Saturday, November 3, 2012

Second City Noir

 Noir, adjective
1. Of or relating to the film noir genre.
2. Of or relating to a genre of crime literature featuring tough, cynical characters and bleak settings.
3. Suggestive of danger or violence.

Few people have written more honestly about Chicago and the racial situation than what you've found here at Stuff Black People Don't Like. Be it the Chicago Public School teachers strike, the almost entirely black crime problem in the Windy City, or the reality that the monochromatic black community's decrepit state is the result of having only black people in the community... few have dared speak the truth about Chicago as we have here.
Standing in the way of a Golden Dawn: Breitbart's "Rebel Pundit" vs. Paul Kersey

Well, the good people at Breitbart have sent an intrepid reporter to Chicago in the hopes of pursuing an "ongoing investigation into the root causes of the rising tide of violence and horrifying murder rate this year in Chicago’s most destitute neighborhoods."
  
The root causes of the rising tide of violence and horrifying murder rate in Chicago is the same root cause that is behind the rising tide of violence and horrifying murder rate in any city that is considered one of the most dangerous in America: black people.

There's your answer "Rebel Pundit" (who happens to be one of Breitbart.com least gifted writers; then again, the prose at Breitbart isn't what would be dubbed "impressive" by anyone save the most depraved and suicidal "conservative" who believes 'America' still exists) of Breitbart, whose investigation into the crime and murder in Chicago failed to include a quick look at the actual statistics compiled by the Chicago Police Department. 

End of story.

But, here's what Mr. Rebel Pundit discovered in his journey to the Second City [Exodus: Inner City Blacks Fleeing Barack Obama and the Democrat-Liberal Agenda, Breitbart.com, 10-29-2012]:
There is little doubt, due the historic and tremendous pressure on black Americans to support the first African-American President of the United States simply because he is not a white Republican, the President will win the black vote. However, just as his strength and reputation are growing weaker every day, the same is quickly becoming true of the support from the community he claims to be the strongest advocate for—the community-organized voting bloc on Chicago’s south and west sides that many say he has long since abandoned.
In the course of an ongoing investigation into the root causes of the rising tide of violence and horrifying murder rate this year in Chicago’s most destitute neighborhoods, several video interviews I conducted with black American voters from the community-organized south and west side, reveal a community that is fed up with the status quo--the status quo that keeps these communities ridden with poverty, homelessness, unemployment, dismantled families, and, of course, skyrocketing murder rates. And residents say, “it is the black Democratic leadership implementing a liberal agenda” that is to blame for the ongoing plight in their community.
Community activist Mark Carter says, “our issues have not been met on, have not been adhered to, and it’s almost as if they are just saying even though no one has addressed your issues, just go with ‘em anyway. And we say no.”
A resident of the Austin community, Jean Ray, says after 40 years of Democratic party control over the black community, the policies "are hurting,” and if there were Republicans willing to do the right job in her community, she would vote for them.
Paul McKinley, an outspoken Chicago resident and voice against liberal-Chicago-machine politics, Rahm Emanuel, and President Obama, spoke to me directly about the ongoing violence in the black community, explaining, “the real cause of violence in the community is caused by narco-terrorism facilitated by Chicago’s liberal-sanctuary-city status, in addition to the historically high unemployment rate among black men between of working age,” which he claims is never addressed by the President and comes last, if at all, in the liberal agenda.

McKinley says boldly, “There is no Tea Party in my community, there is no Republicans in my community, so they can’t blame Republicans, they can’t [blame] Tea Parties; I can only blame the democrat-liberal agenda.”
 Or, you could just blame the fact that there are only black people in these neighborhoods, who are responsible for the violence, crime, deteriorating neighborhoods and "blight", and - most importantly - have failed to create a local economy (outside of a black market replete with drugs and stolen contraband) despite the massive amount of help the state has created specifically for black entrepreneurs: The Minority Business Development Association (MBDA). 

The 'poverty, homelessness, unemployment, dismantled families, and, of course, skyrocketing murder rates' that Breitbart's Rebel Pundit bemoans is just a byproduct of black culture (and culture is the summation of individual black people, an outward expression of the black community); that black people are unemployable in Chicago is the fault of black people -- that same "liberalism" seems to work well in a white liberal area like Austin, Texas, where the strange phenomenon of a lack of "black professionals" plagues the city.

Wait: a lack of black professionals is found in Chicago too (especially the south side of the city), outside of race hustlers and government employees.

But Rebel Pundit doesn't stop there, reporting that a group of black people (upset with a federal, state, and city government that isn't doing enough to specifically help out black people with a greater intensification of tax dollars funneled their way) protested "the destruction and blight brought on their community by the liberal agenda"  [Black Grassroots Activists Protest Obama Fundraiser, City Hall, ABC News in Chicago, Breitbart, 11-3-2012]:
According to Mark Carter of the Broke Party, a newly formed group of black grassroots activists fed up with the destruction and blight brought on their community by the liberal agenda, the protest was “about bringing attention to the demolition of homes in Chicago’s black communities on the west and south sides.” These buildings, Carter says, “can still be saved, but the city is tearing them down,” leaving property values and the community in the gutter.
Carter told Breitbart News they chose the Obama fundraiser as the starting point for the protest in order to send a direct message to Rahm Emanuel and Washington, D.C. that they will not be voting on Tuesday for those politicians who are allowing their homes and community to be demolished.
In an effort to bring even further attention to the ongoing issues of the black community in Chicago, the protest ended up outside of ABC 7 News’s local broadcast studio on State Street. This studio can be viewed from the street and sidewalk. When the protesters arrived, they used a bullhorn to announce themselves and called on weather reporter Jerry Taft, seen through the window, not to pretend they weren’t there, prompting a wave from Taft to the protesters.
The protesters waved anti-union signs, anti-NAACP, anti-Rainbow Push, and signs reading "Rahm Hates Black People" in front of the studio as Kathy Brock and Alan Krashesky broadcasted the evening news. They demanded their voices be heard and criticized Emanuel for acting in cahoots with community-organizing front groups ACORN and ACTION Now to put properties in the community into the organizations’ hands. These actions by the Mayor and the corrupt “Chicago Machine” have ensured that construction work only goes to the unions, effectively keeping the residents of the community unemployed.
Let this be known: the concentration of black people (who rely on the government for their very being) in highrise public housing kept black dysfunction - crime, murder, mayhem - largely in one area; the destruction of these public housing units allowed the spread of black crime throughout the city and surrounding suburbs of Chicago via Section 8 Housing. Those primarily black public housing projects represented an impressive bloc vote; the removal of this concentrated black poverty meant a boon in new development property for the city and a dissolving of the black voter bloc.

Consider the Chicago Housing Authorities (CHA) Robert Taylor Homes --28 high-rise buildings with 16 stories each, with a total of 4,321 apartments, mostly arranged in U-shaped clusters of three, stretching for two miles. Housing 27,000 people (90 % + were black), this mecca of public housing housed those blacks who were part of the "Great Migration" from the south. In 2007, the last of the these... holding cells for "law-abiding" black people (fed, clothed, and housed thanks to white taxpayers) was demolished.

The misery found there (contained), and subsequently, spread throughout Chicago was imported via the blacks escaping "Jim Crow" in the segregated south; the same black dysfunction that necessitated such laws to keep some semblance of a standard of living for non-blacks.

Well Rebel Pundit: Bon Chance Mes Amis working with those black people mad because the government isn't doing enough to help them out. You'd have better luck recruiting members of "The Think Squad" to your pious crusade in the name of 'Breitbart, the son, and the holy ghost' [EXTREME Black Anger in Chicago at Obama: “He done did it. He ruined it for us. White people don’t feel guilty no more and won’t do stuff for us now”, Hill Buzz, 10-9-12]:
Here in Chicago, I regularly meet with a group of friends who call themselves “The Think Squad”; these are men and women who are prominent members of the black community in Hyde Park and the City’s south side. None of them supported Barack Obama’s presidential bid in 2008 but most begrudgingly voted for him because they freely admit race-pride was their motivating factor.
These people knew Obama when he was a state senator and saw him do absolutely nothing for blacks in Chicago back then…and they similarly saw Obama do nothing for blacks (or any of his constituents in general) as a United States Senator. The Think Squad has always seen through Obama and continues to speak out about his failings. Expect them, and other blacks coast to coast, to become even more vocal about the “magical first black president” after he loses in November and the anger of “how much that punk wasted” really comes to a boil and people no longer feel intimidated or threatened when the Obamas have left the White House for Hawaii next January.
That’s when people will REALLY let it all fly, once the Obamas are no longer even a vestigial presence in Chicago and people have no fear at all in talking about what a sham their marriage is and how the two of them benefited from affirmative action and white guilt their entire lives. The problem, for blacks in Chicago, is that the Obamas have actually ruined that white guilt for “the rest of us”, as the Think Squad put it last night at an impromptu after-church-programs dinner I enjoyed with some of the more outspoken “Thinkers” in a little Mexican restaurant near the south side.
As for me, it's time America prepares for a golden dawn. That means uniting conservative whites, reformed liberal whites, and the backbone of this nation -- the white working class -- together, in a movement that articulates the simple fact that white people have legitimate interests.

48 comments:

Anonymous said...

A lack of black professionals in Chicago? How can that be? TV told me that blacks are all smart and educate the dumb white males as best as they can. TV wouldn't lie.

On a more serious note, of course look at the state of Chicongo and the people it produces. This is what happens when you mix in a bunch of races and have a large underground following of communists, socialists, etc. This is the result if you mixed Atlanta with San Francisco.

Of course there might just be something in the water, Chicago has always been corrupt.

Northern Refugee said...

I find conventional conservatism so tiresome. Whenever you ask a "conservative" about the fall of Detroit or Baltimore, they invariably blame "liberalism" or those EVIL UNIONS. And yet, Portland and San Fran are very liberal, but also (with some exceptions) vibrant and viable cities. Much of Northern Europe and Asia are "socialist" and have very strong unions, and yet they thrive. Furthermore, it was unionized industry and trades that built the arsenal of democracy that won WW2. Apparently, liberalism and strong unions can work if you have an educated and intelligent white and/or asian workforce.

But, of course, conservatism inc. will never admit that, and will continue to give lip service to dead end movements and candidates like Condi Rice.

Whiskey said...

Andrew Breitbart. By all accounts to those who knew him, a generous, warm, nice guy who would quite literally give you the shirt off his back and and had the typical Irish desire for fighting (he was adopted and is genetically Irish). He enjoyed picking the fights with liberals.

However, he gave an interview with Ed Driscoll some time before he died blaming "the Frankfurt School" for all that befell America and the West, I find that as wrong-headed as the idea that "the Jews" were responsible for everything bad. Rather than the decline all across the West, as Derb notes in Coastal China, and many other places is not related to profound alterations in sex, family formation, information, status, and much else driven by technology: the pill, mass media/television, consumer product manufacturing, the auto, the internet, and much else. For example, mass consumer manufacturing creates "assumed affluence" through plastics and other petroleum products items that only the hyper-rich could have afforded in say, 1925. Like pens that work. Something as simple as that. But since its mass produced the need to create individuality is huge socially.

Breitbart's people are all even more liberal than he was, and cannot see the failure of Black society for what it is, a sure fire result of toxic levels of self esteem mixed with manifest incompetence.

Whiskey said...

Rebel Pundit or whoever he is seems to think that it is a few "evil-doers" who are to blame for what is happening in Chicago, as paleos blame Jews for modern life in the West, as Muslims blame them for what is bad in the Muslim world, as Breitbart blamed "the Frankfurt School" for Cultural Marxism, as Bush blamed a "few bad people" for jihad in Islamic societies, and so on. This is easy and cheap. Easy because it assigns all responsibility to a few conspirators, and assumes the cheap fix is "unmasking them."

That's the storybook ending of every Liberal movie in the past sixty years, such as "Three Days of the Condor" to "Redacted" or the Bourne Movies.

The reality is, Black people as a whole do things that insure poverty. They have kids they can't support, out of wedlock. They don't defer consumption or save money. They don't refrain from violence. They don't study and value education. They despise the lifetime accumulation of skills, and value pure fleeting athletic prowess. What cultural achievement they have, they throw in the trash, forgetting and dishonoring men and women who should be admired and copied, in so much as they were great.

Black people might not have the ability to make their IQs the level of NE Asians let alone Whites, but they don't have to live as they do. Black women could refuse instead of welcome every thug, gangsta, pimp, and playa. Black women could demand marriage and a steady income for sex, and reproduction. Black men and women might not be engineers and scientists, but being massively skilled: bakers, chefs, carpenters, brick layers, painters, is nothing to be sneezed at. Japanese people revere cooks and chefs and the local mom and pop diner that seats twelve as much as the five star chef with the $1,000 a meal courses. Meanwhile artists such as Louis Armstrong, Jelly Roll Morton, King Oliver, Buddy Bolden, Billie Holliday and Langston Hughes are forgotten. they deserved better and Black people OWE them a debt and remembrance.

However none of these changes will take place without honesty and accountability from Whites. That means an end to status mongering, using Blacks as props, excusing bad behavior, looking away, saying nothing, or refusing to name names and call out Black people AS A WHOLE for acting in a way that is destructive and appalling.

Anonymous said...

The Republican Party and practical Conservatives are in the business of winning elections not committing political suicide; therefore, I tend to give them a pass on the issue of Racial Realism.
However, there certainly could be an injection of RR in a way that would be politically safe and beneficial for the party and the nation.

Particularly, the Republicans should be more aggressive in DEFENDING White America.
Point out that black poverty is overwhelmingly self induced and not the fault of alleged racism. White people are in no way responsible for blacks' astonishing degree of sexual-reproductive irresponsibility. Contraception is extremely inexpensive, easy to use, and available everywhere.

One thing to keep in mind is that a large percentage of White swing voters have a hypersensitive racial tension radar. Many of these people have their precious children in the vulnerable situation of attending government schools overrun with the spawn of welfare sluts and the like.
They won't support Conservatives if they feel that Republican rhetoric is putting their children in jeopardy.

The hard core reality of Racial Realism is just too strong and bitter for the somewhat delusional realm of practical politics currently, but I'm confident that RR will be increasingly entering the mainstream.






brown north said...

Northern europe thrive? Go read about the 3rd would ghettos that are spring up in sweden and norway, this is the product of liberalism.

Whites engaged in their own self destruction, paying for their own extinction, importing feral 3rd worlders, who they think will play by their(whites) lofty rules of fairness.

Liberalism is the poison that will kill genetic europeans.

Sweden had the best social system in the world, only to be raped by the very feral people that the liberals imported by the millions into that country.

City resident said...

They might complain about the Democratic party, Obama not doing enough, and so on, but they'll vote for him no matter what's said. There is a common perception out there that blacks here are suffering, that they're unhappy all the time and that life is just horrible. Actually, for the vast majority it's pretty good. They're always laughing, drinking, smoking pot, socializing,dancing. They're not worried about anything. The complaints are for show to get more money from the white man. They naturally exist in an African-style environment, the men loafing while the women bring in the money from welfare or work. Sudden outbursts of violence followed by calm are the norm; nothing unusual there.
Whites are the ones who are unhappy due to all the pressures put upon them, always having to work in the rat race, paying the white tax to live further away from all the jibber-jabber.

Reality Check said...

Muslims are the new blacks, but you still have the old blacks. That is, nobody in the public eye (except blacks and Muslims who openly demand the 'game') can or will admit the obvious. We are so screwed. Rebel pundit really is delusional.

Anonymous said...

Those vibrant diversities in the shithole on Lake Michigan could always get a diploma mill degree and find a government job. On a side note just read about the British sobama, a fellow named Derek Laud. Look it up in your search engine of choice if you like.

Anonymous said...

Whiskey,
I believe you at one time said you are a school teacher? I DARE you.... I DARE you to openly do this. You won't because while it is not a crime, it would end your career as a teacher, not just you're job, but your career! The worst thing you could be in this society, in this day and age is not a murderer, not a rapist, not a child molester. No, you could be any one of these and still be a major Hollywood celebrity. No, the worst thing you can be in this society that would make you a social pariah with a magnitude 10 is ..... A racist! Yep, that is the power and depth of the brainwashing from those behind the boob tube. That is why we all have anonymous names on here. America is not free any longer. America is not what it once was, it is something else now. It is something less and we all know it. That is why not just us, but almost everyone talks about going back to when things were better. We may all disagree about what made it better before, but almost no one disagrees that things aren't add good as they used to be. We can not be so bold as to to tell the truth in public in these times, that would be a revolutionary act today. More people must wake up first. You know it, I know, we all know it. None of us are an island unto ourselves.

Left Coast White Guy

Anonymous said...

I'm starting to think that avoiding the truth is like some sort of game to white people - an intellectual challenge.

Whoever keeps his head up his butt the longest - wins! (Even if it suffocates him.)

Anonymous said...

Who gives a shit. Let them rot. Black's are being disingenuous here. They've gotten plenty off Obama. Free cell phones,More AA,housing,disparate impact in schools.They've been robbing and racially attacking Whites for years but it's never a hate crime. Read "White girl bleed a lot". They're trying to spin they got nothing so they can bleed whitey for more free shit.

fnn said...

Yockey-writing in 1948!-was able to understand the implications of modern liberal ideology.
Soft totalitarianism:
(...)
Yockey had a similar understanding of the workings of soft totalitarianism. In The Proclamation of London, he writes:

The degradation of social life did not merely happen, it was planned, deliberately fostered and spread, and the systematic undermining of the entire life of the West continues today.

The instruments of this assault and the weapons of propaganda, press, radio, cinema, stage, education. These weapons are controlled at this moment in Europe almost entirely by the forces of Culture-disease and social degeneration.

The “chief fount” is Hollywood, which “spews forth an endless series of perverted films to debase and degenerate the youth of Europe” after having successfully destroyed the youth of America.[7]

Concomitantly “a vicious literature” promotes the “destruction of healthy individual instincts, of normal familial and sexual life, of disintegration of the social organism into a heap of wandering, colliding, grains of human sand.”

The message of Hollywood is the total, significance of the isolated individual, stateless and rootless, outside of society and family, whose life is the pursuit of money and erotic pleasure. It is not the normal and healthy love of man and wife bound together by many children that Hollywood preaches, but a diseased erotic-for-its-own sake, the sexual love of two grains of human sand, superficial and impermanent. Before this highest of all Hollywood’s values everything else must stand aside: marriage, honor, duty, patriotism, sternness dedication to self to a higher aim. This ghastly distortion of sexual life has created the erotomaia that obsesses millions of victims in America, and which has now been brought to the Mother-soil of Europe by the American invasion.[8]

(...)

P.S. This was written before the writings of Frankfurt School had achieved ANY influence in the US.

xthred said...

It was a lovely bitch-slapping you delivered to Rebel Pussy on twitter.

danaigh said...

I 'second' Whiskey's remarks and would like to expand on them. What we, whites, do to blacks we would never to our own children, or each other.

Here is a list of what we expect of our own:

1. Be honest and admit your mistakes. I.e. Don't make excuses.
2. Respect authority: your parents, teachers, police.
3. Obey the law, if you don't then you deserve the consequences.
4. Some people are going to be better at doing things and some worse...live with it.
5. Good things happen to those who work for it.
6. Temper tantrums are childish...grow up.
7. You are judged by the company you keep.

And of course the bible based:
8. The golden rule
9. The seven deadly sins: among them; Pride...go figure
10. Love thy neighbor

So in this context we, us DWL's, have done our fair share of misleading.

Imagine a Rev Wright in your church. What kind of leader of his flock is he?

The patronizing of whites towards blacks does nobody any good and has done immense harm. Hopefully a future generation will figure this out. But who can lead the blind if their leader can't see?

MuayTyson said...

Yet again Whiskey has nailed it.

Blacks are starting to wake up to just how disingenuous Liberals are but they still only want the black agenda pushed. Being that blacks can not compete on equal ground Libertarian and Conservative agendas will not suit them. Only a Socialist agenda will make blacks happy.

As Christianity only favors those who follow what ever version of the Bible they follow blacks need a specific Christian Black Liberation Theology to feel complete and happy. Politically blacks need a Black Socialist agenda. The party must specifically favor the pathologies of blacks.

Of course this is impossible. How do you have safe streets and less violence when blacks are violent and want minimal punishment for their violence? You can not have intact families and constant sexual misbehavior. Blacks want things but they want to have them with no personal sacrifice or to work for them it is a catch 22 with blacks.

Only being seggregated from blacks will benefit the rest of humanity and allowing blacks to be black where they are no problem for anyone else is the answer. Blacks will always want what anyone else has but will never be able to achieve it on their own or they would ahve done so already. You get the kind of society you deserve.

PDK said...

I respected Breitbart and his effort. It is our loss as Americans that he left us so early, so prematurely. Although his organization remains and might well continue on in the Breitbart tradition, his organization is at risk of invadeing liberals.

All liberals are parasites, it is in the nature of their mindset. Just as a virus invades a cell and transmogrifys the cell to produce more viruses at the expense of the cell doing its` natural function, so to do liberals invade an organization and transmogrify said organization into a liberal tool at the expense of its` original purpose. The Ford foundation is one example, a conservative organization, invaded by liberals and transmogrified into a liberal tool.

Blacks, though they clearly are a sub-species of humans as measured by their smaller, lower IQ brains and especially by their inferior for higher culture creation and maintenance cerebrum, could accept their nature for what it is, embrace their personal responsibility to mature, mature, swallow their false pride and join the winning team. This of course is also true for browns and DWLs.

However most blacks are easily enticed or duped to follow the easier liberal path, to refuse one`s personal responsibility to mature, embracing instead the preferred illusion, and become a professional, lifelong parasite.

After the great emancipater, Abe Lincoln, set the blacks free, the black people in kind gave their allegiance to the republican party. For near 70 years they loyaly voted republican until one FDR came along and offered them something for nothing, at someone else`s expense. It was here that they dropped their allegiance to the republican party, embraced the democrats, and joined the chorus of the liberal mantra, "something for nothing at someone else`s expense, makes me happy for a while".

The liberal grand design ideology marches toward a single destination, the new world, one world order of globalism, socialism and democracy. This necessarily intends the death of nation-states, Republics and free enterprise capitalism.

Further, it is our fully enfranchised democracy which serves as the means to the liberal grand design ideology of globalism, socialism and democracy end, if they can influence a sufficient number of dolts.

Therefore the DWLs must tirelessly cultivate a parasitic lifestyle in as many as possible, including blacks. Obviously this is a loser philosophy, but the God-complxed, narcissistic liberal leaders are force by their psychological make-up to pursue this end. They are Sheppards in need of, and in pursuit of, their flock.

Still, all in all, it was good to hear in the audio that some blacks are finally beginning to see that their is no help like the help one can give themselves, embracing the personal responsibility to mature. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

The Republican Party and practical Conservatives are in the business of winning elections not committing political suicide; therefore, I tend to give them a pass on the issue of Racial Realism.

So you 'give them a pass' on helping with the destruction of our people? "Conservatives" like you are every bit as dangerous as the liberals you lament and the black undertow. Maybe even more so because while you may voice indignation at our foes you support those who hate our guts.

Hell_Is_Like_Newark said...

To expand on Whiskey's point:

I used to have a small payroll for a construction related business. Primarily semi-skilled labor. My best employee was VERY slow mentally (not retarded.. but slow). It took a long time for him learn new tasks and he had to be supervised when handling new situations (he would do profoundly stupid things when dealing with the unfamiliar). However, he had some star qualities:

*Drug free
*Showed up for work regularly
*Kept himself physically in top shape.
*Would work his ass off
*Didn't give me attitude.

The above qualities are actually very hard to find today. It was common for new employees to get high once paid, or they were too out of shape (we are talking people under 25 here) to haul a piece of drywall, or lacked even a smidgen of work ethic (you stopped watching them, they stopped working).

I was able to pay him enough that he could afford an apartment (with a roommate) and the basics of life. The actual cost of hiring him was over $21 an hour once you added in all the taxes, fees, and costs of government imposed regulations.. all that stuff to help 'the poor'... except that it makes it more difficult for them to find a job.

Qualities he possessed can only be imbued on the low IQ masses through force: Force of religion and culture (i.e. shaming the woman who get knocked up by the local thug). In addition, force of law; removing the disruptive elements from society through prison or harsher means. Given our cultural decay, I have no idea how you would institute the former of the two.

Anonymous said...

(North,Ga)....In an article, an ol' boy tried to get some constructive criticism on the topic of......."Should white people pay for slavory" Well, I want you to read a comment from a black man with all the answers!


truevillany.............19th April 2011, 1:55 PM

As a black person, I have to interject here... Lets call this what this really is... should WHITE people have to pay for slavery? the answer is yes and no...

I think it sucks that white folks cannot live their lives without the constant reminder of slavery.... I know most white folks are not racist... hell... most of you guys love black people... all people for that matter. quite frankly you had nothing to do with slavery. However, you, the average joe, does not really matter. White people in power decide every aspect of our country... from the majority of our laws, to the interest rates we pay..

the next logical retort is... "YOU ARE WRONG!!! WE HAVE A BLACK PRESIDENT!!"


it is too bad that you do not know this, but our presidents have very little power on most decisions that we as a country make... congress and the senate have this control i.e. white peple in power

THe next point is... white people in this counrty still have a ridiculous amount of advantages... lets look @ the facts shall we? THe avaerage white person makes a lot more $ in their lifetime than the black or latino american. There are moreminorities in poverity as a whole, then there are white people, even though white people make up the majority... not to mention the level of education for whites is VASTLY superior to everyone else...

For black folks... half of the reason we are in the situations we are in is our fault... and the other half is your ancestors fault... EVERY individual, no matter their race, has the ability to choose... You can choose to work hard, or not... you can choose to live a life of crime, or go to school. you can choose to take care of your children, or you can choose to be selfish and not take care of them. So i as a black person admit that alot of the reason we arent doing as well as we should, is because we need to put forth better effort, and choose to do the right thing...

On the other hand, when looking @ the facts, you could see how its a little harder to do so... The black family was intentionally destroyed by whites in order to control them... families were purposefully split up... so without a mother and father figure, its hard for the children to grow up socially and morally correct. Our women were forced to raise our boys... our men were either killed for being deemed weak, or bred with other women like animals.. If you were black and learned to read or write, you were killed, this was done in order to keep control.

THis has a huge effect on why we are so poor. Why some of us dont take care of our children. why some of us dont value education. the depression lack of a cohesive family hence lead to seaking it elsewhere... like gangs...

Honestly i could write you a 20 page paper siting facts and going over specifics, but the fact is, whites still have it better than anyone else in this country. You have more $... you have more job opportunity... you have better education... It sucks, but imo yall need to take it on the chin until we are all.... NOT JUST BLACKS... but ALL on an equal playing field in this country. If you are white and believe that you dont have an advantage, you are most likely one of the following

a. a young kid with no life experience who only knows what you learn from your history teacher and what you see on tv

b. not willing to make a consession on this issue, because it doesnt further your thought process.. even though there are facts there to support the opposite.

Anonymous said...

"Blacks are starting to wake up to just how disingenuous Liberals are but they still only want the black agenda pushed."

Indeed just as Hispanics want their agenda pushed etc. Most conservatives however are as bad as liberals in that they believe in fairy tales. If only we'd reach out to them and show them what real conservatism is we could all be one great big conservative family. That is as long as whites are not explicitly represented.

Mittens and crew will do nothing to alter this...

Anonymous said...

I hate "Conservatism, Inc." as much as the liberals. Both are based upon an inconsistent, illogical mish-mash of thoughts that can only be defended by shouting louder and louder.

I wonder how much "Rebel Pundit" had to pay to get a Negro to utter the GOP line on camera (on cue?). I have to credit his perseverance in finding a relatively articulate Negro.

PDK said...

I have for the past year or so had a realization, I`ve kept it inside. I`m not sure how rude or crude it is, or even how correct it is, however, seeing as how America just might get lucky and be rid of the anti-America Messiah, the anti-white, black, racist thug and embracer of black, social justice philosophy soon, I`ll throw it out there for the reader to decide on his or her own.

What I realized is that Barac may be a cuckold.

From high school biology we all learn that humans have two chromosomal sets, one from each parent. Further we learn the female has two female chromosomal sets, x sets, while the male has one female,x, and one male,y, chromosomal sets.

The sex of the human offspring is therefore and necessarily determined by the chromosomal set the male passes down. The female always passes a female chromosomal set, but the male may pass his female or his male set. If the offspring is female the father passed his maternal, female set down, if the offspring is male, the farther passed his paternal , male set down.

Barac`s father was pure black while his mother was pure white. Therefore since Baracs offspring are females he passed his pure white, maternal, female chromosomes down.

A few years ago, I noticed how black or dark the two daughters are. This struck me as very odd because if Barac passed his female chromosomal set down they should be lighter just as Barac is. I thought perhaps being young their melanin production was at it`s peak, further perhaps they are in the sun alot, either or both might generate the dark black complexion, but still I was not comfortable with that.

Looking at Barac`s mother she had the heart shaped face which can be seen in Barac, so I looked at the pictures of the girls online, but, though I really could not see this feature, I still could not be sure.

Some of the few people who knew young, college age Barac have said Barac lived with a homosexual for more than a year. This to me is just heresy, however it puts one more reason to suspect Barac to be a cuckold.

Online I once gleaned that Barac and Michelle`s marriage was on the rocks, somewhat turbulent, back in the late 90s. Further, for a black couple they came to have children fairly late. Their children seem to be from the late 90s to early 00s, both these realities seem to be associated in time.

Although mostly circumstantial, I am about 75% sure, that Barac is indeed a cuckold.

Don`t know for sure, just saying. Thank you.



Dissident said...

Black Person said,

"As a black person, I have to interject here... Lets call this what this really is... should WHITE people have to pay for slavery? the answer is yes and no..."

You, sir; are wrong, wrong, wrong.

To my knowledge, not one white person alive in Amerika today owns any slaves. So, why on Earth would you think for a moment that whites should continually payup for something some aristocratic (--never the poor, common people) person did over 200 years ago?

It it not my responsibilty to pay you back anything that I was not responsible for in the first place. You owe me---nothing. I owe you---nothing.

Whites work their asses off in todays society, to pay for whatever ripoff the government decides to use our tax money for in entitlement giveaways. How could you possibly think we may owe you any more? And why do you insinuate that it's only the white elite that carry on this way? Do you not know of the graft and corruption in African countries-run by Africans? Third world bannana republics.

I can assure you that 99% of the people visiting and writing here just want to be left alone to live their lives free from cocky blacks, Liberals, and dumb-ass social engineers. I for one, wish no harm on you or yours, but I feel no obligation towards you except simple human respect and dignity--as long as you feel the same.

Anonymous said...

He is a cuckold,he's our first down low president as well....

Anonymous said...

How much would it cost to find out what proportion of a black's ancestry were slave holders rather than slaves to offset the reparation as you could not give the full payment to someone who was descended from slave owners rather than being owned. Also as he is of Kenyan origin Obama and his like could not be compensated as his ancerstors never suffered from slavery.

Anonymous said...

"There is little doubt, due [sic] the historic and tremendous pressure on black Americans to support the first African-American President of the United States simply because he is not a white Republican, the President will win the black vote."

This dreadful sentence is based on a ridiculous premise -- that some externality is victimizing blacks.

From what mechanism comes this alleged "pressure?"

Jay in DC said...

I wonder how much "Rebel Pundit" had to pay to get a Negro to utter the GOP line on camera (on cue?). I have to credit his perseverance in finding a relatively articulate Negro.

That also struck me as -oddly- out of character. Isn't it sad when you hear a single person say something that is at least NEAR the truth that you stop and take notice of it? As it is basically an admission that you expect half-truths and falsehoods 100% of the time.

McKinley says boldly, “There is no Tea Party in my community, there is no Republicans in my community, so they can’t blame Republicans, they can’t [blame] Tea Parties; I can only blame the democrat-liberal agenda.”

I would like to nominate this guy as new mouthpiece for the Ministry of Truth. Of course, since his view is at least somewhat close to reality that would not happen in 1000 years, but we can at least participate in wishful thinking...

Andrea Ostrov Letania said...

“our issues have not been met on, have not been adhered to, and it’s almost as if they are just saying even though no one has addressed your issues, just go with ‘em anyway. And we say no.”

This is so typical of how black people think. Instead of looking around and doing what needs to be done to improve their communities, they MAKE DEMANDS to politicians and white folks to fix all the problem for the blacks. And when whites and politicians do pump money into the black community and build new schools, what do blacks do? They just piss all over, mess things up, beat up teachers, and act like baboons.

Jay in DC said...

Side topic- Hurricane Sandy

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/hurricane-sandy-leaves-frenzy-gas-article-1.1196282

Check out the line of people, there is something about them... I just can't put my finger on it. They seem similar somehow. It just goes to show you that even physicians, engineers, and scientists can be caught unprepared in disaster. I think that is what I'm seeing that makes them all so similar.

Anonymous said...

"There is little doubt, due [sic] the historic and tremendous pressure on black Americans to support the first African-American President of the United States simply because he is not a white Republican, the President will win the black vote."

This dreadful sentence is based on a ridiculous premise -- that some externality is victimizing blacks.

From what mechanism comes this alleged "pressure?"

--November 4, 2012 9:11 AM

I was asking a rhetorical question there, and did not quite complete the thought.

* The "pressure" comes from blacks themselves, who quite naturally act on a racial agenda and vote according to race.

* The "pressure" is augmented somewhat by BET/MTV/Viacom/"Sumner Redstone" (Murray Rothstein), which, as I write, is urging its rap-violence-hypnotized audience to "vote for Obama as if your lives depended on it!"

Perhaps Whites should similarly begin to act "as though their lives depended on it."

It is getting very late in the day.

Anonymous said...

Dissident said...
{ I can assure you that 99% of the people visiting and writing here just want to be left alone to live their lives free from cocky blacks, Liberals, and dumb-ass social engineers. I for one, wish no harm on you or yours, but I feel no obligation towards you except simple human respect and dignity--as long as you feel the same.}

Two thumbs up! I would love to hold this to memory, & repeate often, word for word.

Zenster said...

In the course of an ongoing investigation into the root causes of the rising tide of violence and horrifying murder rate this year in Chicago’s most destitute neighborhoods, several video interviews I conducted with black American voters from the community-organized south and west side, reveal a community that is fed up with the status quo--the status quo that keeps these communities ridden with poverty, homelessness, unemployment, dismantled families, and, of course, skyrocketing murder rates. [emphasis added]

Status quo? Effing priceless. The only "status quo" in question is TNB. Be it rape, robbery, murder or "no snitch", it's all one form or another of TNB. That is the root cause and ultimate driver of all Black misery.

And residents say, “it is the black Democratic leadership implementing a liberal agenda” that is to blame for the ongoing plight in their community.

That "liberal agenda" and the "black Democratic leadership" which helps to propel it is all a manifestation of Liberalism in general. Liberals are merely enablers of TNB. They do not bear direct responsibility for the idiocy of Blacks. Blacks have only themselves to blame for their moral vacuity.

McKinley says boldly, “There is no Tea Party in my community, there is no Republicans in my community, so they can’t blame Republicans, they can’t [blame] Tea Parties; I can only blame the democrat-liberal agenda.”

Any bets against this chap still voting for 0bama?

[crickets]

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race in Progress!

OK, since the issue of "reparations" for slavery has once more reared its head, let's deal with it:

If reparations are owed for slavery, then does this mean that:
* Africans who engaged in the slave trade owe reparations?
* Do Muslims, who enslaved Europeans, Asians and Africans, also owe reparations?
* Will we see blacks go the Muslim Brotherhood and demand reparations for the Islamic end of the slave trade? (Might make an interesting UTube video...!)
* Since Communist regimes in the USSR, China, Cambodia, etc., used slave labor (the Gulag), do communists owe reparations?
* Since DWLs implemented forced busing, a form of involuntary servitude, does this mean that DWLs owe reparations to the students who were bused?

Then again, do blacks owe reparations for:
* The disproportionate amount of violent crime committed by blacks, and the tax dollars needed to incarcerate so many of their numbers, as well as support them on welfare?
* The trashing of public housing, schools, and other infrastructure?
* The massive urban riots ensuing upon the Civil Rights era, including the Rodney King fracas, and going into today's flash mobs?
* The destruction of cities such as Detroit?

If white people can be held collectively accountable for slavery in the past, why not hold blacks collectively accountable for the havoc wrought today?

Why the double standard?

Then again, one might reasonably ask that, if blacks really wanted to restore equilibrium to the force, why not repatriate to Africa? In the lands from which they were forcibly removed, they could enjoy all the benefits of black majority rule.

Any black or DWL trolling here care to answer this?

Bogolyubski said...

PDK:
I have for the past year or so had a realization, I`ve kept it inside. I`m not sure how rude or crude it is, or even how correct it is, however, seeing as how America just might get lucky and be rid of the anti-America Messiah, the anti-white, black, racist thug and embracer of black, social justice philosophy soon, I`ll throw it out there for the reader to decide on his or her own.

What I realized is that Barac may be a cuckold.


Almost, but I expect the reality is that Housenigga Hussein has never been interested in girls, and that Moochelle is his beard - required to get 'erected' by the indoctrinated idiocracy who makes up the largest single voting block in the Banksta Banana Republick (the endlessly ballyhooed 'independent voter' in Ministry of Truth parlance), 95 percent of whom are not gay and might have some lingering discomfort with the notion of a poofter as presidente. There is a reason I often use the term D'Won on d'downlow to describe Dear Leader. The two female sprogs are likely not his, but those of a groid male kept on the side to service the beard.

I also seriously doubt that Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was his actual father. The Mocha Messiah bears much more resemblance to Frank Marshall Davis, the groid communist 'pal' of Stanley Ann Dunham's communist father, who might have been a switch-hitter himself.

Californian said...

Alert! More Dialog on Race in Progress!

And now to deal with the particulars. Just about every argument made by the person being quoted below (name = "truevillany?") is the standard party line from the BRA agitprop machine.

As a black person, I have to interject here...

"As a black person?" I thought that race-was-just-a-construct (tm)? Supposing a white person were to say: "As a white person..." -- would they not be screamed down as (oh my) a "racist?"

White people in power decide every aspect of our country... from the majority of our laws, to the interest rates we pay..

And "white people in power" – politicians, civil service chieftains, media moguls, university bureaucrats, judges in their black robes, clergy, and etc. -- are promoting BRA: AA, busing, MLK Day, Section 8, war on poverty, school lunches, minority grants, "diversity" indoctrination, hatecrime laws, importation into the Homeland of Somalis and Haitians, the destruction of white rule in Rhodesia-South Africa, and etc.

But let's take the above quote at its face value. Why is it wrong that white people run thr show? Compare and contrast white versus black rule in Rhodesia. Or Detroit. Or third world banlieues in Europa. Who makes better decisions, white or black leaders? Whose societies are more peaceful and prosperous, those of white or black leaders? In whose countries and cities would even black people prefer to live, those with white leaders or black?

The defense rests.

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race Goes On...

THe avaerage white person makes a lot more $ in their lifetime than the black or latino american. There are moreminorities in poverity as a whole, then there are white people, even though white people make up the majority... not to mention the level of education for whites is VASTLY superior to everyone else...

* Fewer whites live in poverty because whites have lower rates of illegitimacy and violent crime than blacks; illegitimacy and violent crime are correlated with poverty.
* Black schools have just as much money spent on them as white schools. And we are not even going to talk about HBCU, black studies programs, and etc. It's differences in culture of education between blacks and whites which make the difference (and dare we bring up IQ?).
* White people have much higher rates of business startups. And please note this is so despite government-corporate minority business grants, AA contracts, requirements for a "diverse" work force, and etc., etc., etc.

For black folks... half of the reason we are in the situations we are in is our fault... and the other half is your ancestors fault...

Pretty insulting, attacking the ancestors of white people. Think if those ancestors were alive, "truevillainy" would have the courage to say any of this to their faces?

(It's pointless to inform this fellow that many of the ancestors of white people were not involved in slavery, or even actively fought against it, or marched for civil rights. Just as it is pointless to inform him that his own ancestors in Africa gleefully engaged in the slave trade. Those arguments require one to think in terms of individual responsibility, which seems to be a little beyond the race hustle.)

MuayTyson said...

California,

Do not forget the first legal slave owner on the US was black. Fewer than 5% of Whites owned slaves and a good percentage of blacks born freemen or born slaves owned other blacks.

There were a times of mass immigration AFTER the slave trade. WWI and WWII both saw a huge increase in immigration of Europeans do they owe reperations?

Native Americans owned slaves before the colonies and after the United States was formed should we make N.A.s pay reperations?

This is reperation stance not only has never been thought out it has never been properly argued against.

I would love to see a true debate but it would have to be premised with a 3 hour history lesson.

MuayTyson said...

California,

Do not forget the first legal slave owner on the US was black. Fewer than 5% of Whites owned slaves and a good percentage of blacks born freemen or born slaves owned other blacks.

There were a times of mass immigration AFTER the slave trade. WWI and WWII both saw a huge increase in immigration of Europeans do they owe reperations?

Native Americans owned slaves before the colonies and after the United States was formed should we make N.A.s pay reperations?

This is reperation stance not only has never been thought out it has never been properly argued against.

I would love to see a true debate but it would have to be premised with a 3 hour history lesson.

Californian said...

...and On!

The black family was intentionally destroyed by whites in order to control them... If you were black and learned to read or write, you were killed, this was done in order to keep control.

A lot of assertions. Perhaps Hunter Wallace might respond with the stats on black family formation under slavery-segregation, which were considerably higher than they are today.

In any event, "truevillainy" conflates several different eras. Black children today may not have both an in-home mother and father owing to the choices that black adults have made: 70+% illegitimacy rate, while under segregation black marriage rates were much higher. Let's note that black illegitimacy skyrocketed during the same years that the civil rights revolution was put into effect.

As for blacks being killed for learning to read and write—when was the last time this happened? Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it blacks today who attack other blacks who get ahead in school for "acting white?"

Why some of us dont take care of our children. why some of us dont value education. the depression lack of a cohesive family hence lead to seaking it elsewhere... like gangs...

OK, then explain why you just do not use birth control or practice abstinence until marriage? Or take advantage of taxpayer funded schools, grants, housing, programs, cell phones and everything else to better yourselves?

Honestly i could write you a 20 page paper siting facts and going over specifics,

So far, "truevillany" has not cited very much in the way of "facts." He is simply repeating a party line that has been chanted so often that it has become accepted as The Truth by all True Believers.

but the fact is, whites still have it better than anyone else in this country.

Here's the thing: "truevillainy" seemingly assumes the reason that whites "have it better" is because of some external causes. The fact that whites may value education more, or show more restraint when it comes to reproduction, or commit less violent crime, is irrelevant. The concept of the individual being responsible for one's own fate is beyond him.

.... but ALL on an equal playing field in this country.

An obvious impossibility even if dealing with a racially homogenous society. There will always be differences in abilities, ambitions, capabilities, networking, whatever, even among people of the same race/ethnicity/religion. And when dealing with a racially diverse society, these differences will be all the more pronounced. Given that, there will always be a need to level that playing field, which means that AA and the rest of the race hustle rackets will never go away. And that is what is really disturbing here. What " truevillany" is really calling for is a system of endless government control of everything in pursuit of the mirage of equality—aka BRA.

Anonymous said...

"So you 'give them a pass' on helping with the destruction of our people?"

You have the reading comprehension skills of a negro.

10mm AUTO said...

Whiskey! You own this thread!

I do want to say that blacks will never, ever pay homage to their past. It is a foreign concept. Have you ever noticed that blacks don't really study ANYTHING in depth? Their history even today is mostly "oral" history they get from a class or two during "Black History Month". They never read whole speeches or understand the entire context of what they are as a people.

In 40 years the only thing blacks will remember about MLK is that he said, "free at Last" before Whites beat him to the ground in LA which started the riots after he refused to go to the back of the bus, or something.

Black "Afrocentric-historians" are even worse, making up lies to foster rage in black students and send them out like torpedoes to do damage to who ever they come in contact with.

Did you know Hercules was black? Socrates? He was black but the White man has concealed this from the black man.

Athena? Yes, Goddess of Battle Strategy; she of the grey-eyes who guided Odysseus and who hold a shield with the head of Medusa emblazoned on it, she be of the Black and Juicy butt.

Hannibal? Black as the Ace of Spades. On and on the lies go, till any young blacks who have the brains to rise even to 100 I.Q are loaded with hate for the raped and stolen history, all blamed on Whites. Did you know that Cleopatra (A blond, blue-eyed Macedonian Greek) was black? A good bock on this is called "Out of Africa?".

Anyway, black have always been essentially rootless and without history. Just because Whites have books does not mean that the black wants to record his history, it is more fun to steal it from the White or whoever.

"Yea, da White man do go into Egypt and painted all da wall and sheet wif little tanned men so they would cover up the real black legacy, True Dat!"

Short range history or long range history (and Hollywood in Blackface is working on all the rest of History) the black laps up the lies because it feeds the hate.

Blacks are a biological weapon, pointed right at us.

Anonymous said...

The black people in the Breitbart video have shit in their own nest. Notice the broken windows and filth? Do they get out trash bags and rakes to clean it up? Hell no! YT will do it. They want whitey to swoop in and clean up the piles of crap.

"He has not addressed the needs of OUR community." Tell me, black man, how are your needs different from any other American citizen? Why should you get extra equality? Why should my children suffer for your low IQ and inability to plan for the future. These animals want more free shit. That 's all.

Blacks only want BLACK POWER and reparations for slavery. Period. We can not live together in this Multicultural Mess. Unlike the White Man, who tucks his tail, blacks will always vote in their best interests. Imagine what we could do if white men would do the same.

The Brietbart video is published by a bunch of hipster DWLS in skinny jeans posing as conservatives. I have met a few of them. They have too much hipster gel in their hair. Guess what, "conservative" hipsters? Blacks hate your white ass to the core. They will eat you alive.

No matter black or white, if you promise them free shit, they will vote for you because they have no integrity and are not fit for liberty.

Who cares what these black parasites think? EFF them. I am finished with letting them have a voice. We need to tall them NO and let nature sort things out.

Californian said...

MuayTyson said Do not forget the first legal slave owner on the US was black. Fewer than 5% of Whites owned slaves and a good percentage of blacks born freemen or born slaves owned other blacks.

Sure, but that's real history. What BRA wants is a myth which will justify a never ending parade of demands, each more outrageous than the last. Even if blacks were to get reparations for slavery, the day after BRA would demand that much more. That's why it's important to stop this idiocy NOW.


I would love to see a true debate but it would have to be premised with a 3 hour history lesson.

The thing about the "reparations" issue is that it is a means to place white people on the defensive. In a public debate, we would need to seize the initiative and make BRA account for its idiocy. Race realists need to set the agenda and let the other side respond.

Anonymous said...

It didn't work out so well for Pat Buchanan or Bob Dornan.

Left Coast White Guy

Bogolyubski said...

I really do think that blacks are owed reparations - with accumulated compounded interest - for the events described herein and the uncountable number of similar horrific atrocities. I've yet to see a single black even acknowledge what has taken place - either here or in places like South Africa. The response is always the same when presented with the hideous truth pictured on that site: it's alway YT's fault. Never even the smallest iota of taking responsibility. What an utterly loathsome, contemptible and irredeemably evil race they truly are.

Anonymous said...

Go find and listen to the song by Mike and the Mechanics titled "Silenet Running" time is running out. I SOOOO hope I am wrong tomorrow.

jay c said...

The advertisement at the end of this article started playing video and audio automatically. That will make me leave a site faster than anything. Please take it off!