 |
| A reminder of the culture black people create in America wherever they reside |
On Bob Costas' NBC Sports program "Costas Live" this week, guests Charles Barkley and John McEnroe discussed guns and Costas' anti-gun rhetoric. Barkely defended gun ownership and also reflected on the black community on the show.Culture is nothing more then the shared experiences of a particular people or group. Black people have created a distinct culture in America that is dramatically different then the one white people have created; though individual blacks can assimilate to white culture, they cannot create it. The same goes for white people.
"I think, especially in the black culture, I don't know if it's a gun culture, it’s a crime culture. We, as black people, and I always say we, we don’t have respect for each other. You know? We got more black men in prison than we do in college, and crime in our neighborhoods is running rampant," NBA great Charles Barkley said. "I know everybody reacts when something like the Belcher thing happens, but being black, this is something you deal with all the time and it’s just sad. I’m a guy, I carry a gun. I carry a gun."
But just as black people can't create white culture, they also seem incapable of sustaining it in the absence of white people.
Thus, culture correlates closely to race. And as Charles Barkley noted, black culture is closely correlated to crime culture. Of course we aren't supposed to notice crime statistics and note the obvious -- blacks, particularly black males, bathe in a culture of violence that other racial groups choose to avoid by living as far away from black people as possible.
Mr. Barkley broke rank with the racial etiquette governing acceptable public discourse in Black-Run America (BRA) on such matters of high rates of crime and violence in the black community: one must always blame white people for the culture that black people create whether they live in Birmingham, Alabama or Buffalo, New York.
Steve Bogira of the Chicago Reader, the epitome of a Disingenuous White Liberal (DWL), makes sure to always abide by this proper racial etiquette when discussing the monopoly on violence, crime, and misery that black people hold in Chicago -- nothing more then an extension of black culture. As if on cue, Mr. Bogira finds a way to blame white people for the culture of violence black people have created for themselves in Chicago [Another price of segregation: not just homicide, but countless walking wounded, 12-6-6]:
Chicago's high homicide rate has gotten much attention this year. Through November, there'd been 480 homicides here, up 21 percent from 2011.
The vast majority of these homicides resulted from shootings. And the vast majority of them happened in Chicago's poor black neighborhoods.
I wrote a couple of posts this summer about the relationship between concentrated poverty and homicide. The multitude of homicides in Chicago was a legacy of segregation, I said—segregation that was imposed on blacks by whites here, with the help of government, starting around 1910. Decades of segregation and discrimination have cultivated gangs and violence on the south and west sides, along with joblessness, poor health, and high dropout rates. I wrote that residents of neighborhoods such as Englewood and West Garfield Park would continue to pay the price until Chicago faced up to the problem it had created, and worked to fix it.
As awful as the homicides are, the toll goes way beyond them. The mortality rates for the leading nonviolent causes of death—cancer, heart disease, diabetes-related illnesses, stroke, and unintentional injury—are also far higher in the city's poor black neighborhoods.
But let's just consider the shootings today. Besides the toll in deaths, there's the havoc often caused in the lives of those who survive shootings. Through yesterday afternoon, there'd been 2,339 known shooting victims in Chicago this year—up from 2,102 last year. You can guess in which neighborhoods most of those occurred. Shooting victims tend to be young, so the costs to society—health care, long-term disability, lack of productivity—are enormous.Black people can never be blamed for the culture they create; for the individual life choices that they make, which when measured together, paint a depressing picture for the source of racial inequalities in America -- black people themselves.
That Chicago aldermen are considering using a new disorderly conduct law to aid police in keeping the peace at gang members funeral in Chicago is but another reminder of the type of culture black people create - and why white people always engage in white flight when a neighborhood, community, city, or county starts to see an increase in its black population.
High rates of black violence in Chicago, according to the Chicago Reader and Steve Bogira, are easily blamed on the legacy of segregation. This excuses the horrible culture black people have created in the present, by placing the source of all the problems on an insidious past; never mind segregation - and the practice of restrictive covenants on residential real estate - was to protect white people from the very violence that black people have always created, wherever they go.
53 comments:
though individual blacks can assimilate to white culture, they cannot create it.
What utopian believers ignore. No matter how integrated we are or how much our diversity is a 'strength' the reality of race is exactly this...
Costas is scum. And I'd send Barkley a box of ammo if I knew his address.
Barkley's "fact" is not true. There are NOT more black men in prison than in college. i wish it was true (we'd be safer) but it's NOT true.
http://tinyurl.com/a7xq6ok
if that doesn't work, try
http://www.acenet.edu/the-presidency/columns-and-features/Pages/By-the-Numbers-More-Black-Men-in-Prison-Than-in-College-Think-Again-.aspx
"...though individual blacks can assimilate to white culture, they cannot create it..."
The saddest part? They don't even HAVE to create it. They just have to follow the blueprints that we created, and mimic what we do. They can't even do THAT!
It's pathetic. It's like setting a beautiful, formal table full of wonderful food. They come along and instead of enjoying it with fork and napkin, they smash the table, throw the food on the floor, get on their hands and knees and eat like animals.
But hey. They walk on their hind legs so they MUST be just like us, right?
-Sweep the leg-
^ Barkley is an asshole and no friend to white people. I would save your ammo for when the groids riot after the "gubmint" turns off the EBT cards.
Was in downtown Downers Grove, IL (Chicago suburb) and all the DWLs in this area made me want to smash my head with a hammer. If you told them what Charles Barkley said about his own people they would crucify you. With Obongo in office for the next 4 years I hope he relocates the upstanding citizens of Detoilet to DWL hamlets like Downers Grove, Boulder CO, and Seattle so their citizens can bask in the glow of diversity.
On a side note, how can we get rid of these obnoxious Salvation Army groids who pressure you into giving them money outside of stores.
The statement that "Violence is endemic to black culture" has universal application. A defining aspect of Negro culture,no matter where located (Africa, England, Haiti, America, WHEREVER....)is brutal violence.
"Decades of segregation and discrimination have cultivated gangs and violence...along with joblessness, poor health, and high dropout rates."
One cannot cultivate what is not already programmed into the seeds. Bogira is foolish to think that blacks' genetic tendencies will disappear, just by having white neighbors. Perhaps their animalistic behaviors achieve critical mass at certain observed population densities, but it is what it is.
Bogira also "wrote that residents of neighborhoods such as Englewood and West Garfield Park would continue to pay the price until" someone else fixed the problem. Here, he admits that the people in those hoods are incapable of self-regulating their destructive behavior. What a disgusting, Neandarthal racist.
Charles Barkley is actually pretty light-skinned; I never noticed that before. He's a fairly intelligent negro.
Wonder if there's any correlation ...
"Decades of segregation and discrimination have cultivated gangs and violence...along with joblessness, poor health, and high dropout rates."
Typical of DWL delusions. In case they have not noticed, Chicago has seen decades of civil rights laws, war on poverty, affirmative action, minority programs, race hustling, and the rest of the rackets.
With all that, one might think that the situation re blacks would have gotten better, not degenerated into gang warfare and c. 80% illegitimacy. The young blacks growing up today are living in a world where "segregation and discrimination" are ancient history (literally--I doubt if most of Americans could identify the decade in which Eisenhower was president!).
An objective analysis might conclude that in the years since segregation ended, the rates of black illegitimacy, school failures, violent crime (especially against non-blacks), and etcetera have increased. Given this, it might make more sense to drop all the social engineering and look at what America was doing right pre-1954. But that is not in the cards.
It does not occur to DWLs that "gangs and violence...along with joblessness, poor health, and high dropout rates" all created the so-called discrimination against blacks, or led to whites demanding segregation to maintain the civility of their own communities. Or maybe it does occur to them, which is why the only thing that DWLs can do is repeat the same old tired slogans. The truth is not an easy thing to face.
What DWLs are unable to explain is why their policies stretching over half a century have made things worse. Nor do they explain why would more of the same would lead to anything other than epic fail. The fact that government, universities and media discriminate in favor of blacks via AA and the usual laundry list of policies goes down the memory hole. Logically, since these institutions discriminate against white people, the conclusion ought to be that whites would be the ones afflicted by gangs and violence along with joblessness, poor health, and high dropout rates exceeding the black situation. But such is not the case.
DWLs are ideologues, and peculiarly deluded ones at that. It's as if they are still living in 1953, the year before Brown v. Board of Education.
Another case of the lunatics running the asylum.
Tonight at the supermarket I approached the service desk to purchase a lottery ticket. I handed the black peasant lady my lucky 2012 President Grover Cleveland (second term) dollar coin and asked for a Fantasy 5 ticket, at which point she asked to see my ID. Enraged, I replied "are you serious? I'm 31 years old" to which she replied "if you look 35 and under we are required to check ID", to which I replied "newsflash: you only need to be 18 to play!!" I had bags of groceries in each hand and was not about to put them down to pull out my wallet for this black piece of trash, so I asked for my dollar back. As I was walking away I said in a raised voice "I bet if I were a black man you wouldn't be asking for my ID!!" I would've called her a fucking cunt if a police officer weren't standing within earshot. Anyway, just another example of how Negro-Americans try to keep whitey down any way they can.
Dude, you're a dollar richer because of that uppity negress. The lottery is a fool's game.
Honestly, I can't even hate on Barkley. The man never sugar coates anything. I'm probably one of the miniscually few posters here who watch and follow the NBA. Unlike so many other NBA commentators (Scumbag Michael Wilbon in particular) he doesn't have a black promoting agenda. He just likes good basketball and views life from the most pragmatic perspective possible and shows it on TV.
Costas is a hack and a typical DWL. I dunno about you guys but I honestly believe Barkley is a lot less dangerous than old Bobby C.
Why I won’t be cheering for old Notre Dame
"Two years ago, Lizzy Seeberg, a 19-year-old freshman at Saint Mary’s College, across the street from Notre Dame, committed suicide after accusing an ND football player of sexually assaulting her. The friend Lizzy told immediately afterward said she was crying so hard she was having trouble breathing."
"A few months later, a resident assistant in a Notre Dame dorm drove a freshman to the hospital for a rape exam after receiving an S.O.S. call. “She said she’d been raped by a member of the football team at a party off campus,” the R.A. told me."
Steve Bogira vomited forth [I]"I wrote a couple of posts this summer about the relationship between concentrated poverty and homicide."[/I]
I would love to hear this DWL imbecile attempt to explain to me, in his best condescending better than you voice, how he would consider the abject and concentrated poverty of Appalachia in regards to their homicide rate. The average "poor" inner-city pavement ape looks like an upper-middle class elite when compared to many residents of the hills and hollers of the Tug River Valley.....yet you won't see multiple homicides, rapes and assaults coming from those people. I've spent quite a bit of time in the home areas of the infamous Hatfield & McCoy Feud......and the people of that area, despite mind blowing poverty and isolation, would never hesitate to help a neighbor. Many of these people had no running water, some had no electricity but they would share absolutely everything they DID have.
So no, Mr. Bogira and any other DWL nitwit who happens to read this.....There is no direct lineage to concentrated poverty and segregation and an areas homicide rate. There IS however a direct correlation between any given areas negroid population and it's level of homicide and violent crime. Regardless of how much money the bank of Bath House Barry throws at the ghetto dwellers you will see no decrease or change in the numbers of crime....you will simply see better dressed suspooks. And until idiots like you stand up and point out that the problems are very much race related nothing will change.
Maybe we here can put our collective heads together and develop a scam to get all the DWL's to go to the ghetto en mass and do a days worth of good. There you go! Problem solved!
I am very familiar with Downers and they maje talk a good game at Caribou Coffee but they live there because it is white. If it was sunddenly 20% black they would move out.
Anonymous: And they wonder why the South had anti-miscegenation laws? That's why; if Black men having sex with White women is illegal, there is no way for a Black rapist to claim it was consensual.
In retrospect, Loving v. Virginia was wrongly decided.
My brother use to drink with Charles back in the day in Arizona when he was with the Suns and told me Charles was ok. Michael Wilbon is an ok guy the two times I have been with him as know as a regular guy from Chicago. Bob Costas is an asshole and he knows nothing about the NFl and the brutal violence the women who arr girlfriends and wives of these players endure. The NFL pays big bucks for a lot of this to disappear from police blotters, the papers, or puts other things into play such as access to players and coaches. Not all the players are assholes and some are normal guys but a lot of these players have issues with the treatment of women especially black players. I sort of laughed at the Breast Cancer pink shoes, pink towels and the rest when you know the player when he gets home will be beating the shit out of his 110 pound girl though on average they like him a little thick side.
Costas isn't really anti-gun. Costas is one of these liberals who is so twisted, so sideways that he thinks "a well-regulated militia" means having a National Guard. In 2012, "well-regulated" means federal regulation, full stop.
In 1776 every sovereign nation on the planet had a standing army. So why would the Founders feel the need to guarantee the right to a standing army? Why would a federal or state army be referred to as "the people" in this context? The argument dies literally as soon as it's raised.
Liberals like Costas love guns in the hands of trained, qualified, certified federal and state agents. It's the unwashed masses, who aren't qualified to do much of anything without federal supervision, that need to be deprived of their firearms. Perhaps, after massive government brainwashing, they'll allow you to have a shotgun or a hunting rifle, but have your license ready when Officer Friendly asks for it.
The field of lovely flowers goes both ways. We should welcome the brave declarations of Costas, Rushdie, and their ilk. I much prefer my enemies flushed out in the open.
You are aware that:
* Blacks commit 50% of all murders in the USA, despite being only 13% of the populace.
* Blacks murder more people every year in the USA than whites lynched blacks during 80 years of segregation.
* Blacks have an illegitimacy rate of well over 70% (three times that of whites); and that this leads to welfare dependency, school dropouts, and crime on an epic scale which victimizes white communities.
* Blacks use affirmative action to displace qualified white applicants from jobs and schools, and replace them with unqualified blacks.
* Black flash mobs have targeted white people with mass violence (google "Beat Whitey Night").
* Blacks routinely fake "hate" crimes to demonize white people (see Crystal Mangum, Tawana Brawley, et alia).
* Black race hustlers such as Al Sharpton routinely shakedown white corporations, with much of the black community supporting these cons?
* Black run cities drive out white people via violence and infrastructure collapse, as well as out-and-out discrimination in contracts and such. (Look at Detroit, Birmingham, Rochester, and etc., all covered elsewhere on this website.)
* Blacks have been responsible for every major urban riot since the 1960s, and these riots have led to the decline of many cities; and not only in America, but more recently in Britain.
* Black majority countries have a long history of ethnically cleansing white people. Look at Congo and Zimbabwe. You do know that in black majority rule South Africa, blacks have murdered more whites in the last 18 years than white security forces killed blacks during 50 years of apartheid?
For roughly a thousand years Jews in European cities invariably lived in ghettos which were literally walled in. Crime wasn't high, it wasn't even low. It was non-existent. They let the goy think he had the Jews walled in, but it was the other way around, the Europeans were walled out. Once Jews abandoned that old arrangement they became DWL. Now Jews can't teach the Orcs any useful historical experience about living in the ghetto because the chosen people are too busy social engineering them down into hell.
I was the original poster about Downers Grove. A brilliant idea occurred to me about how we can f**k with DWL areas. Start writing letters to the local media, DWL churches, DWL school boards etc etc about the lack of dieversity in these areas and how they have white privelege etc etc. Most likely these schmuck organizations will agree, and then bring in pimps like Tim Wise who will get the ball rolling on ruining these DWLs fantasy land by encouraging section 8.
"Dude, you're a dollar richer because of that uppity negress. The lottery is a fool's game." - I prefer idiot tax.
Culture is nothing more then the shared experiences of a particular people or group.
This article needs a re-write, after you have collected your thoughts about this. Culture obviously has a genetic component, which you seem to understand elsewhere.
"Decades of segregation and discrimination have cultivated gangs and violence...along with joblessness, poor health, and high dropout rates."
With all do respect Mr.Bogira please explain Libera, Hati, and Sudan as a short list.
Africans are responsible for thier own behavior in Africa and anywhere else they reside.
This is like something out of the Twilight Zone. Would you risk your family's safety in order to abide by "the law"? Dangling judges would be appetizing meat for our Swahilis.
"There are NOT more black men in prison than in college."
True, however...
Most of the black males in college have no business being there.
The black men in prison are exactly where they belong.
Most of the black males in college have no business being there.
Most people in college have no business being there; if they are learning anything worthwhile (e.g. nothing with the word "studies" in the name), much of it should have been taught in high school (and was, a few short decades ago).
Colleges and universities should be there to teach things to the top 10%, 15% at most. What we have is a system first used to get draft deferments during Vietnam, then bent to provide employment credentials as a filter after Griggs vs. Duke Power outlawed what had been the status quo.
OMG Barkley is a racist! Any problem any spanner in the works of the glorious collective utopia is the fault of one W.Bush. If that doesn't work blame it all on Grover Cleveland.
I would love to hear this DWL imbecile attempt to explain to me, in his best condescending better than you voice, how he would consider the abject and concentrated poverty of Appalachia in regards to their homicide rate.
And the poverty of the trailer parks of Utah produces how much crime?
There are a couple theories as to why black people are so much more violent. Needless to say none of them point to the "legacy of segregation".
The simplest and oldest is from the observation that the black brain is smaller in the frontal and pre-frontal lobes. But black brains seem to be the same in other areas notably the sub-cortical areas of the limbic system.
Fear and anger are mediated by the amygdala. The hypothalamus may also be involved. It is easy to make an angry and vicious lab animal by the abalation of certain nuclei (nerve bundles) in the hypothalamus. There is a nuclei in the ventro-medial hypothalamus that if burned out with an electric needle reliably produces a very fat and aggressive rat. This is called the hyperphagic hypothalmic rage syndrome.
If you take a cage of rats and shock them through the floor of the cage, they will attack one another. Apparently the primitive limbic system circuits assumes that if the rat experiences pain it is likely from another rat. The rat lashes out at the nearest other rat.
These sub-cortical reflexes are suppressed by the influence of the higher brain structures. There is a balance between excitation and inhibition. This is the reason alcohol is associated with violence. Alcohol deadens the higher brain functions first. If you drink so much that you deaden the breathing center in the brain stem you become truly dead. That takes a lot of booze, but just a few drinks are enough to turn off your higher brain functions.
We experience being a little drunk as a "lowering of inhibitions". The lower brain functions continue to work unaffected by the alcohol and we become less inhibited. We are more likely to react to some situation violently. Hence the "bar fight".
Black people by virtue of less tissue in their inhibitory higher brain structures are more prone to violence.
Another more recent theory is melanocortin synthesis. This fascinating theory says that black people are violent because of the color of their skin. When nature creates a creature with a dark skin that creature will be more violent because of the biosynthesis of melanin (the principal skin pigment).
The easiest example of this phenomenon can be seen at the dog pound. People tend to avoid adopting black dogs because they are more aggressive and less trainable. Some liberals seem to think this is racism. But even liberals prefer light colored coats for their pets. Piebald dogs are just nicer.
There was a famous very large fox domestication experiment done by Russians. Over many generations they bred the foxes for docility. After a while they developed a fox that was as friendly and mild mannered as a Cocker Spaniel. All these gentle foxes had white coats. They were piebald like my own dog - mostly pure white with patches of colored fur. The Russians didn't breed for coat color they bred for personality. They got whiter animals as a surprising side effect.
Subsequent research has shown that skin color effects aggresiveness no matter what kind of skin - hairless, hairy, scaly or feathered. Birds, lizards, and all mammals are more aggressive if they have black skin color.
In general when we domesticate animals they get whiter. The unexplained exception seems to be the Black Labrador Retriever. These all black dogs seem to be just as sweet natured as the Golden variety.
Presumably there is some part of the biosyntehetic pathway that leads to melanin that potentiates aggressiveness.
The melanocortin hypothesis is the last contribution of JP Rushton. There are some other hints as to greater black aggressiveness in Rushton's earlier r/K theory also.
Albertosaurus
To James Wilson: The Jews of the Notheast are liberal because the Northeast is liberal. The Jews of the South are mostly conservative, because the South is conservative. i grew up in the South - Miami is not the South. The Jews of Israel are also conservative - family oriented. It is the New York and LA Jews which are DWL dominated. The Jewish ghetto experience is interesting. They bred among themselves for 1000 years, in tremendous poverty compared to what the US ghetto has by way of material comfort - and yet they kept losing the word for murder. It came to mean to hit,
then they had to say," to murder to kill" to mean
murder, then they lost that and had to say, "to murder
to kill to death" to mean murder. Why? Because there
were literally no murders. They lost the word. Poverty does not lead to crime.
Black Culture = Crime Culture
We are surrounded by Americans who seem unaware of what is happening to the nation. They're busy with life, their minds are dulled by the mainstream media, or maybe they're consumed with watching football games. Most of these people are not hard-core DWLs, they're simply unaware. A number of influences are set to destroy their nation; communism/collectivism, ignorance,
class warfare, greed, illegal immigration, moral decay and, yes, negroes.
PK brings us first rate material and does it day after day (buy the books, contribute what you can to this site). A lot of the articles are like a graduate level review of black
destruction. The accounts of once great cities that are being destroyed by black corruption and mismanagement are instructive and depressing. But for a lot of whites, they can ignore this stuff. They don't live in Detroit, Birmingham or Atlanta.
The best way to wake up the disengaged American is to regularly highlight the vicous, relentless tale of negro criminal savagery. Some time ago, the SBPDL commenter Zenster, made the point that negroes had clearly moved away from crimes of opportunity, crimes that might
net them a few easy dollars, to crimes of predatory savagery. Negroes aren't just murdering Americans, they are setting
people on fire, pushing them in front of oncoming trains or capturing and torturing them. And there's the commonplace viloence, the daily rapes, mob attacks, thefts, beatings, murder and intimidation that negroes bring to our society.
Whatever the natural tendancy for negroes to engage in violence, no one can argue that the scope of black savagery has ever been worse in our country's history. This fact will resonate with people whose eye's are not yet open.
In American 2012 your chances of being beaten, raped or murdered by negroes is very high. Americans need to come to grips with this reality.
Black Culture = Crime Culture
One of the core tenets behind contemporary Marxism, believed by almost everyone left of center, is that "oppressed" persons cannot be expected to exercise any personal responsibility. In this worldview, all bad things that happen to females, "persons of color," poor people, etc, can be blamed on those with more "power", and thus can only be fixed by those with "power". To even suggest that LaQuisha refrain from having more children than her family can support, and that she avoid having children outside the context of a committed relationship, and that she teach her children to behave like responsible members of society is "victim blaming" and "oppressing" and "'splaining" or any other term that relieves the "oppressed" from any type of responsibility.
Even when you admit that there are oppressive forces at play on the poor or on blacks or on women they still won't give you an inch.
The Marxist worldview is truly strange and I'm not sure if there's any real way to combat it.
Most people in college have no business being there; if they are learning anything worthwhile (e.g. nothing with the word "studies" in the name), much of it should have been taught in high school (and was, a few short decades ago).
Colleges and universities should be there to teach things to the top 10%, 15% at most. What we have is a system first used to get draft deferments during Vietnam, then bent to provide employment credentials as a filter after Griggs vs. Duke Power outlawed what had been the status quo.(
If you don't get a degree in engineering, business, or science you are utterly wasting your time. And I hesitate to include "business" as much of this can/should be taught on the job. The basis of knowledge you get from college for 90% of all jobs could easily be taught to kids if high schools weren't relegated to glorified babysitters thanks to illegals, minorities, and willfully ignorant white parents who let their kids behave like niggers.
You also have the "liberal education requirement" for those 10-15% of the (potentially) worthwhile degrees where the kids are wasting up to 25% of their time and money being brainwashed into believing the white man has polluted and destroyed the earth, and unjustly taken from the noble, peaceful, earth-friendly savages.
I went to college years ago thinking it was some sort of magical job factory where you automatically came out with a degree and multiple job offers. Little did I know college is merely a tool used to possess the minds of white kids and turn them into DWLs.
So blacks are essentially drunk at all times, by virtue of their brain structure. This explains many things.
South Africa under segregation (apartheid) = law and order, expanding economy, white people safe.
South Africa after segregation = high crime, declining infrastructure, "Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer."
There are a couple theories as to why black people are so much more violent. Needless to say none of them point to the "legacy of segregation".
It's liberal ideology at work. Liberals can not admit that their policies have failed miserably to make any change in blacks. If anything, blacks have become more dysfunctional over the last half century. Rather than admitting this reality, liberals reinterpret the world to conform to their ideological assumptions.
Look at the liberal obsession with segregation. They act as if the USA is still living pre-Brown vs Board of Education. It gets back to the point that white liberals seem to live in a world of delusion. There are some real pathologies at work among them.
I'm not so sure about the black race hustlers as to whether or not they really believe in liberalism. They may just recognize liberalism as a good agitprop line and exploit it to bring in the bucks.
Whatever the natural tendancy for negroes to engage in violence, no one can argue that the scope of black savagery has ever been worse in our country's history.
You have to look at the political component. We've had decades of anti-white agitprop which blames whites for black dysfunctions. The flash mobs, the torture-murders, the farm attacks, the rioting in American cities (now extended to cities in Europa) have to be seen in this light.
This is one more reason why it is critical to keep up the race realist political work via the Internet. Have to get more people to take that Red Pill!
Jay Santos said...The best way to wake up the disengaged American is to regularly highlight the vicous, relentless tale of negro criminal savagery.
Definitely. People will rarely be persuaded by abstract political arguments. Most have to be shocked into reality, and unfortunately this often takes things like criminal attacks which knock them out of their delusional worlds. Once they are willing to listen, it is vital to have an intelligent race realist movement which can bring them in and provide a direction for political activity.
Maybe it's time to have a post dedicated to Channon Christian and how the entire black community ignored this fucking crime. Tell her story again to refresh people's minds on a regular basis how blacks are fucking savages.
Did you notice the subtle racist profiling by Mr. Barkley?
"I don't think I need it (gun) with you two."
The unsaid part of that was "because you two are white." And he's right. It's the way Barkley thinks. It's the way most of us think. It's the way any sane, self-preserving individual thinks.
African Americans (AA's) love getting up in front of people and telling them that anyone who dares speek a word that differs from their set of ideas, which constitute their goals and expectations, can expect to suffer a severe toung lashing, followed by an immediate understanding in the form of some random act of violence. Then boasts about how they will overthrow all concepts of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of their own base nature, quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "anthropomorphic"
AA's parrot whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, their ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. AA's are, I.M.O., exploitative crybabies that can't see the forest through the trees. Empty-headed imbeciles; they're now fully convinced that everyone with a different set of beliefs from their own should be wiped out or given a one-way ticket to Hell.
No matter how bad you think AA's musings are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think.
[quote]But just as black people can't create white culture, they also seem incapable of sustaining it in the absence of white people.
Thus, culture correlates closely to race.[/quote]
No MR KERSEY!!
While I don't agree with a good portion of what you write - I am surprised that you made this "Grand Canyon Logical Leap".
* "Black people can't create a "White Culture". Well WE ARE BLACK - so, short of you defining what a "White Culture" IS - this reference is CIRCULAR.
* "Black people are incapable of sustaining a culture without White people present."
This makes no sense. If you said "IN MY OPINION the culture that Black people tend to gravitate to in the absence of WHITE FOLKS is not a CULTURE that I would want to live in as a White man" - This would be an accurate statement.
What you wrote MAKES NO SENSE.
* "THEREFORE - Culture Correlates Closely To Race".
Now Mr Kersey - I don't believe that YOU would present this in a College Level Logic Course.
If you said: 'THEREFORE White people produce cultures that are more favorable to other White people while they would tend to see a 'Black culture' as foreign" then THIS would make more sense.
Mr Kersey -about 2 hours ago I was talking to a kindly old White woman about ASIAN cuisine. While standing in a Chinese restaurant she asked me if I had ever traveled to Asia. She CLEARLY was an aficionado of Asian culture.
If your logic holds - WHY is it that this White woman had such favorable recounting of living in Seattle and San Francisco and frequenting Asian restaurants and then traveling Asia to consume the culture?
Ironically, Mr Kersey - YOU are an aficionado of "Black culture" but instead of "indulging" in it - you collect data in support of your design of your defense bunker.
HOW MANY WHITE FOLKS READ THE 1969 EDITION OF EBONY MAGAZINE, Kersey?
If I bestowed an "Honorary Negro" badge upon you would you TAKE IT?
I would support you as "Neighborhood Watch Captain" of the corner of University Avenue and Metropolitan Parkway in Atlanta. As long as you didn't violate anyone's human and civil rights - I would appoint YOU as the champion to clean up that area.
What do you say?
The job pays $300,000 per year.
The self-parody that is the soi-disant Constructive Feedback wrote: * "Black people can't create a "White Culture". Well WE ARE BLACK - so, short of you defining what a "White Culture" IS - this reference is CIRCULAR.
Just because you ignore the context (of this blog) doesn't mean it doesn't exist and doesn't define "white culture" for you in more than sufficient detail. White culture is shorthand for everything from the technology, to the systems of law and high and popular culture, to the basic habits of interaction between people and personal values which make it all possible.
Nowhere on earth have Black people proven able to do the same, and in the USA Black people do their best to destroy infrastructure and real estate for a few dollars from a scrap dealer.
If you said: 'THEREFORE White people produce cultures that are more favorable to other White people while they would tend to see a 'Black culture' as foreign" then THIS would make more sense.
Sane White people don't see Black culture as merely "foreign". They see it as hostile and dangerous. Failing to see those who say "Kill cracker babies" as hostile is proof of blindness.
If your logic holds - WHY is it that this White woman had such favorable recounting of living in Seattle and San Francisco and frequenting Asian restaurants and then traveling Asia to consume the culture?
Because many White people have an ability to step outside themselves to appreciate things from other perspectives, and enjoy the experience. Most Blacks (among others) appear to be unable to separate themselves from their tribe.
If I bestowed an "Honorary Negro" badge upon you would you TAKE IT?
I would support you as "Neighborhood Watch Captain" of the corner of University Avenue and Metropolitan Parkway in Atlanta. As long as you didn't violate anyone's human and civil rights - I would appoint YOU as the champion to clean up that area.
What a trick offer. Basic crime fighting like arresting armed robbers is "violating human rights", according to "Black community leaders".
I'd be happy to clean the place up myself. I'd start by installing outdoor speakers playing baroque string music, cameras, microphone arrays and computers to detect anyone speaking in a raised voice or loitering in groups, and sonic antipersonnel devices to warn and then repel anyone doing those things. Boomer cars would be confiscated and sold at auction (after removal of all car audio systems and substitution of factory wheels). TNB would be a thing of the past.
The job pays $300,000 per year.
Give me the revenues from the sales of confiscated cars and guns and a commission on real-estate appreciation, and I'd do it for $30,000.
[quote]v White culture is shorthand for everything from the technology, to the systems of law and high and popular culture, to the basic habits of interaction between people and personal values which make it all possible.[/quote]
Mr Rational - now that Black people have full access to the court system I am going to use the judicial to FORCE YOU to never use that alias again.
White Culture =
* Technology
* Systems of Law & Government
* Habits of human interaction
You know, Mr Rational - a few months ago I told a poster on this board that - after seeing "Dr Hubble" and the other White scientists working on their mountain-top observatory in the first half of the 20th century - the ONLY reason why he (the poster) would be in the building would be to EMPTY THE TRASH. (Even though HE TOO was White)
FOR YOU - I believe that you'd be operating the compactor on the trash truck that the first guy dumped Prof Hubble's newspapers, discarded lunch wrappers with the smell of onions and the occasional soiled tissue that he blew his nose with.
YOU ARE JOKING to believe that HIGH TECHNOLOGY is a "White Cultural Artifact"
1) How do you explain THIS NEGRO who is in middle management in technology?
2) Why don't ALL WHITE FOLKS have a minimum threshold of this TECHNOLGOICAL WHITE CULTURE?
3) Why is it that the majority of the computer equipment that your WHITE senses (and fingers) are interacting with IS MADE IN Asian nations?
The ONLY thing that I can conclude about YOU is that you reserve the right to DEFINE "culture" and the QUALITATIVE attributes of each respective "culture". The NEGRO always going to come up short in your measure. The Asian, despite his registration higher on the IQ tables will STILL not be as good as you - BECAUSE he is not "White".
I assure you that as long as his long term fiscal situation looks better than yours BECAUSE he is making you into a consumer - he DOESN'T GIVE A DAMN what you think of him - as long as you purchase what he sends to you in those shipping containers.
Threateneth Constructive Feedback: Mr Rational - now that Black people have full access to the court system I am going to use the judicial to FORCE YOU to never use that alias again.
This—forcing me not to call me by an identifiable pseudonym which reflects my approach to matters—is supposed to be "constructive feedback"? YOU are just TOO MUCH!
First you'd have to file a suit, then you'd have to get discovery from Blogger to find the IP address(es) from which comments from "Mr. Rational" are posted, then another subpoena to the ISP to find out who has the subscriber account, and then maybe a THIRD subpoena to the subscriber to find out who's the actual user... assuming I'm not posting from a public WiFi. That would be just a whole barrel of fun.
Of course, any sane court would look at your suit and say "Fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted" and probably sanction your counsel for frivolity. I'm not discounting the possibility of an insane court with a Black judge going "He be dissin' on Black people, you go get him!" but I don't think that would go far, and you'd be opening yourself to countersuit, SLAPP actions and a whole world of hurt.
FOR YOU - I believe that you'd be operating the compactor on the trash truck that the first guy dumped Prof Hubble's newspapers, discarded lunch wrappers with the smell of onions and the occasional soiled tissue that he blew his nose with.
They'd never hire me for that job if I didn't leave all my post-college work experience off my resume. Programming the controls on the telescope, maybe (they usually have graduate students for that). I've been hired to do stuff for airplanes more than once.
YOU ARE JOKING to believe that HIGH TECHNOLOGY is a "White Cultural Artifact"
I am? I believe the joke is on you, proof to follow.
1) How do you explain THIS NEGRO who is in middle management in technology?
Middle management is one place where AA hires can be slotted to meet quotas and not do much harm. "Human resources" is the biggie. The actual technologists, the inventors and scientists and such... overwhelmingly White and oriental (I don't give a fuck if anyone objects to that label). One or two Blacks proves nothing.
2) Why don't ALL WHITE FOLKS have a minimum threshold of this TECHNOLGOICAL [sic] WHITE CULTURE?
I'll give you a clue: ability lies on a bell curve, and there is a substantial fraction of Whites on the left half of the curve who lie below the Black average. The difference is that there are enough Whites on the extremes of the right half to invent new (and sometimes world-changing) things, and the average White is smart enough to take these inventions up. The average White is also law-abiding enough that infrastructure can be built and left outdoors without being guarded 24/7.
The center of the Black bell curve is so low, you can't even keep your people from ripping the wiring out of street lights for the price of the copper.
3) Why is it that the majority of the computer equipment that your WHITE senses (and fingers) are interacting with IS MADE IN Asian nations?
They work cheap. The electronic assembly happens in low-wage countries, but the chip design and silicon foundries are in the USA, Japan, and Europe.
You'll notice that none of these things are located in Black countries.
The ONLY thing that I can conclude about YOU is that you reserve the right to DEFINE "culture" and the QUALITATIVE attributes of each respective "culture".
Your conclusions reveal a lot about you. That's part of what makes you so funny.
The NEGRO always going to come up short in your measure.
Tell me when the NEGRO takes a Black nation and builds the equivalent of a gothic cathedral or a Brooklyn bridge, starting from stone and iron ore. You've only had centuries to study what White people do and how they do it, you should have learned by now.
The Asian, despite his registration higher on the IQ tables will STILL not be as good as you - BECAUSE he is not "White".
You realize that the Asian thinks you're worthless too, and doesn't care if you live or die?
I've worked with quite a few Asians, both south Asian and east Asian (oriental). In my experience they are bright and acquire knowledge quickly, but are not as quick to make connections between disparate facts or think outside the box. Their strengths may be superior, but the historical east Asian tendency towards uniformity of thought does not suggest any ability to innovate rapidly (as opposed to copying).
Africans? The fact that you have no Black examples of ethnic/national success to try to use in argument against me says all that needs to be said. All you care about is tearing Whitey down. You'd hand the world over to Arabs who'd castrate you and make you a slave, or Chinese who'd either shoot you or herd you into camps to starve... but avoiding that fate requires future time orientation, something you don't have. Whitey's continued dominance is your only ticket to survival, and that is the crowning irony of your presence here and Black existence in general. Savor it.
In case you thought I was exaggerating about Arabs castrating and enslaving you:
Saudi offers castrated African slave for sale on Facebook.
You need Whitey, you should start treating him nice and trying to make him more successful in the world. Your race card is only good in countries run by Europeans.
[quote]Middle management is one place where AA hires can be slotted to meet quotas and not do much harm. "Human resources" is the biggie.[/quote]
Interesting.
Even though I have spent the large balance of my career in a "Sales Quota-based" job that demands that I BRING IN MY SHARE OF REVENUE - I will never break beyond YOUR bigoted assumption that MY CUSTOMERS see a "Negro" on the other side of the table and agree to "Hook A Brother Up" with business over the White consultant from a competitive company. INDEED!!!
I watched a documentary about The Nobel Peace Prize the other day. They noted that 53 million military people died (I don't recall the time frame they quoted - but it was up through and including Vietnam).
QUESTION - Mr Rational: WHAT PORTION of these 53 million combatants do you believe were "PEACEFUL WHITE FOLKS"?
You get no argument from me that Black people murder each other over too much "Stupid Shyt".
What YOU CANNOT justify is your claim that WHITE FOLKS are "Not EQUAL KILLERS" - in fact you are more prolific.
I bet that when it comes to the Romans you would promote their architecture BUT NOT consider the human beings they used as "Lion Food" as evidence of their killing streak.
I bet that when you saw the union thugs in Michigan today -angry and fighting - they were NOT like "Black Thugs".
I saw the history of the train line from Chicago to Seattle which passed through the "Rockies" and "The Cascade Mountain Range". The wealthy owner of the rail line hired THOUSANDS of LOW WAGED (White) workers who shoveled snow to keep the tracks clear after massive snow storms in the mountains.
THEY WORKED FOR CHEAP!!!
They DIED in masses as avalanches or falls from the perch of a mountain led to their deaths.
Was the entity that set up these dangerous working conditions a "Killer Capitalist"?
So tell me, Mr Rationale - is an unsophisticated KILLER worse than those who produce DEATH as a byproduct of a complex "Rube Goldberg machine"?
Mr Rational (and Mr Kersey):
Do Jewish people have a WHITE CULTURE in your view?
I saw a documentary about Physics and noted the number of Nobel laureates that were Jewish.
I'm just trying to understand the limits of your arbitrariness.
you never hear any criticism from blacks/media about the thug/rap culture that is glorified. That has infinitely more of an impact on young males growing up in fatherless homes.
Even though I have spent the large balance of my career in a "Sales Quota-based" job that demands that I BRING IN MY SHARE OF REVENUE
The people who have to make sales quotas are not the people who make products. You're way, way downstream from the cutting edge where chips are designed, polymers invented and characterized, blueprints are drawn, and the ideas which give rise to those activities are born.
Sales is a sort of hustle. Those attuned to the race hustle may well have an advantage there, but you must concede that it is not a creative occupation.
I will never break beyond YOUR bigoted assumption that MY CUSTOMERS see a "Negro" on the other side of the table and agree to "Hook A Brother Up" with business over the White consultant from a competitive company.
I never made such an assumption, and I'm amused that you immediately assumed I would.
WHAT PORTION of these 53 million combatants do you believe were "PEACEFUL WHITE FOLKS"?
Most of them. Despite those wars, the rate of violent death between Whites has been going down for a long time. On the other hand, Africa seems to always have something like Rwanda or Darfur or Biafra going on. This is more or less what you'd get if you expanded any major city's ghettos to national size and took away the xeno-ethnic forces of law and order. Black people killed more people in the USA each year than soldiers died in Afganistan and Iraq put together.
It takes major conflicts to have large numbers of White people killing each other; Black people kill people (including each other) in their own neighborhoods over nothing. Who's better to live around?
What YOU CANNOT justify is your claim that WHITE FOLKS are "Not EQUAL KILLERS" - in fact you are more prolific.
No, White people are better killers. We have become good at breaking things and killing people to make them surrender. When they surrender, we stop; we didn't go on killing Germans or Japanese after they raised the white flag. What we don't generally do is kill people for the hell of it, the way Black people do. Even when we're at war, White people call the killing of people for the hell of it (and rape, and torture as mild as taking humiliating pictures) a "war crime".
BTW, you mis-used "prolific". You meant "deadly" or "virulent".
Was the entity that set up these dangerous working conditions a "Killer Capitalist"?
Were the Black tribes who captured other Blacks to sell, knowing they'd soon be dead, "Killer Capitalists"? How about the Arabs who castrated the boys on the spot, knowing the majority would die of blood loss or infection? How about those who ran the routes back to the slave markets in Arabia and the Magreb; were they Killer Capitalists?
Europeans first invented other ways of doing the dangerous work (like rotary snow plows), and then outlawed most dangerous working conditions. Africans and Arabs still take, sell and sometimes kill slaves to this very day. I'd ask you which society you prefer, except we already know you'd be lying if you didn't say "this one".
Do Jewish people have a WHITE CULTURE in your view?
No. They have a tribal culture (the Jews and everyone else), whereas White culture as currently constituted believes in universal values. White culture is going to have to lose that belief or go extinct. This is a shame, because White culture has been very good for the Jews, but parasites either induce a defensive reaction or kill their host. The alternative is for the parasites to become mutualists, but the tendency over the last century has been the other way.
"It's the way any sane, self-preserving individual thinks."
"There is nothing more painful to me ... than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved." -Jesse Jackson
Post a Comment