Monday, November 12, 2012

Why White People Vote Republican: The Lesson of Wilson Goode, Barack Obama, and Philadelphia

Wilson Goode: "Good" for black Philadelphia, bad for the City of Philadelphia
One thing that should be fairly obvious from the 2012 election results: the greater proximity to black people, the greater the odds a white person will vote Republican; conversely, the less exposure to black people, the greater the odds a white person will vote Democrat.

Insulation from black people, real black people (we aren't talking about Denzel Washington or Morgan Freeman here) is the key to the Democratic Party maintaining the white working class vote and even those status-seeking white liberals whose every action in life is predicated around living an authentic Stuff White People Like - SWPL - life.

A lesson in the reality of why white people vote Republican (white people in the South started voting Republican when the party stood in opposition to the Civil Rights revolution in the 1960s) is offered in the powerful short book The Rhetoric of Black Mayors: In Their Own Words by Deborah F. Atwater. On p. 5 we learn this about the first black mayor of Philadelphia, Wilson Goode:
Running as a highly educated, hardworking, professional manager, he won approximately 23 percent of the white vote and 97-98 percent of the black vote [1983 election].  
But we must be clear about the city that Goode inherited. In his own words:

"The Philadelphia I inherited as the city's first African-American Mayor was on the verge of collapse, suffering a slow hemorrhaging death from high inflation, a declining population, and an anemic revenue base created by the exodus of thousands of jobs." 
However, in 1987 when he ran against Frank Rizzo, he was suddenly less of a technocrat and more of a politician. He won by a mere 17,000 votes (97 percent blacks voting for Goode). His support in the white community had decreased as whites defected to the Republican Party. 
We, of course, can't be clear about the source of the decline in Philadelphia, which enabled the election of the first black mayor in the city's history in 1983. Why would white people flee the city, reducing the white population (and white percentage of the electorate) to the point where they could be eclipsed in an election - merely a referendum on "racial democracy" - by the monolithic black vote?

The rise in the black population was the source of the declining population, with white people fleeing their once safe communities made unsafe by high rates of black criminality. Jobs - with white people being the 'job creators' - left with them. Unable to create new jobs, the increasing black population turned to public jobs to create a black middle class.

In the process, white people turned to the Republican Party; while the Democrat Party in Philadelphia slowly turned into a racial party looking to promote the interests of black people (and take complete control of the city government through the hiring of exclusively black people), the Republican Party became the de-facto "white" party in Philly, though no political party can actively seek the promotion of white interests.

The New York Times reported on Nov. 5, 1987 that Wilson Goode re-elected by black vote:

"Forward" and "together" were the key words, the first because the mayor now is seen among politicians as having the opportunity to move forcefully ahead, unfettered by re-elction concerns, on an unfinished agenda that has long frustrated him, the second because the racially polarized character of his fragile victory margin underscored the division that continue in the nation's fourth most populous city.  
The election returns showed clearly that blacks voted overwhelmingly for Goode, a 49-year-old Democrat who is the first black mayor in the city's history, and whites overwhelmingly for Rizzo, a 67-year-old Democrat turned Republican.  
... the unofficial tally gave Goode 332,396, to 318, 527 for Rizzo... Four years ago, in the Democratic mayoral primary, Goode defeated Rizzo by 10 percentage points. His much narrower margin of victory this time was attributed to a number of factors. 
For instance, in their 1983 contest, a Democratic primary, blacks accounted for a higher proportion of the electorate, nearly half, than the 40 percent they constituted Tuesday.  
White middle-class and working class voters in Northeast and South Philadelphia, Rizzo strongholds, turned out in heavier numbers than in 1983. And there, in sample bellwether wards, they gave Rizzo 84 percent of the vote. Conversely Goode rolled up larger majorities than even his supporters had forecast. In one group of black bellwether precincts, Goode received 97 percent of the vote. Had he not rung up such percentages, he might well have lost. 
The white working class understood what was happening to Philadelphia in 1987; they understand what black neighbors do to property value --- they drive it down (with their black children remaking the school system in their image; posting test scores below the white average and requiring more attention from administrators for their "discipline" problems). They turned to a former Democrat in Rizzo, who had been burned by black primary voters in 1983.


As we know from reading The Philadelphia Experiment: The Streets of Philly Forever Changed, white people abandoned the city. In a word, trying to raise a family or run a business in a city where high rates of black crime is an everyday reality isn't conducive to becoming maintaining ones physical, mental or financial health.

So do we have today? Complete black political control of Philadelphia, accentuated by the recent re-eleciton of Barack Obama, which saw Republican Mitt Romney received zero votes in 59 voting divisions [In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes, Philly.com, 11-12-12]:
It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch. These are the kind of numbers that send Republicans into paroxysms of voter-fraud angst, but such results may not be so startling after all. "We have always had these dense urban corridors that are extremely Democratic," said Jonathan Rodden, a political science professor at Stanford University. 
"It's kind of an urban fact, and you are looking at the extreme end of it in Philadelphia." Most big cities are politically homogeneous, with 75 percent to 80 percent of voters identifying as Democrats. Cities are not only bursting with Democrats: They are easier to organize than rural areas where people live far apart from one another, said Sasha Issenberg, author of The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. 
"One reason Democrats can maximize votes in Philadelphia is that it's very easy to knock on every door," Issenberg said. Still, was there not one contrarian voter in those 59 divisions, where unofficial vote tallies have President Obama outscoring Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0? 
The unanimous support for Obama in these Philadelphia neighborhoods - clustered in almost exclusively black sections of West and North Philadelphia - fertilizes fears of fraud, despite little hard evidence
Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia who has studied African American precincts, said he had occasionally seen 100 percent of the vote go for the Democratic candidate. Chicago and Atlanta each had precincts that registered no votes for Republican Sen. John McCain in 2008. "I'd be surprised if there weren't a handful of precincts that didn't cast a vote for Romney," he said. But the number of zero precincts in Philadelphia deserves examination, Sabato added. "Not a single vote for Romney or even an error? 
That's worth looking into," he said. In a city with 1,687 of the ward subsets known as divisions, each with hundreds of voters, 59 is about 3.5 percent of the total. In some of those divisions, it's not only Romney supporters who are missing. Republicans in general are nearly extinct. 
Take North Philadelphia's 28th Ward, third division, bounded by York, 24th, and 28th Streets and Susquehanna Avenue. About 94 percent of the 633 people who live in that division are black. Seven white residents were counted in the 2010 census. In the entire 28th Ward, Romney received only 34 votes to Obama's 5,920.
White people are not allowed to look out for their own interests, while we see city after city (Romney received zero votes in 9 Cleveland, Ohio precincts) turned into an area governed by black monolithic voting. 

Because of high rates of black crime and the destruction of property value (tied to the quality of life created in the community) when black families came to outnumber white families in the neighborhoods of Philadelphia, white people were - in a word- ethnically cleansed from the city. 

The white working class in Vermont, Maine, Oregon, and Washington doesn't have to contend with rising percentages of black people; thus, they can afford to vote Democrat. 

The lesson of Frank Rizzo and Philadelphia? Once you go black, you never go back.  

84 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why do you think the highly educated, affluent people of Loudoun County, Fairfax Count, Arlington County, and Prince William County overwhelming voted for Obama?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-state-of-nova/post/nova-delivered-virginia-to-obama-despite-75000-fewer-total-voters-in-fairfax-county/2012/11/12/5e9e3a1a-2c8f-11e2-a99d-5c4203af7b7a_blog.html

Sincerely,
AA Woman

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

Whites can afford to insulate themselves from blacks; more importantly, the wealth and growth (continued, sustained growth) in these counties is tied to an ever-increasing, ever-the-more powerful federal government.

More contracts for consultants, etc.

The moment you see a downsizing in government... well, it won't be pretty for the region you discuss. They decided to vote for the person who believes more government is the answer.

Personally, I agree that more government can be a solution -- it just depends what kind of government.

Anonymous said...

@ Stuff Black People Don't Like:

Thank you for your response. I do see your point as the very company I work for is a private industry real estate investment firm - but our number one tenant is the Federal Government. I read an article in the WBJ that stated Romney wanted to reduce the size of Federal employees by 10% the attrition. My first thought was, what would that mean for us (my company)?

Sincerely,
AA Woman

Anonymous said...

Why do you think the highly educated, affluent people of Loudoun County, Fairfax Count, Arlington County, and Prince William County overwhelming voted for Obama?

Because they are as dumb as a bunch of Obama supporters?

MuayTyson said...

PK,
I don't disagree with you often but Morgan Freeman is the kind of black we expect. He is dating/married? to his own step grand daughter. He is a millionaire professional actor yet complains about the lack of opportunity for people of color. 70 something years old can't control his penis, is swimming in money works continually yet bitchs.

I don't know about Denzel but he is such a great actor he played a White man in the true story of Unstoppable.

And least we forget Will Smith everyones favorite non threatening black entertainer. Changes classic American movies to include his black kids and erases Whites.

Fuck them all.

Anonymous said...

From today's Irish Savant:

Sandy was a Category 2 hurricane, i.e. the second least severe. The type Cuba and other Caribbean countries experience several times a year. The timing and location of its landfall were predicted accurately days in advance. Yet the outcome was what you'd expect in the Third World. The headline from a post in the SHTF blog says it all: Starvation, supply shortages, food lines, no clean water, no gas, transportation standstill. They could have added people digging through trashcans, looting, and gunfire in queues to the list of horrors. Weeks later the situation remains terrible in many places.


What's become of the great can-do America, the one that took such challenges in its stride, planned, made provisions and then afterwards worked together to clear up the mess and get back to normal? Well that America no longer exists. If you wonder why the response was Third-World-like, it's because America's population has now rapidly heading towards 50% Third World (I include all blacks in that, irrespective of when their forebears arrived).


But it gets worse. Due to quotas, AA, and legal rulings on disparate impact, crucial agencies such as FEMA, fire brigades, police, and ambulance services are swamped with barely literate unqualified, corrupt, unhelpful and incompetent 'minorities', right up to the top levels. Meanwhile capable Whites, the kind of people who'd have produced world-class performance at those agencies have been downgraded and marginalised. These once proud and efficient services have been corrupted, debased and demoralised and are now significantly unfit for purpose. Hence the abysmal response to Sandy, including the story of the FEMA facility closed down due to the weather! (Here to help: Weather permitting).


Blacks don't prepare. Never did, never will. Same to a lesser degree with Hispanics.. Both will tend to take a manana approach. Neither are they enthused about deferring spending to offset future threats. Not when they could use the money to buy the latest sneakers or a new set of rims. When disaster strikes the typical reaction will be to sit back helplessly and demand action by the authorities......and looting the stores and homes before help arrives.


As Plato said, 'this City is what it is because our citizens are what they are'. And America is what it is because its citizens are what they are. And what they are is increasingly Third World. As the heroic NY firemen of 9/11 will attest, standards everywhere have been debased to the lowest common denominator to accommodate 'minorities'. In a comment on the previous post AnalogMan gives us a link which shows that after his re-election Obama plans to put these measures on steroids. Every workplace must 'look like America'. Unless of course the proportion of minorities is actually way above what America 'looks like', for example the Postal Service. In which case it's 'nothing to see here, move along now'. Amazingly, it seems you can have diversity even if everyone is the same colour. Provided it's black.

Go figure


As I said above, Sandy was a Category 2 Hurricane. Now think how these useless agencies would perform in a real disaster, say were the San Andreas Fault or Yellowstone to pop. Think how the hopelessly unprepared Third World proportion of the population would act. These are not pleasant thoughts.


As I've said again and again, future historians will look back in baffled wonder at how Whites threw it all away, just when they were at their peak. As they do it our descendants will curse us.

May I end with a quote from the great John Adams: Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.


So CAL Snowman said...

I'm starting to understand that one of the main reasons that obama was "selected" (he was NOT ELECTED) was to destroy the Republican party and hence White resistance to the takeover of America by the Globalists and the Third World invaders. While the Republican party is quietly just as destructive to White interests as the Democrats, it does symbolically represent White resistance to multicultural domination. How many people here and at other sites have said, "Well Mittens isn't the best but we can work through him and the Republican party in increments to save White America"? Even though that idea was folly (as Bogolyubuski notes repeatedly how a Republican dominated house has not worked at all to stem the tide of BRA) the party still represents hope to Whites in America.

Now that we have had our "election" and the results are in, one singular talking point has been beaten to death by the MSM; the notion that the Republican party CANNOT SURVIVE as the "White" party. The MSM have been falling all over themselves to say that the Republicans MUST CHANGE and accept the Latino calls for immigration and the Black calls for "fairness" or face the prospect of never "winning" an election again. The MSM have been crowing over the "power of the Latino" vote, yet fail to recognize that if 70% of the White electorate simply "voted" for Romney, it would not matter what the latino and black voters did. And now we have top Republican leaders like Boehner and Graham telling Republicans (White people) to "fall in line" with immigration reform and wealth redistribution. This election was all a big game to convince White people that voting for White interests and White values is a thing of the past, when in reality we are still the single most Powerful Racial Group in America. This election was all about demoralization and disillusionment for White people. The browns and blacks have picked up on this and their jubilation is being fanned by the hate inferno that is the MSM.

* Bonus * I believe it was the erudite Silent Running who referred to ex-KGB defector Yuri Besmenov. I found a 1985 interview with him on YouTube in which he lays out how the KGB (among others) were able to successfully indoctrinate and brainwash the population of the United States. It is a very interesting and eye-opening interview. The most fascinating part is that he says if we were to try and reverse what they have done, if we started right now (this was in 1985) that it would take at least 15-20 years. Why 15-20 years? Because that is the time it takes to educate a generation.

Yuri Bezmenov - How To Brainwash A Nation

Anonymous said...

White in northern New England voted for Obama but whites in the also heavily white Rocky Mountain states voted for Romney. I am not sure how to explain the difference.

whisker child said...


So well said.

Sluggo said...

The same thing was happening in Chicago at the same time. Harold Washington was twice elected mayor.

The best thing that ever happened to Chicago was Harold W. died in office without a black heir to the throne. Richard Daley was elected mayor which made whites feel empowered and secure. Daley was able to placate blacks by buying their clergymen and leaders support.

Anonymous said...

That racist tweet study was a study of 395 tweets. Yes it was a really in depth analysis.

Whiskey said...

You can't sell something to people if they don't want it. Anyone who spent any time in sales knows this. Even if they want it, its difficult. Microsoft spent billions promoting the Zune, and Windows Phone. They're both dead products. No one wanted it, despite the advertising billions used. Brainwashing indeed. On a mass level, it just doesn't work. Its why, as soon as the money stopped coming in, the Soviet Union fell apart like a cheap paper towel in water.

The changes will come as Obama forces WHITE WOMEN out of jobs. That's coming. Already White guys have been largely cleansed, out of government and education and much else. But to support the additional demand for Black/Hispanic jobs, White women will have to go. And then and only then, because White women are the core support of BRA/Affirmative Action etc. will changes come. Including White votes at the 80% level. By then of course, it will be entirely too late for anything peaceful and reasonable.

But there you have it.

james wilson said...

I grew up in DC, left in 1966. Until that parasitic monster sees it's first depression since 1932 we are continuing in the wrong direction.

Jay in DC said...

I'd like to offer a little homework assignment to everyone here. Obama 2016, the movie from conservative Dinesh D'Souza hit video a few weeks ago. I cannot advise strongly enough that you pick it up as a Netflix, rental, etc. Most people here I think understand the puppets pulling the strings on this guy, but it is one thing to know something, another to hear it spoken and articulated.

The level of indoctrination, animosity towards the West and whites in particular this guy has had literally, since childhood, is terrifying. Truly terrifying, considering that "Obama 2016" just became reality. White women who cream their panties watching this guy are no different than his radical leftist coal burning mommy from the 60s. She was a poster woman for self-loathing.

Go rent this. Learn things you may not have known, or just burn home with imagery and sound, all that you already knew.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....Just found a great web sight...

obamavotefraud.blogspot.com


It is full of reports coming in on how the election was rigged again. So many people still believe their vote counts. In your dreams baby, in your dreams.

jay Santos said...

Having spent now nearly a week in thinking about another four years of this negro punk pimp walking through the White House, I’ve got some conclusions.

For those of you who are above the age of say forty, I’d point out that the people of this country have changed. The character of the average American has dropped, as has the education and as has the morality, which had been based in whatever Christian group had been maybe regionally most popular. Over the past two decades, the nation has imported countless numbers of immigrants, the vast majority uneducated poor people from south and central America. They are a natural statist constituency and no amount of short-term effort to show them otherwise will ever change that.

Through the unions and various Acorn-like organizations, Axelrod orchestrated massive and quite sophisticated voter fraud. While that may be wrong, if the opposition party wasn’t prepared for that, then they’re not prepared to run the nation as currently constituted.

The reduction of our liberties to accommodate the lowest common denominator will continue regardless of which political party is in charge. It’s inevitable; liberty would require a national character that is fundamentally moral. I look around me and I’ve got to say, I don’t want the increasingly retarded whites, the savagely amoral negoes or the ignorant meztitsos anywhere near a firearm that will allow them to threaten me.

A US of the current 50 states will not last. Large numbers of us increasingly have nothing in common with one another. Why would Oklahoma taxpayers ever consider paying for California’s debts? It’s going to break and at this point, it’s the only solution. Let’s hope Obama drives it and let’s help him do it. I suppose the only silver lining I see is that history will demonstrate it was actually a negro that destroyed the country. Small satisfaction, and not likely a surprise to a bright historian in the future.

Anonymous said...

What would that mean to my company? Probably nothing although it may have meant something to all those rope head Birkenstock Eco-pussy working summer jobs for the Forest Service.

Jefferson said...

How do you explain the fact that most White people in North Dakota for example, vote Republican even though there are very few Blacks there.

How do you explain the fact that most White people in Chicongo vote Democrat even though that city has a huge Black population.

Lucas Evans said...

"The changes will come as Obama forces WHITE WOMEN out of jobs"

This is very true. The coming tax increases and austerity will hit professional White women very hard. The browns and blacks will continue to be primarily welfare recipients and their sheer numbers and incessant demands will soak up all the AA positions. Why hire a White woman when you can get 2 AA points by hiring a black woman?

The sooner we end up like Greece, the better

DailyKenn.com said...

The vast majority of black voters live in southern states that went red.

This confirms Paul's theory.

Note, also, that the electoral college effectively cancelled these black votes.

Map of red and blue states

Map of demography revealing the concentration of blacks in red states

nameispointless said...

anon@4:30 PM

What's become of the great can-do America, the one that took such challenges in its stride, planned, made provisions and then afterwards worked together to clear up the mess and get back to normal? Well that America no longer exists.

Oh yes it does, it we go to the right places, hang out with the right people
Remember the twister that leveled Joplin, Missouri a year or so ago? 160+killed, $2 billion in damage.
Remarkably, the citizens did not sit about whining, waiting for Superman to bail them out. Nor did they loot merchants, rape, steal from or shoot each other. They did what decent, self respecting people do in a crisis; dug in, helped themselves, each other, and together, rebuilt from the ground up.
Note the faces reflecting their gratitude in the photos.
The town's absence of "diversity enhancement" might have made all the difference, ya think? I do.
The photo-op with imposter-in-chief Barry Hussein makes me gag.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous:
White in northern New England voted for Obama but whites in the also heavily white Rocky Mountain states voted for Romney. I am not sure how to explain the difference.

The lying Ministry of Truth has been parroting this BS story than the Hispanic colonizers put Zero over the top but in reality it was the voting and non-voting of whites that resulted in this result.

Steve Sailer, who actually understands something about statistics (in contrast to the congenital liars at the Ministry of Truth and in the Republican Party), has a breakdown of the vote you'll see nowhere else.

PDK said...

The DWLs will never be caught hob knobbing in the same neighborhoods as blacks. Never will their children have to suffer a public school education with black or Hispanic disruptive, destructive children.

With liberals its do as I say, not as I do. They will never walk the walk of the talk they talk, of which said talk of course is liberal ideology, the ideology of the immature and the insane.

One of the curious realities here is that liberalism is the failure to mature, and further, one main obstacle many liberals fail to hurdle is the cowardice/courage phenomenon.

These are the liberals who would not be caught dead in a black area but further tow the liberal ideology by attacking a non-liberal who embraces the true reality of blacks, and other dangerous minorities. It is here, where first feigning the moral high ground, the liberal then subsequently feigns courage by standing up to a friendly he fears not, and further feigns noblism by defending someone he is cowardly afraid of.

The cheat of nature`s demand to mature as a necessity, via the game of social chess, comes with a price, first that price is dumped upon the collective, then second, that price ultimates in the total destruction of the culture in which this game is very prevalent. This game is very prevalent wherever liberals are found.

America has become a land of two people, DWLs, 40% of whites, 100% of Islamics, 95% of blacks and 70% of Hispanics on one side, the non-liberal rest on the other. Our ideology, philosophy and goals are so different it is time to become two mutually exclusive countries.

In fact, as I perused the web earlier, I gleaned that 20 states have petitioned the US government for the right to secede since Barac was re-elected.

For me this is good news, not sure how it will pan out, but I have been for the creation of separate, mutually exclusive, nation-states since July 2008.

For those who have been considering a move to a republican state the time may be now.

Should any of this happen, I sincerely hope a new Constitution will be forged enfranchising only whites, if the few representatives of minorities, or the minorities already in these possible seceding states don`t like that, they can leave. It is painfully clear that the minorities are here to destroy our Founding Father`s America, white America, which cherishes liberty, wealth and the pursuit of happiness.

There are none so blind as those who refuse to see reality, that would be liberals.

Liberalism is the iceberg, targeting the Titanic. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

When the Berlin Wall fell and all the Boomers started swooning about the Cold War being over and communism is dead I just shook my head and laughed. Communism is an ideology, not a government system. Now upon reflecting I realize why the USSR didn't wish to continue the Cold War. Their subversion had reached it's goals. Maybe I am being a tad paranoid but doesn't anybody else care?

Anonymous said...

Socialism is the ideology of the insecure and the people who exploit them.

Conservatism is the ideology of the confident who thrive on economic freedom and self reliance.


In our multi-racial world, the human breeds who have been genetically enchanced by natural selection over millenniums of surviving brutally cold desolate winters have a huge competitive advantage and will tend to reject hardcore socialism.
The socialism we see in Northern Europe is of the softer form of transfer payments not the extreme form of government ownership.
Communism collapsed in Europe largely because the people are White and, therefore, intelligent and industrious.

We're, also, witnessing how the other major northern race - East Asians - are taking to Capitalism like ducks to water.

On the other hand, socialism will be embraced by the less intelligent and lazier breeds of which the United States is cursed with far too many.




Anonymous said...

1.) Rizzo sucked. He had a large hand in the mess that caused Goode's election.

2.) The majority of white Philadelphians are Democrats. No part of Philadelphia is not racially diverse or within a mile or two of racially diverse areas.

Anonymous said...

The expression "familiarity breeds contempt" comes to mind when I consider why Southern Whites are so much more Conservative than naive Northern Whites.

Southern Whites know firsthand that blacks are the most primitive racial group on the planet and are prone to violence and are almost unbelievably stupid on average. Just consider the fact that nothing is more important and nothing is easier to advance a people than using contraception in order to have planned pregnancies. Generic birth control pills cost about $10.00 and using them requires about as much brainpower as wiping your ass and yet stupid black girls are breeding like rabbits.

Yankees in States like Vermont get their image of black people through the left-wing fantasy world of television and films. Yankees, also, have their superiority complex and antagonistic attitudes toward the South reinforced by pop culture. The fact is that Northeast and Midwest Whites are stupidly reactionary against the increasingly more prosperous and Conservative South.

It's also true that the low-level socialism of transfer payments naturally receives more political support in overwhelmingly White areas. Sub-par White people who receive welfare can be annoying, but they're not raping, robbing, and murdering people and they generally will work when given the opportunity and will produce decently intelligent and civil children.












Anonymous said...

A black family with an income of $75 000 has the same score as a white one with $20 000

What do you think a black man will be able to do in government?

Anonymous said...

The racial pattern of voting for president was always blurred by the fact of candidates up until now being white. With a black candidate the racial lineup has been made very clear to all. All the non-white groups came out strongly for the non-white candidate.
Most people have a poor grasp on whatever issues there may be out there. They know nothing about foreign policy or could even find places like Iran on a map. Fiscal policies, bailouts, budgets, deficits, etc., are confusing subjects with a lot of contradictory claims being made. People voted for who they thought looked best to them. Romney looked just too white for most Obama voters. They just didn't like his looks since most couldn't tell you anything coherent about what his positions might have been.
Obama was able to get 40% of the white vote. I guess 40% of the white populace doesn't realize that they are white, at least not yet. When they get kicked in the teeth later on down the road as the non-whites gain power they'll be sorry.
This was Romney's election to win and he failed at it. He just didn't understand the average white person.

Zenster said...

Black voters vote in a monolithic manner because they are, as a whole, incapable of rising above their tribal mentality. This is evidenced by the miserably small numbers of them that vote for the GOP.

No finer example of the electoral "herd mentality" exhibited by Blacks exists than in Africa. After having Rhodesia handed to them on a silver platter, Black politicians—Robert Mugabe in particular—took what was once known as "the bread basket of Africa" and, through an orchestrated campaign of dispossession and outright genocide, reduced what is now Zimbabwe—home to the world's only 100 trillion dollar bill, worth all of US$5.00—to the point of requiring famine relief.

From: Face to face with Zimbabwe's misery by Alex Perry.

In the 1980s, Zimbabwe was the second largest economy in southern Africa. Millions of tourists visited each year to see hippos, lions and the awesome drama of Victoria Falls. And Zimbabwe--a nation of 11 million to 13 million people (nobody knows the precise number, partly because so many have fled) gave black Africans the best education and health care on the continent. But over the past two decades, Mugabe's single-minded protection of his power has devastated the economy and turned the country into a police state. Unemployment is at 80%, living standards are back to their 1953 levels, and the World Health Organization says life expectancy is 34 for women and 37 for men--the lowest in the world. Inflation hit 1,792.9% in February and is predicted to reach 3,700% by year's end. (A currency free fall of that magnitude means, for instance, that in nominal terms, a single brick today costs more than a three-bedroom house with a swimming pool did in 1990.) [emphasis added]

The decline of Zimbabwe (nee Rhodesia) perfectly mirrors the similar slide in quality of life in Black-run cities throughout America. Paul Kersey, at SBPDL has appropriately labeled this as Black Undertow.

What's to be said about America's Black middle class except that they overwhelmingly voted to reelect 0bama despite how he has, almost single-handedly, destroyed the economic base of that electoral bloc? This is tribal-based voting at its very worst and is, again, reflected in African politics.

For all of Zimbabwe's privations, Mugabe's hold on power seems unlikely to slip anytime soon. On my first day in jail, a heads-of-government Southern African Development Community summit met in Tanzania. In its ranks were other veterans of the fight against colonialism, like South African President Thabo Mbeki, many of whose supporters sympathize with Mugabe's demonization of the West as racist. Despite worldwide calls for censure, the conference refused to condemn Mugabe's leadership and affirmed Zimbabwe's right to noninterference. [emphasis added]

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

The African National Congress, along with ANC-ruled South Africa, have absolutely refused to censure or condemn Mugabe.

Mr. Rational capably identified the root cause of this inability during an exchange with African American woman in his A Pizza [Delivery] Boy Can Survive comment:

African American woman: I am not responsible for, nor do I have control over, what every other black person does

Mr. Rational: This is the classic abdication of civic virtue and cultural values which is why Black societies fail. Yes, you CAN exercise control over what other Blacks do. You can urge the re-imposition of social controls on the underclasses (of all races). You can help restrict the availability of public assistance, and tie it to virtuous behavior. You can condemn the Trayvon Martins and support the George Zimmermans. You can support the police when some thug gets shot, and condemn the "no snitching" ethos as responsible for the gross criminality in ghettos.

In Zimbabwe and its despotic kleptocrat, Robert Mugabe, we see this "classic abdication of civic virtue and cultural values" in its entirety. The ANC's abject refusal to censure or condemn Mugabe represents the Black community's almost congenital refusal to criticize or reject their own.

This is "no snitch" writ large.

bupkiss o'toole said...

YOU BEEN HAD
At the Stasiland Campus Little Brother could not disguise a sly expression of smug satisfaction as he offered his interpretation of the Big Shibai and related developments.

"We couldn't be more pleased with the way things are going. On a secondary level the battle was between our Establishment Old Guard and a couple of wimpy upstarts who thought that money and a modicum of deceit was enough to get them a seat at the table.

They got suckered into believing that the old Master Grid was still in place and, as loyal operatives, it was their duty to make certain it would remain so, as they displaced Jughead's gangsters.

* * *

Consequently, they expected that their own genteel, 'Marquis of Qeensbury' facade and the abysmal track record of the opposition would be sufficient to both satisfy responsibilities to their Reptilian overlords and garner a sufficient number of votes to win the election.

Their big mistake was in assuming that those who had neither ethical nor moral constraints would abide by the same rules.

When we pulled out all the stops and hit them with every dirty trick known to man they were so shit faced and shell shocked that they were stumbling around on queer street.

In fact they are now so discombobulated now that their front men are already throwing in the towel and suggesting that they need to move further down the rat hole and start jettisoning some of the principles they pretend to support."


curious said...

A question if I may, how does your son identify?n seeing you african american, and your husbnland european american.

Does he identify with black culture, or white culture? Please give the reasons why he identifies with one and not the other.

We all know that if you act white in a black community you get ridiculed.

Now seeing that a half white man was elected president in the usa, we know that a half black man would never ever be elected to presidency in a black african country.

Why is that? Why do you choose not to live in a fully black community, therby denying your son a full exposure to black culture?

eah said...

the monolithic black vote

It's amazing how little comment this generates in the media, let alone any kind of unfavorable comment. It's just assumed Blacks will vote for a black candidate, and there's nothing wrong or unexpected about that, even when it's virtually unanimous.

black oscar said...

Well morgan freeman has played mandela so often in movies, he might think that a real proposition, when the old hack kicks the bucket, so that mandela never dies.

Can you believe that the blacks in south africa want mandela to remain continuously living, they can't bring themselves to the fact that the old bag will kick the bucket someday, the level of superstition and fantasy is just amazing

Anonymous said...

Paul- Go for the real news item. 30 (count 'em) THIRTY states have petitions at 'whitehouse.gov' for SECESSION.

Texas in five days, already has over twice the number of signatories needed.

Other states are closing in, fast. And all this, over a weekend, without 'Jewsmedia' coverage.

http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/between-barak-and-a-hard-place/

- Fr. John+
unreconstructed Yankee

Anonymous said...

As has been seen in all cities (where blacks gain political power through sheer population numbers and voting as a racial block along racial lines) all other races get spit on and kicked into the gutter. The blacks quickly show that they have zero loyalty to anything other than race and will quickly (and with great glee) shit on everyone else.
That well documented evidence and reality should serve as a loud and clear wake up call to any non black person that voting for a black is an act of monumental stupidity.
I have shown people (white) the many articles on this website (and others)detailing the downfall of black infested cities and what happens as a consequence only to have them squeal in outrage, "But I have black friends!" Ditto for the same reaction when they're presented with the crime statistics of black communities.
Even when faced with the overwhelming evidence, some willfully refuse to face reality and will (or would) provide the knife that is used to cut their own throats.
You can't wake such people up no matter what you say. It's like having an argument with a stage four alcoholic about the damaging effects of alcoholism on the alcoholic and everyone else around them including their family and friends. They refuse to listen and simply continue to self destruct while dragging everyone else around them down with themselves while making excuses, rationalizations, and justifications for it.
In that regard, sometimes the fact has to be faced that some people are beyond help and have to be written off and left to their fate no matter how pitiful that fate may be.
The unfortunate reality is that DWL's fall into this category and are therefore the best argument for the nation to split up into two separate entities. Call it secession or call it a divorce~ whatever the case, it'll be ugly but necessary or we will all be dragged down to destruction.

Jay in DC said...



Whiskey, I agree with most of your stuff but you are way off target on this one, like, not hitting the paper off target.

White women will never be made to feel disenfranchised under this Marxist juggernaut. I have been consuming literature, writings, and media at a pace almost to the point of being mildly manic recently. BRA seems like something writ small to me now once you understand the "real" agenda.

Their value, is so much higher than some menial amount of money in whatever job they would be disenfranchised from. They are like so much gold bullion, as compared to some copper based economy. Their repurposing is far more insidious and long lasting.

Comrade Zero is no fool as many presume him to be. He has handlers, yes, but he is intelligent and subversive in his own right. Those white women are the most important thing, even more so than the brown hordes and he damn well knows it. So long as you keep them happy, liberated, poisoned, and deluded, they will accomplish Zero's goal far far faster than some yard apes. The handlers know this.

They have the high IQ that the dark horders require to uplift, and they are a trophy that has been desired, in perpetuity, by all races. They will misceginate whites right into history books, and they will do so gleefully. It would be suicide to kill the golden goose, you will never, let me say it again, NEVER, see this ultimate prize made to feel less than. Obama will throw every thing and everyone else under the bus -immediately- as he has already done with impoverished blacks in spite of their idiocy of voting for him again. He knows how to destroy a race wholly.

You will continue to be cut off from your women as the racist, nationalist, oppressive, patriarchal, old idea that needs to die that you are.

Just watch... this is not speculative fiction, because it is happening right now. It has been happening since the 60s, and it will accelerate very very fast in the next few years. The far left indoctrinated white "men" are soft and squishy, and will be more than happy to let their women miscegenate so as to not create another few generations of "pure evil" by whites reproducing with whites.

Anonymous said...

AA woman, did you write this one?

http://thefeministwire.com/2012/11/is-that-healthy-experiences-of-microagressions-by-black-women-at-historically-black-institutions/

credit to Amren.

"Microinvalidations are characterized by communications that exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color."

microinvalidations? microaggressions? microinsults? microassaults?

hahahahahaha!

Anonymous said...

"Microinvalidations" = Microthinking.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous said...
When the Berlin Wall fell and all the Boomers started swooning about the Cold War being over and communism is dead I just shook my head and laughed. Communism is an ideology, not a government system. Now upon reflecting I realize why the USSR didn't wish to continue the Cold War. Their subversion had reached it's goals. Maybe I am being a tad paranoid but doesn't anybody else care?

Excellent point. The reality is that communism had already moved its primary residence to the west by the time the Berlin wall fell. The vanguard of the ideology realized that Russia was a lost cause by the end of the second world war. The USSR had morphed into something that more closely resembled a national-socialist state once Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronshtein, yet another fine Amish name) was dispatched to his eternal reward with an ice axe. As early as 1917, Trotsky stated that the way to take over America was to use the blacks as a weapon. The ACLU was founded three years later by communists to work towards this objective. (The NAACP was already in place, having been founded in 1905). It's chief purpose (now accomplished) was to completely undermine criminal justice in the USA in order that black criminality could be unleashed in full upon the white populace.

A considerable conversion to the ideology took place in the 1930s on the Ivy League campuses, notably among the scions of elite WASP families such as the Rockefellers. These operatives were typically quite secretive about their affiliation and loyalty to the cause. Joseph McCarthy actually seriously underestimated the extent, power and influence of the ideology, which is what led to his destruction. Many of the major national institutions were under their control by 1964 with the elimination of Kennedy. By the time of the Soviet implosion (1990), they were in complete control of the west. Clinton's regime saw the purge of the last opposition elements in the upper echelons of the military.

Californian said...

I have shown people (white) the many articles on this website (and others)detailing the downfall of black infested cities and what happens as a consequence only to have them squeal in outrage, "But I have black friends!"

It's a common enough reaction. Thing is, people behave differently as individuals than collectively. Look at the long and sorry history of mob violence.

Blacks as individuals can be fine citizens. But they will collectively vote on a racial basis, support affirmative action, kowtow before MLK (and expect you to do the same), demand the head of a Don Imus, burn down entire neighborhoods because of something they saw on TV, and fill their coffers with shakedown lawsuit moneys.

Re showing SBPDL to people: rational arguments work to convert only a small number of people. And to work, propaganda has to be seen numerous times (same with advertising or PR). But when someone is ready to take that Red Pill, SBPDL provides the detailed evidence to enlighten those-who-can-see.

Consider the number of people who have posted, "I used to be liberal on race until my neighborhood got trashed by Section 8, or my kids got harassed, or my company was forced to hire AA incompetents." Once people have been shocked out of the DWL ideological beer goggles, they are ready for the rational exposition.

SBPDL is invaluable because PK has the right mix of facts, analysis, and righteous anger to bring it all together.

Californian said...

[Mugabe and company] reduced what is now Zimbabwe—home to the world's only 100 trillion dollar bill, worth all of US$5.00—to the point of requiring famine relief.

When I was in Rhodesia, a Rhodesian dollar was about equal to a US dollar in exchange value. Another of the inequities of white rule, I guess. These days, looks like Bob Mugabe has made everyone in Zimbabwe a millionaire!

(Another thing: even though there was a terror war going on, you could get on an airplane in Rhodesia without the kind of intrusive searches that are now de rigueur under Obama's TSA. Obama has done a pretty thorough job of demolishing civil rights by this sort of thing, but it goes by the boards among most African-Americans, DWLs and the MSM. After all, Obama is "black" and therefore is bringing us all together.)


What's to be said about America's Black middle class except that they overwhelmingly voted to reelect 0bama despite how he has, almost single-handedly, destroyed the economic base of that electoral bloc? This is tribal-based voting at its very worst and is, again, reflected in African politics.


Or look at how blacks voted en masse for Bill Clinton and the Democrats, even though during the Clinton administration the number of blacks in prison skyrocketed.

Mr. Rational said...

"Microinvalidations are characterized by communications that exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color."

This is part of the left's totalitarian movement to brand any and all disagreement as "aggression", "hate" or some other punishable offense.  They want zero INTELLECTUAL diversity.

Dissident said...

"Why do you think the highly educated, affluent people of Loudoun County, Fairfax Count, Arlington County, and Prince William County overwhelming voted for Obama?"

Because they are all government workers. Threy know who butters their bread. They are all LIBERAL DEMOCRATS that LOVE BIG SPENDING government and many are Affirmative Action hires that have elevated through the system. The others are DWL's that will lick the governments boots for a paycheck, etc., ad nauseum.

Shall I continue, African Lady?

Anonymous said...

http://www.nwpr.org/post/firestorm-erupts-over-virginias-education-goals

As part of Virginia's waiver to opt out of mandates set out in the No Child Left Behind law, the state has created a controversial new set of education goals that are higher for white and Asian kids than for blacks, Latinos and students with disabilities.

Virginia Democratic state Sen. Donald McEachin first read about the state's new performance goals for schoolchildren in a newspaper editorial.

"And I was shocked to find that the state board of education [was] putting in place permanent disparities between different subgroups — Asians at the top, African-Americans at the bottom," says McEachin.

Here's what the Virginia state board of education actually did. It looked at students' test scores in reading and math and then proposed new passing rates. In math it set an acceptable passing rate at 82 percent for Asian students, 68 percent for whites, 52 percent for Latinos, 45 percent for blacks and 33 percent for kids with disabilities.

Dissident said...

"White in northern New England voted for Obama but whites in the also heavily white Rocky Mountain states voted for Romney. I am not sure how to explain the difference."

The New Englanders are transplanted NY's and Massuchusetts Liberals, that have taken refuge in the lilly white states of VT, NH and Maine.

Unfortunately the dumbasses, through their Liberal caterwauling, are inviting the unwashed masses of third worlders and section 8 recipients into New England. Lot's of do-gooder Libtards and Green Weenies in those states.

The Western rocky mountain states have become a refuge for white Conservatives with strong liberty orientation.

Bogolyubski said...

Zenster:
No finer example of the electoral "herd mentality" exhibited by Blacks exists than in Africa. After having Rhodesia handed to them on a silver platter, Black politicians—Robert Mugabe in particular—took what was once known as "the bread basket of Africa" and, through an orchestrated campaign of dispossession and outright genocide, reduced what is now Zimbabwe—home to the world's only 100 trillion dollar bill, worth all of US$5.00—to the point of requiring famine relief.

Besides the excellent point raise by Zenster in this account, note that Robert Mugabe remains in power. One of the main reasons for this - perhaps the chief reason - is that whites (both voluntarily and via government taxation) are providing him with just enough famine relief and other aid which keeps the regime afloat so a competing big man cannot topple him. If enough of the groids were actually starving, Zimbabwe would collapse into a total chaos of endlessly warring tribal chieftains - just as it was before YT showed up in the 1800s. I understand the Chinese are also propping him up with resource extraction. Just think of all those nice white folks in the heartland making donations to churches, various charities and missions for Africa. It's all going to keep characters like Mugabe - installed by the Brits and the Americans - on the throne. Ditto for South Africa. BRA is a worldwide operation. No matter how badly groids drive things into the ground, DWLs will be always coming to their rescue - with your money.

10mm AUTO said...

Blogo, Zenster, Ex-NY et. al. CHECK THIS OUT! Vampire Squids imploding!

http://youtu.be/fZu0yJO5NhI

Viva La France! Viva Liberty! I love the symbol! We should adopt it on the Gladsdon Background!

WHITES AWAKE!

10mm AUTO said...

From the Video Above:

“The Generation of National Identity” – A Declaration of War
We are Generation Identitaire.
We are the generation who get killed for glancing at the wrong person, for refusing someone a cigarette, or having an “attitude” that annoys someone.
We are the generation of ethnic fracture, total failure of coexistence, and forced mixing of the races.
We are the generation doubly punished: Condemned to pay into a social system so generous with strangers it becomes unsustainable for our own people.
Our generation are the victims of the May ’68′ers who wanted to liberate themselves from tradition, from knowledge and authority in education.
But they only accomplished to liberate themselves from their responsibilities.
We reject your history books to re-gather our memories.
We no longer believe that “Khader” could ever be our brother, we have stopped believing in a “Global Village” and the “Family of Man”.
We discovered that we have roots, ancestry and therefore a future.
Our heritage is our land, our blood, our identity. We are the heirs to our own future
We turned off the TV to march the streets.
We painted our slogans on the walls. Cried through loudspeakers for “youth in power” and flew our Lambda flags high.
The Lambda, painted on proud Spartans’ shields, is our symbol.
Don’t you understand what this means? We will not back down, we will not give in.
We are sick and tired of your cowardice.
You are from the years of post-war prosperity, retirement benefits, S.O.S Racism and “diversity”, sexual liberation and a bag of rice from Bernard Kouchner.
We are 25 percent unemployment, social debt, multicultural collapse and an explosion of anti-white racism.
We are broken families, and young French soldiers dying in Afghanistan.
You won’t buy us with a condescending look, a state-paid job of misery and a pat on the shoulder.
We don’t need your youth-policies. Youth IS our policy.
Don’t think this is simply a manifesto. It is a declaration of war.
You are of yesterday, we are of tomorrow.

Jay Santos said...

Annon sources

"Microinvalidations are characterized by communications that exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color."


Damn, women can be weird, but a woman of color is a f**king martian.

MuayTyson said...

Anonymous curious said...

If I may I once dated a mixed young woman that looked like a cross between Alicia Keys and Jennifer Lopez.

A question if I may, how does your son identify?n seeing you african american, and your husbnland european american.

Most of her life she identified as black in fact she joined a black sorority and dated black athletes at university. The full blooded sisters ridiculed her ever chance they got and the athletes were abusive at best with cheating and at worst physical abuse.

She was informed it was only her "good" hair and light skin that men wanted but in reality she was ugly. I can assure you she was not.

Blacks may not know the words but they are very aware of genetics and what as seen as Eugenics for the purpose of good hair and light skin.

Does he identify with black culture, or white culture? Please give the reasons why he identifies with one and not the other.

We all know that if you act white in a black community you get ridiculed.

Like I stated she identified with black culture but very slowly started to see the pathologies and jealousies blacks have for Whites and mixed people.

I told her she must identify with herself and leave black pathology alone. Never to be mistaken for White but looking somewhat Hispanic she was truly between two cultures. At least Whites treated her well no matter how much she longed for the embraces of her absent fathers people.

Now seeing that a half white man was elected president in the usa, we know that a half black man would never ever be elected to presidency in a black african country.

Why is that? Why do you choose not to live in a fully black community, therby denying your son a full exposure to black culture

She choose to move to an inexpensive neighborhood that was predominantly black. On the surface she was treated black but the black men were always after her for sex and the women would gossip about her and were surly to her.

When I would visit they would whisper "5.0, 5.0" As I look like a cop. I suspect most other White men and women were at a low level of danger. There was a definable sense of menace about the place and this was a mid priced lower crime level mixed(50% black,30% Hispanic, 20% White) apartment complex.

Mr. Rational said...

women can be weird, but a woman of color is a f**king martian.

I suspect that if you dig into that lexicon you'll find that it originated with a Marxist academic, probably one of TWMNBN.

Jay in DC said...

NEED HELP SBPDL! Perhaps from Paul himself or any of you. I have stepped up my game into overdrive. Within the last few weeks, someone posted a video here on vimeo that had to do with Marxists in America and their heritage. Frankfurt school, Alinsky, Trotsky, Ayers, the viper's nest that went back at least a century leading up to Comrade Zero.

I -cannot- find mention of it here anymore or the link on SBPDL even using the search funtion and I literally scoured every update from the last 3 weeks. For many here, it was a 101 Primer. For me, I learned a few things, but I opened some eyes tonight and they want to know more and sadly, I cannot find the damn video!

Please either relink it, find it, or help out. Every brain I can convert is a check box on our side.

Zenster said...

Anon (11/13, 2012 12:13 PM): microinvalidations?

Just think! If "microinvalidations" are actionable crimes, genuine racism obviously will warrant nothing less than capital punishment.

Microinvalidations? What sort of psychobabble bafflegab is that? Will those who inflict microinvalidations on the perennially thin-skinned eventually be rounded up and herded into microwave ovens?

Once again, Mr. Rational nails it:

This is part of the left's totalitarian movement to brand any and all disagreement as "aggression", "hate" or some other punishable offense.

Aside from criminalizing Free Speech, there is also the Newspeak* component as well.

Remember how, in 1984, things that were good, better and best were; "good", "plusgood" and "doubleplusgood"? Whereas, things that were bad were; "ungood", "plusungood" and "doubleplusungood"?

Notice how, suddenly, there is nothing that's defined as "bad"; that it's all just different shades of "good"?

They want zero INTELLECTUAL diversity.

Recall Winston Smith's neighbor bragging to him in the lift about having "eliminated another 10,000 words from the dictonary, today."

What better way of strangling intellectual diversity than to eliminate all perspective in speech? Imagine the difficulty of exercising critical analytic thought in the absence of any contrast. Without good & bad, hot & cold, near & far, right & wrong; what sort of worthwhile processing can be done?

* Anyone who has not reviewed Orwell's "The Principles of Newspeak", is well-advised to do so. An excerpt: (Font modification eliminated for clarity)

To give a single example - The word free still existed in Newspeak, but could only be used in such statements as "The dog is free from lice" or "This field is free from weeds." It could not be used in its old sense of "politically free" or "intellectually free," since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless. Quite apart from the suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction of vocabulary was regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be dispensed with was allowed to survive. Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.



Take for example the well-known passage from the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of those ends, it is the right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government…

It would have been quite impossible to render this into Newspeak while keeping to the sense of the original. The nearest one could come to doing so would be to swallow the whole passage up in the single word crimethink. A full translation could only be an ideological translation, whereby Jefferson's words would be changed into a panegyric on absolute government.

Mr. Rational said...

Jay, do you mean The History of Political Correctness?

BOOKMARK IT.

Anonymous said...

“A question if I may, how does your son identify?n seeing you african american, and your husbnland european american.

Does he identify with black culture, or white culture? Please give the reasons why he identifies with one and not the other.

We all know that if you act white in a black community you get ridiculed.

Now seeing that a half white man was elected president in the usa, we know that a half black man would never ever be elected to presidency in a black african country.

Why is that? Why do you choose not to live in a fully black community, therby denying your son a full exposure to black culture?”

My son, who is a teenager, identifies as being biracial. However, he is more comfortable with his white side. He is very fair skinned, with straight hair. He is also a self-proclaimed republican and would have preferred Romney (although he is not old enough to vote yet). He disdains how black kids in restaurants (without any manners) act, and says that “his people” don’t act like that. He has always been a hard worker and has been working since he was very young. He already has his own business. He feels that many black people are lazy and he prefers the white side of himself. He refers to himself as us (white people) vs. them (black people). So I would say that he identifies more with white culture.
I do not want to live in a fully black community.

I don’t really have any black friends. I have more friends of other races (White, Hispanic, Indian), than I do black people. I have always had better chemistry with people of other ethnicities. I do not associate with any people, regardless of race, who do not work, do drugs, or engage in any criminal activity.

I want my son to have the very best education possible, so he attends private school. I detest hip-hop and rap and believe it can be deleterious to any community. Chris Rock said it best when he said there are black people, and then there are niggers. I agree that many black people act like niggers and I don’t associate with niggers. It may sound awkward to some of you that I feel this way, but I do. So I keep myself and my family as far away as possible from any type of thuggish or suspicious people.
I do not blame anyone one of any race wanting to have there family safe and free from crime. Although crime can happen anywhere (and by any race) such as kidnappings, child molestation, rape, murder, etc.

I want to add that I had never had any negative or bad experience with a white person until I started on this blog. I initially thought that I could handle a blog like this, but today I was sad. I was sad because every time I saw a white person, I was wondering if they secretly hated me. This blog has been very eye opening for me, a bit of a culture shock, if you will.
I’m not used to white men calling me names. I’m used to them treating me like I was the most beautiful person they laid eyes on. I was used to them treating me with respect, and care, and like a person of value. White men have always been good to me through relationships and friendships. My husband is loyal and awesome.
But the emotions that rocked my soul today took me off guard. For the first time I felt hated by white men – and it hurt.

I realize that I must have been living in a bubble. And this is the reason I wanted to read blogs of this sort, so that I can understand the world better. I still think that this is a great blog for like-minded people to get together and the stories have been well written.

And to the people who responded to me in a respectful way, I thank you for that.

Sincerely,
AA Woman

Anonymous said...

Is this the post and videos that you are looking for?

Anonymous said...

A must read:
"The origin of political correctness"
http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/

Then watch the Youtube video on the Frankfurt school of Marxism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4v6CVcHUXY

and then watch this You tube video of the KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov previously Thomas Shuman.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlpODYhnPEo

You now have all the info to figure out exactly what is wrong wit the world today.

Lastly remember that Marxism is an instrument of war and its intended goal is to subvert an ENEMY FROM WITHIN.

Anonymous said...

The white residents were probably too scared to vote

Anonymous said...

When I was in Rhodesia, a Rhodesian dollar was about equal to a US dollar in exchange value.

@Californian when you were in Rhodesia it was a food exporter now it struggles against famine.

Discard said...

10 MM: Perhaps we ought adopt the Greek letter lambda as our symbol of racial pride. A little code to identify one another as Those Who Can See.

MuayTyson said...

"I want to add that I had never had any negative or bad experience with a white person until I started on this blog. I initially thought that I could handle a blog like this, but today I was sad. I was sad because every time I saw a white person, I was wondering if they secretly hated me. This blog has been very eye opening for me, a bit of a culture shock, if you will. "

I can only speak for myself. I do not hate you but I am suspicious of you. Anyone with half a brain would be suspicious. The current climate that has been shoved down our throats make us suspicious and rightfully so. You are two things that currently make you more equal than me. You are black and a woman. If you choose to accuse me of any number of this you could easily do so and I would have to prove my innocense even though this is against the US Constitution.

People who carry your genes destroy or cities, assault us with out punishment, rape our women, waste our tax dollars, shall I go on? Until this ends expect to be given the sideways glance.

Mr. Rational said...

Perhaps we ought adopt the Greek letter lambda as our symbol of racial pride.

Not sure if you want to be confused with Lambda Legal or use them as cover.  Could be positive or negative.

μολὼν λαβέ has its own meaning.

Anonymous said...

Why lambda? When I hear lambda, I think of lambda the fag.fraternity from revenge of the nerds.

10mm AUTO said...

Discard! I agree!

It unites all Whites, Stands for no retreat and pride under diffucult circumstances. I Like it. It wasn't mine though. These kids thought it up, and drove a truck through Milticult. I actually have respect for the French. I guess no matter who you are, Soviets or White French kids, you can't live with lies forever.

10mm AUTO said...

"This blog has been very eye opening for me, a bit of a culture shock, if you will.
I’m not used to white men calling me names. I’m used to them treating me like I was the most beautiful person they laid eyes on. I was used to them treating me with respect, and care, and like a person of value. White men have always been good to me through relationships and friendships. My husband is loyal and awesome.
But the emotions that rocked my soul today took me off guard. For the first time I felt hated by white men – and it hurt."


Oh cry me a River! Your race rapes, kills and discards us like tissue paper and you want respect. We come here to lick our wounds from people like you. Boo Hoo! Try being the parents of Autumn, or of Anne Pressly or Channon Christian. Try listening to the BPP telling the public that they are going to have to "kill some cracker babies". Try seeing Louis Farrakahn training the next generation of "The Fruit of Islam", knowing your children are going to have to face up to that horror. You have had one day of emotional sadness because you thought White men might not find you as attractive as you were because your were a legend in your own mind.

Try picking up your child at the ER or the Morgue because he or she was "walking while White" or delivering Pizza or going to a school near blacks. Gah! You are a propagandist and a superficial Whiner.

Anonymous said...

Superb analysis Zenster

Anonymous said...

Californian: "Blacks as individuals can be fine citizens."
That's true, I suppose, but the thing is you have to look at the mob of worthless blacks following in their wake~ their friends and relatives from da hood.
That one fine citizen is a veritable "Typhoid Mary"- immune to the disease but a carrier spreading it's plague wherever it goes.
Even though it may show no symptoms itself, it still needs to be isolated and avoided. The fact that it may be innocent and a fine citizen pales into insignificance in light of it's plague spreading capacity. Worse yet, it will object strenously to any attempt to reject the plague it carries with it and will defend that plague.
When you get right down to it, that fine citizen is really not so fine after all.

Anonymous said...

That is beautiful, can we be next? We were in our wast for independence, right after France, though a picture of 180° difference at that time.

Anonymous said...

African woman,
I feel bad that you are hurt by the hate you perceive here. Most people on here don't hate you. Most have approached you with a candidness that would not be considered acceptable in polite society. However, here, we find it impolite and unacceptable to be untruthful for the sake of feelings. I hope you will use the sting of this criticism to make improvements where you can. What you are doing right is by raising your kid to rise to a higher standard of conduct and achievement. What you fail to do is be honest with yourself and others in admitting the failures and wrong doings of your race. I believe it was Mr. Rational who pointed out a moral obligation to try to influence those in your sphere of influence (preferably blacks) to stand against "no snitching", poor effort in education, broken families, illegitamate births, and so on. Use this as an eye opening experience and a positive one. You spoke of how white men treat you, good... It made you feel good, there appears no wrong in that...so raise your kid to treat women that way. What is right and wrong is not hard to identify.
Here's a little something you may be missing because of the sting of what you have heard here. The people here have gone to great lengths to tell you why they don't like blacks in general. This was not a personal attack on you, but you were personally challenged to be honest about black behavior in general and you refused to answer or give an account for any straight questions and just gave general platitudes ("whites do it too"crap). The people don't hate black people because your skin is black or brown, they all have reasons because of how.the have come to this... they are being dispossessed, mistreated, robbed raped or killed. That is not a trifle thing. Use this as a positive learning experience to come away with. Not, with "oh, white people secretly hate me and talk behind my back"! No, most likely they like you personally but dislike blacks in general because most people who have interacted with blacks have had negative experiences with them. Don't be like them and don't be content with just that. Strive to improve being honest with yourself and getting your people to accept an improved standard for themselves.
Also, don't condemn us for not wanting you (your people) to be apart of ours. It is through these experiences that we have become convinced that it is for everyone s best interest that each people should be with their own kind.
I'm sorry if I am rambling, it's almost midnight as I write this.
In summary, be the best you can and insist on it from others that you surround yourself with. Not all whites do this, but it is a characteristic of my people.
I think for Asians the Japanese do it too and it shows in their culture and is admired. It would be with your race too if that were the case, sadly, it's not.

Left Coast White Guy

Jay in DC said...

AA Woman--

Thicken thy skin. You are the polar opposite of the world I lived in. "Jay in DC" should be expanded to this "Jay in DC, White male LEO type, surrounded by a sea of incorrigible, recidvist, black criminals with no hope of redemption."

This is where I simply laugh at things like "microaggressions, microinvalidations, etc." I.E. Any perceived slight is now a crime and actionable. Really? Really!

Let me flip the script for you, with a profession that required micro-NOTHING. I at least respect the enemy in this way and this was my life for too many years. Let us call this then, MACROaggression;

"Fuck you white motherfucker I am gonna kill you when I get these handcuffs off."

"Faggot ass whiteboy what the fuck you know without your walls, bars, or badge"

"I want to fuck you in your ass whiteboy, I'm tired of these soft niggas willing to take a black dick."

The list goes ON and ON, ad infinitum. Fuck your fucking microaggressions, microinvalidations, microPCbullshit. It is why I sometimes took perverse pleasure in my ability to loose my rage on black skin with violence when things just got a bit out of hand. Could you blame any human being for this?

You want to raise your child as White why? Because you, apparently, are a sane and rational human being. You realize the Europeans built civilization in the last 2 centuries. Any loving mother would embrace an ideology such as this. Only a sociopath, given the choice, would embrace "black culture" circa 2012 vs. white culture to raise and love a child. I do not doubt your decision. Your 'people' (props Eric Holder) are a poison, a parasite, that destroys societies and nations. History, real history not 1984 terrifying revisionist history which will soon be all we know, bears this out for all of us. You are 100% incapable of self rule, morality, the natural will of law and respect, any of it. You are feral animals filled with the basest of human characteristics and instincts. I have 15 years of personal evidence on top of the mountain of anecdotal evidence from everywhere else to support this.

My days use to consist of TNB, feral beasts needing to be house and controlled by other corrupt incorigible Uncle Tom house niggers who understood with great clarity, their own kind would eat and destroy not only whites but blacks, like a virus without thought or hesitation. What a pathological breed and species you all are. You are definitely NOT homo-sapien. You are perhaps homo-habilis with some intertwined strain of viral DNA interspersed into your strands. Again, just factual observation after decades.

Californian said...

I am going to assume that AAW is sincere about a dialog on race. And even if she is not, I am sure there are many casual readers of SBPDL who might be interested in a response. So here we go...


AAW said..."I want to add that I had never had any negative or bad experience with a white person until I started on this blog."

You need to understand that when white people have tried to engage in civil dialog to disagree with the liberal position on race, they are shouted down, fired from their jobs, threatened with violence, and if living in much of Europe, face criminal penalties for "hate speech."

Try googling "John Derbyshire" or "J. Philippe Rushton" to see some examples of white people who dared to dissent from the official party line on race.

You need to ask why, if the DWL [disingenuous white liberal] viewpoint on race is so correct, it is so necessary for DWLs to suppress dissent.

Seriously.

Why do you think this is so?

Whites, most of them, have done everything in their power since 1954 to open their neighborhoods and schools and workplaces to blacks. And what have they gotten in return? Flash mobs attacking them in public places. Taxes to support the high rates of black welfare dependency. Anti-white discrimination in the form of affirmative action and every manner of government intrusion into business and education. The railroading of a George Zimmerman to placate the NAACP and its minions. The destruction of once great cities such as Detroit. And ritual denunciations of whites as "privileged," followed by never-ending race hustles.

Being civil on race just does not seem to work, at least not for whites.

Think about this: a common comment on SBPDL is: "I used to be a liberal on race until..." followed by a description of how blacks victimized them via crime or school trashing or economic fiasco. Blacks are even losing allies among white liberals.

Think about that: blacks are alienating even their own white liberal allies by their incivility. Blacks lose the white liberals, where are you?

Blacks and their allies in government-media-corporations-schools need to recognize that the First Amendment exists for white people when they speak out against what SBPDL calls "BRA."

Because if being civil does not work, then white people will turn to righteous anger and become ever more militant. You can only push people so far before there is the inevitable backlash. Look at how white nationalist parties are on the rise in Europe. Or how in the USA more people are arming themselves. And how websites like SBPDL are expanding across the WWW. (It's what the Pentagon calls "information warfare.")

You need to think about all this.

A lot of people do.

Anonymous said...

So Cal - right on. I believe that this election marks a tipping point for the whites in this nation. Do we lay down and take it up the ass so to speak or do we resist? The biggest factor is the blatant stupidity of Gen Y. Good god they are idiots. The fight is not over though. I hear more and more people advocating for homeschooling, a BIG disempowerment if the brainwashing regime. One thing we have today to combat all of this BS is the Internet. A big plus! News networks are for the masses of asses and those with brains of fruit flys. Keep it up SBPDL!

Dissident said...

To the AA woman.

I'd like to say something to you and say it in all sincerity. I really do feel a sense of sympathy for you knowing that you come on here and witness a lot of hostility from these posts.

This has always been a concern of my mine by posting here. As I know that there are many decent, law abiding and respectable blacks folks that could be reading this.

I would just like to relate to you and some others reading this that my experiences with black folks has been about 50/50. Half of them positive and half of them negative. Not very good odds really.

In my formative years in the 70's and 80's I had some really good friends that were black. Upstanding kids that were Boy Scouts and civic minded. As we progressed through school together this started changing slowly. My former friends became tribalistic towards other blacks and antagonistic towards whites. They would cajole and belittle the white girls with typical black chest thumping bravado, etc.

This is when my attitiude towards them changed 180 degrees. Ever since then I've noticed a steadily decreasing civility in the black community and a steadily increasing hostility towards white culture. Naturally, the consequences of that are what you see on this board.

Some have called it Negro fatigue, others have called it other things. Sometimes the language on here can be a little abrubt and to the point, but that's because so many of us are frustrated beyond comprehension.

I, for one, do appreciate your candor on these topics. If others want to flame away then so be it. I'll give you points for coming into hostile territory. You'll earn big points here if you address the questions that are posed, but you'll recieve major scorn if you avoid them.

I wish you and your family well.

YIH said...

@Zenster:
Absolutely right, Zimbabwe money is quite literally totally worthless.

Discard said...

Mr Rational and Anon: We ought not give up the lambda, symbol of the Spartans (Lacedaemons), to Leftist vermin, not let Hollywood define anything for us. Western civilization is ours, not theirs.

morphius said...

You wrong to see the comments as personal hatred, they are not, you've embarked on a journey and there is a lot to learn, we only touch the tip of the iceberg, this rabbit hole goes really deep.

You won't find more honest tolerant people as on this site, see how we argue with each other, yet we mature enough to handle it.

There is one culture that leads to highest standard of living for humanity, that culture has been targeted for eradication cause it stands in the way of a bigger agenda, everything is being manipulated with one goal, and one goal only, to destroy the culture that brings the greatest success and standards to humans, irrespective of colour.

Now, you can allow yourself to be manipulated, or you can carry on reading and joining the discussion, and not see it as a betrayal to your blackness, I guarrantee you that a black person that thinks like us isn't seen as black but as a person.

Why do black people see it as betrayal to their race, to see things the way a logical person should.

If a black person becomes a good classical musician, somehow he/she has to politicise it, out of some need to appease the race gods for defecting, if a black person becomes an astronomer, they have to always remain concious that they black first, why?

That is the problem with black intellectuals they cannot forget they black.

AAwoman forget about being black, do you see what we see, it seems that you do, don't feel as if you betraying your blackness for being reasonable and logical, don't do what the black classical musician does, or the black astronomer.

Truth is truth and that is all that matters.

Most ppl here know the big picture, its a trully complex beast, but the root cause of all these obfuscations is to bring an end to the culture that trully allows humans to be their best, their are forces that don't want humans to be at their best.

That is the clue I give you, carry on reading this blog, the puzzle pieces are all here, you can piece the big picture together.

Acknowledging truth isn't a betrayal, even when they have convinced you that it is

Anonymous said...

Philadelphia possibly inspired by a mawkish Tom Hanks film is spending money on a LBGT only housing project.

Mr. Rational said...

What do you want to bet that the only reason an LGBT housing project is needed is because of attacks by homophobic Blacks?

This may not fly.  The LGBTs may figure out that grouping together creates a "target-rich environment" for their attackers.

J. Frank Parnell said...

What do you want to bet that the only reason an LGBT housing project is needed is because of attacks by homophobic Blacks?

I'd bet any amount of money. Some of the most racially aware whites you'll meet are gays and lesbians. They're well aware of where most of the violence directed at them comes from, and it's not white rednecks in pickup trucks, it's niggers.

Zenster said...

Presumably, African American woman: I have not responded to you because I felt your tone to me has been disrespectful.

And your attempts to pawn off such hackneyed crap as:

But in denying that white people commit crimes and proposing that all black people are savage beasts is a defense mechanism whereby your ego refuses to acknowledge reality.

… are not disrespectful?

Yours is the classic "White people do it too" or tu quoque argument which has no race-based statistical truth to it or any forensic validity.

After which, you smarmily scold us about how:

It is not good for your health to hold such hatred because studies show that prolonged negative emotions have a high correlation to heart disease, high blood pressure, depression, and stress.

Let me tell you a little known secret; anger is the best anti-depressant. Being around Black people—much less having to see the once-great nation of America abase itself at the feet of one of nature's most abject failures—would be truly depressing if it wasn't such a complete and utter farce.

Then you attempt to summon up White guilt in the form of "Massah done poked hiss po' hepless Black slave gurls" with this tissue of crap:

This is due to the white man having intercourse with the black woman and is the reason black people are so many different complexions. Many of these happenings were a result of rape.

Even though Anon @ 11/11, 2012 3:50 PM pointed out that Southern (read: more slave-related Blacks), had less White DNA.

Do you have any idea of just how ridiculous that comes across to a group of people who have finally shrugged off all responsibility for Slavery?

What you probably cannot imagine is the intense derision that such infantile scolding elicits from the same lot of us who know with absolute certainty that Islam enslaved more African Blacks than Europe and America COMBINED. Perhaps we should take time out to discuss how most African slaves were sold to Whites by other Africans. Or how about we take note of the fact that the first American to secure permanent ownership of an African slave was Black? But that sort of demolishes much of your argument, doesn't it?

What makes your position even more ludicrous is this; not only did slaves brought to America enjoy, upon arrival, better living standards and life expectancy than their African counterparts, they also suffered only a 15% mortality rate on the slave ships. By comparison, African Blacks taken to Islamic countries underwent an attrition rate of 85%. Only about one in SEVEN Islamic-held slaves survived their brutal forced march to set foot in the MME (Muslim Middle East).

Unlike most Americans, many here at SBPFL are keenly aware of these facts and can only laugh at Blacks like you who seek to play upon White guilt even as they patently ignore Islam's far more egregious track record.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

Then you give us this ration of horse hockey.

Now white men openly deny the black race while secretly lusting after black women.

The almost endemic levels of HIV/AIDS among Blacks means that only a totally unhinged White guy would consider having sex with the average Black woman. Blacks may be "great communicators", but only when it comes to HIV/AIDS.

Finally, you dish up this puddle of self-aggrandizing slop:

I’m used to them treating me like I was the most beautiful person they laid eyes on. I was used to them treating me with respect, and care, and like a person of value. White men have always been good to me through relationships and friendships. [emphasis added]

Can you possibly imagine just how self-absorbed—not egotistical, not conceited, not self-centered; as those are all good things—but self-absorbed you come across as with that sort of puffery?

You repeatedly mention "respect" even as you constantly refuse to answer some of the most basic questions about the reality of racial relations. There is nothing respectful about turning your blind eye to our deep and abiding concerns. In fact, it is discourteous and indicative of someone who knows their arguments are weak, something which just about everybody here but you seems to grasp.

Finally, on a personal note, you mention sitting on your son's school board. Well, ain't that sweet? Do you bother to stray over to the other side of the tracks and lend your visionary genius to educational facilities that are in far greater need of skilled guidance?

The reason why I ask is that I happen to sit on the Corporate Advisory Council of an ALC (Alternative Learning Center) over in the rough, almost totally minority district of where I live.

I'm working hard to close the "achievement gap" for girls and minorities in the hard sciences; one of the most thankless tasks imaginable. Even if it proves impossible, at day's end I still can say, "I tried".

Instead, you talk about how:

I don't live in a bad community though, which is a mix of blacks, hispanics, and whites - but I am not too far from the higher crime areas.

But when AnalogMan asks you a simple and honest question:

And what do the people in those "higher crime areas" look like?

The line goes dead.

It's not hatred, which you love to persuade yourself is happening to you. IT'S SCORN. Worst of all—but only for you—it's coming from your intellectual betters.

Anonymous said...

Funny how your following believes they speak for a specific race of people. I view the commentors as a bunch of spineless degenerates. Probably struggling economically but definately delusional. Their arguments/views shift and sway to suit the twisted ideology of the moment they envision. I read views prior to the election and afterwards. Like I said, a funny group of knuckleheads. Educated and mentally disturbed rambling. Everyone shows undertones of jealously and envy. The chronic commentors are the most hilarious. Real glass jaw types.

Anonymous said...

You could have made your point in one sentence. You are rambling and you are a glass jaw type. Takes one to know one