Friday, November 10, 2017

When Our Overlords Discover Francis Scott Key was an unrepentant bigot, how long will take to dump the National Anthem?

Previously on SBPDL: As Confederate Monuments Come Down in 70% Black Baltimore, Push to Build Statue to Poop Eating Drag Queen Gains Traction


Our new nation is going to be great, isn't it? 

Not but two months ago the words "Racist Anthem" were splashed upon the Francis Scott Key statue in Baltimore, the 70 percent black city where long ago he penned what would become our national anthem. [Baltimore to keep, clean defaced Francis Scott Key statue, Baltimore Sun, 9-13-17] 

The Baltimore of the early 19th century was far different than the collapsing, majority African in America city we see in 2017 (coincidentally confirming every fear members of the American Colonization Society, like Key, had about what blacks would do to American civilization), but Francis Scott Key is now a pariah in Black-Run America. 
The Francis Scott Key Monument in Baltimore was erected in 1911 when the city was 90 percent white

And with his new leper status, comes the push to get rid of his song as our national anthem. [California NAACP seeks to remove 'Star-Spangled Banner' as national anthem, WBALTV.com, 11-8-17]:
The country's most patriotic song, "The Star-Spangled Banner," most recently caught up in the contentious NFL kneeling debate, is once again in the spotlight -- this time recommended for removal as the national anthem. 
The California NAACP wants to introduce a resolution to state lawmakers that proposes removing “The Star-Spangled Banner” as the national anthem. 
California and Hawaii NAACP president and national board member Alice Huffman brought up the idea at a recent NAACP state convention -- along with two resolutions to support Colin Kaepernick and to censure President Donald Trump after he used profanity toward NFL players who knelt during the anthem. 
The proposal is not intended to disrespect the flag, Huffman said. 
“We’re not trying to protest the flag at all,” Huffman said. “We’re protesting this racist song that has caused so much controversy in America, and we’re just trying to get it removed. So, whatever comes out in the future as a national anthem, we can all stand proudly and sing it.”
"The Star-Spangled Banner" is a relic of white America, a reminder of our non-inclusive past. Obviously, the only solution is to get rid of it as our national anthem so implicit bias and systemic racism can no longer inflict people of color from sea to shining sea. 

Right? 

After all, Francis Scott Key held now heretical views of Africans in America (their divine status one of the underlying ethos of our present ruling class) believing they were “a distinct and inferior race of people, which all experience proves to be the greatest evil that afflicts a community.”

Were he to see the quality of life found in present day Baltimore, a 70 percent black city whose chief executive is a black woman and a majority black city council runs the legislative agenda, would Francis Scott Key find an abundance or paucity of evidence for his pronouncement on Africans in America potential? 

Our new nation is going to be great, isn't it?

38 comments:

Anonymous said...

History means nothing. What was common at that time also means nothing. Does a crack smoking former mayor deserve honoring with a monument? Does a reverend who allegedly beat women and attended orgies deserve a huge monument honoring his endeavors? Does Detroit need a huge black first to pay homage to a black heavyweight champion? C’mon white people let’s get these hideous granite monuments taken down. Why stop with what blacks find offensive. Hell, everything is offensive to someone. We can probably have all artwork destroyed if we put out minds to it. Aren’t they an erudite bunch of idiots.

Paradise Lost said...

These monuments are simply a reminder of achievements that only whites can attain. We set the bar to high. By removing these monuments, the undertow can "kick back"...kick off dey shoes...abandon the belt.
The brown isle of Porto Rico still struggles to recover from the last hurricane, not due to racism but rather the inability of non whites to maintain civilization.
We should have been on Mars by now but instead whites are held back by a swiftly growing black anchor.

Ex New Yorker said...

A couple months ago I read about how the British that night aimed all their guns at the flag trying to knock it down. At the "dawns early light" it was still standing, but it wasn't standing straight up. It stood at an angle. When Key entered the fort he was shocked to see what held it up.

What happened was that every time the flag was knocked down a man ran and held it back up until he was killed. Then another man or two ran to hold up the flag. They stood on the bodies of dead men until they were also killed. Followed by more men to hold up the flag. By early morning when the shelling had stopped what held up the flag were the BODIES OF DEAD MEN THAT SURROUNDED THE FLAG POLE.

Fuck these assholes who have no respect for the flag and our National Anthem.

Raccoon said...

Hey, WOW! Now I'm going to have to change my on-screen toolbars again!

Welcome back, PK!

Iron Sharpens Iron said...

Our own government has betrayed us, and soon whites will be a minority in the country their ancestors fought for, died for, and founded. The blood of our ancestors cries out from the ground for us to do something or we shall surely perish. None of the major societal changes such as ending Jim Crow Laws, Laws against Miscegenation, Affirmative Action, 1965 Immigration Act, Desegregation, Restrictive Deed Covenants to prevent Negroes from infesting our neighborhoods and destroying same, Freedom of Association to avoid Negroes, Freedom to Contract with Whites Only, etc. has occurred with the consent of the majority of governed whites. It's time for action and a new Declaration of Independence, which in part has already been written:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government."

Ohio born said...

I might not think just right, but for some reason the elite have used yt to protect this country. We have a huge abundance of untapped natural resources that the government controls. Have we been used as tools to protect the elites stockpile of natural resources? Does changing our history and marginalizing white achievement have an end goal? I have more questions than answers, not using Americas natural resources and fighting wars on foreign soil to protect foreign natural resources. Not mining or using coal in the name of envirmentalism while the rest of the world mines and uses coal? Eliminating white hero's in the name of diversity and demonizing the people that built america. Blame who ya want but I think we have been played!

Anonymous said...

These monuments are simply a reminder of achievements that only whites can attain.

Leftists and egalitarians show their lack of faith in equality by focusing on icons.

If you truly believed in racial equality then why waste time on tearing down the past?

These egalitarians think they believe in equality but their actions show a lack of confidence. According to liberal racial theory it's actually only a matter of time before Africa becomes more advanced than America due to having more people (since all groups have equal potential). So why focus on icons of White society? Those icons will be overshadowed anyways as Africans prove that liberal racial theories are correct.

the Watcher said...

No matter which site I visit the comments always seem to follow the same basic reasoning.

Anger-filled diatribes about how Blacks are morons and Whites should rise up and take back our country. Well, if they are such idiots, why are we venting online and they are continuing to deconstruct our country?

We all know, or should, by now that Blacks (actually it could be extended to any non-White) are the enemy and what the score is in our country.

Even if we could eliminate Blacks overnight it won't change anything except for the short term. That is because the collective mentality that has allowed this situation will not have changed. We, as Whites, must change our thinking. Practice due diligence to defend our borders.

Which means against internal threats as well.

If we cannot, or will not, accomplish that. Then we deserve such desecration of our culture. Running somewhere else to "rebuild America" will not solve the problem. If the solution were that simple, moving out of our cities and leaving them to the Blacks would have solved it. It didn't.

It would simply be a short-term fix to a long-term problem. That problem being the mentality that has allowed this sorry state of affairs to even exist.

Blacks, Mexicans. Doesn't matter. If you give *anyone* leeway to steal from you, they will steal.

That most definitely includes your very culture.

Just look at the change in the "English" class at Yale for a good example of what is coming.

They abolished nearly all White authors from study in favor of known Black Marxists and pop culture rags. As if such material were worthy of study. And the remaining White authors will only get token treatment, if any at all, no doubt.

It's not enough that White apologists, SJW's and the like spew their venom and propaganda before entering college. Now they wish to hear it constantly while there.

I realize there are those that come to these sites that most likely have no interest or acumen for politics but those of us that do need to start getting involved and actively working to take back this country.

If we cannot, or will not, then we should simply stop complaining and let the Blacks win. That is how it will go anyway if left unchallenged.

Again, we all already know that Blacks are rude, uncultured, low-brow, hate-mongering anti-Whites. Let's get past that and focus on coming up with practical solutions to the present problem. Anyone agree?

SC Native said...

Perhaps Africans in America should have their own national anthem? I clown horn honking for 3-5 minutes followed by dozens of gunshots would be perfect.

Nature’s clowns deserve Dey own anthem and sheet yo!

Anonymous said...

O say can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming,
Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there;
O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

On the shore dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected now shines in the stream:
'Tis the star-spangled banner, O long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion,
A home and a country, should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

O thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war's desolation.
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the Heav'n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: 'In God is our trust.'
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

the Watcher said...

@Anonymous that posted the Star Spangled Banner:

I agree. Very fitting. Thanks for posting it. There is, however, a 5th stanza to that poem. It was written by Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1861 and very pointedly expresses what should be our reaction to an internal threat.

When our land is illumined with Liberty's smile,
If a foe from within strike a blow at her glory,
Down, down with the traitor that dares to defile
The flag of her stars and the page of her story!
By the millions unchained who our birthright have gained,
We will keep her bright blazon forever unstained!
And the Star-Spangled Banner in triumph shall wave
While the land of the free is the home of the brave.

Wouldn't you agree?

europeasant said...

iron sharpens iron said this;
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal"

That sentence has caused more strife and discord than anyone can shake a stick at!
I'm no Jefferson but I will take a stab at fixing that statement with the following;

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal before God,
But here on Earth all men are created unequal, in that some are bigger, stronger, smarter, handsomer and therefore there will never be equal outcome in any mental social or physical endeavour"

Anonymous said...

Still think America is "your country," YT?

Anonymous said...

Attention: To the ever increasing number of idiots in this world. It’s called history. It’s not inherently bad. The ignorance that flows through this bunch of fools is mind numbing and head exploding, all at the same time. If it’s old. It bad. Including old white people. I always ask “ who’s going to keep the lights on”? As in the case of Puerto Rico...no one.

Anonymous said...

I heard PK and Jared Taylor give an excellent podcast about the latest in the news. This last one was exceptionally good. It covered a lot of ground. I think the one about the General chewing out his cadets over faux racism made me the angriest. I was in the Air Force and I think that General was a disgrace and should be fired or demoted in rank.

As for this story, PK...you give some of the best editorials I ever read. Keep up the good work! The truth is not racist, but it is an inconvenient fact to the left about their pet people.

Californian said...

Anonymous the Watcher said.....Even if we could eliminate Blacks overnight it won't change anything except for the short term. That is because the collective mentality that has allowed this situation will not have changed. We, as Whites, must change our thinking.

Currently, most Whites see themselves as either (a) atomized producer-consumers; or (b) members of some mythical rainbow-diverse-multicult.

What is needed is a revolution in White racial consciousness. Once Whites see themselves as a people they would take the steps necessary. Consider the revolution in White consciousness post-Reconstruction which culminated in D.W. Griffith's "Birth of a Nation."

Whites in America did it before.

We can do it again.

Anonymous said...

In the words of Charlton Heston "damn them damn them all to hell"

Californian said...

One wonders what Air Force Academy Superintendent General Jay Silveria would have to say about the NAACP's charge of "racist" lyrics in the national anthem. Since the General believes that "racism" has no place at the Academy, perhaps he can purge the Star Spangled Banner from Colorado Springs.

Because that is where all this is headed. Once one accepts that "racism" is some ultimate evil, then one would have to conclude that 90% of the history of the USA is "racist." Francis Scott Key, let us not forget, was a slaveowner. And I need not comment on how Jefferson, Wilson and many more American greats would be considered "racist" by today's standards.

Perhaps the General can invite the NAACP into the Academy's music department to compose a new national anthem.

Anonymous said...

In the words of Charlton Heston "damn them damn them all to hell"

Seconded.

And thirded.

Anonymous said...

I heard PK and Jared Taylor give an excellent podcast about the latest in the news.

What is the URL for this?

Anonymous said...

I hate to break it to you "brothas", but the majority of Americans are never going to go for a rap-based national anthem.

Notice once again how the "protest" here isn't clever, elegantly designed, or really planned in any way whatsoever. To do so would make a much greater impact, but that would require actual effort and forward thinking- even a stencil would have made a much bigger statement. Luckily all of what I am saying is completely lost on them- I really should make a habit of telling them what to do since they make a point of always doing the opposite.

All the talk about destroying cultures, well when the shoe is on the other foot is it obvious how blacks would have acted all along- they seek to control and destroy as they deem fit. And people are still asking why people don't want anything to do with them.

Their understanding of the golden rule is on par with their understanding of Algebra and anything above- don't mind me if I decline to participate in teaching a pig to tap dance.

Anonymous said...

Here is the link:

https://www.amren.com/podcasts/2017/11/hate-crime-hoax-marion-barry-paul-kersey-jared-taylor/

I'm so glad Kersey and Taylor are continuing to work and build and audience together. Both incredibly effective on their own, but you know how the saying goes.

CENTURION (the suicide survivor) said...

Paul Kersy and Jared Taylor:

https://www.amren.com/podcasts/2017/11/hate-crime-hoax-marion-barry-paul-kersey-jared-taylor/

Anonymous said...

For any of you who want to hear PK's podcast, all you need do is look in the American Renaissance Blog. PK usually promotes those things on this site as it is basically HIS podcast with Jared Taylor. Colin Flaherty also does a good job with videos and commentary. There are only a few alt right places left as a massive purge occurred a few months ago after Charlottesville. None of those sites promoted violence, but they were shut down by the left because they told the unfiltered truth. Next week is another man who part times for Mr. Taylor when he is away. However, the podcasts are always great!

Brian in Ohio said...

The term "racist", as we know it today, is just code for anything traditionally American.

Stay alert, stay alive.

D-FENS said...

A nation (if I may use that term) that embraces multiculturalism is one that can be controlled by playing off one group against another. As long as there are enough cowed Whites to keep the machinery going and the paperwork flowing but not enough to cause any trouble, the darkies can be bought off with trinkets and electronically created money.

Think of it as a 21st century version of feudalism.

Anonymous said...

I hope these stupid resentful blacks push this initiative. It will wake up more normies.

White Trash Hillbilly said...

"we all already know that Blacks are rude, uncultured, low-brow, hate-mongering anti-Whites. Let's get past that and focus on coming up with practical solutions to the present problem. Anyone agree?"

I do most emphatically agree!

But what do we do...whats the first step???

Anonymous said...

Can some bright mind on this website explain the offensive line in the anthem. I don’t understand how it’s offensive. Missing something.

Anonymous said...

Third stanza, mentions slaves.

Bud said...

Re Anon@5:11

I believe some minorities find these lines offensive:

Jose, can you see?

Homey of the brave.

Detroit Refugee said...

Ohio Born

You talk about resources and conservation, I agree fully with your comment. Where I'm from, the Detroit River was lined with factories, ship building works, warehouses, a DTE coal burning power plant (still operating), etc. almost all of it is GONE. Today we have golf courses, condos, marinas, a State owned Nature Preserve. Someone has plans for the future of the river & lake area. I once was a big supporter of environment, recycling, and all. But the Left overplayed their hand by boasting about the demographic changes to come. So we are expected to just smile and hand over the resources to an ungrateful 3rd world massive tsunami? Let them be good stewards of the environment.

Anonymous said...

Can some bright mind on this website explain the offensive line in the anthem. I don’t understand how it’s offensive. Missing something.

I'll take this one. You see, Francis Scott Key was a White man which makes everything he did automatically racist. He didn't commend, laud, recognize or pay any homage to blacks in the Star Spangled Banner, affirming blacks' belief that dat song be rayciss.

All blacks have to do is randomly allege racism and they're taken seriously by sycophantic virtue signalling White pussies.

the Watcher said...

@ White Trash Hillbilly:

Well, I can give my, admittedly personal, opinion on that. The answer to your question will depend greatly on the answer to another question.

Should the United States be all White or not?

If yes, then we could follow the examples set by the Mohawk and Cherokee tribes. They've been banning and kicking non-Indians off their lands for some time. As an example:

https://www.npr.org/2011/09/19/140594124/u-s-government-opposes-cherokee-nations-decision

Cherokee tribes state they wish to maintain their ethnic purity. And quite frankly, I don't blame them. (I realize NPR has a liberal slant, so research accordingly)

We could also follow Poland's example as seen from this story:

https://www.politico.eu/article/white-nationalists-call-for-ethnic-purity-at-polish-independence-day-march/

If the answer is, no. That we could possibly live side by side with non-Whites, it would then need to be adequately worked out. (Easier said than done) Integration has been a dead-end as all groups end up self-segregating anyway.

Personally, I would go with Poland's idea. All White.

Once that question has been answered, yours can be answered by all of us stepping up to the plate and getting what needs to be done, done. No apologies. No regrets. However, such action will require fortitude that hasn't been seen from Whites since the founding of this country.

Regardless of how it is phrased, once such action has been put in motion there will be charges of "intolerance" and "racism". However, that is happening anyway so it might as well be charged while trying to accomplish something positive.

Anonymous said...

Even with all the Confederate monuments gone and a new national anthem, nothing will change for Africans in America until they clean up their own backyard.

Anonymous said...

Answer: no.We are displaced Europeans.

Anonymous said...

I always figured that the "hirelings and slaves" reference had to do with the British Army's use of mercenaries and the inevitable place of a subject in a monarchy. But Key meant exactly that - slaves. Turns out the Brits were recruiting traitorous slaves into the British Army to fight Americans. That and fomenting slave rebellions. And Indian massacres. Thanks Brits!

After the war, the Brits dropped their sorry asses off in Sierra Leone.

Left Coast White Guy said...

Nation, as its etymology imports, originally denoted a family or race of men descended from a common progenitor, like tribe, but by emigration, conquest and intermixture of men of different families, this distinction is in most countries lost.

....Noah Webster....1828