From the Chronicles of Fulton County comes a tale of a Black teenager refusing to cooperate with the police (a white police officer), who then was forced to shoot him in an act of self-defense. This action took place in predominately Black South Fulton County (Union City, a town that is roughly 75 percent Black and home to the famously empty Union Station Mall -- a failed monument to consumerism when the immutable law of Visible Black Hand of Economics strikes).
The Black kid died. A Fulton County Grand Jury exonerated the white cop of any wrong-doing. The Black community was enraged. Justice, after all, must be served and Black people are - of course - entirely innocent of any crime in America (especially one they committed) and will be vigorously defended by the Black community. CBS Atlanta reports:
State Senator Vincent Fort, (D-Atlanta), will hand-deliver a letter to the U.S. Attorney's Office Wednesday requesting a federal investigation into the shooting death of Ariston Waiters, 19.Ask and you shall receive with Eric "My People" Holder's Department of Justice assigning an attorney to probe this obvious case of racial bigotry. The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports:
Luther Lewis, a Union City police officer, killed Waiters in December while responding to a fight. A grand jury last week found Lewis did nothing wrong and did not indict him.
"We've got to send that message loud and clear, so it will reverberate from Union City to this place that it ain't over yet!" declared Fort shortly after the grand jury's decision.
Lewis and Waiters ended up in a scuffle, even though witnesses said Waiters had nothing to do with the fight Lewis was responding to. Waiters was shot twice in the back. Lewis said he had no choice because Waiters grabbed his weapon.
"I did not get out of bed that morning to find Ariston Waiters to shoot him. I did not come to work that day to change my life forever," Lewis told CBS Atlanta.
Waiters' supporters called Lewis a "murderer" and said he racially-profiled.
Federal investigators are taking on the case of the the Union City teen shot and killed by police last December.
"The U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI will look in to the shooting death of Ariston Waiters to determine whether any federal laws were violated," Executive Assistant U.S. Attorney Charysse Alexander told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Wednesday.
The decision was made following an impromptu meeting between U.S. Attorney Sally Quillian Yates and state Sen. Vincent D. Fort (D-Atlanta) late Wednesday morning.
Fort was accompanied by Waiters' mother, Freda Waiters, her attorney Mawuli Mel Davis, several family members and community activists as they gathered to deliver a letter to Yates requesting her aid in the case.
"It was an illegal arrest," Fort told the AJC following the meeting. "Even [Fulton County District Attorney] Paul Howard said Ariston never should've been arrested."It should be obvious to anyone reading this now what is happening in America. A Black kid in South Fulton is dead, shot by a white cop because he refused to cooperate with the police. An elected Black official dares to assert that race played a factor in the shooting, though Black people are probably responsible for 98 percent of the crime in Union City (after all, they are 75 percent of the city).
Will it be illegal to defend yourself from Black people in the near future? Just ask George Zimmerman, who sits in a jail cell in Stanford, Florida.
Just ask Officer Luther Lewis, whose life will now come under scrutiny for daring to defend himself while arresting a Black reprobate.
90 comments:
There us a saying in the south:
"Shoot, Shovel. Shut-up"
IF you are in a place where that can't work, then run.
Unless you have the estimated 2,000,000 it takes to defend yourself from a murder 2 charge like Zimmerman.
We are so fucked.
From what I've heard this upstanding citizen had warrants out for him at that time of this incident.
-Ulick Varange
It should be interesting to see how various defenders of the 2nd Amendment respond to this sort of thing. Will the NRA, the Libertarian Party, the erstwhile gun lobby, all stand up in favor of citizens who shoot in self defense? Or will they cave in before BRA?
The only thing that matters to these racebaiters is that a black is dead at the hands of a white.
Nothing else is necessary to convict, in their eyes.
Doesn't matter if it's St. Trayvon sneaking up on Zimmerman to turn a previously safe "confrontation" into a life and death struggle by suckerpunching and attacking the guy (forcing him to defend his life), or it's yet another black that can't simply follow instructions from an officer of the law (and ends up shot for it).
It's almost as if this type of violence just falls from the sky on po' black peoples' heads. At least, that's what the morons who want to play the race card believe. /rolls eyes.
Speaking from experience, it's damn near illegal to defend the act in any on-line forum.
two shots in the back? that's a hard sell for self-defense, in this case i can't really blame anyone for being skeptical.
pigs do abuse their power, you know? against both whites and blacks. remember kelly thomas?
Excuse me, but isn't this constant hue and cry of "White Person X racially profiled Black Person Y," in and of itself, also racial profiling?
After all, the way it has been coming across lately, ALL white people racially profile ALL black people, ALL THE TIME - so blacks are doing exactly what they are accusing whites of doing.
Excuse me, but isn't this constant hue and cry of "White Person X racially profiled Black Person Y," in and of itself, also racial profiling?
After all, the way it has been coming across lately, ALL white people racially profile ALL black people, ALL THE TIME - so blacks are doing exactly what they are accusing whites of doing.
It is ALREADY illegal to defend yourself against Blacks, this much is known and results in the passivity and avoidance Whites exhibit in the face of Black aggression. Both Whites and Black alike KNOW the police will come to arrest ... the White guys. For defending themselves.
Officer Luther will find few White defenders. Given that the police job is to enforce the unwritten laws against Whites. Sadly.
The ultimate outcome of course is a response like Prohibition. Everyone will simply defend themselves outside a law and legal system they hold in absolute contempt. Defend and run like bathtub gin in the 1920's. Facial recognition, gait recognition video cameras and computers being defeated by a uniform of hoodies and baseball caps and sunglasses, if nothing else adopting the guise of predators to blend in. Like butterflies aping the toxic cousins with colorful patterns. "Don't eat me! I'm poisonous."
My guess is that BRA is going down, and the Reds are getting desperate. They're going to lose.
The short answer is: Yes. The police will not end up being the ones for whom self-defense is outlawed. Although the white officer in this case might be railroaded a la Zimmerman, those who run BRA want police to have carte blache to kill anyone for any reason. The plan is to vastly increase the number of armed groids in federal uniform under the DHS domestic security force. As in South Africa, the badge-gang groids will be working hand-in-glove with the more violent forces in the zebra intifada to rack up white corpses and terrorize whites generally. One of the keys to this is to destroy the legal concept of self-defense, which is already the case in many white-majority countries, accompanied by gun control.
The whole network funded by the usual suspects has been prepared in advance for the Martyrdumb of St. Ashtrayvon roadshow, which has served as a great catalyst. Mayah Bloomberg (another billionaire supporter of BRA - except in his own neighborhood of course) has funded a number of groups whose expressed objective is to overturn every single 'castle-doctrine' and 'stand-your-ground' statute in the country. It's not just Bloombrain (a well-known anti second amendment totalitarian), but numerous other deep-pockets who've been some of the principal bulwarks of support for BRA. Pennsylvania's 'stand-your-ground' law was struck down by a black-robed mullah just last week. It's the first domino. There are other cases pending.
Republicans under Boehner and Eric Cantor have already caved on the whole "Fast and Furious" scandal, which could have been used fairly effectively to get rid of Eric "My People" Holder and some of his more egregious associates in the DOJ. Interesting behavior form the so-called "opposition party" no? This is why I keep pointing out the "greater enemy" and "lesser enemy" concept. BRA is not the same as ABRA. Those who support and enable BRA are the ones who need to be ruined, bankrupted, boycotted, etc. - by any and all means available.
A fair portion of south Fulton has been trying to join Coweta County for decades too. The mostly rural white areas just 40 minutes south of Atlanta pay for services that they lack, like paved roads, city water and sewage, etc...
He be tryin' to subject natural athlete Obama owns this motherfucker. to YT law. Dats rayciss'.
He be tryin' to subject natural athlete to YT laws. Dats rayciss'. Obama owns this motherfucker.
"refusing to cooperate"?
That makes it sound he just didn't want to answer a question or take a sobriety test or something.
In actuality, he ran from the scene of a shooting and then once stopped, wrestled with an officer and grabbed his gun.
These knee-grows are going to talk themselves into an early grave! Now only the most blind and dumb Liberals could ignore the Reason for Jim Crow and Segregation.
They won't allow Re-Segregation, so other more permanent Solutions to this problem are going to have to be implemented...
They are demons. They are trying their damnedest to drag us down to Hell with them.
How do escape their clutches once and for all?
(N.Ga.)-- I believe it's alredy illegal. There is no doubt in my mind. From Obamas executive order on the protection of federal employees, all the way down to the lowest level street thug. They know it too. Whites are the only ones who don't seem to get it. It's all part of a much bigger picture.
As Leornard Pitts put it, in a column he wrote about a white couple who were raped and murdered by five black assailants in Knoxville Tenn. In his column addressing the murders, Pitts wrote, "I am unkindly disposed toward the crackpots, incendiaries and flat-out racists who have chosen this tragedy upon which to take an obscene and ludicrous stand. I have four words for them and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized: Cry me a river." (Just replace the “white Americans” with 'Black Undertow”, and i believe that about sums it up, in my opinion.
(N.Ga.)--A part of “Leonard Pitts” rants & raves in another article on the Martin case.
That no such alternate possibilities seem to have occurred to Zimmerman for even an instant suggests the degree to which we as a people have grown comfortable with the belief that black is crime and crime is black. Nor are African Americans immune to the effects of that invidious formulation.
Indeed, the dirty little secret of the Martin killing is that Zimmerman could easily have been black. True, a black Zimmerman probably would not have been sent home by prosecutors who declined to press charges — whiteness still has its privileges — but otherwise, yes. It is entirely possible.
Why not? Blacks watch the same TV news as anyone else. We internalize the same message. We drink the same poison.
Why else do you think black folk flinch when the mug shot goes up on television, hoping the face will not be brown — as if we bore some communal responsibility for the suspect’s misdeeds? Why else do you think so much of our music is a song of violence and crime? Why else, when I ask an auditorium full of black kids how frequently the individual who murders a white person is black, do they figure it at 75 percent? Why else are they shocked to hear it’s only 13?
At some subterranean level, we — African Americans — still believe the garbage of innate criminality we have so assiduously been fed, and struggle with hating ourselves, as America long ago taught us to do. We struggle with it, yet we know better from firsthand, man-in-the-mirror experience. So how much harder is the struggle for white folks?
It already is. Here in Baltimore black officers will not take white complaints seriously and will defend via color their brothers in crime. It's a racket.
This is known to all but the most liberal of whites. Who still think a uniform
And badge mean something. They find out the hard way when we have 500 youths "gathering" aka rioting.
Always the skin is first. Has there been a black in power that did not see race first?
White have a very short time to wake up if not we will be in the cannibal's pot.
"white North Fulton pays - in some estimates - 80 percent of the taxes that go to sustain all of Fulton County) "
And this is just about to go global if we don't act now.
We about to pay for the entire third-world black population with Agenda 21 from the UN. Have you seen this Paul? The preamble outlines the plan for the transfer of wealth from white western countries to the third-world.
I am emailing my senators today. Obama wants to approve this without the American people knowing.
http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_01.shtml
From the preamble:
1.4. The developmental and environmental objectives of Agenda 21 will require a substantial flow of new and additional financial resources to developing countries, in order to cover the incremental costs for the actions they have to undertake to deal with global environmental problems and to accelerate sustainable development. Financial resources are also required for strengthening the capacity of international institutions for the implementation of Agenda 21. An indicative order-of-magnitude assessment of costs is included in each of the programme areas. This assessment will need to be examined and refined by the relevant implementing agencies and organizations.
Hillary Clinton supports the UN Small Arms Treaty, which will ensure that we can not defend ourselves:
http://www.nagr.org/UN_lp_survey2.aspx?pid=txt2&gclid=CKzf_vOLvLACFQYKKgodiWLhqA
What is wrong with these people??
first thing first! how about the brother in the red shirt behind the elected whine-bag! he is so intense, almost hanging on every word. the redshirt dude has to repeat the words right after they come out of the elected official's mouth. i bet if that community organizer was that intense on his book studies in high school he would be running the nearest acorn branch. you can just see the stupid on his brain. why is it in america that every time some chimp gets killed by a white citizen/cop these bastards must cry racism or my favorite profiling. these black bastards won't quit and you know what neither will i.(meaning i'll call them out for what they are. my message to the negroes in this land they can't stand-STOP CRYING, AND START TRYING! and to all my god's chosen people(meaning whites) WE MUST UNITE,TO WIN THIS FIGHT!!! keep your heads up and your eyes open white america and godspeed!!!
Speaking from experience, it's damn near illegal to defend the act in any on-line forum.
June 6, 2012 10:18 PM
Anonymous said...
two shots in the back? that's a hard sell for self-defense, in this case i can't really blame anyone for being skeptical.
pigs do abuse their power, you know? against both whites and blacks. remember kelly thomas?
_____________________________
"Pigs?" You some kind of 1960's retread? You must be, because you automatically assume the cop was wrong. That crap was popular back then.
Shut your fucking face, hippie. The adults are talking.
Someone had a keen sense of humour when they named the infant Waiters. Ariston is a whitegoods manufacturer.
Thank goodness treaties do not trump the Constitution.
One of the reasons Obummer has to go is because the 2nd Amendment hangs by a 5-4 thread.
That's what the Zimmerman case is about, to hold up to the public an example of what happens to those who try to stand up to predatory blacks. It's to terrorize whites and anybody else who may get ideas about defending themselves. A public lynching to send a message. This case is a continuance of that.
It's all about race with blacks, and nothing else. It's their group against all others; what's right or fair plays no role.
Funny how race is always instantaneously said to be a factor in any crime/self defense of a White on a Black, (or a White Hispanic on a Black) but any time it's Black on White, the police departments and media promptly (and predictably) insist that it's just "random."
Will it soon be illegal to defend yourself from Blacks? Sounds like it already is. I daresay that it will eventually be illegal to say "no" to them.
There's a money motive here also of wrongful death. It's like hitting the lottery for a black. My baby was shot by de po leese. I is rich.
The black politician gets lots of publicity. Not a sound from any White politican, they know where their place is, under the desk.
I notice on the police shows on TV the place a cop's pistol stays is in his holster even in the dark searching for some black criminal.
This case won't end until that cops found guilty of something.
Blacks have pretty much destroyed the rule of law and sooner or later it's going to be every person for their self.
Why any White would WANT to be in Law Enforcement in an area with 20% or more Minority population is a mystery to me.
Statistically, it's just a matter of time.
I've given up on America.
Our family is preparing to rebuild after the collapse.
I'm stunned: I actually agree with Whiskey's well-written comment, about Whites' vain attempts to blend-in and somehow avoid black hostility and criminality because, to defend oneself, is already patently illegal.
Paul, for the love of God, don't allow the mulatto Nickrit to colonize this site, whether under his own handle or that of "anonymous" as today. And, in the interest of informing other regulars here, please don't delete this comment. He twists every truth and statistical reality of black criminality and dysfunction into maudlin self pity ("we - African Americans - still believe the garbage of innate criminality we so assiduously have been fed, and struggle with hating ourselves, as America long ago taught us to do.") He turns every thread(he's ruined OneSTDV)into a forum on his "expert" and "with it" experiences to enlighten the ignorant racists he chooses to troll.
Please spare us from his drivel.
Bogolyubski said...
Excellent and SPOT ON! O-Boy wants his Civilian Army and he can get it by using the Police/Military/Security as long as they are of the right color!
I advise you to load your weapons with gloves, so as to not put fingerprints on the cartridges (a new tech just developed). You have to assume that a groid is going to attack near a camera, unless it is in your house or Apartment (7-11, Gas Station, Parking lot). Decide now how you would handle it. Fleeing in terror for fear of unseen "accomplices" or belief that you "missed and the perp is going to get up" is not a crime, running so as not to get caught, is. Decide Now.
If in home:
1. Get Wife or girlfriend holding a baby or dressed in robe out in front of cameras. She does not have to say anything, just sob incoherently and repeat "how awful" and "He was going to kill us". REMEMBER, Da BabyMomma is SURE going to get in front of the cameras, you must be proactive so that people understand whom was attacking whom. If they are only going to consider the racial aspects of this, then make sure the public has an image in their minds that can counter "He Was a goooood Boy who dinnt do nuffings". Ashtrayvons parents were very clever with the old pictures and the carefully crafted storyline while leaving out the drugs, expulsion, tattoos. Review your Facebook/ Public Persona in the light of race.
2. If you must shoot, shoot so that there is only One side to the story. Get me?
3. Don't say anything to Police, lawyer up at once. I mean don't even answer when they say "What happened" or "Good Evening". "I need to speak to a lawyer" is the only thing you say.
4. Order, right now, the book "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross. Available from Amazon.
None of this is foolproof. Zimmerman had/did: Black relatives, defended a black man FROM a police officer, cooperated in every way, told the absolute truth so that all physical evidence was consistent and could be verified, had broken bones, had his wounds photographed at the scene, called the police himself, had witnesses verify his story, only shot one shot, didn't flee, was cooperative and saddened by having to shoot, has a sympathetic and educated family, etc.
None of it helped him with the groids. None.
As to the NRA, the NRA should not get involved any more than I want the NAACP involved.
This has been going on for sometime now. Since the Rodney King case no non black is allowed to win a physical confrontation with a black. This is doubly true if the person confronting the black is a White Law Enforcement Officer. So self defense or doing your job is longer justification in any action with a black.
Nobody is suggesting that every black person is a criminal. We're pointing out that violent crime is committed at a rate of about 3 or even 4 to 1 by black people over whites. What we have a problem with is the fact that black people with a grasp of the language who are willing to admit that there's an issue in your community still blame white people for the problem to lazily excuse yourselves from doing anything about it. Now that your community's dirty little secret isn't so secret and the violence is spilling over into communities where we take responsibility for our children and our actions, the poverty pimps and race hustlers that represent you in the media are trying desperately to shift the blame for black crime and appropriate white response to it into an issue that obscures the fact that they've been asleep at the wheel of the caddy you bought them and have done less to improve your lives in the last forty years than I do every day by going to work and paying into the welfare system that keeps your community alive in the first place. Black people in America have been given every advantage possible and still choose to live in a cesspool of blight and violence. Either clean it up yourselves or shut your mouths when it spills over into our communities and we deal with it. Even your most delusional liberal apologists wouldn't want to live near your bullshit. Why should we have to?
The numbers don't lie. People are waking up. Those of us who can see are not going to be railroaded for defending our families from crime and criminals that you give a free pass to in your community. Live by the gun, die by the gun we understand. Live by the negro, die by the negro we just won't accept.
Sybrina (uhm...spelling?) Fulton has taken time off from "work" to tour the world making money. She had kicked Trayvon out da house most likely after he had become violent with HER. Thats why she made the comment about it being an "accident".(Quickly tretracted by the lawyer-pimp Crump.)They rae savages.This is the BEST thing thats ever happened to her;she missess that good for nothing ape not at all.
In metro Atlanta, North Fulton residents have incorporated in order to try and escape the confiscatory taxation and lack of services that the black controlled county governments inflicts upon them. Same with black controlled Dekalb County with the formation of the new city of Dunwoody and the proposed incorporation of Brookhaven. Well, the Georgia Legislative Black Caucus believes that it is unconsitutional for whites to attempt to protect themselves from corrupt and incompetent Black governments, and are bringing lawsuits alleging violations of the Voting Rights Act, and the 14th and 15th amendments. Apparently Blacks think we have a constitutional duty to sit still while being fleeced.
just remember the simpson case and the way the end of that trial went! then throw the rodey king verdict in that same conversation and we all know the diffrence of paid out insurance claims. wow man it's like most have said "every man/woman for themselves. i'm just worried for the white elderly.
Order, right now, the book "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross. Available from Amazon.
Excellent book. I bought a copy and ended up reading it practically in one sitting. Ross does not pull any punches--and the book pulls plenty of triggers. Also, lots of good info on tactics.
Zimmerman had/did: Black relatives, defended a black man FROM a police officer,
This is a point that DWLs and others reading this website who do not buy into race realism might consider: that all of your pro-black activism, all of your marching in solidarity, all your reciting of the party line that race-is-just-a-construct, will count for nothing in the event that you have a run-in with a black and dare defend yourself. You will be the next on BRA's list of people to be railroaded. Heck, all you need do is make a casual un-PC remark in an email or tweet and you too will be cast into the outer darkness.
And if you are a DWL reading this, you might consider BRA's lack of loyalty towards whites like yourself, and then question why you would support a system which will do everything in its power to destroy you should you cross the line. Given this, perhaps DWLs can tell us why they continue to support BRA.
Clearly self-parody is not one of the things black people don't like. They seem to be really into it.
As things get worse and worse, more and more are waking up. I'm finding that even students at my university are waking up to how liberal politics/economics is very likely to leave them without a job and possibly in debt when it's all said and done. Kids are also waking up to the fact (partly thank to YT) scholarships and grants are few and far between in the face of minority (un)competition.
At work every single person I work with has blue eyes. Every single one of us is already awake (even before I started and the guys were glad I was already on board), especially us grunts who do the bulk of the work. One of the benefits to working with all blue-eyed people (you brown eyes are cool too, it's just a fluke where I work!) is that we all show up on time, get the job done and there is NO drama whatsoever.
~~~~~We've done work on a few homes owned by black families and their houses are always a pigsty. We have to be extra careful not to touch or damage anything and take pictures of our work (we do not have to do this for White customers) to prove that we did it and cleaned up well, because 50% of the time they DO complain and are always looking to blame someone and/or get a refund/freebee.
One of these days I can see us doing work in one of the surrounding town's ghetto pockets and there being an incident, probably not from the homeowner, but likely from a thug/group of thugs trying to steal tools or something. I already know how potentially bad things could turn out, and of course if we try to defend ourselves we'll get blamed, I'm sure of it.
Living in a liberal state doesn't help much, but 2/3rds of Whites are already conservative, it's the other 1/3rd that keeps costing us elections and political influence. People are already starting to wake up to black crime. One of our delegates recently mentioned that it was BLACK crime terrorizing downtown Baltimore and yesterday a State Senator got on board (though shied away from the race aspect) and called for state troopers to patrol Baltimore. We can only see how that goes, if it goes.
Since the Rodney King case no non black is allowed to win a physical confrontation with a black.
No, there was the man on the bicycle in Reading last January who shot 2 out of 3 of the Black thugs who attacked him, killing 1. But a 65-yr-old attacked by a gang is too sympathetic, so the media dropped it while looking for someone they could make out to be a villian.
MuayTyson: Whites have a very short time to wake up if not we will be in the cannibal's pot.
We already are in the cannibal's pot. As yet, the rate of climb in temperature has not been enough to wake up the frog.
Trust impatient, idiotic Blacks to stoke the fire too quickly and scald their erstwhile dinner into awareness.
Midwestern: What is wrong with these people??
Nothing that cannot be cured by a sufficiently irate public.
Anon (6/7, 2012 7:18 AM): Blacks have pretty much destroyed the rule of law…
I guess they'll just have to get a taste of how that works out for them.
After all, the only thing protecting Blacks right now is the law. Were they stripped of their protected species status outraged Whites might start hunting Black criminals for sport.
10mm AUTO: 3. Don't say anything to Police, lawyer up at once. I mean don't even answer when they say "What happened" or "Good Evening". "I need to speak to a lawyer" is the only thing you say.
Excellent comment, as usual, 10mm AUTO. The part about getting in front of the cameras is very instructive. If public opinion is going to be charged, get the polarity right.
However, your point number three cannot be stressed enough. If Zimmerman's case did not make it clear enough, then that of officer Luther Lewis should. Cooperating with law enforcement will get you nowhere but a jail cell and the fact that even a police officer now faces this legal lynch mob should make it crystal clear.
Until Obama is thrust from office, this skidmark on humanity's underwear will continue his multi-front assault against White Western civilization.
Ray Scissom: Live by the gun, die by the gun we understand. Live by the negro, die by the negro we just won't accept.
[golf clap]
Quite the eloquent turn of words there, old bean.
I can't believe this hasn't hit the national news yet, but here in Chicago, a pregnant Negress was tasered by the police after ripping her and her boo parked in a handicap spot, were ticketed by the police, then ripped up the ticked and tried to flee the scene.
Jesse and Reverend Al must be slipping, they should have already organized marches and protests for this victim of White oppression
Alert:
Quentin Tarantino is coming out with his latest self-professed "revenge" movie, to be released Christmas 2012.
It's called Django Unchained, and stars Jamie Fox and Leonardo DiCaprio, amongst others.
Remember that Quentin's last real movie, Inglorious Bastards, also had a professed and quite explicit revenge theme.
Anyone want to guess what a 'revenge' movie entitled Django Unchained is about?
I'm quite sure that most of you have guessed correctly.
A slave goes on a rampage killing white plantation owners.
The most memorable quote from the trailer was when Mr Fox utters:
"Kill white folks and they pay you for it? What's not to like?
Check out the trailer.
Racial agitation, aka: murder, is very obviously being purposefully instigated at an institutional level.
For what purpose?
Who is behind it?
This is getting nuts. Be careful out there.
The day they rescind the 2nd Amendment is the day that the thin veneer of civilization hiding the decay of the United States cracks. I've been doing a little research and it seems like the "black mobs" are far more prevalent in places with restrictive gun control laws. Places like Chicago, Philly, Baltimore, D.C., etc. (all with strict gun control laws) seem to be the epicenter for these events. Places like Georgia, Texas, ALabama, and Arizona seem to be largely immune to the black wildings and flash robberies. These places also have very pro gun laws. This is not a coincidence. I saw this comment on WND and I thought I would share it with you :
From Big John : "As far as self-protection, liberalism is a complete failure. Law enforcement is a REACTIVE tool, NOT a proactive one. You cannot rely on law enforcement to save your bacon, or worse, your family's bacon, in bad situations. They will respond ONLY AFTER the damage has been done. Screw that.......
You do NOT see this kind of crap down here in Georgia. If a group of aggrieved africans began rioting, beating and destroying around here, they would be blown to bits in short order, and they know it. There are enough M-4's and M-10's in this neighborhood alone to make complete "Gutter-butter" out of every last one of em.
So as the summer heats up, keep score, folks. Where are these outbreaks of racial Black on white violence erupting; in OUR states where everyone is packing, or in YOURS, where NOBODY but the cops and the criminals are packing? Wanna rely on law enforcement to keep you safe? Good luck with that."
+10 for the new term "Gutter Butter"
I was always of the opinion that "Inglorious BASTERDS" was a satirical riff on the apparent blood thirsty nature of the world's "most historically oppressed ethnicity." To me Tarantino put one over big time on the "vampire squids" by playing on their Nazi sentiments. I have heard from more than one source of "those who shall not be named" calling Inglorious Basterds "Kosher Porn!"
Also, let's remember this is a guy who asked Samuel L. Jackson "Do you see a sign outside my house that says DEAD NIGGER STORAGE? No? That's because storing DEAD NIGGERS ain't my thing." Watch any Tarantino movie (besides Basterds) and he drops more N-bombs in his movies than Jay Z and Kanye at a memphis BBQ combined! I mean how the hell does Tarantino get away with it?
My feelings on Django Unchained! is that it's a big joke, except only Tarantino and "those who can see" will get it!
I can't wait to not watch that. I don't even pirate the magical negro films. I'd bet a thousand dollars that Jamie Foxx has actually had a white dick in his mouth, too. :)
Thank you kindly. I'm constantly in awe of your knowledge and eloquence here and elsewhere. Keep up the good work.
I agree up to the point that you assume that removing Obama will remove the problem. While Obama and Holder are pretty bad, TNB and the unwillingness of the white or black community to address it goes way back. We're headed for hate-speech and thought-crime laws here like they have in Europe whether we elect Obama or not.
They're too busy shooting each other over who makes better instant honkey (and Kool aid) to watch the stove. Rest assured that the pot, water, gas and effort to cook us comes at the hands of stupid white people.
Watching those DWLs fall victim to their own cause will be worth the price of admission to the race war, and their sacrifice will be an even bigger improvement to the state of affairs in America than the defeat of blacks.
If her baby dies, you know the media will be showing photos of the first ultrasound, not the latest one where it's throwing up gang signs and making purple drank out of the amniotic fluid.
Bogolyubski:
"Pennsylvania's 'stand-your-ground' law was struck down by a black-robed mullah just last week."
Not exactly. The key in this case was that the "victim" was stabbed in the back, creating an impression that he may no longer have been a threat. Don't get me wrong, I think its an injustice, but its not the same as the stand-your-ground law being struck down; not entirely, anyway.
I agree with you on what's is happening, but we aren't as far along as you think.
"Republicans under Boehner and Eric Cantor have already caved on the whole 'Fast and Furious' scandal"
Hmm. Odd that Holder appeared before the House TODAY to be further questioned about F/F.
The GOP is at best a temporary ally due to the greater enemy of the Dems, and will need to be brought under control or abandoned, but you do exaggerate.
Anon (6/7 3:18 PM): Racial agitation, aka: murder, is very obviously being purposefully instigated at an institutional level.
For what purpose?
Who is behind it?
The purpose is to incite relatively horizontal class warfare in order to avoid vertical class warfare.
Who wants this? The political and financial elite who have raped this nation's economy and damn well know that they have hell to pay for it if the Middle Class can find a way.
Keeping us busy fighting off Black Undertow and punishing those of us who are successful at it is a primary way of averting, what is for them, much-dreaded vertical class warfare.
Here's something I don't understand: If Martin was being followed by Zimmerman, then why didn't Martin run? A young negro vs a fat Peruvian.
Who would you bet on?
I've been followed a couple of times while walking the negro infested streets of New Orleans. My ass turned a corner or ran like hell. I would have gone to jail if I turned and killed the person following me.
So, as of now, the only argument left for the Martin survivors is this: Travon was defending himself from being followed by a fat Peruvian by beating his head into the concrete.
What ... the ... fuck ... ever. That negro was shot because he was a acting like a nigger. If ever there was a time for a non-negro to use the word nigger, it's now.
Niggers don't think about the value of preserving life at the expense of pride. For them, it's all about face and reputation .. which is BULLSHIT!! AND SAVAGE!!
I'm tired of running, too, but I would rather run than die.
The Senior Engineer
Mr. Rational: "Thank goodness treaties do not trump the Constitution."
The wording of Article VI, Section 2 allows for an "interpretation" that could let a treaty trump the Constitution:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the Unites States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land..."
Now, you and I know that, put into context of what the Founding Fathers were creating, there is no way that they would ever have intended to allow international law or a treaty to have supremacy over the Constitution. But could a liberal who really wants to read into it find it there? Of course.
I don't know of this being addressed in any previous Supreme Court cases.
Fortunately, it takes 2/3 of the Senators to ratify a treaty - not happening unless they can manage to meet with no GOP senators present.
In Massachusetts, a white man was prosecuted for punching and knocking out a white, armed (knife, asp baton) junkie (had heroin on him)who was stealing tools from his truck in his driveway. Later, the man defending himself was brought up on aggravated assault charges since he broke the thieving, armed junkie's jaw with one clean punch. Only after many people protested were the charges finally dropped.
I'm moving from Massachusetts soon! Goodbye high state income tax, goodbye moonbats, goodbye Fauxcahontas!!! Threaten me with a weapon in my new state, I'll put two in the chest and one in the head in a second. You'll be dead before you hit the ground.
You bet 10mm AUTO is (as always) right. We focus on our glorious Second Amendment rights so much that we sometimes overlook the whole Bill of Rights. That Fifth Amendment is great!
Here's a (not brief - but important) review of the right to remain silent. It's worth a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
Ray Scissom: I agree up to the point that you assume that removing Obama will remove the problem. While Obama and Holder are pretty bad, TNB and the unwillingness of the white or black community to address it goes way back. We're headed for hate-speech and thought-crime laws here like they have in Europe whether we elect Obama or not.
Nowhere do I say that ousting Mein Obama is any sort of cure all. It's just that America will have a difficult time surviving another four more years of his no-holds-barred attack on the Constitution.
White America needs some breathing room to rally its spirit and that just ain't gonna happen with BHO in office.
I also agree that the unwillingness of Whites to tackle TNB head on is a bigger problem. Blacks are helpless puppets of their manifest shortcomings. For these birderline retards TNB just comes naturally. While this does not exculpate them one whit, it transfers the onus of identifying and then penalizing TNB over to Those Who Can See.
At this point, Liberals are willfully blind to TNB―and every bit deserve to have their pet apes turn on them―but it also means that it's our job to put a price tag on this chimp out bullsh!t.
Wouldn't it be great if, during some flash mob beating, a van full of Whites with baseball bats pulled up and whaled the living snot out of the Mahogany yoofs?
Its going to take years of intensive, extended session, parking lot therapy to help Blacks finally get past their predisposition for TNB.
The OWS fracas garners all the attention but we all know the GZ vs TM trial will be the real deal when it comes to finding out where things are headed in the USA. I predict if GZ gets convicted and the anti second amendment crowd gets stoked up for more and more confrontations on the issue of self-defense the matter of secession will soon be front and center. The second amendment is the line in the sand. It is the right to life and liberty defined. If these rights are denied then the society is not worth living in.
Were they stripped of their protected species status outraged Whites might start hunting Black criminals for sport.
Sweet Jesus.....Hell yeah getting tired of shooting innocent furry woodland animals, can't wait to give the local homies a gigantic lead enema, somebody buy me a bobcat there's gonna be a lo of digging that needs to be done.
I cannot wait for the day Eric Holder is either removed from office and or charged with multiple offenses ranging from murder to racial hate crime. He is a BLACK eye on the justice system.
Who, in their right mind, would ever become a police officer anymore?
Now, white cops will have to decide between being killed by a black or going to prison for defending themselves from a black.
I think it's about time to put a camera on my gun.
Most White people, law enforcement or civillian licensed to carry a firearm will now have to think hard and long about using that firearm in a confrontaion with negroes. Do I take the chance of being killed or seriously injured or defend myself and face years of criminal and civil court cases and probably million's in legal fees and have my life ruined. Most Police around the country who are in these situations usually are not convicted of any crimianl wrongdoing, but they never go back to being a Police Officer and their lives are forever changed,most going broke from the legal cost of defending themselves.
As long as these lawyers are around to prosecute us for killing their pet thugs, nothing will change.
Thugs are the terrorists, the lawyers and community activists are their supporters. Neither should be given any quarter.
Blacks have pretty much destroyed the rule of law and sooner or later it's going to be every person for their self.
Anonymous @ June 7, 2012 7:18 AM
That's the only way it will change. The System is beyond reform. It must be burned so a new phoenix will rise from the ashes.
I don't believe it will die with a bang, but a series of loud whimpers. Bit by bit, it will contract until it implodes.
Anonymous said...
The OWS fracas garners all the attention but we all know the GZ vs TM trial will be the real deal when it comes to finding out where things are headed in the USA. I predict if GZ gets convicted and the anti second amendment crowd gets stoked up for more and more confrontations on the issue of self-defense the matter of secession will soon be front and center. The second amendment is the line in the sand. It is the right to life and liberty defined. If these rights are denied then the society is not worth living in.
June 7, 2012 8:02 PM
Yes. Secession. The liberals are mostly clustered in the Northeast (New England) and the Left Coast. They can have their side of the fence and abide by their own rules there. The rest of us don't need them.
Big Bear: Allowing the Darks and Reds to occupy the West Coast and the Northeast can only be a temporary solution. We don't need to leave them a bridgehead. Think of those areas as places of concentration, awaiting a later solution.
The only reason New York City (and NYS) is able to pay for a lavish welfare system is because of taxes on the financial traffic of the nation and part of the rest of the world.
Imagine the financial hub of the USA losing half or more of its traffic to Omaha or Lansing. I think the left would tire of their burden of blacks and browns very, very quickly.
Ray Scissom: Thank you kindly. I'm constantly in awe of your knowledge and eloquence here and elsewhere. Keep up the good work.
Ray, if that comment was intended for me, then please permit me to return the favor in some small measure.
With your permission, I'd like to add:
"Live by the gun, die by the gun we understand. Live by the negro, die by the negro we just won't accept."
… to my catalog of Race Realism memes.
"Live by the negro, die by the negro…", is much like live by the train tracks, die by the train". It just isn't supposed to happen if one has any choice.
That our government is pushing us in front of the speeding train of Black Undertow (if you'll forgive the mixed metaphor), represents a conspicuously determined effort at destroying White America and sane people just cannot help but notice it.
Now, it is up to us to remove the political and corporate elite who actuate this ethnic cleansing of America. Soon enough―and these bastards wouldn't have it any other way, mind you―it will reach the stage of "by any means necessary", but for now it would be wisest for us to confine our efforts to boycotts and groundswell voting patterns.
The rest is sure to follow in the not too distant future, it may as well be cut in stone.
Discard: Allowing the Darks and Reds to occupy the West Coast and the Northeast can only be a temporary solution. We don't need to leave them a bridgehead. Think of those areas as places of concentration, awaiting a later solution.
Which, by and large, describes the issue with Islam.
Even were we to deport all American Muslims to their countries of ancestral origin, they would still seep out around the edges of Islam's "bloody borders". The mayhem and terrorism will never stop so long as an existential threat is not posed such that Islam would simply cease to exist if terrorist acts continued.
With Blacks the case is slightly different. If they were all repatriated to their respective African utopias, their collective technological incompetence would limit them to amphibious assaults of the sort that we see in Lampedusa, Italy, for instance. Sink enough of the boats in transit and such nautical TNB would cease and desist rather promptly.
That said, both Islam and, in the much longer term, Africa definitely will require further attention. However, Islam's continuing acquisition of nuclear weapons is, by far, a more pressing issue.
Rex freeway: I cannot wait for the day Eric Holder is either removed from office and or charged with multiple offenses ranging from murder to racial hate crime. He is a BLACK eye on the justice system.
And who, exactly, is going to remove this evil POS? Republicans - who've been handed a golden opportunity to do so but choose to hold TV-land hearings instead of bringing articles of impeachment or doing anything meaningful? You'll be waiting a long time. I wouldn't be even a little surprised if he were retained in office should Willard Mittens Obamney become the oligarchs' teleprompter-reader next January 20th.
In case you've not been paying attention: Republicans have already caved on the whole issue. Major donors have dropped their support of the second amendment organizations who were (successfully) fighting to expand concealed-carry, castle-doctrine and stand-your-ground laws. The Repukes offer a candidate from the BRA bastion of Massachusetts who favors gun control as much as his opponent - the putative "President" who reads teleprompter statements. Someone above mentioned a "line in the sand". If I had a nickel for every time I've heard a 'conservative' mention a "line in the sand" I'd be almost a rich as George Soros. The system in the Banksta Banana Republick is not reformable. It has to be destroyed - burned to the ground. We need to completely stop playing by the rules established by those who own and operate BRA.
Bogolyubski: We need to completely stop playing by the rules established by those who own and operate BRA.
That's a gimme.
There us a saying in the south: "Shoot, Shovel. Shut-up" IF you are in a place where that can't work, then run. Unless you have the estimated 2,000,000 it takes to defend yourself from a murder 2 charge like Zimmerman.
There was a case recently on one of those daytime court shows involving self-defense. The plaintiff was a single mother (who was accompanied by her 17 year-old thug-wannabe son) and the defendant was an elderly white Marine. The 17 year-old was a suspected drug dealer and was apparently a neighborhood terror. The mother and the old man had several run-ins and he had reported her to the neighborhood association several times and to CPS also because of her son's behavior. Late one night, the teen and some of his friends went over to the old man's house to start trouble (the teen even admitted that he was trying to "get back" at the old man). The old man woke up and ended up shooting the teen in the leg. He didn't recognize the teen at first because it was dark - he thought that he was being burglarized because he heard a commotion on the porch and thought that he heard his windows breaking. The police were called after the shooting, but they didn't file charges against the old man. The judge (who was black) ruled in the plaintiff’s favor and ordered the defendant to pay her and her son $25,000 (which is the maximum that you can get in small claims court in Tennessee, where the litigants were from) to cover the teen's medical bills and hospital stay. In the interview after the show, the old man said that he was on a fixed income and would probably end up losing his house because he didn't have the $25,000 to pay them.
It sends the message to the audience watching at home that you'd better not defend yourself or else you'll lose your home and anything else you've ever worked for.
The police were called after the shooting, but they didn't file charges against the old man. The judge (who was black) ruled in the plaintiff’s favor and ordered the defendant to pay her and her son $25,000 (which is the maximum that you can get in small claims court in Tennessee, where the litigants were from) to cover the teen's medical bills and hospital stay.
This is why "Stand Your Ground" laws exist: to remove the power of racist Black officials, judges included, to Get Whitey even when Whitey is acting in self-defense.
To be honest, when Trayboon got shot for chimping I knew it was going to to be used as a justification for eroding our right to self defense. We're seeing this all over the place with libtards going off about STANYANGRAN laws.
Looks like we need a National Association for the Protection of White People (NAPW? Not very catchy). But some organization that can gather volunteers and CASH to help out victims.
Looks like we need a National Association for the Protection of White People (NAPW? Not very catchy).
How about Whites Impeding Minority Predation: WIMP
Silent Majority European-American Rights: SMEAR
Majority United Mutual Protection Society: MUMPS
I know, funny. But those are images any organization will have to fight.
I know: Society Protecting European-American Rights: SPEAR
Mis-posted in the other thread:
Society Protecting Existence of European Common Heritage:
SPEECH
"NAPW"? And what will the press end up calling the members? "Nappies"? They'd latch on to that because it would be a way of saying we are full of...
:-{)}
The old man woke up and ended up shooting the teen in the leg. He didn't recognize the teen at first because it was dark - he thought that he was being burglarized because he heard a commotion on the porch and thought that he heard his windows breaking. The police were called after the shooting, but they didn't file charges against the old man. The judge (who was black) ruled in the plaintiff’s favor and ordered the defendant to pay her and her son $25,000 (which is the maximum that you can get in small claims court in Tennessee, where the litigants were from) to cover the teen's medical bills and hospital stay. In the interview after the show, the old man said that he was on a fixed income and would probably end up losing his house because he didn't have the $25,000 to pay them.
It sends the message to the audience watching at home that you'd better not defend yourself or else you'll lose your home and anything else you've ever worked for.
Well, the old man was just selling out by being on the show in the first place; the court shows agree to pay for all judgements, which is how they get people to go on TV and let the media circus settle their disputes. The drama about losing his house was just that, drama - they probably arrange what to say well beforehand.
MUTANT SWARM:
Don't shed tears for any cop. They are often corrupt and are no friends of whites.
Don't do this silly naive knee-jerk response because the other guy told the truth about the police. Try being honest with a cop about your views see what it gets you.
Cops ONLY care about other cops, period.
-A whole other Anon.-
Sheila says,
"Paul, for the love of God, don't allow the mulatto Nickrit to colonize this site, whether under his own handle or that of "anonymous" as today. And, in the interest of informing other regulars here, please don't delete this comment. H("we - African Americans - still believe the garbage of innate criminality we so assiduously have been fed, and struggle with hating ourselves, as America long ago taught us to do.") He turns every thread(he's ruined OneSTDV)into a forum on his "expert" and "with it" experiences to enlighten the ignorant racists he chooses to troll."
Wow!
I really must've gotten under your skin. An online avatar I barely know and have had exchanges with at OneSTDV a few times is now trying to cleanse me from the blogroll on this and other sites!
Now, on to your latest slander:
1) I have never left an 'Anonymous' comment on this or any other blog; (check: once or twice I may have done as much inadvertently, but followed it with the comment with a atributed one with brief explanation).
2) RE: "He twists every truth and statistical reality of black criminality and dysfunction into maudlin self pity."
What is the matter with you? Why are you acting so silly and childish; you know damn well that I have said ----- at times within those aforementioned discussions with you ----- that I acknowledge the obvious disproportion of dysfunction and other pathologies in the NAM aggregate. You know that.
Now, why are you imploring OneSTDV and now some blog moderator who i've rarely visited to censure me? Because you don't like my comments? Good grief. Fyi, I do 95% of my commenting at OneSTDV and occasionally contribute at one or two of the blogs on One's blogroll (hence my coming here a few times).
Now, last I checked, you're not the moderator here or at OneSTDV; I'm assuming that if you were, I'd be blocked. And I also assume that, if the real moderators wanted to censure me, THEY would do as much, but so far One and the SBPDL moderators haven't blocked me. Too bad for you.
Now, being a "NAM" and therefore not a fellow-traveler ideologically, I even understand why I may not be welcome at times; some pro-white blogs are more for bonding-and-venting ---- a sort-of piss-n-vinegar approach which isn't so much a debate forum but more a place to find kinship. And at those such blogs and on those such posts, I tend to make myself absent; but when the discussion is open and free debate prevails, why shouldn't I be able to contribute; I think there are some pro-whiters that appreciate the fact that a NAM doesn't automatically disregard their opinion and welcome a chance to leave the echo chamber (to the extent they care at all about squabbles like this).
Furthermore, I would figure that a pro-white outlier such as yourself could maybe even appreciate the conundrum of another outlier, even if a NAM outlier.
I urge you to stop this silliness and perhaps reconsider what a Anonymous commenter said at OneSTDV.com about your meddlesome attempts to censure views you don't approve of, back when we first locked horns at OneSTDV in Sept. of last year:
To wit:
"Sheila, your sanctimoniousness is more out of place here than anything nikcrit has said.....In fact, it seems there's an entire class of angry, married w/children, WN-oriented female commenters who all behave in this way. Treating the blog comments like they're some ideological nest that needs to be defended against invaders and heretics.
God, just chill out. We men are having a civilized discussion here."
p.s@Sheila,
BTW, the 'maudlin' quote you attributed to me, claiming I did so anonymously, was a quote from the nationally syndicated columnist Leonard Pitts, you knucklehead! The 'Anonymous' commenter that you decided was me was quoting Pitts ----- and said as much, you goofy-ass yenta!
You and your Jewish evangelical avatar; you can't be serious; I'm thinking you're pulling a ruse on us ----- and it just may be a good one. (lol!)
Post a Comment