Sunday, December 2, 2012

God's Gonna Sit This One Out

Well, not in Chicago...
The year is 1890. Chicago is a city on the move. With a population of more than one million people, the Windy City was a mere 1.3 percent black (14,271). By 1960, Chicago's black population would be 812,637 strong, or 22.9 percent of overall population.

As the book "Making the Second Ghetto: Race & Housing in Chicago 1940-1960" by Arnold R. Hirsch makes clear:
Chicago's black population grew significantly during the twentieth century. Although the percentage increase was greatest during the initial period of ghetto formation, the largest increase in absolute numbers came during the 1940s and the 1950s. Analysts of the 1919 riot never fail to cite the growth of Chicago's black population; more than 148% between 1910 and 1920. yet, it was the addition of 65,355 new black Chicagoans to a relatively small existing black population  that accounted for the large percentage increase. Between 1940 and 1950 Chicago's black population swelled by 214,534; between 1950 and 1960 it grew by 320,372. Although the percentage growth during these two decades cannot compare with that associated with the Great Migration, the absolute numbers of new black resident represented a movement of unprecedented scale. In 1920 Chicago's black population totaled 109,458; between 1940 and 1960 it grew from 277,731 to 812,637.

Whereas blacks represented only 4.1% of the city's total population in 1920 and but 8.2% in 1940, they accounted for 13.6% of the city's total in 1950 and 22.9% in 1960. (p.16-17)
Why mention this? Because violence in 2012 Chicago is completely monopolized by the descendants of the "Great Migration" of black people to city. While Thanksgiving was being celebrated across the city, 5 people would fall dead and 20 wounded thanks to black violence in the Second City.

But it was a shooting at a funeral that serves as a fitting reminder of the legacy of the Great Migration of black people to northern cities; a powerful reinforcement of what we have dubbed "Manifest Destruction" [Cops: Gang member killed, another seriously wounded at funeral, Chicago Tribune, 11-26-12]:
Shots rang out, causing panic and chaos as hundreds of mourners were leaving a Catholic church on the South Side following funeral services Monday for a slain reputed gang member.
As people scattered for exits, a woman knocked Deborah Echols-Moore, 59, to the floor and fell atop her. Her shoes were thrown off her feet. When she stood back up, she fled barefoot out a door.
“When I came outside, you still can hear shooting. Boom! Boom! Boom! I still ran…people was running behind me,” the longtime CTA employee said not long after the 12:30 p.m. shooting. “You didn’t know which way to go or what to do. All I knew to do was run for my life.”
Chicago police said one man was killed, another critically injured in the bloodshed at St. Columbanus Church. Police identified both as Gangster Disciples members and convicted felons, illustrating once again the high risks of gang membership in a year in which rising homicides have brought Chicago unwanted national attention.
GDs alone make up more than a quarter of the city’s approximately 470 homicide victims. About 60 percent of this year’s homicide victims were gang members, according to department statistics.
Police were still investigating who was responsible for the shooting, but investigators said the neighborhood has long been rife with conflict between GDs and rival Black Disciples.
Illustrating the sudden, often unpredictable nature of the violence, police Superintendent Garry McCarthy just a couple of hours earlier was touting the department’s crime-fighting strategies in tamping down the city’s rate of violence since earlier in the year when homicides soared. Through Sunday, homicides have risen more than 19 percent over the same period a year earlier, department records show.
There were five fewer homicides during the first 25 days of November compared to the same period in 2011, according to department statistics. But shootings during the first 25 days of this month have risen sharply by 45 percent.
From November 1 through Sunday there were 161 shootings compared to 111 during the same period in 2011, department statistics show.
Rev. Corey Brooks, a well-known South Side pastor who officiated at Monday’s services for James Holman, 32, said a church would have been off-limits for gangbangers at one time.
“Now we are living at a day and time where these younger criminals have no regard for life or for street rules,” he said.

bout a dozen bullet casings littered the steps outside the church where yellow evidence markers were placed. Beat cops blocked off traffic with their squad cars and sealed off the church’s entrance with yellow and red tape. As evidence technicians took photos of the crime scene, detectives went door-to-door to nearby homes scouring for witnesses.
April Smith, 30, said she looked out a second-floor window of her home when she heard her car alarm sound off and noticed a man wearing a black hooded sweatshirt and blue jeans walking toward the church entrance on 71st Street. She then heard about a dozen gunshots and saw two passersby crouch for protection.
Moments later, the same man in the sweatshirt ran back onto Prairie and fled south, said Smith. Mourners then frantically exited the church.
“To know that something like that happened right across the street...it’s terrible,” Smith, who has lived at her home for seven years, said in disbelief. “It’s broad daylight.”
Brooks, who is pastor of New Beginnings Church of Chicago in the Woodlawn neighborhood and is considering a run for former U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.’s vacant congressional seat, said about 500 people attended the funeral, including about 50 children. The church was so crowded that people were standing in the back.
Brooks had finished the eulogy and Holman’s family and close friends had gone out the front door of the church when shots rang out.
“That's when all the gunfire broke out and it was just crazy,” Brooks said. “People were hollering and screaming and kids running everywhere.”

Charles Childs, a co-owner of the A.A. Rayner and Sons Funeral Home across the street from the church, held an uneventful visitation for Holman on Sunday. On Monday he said he saw the gunman firing his weapon as he came down the front steps outside the church.
“No place is safe,” he said. “It’s just despicable.”
 Well, actually a lot of places are safe; but one must understand that the "blacker" an event, the greater the odds are that 'random violence' might suddenly occur. Even at a funeral [1 dead, 1 critically wounded at gang member`s funeral, My Fox Chicago, 11-26-12]:
The Rev. Corey Brooks said he spoke at a funeral for James Holman, 32, of Chicago, who was shot to death Nov. 19 in the 6000 block of South Michigan Avenue.
"I preached that we have a great need for God and peace in our neighborhoods," said Brooks, who is running for Jesse Jackson Jr.'s vacant congressional seat.
About 500 people attended the funeral and Brooks heard the gunfire after the service, Brooks said.
"It was crazy," he said. "It was the worst thing you could imagine. People were running, screaming, trying to get safe. When people were going out the door, they saw the bodies."
Brooks said he didn't know the identity of the two people shot.
"This was at a funeral home," he said. "At least on the South Side, no one is safe in Chicago."
"I've seen a lot of things in my life, but this has probably been the toughest and most heart wrenching," Brooks continued.
Outside the church, a sign said: ‘‘Pray for Peace."
Pray for peace? How about praying that black people stop engaging in random acts of blackness? Recall this article from the Chicago Tribune [Homicide numbers reveal stark contrast/African-Americans hardest hit by spike in violence, deaths in Chicago, 7-12-12]:
Violent crime has long afflicted minorities in Chicago at a much higher rate than the rest of the population, and the spike in homicides in the first half of this year provides an especially stark measure: 201 of the 259 homicide victims were African-American.
While blacks make up about 33 percent of the city's population, they accounted for nearly 78 percent of the homicide victims through the first six months of 2012.
The pattern is a familiar one in Chicago, where most violent crime happens in impoverished, mostly black neighborhoods on the South and West sides. Annual Chicago police statistics show a majority of both homicide victims and offenders are young black men with criminal records. With one exception, African-Americans have made up more than 70 percent of homicide victims in Chicago every year for the last two decades.
 Ask yourself: would black people in the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s want to migrate to a city with high rates of crime? No. They'd want to move to a city with lots of job opportunities and potential for creating a better life for their posterity (leaving the Jim Crow South behind).

2012 Chicago is the legacy of this migration. Barack Obama recently discussed the (almost entirely black) violence in the city, noting [Obama Talks Chicago Violence: “I Live On The Southside…Murders Happening Blocks From Home”, Newsone.com, 10-28-12]:
“What I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence, generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban re-introduced, but part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence, because frankly, in my hometown of Chicago there’s an awful lot of violence, and they’re not using AK-47s. They’re using cheap handguns,” Obama said.
Law-abiding white citizens aren't turning Chicago into a war-zone; it's black people, those descendants of the black migration from the southern states, who are re-making the Windy City in their image. You can't even seek refuge on Holy ground in this war.

Chicago News and Weather | FOX 32 News

76 comments:

Ryzzia said...

Peace is a lie, there is only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken.
The Force shall free me.


The Sith Code.

There can be no peace until people decide to stop with the violence. Until that happens, more people will die for no reason over nothing. And they will never be anything but what they are becasue that is what they know.

Anonymous said...

Anyone at the funeral of a gang-banger is fair game. If my boy were a dead gang-banger I wouldn't be attending his funeral, I'd be saying good riddance.

James Wilson

City resident said...

They're "using cheap handguns"? Well, what does Obama intend to do regarding this egregious situation whereby black youth are forced to use the cheaper varieties rather than the deluxe models? Issue gun stamps along with Food Stamps? It's just not fair for income disadvantaged youth to be forced to use cheap guns.
Fortunately, most of these shootings occur in the tribal areas, although that might also be slowly changing with recent occurrences taking place out of area. The idea is to blame guns and by extension blame whites for whatever blacks do. Never hint that something some blacks might do is their fault but rather reach for a sociological cliche that works to absolve them.

Anonymous said...

Ironically 71st Street in front of the Saint Columbanus church has been renamed Emmett Till St.

Anonymous said...

Police identified both as Gangster Disciples members and convicted felons, illustrating once again the high risks of gang membership

"High risks" of gang membership? Like gang-banging is a job along the lines of coal miner or electrician? Maybe there's a payout for on-the-job casualties, with special bonuses for bullets caught at funerals? Perhaps gang-banging is part of that "hard work which built America" that we have heard so much about from the race hustlers.

Gangs have become quasi-insurgent armies occupying parts of many American cities. Getting killed is hardly a "risk." It's part of a life of violence which these people have chosen--and which they inflict on the more civilized parts of their metropolises.

The government's response? Push to repeal the 2nd Amendment.

Life in BRA.

Which is the point. The government crashes around trying to "solve" the "problem" of urban violence without naming the real villain: BRA. This is why it is impossible for community leaders to come up with policies that would restore civil order.


Analysts of the 1919 riot never fail to cite the growth of Chicago's black population;

The usual narrative of race riots is: "Whites = bad + blacks = innocent victims." But stuff like this shooting ought to get people to reconsider the party line. Look at all the violence generated from the black demographic, documented by SBPDL among other websites. And the flash mobs. And the torture-murders. And the trashing of schools. And Devil's Night a city over. And the Long Hot Summer riots after the USA implemented the entire Civil Rights agenda.

Could it be that white people in 1919 were acting to defend themselves? Maybe it is time for someone to do an online analysis of every major race riot in American history to give an entirely new look at this phenomenon.

countenance said...

Black people moved to Chicago because they knew it was a place where every one of their whims was pandered to and fulfilled. That and the welfare checks were good. What else could the biggest city in the Land of Lenin...er, Lincoln, offer?

St. Louis blacks still kinda look on Chicago as some sort of a land of milk and honey. If only they would go for it...

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....These shooters are the grown up "welfare babies". The spawn of the Great Society and their War On Poverty. The welfare breeders will spread their legs for a bottle of Colt 45 or a snort of coke.

Mama gets the check and Tyrone gets the gun. Bang. Bang. Boo hoo. Boo hoo. "My baby he be daid. Dat not be right." Over and over the same shit. Blah, blah, blah. Better schools. Blah, blah, blah. We need jobs. Blah, blah, blah. More money for the hood. Blah, blah, blah. This shit ain't never going to change and anybody that thinks so is a fucking moron.

Anonymous said...

The problem with the Black community beyond the lower average IQ is that it tolerates nonsense.

The church that conducted the funeral for this gang banger should have rejected it outright. Tell his family to have it elsewhere. Social stigma needs to return to these communities assuming it ever existed in the first place

Anonymous said...

These shooters are the grown up "welfare babies". The spawn of the Great Society and their War On Poverty.

Dysgenics in action.

Brought to you by the Federal Government--a DWL Production.

Anonymous said...

Flood the hood with cheap guns and drugs and let the problem solve itself.

Room101 said...

City resident said...

"They're "using cheap handguns"? Well, what does Obama intend to do regarding this egregious situation whereby black youth are forced to use the cheaper varieties rather than the deluxe models? Issue gun stamps along with Food Stamps? It's just not fair for income disadvantaged youth to be forced to use cheap guns.
Fortunately, most of these shootings occur in the tribal areas, although that might also be slowly changing with recent occurrences taking place out of area. The idea is to blame guns and by extension blame whites for whatever blacks do. Never hint that something some blacks might do is their fault but rather reach for a sociological cliche that works to absolve them."


Why izzit that all kinds of Federal bureaucracies are allocating and spending to acquire over a billion rounds?
Coincidence?

December 2, 2012 6:32 PM

Room101 said...

5 dead, 20 wounded in holiday attacks is just another one of those feel-good media stories.

Can't wait to read about the Bloodbath of Christmas in the 'Hood'.

This site rocks.

Anonymous said...

OFF TOPIC



GET THOSE WHITE DEVILS:

I almost never go to NR site…
learned of some anti White ‘prof’ [read jingoist]
ms alcoff……..

In case you haven’t heard,

[WE HEARD...WE READ HUFF POST]

whites are stockpiling guns in preparation for a coming race war with Latinos, according to professor Linda Martín Alcoff of the City University of New York.
[YIKES GET THOSE WHITE RAY CYSTS]

Prof: Whites Amassing Guns for Race War
By Nathan Harden

In case you haven’t heard, whites are stockpiling guns in preparation for a coming race war with Latinos, according to professor Linda Martín Alcoff of the City University of New York.

Luke Kerr-Dineen, a student at Columbia’s Graduate School of Journalism, reports for The College Fix:

While the Associated Press reported last month that rising firearm sales resulted from a fear of increased gun laws, Alcoff said this is instead evidence of the Latino community being targeted.

“These groups are not harmless,” Alcoff said. “The principle target here . . . is not an unspecified or abstract immigrant population, but generally Latino immigrants from Mexico or Central America.”

What Should White People Do?
LINDA MARTÍN ALCOFF

In this paper I explore white attempts to move toward a proactive position against racism that will amount to more than self-criticism in the following three ways: by assessing the debate within feminism over white women’s relation to whiteness; by exploring “white awareness training” methods developed by Judith Katz and the “race traitor” politics developed

Anonymous said...


Mama gets the check and Tyrone gets the gun.

Reminds me of jevons ? murder-suicide
just the other day.

his mom was there when he killed his common law wife.

momma gets custody of baby.

Whiskey said...

Black people were not ALWAYS like this. Violence though higher was much lower in say, New Orleans 1900 than today. Same with single motherhood. We know this from crime stats, and first hand accounts by Black people who wrote or recorded their experience from that time.

What happened?

Black people got caught in a violence trap.

Black people used hyper-violence, on a massive scale, to ethnically cleanse Whites out of Cities. To take them over, by driving Whites out with constant, non-stop, grinding violence. That was basically the strategy from 1943 onwards, though you saw stirrings of it earlier.

But then ... Black people having gotten control, could not turn the violence off.

The violence is never "senseless" because it always has a purpose. Every "hard" gang-banger who shot someone, even a toddler, will get laid THAT NIGHT over the killing. That's the pattern in a lot of places. Africa. Parts of SE Asia. Latin America. The Balkans. The Caucuses. A lot of the ME.

If you depend on a tribal rabble constantly grinding on the other people you seek to drive out, the violence just does not get turned off.

Unlike the West, and Japan, and China, where the violence is state-directed, organized, fairly intense and horrific, requiring a lot of resources, the low-resource violence is organic. But not being organized and state directed it just never turns off.

There are places in the Balkans where blood feuds run to 100 years or more, and killing is a commonplace as Chicago and Detroit. Its the same deal. Violent young men who get sex from violence don't just turn it off.

Imperial Japanese soldiers in the War did terrible things. Often disobeying direct orders. The rape of Manila, when the soldiers went on a rape and murder rampage, instead of digging in and fortifying, as ordered, is a good example. Yet these same men who survived went home and never engaged in violence again. And they were not violent either before the War -- they did not gang-bang like the tribal stuff in Chicago.

Whiskey said...

Let me add, the low-intensity tribal warfare is a trap, against an enemy with no compunctions the inability to mobilize any significant resources leads to ... annihilation.

After better medicine and modern industry allowed colonization of Africa, the inherent weakness of tribal warfare allowed even weak powers like Belgium to have its way.

And the trap gets worse because the constant violence just eats away at any attempt to mobilize resources and generate a society with high amounts of discipline that is able to engage in high-stress defenses against formidable enemies.

Mexico is following the same path.

Bogolyubski said...

Funny how the convicted felons have no trouble with weapons acquisition in the most gun-controlled city in the Banksta Banana Republick. It's quite illegal for non-felons to own even a BB gun in Rahm's little slice of utopia without the proper permits, registration, background checks, etc. (Rahm, another of TWMNBN who doesn't believe in guns, of course is surrounded 24x7x365 by elite goons armed with full-auto, etc. which are completely illegal for civilians in the great necropolis of IL).

AnalogMan said...

"on Holy ground". There's your problem. Anthropomorphism. You speak as though these were humans. They're not.

And why is it that you can say "Violent crime has long afflicted minorities in Chicago at a much higher rate than the rest of the population", but you can't say "Violent crime has long been committed by minorities in Chicago at a much higher rate than the rest of the population"? Why, because dat be raciss 'n' sheet. See, they aren't agents, they're just victims. Not like people at all.

Here in the Rainbow Nation, I just heard that a friend from way back, a divorced woman living alone, has been killed in one of the standard invasion/toture/murder operations that are the staple fare of our brave freedom fighters and tireless crusaders for social justice. Four suspects apparently in custody. Considering that the rate of murders actually resulting in a prison sentence in South Africa is three percent, I'm not holding my breath waiting for justice.

They are animals. We need to face that fact. They will never be White. Even a dog turd will eventually turn white and stop stinking. Not these "people".

Excuse me, Paul. I'm very pissed off today. I pay taxes to these savages.

MuayTyson said...

Maybe Paul or Zen or someone can give us a timeline and the techniques used to change public opinion.

In 1900 it was pretty much an established fact for most Americans that blacks were an inferior subspecies. Public opinion changed very quickly and it was not due to outstanding behavior by blacks. How did this happen?

We now have more proof than ever that Sub Saharan Africans are not the same as anyone else in the world the genetics tell the truth. There is no genes for Neanderthal which every other race on the planet carries. The IQ test the brain size all the modern science tell us what our ancestors knew by simple observation and a gut feeling.

Was the worlds opinion that easy to change?

Anonymous said...

Maybe the black community should ask itself why more than 500 of them were packing into a church like sardines to pay their respects to a worthless bag of shit.

After all these decades it's still a deep, dark mystery: Why on earth are all these killings happening in the black community? Whatever can we do to stop violence in the black community? Why do young people in our black community continue to murder, rape, and rob?

More focus groups. More protests. More social programs to help troubled youth. More midnight basketball. More government grants to combat youth violence. More seminars, more speeches, more public hand-wringing, more Scared Straight indoctrination, more newspaper editorials, more community meetings, more faith-based programs, more special classes and field trips and after school programs and parent-teacher meetings and metal detectors and police officers in public schools, more sensitivity training for LEOs, more demands from professional blacks and DWLs, more accusations from the race hustlers, more moaning from academics and opinion makers, more sound bites from concerned-looking public officials on the evening news, more community outreach, more interfaith councils, more anger management, more public service announcements from black celebrities, more manipulation, more guilt trips on whites, more bullshit, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Anonymous said...

Actually, the shooters are the children and grandchildren of grown-up welfare babies.

Anonymous said...

I think the practice of lynching deserves an informed second look too. It's become a generic metaphor for all the evil visited upon poor ole innocent Blacks in the history of the United States, but I'm certain that whites were much safer from black crime during the era it was practiced.

Anonymous said...

Minor correction: "My baby he be daid. Dat not be right. He ain't never did nuffins tah nobody. He was a good boy an always hadda big smile onna his face fo everywunns. We muss come togethah tah enns dis plague ah violence on our chilluns. It ain't about Black or White, it about alla God's chilluns on dis erff. Lawdy, lawdy, Imma pray fo us all."

Wednesday said...

Liquidate the gangs. Automatic death penalty for any gang-related felony. If you are already in prison on a gang-related felony, the line starts right there.

Anonymous said...

I know the real cause of violence in the black community. And so do you. Everyone does.

It's N-I-G-G-E-R-S.

Anonymous said...

Amazing, but not a surprise. Again, just being born white is offensive. For the first time in my life I have seriously considered buying a gun and getting firearm training. I have been nearly assaulted by feral teens at parks when out with my kids in DC parks.

Did the dipshits that wrote this article stop to consider that perhaps white people are starting pack heat to defend themselves? Oh I forgot, that's racist!

White Mother Living Among The Turds

Melanie said...

Ironically 71st Street in front of the Saint Columbanus church has been renamed Emmett Till St.



December 2, 2012 6:42 PM




Would that be the son of Louis Till, who was executed by hanging by the US Army for the murder of an Italian woman and the rape of two others?

Anonymous said...

"The church that conducted the funeral for this gang banger should have rejected it outright. Tell his family to have it elsewhere. Social stigma needs to return to these communities assuming it ever existed in the first place."

Just yesterday, I listened to one of the black ministers in Savannah spell out how to end violent crime in his community. Of course, part of the solution involves free education and job training, as well as gimme jobs. However, his main point was that the community needs to welcome criminals back into the community without the stigma of being criminals.

I give up!

jungle tactics said...

The problem with black criminality is blacks themselves, it has nothing to do with education, oportunites, poverty, ghettos.

Its all got to do with genetics, you can take bontavious out the ghetto and make him a football star, what do you get a violent foorball star, or actor, or policeman, or teacher.

Excercise is futility.

They themselves are the problem, how many learned black ppl come here and with all the education they still fiercely black, refusing to believe what is the only answer, blackness.

Not to be vilified by their brothers for trying to be black, they adopt a pro black philosophy like MLK and malcom X. The black feral behaviour is still there, instead of using cheap fire arms as weapons, they use distorted intelligent argument, that sounds logical but isn't.

I have only ever spoken to a black man that sees what we see, and didn't hide behind the usual educated feralness.

He was black and admitted that the problem was blackness, nothing else.

He was sought of like that black preacher that says the truth, but not as steroided.

1 black man that admitted the truth and took other blacks to task for justifying genetic blackness.

Needless to say, we know the reaction the other blacks gave him.

So sad that they have played to the elitists hands, and they are worse off now.

Our local trolls are quiet lateley, We miss hearing how much more educated they are than us, educated with white ppl's systems, how racist we are yet they live in white neighbourhoods, and send their kids to white schools.

Always bragging about how much they know, all this braggart arm flapping intimidation tactics.

You never hear white on here bragging about how much they know and erudite we are.

Jay in DC said...

MuayTyson said...

In 1900 it was pretty much an established fact for most Americans that blacks were an inferior subspecies. Public opinion changed very quickly and it was not due to outstanding behavior by blacks. How did this happen?
Was the worlds opinion that easy to change?


How it happened: http://vimeo.com/52009124 (90 minute run-time, life altering shattering of the scales upon your eyes if they are not already lifted)

And as you can see from the video, it was NOT easy. This was an infiltration so subtle and masterful that you simply MUST give credit where it is due. Few causes in history have ever managed 100 years of grinding away in subterfuge, infilration, and stealth to accomplish a goal that they knew they could never achieve militarily.

You post, quite astutely, the next step in the equation. What now? How do we, then turn this weapon backwards, or turn the world right side up again? On a long timeline, with no outside pressure which is what a country built upon the sweat of Europeans gave the enemy we could simply reverse engineer this process. Sadly, the barbarians are not at the gates, they are INSIDE of them, so we do not have the luxury of time. Hence, radicalism is now a requirement due to time constraint.

A shooting war is ill-advised and just about a guaranteed failure in this particular slice of time. Later, if the status quo is maintained and the wheels -really- come off. Re-evaluate, then it may not be. A combined arms approach is the key today. Heavy handed propaganda to ALL Whites you know, particularly moderates. Don't start in with dumb shit like "Naming the Jew" give them the movie above, give them Obama 2016, etc. Small moves... secondarily, wear your heritage on your sleeve, but not in people's faces. Do what the MRA and PUA communities do against feminism stand in the face of shaming language and stand tall. Raaaaayccccciiissss, it is thrown around now for the slightest of offenses, so if you are a de-facto racist by simply being white, then own it. You will be called it anyways.

Thirdly, and probably the most importantly. Network with the awake in places beyond SBPDL. As I said before there are great cogs and wheels that have rusted in a stable and civil society starting to creak and shudder back to life. The very same cogs and wheels of the juggernaut that built this country through blood, sweat, tears, intelligence, lack of risk aversion, etc. And lastly, do not be defeatist. Have a plan, which does not include curling up and dying.

Jay in DC said...

Anonymous said...
Amazing, but not a surprise. Again, just being born white is offensive. For the first time in my life I have seriously considered buying a gun and getting firearm training. I have been nearly assaulted by feral teens at parks when out with my kids in DC parks.

Take it from someone that has been navigating the mean streets of DC for a long while. (The real streets not DWL friendly NW or Arlington), you should think long and hard about the above decision. DCs firearm laws are rather draconian and you are "Guilty by Association" automatically, that association being your skin color. I'm not saying to NOT do this, but have a secondary option as well. Pick the right tool for the job, as they say.

I have some ahh "interaction" experience, and it generally works like this...

LTL (Less than lethal) options are preferred and as is the case in dealing with most animals/critters often once a single one is incapacitated the pack will break, think hyenas or jackals. So if you drop one with a chemical or electrical weapon (I highly recommend both) the rest will generally haul ass. If not, so what? You now have a VERY strong case for self-defense.

"I pepper sprayed one yoof when I felt in danger, and told the rest to leave me alone. At that point, they descended on me in a pack so I discharged my weapon."

This is basically what LEOs/COs and every other agency uses for CYA when dealing with litigous Baby Mama's looking for a pay day. It is a very sound defense strategy and will make your life emminently less complicated should you ever have to actually use deadly force. Just FYI...

Jay Santos said...

MuayTyson said...

In 1900 it was pretty much an established fact for most Americans that blacks were an inferior subspecies. Public opinion changed very quickly and it was not due to outstanding behavior by blacks. How did this happen?

...Was the worlds opinion that easy to change?


That is becoming the most interesting aspect of the problem for me. How, in spite of mountains of evidence to the contrary, do you convince a largely literate population that negroes are smart, peaceful, industrious, sexy and ultra-cool role models?

It's trully magic, the magic of movies and TV. It's possible that much of the media propoganda began to have its effect well before the skyrocketing of negro dysfunction. Back in the 60's and 70's, black violence, criminality and dissolution of the family hadn't reached the levels we see now.

It's entirely possible that, while blacks have a whole host of inate problems ranging from lower IQ, higher levels of violence and promiscuity, it took the political changes that only began in the mid-sixties to finally create the horror that we see today.

Anonymous said...

Maybe Paul or Zen or someone can give us a timeline and the techniques used to change public opinion.

This is response is not quite to your question, but you can get the Army psychological operations (PSYOP) field manual at any number of websites such as:

http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-05-30.pdf

You could possibly pick up a copy on Amazon, or in your local military surplus store:

http://www.amazon.com/Psyop-Military-Psychological-Operations-Manual/dp/0557052564

You might also dig up a copy of Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals." If all the people on the right who complain about Alinsky were to instead read his book and then practice what he preached, the political situation would be revolutionized. Here's some "rules," right out of Wikipedia:

• RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
• RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
• RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
• RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
• RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
• RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
• RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
• RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
• RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
• RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
• RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
• RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

Californian said...

AnalogMan, I take it you live in South Africa? I have a question:

From what you see, how do blacks perceive the world? And what kind of social order is needed to maintain levels of civilized behavior among them?

For example, is it literally impossible to get black Africans to see long term when it comes to things like farming, so that black run agriculture tends to fail?

And how do blacks perceive such things as democracy and modern industrial societies (which they seem to be unable to maintain)?

Do you think the differences between black and white genetic or cultural, or some combination?

Back in the mid-20th century, there was a period of optimism that blacks could be brought up to white standards by eliminating segregation-colonialism-apartheid, and perhaps tossing in some social programs. Well, all that was done, and the results have been pretty disastrous, especially in Africa.

The interesting thing is that today's DWLs (disingenuous white liberals) refuse to recognize the disaster wrought by their policies. No matter how many times that black-majority-rule fails, they insist on applying it again and again, much to the detriment of civilization--as you report in SA. Here's another question: what do you think is wrong with DWLs?

Californian said...

Whiskey said ... Black people used hyper-violence, on a massive scale, to ethnically cleanse Whites out of Cities. To take them over, by driving Whites out with constant, non-stop, grinding violence. That was basically the strategy from 1943 onwards, though you saw stirrings of it earlier. ...

Some interesting stuff here, and I'd like to see you elaborate (perhaps on your website?).

The usual narrative about the civil rights movement is that blacks won owing to non-violence, supported by massive DWL agitprop. I don't discount the political struggle, but the black violence needs to be examined more.

How much of DWL capitulation to blacks is a Stockholm Syndrome magnified by millions of black-on-white violent incidents? When faced with superior opposing force, DWLs create a pleasant collective delusion in which they can believe they still have power. Look at all the DWL produced TV shows and movies with blacks as heroes and whites as villains. Look at how the DWL magic turns gang-bangers into victims of violence and bad socio-economic conditions.

If a small group of people held hostage by terrorists for a few hours can identify with their captors, then larger numbers of DWLs, motivated by herd instinct and the need to maintain their egos, can rationalize away decades of black-on-white violence: flash mobs, drive-bys, torture-killings, the destruction of entire cities.

The 1968 Kerner Commission report on riots in America's cities called for massive federal spending and programs to give blacks everything they demanded and more (all implemented by LBJ and his successors). Civil rights was no longer about just repealing segregation; it became a massive transfer of wealth and power to blacks. You can look at the Kerner report as a statement of capitulation to superior force, creating what PK calls BRA. Sort of like ancient times when a civilized but decadent people would give cartloads of silver and gold tribute to barbarian tribes, then telling themselves that the barbarians pillaging their cities were "allies."


...The violence is never "senseless" because it always has a purpose. Every "hard" gang-banger who shot someone, even a toddler, will get laid THAT NIGHT over the killing.

I take it that you are implying that one reason for the seemingly senseless black-generated violence is that it results in increased reproduction of the most militant tribal individuals? Even if the perpetrator ends up incarcerated for life, his genetic heritage is disseminated and in the long run makes the tribe stronger?

Compare this to the ZPG (zero population growth) policies that whites have practiced over the last century. ZPG parallels the growth of BRA, de-colonialization, and the mass migrations of third worlders into Europa. I suspect there is a lot more going on here than you'll see on the six o'clock news.

Again, I'd like to see this elaborated.

truth said...

how do blacks perceive the world? Like it has robbed them somehow, and that they are owed reparations for eternity.

And what kind of social order is needed to maintain levels of civilized behavior among them?
A tribal chiefdom, where the chief is a cruel exacting ruthless dictator, like shaka, that is what it takes to clamp down on them, hence mugabe's approach.they must be weakened thru starvation to quell their impulse control.they marginally function under terribal tribalsism. But that's blacks for you.

Do you think the differences between black and white genetic or cultural, or some combination? Strictly genetic, which leads to cultural keyholing of genetics, a cycle that feeds itself, untill stasis is reached, which is what we have

what do you think is wrong with DWLs? The desire to appear sophisticated and learned, to stand out from the heard, to be cultured and well read, that coupled with new agey eastern mysticism, all fused into this new doctrine of destruction thru altruism.

The culture of charity is so sickening in south africa, it seems as if being capable is frowned upon, everything has to be group think and group effort, hive mind mentality.

The same pathologies mentioned on the blog is exactly the same pathologies afflicting black people in south africa, exactly

Cronyism as soon as they get public service jobs, it goes a step further in mandelatopia.

Personnel head hunters, if they black immediatly throw the resume away one they see its a white person, with the endevour that they will be able to place a friend or family member,

Otherwise its the same in haiti, bristol, US, europe

Californian said...

[continued]

That's the pattern in a lot of places. Africa. Parts of SE Asia. Latin America. The Balkans. The Caucuses. A lot of the ME.

This has been the history of much of the world: a constant struggle for dominance, territory, genes. Civilization is supposed to bring an end to these struggles, but civilization seems to be breaking down in America's inner cities, as well as in various European neighborhoods dominated by the famous "Youths." And we can also see the fate of civilization in black-majority-rule Africa.

To DWLs, the violence and poverty and dysfunction are all temporary socio-economic problems to be solved by throwing in tons of taxpayer money and giving themselves cushy jobs in the bureaucracy or NGOs. But as the history of the last half century shows, BRA is not a problem which can be solved, but a civilizational decline, evident in former cities such as Detroit. But DWLs, afflicted by an epidemic of Stockholm Syndrome, refuse to recognize this reality. James Burnham makes a similar point in his epic "Suicide of the West," and this was at the start of the era of civil rights and de-colonialization.

One last thought: we see the government is alarmed by the reports of more Americans buying guns. Do you think that the average American has an idea of what is going on--that the country is in the middle of a low level guerrilla war? And are reacting instinctively to carve out their own territories?

Bogolyubski said...

Meanwhile, the Republicans just can't help but to poop all over themselves: Once you go black, you never go back!

Another "conservative" groid who voted for Obama at least once. Repukes already tried a cheap-imitation magic knee-grow four years ago, a complete disaster. Now, like the proverbial dog, they insist upon returning to their own vomit. For the millionth time: Republicans are the enemy!

Anonymous said...

A tribal chiefdom, where the chief is a cruel exacting ruthless dictator, like shaka, that is what it takes to clamp down on them, hence mugabe's approach.they must be weakened thru starvation to quell their impulse control.

You know NYC mayor Bloomberg's cracking down on a lot of seemingly petty things in NYC, like Big Gulp(tm) type drinks? And banning trans-fat? And over-enforcement of marijuana laws? And more serious things like gun control?

It seems to be ch*cke*n sh*t, but one interpretation is that given the demographics of the city, NY's elites know that if the government were not cracking down, the populace would overindulge to the point of dysfunction. It's that impulse control thing.

There's an unspoken recognition that when you switch out the populace, you also have to switch the policies.

Just a random thought from the trenches of BRA.

MuayTyson said...

Thank you all for answering my question. I actually thought the you would give the answer that you did. So let me make a few more statements and ask a few more questions.

First question what roll do women have in this being that they are more emotional? Women had a huge effect and were instrumental in the Under Ground Railroad as well as the Civil Rights movement.

If the Communist want the fall of the United States how do they expect to control the Orcs? Will Orcs be the majority of the military? If they are who in their right minds want an African military?

I guess the Alinskites and Commies just want total destruction of the world? Because a world full of Orcs and Groids is not a controlable world.

Anonymous said...

Majority Negro = Societal Demise.

It's a mathematical certainty.

WHAT'S NOT TO UNDERSTAND?????

So CAL Snowman said...

MuayTyson said...

"In 1900 it was pretty much an established fact for most Americans that blacks were an inferior subspecies. Public opinion changed very quickly and it was not due to outstanding behavior by blacks. How did this happen?"

There is no simple, easy explanation. It's very interesting that you picked the date 1900. You see the first step in this destructive dance was to replace Victorian era morality with something more malleable and decadent. Victorian morality guided much of the Western World in the 19th century and focused on sexual restraint, low tolerance of crime and a strict social code of conduct. The morality and values of the Victorians can be classed under Religion, Morality, Elitism, Industrialism and Improvement. As you can see, in order for something like today's nightmare to take place, Victorian values had to be replaced, but how?

World War 1 completely obliterated the Victorian outlook on Western Civilization. Man was now seen as a wicked, immoral beast, capable of inflicting unimaginable evils on his fellow man. The same time frame also saw the Bolshevik Revolution, giving the global communists a huge base from which to launch their attacks on Western civilization. So now we have a disenfranchised and psychologically shattered people (Western Civ) just waiting to be molded by some sinister entity, combined with the rise of global communism in the East (the Soviet Union). So now we are starting to get into the Hegelian Dialectic that the Globalist Bankers had planned. We have the Capitalist West and the Communist East and soon we would have World War 2 (problem, reaction, solution) all carefully crafted by the Globalist Bankers.

World War 2 is THE SEMINAL EVENT in 20th century history and played a crucial role in the founding of BRA. World War 2 introduced the NAZIS! to a global audience and the history books. The NAZIS were formulated to disenfranchise and reject any concept of "White Interests" and "White Rights." The NAZIS are/were used as a tool by the Globalist Bankers to quell any opposition to White racial dispossession to our homelands. You have all heard the liberals scream NAZI! time and again at any White person who seeks to legitimize the White struggle. World War 2 also introduced horrific weapons of mass destruction and produced the highest amount of casualties of any war in human history. Much of Europe and Asia was left in smoldering ruins. The PSYCHOLOGICAL damage done to the West is incalculable. World War 2 made us believe that we were little more than savages. It fractured the PSYCHE of the West, and this is important, because a fractured psychological state is very easy to REPROGRAM. (Continued)

Anonymous said...

Hello all:

Jay in DC:

Thanks for the advice. I will definitely use it. I have been in DC awhile but I have noticed that the natives are becoming more squirrelly. I try to stay just within my hood I try to avoid the metro.

Californian:

Most people are in denial as to what is going on in this country. The aware people are buying guns. Most people though, are stuck in denial. Subcortically, just beneath the conscious, they know, but to face the truth would be too much. Frankly I don't know why. A defense mechanism perhaps. It's unsettling to know that the groids and other third world turds that are trying to overthrow this country really deep down want whitey dead. I think optimism and can do attitude, as Pat noted, is very white and/ or American, yet it can does weaken us,

My plan; to have another kid or two( I have 2) and then suck every social service dry here in DC while arming my self and learning how to use firearms. Then go west..,

How do you think the 'stand your ground' laws fit into all this?

So CAL Snowman said...

(continued)

After World War 2 had left a psychologically shattered populace, a new, devious device was introduced to the public in 1948, the TELEVISION. For centuries Western Civilization relied on the Newspaper to provide them information about the world. The newspaper was NEVER going to convince millions of Americans that blacks were just like Whites with different skin tones. However, the Television with it's hypnotic like abilities to ensnare its audience would prove to be the perfect tool in manipulation and indoctrination. Slowly but surely the Television became a staple of the American living room, due in part to the economic boom of the 1950s. Now that almost everyone had a television in their domicile, the 1960s and the real revolution was about to begin.

The 1960s saw a full spectrum blitz of televised propaganda. Black faces were shown being attacked by racist dogs and racist fire hoses. The type of images shown on the Television would have been impossible to convey via Newsprint. Protests were televised as were the "results" of the protests. AMericans were fed a steady diet of predictive images which convinced them that EVIL WHITEY was hammering the black man to the ground. The destruction of LILY WHITE cities and neighborhoods by the black revolutionaries was NEVER shown.

By the time MLK arrived on the scene, White America was primed to swallow his message of tolerance and judging a man by the content of his character. I think they just wanted the violence and chaos to end. At any rate, White America swallowed the Shit MLK spoon fed them and then he was offed to remind Whitey that Whitey is still very racist and dangerous. The death of MLK was the birth of BRA. You pretty much know the rest of the story from here on out, LBJ, Civil Rights Movement, Marxist infiltration of the colleges, etc.

I try to focus on the MACRO aspects of our decline and this is in no way a complete picture. My main point in emphasizing the two World Wars is to show how they completely changed the psychological makeup of an entire RACE of people by exposing them to the worst horrors imaginable.

Anonymous said...

Everyone should check Pat's responses to everyone else's comments on the prior article:

He asks if we think he is an accommodationist?

Pat, I think that you are elitist neocon. I don't give a rip who your blueblood ancestors are. And I don't care if what I dm writing here is being recorded.

So Obumma got elected again, so what? Blacks are unemployed and jailed at record numbers. People are calling for secession. Hispanic immigrants are not reproducing as much. More than half of the babies born last year were white. People are rebelling in small ways and they are arming themselves.

The Great White Middle Class still has fight in it my friend..,

Me thinks that you are like Glenn Beck cautioning those who signed secession petitions because oh no the government might be keeping track of their names. Me thinks you are trying to intimidate us.,,, which tells me that you speak for the elites and that they are afraid,


You know what, I think it is GOOD that the government and it's stupid little mignions are aware and FEARFUL that people are buying guns. Is that not what our forefathers wanted? They did want citizens afraid of the government.

As for a disciplined rational resistance, this site is a good start...

Anonymous said...

So Cal:

Brilliant!

This is why I do not have television or Internet access at home for my kids. Also, I point out frequently to my son the behaviors of groids that make them distinct from us and vice versa. I point out that whites are better because we are different from groids and other turds

YIH said...

Stuff Black People Do Like:
Da booty. And thanks to Paul for turning me on to this site. Read the first link and the second one will really help you to understand.

Jassi said...

This is off topic but if you guys haven't seen this, it's worth watching a bit of to get a perspective on the reality of race, and how deeply race penetrates an individual. The mannerisms of these people are so similar to an African American that one can't deny that the behavior is not something they learned. It's innate and forms the core of these people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL3UHF5SlEU

Californian said...

If the Communist want the fall of the United States how do they expect to control the Orcs? Will Orcs be the majority of the military?

A standard communist "tactic" (to use a Marxist-Leninist term) has been to exploit any group which can be used as muscle against the ruling class. Initially, this was the working class. Later, it became blacks, and these days it's third world immigrants. (By communists, I mean radical leftists in general.)

Orwell sums it up as the middle (communists) using the lower (the "oppressed") against the top (the current ruling class). Communist agitprop stirs up the current underclass in order to overthrow the ruling class. Then the communists step in and take control. This worked pretty well in Russia in 1917.

Go back a century, and communists were pushing the white working class into revolution. Then whites caught on to this racket and turned against the communists (see the rise of fascism, McCarthyism, Reagan Democrats). So the communists switched over to agitating among blacks. You had the Long Hot Summers, and you had a panicked white establishment push through the entire civil rights agenda, especially the socialism of the war on poverty.

Look at the flexibility of the tactic: today, communists are promoting illegal immigration at the expense of the white working class. And aligning with Muslims even though Islam is about as anti-egalitarian as you can get.

It's all about tactics. You choose the group you need in the same way you choose the weapon best suited for a battle. The communists can pull the switcheroo on the working class without missing a beat in the party line. It matters not if the war is with Eurasia or Eastasia, but that the war be fought.

As for controlling the underclass: the communists believe that, because they have superior discipline as well as a scientific understanding of history, they will come out on top in the end. The "oppressed" groups which supported the communists seizure of power will either get into line or be annihilated. This was so after the Russian Revolution, just as it is today true in Zimbabwe.

None of this would work were it not for the various enablers of the communists in the ruling classes: corporate foundations, red trust fund babies, and the usual suspects among the DWLs.

Of course, it could be that the communists have completely misunderstood the situation, and that today they are unleashing forces which they can not control. In that case, they be bringing down everything around them. Which means that if white people can understand the tactics, they might come out ahead.

Anonymous said...

Thread winner has to be ex new yorker. While i type this i notice the section 8 house across the street has every light in the house on and as far as i know theres only one occupant, older black lady. Meanwhile i set my alarm for 5am and decide who should use bathroom first me or wifey who at 40 got her RN. We struggled on one income for 4 yrs to get to this point too...

Anonymous said...

I don't think Rev. Brooks is catholic. Is the thug? If not, why are they in a catholic church? The perfect pastor would have been Father Pfleger (he's white), Obama's buddy and fellow white hater.

Anonymous said...

Bogo, you're right about republicans. I never liked Watts, he worked with Gingrich to make sure affirmative action was untouched.

Anonymous said...

Meant to say that our forefathers did NOT want us afraid of the government

Discard said...

Anon at 4:31 PM, Dec 3: If you have something to say about Pat Albertosaurus' comments on the previous article, (In Their Own Image: Will 90% Black Detroit Cease Being a City?), why don't you post a comment there? Is your mind so disordered that you would walk into a hardware store and try to buy milk?

Anonymous said...

Good tactic anon @5:03 pm. Used it on my 2 and they are very groid wary. It works. And if you can homeschool so much the better. Keep on them so they are inculcated.

MuayTyson said...

Liberals and Commies never seem to know the end game. They are adpt to unkleash forces there is no way to control.

Anonymous said...

Jim Crow said:

I posted this comment on a "White Privilege" video on YouTube, and none of the responses could contest it.

"White privilege" is nothing more than code for Black failure. Blacks have Affirmative Action, minority business grants, university admission preferences, scholarship preferences, The Race Card, and the list goes on and on. Even with all the goodies, they still fail as a whole to belong in modern society. Just look at any Black- run country or city in the world (Detroit, Newark NJ, Camden NJ, Birmingham, AL, Memphis, TN, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Haiti, Congo) are any of these places desirable?

My answer was: White privelege is this entire damn comment.

They know it's true, and have nothing to reply with other than something to make me feel guilty. They don't even have an argument, as I've seen several times on this blog. How long before people begin to see the truth?

SKIP said...

"Will Orcs be the majority of the military?

Sorry Californian, as I have posted in the past, since I work with the U.S. military, I can attest that blacks are already the greater part of the Army now, not so true of the Marines though as they are the sharp end of the stick where few blacks like to be and the Navy and Air Force have intelligence requirements (soon to be lowered)at the moment. I would also mention again that besided ghetto blacks, there are a great number of foreign blacks in the Army too.

Snapperhead Soup said...

http://tigersophia.blogspot.com/2012/11/why-i-spending-ton-of-money-and-time-to.html

Amy Chua's Chewish daughter explains why she voted for Obama. How the children of the elites think.

Anonymous said...

Californian said...DWLs create a pleasant collective delusion in which they can believe they still have power.

My DWL mother is 66. She used to march for NAACP, NOW, Gloria Steinem, and various gay rights organizations.

My family comes from Alabama. My mother used to tell me stories of visiting her great-grandmother in the hills and using the outhouse. No running water, hand-me-down clothes. She makes it sound like torture. My great-grandfather moved the family to Indiana to find factory work. My grandfather was a veteran, and bought a Texaco gas station franchise after the war. She despised him.

My mother was the first in our family to earn a college education, the first feminist, the first to get her teeth fixed, and the first ever to divorce. She never looked back. She said my father was a violent, raging racist who used to beat up blacks in school. She hates him too. She divorced him when I was 2, and I do not know him.

She has spent her ENTIRE LIFE avoiding her redneck past. She does not want to be the "wrong kind of white person". She refuses to even talk about it at times. I can't figure out where we became broken, but I am trying to break this cycle of self-hatred.

I have other relatives who deny their heritage, including my own brother. One male cousin went to Brown University and lived in RI for a few years. He is a liberal snob, and makes fun of redneck whites, cigarette smoking, pop drinkers, their pickup trucks, Walmart, NASCAR, etc.. He speaks with so much venom for his fellow whites that it makes me feel sick.

They run from their whiteness. My mother started it, and I can't figure out where it all fell apart.

AnalogMan said...

Whiskey, you are mistaken. Blacks do not have a strategy. They have only behaviour (TNB) which is simply the expression of their nature. When you compare their present-day behaviour with that of 1950, you see a change in strategy. It's not. The difference is, in 1950 White people controlled their behaviour. Their nature has not changed. They've simply been unleashed.

AnalogMan said...

Californian, that's not one question! I'm no expert, but I'll try. Truth has given his views, and they are correct in my experience.

Let me reiterate what I said before: our problem is one of anthropomorphism. We ascribe to non-human things our own human motives and thoughts. We see ourselves in our pets, and interpret their behaviour in terms of our own motives. I'm convinced that negroes think very differently from us. I'm not able to get into their heads, all I can do is observe their behaviour. What I see is an incomprehensible capacity for destruction. A complete lack of appreciation for any value. Unbelievable cruelty - no empathy whatever. A couple of anecdotes:

A colleague once told me of an experience of a friend of his, a farmer, which he said led him to understand the African mind. He had to leave his farm for a few days, so he called his staff in and told them they were to continue their chores in his absence, and threatened dire mayhem if they didn't maintain the farm in perfect condition in his absence. He went off in trepidation, and on his return, sure enough, the entire staff was drunk. But as he looked around he found that his crops were irrigated, his garden watered and weeded, his livestock fed and watered, everything was in order.

But his staff's own vegetable garden... just a few dry sticks remained. Their own chickens were just a few dusty mounds of feathers. All their stock, all their crops were dead.

(continued...)

AnalogMan said...

...
I once spoke to another man who had had experience working in an international consulting company which employed some highly educated Africans. He told me that he spoke to some of these. Bear in mind they were sophisticated, intelligent and highly trained. They told him that the job was incredibly stressful (I have read this elsewhere - the rate of mental illness is very high among these people). They go to work in the morning, dressed in suits, but it's not their natural habitat. They play a role all day long. And even while they are operating in the White man's world, the savage is lurking in their minds. It's like schizophrenia; they never know from one moment to the next whether their thoughts are the product of their Western training, or the savage culture they sprang from; the one that believes in witchcraft and demons.

The fact is, Africans in Africa are generally unsophisticated. They don't believe in that equality crap. They are perfectly aware that White men can do things that they would never be able to do. They're quite happy to accept that as the natural order of things. But because they are also naturally destructive, they need to be ruled with a firm hand. As Truth said, they need an absolute despot, like Shaka of the Zulus. They actually prefer that style of rule. You'd expect that an absolute tyrant who, for example, had 8000 of his own people killed in a single day to mourn his mother's death, would be hated by his people. Africans boast about how powerful their leader is.

They have a group mentality. Nobody is allowed to rise above the herd, so nobody tries any harder than the benchmark set by the group. I once attended a lecture at which the speaker was praising the late President Julius Nyerere of Tanzania for his innovative application of "African socialism" which sought to leverage this typically African mindset. At question time, I asked him, "It's my understanding that this policy has been a dismal failure. Am I missing something?" He replied, "A failure in what terms?" I said, "In terms of feeding his people." "Ah, well", he says, "if you look at it that way..."

As to how much is genetic and how much cultural, ultimately I believe it comes down to genetics. Not that culture is insignificant, but that culture is itself the expression of their genetic make-up. They create the same culture wherever they go. Obviously an individual child born into that culture, White or black, has a huge mountain to climb to rise above it. But black children raised in a White culture don't seem able to benefit from their advantage. A fellow South African now living in the USA told me of another White SA couple who moved to the USA, taking with them an adopted Zulu baby. Apparently the boy is a bit of a disappointment to his parents. Who would have thought that he would grow up to be a typical Zulu yoof? I just laugh.

Obviously each individual is not only the sum of his genes. Even IQ, which even back in the 1960's when I studied Industrial Psychology was acknowledged to be heritable, is affected by environmental factors. A blow to the head with a hammer will reduce your IQ to zero. Foetal alcohol syndrome is an example of congenital but not heritable mental retardation. Poor nutrition can stunt mental as well as physical development. But the best environment in the world will not enable you to transcend your genetic heritage.

What's wrong with DWLs? Again, anthropomorphism. They start with the assumption that the aliens are "just like us". They identify with them, and feel guilty for being more successful than them. And if they feel guilty, then you should, too, and the fact that you don't is proof of your guilt.

Or, the short answer, which I favour: they're just plain evil.

AnalogMan said...

Anon @ 6:55 I can't figure out where it all fell apart.

It was that college education. A little education is a dangerous thing. Especially for women, and more especially if it differentiates them from their "ignorant, hick" family. So, the more the education sets them apart from their roots, the more those roots must be despised. That, after all, is the mark of an educated person (or so they have been taught).

Melanie said...

@AnalogMan

You should write a guest article for this blog. Everything you posted makes perfect sense. It's as if watching the pieces of a puzzle being quickly and surely fitted into their proper place, and the picture emerges clearly.

I especially appreciate the point you make, which I have tried to make but never so articulately, that negro behavior can't be explained in terms of any grand strategy, not in the big picture. There is no use in trying to figure out this or that in order to change their behavior or thinking, such as it is. There is no use in trying to "fix" them-the best that could ever be done would be to control them if we are forced to have them amongst us, and we threw that tool away into the depths of the ocean abyss, never to be recovered.

All that remains is to separate from them, anyway we can. For now, a kind of "internal self-exile" may be the best we can do. The enemy-whoever they ultimately are-is chipping away at that small remaining right, in such ways as planting section 8 housing in utterly illogical places-illogical except to their illogical purpose.

I can't tell if I have hope for a better, more encompassing separation or not. I want to have it. If it ever occurs-the ability for whites to live apart from negros completely and openly-I suspect it will come about in spite of soundly sleeping whites, who will only awaken once their backs are against the wall. I mean really against the wall. If even then.

I think that's what we really all wonder, at the bottom line. We already know they are what they are and always will be. The question is, how can we manage to live apart from them and all their dysfunction-dysfunction in a white society, that is. It's perfectly natural for them.

Californian said...

They run from their whiteness.

Here's a question I have asked of white liberals: why don't you put your money where your mouth is and surrender your own "white privilege?"

Their answer? None.

* There's nothing to stop a DWL from pulling their kids out of private schools and sending them to public schools so they can enjoy all the benefits (ahem) of a public education.
* There's nothing to stop them from moving into their local inner city so they can enjoy all the benefits of a diverse neighborhood.
* There's nothing to stop them from giving up their own fancy jobs and working in a diverse service industry.
* There's nothing to stop them from handing over their own wealth to blacks as a personal reparation for slavery.

I've taken this further: how about if the government were to institute a special program in which liberals could trade their schools, their houses and their jobs with those of the minority of their choice? For example, their children would give up their acceptance to that ivy league university so an underprivileged black could attend.

The DWL response to these obvious points? Again: none.

I have a sneaky suspicion that the liberal "guilt" is a mask for maintaining their own power. They can claim to abhor the "privileges" of being white while having all the power in the world. Let's not forget that liberals dominate the media, the schools, the corporate foundations, and sizable chunks of the federal bureaucracy.

By beating their breasts in public, DWLs can rationalize away own very real privilege.

Anonymous said...

And that's how you beat the DWLs. You don't give over your personal power. You disengage. You self exile. You homeschool your kids. You grow your own food. You do cash business with like minded people. It can be done. Like minded people will find one another

Californian said...

AnalogMan, thanks for the response to my question.

Some more thoughts...

The fact is, Africans in Africa are generally unsophisticated. They don't believe in that equality crap.

Nor do they believe in equality here in America, since they are constantly pushing for advantage based on the color-of-their-skin with all the race hustles and government programs.

They are perfectly aware that White men can do things that they would never be able to do.

One thing I observed from my own visit to Rhodesia was how well a white-run society worked. Everything functioned, despite a war and international sanctions. Electric lights, buses, service in restaurants, rental car agencies, all were up to Western standards. There was a sense of order. Even in public places where blacks outnumbered whites, there was never the kind of tension you had when strolling about America's inner cities.

Blacks seem to believe that whites have a special magic which makes things happen, and that as long as whites have confidence in themselves as rulers, they can make it work for Africans as well. And why not believe this? Look at the world of difference between white-ruled and black-ruled countries.

Westerners might think about this (though they won't) when cooking up foreign aid and development programs for African countries. No amount of money is going to make them into self-sufficient industrial states, given the mindset of their peoples. The historical record of Western aid to Africa being diverted into the bank accounts of the kleptocracy, or being used by warlords to reinforce their power, is ignored.

(Come to think about it, the historical record of DWL failure in America is also ignored!)

[Blacks] have a group mentality. Nobody is allowed to rise above the herd, so nobody tries any harder than the benchmark set by the group.

The group mentality was a basis for Nyerere's Ujamaa--that Africans were by nature collectivist, and that capitalism and multi-party democracy were unsuited for them. During de-colonialization, black politicians were adept at using the rhetoric of liberalism to give the delusion that they were going to establish new democracies throughout the continent. But once in power, it was back to the big man ruling the collective, and out the window went quaint liberal ideas such as due process and elections.

You also wonder if this is why in America blacks abhor other blacks who get ahead in school for "acting white." Nobody can rise above the herd. And you can see it in the c. 95% black vote for Obama.

Californian said...

[continued]

AnalogMan said... I once attended a lecture at which the speaker was praising the late President Julius Nyerere of Tanzania for his innovative application of "African socialism" which sought to leverage this typically African mindset. At question time, I asked him, "It's my understanding that this policy has been a dismal failure. Am I missing something?" He replied, "A failure in what terms?" I said, "In terms of feeding his people." "Ah, well", he says, "if you look at it that way..."

Back when I was an undergrad, I took a course in current African history. Nyerere was popular among tenured set at the time. The professor told us that even though (socialist) Tanzania had a lower standard of living than (capitalist) Kenya, the former was more in line with African expectations. Jomo Kenyatta's Kenya was considered a sell-out. Maybe because Kenyatta was "acting white?"

You could see the shock on the faces of the various DWLs in the classroom. How could it be that their black liberation heroes were tossing the liberalism out the window? Well, as good ideologues, they found ways to rationalize it away. It's a downward cycle of self-delusion, perhaps one reason the Western world is facing crisis today.

What's wrong with DWLs? Again, anthropomorphism. They start with the assumption that the aliens are "just like us".

Look at Star Trek, the ultimate in liberal science fiction. The show's concept of "aliens" is that they are people just like us humans, only with superficial physical differences (color of skin, shape of ears, an antenna here or there). Ghee whiz, humans and aliens can all work together on a great big multicultural starship. There are no differences in metabolism, psychology, or perceptions which would prevent everyone from building a better galaxy.

Well, maybe there was a time when there could be optimism about the future, say back in the mid-20th century. What is remarkable is that DWL policies over the last century have created a world more akin to Mad Max than Star Trek. This is so whether we are talking about Africa, or Detroit, or the third world enclaves in European cities. Yet such is the power of DWL ideology, that they refuse to recognize the fiasco they have wrought.

Or, the short answer, which I favour: they're [DWLs] just plain evil.

It's getting harder to disagree with that.

Anonymous said...

"What happened?" - The authoritarian dictatorship that slammed down hard on their ability to make unbelievably vile, stupid, shortsighted, and dysfunctional decisions ended. As you have mentioned, it would not be possible to have indifinitely maintained that social framework.

"If you depend on a tribal rabble constantly grinding on the other people you seek to drive out, the violence just does not get turned off." - Precisely. violence is selected for, unless something selects against it.

"If the Communist want the fall of the United States how do they expect to control the Orcs? Will Orcs be the majority of the military? If they are who in their right minds want an African military?" - They didn't control the situation in Iran, they were lined up against the wall and shot. They wouldn't do it here. marxism has become suicidally insane, if it didn't start there.

Anonymous said...

was the quaker movement and the democrats behind it?

The problem with black criminality is blacks themselves, it has nothing to do with education, oportunites, poverty, ghettos.

Its all got to do with genetics, you can take bontavious out the ghetto and make him a football star, what do you get a violent foorball star, or actor, or policeman, or teacher.

Excercise is futility.

They themselves are the problem, how many learned black ppl come here and with all the education they still fiercely black, refusing to believe what is the only answer, blackness.

Not to be vilified by their brothers for trying to be black, they adopt a pro black philosophy like MLK and malcom X. The black feral behaviour is still there, instead of using cheap fire arms as weapons, they use distorted intelligent argument, that sounds logical but isn't.

I have only ever spoken to a black man that sees what we see, and didn't hide behind the usual educated feralness.

He was black and admitted that the problem was blackness, nothing else.

He was sought of like that black preacher that says the truth, but not as steroided.

1 black man that admitted the truth and took other blacks to task for justifying genetic blackness.

Needless to say, we know the reaction the other blacks gave him.

So sad that they have played to the elitists hands, and they are worse off now.

Our local trolls are quiet lateley, We miss hearing how much more educated they are than us, educated with white ppl's systems, how racist we are yet they live in white neighbourhoods, and send their kids to white schools.

Always bragging about how much they know, all this braggart arm flapping intimidation tactics.

You never hear white on here bragging about how much they know and erudite we are.

December 3, 2012 10:13 AM
Anonymous Jay in DC said...

MuayTyson said...

In 1900 it was pretty much an established fact for most Americans that blacks were an inferior subspecies. Public opinion changed very quickly and it was not due to outstanding behavior by blacks. How did this happen?
Was the worlds opinion that easy to change?

How it happened: http://vimeo.com/52009124 (90 minute run-time, life altering shattering of the scales upon your eyes if they are not already lifted)

And as you can see from the video, it was NOT easy. This was an infiltration so subtle and masterful that you simply MUST give credit where it is due. Few causes in history have ever managed 100 years of grinding away in subterfuge, infilration, and stealth to accomplish a goal that they knew they could never achieve militarily

Anonymous said...

The irony that not many people know about today is that MLK was on his way down when he was killed. His speeches were only attracting audiences of a few hundred, down from thousands in the early 60s. His political power was in free fall with both the white and black establishments. Young blacks were rejecting his message of non-violence and peace and turning to more confrontational leaders like Malcolm X and other radicals. By killing him, JER turned him into a martyr and a global icon. Getting killed was probably the best possible career move MLK could have made.

Anonymous said...

If anything they wanted government to be afraid of US.

Anonymous said...

Nothing new there. Trying to wish away their own criminality by voiding the legal and moral standards that define crime and criminals is one of the oldest tricks in their book. It's just an elevated form of 'I didn't do nuffins.'

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous (about the martyrdom of St. Martin the Adulterer):
The irony that not many people know about today is that MLK was on his way down when he was killed. His speeches were only attracting audiences of a few hundred, down from thousands in the early 60s. His political power was in free fall with both the white and black establishments. Young blacks were rejecting his message of non-violence and peace and turning to more confrontational leaders like Malcolm X and other radicals. By killing him, JER turned him into a martyr and a global icon. Getting killed was probably the best possible career move MLK could have made.

Indeed true, but there's more. As you mention, St. Martin had outlived his usefulness to his communist masters (his handler, Stanley Levinson, was an actual member of CPUSA). Hoover had tapes of his group-sexcapades, including one where his holiness shouts how happy he was to be "fuckin' for Jeezus" (I plan to make that one into a ringtone to give to dumbass Christians who think he was a great 'Xtian conservative') and was about to blow the lid on the whole sordid mess - permanently discrediting his holiness in 1968 America. A copy should be sent to Glenn Beck too, just to rub his nose in it.

His masters, who already had control over sections of the government by 1968, likely engineered the hit, leaving James Earl Ray holding the bag along with a well-marked trail leading to some lawyer in Southern MO with KKK ties. In the wake of St. Martin's demise, a Federal judge locked up all of the FBI tapes for 75 years to "protect the family". The plan, as we can see, worked. To add icing on the red cake, in the last 20 years or so there have been numerous "conservatives" from Conservatism, Inc. touting the Christian conservative virtues of this worthless POS groid.

Anonymous said...


"I pepper sprayed one yoof when I felt in danger, and told the rest to leave me alone. At that point, they descended on me in a pack so I discharged my weapon."

This is basically what LEOs/COs and every other agency uses for CYA when dealing with litigous Baby Mama's looking for a pay day. It is a very sound defense strategy and will make your life emminently less complicated should you ever have to actually use deadly force. Just FYI...

December 3, 2012 10:34 A



Don't forget the phrase"in fear for my life".Above all else you MUST add that to any statement you give after an act of self-defense that leaves someone hurt or dead.