Wednesday, December 12, 2012

You Can't Hide Your Lying Eyes: Conservatism Inc's Refusal to Admit Detroit is 92 Percent Black


It’s hard to take Conservatism Inc. seriously. Over the past 60 years, conservatives trying to defend America have allowed the nation to be remade by Disingenuous White Liberals (DWL), crafting their defense on a proverbial Etch-a-Sketch.

Each time DWLs shake the foundations of culture, civility, social norms, etc. in America, Conservatism Inc. sees its Etch-a-Sketch defense of the nation modified – to support much of what DWLs have altered.

I became interested in Detroit, not because I’m from there, but because it was so obvious to me the reality of why The Arsenal of Democracy had failed: just like in Haiti (with the revolution of San Domingo), white people had been forced out by a black revolution – the black rebellion of 1967.

The city was remade in a black image, though no one, absolutely no one, within the rarified halls of Conservatism Inc. will dare mention that Detroit is more than a 90 percent black city today. Take Terence Jeffrey of CNSnews.com, who wrote this about Detroit [Obama's America Will Become Detroit, 12-12-12]:

If America continues down the road to Obama's America — a road that began when President Franklin Roosevelt started building a welfare state here — our entire nation will become Detroit.

Obama's economic and moral vision has played out in that city. What he seeks has been achieved there.

Last week, as reported by the Detroit Free Press, Michigan's state treasurer told Detroit's mayor and city council that the state may soon appoint an emergency financial manager for the city. Under Michigan law, the paper said, only such a manager can initiate the steps leading to a bankruptcy filing for the city.

By current calculations, Detroit faces obligations over the next six months that exceed its revenues by $47 million. The city, the Free Press reported, now pays $1.08 in benefits to municipal workers and retirees for every $1.00 it pays in salary.

What happened to Detroit? It is achieving socialism in one city.

Traditional two-parent families and the productive taxpaying citizens they produce have fled. In 1950, according the U.S. Census Bureau, Detroit had 1,849,568 people and was the fifth-largest city in the nation. By 2000, its population had dropped to 951,270; by 2010, to 713,777; and by 2011, to 706,585.

What has happened to the people who remain? The Census Bureau estimates there are 563,055 people age 16 or older in the city who could potentially work and be part of the labor force. But only 54.3 percent of these — or 305,479 individuals — actually do participate in the labor force, meaning they either have a job or are looking for one.
Another 257,576 of Detroit residents age 16 or older — 45.7 percent of that demographic — do not participate in the labor force. They do not have a job, and they are not looking for one.

In fact, these 257,576 people in Detroit who do not have a job and are not looking for one outnumber the 224,846 residents who do have jobs. But of the 224,846 residents who do have jobs, 34,500 — or 15.3 percent — have jobs with the government. Thus, this city that boasted 1,849,568 residents in 1950 has only 190,346 private-sector workers today.

There are 264,209 households in Detroit, and 91,204 of them — or 34.5 percent — get food stamps.

Very few of the people who are staying out of the labor force in Detroit are staying out because they are stay-at-home moms with working husbands. Of the 264,209 households in Detroit, only 24,275 — or 9.2 percent — are married couple families with children under 18. Another 78,438 households — or 29.7 percent of the total — are "families" headed by women with no husband present. Of these, 43,742 have children under 18.

There were 12,103 babies born in Detroit in the 12 months prior to the Census Bureau survey, and 9,124 of them — or 75.4 percent — were born to unmarried women.

Of the 363,281 housing units in Detroit, 99,072 are vacant. Indeed, vacant houses have become a powerful visual symbol of what advancing socialism has done to the city. Traditional family life is nearing extinction in this once vibrant corner of America.

Obama said in Michigan that if the federal government does not take more money away from people who have earned it, the public schools may not be able to buy school books. But the Department of Education says that in the Detroit public schools — which have books — only 7 percent of the eight graders are grade-level proficient in reading and only 4 percent are grade-level proficient in math.

School books are not lacking here. Self-reliance, the spirit of individualism, and the Judeo-Christian values that support marriage and family are. They have been driven out by a government that wants the people to depend on it rather than on themselves, their families and their faith.

Do you notice anything… missing? Who is in control of political power in Detroit? Just what racial group is the majority of the population of Detroit?

Wouldn’t that information be vital in determining part of the reason – if not the most important reason – for the demise of Detroit in every measurable category for the quality of life in the city?

Not once does Terence Jeffrey dare mention the racial narrative behind the nightmarish conditions found in Detroit. Not once does he dare point out that Detroit is a 92 percent black city.

Doing so would – logically – cause people to pause, for a brief second, a look at the conditions of other majority black cities and allow the most evil thought to slowly enter their minds: are black people incapable of sustaining a civilization they inherited via white flight? If so, are the policies all of America is forced to live under, misguided?

Of course, in Escape from Detroit, I do my best in describing why the Motor City died, and why it has now become fodder for Matthew Drudge of the Drudge Report in driving hits to “conservative” Websites that poke fun at a dying metropolis without ever daring to mention that it is a dying black metropolis.

Almost 92 percent of the city is black; more than 96 percent of the students in the Detroit Public System (DPS) are black.

Maybe it was Sean Penn who put it best, comparing life in Port-au-Prince, Haiti to the conditions found in Detroit [Sean Penn: Port-au-Prince, Haiti, is like Detroit, Bay News 9, 12-12-12]:

As the three-year mark approaches of the devastating earthquake in Haiti that killed, injured and displaced hundreds of thousands of people, actor- activist Sean Penn describes life in the country's capital city.

In the January issue of Esquire magazine, Penn compares Port-au-Prince to Detroit, saying, "It's not more dangerous, it's not less dangerous."

Penn founded a relief organization in response to the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. He still spends about half his time there.

The two-time Oscar winner says a child with a fever in the U.S. gets medicine, a cold bath, or a trip to the emergency room. In Haiti, he says, parents wait "to see if he's going to die or not."

Black people in Haiti are responsible for the conditions they have created in Haiti, just as black people in Detroit (92 percent black city, with a complete black monopoly on executive power, government jobs, the city council, the courts, and the school board) are responsible for the conditions they have created in Detroit.

This is a revolutionary thought, I know.

For it is the equivalent of taking C4 to the idea of equality and the “all men are created” nonsense that Conservatism Inc. so desperately clings too; but if people don’t start to take this rational, logical conclusion into consideration, then DWLs and black people will continue to use C4 in destroying all that the western world – western man – has created.

Detroit, as NPR noted, is driving to its own debt cliff. That the road was paved by black people, maintained by black people, and that the car is driven by black people (with only black passengers) is a fact we must assiduously avoid.

If Conservatism Inc. punts on addressing the reality of 92 percent black Detroit’s (on the black people in the city themselves) collapse for future generations to address, we will see more and more cities fall to the same Black Undertow that overwhelmed the Motor City. 

Though those contrarian voices whom dare point out the reality of Detroit’s demise will be ignored (and castigated) by Conservatism Inc., it doesn’t change the fact we are right.

Detroit's death, like Haiti’s death, is all due to black rebellion and then the institution of black rule in both places.


108 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good stuff, Mr. Kersey.

How is it that in matters of race, people have become terrified to notice, let alone speak of obvious truths? I can think of no other area of thought where people are so afraid to accept and talk about what their senses are telling them.

Anonymous said...

Good stuff, Mr. Kersey.

How is it that in matters of race, people have become terrified to notice, let alone speak of obvious truths? I can think of no other area of thought where people are so afraid to accept and talk about what their senses are telling them.

anon anon said...

Glenn Beck was ranting on about Detroit a couple of days ago, and then started mentioning the failure of other minority-run cities as well. He finally asked the question: "What do all these cities have in common? They're run by [I held my breath] - Democrats!!"

Just. Stunning.

One can only speculate that the blowback from his venture into calling a spade a spade (referring to Obama as a racist) neutered him permanently.

Anonymous said...

Another masterpiece Paul. Disingenous White Conservatives like Hannity will tell us again and again that lower taxes and right-to-work legislation will take care of all the ills in places like Detroit. Hopefully Paul Ryan's career in the national spotlight is over and we don't have to hear him boring us with this nonsense.

Anonymous said...

If a destructive bacterial plague were spreading, everyone would face the truth that it was doing so and demand that the CDC intervene, locate the vector and eliminate the source. People would demand medicines to cure the disease. No one would deny what was happening just as they wouldn't if the problem were a food born pathogen affecting the food supply.
However, when it comes to the destructiveness of black people and black communities, there is a willful self-inflicted blindness by many even though the damage done by the "disease" is just as obvious and the source is known.
The DWL's and even "conservatives" refuse to acknowledge that blacks are the disease and not a symptom of it. So, they run around ignoring the cause and seeking magical cures for the symptoms while ignoring the organism that causes the problem in the first place.
You can't get rid of the symptoms until you cure the underlying cause. The violence, the destructiveness, the ruined cities are part and parcel of the black plague and are a function of it.
Treating the symptoms while ignoring the cause just allows the plague to spread further and do more damage.
So when DWL's and "conservatives" support all the social programs aimed at uplifting the black community, they're simply functioning as carriers of the disease organism. They're like the rats that carried the plague infected fleas during the dark ages or pretty much like the flagellants during the black plague of 1349 who traveled around spreading the plague while whipping themselves with whips as penitance for the sins of humanity. However, the flagellants didn't know any better due to their vast ignorance.
What's the excuse our current crop of "flagellants" use?

Anonymous said...

"It’s hard to take Conservatism Inc. seriously."

This topic, while perfectly accurate and factual, is pointless.

Conservative Inc is not going to commit political suicide just to please the regulars here at SBPDL.

And neither is Beck, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity, etc...

They will all continue to use code words like "liberalism", and we will all know they're referring to negroes.

Michelle Obama uses the term "food deserts", when in fact she means "any geographic area in which grocery stores have all closed because of epidemic negro theft".

Anonymous said...

May you tell: Can diverse America compete with China? Chinese don’t care about the U.S governments have to support diverse communities.

F G Knight said...

Those statistics are mind boggling but no, the Detroit predicament is not the fault of the black majority power structure. That would be raciss! It's whitey's fault. Don't believe me, just ask one of them. But seriously, I do find there are actually some very smart people in Detroit -those that hightailed it out of the city proper that is. Good on them and welcome to Obama's America!

Anonymous said...

What is so bad about Detroit going bankrupt is the fact that the state willhave to pickup the tab.This puts a burden on taxpayers in Michigan that are quite overwhelmed now.What do you do about Flint,Pontiac,ad nausam?

Anonymous said...

Conservaturds are on the same sell out traitor globalist team as the democRATS. The sooner people figure this out the better off they will be. They don't give a rat's ass about "constituents" or voters they only care about a cush overpaid and overrated job of selling out Amerikwa and that nice office in the district of cesspool and an invite to the next cocktail cocksucker party.

Anonymous said...

@anonymous 9:50AM"Conservative Inc is not going to commit political suicide just to please the regulars here at SBPDL.

And neither is Beck, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity, etc...

They will all continue to use code words like "liberalism", and we will all know they're referring to negroes."

But that's the deeper question: Why, and since when, is noticing the truth and speaking about it, political suicide? As disfunctional as negros are, how much better are we if we willingly lie to ourselves and refuse to acknowledge truth?

Anonymous said...

LOL Kroger closing two stores that are losing money, both are in black neighborhoods.

http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/11/18/2488179/kroger-closing-two-raleigh-stores.html




pat said...

The answer as to why this particular author didn't mention race is the same reason that everyone avoids discussions about solutions.

Genocide.

People don't want to be Nazis. And they can't think of an alternative that would work.

Unless you can suggest an acceptable solution most people will reject acknowledging that there is a problem at all.

The great advantage that blaming everything on the Democrats is that if this were really the problem, it could be solved overnight by just voting for the Republicans. Simple, easy.

The problem of course is that it isn't just the Democrats and their social policies. It's race.

A favorite explanation and solution for Detroit is education. This is preposterous but it does encompass an acceptable solution - find Superman, build bigger school buildings, pay teachers more, require kindergarten teachers to have doctorates, give everyone in public schools an iPad. All of these loony proposals have been tried and none of them have worked but they remain popular - not because they work - but because they are acceptable.

OTOH everyone knows what will work - just get rid of the black folks - but this solution is not acceptable.

There are a couple alternatives to simple genocide. There is the always popular notion to "ship them all back to Africa". Most of us have heard someone suggest this at one time or another. Is it possible?

There are about forty million blacks in America. The Atlanta airport alone serves nearly ninety million passengers a year, so at first blush it would seem that we wouldn't have to ship them, we could fly them. But of course the problem isn't the capacity of the airlines, it's everything else. Dropping millions of American blacks into Africa is itself genocide. It's not a question of how many would die, but rather, would any live? Any mass transport of people to Africa is just a death sentence for most of them. It's genocide by another name.

The only real alternative to genocide in one form or another is somehow making African descended peoples smarter. We know that blacks have smaller brains and that the areas of their brains that are less developed are in the frontal and pre-frontal lobes. These are the areas that are responsible for intelligence, learning, and that provide the substrate for civilized behavior. This brain anatomy is of course the product of genetics. Detroit is a mess because it is filled with black people who have inadequate brains. We either fix that or we will have to get rid of them. There are no other choices.

In the long run I have no doubt that mankind will learn all the secrets of our genes and our brains - but will we learn in time? Is it possible to learn enough in time to fix it?

A society in which all the major groups are roughly equal would be a happier and more stable society. Alas Africans and Australian aborigines are not anywhere near being equal. The English colonizers of Tasmania solved that problem by simply eliminating the Tasmanians.

If we wish to avoid the "Tasmanian Solution" for American blacks we will need learn how to make those blacks smarter. How long do we have?

First of all we need to start. Right now there is considerable resistance to admitting that blacks are less intelligent because of their genetic endowment. I think that won't substantially change for at least twenty years - probably longer.

I doubt if anyone will make a serious attempt to enlarge black brains until at least the middle of this century. I would guess that it would take fifty years of research after that to get to a point that we could engineer all Americans to be roughly equal.

That takes us to the year 2100. I think by the year 2100 parents will be able to specify most of their child's characteristics including intelligence.

So the question becomes - will America (or whomever is running America then) tolerate blacks in their present form for that long?

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

Wouldn’t that information be vital in determining part of the reason – if not the most important reason – for the demise of Detroit in every measurable category for the quality of life in the city?

No, it's completely irrelevant. Their skin color has nothing to do with the phenomena of rapid decay and collapse seen across dozens of American cities.

Tyrone noose said...

Political suicide mentioning black crime?

Try literal suicide. Most of these coward libtards and conservatives are afraid of the physical and social backlash that comes from speaking the truth.


If we would all just sponsor a niglet today, this would all be over soon. Too bad we don't collectively have the balls. We will grow them when it is abundantly clear that we are facing our own genocide..... And then it will be too late. If our races tolerate this crap, we deserve to go extinct. Darwin baby.

Bogolyubski said...

Outta the park. The loudmouths of Conservatism, Inc. are just DWLs who wear Reagan masks for Halloween. Speaking of Haiti, does anyone here remember that Chile suffered a much more severe earthquake at around the same time? Haiti's been the subject of Ministry of Truth sob stories for years now, accompanying the preening and moralistic puffery of DWLs like Penn, Clinton, the Shrubbery, et al.

Didn't see any of their pompous arses preening themselves over Chile did you? Turns out the hated Pinochet instituted strict building codes which minimized the quake damage. The Chileans were able to handle the rebuilding and rescue efforts largely by themselves. Of course, Chile isn't an African shithole - while Haiti (and Detroilet) are.

Anonymous said...

"Most of these coward libtards and conservatives are afraid of the physical and social backlash that comes from speaking the truth."

I don't blame them.

I post here anonymously because I don't want to risk losing my livelihood. or my ability to make a living.

If that makes me a coward, then so be it.

Anonymous said...

@anon at 11:16am store located at Martin Luther King boulevard was all I needed to read. Kroger is union so look for all those vibrant diversity employees to transfer to other stores.

Californian said...

Good stuff here, PK.

Consider Terence Jeffrey's insistence that Detroit has been practicing "socialism." What does he mean? That the workers control the means of production? That everyone is living in communes? That the city government has nationalized the major industries and runs them from a central bureaucracy?

How would he account for the fact that many European countries actually do practice socialism of one form or another, but have high standards of living and low rates of crime? Or that Haiti, whose government is largely ineffectual, has not seen its population rise up in the spirit of entrepreneurialism and create an expanding economy?

What does Mr. Jeffrey propose be done about Detroit? Take for example his point about Detroit having a 75.4 percent illegitimacy rate. There are a number of ways this could possibly be dealt with: cutting welfare to single mothers; making divorce much more difficult to obtain; returning social stigma to having children out-of-wedlock; and so forth. Any of that gonna happen?

Or Detroit's unemployment situation: supposing that Detroit were to reduce taxes and cut regulations. Will entrepreneurs suddenly arise from the disintegrating pavement to create new businesses? Can he identify these budding businessmen?

We'd also have to figure on something being done to cut crime, otherwise business will stay away. Does this mean more black people in jail? How's that going to go over?

Oh yeah, there would also have to be an educated populace to work in these new jobs. I take it that conservatives are going to volunteer to teach for America? And even if they did, it would take another generation to graduate enough people to show up on time to punch a time clock.

I can go down the list, but it comes down to this: even if conservatives/Republicans were to take control of Detroit, nothing would change. We have had Republican administrations in the White House during the Regan-Bush era, and they did nothing to reverse the slide into BRA.

Californian said...

How is it that in matters of race, people have become terrified to notice, let alone speak of obvious truths? I can think of no other area of thought where people are so afraid to accept and talk about what their senses are telling them.

Ultimately, because people would have to realize that the system has failed.

There was a time when white people could believe that if we simply gave blacks equality, we would enter the promised land. No more race riots, no more black poverty, no more America looking bad at the UN, no more separate water fountains. The American dream, no doubt.

Well, we have seen blacks given equality (and more), and how has it worked in Detroit? Or Newark? Or Birmingham? Or sub-Saharan Africa? It hasn't! SBPDL, among others, has documented the reality.

Supposing the majority of people faced up to this reality? They'd have to admit that the future was going to be a pretty grim place, Detroit writ on a global scale.

Again, look at the positive images which television and the movies project of blacks. It's what's called a "mass consensual hallucination." Under the spell of BRA, people can go about their daily lives without having to consider that their world may be ended by irrational violence. Or that their children will be discriminated against by AA and a host of other rackets. They can even convince themselves that while the system is doing everything in its power to destroy themselves and their civilization, they are "building a better world." Look at Amy Biehl: she and her family lived the illusion even though the reality killed her.

Call it the Stockholm Syndrome on a societal scale. Far easier to believe than to wake up and realize that you and your children will face a world of apocalyptic struggle.

The funny thing is, white people could triumph in this struggle, if they faced the reality.

Californian said...

OK, one more thing, then I'm outta here:

However, the flagellants didn't know any better due to their vast ignorance.
What's the excuse our current crop of "flagellants" use?


Modern liberalism has become something on the order of a Medieval mass hysteria. There is much in the way of DWLs flagellating themselves over the "sins" of slavery and segregation. Yet from a rational perspective:
* Neither slavery nor segregation were crimes at the times they were in force (ergo, DWLs are worked up over an ex post facto situation).
* White people today were not responsible for these "sins."
* Punishing people today for alleged "sins" committed by others goes against any concept of Anglo-American jurisprudence, and most systems of religion.
* In fact, white peoples ended slavery and promoted human rights on a global level.
* DWL social engineering has done nothing to reverse the dysfunctions in the black demographic, instead accelerating them (illegitimacy, crime, the usual laundry list.)
* DWLs ignore their own complicity in real crimes such as their destruction of civilized (white) rule in Africa via promoting assorted black terrorist fronts masquerading as liberation movement, and kowtowing to one-party-state dictators pretending to be parliamentarians.

But these are all rational arguments, and DWLs are not rational.

I am going to give my usual plug for James Burnham's "Suicide of the West," especially his chapter on the Guilt of the Liberal. Burnham views guilt as a mostly irrational impulse, since people feel it even if they have committed no crime or sin. Religion has been one way to deal with the irrational aspects of guilt. Christianity, for example, transfers the guilt for original sin to a Redeemer who sacrifices himself, thereby expiating the sins of mankind.

But liberals are largely secular, so they must have a substitute for religion. By going into an orgy of self-flagellation, they can justify their own privileged positions in the world—and it is real privilege because white liberals are at the top of the feeding chain both materially and politically. You do not see DWLs giving up their own McMansions or fancy jobs in corporate foundations, nor placing their children in public schools, nor moving en masse to black-majority-rule countries.

DWLs expect other people to make these sacrifices.

In the long run liberalism is dragging down Western Civilization. DWLs were more than willing to toss French colonists in Algeria to the wolves, as they did later with white Rhodesians and South Africans. This expiated some liberal guilt and let them attend those benefits at the Lincoln Center, heads held high. Same thing with American cities: these can be abandoned to the race hustlers and gang-bangers as part of the "fight against racism." You end up with the destruction of Detroit? No time to consider it because next on the agenda is sacrificing the American middle class to bring in those Somali refugees. And yes "sacrificing," because groveling before blacks (apologizing for slavery-segregation-apartheid) has become a quasi-religious ritual. There's even the literal blood sacrifice of children. It's worth examining the case of Amy Biehl, DWL par excellence, cut to pieces by blacks in South Africa—and Amy's parents then supplicating before the murderers.

Sooner or later, the surrenders are going to have to stop. Either the Western world will cease to exist (and DWLs will find themselves subjugated by non-Westerners, or simply wiped out). Alternatively, Westerners will be pushed so far they will respond with a very illiberal bloodbath. For the latter, look at the Wars of Religion in the 16th-17th centuries. It just may be we are headed in that direction. And as unpleasant as it may sound, those wars may provide alternative strategies for the salvation of the West.

Anonymous said...

Informative, thought-provoking article. Why is it so hard for people to accept the hard, cold truth that black culture hasn't produced ONE properous, orderly, and successful society in the history of the world. Even when working societies are handed over to blacks, as has happened throughout the U.S. and S.A., such societies inevitably turn to manure.

Anonymous said...

Nearly fifty years after the Civil Rights Act was signed into law black wealth declined by 53 percent. Blacks suffered, in the long term, from the Great Society. Why would that be? Because it fed into all the dormant black male pathologies which probably derived from ancestral social organizational modes in Africa. The new dispensation meant that if an unwed woman became pregnant, moved out of the home of her parents, did not name or know who the father was, then Big Daddy in Washington would provide for all her essential needs. Ergo she no longer needed a husband or the support of her family. In fact, the more children she had out of wedlock, the more money she would receive from the government.


For black males this was Nirvana. They could father as many children as they wanted, from multiple women, without ever having to accept the responsibility of fatherhood. In fact many women rejected marriage in favour of a boyfriend who could slip in the back door and not jeopardize her government check. In this dysfunctional culture why would education be important? Why seek an education only to have to compete for a good job in the market place when they could just hang around the neighbourhood and have all of life's amenities? Did not the NAACP and race hustlers like Jesse Jackson tell them that it was not their fault? That they were just the innocent victims of white racism?


Listen to the Rev. Jesse Lee Patterson who admittedly is reviled in the black ‘community’ as an Uncle Tom. Now consider the modern black ‘community’ half a century after the CRA. Per Rev. Peterson again: ‘There was a time in this country when blacks weren’t raping 100 White women a year in Alabama, when most of them were married, when black children had fathers, when they weren’t on drugs or welfare, when they weren’t packing the prisons, and when they didn’t name their children stupid names or celebrate fake holidays like Kwanzaa.’


He then goes on to pose, and answer, the following questions:


(1)Was it really so bad to have black neighborhoods?
(2) Were the anti-miscegenation laws really so bad?
(3) Were the black schools and colleges really so bad?
(4) Were things like segregated water fountains and restrooms really such a big deal?
(5) Was segregation itself really so bad?


But the problems of blacks go much deeper. Despite, or maybe because of, all the Affirmative Action, the ridiculous Black Studies and Black History Months, and the endless misrepresentation of blacks in the media, blacks are arguably more embittered and destructively anti-White today than they ever have been. As Fred Reed put it: ‘These ‘hoods are utterly black, with whipcord young males leaning against lamp posts and eyeing cops with hostility. The people in them have no identity other than black. They aren’t African and aren’t American. They don’t read and many can’t. The schools are just holding cages. They’ve got nothing and they’re going nowhere and they know it. The great white beyond out there, with its computers and universities and those rich white people with their jobs and books and understanding of mysterious things like international politics—they have no access to these.’


They will be the first to fall when the really tough economic times hit in due course. In fact it’s happening already. The moral of the story: political victories and economic progress are not necessarily correlated. As blacks have become Governors, Attorneys General and even President, black society has been destroyed. And it’s getting worse as dysgenic forces come into play, genetically altering them by encouraging the black underclass to reproduce at a higher rate. A kind of rapid reverse evolution. And it will continue as long as the social services industry ‘professionals’ and race hucksters like Sharpton and Jackson need this heaving impoverished underclass to maintain their own privileged lifestyles.

YIH said...

To give you an idea of ''wacky morning zoo'' guy Glenn Bunk's head is at, now he's bending over for ''gay marriage''.
Need I say more?

Anonymous said...

It isn't just a matter of raising black intelligence. Would you want to create a black with +20 IQ points but the same tendency toward violence, impulsiveness, and short time orientation? You'd have a more dangerous predator than we're dealing with now.

No, you'd really have to find a way to completely restructure the black brain to make it resemble the white man's. And since genes tend to be linked, achieving such a wholesale restructuring of one organ would likely change many others in unpredictable ways. There's a chance your new creature would be a normal white man, but it's more likely you'd create a Frankenstein's Monster that is unable to live. We simply don't know enough about the subject to play God.

There are non-violent solutions to the problem of blacks among us, such as a return to a form of segregation similar to what existed in previous eras, but I don't see anything happening until after the Collapse, whatever form it might take.

Constructive Feedback said...

My Dear Friend Mr Kersey:

YOU HAVE IT BAD.
REAL, REAL BAD.
I have never seen a White man (who - as far as I know - has NEVER resorted to VIOLENCE against Negroes) be so fixated on the Negro in the way that you are.

Please tell us about your childhood.

Mr Kersey - IF we take the entire FISCAL BUNDLE in the City Of Detroit - and tabulate:
1) The organic economic productivity within
2) The property values
3) The DEBT
4) The net INFLOW of ENTITLEMENTS........

ALL WHICH produces a city in decline...........................

TELL ME, Mr Kersey - how does the FISCAL PROBLEMS OF AMERICA square?

If we contrasted 800K Detroiters with about $9 billion in municipal bonds (etc) and then compared that against 310M Americans with $20Trillion in debt - WHICH do you figure will be larger?

$9 billion per 800K people is a BETTER debt ratio than $16T to 310 (I didn't even include the UNFUNDED LIABILITIES that would move it up to $75T)


HERE IS YOUR PROBLEM, Mr Kersey -
EVEN THOUGH AMERICA IS A BIGGER FRAUDULENT FIAT ECONOMY than is DETROIT as DETROIT can't MAKE "MAGIC MONEY" like the Fed can - YOUR focus on DETROIT satisfies your "Negro's Can't Count To 10" theory - while you avoid doing as I have been telling you for some time now:

LOOK AT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE STEALING TRILLIONS FROM YOU and your future - WHILE YOU are looking at your back window, TO make sure that that "LITTLE NINJA" doesn't trek across your lawn.

You have it real, real bad sir.

MuayTyson said...

Pat, California, and others great comments as always. I do miss Zenster too wonder where he has been?

I will say something really shocking to SBPDL. Conservatism Inc is correct! It is Liberals that destroyed Detriot, Chicago, etc. Blacks are doing just what they do. If it were not for liberals blacks would never have had the power to do what they do. If Whites have not flexed their political muscles then blacks would have been kept in their place and unable to destroy anything.

There is another thing; why can't so many people admit that blacks are such a destructive force? Simple I learned it here IKAGO(I know a good one). I will admit I struggle with this myself. I can count at least 5-10 black people who are very nice,polite and nothing like the stereotype.

The only practical solution is very strong conservative policies. I doubt there will be sucession. I know the US would never deport black immigrants and no way in Hell black citizens. The only hope is to cut deep into social welfare programs, end A.A., and repeal the Civil Rights amendment.

The problem with Conservative Inc. is their stance on abortion. Abortions sould be available up until 3 years of age for intercity welfare rats. They need to have norplant for all female welfare recipients and limited children polocies. This is counter to Conservative Inc.

Constructive Feedback said...

Disingenuous White Liberals - I understand the concept.

Not that I am in any position to tell you "Kindly White Folks" what to do BUT this is not a good label.

IF you don't mind - perhaps you will accept some alternative labels from a Black man who is WATCHING them AND WATCHING you all and Watching the Black Progressive Fundamentalists as well:

Actually - instead of giving you a substitute at this time - let me capture the indictment that you have against them:

1) Whites who cavort with NON-WHITES in order to win the battle against US (White Conservatives)

2) Whites who are looking to attack key White/Western European Institutional Traditions

(Mr Kersey - can I tell you, since I feel that you are a friend of mine - WHEN I was watching a documentary about human history - I WAS STUNNED to hear the term 'CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS FROM EUROPE". Even though you are smitten by the AFRICANS IN AMERICA that are destructive to WHITE CULTURE - the fact that the term "CHRISTIAN" being applied to EUROPE seemed so foreign to me when you look at that Godless place - told me that you just might be fixated on the WRONG ENEMY

YOU ATTACK the DWL because of his relations with THE NEGRO.

It seems to me, SIR, that IF YOU were given to be a bit more intellectually honest - YOU WOULD promote THE DWL and his FIGHT AGAINST YOU as your superior concern. HE IS USING THE NEGRO rather than being TRICKED BY NEGROES. All of this because he wants WARM BODIES to FIGHT AGAINST YOU)

Seriously Mr Kersey - I struggle to understand you with reference to Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz, Jennifer Granholm or Chris Matthews.

How do you rationalize their actions by POINTING OUT BLACKS and then wondering WHY THEY HAVEN'T called out "THE BLACKS" as you want them to?

IT IS CLEAR (at least to me) that you should LEAD by CALLING THEM OUT for wanting to ATTACK WHAT YOU BELIEVE. The merely are building up a "Diverse Coalition" who HATE YOU just as much as THEY DO.

WHEN THEY DO YOU FOCUS ON THE NEGRO so?

Obama has "The Black Liberals" HAPPY that he beat YOU all BUT demanding that he DO SOMETHING for "The Blacks" in his second term!!!

Do you see again - THE NEGRO PROGRESSIVE is fighting you MORE THAN HE IS ADVANCING HIS OWN CAUSE.


If we go through all of the modules in the "Progressive Coalition' and THEY ALL are PRIMARILY FIGHTING YOU (The White Right Wing) FIRST............how then is it that you FOCUS ON THE NEGRO SO?

Is he really the catalyst of all of the problems that you speak of?

OR, as I suspect, you are USING THE NEGRO as an easy target BUT, in truth, you are merely not prepared to deal with YOUR WHITE FOX BROTHER who is ORCHESTRATING IT ALL.

(Did you see the David Geffin documentary on PBS a few nights ago? An URBERLIBERAL, WEALTHY GAY White man. [OK he's Jewish and you did not answer my question on your classification of Jews].

Geffin has FAR, FAR, FAR FAR, FAR more power and money than the AVERAGE NEGRO and can do more damage to WHAT YOU VALUE more than an auditorium of 50,000 Negroes could ever hope to do.

WHY is it that HE is not a prime target of your focus?)

Anonymous said...

No, the system has not failed. While we as african americans have the government somewhat helpibg us as a people, we need businesses to pitch in as well. Based.on the unfairness directed upon us over the last 150+ yrars this can only be cobsidered fair. When will you people realize your.policies and system has negatively affect us. Look, we need help from the business community as well before the playing field is considered level. The racist whites cannot bring themselves to admit such a travesty.

Anonymous said...

This is added comment from a prior anonymous: White people act like they can just forget about us, forget about their horrendous past and live without us. Well they cannot. They are responsible for our plight and will continue to reminded of their wrongdoing until the field is level. It's sad that the African American leaders today aren't demanding for more money damages inflicted upon our people by the government over the years. We have got to stop the injustice and realize as a nation the wrong we have done to the AA community.

So CAL Snowman said...

When the lights of the world dim and seem to go out, the true lights of awakened humanity shine brighter and brighter. Realizing what is really going on and detaching from this tyrannical empire in every way possible and helping others to do the same is the living solution.

Anonymous said...

"White people act like they can just forget about us, forget about their horrendous past and live without us. Well they cannot."

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Nice troll-job.

Anonymous said...

"1) Whites who cavort with NON-WHITES in order to win the battle against US (White Conservatives)"

DWLs do not necessarily cavort with non-whites, and in fact, often have no contact with non-whites, leading to the absurd belief that "we're all alike".

"2) Whites who are looking to attack key White/Western European Institutional Traditions"

Not necessarily "attack" white culture...DWLs are multiculturalists who foolishly believe that all races/cultures are equal.

"YOU ATTACK the DWL because of his relations with THE NEGRO."

Again, NOT necesaarily. The worst DWLs live in all-white enclaves while criticizing "racist" whites who are forced to live and interact with blacks.

CF, I like you, but you are completely missing the point of what defines a DWL.


Californian said...

Constructive Feedback: let me repeat the question which has been raised numerous times on this website: "Can you name the black majority cities in America or anywhere else in the world which are ahead of similar white cities economically, in law and order, and in school graduation rates?"

And as a corollary: "Why, if white 'racism' holds down black people, are black majority cities such as Detroit marked by economic decline, high violent crime rates, and pathologies such as collapse of education, exploding illegitimacy, welfare dependency, and fiscal insolvency?"

You would think that by being liberated from the boot of white racist oppression, cities such as Detroit or Port au Prince or Johannesburg or your average Paris benelieu would be showcases of prosperity and progress. Incredibly, this is not the case.

Care to answer these questions?

Californian said...

Alert! Dialog on Race!

I am going to answer Constructive Feedback because it is one way to determine what the "other side" is up to. And because I am really interested in their line of reasoning.

Constructive Feedback said...LOOK AT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE STEALING TRILLIONS FROM YOU and your future - WHILE YOU are looking at your back window, TO make sure that that "LITTLE NINJA" doesn't trek across your lawn.

CF, if you would surf around various race realist websites, you would find considerable criticism of financial and political elites in the Western world.

One reason for the emphasis on what PK calls Black Run America is that the damage it wrecks is so in your face that it can be denied by only the most deluded ideologue. Your average Americans can see the crime and school trashing. They've lost jobs and university slots to affirmative action hustlers. They have to pay the taxes for your welfare queens who flash EBT cards in their checkout lines. And the destruction of cities such as Detroit is hard to miss. It's easier to mobilize people around these debacles as opposed to stratospheric issues such as globalization--though once you open up people's eyes to BRA, they come to see the bigger picture re globalization and such.

CF, doesn't it bother you that blacks collectively have created such debacles? That because of black majority rule, a city like Detroit, or country like Rhodesia-Zimbabwe, has been trashed? And doesn't it occur to you that as a result of all this, the job of people like Paul Kersey in opening up people's eyes is being made much easier?

Something to think about as we brave the Dialog on Race.

pat said...

Anonymous said:

It isn't just a matter of raising black intelligence. Would you want to create a black with +20 IQ points but the same tendency toward violence, impulsiveness, and short time orientation? You'd have a more dangerous predator than we're dealing with now.

The point is that violence, impulsiveness and a short time orientation are all symtoms of the same underlying cause - lower intelligence. There is every reason to believe that fixing IQ fixes everything else. Almost every student of intelligence thinks that that's true. Crime and violence are closely associated with IQ. Criminals are only smart in the movies.

The only other possibility is from the melanocortin hypothesis. But a society that could control and direct brain development should also be capable of dealing with the problems of pigmentation synthesis.

My point is that in the long run blacks will all be killed by the other races unless they can get their act together. I know it doesn't look that way right now, but the world probably has too many people already. We don't need any lower quality people. The public will eventually come to realize that. Next they will notice that the most troublesome people are convieniently color coded. On that day blacks will be in trouble.

If you think that America and Americans would never do such a thing as genocide, I agree. But there are two possibilities that we won't be in charge. Mark Steyn keeps writing best sellers with titles like "America Alone" and "After America". Others point to China's massive economic resurgence. From the fall of Rome to roughly the fall of Constantinople, China was the richest and most powerful nation on earth. It may be again. Personally I don't think we're going to be done in by either the Muslims or the Chinese - but it's certainly a possibility. If that happened it wouldn't save the blacks. There's no reason to believe that either of these two groups would see blacks any differently than they are seen my this blog's readership.

The black population of Detroit and similar cities is a population that was formerly useful as field hands and manual laborers but is no longer of much use in a modern economy. There are smart black individuals, but not enough. Their talent pool is just too shallow.

The only chance that the black race has to get out of this century without being systematically exterminated is if medicine and science can make them equal neurologically. But that great work can't even begin until the public confronts race reality. Before we can get on the great task of fixing black people the public needs a better idea of what needs to be fixed. Most of the nation is in denial.

Paul Kersey is one of the best friends black people have. They should put his statue on the Mall next to that of Martin Luther King.

Albertosaurus

Jassi said...

The strangest comments always have LOTS of WORDS EMPHASIZED with CAPITAL letters.

And to the asshole who wrote-
" While we as african americans have the government somewhat helpibg us as a people, we need businesses to pitch in as well."

How about BLACKS pitch in? How about you do your part. How about you make liveable communities where people are safe and how about you stop asking for us to do everything for you.
Why do blacks seem to think that everything comes from the outside? Did the early white settlers write back to their European brethren saying "Ya'll NEED to gib me sum mafuckin money.We strugglin ova heea. My cousin done ate his son and my baby momma done got raped by err one in da whole community.Fa ril doe, yall need to fix dis shit." I just don't think that's the way it happened.

Make yourself worthy of even humane treatment,black man.Work hard.Speak well. Treat people with dignity. Have some class. Otherwise,go away. Far away.

Room101 said...

Great article.

Wish I could properly attribute this paraphrase I read from a recent commenter: 'Hoping and looking forward to a GOP crack-up beyond repair.'

The GOP as a whole is less-than-worthless in defending the Constitution, just like every other institution in our bloated and decaying society.

The GOP and their well juiced-into-government-subsidies sponsors are just further manifestation of the economic and thus political rot.
Crony-socialism.
Socializing the debt and liabilities onto the taxpayers while the well-connected collect upon the legislation enacted or adjudicated in the courts. 'Public-"private"-partnerships'.

Unless Government is brutally beaten back into the cage in which it belongs by its handlers, the beast will escape like King Kong, the cool 1933 version.

MuayTyson said...

California, CF has been told this time and time again yet he refuses to lsiten or typical negro grey matter does not allow the information to seep into his his head.

I hate to use the Lord of the Rings analogy so people reading this site don't think we are all nerds in Mom's basement but it really is the best fit.

CF, the site started out as a joke then PK started to see the very real implication of an America that caters to distructive black people.

Let's say Sauron is an anology of the elites and DWL. Then the blacks would be his orcs. Sauron must be delt with as the end game and to have a checkmate but the most immediate issue of physical safety and violence is the orcs so they are the first line of defense that must be defeated to progress. Do you understand now?

If you do please stop asking the same questions and making the same statements.

Room101 said...

Constructive Feedback said...

"My Dear Friend Mr Kersey:


I have never seen a White man (who - as far as I know - has NEVER resorted to VIOLENCE against Negroes) be so fixated on the Negro in the way that you are.


Mr Kersey - IF we take the entire FISCAL BUNDLE in the City Of Detroit - and tabulate:
1) The organic economic productivity within
2) The property values
3) The DEBT
4) The net INFLOW of ENTITLEMENTS........

ALL WHICH produces a city in decline...........................

TELL ME, Mr Kersey - how does the FISCAL PROBLEMS OF AMERICA square?

If we contrasted 800K Detroiters with about $9 billion in municipal bonds (etc) and then compared that against 310M Americans with $20Trillion in debt - WHICH do you figure will be larger?

$9 billion per 800K people is a BETTER debt ratio than $16T to 310 (I didn't even include the UNFUNDED LIABILITIES that would move it up to $75T)


HERE IS YOUR PROBLEM, Mr Kersey -
EVEN THOUGH AMERICA IS A BIGGER FRAUDULENT FIAT ECONOMY than is DETROIT as DETROIT can't MAKE "MAGIC MONEY" like the Fed can - YOUR focus on DETROIT satisfies your "Negro's Can't Count To 10" theory - while you avoid doing as I have been telling you for some time now:

LOOK AT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE STEALING TRILLIONS FROM YOU and your future - WHILE YOU are looking at your back window, TO make sure that that "LITTLE NINJA" doesn't trek across your lawn.

You have it real, real bad sir."


All good points.
The acronym BRA, as I understand it as a new reader, is a euphemism or description for something much more foreboding and consequential than just the mere niggers.

Room101 said...

Anonymous said...

"Informative, thought-provoking article. Why is it so hard for people to accept the hard, cold truth that black culture hasn't produced ONE prosperous, orderly, and successful society in the history of the world. Even when working societies are handed over to blacks, as has happened throughout the U.S. and S.A., such societies inevitably turn to manure."

Another great observation was posted by someone of the fact that if you put a thimbleful of feces into a 5-gallon bucket of ice cream, you now have 5 gallons of inedible crap and sewage.

Gresham's Law @ work, as in most things.

December 12, 2012 3:12 PM

Californian said...

A very serious question

Anon said: "While we as african americans have the government somewhat helpibg us as a people, we need businesses to pitch in as well."

Anon, I am going to assume for the moment that you are sincere. Can you please inform us what kind of "help" blacks need? Can you spell out what specific programs blacks would need to function at the same levels as whites? That is, blacks would raise their employment rates to those of whites; would reduce their violent crime such that they no longer commit half the murders in the USA; would reduce their illegitimacy rates from c. 75% down to the c. 25% of whites; would graduate from school at the same rates as whites; would form as many new businesses as whites; etc.

Here are some ideas:

* Ending de jure segregation.
* Guaranteeing the right to vote regardless of race, creed or color of skin.
* Establishing government equal opportunities commissions.
* Banning discrimination in housing.
* Wealthy whites such as Bill Gates establishing scholarships just for minorities.
* Government grants made exclusively for blacks.
* Government contracts reserved for black companies.
* Taxpayer supported universities creating black studies programs.
* Busing black students to white schools and white students to black schools.
* Lowering entrance standards for blacks applying for police and emergency worker positions.
* Universities enacting speech codes to censure students who deride blacks.
* Suppressing scientific research on genetic differences among the races.
* Businesses creating special vice presidents for "diversity."
* Employers requiring "diversity training" for employees.
* Corporate media producing television programs portraying black people as scientists, wise politicians, honest cops, and all sorts of other positive role models.
* Corporate media making movies glorifying the Civil Rights Era, and vilifying white segregationists.
* Fast food franchises having 365 Black policies.
* Making crimes against black people a special "hate" offense.
* White cultural leaders such as Leonard Bernstein hosting parties for black radicals.
* Establishing special Black History Months.
* Creating a national holiday to honor Dr. Martin Luther King.
* Importing large numbers of Haitians and Somalis to provide all the benefits of a diverse society to America.
* The US government joining in sanctions against white-ruled countries in Africa to force black-majority-rule.

Which of the above would be needed to help blacks come up to white standards?

I am really interested, so please post your reply here.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 4:05 and 4:14 pm:

The system has failed and I as a white woman do not owe you anything. My parents did not own black servants. My mother's side of the family are all poor Eastern European immigrants....Yugoslavia dn Czechoslovakia had nothing to do with slavery and are very poor. My dad;s family did not own slaves. I did not get here to the eighties. My two kids under the age of five dont owe any balck people anything. Nope. You are wrong. Business does not owe you anything. Government serves EVERYBODY, not just you. In short, get the eff over yourself. You will never be on an equal playing field with whites because white people are smarter and better than you. They value work ethic and persistence. They value health, eating well, and not being fat. They value fidelity and not screwing Tonesha and all her friends. They value cleanliness. They value health food stores over pawn shops and nail salons. Black women have fake hair, fake nails, fake eyelashes, fake eyebrows, and fake pedigree. Game over.

CF- I agree, the banks, the elites and others in their cohort are thge bigger issue. The low SES blacks are just their pawns. Oh well, someone has to be fodder. That's what you get for looking for gibsmes

Room101 said...

Anonymous said...

"This is added comment from a prior anonymous: White people act like they can just forget about us, forget about their horrendous past and live without us. Well they cannot. They are responsible for our plight and will continue to reminded of their wrongdoing until the field is level. It's sad that the African American leaders today aren't demanding for more money damages inflicted upon our people by the government over the years. We have got to stop the injustice and realize as a nation the wrong we have done to the AA community.

December 12, 2012 4:14 PM"


Don't care who you are, that's downright funny right there, I tell you what.

Anonymous said...

"LOOK AT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE STEALING TRILLIONS FROM YOU and your future"

This blog is not about atrocious US fiscal policy.

This blog is Stuff Black People Don't Like.

If you're interested in discussing the national debt, do it on your own blog.

Anonymous said...

CF,

Pretty much what MT said. Yes globalization and crony capitalism and plutocracy are BIG problems. But in terms of physical safety and property values it's not rich people I have to worry about. Except insofar as those rich people are giving my tax dollars to worthless scum to move our of their shithole ghettos and infest my neighborhood. Not to mention the economic cost of supporting 20 million worthless black parasites

Wha Choo Say?! said...

As comforting as it is when terrible things happen to non-humans (Natural Disasters), the real damage is done in the aftermath when they are displaced.

I saw a documentary about a year or so ago (MSNBC, iirc) about how after Katrina hit, and all of the NigOrleans non-humans fled to surrounding large cities, that most of those cities saw a 35%-70% increase in their violent crime rates. That doesn't even begin to speak of all of the crimes committed in NigOrleans during the days immeditely after.

The fact is, that the real natural disater are the non-humans, themselves. It's like having an earthquake in the middle of a hurricane. And then of course they will always try to find a way to blame humans for the natural occurrence (and they tried).

Remebering the earthquake in Haiti (With a smile I might add), or any natural disasters that occur where the majority population is non-human, everyone will always notice how the first thing that they do put their OTHER paw out for more handouts. Look at all of the resources that have been sunk into that shithole, Haiti and how little has been repaired since.

Several natural disasters have occurred around the world since then, and in areas with a majority human population recovery has been strong, and for the most part independent.

The simple truth is that non-humans are incapable, and also too lazy, to take care of themselves or their environment. So they do what dogs do, they look to their masters for help (At least dogs are pleasant to have around- they smell better, too). It makes me wonder, what would happen if a 7.0+ earthquake happened in Detroilet? or E. St. Louis? or Non-Human-Ham? or Memphrica? etc

I know alot of people who post here are not terribly fond of the illegal Latin-Americans, I'm not fond of the illegal ones. But you have to give them their credence: Latinos are Human, most of them have a damned good work-ethic, and if I had to choose one or the other, I'd take 50 Latinos to every one useless non-human (Gangster Latinos are congruent with non-humans in my book). At least most of them contribute to society and Do have culture.

When I hear non-humans speak of culture, I laugh, because I know that unless you mean a culture of robbing, raping, killing, and otherwise criminality and neglect, that the only culture that non-humans have is what they buy in the dairy isle with their EBT cards.

SKIP said...

"OTOH everyone knows what will work - just get rid of the black folks - but this solution is not acceptable.

THAT would depend on whom you ask.

Jay Santos said...

Why is CF back?

CF, go spend your time trying to teach just one or two negro children not to maim and kill others. Why not do that with your spare time? You feeling me?

Californian said...

MuayTyson said... Californina, CF has been told this time and time again yet he refuses to listen or typical negro grey matter does not allow the information to seep into his head.

I've observed this. And it is not simply CF. Notice we have never gotten any answer to questions such as, "Can you name any black majority city that is up to the same standards of an equivalent white city, etc?"

I really would like to see that dialog on race take place. But the BRA babble machines are not, apparently, programmed for it. The agitprop machinery of BRA consists of repeating the same slogans right out of the Ministry of Truth. All of which makes one conclude that their entire position is intellectually bankrupt.


Anon said...The system has failed and I as a white woman do not owe you anything. My parents did not own black servants.

And even if they did own slaves – you would not owe blacks a thing. You have to understand that the "whites owe blacks" party line has nothing to do with making an objective case. It is agitprop designed to throw whites on the defensive. It is also meant to divide whites into "good" (descendents of non-slave owners) versus "bad" (descendents of slave owners). And then play whites off against each other. Blacks do not fall for this game themselves. They don't put down other blacks who were engaged in the slave trade, or who have wrecked American cities, or who have laid waste entire countries in Africa. They understand the value of racial solidarity.

Logically, one could argue that blacks owe whites. Blacks, after all, have wrecked much havoc in America with their violent crime, their illegitimacy, their corrupt city governments, their abysmal educational culture, their urban riots, their endless race hustling.

In an agitprop campaign, you have to take the initiative. This is what the race hustlers do via making endless demands. Rather than getting defensive, white people need to go over to the offensive. Perhaps white people ought to start demanding reparations from blacks? And yeah, all this can get ugly, but it has been blacks (and their DWL handlers) who have tossed down the gauntlet. They can not complain when white people fight back using the same weapons.

Room101 said...

Anonymous said...

"LOOK AT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE STEALING TRILLIONS FROM YOU and your future"

This blog is not about atrocious US fiscal policy.

This blog is Stuff Black People Don't Like.

If you're interested in discussing the national debt, do it on your own blog."



Overly-harsh response to anon on your part.

The anon was on point.

Niggers cost civilized humanity and the over-burdened taxpayers way more than they're worth.

This isn't a new thing.

December 12, 2012 6:37 PM

SKIP said...

To whomever is mentioning the national debt!!! We have a national debt of such proportions because of blacks! Simple! Guess we could also put some of that onto supporting hostile muslim countries too, but mostly the American blacks and their pathologies are such a drag on finances. Can't wait for the total social collapse myself.

Constructive Feedback said...

@Cali: Does it seem ironic to you that you are using as your alias a state that is both fiscally and morally bankrupt but you are running me down about Detroit?

@MT - While you may be ultimately focused on the "Big DWL Lord Who Holds The Ring" - you sure do seem more passionate about the Negro who has the small gold stud piercing in his nose.


You all ask ME why I am not more concerned about the fraud and destruction in DETROIT.

MY RESPONSE IS: I am AS CONCERNED and as EFFECTIVE at getting the "Embedded Black Fox Confidence Men" to express more COMPETENCY IN GOVERNANCE - as YOU ALL ARE in getting the CORRUPT WHITE OPERATIVES who are pulling the strings of the AMERICAN FIAT ECONOMY.

I CAN DO NOTHING but REPORT about the FRAUD AND HOKUM that they pass off as "The Black (Progressive) Agenda".

While I don't trust the bulk of you'all's AGENDA (intentions as it relates to Black people) I AM BOLD ENOUGH to go after the FRAUDULENT "Systematic Racism Chasing" that they use to neutralize Black Community Conscious attention.

The WHITE RIGHT WING provides the JUSTIFICATION for them to run what amounts to a "Defensive War Against The Right Wing Threat". Thus just as any other "The War On {Fill In The Blank}", the heightened alert level justifies the institutional compromise, the loss of liberties and the demand for UNITY.

STILL - with your WHITE PROGRESSIVE CHESHIRE FOX adversary he is BEATING YOU ALL on the popular front.


GET THIS ONE, Mr Kersey - AS MUCH as you Kindly White Folks have worried about the BLACK MALE getting his hands on your WHITE WOMEN - it is THE DWL force that HAS HER VOTING and SUPPORTING his cause!!!!!


Do you not SEE?
If you take the bulk of the angst that you project upon the "Negro" and LOOK WHO IS ACTUALLY HAVING MORE SUCCESS at "Having His Way With YOUR Valuables" - it is your WHITE BROTHER - who was born from the very same womb - who might be invited to sit at the very same Thanksgiving Table as you, without triggering a "Guess Who's Coming To Dinner" moment - YET when he starts talking his THEORIES - you are ready to pull off a turkey leg and beat him with it.

Your EVIL TWIN IS your biggest problem - NOT THE NEGRO!!!

While you all might be pissed at the sight of "Negro Crime" - he, like all other races mostly attacks his OWN KIND.

Of the WHITE FOLKS who are victims of "Black On White Crimes" - WHILE IT may rile up your tribal instinct - THE PROPORTION of WHITE FOLKS actually suffering from these effects are QUITE SMALL compared to the total 170 million "Kindly White Folks" in the nation.

Mr Kersey - those two White men who robbed the bank in Gainsville GA today did not say they did it NOT BECAUSE some NEGRO ROBBED THEM. They said because THEIR LOST THEIR HOUSE TO FORECLOSURE and are now desperate for money. Unless you can show me a bunch of Negroes on the House and Senate Banking committees - I think that the source that drove these otherwise law abiding White gentlemen to do such a "niggardly act" is something other than what any Negro has caused.
http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail.php?n=256095

Fisk Ellington Rutledge III said...

All this denial about race is simple cowardice. Leftists are generally cowards and in order to rationalize their cowardice, they have to redefine it as transcendent courage. They have to "embrace" and "celebrate" whoever it is frightens them the most. It's like a massive case of Stockholm Syndrome.

The problem of course is that the Left insists on enshrining their cowardice into law. As a result none of us can tell the truth or defend ourselves or be armed. We are ruled by a tyranny of cowards and sanctimonious twits.

hossman said...

"True" Conservatives are as much blank slatists as liberals. They believe that black behavior is a choice, not a genetic imperative.

IOW, detroit is caused by character defects, not human ones.

IOW, they are fundamentally the same as liberals...

IOW, you guys are on your own...

hossman said...

Just spitballing here, but...

From my travels, I think that alot of what you guys say is true. The theories are sound, the cause is just, your argument is valid. Now, the question is...are you going to just talk about it....or are you going to do something about it......?

Thats what's so crazy about this website....detroit is a perfect, huge example of what you guys are talking about, and yet......

....and yet it never goes anywhere. All the logic, all the talk, nothing....

Seriously, what would you guys be willing to do to make "something" happen....

If someone stood up, would you stand up with them? If someone wanted to fight, would you fight with them?

Does any of this talk mean anything, after you close your web browser?

anyway, thought id ask.

hossman said...

I feel talkative tonight..

...i spent alot of time in the desert...joined summer 2001...so i come back and its like....what????...is this my home...is this the US>...

I caught a flight connection thru detroit, to go to a concert at the filmore theater in detroit, before heading home, and it was like, id never left the M.E....The airport was full of arabs, and detroit was like mogadishu....the barbarians were inside the gate. Insanity.

So its like, "over there" if i had a problem, i would solve it thru action. Wouldn't "talk it out."....talking wouldn't solve things...although it could be fun..

Detroit seems like a great "hood ornament" (ha ha). why not psyops...financial warfare...congressional spam...media infil, advertisements, etc...use it to teach people, an object lesson, just show people, people who dont already believe, who arent part of the choir, etc....

honesty, what do you guys have to lose...whats wrong with standing up for what you believe, etc...what downside is there to doing something...



designer genes said...

You right its not the skin colours that is responsible, its the genetics that are responsible.

A pity that the people who have the genetics for systemic city destruction all share the same skin colour.

Oh that's right, genetics governs skin colour too.

Oooohhhh I'm feel so dirty for saying that.

Does skin colour have anything to do with africa going back to pre colonization levels of society?

mastermind said...

By making black people realise that their genetic makeup, is the cause of their problems, by making them see that they themselves are the problem, then once they see that, they can see that their genetic makeup and propensities for certain behaviour is exploited.

By making black people see that we can stop the top down manipulation, just as the elites need the masses to do their job, we can not target the elites with out making the masses realise the problem.

Blacks cannot see that the very things they baying for are the very things destroying them.

Civil rights has made their lot worse off than before, the proof is there for all to see.

Yet blacks still see civil rights as their salvation, and its actually been their destruction.

Once the masses are made aware of the problem, then we can move up the pyramid.

You show potential, but you still have the black angst strong in you, show your brothers that their genetic pre-dispositions are being used against them, forget about the elite, you can not win the battle with out the masses, why do you think the elites use the masses, cause its fun?

Realize that your pre-disposition is being used aswell, your anti-white overtones influence many black people to reinforce that they are right.

So, if you see the problem do the right thing, Rev Patterson speaks the truth, and makes black people see the problem, he is on the right track, he gets labled as an uncle tom, because he dares say the truth about black ppl, as soon as black ppl see the truth, and feel the shame of judgement, they can not be used anymore, to further the elites agenda.

Some how I get the impression you feel disloyal to point out the problems with black people, your built in genetic pre-disposition to black loyalty is your greatest weakness, and believe me, used very effectively to enforce the very thing you trying to prevent.

I respect your thinking, but you cannot move away from blackness, you stuck there, your black loyalty is preventing you from being effective, I don't blame you, its easier for whites to speak about black dysfunction than it is for you or Rev Patterson

We get labled racist and you get labled uncle toms.

If more black ppl spoke against black dysfuntion, black ppls usabilty would be lessened.

Look at what civil rights and black freedom have achieved in africa, everything but freedom, and yet black ppl refuse to see it.

white is right said...

No its not our policies that have adversly affected you, under those policies, blacks were beginning to florish, the beginnings were starting.

This your viewpoint is what's affecting you, you should be thanking us to point this out to you, this thinking of yours is what is aiding the destruction of black ppl, if we were racists we would actually keep quiet, and let this take its course, cause it would mean your anihilation, and ours aswell.

Has civil rights improved your lot over the last 50yrs, are black ppl as a group better off now than they were, listen to Rev patterson, he can see the truth.

The elites just want feral dysfuntional blacks, its easier to enslave that way, whites have actually showed you how to free yourselves, but you don't want that.

I actually think whites should keep quiet in pointing out that you are the problem, the DWL's and liberals, are actually accelerating your destruction faster with your own assistence.

1st you needed black councils and black contracts and integration and that has got you no where, now you need business to assist aswell, why, is the government assistence not good enough anymore.

Council jobs for black ppl, did this not work, why do you think business will work if government assistence didn't

Wake up, you are your worst enemy, and you are working your own destruction

Natassia said...

We should not play God with people's brains. Forced eugenics is not acceptable any more than genocide is.

We should encourage morality. An evil intelligent man can be far more destructive than an evil man with a low IQ.

Our government should cease it's unqualified handouts to everyone, and leave it up to our moral institutions (places of worship and religious charities) to provide for the needy while holding them accountable.

It is the only MORAL way that we as a people can deal with the problem of destructive blacks.

Our government is not treating black people as human beings with souls and a moral compass. Instead, it treats them like animals incapable of knowing right from wrong who simply need to be appeased so that they do not turn on their handlers. This is evil.

A person does not need a high IQ to be moral and wise. I have met many high IQ fools and moral degenerates as well as low IQ people with humility and good hearts.

Intelligence is not everything. It isn't even the main thing.

Natassia said...

Exactly. The morally degenerate leftist libertines (we can't even call them liberal when the only two things they are liberal with are sexual perversity and other people's money) are why our civilization is being destroyed from the inside-out. The "Negro problem" is just a symptom of that. Interestingly enough, if things like same-sex marriage or abortion were left up to the black vote, not only would those things not be tax-subsidized, they'd probably be illegal.

How many white libertarians (also libertines at heart) promote intense degeneracy like legalizing prostitution, computer-animated child porn, same sex marriage, abortion, dangerous drug use, etc.?

Dissident said...

As Californian so succinctly put it:

The average white working person can much more relate to the physical carnage that they can actually see on a daily basis. We can walk out our door and see the black attitude and watch it with our own eyes (Jamie Foxx and his "killing whites" rant).

Consequently, if I could get my hands on that Son-Of-A-Bitch, Tarantino, for making such a gratuitious piece of agitation propaganda-I'd probably do incredible bodily harm.

And the WEINSTEN brothers for producing such filth. So, in essence, CF is correct in his larger picture assessment of our problems, but how does he explain the actions of black irritants like Jamie Foxx, Sharpton, Holder, Obama, Mandela, et al.

These people despise the white man, they'd rather see us eradicated. Violence against whites will only escalate because of this movie, as impulsive and rage filled Negros are tempted to "exact revenge" for the sins of the past.

Tarantino, Weinstein and all DWL's can go straight to Compton!

Anonymous said...

Cut CF some slack please.

He comes into hostile territory and speaks his piece without being a jerk. Anyone can appreciate that, I'd hope.

Feedback is pointing out the 15-Ton elephant that is sitting in this room. I understand the position that he's taking in presenting the hidden hand of control. That's acceptable and not inaccurate in the least.

It's simply dialectical materialism being played out on the national political and social stages. Both blacks and whites are caught up in the struggle with both sides blaming the other. There's plenty of blame to go around unfortuantely.

And to the lady that says that pure intelligence doesn't make anyone moral. She is spot-on correct. The comments on here about the virtues of intelligence are over the top ridiculous at times.

All of the worlds worst perpetrators of crimes against humanity were certainly smart men. You want to find the real intelligence, just peel back that curtain of the media/financial/government complex in this country. They're the ones enabling much black dysfunction.

Nancy Botoxsi said...

I sense a distinct lack of concern for the Sanctified and Holy Holiday of Kwanzaa, which is a totally real day and not made up at all. Really.

PDK said...

Both the black and LMSM illusion, that whites have so terribly abused blacks, to the point where blacks cannot function in our culture due to said abuse forcing them so far down that everything is up to them, is so ingrained in the American psyche, most people believe it is the truth.

So many times non-liberals fear the Gestapoed LMSM, the arm and fist of liberal ideology, so intensely, they will not, even knowing they are correct, stand up to said Gestapoed LMSM. Just let the BS fly high, and they warrant not, an aggressive attack by the GLMSM. However, here non-liberals aren`t simply afraid of the Gestapoed LMSM, they just cannot look at, and see, the truth about black dysfunction, that blacks are dysfunctional because they are incapable of higher culture creation and higher culture maintenance.

Black, higher culture dysfunction is rooted in the black gene pools nature, more r selective, numbers over nurture, coupled with a shorter neotenous growth pattern, smaller brain production.

Take the issue of slavery, truth be told, whites did not enslave blacks, blacks enslaved blacks. In fact, American whites liberated blacks, not once but twice from their own inherent proclivity to enslave their own kind. Their own kind being more a people who possess a physically smaller, lower IQed cerebrum, than a black skinned people.

In fact, because of the physically smaller, lower IQ the black gene pool produces, enslavement of their own kind comes naturally to the Negroid sub-species of human.

Further, when the physically smaller, lower IQed black cerebrum comes in contact with a higher culture born of a people possessing a physically larger, higher IQed cerebrum, the natural proclivity to enslave their own transforms into a natural proclivity to parasitize those higher culture, capable people.

Therefore in America, blacks pursue a parasite/host relationship with whites.

However, for blacks, the parasite in the parasite/host phenomenon, the problem becomes one of surviving as a parasite because the host in a parasite/host relationship has a natural proclivity to cleanse their self from the deleterious effects of a parasite, by purging said parasite. In fact, here in America, the 13% solution of black parasite/white host, has worked for a sesquicentennial; however, we are a culture being transmogrified by other parasitic peoples, both Hispanics and Islamics, and as a host cannot survive with a much higher rate of parasitism than the 13% solution, so sayeth, or evidenced by, our current, 16+ trillion dollar debt.

Protection is offered to these parasites by white liberals who, by a fully enfranchised democracy can achieve their superiority of power in government over non-liberal whites, the matured, with the aid of the parasites. For white liberals, the immature, selfish stupidity, and not sagacity, reigns their rather small, undeveloped psyche. The expense encountered being the liberals “brother’s keeper” is simply too high.

Once again I can only muster my fellow non-liberal whites attention to the only viable solution that protects both the white race and white, Founding Father`s culture, secession. Secession from white liberals, blacks, Hispanics and Islamics, those who see parasitizing whites as their best solution, is the only solution, and further appears to have a limited window of opportunity. It is our duty to our posterity to begin action now by conditioning our minds to this reality.

Further, and most unfortunately, all who imbibe the liberal ideological Kool-Aide, make clear their intention of forging a single gene pool and race from our current mutually exclusive gene pools.

Most hideously, this will lower the white gene pools, bigger, better cerebrum while simultaneously increasing the other gene pools smaller, lesser cerebrum, which benefits their evolution at the expense of our evolution, no thanks.

From me, my posterity deserves nothing less, than what I received from my ancestors.

“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands…”, Thank you.

Mr. Rational said...

patPeople don't want to be Nazis. And they can't think of an alternative that would work.

Unless you can suggest an acceptable solution most people will reject acknowledging that there is a problem at all.


Why not eugenics under some other name or pretext?  For instance, instead of a program to encourage unwed mothers to get married, have a program which strongly discourages the unwed from getting pregnant by withholding benefits or imposing onerous work requirements.  Instead of a program to educate the children of the illiterate and unemployable, have a program which strongly discourages the illiterate or unemployable from having children; call it "First Things First" or "Ducks In A Row" or something that suggests prudence.  Pay the illiterate and criminal to be sterilized.

If you don't want to look like Nazis, use West Virginian hillbillies as the poster children for the program.  The impacts would fall much more heavily on the Black and indio/mestizo groups, but if it looks even-handed people wouldn't feel like Nazis.  Those who won't learn to read, won't work or won't behave themselves don't deserve our subsidy, and anyone screaming "NAZI!" in response to a graph showing the explosion of welfare and criminal justice spending due to people with characteristics X, Y and Z is going to make the word as meaningless as "racism".

(I note that Muay Tyson has very similar ideas.)

Mr. Rational said...

And another Anonymous [Black] CowardWhite people act like they can just forget about us, forget about their horrendous past and live without us. Well they cannot. They are responsible for our plight and will continue to reminded of their wrongdoing until the field is level.

White people are not responsible for your "plight".  Black people on average are worse off than White people regardless of where they are in the world or their family's history; the uneven field is due to genetics, and the White advantage comes from a thousand generations of suffering and striving on the part of their ancestors.  You ignore the Sequoia tree in your own eye when you talk about a "horrendous past":  Africans, whether in Africa or America, have a horrendous present.  Have you no gratitude for the hundreds of thousands of White people who died (and hundreds of thousands more who were maimed) so you could be something other than a field hand, and the millions who've suffered because of the fiction that you could be civilized and productive if only you were "integrated"?  Of course not.  Your pathetic little excuse for a mind is fixated on 3 syllables:  "gibsmedat".

Mr. Rational said...

hossmanThey believe that black behavior is a choice, not a genetic imperative.

The beauty of behavior-based eugenic programs is it doesn't matter what the cause is, the problem will be ameliorated.  Whether the pathology is genetic or cultural, if the carriers do not make or raise children they won't pass it on.

Anonymous said...

"Niggers cost civilized humanity and the over-burdened taxpayers way more than they're worth."

This is not in question.

But discussing the national debt takes the focus away from the BIG LIE, which is the most fundamental purpose of this blog.

selective breeding said...

CF you still stuck in MLK and malcom X stage.

You cannot see past your blackness, as someone here stated, why not go to a black ghetto and educate the blacks that are still redeemable.

We know where the problem lies, you not teaching us anything, and the elites are not white, they may look like it but the not white.

If us as whites do not need to worry about the negro, why is the negro such an effective weapon in wealth eradication. House price attrition, destruction of economy.

Dear CF I think you do your masters bidding, in trying to convince us that the negro isn't the problem.that is what the elites allow their lords to tell us, most fall for it, but we know the chess game fairly well.

As I said, the elites are not white, the majority anyway, they look white but they are not, their ability to look white is what has allowed them to infiltrate white western countries.

They cannot infiltrate japan or south korea, that's why those countries function so well.

Do not For one moment believe that the negro isn't the problem, if that were the case they would not be used as the effective weapon that they are.

Japan and south korea work, because the elites are easily spotted, and their favorite wealth reduction weapon is easily spotted.

I do not trust your attempt to convince us that the negro isn't the problem.

In a condescending way you pressume to tell us the game when we full aware what the game is, you would be more powerfull in telling single slutty white women, that their sudden liking for black men is part of the agenda, that phrase comming from a black man would be more powerfull than comming from a white male.

If you know the agenda, why not seek its destruction, why fight for MLKisms, and Malcom Xisms or spike leeisms.

Go tell black ppl that their entitlededness is precisely the very thing that the elites want.

Go warn black kids that acting like thugs is precisely what the elites are cultivating, as a gentic keyhole to breed a more feral degenerate black person.By getting black people to be degenerate, unproductive demanding, seeking reperations, overly sensitive, demanding their rights.

This is the best eugenics program ever devised, and you CF, yes you are enabling it, I bet in all your condescending wisdom, the thought that a eugenics program for black people was underway, and to hear that from a white man, you can thank me later for the headsup.

The elites are bredding a generation of extremely feral, low impulse control, instant gratification, perceived insult trigger happy zombies.

We know the game that is being played, the negro is the problem, if it weren't, the 50 year old eugenics program wouldn't be so well advanced. You might not want to believe that the negro is the problem, but you have no say in that, the elites have chosen to make the negro a weapon, and MLK and all the other idiots have aided them.

In some way the irony is delicious, what better way to get the elite agenda underway than to use the slaves themselves, an agenda disguised as assistence, and the very ppl trying to prevent oppression were the very ones who got the eugenics program to work.

Trully genius.

CF you have no idea with what you dealing with, you are the result of the eugenics program, how does that feel, and ironically you aiding it even further.

Go tell single black women to stop seeing thugness as an attractive quality in a mate, cause they aiding in the creation of a feral army of zombies.

If you know the agenda help us,

Anonymous said...

African Americans (AA's) are driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! They have failed entirely to grasp the essence of anything worth mentioning. A few days ago, I overheard some sniveling potlicker tell everyone who passed by that everyone and everything discriminates against AA's—including the writing on the bathroom stalls. I hate hearing the claims of an atrabilious protestor who doesn't realize that he's an atrabilious protestor.

AA's are united by only two things. They're deep-seated sense of victimization and a burning desire to convert our children into unthinking, easily herded cattle. (cultural zombies ) They are apart of a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance.

I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of the DWL, and their treasured pets. In all fairness, AA's are extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, their willingness to turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency sets a new world record for brazenness.

I hate to break it to you, but down the path lies only heartache and tears. AA's policies are adjudged failures. This just goes to show (to me, at least) that they aim to contravene decency. I mean, their long-term goal is to undermine the foundations of society, take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift.

I can say that if society were a beer bottle—A huge percentage of AA's would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom, that only the homeless would dare to drink.

freewill conflict said...

Strange how we both posted about the covert eugenics program underway, all these people going on about the horrendous eugenics program of a certain political party in germany during world war 2.

Failing to realise that a eugenics program is underway right now, eugenics programs are targetting black people as weLl as white, but ppl can't see that

Illegitamacy is pushed for a reason, people believe that genes are static, they are not, we are always having genes switched on and off. By external stimulii.

What is being done to black people is a eugenics program on a massive scale, and what better way to do it than with the full consent of the subjects.

Even whites are having selective breeding inflicted upon them with out knowing

In white communities they desired offspring is a passive male, totally wussified, dumbed down, women are prompted to view men like the ones that post here as dangerous, radical, they are prompted to view these metro sexual, oprah watching, minority outreach as desirable mates. There by producing passive off spring.

With black people its the opposite, using innate qualities and boosting them thru selective voluntary breeding. And the results show that the desired goals are being met.

So few see the full game board from above.

Eugenics is alive and well, in a more sinister variant than hitler ever devised.

Nice to see some ppl can see it too

Californian said...

This is for Constructive Feedback:

Whatever the merits of your argument re white liberals and financial elites, the purpose of SBPDL is to examine the impact of blacks and their politics on America. Going off in other directions diverts SBPDL from its mission.

The thing is, blacks have allowed themselves to be used by those elites as foot soldiers in the war against white America. The fact that 90+% of blacks voted lockstep for Obama is an indicator of their race based mentality. If we were to see blacks break with the Democratic Party and support conservative or libertarian candidates it would be one thing. But we do not, so BRA becomes the tactical problem. To repeat my earlier point: the dysfunctions of BRA are so in your face that they are obvious to all but the most deluded. As a result, they are useful in mobilizing people against the system.

It's like a two front war. On the one hand, we have an elite in the Western world which for perverse reasons is selling out its own civilization. Meanwhile within the gates, there is the growing dysfunction of criminality, illegitimacy, educational collapse, declining infrastructure, urban rioting, and all the rest of the symptoms of BRA.

If we saw blacks standing up and admitting their responsibility for the havoc they have wrought, it would be one thing. But they do not. Instead, the race hustles never end. This leads to a white backlash, and that backlash can be used to eventually build a movement which will deal with both fronts.


@Cali: Does it seem ironic to you that you are using as your alias a state that is both fiscally and morally bankrupt but you are running me down about Detroit?


There's still potential in California, but it's where white (or Asian) people dominate, such as Silicon Valley. In any event, recent developments in California vindicate the bigger picture: multicultural societies simply do not work. They become battlegrounds for ethnically based resource extraction from a diminishing productive sector. And require growing police state measures to keep ethnically based conflicts from turning into open warfare. If you do not believe the last sentence, just look at the gang violence in major cities, and third world immigrants ethnically cleansing blacks from their traditional neighborhoods.

Let me note that there has been considerable white flight from California, a major factor in the state's economic downturn. You remove the people who made the state great in the first place, you replace them with others, add in the usual DWL anti-policies, and the result is civilizational decline.

10mm AUTO said...

I agree that forced Eugenics is an impossibility. Given the pattern of Western medicine and even assuming the most optimistic appraisal it may well be centuries or never that we would be able to locate EVERY negro female before breeding and EVERY negro male before breeding and attempt some sort of radical genetic alteration on their germ cells that would give them essentially "White" brains.

Further, their is the resistance by the low I.Q. negros themselves. How do you convince a 13 year old negress that she needs to extensive genetic alteration? How do you even measure "informed consent" to a negress that can't even read or write and simply wants to "beat down" every White she sees. How would she raise the high I.Q. child? This is the path of madness and pathological White guilt because it is not White Man's responsibility to build a new level of "White Man's Burden" to "fix" negros; another utopian scheme. It is a sign of our sickness that Whites immediately look to doing what they have always done (uplift the negro) with another program, in this case a medical one. We owe them NOTHING.

Further, it is not genocide to rid the North American Continent of negros, their are plenty in Africa, the Carribean, South America and Europe so that the question of genocide is moot. They are simply being removed from this area for the Survival of the White race and to have a White homeland.

On the other hand, implant birth control for anyone on Welfare and supported abortions (while Whites continue to discourage them amongst Whites) is a very viable solution. The bottom three cohorts of negros (out of five total) are the breeding core of negros here in the USA and nearly all of them are on Welfare for life! The top two I.Q. cohorts are not breeding at replacement level. While their might be some shifting of these numbers in response to such a program, the core numbers will not shift radically enough to make a difference in the time allotted. To illustrate my point, let's take the case of Laquanaquisha who at 13 is required to get mandatory birth control. She parties down, services the bucks and generally has a good time. At 30, with no job sills and perhaps a record, she would have to get a job sufficient to shed every Welfare program to get the birth control removed. Her job would then have to pay enough for her to hire a nanny to take care of her child or a husband making enough to do the same. Given that 70% of negros don't get married, that education sufficient for a good job is difficult to obtain and hold, that a negros female fertile period is relatively short, even if she squeezes out two replacement niglets MOST of her peers will not. The negro population, already mildly negative, would crash within only a few generations. This of course assumes that we quit flying them in by the plane load as well as their continued shooting of each other.

Again, we owe them nothing. If negros need public assistance to survive then it should not be the taxpayer who foots the bill for their babies. Simple implant birth control along with the excellent efforts Planned Parenthood has accomplished will wash our land of the negro.

Anonymous said...

Anon said...Based.on the unfairness directed upon us over the last 150+ yrars this can only be cobsidered fair. When will you people realize your.policies and system has negatively affect us.

If you want to play that game: White polices towards blacks have been entirely fair over the last 150 years:
* White people ended slavery.
* White people instituted Reconstruction and gave blacks control of several Southern states. But blacks so alienated whites -- even Northerners who fought a war to end slavery -- that segregation was deemed the most humane policy.
* White people instituted segregation to give blacks the discipline to function in a modern society. (Under segregation, blacks were much more functional: look at the rates of illegitimacy, violent crime, business formation, etc.)
* White people since 1954 have given blacks every program they have demanded. And on top of this, have instituted a war on poverty whose main purpose was to level that playing field.

And what have white people gotten in return for all their benevolence towards blacks? The more civil rights programs enacted, the more money dumped into the black community, the more the dysfunctions increase. One can only shake one's head at the ingratitude.

It's blacks who owe whites for:
* Massive black on white criminal violence.
* Skyrocketing illegitimacy and welfare dependency.
* Trashing education.
* Extortion in the form of race hustles which loot public and private moneys.
* Undermining public services by using affirmative action to hire unqualified blacks.
* Long Hot Summer riots which drove millions of white people from cities their ancestors built.
* The destruction of cities such as Detroit, Birmingham, and etc.
* And how about the fact that white taxpayers are picking up the bill for US aid to Africa to ameliorate black-generated problems such as hunger, AIDs epidemics, and the not infrequent massacre?

Please provide an address to whom the bill will be sent. Gold ingots are preferred in payment. Cash will be accepted as long as the Federal Reserve can keep the printing presses going.

Thank you and have a nice day.

Jay in DC said...

Couple things...

1) I agree with the other post about CF coming into hostile territory to make a point. I agree with very little of what he posits, but some of his points are salient, though it appears, like most nig-nogs reading comprehension is not his strong suit. Yes CF, we "get it" that Elite Bankstas (aka Vampire Squids) play both sides against the middle. But this site is SBPDL. Paul stays on topic, and rightly so though he has no illusions about the puppeteers pulling the strings from behind. Secondarily, as others have mentioned with the LOTR analogy. Sauron (elite bankstas) are in far away fortresses, hard to get to, suicide to assail, the black skinned violent sub-race of Orcs are the enemy at the gate. We must address this problem before ever making an attempt at their controllers.

2) hossman- You echo what I feel about this place. Lots of VERY good dialogue, I will never shit on SBPDL this is a place where leaders of men could exchange ideas and have, the problem is, it is mainly theory. Lots of hand-wringing and deep understanding of the problem, little in the way of actionable ideology. I've said it before, seek these venues elsewhere, they go hand in glove, with what is discussed here.

Case in point: I'll leave you with something I had to dive very very deeply into the "alternate" Internet to discover, consider it an adjunct to the lively discussions here.

Did you know there are a few places on the internet that will sell to civilians Level 4 trauma plates? This is wholly illegal under US Law. Only our Overlord's Minions are allowed these items. LEOs, militarized FedCops (which are everywhere now), and the military. These are what I like to call "Terminator Plates". They are quite hard to acquire because they can defeat multiple impacts from rifles like the AR-15/AK-47 variety. Even normal cops don't wear this amount of ballistic protection. They are an absurd force multiplier for a single solider.

hossman, you want to take action? Find the right places to do it. This is a talky place, and likely always will be, but there are action places very very close by. Expand your network.

-Jay

Anonymous said...

Following should have read:

"If you want to play that game: White policies (not "polices!") towards blacks have been entirely fair over the last 150 years..."

...though come to think of it, there's something to be said about the original posting!

Anonymous said...

Earlier, pat said:
"Any mass transport of people to Africa is just a death sentence for most of them. It's genocide by another name."

To which I would say better them than us.

Pat also said: "I doubt if anyone will make a serious attempt to enlarge black brains until at least the middle of this century"

As mentioned by several others in the thread, this "forced eugenics" program is already well underway.

It is "forced" in that the cultural reprogramming by Hollywood and the MSM of our younger generations to find miscegenation attractive is occurring without our permission and in the case of most people, without their knowledge.

The result of generations of white/black mixing will eventually be that the negro brains will be enlarged.

Unfortunately, from the White perspective, this is actually forced dysgenics.

Californian said...

10mm AUTO said ... I agree that forced Eugenics is an impossibility.

True. Look at the backlash that just the discussion of eugenics caused a century ago. But to view this in the most Machiavellian way:

You do have eugenics programs in America today, though "dysgenics" might be a better term. High-IQ people limit their numbers, low-IQ people reproduce unthinkingly. (An outcome predicted by the early eugenicists, by the way.) The low-IQ are subsidized by assorted welfare programs as well as the adulation of DWLs. Scientific discussion of genetic factors leading to high-IQ demographics is largely proscribed, while DWL orthodoxy is enforced. Meantime, apparently low-IQ third world populations are moved into first world countries; and high-IQ populations (such as whites from southern Africa) are persona non grata. We can see the results in BRA and related manifestations.

Still, it's not entirely out of the picture to speculate that if pushed too far, white Americans might not implement some massive population control measures. We can look at the forced movement of the American Indian to reservations. And for that matter, the rise of both de jure and de facto segregation during the Progressive Era.

(As an aside, it might be interesting to see an analysis of why segregation rose at the same time that Progressive and Populist politics were widespread in the USA.)

How far can Americans be pushed? Look at the measures used to enforce the war on drugs, and the child support system. I'll conflate them here: asset forfeiture, drug testing, creation of national data bases, liens on income and wealth, automatic revocation of gun rights as well as professional and driver's licenses for malefactors, long jail sentences for civil infractions, government propaganda demonizing violators, and SWAT teams kicking down doors all over the Homeland. And I need not comment on how the state has expanded its powers under the Patriot Act.

This is not to justify or critique any of these measures. It's meant to provide an objective observation. Americans, under certain circumstances, will accept the most extreme policies. And modern technologies make this all the more easy. To give one example: supposing a white supremacist government were to electronically revoke the bank accounts and credit cards of blacks who lived in certain states with the intent of driving them into other states; and perhaps this was done both ways, to concentrate whites in an ethno-state? Of course, this is a sword that cuts both ways, and we have seen race realists such as Dr. Rushton denied their professional and free speech rights.

Which gets back to the point about dysgenics. DWLs have declared a sort of a race war, but it is a peculiar race war whose goal seems to be self-destruction. If you compare the America of 1912 with that of 2012 you can see how far we have come--or regressed.

Californian said...

1) I agree with the other post about CF coming into hostile territory to make a point.

It's important to engage posters like CF because:

1: Their arguments are widespread in BRA. Race realists can take the opportunity to develop counter-arguments which are useful when out in the real world. For example, if the topic of race comes up in the workplace or schools, you want to be able to refute the BRA party line in an intelligent manner. This lets you win over other people and enhances your status. PK's articles, the websites to which he links, and many of the posters on SBPDL provide the intelligent arguments.

2: There are many middle of the road people who read SBPDL. They hear the BRA party line all the time. This website is one of the places where they will see that line refuted in an intelligent manner. This wins over people and even spreads the "word" among the otherwise uncommitted. It also discredits the BRA agitprop machine.

As evidence this is working, I see more race realist arguments showing up all over the blogosphere. This is information warfare, and effective tactics will win the day.

Mr. Rational said...

10mm AUTOHow do you convince a 13 year old negress that she needs to extensive genetic alteration? How do you even measure "informed consent" to a negress that can't even read or write and simply wants to "beat down" every White she sees. How would she raise the high I.Q. child?

She only needs convincing that a bunch of money right now is a worthwhile trade for having her tubes tied or plugged.  Once she's made that trade, the problem is dealt with.

We can do the same for low-functioning White populations which have a culture of subsisting on disability and SSI.  If there are genes associated with the desire to work and achieve, the least we can do for our posterity is to select our next generation from those who carry them.

Mr. Rational said...

Anonymousclaims of an atrabilious protestor

Great word there!  The spirit of Christopher Hitchens lives on at SBPDL!

Sadly you mis-used "they're" when you meant "their", but....

Anonymous said...

There are so many involved comments here, so much detail and different philosophies.

All these words are unnecessary. It's really quite simple.

Negroes have intense hatred and anger. They hate themselves, but more importantly, they intenseley hate non-negroes. Their hatred manifests itself in brutal criminal savagery; beatings, rapes, torture and murder.

What more do we have to talk about?

Anonymous said...

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/12/13/ESPN-Rob-Parker-RGIII-not-black

ESPN COMMENTATOR:
RGIII A 'CORNBALL BROTHER' DUE TO POSSIBLE REPUBLICANISM

Anonymous said...

I don't want to have to pay to fix the negro. Not worth one single dime.

Let them rot in their own filth and hatred for all I care. It seems like that is what they are determined to do anyway. I have done enough. Haven't we all done enough? My kids and grandkids will be paying for the social engineering efforts for generations.

I want to to raise a family not raise black IQ. Can't do both. I don't have the time or patience or the "It Takes A Village" mentality.

I and a few friends have already been victims a few times, and I am over it. They hate our guts and want us dead.

Good luck with your compassionate Negro-Saving programs, Pat.

Count me out.

Anonymous said...

Unsuck DC Metro.

http://unsuckdcmetro.blogspot.com/

Apparently, now the deranged negroes are slamming the emergency stop on the down escalators during peak travel time in order to watch the innocent commuting YTs fall forward and bash themselves on the concrete below.

But Negroes, if all the YTs get hurt by falling on each other, who will pay to feed your fat lazy ass?

YT dominoes. What fun!

Anonymous said...

Here is an example of a negro throwing industrial strength lye upon and beating his former white girl friend with a baseball bat. Occurred in Vermont and reported on in the UK's DailyMail newspaper on Dec 7.

Warning, it's a horrible story, very disturbing pictures.

Negro Savagery

Anonymous said...

Maybe the United States should give Detroit to Israel and let them all recolonize there. Israel is an amazingly technologically advanced country with lots of intelligent, hard-working people. If all of the Israelis moved to Detroit, they wouldn't have to worry about the other Middle Eastern countries bothering them anymore. Detroit is largely abandoned anyway. If the Isrelis could turn an arid patch of desert into the country it is today in a little over 60 years, just imagine what they could do with Detroit. In 10-20 years, they would probably have the whole city completely turned around and it would be a computers and technology manufacturing center that would rival Silicone Valley.

They wouldn't even have to become US citizens if they didn't want to. There are lots of territories in the US (such as the Native American reservations) that act independently and have their own laws and government.

If Israel didn't want Detroit, maybe importing a bunch of displaced white South Africans would do the trick.

pat said...

I was just about to buy Escape from Detroit from Amazon when I noticed that there are a whole lot of other books about Detroit. There are in fact too many to review in one single blog comment. So I'll do this in chunks. Today I'll comment on the first four. I'll get to the others later.

Note first that I haven't read any of these books. I'm trying to figure out if I should read any of them. Note second that I've never even been in Michigan much less Detroit. Some commenters on the Amazon reviews catch some writers out because of their private knowledge. Not me.

The first four are:
• Detroit: A Biography - Scott Martelle
• Hidden History of Detroit - Amy Elliott Bragg
• Lost Detroit: Stories Behind the Motor City's Majestic Ruins - Dan Austin
• Detroit City Is the Place to Be: The Afterlife of an American Metropolis - Mark Binelli

Detroit: A Biography seems to be general history for the early years and then adopts a political stance for more recent times. The publisher's blurb says "the problems were caused by - "confluence of public policies, private industry decisions, and deep, thick seams of racism". Looking at random through the preview text, I find on page 172 this citation from what the author calls the landmark study The Origins of Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit by Thomas J. Sugrue.

Without reading too much I conclude that the first half of the book is good professional history of the first settlers and the Indians. By the epilog Martelle has blamed all of Detroit's subsequent problems on "outsourcing and profiteering by the auto industry" and white racism.

This looks to be one of a series of biographies of American cities. Martelle appears to be a hard left writer. His other two books are about class war and American persecution of communists.

The Hidden History of Detroit is a short book of nineteenth century Detroit. It includes eighteenth century materials but focuses on the nineteenth. It appears to be written for younger readers. Apparently the "hidden" referenced in the title means that history that no one has ever cared about.

Lost Detroit is a picture book. It is very short on everything except photos of formerly magnificent buildings that have crumbled into ruins.

Detroit City Is the Place to Be is a soft centered personal memoir by a Detroit native. It seems to have a lot of detail but few conclusions. Binelli writes for Rolling Stone and he wrote a comic novel. He seems to be a professional writer and Detroit is a hot topic in publishing. It appears to be a good source on recent Detroit minutia.

At four books per comment. I should be through with my review of Detroit books in less than a week.

Albertosaurus

Jay in DC said...

Anonymous said...
Warning, it's a horrible story, very disturbing pictures.

Negro Savagery


Hahaha! I feel like you are new here, welcome to SBPDL! This coal burning whore deserved that exact outcome. Nothing, seriously, nothing can be better than every thin white girl who has been indoctrinated in a Gramci, Marxist, Frankfurt school, Leftist West, at the LEAST being- raped by a nigger. Secondarily, embracing minority yoof that, as I often like to do to white DWLs in DC, choking them out until orgasm. The difference is what? I have genius level sperm that may or may not, be aborted. They have mulatto niglets that will just be another EBT card. I'm not up nights about it.

Either way, it is comical to me that you are just now realizing what reptilian black skinned males are capable of. Welcome again to SPBDL, I guess... *shrug*

Anonymous said...

Detroit Library Ruins. Another destruction caused by black people.

https://www.google.com/search?q=detroit+library+ruins&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=XtJ&tbo=u&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ei=AGrKUK-IOJOe8gSAl4C4Dw&ved=0CD0QsAQ&biw=1901&bih=920

Anonymous said...

Why do some people feel that they are "ENTITLED" to free handouts and free money? What makes them so special? Blacks will always be "victims" of white oppression even in the black Mecca otherwise known as Atlanta. These people have have no right to complain about anything.

Discard said...

Wave the money at Blacks and see how many of them will jump to get sterilized, especially once we've cut off the welfare. Truthfully, we've got them cornered. They are generally incapable of supporting themselves, and making sterilization a condition of survival would solve the bulk of the problem. Of course, sending any and all violent thugs to the gallows would remove most of the incentive to survive through preying on others.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous of 2:33 PM:
Maybe the United States should give Detroit to Israel and let them all recolonize there. Israel is an amazingly technologically advanced country with lots of intelligent, hard-working people. If all of the Israelis moved to Detroit, they wouldn't have to worry about the other Middle Eastern countries bothering them anymore. Detroit is largely abandoned anyway. If the Isrelis could turn an arid patch of desert into the country it is today in a little over 60 years, just imagine what they could do with Detroit. In 10-20 years, they would probably have the whole city completely turned around and it would be a computers and technology manufacturing center that would rival Silicone Valley.

Silicone Valley indeed! That's the most humorous suggestion I've read in some time. Since the Israelis recently deported most of the groids who came across their border recently to stone silence form the Ministry of Truth (owned by TWMNBN), it has about the same likelihood of actually happening as the The Old Negro Space Program did. (Is that the one where they were flying around the pyramids of Uranus before YT was hatched by Jakub when his mad-scientist xperiment went astray?)

My own suggestion for Detroilet's governance is nothing so impossible. Simply have neighboring Dearbornistan absorb it - and impose full-blown sharia on the groids, complete with beheadings, stonings, cutting off of hands, etc. That would reduce the welfare rolls in no time at all. Oh, and not to forget - sharia allows for full-blown chattel slavery as well. Has there ever been a more perfect law for a more deserving people?

Anonymous said...

I was listening to Sean Hannity interview Richard Snyder (Gov of Michigan) tonight. They were talking about the downfall of Detroit. Snyder mentioned that things started going downhill in the 60s or so. I crossed my fingers and prayed for some honesty.
No luck. Not a word about race. Not a word about how Detroit is what it is because of who lives there.

Room101 said...

"There are so many involved comments here, so much detail and different philosophies.

All these words are unnecessary. It's really quite simple.

Negroes have intense hatred and anger. They hate themselves, but more importantly, they intenseley hate non-negroes. Their hatred manifests itself in brutal criminal savagery; beatings, rapes, torture and murder.

What more do we have to talk about?

December 13, 2012 1:13 PM"



I think what you're getting at is how do we hold the lying-stealing-less-than-worthless-Government to consider the case of each citizen based not on the color of his or her skin, but their record and content of their character.

I think Government employees shouldn't be taking MLK-day off anymore.
Government has by example and rule completely repudiated and dis-credited all the stupid, obsolete, and disingenuous writings and speeches of MLK.

It's a complete travesty that these filthy rich Government employees get a day off with pay to rest between screwing over white taxpaying American citizens.

It doesn't make any sense until you examine the financial incentives: The more severe and costly the Government-failure, the greater their allocated budget in the up-coming fiscal year.

The purpose of Government is to spawn more failed bureaucracies, thereby justifying larger spending.
Both Democrats and Republicans are all about making sure the IRS captures all our wealth and diminishing "freedoms", such as they were.

rjp said...

Anonymous said... Michelle Obama uses the term "food deserts", when in fact she means "any geographic area in which grocery stores have all closed because of epidemic negro theft".

Food deserts exist because there is not the population density to support supermarkets. They are only “food deserts” when they are black neighborhoods. If the neighborhood is white it means you have to have a car.

pat said...
The answer as to why this particular author didn't mention race is the same reason that everyone avoids discussions about solutions.

Genocide. People don't want to be Nazis. And they can't think of an alternative that would work.


The Jews spun a great story .....

If we wish to avoid the "Tasmanian Solution" for American blacks we will need learn how to make those blacks smarter. How long do we have?

Only way to do that is through miscegenation.

That takes us to the year 2100. I think by the year 2100 parents will be able to specify most of their child's characteristics including intelligence.

By then that won't be possible ..... state approved and preferred miscegenation will have destroyed the possibility of a 130 IQ.

Californian said... Or Detroit's unemployment situation: supposing that Detroit were to reduce taxes and cut regulations. Will entrepreneurs suddenly arise from the disintegrating pavement to create new businesses? Can he identify these budding businessmen?

Regulation by cities is out of control in dieing cities ....you can't generate revenue by driving evering one out of business and making the cost of starting one financial suicide.

hossman said... Seriously, what would you guys be willing to do to make "something" happen....

If someone stood up, would you stand up with them? If someone wanted to fight, would you fight with them?


Some rats were trying to set me up to be robbed a week ago. I called 911, turned, and started walking towards it and followed the ring leader into the street and off he scurried like the rodent he and his are. %$#@ that POS. Don't %$#@ with me.

Mr. Rational said...

If you don't want to look like Nazis, use West Virginian hillbillies as the poster children for the program.


Hey hey hey. What the %$#@ is with people thinking West Virginia is fair game for treating like the bastard step-child?

Mr. Rational said...
10mm AUTO: How do you convince a 13 year old negress that she needs to extensive genetic alteration? How do you even measure "informed consent" to a negress that can't even read or write and simply wants to "beat down" every White she sees. How would she raise the high I.Q. child?

She only needs convincing that a bunch of money right now is a worthwhile trade for having her tubes tied or plugged. Once she's made that trade, the problem is dealt with.

We can do the same for low-functioning White populations which have a culture of subsisting on disability and SSI. If there are genes associated with the desire to work and achieve, the least we can do for our posterity is to select our next generation from those who carry them.


North Carolina tried this .... got sued .... paid "reparations".

Mr. Rational said...

North Carolina tried this .... got sued .... paid "reparations".

North Carolina had a eugenics board which oversaw forcible sterilizations.  I'm talking about voluntary sterilizations; if the illiterates and criminals take $5000 to leave the gene pool, they have no cause for complaint—and you might even be able to write the law to force them to repay that sum with interest out of their own earnings before they're allowed to take any legal action in the future.

Constructive Feedback said...

@Cali:

So, in your view - to talk about the SOURCE of "The Negro Problem" (you all's word) is a DIVERSION OF SBPDL's mission????

What IF THE DWL decides to SHUT DOWN "Offensive Web Sites"?
Despite your continued DESIRE to TALK ABOUT NEGROES all day long - YOUR ENEMY will have pulled the plug on your router.

You just proved what I said about my dear friend Paul Kersey. Though HE KNOWS that my own analysis that "THE NEGRO DOESN'T POSSIBLY have the POWER or MONEY to tear down the whole of America", as he surmises - THIS SPORT proves to be more pleasing to him.


*********************
Dissident says:

These people despise the white man, they'd rather see us eradicated. Violence against whites will only escalate because of this movie, as impulsive and rage filled Negros are tempted to "exact revenge" for the sins of the past.


If you don't get my words (this time) YOU NEVER WILL

** "They Hate White People"
** "They are TEAMING WITH White People Who Are PROGRESSIVE Fundamentalists TO FIGHT THE RIGHT WING".

Question Dissident - using the two points above: WHICH ONE do you think is the more POWERFUL operating mandate today for the PROGRESSIVE NEGRO?

Can I give you all Kindly White folks some "inside baseball" information? (and NO do you assume that I am a BLACK TIM WISE. I don't trust the majority of you all (on this blog - not all White people)) :

THE "BLACK STRUGGLE" in 2012 IS NOT A "Black Struggle".
"BLACKNESS" is used as a WEAPON by Black Progressives and the DWL (White Progressive Cheshire Fox Ally) to FIGHT THE RIGHT WING!!!!!

Do you really believe that Chris Matthews believes his "racial dog whistle" that he is blowing?

When you have a "partner" that you can hold up to take the hit from the bullets that YOUR COMMON ENEMY is firing - what is the downside to doing so? Your honor???

I don't blame Chris Matthews and MSNBC for "Using Negroes".
The PROGRESSIVE NEGRO has left themselves OPEN FOR THE TAKING.

Their common goal is POWER IN AMERICA.
If they both can put a forbearance on their racial animus in order to fight YOU - the Right-Wing - then it is all worth it.

MY PERSONAL OPINION is that when the WHITE LIBERAL loses his WHITE PRIVILEGE - his fight against YOU ALL will change.
The BIGGEST DOUBLE CROSS IN HISTORY will happen as the DWL turns against his Black and Hispanic Allies and DEPARTS FOR "A LAND OF HIS OWN" with his WHITE RIGHT-WING ENEMY.

You all will CONTINUE your RIGHT/LEFT battle. You'll just be doing it in a land of your own.

It would be more logical FOR YOU ALL to expedite the loss of "White Privilege" among your enemy DWL rater than receiving the "masturbatory effects" of BASHING NEGROES while YOUR REAL ENEMY continues, unabated.

Mr. Rational said...

It would be more logical FOR YOU ALL to expedite the loss of "White Privilege" among your enemy DWL rater than receiving the "masturbatory effects" of BASHING NEGROES while YOUR REAL ENEMY continues, unabated.

What do you mean, "REAL ENEMY"?  You're BOTH our enemies; DWLs are the generals, Blacks are the shock troops.  Black people are not going to become friendly and productive if the DWLs go away.

The media portray even Black "yoof" robbers, rapists and murderers as "victims of oppression".  We need our public to recognize the Black shock troops AS ENEMIES before they can understand that the DWL generals (including and especially the media) are enemies also.

Dissident said...

CF,

I find myself in a bit of a conundrum at times; here's why.

I consider myself a person of Christian sensibility. A person of fair-play and a person interested in equitable distribution of the real and honest pursuits to happiness. I want a level playing field for you and your people-as well as mine.

The hard part for me, is that the reality of seeing the daily carnage being perpetrated against innocent whites by militant blacks, has put me into direct conflict with my own sense of fair-play and respect for what I use to feel where disadvantaged people of other races.

I know full well of the common enemy that you frequently speak of and allude to in your writing. I'm on board with most of that, however, the very real line of demarcation for me is the real world where the rubber meets the road of race relations.

I take absolutely no glee or joy in coming onto this forum and discussing what I'd rather not be discussing. We should be past this point by now in Amerika, but because of the Liberal death Kult and their unnatural social experiments..well, here we are 2012Amerika, with a Marxist President and an outrageous BLACK ON WHITE crime epidemic, that goes unreported by a media that seems intent on the demise of my heritage and my race.

I'd truly like to be your friend CF. I say that in sincerity, but the swinging door of dialectical conflict will not allow it. You and I are probably not that far removed pholosophically, perhaps? But, you find yourself in a defensive posture trying to enlighten us "right-wingers" unto the reality of the marionettes pulling the levers of power and I find myself in the defensive posture of having to defend my family, property and sanity from rampaging blacks and hostile government.

What are we to do? Where's the common ground for all of us?

If we could get together to fight our common enemy, then we would make progress, instead we will remain here, in this forum fighting each other with words. Others will be in the street fighting for their lives from the carnage that has been engineered by those that would try and force an unnatural relationship between naturally different cultures?

You can lead a horse, but can you ever really make him drink?

At this point, I feel the only real solutions are segregation of races. Natural and normal and historical segregation of races.

Anonymous said...

Dissident: I agree 100% with your position as regards segregation but, along with segregation there must be a cut off of all the gibsmedat that blacks depend on. Without ending the entitlements, segregation is like never seeing a useless bum of a neighbor yet still having to pay his bills via section 8, welfare, ebt etc.
The cut off would have to be a phased withdrawal over a period of decades otherwise there'd be massive riots, looting and killing once the gibs ended.
The point is, segregation could only be effective if blacks were weaned from the government teat and forced by circumstances to behave responsibly and fend for themselves.
They'd naturally fail and there'd be a return to the shanty towns I remember seeing in my younger days but as I've always agreed with the philosopy of "each according to his efforts, each according to his abilities" I'd have no problems with that at all.
Segregation and ending the gibs would also start a much needed reduction in the number of blacks being born to leech off the system. When the government no longer paid Shaniqua to have 4 or 5useless children, she'd have no choice but to stop popping them out or she'd be eating Haitian dirt cookies for dinner every night.
Entitlements or "gibs" is the gas thrown on the fire of black dysfunction and it needs to end.

Melanie said...

@ Dissident December 15, 2012 4:45 AM

I am at exactly the same point at which you seem to be. "Where the rubber meets the road" is my immediate and primary concern, how can it be otherwise? And "where the rubber meets the road" is a spreading concern, thanks to the destruction of the Cabrini Greens and the spread of the problem into the very white flight suburbs into which we fled when the first displacement occurred. The less there is a safe vent for the pressure, the more the urgency builds.

Jefferson said...

No Conservative in the media will bring up Detroit's Black as hell demographics because they will lose their jobs if they do.

Look at what happened to Don Imus. In the media it is career suicide for a White person to say anything negative about Blacks and other Nonwhites.

Bogolyubski said...

CF, why do you come here? As many have stated previously, nearly everyone who posts here regularly is well aware of the fact that blacks could never have pulled off something like BRA. Are you even aware of the fact that the NAACP, founded in 1909, had only 3 blacks on the initial board of 9 members? The other 6 were 5 rich whites and 1 TWMNBN. Here's the NAACP's first president, who looks a bit pale, no? The NAACP didn't have a negro president until 1975. Even the current president, Benjamin Jealous, appears to have less African ancestry than D'Won Mocha Messiah. I expect that even today, the organization (which is but one example of its type) would collapse in weeks were it not for money being provided by the usual suspects.

How many of your fellow blacks are even dimly aware that the leaders they follow like a herd of lemmings all serve the usual suspects and do their bidding? Wouldn't your time and energy be much better spent attempting to have the scales fall from their eyes?

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]The hard part for me, is that the reality of seeing the daily carnage being perpetrated against innocent whites by militant blacks, has put me into direct conflict with my own sense of fair-play and respect for what I use to feel where disadvantaged people of other races[/quote]

Dissident:

1) YOU DON'T have to have the goal of "BEING MY FRIEND". I ONLY ask that WHITE FOLKS and the CRIMINAL ELEMENT among the Negro respect MY RIGHTS and PROPERTY. (our debate is ONLY on the size and scope of this element as compared to the whole)


2) You are no less a TRIBALIST than the various "Black Progressive operatives" who see a WHITE MAN shooting a BLACK TEEN in Jacksonville or Sanford FL and get RILED UP more than an INTRA-RACIAL CRIME.

3) The fact is that MOST CRIME IS INTRA-RACIAL.
I DO NOT HIDE from the fact that BLACK CRIME VICTIMIZATION is of a higher proportion than what our American population numbers should dictate. I see this as a HUMAN DEVELOPMENT issue and not the GENETIC problem that many of you believe it is.

3a) Sorry - but I DO NOT promote the BLACK ON WHITE violence rate as the PRIMARY THREAT TO WHITE FOLKS as many of you all have a vested interest in doing. The NUMBERS do not justify your response.

But hey - I am on a blog in which my dear friend Mr Kersey is not only spending a lot of time watching Black folks - he is now getting you all to pay $50 for his publications.

If the Hip Hop artists can become millionaires by selling stories of Black violence in the drug game, with a large portion of the revenue coming from White kids - I can't begrudge my dear friend Mr Kersey for getting you all to type in your PayPal account information to his cause.

We should go on tour together Mr Kersey. We can pack the halls just like "O'Reilly and Beck/Jon Steward".
YOU can play the straight main, "Protector of White Culture". I would even agree to play the "Black Criminal Element" who turns everything back toward Slavery and the rape of Black women that was legal because "the rapist" controlled "What was legal".

Then any White women in the audience like Melanie can receive solace that they are not a "Slave era Wife" - knowing that some of those mulatto children look just like her husband BUT publicly believing him when he tells her: "I would NEVER allow the flesh of no dirty Nigra wench to touch my PURE WHITE SKIN and risk catching something. You know that these Negra winches wash our linen. Maybe when she was pulling the sheet off of our bed one of my PRIZED WHITE SPERM CELLS crawled from her hand, up her arm, down her black skinned body and into her vagina and impregnated her.

YOU DO KNOW that the WHITE SEED is prized AND those Nigra will do anything to lighten their skin like Beyonce and get an upgrade in their IQ.

This story was accepted until the wives started comparing notes and saw that the other husband said the same thing EXCEPT they used a reference to "Halle Berry" or Solidad O'Brien" instead of Beyonce.

How about it Mr Kersey/ 80/20% with you taking the majority?

That's still more money from an audience full of White folks that any Black man will ever get UNLESS he is running with a ball or pulls out a handgun. Right?

SKIP said...

" Jay in DC said...
Anonymous said...
Warning, it's a horrible story, very disturbing pictures.


Jay, you are indeed an enlightened individual, I second your entire post here.