Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Take a Picture: The Real Alinsky and the Fall of Rochester

Alinsky.

You hear this name all the time, liberally used by members of Conservatism Inc., to describe Barack Obama's tactics. Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky, the intellectual godfathers of Barack Obama and the driving force behind the tactics used by Disingenuous White Liberals (DWL) to undermine and subvert traditional American values
Saul Alinsky: His work in Rochester (98% white in 1950) destroyed the city

But, what if Conservatism Inc. has refused to acknowledge the one truth of what is called Alinskyism, which cuts to the heart of how Black-Run America (BRA) was created? 

What if they refuse to acknowledge this story, because it obliterates the entire faulty foundation Conservatism Inc. is built upon?

And it is all centered around the city of Rochester. Once referred to as "Smugtown, USA" by Curt Gerling - because it was one of the richest cities in all of America, where Republicans repeated the same campaign promise for decades: low taxes and pay-as-you-go spending - Rochester fortunes rose and fall with its white population. 

In 1950, a robust population of 332,488 (of which, only 7,845 or 2 percent, were black) worked to build, sustain, and create one of the richest cities in America. With Eastman Kodak Company leading the way, and more than 200+ ancillary companies working within this industry, the city of Rochester, New York was booming. 

And at 98 percent white, Rochester was flowing with social capital/trust, of which high amounts are needed to finance the creation of thriving, safe, and industrious community. 

Then, came the Manifest Destruction of the The Great Migration of black people from the south [The Remaking of a City: Rochester, New York 1964-1984 by Lou Buttino and Mark Hare] (p. 3-4):
For most Rochesterians, life was indeed good. The economy was solid and robust. Workers were secure and highly skilled. Future growth and prosperity were taken for granted.  
Most Rochsterians also paid little attention to the steady influx of blacks who settled in the city's Seventh Ward, not far from the railroad yards where they arrived in search of jobs and better living conditions. During the 1950's the city's black population tripled from 7,845 to 23,586, and then doubled to nearly 50,000 by 1970. 
One prominent reason for the dramatic black emigration was the city's reputation for jobs. The unemployment rate in Rochester was a paltry 1.8 percent in the early 1960's - the lowest among thirty-nine major industrial areas in the United State. More than 10,000 jobs were unfilled.  
Still, by 1964, unemployment among blacks in Rochester's central city was between ten and twenty-five percent. At least 4,000 blacks were unemployed, and several thousand more looked for work intermittently.  
As the number of blacks increased in the inner city, White Rochesterians - like Whites in other northern cities - began moving to the suburbs. Business tended to follow its more affluent customers, and the urban core began to deteriorate. 
For the city's newly arrived blacks, life in Rochester was better than life in the South in only one major way: her, at least, welfare benefits were more liberal and more available. 
So, Rochester was 98 percent white in 1950; by 1960, the black population went from 2 percent to 7 percent; by 1970, Rochester's declining population of 296,233 was 16 percent black.

What caused the 11 percent drop in the overall population of Rochester from 1950 - 1970? Well, the arrival of black people for one that upset the fragile balance of community in the city. The other?

The Rochester black riot of 1964, which required - after three days of black looting and mayhem - the National Guard to put down. The cause? Police arresting an intoxicated black male, in the Seventh War of Rochester where most of the recent black migrants to the city resided. Unsubstantiated rumors spread that a pregnant black woman was attacked by a police dog, a mob of black people rose to attack the Frankenstein monster of white racism and Rochester burned (a documentary on the black uprising in Rochester, July '64, can be viewed here)

Just as the smoke clearing in the Detroit black uprising of 1967 convinced white citizens of the city to flee, those white people who had built and sustained Rochester now realized that to live peacefully meant to abandon their city to the recent black arrivals.

Enter Saul Alinsky. From his infamous Rules for Radicals, we learn on p. 170-173, that in the ashes of the black riot grew a radical black organization called FIGHT -- Freedom, Integration, God, Honor, Today -- that demanded Eastman Kodak alleviate the black unemployment problem in Rochester. Alinsky was brought in to organize the rabble:

The proxy tactic was born in Rochester, New York, in the conflict between Eastman Kodak and the black ghetto organization called FIGHT our foundation helped to organize. The issues* of the conflict are not relevant to the present subject except that a VP of Kodak assigned to negotiate with FIGHT reached an agreement with FIGHT, and that seemed to close the matter. Enter the first accident, for Kodak then repudiated its own VP and the agreement he had made. This re-opened the battle. If Kodak had not reneged, the issue would have ended there. 
Now necessity moved in. As the lines were drawn for battle it became clear that the usual strategy of demonstrations and confrontations would be unavailing. While Kodak’s buildings and administration were in Rochester, its real life was throughout its American and overseas markets. Demonstrations might be embarrassing and inconvenient, but they would not be the tactic to force an agreement. It wasn’t Rochester that Eastman Kodak was concerned about. Their image in that community could always be sustained by sheer financial power. Their vulnerability was throughout the nation and overseas.
  *Those involved in the Kodak-FIGHT battle knew that there was on issue- “Would Kodak or any other corporation recognize FIGHT as the bargaining agent for the black ghetto of Rochester, New York?” Once Kodak recognized FIGHT as represent the black ghetto, we could come to the table to negotiate on all other issues, including the employment of more blacks. Kodak’s recognition of FIGHT would result in other corporations following suit and this would lead to other programs and other issues. Kodak’s subsequent recognition of FIGHT caused Xerox to do the same and resulted in the launching of a black-manned factory by FIGHT called FIGHTON in collaboration with the Xerox Corporation. 

In a 1972 interview with Playboy, Alinsky let slip the one fundamental truth of what Rules for Radicals is all about, and what the battle of Rochester boiled down to; screwing over the civilization white people had built:

After the Black Uprising in 1964, whites left, taking the "quality" with them

ALINSKY: I kept my fingers in a number of pies throughout the Sixties, organizing community-action groups in the black slums of Kansas City and Buffalo, and sponsoring and funding the Community Service Organization of Mexican-Americans in California, which was led by our West Coast organizer at the time, Fred Ross. The staff we organized and trained then included Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta. But my next major battle occurred in Rochester, New York, the home of Eastman Kodak -- or maybe I should say Eastman Kodak, the home of Rochester, New York. Rochester is a classic company town, owned lock, stock and barrel by Kodak; it's a Southern plantation transplanted to the North, and Kodak's self-righteous paternalism makes benevolent feudalism look like participatory democracy. I call it Smugtown, U.S.A. But in mid-1964 that smugness was jolted by a bloody race riot that resulted in widespread burnings, injuries and deaths. The city's black minority, casually exploited by Kodak, finally exploded in a way that almost destroyed the city, and the National Guard had to be called in to suppress the uprising. 
In the aftermath of the riots, the Rochester Area Council of Churches, a predominantly white body of liberal clergymen, invited us in to organize the black community and agreed to pay all our expenses. We said they didn't speak for the blacks and we wouldn't come in unless we were invited in by the black community itself. At first, there seemed little interest in the ghetto, but once again the old reliable establishment came to the rescue and, by overreacting, cut its own throat. The minute the invitation was made public, the town's power structure exploded in paroxysms of rage. The mayor joined the city's two newspapers, both part of the conservative Gannett chain, in denouncing me as a subversive hatemonger; radio station WHAM delivered one-minute editorial tirades against me and told the ministers who'd invited me that from now on they'd have to pay for their previously free Sunday-morning air time. A settlement house that had pledged its support to us was promptly informed by the Community Chest that its funds would be cut off if it went ahead; the board retracted its support, with several members resigning. The establishment acted as if the Golden Horde of Genghis Khan was camped on its doorstep. 
If you listened to the public comments, you'd have thought I spent my spare time feeding poisoned Milk-Bones to seeing-eye dogs. It was the nicest thing they could have done for me, of course. Overnight, the black community broke out of its apathy and started clamoring for us to come in; as one black told me later, "I just wanted to see somebody who could freak those mothers out like that." Black civil rights leaders, local block organizations and ministers plus 13,000 individuals signed petitions asking me to come in, and with that kind of support I knew we were rolling. I assigned my associate, Ed Chambers, as chief organizer in Rochester, and prepared to visit the city myself once his efforts were under way. 
PLAYBOY: Was your reception as hostile as your advance publicity? 
ALINSKY: Oh, yeah, I wasn't disappointed. I think they would have quarantined me at the airport if they could have. When I got off the plane, a bunch of local reporters were waiting for me, keeping the same distance as tourists in a leper colony. I remember one of them asking me what right I had to start "meddling" in the black community after everything Kodak had done for "them" and I replied: "Maybe I'm uninformed, but as far as I know the only thing Kodak has done on the race issue in America is to introduce color film." My relationship with Kodak was to remain on that plane. 
PLAYBOY: How did you organize Rochester's black community? 
ALINSKY: With the assistance of a dynamic local black leader, the Reverend Franklin Florence, who'd been close to Malcolm X, we formed a community organization called FIGHT -- an acronym for Freedom, Integration, God, Honor, Today. We also established the Friends of FIGHT, an associated group of some 400 dues-paying white liberals, which provided us with funds, moral support, legal advice and instructors for our community training projects. We had a wide range of demands, of which the key one was that Kodak recognize the representatives of the black community who were designated as such by the people and not insist on dealing through its own showcase "Negro" executive flunky with a Ph.D. Kodak naturally refused to discuss such outrageous demands with us, contending that FIGHT had no legitimacy as a community spokesman and that the company would never accept it as such.
PLAYBOY: In any case, you never held your fart-in. So what finally broke Kodak's resistance? 
ALINSKY: Simple self-interest -- the knowledge that the price of continuing to fight us was greater than reaching a compromise. It was one of the longest and toughest battles I've been in, though. After endless months of frustration, we finally decided we'd try to embarrass Kodak outside its fortress of Rochester, and disrupt the annual stockholders' convention in Flemington, New Jersey. Though we didn't know it at the time -- all we had in mind was a little troublemaking -- this was the seed from which a vitally important tactic was to spring. I addressed the General Assembly of the Unitarian-Universalist Association and asked them for their proxies on whatever Kodak stock they held in order to gain entree to the stockholders' meeting. The Unitarians voted to use the proxies for their entire Kodak stock to support FIGHT -- 5620 shares valued at over $700,000. 
The wire services carried the story and news of the incident rapidly spread across the country. Individuals began sending in their proxies, and other church groups indicated they were prepared to follow the Unitarians' lead. By the purest accident, we'd stumbled onto a tactical gold mine. Politicians who saw major church denominations assigning us their proxies could envision them assigning us their votes as well; the church groups have vast constituencies in their congregations. Suddenly senators and representatives who hadn't returned our phone calls were ringing up and lending a sympathetic ear to my request for a senatorial investigation of Kodak's hiring practices. 
As the proxies rolled in, the pressure began to build on Kodak -- and on other corporations as well. Executives of the top companies began seeking me out and trying to learn my intentions. I'd never seen the establishment so uptight before, and this convinced me that we had happened onto the cord that might open the golden curtain shielding the private sector from its public responsibilities. It obviously also convinced Kodak, because they soon caved in and recognized FIGHT as the official representative of the Rochester black community. Kodak has since begun hiring more blacks and training unskilled black workers, as well as inducing the city administration to deliver major concessions on education, housing, municipal services and urban renewal. It was our proxy tactic that made all this possible. It scared Kodak, and it scared Wall Street. It's our job now to relieve their tensions by fulfilling their fears. 

Rochester had a population that was less than 2 percent black in 1950. The white population had created an economy that was the envy of the nation, and black people flocked to the city hoping to live off a slice of the pie; instead, they were virtually unemployable, importing crime and driving property values down in a city with such a surplus of cash that the blacks were able to live comfortably on welfare.

Then, the black uprising of 1964, followed by a DWL-led shakedown of Eastman Kodak.

There's the truth about Alinsky or Alinskyism.

Connected Capitalism -- the same that was used to bring about black rule in Atlanta -- was forced to cave to the demands of an outsider, agitating for a group of people whose ranks had only grown through recent migration to the city.

Rochester, like Gary (Indiana), Newark, Atlanta, Memphis, Baltimore, Detroit, and Chicago, has fallen to the Black Undertow.

The white population in each of these cities, which had created and sustained the conditions that attracted black people to them in the first place - high standard of living, thriving economy, robust employment prospects, inexpensive housing, a climate of upward mobility, safe streets and quality schools - was overwhelmed when black racial solidarity demanded concessions and threatened (and many times engaged) riots were they not met.

The climate that follows all black migratory patterns - crime, dysfunction, offspring that perform at lower levels then white students in school, the closing of businesses, and an immediate drop in property value - means an immediate evacuation of areas near where black settle by whites.

In the ruins of blighted urban areas like Birmingham, Detroit, and Rochester bespeak racial truths that no crash course lesson in genetics and heredity from the late Jensen or Rushton could supplant.

And there is the truth of Alinsky that Conservatism Inc. refuses to acknowledge.

Black people destroyed... no, obliterated the idea of Rochester: A City of Quality.

But "progress" and "freedom" had to come to Rochester, as it did to Detroit.

Rochester died (just watch this documentary of the community white people created in Rochester), so Black-Run America (BRA) could be born.

86 comments:

Melanie said...

Then the bottom line is that there is a minority of power players on earth who have no allegiance to anything except their power through wealth, and presently they are almost all globally connected. They use politics to maintain their power though wealth, and the general public probably doesn't even know who all the players really are. Since the engine of politics now is money, not principles or party platforms or race or patriotism, the best we can do is wait for the engine to run out of fuel somehow. Pretty dispiriting. Their only stake in the survival of the white race is inasmuch as it affects their bottom line, and that's not enough of a stake to expect much. That only requires a small elite in these days.

Bogolyubski said...

A most fascinating article. Look at where Alinsky got his power from - the white, establishment churches. They were the ones who first contacted him and ultimately the ones who strong-armed Kodak via stock holdings.

The "long march through the institutions" advocated by Antonio Gramsci must have already been largely a fait accompli by 1964 - which is considerably earlier than I would have thought. I've known for some time that it was largely accomplished by the 1980s, but this is two decades before that. Look at the depth and deep pockets of support he already had from within the upper echelon of white society before he even showed up.

As I say, this is a really interesting piece of history. We need to understand the roots of how the enemy has taken over the country in order to learn to find their weak points. This unknown history tends to prove the what we refer to as BRA was already well-advanced before the 1960s.

Melanie said...

Yeah Bogolyubski, I noticd that too re the churches, but I must admit that it's difficult for me to speak to that as I am a Christian of the Independent Baptist fundamentalist variety. Traditionally apolitical (much much more fundamentalist than the Jerry Falwell/Pat Robertson flavor. We call them "evangelical" as opposed to "fundamentalist"). We have never been part of the "Moral Majority" or anything like that, for better or for worse. But at least we knew long ago that no good was coming from the liberalisation of the churches (not "church" as we don't recognise hierarchies other than loose affiliation between like-minded churches)

Anonymous said...

The universalist church mentioned above has ALWAYS been less of a church and more of an athiest dwl racial self hate group. They were this way in the 1700's. They are completely anti Christ in their doctrines.

So CAL Snowman said...

After last night, CA will now officially be ruled by a 2/3 super majority of Democrats who have vowed to raise taxes as soon as possible. I'm out as soon as I can sell my house for a reasonable amount. New Zealand is looking like a decent immigration destination as they have both surfing and snowboarding. For anyone else that is interested here is a good place to start :

Immigration New Zealand

Midwestern said...

Here is the story of my historic neighborhood. Now 84% black and crumbling.

The white churches were a HUGE part of our destruction. They still are.

Most of them now have a "diverse and inclusive" congregation, gay preachers, football programs for the inner-city youths, and food pantries for the black underclass. It is an interesting read, and probably every city in the country experienced the same thing as my neighborhood. Notice they blame whites for not embracing the black demand for equality of outcome.

http://www.polis.iupui.edu/RUC/Neighborhoods/MapletonFallCreek/MFCNarrative.htm

Jay in DC said...

Speaking of whites rubbing shoulders in close proximity to negroes. Here is one white that I'm pretty sure did not want her shoulders, or anything else rubbed, but Groids gonna groid...

Diversity is our Strength


This happened less than 5 miles away from where I live. Now with the emboldened knowledge that Dear Leader has "got their back" I expect an extreme rise. I can peg the target without even seeing her. Mid to late 20s, either a recent Georgetown graduate or some other liberal policy wonk type in training. Fairly tight little body because she has lots of free time and expendable cash compliments of her liberal degree to peruse the isles of Whole Foods for Gluten Free Products and some Eco-Friendly Paper Products. Running JUST near neighborhoods that she knows in her reptile limbic brain are dangerous, but her massive and developed cereberum has been taught for at least a decade that she is indeed, compleletely safe. Because number one, blacks are just like us! Number two, she had her little earbuds in jamming to some MP3s thereby acting as a magical shield against everything in the outside world.

These dumb bitches are EVERY SINGLE BLOCK from about half a mile out of the 'hood in DC in these re-gentrifying white areas. And nig-nogs are NOT happy about it. I hope now, since Plan A shit itself last night for Plan B as bogloyubski and others have wanted from jump street. Full burn mode, knowing they can act with virtually impunity I want to see each of these eco-friendly DWL woman savaged brutally. I cheer for the orcs. Does that make me sound too scary to some of the women here that I wish for another human being to be physically and sexually assaulted? I hope not, as it is a means to an end.

When this behavior is EVERY SINGLE DAY, we will see just how well the MSM can cover it. I'd like to see one a night like this in every major city particularly DWL heavy spots where people who live with invisible MP3 player shields walk around at night.

I may have to start going out walking at night again soon, these interactions are always comical and I use to get a chuckle out of it. I could be a top contributor to world star hip-hop. They aren't always as egregious as this sometimes just a racial slur or a slight groping on the subway, but no less entertaining, to be sure...

Jay in DC said...

More, I want more. This happened on election day. Read the article typical "MO". Not looking for trouble, didn't know the guy, pleaded with 'groids that he did not want to fight. Now his frontal lobe is pulverized and he is a medically induced coma. From my good friends 45min up north in Baltimore, now THAT is a city. There is no DWL population there just some trapped white folks who are being increasingly predated on by groids, now in broad daylight apparently and on Election Day! Not very sporting of them to cave in his skull before he may have had a chance to vote.

Oh and I forgot to mention, one of the most corrupt police forces in these United States. Half those scumbags are on the take and I can tell you this from personal stories I know as well as anecdotally from others.

I want to see RIVERS of white blood in the street. Nothing would make me happier right now.

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/11/06/witness-to-brutal-attack-speaks-with-wjz/

Anonymous said...

Some Unitarians were famous racial philosophers. Chief example: Lothrop Stoddard.

Anonymous said...

Wow!!! Mapleton Fall Creek??? That sounds so "Bedford Falls" of "It's a Wonderful Life"!!! I'm sorry you received the version where George was never born.

Left Coast White Guy

Anonymous said...

Jay in DC,
This does happen every day and the MSM doesn't bother to report it.

Leggy Coast White guy

Anonymous said...

Obama's sons have been raised on a diet fed to them by DWL's. The diet consists of coddling and telling them they are not responsible for their self inflicted status in life, it's all because of YT and his institutional racism and white privilege.

They are told lies and myths about their history about famous black men who were geniuses that invented gravity and the second law of thermodynamics and that they even used to fly!!!!...., with the power of their mind.........but YT (evil bastard that he is) suppressed and stole this mythological mojo.

They were noble savages, building pyramids and inventing philosophy and sheeit, maths to, living a life of peace and luxury in "da mudda land" and were cruelly snatched away to be enslaved........., all bullshit of course, but DWL's have got to feel good about and validate their own existence somehow and show that they are good color blind people.
As long as DWL's don't have to live or be near their pet projects.

When their are no majority DWL neighborhoods left and they have to live with their pet projects, sadly for them, reality will home invade them, rob them, rape their wives and daughters and call them a cracker.

Don't be surprised to find a few DWL's creeping into your "racist" "tea bagging" "hillbilly" "white trash" neighborhood.

panjoomby said...

So CAL Snowman: watch out dude, the first pic on your NZ link is of an umm "african-zealanderian." Did NZ got bit by the PC bug (meme? virus!) wonder if Saul Alinsky spent time there. All this groid on white crime & NPR ignores it to cite a possible "hate" (anti-black) crime. & they never point out that 90% of those "hate" crimes are hoaxes. i'd be happy if they would report crime proportionately (isn't that what fairness is??) even better if they reported only black crime. that would be nice (& useful).

Church of Jed said...

Everyone should read his Rules for Radicals.

In it, he admits that when the target agrees with the radicals' accusations and then asked what they should do, the radical is disarmed.

The greatest fear of Diversity is if we say, "Yes, we are White privileged racist, and need your help. What should we do next?"

That will work for us, because whatever they say next will justify all our past racism and deepening our commitments to more and more...

"Under the circumstances, racism really is the best option."

-Rev. Jed DeValleyism, "The Obama voters know where your White daughters live," 2009

Zenster said...

Per Alinsky: In the aftermath of the riots, the Rochester Area Council of Churches, a predominantly white body of liberal clergymen, invited us in to organize the black community and agreed to pay all our expenses. We said they didn't speak for the blacks and we wouldn't come in unless we were invited in by the black community itself. At first, there seemed little interest in the ghetto, but once again the old reliable establishment came to the rescue and, by overreacting, cut its own throat. The minute the invitation was made public, the town's power structure exploded in paroxysms of rage. The mayor joined the city's two newspapers, both part of the conservative Gannett chain, in denouncing me as a subversive hatemonger; radio station WHAM delivered one-minute editorial tirades against me and told the ministers who'd invited me that from now on they'd have to pay for their previously free Sunday-morning air time. A settlement house that had pledged its support to us was promptly informed by the Community Chest that its funds would be cut off if it went ahead; the board retracted its support, with several members resigning. The establishment acted as if the Golden Horde of Genghis Khan was camped on its doorstep.

And they were right. A bunch of vandals and looters were about to be given the keys to the city. All courtesy of "the Rochester Area Council of Churches". Those f&%king do-gooders were totally unable to discern between earning one's way and the false flag of "social justice" which Alinsky so adeptly waved.

Overnight, the black community broke out of its apathy and started clamoring for us to come in; as one black told me later, "I just wanted to see somebody who could freak those mothers out like that." Black civil rights leaders, local block organizations and ministers plus 13,000 individuals signed petitions asking me to come in, and with that kind of support I knew we were rolling. [emphasis added]

Notice how it's not about taking responsibility or being accountable for one's actions? It's all about wanting to "see somebody who could freak those mothers out".

Simply put, it was just another round of coercion, another shakedown, another back-alley mugging. A look of terror meant more than any real community effort. In fact, "effort" is more of as dirty work because it implies [gasp!] WORK, something that many Blacks have a near-fatal allergy to.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

After endless months of frustration, we finally decided we'd try to embarrass Kodak outside its fortress of Rochester, and disrupt the annual stockholders' convention in Flemington, New Jersey. Though we didn't know it at the time -- all we had in mind was a little troublemaking -- this was the seed from which a vitally important tactic was to spring. I addressed the General Assembly of the Unitarian-Universalist Association and asked them for their proxies on whatever Kodak stock they held in order to gain entree to the stockholders' meeting. The Unitarians voted to use the proxies for their entire Kodak stock to support FIGHT -- 5620 shares valued at over $700,000.

Simple blackmail, assisted by a bunch of race traitors. The same ones who are now donating blood for the Paleostinians and leading the divestiture movement to harm Israel. Never once voicing the thought that Islam would just as soon bulldoze every Christian church in the world. Never once admitting to themselves that Black Liberation Theology has, at its core, an undying hatred for everything that is White. Fools!

Politicians who saw major church denominations assigning us their proxies could envision them assigning us their votes as well; the church groups have vast constituencies in their congregations. Suddenly senators and representatives who hadn't returned our phone calls were ringing up and lending a sympathetic ear to my request for a senatorial investigation of Kodak's hiring practices.

And, thus, was Kodak Zimmermaned. It also appears as though our pols have never forgotten that basic lesson by which Alinsky led them over to the dark side of extortionate politics.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous observation:
The universalist church mentioned above has ALWAYS been less of a church and more of an athiest dwl racial self hate group. They were this way in the 1700's. They are completely anti Christ in their doctrines.

Interesting. The same can now be said of every major nominally Christian denomination, as the Gospel of Galatians 3:28 is now the summa theologica.

I do wonder what our newly arriving neighbors who hail from the Dar al-Islam would think of the Unitarians? I do wish they would understand that such are not "people of the book" but actually pagans and heathens. Bad as sharia might be, the one good thing about it is that it takes an extremely uncharitable view of the likes of Unitarians. I think the official recommended Mohammedan response to such nice folks is beheading (which seems to be their response to many things). That could have its positive aspects, though.

Bogolyubski said...

Good God, Weepin' Johnny didn't even take a full day before he assumed the classic Repuke position before the Magic Knee-Grow. One would have thought he'd at least wait for a respectable period of mourning. That's ferocious Repuke Resistance for you - it's like Brave Sir Robin: Run away! Run away! ...and these are the folks who like to ridicule the French for craven cowardice. Gay Old Pedophiles!

Bogolyubski said...

BTW, here's a demographic breakdown of the vote.

Melanie said...

Imdeed, the universalist church was one of the primary movers and shakers in the abolitionist movement.

Re New Zealand-you might want to look more closely into that, as they have become extremely PC and are now seeing the results with their local indigenous, the Maori, giving the whites problems, with impunity, much the same as the problem we have with our own orcs. Maybe even worse, as their government is more PC on the European model and their freedom of speech etc is less than ours. Very regulated.

As bad is this county is, there is really no place better, and I don't say that out any loyalty. It's a bald fact. As badly as our freedom has been diminished, no other place is any more free.

Anonymous said...

The GOP elite will look at the demographics and conclude that more hispandering is in order with a side order of more goodies for the negroes. This is a non-starter - they will never win a bidding war with the democrats.

What I see is the need to target the young white voters. This means abandoning the christian wingnuts.

Many young people and independents would have voted Republican if they would just stick to good economics and dump the moral crusades and military adventures to save the biblical theme park in the middle east.

10mm AUTO said...

PK, This may be your finest article yet. Focused, to the point and with quotes from the Agitator, numbers and a full illustration of the background web of evil. The churches now are concentrating on importing as many unassimilable shitskins as possible.

You have perfectly captured the Corp response to this type of shakedown. Remember last year when the Bank of America had its President's house picketed with his son inside? Company rolled over and spread its legs Right Now to get that kind of stuff off the front page.

McDonald's or Coke are multinational, they can't be harmed the same way. They drop 100 million on the shakedown artists to make them go away in negotiations, start a few "outreach" programs (365Black.com) and hire a few negros into Diversity and Warehouse jobs so the negros shut up.

I just want to end the black colony here in the USA and remove them from our Country, but this is a sick method of Using the negros to pocket cash and then the negros slide right back down into their holes again while Whites flee. For a Marxist, its perfect. You damage the Country, harm property and employment rights and damage a Corp all at the same time, perhaps even to the point of forcing it to flee overseas. Negros are disposable, cost nothing and long term, NOTHING POSITIVE IS ACCOMPLISHED either for the negro or the company!

Great Article, Really...

Anonymous said...

Abandon the God of our fathers? Abandon our morals? What you're saying is like saying "keep America, but toss out all that is good."
Christianity is not the problem. Church is not the problem. The problem is the degree that to which our people don't uphold virtue. The degree to which people hold to select verse and pretend others don't exist that don't fit their pet doctrines. Don't toss the baby our with the bath water.

Left Coast White Guy

Anonymous said...

The churches who do these things, ....who import Somalis, who support sodomy and all other things that are not Christian, yet they call themselves Christian.
Leggy Coast White Guy

Anonymous said...

leading the divestiture movement to harm Israel

Zenster, please don't go down the protect Israel road. I am through being concerned about them. After watching 70% of American Jews vote for Obama, reading about Saul Alinsky, and now dealing with the reality of Emanuel Celler's Immigration Act of 1965, I have had it. If they want me to defend Israel, then I would like to see them stop destroying my country.

Melanie said...

It's plain to see why whites will never come together and it's every man for himself. We apparently are indeed more stupid than orcs who put aside all else when it's their race opposed to another. After race, there's only family then individual. I will continue to care for my family.

Goodnight all.

Zenster said...

Over in the Obama's War on White America, a comment by Artist mentioned the movie, "Silent Conquest".

As someone who has written extensively on Islamic jihad, this production is one of the most up-to-date that one could hope for.

It provides, in chilling detail, fact after fact which exposes 0bama's complicity in crippling the constitutional right of Americans to Free Speech.

Whether you are conversant or not about Islamic jihad, this useful documentation of current events is well worth eighty-three minutes of your time.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff is a personal friend of mine and it is gratifying beyond measure to see her appear in this piece. There are a lot worse ways that you could spend an hour or so. With 0bama back in office, it is all the more imperative that we become keenly aware of this traitor's treachery.

Anonymous said...

We are killing ourselves, have been for a long time. I am a member of a race that has been infected with an incurable mind virus. I can't wrap me head around it, and I don't know if I should even keep trying.

Maybe I really will move to Montana. Watch the fires from a distance. Learn to hunt, fish, skin and trap - all that Davy Crockett shit. Who needs Obamerica?

Bogolyubski said...

Left-Coast White Guy:
Abandon the God of our fathers? Abandon our morals? What you're saying is like saying "keep America, but toss out all that is good."

Christianity is not the problem. Church is not the problem. The problem is the degree that to which our people don't uphold virtue. The degree to which people hold to select verse and pretend others don't exist that don't fit their pet doctrines. Don't toss the baby our with the bath water.


I hate to break the news, LCWG, but Christianity - as it is presently constituted - is very much at the heart of the problem. While I do not think the root of the problem is Christianity per se, the fact remains that Christian church in the USA as it stands right now has embraced the doctrine of 'anti-racism' with full religious fervor - even among Republican-leaning "conservative" churches.

I've yet to hear of a single "Christian" who proudly "stands against racism" even once address the actual worst racism problem in the country by far and away - the racial animus of blacks against whites exemplified by the endless list of atrocities catalogued by Cicero over at Big Lie on Parade and other sites. Nor have I heard a peep from these moral towers of shit about the deliberate genocide of white Christians being carried out in South Africa.

The churches who do these things, ....who import Somalis, who support sodomy and all other things that are not Christian, yet they call themselves Christian.

This is essentially the 'no true Scotsman' argument (not an argument at all, actually). Here's the thing: While it is quite true that the liberal "churches" you describe have indeed overthrown 2000 years of church teaching, including a rejection of the virgin birth, all miracles, and the resurrection itself, the churches who did not reject these doctrines have failed to separate themselves with formal anathemas and excommunications.

Let's take the Lutherans as one example (of several). The ELCA is exactly like you describe. They have embraced the whole Marxist enchilada from gay marriage to aiding and abetting Muslim colonization. In a word, they're heathens and infidels at best. Some are literally the spawn of Satan.

Have the Lutherans who still hold at least some of the traditional faith (Missouri and Wisconsin synods) issued a formal anathema and excommunication declaring them as apostates? No. Both of the two synods I mentioned are already on their way to the same place the ELCA is now. They are well on their way to accepting what I call the Gospel of Galatians 3:28 as their summa theologica. Put bluntly, this is nothing short of a full-blown heresy. Marxist dogma in a clerical collar. Equality ├╝ber alles. This Marxist notion of equality is not found in either scripture or in the teachings of the apostles. Yet this doctrine now holds sway in formally conservative churches like the Southern Baptists. The body-snatchers have taken over the church.

Silent Running said...

As bad is this county is, there is really no place better, and I don't say that out any loyalty. It's a bald fact. As badly as our freedom has been diminished, no other place is any more free.

And many will learn this the hard way. One wonder how many speech law violators are currently rotting in UK prisons.

Anonymous said...

Bill Ayers is a terrorist who estimates 20million people will have to die in order to implement a socialist utopia in amerikwa. In a real country this maggot would be up against a wall or swinging from a tall tree. As for unemployment figures they don't mean anything to blacks. The government checks and ebt cards keep coming so the economy must be fine and YT has deep pockets.

Anonymous said...

So CAL Snowman said...
After last night, CA will now officially be ruled by a 2/3 super majority of Democrats who have vowed to raise taxes as soon as possible. I'm out as soon as I can sell my house for a reasonable amount. New Zealand is looking like a decent immigration destination as they have both surfing and snowboarding. For anyone else that is interested here is a good place to start :

Immigration New Zealand


We should also invest a little bit of effort in to researching how easy it might be to immigrate to African countries. Then we set up and fund an organization that helps Blacks repatriate back to the Motherland. I'd be curious to see just how many would be or are even interested.

scottb said...

Hi, I'm a long time reader of this blog and fully support.

Furthermore, I'm from Rochester, and being only 30 years old, this is the truth. The city itself is all but dead. If you take a look at this map of the wards, here is the breakdown
http://www.thehilbertgroup.com/atj/user/AdditionalGetAction.do?pageId=197693
About 80% of those wards are completely off limits to white people. Downtown itself has only a handful of businesses that survive and a couple of headquarters. It's sickening how many square miles of city are uninhabitable now. And a predominantly black city council, as well as a former black mayor, have made it a very tough place to live. Big business has left us a long time ago. ALl that's left is a pathetic service industry and stories of old folks telling us how much money and life used to flow through this city.

lenzap said...

"Democratic ideals among an homogenous population of Nordic blood, as in England or America, is one thing, but it is quite another for the white man to share his blood with, or intrust his ideals to, brown, yellow, black or red men.
This is suicide pure and simple, and the first victim of this amazing folly will be the white man himself."

~ Madison Grant-1920 in a forward to the book The Rising Tide of Color by Lothrop Stoddard ~ historic Unitarian Christian, dismissed by secular humanists posing as christians.

Mutant Swarm said...

Bogolyubski said...

"A most fascinating article. Look at where Alinsky got his power from - the white, establishment churches. They were the ones who first contacted him and ultimately the ones who strong-armed Kodak via stock holdings..."
______________________________

A six word cure for a large part of the BRA problem:

"Revoke the churches' tax exempt status."

If these so-called "preachers" (who appear to be political operatives) want to "preach" hatred of one's fellow man based on their white skin, then hide behind the pulpit, make them pay for their racial treason.

(Gratuitous wish fulfillment to follow)

Wouldn't it be fun to see the look on the faces of these televangical blow-dried false prophets when they got their first tax bill?
They have been living large off their parishioners' gullibility for far too long.

"Help me, brothers and sisters! If I don't raise $8 million to pay the Devil's henchmen, I'll have to sell the Learjet! You don't want me doing the Lord's work from a prop job, do you?"

It would also be an excellent way to turn them against BRA, once they've been forced to, how do you say, pay their fair share.

Anonymous said...

Saul Alinsky - Swedish Christian, right?

Sheila said...

Top-notch article and comment thread. Much as I hate to admit it, those blaming the churches in America today are totally correct. We left our previous church when the pastor began equating the Gospels to social justice, and oozed with satisfaction over the increasing (but still tiny) number of black congregants. We've yet to find another church I will consent to attend regularly. I will no longer sit through a single sermon moralizing on how "loving" my neighbor means adopting a black criminal. I will not be accused of White privilege. I still hew to the Bible, but to the actual truths written therein - which include the truth that God intended for the races and nations to remain separate.

I second anonymous' comment to Zenster. Opposing Islam and Sharia does not equate to supporting Israel. As a point of fact, today's liberal, generally non-religious Jews in America are more of an immediate danger than the Muslims. Longer term, I have no doubt that will change, but right now they are equally my enemy.

Anonymous said...

"The establishment acted as if the Golden Horde of Genghis Khan was camped on its doorstep."
Turns out that they were right.

Jay Santos said...

Jay in DC said...
Speaking of whites rubbing shoulders in close proximity to negroes…. Running JUST near neighborhoods that she knows in her reptile limbic brain are dangerous, but her massive and developed cereberum has been taught for at least a decade that she is indeed, compleletely safe. Because number one, blacks are just like us!….


Great post there. Evocative, strong, well written. I lived in DC for years, I know the crescent trail and I sure know the woman you’re describing. Maybe it’s our gluten content that causes the attacks, so she’ll be increasingly safer with her high-tech diet. I almost believe there’s an actual entrance to hell itself located beneath DC. Possibly under the capitol, the Smithsonian grounds or, I don’t know, Howard University maybe. I’m pretty sure it’s there somewhere and then of course there’s the entrance in Hyde Park, Chicago.

…I cheer for the orcs. Does that make me sound too scary …
Uhm, no, not in this case.

Zenster said...

Anon (11/7 8:11 PM): Zenster, please don't go down the protect Israel road.

I have already made clear, here at SBPDL, my ambivalence regarding Israel and feel no need to repeat it. Nonetheless, they are one of the very few countries doing a fantastic job of humiliating Islam. That alone is worth something.

Plus, unless you have eyes only clearance, there is no possible way for you to know the amount of valuable intelligence that Mossad is passing to the USA regarding Islamic terrorism. Finally, with Muslim ass-kissing 0bama re-(s)elected, the neutralizing of Iran it will probably fall to Israel. If, indeed, they do perform that task, the entire free world will have much to thank them for.

America's Liberal Jews and their anti-White politics are another matter and they're rapidly building a hostility towards them which could get quite ugly. I have yet to hear any of the truly sane Jews loudly proclaiming the heresy of their fellow Hebrews. Much as with how Bogolyubski noted about the Lutherans.

Finally, a note of concord with Mutant Swarm:

"Revoke the churches' tax exempt status."

This would deal a much-needed blow to Islam's colonizers here in America as well.

PDK said...

Election Day, 2016. As the polls close and the voting data is presented via the LMSM, all the liberals of the land feel the rapture of great joy. For at first curiously, then alarmingly, the liberals and their democrat party are off to the races, their horse has charged out of its starting gate and appears to be running away with the election. Further as the night progresses the liberal democrat is breaking away from the republican candidate faster than Secretariat broke away at the Belmont in June 1973.

Chris Mathews, as with others of his ilk, has wet his pants. He cannot noticed the exceptionally low turnout of republican voters at this election as he must necessarily imbibe deep the fruits of the liberal, socialist agenda, and it`s anti-white, anti-conservative come-up-pence ideology, which pursued by said liberals for more than a sesquicentennial has finally materialized and been made manifest.

Then, before the liberals of the land can sober up, the hour of midnight strokes. From deep in the heart of East Texas, a powerful broadcast on TV, radio and internet suddenly delivers the real explanation of election nights seemingly impossible results. As the people of all the land and the entire planet that so chooses to listen and hear do so, those same people are stunned into a speechless stupor.

The broadcast begins, “I, John Liberty, the newly appointed President of the Confederated States of our newly formed Capitalist Republic, do formally proclaim our Independence from the former Union, and do so with a new Constitution predicated on our Founding Fathers Constitution of unalienable rights, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Further, our new Constitution is augmented with necessary particulars; born out of empirical and pragmatic realities are here elucidated”.
The President continues; “the augmentations of our new constitution are thus: socialism, Islam and illegals are outlawed permanently. Only white males, 30 years of age and older and white females 55 years of age and older, shall be enfranchised in our limited democracy, and this to ensure permanently the path to prosperity and happiness that all our citizens may live their life in harmony with their nature. Lastly English shall be the official language”.

In closing the President states; “We have called our military back to our new confederation. We have called out our National Guard; we have enabled all men who wish to stand up to any hostile aggression directed at our new Republic; and lastly we created a dozen I mg ton nuclear bombs ready to be deployed within minutes. We wish peace, we will live in peace, but shall if necessary, if provoked, defend ourselves with complete resolve. May God speed our endeavor that our citizens shall live free of tyranny and dwell in the heart of liberty. Thank you and good night”.

This is a viable possibility. White flight may continue on in any of its forms, with its hugh waste of effort and capital, or with a new Republic we can disenfranchise blacks and refuse social services on a federal level. Liberals will continue their pursuit of a new world, one world order of globalism, socialism and democracy. Islamics will continue to pursue their one world caliphate of Sharia. However, with a new Republic we could outlaw them completely, effectively ending both their dreams of enslaving we, and our posterity, to their tyranny, poverty and misery.

The difficulty factor is great but the return is much greater.

Liberalism is the iceberg targeting the Titanic.

Woe will be humanity, when all are enslaved to Islamic insanity.

Blacks are endowed by their gene pool with an inferior cerebrum and therefore should be disengaged from enfranchisement.

As it turns out all races are not created equal. Thank you.



Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous said...
"The establishment acted as if the Golden Horde of Genghis Khan was camped on its doorstep."
Turns out that they were right.


The establishment actually did not act as if this were the case. If they had, Alinsky would have tragically hanged-himself in his jail cell from being depressed, or taken several lethal bullets while resisting arrest. No, the establishment - while not initially assuming the position - acted like typical milquetoast Republicans.

Anonymous said...

scottb Big business has left us a long time ago.

Does that include the defense contractors? I recall Harris being there.

Mr. Rational said...

The 2012 presidential race had one very interesting similarity to the 1964 race:  both Romney and Goldwater were tarred as war-mongers, while the Dems they were running against had been firing up conflict like crazy (Johnson in SE Asia, Obama in the ME and North Africa).  A purer example of projection is hard to think of... and the lack of an effective response from the Republicans makes me wonder if this is just incompetence on the part of the campaign advisors, or something more sinister?

Bogolyubski said...

Zenster:
I have already made clear, here at SBPDL, my ambivalence regarding Israel and feel no need to repeat it. Nonetheless, they are one of the very few countries doing a fantastic job of humiliating Islam. That alone is worth something.

I think it is important to understand that Israel and Israelis are really quite different from the Marxist Jews who inhabit the USA and other western countries (where even the "conservatives" are really just re-constituted Trotskyites). For one thing, along with dealing with the Moose-limb problem, they have recently been quite efficient about deporting the groids who've been hopping the border with Egypt. While there are Israeli leftists agitating for open borders, Netanyahu is standing firm. The open-borders gang there are an ineffective marginalized group.

Israel should be studied closely as a viable model for a white ethno-state. They've managed to maintain an ethno-state since 1948 where the Jewish majority is now actually growing. While it is true that Israel is fairly socialist economically, all but the tiny extreme Marxist parties and Arab parties there are very nationalistic. Israel is actually the planet's first example of a successful national-socialist state, which is likely one of the reasons Americans are kept in the dark about it. It's somewhat like PK's example of Pittsburgh.

Anonymous said...

"Revoke the churches' tax exempt status."

Amen Brother.

They are enablers but hide behind religion when their motives are questioned.

Bogolyubski said...

A six word cure for a large part of the BRA problem:

"Revoke the churches' tax exempt status."

I actually agree. The LBJ-authored law to bring churches under the IRS tax code is one of the problems here. The 501c(3) "church" is basically a state-controlled church. That took place back in the placid 1950s, BTW. Note that Negroid "churches" with their mountebank "preachers" in thousand-dollar suits prancing before their harems of wymyn (both female and male) are able to openly endorse candidates for office with zero opposition from all the "watchdog" groups devoted to the "separation of church and state" - or from the putative "opposition" party. I've yet to see the IRS go after a Sharptonesque circus.

Californian said...

I suppose if we went back to the early 1960s, the argument which might have been made was that blacks were suffering from segregation, whether de jure or de facto. And therefore, some radical means were needed to bring us to that promised land of equality, sing it brothers and sisters!

But the entire liberal agenda was implemented when it came to integration. And the results were not what was promised from the pulpit or in the boardroom. The black political machine established itself as a sort of third world satrapy with the usual taxpayer funded rackets, shakedowns, and street violence. Along with this came the ethnic cleansing of whites via the usual dysfunctions.

Blacks--or their radical handlers--see all the high-fallutin' liberal slogans anout equality as agitprop weapons to seize power. And once they have power, they never, ever give it up. (And why should they give up power? Just because DWLs were dumb enough to turn over the keys to the kingdom doesn't mean that blacks will do the same!)

What's all the more amazing is that the same white people who are being ethnically cleansed from their own cities actually support their own dispossession via affirmative action, minority contracts, the welfare state, endless agitprop in the media and schools, ritual obeisance from the liberal churches, and ad nauseam. These are now permanent parts of the political landscape, a means for blacks to maintain their status as an over-class. But even with all these rackets, blacks seem to be unable to maintain modern cities. At least the Goths, when they took over Italy in the 5th century AD, kept the aqueducts running!

Rochester is another city about which, when future archeologists dig among the ruins, people will scratch their heads and ask "What the [expletive deleted] happened?!"

Bogolyubski said...

Since we're into some quasi-spiritual discussion, a very interesting piece just appeared over at Alternative Right.

scottb said...

Harris is still here, although they moved their facility into the burbs from the city. And without the Rochester Institute of Technology providing a steady flow of qualified workers, they'd be gone.

scottb said...

from the Rochester Business Journal
http://www.rbj.net/print_article.asp?aID=192755
"Who could have imagined a quarter-century ago that Eastman Kodak Co. today would be in bankruptcy and getting out of the photography business? Who in 1987 would have imagined a future in which Rochester's Big Three-Kodak, Xerox Corp. and Bausch & Lomb Inc.-together would employ roughly 12,500 people locally, down from more than 60,000?

Few people, no doubt. Yet back then it certainly was possible to identify trends and forces that likely would shape the next 25 years-from the declining role of manufacturing to increased globalization to the hollowing of Rochester's urban core.

The same is true today, as the Rochester Business Journal marks 25 years of covering local business and economic news. It's not known what people, companies and events will loom large between now and 2037, but the key underlying trends are not completely hidden from view.

One of them is the rise of the post-Kodak economy. The once-towering company may succeed in its attempt to reinvent itself, but its days as Rochester's dominant employer are over. More broadly, the Big Three-and the manufacturing sector as a whole-likely will be further diminished locally.

Rochester's transition to a knowledge economy-already well under way-will continue in the coming decades. The region's ability to further enhance its assets in education, health care, information technology and other sectors will be essential to job and wealth creation.

Another trend is the unrelieved burden of state and local taxes. The Tax Foundation this week reported that New York's individual income tax ranks worst nationwide and its property taxes are sixth-worst. This combined burden, built over many years, will not be remedied anytime soon, especially with the fiscal mess at the federal level.

These factors and others-many outlined by RBJ readers in response to a special 25th-anniversary poll-will play a big role in defining the Rochester area's opportunities and challenges.

What's needed is a new generation of growth-oriented companies and community leaders who believe our combined assets, if used wisely, are more than sufficient to build a prosperous future for the community."

Why are our taxes so high? this is a small city that should not take much overhead to run, seeing that its in shambles. What are we paying for? WHO are we paying for?

Anonymous said...

It seems as though one could trash the church, but not defend it.

blancdeseinesaintdenis said...

bonjour, can you tell me more about the history of your cities...is pittsburgh full of white and how does it do? It's near detroit so why poor niggers go to piitsburgh? Concerning obama, in france it says that latinos blacks and white women make hin win...dont US girls realize how bad blacks are??? In france ours girls take it like a fashion to kiss a black man...About france: a mosquee has been penetrated by nationalist..it seems like a little woke up...bye

DailyKenn.com said...

blacks take credit for Obama win.

Truly black run America

http://newsone.com/2077545/black-voters-may-have-decided-election/

Silent Running said...

While I do not think the root of the problem is Christianity per se...

That makes one of us.

A six word cure for a large part of the BRA problem:

"Revoke the churches' tax exempt status."


The irony is that this is far more likely to happen under Obama than Romney. I get the feeling the homosexuals will be going on the rampage next year. Perhaps they'll demand the blood of those who stood in the way of "marriage equality," and I'm sure Uncle Sugar will oblige. Long may it last.

This is part of the great paradox of liberalism: most of its constituent parts hate each other. The paradox represents opportunity.

This is a viable possibility.

Indeed it is. Secession is our best shot as far as I'm concerned. I'll be making the move from blue state to red state fairly soon.

These are now permanent parts of the political landscape

Yet the political landscape itself is impermanent.

Anonymous said...

Revoke the churches' tax exempt status.

I completely agree. Virtue is not borne out of religion; it is borne out of race. White people everywhere, whether liberal, conservative, religious, or atheist, tend to be much less violent, much more ethical, and much more intelligent than blacks, and that is a fact. Christianity--fundamentalist, evangelical, or otherwise--isn't the dam that holds back evil. Only facts and science can help us now. We can start by making the DWL SEE the facts regarding those negroes they are in such a hurry to prop up. That will be the hardest hurdle, and maybe it's not possible to overcome it; but I believe that once it is overcome, the rest will fall into place.

Anonymous said...

Well democracy won out yesterday. But is democracy what we are supposed to have?
"the united states shall fastener to every state in this union a republican form of government...
U.S. Constitution, article 4 section 4

So, why were we all taught in high school that we live in a democracy?
Why do our elected leaders tell us that we need to promote democracy around the world?
Why does the news always say we live in a democracy?

If we measure forms of government by the amount of government used to control a society, you would have communism, socialism and fascism on the left and anarchy on the right with democracy in between.
We understand democracy to mean "rule by the people". Elections are won and laws are passed by a majority vote. Whatever the majority says, goes, right? But how is the majority prevented from trampling the rights of the minority? Thus is what we are faced with from our 50% imported population. The majority will then tyrannize the minority, democracy turns into mobocracy.
The only difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is the ratio of slaves to tyrants.

(to be continued)

Thom Jefferson said...

http://www.roitov.com/articles/obama2.htm

Read it and weep, another double game.

SwampThizzle said...

You guys are gonna be pissed at me, but I voted Obama. Not enthusiastically, of course. Obama sucks, but that Romney is just a clueless rich asshole. Romney might even be an okay guy (for a creepy Mormon), but he was promising a George W. Bush-style presidency.

Jay Santos said...

PK - This is an excellent piece you've done. Currently relevant, well written and so interesting in its historical presentation. It's through work like yours that we can begin to see the enormous scope of the lies forced on us for so many many years.

Anonymous said...

Let's look back and see at the beginning of this current government what theory thoughts on democracy were...

Thomas Jefferson...
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those that are willing to work and give to those who would not."
"I have never heard, or heard of, a single expression or opinion which did not condemn it as an inexcusable aggression."

Samuel Adams...
"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself! There wad never a democracy that did not commit suicide."

James Madison...
...Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatable with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."

Thomas Paine...
"A democracy is the vilest form of government there is!"

I don't believe that democracy if three form of government they intended us to have. But, our "representatives" , if they can convince you that you live in a democracy will continue to impose confiscatory taxes, oppressive laws, burdensome regulations, dispossession of your property and country...and when you object, they will respond by saying "hey, majority rules, remember"?

(to be continued)

Anonymous said...

Virtue and nobility is not born out of race. Our people have been new covenant people as long as we have recording of them. There nobility may be inherent in only through being blessed by God. We are goods because there is righteousness in the laws of God and our keeping of the commandments. No other people have so clung to the gospel as ours... You cannot separate this and think we will remain virtuous or good

Left Coast White Guy

Californian said...

So, why were we all taught in high school that we live in a democracy?


The US was established as a republic, not a democracy. This was the reason behind the checks and balances as well as the electoral college and limiting the franchise. The idea was to prevent democracy from turning into demagoguery and then dictatorship. As Heinlein points out, once the plebs figure out they can vote themselves bread & circuses, they will do so until there are no more bread & no more circuses--at which point they rally behind that man on a white horse.

As to why we are told the US is a democracy? Mainly because for the last century the franchise has been expanded to all warm bodies 18 and over (and some cold ones, too!). This has been especially so since the civil rights revolution.

Of course, democracy is a joke, anyway. When voters support measures which the establishment does not like, they use the courts to toss them out. Meantime, blatantly abusive policies, such as the TSA police state at the airports, are allowed to stand.

Anyway, looks like what the Founding Fathers feared is coming to pass in front of our eyes and on 500 channels.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous said...
It seems as though one could trash the church, but not defend it.

Care to explain? As I stated above, the church as it presently stands is essentially aiding and abetting the genocide of whites. It is therefore an enemy and should be destroyed completely at the earliest opportunity. And please refrain from any 'no true Scotsman' excuses. I'm not referring to the church of 1000 years ago, or those of even 200 years ago. The church as it exists right now in the USSA and elsewhere in the western world is controlled by genocidal Marxists. Burn it. Hopefully the survivors will emerge from ashes to return to the real thing.

Anonymous said...

I apologize for the spelling errors. I am writing this on my smarty phone and it substitutes the words it guesses that I am writing at will.

More thoughts on democracy...

Alexander Tyler...

This one I gave yesterday...
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of document. It can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves larges out of the public treasury."

Charles T Sprading...
"We no longer believe that it is just for one man to govern two, but we have yet to outgrow the absurd belief that it is just for two men to govern one man."

H. L. Mencken...
"Government is a broker pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction of the sale of stolen goods."

George Bernard Shaw...
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."
Update 2012 ...
"A government that robs Robert to pay Juan and deshawn can always depend on the support of Juan and deshawn"

Harold E. Stassen....
"Let us always have in mind that every attempt to establish a loafers paradice had wound up a dictators hell hole."

Lord Action...
"It is bad to be oppressed by a minority, but it is worse to be oppressed by a majority."

Jim Davidson...
"In a democracy the people get what the majority deserve."

(This it's my personal favorite)
Richard J. Maybury...
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for lunch."

Also,
"in the hands of a lazy, envious self righteous majority, democracy is under most vicious tyranny of them all.

I do not believe in the collective wisdom of average ignorance.

Do you remember the ten planks of the communist manifesto? Did you ever learn it in school?
1. Abolition of private property
2. Heavy progressive income tax
3. Abolition of rights if inheritance tax
4. Confiscation of all property of rebels
5. Control money supply through central bank
6. Govt control of transportation and communication
7. Govt control if factories and agriculture
8. Govt control of labor
9. Corporate farms/regional planning
10. Govt control of education

Compare to God's ten commandments
1. You shall have no other gods before me.
2. You shall not make for yourselves any graven images.
3. You shall not taker three name if YHWY your God in vain.
4. Remember the sabbath to keep it holy.
5. Honor your mother and father
6. You shall not murder.
7. You shall not commit adultery.
8. You shall not steal.
9. You shall not best false witness.
20. You shall not covet.

Government to think about...
Left Coast White Guy

Anonymous said...

California will be the place because it may very well become the first entire state to go the way of Detroit or Gary.

Tom said...

Anonymous said "Maybe I really will move to Montana. Watch the fires from a distance. Learn to hunt, fish, skin and trap - all that Davy Crockett shit. Who needs Obamacare? "

I tweeted a comment similar to this to PK on election night and he quickly upbraided me "No you stand and fight". Fight? Somebody tell me how. I've watched city after city fall to the black cancer for all of my 63 years. It never stops. How do we stop this black undertow that destroys everything it touches?

TFD said...

Sounds like we need some similarly talented "community organizers" like Alinsky to move the blacks back to a certain confined area of the country. And then induce them to riot in favor of declaring their independence as a separate nation.

(Although I'd prefer that said future nation be sprinkled with DWL's who'll then be forced to live with the consequences of their mindless crusades for black power.)

Anonymous said...

"...there is no possible way for you to know the amount of valuable intelligence that Mossad is passing to the USA regarding Islamic terrorism."

You mean when they're not busy spying on us and stealing our technology to sell to the Russians or the Chinese?

Zenster said...

Anon (11/8, 2012 5:29 PM): You mean when they're [the Israelis] not busy spying on us and stealing our technology to sell to the Russians or the Chinese?

In a last effort to wise you up, I must guess that either you're new here or purposefully opaque.

I have already mentioned every last one of your objections in prior comments which is why I feel no need to enumerate them now.

If you are incapable of absorbing the importance of America having at least one ostensible ally which possesses the necessary scrotal endowment to neutralize Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, then you're just plain brain dead or obsessively Antisemitic.

Pay close attention to what Bogolyubski noted in his comment here at November 8 10:23 AM. If you are unable to digest the central message being made, then I politely suggest that you take your insincere protestations over to Stormfront.

AnalogMan said...

So CAL Snowman: New Zealand has a huge advantage in having few Africans, but it's very liberal (in spite of a large South African expatriate population).

Self-defence is illegal. Cost of living is high (especially property), consumer choice is limited, salaries are low. Crime is low.

New Zealand is about as far as it's possible to get from world markets. It has no industry. Its main export is dairy products. In short, it's like living in the sticks, without the space.

Anonymous said...

California will be the place because it may very well become the first entire state to go the way of Detroit or Gary.

I live in Arizona and I've been seeing tons of cars on the road with California plates. There are also many blacks moving here from California. Unfortunately, these retards all support the same failed policies that fucked up California to the point where no one wants to live there anymore. My new state senator is, in fact, a liberal Californian. I think it may be the beginning of the end for this once-fair state.

Anonymous said...

If you are incapable of absorbing the importance of America having at least one ostensible ally which possesses the necessary scrotal endowment to neutralize Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, then you're just plain brain dead or obsessively Antisemitic.

Zenster, I will have to disagree with you about Iran. Iran getting a nuke is no threat to the the US. Just like North Korea, Pakistan and India, it is no threat to us. The main threat those countries pose to us is not sending nuclear weapons our way, but sending their people as immigrants. The demographic threat trumps any military threat from these nations.

What good is it to be s superpower, when you are peopled by third worlders? In fact if the USA is going to become a multiculti empire, I just assume it DIDN'T HAVE military power. Does anyone here really want a multiculti USA making the world into its image?

This fixation by conservatives on foreign policy is killing us. We have wasted a decade in Iraq and Afghanistan when they were never a threat to us. And what did it get us? We have spent trillions, lost some of our best young men and replaced them with an uninterrupted stream of immigrants, LEGAL ones at that, year after year.

Everyone always asks what about 9-11? 9-11 happened because foreign muslims were allowed into our country on visas and not deported once they overstayed. We could have made ourselves safer over the past decade by concentrating on repatriating people who don't belong here and turning off the spigot on new arrivals.

To paraphrase Pat Buchanan, while Bush was worried about saving Anbar province, he was losing Arizona.

Zenster said...

Anon (11/9 9:59 AM): Zenster, I will have to disagree with you about Iran. Iran getting a nuke is no threat to the the US. Just like North Korea, Pakistan and India, it is no threat to us. The main threat those countries pose to us is not sending nuclear weapons our way, but sending their people as immigrants. The demographic threat trumps any military threat from these nations.

Apparently, you have forgotten the old addage about how:

"One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day."

Yes, the demographic threat is of genuine concern. Properly enforcing our immigration laws could change much of that in a heartbeat. What our legal system cannot change is this simple fact:

Beyond a certain unspecified number of nuclear weapons held by Muslims there emerges a non-zero probability that one or more of them will fall into terrorist hands.

Nor does this begin to encompass the issue of how Iran's accession to nuclear weaponry would drive an immediate atomic arms race in the increasingly unstable MME (Muslim Middle East). Iran's Shiites are regarded by the Sunnis as heretics who might just as, if not more, readily nuke Mecca than Islam's infidel foes. Plus, rogue nations like North Korea and Pakistan have already participated in proliferating nuclear weapons technology. The last thing this Free World needs is for there to be an avalanche of Islamic nations sharing out amongst each other the tedious details of unconventional arms technology.

This fixation by conservatives on foreign policy is killing us. We have wasted a decade in Iraq and Afghanistan when they were never a threat to us.

Are you saying that the 9-11 atrocity was not a trillion dollar "threat" to America? The global cost of that one single terrorist attack—based in and executed out of Afghanistan—was more on the order of ten to one hundred trillion dollars, after factoring lost tourist revenues, economic upheaval, extra operational airline overhead, increased security measures and military retaliation. There is also proof that Saddam was an active conduit for movement of al Qaeda operatives. Not a "threat" you say?

That said, should we have bothered to engage with nation building in Afghanistan and Iraq? Horse snot! I mean, of course not! The "hearts and minds" nonsense that is preached by Liberals and Conservatives alike is pure tommyrot. Nothing could be more foolish than attempting to uplift Muslims who adore wallowing in the filth of their their Islamic quicksand. One may as well seek to uplift Blacks and we all know how that little adventure turned out.

And what did it get us? We have spent trillions, lost some of our best young men and replaced them with an uninterrupted stream of immigrants, LEGAL ones at that, year after year.

Agreed, but this has little to do with the fact that it is still important to prevent any nuclear escalation in the MME. Our policy should have been and needs to be one of; Break the bad boys' toys and get the hell out. We should have done that in Afghanistan and Iraq—whilst backbilling the Iraqis for our expenses in oil—and it is what we need to do in Iran. The Smash and Grab Method™. Fly in, bomb the crap out of their enrichment facilities plus any supporting infrastructure, trash their last few remaining gasoline refineries and then wave good-f&%king-bye. Lobbing a few dozen cruise missiles into a full session of the Iranian majlis (parliament), wouldn't hurt either.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

Everyone always asks what about 9-11? 9-11 happened because foreign muslims were allowed into our country on visas and not deported once they overstayed. We could have made ourselves safer over the past decade by concentrating on repatriating people who don't belong here and turning off the spigot on new arrivals.

Absolutely. Doing that in combination with leveling a major Islamic city after every jihadist atrocity (i.e., 9-11, Bali, London, Beslan, Madrid, Bali II, Mumbai) would see us much farther ahead in fighting jihad. The only other thing that would help is a "wetworks" campaign against the upper echelons of Islam's political, clerical, financial and scholastic aristocracy. A billion dollars spent on neutralizing just one thousand of these terrorist elite would have made more progress in just one year than the last decade that we've wasted in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Finally, the grim reality. There are another 48 Muslim majority countries that must be pacified. At the current rate of spending, that effort represents some 24 TRILLION DOLLARS. The entire Free World combined doesn't possess that much available cash. There is only one way to effectively reach out and touch 1.5 BILLION people. After Islam has forced our hand enough we will reach the tipping point. That being: When living with Islam is more trouble than living without Islam.

As seen above, the only economic way of pacifying 1.5 billion people is with nuclear weapons. This is what Islamic jihad is driving us towards. If anything, after Afghanistan and Iraq, at the very least we will be able to tell future generations "we tried". Islam has always demanded to be paid in its own bloody coin. At whatever cost, the West will eventually learn this dreadful lesson. Then will come the Muslim holocaust.

Islam has "unhappy ending" written all over it. Richard Fernandez, the owner of Belmont Club, summed it up most concisely in his magnum opus "The Three Conjectures":

The most startling result of this analysis is that a catastrophic outcome for Islam is guaranteed whether America retaliates or not. Even if the President decided to let all Americans die to expiate their historical guilt, why would Islamic terrorists stop after that? They would move on to Europe and Asia until finally China, Russia, Japan, India or Israel, none of them squeamish, wrote -1 x 10^9 in the final right hand column. They too would be prisoners of the same dynamic, and they too have weapons of mass destruction.

Even if Islam killed every non-Muslim on earth they would almost certainly continue to kill each other with their new-found weaponry. Revenge bombings between rival groups and wars between different Islamic factions are the recurring theme of history. Long before 3,000 New Yorkers died on September 11, Iraq and Iran killed 500,000 Muslims between them. The greatest threat to Muslims is radical Islam; and the greatest threat of all is a radical Islam armed with weapons of mass destruction.


Remember just this one thing, Islam wouldn't have it any other way.

Mr. Rational said...

Our policy should have been and needs to be one of; Break the bad boys' toys and get the hell out.

That's not sufficient; they'll just get new toys.  You need to break their will as well, and the only thing proven to do that is to kill, maim, and destroy the homes and livelihoods of enough of them that they lose the will to fight and the cultural memory remains for generations.  Anyone canvassing for Al Qaeda should have been killed on the spot by the locals, for fear they'd bring hell down on their heads again.

A starting point would have been to chase the Taliban to Kandahar and then flatten the city with MOABs and incendiaries, no survivors.  We never even started.

SwampThizzle said...

Islam's biggest weapon is demographics. In most of Europe they are the only people having kids. I suspect it has always been this way.

Zenster said...

Zenster: Our policy should have been and needs to be one of; Break the bad boys' toys and get the hell out.

Mr. Rational: That's not sufficient; they'll just get new toys.

Then break them again.

You need to break their will as well, and the only thing proven to do that is to kill, maim, and destroy the homes and livelihoods of enough of them that they lose the will to fight and the cultural memory remains for generations.

What part of: leveling a major Islamic city after every jihadist atrocity was unclear? Unfortunately, America and Europe lack the political spine to do anything of the sort. Ergo, my Smash and Grab Method™. Baby steps. Baby steps.

I don't expect that you've read my body of work at Gates of Vienna. Feel free to peruse my three-part summation of dealing with Islam and then get back to me:

When Will it End?

Why Will it End?

How Will it End?

As you might have noticed, I recommend all of what you mention and more.

Anyone canvassing for Al Qaeda should have been killed on the spot by the locals, for fear they'd bring hell down on their heads again.

The only alternative to the Smash and Grab Method™, would have been to set up ruthless military dictatorships amidst the smoking ruins that shot-on-sight after curfew, summarily executed anyone out of uniform who carried arms, bulldozed all mosques and viciously suppressed the practice of Islam for at least three generations.

Otherwise, the end point is what we are headed straight towards, a Muslim holocaust courtesy of cost-efficient Western nuclear weapons.

A starting point would have been to chase the Taliban to Kandahar and then flatten the city with MOABs and incendiaries, no survivors. We never even started.

Which is what should have been done within days of the 9-11 atrocity and something I advocated just hours after the WTC attack. Mullah Omar's hometown should have been a "teachable moment" for every last Muslim on earth.

SKIP said...

"To paraphrase Pat Buchanan, while Bush was worried about saving Anbar province, he was losing Arizona."

And we STILL LOST Al Anbar province to Al Qaeda, in fact, all of Iraq is lost to Al Qaeda as is Dearbornistan, Michiganistan. Dearborne is a beach head of islam as was the allied invasion of Normandy in WWII and we know where that ended for Germany. The more I think about it, the wrong side won WWII and I'm sure a lot of British vets think the same every time they see Burqa clad muslim women all over Londonistan.

crusada infinita said...

Portugal and spain were fully under muslimn control in the 1490, and the illiterate portuguese and spanish managed to chase the muslim plague out.

Maybe islam during the iberian peninsula's occupation was more benign that the feral islam of today, but if illiterate ppl could make them shove off, then literate ppl of today can accomplish the same

Anonymous said...

Are you saying that the 9-11 atrocity was not a trillion dollar "threat" to America?

Absolutely, 9-11 was no where close to costing us $1 trillion. And the one solution that would have prevented 9-11 is the one thing we did not enact, namely, putting an end to muslim immigration. In fact the number of muslims in the US has doubled since 9-11. Instead we attacked Iraq. Way to go Bush and the neocons.

As Steve Sailer has so aptly stated, conservatives under Bush and the necons enacted the policy of "invade-the-world, invite-the-world, in-hock-to-the-world".

Not only are you guys bankrupting us with your worthless military campaigns, you are replacing the historic American population at the same time.

Yes, the demographic threat is of genuine concern. Properly enforcing our immigration laws could change much of that in a heartbeat. What our legal system cannot change is this simple fact:

Demographic threat is the ONLY threat of genuine concern. How can one not see this. If we are talking about Israel, people will say "Israel must remain a Jewish state. If it loses its Jewish majority, it will cease to be a Jewish state." There is truth in that sentiment.

If you replace the historic people of the United States with people from diverse alien cultures then you do not have the United States. You might call it the United States, and it might occupy the present territory of the United States, but it is no more the United States than Detroit of today is the city that put the world on wheels.

Given all the discussion we have here on Detroit, I am surprised people don't understand that demographics are not just the main issue, they really are the only issue.

And we are past the point of return when it comes to enforcing immigration law. It is over. Already there are more minorities under age two than whites. Even if immigration stopped cold turkey, which it won't, the white share of the population is now on the downward slide. More minority kids are born each year than whites, and that number is growing. So even if immigration stopped tomorrow, our future is baked in the cake.

Bogolyubski said...

The only possible valid reasons for people in our position to support the "Free World" (bad choice of term, Zenster, as the so-called "Free World" are totalitarian satraps of a genocidal oligarchy) is to bring about a faster collapse of the rotten totalitarian banana republic situated on the Potomac River. Remember? It's not reformable. After all, if Benny and the Feds can push the buttons to create a few trillion, why not a few hundred quintillion? Worse is better.

If a nuke-armed Iran brings about the collapse of the treasonous and genocidal regimes and oligarchy in control of the "Free World", then we should not seriously oppose Iranian nukes. The House of Saud aren't our friends, and the Israelis have more than enough nukes to deal with the entire Ummah just by themselves. If mullahs with nukes are a real existential threat to Israel, we can be assured that Netanyahu will deal with them far more effectively than the BRA-regime of Magic Negro., as would China or even Putin - neither of whom is bound by the laws of PCMC.

You're failing to grasp the concept of greater enemy and lesser enemy. The Muslims are fully aware of the jihad of the womb and are waging it quite effectively in the EUSSR's prison of nations, with the full assistance of the treasonous and genocidal elites there. The oligarchy and all of their numerous indoctrinated servants in the west work to facilitate the simultaneous destruction of whites with feminism, sports, BRA, open-borders, "free trade" and "free market" banksterism while carrying out bogus PCMC military actions to make the Ummah safe for feminism, sodomy and the Amurikan way. Quite a scam - which has roped in whites from both the "liberal" and "conservative" camps in support. The Evangelical Christians want to go bomb the hadjis while the Leftist "Social Justice" types resettle Somalian Muslims in the heartland. Both policies are utterly disastrous for us.

You appear to be taking this bizarre position that we should support the objectives of a treasonous and genocidal oligarchy because they are themselves afraid of their Musloid friends (who they never stop importing, by the way) because just this once they're not being lying, treasonous genocidal enemies (despite the century-long record to the contrary). At the end of the day, Musloids aren't that bright. We won't even be able to think about dealing with them until the monster which has us in its claws is defeated.

Zenster said...

Anon (11/10, 2012 10:55 AM): Absolutely, 9-11 was no where close to costing us $1 trillion.

Counting the value of lives lost as well as property damage and lost production of goods and services, losses already exceed $100 billion. Including the loss in stock market wealth -- the market's own estimate arising from expectations of lower corporate profits and higher discount rates for economic volatility -- the price tag approaches $2 trillion.

And…

The U.S. launched a global war on terror after the 9/11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the most deadly strikes against domestic targets by foreigners in U.S. history. Beyond the incalculable human cost of nearly 3,000 civilian lives and the subsequent deaths of more than 6,000 soldiers, 2,300 contractors and hundreds of thousands of Afghan and Iraqi soldiers, policemen and civilians, the fateful choices made after the attacks had profound ramifications for the U.S. government and continue to be a major contributor to its fiscal woes.

If you include both the next decade's interest payments on the debt-financed wars and future veterans' benefits, the total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is now estimated to reach more than $5 trillion.


And…

The agency by agency cost In Today's New York Times, Shan Carter and Amanda Cox gather estimates from a range of experts and breaks down the attack's fees agency by agency with a grand total of $3.3 trillion, including costs for war funding, homeland security, economic impact, veteran's care and physical damage.

You know it's got to be bad when even Wikipedia agrees with you:

The September 11 attacks also led indirectly to the U.S. war in Afghanistan, as well as additional homeland security spending. The attacks were also cited as a rationale for the Iraq war, although this rationale was discredited by intelligence organisations globally. The cost of the two wars so far has surpassed $5 trillion.

Thank you for playing, please try again.

Zenster said...

Bogolyubski: You appear to be taking this bizarre position that we should support the objectives of a treasonous and genocidal oligarchy because they are themselves afraid of their Musloid friends (who they never stop importing, by the way) because just this once they're not being lying, treasonous genocidal enemies (despite the century-long record to the contrary). At the end of the day, Musloids aren't that bright. We won't even be able to think about dealing with them until the monster which has us in its claws is defeated.

Ummm … no.

What I advocate is delivering unto Islam the Total War it so dearly loves to brag about. Leaving the entire MME (Muslim Middle East) in smoking ruins would be a good starting point.

Sadly, nowhere does anything close to this sort of political will exist in the West. For that reason, I'm obliged to hope for some strong neutralization of the current most-active terrorist elements.

Allowing them to fabricate or purchase nuclear weapons is in NO ONE'S interest save that of Islam. Just the loss of a few American or Western cities could bring about the sort of catastrophic economic collapse that you read about in Stephen King novels. We DO NOT need that sort of total catastrophe. Try hard to remember that radioactive soil grows food for NOBODY.

What we NEED is to visit that sort of destruction upon our enemies. Yes, including some very harsh measures against the internal ones as well.

SKIP said...

" crusada infinita said...
Portugal and spain were fully under muslimn control in the 1490, and the illiterate portuguese and spanish managed to chase the muslim plague out.


It was legal to KILL THEM then, it isn't now and even in combat with them over here in afghanistan we put our freedom in jeopardy if we kill one of them. Keep in mind too that even being legal to kill them it took years to get rid of the bastards. Imagine the liklihood of EVER getting rid of them in Americistan since they are a protected species, DOUBLY so being mostly black too.

Discard said...

Zenster: Ten to a hundred trillion dollars in losses due to 9-11? Uh-uh. If the stock market is a ponzi scheme, as I believe, then there are no real losses in stock values due to the attack on the Trade Towers. And the losses and money spent in Afghanistan and Iraq are due to the choices made by President Bush and his advisors, not Al Queda.
Today, I tried to buy a new electric drill, one made in America. I couldn't find one, so I found an old guy who fixes them, if he can get parts. The export of American manufacturing has been far more costly than a few ragheads knocking down a couple buildings full of world trading cubicle rats. Not until I heard of all the cops and firemen who died did I give a shit about it.