Friday, January 31, 2014

"He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time." Four Blacks Suspected in Murder of White 19-Year-Old Kyle Jobin

 "He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time."

That's what police said.

Of Kyle Jobin.
Police say "he was in the wrong place, at the wrong time." 19-year-old Kyle Jobin gunned down by four black males... The wrong place for white people is America; the wrong time is now

A white, 19-year-old college student.

"He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time."

In a suburb of Indianapolis.

Four black males were the last people Jobin would see in this lifetime; and it's four black males the police are looking for as suspects in the murder of Jobin. [Family hoping for answers in death of McCordsville teenager,, 1-29-14]:

That’s what investigators say about the night 19-year-old Kyle Jobin of McCordsville was shot and killed outside a Lawrence gas station.
“Part of us died that night, too,” said Kyle’s dad, Joe. “He was everything to me.”

Joe Jobin and his wife Cyndi sit in their McCordsville home Wednesday night, reliving the night of Jan. 4.
Their youngest son Kyle was home on Christmas break from Vincennes University.
“It was the last part of the week, and there was a big snow storm coming,” recalled Joe Jobin. “I said Kyle, if you want to go hang out, you’ll want to do it tonight. You’ll want to be here tomorrow, because we’ll be snowed in.”
“We said ‘love you,’ and he went to spend the night at a friend’s.”
Jobin says it was 3:30 a.m., when they were awoken by a knock at the door.
“Being a service member, you hear different stories about having that call to your door. I opened up that door and I could remember my eyes going from law officer, to law officer, to chaplain. When I saw that chaplain, I knew it. Something very, very drastic had happened,” Jobin said, a retired Air Force vet.
“We jumped in the car as fast as we could, and we rushed to the hospital to spend what last little time we had with him, Luckily we had a little time. I’m not sure if he was really with us, but we got to hold his hand,” said Jobin, emotionally. “It was a terrible night and one I’ll never forget.”
Police say Kyle had gone from his friend’s house around 2:30 a.m., to get a pack of cigarettes from the Marathon gas station at 7013 E. 56th St.
Investigators say a witness saw four black men surround his car, after he came out with his cigarettes: they were knocking on windows and doors, trying to get in the car.
The witness ran to get police: when they came back, Kyle was slumped over the wheel, with a gunshot wound to the head.
His ID and debit card were still in his hand.
 Gunshot wound to the head? Four black male suspects?  His ID and debit card still in his hand when police showed up?

What was it the four black male suspects wanted?

His cigarettes?

Or yet another white homicide victim by black males in the Indianapolis region? [Police, family seek answers in Lawrence homicide,, 1-29-14]:
The incident happened at the Marathon gas station, 7013 E. 56th St. A witness saw Jobin get back in his vehicle after buying cigarettes. Then, four black males got out of a white SUV and started knocking on windows and doors, trying to get inside. One of the people from the SUV was wearing a maroon hooded sweatshirt, but no other descriptions were available.
A witness drove to another gas station to find an officer, but when the officer arrived, Jobin had already been shot.
 "He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time."

 Oddly, the Indianapolis Star doesn't point out the racial aspect of the suspects...

Black males engaging in gun crime in Indianapolis?

What do you want to bet the NRA Convention in April held in Indianapolis doesn't require the same police state measures the Indiana Black Expo annually requires when it is held in the same city?

"He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time."

Kyle Jobin is dead.

Not because of the NRA and not because of living in a Democrat-run city.

He's dead because he was a white male (remember, his debit card was found in his nearly lifeless hand when police found him).

Brian Garfield's novel Death Wish includes this important line, when our protagonist Paul Benjamin catches himself questioning the sanity of a crime victims judgement, instead of castigating society for tolerating criminality:
He paid through the little tilt-slot in the plexiglass and got out on the corner. He was about to cross the street when his eye fell on a convertible parked in front of the supermarket. Part of the roof had been slashed open; it hung in gaping shreds.
Probably there had been some item of miniscule value visible on the back seat; someone had pulled a knife, ripped the car open, reached in and stolen the object. People ought to know better than to park canvas-topped cars on the streets...

He stopped, drew himself up. What the hell kind of thinking is that? 

Do we have to give up every God damned right we have? Do we have to let them scare us into giving up everything? 

Fallen rain gleamed on the street like precious gems. He looked over toward the river- along the block, under the concrete of the West Side Highway. The lights of a boat were sliding past. Out there on the filthy river in a boat you'd be safe. 
Safe, he thought. And that's all we have left to shoot for? (p. 66)
"He was in the wrong place, at the wrong time."

As Benjamin thought, "Safe.. And that's all we have left to shoot for?"

Thursday, January 30, 2014

The Criminalization of “Noticing”: Blacks Commit All Crime at University of Minnesota, Organized Blackness Shouts "Pattern Recognition" the Real Crime

Notice when we score a touchdown, or make a game saving tackle.

Notice when we dunk a basketball or perform an awe-inspiring, gravity defying blocking of a shot.

Notice when one of us can become a doctor, immediately earning the title “gifted hands.”
Fragile Black Egos: Sure, blacks commit all the crime at the University of Minnesota, but the real crime is daring to notice this fact. 

Notice when we become the “first” of our race to do something or attain some title that some pale-face dared to hold before us; it didn’t really count until we did it, after all.

Notice, as in Major League Baseball or the Winter Olympics, when the paucity of competitors from our racial ranks dares show that these “sports” hardly warrant the title of boasting the top athletes.

But never, ever notice when crime in a neighborhood/community/city/university is committed exclusively by our people, for you must only notice our achievements; that’s the only type of pattern recognition we will tolerate. [U’ Students Want Crime Alerts To Avoid Using Racial Descriptions, Minnesota CBS, 1-29-14]:
School officials at the University of Minnesota are working with black student and facility organizations after they wrote a letter to the school’s president about the racial descriptions given in crime alerts. 
The letter, sent on Dec. 6, 2013, was issued by members of the African American and African Studies, Black Faculty and Staff Association, Black Graduate and Professional Student Association, Black Men’s Forum, Black Student Union and Huntley House for African American Males. 
It was directed to University President Eric Kaler and Pamela Wheelock, the vice president of University Services. 
Students and staff mailed the letter more than a month after the campus went on lockdown because of an attempted robbery at Anderson Hall on Nov. 11, 2013.

University of Minnesota Police wrongfully identified a student as the suspect.
On Tuesday, school officials reported there have been 25 robberies in and around the University, an increase of 27 percent over the last few years.
The organizations wrote that while campus safety is crucial, the profiling can be devastating for black male students.

The frailest of egos do blacks have, especially those black males who would place their psychological health above the safety of the University of Minnesota community. [U of M crime alerts spark backlash,, 12-14-13]:
Black students at the University of Minnesota say racial descriptions in crime alerts does not help catch suspects. Instead, it's hurting black male students. 
There have been more than two dozen crimes on or near the U this year. 
Crime alert after crime alert describes many of the suspects as young black males. 
"There are a plethora of young black men on campus who fit that description," Abdel-Kader Toovi, a college senior and vice president of the Black Men's Forum on campus, said. 
Ian Taylor, a junior and president of the Black Men's Forum, said many of their members have expressed concern over how other students treat them. 
"You might walk a certain side of the street and someone might walk the other way or the other direction…just this feeling that people feel unsafe around you," Taylor said. 
The racial descriptions are leading to racial profiling, according to Amber Jones, president of the U's Black Student Union. 
"When a crime alert comes in everyone's like crime alert…there's another crime alert. Let him not be a black person again," Jones said.
But it is another black person. Indeed, it’s almost always a black person. [Profiling worries black community: Some faculty, students and staff say suspect descriptions are doing more harm than good,, 12-8-13]:
When Chisom Esele walks around the University of Minnesota campus at night, people sometimes get nervous, walk faster or cross the street when they see him coming. 
“I feel like when you’re black and you’re walking on the street at night, you’re kind of viewed [in a certain way],” the electrical engineering junior said. “I kind of understand, but at the end of the day, when this kind of stuff happens to me … it affects the way I feel.”
With the recent string of crime alerts emailed to University students, faculty and staff, the black community has an additional safety concern: racial profiling. 
All but two of the 19 crimes in alerts sent this semester have described one or more young, black males as suspects. The other two didn’t include race descriptions. 
“The problem is that it’s not descriptive enough to say who they’re actually looking for, because a black male in their 20s is me, and I’m a professional staff member here,” said Black Faculty and Staff Association logistics and technology coordinator Delonte LeFlore. 
Black faculty, staff and students across the University are working with police, administrators and the campus community to address the growing safety issue. They say they are worried about racial profiling by police, racial fear in the community and the potential for the situation to escalate into racially based violence.
Don’t worry, with the rate Minneapolis is gaining in black population (with the obligatory drop in overall white population that accompanies such a demographic shift), the University of Minnesota will soon become a fortified campus like that of the University of Chicago and Yale.
The criminalization of “noticing” is the story of post-Cold War America.  Our fanatic obsession with equality and punishing any person who dares point out discrimination is no longer a factor in being the catalyst for black dysfunction is a reminder white Americans don’t need to be sent to Gulags or FEMA Camps; almost all of America is already a thought Concentration Camp, where those sociopaths who dare not “notice” patterns are rewarded by the guards of tolerance with an advancement in Black-Run America (BRA).
Those of us who might look at the empirical evidence of crime alerts at the University of Minnesota and notice know one is compelling these individual blacks to collectively racial monopolize crime on the campus are the true enemies of polite civilization.
Best to avert your eyes and believe race-less criminals are tormenting the law-abiding students at the University of Minnesota; better that than hurt the self-esteem of any black male student, for they already have to feel bad about lacking the intellectual acumen to be enrolled in STEM-affiliated classes.
Working in a prison camp in Siberia would have been a lot healthier than being coerced into closing our eyes to the darkening truth about life in America: where the criminalization of “noticing” is enforced by a black supremacist Attorney General of Department of Justice, who believes white victims of black crime are getting their just rewards for centuries of oppression and persecution.
White victims of black crime on the campus of the University of Minnesota? Well, who cares about the psychological devastation you might have from this altercation… we have the feelings of the black community to worry about.

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Portlandia vs. The Wire: In all of 2013, Portland (72% white) had 16 homicides; In January 2014, Baltimore (64% black) already has 22 homicides

Portland, Oregon is 72 percent white. A city of more than 603,000 people, blacks represent just 6.3 percent of the population. In fact, Portland is one of America’s whitest big cities. [Census ranks Seattle among whitest big cities, Seattle Times, 4-23-11]
If Democrats kill people, why were there so few murders in 72 percent white Portland in 2013?

Bodymore, Murderland Baltimore, Maryland is 28.2 percent white. A city of more than 621,000 people, blacks represent 63.6 percent of the population.

The two cities are best represented in pop culture via the television programs Portlandia and The Wire; both are expressions of the type of community a majority white or a majority black population will create.

Did you know that in 2013, the city of Portland registered only 16 homicides? [Portland's 16 homicides in 2013 are fewest in more than 40 years, The Oregonian, 1-03-2014]

Did you know that in 2013, the city of Baltimore registered 235 homicides? [Batts: Crime Dropped for "Everyday Citizens" in 2013", Baltimore Sun, 1-2-14]

The cities are roughly the same size in population, both voting overwhelmingly for Democrats. Yet if New York City had Baltimore’s murder rate, 3,160 people (invariably, almost all black, since that’s who is being murdered in Baltimore… by other black people) would have been killed last year.

Furthermore, did you know that as of January 28, 2014, 22 people (almost all black) have been killed in Baltimore? [Baltimore shooting marks deadliest start to year since '07: Homicide detectives investigating double shooting near Pimlico Race Course, Baltimore Sun, 1-29-14]

 Translation: a one-month period (well, less than a month) in 63 percent black Baltimore is far deadlier than a 12-month period in 72 percent white Portland.

So while the American Thinker will publish stories with inane headlines like Guns Don't Kill People, Democrats Kill People, in reality it should read, “Guns Don’t kill people, Black people kill people.” The black police commissioner of Baltimore admitted this much (though he was lying about “motive”), when Anthony W. Batts said [Batts: Crime dropped for 'everyday citizens' in 2013, Baltimore Sun, 12-31-13]:
"It's not throughout the city as a whole," Batts told WBAL-TV of the violence. "It's very localized and unfortunately, it's with African American men who are involved in the drug trade and 80 to 85 percent of the victims are involved in the drug trade going back and forth."
In Portland, crime is always relatively low.

In Baltimore, 90 percent of registered voters identify as Democrats; Portland is well known as one of the most left-leaning populations in America, but with only 6 percent of its population being black, the same societal problems found in a 63 percent black city are absent.
A city almost the same size as Portland, 63 percent black Baltimore had one of the highest murder rates in all of America in 2013... in January of 2014 (as of the 28th) there have been more homicides here than in all of 2013 in Portland...

In Portland, HIV/AIDS is hardly a crisis (save for the black population); meanwhile, in 63 percent black Baltimore, efforts are underway for the city government to distribute more free needles for drug users as a way to fight HIV/AIDS [Baltimore wants to give out thousands more needles to drug users: Effort to curb HIV is one of mayor's top bills in General Assembly this year, Baltimore Sun, 1-14-14]

And while many of those homicide suspects in Portland had precious little racial connection with the majority population of the city, almost every murder suspect in Baltimore in 2013 was either a black male or female.

Blaming the drug trade on murder and crime in Baltimore is a national pastime (a way to deflect from the obvious dysfunction and poor impulse-control found in the majority black population), but it’s a well known fact white people in Portland consuming vast amounts of marijuana and other items purchased from the black market.

Why, then, if Baltimore is besieged by ‘drug’ violence, is the city of Portland free of such ‘drug’ violence?

In fact, Baltimore seems to be free of ‘drug’ violence; instead, black violence permeates throughout the rotting corridors of the city [Motive known in few city homicides, police data shows, Baltimore Sun, 1-4-14]:

Just three of Baltimore's 235 homicides in 2013 have a known drug motive, and police say 30 of the victims were verified gang members, year-end statistics show. 
As the year came to a close with an increase in homicides and shootings, Police Commissioner Anthony W. Batts said in television interviews that up to 85 percent of the victims of the city's gun violence were black men involved in the drug trade.
He was not available for further comment. 
Black males made up 84 percent of the city's homicide victims in 2013. And while officials say that drugs and gangs fuel much of the violence in Baltimore, detectives investigating the deaths verified drug motives in just three of the cases, according to police records. The motive is listed as unknown in 164 cases, the records show. 
The refrain about drug ties is drawn from the criminal records of the victims. Police Department data indicates that 74 percent of the homicide victims last year had a drug arrest on their record and 86.4 percent had been arrested for some crime. 
Among homicide suspects, 86 percent had criminal records and 72.5 percent had drug arrests. 
Gang ties, not tracked by the department before 2013, were determined in 66 cases, and 30 of the victims were listed as gang members.

In 63 percent black Baltimore; it’s a yearly tradition for the black mayor to call upon the citizens of the city to stop the violence and do something to make the community safer. [Mayor calls on citizens to do their part to fight violence: Rawlings-Blake says 'all-hands-on-deck' effort is needed, Baltimore Sun, 1-8-14]

In 72 percent white Portland; it’s a daily tradition to enjoy safe streets, clean parks, spotless public transportation, and a thriving downtown nightlife.

 Blaming Democrats for gun violence is an easy thing for to do for those still wedded to the notion of racial equality, and hoping the ghost of Martin Luther King will deliver black people from the “liberal plantation” and safely guide them to the Republican Country Club.

But the earth isn’t flat. The earth isn’t the center of the universe. Race is real.

The conditions of Portland and Baltimore prove this. 

Two cities, almost exactly the same size in population. 

Only difference: one is more than 70 percent white, the other is almost 70 percent black. 

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

America Doesn't Need Gun Control, it Needs Black Control: New Study Confirms Enormous Financial Burden on Hospitals of Black Gun crime

What can we infer from a new paper - Hospitalizations Due to Firearm Injuries in Children and Adolescents - that could help us craft a sensible policy when it comes to the issue of gun control in America? 

How about you read the findings of this report, published in the journal Pediatrics, and then come up with some ideas? [Guns sent 20 children to U.S. hospitals every single day, study finds, Los Angeles Times, 1-27-14]:

Twenty children or adolescents were hospitalized for firearm-related injuries every day in 2009, and 453 died of their wounds, a new report says. 
The study provides one of the most comprehensive recent efforts to tally the number of children hurt nationally in gun-related incidents. It was published Monday in the journal Pediatrics. 
A national database of patients younger than 20 who were admitted to hospitals in 2009 shows that boys represented nearly 90% of the total, and that the rate of gunshot-related hospitalizations for African American males was 10 times that of white males. 
Blacks ages 15 to 19 were 13 times more likely than their white peers to be injured by gunfire.  
And 70% of all black children hospitalized for gun injury (compared with 32% of all white children injured by firearms) were classified as victims of assault. Latino children and adolescents were three times likelier than white children to be hospitalized with a firearm-related injury. 
Hospital care for youths injured by gunfire cost $147 million in 2009, according to the report, but that is a fraction of the overall cost of the injuries. It doesn't include physician-related services, rehabilitation and ongoing care and rehospitalization, and does not take into account many victims' loss of future productivity. (Past research has found that almost half of children hospitalized for gun-related injury are discharged with a disability.) 
Among Latino youths, firearm-related injuries were three times higher than among white children, the data show. And African American girls were more than six times as likely as their white counterparts to be injured by gunfire.
Got any ideas yet? 

The only benefit of a true zero-tolerance gun control policy among the black population (this paper makes it clear which demographic is responsible for the incredible financial burden on hospital care for treating those children of gunfire wounds) is we can train our trauma surgeons employed by the military on life-saving techniques before they go into a war zone.

For the killing fields of Baltimore, Cincinnati, and Philadelphia provide hourly opportunities for new techniques to be developed that will save the life of a black person shot by another black individual (one of the truly unexplored reasons why homicides have declined so significantly in places like Chicago and New York City: heightened proficiency of emergency room surgeons/care courtesy of an almost endless supply of black bodies to experiment new techniques upon). 
Proficiency of trauma surgeons has only improve as America's hospitals fill with non-white victims...

Consider this: a study conducted by Dr. David Livingstone, Wesley J. Howe Professor and chief of trauma surgery at Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School and director of the New Jersey Trauma Center, reviewed all the interpersonal gunshot cases at the hospital between 2000 and 2011, using the data from the trauma registry, emergency department billing and hospital finance records. 

Only four percent of his patients were white (odds on what percentage of blacks were behind these shootings?) [Degree of Gunshot Violence Takes Turn for the Worse, Study Suggests,, 1-3-2014]:

Of the 6,322 patients who presented with firearm injuries, 92% were male. They were young, with a mean age of 27 years (±9 years). In fact, they were very young: 29% of all gunshot victims were between the ages of 20 and 24, and nearly 20% were teenagers aged 15 to 19.
In keeping with other studies, the research confirmed that gunshot violence disproportionately affects blacks and Hispanics. Eighty-six percent of gunshot patients who presented at the Level 1 trauma center were black, and 9% were Hispanic. Whites and Asians represented 4% and 1% of all gunshot patients, respectively.
What does the average person treated at the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center (serving 65 percent black Baltimore, perhaps ground zero for gun crime in America) look like?

Funny you should ask... 
 Violence is the leading cause of death for young adults in Baltimore and is a widely recognized public health concern.  
VIP Background Dr. Carnell Cooper started the Violence Intervention Program (VIP) in 1998 after seeing victims of traumatic violent injury being treated, released, and readmitted months later due to another, often more serious, violent injury. 
Dr. Cooper recognized that this "revolving door phenomenon" occurred repeatedly, with patients being discharged without any form of counseling or intervention to the same streets where they had sustained their injuries. Seeing this caused Dr. Cooper to ask a simple scientific question:"How can we reduce the number of repeat victims of intentional violent injury coming through the doors of Shock Trauma every day?"  
To answer this question, Dr. Cooper, Dr. Paul Stolley, and other colleagues completed a comprehensive case-control study (Archives of Surgery, Vol. 135, No. 7, July 2000) that identified the risk factors for repeat victims of violence. 
The study identified the following risk factors: 
  • African-American male 
  • Median age 31 Unemployed 
  • No health insurance 
  • Income less than $10,000 yearly 
  • Current drug user 
  • Past or present drug dealer 
  • Positive test for psychoactive substances upon admission 
  • Additionally, eighty-six percent (86%) of the victims felt that disrespect was involved with their injury, and a majority of the victims had a history of involvement with the criminal justice system.
 How about a more in-depth look at both the societal cost (in terms of wasted man hours trying to save criminals lives and the drain on taxpayers money going to save them) of black people on trauma centers in Baltimore (a gun is just a tool; a person must make a conscious decision to use this tool as a weapon)
[The trauma of gun violence: Dr. Edward E. Cornwell III, trauma chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, describes gunshot wounds as "more and more a juvenile disease.", Baltimore Sun, 3-12-2000]:
So what happens when the human body meets the gun industry's deadliest creations? It's not pretty. Ask Dr. "Eddie" Cornwell, the trauma chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital. During the 16 years he has been a trauma surgeon, Cornwell has saved his share of gunshot-wound victims, and he has watched many others go to the medical examiner for autopsies. 
Edward E. Cornwell III, 43, realizes that only a quirk of fate separates him from the African-American youths he is trying to save. He says his parents made the difference.  
Cornwell has strong opinions about gun violence. Recently, he shared his thoughts with Perspective Editor Mike Adams. 
How many gunshot wounds does Hopkins treat annually? 
It's been slowly increasing. We had about 365 in 1997, about 380-some in 1998 and 390 last year. Baltimore actually stands out a bit, apart from the national trend. 
From the early to the late 1990s, in Boston, New York Los Angeles, Miami, Washington, the numbers of penetrating trauma, gunshot wounds and stabbings, have gone down. Baltimore is different, and I don't have a complete explanation for it. But, in the neighborhood around Hopkins, about 80 percent of the crime is centered around trying to obtain or sell illegal drugs. 
How would you describe the typical gunshot wound victim treated here at Hopkins based on age, race and economic background? 
Simply put, young black males. The typical patient would be in his late teens or early 20s, someone from the surrounding neighborhoood. As I said before, in 1999, we had about 390 gunshot cases, and those patients from the narrow age of 15 to 20 years old represent close to 60 percent of our gunshot wounds and close to two-thirds of all of our deaths. 
What's the societal cost of these gunshot cases? Who's paying the bill? 
You and I are paying the bill. The taxpayers are paying the bill. That's the sad truth throughout the country. To be a Level 1 Trauma Center as we are, we need to be open, ready and available 24 hours a day. That means the lights are on, the CAT scan is ready, the operating room is ready to go, the blood bank is available, people are in-house who are specialists in certain areas and prepared to take care of these patients whether they show up or not. And then, when the patients show up, they may or may not be able to pay. Many of my patients are Male X, Male Y, Male P, for hours before we even know a name.
A sensible gun policy for America?

Make it illegal for black people to own a gun.

Those black people found possessing a gun?

Throw them in jail immediately.

Those found using a gun in a crime?

Execute immediately.

America doesn't need gun control; it needs black control.

Monday, January 27, 2014

1987's "Enemy Territory" -- Worth Watching

If you enjoyed the book Brooklyn Bounce, you'll love watching the incredibly hard-to-find movie Enemy Territory.
A movie thrown down the memory hole for a reason

It's a movie working overtime to confirm every observation former New York City Cop Joe Poss made about what it was like (as a white person) trying to uphold law and order among a non-white population.

The plot is simple: a white insurance salesman goes to collect a policy (the premium) in a ghetto highrise, almost entirely populated by blacks. These black residents, with rent paid for by the taxpayers of New York City, decide to hunt the "ghost" (white man). 

Here's what the Los Angeles Times wrote about this 1987 movie. [Movie Reviews : 'Enemy Territory' Packs Texture Too, 10-5-1987]:
In a genre--low-budget action--noted for slam-bang, no-nonsense entertainment, "Enemy Territory" (citywide) has a lot, and a lot more, to offer. Apart from an obvious urban thriller framework, there's a smattering of social commentary, literary allegory and old-fashioned moralizing in the story. Surprisingly, it's not gobbledygook. The film works within the confines of its genre and, without straining, slyly introduces textures that are usually reserved for more serious entertainments.
Rather than relying on Pavlovian logic, the underlying motivations for the action are greed, lust, fear and honor. Barry (Gary Frank), an insurance man, enters a tough black New York neighborhood after dark to sign a policy and collect a fat commission.
Will (Ray Parker Jr.), a telephone repairman, is in the same building--a 20-story apartment complex--seeing his new girlfriend on company time.
Black cop: "What the f^&$ you doing here, white man?"
Not hip to borough etiquette, Barry makes a faux pas that can only be termed "life threatening." Searching out the policy holder, he taps a brother's shoulder, to ask if he knows the tenant. Insulted, the young man vows he'll avenge the slight with blood. A few minutes later he returns with other members of his gang, the Vampires.
Fortunately, owing to matters of scripting, Barry eludes death, albeit narrowly. That's when Will instinctively answers his cry for help. Unquestionably, both men would pay dearly to start the whole day over again.
Writers Stuart Kaminsky (author of several books on American action directors) and Bobby Liddell are up to the challenge of realizing a great premise. Through force and cunning their heroes proceed to work their way from the top floor to the basement and presumed freedom. If they can only survive the night, surely the Vampires will lose their fangs in daylight.
Director Peter Manoogian visualizes a harsh and ugly environment to play out the situation of inherent jeopardy. He also demonstrates a facility to keep us on the edge of our seats as peril dogs the two men along every step of their escape route. Although the thriller has echoes of many earlier films from "The Defiant Ones" to "The Warriors," it's John Carpenter's "Assault on Precinct 13," with its emphasis on claustrophobia, that it most closely resembles in both story and craft.
Another great asset of "Enemy Territory" (MPAA rated R, for violence and language) is the clever manner in which it makes social points through character.
Frank is an unsympathetic, failed yuppie whose race prejudice comes from self-developed tunnel vision. Parker (Jan-Michael Vincent), a Vietnam veteran, seeks an embattled environment to fulfill his need for paranoia.
Objectively humorous, the truth of the observations is undeniable too. Also obvious is the talent of the film makers, which shouldn't in any way be diminished by considerations of budget or theme--they deserve unqualified praise.
Well.. there's not much race prejudice in this movie that isn't richly deserved. 

It's not available on DVD, but you can find VHS copies for around $40. However, someone has uploaded it to YouTube.

Watch it here.

And let's talk about it below


Sunday, January 26, 2014

On the eve of Amnesty to 20 - 30 Million Illegals, Erik Prince States: "There's very little advantage to being an American citizen anymore."

It was something Erik Prince said.

The founder and former CEO of Blackwater/XE was being interviewed by the Wall Street Journal, when bluntly stated:
"there's very little advantage to being an American citizen anymore. They tax you anywhere in the world you are, they regulate you, and they certainly don't help you, at all." [Erik Prince: Out of Blackwater and Into China: The former CIA asset on his latest venture: After being 'blowtorched' by U.S. politics, he says, this time he's working for Beijing., Wall Street Journal, 1-24-14]
 The article notes Prince has started a new firm, which will have close ties with China as it begins exploiting Africa's low-IQ population and inability to develop channels for distribution, trade, and cultivation of the resources only this continent possesses.
Erik Prince: "there's very little advantage to being an American citizen anymore..."

He calls the decision "emotionless," and entirely a decision based on making money.

Good for him.

While the Chinese are busy working to make the lives of its people better, the United States of America has a government actively working to make the lives of its people worse.

Far worse.

China wants to open new markets in Africa, understanding such capital investments represent a long-term strategy in establishing trading partners and a pipeline into resource cultivation; America wants to eradicate the school-to-prison pipeline, with our politicians believing disparate impact in school discipline represents the greatest threat to our country's future.

China has a government policy to uplift its people; America has a policy to uplift its black population (courtesy of white taxpayers), forever shackled by the tremendous weight of slavery, oppression and Jim Crow. 
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson: illegal aliens have “earned the right to be citizens.”

Let's just sit back and think about one simple, indisputable fact:

America is roughly 13 percent black.

Our president is black, who believes:  “There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black President.” [Going the Distance: On and off the road with Barack Obama, New Yorker, 1-27-14]

Our attorney general is black. A man, who heads of the Department of Justice (who believes hate crime laws don't protect whites, since black people and non-whites are incapable of race hatred), that calls white people a 'nation of cowards' and laughs knowing demographic changes will completely beach not some white males, but all white people soon enough:
“We have demographic changes in this nation the likes of which we have never seen before,” he said. “That could be a very divisive thing… on the other hand, if we do accept the new nation that we are about to become, that could be a very positive force.”[Eric Holder: US still a nation of cowards on race, Daily Caller, 1-23-14]
Were demographic changes in Detroit (98 percent white in 1914; 83 percent black in 2014) a positive force in creating a new city? Were demographic changes in Baltimore, Camden, Newark, Milwaukee, Gary, Rochester, or New York City a positive force? What about Los Angeles or the entire state of California? 

The answer is no. There is no evidence that once a neighborhood, community, city, zip code, or state goes from white to black (or brown), it represents a positive force. 

In fact, it's the extreme opposite (and a very divisive thing, with the black population of places like Detroit and Baltimore doing the jobs white Americans won't do -- namely killing one another at a rate that requires massive growth in the police and judicial sector). 

And who might be in charge of Homeland Security? That's right, a black man named Jeh Johnson.

While the Chinese busy themselves with preparing to loot a continent of people incapable of understanding the basics of supply-side economics, our country is busy being looted by a people incapable of running anything more than a racial shakedown racket.

Homeland Security Secretary Johnson is proud that he is prepared to discharge his duty of upholding the US Constitution as his branch of government prepares to usher in the election of a new people by granting amnesty to Hispanics (that same group of people waging racial war on blacks in places like Compton and Dallas):
Speaking at the United States Conference of Mayors on Friday, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said the approximately 11 million people who are in the country illegally have “earned the right to be citizens.”
“An earned path to citizenship for those currently present in this country is a matter of, in my view, homeland security to encourage people to come out from the shadows,” said Johnson, in what he remarked was one of his first public speeches since being confirmed as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) chief in December.
“It is also, frankly, in my judgment, a matter of who we are as Americans,” he said, “to offer the opportunity to those who want to be citizens, who’ve earned the right to be citizens, who are present in this country--many of whom came here as children--to have the opportunity that we all have to try to become American citizens.” [Homeland Security Secretary: Illegals Have ‘Earned Right to be Citizens',, 1-25-14]
What does any of the pablum Johnson is saying - regarding citizenship - even mean?

What our people did to Detroit and Baltimore, we can do - in office - to the entire country...
For your average white citizen of the United States, why should they read the words of Johnson and smile, instantly being filled with patriotic feelings and being overcome with the smell of warm apple pie? 

Some have called the Obama Administration the Minority Occupation Government.

We've dubbed the ruling ideology of both political parties (as well as academia, entertainment, and all government agencies) Black-Run America. 

Sadly, as Erik Prince mentioned, there's little advantage to being an American citizen anymore. 

Save the competitive disadvantage of being tasked with subsidizing a growing underclass of nonwhite people (if amnesty passes, that pool just got a lot more crowded) with tax money that could have gone to building high-speed rails and improving the infrastructure of this country. 

Being an American citizen of white racial classification in 2014, well, is like being one of those long-time white citizens of Detroit who decided to stay behind after the black riots/insurrection of 1967, believing things would turn around. 

That your property value wouldn't continue dropping.

That the jobs would come back.

That crime would drop. 

That the schools would get better. 

That the newly elected black supremacist government would consider the interests of white people, just as they legally affirmed (and reveled in -- paybacks a bitch!!) the rights of black to rule white. 

That, though Detroit wasn't the city it once was (with safe streets, high social capital, a growing middle class, and parks full of white families), it could, maybe, possibly, hopefully come back from a city where businesses were boarded up and you didn't dare venture out of your house after 5 p.m. 

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Violence Prevention Ideas Discussed in Emergency Planning Meeting in Baltimore City Hall; 20 Years Ago, Norplant was the Solution to Future Violence Baltimore

White-on-white violence (be it homicide, robbery, assault, etc.) is never concentrated enough in a city or metropolitan area to warrant government interventions or community marches.
Twenty year ago (roughly), the solution to black teen pregnancies in Baltimore was Norplant. Today, Baltimore is awash in the violence that solution was created to prevent

More to the point, no one protects members of the white community who engage in crime, inflict damage on property, or are wanted in homicide investigations.

You see, those white people who engage in homicide are usually suffering from severe mental illness or are psychological damaged; thus, they pose no threat to the greater community at large.

Preventative measures are needed in the black community, where criminal, anti-life pathologies are so prevalent a call for a "march to end violence" is an annual event; and where police encouraging the black community to cooperate with a homicide investigation is a daily chore.

In 65 percent black Baltimore, 2014 is no different. [Violence prevention ideas aired at City Hall meeting: Bloody start to 2014 spurred emergency planning session, Baltimore Sun, 1-25-14]:
The founder of last year's 300 Men March and two Baltimore City Council members held an emergency planning meeting Friday evening at City Hall, saying the bloody start to the new year spurred them to develop a violence prevention strategy sooner than they had originally anticipated.
The city recorded 16 homicides in the first 12 days of the year. January's toll stood at 18 as of Friday night. Last year, there were 235 homicides in Baltimore, an 8 percent increase over 2012 and a four-year high.
"A murder a day wasn't something we could just sit on," said Munir Bahar, who founded the march movement last year to galvanize residents, particularly men, to combat violence. "We were kind of hoping the wintertime would calm things down a little and we would have more time for planning."
Also Friday, it emerged that a 24-year-old man killed this month was the nephew of City Council President Bernard C. "Jack" Young. Tavon Antonio Young, who was sentenced in 2009 to five years in prison for his role in a high-profile drug distribution conspiracy, was found fatally shot Jan. 17 in an alley in the Harwood neighborhood.
The funeral was Friday, and Young was unavailable for comment. His spokesman, Lester Davis, said the councilman was "spending his time supporting his sister and their extended family during this period of grief."
Last May, a 20-year-old cousin of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake was fatally shot, the victim of a suspected home invasion robbery.
Friday's meeting was called by Bahar and Councilmen Brandon Scott and Nick Mosby. "We wanted to get a plan together and get people mobilized, so when spring hits we can be ready to deploy into the neighborhoods," said Scott, who represents Northeast Baltimore and is vice chairman of the council's Public Safety Committee.
A standing-room-only crowd of about 100, including community group leaders and Police Department representatives, packed a meeting room at City Hall as Bahar, a fitness trainer, delivered a high-energy presentation.
"This is the charge: How do we do more?" he said. "How do we increase our presence on the streets?"
Among the ideas he outlined were the creation of a "mobilized street force" of at least 100 people and a citywide communications network of 1,000 residents to alert their neighbors to incidents in "real time."

The 300 Men March took place July 5, cutting east across the city along North Avenue. Promoted largely through social media and word of mouth, the nearly 10-mile trek drew more than 600 people, according to participants, among them Rawlings-Blake and Baltimore police Commissioner Anthony W. Batts.

A number of smaller marches were held later in the summer, including one in which about 60 men walked through East Baltimore, speaking to people they met and handing out fliers detailing a "code of honor" for peacefully resolving conflicts.
Bahar said before the meeting that last year's higher homicide total did not make him feel those efforts had been in vain. He said he knew that lasting change takes years.
"What's disheartening is the lack of participation from the community," he said. "We can only round up 30 to 40 men to come out on the streets at night and do this anti-violence work. That's the discouraging part."
 When many of those democratically-elected to serve in the executive and legislative branch of local Baltimore government have family members being gunned down in the streets (while engaging in criminal behavior), you know the city is beyond salvation.

Any violence prevention ideas discussed that don't mention the violence has a biological source - black people - is an exercise in futility.

Strange that only one score and two years ago, America was on the verge of becoming a sane place.

And Baltimore was the city on the cutting edge of a tomorrow where "violence prevention meeting" at city hall would have been the subject of a dystopian future, instead of one free of the burden of a people fucking their way to the ruin of a entire civilization (strangely, the byproduct of this "union" being completely subsidized from cradle-to-grave by productive members of society). Even conservative hack George Will praised Baltimore for the measure they enacted, writing [Baltimore's Fledgling Norplant Program Seems Careful, Consensual - And Needed,, 3-18-1993]:
And those black activists who profess to see Norplant as a "genocidal" attack on black fertility should answer this:
What is more dangerous to the flourishing of black America, Norplant for teenagers or a growing number of black adolescents headed for a life in poverty because they were born into poverty to a single mother whose life chances were blighted by a pregnancy at age 15?
Norplant. A way to decrease pregnancy among black Baltimore teenagers.
The womb is the key to ending this pipeline... even George Will endorsed the Norplant idea in Baltimore...

A plan to try and save the future of Baltimore, by waging a war against destructive decisions. 

A way to make Baltimore safer for not just white people, but all people in a manner of a generation by terminating pregnancies among a demographic completely unprepared to care for the black children they'd unleash upon the world. [Norplant Is Getting Few Takers At School, New York Times, 6-3-1994]:
Providing Norplant to Paquin's students was seen as an example of the struggle being waged by officials in Baltimore and other cities to reduce the rising number of out-of-wedlock births, a phenomenon that is held responsible for many of today's social ills, including poverty, welfare dependency and high crime rates.
But so far, officials say only 36 of 700 students at Paquin have turned to Norplant in the nearly 15 months it has been available.
Earlier this year, health officials here extended the Norplant option to 2 more of the 21 high schools in the city. But Bernice Rosenthal, director of school-based clinics for the health department, said only two students have had the device inserted by staff members in those clinics.
Shunned by School Boards
Officials of Advocates for Youth, a Washington-based group that promotes sex education and birth control for adolescents, say school boards around the country have shied away from offering the contraceptive in school-based health clinics. About 1 percent of 105 such clinics that responded to a survey provide Norplant in their clinics, the organization said.
Baltimore health officials say many young women have shunned Norplant because of misinformation about its side effects and because of accusations by some blacks that making Norplant available in predominantly black schools like Paquin was "genocide."
"I know anecdotally from patients that it's still being talked about on the street," said Dr. Peter Beilenson, Baltimore's Commissioner of Health. "There are rumors about Norplant that are just not true."
Just who was spreading these rumors Norplant wasn't safe?

Not George Will.

He approved of the idea (the Republican Party had not been completely hijacked by the civilization-destroying Pro-Life movement yet).


It was the Nation of Islam, who'd rather black people (primarily males) have the right to play predator to the entire Baltimore community once they grew up, instead of never have been born in the first place.  [150 protesters object to Norplant in schools Nation of Islam members call it 'genocide' BALTIMORE CITY, Baltimore Sun, 10-1-1993]:
Carrying placards reading "Stop Norplant genocide" and "No Norplant experiments on our teens," more than 150 people jammed the Baltimore school board meeting last night to protest the city's plan to let schools offer the contraceptive.
The protesters, most of them members of the Nation of Islam, the black Muslim group led by the controversial Louis Farrakhan, called on the board to forbid school clinics to offer Norplant.
They denounced the contraceptive as "social engineering" designed to reduce the black population. They claimed it has not been adequately tested and said it encourages teen-age sex instead of abstinence.
"I would urge you to not use our girls as guinea pigs in this social experiment," said Debra H. Freeman, a spokeswoman representing Mr. Farrakhan's organization.
The protest came a month after Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke decided to let five high schools decide for themselves whether to offer Norplant to teen-agers in school clinics. Mayor Schmoke was out of town last night and could not be reached for comment.
An attempt to end the "cycle of dependency" and reliance on long-term welfare was what this Norplant program in Baltimore was attempting to do. After all, a 1994 article noted, "In Baltimore, the city dedicates an entire school, with grades six through 12, to helping pregnant girls keep their lives on track."

It was - if we are to believe the "poverty creates violence" canard - a way to stop future criminals from ever being born in the first place (consider it the "Kill Jamal Conner" plan from a black-theme Terminator movie).

But poverty doesn't create violence; black people create violence, which turns an entire area into one brimming with poverty.

That's Baltimore in 2014.

It's why the black community marches against violence (all black in origin) on a yearly basis.

It's why the black community demands answers to the violence (all black in origin) at City Hall meetings on a yearly basis.

It's why businesses flee Baltimore and those remaining behind barricade their employees in plexiglass.

America was on the verge of sanity in 1992.

Instead, America went the route of Ralph Reed.

Salvation isn't coming, though.

Just a whole bunch of Jamal Conner's are coming, courtesy of HUD, to your neighborhood -- an effort to spread black pathologies as official state policy to those white communities in need of vibrancy.

In need of a little Baltimore...

The United States had a shot at salvation in 1992.

Today, we are on the verge of Bill de Blasio having a prominent position in the office of whichever Democrat wins the 2016 election. Perhaps Andrew Cuomo too.