Tuesday, December 18, 2012

The Village: Chicago vs. Newtown Redux




How the death of white kids in Newtown compares to the death of 260 blacks kids in Chicago; gun control measures are compelled by the former, while gun purchases are compelled by the latter
Ever seen The Village? It's a movie about a group of white families who decide the world is too violent to raise their children in, so they use their considerable wealth to create an elaborate ruse; pretend the modern world doesn't exist and live as white pioneers did in the 1700s, with a supernatural threat in the woods to keep the children afraid of ever leaving. 

There is no crime, only peace, harmony, and prosperity. However, a mentally disturbed individual is part of the community and (spoiler alert), he stabs a male rival over jealously; this action threatens to destabilize the ruse, because only modern medicine can keep alive the individual that was stabbed. 

Why bring up this M. Night Shyamalan film? Well, because it is our compassion for those who lack full  mental acumen that leaves us most vulnerable to their acts of insanity (just think of the Newtown Tragedy, with information continuing to come forth about Adam Lanza mental instability); in the case of the movie The Village, a peaceful white community was almost destroyed because of compassion toward an individual who should have been excommunicated from their settlement. 

Noah Percy (played by Adrien Brody) was the character in The Village with development problems who almost brought down the settlement, which served as the only incubator against 21st violence available to the white families in the film. 

We already know that a full-court press by Disingenuous White Liberals (DWL) to curb gun rights is underway; it wasn't the routine black violence in cities like Birmingham, Memphis, Baltimore, Atlanta, or Chicago that provided the necessary ammunition to galvanize the nation into action; no, it took the the shooting deaths of primarily white children (just look at the angelic faces of those killed by the mentally challenged Lanza at Sandy Hook Elementary School) to provide the moral ammunition necessary to disarm white America. 

Strange -- why didn't the news of 260 Chicago Public School (CPS) students killed over a three year period (most victims of gun violence) galvanize the nation as did the events of Sandy Hook? Recall, out of 400,000 students, only 8 percent of the CPS students are white. [Rahm Emanuel Mourns 260 Chicago Children Killed By Violence, Huffington Post, 11-2-11]:

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel was among the attendees at a Monday memorial honoring some 260 Chicago Public School students killed by violence during the last three school years. 
The vigil at St. Sabina's Catholic Parish in the city's Auburn Gresham neighborhood was the first of five memorials scheduled throughout the city during the next week by Urban Dolorosa (or the "Sorrowing City"), an organization that for the last three years has memorialized Chicago victims of youth violence with an outpouring of poetry, music and other performances in their honor. 
The Rev. Susan Johnson pastor of Hyde Park Union Church and founder of Urban Dolorosa, described the vigils' mission to the Chicago Tribune. 
"When we talk about gun-wielding teenagers and we ask ourselves as clergy: 'What can I do?' I think people don't feel they have much to offer," Johnson said. "We can't live thinking the blood is on our hands. I'm just trying to make these children less invisible." 
Addressing the packed church assembled for the event, Emanuel said, "I want you to know your city is with you, you are not alone." The mayor is known for personally calling the family of each young victim of gun violence, most recently a 10-year-old boy shot in the leg on his way home from trick-or-treating on the city's Northwest Side on Monday night. 
"I've seen the promise of Chicago, this is a strong city, a loving city and a caring city," the mayor said, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. "I want everybody to know in this city, if there is gun violence, it is not over there. It is not down there. If it happens in our city, it is part of your community regardless of where of you live."Among the many community members assembled to grieve and mourn the loss of loved ones was Anjanette Albert, the mother of Fenger High School student Derrion Albert, who was violently beaten to death during a gang fight outside his school in the fall of 2009. She told NBC Chicago that she was comforted by the vigil.

Why weren't DWLs able to triangulate a massive push for gun control over this story? Well, because it served as a reminder of, A. Why White people don't live around black people or send their kids to primarily black schools, and, B. Why White people need guns.
The only monster, the only threat in The Village was the developmentally challenged character Adrien Brody played

I've been reading "There Goes the Neighborhood: Racial, Ethnic, and Class Tensions in Four Chicago Neighborhoods and Their Meaning for America" by William Julius Wilson, and it tells the story of Groveland, what is described as a 'stable African American community'; in 1960, the community of 12,710 residents had only six black people (the rest were white people); a decade later, blacks accounted for 83 percent of the Groveland's population and by 1990, the neighborhood was 98 percent black (p. 128).

Hilariously, in 2000, one-third of those employed in this 'stable African American community' worked for the city, state, or federal government (p.133).

However, the kicker is found on p.156-157:
Gradual in-migration of families from nearby low-income neighborhoods had already made Groveland slightly more economically diverse... longstanding residents were well aware that the rising number of lower income residents could herald a sustained decline in the neighborhood's socioeconomic profile. 
Residents did not discuss these changes in terms of poverty statistics. Rather, they talked about the increase in gang membership, growing numbers of out-of-wedlock pregnancies, drug houses, renters (including families receiving federal Section 8 housing subsidies), and residents who failed to maintain their homes and lawns. 
During our research, a major South Side gang was using the park's field house as its headquarters. Residents sensed the fragility of their neighborhood, and block-club members talked constantly about problems arising from the neighborhood's proximity to high-crime areas, and who to address them.  
The visible presence of firearms in the neighborhood raised sobering concerns about crime, and apprehension about violent crime became prevasive. An older man in a church choir walked women to and from their cars before and after rehearsals because of these concerns. And, as noted previously, those planning a high school class reunion were concerned for the safety of white alumni as they walked from the parking lot to the reunion or stepped outside the event to smoke.  
Aware of burglaries and other crimes associated with drug dealing, Groveland residents worked hard to keep crime under control. In fact, they believed their community did quite well in preventing crime, and did not have a serious problem compared with other black neighborhoods. 
Yes, fearing that white alumni might not be safe walking from their cars to a school building is hallmark of a strong community. A 98 percent black community, where 1/3 of those employed work in government jobs, and white alumni from decades before coming to a reunion... aren't safe?

Now do you understand why The Village is a movie that makes so much sense. White people try to recreate them in the suburbs of every major city that goes majority black; but even in a charming, 95 percent white city like Newtown, Connecticut, evil is found.

Funny -- Lanza obviously had mental problems, which - were we a real nation - would have been sufficient evidence to lock him away from society; what do we blame black dysfunction on, especially in a place like Groveland that is 98 percent black?

57 comments:

Whiskey said...

While Mayor Rahm and Bloomberg push for gun bans (and don't kid yourself, its coming, no one ever says no to Obama, ever) -- Django Unchained has the fictional shootings of White guys celebrated.

A comment over at Larry Auster's here nails it: "The ugly truth is that they have had it with us and they want us gone. " (referring to the White Elites and Non-Whites).

There wasn't a lick of maudlin stuff and demand for "action" on 9/11. I know. I lived through it. We were supposed to "understand" Muslim rage and anger.

Heck Quentin Tarantion, Harvey Weinstein, and Jamie Foxx would heartily approve of killing those "angelic faces" were they buy 20 years older. What did Jamie Foxx say, "I kill all the White people. How Black is that?"

White and Asian guys (Cho Seung Hui, One Goh, James Holmes, Jared Lee Loughner, Adam Lanza) in the US go nuts, are miserable Omega males with no place, and plot mass murder of helpless people and often kids. In China they do it too, only with knives. The same day a Chinese guy sliced up a bunch of kindergartners and there have been hundreds slaughtered in the past five years in China in heavily censored incidents. Chinese are too poor, for now, to buy guns. So the toll is lower. American White/Asian omega male nutcases can afford them, along with fertilizer, so that's futile as Norway banning guns. How did that stop Breivik?

This is all the elite White hatred and desire for extermination of ordinary Whites, showing its face.

Anonymous said...

Politicians want the weapons taken away. I bet they keep armed security and weapons in their homes though. They will let mahogany mobs run amuck armed though to keep receiving votes. I often wish to sail to a lost island ALONE, but they probably have section 8 tree houses in place with EBT cards precariously dangling in an aloof fashion from the coconuts.

Anonymous said...

off topic

Jamar Darnell Thomas, explained he wasn’t wearing any clothes

A naked man who Athens-Clarke police say assaulted his girlfriend in Athens this week told officers he was stripped of his clothing because he lost a game of beer pong.

Officers said they were called to an apartment at The Lodge of Athens on North Street about 1:20 a.m. Tuesday when a woman complained her roommate was assaulted by her boyfriend.

The first officer to arrive heard sounds of a struggle and a woman crying loudly in the apartment. After knocking on the door, the officer said a woman with a bloody lip answered.

The officer said he saw naked man in the living room, a milk jug with something in it on a table, along with several plastic cups. One of the cups had two ping pong balls in it.

The naked man, 19-year-old Jamar Darnell Thomas, explained he wasn’t wearing any clothes as a consequence of losing a game of beer pong, police said
..................................
funny, maybe..but as the song goes
'we got to live together'

.45jack said...

Anyone who thinks there is not a serious racial component to the massive anti-gun movement now being orchestrated by TPTB and their pet media whores is living in denial.

Black politicians - especially obuma and holder - are going balls to the wall with their gun grabbing because they know, as do all blacks, that the reason we Whites do indeed cling to our guns is to protect ourselves from their savagery.

They are desperate to have us disarmed in time for the trayvon martin trial so that when Zimmerman is correctly found not guilty we won't have the firepower to defend ourselves against their rioting honor student brethren.

I think too that their desperation is being heightened because many blacks are realizing that this next riot will be the riot too far; the Great White Awakening will emerge from the ashes of the Last Riot.

Anonymous said...

Exactly, observably, undeniably. The United States has tied itself into knots that would baffle a wind-era sailor to keep thirteen percent of the population placated. And done it unsuccessfully. All we hear is slavery, send money. We be discriminate, send money. Give us a job we can’t do very well, or perhaps at all. That is what affirmative action is.

No nation has ever made such desperate, soul-wrenching efforts to convince a large minority to for God’s sake do your homework. And this is what it comes to. I say to black parents: Your kids do not do poorly in school because of discrimination, but because they don’t know the answers. We evil whites can give you schools and books. We can’t read them for you. And we can’t make your children read them. That’s your job.

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]We already know that a full-court press by Disingenuous White Liberals (DWL) to curb gun rights is underway; it wasn't the routine black violence in cities like Birmingham, Memphis, Baltimore, Atlanta, or Chicago that provided the necessary ammunition to galvanize the nation into action; no, it took the the shooting deaths of primarily white children [/quote]

My Dear Friend Paul Kersey:

I AGREE WITH YOUR OBSERVATION of how the "White Progressive Cheshire Fox Ally" practices "Assumed Black Inferiority".

I don't think that you have captured the REASON.

Simply put - "When the Progressive Negro is ALREADY doing what you want him to do - WHY UPSET HIM with disposition in news reporting that makes him EQUAL to the White man in his ability to commit SERIAL MURDER against other Black people?"

You are so busy focused on the supposed GENETIC motivations for "The Violent Black" that you can't see how much of this is merely a GRAND USURPATION and fraud.

I should tell you that on a Black talk radio show today a Black caller pointed to a series of books that documented THE WHITE MAN'S psyche of violence and that the CT killer was just acting out of what had been implanted in you all since your time in the "Caucasoid Mountains".

You still haven't told me if you consider "The Jew" to have a "White culture" - but - I watched Amy Goodman from "Democracy Now" focus upon the HATRED that had been brewing in Arizona that lead up to the Tucson shooting.

The ironic point, Mr Kersey is that Goodman and the White man who was reading this account of Goodman's assessment about the situation:
* Could not bring themselves to talk about the gross violence in MEXICO OR.....as you say
* Dare to use CHICAGO as a backdrop for HATRED motivated killings.

YOU have a contradiction though, sir.
Your White Progressive Brother is affirming his views of "BLACK INFERIORITY" as he slants his reporting in order to remain a partner in good standing with the "Diverse Progressive Joint Venture".

It seems that YOU want him to be more up front in his projection OF WHITE (cultural) SUPREMACY.

In as much as the DWL is fighting against YOU - the Right-Wing White Cultural Supremacist in order to gut your theories and replace them with his own - WHY do you need him to be less-Disingenuous When his goal is to DEFEAT YOU with diverse populism - rather than tell his coalition partner that he INDEED feels that he is SUPERIOR to them?

This is the flaw in your strategy -sir.

As I told you before until he MATERIALLY FEELS the loss in WHITE PRIVILEGE he is going to continue to hide behind YOU - the RIGHT-WING RACIAL BIGOT - allowing you to take the hit of "White Racism".

As for me - the only way to get Black people to disengage from the massive "Social Justice outsourcing" that is destroying my people's will to govern ourselves in line with organicly productive ends if for this event that will provoke the DWL to SHOW HIS TRUE COLORS and thus destroy the fraudulent joint venture.

(I am impressed that you are reading the book of A BLACK MAN !!!)

ToothlessBarney said...

Is it just me, or does everyone get a headache reading Constructive Feedback's posts? I feel like I am reading through dirty glasses or something. I can read the words, and kind of make some sense of it, but it seems to be missing something.
It isn't that he/she shouldn't post here, maybe it would make more sense if I were listening to him/her speak instead.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....The media and the government are the same. No difference between the two. It's been that way for years. It is propaganda and lies mixed in with ads for what kind of drugs (dope) you should take. Anybody that can sit and watch that shit definitely needs the drugs their selling. Watching TV will make you depressed.

The NEWTOWN BLOOD BATH SHOW is just another program brought to you by your owners. They call it "shock and awe", also known as trauma based mind control. Keep the sheep living in fear and they are easier to fleece. Help me, save me, rescue me and protect me. The dumb fucks.

The same scam works every time. You send in some mind control robot or a Prozac Zombie to butcher a bunch of kids. Hundreds of school shootings and thousands of slaughtered children. This also goes on in other counties. Over and over again. Then the same parade of scuz-bag politicians preaching the GUN BAN GOSPEL. The media is the enemy.

The system is rotten. There is no more law. There is only corruption. Your elite rulers are all evil. The bottom feeders are in office and they stink like dead fish. A hierarchy of evil controls you through fear. The whole program is based on fear.

ThePunishers.45 said...

.45Jack is right. The "tribe"(can't be named here), and their "foot soldiers"(blacks) are on the war path. Way to many talking heads in the media are talking about locking "gun owners"(whites) up in FEMA camps. I've got a bad feeling about this. Come the first congressional session we'll see the U.N. "Small Arms Treaty" signed, and the U.N. "Peace Keepers" will assit FEMA, and the DHS Home Land "civilian" army in door to door confiscation. Then the economy collapses, and all the police get laid off. Would'nt take long for white folks to line up to a FEMA camp to aviod the groid...and their carnage.

People should look up some information on Obamas "Youth Core". It's some scary brownshirt shit. Its alot of young white women and black and brown boys as old as 24. There is plenty off non white women, but the sheer amount of white women ready to round up "gun owners" (conservative white men) just blew my mind. We are about to witness something epic, and I mean that in every sense of the word. Epic.

Mr. Rational said...

I feel like I am reading through dirty glasses or something.

It makes me feel like I'm reading the rants of some tiny religious sect whose metaphors have little in common with the vernacular.  There's this hint of a sort of internal logic that might make sense in its bubble, but it's hidden in a bowl of word salad.  (Note that "word salad" is a sign of dementia, and I use the term deliberately.)

europeasant said...

If your car breaks down on any high way on the west or south sides of Chicago, Stay in your car and call 911. Do not under any circumstances speak to the natives if they approach. To do so might endanger your health or life.

nameispointless said...

@Toothless: Is it just me, or does everyone get a headache reading Constructive Feedback's posts? I feel like I am reading through dirty glasses or something.

No worries; it's not your problem.
The smarmy, but snidely hostile opening salvo, "my dear friend Paul Kersey," triggers the perceptive reader immediately.
Thereafter, your headache is probably intensified by the poster's habit of RUDElY SHOUTING. Aren't we all reactive to this cultural trait?
As to the text, attempting to make sense of the unfocused and rambling pretentious screed of this thought disordered individual is impossible, even without the blur of a headache.
My advice? Two ES Bufferin, a cuppa, and ignore.
PK, we need an 800 NF Crisis Hotline.

Anonymous said...

AM radio junkie here and there are some theories on das Radio saying the mother was about to commit the CT. fruitcake and it pissed him off, also he was jealous of the attention she was giving to the children.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

The United States has tied itself into knots that would baffle a wind-era sailor to keep thirteen percent of the population placated.


And yet it goes on and on. Do understand that the population percentage that truly fought for and was committed to independence from King George was said to be near 15%. You have a negro elected to the presidency for a second term, despite the social and economic collapse around you. That negro has no compunction in violating the laws of your country, none whatsoever.

I am an Irishman; we recently lost a beautiful young woman to a rape and murder by a negro in Japan. Her name was Nicola Furlong. Raped and murdered by a negro who laughs about his acts during media interviews.

I'm interested to see what these American citizens do in reaction to a negro administration's attempts to disarm them. You are approaching extremely dangerous times in your country. My bet is that those Americans lay thier weapons down and walk meekly into a life of violent attacks by and tax servitude to their black overlords.

Good God, what happened to you people?

Jay Santos said...

ToothlessBarney said...

Is it just me, or does everyone get a headache reading Constructive Feedback's posts?


I think he's fabulous. I've never read anything he has written, but it's so damn cool. It's got like this beat to it, like jazz. And when he switches to upper case it's like he's saying "gnomesayin".

If he would send his EBT card number, I'd donate weekly.

Anonymous said...

We chicagoians cannot talk about the murders of school children in Chicago. The media and the politicians won't let us. To openly talk about this is RASSIST!

Anonymous said...

Re Whiskey @ December 18, 2012, 5:03 PM:

Funny that you mention Norway and Breivik. I happen to live there. The self-righteous media outlets here have already reached a rock solid conclusion (in their view) in the Newton case: It was the guns. Now they are cheering on some sort of gun control in the US - as if that is going to stop anything. Never mind that Lanza was a nut case years before he ever ventilated those kids. We seem to have already forgot that whilst Norway has stricter gun control laws than the U.S., that did not stop Breivik from assembling a small army arsenal.

Californian said...

Strange -- why didn't the news of 260 Chicago Public School (CPS) students killed over a three year period (most victims of gun violence) galvanize the nation as did the events of Sandy Hook?

260 students KIA. That is a sobering number when you think about it. And again, this is after half a century of every civil rights and social engineering policy in the playbook. (Be interesting to compare the kill ration in the schools today with those pre-Brown vs Board of Education.)

It's unique events such as the recent Sandy Hook shootings that get most of the publicity. But the ongoing urban guerrilla warfare is so ho-hum it gets swept under the carpet--especially when the largely DWL media knows it does fit the "narrative."

Anonymous said...

Is it just me, or does everyone get a headache reading Constructive Feedback's posts? I feel like I am reading through dirty glasses or something. I can read the words, and kind of make some sense of it, but it seems to be missing something.

It's not just you!

I can kind of make out what CF is saying through the fog: that DWLs are playing off blacks and whites (I think). And that rather than focusing on blacks, race realists ought to be looking at the people behind the scenes (or something like that).

Anonymous said...

@ Toothless...Was thinking the same thing. Is he on peyote or some other mind altering pharmaceutical ? What barricade will accept him when the SHTF? Is he a member of the blue men band?

Johnny See said...

Wow, just... WOW. I started watching 'The Village', then went out to dinner (with One Who Can See and knows what is up... from a high level) and then came back and finished the movie. (clap clap clap, well done. Damn, Ivy is HOT)
Now, I see 11 comments. Clap, clap, clap, well done! (Yes, even you, confused feedback) I am seeing more and more awakening among those with whom I hang. Nice. The great unwashed is blissfully ignorant of what awaits their foolishness. Please continue to peacefully prepare your words, my aware brothers and sisters. Guns are only backup...of last resort. The pen is mightier than the sword... thank you, Paul. Thank you very much indeeed.

catch 22 said...

If a culture allows people to cohabit in a highly structured technological environemt, with a high standard of living and another allows people to live in 50person tribes, with no technology, hunger disease and misery, why is it that the first culture can't be said to be superiour to the second culture.

Yes both cultures are equally valid, we not saying they not, but why can't the culture that leads to the btterment of life and people be called superiour to the culture that keeps its ppl in the stone age?

Why is that offensive? Black people cannot sustain a culture which benefits them, the proof is all over, they need DWL's to allow then to live a semi technological existence, with out DWL's they revert back to stasis, which is haiti and zimbabwe etc etc.

DWL's with good intentions are the foot soldiers of the elite, to remain elite.

If you free your black nation from the DWL's and the oligarchy, then what, haiti and zimbabwe and rwanda?

Its catch 22, friend, and the elites know that, you damned either way.

The only thing that stands in the elites way is white western culture, which they dismanteling pretty soon.

Elites saw that the white way was leading to the upliftment of blacks, they had to stop that very fast.

They have actually used black people to oppress themselves even more, that is the genius of it all.

Back in the 50's you could emancipate, but now, black community is to attached to its surrogate, you cannot pull away from the poisened teet, cause the black community will implode into haiti or rwanda, and by continuing to feed at the poisoned teet, you know you will die, either way its check mate.

You had an aportunity to free yourselves from this fate, but chose the poisoned apple, now you have to play the game out.

You can try and free your community, but freedois not yours to excercise, you trapped.

The decision has been made for you.

Its sad that you still can't see the full picture.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Rational: did you forget to take your meds today? You are babbling incoherently.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone else traveled abroad for lengthy periods? Middle East especially...they will not listen to mahogany BS and fully realise most are savage animalistic beings. 13% population and they run a good parasitic scheme on foolish obese absent minded citizens. Qua'shon be ready to kill yo ass while you watch Reality TV. Once the people are ready then you can take your country back from frivolous gibs me dats'

Anonymous said...

Implicit in all the solemn trumpery about race is that vile and malevolent whites want to exploit blacks, or see advantage in holding them down. Oh? I suspect that if rationality were oil, race hustlers would be about a quart low, so let me explain some facts. Most whites do not want to hold blacks down. On purely selfish grounds, it is very much in the interest of whites for blacks to prosper. If all blacks shot into the middle class tomorrow, we could tax them instead of paying for welfare. We could fire three-quarters of most urban police departments. We could live in the cities. We could take the wrong exit into Newark and expect to come out alive.

Anonymous said...

When I see constructive feedbacks posts I scroll down to the next one skipping it.
Im tired of reading about how blacks problems are my fault.
What I do like is the replies.

Mutant Swarm said...

Anonymous said...

When I see constructive feedbacks posts I scroll down to the next one skipping it.
Im tired of reading about how blacks problems are my fault.
What I do like is the replies.

December 19, 2012 4:38 AM
________________________________

So do I. I don't know why Paul continues posting his crap, other than it gets people jacked up and posting replies.

Constructive Feedback said...

@Jay Santos:
I am almost certain that I make more money per year than you do.

@Swarmy Mutated
Im tired of reading about how blacks problems are my fault.

YOU LIE!!!!
I said no such thing!!

This NEGRO is NEVER going to say that YOU are the primary problem with Black people. I will tell a Black progressive that RACISM is not the primary problem for the Black male unemployment problem.


[quote]ToothlessBarney said...
Is it just me, or does everyone get a headache reading Constructive Feedback's posts? I feel like I am reading through dirty glasses or something. I can read the words, and kind of make some sense of it, but it seems to be missing something.[/quote]

Mr Toothless:

If I sat a calculus book in front of you I bet that you would suffer from the same glazed over look at the contents as you claim to get when you read my words.

YOUR inability to comprehend what I am saying does not necessarily prove a defect in my arguments or ability to articulate them. It might point to the need for me to reduce the grade-level of my verbiage in order to expand the domain of understanding. I will take this under advisement.

My statements remain.
The "White Progressive Cheshire Fox Ally" practices "Assumed Black Inferiority"

The White Conservative Wolf practices WHITE SUPREMACY in thought and action.

MY AGENDA entails that you all not VIOLATE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS - while I work to PURGE THE CORRUPT operatives that have partnered with the DWLs to destroy THE INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY. This is what you see in Detroit more than a GENETIC disposition among Black people.

Kirik said...

Gee CF, my KNUCKLEDRAGGING PROTOHOMINID BROTHER,

If Whitey's holding you yard apes back so much, you should try moving away from White people. have you considered AFRICA? There's no White privilege there; actually, Whites have NO power in da mudderland. It's ALL black rule over there, so it should be a veritable PARADISE!

I swear to Gawd, Blacks are stupid animals. They claim that Whitey beats them and discriminates against them on a regular basis. They say that Whites are the most vile, violent, loathsome on the PLANET, and that we're essentially a BLIGHT on the planet. Yet, wherever Whites go, BLECHS! try to follow. If we try to keep them from following us, they sue us for the RIGHT to follow us around. They're always at our heels. Buy a huge tract of land, build a housing development, and then announce that no blacks are wanted, nay ALLOWED, to live there. What's the first thing that will happen? Blacks will sue to get into that housing development, even if they would have otherwise NEVER entertained the thought of living in that housing development. This is just one of many ways that Negroes actively SEEK TO LIVE with their supposed "opperssors."

Every other minority group on the planet that's truly oppressed does everything in its power to GET AWAY FROM THE OPPRESSION. They self segregate. They migrate to other lands and form their own nations. Blacks always claim discrimination and oppression, usually that they're the most discriminated against group on the planet. If Whitey's so bad, WHY DO YOU FOLLOW US? LEAVE if we're so bad.

I've said this before, and I'll say it again: Negroes are the FIRST minority group in the history of the Earth that actively SEEKS OUT their "oppressors." Since they constantly seek to be around White people, how "oppressed" can they truly be?

make it rain TRUTH said...

PK should keep posting Constructive Feedback's comments.

Never be afraid of letting the other side voice their opinions. Trust me, these foolish ignoramuses like CF are their own worst enemies. When their incorrect opinions and ideas are exposed to the light of day, it falls apart on it's own.

Anonymous said...

"Is it just me, or does everyone get a headache reading Constructive Feedback's posts?"

CF is a decent fellow, he is a rare black striving to live according to the behavioral standards of white society. If I ever met him, I have no doubt that I would like him.

However...yes, his posts are often long-winded and headache-inducing, and seem to miss the point of this site.


SKIP said...

"The pen is mightier than the sword...

In the final analysis, NO it is not

Anonymous said...

Right on ex New Yorker:

I don't watch the news, I don't own a TV, I do think the white middle class is great/ why? / they work! I know the truth and I don't need ANYONE to tell me, I am a white middle class female and no I am not privileged. But guess what, good for me.,, it makes me work.

Screw the government. Screw third world turds. Screw the groids in this country who think the world owes them and that I , a white female who is middle class owes them. I am buying guns, having more kids, and moving to the middle soon... And yes it is to get away from diversity. Screw diversity.

It is amazing that when you take risks and do it on your own without riding someone's coat tails how privileged you become

White Mom

Anonymous said...

it's not the same when black children are killed.

white children are beautiful and full of potential.

black children all look the same, and yield the same bland, interchangeable results -- dull violence and little else.

even their parents don't care for them the way white moms and dads care for white children.

most white children are planned births; eagerly anticipated gifts from God.

black offspring is just another unit to boost the value of an EBT card; spawned haphazardly and carelessly named, with little thought as to how it will be raised.

gene theory said...

What corrupt operatives operate in haiti? And what institutions are you refering to in the black community?

As far as I know the corrupt operatives were chased out of haiti, so there are none left now, so why have the black community institutions not come to the fore?

You deluded in thinking that you can save the black community, MLK did too and he actually aided in the oppression.

So what will you tell the black progressive is the reason for black male unemployment problem?

I can tell you what the reason is, genetic coding, black males do not work, its the females task to get the firewood, water, prepare the meals, build the huts, the only thing black males do is hunt for the buck they will eat, and that is a 2ice weekly excercise tops.

So black males hunt, and the rest of the time they debating endlessly, about what no one knows.

And this is from observation in africa, and that is the way the genes are programmed.

That is the reason for the black male unemployment problem, hence haiti still being rubble strewned 2 yrs after the earth quake.

Black males hunt and debate, your master debation abilities are proof of the genetic origin of the latter.

Why is it so offensive to believe that genetics control behaviour, please explain

Anonymous said...

CF : "The White Conservative Wolf practices WHITE SUPREMACY in thought and action."

Yes! Yes!! We admit it.

The great Hunter Wallace once said, "The preservation of civilization requires the restoration of white supremacy and the eternal perpetuation of white privilege. " Brilliant.

and

"I don’t believe in equality. I don’t see white supremacy or white privilege as a problem that requires a solution." HA! Brilliant again.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2012/06/04/occupying-privilege/

Anonymous said...

There's no cure for black dysfunction and they will sink to their natural level of existence (wherever they exist in large numbers) unless supported and propped up by others. It truly is a waste of time, effort and money.
Segregation WAS the answer to the problem and was essentially a recognition of this reality and functioned as Damage Control.
After decades of desegregation, the obvious result is things have become far worse with no end in sight for the spiral downwards.
Why anyone would continue with such an obviously failed experiment indicates they're trapped in the "in for a penny, in for a pound" mindset and can't realize it's time to stop, count your losses and learn the lesson. Instead, they continue on with it like a drunken fool sitting at a slot machine who believes if only he keeps pumping more money into it, he'll eventually win. Of course, he's playing with our money and our future and no matter how much we protest, he'll adamantly refuse to stop and just say, "Wait a minute! Let me try these other machines (social programs) and I'm sure they'll pay off and we'll win!"
You can't win because negro dysfunction precludes any possibility of doing so. You're playing a broken slot machine that will never and can never pay off. It can only take everything you have and give nothing in return except impoverishment and self destruction.
Arguments with the idiot wont stop it, rational discourse won't stop him. Someone has to grab the drunken fool by the hair of the head and drag his stupid ass away from the slot machine by force. Either that or grab what's left of your money and your future and abandon the drunken idiot to his fate. I believe that's called secession.
If you can't drag the belligerant drunken fool away from the broken slot machine, what other choice do they leave you?

Anonymous said...

Many of us have lived around hostile authentic blacks like CF.

We are teachers, health care workers, government employees, police, supervisors, managers, and industrial workers. Because of forced integration and AA, we have to rub up against blacks daily.

Blacks are like children compared to whites.

I have found that it is impossible to have a rational conversation with blacks about the supremacy of white culture because blacks begin at a different starting point than we do. They only know BLACK.

Whites are a mystery to them.

Black culture is SO BROKEN that blacks have no idea how wonderful white culture is. They have no reference point to help them understand. They live in a black bubble of dysfunction and don't know how good life can be.

This IS white privilege. And they hate us for it.

CF thinks we all live in clueless Whiteyville, but we know more about him than he could ever know about us.

Wulfram said...

Anonymous said...

When I see constructive feedbacks posts I scroll down to the next one skipping it.
Im tired of reading about how blacks problems are my fault.
What I do like is the replies.

December 19, 2012 4:38 AM

===================================

I am another who just skips past Feedback's 'thoughts' when I (see) the capital letter overuse. I have no time for that shit.

Anonymous said...

I've said this before, and I'll say it again: Negroes are the FIRST minority group in the history of the Earth that actively SEEKS OUT their "oppressors."

Interesting observation. And one which I'd like to see DWLs, race hustlers, diversocrats, and the rest of the mob explain.

I suppose we would be told that blacks want to "have a better life." So they move into white territory. But they do not play it by white rules (e.g., high black rates of violent crime, illegitimacy, dropouts, etc.). Add the endless demands for affirmative action, the ghetto lottery lawsuits, and other intrusions. This forces whites out of their own communities, leaving blacks right back where they started (e.g., Detroit). Then the process starts again.

It's as if blacks assume there is some magic which whites have that can be bestowed upon themselves via close contact. But it is not what white people have, it's what blacks fail to do: form stable families, make education a priority, maintain that infrastructure, etc.

DWLs give the ideological rationale for this, justifying every last mass pathology and then blaming something called "racism." It's unreal. It's like someone in a dysfunctional relationship who is certain that they can change their partner for the better if only they do the right thing. To DWLs, blacks are like the rogue in a romance novel who can be reformed by the heroine's love. Works great in fantasy, but in the real world this kind relationship usually ends up in the emergency room, prison, or the morgue.

Which sounds like where the Western world is headed these decadent days.

ToothlessBarney said...

CF returns to reinforce my previous statement.
I also like how it left off the last part of my comment.

When Jesse Jackson speaks he mumbles a whole lot of big words. Unfortunately he has no understanding of the definitions of those words, and sounds like a moron.
Saturday Night Live once did a skit about it.
Same thing for Farrakan.

We can have a conversation, but you are going to have to keep up!

Californian said...

CF said: My statements remain.
The "White Progressive Cheshire Fox Ally" practices "Assumed Black Inferiority"

The White Conservative Wolf practices WHITE SUPREMACY in thought and action.


If this is the case, then why (as more than one poster here has noted) do blacks move en masse into white polities? Why not be happy with black majority rule countries in Africa, or black run cities in the USA? Whites (either progressive or conservative) have minimal power in these places. Given this, you could build any kind of society you'd like.


MY AGENDA entails that you all not VIOLATE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

Fair enough. At the same time race realists ask that the rights of whites not be violated via affirmative action, forced busing, income redistribution, hatespeech laws, Section 8 housing, infrastructure destruction, flash mobbing, urban rioting, and the rest of what PK terms BRA.


while I work to PURGE THE CORRUPT operatives that have partnered with the DWLs to destroy THE INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY. This is what you see in Detroit more than a GENETIC disposition among Black people.

No doubt there is a political component at work here. And it should be purged. But will this ever happen? And if it does, what exactly will change?

Thing is, would we ever see black conservatives (like Walter Williams) becomes the community leaders in black America? And will we then see massive changes in black behaviors?

Discard said...

Blacks will follow their "oppressors" because, as hunter-gatherers, they need to stay close to their food source.

10mm AUTO said...

This story is both hysterical and sad. Imagine if a 98% White community had to escort negro "alumni" from school to car with rifles openly displayed!! O-hole and company would send in the military to clean out the evil White racists. But in BRA Whites in their own Country have to be escorted to their cars by blacks with guns to keep other blacks at bay and it barely makes local news.

Good God.

I actually understand the "Village" idea as this is the idea that Whites go to with gated communities and White flight. They try to move to a place where they can go back to leaving the doors unlocked and hear Churchbells on Sunday but the Orcs have made it so that that time can never be again without some serious work.

The Amish are the only ones I can think of that truly follow this way to success. Again, they are a highly insulated community that reject racial and cultural destruction through an all encompassing religion. Negros are not welcome and are expelled via "shunning". Nor are they too proud to call the local cops to remove a negro.

As to the black "middle Class" it really shows what happens to them. They are at the high end of Orc functionality, but the low end follows them, probably is part of the family. So, while the high functioning Orc goes into Government by AA, the lower level street rat moves in around them "cuz dey be Brotars and sheet". Murders start, gangs are formed, drugs flow, niglets be spawned and the Orc tears itself down all over again in a pattern we have seen time and time again, the Black Undertow. It is as genetic as their feces-colored skin.

I agree that Constructive Feedback is barely comprehensible if not completely babbling. Many times he will say stuff that is either illogical or just plain wrong and the effort to educate CF is just too much, like arguing with a negro about who invented what. It is exhausting and stupid, never ending exercise. A negro will say "A black invented (insert nearly any invention prior to 1900 here) and so I used to look up the actual invention patents and say, no, you are wrong. (Several good websites do this now like: http://tightrope.cc/Black-Invention-Myths.htm ) but the process is never ending because negros never get this information from real books, but from their "leaders".

Hey ZENSTER! Where you be buddy!?

10mm AUTO said...

Discard said...

Blacks will follow their "oppressors" because, as hunter-gatherers, they need to stay close to their food source.

December 19, 2012 11:27 AM


THREAD WINNER!!

Anonymous said...

We see the problem but can’t do anything about it. White communities lost power. The powers hold by BRA. Therefore the American economy is going quickly down. I don’t think we have good future at this point.

jewamongyou said...

Not that I disagree with your assessment but I doubt most of the Chicago students killed were actually children. Most of them were probably teenaged thugs. Most people understand, though they won't admit it, that there's a difference between a teenaged gangbanger and a 6 year old.

Anonymous said...

Very few of the CPS students killed are not gang-affliated. The young man killed on the CTA bus was one of the few non-gang kids. He had an involved father who lived at home and they are a nice family. Darrion Albert? I think. There are several killings of children causght in gang cross-fire who under age 11. The age at which it seems gang affilation is about 10 to 12, unless you have a gang member living in your home.

Anonymous said...

So true. I especially like the abusive partner metaphor. Liberals are the first to tell a woman to leave a troubled relationship immediately and that abusers will never change or reform. Yet when the abuse is on a national scale, the Libtard essentially asserts that the (black) abuser is a terrific, amazing, worthwhile person who is just having a bad day because the check-out clerk was rude to him last week or he was ripped off by a shady mechanic ten years ago.

City resident said...

I get a laugh out of this nonsense whereby dead gangbangers are called "students". None of them are really students in the way most people here understand the term. It's just a way of heightening the drama. The vast majority are just officially enrolled, carried on the books as such but are mostly no-shows, occasional attendees, flunked out types who roam the streets. As far as that D Albert case goes, he appears to have been an active participant in the melee that got him killed. There's a video of it. Remember, most people start filming only after something has already started to happen, thus the first few moments are usually missing. At the outset he seemed to be jumping in as a co-combatant before getting clobbered with a big piece of wood. At that school anybody who shows up consistently is regarded as an 'honor student'. It's all about creating fashionable myths.

Anonymous said...

The age at which it seems gang affilation is about 10 to 12, unless you have a gang member living in your home.

Anybody here have experience in dealing with gangs? What causes people to join them? And why can't their parent(s) control their kids? (Or do they want to?)

Also, any recommendations on how to deal with the gangs? (Or do we just see things revert to the jungle?)

Thanks.

City resident said...

Anonymous of 2:59 am, asking about gangs, asks what "causes people to join them". In cities like Chicago a large percentage of young punks are in them due to the fact that their own parents are in them. That's right, they're born into them and are sometimes third generation gang members. Keep in mind that in the underclass, grandparents are often still in their thirties or early forties. Gang life is an entire parallel culture. As far as how to deal with them the only thing they comprehend is force.

Anonymous said...

City resident is right. A 5 year old was shot in Chicago and the TV news blurred out his hands. Why?

He was giving a gang sign.

One less thug son of Barry O to worry about.

Anonymous said...

City resident said... Anonymous of 2:59 am, asking about gangs, asks what "causes people to join them". In cities like Chicago a large percentage of young punks are in them due to the fact that their own parents are in them.

Like a tribe.

Gangs are akin to barbarian tribes who have settled within a civilized empire. They are the real government to those people. The reality is a loss of sovereignty by the American government in its own inner cities (and beyond, as gangs expand throughout the Homeland).

DWLs, when they consider gangs, see them as a socio-economic problem to be solved by throwing money, educating people, and giving themselves more fancy job titles. And oh yeah, "ending racism." The fact is that every last DWL policy has failed -- desegregation, war on poverty, AA, Section 8, etc. The result? DWLs create a fantasy land on television and in the movies where blacks are all wise politicians, honest cops, and ground-breaking scientists.

They gotta plug into that Matrix as the reality can't be faced.

We've had a civil rights revolution for 60 decades, but it was like a revolution against civilization. Look at what it has produced with gang warfare and mass illegal third world immigration.

It's like the 5th century AD with Huns taking over cities in Gaul, pillaging and causing the flight of the former citizenry. Think this is an extreme metaphor? Look at Detroit, Newark, Johannesburg, the Long Hot Summers, London's recent rioting.

Did America have this kind of gang situation during segregation?

Anonymous said...

I especially like the abusive partner metaphor. Liberals are the first to tell a woman to leave a troubled relationship immediately and that abusers will never change or reform. Yet when the abuse is on a national scale, the Libtard essentially asserts that the (black) abuser is a terrific, amazing, worthwhile person ...

There may be some kind of weird psycho-sexual thing going on between DWLs and blacks. This is getting into the territory which Whiskey touches on, but you have to ask if DWLs are attracted to the very pathologies which race realists criticize about blacks: the impulsiveness, the mindless violence, the hyper-sexuality, the refusal to buy into the discipline of school or the workplace.

To DWLs, blacks are the "bad boys" with whom the good girl wants to run, the Rebels without Causes. Blacks allow DWLs to revel in the thrill of the pack, to do that which is forbidden while absolving themselves of responsibility. And like an abused partner, DWLs invent endless rationales for the abusive behavior. It's because "he" suffered from a bad upbringing or a harsh life, but underneath it all "he" is really a sensitive poet or honor student. Or something.

"She" believes her-love-for-him-will-make-him-change (just as DWLs believe that their social engineering will uplift blacks). It's a measure of DWL delusion that the utter failure of their policies is not allowed to penetrate that warm and fuzzy romance novel in which they live.

Whiskey has commented that feminized (actually, feminist) societies, as in certain Scandinavian countries, are the most susceptible to PC/multicult ideology. It's like one big sh*t test for these countries' men, and those men are failing big time.

Something I have observed from endless debate on this topic with DWLs is that the worst offenders are the male feminists. They seem to be the personality type which tends towards the low end of the feeding chain (call them the "Deltas" or "Thralls" or whatever). To give one example: look at how male feminists degrade themselves by participating in "vagina monologs" and "slutwalks," acting like some kind of bonobo chimps, fluttering around the females hoping to get their attention.

To put it crudely, DWLs lack the guts to stand and fight. They believe that by being nice to the bad boys (e.g., third world immigrants, the urban underclass), in return the bad boys will be nice to them. Then they find themselves stuck with hostile internal populaces who form gangs, burn cars, sexually assault their females, and often (in Europe) engage in anti-semitic attacks. And what do these feminized males do?

They act like the worst cliche of an abused female. They refuse to recognize their own abuse. They go into hysterics, screaming "racism!" They attack the very people who are trying to save their bacon, such as white nationalists or the gun lobby. And then they hand over even more of their wealth and lives to the aggressor. Just like an abused partner.

As I say, there is some kind of weird psycho-sexual thing going on here.

Thoughts?

MuayTyson said...

Anon @ 12:03 PM, That was a brilliant conclusion. I guess Whiskey should get some credit too.

Given the choice look at how little boys and little girls play(maybe pre-internet connectivity?). Little boys love dicsipline they play by creating teams and rules wether it is war or good old fashion baseball. They organize and create a pecking order.

Little girls not so much they form bonds with one other girl or small groups and gossip and do a lot of playing house and dolls.

Now it is such where little boy behavior is concidered too aggresive they have to much energy.

Femenizing of Western culture is just as important as the destruction of the culutre. In fact it is an aspect of the destruction.

Now everything masculine is concidered bad or inappropriate.

Blacks and hispanics have racial identitiy and they have retained their gender identity. They form gangs because gangs are the logical conclusion when there is no positive male infleunce.

White kids have no racial identity. Any display of proper gender identity is frowned apoun. There are male influences but they are femenized.

All in all the left has created a situation where young White males are femenized, individualized, and marginalized.They have created a perfect White Victim class.

Young White males are victimized and young White females are drawn to the more manly dusky races.

It is all very insideous and a perfect way to destroy the West.

Fuck are my eyes open now.

Anonymous said...

'Blacks have retained their gender identity.'

Have black males done so?
with 4 of 5 or 5 of 5
raised by mamas.