Tuesday, September 20, 2011

#66. Faded "In Memoriam" T-Shirts

The news that Troy Davis will be executed tomorrow brings a smile to us at SBPDL. Black murderers on death row always become a cause célèbre for Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) who are convinced that high-rates of Black males in prison is proof of a racist justice system. All that high rates of Black imprisonment prove is that Black people engage in criminal activity at rates that are disproportionate to their actual percentage of the population.

Take for instance the 2010 FBI UCR  statistics, which show that at least 53.1 percent of the murders in the United States were committed by Black people. Considering the high rates of Black incarceration - more than 1 million Black males are in jail right now - this astounding figure is even glaring when you consider Black people are only 13 percent of the United States population. 

The whitest states in the Union - Wyoming and Vermont - have the best gun laws in the country, yet the lowest rates of gun crime. Family Guy is right: guns don't kill people, only dangerous minorities do.

Just as in Star Wars Episode III when the Emperor orders the execution of Order 66, we at SBPDL endorse the immediate execution of everyone currently on death row in the United States. This would jump start certain sectors of the economy, for anyone who has ever lived in a majority Black city is aware that one of the favorite accouterments of the Black community - outside of Mein Obama gear and Family Reunion t-shirts - is the "In Memoriam" shirt, complete with the a picture of a deceased Black person on it. 

More than likely, the picture of the deceased Black person is due to pervasive Black-on-Black violence. In the case of the executing Order 66 within death row in the United States, the In Memoriam t-shirts could be pumped out with such celebrities as the convicted cop-killer Troy Davis face upon them. Or Mumia Abu-Jamal, one of the darling Black killers constantly promoted by DWLs the world over. Imagine how many "In Memoriam" t-shirts could be sold with his face upon them? 

Black people love the "In Memoriam" t-shirt, wearing it as a badge of honor. Having them made and then purchasing them from kiosks in the mall or from local t-shirt companies, the quality of the "In Memoriam" t-shirt is always in question. Multiple wearings and excessive washing can jeopardize the look of the shirt and overall quality of the In Memoriam t-shirt, sullying the memory of those being remembered.

Stuff Black People Don't Like includes faded "In Memoriam" t-shirts, for after the Mein Obama inaugural t-shirt and the requisitse family reunion swag, this is the most commonly worn accoutrement for a Black person. One should remember that the entire reason these shirts are so tragically popular in the Black community is because of the pervasive violence found within that community.

Once the image on the t-shirt fades away, the memory of that Black individual will fade too. But with the practical application of executing Order 66 on death-row inmates , just imagine the demand for "In Memoriam" T-shirts for the Black murderers, rapists, sadists, and other assorted criminals. Want to stimulate the economy? Execute Order 66 upon death-row inmates, starting tomorrow with Troy Davis.

Inevitably, a In Memory of t-shirt will be made canonizing this cop killer. 

128 comments:

Amarillo said...

Yay! A # post!

Most of the newbies have no idea what a twisted sense of humor you have, Kersey. I always get a chuckle out of these.

Anonymous said...

I hope his death is as painful and horrible as the ones he meted out to his victims, who were undoubtedly white. Were I a relative of one of them, I would consider it a privelige to press the button that terminiates his life and the threat it poses to all whites.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to print a t-shirt with a picture of the U.S. and
the caption, "In Memoriam: 6/1776 to 6/1964."

CJH

Zenster said...

… guns don't kill people, only dangerous minorities do.

Another variation on that is:

Guns don't kill people … bullets do.

The American system of justice is based upon the premise of how it is better that 500 criminals go free than one innocent man be convicted.

I think it's safe to say that our present judicial system has taken this idea a little bit too far.

My own view is that if an individual is on death row ― whether or not they are guilty of the crime that put them there ― they usually have been the source of so much mayhem and death that society is better off without them.

With the advances in forensic science and DNA analysis, proof of guilt is a much more concrete affair than it was just a few decades ago. Sorely needed is a fast track appeals circuit that deals strictly in cases of capital punishment where there was overwhelming and incontrovertible evidence of guilt.

Such menaces to society need to culled from its ranks in the swiftest possible manner. Warehousing them for decades while ACLU lawyers go prinking about, quibbling over legal niceties, is a phenomenal and needless waste of taxpayer dollars.

I invite others here at SBPDL to dispute the following point:

Over the last several decades there has been a dramatic shift away from petty crimes of opportunity towards incorrigible and habitual predatory criminal behavior.

Instead of criminality being an anomalous aberration in an individual's conduct, it is more often now a "character" trait and one that manifests persistently and consistently.

Accompanying this dramatic shift away from petty criminality is a marked increase in a propensity for violence, both physical and sexual, that lends a previously unknown degree of viciousness to modern criminal activity.

The recidivism rate for these vicious predatory criminals needs to be tracked carefully in order that such habitual offenders are disqualified from plea bargaining and incarcerated without time off for good behavior so that they, and the threat that they represent, are removed from society at large.

Anonymous said...

I have an idea ....

How about whites start making t-shirts memorializing white victims of black crime? You could put the victim's picture on the front, and a picture of the savage who committed the crime on the back.

Or is that too racist?

Anonymous said...

Zenster, I must make a confession. When you first arrived here, I directed a sarcastic remark toward you, based on what I mistook for a "dummy" comment.

I wish to apologize to you. I couldn't have been more wrong.

I now look forward to your regular commentary, which is nothing short of consistently brilliant.

Dissident said...

I concur, Zenster is quickly becoming one of my favorite posters here, and that's saying something, because most of you people are very astute, to say the least.

I can tell you reams of stories about having worked with inner city youth (aka. black thugs) from the Pittsburg area for a year. Recidivism in our program was exceptionally high and I wouldn't know where to begin in telling you some of the things that I've witnessed first hand.

And the expense, at which the taxpayer must incarcerate and rehabilitate is astronomical.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (September 20, 2011 1:08 PM), no harm no foul. I've been called names a lot worse than "dummy".

I now look forward to your regular commentary, which is nothing short of consistently brilliant.

You are too kind. I really appreciate your gracious reply.

Dissident: I concur, Zenster is quickly becoming one of my favorite posters here, and that's saying something, because most of you people are very astute, to say the least.

I am honored. Paul Kersey is doing a yeoman's job of exposing "that which must not be named", and if I can be of even slight help in clarifying or emphasizing some of the remarkable points being made here, then the pleasure is mine.

Again, thank you both for the encouragement.

Anonymous said...

We should all be careful here. We do not want to become the mobs we hate so much.

I am not for freeing a murderer but I am also careful to not let my racism convict a person because they are black. Maybe Davis is one of the 10% of black people that do not suck. The whole case is full of problems. Seven of the nine eyewitnesses have recanted their testimony? No weapon found?

The death penalty should be abolished. I have no love for murderers but if a single innocent person has been put to death in this country, it is one too many. I say bring back "hard time". Put all of our prisoners to work and have them earn their keep. At least an innocent person wrongfully convicted will still be alive.

Zenster said...

Dissident: Recidivism in our program was exceptionally high and I wouldn't know where to begin in telling you some of the things that I've witnessed first hand.

Having been on the front lines, if you are so inclined, I would relish your own assessment of my post at 12:17 PM about how today's criminals are now rather consistently predatory and, also, violent, both physically and sexually, to a far larger extent than just a few decades ago.

If you would care to share your own ideas of root causes, those would be of extreme interest as well.

Anonymous said...

Paul, one thing you forgot to mention.

Hispanics are lumped in with whites when crime data is collected.

So, statistically, Blacks commit more murders than both Whites and Hispanics combined!

Oh yeah, someone posted this in the prior commentary section, but it is too sickening to ignore.

Mahogany Mobs attack Army Vet

http://www.twincities.com/ci_18913782?IADID=Search-www.twincities.com-www.twincities.com

Anonymous said...

I apologize I left a crucial factor out of the story about Mohogany Mobs attacking a vet, the Cops simply said "NOT MY PROBLEM."

While I am certainly not anti-Law Enforcement, it seems that the Minneapolis Police Department is completely in favor of BRA (Black-Run America).

Anonymous said...

"The whole case is full of problems."

No. It's not. That's defense spin.

This case has been through numerous appeals courts, the evidence of guilt is compelling.

Anonymous said...

I apologize I left a crucial factor out of the story about Mohogany Mobs attacking a vet, the Cops simply said "NOT MY PROBLEM."

While I am certainly not anti-Law Enforcement, it seems that the Minneapolis Police Department is completely in favor of BRA (Black-Run America).

Link: http://www.twincities.com/ci_18913782?IADID=Search-www.twincities.com-www.twincities.com

missbosslady said...

Anon @ 1:45 said;


"The death penalty should be abolished."

Actually, the death penalty should be more readily applied. You state your support for abolition of capital punishment because an innocent person might die. Huh? First, you will have to present us with even one case of an innocent person being put to death by the state, and when I say innocent I mean innocent. Please find us the innocent angel that we executed and we can start the conversation there.

We have a case here in a Florida, a cop killer, that was sentenced 33 yeras ago! For 33 years we have been housing and feeding this total waste of space at an average cost of $30,000. per year, which of course does not include the costs of his taxpayer funded representation. Please tell me why this is a good idea? Please tell me why my hard earned money should go to care for a guy who forfeited his right to live in a civilized society?

Personally, if someone murdered one of my family members I would respond in kind. In fact, I might hope the courts let him go on a technicality so that I could do the deed myself, it would not take me 33 years to get the job done and I'd be saving the taxpayers a bundle. I call that a win/win.

Anonymous said...

Ret'd LAPD here. This may sound unbelievable but there are gangsta thugs who yearn to be immortalized by one of these silly t-shirts. They want to go out in a hail of bullets and have dey boo make a typical ghetto memorial to them, which is usually a section of fence and sidewalk festooned with candles, signs, 40's, maybe a stuffed animal and homies wearing the aforementioned t-shirts. This is what many aspire to, along with being a shot-calling gangsta rapper. Then they get into an expected beef with a competitor, and out come the Glocks.

As for Hispanics being lumped in with whites, you can thank the FBI for that. They use the Statistical Policy Handbook to compile racial data and the SPH does not list Hispanic as a race. So what do they do? They say that Hispanics are more aligned with whites than American Indians, which I disagree with. This increases the fallacious Part 1 crime rate attributed to white people. Go to the FBI's website and look at the Ten Most Wanted list. There are four Hispanics listed as White (Hispanic). Only half of that description is true. Ask any Hispanic person if they consider themselves white and they'll smash your face in.

Dissident said...

Zenster since you asked. I'd be happy to offer my two-cents.

The program that I was involved in was an outdoor experiential education-Outward Bound style-program aimed at inner city adjudicated youth, under the age of 18.

This was in the early 90's so things have changed for the worst since then, but in my opinion, you are absolutely right in your assessment that today's offender is most definitely more violent and more predatory and without remorse! The causes are legion, but I put much of the blame squarely on the shoulders of the media industry in general.

The proliferation (and subsequent glorification) of violent rap music has been like a catalyst to these impressionable, semi-literate savages. All they know is violence. Hell, how does anyone expect to reason with an irrational brute?

Can't be done.

While there are many other factors, the glorification of violent behavior sticks out in my mind as the prime mover. Certainly broken families, drugs, lack of role models, etc. all play a hand.

When I was in the woods with these savages, I literally had to sleep with one eye open at all times to keep them from killing each other AND me!

They resented the fact that I was a white man trying to 'rehabilitate' these street smart punks. While there were some 'juvies' that were appreciative of our efforts, most remained hostile and indignant. Most showed me utter contempt and made my life miserable. These punks were savvy and very manipulative in their own little ways.

I kept seeing the same offenders over and over again.

Discard said...

Something to keep in mind about death penalty cases. No system is perfect. There is always a small chance that they'll execute the wrong guy, and so their is a statistical near certainty that sooner or later they will execute the wrong guy. Wrongful execution is an extremely rare cause of death. You're probably a thousand times more likely to die of a lightening strike, but the risk is still there.
So who bears that risk? The woman that works 15 hours per week at each of three local Starbucks or the thug who has no alibi because he was in a drunken stupor? The man who maintains the copiers at your office or a parolee whose friends deny that he was with them because they were gang raping someone and don't need the cops asking them any questions? If someone robbed the store down my street and the thief was described as a White man with grey receding hair, 5'7", 145 lbs, about 65 years old, wearing a navy watch cap and sunglasses, and driving a green Nissan truck, I would get no more than a cursory interview with the cops because I'm just Joe Citizen who goes to work and pays his bills. The cops don't spend their time digging for potatoes in an apple orchard without a good reason.
How many of these celebrity convicts don't have long rap sheets? And who cares if a mere armed robber and polar bear hunter gets chopped for a crime that he hadn't got around to yet?

Discard said...

Retired LAPD: The FBI can spot a Hispanic if they're a victim of a "hate crime". But not if they're the perpetrator. Check out the FBI hate crimes web page, and you'll see that there's a Hispanic category for victims, but no such category for the criminals.

LBD said...

I am so very tired of hearing, "if one innocent person", etc. Do you know what? If a truly innocent person is executed, he took one for the team, like a soldier dying for the good of his country. We can't afford the chaos in which we are living--innocents die in all sorts of human endeavors, from wars to bridge building to mining. We should honor the "Unknown Executed Innocent" as we honored the " Unknown Soldier" and go ahead and clear out Death Row for the health of the nation.

Analytical said...

Please find us the innocent angel that we executed and we can start the conversation there.

Cameron Todd Willingham.  The morning of December 3 1991, a fire killed his 3 young daughters.  Fire investigators pronounced it arson.  He was convicted of murder and executed February 4, 2004.

The arson "investigation" was rubbish, based on nonsense instead of scientific evidence.  The New Yorker article lists some of the details.  Real scientists tried to get that re-appraisal in front of the Texas Parole Board and Rick Perry, but they were ignored.

Cameron Todd Willingham, a wholly innocent man, was executed for murder in Texas.  No motive, no evidence... executed anyway.

Now let's have that conversation, okay?

10mm AUTO said...

"Over the last several decades there has been a dramatic shift away from petty crimes of opportunity towards incorrigible and habitual predatory criminal behavior.

Instead of criminality being an anomalous aberration in an individual's conduct, it is more often now a "character" trait and one that manifests persistently and consistently.

Accompanying this dramatic shift away from petty criminality is a marked increase in a propensity for violence, both physical and sexual, that lends a previously unknown degree of viciousness to modern criminal activity."

Amen. This is why the groundroots movement to take back the 2nd Amendment (9 states to 49 States in 25 years, Shall Issue Laws and HELLER decision) People have seen, not a fall off in crime but a steady, ugly increase in vicious negroid crimes, committed with a conquering poise by animals that become younger and their crimes more shallow and evil by the year. Negroid rape of the elderly, Knoxville horror, Flash mob attacks, etc.

Here is the next generation: http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/81842735/

Please note the pride that the Baby Daddy takes in the unstoppable hate.

Here is what it will come to in the end.
(For those bored, please advance this video to 7:20):
http://youtu.be/ztSzoh8N6es

This is what the Louis Farrakhan teaches at the Nation of Islam, today. Louis Farrakahn, Rev. Wright, Barrack Obama.

Zenster, Always a pleasure!

Anonymous said...

Among many other things, blacks are really, really weird about death. Wakes and funerals are basically pageants to them where the dead are merely an excuse to perform.
It could be surmised that because like any situation that requires a profound empathy, which is found as a cornerstone within any civil society - the blacks predominantly come up ashily empty handed.
They will, without a shred of self-awareness or irony, shreik "oh Lawd", strike dramatic, limp-raggedy "lookee me" postures and flail themselves over the caskets of known cheats, philanderers and siphons who willfully ate themselves into disability and death. They cannot process that this is simply the end result of a karmatic dogfight.
This is because, for blacks, EVERYTHING needs to be based around THEM and ABOUT them.
The ghastly oversized R.I.P. shirts with the bright pastel colors covering their bloated ghetto bellies, which encase deep-fried waste-caked intestines, aren't so much a tribute as an awkward punchline to the civil society.

mr_evergreen said...

"Guns don't kill people, only dangerous minorities do".

If that is the case, then it is important to mention that Black people are the most likely to be murdered by Black people. I'm not denying that fact that there are alot of Black on White murders. I am saying that Black on Black murders happen the most. The "guns don't kill people, only dangerous minorities do" quote, well this is what I have to say about it. Some people would try to use that as a reason to deny Black people the right to own a gun. This would make it difficult for law-abiding Black people to own a gun. It is interesting that the places with the strictest gun laws have the highest crime rates. If the highest number of murders are Black on Black, then it would be Black people who need to be able to protect themselves and have a firearm, especially law-abiding Black people.

Anonymous said...

"Cameron Todd Willingham."

He was guilty.

Anonymous said...

"I am saying that Black on Black murders happen the most."

This is true.

It's also a reason that black people should DEMAND tough sentencing.

But they don't.

Instead, they whine that the criminal justice system is unfair to blacks, and they bemoan the fact that so many black criminals are in prison.

mr_evergreen said...

Black people should demand tougher sentencing for ALL criminals because Black people have a high likelihood of being victimized by it. That said, there are still some unfair things that go on in the justice system. What needs to happen is a reform in the justice system to make it fair for all, no one should be able to buy their way out or anything. If the evidence is solid, then you should do your time.

Anonymous said...

"That said, there are still some unfair things that go on in the justice system."

Like what?

If you believe the justice system is unfair toward blacks, you are wrong.

http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_2_criminal_justice_system.html

Mr Evergreen, you have been fed a monstrous lie that this country is unfair to blacks. If you are going to be spending time on this blog, then open your mind, and you will be enlightened.

Zenster said...

10mm AUTO: Zenster, Always a pleasure!

Back at 'cha. I enjoy your comments as well.

Anonymous said...

"And who cares if a mere armed robber and polar bear hunter gets chopped for a crime that he hadn't got around to yet?"

Wow! Really? I mean...you really meant that?

Let's just go ahead and have punishment for thought crime as well.

Anonymous said...

"We have a case here in a Florida, a cop killer, that was sentenced 33 yeras ago! For 33 years we have been housing and feeding this total waste of space at an average cost of $30,000. per year, which of course does not include the costs of his taxpayer funded representation. Please tell me why this is a good idea?"

As I stated: I say bring back "hard time". Put all of our prisoners to work and have them earn their keep. At least an innocent person wrongfully convicted will still be alive.

Did You Guard Your White Privilege Today? said...

Good riddance, Troy Davis. The White church do gooders in Atlanta are nearly fighting over who gets to stand next to the angriest, ugliest afrovoodoo at the protest march.


Churches are unsafe for White Humanity these days. Why would a Whitey want to attend church and be told that only through integration with hate filled afrovoodoo diversity will God allow peace and happiness?

Is that a God we would worship? He fled those voodoo temples long ago... we should follow Him!

We must stop giving money to anybody or anything that helps blacks advance past their natural Africansims. Every one step up the ladder for them, we are pushed down ten steps. Our money and time and talent must be diverted away from all causes that promote the welfare of blacks and foster diversity.

WE MUST BECOME HUMANITY'S ORDAINED ISOLATIONISTS: transcend diversity, embrace Whiteness, beware and prepare, because you really do know what's coming next... you see it in your worst nightmares... and you are extremely right!

When we invest, we must invest only in the preservation and success of our White Privilege.

When you seize an opportunity, seize it for the preservation and success of your White Privilege, not for adding fuel to the hostile and dangerously anti-white juggernaut of Black Privilege, a/k/a Diversity and Inclusion.

All money transactions should be grafted or preceded with this question: "Will this purchase or donation help or hurt my White Privilege?"

We should ask that same question before any interaction of any kind. I curtail any contact with blacks as soon as possible, because I know that the longer I am object of their attention, the more endangered is my White Privilege.

Whenever blacks are around, make yourself as invisible as possible, and never look them in the eye. They interpret direct eye contact as a racist threat, and given that they all believe social, remedial, restorative, and redemptive justice demands that they rob, rape, or murder some of your unearned White Privilege out of you, there is no reason to invite the attack with looking at them.

All blacks are a threat. You must avoid them as you would a rattlesnake. Brittney Fox Watts learned that lesson about one bullet too late.

Kant had his categorical imperative that was supposed to force us to query Enlightened Reason so as to emancipate ourselves from prejudicial tradition and custom. We refuse.

Our categorical imperative will be the imperative of our category of White Privilege.

Will this help or hurt my White Privilege? That's the only question that matters after Brown vs. Board.

Our Imperative of White Privilege: "Prejudice renders a man’s virtue his habit; and not a series of unconnected acts. Through just prejudice, his duty becomes a part of his nature." Edmund Burke

Prejudice in our own favor renders our White virtue into our White habit of White Privilege. Through justified prejudice, our White duty of White Privilege becomes a part of our White nature. When we give, we give only what strengthens our White Privilege. When we take, we take only what weakens the privileges of our enemies.

Anonymous said...

"If a truly innocent person is executed, he took one for the team, like a soldier dying for the good of his country."

Are you serious? What if this man was your brother or father or son? It is shit like this that makes me ashamed to be a racist.

Anonymous said...

"Please find us the innocent angel that we executed and we can start the conversation there"

There have been 273 post-conviction DNA exonerations in the United States.

The first DNA exoneration took place in 1989. Exonerations have been won in 34 states; since 2000, there have been 206 exonerations.

17 of the 273 people exonerated through DNA served time on death row.

Analytical said...

We went through that.  Black people moaned about the toll that crack cocaine was taking on them.  Lawmakers obliged by taking crack possession as seriously as 100 times as much powder cocaine.  Black people promptly started complaining about the unfairness of their boys being sentenced far more harshly than white dealers who had much larger amounts of powder cocaine.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

Zenster said...

Dissident: The proliferation (and subsequent glorification) of violent rap music has been like a catalyst to these impressionable, semi-literate savages.

No argument. (C)rap music is the steady drip feed of criminality into Black America. In this one form of media is embodied so much of what is so direly wrong with Black culture that words are almost inadequate to the task.

Thank you for responding. I think a study about the escalating nature of predatory criminal violence would be very revealing.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: If that is the case, then it is important to mention that Black people are the most likely to be murdered by Black people.

That in no way changes the disproportionate criminality of Blacks in America. As Paul Kersey noted in the original article:

… at least 53.1 percent of the murders in the United States were committed by Black people.

[snip]

… Black people are only 13 percent of the United States population.


What other explanation is there for this except a profound lack of moral values that translates into an intense inclination for criminal activity?

America's Black community should be outraged by this damning statistic and long ago have begun initiating widespread neighborhood watches to report ongoing crime.

Do they? Absolutely not as that would be "selling out to the man". Something that, evidently, is a little too White for most Black people. And I say "most" because if that weren't the case then the above statistics wouldn't be half as damning as they already are.

I'm not denying that fact that there are alot of Black on White murders. I am saying that Black on Black murders happen the most.

Who gives a rip? You can hardly expect White people to have much sympathy for the mayhem in urban Black communities when a huge chunk of their tax dollars are going to supporting or prosecuting and incarcerating these thugs and rapists.

Keeping Troy Davis on death row for 33 years has cost over one million dollars. How many of Black America's top 10% could have been put through university on that astronomical budget?

"Black on Black murders" are the American (and international) Black community's own self-inflicted wound. Nobody but absolutely nobody bears the least responsibility for this but Blacks themselves. It cannot be explained away by economic under-privilege or lack of opportunity. The vast majority of contributing factors (i.e., single parent families, illiteracy, low IQ, etc.) are all a direct result of the actions of Blacks.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

The "guns don't kill people, only dangerous minorities do" quote, well this is what I have to say about it. Some people would try to use that as a reason to deny Black people the right to own a gun.

STRAW MAN! Yours is a straw man argument as there is NO ONE here at SBPDL advocating that Black Americans be denied their Second Amendment rights.

Since you mention it, can you imagine how the crime rate would plummet if possession of a firearm by a Black was an actionable offense? Doesn't that fact alone form a damning indictment of Black conduct?

It is interesting that the places with the strictest gun laws have the highest crime rates.

No, what it is constitutes is an abomination that happens when Liberal morons attempt to slather regulatory band-aids over the sucking lung wound of Black crime.

If the highest number of murders are Black on Black, then it would be Black people who need to be able to protect themselves and have a firearm, especially law-abiding Black people.

Nobody's stopping them but the fact remains that voluntary Black reportage of crime remains the more pressing issue. Look at executed gangland crime boss Stanley "Tookie" Williams III. This scumbag went to his date with Mr. Needle still pretending to have converted away from gang mentality, even as he adamantly refused to provide full cooperation with authorities in dismantling the ultra-violent and bloody Crips gang that he founded.

Liberal loons repeatedly attempted to nominate this walking waste of skin for a Nobel Prize despite how Williams insisted that assisting the authorities would send a message of selling out to the law. In fact, Williams refused to help police investigate his gang, and was implicated in attacks on guards and women, plus escape attempts as well. Some “cooperation” that is.

Anonymous said...

Ret'd LAPD here. Mr Evergreen, you talk as if we are all on the same social plane, with hapless blacks suffering at the hands of a few bad apples. You don't mention being victimized by other blacks, but in reality you would be. On fictional TV shows, movies and commercials, it would be a white guy victimizing you.

Blacks need to admit their genetic propensity for being violent. Blacks need to see this as a greater threat than sickle cell or hypertension. Until that happens, it's all the same crap. Blacks need to demand tougher sentencing for their feral brethren that make the "good" blacks look bad. Blacks need to demand stricter incarceration for black criminals with no mention or comparison whatsoever of whites or other races. Blacks need to resist the urge to defend the bruthas and commit themselves to sending these violent dullards to lengthy prison terms or a death sentence. Blacks need to shun liberal whites and their efforts to run interference for you, especially in the criminal justice system.

In other words, blacks (and only blacks) can clean house and get their race on the path to credibility. Whether it's eugenics, abortion, or whatever, blacks need to commit themselves to changing their race into one of positivity and creativity, instead of poverty and criminality. It will take at least four or five generations but it is the only way that blacks will become productive. The days of ebonics, welfare, public housing, blame, failure, demands, unwarranted expectations, crime (petty to horrific) and low intelligence will be things of the past.

This is completely on the shoulders of blacks to change in order to rise out of your self inflicted miasma that you keep on perpetuating.

Anonymous said...

"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs."

-Booker T. Washington

Lee said...

Cameron Todd Willingham. I saw the documentary on him. He was presented as a wife batterer, drug addict and all around asshole. The world is better off without him. As LBD said, "he took one for the team." And Missbosslady, you should live in California like I do (totally fucked up state). They don't execute ANYONE here. There are HUNDREDS and hundreds of people on California's death row. David Carpenter, the Trailside Killer of 35 years ago is freakin' 80 years old now. We need to put in an express lane like Texas.

map said...

1) Black people are not murdered in predatory crimes. These are drug deals gone bad, arguments over women, etc.

When blacks murder white people, it is over home invasions, muggings, rapes, etc. Wholly different animal.

2) Ending the death penalty sets the slippery slope to ending hard time, long prison sentences and other forms of punishment. After all, how does an "innocent" person get all of his lost years back?

Dissident said...

"What needs to happen is a reform in the justice system to make it fair for all, no one should be able to buy their way out or anything. If the evidence is solid, then you should do your time."

You mean like that black murdering scumbag OJ Simpleton?

"It is interesting that the places with the strictest gun laws have the highest crime rates."

DING, DING, DING, DING!

That's is in a nutshell, regardless of WHAT the liars in our media say. Armed society is polite society. I live in a heavily armed state and I feel very safe and secure here. I live here, because an unarmed man is a slave and I don't wish to be a slave.

Evergreen, you seem reasonable and I applaud you; just wish more of your racial compatriots were like you?

Anonymous said...

Black people should demand tougher sentencing for ALL criminals because Black people have a high likelihood of being victimized by it.

I'd be happy as a riddle if only I had a fiddle
I would not be just a nuffin'.
My head all full of stuffin'.
My heart all full of pain.
I would dance and be merry.
Life would be a ding-a-derry

Anonymous said...

Anon. @ 9/20, 5:45 pm: You nailed it. That was one of the best descriptions of the "thought" processes of these so-called people I have ever read.

The most important thing to to realize about blacks is how profoundly different they are from us. When you begin to really see (I mean *see* in that deeper sense) how ass-backward these creatures think about things, then you can begin to see a solution to this problem. And the solution ain't gonna be pretty.

Anonymous said...

Re: Wrongful death convictions:

Check out the movie "The Star Chamber", with Michael Douglas and Hal Holbrook. It's food for thought.

Anonymous said...

The death penalty and extreme duration of wait on death row are two separate issues.

The latter is a form of torture, whether you approve of the death penalty or not.

If you do, the only remotely humane way of applying it is to execute the sentence quickly, and not to have appeals dragging on for decades.

If you don't, obviously it's even worse.

Both ways, it's a case of unintended consequences.

Robert Marchenoir

mr_evergreen said...

"You mean like that black murdering scumbag OJ Simpleton?"

What about Casey Anthony? And she didn't have alot of money either.

"Mr Evergreen, you have been fed a monstrous lie that this country is unfair to blacks. If you are going to be spending time on this blog, then open your mind, and you will be enlightened."

Actually, I don't think this is a lie. Even with the American justice system, bias can occur and historically, the justice system hasn't been fair to Black people.

"That's is in a nutshell, regardless of WHAT the liars in our media say. Armed society is polite society. I live in a heavily armed state and I feel very safe and secure here. I live here, because an unarmed man is a slave and I don't wish to be a slave. "

That was part of my idea. The people who don't own guns who obey the law will fall victim to criminals who do have guns.

"You don't mention being victimized by other blacks, but in reality you would be. On fictional TV shows, movies and commercials, it would be a white guy victimizing you"

Actually, I have been victimized by Blacks. I even testified against one of them and he went to prison. He was a repeat offender and a juvenile. I was assaulted and robbed by three Black men one night. I have also been victimized by some White people as well. When I was 11 years old, a White teenager shot me with a paintball gun. When I was in high school, 2 White kids jumped me while I was in a classroom. I have seen pathological stupidity from both Blacks and Whites.

"Since you mention it, can you imagine how the crime rate would plummet if possession of a firearm by a Black was an actionable offense? Doesn't that fact alone form a damning indictment of Black conduct?"

Actually, this has happened. Slaves were not permitted to possess a firearm. Back when the KKK was getting strong, some people disarmed Black citizens, and then the KKK would go in and terrorize people. There is a history of trying to prevent Black people from owning guns, often with scary results. If a Black man can't own a gun, it can be argued that it would open that Black man up to much more victimization from other Black people, as most crimes committed by Blacks are against other Blacks. How would a person defend himself from a criminal?

Sheila said...

Mr. Evergreen and "anonymous" are both WRONG that black criminals target/murder other blacks the most. According to Unamusement Park (http://unamusementpark.com/), while most crime overall is intra-racial (i.e. White on White or black on black), this is because there are far more Whites than blacks and most crime in the U.S. is White on White. However, looking at inter-racial crime, the picture is clear: 83% of inter-racial crime is black on White, and blacks commit their violent crime primarily against Whites, not other blacks. For more statistics, see Unamused's flyer: http://unamusementpark.com/2011/05/black-people-are-more-criminal-than-white-people-a-flyer/.

Anonymous said...

Old-line SEC fan here. Tru TV's In Session hosts were supporting Troy Davis this morning.

Anonymous said...

"What about Casey Anthony? And she didn't have alot of money either."

Do you have a point??

"Actually, I don't think this is a lie."

Of course it's a lie...a monstrous lie.

"Even with the American justice system, bias can occur and historically, the justice system hasn't been fair to Black people."

You are full of shit. The justice system is biased IN FAVOR of blacks.

If you are not interested in enlightening yourself, then go away, this blog is not for you.

"There is a history of trying to prevent Black people from owning guns, often with scary results."

There is not "a history" of preventing blacks from owning guns. If you have to use "slavery" or "the KKK" to make your point, then you have no argument.

Discard said...

Anon at 8:07 PM Sept 20: "And who cares if a mere armed robber and polar bear hunter gets chopped for a crime he hadn't got around to yet?"
Yes, I really mean that. (BTW, in case you're not aware, "polar bear hunting" refers to the custom among Blacks in some cities of attacking Whites at random.) Armed robbers and the like have made in clear that they will kill an innocent person for personal gain or amusement. It's best that they be put down before they actually achieve their goal. It is, of course, legal to shoot a robber caught in the act as a matter of self defense. Is it any less a matter of self defense to execute them after the fact, thus sparing their next victim? The only reason to not make all armed felonies into capital crimes is the concern that thugs will kill all the witnesses to their crimes. Given that, the "wrongful" execution of a mere robber or rapist for a murder they did not commit is merely a lucky accident for the rest of us.

Sheila said...

Paul - I'm not familiar with your earliest numbered posts, so you may have done one about blacks' hair, but here's a tidbit for you from Drudge: http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/TSA-Searches-Womans-Afro-Hair-for-Weapons-130220258.html

This Dallas woman's name "Isis" is familiar to me - I'd have to check the local paper's archives, but I seem to remember some other dispute she was involved in regarding her hair.

Anonymous said...

@Anon. 9/20, 5:45 pm
...now that was just good writing. Descriptive, humourous and spot on observations regarding just one of the many idiosyncrasies of that parasitic and predatory dark race.

Northlander

Californian said...

Even with the American justice system, bias can occur and historically, the justice system hasn't been fair to Black people.

Can you give us a specific example of how the justice system today is biased against Black people?

And by the "justice system" what do you mean? There are many justice systems in the USA: local, state federal.

Would the justice system of cities run by blacks, such as Detroit or New Orleans, be the same as one in, say, Idaho?

How is prosecution of such things as "hate crimes" biased against blacks under the Holder DoJ?

Look at the prosecution of the Duke University trio of lacrosse players: they were singled out for prosecution because they were white men accused -- and on the flimsiest of evidence -- of raping a black woman. The justice system, backed up by the media and academic establishments, wanted to nail the Great White Defendant. How does this fit in with the thesis that the justice system is biased against blacks?

Here's another question: if as is claimed, the crack cocaine sentencing laws impact greater on blacks than whites, then why do blacks continue to use crack? (I'd think the logical course of action would be to find some other substance to ingest without the enhanced penalties.)

The court system has generally supported the civil rights movement: Brown vs Board of Education, court ordered busing, upholding affirmative action policies (most of the time), striking down allegedly discriminatory laws (e.g., the Arizona immigration bill), etc. How does this fit in with the claim that the system is biased?

The thing is, we have heard of the allegations of bias in the justice system for quite some time now--and I would like to see some evidence of these claims.

Zenster said...

Ret'd LAPD: In other words, blacks (and only blacks) can clean house and get their race on the path to credibility.

This is the bottom line and whatever it takes to convince Black America is what is required.

Speaking of habitual criminals, this exact same equation applies to Islam as well. Muslims are laughing up their sleeves at the sight of America attempting to fastidiously sort out terrorists from so-called "moderate" Muslims (the sea that terrorist fish swim in).

In either case, the strongest measures possible must be taken to assure that each group cleans their own house and polices their own street.

Until that day, there will only be more suffering and mayhem all the way around.

Dissident said...

Casey Anthony?

Did you notice the outrage that most whites had when that whigger was acquitted? Did you notice that?

Now, did you notice the jubilant, shucking and jiving from blacks when OJ was acquitted?

Blacks own weapons today, so please don't dredge up that old cunard of KKK racism. It's old man, it's worn out.

If you want people to take you seriously on this blog, then you'd better get your facts straight and quit with black Racist(TM) talking points.

Zenster said...

Lee: Cameron Todd Willingham. I saw the documentary on him. He was presented as a wife batterer, drug addict and all around asshole.

Quelle surprise!

Wife beaters have a special circle in hell awaiting them.

Zenster said...

map: 2) Ending the death penalty sets the slippery slope to ending hard time, long prison sentences and other forms of punishment.

This danger is epitomized by media sympathy being shown over the Pelican Bay hunger strike that has spread to other California prisons.

Just listen to the sympathetic tone of this article:

Largely unrestrained by courts, legislatures or public opinion, solitary confinement has become routine – a punishment of first resort for all sorts of prison infractions. Today, a prisoner can be placed in solitary not only for violence, but for any form of "insubordination" towards prison officials, or for possession of contraband (which includes not only drugs but cell phones, cash or too many postage stamps). Some inmates are sent to solitary confinement for exhibiting the symptoms of untreated mental illness. Others, including juveniles in adult prisons, end up in isolation for their own "protection" because they are targets of prison rape. Many of the men in Pelican Bay's Security Housing Unit are there because they've been "validated" as gang members, based on their tattoos or on the say-so of other inmates, who are rewarded for "snitching".

Face it, just like death row, if you've made it to a super-max facility like Pelican Bay ― especially in soft-on-crime California ― you have presented such a constant menace to society that you probably should have been in solitary years ago.

It is difficult even to summon up any sympathy for juvenile offenders in super-max. These vicious little cold-blooded killers are among some of the most callous criminals of all due to an almost completely amoral mentality.

My prescription for convicted terrorists might have application to super-max policies.

Cell interiors are painted beige with indirect lighting. No television, no books, no pen and paper, no computers, no radios, no yard exercise, all food is pulped into a beige color, even the blankets and sheets are beige. Furnishings are painted beige. Guards are in beige uniforms and always remain in complete silence. Medical complaints are addressed by silent doctors in beige lab coats with written instructions.

Life under such circumstances would be and endless vista of colorless and silent existence. This is what the most predatory elements within our society deserve.

Van said...

Evergreen:

The reason most victims of black crime are black is simple: whites avoid blacks. If we didn't we'd be routinely victimized. The fact that smoking isn't dangerous to non-smokers doesn't mean they shouldn't continue to be non-smokers.

I have a question for you, one that I pose (in some form or another) to all black commenters here. But first, a little background:

You seem to be aware of the crime stats. Crime is astoundingly more common among blacks than other groups. Income does not account for this. In my own life, I've also found that the majority of people I've met who have been rude, inconsiderate, loud, difficult, or in any way unpleasant have been black.

I've also found that blacks bring absolutely nothing to the table that isn't provided (usually better provided) by whites.

So essentially, during long periods of my life when I've regularly interacted with many blacks, my quality of life has gone down.

Here's the question: given the above, why wouldn't I avoid blacks? If my quality of life is so easily improved, and I lose nothing, why wouldn't I? What do you, or any of the other
"good" blacks provide that I can't get without you?

Zenster said...

Robert Marchenoir: If you do, the only remotely humane way of applying it [the death penalty] is to execute the sentence quickly, and not to have appeals dragging on for decades.

I am unable to find the exact quote but even Machiavelli himself noted that capital punishment should be meted out swiftly so that whatever crime involved was not allowed to fade in the public's mind nor any sympathy for the offender to grow.

Zenster said...

Sheila: 83% of inter-racial crime is black on White, and blacks commit their violent crime primarily against Whites, not other blacks.

And people wonder why racism is alive and well.

Black on White violence is little else than ethnic cleansing or just plain genocide. At least it is according to such trolls as Louis Farrakhan et al.

PS: Thank you, Sheila, for some hard statistics.

Van said...

More for Evergreen:

Yes, you have been fed a bunch of lies. Lies that you are all too willing to believe.

The criminal justice system has not been shown to be biased against blacks. This has been claimed as the result of deeply flawed studies that look at broad crime categories, then claim longer sentences for blacks than whites. For example, "robbery" is a category. But when the details are accounted for - weapon used, victim injured, priors, etc. - there is no disparity. The claim that blacks are more likely to receive the death penalty is based solely on the percentage of blacks on death row compared to blacks in the general population. When you factor in the commission of a capital offense (a rather relevant variable, I'd say), there is no disparity.

Interestingly, while black juries are more likely to convict a white defendant than a black one (as expected), white juries are actually less likely to convict a black than white.

Similar with the claim that approval for home loans is biased. The study that "found" this only looked at income, and found a disparity. But when credit history, down payment, and net worth are factored in, the disparity magically disappears.

The famous study by Deborah Prager in which white ex-cons were as likely to get called for a second interview as black college grads? In reality, the study only found possible racism in 10% of employers. And the researcher makes no attempt to hide her agenda, calling her methods into question. The study where obvious black names were ignored when resumes were sent into employers? No control group of trashy sounding white names like Cletus or Bubba.

On and on. Every single study claiming to show significant racism against blacks is so easily picked apart. Sorry. You're probably a decent guy, but most of your people are simply are not fit to function in a modern society. There's a reason sub-Saharan Africans were cavemen when Europeans were exploring the entire globe.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (September 21, 2011 9:27 AM) There is not "a history" of preventing blacks from owning guns. If you have to use "slavery" or "the KKK" to make your point, then you have no argument. [emphasis added]

Le bingo!

The time of punishing Whites for something done by people who are now all dead several decades, if not a century ago, is long over.

Attempting to do so is both intellectually bankrupt and direct evidence of a wholly unsupportable argument.

Anonymous said...

"The reason most victims of black crime are black is simple: whites avoid blacks."

This.

When you consider the extremes that whites go to in avoiding blacks...then consider the high incidence of black-on-white crime...

It is clear that black criminals seek out and target white victims.

Anonymous said...

A rare victory for White Privilege and White Humanity:

Troy Davis shall die for killing a White cop!

http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/georgia-supreme-court-rejects-1185593.html

Zenster said...

Anonymous (September 21, 2011 2:16 PM): When you consider the extremes that whites go to in avoiding blacks...then consider the high incidence of black-on-white crime...

It is clear that black criminals seek out and target white victims.


Somehow, much to my dismay, this did not even occur to me although it only serves to further cement the notion of Black violence against Whites amounting to nothing but ethnic cleansing and genocide.

Californian said...


Black on White violence is little else than ethnic cleansing or just plain genocide.


You can see this process in post-apartheid South Africa. ANC minions chanting, "Kill the Boer, kill the farmer." Farm attacks. Some really horrendous torture-murders. All set against a background of black demagogs blaming white people for everything.

Now, Africa is not America, but even so, you have to wonder how much of inter-racial crime has a political dimension. Is all the agitprop directed against whites also encouraging blacks to attack whites?

And what if the situation in cities such as London where white people are becoming a minority? What are the inter-racial crime figures there?

Thing is, if this has a political origin, then changing the politics might make a difference. For starters, driving liberals, especially the white guilt trip types, out of office. Perhaps they can be bused to the inner cities, or "liberated" countries such as Zimbabwe?

Zenster said...

Californian, I'm glad to see you mention Zimbabwe. Under the name of Rhodesia, it was once the literal bread basket of Africa; an agriculturally productive nation that fed millions.

Under the corrupt "leadership" of Robert Mugabe, it has entered a death spiral that now sees it accepting millions in foreign aid for famine relief.

With all of this glaring evidence presented before the world community, the ANC (African National Congress), still could not bring themselves to condemn "one of their own" as a tyrant and murderer worthy of prosecution, if not execution.

Bearing this in mind; what hope is there that the CBC (Congressional Black Caucasus) will ever rise above partisan politics and declare Mugabe to be the racist, corrupt despot that he remains to this very day?

How little hope is there, especially under abjectly racist Attorney General Eric Holder, for any unbiased prosecution of race-based ― especially Black on White crime ― offenses in America?

mr_evergreen said...

"Do you have a point??"

She got away with murder.

"Troy Davis shall die for killing a White cop!"

So if Troy Davis allegedly killed a Black person, it would mean nothing to you?

"The reason most victims of black crime are black is simple: whites avoid blacks."

Then here is a question: How would segregation be good for Black people if Blacks people get killed by their own people these days more than anyone else?

"Here's the question: given the above, why wouldn't I avoid blacks? If my quality of life is so easily improved, and I lose nothing, why wouldn't I? What do you, or any of the other
"good" blacks provide that I can't get without you?"

Being that Blacks only make up 13% of the population, how does any of this help me? I ask this because I look at things from a historical perspective. I won't lie. I do take it personal when someone says they avoid Blacks. This is why. To me, it is "This isn't 1950, why are you acting like it?". To me, I look at it as "what did I do to you?". I don't look at it as any different from when Blacks were treated like crap in the 1950s.

"Can you give us a specific example of how the justice system today is biased against Black people?"

Troy Davis is going to be executed today. However, the Memphis Three got away with murder, as did Casey Anthony. OJ Simpson had the money to buy his way out, but if he didn't have the money, he would have gotten the death penalty just as Troy Davis is going to get.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: Troy Davis is going to be executed today. However, the Memphis Three got away with murder, as did Casey Anthony. OJ Simpson had the money to buy his way out, but if he didn't have the money, he would have gotten the death penalty just as Troy Davis is going to get.

And your point is?

Anonymous said...

"She got away with murder."

This is not news. Do you have a point??

"So if Troy Davis allegedly killed a Black person, it would mean nothing to you?"

Blacks murder each other every day, and the black community does not seem to give a shit. Why should anyone else?

"Then here is a question: How would segregation be good for Black people if Blacks people get killed by their own people these days more than anyone else?"

Segregation would be good for white people.

"I do take it personal when someone says they avoid Blacks."

I avoid blacks for the same reason I avoid rattlesnakes...because they are dangerous.
Of course, not ALL blacks are dangerous.
Similarly, not ALL rattlesnakes are dangerous.
But my health and well-being are more important than your feelings.

"Troy Davis is going to be executed today."

Troy Davis has had every possible appeals court consider his case. If the system was biased against black people, he would have been executed 20 years ago.

You fail.

Anonymous said...

"OJ Simpson had the money to buy his way out, but if he didn't have the money, he would have gotten the death penalty just as Troy Davis is going to get."

OJ Simpson was acquitted because he had a black jury. Black juries acquit black defendants at three times the national felony acquittal rate.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/6_2_my_black.html

Mr Evergreen, if you are not interested in being enlightened, then please go away, this blog is not for you.

Van said...

Evergreen: "How would segregation be good for Black people" and "Being that Blacks only make up 13% of the population, how does any of this help me?"

Why must I help you? Why must whites always be on the hook for blacks? Helping blacks is destroying our society. Its time for you - collectively - to contribute at a level that is roughly proportional to your representation in the population, or face the consequences if you can't.

I don't promote a return to de jure segregation. I would be satisfied with honesty on the issue of racial differences in intelligence, general aptitude, and crime; and the logical policies that would ensue. No more racial preferences - equality under the law. A legal right to self-segregate, if one chooses. Race-neutral policies would satisfy me. But they would be devastating to blacks, so you agitate for more and more free goodies on the backs of white taxpayers.

You ask "how is this good for blacks" as if that's a concern. I care about what's good for myself and my family.

Anonymous said...

The study where obvious black names were ignored when resumes were sent into employers? No control group of trashy sounding white names like Cletus or Bubba.

Wasn't there some ridiculous low number that was used? 12 acceptances versus 8 from 200 sent was said to be proof that whites were 50% more likely to be called to interview whereas this was not shown.

Anonymous said...

"Then here is a question: How would segregation be good for Black people if Blacks people get killed by their own people these days more than anyone else?"

You miss the important point. White people should not be concerned with what is good for blacks. That is YOUR job. Do you and other blacks worry endlessly about the welfare of whites? Of course not. HIstorically, blacks have become used to white people's charity and white guilt. This is ending with BRA as I speak.

Whites should be concerned with only the welfare of whites. Blacks are always going to be at the bottom of the pile because they rely on white people for their existence (AA, welfare, programs, housing, forced diversity, etc.) and because of lower ability, they are unable to function in a complicated society.

Stop thinking that white people should care about the plight of blacks. Look at the crime stats and black behavior WORLDWIDE and you will find your answers. Whites want blacks to leave them alone. Stop following us. Stop demanding inclusion in our communities. Find success on your own, and practice personal responsibility.

Anonymous said...

Quote:
Slaves were not permitted to possess a firearm.
end

Not true.
Slaves did possess shotguns and hunted routinely in the night hours to supplement their starch-heavy diets.

Californian said...

I asked mr_evergreen for how the criminal justice system is biased. His response was:

Troy Davis is going to be executed today. However, the Memphis Three got away with murder, as did Casey Anthony.

Thing is, these are three arbitrarily chosen cases. The cases are all different jurisdictions and different circumstances. I can just as well pull out any number of arbitrarily chosen cases and prove just as much, or little. e.g., the DoJ refusal to prosecute Black Panthers, or whatever.

What I want is for someone to demonstrate that in a specific jurisdiction the people who run it intentionally discriminate such that blacks are arrested, prosecuted and given higher sentences than whites for the same crime. I'd like to see evidence which could hold up in a court of law. For example, an entire DA staff saying that they intentionally targeted blacks simply because of the "color of their skin."

We've already demonstrated that blacks have a much higher rate of violent crime than whites, so the (non-discriminatory) result ought to be more blacks in jail than whites. But what I see happening here is an "equality of outcome" situation: since there are higher proportions of blacks in jail than whites, this is considered to be discriminatory.

Discard said...

While segregation might not have been personally beneficial to every Black, it was beneficial to the Black race. By keeping the better sort of Negroes living and working among their less well-endowed brethren, Black communities had the benefit of their leadership and example. When middle class Blacks moved out of the ghettos, social leadership fell to the street hustlers.

YIH said...

"It is interesting that the places with the strictest gun laws have the highest crime rates."

DING, DING, DING, DING!

You're overlooking something here. The country with the strictest weapon (not just firearm) laws?
Where private ownership of firearms is impossible?
Where even kitchen knives have to be transported in a locked case?

That would be Japan.

Now close your eyes and picture what would have happened if that quake had hit say, Detroilet? or Ratlanta?
Heck, no need for imagination, L.A. right after Rodney King or N.O. right after Katrina.
Yeah, race and the foolish attempt to combine very different races matters.

10mm AUTO said...

When you consider the extremes that whites go to in avoiding blacks...then consider the high incidence of black-on-white crime...

"It is clear that black criminals seek out and target white victims.

Somehow, much to my dismay, this did not even occur to me although it only serves to further cement the notion of Black violence against Whites amounting to nothing but ethnic cleansing and genocide."

It is even worse than you think. Let's take the negroid population number of 12%. Now the females are not a huge source of murder and rape (other types of crime, Yes.) but let's stick with murder and rape first. If we throw out the females, then we are talking about a criminal element composed of only 6%. But it is not the niglets that are doing the crime, so let's shave off a further 2%. Then we have to consider the elderly bucks, the crippled and the "good" blacks. That leaves about another 2%. So in reality, 2% of the population as a whole accounts for 100% of the interracial rapes and all of the interracial murder, a figure that higher that the White population murder rate IN TOTAL.

Therefore I agree. It is not only a Genocidal movement but it is a Genocidal Movement fostered and supported by the negroid population at large with the "no Snitching" and the black "jury nullification" and the toleration of Rap music that delights to sing about killing Whitey, etc.

Not once on any blog or newspaper comment section have I ever heard a negroid say, I am sorry for my race, we really need help before we destroy ourselves." It is shift blame, "What about me, I'm good", It is all da White mans fault", "you're racist!" etc.

They must be driven out. The sooner we face this conclusion, the sooner we can face the future "Resettlement Wars". North American for North Americans, Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, Europe for Europeans. This idea that Somalis are coming here to be little Englishmen and integrate EVER is completely unsound. Whites are only 10% of the Worlds population, yet we alone have no Homeland. Even the Jews have Israel. Only we can be what we are, White. And we can't do it with an internal, eternal, cold civil War dogging us at every step.

YIH said...

The more I see ''mr. evergreen'' the more I think ''Oh GREAT, not THIS again!''.
@Zenster; click the link, and say a little prayer that another blog didn't have to deal with that.

Van said...

Evergreen:

You avoided my question. I'll present it again.

When I interact with only whites, I rarely come across a rude, argumentative individual. Business transactions go smoothly. Even when heavy, the traffic is more orderly and flows more smoothly. There are few to no jaywalkers jumping out in front of my car. At the "white" gym, the atmosphere is serious but friendly. And, most importantly, I am extremely unlikely to be the victim of a violent crime.

On the other hand, when I have significant interaction with blacks, I come across a number of rude and argumentative individuals. Business transactions are anything but smooth. Traffic is congested and disorderly; even lawless. Pedestrians constantly jump out in front of my car. People in the "black" gym are generally hostile. And, most importantly, I am extremely more likely to be the victim of a violent crime. Nothing changes in a remotely positive way.

As an aside, you might be tempted to say only a racist could imagine such disparities of behavior. I can only tell you that a few years ago I believed the exact opposite. It was experience, not bias, that got me here. Take it or leave it, I know the truth, and your opinion is irrelevant.

As an adult with a career and family, I simply do not have time to familiarize myself with every person, place, or situation. I avoid some based on past experience. In the case of blacks, I can avoid them altogether, and I lose nothing while harming no one, and I gain increased quality of life.

Now remember, by avoiding blacks, I don't harm them. I do not violate their life, liberty, or property. I simply don't offer them any of my life, liberty, or property. No one is harmed.

So, given the above - the total difference in my quality of life when interacting with blacks vs. avoiding them, isn't it simply LOGICAL to avoid them?

Again, what can you - or any particular black - offer, that is so good and otherwise unattainable as to be worth the negatives inevitably brought by your brethren?

Anonymous said...

"The more I see ''mr. evergreen'' the more I think ''Oh GREAT, not THIS again!''."

I'm beginning to wonder myself...

Anonymous said...

"North American for North Americans, Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, Europe for Europeans."

The Chinese have already laid claim to Africa.

They won't be leaving...

Zenster said...

10mm AUTO: So in reality, 2% of the population as a whole accounts for 100% of the interracial rapes and all of the interracial murder, a figure that [is] higher than the White population murder rate IN TOTAL.

You provide a compelling argument for racism against Blacks. Your "100% of the interracial rapes" figure is easily disputed as there are White on Black rapes as well but your point still stands by a large majority.

Therefore I agree. It is not only a Genocidal movement but it is a Genocidal Movement fostered and supported by the negroid population at large with the "no Snitching" and the black "jury nullification" and the toleration of Rap music that delights to sing about killing Whitey, etc.

The "no Snitching" mentality exhibited by so much of the Black population will be its undoing. To habitually not report crimes that you have witnessed eventually makes you complicit in them, period. Guilt by association is an onus that Blacks justifiably have to endure until they summon up the courage to display some real social cohesion and work towards eliminating crime in their own neighborhoods.

(C)rap music is in a category of its own. The incitement to violence, overt racism, glorification of criminality and intense misogyny it routinely contains invites every bit of the scorn and derision that it so richly deserves.

It is safe to say that (c)rap music has easily eroded the last 50 years of progress towards racial equality, if not more so. Aside from Black crime itself, I cannot think of one single other entity besides (c)rap music that so encourages people to hate Blacks and for so many good reasons.

Anonymous said...

"as there are White on Black rapes as well"

True, but the number is statistically insignificant.

Van said...

From the data easily available:

From 1976-2005, 51% of gun homicides were committed by blacks. We'll assume this number is static (probably generous, as it was likely increasing), and say 51% of the 11,346 gun homicides in 2005 were by blacks. So 5,786 by blacks and 5,560 by the rest of the US.

The US population in 2005 was about 288 million, with about 12% black. So around 34.6 million blacks.

This gives us a total US gun homicide rate of 3.9 per 100,000. When you take the blacks out of the equation, you get 253.4 million and 5,560 gun homicides. This gives you a gun homicide rate of 2.2 per 100,000.

Blacks alone have a rate of 16.7 per 100,000.

Its too bad Latinos/Hispanics are counted as white for crime offender purposes. It would be interesting to see the white gun homicide rate.

Anonymous said...

Ret'd LAPD here. In over 20 years on the street I never took a report of, nor did I ever hear of a reported, white male on black female rape. Never. Not once. I'd like everyone to ask their local cops if they have too.

Dissident said...

Evergreen poses the question:


"Then here is a question: How would segregation be good for Black people if Blacks people get killed by their own people these days more than anyone else?"

It wouldn't be good for black people, but it would be paradise for all other races. Almost utopian in scope.

10mm AUTO said...

"You provide a compelling argument for racism against Blacks. Your "100% of the interracial rapes" figure is easily disputed as there are White on Black rapes as well but your point still stands by a large majority."

Zenster, I hate to dispute you but I Quote:

"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man."

Source: http://www.thenationalpolicyinstitute.org/2009/09/25/the-truth-of-interracial-rape-in-the-united-states-2/


There are essentially NO White on black Rapes, according to LE Stats. The truth is 100 a day verses zero.

Van said...

I'm guessing, in 2005 about 11% of the US population was Latino (non-white Hispanic), giving us 31.7 million.

We'll put them in the middle of blacks and whites for gun homicide rate, and estimate them at 9.5 per 100,000. This gives us 3,012 gun homicides from Latinos. Leaving 2,548 for the rest (non-black, non-Latino) US, with a population of 221.7 million. The resulting (white and Asian) gun homicide rate is 1.1 per 100,000. Slightly higher than most European countries.

The only data I can find shows victim rates of Latinos to be just under blacks. We'll assume this indicates comparable offender rates (de facto segregation, and all). We'll start at a rate of 15.0 per 100,000, giving us a total of 4,755 gun homicides for Latinos. This leaves us with only 895 gun homicides for the non-black/non-Latino US. The gun homicide rate here would be 0.4 per 100,000.

This, despite widespread gun ownership, is in the range of the European countries with the tightest gun control laws. A heavily armed white population is safe. A heavily armed black or Latino population is a war zone.

It really is true. Guns don't kill people; minorities do (especially minorities with guns).

Zenster said...

Anonymous (September 22, 2011 2:29 PM): True, but the number is statistically insignificant.

Which is why I noted how 10mm AUTO's "point still stands by a large majority".

10mm AUTO: Zenster, I hate to dispute you…

Please do not hesitate to correct me if I am wrong. That does no one any favors. I've eaten enough crow to stock my own KFC.

… I Quote:

"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man."


I could not have imagined that the ratio was so disproportionate. Now I know better.

The truth is 100 a day verses zero.

And Black people wonder why Whites are so pissed off. Go figure.

Also, thank you for chiming in as well, Ret'd LAPD. This one statistic alone justifies SBPDL's existence.

Zenster said...

Van: This, despite widespread gun ownership, is in the range of the European countries with the tightest gun control laws. A heavily armed white population is safe. A heavily armed black or Latino population is a war zone.

It really is true. Guns don't kill people; minorities do (especially minorities with guns).


Another less often mentioned fact revolves around how so many illegal Mexican aliens and unemployed Blacks run up huge taxpayer funded hospital bills for routine surgeries ― often worth tens of thousands of dollars ― required to treat their frequent gunshot wounds.

Too bad there is no easy way of decoupling those statistics so that the public can see how this criminal subset is, literally, bleeding it white.

Anonymous said...

"I could not have imagined that the ratio was so disproportionate. Now I know better."

Consider this...

To our worthless mainstream media, a white-on-black NON-rape (Duke Lacrosse) is an enormous story, whereas an ongoing epidemic of black-on-white rape is unmentionable.

Californian said...

Californian, I'm glad to see you mention Zimbabwe. Under the name of Rhodesia, it was once the literal bread basket of Africa; an agriculturally productive nation that fed millions.

I was in Rhodesia right at the end of white rule. It was kind of amazing, when you think about it, how a small number of white people were able to run a country with a black majority, and do so in the face of international sanctions and a guerrilla war. Shows you what can be accomplished when white people put their mind to it. I'll note that the whites had the support of many blacks who saw they were getting a better deal than they might have had from the insurgents, the latter being Marxist terrorists.

I returned a couple years later, right after Mugabe and company took power. You could already see the deterioration in such things as cleanliness of the streets and public order. In the years following, Mugabe wrecked the country. He probably killed more Zimbabweans than died in the war. And now a sizable portion of the Zimbabweans are refugees or starving. But then again, those "racist" whites no longer have any power.

Such is black liberation.

mr_evergreen said...

"Heck, no need for imagination, L.A. right after Rodney King or N.O. right after Katrina.
Yeah, race and the foolish attempt to combine very different races matters."

There were quite a few White people down there doing nefarious and repugnant things as well. There were also police officers involved in corrupt actions. Your race does not determine if you will be a violent criminal. The deal with Japan is that this is a communal society. Everyone is expected to act the same way. If you don't, you get outcasted. People don't riot because the attitude "every man for himself" doesn't fly in Japan. You do something criminal, it is considered shameful to your family and a hassle to the people around you. In the USA, the mentality is different. For many people, the attitude is "every many for himself and forget everyone else". A person who feels like he has nothing to lose has a very high propensity for violence. Such a person doesn't care. Look at Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The murder rate reached astronomical levels, as high as 30 murders per 100,000. The USA has never gotten that bad, and Russia doesn't have many Black people.

"The more I see ''mr. evergreen'' the more I think ''Oh GREAT, not THIS again!'' "

Thanks for the compliment.

Californian said...

I want to follow up to my last comment, the one about Rhodesia:

One of the things that got me posting on websites such as SBPDL is my experience in Africa. When you see what happens when white people give up power--well, it ain't pretty.

Now, Africa is not America, but it does get you to think of what will happen in Europe and north America when third worlders become a majority -- or even a significant minority with political clout. Is Zimbabwe-South Africa the future of things for the rest of the Western world? (American blacks ought to give this some thought--after all, how many black people have decided to move from the "racist" USA to anywhere in Africa? But you have plenty of incoming Somalis, Haitians, et alia.)

You also have to wonder at the sanity of many whites. They are so deluded by multicult ideology that they can not see the reality on the ground in Africa...or America-Canada-Europe. Instead, they reinterpret catastrophic losses for the Western world, such as the takeover of Rhodesia by African Marxist terrorist guerrillas, into progress for their fantasy of a universal democratic world order. They seem to see the future as some sort of United National cocktail party held on the set of Star Trek's Ten-Forward in which all species sip synthehol and sing kum-bay-a.

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Ten_Forward

But the future is rapidly turning into something closer to the world of Blade Runner.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: Your race does not determine if you will be a violent criminal.

You are tight! You are absolutely right.

So, please tell the studio audience and all the folks at home exactly why it is that American Blacks so disproportionately represented in violent crime statistics.

If you've read through this thread, you've seen the insane numbers that constantly point to the huge amount of violent crime being committed by a tiny percentage of almost unanimously Black people.

There are clearly Root Causes for this epidemic and the vast majority of responsibility for them lies directly at the feet of Black America and no where else.

Care to venture a few guesses as to what those Root Causes are?

Anonymous said...

"There were quite a few White people down there doing nefarious and repugnant things as well."

No, there were not.

"There were also police officers involved in corrupt actions."

They were mostly black. In fact, you can see them on YouTube, taking part in the looting of a Wal-Mart.

"Your race does not determine if you will be a violent criminal."

Of course it does, that's why the black crime rate is so high throughout the entire globe.

"Thanks for the compliment."

It wasn't a compliment, you dumb fuck.

Mr Evergreen, your boilerplate negro talking points only serve to confirm your low IQ. If you are not interested in enlightening yourself, then please leave, this blog is not for you.

Van said...

Evergreen: "Look at Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The murder rate reached astronomical levels, as high as 30 murders per 100,000. The USA has never gotten that bad, and Russia doesn't have many Black people."

In 2010 there were 38.9 million blacks in the US, who are known to have committed 5,770 homicides. This gives a homicide rate of 14.8 per 100,000.

But wait. There were also 4,224 homicides for which the race of the perpetrator is not known. So how do we determine what percentage of these homicides were committed by blacks, so we can more accurately determine the black homicide rate?

We'll take the ratios of known offenders, and apply that to the unknown. Blacks committed 53.1% of the known homicides, so we'll add 2,243 to their total, for 8,013. This gives us a rate of 20.6 per 100,000.

Of course, given the common lack of cooperation with police among black communities, it is likely that the unknown offenders are largely black. But that isn't something that can be accounted for, so we'll go with 20.6 homicides per 100,000 black people. This puts American blacks worse than all but 10 countries worldwide.

As for Russia, exceptions don't make the rule. This was a brief period of chaos (the rate is down to 13), and unusual for a white country. High homicide rates are the norm for black societies. In 2010, Africa as a whole was at 20 per 100,000; this despite mostly Caucasian North Africa having a rate of 7.6. Look up homicide rates for any majority black country - Africa or the Caribbean - always high.

Anonymous said...

One reason why whites hate blacks with good reason is the fact blacks do not hold each other accountable for their actions. When they are silent about black on white crimes, they are complicit and co-offenders in those crimes. When they act to prevent the punishment of blacks who rape, rob, kill and assault whites, that is as good as doing it themselves. You don't see whites covering for other whites who murder blacks, but blacks shield other blacks from the consequences of black on white violent crime. And while 36,000 white women are raped and often murdered by blacks too, very few if any black women are attacked by white men in the same manner. In other words, blacks are sooner than later going to suffer retaliatory violence through guilt by association, and the onus for that will belong sqaurely on their shoulders. Whites are going to resort to Vlad the Impaler style rule to restore the rule of law, and many blacks are going to get the brutal and degrading death they deserve, just like the ones many whites have suffered at their hands.

Anonymous said...

"I could not have imagined that the ratio was so disproportionate. Now I know better."

Consider this...

To our worthless mainstream media, a white-on-black NON-rape (Duke Lacrosse) is an enormous story, whereas an ongoing epidemic of black-on-white rape is unmentionable.


why is non rape a bigger crime than actual rape?

Zenster said...

Anonymous (September 23, 2011 10:31 AM): Why is non rape a bigger crime than actual rape?

It allows the MSM to exculpate Black criminality by playing at moral relativism ― plus the illegitimate augmentative device known as tu quoque (as in, "See! Whites do it too.") ― so that the problem remains unaddressed by specific measures directly aimed at Black crime and not crime in general.

It is criminal obfuscation and the MSM is beginning to pay a heavy price for it as droves of people abandon print newspaper or television and migrate to the internet as their primary news source.

Anonymous said...

"why is non rape a bigger crime than actual rape?"

Any white-on-black crime (or non-crime) fits the political agenda of liberals (particularly the liberal MSM and academia), who apparently live in an alternate-universe-twilight-zone where blacks (and other minorities) are the victims of an epidemic of white crime.

Before the internet, they were able to indoctrinate the entire world with this monstrous lie.

These days, the MSM is quickly becoming an irrelevant laughingstock.

mr_evergreen said...

"No, there were not"
That's a lie

"They were mostly black. In fact, you can see them on YouTube, taking part in the looting of a Wal-Mart"

Who is to say that there weren't Whites involved in corrupt activity?


"Of course it does, that's why the black crime rate is so high throughout the entire globe"

Then why am I not a criminal? Why am I functioning in the USA peacefully and without criminal actions? Attitude determines if a person will be a criminal.

"It wasn't a compliment, you dumb fuckMr Evergreen, your boilerplate negro talking points only serve to confirm your low IQ. If you are not interested in enlightening yourself, then please leave, this blog is not for you"

Well, the fact that you insulted me basically means something. I, a Black man, am suppose to be pathological and violent, but between you and I, you are the one calling insulting me, swearing at me, and I'm not even trying to get that kind of response from you. I'm merely just stating my input. I'm not insulting you. I don't agree with most of what gets posted here, but I respond without insulting people. You even say things about me before you even know anything about me.

Anonymous said...

@ mr_evergreen

"Then why am I not a criminal? Why am I functioning in the USA peacefully and without criminal actions? Attitude determines if a person will be a criminal."

The exception IS NOT the rule! For someone as yourself, claiming impressive academic achievement, you come off as pretty thick when you fail to comprehend basic laws of average.

mr_evergreen said...

"The exception IS NOT the rule! For someone as yourself, claiming impressive academic achievement, you come off as pretty thick when you fail to comprehend basic laws of average."

My point is that it doesn't address ME as an individual. Even with the average, I have to ask "how does it serve me"? Like a said before, if a person has a bad attitude, then criminality will come from it. A person has to change their attitude and take responsibility, and choose not to be a criminal.

Discard said...

Mr Evergreen: Once upon a time, most non-southern Whites could be fooled into thinking that accepting well-behaved Blacks could be done without destroying our communities. The last fifty years have disproven that thesis. The good Blacks pave the way for the rest of their race, with all their baggage. It really doesn't matter how fine a fellow you are, if you are admitted to our world, your brothers will follow, then your cousins, them your homies. Our world will decline as your presence increases. Our world has in fact declined as your presence increased. That is the historical record. It may be tough for you, but it's damned tough on us to watch your brethren destroy out towns. Maybe you ought to find a like-minded group of Blacks and set up your own communities. Could it be that there are not enough good Blacks to do so? Or do you all just want to ride on our coattails?

mr_evergreen said...

Discard, history teaches me that non-Southern Whites didn't want to live around Blacks either. I should know as I have family from northern states. Read about the restrictive covenants back in the old days.

Anonymous said...

history teaches me that non-Southern Whites didn't want to live around Blacks either.

Now look around and ask yourself, why would anyone think that this was sane and sensible?

mr_evergreen said...

"Now look around and ask yourself, why would anyone think that this was sane and sensible? "

History also teaches that Blacks were treated like crap simply because of their skin color long before "eugenics" made it in to the sciences. And with persons such as Daniel Hale Williams, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Booker T. Washington, Benjamin Banneker,Elijah McCoy, I say the insanity lies with those who refuse to judge people as individuals.

Discard said...

mr evergreen: Other races and nations knew that Blacks were dullards long before the science of eugenics. The Arabs, the Romans, the Greeks, the Egyptians, all knew about sub-Saharan Africa and its people. And it was not the color of their skin that brought Negroes such ridicule, it was their mental obtuseness.

Anonymous said...

Evergreen: "History also teaches that Blacks were treated like crap simply because of their skin color long before "eugenics" made it in to the sciences. "

Dude, you just don't get it. People from South Asia have darker skin than your average negroid, but they do not elicit the same reactions from most of society, because they do not act like negroids. If negroids had pale skin, they'd find some other ancillary reason to blame others of racism. It's the rampant violent behavior and primitive tendencies on display everyday (thank you, Worldstarhiphop) that makes people think that all races are not equal.

mr_evergreen said...

"mr evergreen: Other races and nations knew that Blacks were dullards long before the science of eugenics. The Arabs, the Romans, the Greeks, the Egyptians, all knew about sub-Saharan Africa and its people. And it was not the color of their skin that brought Negroes such ridicule, it was their mental obtuseness"

Do you have any historical proof of that?

Anonymous said...

mr_evergreen

Why don't you post on another blog. Your whining, and failed attempt at make light of black dysfunction, by always pointing out - well I know some whites that act in such fashion, really sucks. We're not here to comfort you and tell you everything's fine & dandy with Major Black pathologies.

And please stop your rambling on with this: Do you have any historical proof of that?

This is SBPDL, and from what I've read of your posts so far, you're obviously not ready to accept certain obvious facts regarding some pretty serious issues we face at the hands of entitled & angry Blacks.

mr_evergreen said...

"Why don't you post on another blog."

Who are you to tell me where I can go?

"And please stop your rambling on with this: Do you have any historical proof of that?"

I am going to keep asking until I get some historical proof.

"This is SBPDL, and from what I've read of your posts so far, you're obviously not ready to accept certain obvious facts regarding some pretty serious issues we face at the hands of entitled & angry Blacks."

I don't accept such things because this stuff only exists in a small segment of the Black population. It has nothing to do with me. I'm not denying that there are Black people doing evil and violent things. I am also saying that most Blacks are not like that and shouldn't be held to the actions of the thugs who do violent things.

Anonymous said...

@ Mr_evergreen

"Who are you to tell me where I can go?"

People that get sassy and DO NOT contribute anything positive to any topic should be banned from this blog. You're merely on this blog to spread the same unfounded drivel someone named Desiree used to do in the same frenetic fashion. She got the boot, I don't see why you shouldn't.

People here at SBPDL are not there to reassure you and always provide you with links you obviously refuse to consult.


" I don't accept such things because this stuff only exists in a small segment of the Black population."

LOL! Small segment...sure!

You refuse to recognize the disproportionate amount of violence the MAJORITY of Blacks exhibit. Just because yourself and the other few exceptions are somewhat sheltered from it. The EXCEPTION is not the rule and you're obviously DEAD Wrong in stating this fact alone.

Read on crime statistics, stop being lazy and bother everyone with your unfounded bias.

Anonymous said...

Tell us something, Evergreen....do you feel safer when you are around large group of whites or when you are around a large group of blacks? How about Asians vs. blacks? or Hispanics vs. blacks? Your other posts imply your answer. Now, we feel the same way: we definitely do not feel safer when we are around a large group of blacks. Everyone from all ethnicities are in total agreement on this, so why the fuck do you keep complaining that we all agree on this?

mr_evergreen said...

"Tell us something, Evergreen....do you feel safer when you are around large group of whites or when you are around a large group of blacks? How about Asians vs. blacks? or Hispanics vs. blacks? Your other posts imply your answer. Now, we feel the same way: we definitely do not feel safer when we are around a large group of blacks. Everyone from all ethnicities are in total agreement on this, so why the fuck do you keep complaining that we all agree on this?"

Personally, it depends on the demeanor brought forth. If I am around a group of Black college students, then yes I will feel much safer than being around of group of Black people who act like "thug wannabes". I've have been around some White people I didn't feel safe around. This particular group of Whites were the type who drove pickup trucks, wore Confederate flag shirts, behaved rowdy. I was actually bullied by such types, as well as the "thug" wannabes. Anyone who tries to behave like they're part of some violent subculture, I will be afraid of, no matter what race they are.

mr_evergreen said...

"You refuse to recognize the disproportionate amount of violence the MAJORITY of Blacks exhibit. Just because yourself and the other few exceptions are somewhat sheltered from it. The EXCEPTION is not the rule and you're obviously DEAD Wrong in stating this fact alone"

There are 39 million Blacks in this country. If the majority of them were violent, then that would be at least 20 million of them committing violent crimes. There aren't even that many violent crimes taking place per year.

Anonymous said...

mr evergreen, I don't know why you can't seem to understand this concept. No one is saying that the majority of blacks are violent. How much needs to be spoonfed to you so that you can comprehend??? What everyone is saying is that the vast majority of violent crimes are committed by a minority of blacks. But that small violent minority is a far greater percentage of the black population than other races. All races have their violent minorities. WE GOT THAT. But when you compare the percentages for each race, it's obvious that the best way to avoid being a victim of violent crime is to stay away from blacks. It also helps to stay away from the violent minority of whatever race you belong to, but the big fat elephant in the room is that violent crime always seems to follow any large group of blacks. If you try to argue any further that there are a lot of blacks who are not violent, I swear my head is gonna explode.

Anonymous said...

@ evergreen


" This particular group of Whites were the type who drove pickup trucks, wore Confederate flag shirts, behaved rowdy. I was actually bullied by such types, as well as the "thug" wannabes. Anyone who tries to behave like they're part of some violent subculture, I will be afraid of, no matter what race they are. "

Here we put forth the habitual " Racist Whites"=Redneck Nazis. Well, you Blacks are certainly stereotypical when referring to many Whites you consider of being of low character.

Btw, why do you always feel the need to have the "last word"? You always challenge us when faced with unpleasant truths regarding black behavior. If you can't take the truth or understand statistics, you have no business here & should go your own merry way!

Personally, I feel you're a major drain on this blog.

Discard said...

mr evergreen is an attention seeking boy, and no doubt an annoyance to his teachers. I have taught many White and Mexican boys like him. Generally, the solution is to explain that you are not conducting a private tutorial and give them a few books to look up. They usually don't read the books, but the next time they try to dominate class discussion, ask them if they've read what you asked. You then tell them that if they can't be bothered to educate themselves, you're not about to do their work for them. The class will recognize that you've given the little turd all that he is due and more, and will silence him themselves.
(Note:I taught in nun run schools. No chaos allowed.)

mr_evergreen said...

Discard, I don't get silenced easily. I do annoy people. I question things if they don't help ME personally.

Anonymous said...

I question things if they don't help ME personally.

This explains why you won't get behind any abolition of Affirmative Action and "diversity" preferences.  You don't need them if you are as good as you say you are, but those unearned and unmerited advantages they give help YOU personally, don't they?  Never mind that they also help the Black Undertow invade White enclaves and destroy the very things that make them attractive to you.

Abolishing Affirmative Action and Diversity programs would probably not hurt you much.  You'd get positions and pay according to your abilities, without the scarcity premium accorded competent Blacks.  But you want that to continue, because it helps YOU personally.  But those very things allow the Black Undertow to come after you, eventually destroying the ability of White society to give you those benefits... benefits that you admit that Black society cannot generate.

In the end you are stereotypically Black, with no future-time preference and unable to see beyond the end of your nose.  The White separatists are correct to have judged you incompatible and worthy of explusion.

mr_evergreen said...

"This explains why you won't get behind any abolition of Affirmative Action and "diversity" preferences. You don't need them if you are as good as you say you are, but those unearned and unmerited advantages they give help YOU personally, don't they? Never mind that they also help the Black Undertow invade White enclaves and destroy the very things that make them attractive to you.

Abolishing Affirmative Action and Diversity programs would probably not hurt you much. You'd get positions and pay according to your abilities, without the scarcity premium accorded competent Blacks. But you want that to continue, because it helps YOU personally. But those very things allow the Black Undertow to come after you, eventually destroying the ability of White society to give you those benefits... benefits that you admit that Black society cannot generate.

In the end you are stereotypically Black, with no future-time preference and unable to see beyond the end of your nose. The White separatists are correct to have judged you incompatible and worthy of explusion"

I wasn't talking about affirmative action. I was talking about some of the stuff that has been suggested. What I am talking about is the fact that there are people who suggest that I can't live in society, that I am somehow flawed, that I am somehow stupid. I am talking about things like IQ and "inherent criminality". I question the idea of Blacks being "inherently criminal and stupid" because I know ME. I worked hard to get where I am. I did what I was suppose to in order to get into college. I am even trying get a business started for when I graduate because I know employment isn't guaranteed. I wasn't talking about AA or "diversity programs". I was talking about things such as being able to vote, being able to live in this nation as an American citizen. The way some people put it, the idea is to take away what I currently have.

Anonymous said...

I read another comment stating the highest rate of murder is black on black & the writer suggested, therefore it is the honest, hard working blacks (Oxymoron) that need to carry more fire arms to defend themselves. I disagree. most of the blacks that are killed by other blacks are NOT honest hard working blacks but other low life gang bangers. They are already heavily armed, so let’s NOT go down that road. Black people simply cannot integrate into a white society because, they do not have the intellect to comprehend our way of life, nor the speed at which it happens. To blacks, ALL our laws are racist. A quick example. A black co-worker was in a car accident during lunch break. He was turning left at a traffic light. A large truck blocked his view, so he went. BANG, he was hit by another car that was going straight. He crossed that car’s path. here is where it gets interesting. He felt he MUST have the right of way, because he couldn’t see oncoming traffic. “I honked my horn several times before I went through” Like somehow that gave him the right to cut another driver off. He was charged for the illegal left turn & was subsequently found at fault & totally liable for the other drivers car repair …because he was black. The cop was racist, and that’s that. So, all the low life shit he does every day, like selling drugs is ok, because he was always a victim or racism. Too stupid to integrate, period.