Sunday, August 25, 2013

"Inevitably, Underlying Instabilities Begin to Appear" -- The Merritt Landry/Marshall Coulter Situation is About to Explode

Why might citizens of New Orleans erect eight-foot walls/fences to protect their property, imitating white property owners in South Africa who have fortified their homes in ways best described as 'medieval'.

Because in the 1990s, approximately 3,000 citizens of New Orleans were murdered. Almost all were killed by black males.
"At the earliest drawings of the fractural curve, few clues to the underlying mathematical structure will be seen."

As Kent B. Germany, an assistant professor of African American studies, who wrote about New Orleans After the Promise: Poverty, Citizenship, and the Search for the Great Society, makes clear, " on the evening news, reports of young black men killing young black men were so commonplace [in New Orleans] that they became almost like macabre sports reporting.":
In the last two decades before Hurricane Katrina, the urban crisis showed few signs of coming to an end. Worsening the situation was New Orleans's troubling tradition of violence that has for centuries resulted in bloody man-to-man combat. The local economic depression of the 1980s and 1990s and the mercilessly high rates of black male unemployment have reaffirmed the city's reputation as one of the most dangerous places in America. During the 1990s, approximately three thousand residents were murdered, most of them young and black. On the evening news, reports of young black men killing young black men were so commonplace that they became almost like macabre sports reporting, unless a toddler or a white person were caught in the crossfire. In an era when many young people looked increasingly to the informal economy for jobs and financial support, the ties of some of them to civil society became stretched as thinly as at any point in local history. The local response to this problem generally followed the trends of the 1960s. The prominent governmental reaction was to institute more law and order: more police, more interdiction, more jails, more jail time, and less rehabilitation. Other responses reflected Great Society stand-bys: demands for more economic growth, more self-knowledge, and more investment in people and institutions, although without the commitment to community organization that had defined the Great Society. (p. 309)
 Perhaps the above paragraph from Germany's book helps explain why Merritt Landry had an eight-foot fence around his property; it might explain why Landry's neighbor has surveillance video protecting his property, which captured a black teen (Marshall Coulter) jumping over Landry's fence. 

At 2 a.m. 

You know the rest of the story

Landry opened fire; Organized Blackness went nuts, with the inevitable national (international) media circus a few weeks away from turning this into Trayvon Martin 2.0.

MSNBC, Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson will make sure of that, with Eric "My People" Holder's Department of Justice prepared to scour all of New Orleans for signs Landry was a bigot -- thus sealing his fate. [Activists gather near Merritt Landry's home, call for his indictment in shooting of 14-year-old, NOLA.com, 8-25-13]
On Saturday evening, activists standing just a few feet from Merritt Landry's home on Mandeville Street shouted for his indictment in the July 26 shooting of 14-year-old Marshall Coulter.
"I am totally, unequivocally for the indictment and conviction of Merritt Landry," the Rev. Raymond Brown said. "He shot the child in the head, and he needs to be brought to justice. We don't know what (Coulter) was doing, but he did not deserve to get shot in the head and sit around in a vegetative state."
Landry was arrested after the shooting on charges of attempted second-degree murder. A preliminary hearing in his case is scheduled for Thursday.
The group of 30 or so protesters gathered across St. Claude Avenue about 6:30 p.m. Saturday and walked into Faubourg Marigny, ending in the block where Coulter was shot inside the courtyard of Landry's home at 2 a.m.
Brown led the march and was joined by other well-known activists, including W.C. Johnson of Community United for Change and Mike Howells with the EcoSocialists.
Brown previously spoke at the site at a July 29 gathering that ended when he got into a shouting match with neighbors supporting Landry. On this occasion, no dissenting neighbors appeared.
A rally to support Landry had been interrupted on Thursday when several groups of protesters arrived and drowned out a news conference held by the supporters.
"Free Merritt" supporters called Thursday for all charges against Landry to be dropped, maintaining that he was within his rights in shooting Coulter, who has a history of burglary charges but was unarmed when he was shot, according to police.
Legal experts have said that to support a claim of self-defense, Landry will have to prove that he felt his life was in imminent danger at the time he pulled the trigger.
At Saturday's rally, Johnson said he is bothered by the message that it is OK to shoot first and think later. "This is the result of a system that has done nothing for poor and black citizens," Johnson shouted. "The message is, if you're poor or if you're black, get back."
"Two wrongs don't make a right," Howells said. "We should value human lives over control of private property."
 If human lives are valued more than the rights of private property owners, what's the point of locking doors, erecting 8-foot tall fences, or employing security cameras to ensure the integrity of your home (and safety of your family)? [New Orleans: A City United or Divided in the Fight Against Crime? (Part 1), New Orleans Data News Weekly, August 1, 2013]:
This is a neighborhood that is still feeling the 2007 death of Helen Hill, a filmmaker who was killed during a home invasion by an intruder who shot and killed Hill and shooting her husband three times and he survived and their young child uninjured. This along with a spate of other shooting including Dinerral Shavers of the Hot 8 Brass Band caused citizens to march on City Hall about the escalating crime problems in the City. Today some 6 years later Hill’s murder is still unsolved with no one arrested in this case.
Jonathan Harris is a business owner who lives in the Marigny who says that crime is getting out of control. “I have placed security cameras outside of my property because things have gotten far worse since Katrina with the crime in our neighborhood. After 9 O’clock we get people not from the neighborhood casing out houses and targeting our people walking through down the street to rob them.” Continuing he says with a bit of exasperation in his voice, “I have been mugged before and am sometimes afraid, but I love New Orleans and many of my friends do as well, but some of them who have also been victims of crime are considering leaving because they feel it is becoming too dangerous.”
Though black individuals collectively make New Orleans one of America's most unsafe cities, the real villain in this story is the white property owner who dares put up walls/fences that black people have to scale when attempting to rob them.

"Increasingly, the mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications."

Even those who support Merritt Landry, the Home Defense Foundation of New Orleans, can only do so by qualifying their support in utter deference to the prevailing narrative of Black-Run America (BRA) [Justice for Merritt Landry Meeting, WGNO.com, 8-6-13]:

“If it happened to me, somebody jumped over my fence, I live with an eight foot fence around where I live, I wake up in the morning and somebody’s inside my fence, they would be killed,” says Benjamin John.
“I know the Landry family and I know Merritt well, and I think he was 110% justified. He’s protecting his family and his property,” says Maureen Noonan. 
In a crowded room in Mid-City several Marigny residents came out to show their support for Merritt Landry. 
“If we can move past the racial narrative and just say New Orleanians are suffering, New Orleanians are dying, and New Orleanians are being victimized by other regrettably other New Orleanians, I think that it would put our community in a much better place,” says civil rights activist Nadar Enzi also known as Captain Black. 
The ‘Justice for Merritt’ meeting was led by Captain Black and Mike Weinberger of the Home Defense Foundation of New Orleans. 
33-year-old Merritt Landry faces Second Degree Murder Charges. Nearly two weeks ago police say Landry shot an unarmed teen inside his property. A neighbor says his surveillance video caught 14-year-old Marshall Coulter jumping over Landry’s fence. 

According to court documents Landry shot him in the head after the boy made a “thwarted” move.
“Mr. Landry violated the law when it comes down to self defense,” says civil rights activist Rev. Raymond Brown. 

“I think time will tell (whether Merritt was justified in using deadly force) and the narrative will speak for itself,” says one of Landry’s attorneys Tanzanika Ruffin.
New Orleans is suffering and New Orleanians are dying and being victimized by the Sons of Obama, a fact no one dares point out in a public forum.

That's why property owners have 8-foot high fences protecting their homes and security cameras monitoring their lots 24/7.



Such security measures are the reality of Martin Luther King's dream come true, where white people must invest much of their income in securing their property from black people; meanwhile, the law and the media continue to protect black criminals from being judged by the content of their character.

Black-Run America (BRA) is just a system for governing man.

It won't fail by dissent, but because the flaws inherent in the system will become more severe as time goes on.

System recovery will prove impossible.


95 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Despite the fact that the number of white people killed by black people in America annually exceeds the United Nations' official threshold to be classified as a WAR, our nation does not report it so that people will know about it and stand ready to defend themselves."

Western Voices World News.

Anonymous said...

Big problem for Landry: He left a witness who may be able to later testify against him. There is an old saying that applies here and to many similar situations--dead men don't talk. I have always been told and believe to my core, that if faced with such a scenario, you do not allow your attacker a future chance to lie about what happened.

Also notice that Landry went out and hired himself a dark diversity for attorney. While his thinking is probably along the lines of gaining some sympathy from the very racists that want to fry his ass, what most likely will happen, is she will be viewed an Aunt Jemima by most jury members. I would rather hire a competent White lawyer, who would use every legal trick to get a favorable verdict, rather than taking a chance with an incompetent low IQ she-boon.

III

Anonymous said...

http://raymmar.com/nigga-please-the-reality-of-reverse-racism-in-america-explicit-content-nsfw/


More brainwashed disinfo

8MM

10mm AUTO said...

In a sane world, Rev. Brown would be lashed out of town along with its 30 followers with a bull Whip and the theif would be harvested for its Organs. Rev. Brown wants a mob, the same thing negros complain about being afraid of in their "terble terble legcy of da Slabery".

I am glad to see Whites standing up for their own, even a little, God Bless 'em. This is a lose, lose situation. If Mr. Landury is found Justified, Whites in NO will face a backlash. If he is found guilty, negros will take it as justification for their hatred of the White man (but not their getting away from the White man; they needs their GibmeDat!)

Anonymous said...

Let this be a lesson to you all. DON'T call the police.
Lookup "drop gun", "drop knife" etc.

Harden your defensive perimeters.

Stay safe, get to know your neighbors.

Don M said...

There is no possible way that Vibrant Cultural-Enricher is only 14 years old. No way. He looks ready for a feetsball skolluhship.

Anonymous said...

Is there a way to get Mr. Landry donations for legal defense?

Lawrence of Aphasia said...

Have you seen THIS?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b00_1377453339

Couple of little black kids slap around and bully a white toddler, record it on video.

Anonymous said...

If it wasn't for Negro doubles standards, Negros wouldn't have any standards.

Anonymous said...

Landry saved the city of New Orleans millions of dollars by capping that hood rat.

Gwinnett Gladiator said...

I’m really concerned that Landry is going to jail. I think the post-Zimmerman outrage will render it virtually impossible for him to get a fair trial. I just love that someone, caught during the commission of a crime and confronted, ends up becoming the defendant. And then the Monday morning quarterbacking by DWLs who do not own, have never fired, and lively never even touch a firearm in their entire lives conduct non-reality based scrutiny of a split-second decision that Landry shouldn’t have even had to face, in the middle of the night, with his wife and infant child in the house. But such is life in BRA. And South Africa. And Zimbabwe…

OT, but a few items for consumption. First, me and missus were going to the grocery store today, early, in order to avoid negros to the maximum extent possible. Probably between 10 and 10:30. We went to a shopping center that is far nicer (and whiter) than the area we abandoned a year ago due to Section 8 infestation. We pull up, and there are 3 cop cars there. The store is very sparsely patronized at this hour on a Sunday morning. WTF?

Well, it turns out, and only as a result of overhearing the conversation of the negress checkout and bagging clerks (at least they were working), a Son of Obama had just pulled a knife on a store employee when confronted while attempting to steal a box of Pop Tarts. Seriously. Then the clerks talked about the bank across the street having been robbed very recently. FYI, this is an area that is about 30 miles from downtown Atlanta, and a former whitopia with extremely high property values, some of the best public schools in the state (whatever that’s worth), and first-class amenities. In ten years, the groids have infiltrated, white flight, wash, rinse, repeat. But never mind – did you know it’s almost time for college football?!

Gwinnett Gladiator

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous 12:21 PM said: I have always been told and believe to my core, that if faced with such a scenario, you do not allow your attacker a future chance to lie about what happened.

Shooter may have thought the head shot did just that. I didn't see what caliber was used or where exactly it hit. The negro is alive and talking. It might have been a facial wound, etc..

Shooting perp multiple times with rapid fire (and the sounds of such) will lend credence to your subsequent statement that you were in fear for your life ("he lunged at me", "he quickly went for something in his waistband", etc.).

Shooting perp from some distance away doesn't help your case that you were in imminent danger.

Anonymous 1:16 PM said: Let this be a lesson to you all. DON'T call the police.

In a city? Yeah, you're right... the neighbors will call them for you.

Anonymous 1:16 PM said: Lookup "drop gun", "drop knife" etc.

Uh-huh. And assuming they care, the police would never, ever suspect such a thing, and have no way of determining if evidence was planted. And on the off-chance they do know about this super-secret practice and somehow, some way can prove that you've done this, it won't hurt your otherwise at-least decent case a bit. Sure.

You only have to say that he went for something. Chances are, he will have something on him (e.g., a screwdriver) that could help your case. The perp also probably has a history of violence.

Anonymous said...

Have negroes ever improved anything?

Anonymous said...

The family's response to the shooting of their boy reveals a trait that psychological testing has shown to be typical of black people in general. They reason as follows, "On Friday, Coulter's family acknowledged the teen's history of burglary arrests but said he had never used a gun."

Now, how could a homeowner know whether a burglar standing in front of him had a history of using a gun during his crimes? Their way of thinking implies that a person defending their home would have instant access to the invader's criminal history which presupposes that he would take a moment and ask the invader to identify himself and say, "Oh, excuse me while I look up your criminal background on my computer's search engine to see whether you constitute an imminent threat or whether you're just trying to rip me off."

In short their rationale displays an impossible level of narcissism. They are incapable of seeing a situation from another person's point of view. And this squares with results from psychological testing of blacks in general.

Anonymous said...

Rev. Raymond Brown said: "He shot the child in the head, and he needs to be brought to justice. We don't know what (Coulter) was doing, but he did not deserve to get shot in the head"
Says the negro: "We don't know, or even care, what our boy was doing to your family. You have no right to defend yourself; and if you dare to defy us, we will use every black ally in every govt office to punish you."

Anonymous said...

The photo above the text "Increasingly, the mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications." is missing.

Gwinnett Gladiator said...

OT, but part of the larger context. Something just hit me like a ton of bricks. While performing mandatory, assigned domestic duties, I was replaying the latest MSLSD clip of TWMNBN Tim Wise in my head. Apparently I'm not capable of thinking about anything pleasant on a Sunday afternoon...

In repeated exposure to his warped reality, I realized that he focuses on one, recurring theme - that white people are statistically unlikely to be victimized by blacks in acts of violent crime. He then uses this point as his foundation to paint white people as racist and horrible and scared of nothing from virtuous, peaceful black people. Relatively speaking, this is, of course, true. However, such a statement is meaningless outside of quasi-academic discussions, as he routinely glosses over the epic, undeniable statistics of black violent crime and dysfunction a la Detroitlet and Chicongo. I don't know that I have seen him confronted in this regard, as whenever I've seen him talk, it's always in a carefully staged setting where, even with Jared Taylor and Matthew Heimbach on the other side, they were prevented from ever going on the offense. Having Marc Lamont Hill leading the discussion certainly doesn't help. But I digress.

White people generally AREN'T victimized by black people to the extent they otherwise would because of white flight and the extensive precautions whites take to avoid becoming victims (again, relatively speaking) in isolating themselves from TNB (that map of racial segregation based on the 2010 census data doesn't lie). Those that are are generally clueless DWLs, those who cannot see, with a smattering of true victims who did nothing in particular to put themselves at risk of death (Autumn Pasquale, Knoxville Horror, Brittany Watts, etc.). Those that do put themselves at risk are violated and beaten and raped and slaughtered at what we know is an exceptional rate, but only because we at SBPDL look at the larger context and circumstances of the victimization and interaction with negros. Virtually no one else does this, and the whole "random attack" or "wrong place at the wrong time" or "robbery gone wrong" characterization goes unchallenged. Otherwise, I'm not aware of any concrete statistics on the violent outcome of white association with negros because dat be rayciss. That "statistic" can only be gleaned by aggregating thousands of local news stories gathered from across the country over a period of time. Gnomesayin'?

I'm not sure I have made my point as eloquently as I could have, but I'm sure that someone can pick up where I left off and do a better job. Bogolubski? Californian? SO Cal?

Gwinnett Gladiator





Anonymous said...

Eventually this will end.Most likely long after all of us are gone,but end it will.This country is a pale shadow of what it once was-that is a shame.Just from a practical viewpoint;we (the US) can not afford to pay millions of assholes to not work and have as many illegitimate offspring as possible.It is simply not sustainable.Throw in a couple of open-ended wars,giving as much money as we can to other assholes that hate us,(US foreign aid policy),add a southern border that is like a sieve,try to take guns from everyone but criminals...before you know it,we are broke financially,(with no industry infrastructure to fall back on) and before you know it we have real problems...What a fucking mess! Richard Cranium

Anonymous said...

PK have you seen this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TBRwiuJ8K7w#t=97


what do you think? it is how your white enemies think and they are often in college

Anonymous said...

It's laughable that Landry is being targeted for "breaking the law." Simply, unbelievable. But then again, knowing what depths of staggering stupidity black "activism" can reach, maybe it's not so unbelievable after all. My 96 year-old grandmother said it best when she said "Black people are just so stupid sometimes."

Reverend Bacon said...

"system recovery will prove impossible." Sure sounds like you've given up, PK. Say it ain't so.

Whiskey said...

Thing is Tim Wise is all wrong. Whites default value is worship of all things Black because of Black racial superiority in athletics. Like football.

So this White guy is toast.

Like Italy is now over run with Egyptians and cannot muster the will to stop it.

LEO Ret said...

Anonymous said...

Let this be a lesson to you all. DON'T call the police.
Lookup "drop gun", "drop knife" etc.

Harden your defensive perimeters.

Stay safe, get to know your neighbors.

August 25, 2013 at 1:16 PM

"Drop screwdriver".A tool that can be used as a weapon and also in the commission of a burglary.Case closed.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. I tell people you can only shoot someone on your property (without being arrested) if the intruder is coming in your house. If you do, be prepared to spend your life savings on a lawyer.

There was a case in Knoxville (all involved were white) a few years ago. A man shot someone stealing his tools from a shed on the man's property. He was tried for 2nd degree murder and was acquitted after spending a large sum in legal fees.

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

Rev. Bacon -- Just call me the "Ian Malcolm" of BRA.

Al Sharptonsucks said...

"In short their rationale displays an impossible level of narcissism. They are incapable of seeing a situation from another person's point of view"

Wow! just wow, what a perfect way to describe the day to day thinking of the American negro.

Al Sharptonsucks said...

"In short their rationale displays an impossible level of narcissism. They are incapable of seeing a situation from another person's point of view"

Wow! just wow, what a perfect way to describe the day to day thinking of the American negro.

Robert in Arabia said...

Where I live crime is against the law.

james m said...

"System Recovery will be impossible" means BRA will be destroyed once and for all.
Since we know White people invented the best things on Earth, like steam power, electric light,electric everything really, the airplane, the internet, the telephone, Television,ect.
You can be pretty sure that ALL these things existed first in the IMAGINATION of the inventor. So Realists start using your imagination to dream up ways to destroy BRA. It Can be done.

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous 6:40 PM said: Trial junkie here. I tell people you can only shoot someone on your property (without being arrested) if the intruder is coming in your house. If you do, be prepared to spend your life savings on a lawyer.

Not quite true. In most places in the US, you certainly can confront someone on your property, particularly if they are engaging in theft or vandalism. As with any time where you are in place where you have a right to be, you can use deadly force if you are faced with a threat of imminent death or serious bodily harm. However, in many places that threat must be immediate, as those places impose a duty to retreat to avoid using deadly force, if you can retreat safely (the stand your ground laws eliminate this duty).

In this case, it appears that the shooter just stepped outside his home and took a shot at an unarmed negro from some distance away. As much as I sympathize with him, IMO the shooter is going to have face some legal problems from this.

It all depends on the law of the relevant jurisdiction, and perhaps more importantly, how the local DA's office applies that law. But your point is taken... defending against a charge ain't cheap. If you are going to have to account for it, It is best to not discharge your weapon unless you truly have to or if you KNOW you are in the absolute clear legally.

Anonymous 6:40 PM said: A man shot someone stealing his tools from a shed on the man's property. He was tried for 2nd degree murder and was acquitted after spending a large sum in legal fees.

And then he might have to spend any money he has left defending against a civil suit from the dead man's family, and there is no guarantee that he won't lose that and have a large judgement against him for the killing.

Anonymous said...

WHOSE CHILD IS THIS?
HOW CAN SHE BE LEFT ALONE?

Anonymous Lawrence of Aphasia said...

Have you seen THIS?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b00_1377453339

black kids slap around and bully a white toddler, record it on video.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. Whiskey flatly predicted Zimmerman would be convicted because the white women on the jury "love blacks."

Anonymous said...

"Thing is Tim Wise is all wrong. Whites default value is worship of all things Black because of Black racial superiority in athletics. Like football" says Whiskey.

Enough of this tired old canard already. Not only most Whites don't "worship" blacks but those same blacks are nowhere as athletics and as STRONG as Whites in many more other WORLD sports (e.g., SOCCER, tennis, rugby, hockey, weightlifting, swimming, gymnastics, pole vault, javelin throw, shot put, hammer throw, discus throw, triathlon, rowing, volleyball, handball, wrestling, MMA, judo, cycling, auto racing and on and on).

What Whites are worshipping is THE SELECTIVE COMMERCIALIZATION of American culture ever since TELEVISION took over all aspects of popular culture (same goes with the constant bombardment of RAP). White adults and kids don't want to emulate negroes, but have been effectively brainwashed to consume everything and anything that is thrown at them by the USUAL SUSPECTS to consolidate their total control of a dumbed down population.

Stop repeating liberal clichés and start seeing the forest for the trees !

Anonymous said...

Jesus, Christ, look at that picture - they're shaved apes, they're animals! How much longer do we have to pretend these things are human? I don't want to play this game anymore. It's a big universe; there are lots of other games to play.

Let's move forward.

Anonymous said...

Check out the comment section over at the Huffing-On-Something Post story about the 99 year-old woman ... lots of race realist comments are now getting through.

It's getting harder to ignore. Even for liberals.

Discard said...

Gwnnett Gladiator: White people are generally smart enough to take precautions against Black thuggery, and therefore suffer from it less than they otherwise would. Most of us are pretty successful at avoiding Blacks, and are prepared to meet them should they break into our homes. Note how so many of the White victims are helpless old people, clueless foreigners, or foolish "liberals".

Anonymous said...

Look at this and yet I've just read an article in the Daily Mail about middle-aged white women going Jamaica etc to be fleeced and f##ked by locals who are just like the worst black residents of New Orleans.

Anonymous said...

I've noticed that black people will take an incident and spin the story to fit their agenda of playing the "black people are always getting done so wrong" game. Then they use their fantasy about what happened to throw a fit and then can't understand why other races think they're idiots. All the excuses they use are in service to this game they play and are used to justify their "position" on the matter.
Does it matter that the punk was a chronic thug and burglar? No. Does it matter that he was trespassing at 2 a.m. with intent to steal and God knows what else? No. To blacks, none of that matters. All that matters is a little black asshole got shot and they'll only see that from the perspective of, "I be black. Whut if I wuz doing dat stuff and somebody shot me? I is just stealing, ain't got no intention of hurtin' nobody. Why I gots to be shot? Dat ain't right! I be innocent!"
The perspective of the homeowner and how he felt is irrelevant to them even if he feared for his life and thought the little black asshole was reaching for a weapon.
IF the punk had lunged at the homeowner with a screwdriver and got shot, the black perspective would be, "ALl he done hab wuz a screwdriver. Dat man could have jes' shot him in de foot. He didn't have to shoot him in de haid! If he was white, he wouldn't hab shot him in de haid! Dis be raycism!" We've all read that "excuse" in other stories where an LBA (little black asshole) has been shot either by an intended victim or by the police.
They really need to be told to just shut the hell up.

Anonymous said...

Gwinett Gladiator,
Exactly. I have never been a victim of black violent crime because I deliberately avoid them, especially regarding my housing choices. We pay a lot of money just to do that: avoid blacks. We know people whose children go to graduate schools in urban areas and they are paying tremendous amounts of money and have few options because they need to avoid blacks. I'm thinking Baltimore, Newark and Philadelphia. To stay safe you have very few options in these rather large cities because the priority is to keep the hood rats away from you.

You are living in a little fortress and Tim Wise and his ilk would call it a "privileged enclave." You are "privileged" because unlike whatever percentage of blacks who are innocent blacks and don't have the financial ability to protect themselves better from black crime, you've managed to secure a little protection. Of course every "innocent black" up to and including Obama has criminal relatives! Thats why we've seen the elite blacks on TV in total solidarity with Trayvon Martin. Every damned last one of them has some Trayvons in the family and they would rather see an innocent white person murdered by their Trayvon than protect the innocent.

Its stunning: rather than attack the disease, the black criminals and the black culture of violence and shameless sexual immorality, our society attacks people who sacrifice to protect themselves from it.

As an aside, I caught some of the Video Music Awards last night because a young member of the family was watching it. What a nasty piece of business former child star Miley Cyrus has turned into. Her song stunk - can't think of even one memorable song from the show, actually and rap/hip hop ALL sounds the same, doesn't it? So, its all promotion. Miley Cyrus the nasty tart is being promoted. Songs about "partying" are promoted. Obviously, the partying is sexual. Ugh. Creepy. They are not "cool," they are creepy.

Anonymous said...

I can't help but notice how black leaders immediately go into action when a coon gets shot by a white person in self defense . where are the white leaders when whites are being murdered by groids? like the innocent baby shot in Georgia ...why aren't there white crowds demanding justice for that poor innocent child ? are we now a bunch of cowards now? yes they'll say we be rayciss for being angry at the po' black yoofs. so what ? start standing up and speaking our or else back down and let the niggers kill us at will .

Anonymous said...

OT http://urbanintellectuals.com/2013/08/25/restaurant-in-south-carolina-refuses-african-americans-service-after-white-woman-says-she-is-uncomfortable/

Restaurant in South Carolina Refuses African Americans Service After White Woman Says She Is Uncomfortable.
This story was posted on the Urban "Intellectuals" blog.

I suggest writing and calling this restaurant to support their right to freedom of association.

Anonymous said...

As a waitress, I have dealt with these chip-on-the-shoulder types. Instead of going to another restaurant so they would not have to wait 2 hours, they stay and bitch and probably demand a free meal or lawsuit payout. I never wanted to wait on them either. They ran my ass off and they never tipped.

http://urbanintellectuals.com/2013/08/25/restaurant-in-south-carolina-refuses-african-americans-service-after-white-woman-says-she-is-uncomfortable/

Anonymous said...

I really don´t know what is the problem to you black people! Why don´t you just live in peace and be good persons? Why don´t only live your cultures? No more culture in the world do what you do, that is like the culture "fighting", but against who?? The laws, the rights and everything is for everyone! In the past you fought because have reasons, but now a days everybody is the same to the law! We know that in the past you suffer a lot, but the judge people suffered too, and we don´t see judge people "fighting" against other cultures! that's my opinion...
I say that because here in Brazil we also have this mixed of races too, but here we don´t care so much about "black VS white", we don´t have that, we think more about "bad people VS good people", that's my opinion.

Anonymous said...

Black property acquisition = steal
Not work, not build, not earn. They are so used to this they can't figure out why a white man would shoot one of them over it

Anonymous said...

Precisely...Uncle Tims statement is true but lacks context.

Most whites aren't around blacks. Therefore their risk profile is low. Simple as that. If you spend much time after dark among concentrations of them, your risk will rise to nearly 100%.

Wise needs a rope and a tree to set him right

Anonymous said...

Hate beating of white 3-year old girl:

http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/worst-thing-ive-ever-seen/

Make it viral. I am sick of this shit. Mother says, "they didn't fuck that girl up."

Anonymous said...

This guy's fuc7ed , the Black hoard is out of blood

He broke the golden rule, anything smaller than a .45 is going to ricochet off a Groids thick skull . You anyways go for center mass.

SwampThizzle said...

"We don't know what (Coulter) was doing, but he did not deserve to get shot in the head and sit around in a vegetative state."

I just had to fucking laugh at this bullshit. It's the only thing to do.

On a serious note, when some nig scales a high property wall at 2AM to steal your stuff or kill you or both, odds are he won't be coming alone. There will be at least a "lookout." Remember, nigs are vicious and opportunistic but they are also dumb and cowards.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous:
"Thing is Tim Wise is all wrong. Whites default value is worship of all things Black because of Black racial superiority in athletics. Like football" says Whiskey.

Enough of this tired old canard already. Not only most Whites don't "worship" blacks but those same blacks are nowhere as athletics and as STRONG as Whites in many more other WORLD sports (e.g., SOCCER, tennis, rugby, hockey, weightlifting, swimming, gymnastics, pole vault, javelin throw, shot put, hammer throw, discus throw, triathlon, rowing, volleyball, handball, wrestling, MMA, judo, cycling, auto racing and on and on).

What Whites are worshipping is THE SELECTIVE COMMERCIALIZATION of American culture ever since TELEVISION took over all aspects of popular culture (same goes with the constant bombardment of RAP). White adults and kids don't want to emulate negroes, but have been effectively brainwashed to consume everything and anything that is thrown at them by the USUAL SUSPECTS to consolidate their total control of a dumbed down population.

Stop repeating liberal clichés and start seeing the forest for the trees !


I understand your annoyance at Whiskey - he's a true gadfly. You raise some good and valid points in your response (which Whiskey never fails to ignore or gloss over) about how both professional sports and the media which promotes them are controlled by the same folks (who identify as white or as non-white when it's to their advantage). Really, if media manipulation and propaganda were ineffective tools, do you think they would be spending billions on it?

Even taking all of the above into account, the simple hard truth remains that there are no armed DHS stasi jackboots holding loaded weapons to YT's head and making him watch endless hours of niggerball - between various ads offering shit sandwiches for his gold. Ditto for the females who tune in Dancing wi' da Stahs. Ditto for whites who listen to degenerate popular (c)rap "music". They do all of this quite voluntarily - even if they've been brainwashed to a massive degree. Eyes can be opened more readily when the 24 x 7 x 365 stream of lies, deceit and depravity is cut off. If we (collectively) cannot get rid of the cable and cannot be bothered to take our own progeny out of the government indoctrination centers, all but a tiny remnant will be exterminated as per Tim Wise's genocidal vision. Contrary to what some other anon poster stated about Wise, he is no self-hating TWMNBN but one of the 99% who makes the other 1% look bad (so unfair, I know). Whiskey annoys us because a good part of what he says is actually true - though he tends to exaggerate and ignores other important factors.

Anonymous said...

Increasingly they are now driving, walking, and loitering in mice areas targeting white "licks". You used to never see blacks at Oakbrook Mall in Il but now they are everywhere and they are thugs. Robbing patrons etc. you cannot go anywhere out side of Chicago anymore without a thug popping up. The stores are hiring them, the zoo, surly black employees at Nordstrom, Nieman's, it never ends. Buy a $100 shrit is now like waitning in line at the DMV. Surly, slow, unintelligble, unintelligent 300 pd black women with fake nails, hair and eyelashes.

Anonymous said...

At least there's one thing that all the ethnicities can agree on: blacks are the worst of all.

It's true too. Ask any person of any skin color (minus blacks, because there's no use talking to them), and they'll inevitably admit that they can't stand black "people."

So the moral of the story is, as some posters have stated previously: be your kind, gentle, intelligent selves to anyone who is a non-black (chances are: they hate black people just as much as anyone). Sure, there are bad stripes from all the ethnicities, but none come close to what the blacks are capable of...

Anonymous said...

"odds are he won't be coming alone. There will be at least a "lookout."
I think that's the core problem with this case: the shooter's story was contradicted by the punk's lookout. Of course, a black pig, black DA, black judge, or black jury will give creedence to a criminal's "word", if it gives them an excuse to fuck over Whitey.

Anonymous said...

Wise just needs to be taken to the darkest ghetto around 10pm on free money day 1st of the month.The rest would take care of itself.He would slowly realize that for all his black ass-kissing and race-traitorism,none of the ferral groids he encounters will have any idea (or give a shit) who he is.After he is robbed,beaten,possibly raped-his last words may well be "But I'm tim wise! I have helped you people"...
Outside a very small circle,tim wise is nobody,a pseudo-intellectual nigger lover that should know better.Richard Cranium

Anonymous said...

That is it in a nutshell ! It isn't like there is a lack of opportunities to tell them ! As soon as it stops working for them it is over. Thank You ! Richard Cranium

Anonymous said...

Well you guys are smarter than Americans in that regard.No doubt.

Anonymous said...

Hate to play devil's advocate, but Landry is probably screwed. I'm not 100% sure about Louisiana, but in most states, you cannot use deadly force unless deadly force is being used against you. Landry *probably* won't be able to plead self-defense, because no weapon or force was used against him. Also, the intruder was only inside the fenced area, not trying to break into the house. Even if the intruder has attempted to break in, again, force can only be met with force. The law (again deferring to the fact that every state is different) requires that the homeowner take every step to avoid using deadly force-fleeing the house, locking themselves in a room, and, of course, calling 911.

Sorry, but, under the law, shooting someone who climbed a fence, but did not use force against the homeowner, will probably be seen as murder. Maybe not first degree, and maybe Landry will plead to a lesser charge, but he will probably be convicted.

Anonymous said...

This is some sick, twisted shit.

http://www.indystar.com/article/20130823/NEWS02/308230049/Teen-detained-connection-rape-93-year-old-Anderson-woman

In an interview, the 93-year old white woman said she thought she would die before this animal was caught.

How does her family cope with this?

Anonymous said...

OAULS CAPTION:
"Increasingly, the mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications."

I wonder how many minutes Tim [un]Wise would last in that crowd?
Thats a 'Reginald Denny' moment if there ever was one.

COMING TO YR NEIGHBORHOOD...VIA S 8.

Don M said...

Rich Cranium Said: "Wise just needs to be taken to the darkest ghetto around 10pm on free money day 1st of the month.The rest would take care of itself.He would slowly realize that for all his black ass-kissing and race-traitorism,none of the ferral groids he encounters will have any idea (or give a shit) who he is.After he is robbed,beaten,possibly raped-his last words may well be "But I'm tim wise! I have helped you people"...
Outside a very small circle,tim wise is nobody,a pseudo-intellectual nigger lover that should know better.Richard Cranium"

I don't know Rich, I think Timmy Wise is a genuine DWL in that he knows all about vibrant diversity and remains well clear of it. His advocacy for the Politically Correct Multi-Cult is just his way of turning a very easy and handsome shekel. BTW, he's no race traitor. He's doing exactly what his merry band of Red Sea pedestrians consider to be in their best interest.

Don M

Anonymous said...

You should cover this: http://www.ijreview.com/2013/08/75227-dhs-employee-we-are-going-to-have-to-kill-a-lot-of-whites-for-black-people-to-survive/

Anonymous said...

The obvious point is to ask why the the mob calling for Landry's head was not calling for law & order among the black community? But we know why not. It's not about justice, but about using incidents like this to rabble rouse. It's really a modern day version of the old lynch mob. Many lynchings back during segregation were about offing a criminal perpetrator whom people believed (rightly or wrongly) was being treated too leniently.

Today, it is blacks who are howling for the lynching. Meantime, YT watches 500 channels of cable ...

"He shot the child in the head..."

Hmmm...I wonder what would happen were a white person refer to a black youth as "child?" Would that lead to screams of "racism?" Would the reverends be out in the streets howling for YT's head?

Anonymous said...

Dear Black Thugs: You’re Making It Hard For White Devils to Believe You’re Innocent Children

http://townhall.com/columnists/douggiles/2013/08/25/dear-black-thugs-youre-making-it-hard-for-white-devils-to-believe-youre-innocent-children-n1672807/page/full

Californian said...

Even taking all of the above into account, the simple hard truth remains that there are no armed DHS stasi jackboots holding loaded weapons to YT's head and making him watch endless hours of niggerball - between various ads offering shit sandwiches for his gold.

Right. And this is why race realism needs to be part of a larger cultural insurrection which ends the modern bread & circuses of television and worship of celebrities. As I noted in a prior post, Hunter Wallace stated somewhere that the civil rights revolution won through at the same time that television exploded across America. The effects of television really need to be explored further. Oddly enough, most of the critique seems to come from the counterculture left. See Marshal McLuhan, or Jerry Mander, the Situationalists, or even The Matrix.

It's not so much TV's liberal content -- which is a factor. Rather, it is the passivity, the fact that most people spend an inordinate amount of non-work hours staring at the tube, watching what someone else decides to show them. It has implications for society in terms of undermining civic life and the public forum. Without television, all those people would be out in the streets, interacting and viewing the real world, as opposed to letting a simulacrum wash over them.

To give an example: would the reality of street crime make more of an impact if people actually got hassled without being able to run home and "watch their programs" showing that there is no threat from flashmobs or gangbangers?

The passivity engendered by modern media makes it possible for elites to get away with what they are getting away with. If people were living their lives in the real world, how long would they stand for the destruction of their own cities, or the cynical manipulation of minorities against the white majority? How many white people would have attended public meetings or marched on city hall were they not plugged into the telescreens.

White civilization was not a product of 500 channels of cable. People need to reclaim their reality.

10mm AUTO said...

"On a serious note, when some nig scales a high property wall at 2AM to steal your stuff or kill you or both, odds are he won't be coming alone. There will be at least a "lookout." Remember, nigs are vicious and opportunistic but they are also dumb and cowards.

August 26, 2013 at 10:24 AM"

I agree completely, there is no way that this niglet "professional Thief" scaled an 8 foot wall without someone to hold tools, weapons, provide aid and transport, be a lookout. Where is the accomplice? The "fambly" is covering.

Remember, where there is one negro, there is another or two moving up on your six.

Californian said...

GG said...White people generally AREN'T victimized by black people to the extent they otherwise would because of white flight and the extensive precautions whites take to avoid becoming victims ... Those that do put themselves at risk are violated and beaten and raped and slaughtered at what we know is an exceptional rate, but only because we at SBPDL look at the larger context and circumstances of the victimization and interaction with negros. Virtually no one else does this, and the whole "random attack" or "wrong place at the wrong time" or "robbery gone wrong" characterization goes unchallenged. Otherwise, I'm not aware of any concrete statistics on the violent outcome of white association with negros because dat be rayciss. That "statistic" can only be gleaned by aggregating thousands of local news stories gathered from across the country over a period of time.

There are any number of psychological mechanisms which people use to avoid considering themselves to be victims. One of the more fancy labels is "identification with the aggressor." Another is "Stockholm Syndrome." A while back, there was a video bouncing about the internet of a Norwegian policewoman explaining how the "assault rapes" being committed by "immigrants" [i.e., third worlders] in Oslo were really the result of the perpetrators coming from "traumatized countries." i.e., she reverses the role of perpetrator and victim. IAW liberal ideology, members of the underclass committing violent crimes, racial minorities running amok, ANC thugs torturing and murdering white farmers, etc., are all really victims of society. There is some peculiar psychological anomaly going on here among DWLs, a point which, perhaps, Whiskey is getting at.

The theme of a "robbery gone wrong" is one of these mechanisms. For starters, a robbery is "wrong" right from the get-go. This is acknowledged by laws such as felony murder, which makes the killing of anyone in the course of an unlawful act to be a form of criminal homicide. (And what would be a "robbery gone right?" One where the perpetrator gets away with the loot but kills no one? That's OK? Huh?).

Similar with being at the "wrong place at the wrong time." But how can one know where and what are the "right place" and the "wrong time?" I'd think that a Midwestern state fair would be the right place and time to be--yet what if it is Beat Whitey Night?

It goes back to the psychological mechanisms at work. People refuse to acknowledge they are, or can be, victims. People want to assume a state of normalcy. There's the bigger picture. The threat is not simply crime, but the overall disintegration of civic life and physical infrastructure under black-ruled polities (from Detroit to Kinshasha). If people had to face up to that reality, they'd have to consider that they are in an existential struggle for survival. No more normal world of 9 to 5 jobs and soccer practice and 500 channels of telescreen. They or their children might have to get out the guns and we know how unpleasant that can be. Better to believe that criminal attacks are aberrations than the standard. Better to not think what happens to white people in black-ruled South Africa or Detroit.

To give another of my usual plugs, James Burnham examines this syndrome in his classic, "Suicide of the West." Modern liberalism invents a fantasy world in which defeats for Western (white) peoples can be placed into the ideological transformation machine and emerge as victories for equality, social justice and a better world.

Anonymous said...

Indiana: Iquise Taylor, 17, is charged with rape, burglary, criminal confinement and strangulation, and he has been waived to adult court.

Rape of 93 year-old.

http://www.wibc.com/news/story.aspx?ID=2030836&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wibc%2FXlKN+%28WIBC+Local+News%29

Californian said...

[continued]

Let's look at this business of the "wrong place at the wrong time:"

Was the "child" [the reverend's term] Coulter at that proverbial "wrong place at the wrong time" when he was shot? You'd think that jumping someone's fence in the middle of the night was the "wrong place at the wrong time." I imagine the race hustling reverends consider this to be the "right place at the right time." Perhaps Coulter was bringing the joys of diversity to Mr. Landry's neighborhood?

What if one were to say that Emmett Till was at the "wrong place at the wrong time?" How would that fly with the race hustlers and DWLs?

It goes back to the political narrative being pushed: white = bad, black = victim.

And: black (thug) life = valuable, white (law abiding citizen) life = expendable.

I was thinking about the media's use of Trayvon Martin's photo as a 12 year old, i.e., a "child." On one level, DWLs really do see blacks as poor little children who need to be protected from "racism." In return, perhaps, those children will then love the DWLs. It's related to the endless number of celebs who line up to get photographed holding black infants, especially from Africa.

"Save the children!" becomes the battlecry.

To this end, white countries pour endless amounts of money and resources, not to mention missionaries, NGOs and bright-eyed idealists, into Africa. And yet what is the return? Africa becomes more dysfunctional every year. We now see South Africa self-destructing even though Amy Biehl gave all her compassion.

The fact that most Africans are not children, and these same Africans have largely wrecked their own countries via economic mismanagement and human rights debacles, is irrelevant. Similarly, that Marshall Coulter was not a child, but quite possibly involved in a criminal act, is irrelevant.

"Save the children!"

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous 12:15 PM said: In most states, you cannot use deadly force unless deadly force is being used against you.,

No offense, but this is not only untrue, it is idiotic. By the time deadly force is being used against you, it is too late. You just have to show a reasonable belief that you were facing an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury. If a negro comes up to you with his paws in his hoodie pockets and says "give it up", you do not have to actually see a gun, and it doesn't even matter if the negro has one. You are justified in believing that there is a gun on you, that it will be used on you, and where applicable, that you could not retreat safely. You are legally justified (in most areas) in putting the negro down.

Anonymous 12:15 PM said: Even if the intruder has attempted to break in, again, force can only be met with force. The law (again deferring to the fact that every state is different) requires that the homeowner take every step to avoid using deadly force-fleeing the house, locking themselves in a room, and, of course, calling 911.

Again, no offense, but this is even more idiotic than your first assertion. I suggest you research "castle doctrine", particularly for your jurisdiction. Most areas do not require you to retreat at all from a forced entry into your home or business. Unlike an encounter in public, a break-in is itself evidence of an evil intent on the part of the perp. Even the few places that do include a duty to retreat, that is only binding if the homeowner can do so safely. Many states now also include statutes that absolve the home/business owner from civil liability.

I can tell you that in PA (philly area), nobody is going ask too many questions if you delete a home invader, the assumption from the outset is that the killing was justified. Probably just some paperwork and carcass removal, maybe the cops will buy you beer after their shift.

Jay Santos said...

Anonymous said...
This is some sick, twisted shit.

http://www.indystar.com/article/20130823/NEWS02/308230049/Teen-detained-connection-rape-93-year-old-Anderson-woman

In an interview, the 93-year old white woman said she thought she would die before this animal was caught.


Not unusual.

Here's a tale of our immigration "system" along with another data point on negro behavior.

Jean Paul Mpanurwa is a 26 year old negro from the Congo. He entered the U.S. in 2004 on a student visa. The only involvement in education that investigators could find was a brief stint with the Clearfield Job Corps in Utah. That organization appears to be an arm of the U.S. Department of Labor. In 2012 our little Congolese immigrant was charged with sexual battery in Utah. After pleading down, being released based on the terrible legacy of slavery or just walking out of jail, this Congolese entrepreneur moves himself to Riverside, Ohio. There he picks up a charge of disorderly conduct and is asked to pay fines on his conviction. But he is free. Free to walk about, free to remain in the U.S. In July of 2013, our little Congolese friend is arrested for raping a 90 year old woman, who, for reasons I find hard to understand, was walking alone on a bike path in Riverside Ohio.

That's one negro immigrant, just one.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Clean-Which law school did you graduate from?

"I can tell you that in PA (philly area), nobody is going ask too many questions if you delete a home invader, the assumption from the outset is that the killing was justified. Probably just some paperwork and carcass removal, maybe the cops will buy you beer after their shift."

OK, tell me your tales from the mean streets of Philly. Cite one case where where someone "deleted" a home invader (even though we're discussing yard invaders) and "nobody asked any questions."

Arguing from emotion and ad hominem attacks are logical fallacies, and referencing "many states" when discussing the law in one particular state is vague. I'd try to get a refund from that law school. Maybe you could "delete" all the instructors that failed you and nobody will ask any questions.

Anonymous said...

Slightly off topic but:

At 5:18 P.M. central time, I was surfing through the channels and was going through the CNN propaganda channels, and on one of the channels, the (naturally) black newsreader was talking about the attacks on and deaths of the Australian baseball player and the 88 year old veteran in Washington state.

He was emphatically stating that neither attack was about race. He then showed a clip of the police chief in whatever Washington state town the attack on the WWII vet took place. The police chief was also emphatically stating that race had nothing to do with race.

Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but I think it is significant that the media and the police are going to such great lengths to say that race had noting to do with either attack.

In the past, the media and police would simply ignore and not address the race angle, but now they feel the need to address the issue.

Is this perhaps because people are finally waking up and getting fed up with black criminality and homicidal tendencies?

As someone said in an earlier post, even liberals on Huffington Post are starting to comment on the racial aspect of these and other crimes.

Dare we hope that a change for the better is in the wind?

Also, have you noticed how racial stories are almost always covered by black anchors? That be rayciss!! Surely white anchors can do the job just as well?

Oh, stupid me. There I go interjecting common sense into the discussion again.

james m said...

Californian wrote:White civilization was not a product of 500 channels of cable. People need to reclaim their reality.
F*ckin A boyo !

Unknown said...

You know what, if you jump over a fence at 2 in the morning you are not just innocently going about your business. And a home-owner is justified to assume the worst and shoot in that situation. I am glad I live in Texas where this would be a no-brainer.

I am not white (my parents came here from India) and I remember one time _I_ got locked out of my house after dark. This was before cell phones, I was in a residential neighborhood a couple of miles from the nearest store. One of my neighbor's lights was on, so I went to the FRONT DOOR, rang the door bell and politely asked if I could use the phone to call a friend. It was not a problem.

If you have a valid reason to talk to someone, you GO TO THE FRONT DOOR and ring the bell or knock. You do NOT jump over their fence.

It is not racist for a home-owner to shoot an intruder late at night. If you do not want to get shot, don't trespass onto their property.

I grew up in New York City and my parents would sometimes drive through other ethnic neighborhoods - Chinatown, Little India, Little Italy, Little Nicaragua, etc. The only time my Dad made sure all the car doors were locked and got nervous was when we had to drive through all black neighborhoods. And we're not racist - I've had black friends. But statistically, black neighborhoods are more dangerous.

There are white criminals and Hispanic criminals and Asian criminals. But statistically, the worst neighborhoods are the black ones. This is just a fact.

Mr.Ken said...

Ok, this guy had to build an 8' fence around his house? And then he is being accused of shooting an ORG for climbing over and threatening his family? WTF? is wrong with this country?

Anonymous said...

When I owned a business in San Francisco, we had a UPS driver that would pick up for us every day. He was a great guy and a real character, so he had many stories to tell. He was black, born in early 40s (so at the time he was in his mid 40s), and he lived in Hunter's Point. His name was Bernie.

While H.P. was never safe, it wasn't Detroit. In the 80s that changed. Bernie owned a home there, and he rented the ground floor out to a small grocery. In those days, the adults still ran things, and as any self-respecting adult male born prior to 1960 knew, if you have teen thugs in your neighborhood, you make their lives miserable. Bernie did that regularly and would tell us of his exploits. In those days, I still thought blacks could improve their lot, so his "frontier" spirit was always welcome in my office.

One day he told us of hearing someone trying to break in to the shop below his bedroom. He grabbed his shotgun, but couldn't find cartridges so he took his .32 pistol instead. He stuck his head out the window and shouted at the teen thug to "desist or be destroyed." The kid looked up at him and told him he'd fuck him with the crowbar he was using to break in. Bernie didn't have to hear any more. He put two bullets into the kid's head. No arrest was made. SFPD understood protecting your life and property in H.P. required that frontier spirit. SFPD in those days was still mostly Italian and Irish males with few affirmatively hired blacks.

A couple days later, some of the thug's buddies drove up to Bernie's house, fired several shots into the store below, and shouted for Bernie to come out. Lucky for him, he was in the backyard with his shotgun -- and this time it was fully loaded. While the yoofs were looking at the 2nd floor window, Bernie walked up from behind the vehicle and emptied all rounds into the car through it's back window. No one survived. Again, no arrest. Again, all who were dispatched were under 18.

Later I confirmed his stories with a police sergeant. This officer was one of our clients (we did a lot of specialized work for the SFPD), so he knew me and was willing to tell the story. He said if there were more guys like Bernie, H.P. might have a future, but he doubted it. I asked him what my chances were with the legal system if I did the same as Bernie. He said "a big fat zero. Don't try it." (No need to wonder why gentrification fails so often.)

Naturally, neither the local black race pimp, "Reverend" Cecil Williams (they're all Revs, eh?), nor the national asswipes like Jackson never uttered a peep about Bernie's self defense tactics despite the four dead babies who dah mommas done loved so.

I'll bet there are still some Bernies in New Orleans. But we'll never hear of them. Landry will be transformed into a racist, rabid dog who did the most unique, bloodthirsty thing possible without being Charlie Manson himself. Now THAT is a tragedy.

Discard said...

Anon at 3:32 PM who noted that the police and media are taking the time to deny that certain murders are racially motivated: Shakespeare had a phrase for those who deny accusations before they are made. "Me thinks he doth protest too much."
Sharp guy he was, to anticipate BRA.

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous 3:19 PM said: Mr. Clean-Which law school did you graduate from?

Arguing from emotion and ad hominem attacks are logical fallacies, and referencing "many states" when discussing the law in one particular state is vague.


There is so much wrong in that last sentence above that I am not even going to touch it.

If interested, please carefully review my last post, including my suggestion for further research.

For you or any other interested reader... your area may offer self-defense or concealed carry classes, which probably reviews the applicable laws for your jurisdiction, and perhaps more importantly, might include a discussion of the practical application of those laws. Many times these classes are taught at least in part by current or former law enforcement officers.

Getting back to the article... I am not familiar with the relevant laws and practices in New Orleans specifically, I don't live there. Based upon what I know about these types of laws generally, it appears that Merritt Landry screwed up. The fact that he is being charged would seem to prove me right.

Anonymous said...

The message is, if you're poor or if you're black, don't climb over that eight foot tall fence and nothing will happen. It's funny how respecting the rights or the property of others tends to smoothe one's progress through life.

Mike James

Mr. Rational said...

it appears that Merritt Landry screwed up. The fact that he is being charged would seem to prove me right.

You mean, he shot a Black criminal when we have a Black president and Black attorney general... while being not-Black?  Because that's all George Zimmerman did.

Anonymous said...

RE,
WTF? is wrong with this country?

The contention of PK is that USA is PC.

GET IT????

Mr. Clean said...

Mr. Rational said: You mean, he shot a Black criminal when we have a Black president and Black attorney general... while being not-Black? Because that's all George Zimmerman did.

Zimmerman was attacked, pinned, and was having his head slammed into concrete. He was also in danger of being disarmed and having his weapon used against him. Both these facts point to an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Florida didn't require it, but Zimmerman couldn't have retreated even if he had wanted to. He should have never been charged.

With Landry, the police are saying that he shot the unarmed negro from some 30 feet away, the negro was not trying to break into the home, and Landry's claim that he fired after the negro reached for something is being contradicted by a witness. In short, the police believe that Landry was not in danger, but (understandably) shot the negro for trespassing and property crime. Use of force under these circumstances would likely get Landry in legal hot water in most jurisdictions in the U.S., regardless of any racial politics.

I hope things work out for him.

Anonymous said...

Rather than debate right-to-shoot here, I'd recommend checking with Gun Owners of America or the NRA about your state's self-defense laws. They vary by jurisdiction and political climate. Also, if you plan to "carry," join a local gun rights group so you have people on your side if something goes down.

Californian said...

RE:

http://www.indystar.com/article/20130823/NEWS02/308230049/Teen-detained-connection-rape-93-year-old-Anderson-woman


...and...

Jean Paul Mpanurwa is a 26 year old negro from the Congo. ... In July of 2013, our little Congolese friend is arrested for raping a 90 year old woman...


Some questions here:

* Is this a common kind of crime committed by blacks--sexual assaults on the elderly? (Similar crimes have been reported in the rainbow nation of South Africa.)

* Do other races have criminals who perpetrate similar acts? If so, what are the rates?

* Is there a political component here? i.e., it's a way for the "oppressed" to put the "oppressors" in their place?

* Is this type of crime becoming more common in America? i.e., did this sort of thing happen when segregation was in force?

I'd also be interested in seeing the reaction of your average white person. How do they respond to this sort of crime? Do they get up in arms? Or do they put on the ideological blinders because they don't wanna be (ooooh!) "racist?"

Oh well, can't be important because there are 500 channels of TV to watch...

Anonymous said...

Mr.Ken said...Ok, this guy had to build an 8' fence around his house? And then he is being accused of shooting an ORG for climbing over and threatening his family? WTF? is wrong with this country?

What's wrong with this country? It's simple: BRA.

Californian said...

Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but I think it is significant that the media and the police are going to such great lengths to say that race had noting to do with either attack.

In the past, the media and police would simply ignore and not address the race angle, but now they feel the need to address the issue.


It's like asking, "Do you still beat your wife/husband?" The more they state it in a negative manner, the more they give validity to the racial angle.


Is this perhaps because people are finally waking up and getting fed up with black criminality and homicidal tendencies?

Yes.

Look at how infowar ops on the Internet are spreading the "word" about race reality. Bear in mind the mainstream news media has been on the decline owing to people switching to the Internet. To some degree, the MSM is flailing about, trying to deal with this.

We need to keep up the pressure.

Anonymous said...

where are the white leaders when whites are being murdered by groids? like the innocent baby shot in Georgia ...why aren't there white crowds demanding justice for that poor innocent child ?

Indeed.

Most white "leaders" are worshiping at the church of MLK, or prancing about in their Trayvon Brand Hoodies(tm).

New leaders are needed.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous:
Later I confirmed his stories with a police sergeant. This officer was one of our clients (we did a lot of specialized work for the SFPD), so he knew me and was willing to tell the story. He said if there were more guys like Bernie, H.P. might have a future, but he doubted it. I asked him what my chances were with the legal system if I did the same as Bernie. He said "a big fat zero. Don't try it." (No need to wonder why gentrification fails so often.)

Naturally, neither the local black race pimp, "Reverend" Cecil Williams (they're all Revs, eh?), nor the national asswipes like Jackson never uttered a peep about Bernie's self defense tactics despite the four dead babies who dah mommas done loved so.

I'll bet there are still some Bernies in New Orleans. But we'll never hear of them. Landry will be transformed into a racist, rabid dog who did the most unique, bloodthirsty thing possible without being Charlie Manson himself. Now THAT is a tragedy.


That was a very interesting tale from San Francisco of the 1980s, Anon. The telling thing was what the police sergeant told you when you asked if someone like yourself could do what Bernie did. The so-called "double-standard" (it's actually a single standard) was already in place by the 1980s.

Why does the Ministry of Truth still have this vast power? Why does the Huffington Post - a particularly sordid menu of Marxist lies, gold-painted turds, and finest vintage of the Rev. Jones' grape-drank, have a readership which is many times that of this site? The obvious, Occam's butterknife explanation, which Whiskey likes to mention all the time, is that the majority of whites actually believe in this massive system of lies. This is one of the reasons some of his here are constantly stating the need to stop feeding the system which enables all of this - which (as you pointed out) was already well entrenched even in the 1980s.

Californian said...

Busy day for me on SBPDL!

Thats why we've seen the elite blacks on TV in total solidarity with Trayvon Martin. Every damned last one of them has some Trayvons in the family and they would rather see an innocent white person murdered by their Trayvon than protect the innocent.


Back when I was an undergrad, I took a modern African history class (about the continent of Africa, not the Africa in America). This was at the time the anti-apartheid movement was kicking into high gear. Somebody asked a question that went like this: "White people are opposed to apartheid because South African whites oppress blacks. Why there is no similar black protest against black-run countries which oppress everybody?"

The response (from a black activist) was: "We blacks stand in solidarity with other blacks globally!"

i.e., for blacks it is not about "democracy" or "equality" or even "anti-racism." Politics are purely about pushing black interests. One uses slogans such as "equality" to gain power, but once that power has been seized, blacks put the boot in on everybody. Their objective is to be the top dog. If white people are dumb enough to fall for the slogans...well, more fool them!

Now, while one might not like black-run polities, one can show some grudging respect for their leaders. They understand their racial interests and promote them. Compare that to white "leaders" who take every opportunity to grovel before the gods of BRA. Or DWLs who invent ideological delusions to rationalize black malfeasance. Or too many white consumers who tune in to 500 channels of "Oprah" and "The Help" and college football.

Is it any wonder that blacks know they can get away with flashmobs, or shooting white infants in their strollers, or farm murders in SA? They can trash major American cities and have YT running in to bail them out. You can say this about blacks, they do have a healthy understanding of their racial interests.

Question: why don't white people?

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous 10:53 AM said: Rather than debate right-to-shoot here, I'd recommend checking with Gun Owners of America or the NRA about your state's self-defense laws. They vary by jurisdiction and political climate. Also, if you plan to "carry," join a local gun rights group so you have people on your side if something goes down.

I certainly agree that folks should verify the gun and self-defense laws for their particular jurisdictions. I don't believe GOA or NRA are going to have anything more than summary (if that) information on use-of-force laws.... they focus more on the gun laws (purchase, possession, carry, etc.).

Gun laws tend to be more black and white... something is illegal or it is not. Self-defense situations can be highly subjective and case-specific. Many times, they hinge on the reasonableness of a person's actions based upon what that person could have reasonably believed at the time.

Melanie said...

Enough of this tired old canard already. Not only most Whites don't "worship" blacks but those same blacks are nowhere as athletics and as STRONG as Whites in many more other WORLD sports (e.g., SOCCER, tennis, rugby, hockey, weightlifting, swimming, gymnastics, pole vault, javelin throw, shot put, hammer throw, discus throw, triathlon, rowing, volleyball, handball, wrestling, MMA, judo, cycling, auto racing and on and on).



Thank you, thank you, thank you! I am sick to death of hearing about negro's alleged superior athletic prowess when there are app 5 or 6 sports in which they excel, and even in football, most quarterbacks are white. There is "Cablasian" Tiger Woods who excels in golf, and two black trannies, who play against women, who have excelled in tennis. Other than that, there is a whole world of sport in which blacks (or anyone except whites for that matter) have left absolutely no mark.


It's like that other maddenng canard that blacks are the better dances. Sure, they can shake their rear ends, bump and grind like strippers, and make such movements as animals make in their matng rituals, but when it comes to real dancing requiring skill, years of practice and discipline, and learning routines (rather than making it up as they go along), whites set the standard. Even in tap, which blacks clam to own, the best was Fred Astaire, who brought elegance and finesse to the style, which no negro could ever do. And every single celebrated female tap dancer is white-Eleanor Powell, Ann Miller, Vera-Ellen, Gwen Verdon, etc, and every one of them was also accmplished in other styles, such as ballet.


And give me a Frank Sinatra or almost any opera singer everytime over the caterwaulng which is the "black style" of singing, and don't even cRap into the conversation-it requires no musical talent of any kind.


As for Hendrix, guitarists such as John McLaughlin, Steve Howe, Al di Meola, and Paco de Lucia could play rings around him.

Californian said...

Bogolyubski said...
That was a very interesting tale from San Francisco of the 1980s, Anon. The telling thing was what the police sergeant told you when you asked if someone like yourself could do what Bernie did. The so-called "double-standard" (it's actually a single standard) was already in place by the 1980s.


The first time I heard the term "politically correct" was in 1989. This was after eight years of Ronald Reagan, Morning in America, and the Triumph of Conservatism(tm).

Here's one incident from that time:

I was working with a rightwing youth activist who had a fairly good understanding of the racial issue. He was something of an intellectual, though he often took it to the streets, and was involved in what would today be considered alternative right bands and recording.

Anyway, I brought up the point about why, if "racism" is so bad, do blacks have all sorts of organizations dedicating to promoting black interests. Why were there no similar white organizations? He commented--ironically--that the party line was: "White people do not need such organizations but blacks do because of centuries of oppression, etc., etc."

Thing is, even at the highpoint of the Reagan Revolution, what PK terms "BRA" was well entrenched. And the conservatives were doing nothing to fight it. For example, the GOP could have pushed through some kind of constitutional amendment banning affirmative action. This was at a time when white people were in the clear majority in the USA, when there was a conservative infrastructure in place, when groups like YAF could still be found on campuses trying to take on the system.

Lights, camera...no action!

It was really up to the outliers on the right to promote white interests, like this activist. But there was no support from mainstream conservatism. This is all the more odd since if they had ended AA, and black studies, and any number of federal programs, they would also have undercut both the minority and liberal sectors of the voters. Conservatives could have had their permanent majority.

Then again, the Reagan era was the beginning of the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, Republicans like Dick Lugar supporting sanctions on South Africa, and Bush's declaration of a New World Order.

Thoughts?

Bogolyubski said...

Californian asks THE question:

Question: why don't white people?

There are a number of theories offered about the reason for this, ranging from flouride in the water (I suppose), to "liberalism", to financial control by a hostile elite (the elite really does now control practically all wealth in the country), to Christianity or the abandonment thereof, to innate altruistic tendencies of whites - exacerbated by unprecedented prosperity.

The only thing I can offer with a fair degree of confidence is that this type of what amounts to a mass suicide by an entire race has never been seen anywhere before in history. There really is no precedent for it. Many place the start of this in the 1960s, but it was there long before. The unleashing of the Great War of a century ago marked the first serious outbreak of what could be termed our spiritual crisis as a people. Even so, there were signs of a problem before. The behavior of abolitionist whites over the issue of slavery serves as one example: With federal armies occupying much of the former confederacy, many abolitionist ministers went south to essentially loot the property of southern whites and to whip up black mobs against them. Nearly all of these traitors were Christians, by the way - who openly advocated all manner of wickedness be done to their fellow Christians in the name of equality. This suggests that the real object of their worship was equality, much like the French armies who depopulated the Vendée region of their country in the wake of the revolution. Nearly all of what identifies itself as Christianity today now worships the idol of equality - a total abstraction which really does not even exist in nature.

Bogolyubski said...

Californian:
Thing is, even at the highpoint of the Reagan Revolution, what PK terms "BRA" was well entrenched. And the conservatives were doing nothing to fight it. For example, the GOP could have pushed through some kind of constitutional amendment banning affirmative action. This was at a time when white people were in the clear majority in the USA, when there was a conservative infrastructure in place, when groups like YAF could still be found on campuses trying to take on the system.

Interesting observation. It's true and there's an even worse part: The Supreme Court basically gutted racial preferences in a series of decisions in the 1980s. These decisions were all undone with the 1990 revision of the civil rights act, which enshrined the concept of "disparate impact". Before then, the usual suspects actually had to prove there was discrimination based upon race to win in court. Only designated protected groups are allowed to sue under the "disparate impact" doctrine, which is why most lawsuits brought by whites for discrimination are summarily dismissed. The Republicans in Congress enabled the passage of the law and George Herbert Walker Bush (Repuke extraordinaire) signed it into law. Once again, it's worth noting that blacks could not have enacted this on their own. The entire white power structure pushed it through.

Anonymous said...

@Bogolyubski - August 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM

Why do they have this power? They hate us. Blacks hate White people just because. Jews hate the gentile because they believe every non-Jew they see would start a pogrom if given half a chance. DWLs hate us because it's fashionable.

As Orwell noted, hate is much more vital than love. If you only see politics as a disagreement about how to fix things, you'll never kill anyone. If you see it as a struggle between good and evil as little children do, there will be no boogeyman that can't be eliminated for the good of all.

They hate us. Never forget that.

Anonymous said...

Just one of many reasons I'm glad to be a Pennsylvanian, shoot first keep walking it's all good :D