULTS would be much different because of some intrinsic difference in IQ?

Better idea: put the producers of these programs on desert islands!

If you get your ideas about the realworld from TV, then you might also assume all those black engineers, doctors and enlightened politicians you see on the tube would create just such an island utopia.

You keep trying to lump me in with the IDEOLOGY and LEADERSHIP of Detroit. I 100% REPUDIATE the antics that are in full display and the damning results that they generate.

OK, will give you credit for that.

HOW does this differ from the famous "Trust Fund Babies" ...

For every trust fund baby who blows the family fortune (and I have known a couple) there are many more white people who create new wealth.

But can you name for us any black majority run city or country which has an expanding economy, schools which turn out superior graduates, and low crime rates?

Because that is the real issue here. More white people are getting concerned about the fate of themselves and their children as they lose control of their own countries.

[continued]

Mr. Rational said...

Confused FsckheadIf I didn't know any better I would think that you don't like me and its for no other reason than I am BLACK.

RaceCard™ not accepted here.  Try some other social currency, like... good writing, sound reasoning and firm facts.

YOU argue that the Post-Apartheid attempts to bring more people into the economy is "Destroying A Great Thing"?

You appear to be thinking in slogans like "bring more people into the economy", instead of looking at pertinent facts.  Giving a Black person a job they can't do isn't bringing him into the economy, it's destroying the economy.  Paying them for not doing a job is just parasitism.

I guess some things are only GREAT if you are not occupying the toilet bowl

Blacks in Rhodesia were better off, pre-Zimbabwe.

you keep arguing as if YOU and 99% of the other WHITE FOLKS - would be able to pick up and replicate the SCIENTIFIC/TECHNOLOGICAL, FINANCIAL, MILITARY advancements that a small class of WHITE FOLKS can be attributed with.

Average White people can produce the society which creates and nurtures that group.  Blacks have not shown any ability to do that.

I DON'T BELIEVE THAT I COULD EVER ANSWER ANY OF YOU

Because you fail at facts and reason.  Your experience as an individual means nothing compared to the over-arching reality.  But go ahead, get your highly-selected group of other Blacks and go start a country somewhere (I suggest settling in a piece of Africa).  Breed like crazy, toss out your obvious failures and expand.  See what you can turn into a dozen generations from now.  In the mean time, get your whiny black ass out of here.

Bogolyubski said...

I see CF appears to be in one of his more semi-lucid (for him) moments. So, I gather that CF takes the view that the cited basket cases of Detroit and South Africa are the result of looting by the vampire-squids, who then play off their victims (black and white) against one another. It's not as simplistic as this, but there is nevertheless a grain of truth in his point.

CF (sort of) acknowledges the black willingness to buy into the squids' looting strategy, but then accuses of PK of indulging in a sort of mirror-image of what Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Housenigga Hussein do with negroes - PK is trying to be a whote Jesse Jackson. (e.g. screaming about the black kid mowing a lawn while the squid-ninjas break down the door to completely destroy). This is a complete comprehension failure on CF's part. There is no black kid mowing the lawn. Instead, shitavious along with his fellow yoots and honah studintz have been empowered by the squids to break down YT's door and murder, rape and loot YT with impunity - which they do routinely and with great relish.

Nobody held a gun to blacks' heads and forced them to vote as a block or to indulge their inner groid on the sex-decades zebra intifada of rape and murder against whites, CF. I've yet to see a single black, including you, even admit that whites in SA are being genocidally slaughtered by the ANC regime there. Again, nobody forced them to do this. They are more than willing to do it all on their own. The squids who actually call the shots didn't even have to dog-whistle instructions - though they knew full well what the unleashing would result in.

In reality, the primary point of PK pointing out all this black crime and dysfunction is - strange as it may seem to CF - to undermine and overthrow the power of white guilt, which has been a most effective tool of the very financial overlords he appears to oppose. Indeed, it is one of the most effective methods of control they exercise over the white population.

Discard summed it up quite brilliantly a few days ago:
White guilt is a marketing tool, crafted to suit a once Christian people. Fill them with intolerable guilt, then offer atonement through racial self-abasement. Just like selling deodorant, once you've convinced people that they stink, the product sells itself.

Complaining about blacks' degenerate and animalistic behavior on its own terms is as useless as complaining about horses who relieve themselves on the street. It's just what they do and who they are. Destroy or deactivate the radio-shock collar of white guilt is one the only ways the control of the squid overlords can be broken. CF should take some time to go and read the writings of the late Elizabeth Wright, a black woman who did have some understanding of the issues. As others have mentioned, he needs to go and start working on presenting truth to his own people.

Californian said...

[continued]

CF, you seem to understand why white people might have some concerns over blacks. Which is why I am willing to continue this dialog.

Why is it that they don't assume the mantle of WHITENESS per your analysis but when a group of Blacks - who I can articulate MY DISAGREEMENTS with - do the very same thing it becomes a BLACK ATTRIBUTE?

Here's the thing:

Assume a white person were to assume that mantle of whiteness and publicly stated he or she was proud of being part of a race/civilization which created the industrial and scientific revolutions, fought the wars which ended slavery, made a high standard of living possible for average people, and even landed humans on the Moon.

That person might also note that whites have built the cities to which blacks flock from all over the world in order to take advantage of the jobs, schools and civil order which blacks themselves seem unable to create or maintain. Again, see Detroit. Or Johannesburg.

If any white person were to assume this mantle and show some pride in what his or her civilization has accomplished, they would be shouted down, fired from their jobs, vilified in the media, harassed by students, subjected to mob violence, and in parts of Europa subjected to criminal prosecution. (google John Derbyshire, William Shockley, J. Philippe Rushton, Emma West, Jared Taylor, etc.)

This is one reason you see the rise of the far right in Europa, and more Americans are arming themselves. The more repressive the system becomes, the more likely there will be a massive white backlash.


"The Blacks" are such a POWERFUL CONCERN to you that you end up demoting the threat of what YOU NEED TO BE WATCHING OUT FOR.

There is concern among race realists about the corporations which push globalization and use third worlders to displace white populaces; about an establishment which is openly hostile to the majority culture; and especially about disingenuous white liberals (DWL) who use blacks as a front to attack whites.

But SBPDL is intended to deal primarily with the dysfunctions which black majority rule seems to bring with it (high crime, high illegitimacy, declining economy, disintegrating infrastructure, torture-murders of white people, that sort of thing). SBPDL works because these dysfunctions are so open, so in your face, they shock people's eyes open and thereby get them to understand the bigger picture.

As they say in The Matrix, it's the Red Pill.

PDK said...

Anon, 11:39; CF is so disingenuous and of such low IQ, he does not see, nor noticed, that he hammers home, Paul`s point.

When whites create something special the blacks "dog" the whites, hunt whites down to parasitize a slice of white creation.

As Julian Bond once said, "where you go,(whites), we, (blacks) will follow". At least JB was genuine.

Cali. 11:22; I was unaware of the 70,000 total whites murdered by the anti-white, racists blacks, I`ll seek confirmation of your statement, though I trust it to be true.

By the way, before SA became white dominated, or should I say before whites created the SA culture,(BLE), black life expectancy, was 38 years of age. During the reign of SA white culture, led by whites, the BLE rose to 61 years of age. Since 1994, the fall of white dominated, white SA culture, and the rise of black dominated, black SA culture, the BLE has regressed to 52 years of age.

No matter how blacks paint the picture, how greatly they cling to their most cherished illusion, that blacks are failures because of white persecution, the truth of reality surfaces, as with rich cream that always rises to the top, and makes manifest the incapable of higher culture creation, higher culture maintenance of the black inferior cerebrum.

In memory of Eve Carson, as good a symbol for all the beautiful, young, white women murdered by the thug embracing, immature, somewhat retarded, white welfare recieving, thankless blacks.

Eve Carson`s story can be gleaned, online. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

I do not read that PDK thinks any one of us would be the next Thomas Edison or Henry Ford. What he posits, is that we, collectively, create a stable enough economic society that ALLOWS for those of high merit to share their creativity and genius with others. Blacks, for all the reasons PDK listed in his inital post cannot do these things because they are fundamentally incapable of building the societal infrastructure.

Jay in DC, that is one of the most cogent explanations for white success I've ever seen. I tip my hat to ye, and to your generally insightful comments altogether.

10mm AUTO said...

"Waking Up from the American Dream -
A White Nationalist Memo to White Male Republicans

http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/11/a-white-nationalist-memo-to-white-male-republicans/

It's not very often that I'd characterize something as a must-read, but this one is really extraordinary."

I hated reading this, but I have to agree. Gah! It hurts. The fact is Mittens was the best we are going to do. He is handsome, practically a send over from Central Casting for an American President. He had no significant scandals, a large White family, support from his community and other than his somewhat odd religion was a TV President with a successful business career. Ryan is a policy wonk, young, good looking with ideas and numbers and the will to follow through. He totally locked up the NRA vote and you could see him being President one day. They made a great team.

But it is over. I am reading over at Hot Air (a middle of the road Conservative site) how can the Republicans out pander the Dems or find a "racial" Conservative like Bobby Jindal. Sigh....

Obamaphones and Food Stamps are the modern equivalent of "Bread and Circuses". Obama adopted the FDR idea of Tax, tax, tax, spend, spend, spend, vote, vote, vote (with which he won three Presidential Terms!); specifically pandering to the negro, while White Republicans tried to show how "inclusive" they were. You can not out vote-buy the Dems and keep any shred of belief in the Republican system. Romney got the same percentage of the White vote that Ronald Reagan got, get it? We don't have the numbers and no one is buying Austerity and Self Reliance in BRA. The third level of Government is so broke all the taxes it takes in merely pays for entitlements and interest on debt. Everything Government does, from Dept of Commerce to Dept of Education to Defense is borrowed. It is all over for good. I will be very surprised if the Fed lasts long enough to fund ObamaCare.

I do not see a path forward for Whites except for either girding our loins and expelling the negro and the Hispanic (unlikely given South Africa or Rhodesia) or a breakup of the Union, which is how it was designed in the first place.

If the Fed was destroyed, the Governors have direct authority over their territories until a new Government is formed. That is what the BPP and Louis Farrakhan and the rest are waiting for, that is the reason for the Cloward/Priven push on the Federal Government.

White Man we are on our own. We are in a much better position than South Africa was in the 1990's and the African Colony here in the USA is unable to break the Whites in numbers or surround them, especially in the Western States, but the situation not yummy.



Zenster said...

Bogolyubski: It's telling that the Repuke establishment absolutely insisted on putting up the very faceless banksta who the Democrats wanted to run against. So the bosses of Repukedom now follow the requests of Dems on who to "nominate". That's one hell of an "opposition" party.

Yes, it's very telling and only goes towards cementing my perception that we are now in a one-party system of the almighty dollar. Even more perverse is that this one-party system is nested in a plutocracy that worships, not the dollar, but whichever currency or financial instrument can boost their profit by 0.0000000001%.

Romney and Ryan weren't merely "listening to the wrong people". They were dutifully playing the part assigned to them by those who control single ruling party, who obviously wanted Zero to read their decrees for another term so they can ramp up their looting. Yes, it's undeniable that the white share of the total electorate has gone down since Reagan's era - thanks in no small part to the 1986 amnesty signed by Reagan and passed with Republican votes. Stop playing by the enemy's rules. Republicans are the enemy.

Correction:

Republicans are also the enemy.

Liberals still hate Whites more than the GOP. That said, trust the Republicans to remedy that slight deficiency at their earliest opportunity.

As Baron Bodissey over at Gates of Vienna is fond of noting:

The only thing worse than a Republican is a Democrat.

Zenster said...

PDK: Thank you for the kindness Zenster.

Hey, no problem. You make it easy. Like any good Conservative, you earn it.

Zenster said...

Anon: (11/15 12:13 PM): Did Obama use his idol’s model to win this election?

Yes, but only if that idol is Stalin.

PDK said...

Jay,11:39;

Whatch your BP friend.

What I argue, so many times I feel like I`m being redundant, are the two main points that differentiate whites and blacks. They are; 1) our mutually exclusive gene pools and the noticeably different, in size and IQ cerebrums our said, mutually exclusive gene pools create, and 2) the percentage of whites, 60%, versus the percentage of blacks, 5%that chose to embrace their personal responsibility to mature.

I`m not talking about variation of IQ within a single race, that should be a given, it should be naturally understood.

However, the average mean for black IQ, consistently over decades, is 85, while for that same time period, for whites, has been consistenly at 100.

If you disbelieve me you can glean these numbers online, further, you may wish to check out Phil Rushton or other scientists.

There is a reason blacks dominate basketball, their gene pool produces a run fast, jump high, athleticism.

Equally however, there is a reason whites dominate Houston control and white America, not black America, put a man on the moon.

Our mutually exclusive gene pools have evolutionarily entered into speciation; we were/are becoming different humans.

No offense friend, but I must say I think you are still suffering from DWL indoctrination. If you are Catholic, seek out a Priest who will engage in exorcism. Or, if not, take your time, and embrace your personal responsibility to mature. It will sober you up, open your eyes, and finally allow you to see the truth of objective reality.

In case this helps, I have not a superiority complex, but then again, I have not an inferiority complex. I have always considered myself just plain old average on everything that can be measured. I just might be that one only, perfectly average white person out of all the whites alive today.

Not sure, just saying. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Great Point!!
Constructive Feedback

Zenster said...

Anon (11/15 4:13 PM): Now the elites want to be kings of the turds. They wrecked this country. Let them eat turd sandwiches

As the old saying goes:

LIFE IS LIKE A SHIT SANDWICH. THE MORE BREAD YOU HAVE, THE LESS SHIT YOU HAVE TO EAT.

Anonymous said...

YOU argue that the Post-Apartheid attempts to bring more people into the economy is "Destroying A Great Thing"?

When South Africa became a net importer of food this was proved.

Mr. Rational said...

10mm AUTOThe fact is Mittens was the best we are going to do.

Are you kidding?  He could have sewed up the election by appealing to Americans tired of "diversity" by pledging to reverse the Obamnesty, deport illegals and eliminate immigration until the employment crisis is over.  Instead he ran scared from criticism of his own "kinder, gentler" proposal that illegals should self-deport!  He is completely a creature of the cheap labor lobby (aka the Treason Lobby), or at least his campaign advisors are.

We could have done a lot better.  Even the other Mormon, John Huntsman, was a lot better than Mittens.  Pair Huntsman with an immigration realist like Chris Kolbach and you'd have had a ticket that would have outraged the left but won the center.  Instead, we got the candidate vetted by Big Money, who ran against the other candidate vetted by Big Money.

Anonymous said...

our mutually exclusive gene pools and the noticeably different, in size and IQ cerebrums our said, mutually exclusive gene pools create

Ah, PDK, someone who understands population genetics! And those who argue that 700,000+ years are not enough for evolution to genetically differentiate gene pools are not familiar with the concept of punctuated evolution, wherein a new or challenging environment can more quickly select for traits favorable to that environment. For instance, COLD WEATHER. It's no accident that the most intelligent races tend to come from the northern climates, because those with the smarts to live in such climates would survive best, and thus their intelligence would be passed down to the next generation. You might say that modern Western society is de-evolving intelligence-wise, since any fool can survive and reproduce nowadays thanks to gubmint handouts.

Anyway, I sure appreciate the intelligent comments to be found on this site.

Anonymous said...

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/white-liberals-and-politically-correct-racism

YIH said...

Oh great, first Treeboon now EBT's messed up.
I emailed Santa for a new gun for Christmas.

Zenster said...

African American woman: Why are blacks considered the enemy?

You make yourself the enemy. All that sane Whites are obliged to do is accept that fact as truth.

Yes, even you, African American woman. By refusing to genuinely engage in an honest discussion of Race Realism, you perpetuate every last detrimental thing that Blacks do to Whites and all other races that they encounter.

You can prove otherwise by making a sincere response to my reply regarding your comment towards myself.

If you refuse to do so, it can only be taken as proof of your insincerity. I doubt that many others at this site will be gulled into siding with you if you cannot answer my few simple questions.

You can start with this one (courtesy of Van).

What vital products, goods or services are provided by Blacks that cannot be obtained elsewhere with significantly less risk of physical assault, poor quality, slack performance or sullen attitude?

This one simple question has now been posed to you several times without your having displayed the "respect", decency or courage to respond. Please do not think that this has gone unnoticed as it's something which speaks volumes about your true character.

Anonymous said...

When whites create something special the blacks "dog" the whites, hunt whites down to parasitize a slice of white creation.

South Africa became a place of refuge for Blacks who were endangered in their own areas due to TAB.

After Bob Mugabe went on an unnoticed killing spree it became a place of refugees from Zimbabwe.

Now that it is being Zimbabweified ..... .

Anonymous said...

You guys are missing the point about CF. He complains because he has to. It's in his genes. And, he must complain where there are white people. Again, it is genetic. Blacks seek out whites to harm, blame and destroy. Then, when the shit hits the fan, these very same blacks seek out whites to get them out of their self created miasma.

This happens all throughout Africa actually. Wherever you have whites, like a Peace Corps enclave, a UN mission, a Doctors Without Borders camp, or any one of a hundred Christian missionary endeavors, it doesn't matter how many whites there are but you will always find blacks streaming en masse to these few whites for help. Not to their own people, their own police, their own medical help or their own government. And, these very same blacks have no compunction about slaughtering the very whites who helped them. Pure genetics.

I'd like to ask CF if he has seen the movie "Flight" with Denzel Washington. He plays a heroic airline pilot named "Whip" Whitaker, no doubt based on the actual heroic white airline pilot "Sully" Sullenberger. But Hollywood being Hollywood, they had to create a story around "Whip" to divert attention away from their using "Sully" as the catalyst for the movie.

CF, I doubt anyone hates you but like most whites I feel better when blacks are not around. You feel as if you need to educate the people who post here because somehow "we are missing the glaring obvious fact that not all blacks are the same". But enough of you are and there is scant effort to get these troublesome, parasitic blacks to become civilized.

Stephen said...

Sometimes I see a commenter say that it feels like we are living in an episode of The Twilight Zone. The episode we are living in is called It's a Good Life. I recommend everyone here (especially our token negroes) to watch it. How the adults behave toward the boy is exactly the way Whites behave towards non-whites.

Anonymous said...

Ryan looks like a wigger with that backwards ball cap on.

Turn that cap around and wear it like a white boy!

Anonymous said...

Yes, dressing in layers determines someone's intellect.

Anonymous said...

Why are blacks considered the enemy?

Sincerely,
AA Woman


Fair enough question.

Here are some answers:

* Black vote en masse for black politicians regardless of how corrupt or anti-white they may be.
* Blacks support affirmative action which openly discriminates against white people.
* Blacks constantly hustle whites for minority programs, disparate impact court settlements, "reparations" for slavery, and a thousand other rackets which drain the white tax base.
* Black commit an incredible amount of violent crime, leading to deterioration of quality of life in the community and requiring even more taxes to incarcerate the perpetrators.
* Blacks commit an incredible amount of violent crime against white people, while the amount of white-on-black crime is proportionately much smaller.
* Blacks engage in such atrocities as "Beat Whitey" night at the Wisconsin State Fair.
* Black race advocacy groups such as the NAACP will make a national issue out of the shooting of a Trayvon Martin but sweep under the rug black perpetrated torture-murders such as Channon Christian/Christopher Newsom.
* Blacks have an illegitimacy rate of 70+%, leading to dysfunctions such as welfare dependency and even more crime.
* Black illegitimacy meaning that the most dysfunctional sector of blacks in the long run will have disproportionate voting power (see the first point) while not contributing their fair share to the tax base.
* Blacks being responsible for virtually every major urban riot since the Long Hot Summers of the 1960s.
* Black rule destroying several major cities such as Detroit and Birmingham. (Are you proud of the black stewardship of those cities?)
* Blacks subvert the democratic process by exploiting the courts to throw out popular initiatives to end affirmative action.
* Blacks rewrite history to demonize whites and glorify non-existent black achievements.
* Blacks supported the ANC in South Africa, resulting in a black majority government in that country which is now ethnically cleansing whites.

* And last but certainly not least, rather than engaging in a dialog-on-race, blacks scream Raaaaaaaacism! whenever anyone makes any of these legitimate criticisms.

Anonymous said...

[continued]

The thing is, AA Woman, you asked why many whites see blacks as the "enemy." The reasons, some of which I have listed above, are the result of collective black behaviors. These behaviors are either committed by the majority of blacks, or tacitly supported by them.

I mean, do you not see the relationship between such black atrocities as "Beat Whitey Night" and the hostility of growing numbers of whites towards blacks?

Are the majority of blacks going to oppose affirmative action? Or would blacks be willing to get their 70+% illegitimacy rate down to half of that (which would still be higher than the white rate but at least a step in the right direction)? Black males could end their growing incarceration by actually obeying the law. Are they going to do it? And Obama might find that white Americans would have fewer reasons to buy guns and ammo were it not for the black flash mobs which terrorize many communities.

Yes, I know, there are individual blacks who do stand up for decency. Cosby was one. But the thing is, organized black groups, such as the NAACP, are not going to stop the race hustles and guilt tripping and covering for black crime and dysfunction. And it's the organized groups which present the public face of the black community.

So it's blacks constantly attacking whites on every front (politically, economically, in the courts, on the streets). Black have chosen -- yes chosen! -- to make themselves into the enemy of white people. And yes, more white people are waking up, and fighting back.

Funny thing is, blacks could end this tomorrow by ceasing their anti-white behaviors. Or are you going to continue your race war until it brings this entire country down on your head?

It's your call.

Zenster said...

Anon (11/17 3:06 PM): Funny thing is, blacks could end this tomorrow by ceasing their anti-white behaviors. Or are you going to continue your race war until it brings this entire country down on your head?

Clearly, African American woman, has had every convenient opportunity to address these and many other questions posed here at SBPDL.

Why not?

The answer is simple. SHE IS A COWARD.

There is no other possible explanation. She is one of the usual edumahcated niggrahs who feels qualified to scold us Whites while refusing to provide a shred of evidence which might prove her point.

African American woman is no better than Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson or Julian Bond. All of whom seek to bleed White society of its wealth in order to benefit the Black parasite class.

If my position is without merit, let's see if African American woman has the ovaries to step in and provide an opposing viewpoint.

In your f&%king dreams.

Zenster said...

Anon (11/17 3:06 PM): But the thing is, organized black groups, such as the NAACP, are not going to stop the race hustles and guilt tripping and covering for black crime and dysfunction. And it's the organized groups which present the public face of the black community

Got that?

So it's blacks constantly attacking whites on every front (politically, economically, in the courts, on the streets). Black have chosen -- yes chosen! -- to make themselves into the enemy of white people. And yes, more white people are waking up, and fighting back.

Funny thing is, blacks could end this tomorrow by ceasing their anti-white behaviors. Or are you going to continue your race war until it brings this entire country down on your head?


Again, got that? You are sealing your doom in the exact same way that Germany's Jews did before WW II but without any actual exculpation.

In other words; Keep it up and you're oh so fucked. Full stop. End of Line. Paragraph.

Any questions?

Annie Oakley said...

AA – I wanted to respond to some of your posts and your comments.

I see you’re married to a white man. Uh why? By marrying him and gene hijacking the white race, you’ve produced a mulatto offspring that will never have a sense of cultural identity. Your husband is a race traitor. He has destroyed 10,000 years of Nordic/Aryan DNA by mating with you. His white seed line is forever destroyed.

I’m sure you fell in love with your husband, but you fell in love with his whiteness. His world is safe; your black neighborhoods are not. I’m just as offended when I see white women with black men. The commandment thou shalt not commit adultery did not mean cheating, it mean not to adulterate outside of your race.

Mulattos like our president, always turn black when it suits them and they turn white when it suits them as well.

Your tribe offers nothing to the white race, nothing. When your tribe moves into a city, it turns to shit. A turd in a bowl of vanilla ice cream is still a turd. The vanilla ice cream is forever tainted.

I hear all this talk about good blacks.

Where are all those good blacks when the two black thugs robbed and old couple in Oklahoma? They raped grandma who died a few hours later.

Where are all the good blacks when black ghetto bastards beat down a white man like a pack of dogs in Baltimore?

Dead silence. Because there are no good blacks who give a damn about whites. Blacks enjoy it when the white man or white woman is beaten down. They enjoy it. Even the upper income government workers love it. Your race has a seething hatred for whites.

You see, AA woman. When you walk into an all-white neighborhood, you’re safe. In fact, you’d be safer at a Klan meeting that I’d be in Detroit. You know it’s true.

If I go into a restaurant and it’s all white, I feel safe. I feel a little less safe if it’s a mix of Asians, Hispanics and whites. But if there are all blacks, I leave. No meal is worth my life.

I’m a white separatist. I want to live around my kind only. And don’t tell me to go to Europe. It’s been infested with the multicult rot of the third world as well. You see I’m not a phony. I admit I’m a racist. I own that term and embrace it.

I’m all for black separatism. I feel blacks should have their own nation state (as many of them here in the USA were born here) and whites have their own. All recent immigrants (illegal and legal) from East Asia and Mexico should be deported.

Zenster said...

Anon (11/17 2:36 PM): Here are some answers:

And they are all good.

Too bad that African American woman doesn't have the ovaries to respond.

Actually, it's not a matter of reproductive fortitude, it's more a matter of moral and ethical substance, both of which African American woman lacks. Her cowardly silence being indicative.

Anonymous said...

You see, AA woman. When you walk into an all-white neighborhood, you’re safe. In fact, you’d be safer at a Klan meeting than I’d be in Detroit.

Incredible statement.

But true!

Anonymous said...


Yes........if a number of states were successful in secession, ending all the gibsmedat to black people would result in their en masse migration to states that still maintained the host/parasite dynamic. This (of course) would result in the almost immediate collapse (and Detroiting)
of said states as there would be insufficient tax dollars coming from the collective to support such vast hordes of parasites.
However, before the mass migrations, there'd be non stop rioting in black communities as they threw a collective fit over the end of their life support.
Realistically speaking though, other states who did not secede would not want the black parasites as they'd recognize what such a destructive influx would mean. No doubt they'd try to do everything they could to stop the influx and force the parasites to stay wherever they were as they could not sustain nor support such a sudden and overwhelming flood of non productive hoodrats. Imagine the 34% of blacks on welfare suddenly heading to the Northeast for example. Millions upon millions of parasites flooding into already over burdened systems.
BRA will never allow this situation (a "humanitarian" crisis) to arise and any secession movement would face violent opposition and an invasion by the feds to "protect" all those sweet innocent black angels from the horrible white racists.
Secession equals a massive civil war with the secessionists having to fight a violent feral population on a rampage while simultaneously having the feds to deal with.
The majority of people would rather have a comfortable and incremental decline courtesy of BRA rather than to face such a scenario. They'd rather sip the poison that kills their society off over a period of decades rather than risk a bullet to the head today.

Svigor said...

“These 2 losers continue 2 demean minorities.”

Ever notice how telling the truth about "minorities" is always demeaning to them?

And no, I ain't just talking about blacks and browns.