Monday, February 25, 2013

"Guns, Blacks, and Steel": 'Obamerica' and the Morality of Survival


From what I can tell, a term coined by Daniel Greenfield at Front Page Magazine.

Murder in America: The Wall Street Journal created a database for all firearm murders in America (save Florida) between 2000-2010 -- though black people are 13% of US population, they were responsible for 45.1% of known murders in America committed with a gun; whites, though roughly 66% of US population, were responsible for 24.3% of known murders committed with a handgun. 
As we consider the question of 'Guns, Blacks, and Steel', it would be imprudent not to include Greenfield's piece detailing the true source of America's gun problem [Gun Violence is Not a Republican Problem, It’s a Democratic Problem, Front Page Magazine, 1-18-2013]:
Forget Wal-Mart and skip your local gun show. The murderers of tomorrow will not be found wearing orange vests at your local sporting goods store. They won’t have NRA memberships or trophies on their walls.
You won’t find them in America. Look for them in Obamerica. 67% of firearm murders took place in the country’s 50 largest metro areas. The 62 cities in those metro areas have a firearm murder rate of 9.7, more than twice the national average. Among teenagers the firearm murder rate is 14.6 or almost three times the national average.
Those are the crowded cities of Obamerica. Those are the places with the most restrictive gun control laws and the highest crime rates. And many of them have been run by Democrats and their political machines for almost as long as they have been broken.
Obama won every major city in the election, except for Jacksonville and Salt Lake City. And the higher the death rate, the bigger his victory.
He won New Orleans by 80 to 17 where the murder rate is ten times higher than the national average. He won Detroit, where the murder rate of 53 per 100,000 people is the second highest in the country and twice as high as any country in the world, including the Congo and South Africa. He won it 73 to 26. And then he celebrated his victory in Chicago where the murder rate is three times the statewide average.
These places aren’t America. They’re Obamerica.
In 2006, the 54% of the population living in those 50 metro areas was responsible for 67% of armed killings nationwide. Those are disproportionate numbers especially when you consider that for the people living in most of those cities walking into a store and legally buying a gun is all but impossible.
Mayors of Obamerican cities blame guns because it’s easier than blaming people and now the President of Obamerica has turned to the same shameless tactic. The NRA counters that people kill people, but that’s exactly why Obamerican leaders would rather talk about the guns.
Chicago, the capital of Obamerica, is a city run by gangs and politicians. It has 68,000 gang members, four times the number of police officers. Chicago politicians solicit the support of gang members in their campaigns, accepting laundered contributions from them, hiring their members and tipping them off about upcoming police raids. And their biggest favor to the gang bosses is doing nothing about the epidemic of gang violence. 80% of Chicago’s murders are gang-related.
But in 1999 when a bill came up in the Illinois State Senate to charge anyone carrying out a firearm attack on school property as an adult, a law that would have largely affected gang members, the future leader of Obamerica voted present. Had he not voted present, it is doubtful that he would have been reelected in an area where gang leaders wield a great deal of influence. The majority of murders in the cities with the worst homicide rates are gang-related. And while it isn’t always possible to be certain whether a killing was gang-related, the majority of homicide victims in city after city have been found to have criminal records.
In 2010, there were 11,078 firearm homicides in the United States and over 2,000 known gang-related killings, over 90% of which are carried out with firearms. Since 1981, Los Angeles alone has had 16,000 gang related homicides. That’s more than twice the number of Americans killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This is what Obamerica looks like. It’s a place where life is cheap and illegal guns are as available as illegal drugs. It’s the war that we aren’t talking about, because it’s easier to talk about the inanimate objects being used to fight that war.
 "Obamerica" -- funny, as James Kirkpatrick illustrated at Vdare, those leaders of Conservatism Inc. believe only a black man can save America from "Obamerica" (paging Dr. Ben Carson... paging Dr. Ben Carson) or else watch as the Republic is dragged into the 9th layer of Hell.

Right now, there is no "morality" in place that defines why white America has a right to exist, to survive -- instead, the only hope by the gatekeeper at Conservatism Inc. is in coagulating the severe wound "Obamerica" has inflicted on the nation with the steady hand of Dr. Carson.

No thanks.

The cities Mr. Greenfield mentions as the epicenter of "Obamerica" - Chicago and Detroit - were once the crown jewels of white America, an expression of the type of community white individuals could collectively create.

In 2013 -- they represent the type of communities black individuals are capable of collectively creating.

It was those conditions white people created in Detroit and Chicago - seemingly limitless prosperity, a state-of-the-art infrastructure, etc. -   that attracted black migrants; it is the conditions the now black majority in each city created that drove away white people and allowed for the flowering of "Obamerica" to transpire.

The constant threat of black violence (be in gun or black criminality) drives away capital investments in a city; it drives away businesses - legitimate businesses - that can provide tax revenue for much needed city improvements; and, most importantly, it drives away white people who must seek a safer climate to rear children and protect their family.

One city Mr. Greenfield doesn't mention is Philadelphia, where it was reported 59 precincts went 100 percent for Obama in the 2012 election.

Zero votes for Mitt Romney.

Conversely, Philadelphia is also a city firmly controlled by "Obamerica" [Violent trend remains epidemic, Philly Tribune, 6-28-12]:
From one end of Philadelphia to the other, virtually no neighborhood — from Society Hill to Grays Ferry and from University City to Strawberry Mansion — is exempt from the senseless violence that seems to have a vice-like grip on Philadelphia.

According to law enforcement experts, among the top ten cities in the nation, Philadelphia’s homicide rate remains among the worst, with young Black males between the ages of 17 to 25 consistently being the majority of the victims and perpetrators. After a 20 percent decline in homicide over the last three years, the numbers are starting to inch up again. To put the figures in context, there have been 183 murders in Philadelphia as of Tribune press time. By contrast, one U.S. serviceman was killed in Iraq in 2012. In 2011, there were 324 murder victims in Philadelphia, again, mostly Black males. In Iraq for that same year, 54 U.S. servicemen were killed.

The numbers illustrate the glaring and frightening reality that a young Black man is safer in Iraq fighting insurgents than he is walking around the streets of Philadelphia’s African American neighborhoods.

During military operations in Iraq from 2007 to 2012, 1,482 American service members were killed. In Philadelphia for the same years, 1,654 people were killed — mostly Black males. To color that number even more, according to Philadelphia Police Department figures, 645 Black males between the ages of 17 and 25 were murdered in Philadelphia during those years. By contrast, 27 Black males between the same ages were fatally shot by police officers in the commission of their duties.
 It is the destruction of a city of such national importance as Philadelphia that illustrates why the "Liberty Bell" has no meaning in 2013 -- a property owner or business owner in the "City of Brotherly Love" only has the liberty to watch their property value plummet or their security expenses go up and their cash flow go down as the "Obamerica" sets in upon Philly.

The Wall Street Journal created a database for all firearm murders in America (save Florida) between 2000-2010 -- though black people are 13% of US population, they were responsible for 45.1% of known murders in America committed with a gun; whites, though roughly 66% of US population, were responsible for 24.3% of known murders committed with a handgun; Hispanics, roughly 13% of the US population, were responsible for 9% of known murders in America committed with a gun over that same time period.

Mr. Greenfield would end his piece at Front Page Magazine with these words:
There are, as John Edwards said, two Americas. America is a country that runs pretty well. And then there’s Obamerica. Not all of Obamerica is broken, but a lot of it is. America does not have a gun violence problem. Obamerica does. And Obamerica has a gun violence problem for the same reason that it has a drug problem and a broken family problem.
Democratic leaders and machines, combined with social workers and justice crusaders have run Obamerica into the ground. Obamerican cities used to be the homes of industry and progress. Now they’re places where young Black and Hispanic men kill each other in growing numbers.

We need to set aside the same old tired social justice rhetoric and have a serious conversation about what is wrong with New Orleans, Detroit and Chicago. And we need to do it before it’s too late.

 Right now, one of Greenfield's "two Americas" is under tremendous assault from all corners: immigration, illegal immigration, the removal of Red State white males from the military, gun control, the outsourcing of jobs, confiscatory levels of taxation, an EEOC determined to make erratic heartbeats a violation of 'equality', a USDA that considers any white person an abomination,  and an Education-Industrial Complex determined to create handicaps for white (and Asian) children just to close the racial gap in achievement.

And a state whose private and public sector is doing everything possible to retard the advancement of white people via "diversity" and quota mandates. 

And the best Conservatism Inc. can do is look to Dr. Ben Carson and pray for his divine wisdom to impart sanity upon "Obamerica."

What those 65 million people who have bought guns since President Obama's election in 2009 don't understand is simply this: it is the goal of those in charge of "Obamerica" to turn every last village, city, or community in this nation into just another reflection of "Obamerica."

And it is almost exclusively white people who have even vested interest in stopping this from happening.

The morality to survive is a radical, radical notion in "Obamerica"; after all, in what other epoch of American history would the very people whose blood was the catalyst for the creation of the nation be targeted for elimination?

SBPDL was started as a joke -- but with the fall of black-run Detroit imminent, I know realize the importance of such seemingly insignificant projects as this; no one else had told the story of Detroit's demise.

The same with Chicago; the same with Birmingham. 

What is becoming increasingly obvious about life in "Obamerica"is, to paraphrase President Thomas Whitmore's speech from Independence Day, "White America is  fighting for a form of ultimate freedom. Not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution, but from annihilation. We're fighting for our right to live, to exist."

As we have seen with Detroit, where white America is absent (violently overthrown by blacks in an as-of-yet-unnamed war), civilization is absent.

And the cost of policing and maintaining the "absence of civilization" in black-run Detroit is passed on to the white taxpayer; as will the cost of bailing out the city.

So Mr. Greenfield is correct to call for a conservation about what is wrong with New Orleans, Detroit, and Chicago. 

But any discussion of gun control in America would - as the Wall Street Journal's interactive on murder in the USA between 2000-2010 makes clear - would involve a frank discussion of race.


Anonymous said...

There will never be a frank discussion on race as anyone who points out the unpleasant truths will be shouted down and declared to be a racist engaging in hate speech.
That's the only reason libtards and the like would ever agree to it in the first place as it would give them a platform on which to spew their rubbish and to advocate for more of their failed programs.
As bad as the libtards are, the reaction of blacks would make the libtard reaction pale into insignificance as they went berserk.
The time for talk is OVER.

Mr. Ken said...

"These places aren’t America. They’re Obamerica." Brilliant. That is just exactly it, isn't it? These places are not now, and have not been a part of America for some time. Why would anyone want to go there? To be robbed, beaten, shot or murdered? Who would want to live or work in a war zone? A CIVIL WAR ZONE is what it is, let's be honest.

Anonymous said...

"though black people are 13% of US population, they were responsible for 45.1% of known murders in America committed with a gun"

Although you did not explain, it is important to mention your emphasis on the word "known".

Blacks practice the absurd and childish "No Snitch" policy. Additionally, because of fear of retribution, black witnesses are reluctant to speak to police. For these reasons, many crimes committed by negro offenders go unsolved.

The point is, unknown offenders are disproportionately black, and therefore the actual black murder rate is much larger than reported.

Oops said...

We can't talk about race, we can't talk address the lack of fathers in the home, we can't talk about degeneracy. But we're going to have a serious talk about the Second Amendment.

I'm telling your right now progressives, I'm not talking about the Second Amendment with anyone too intellectually addled to talk about the former.

Beam me the freak up.

Anonymous said...

I wish a Conservative politician would point out the fact that the one thing that would do, by far, the most to reduce gun violence would be an aggressive and sustained national campaign to reduce sexual/reproductive irresponsibility in the Obamavilles.
The stupidest and poorest blacks are breeding like rats and it's nobodies fault but the blacks themselves. Whites have created spectacularly effective inexpensive and safe contraceptive technology that's available everywhere and there's almost no effert on the part of black America to promote it.

What has Obama done to promote black sexual responsibility? Answer, Zilch.
What has Michele Obama done in this regard? Answer, Zilch.
What has rap producer billionaire Russell Simmons done? Answer, Zilch.
What has ANY black "leader" done? Answer, Zilch.

This complete lazy-brained attitude from black America on most critical issue for their self improvement has been most glaring warning sign for me on how hopelessly dysfunctional is this mentally weak racial group.

Real America is facing a decades long economic hurricane of Asian engineering brainpower while our economic and cultural structure is being undermined by rapidly growing African and Mexican
termite infestation.
What a disaster in the making!
If I was 30 years younger I would be seriously considering emigrating to Canada.

Anonymous said...

"What we hope to achieve with the conference is create a national movement to help end the violence. We need to look at fresh models and create a national network of groups to work on the problem,” Qayyum said."

Yeah, right. This "national movement" will do nothing if they don't talk honestly about the black race AND kill all of the welfare feeding programs to shrink this population.

The social-engineering foundations such as CICF, LISC, ICLEI, and Ford Foundation have for years been funding these "Stop the Violence" and anti-poverty programs in the black ghettos, and at the same time, funding the black power campaigns like Black Panthers, Malcolm X, Nation of Islam, the black riots, and at the same time funding Planned Parenthood and the aborting of black babies in the ghettos.

I wonder if the clueless blacks have even connected the dots here?

There is a youth group "Running Rebels Community Organization"

which just received a whopping $3Mil for the renovation of their community center, including a basketball court and a full gym. This was completely funded by several private foundations which are all listed on their capital campaign website. This Running Rebels is connected with the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise organization.

They are all black community agitators, just like Obama. They work through United We Serve at .

And they ALL know what is going on here.

The black guy who helps this group runs the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise (CNE) Bob Woodson. He calls himself a "civil rights activist", and claims to be a GOP conservative. His group has just partnered up with Ted Cruz and Paul Ryan in the new GOP anti-poverty campaign, Mr. Woodson says we need to move money from less useful programs, and pour it into the black communities for up-liftment instead. This is the looting of the treasury and a massive transfer of wealth from white people.

Here is their "results" page for proof that the CNE's social engineering programs really "work":

The foundations are currently working to implement UN Agenda 21, using white tax dollars for redevelopment in the black ghettos, expanding transit to white suburbs, and probably working toward civil unrest and an eventual race war. Check out Agenda 21 efforts in your own community. It is all out in the open. The key slogans are "sustainable development" , "urban enterprise zones", "land use and zoning", and "community revitalization".

I personally would just like my money back and end all of these programs. I would also like a return of the right to freedom of association, and an end to forced integration.

Anonymous said...

I believe that the population of blacks is higher than 12.7%.

They don't own homes. The young black males squat in abandoned homes, stay with their grandmomma, stay with their babymommas in subsidized housing, and basically do not exist on record. They roam around unaccounted for. They hustle money, sell drugs and stolen goods, and scam welfare to make money. They eat from their babymomma's EBT card.

There are thousands of them all over the country who are completely feral and unaccounted for.

Big Bill said...

Anything good in Obamerica wants to escape Obamerica. I know several black families who have used free white money to escape Detroit and live among white folks. And they STILL p!ss and moan about how the white man done did them wrong!

The handful that escape leave the black trash behind. There is no way they are going to stay and better their communities. Nope. That is a job for you and your taxes.

Heck, half the black folks in Detroit refuse to pay their property taxes so they can have good schools and a police force. Paying for black schools, black police, and black firemen is a job for the white man.

Mutant Swarm said...

And now, Mr. Farrakhan is promoting the idea of drafting Chicago's gang leaders and members as his personal army:

Farrakhan's Private Army?

From the article:

"Farrakhan told a crowd of more than 7,000 people at the UIC Pavilion that national lawmakers are using Chicago's violence epidemic to push for stronger gun control laws but said the Second Amendment has nothing to do with the spate of shootings in Chicago.

"The guns that every one of our young people have, are they legal? No!" Farrakhan said.

Instead, Farrakhan had a different idea for how to address gun violence. In addition to sending letters to black military leaders, Farrakhan said he planned to contact the city's gang leaders to recruit gang members to "protect" any land the Nation of Islam might buy in the future.

"All you gangbangers, we know you love to shoot, but you're killing yourselves," Farrakhan said. "All your weapons are illegal and you're using them like savages."

But Farrakhan said gangbangers are "natural soldiers" and could be taught "the science of war" to become protectors of the Nation of Islam's assets in the future."

Doesn't that make you feel all warm and fuzzy? Fortunately, rifle parts and ammo are slowly starting to come back on the market, even if it is only speculators trying to make a quick buck.

Anonymous said...

This is the "mentor" page for

The Center for Neighborhood Enterprise CNE calls for mentoring as a way to reduce violence and uplift the black "youths".

These groups are all connected, and are funded via taxpayer dollars and foundation money. This runs deep.

Big Bear said...

Maybe the best plan for breaking up the country would be a collection of city-states for the liberal socialists and their pets. The tax base would be funded by tech jobs primarily producing data and entertainment.

The rest of the country (White, rural America) would be resource-based.

The Socialists would then realize the true cost of their Utopia, as they alone would bear the cost of maintaining their welfare state, but they would go along with it. Compliance with the Nanny State is part and parcel of the mental illness of liberalism.

Anonymous said...

Baron Munchausen here.....

Just a hunch but I am willing to bet that a great many "Hispanics" were lumped into the white category to artificially inflate numbers, much like the FBI does now

10mm AUTO said...

Yea, like Farrakhan has to worry about home invasion...

Look, Farrakhan is looking to carve off a piece of the USA as a black nation, (I call it Darkland) on the North American Continent. Please note that:

1. Blacks outside Darkland will still prey on the White.

2. Whites will have to fund Darkland for it to be economically viable. It will always default to being a slum like Detroit.

3. Whites will never be able to be citizens of Darkland (not that they would want to, but it would raise the number of Countries where Whites can't be citizens and it would be another way to spit in the eye of Whitey.)

4. It would be a theological Dictatorship right off the bat. No messing around with rights or other Whitey crap.

5. Negro felons could flee to Darkland after committing the most heinous crimes in the White sections of the North American Continent. Terrorism would flourish there.

6. Over time, Farrakhan or his successor would expand the borders of Darkland as Whites fled the area around Darkland or as negros who moved into the area petitioned to be part of Darkland.

7. Most of the land would be "donated" as reparations.

8. When things went from bad to awful, negros would blame Whitey, leading to a war of expansion. You know its true.

9. Even if Whites won such a war, Darkland would demand a Marshall Plan to assist in the rebuilding of Darkland.

10. Every failure or disaster that struck Darkland would be blamed on Whitey, either through the "Legacy of Slavery" or through "outside influences" or some sort of Sabotage. The rest of the world would back Darkland over the White Areas, even to the point of imposing sanctions. It would never be the case of "let us go our own way" but a constant bloody ripping at each Whitey for resources (again like Detroit).

Sounds like fun, huh?

PDK said...

The problem for white liberal/democrats and guns has nothing to do with murder, their problem is the Constitution. The Constitution makes our culture a Republic.

In fact our Founding Fathers gave us a free enterprise Republic. White liberal/democrats want a socialist democracy, and they see the 2nd amendment as the chink in the Constitutions armor, which further, can be exploited, and thusly begin the process of transmogrifying America from a writen law of the land to a majority vote law of the land.

Any guesses as to what the immature, low IQ people, who are now the majority in America will vote for as the new law of the land? Thank you.

Unknown said...

Nice article, and I appreciate the statistics. They are a bit misleading as presented, however.

Because the race of the perps isn't always knows, it looks like blacks aren't responsible for over half the murders, while it's pretty clear that they are. A standard tool of a statistician when comparing two sets like this, where set B has more choices (i.e., "Unk"), is to discard that choice and normalize the dataset. That's just a fancy way of saying that one should make the race of the murderers come out to 100%, as does the race of the victims.

I have taken that liberty:

There are 38,826 unknown killers out of 128,201 (presumably there are more killers than victims because of group murders).

So, to compare apples to apples, one should subtract 38,826 from the total, and take each race's number as a percent of the normalized total (i.e. 89,375). This yields a much more telling number: of known homicide criminals, blacks are responsible for 50,253 out of 89,375, or 56% of the homicides. The 45% number you cite understates the problem, particularly because it implies that they aren't responsible for more than half, which they clearly are.

Many may quibble with my broad assumption that the population of those caught may differ significantly from the universe of all murderers. For example, because of an average lower IQ, blacks don't get away with murder as often.

I think this is clearly false. If anything, black murderers are underprosecuted for a variety of reasons, including the famous "no-snitch" rule that causes urban blacks to fail to ID the killers. And urban PD's have much lower solve rates than rural ones, which means that urban killers are underrepresented in the samples. My educated guess is that the prepondernace of urban murders are committed by blacks, that the solve rate in urban dystopias is about 25%, and in rural areas about 75%. This might overstate the number of white murderers as a percentage by a very large number. For example, if 90% of the "unknown" killers were black, then the number of black killers would be 50,253 (given) plus (90% times 38,826=)34,943 more murderers, that is to say 85,196 murderers. Out of the 128,201 total kilers (we must add back the "unknowns" we tossed earlier), this yields 66%. This is a number that sounds more realistic, I think.

Last, there were 1,161 murders where the race of the victim was also unknown. To do this right, that should be normalized also, but it's not that significant.



City resident said...

You can just assume that most of the "unknown" killers are black with a smaller share of it going to Hispanics. Also, I wonder who they're counting as white; they're probably lumping in all sorts of questionable types into that category.
But let's not just focus on cases where there's a dead body. Take a look at the number of shootings that don't result in a death. Those can be considered attempted murders. Lots of those do plenty of damage, putting people into wheelchairs and nursing homes. In Chicago last year 94% of shooters got away with it; nobody snitched, nobody identified. Were one to draw up a pie chart showing both murders and attempted killings then there'd really be one big stark flashing red light.

Anonymous said...

"There will never be a frank discussion on race as anyone who points out the unpleasant truths will be shouted down and declared to be a racist engaging in hate speech."
February 25, 2013 at 9:08 AM

I was just thinking about this. The UK's Telegraph site (and others) have had a couple of articles recently talking about massive non-white immigration into Britain. "White Britons now minority in London." About a quarter of the Telegraph's user comments have been deleted. They weren't wild-eyed, obscenity-laced rants. They were candid, reasonable sentiments about race from the perspective of the now fashionable-to-hate white people. Western society is run and completely dominated by people who will allow only the "correct" kind of debate on race or any other topic. (No, this is not a speech about a certain tribe.)

Discussion is allowed in the West in 2013 only in such a way as to push along the progressive narrative. Disagreement is allowed but only in small amounts and only in the "right" way, a way that buys into the existing narrative. Ways that "season" it, so to speak, by giving the illusion of dissent without ever actually threatening the ruling doctrine and power structure of liberalism.

Orwellian. The vision of the future never totally matches the eventual reality. A prediction or a plan never turns out to be 100% accurate. But there is no doubt we are living in an Orwellian society. It's not as complete as our handlers would like but we're at least 2/3 of the way there.

Lily White said...

RE: The "no snitch" policy in the 'hood.

On the one hand, they have the aforementioned "no snitch" policy, where they don't tell the police what they saw, if they are witness to the crime.

On the other hand, they moan and groan and wring their hands that nothing is being done to stop the violence in their community.

On still ANOTHER hand, when the police TRY to do something about the violence--as requested--these same hand-wringers howl that the police are picking on the denizens of the 'hood because they're "rayciss."

That sort of cognitive dissonance is truly mind-boggling. "Rayciss white 'merica gotta put a stop to all this vi'lence in the 'hood for us, cuz if they don't, that's rayciss! But they better not do anythin' to the ones who is committin' the vi'lence! Cuz that's rayciss!"

Silent Running said...

Chicago, the capital of Obamerica, is a city run by gangs and politicians. It has 68,000 gang members, four times the number of police officers.

So Chicago has 85,000 gang members.

Blacks practice the absurd and childish "No Snitch" policy

Ironically, Caucasians are going to have to learn to practice omerta sooner rather than later. TPTB aren't exactly on our side, are they?

I'm telling your right now progressives, I'm not talking about the Second Amendment with anyone too intellectually addled to talk about the former.

And what is there to really talk about? Shall not be infringed doesn't allow for much nuance. Any talk about 2A with a liberal necessarily involves infringement.

Silent Running said...

9. Even if Whites won such a war, Darkland would demand a Marshall Plan to assist in the rebuilding of Darkland.

Here's the rub: Caucasians would have won a war in which horrific violations would have been committed by blacks on a semi-mass scale. Digital media being what it is, there would be terabytes of video showing blacks in a profoundly depraved state (their natural state). Remembering the failed nation-building missions in Iraq and Afghanistan (contrasted sharply with the Marshall Plan, which involved nations that had high civilizations before the war), blacks might not get what they want, especially when so many Caucasians will have watched their sons and daughters be annihilated by these animals.

And since our innovations in virtually every field would still be in high demand, we'd have a certain amount of leverage.

Also, there's no telling how much the population of Darkland will have been depleted in such a war. Uncle Fester can talk about "the science of war" all he wants, but it's obvious that the Darkland Army would favor human wave tactics. They're already natural urbanites and cannibals, which would turn every major city in Darkland into a cauldron.

During this time, conditions in the EU and the English Police State will not have improved, and that's where all the outside pressure would come from. Hell, the founding of Darkland might just inspire all the muds in the banlieues to rise up in earnest.

It's a very interesting scenario, to say the least.

Anonymous said...

Some big problems with this dataset, that I am sure some others caught:

1) There was a massive demographic change between 2000 and 2010, to the tune of at least 11 Million Illegals pouring into the country. This distorts the figures for hispanic crime.

2) Blacks rate of criminality has increased since 2008, with beat whitey night, flash mobs, etc.

for these reasons I would say these numbers are underestimating the problem.

Melanie said...

It is infuriating to watch "conservatives" leap onto the Ben Carson bandwagon without so much as a quick look at where his wagon goes. We are (again) fighting against further infringements of our 2A rights-it's a never-ending battle, like constantly checking the dikes to make sure small leaks don't turn into catastrophic flooding. Carson describes himself as an "independent", not "conservative", for the little that's worth these days. What do the people desperately looking for the great black conservative hope even know about his stance on the 2A? He's a black Dr-that gives me reason to believe that he probably at least supports so-called "common sense" restrictions (further restrictions) on the 2A.

Oh, and @ Anonymous February 25, 2013 at 10:54 AM-

Moving to Canada won't be what you think -if you can imagine it, they are even further along than we are in the restriction of free speech and political correctness. Google "Human Rights Commission" and "Canada" sometime to see what I mean. Same with Australia. No, if we lose in the US, where we at least retain our right to KABA, it's over, period.

I am all for segregation, I believe that whites who would choose to live in a segregated white homeland carved from the US could easily defend it (the very nature of the kind of people who would want that, would ensure it to some extent), and that fact would also seem to ensure that whites in such a land wouldn't so easily just pay "Darkland" anything they demanded for any reason they demanded it. In fact, I think they'd be inclined to quite the contrary. "Darkland" would have to sink or swim on its own, and it would be all the same to whites who have long been fed up to the gills with black violence, dysfunction, and demands for redistribution of our wealth. "Darkland" could want in one hand and you know what in the other, and I have no fear of disorganised bands of negros defeating whites in any kind of military action when we don't have a government which ties both hands behinds our back. Why wouldn't they be dealt with the same as any other foreign hostiles invading our country, a voluntarily white segregated country (or other autonomous region)?

Melanie said...

@Silent Running February 25, 2013 at 2:31 PM-

I know of quite a few white Americans who are practicing a form of omerta (or non-compliance perhaps is the better term for now) re the 2A. In order to avoid paper trails, in order to avoid the possibility of winding up in a national database which will be used for confiscation, etc. I'm hearing life-long law-abiding whites say they would be willing to do what they've never done in their lives, in order to protect their means of defense and stay out of the system. And then there are the people who were far-seeing enough to live this way starting years ago.

MuayTyson said...

A few observations. I find this article positive anyone with two brain cells know exactly what the author is talking about blacks. Is it so important in the short term if the word is not spoken but everyone knows?

I don't think so, we just are not ready. It is exactly like the homosexual agenda. Uncle Bob is a bachelor, then it became he has a friend, then his partner, now they are striving for and in many case are saying husband.

Agree or not with homosexuality but look how the language has been co-opted to make it more acceptable and this has taken 50-60 years.

Obamerica is black and mean ghetto.

My second observation is the ,"No Snitch" policy. America has a ,"No Snitch" policy. It is do not blame those who deserve the blame. Keep it quite and pretend it does not exist. Wishing somthing was not true does not make it true. This is Liberalism at it finest!

Moondoggie said...

Liberals we are waiting for your responses. What is your solution to this ? Do any of you have enough brain power to come up with a viable solution to the black on white race war? And please no more talking points to be repeated over and over, We have heard them all millions of times. Come now, heck we are the stupid,backward people right? We waiting.....

Anonymous said...

Again I am going to ask everyone on this board what they are doing to deal with the demographic changes in this country. If you are white you should be having kids by any means necessary. We got caught up in trying to do the right thing by being fiscally settled before havIng kids, etc. Well all of that is out the window now. Have kids and have more kids. The Orthodox Jews are talking about it in their synogagues, etc. Be civilly disobedient. Screw credit. Screw paying credit cards. Get selfish and practice white self-interests at all times.
I have two frOzen embryos. I am seriously thinking of going for pregnancy three. I am inspired.

White Mom In the District of Craptopia

Anonymous said...

Beyonce who?

Listen to Helene Fischer sing Ave Maria on youtube.

Swell with white pride...

Protect OUR culture. Buy rifles and ammo.

Anonymous said...

James Briggs AKA Playing Roots Backwards said...

I think it is possible that White folks were responsible for many of the murder cases in which the perpetrator was never identified.

You know how sneaky we White folks are.

We throw the murder weapon away instead of shoving it down into our baggy pants and going for a drive while high out of our minds.

Also, most White folks are not afflicted with the uncontrollable urge to tell teenage hoodrat females all of the details of their grisly exploits.

Last of all, White folks usually have enough impulse control to wait to pull the trigger when there aren't any witnesses around.

Yep, murder is probably another thing that Whites do better than Blacks.

Anonymous said...

" James Briggs AKA Playing Roots Backwards said..."

James, you are remarkably unfunny.


Anonymous said...

Calypso Louie is waiting on the mothership from the sungod RA who has 22" spinners on his pimpin' spaceship which hides on the dark side of the moon. All those pyramids, jets, civilizations and monuments the noble black race built are hid there as well.

Californian said...

I think it is possible that White folks were responsible for many of the murder cases in which the perpetrator was never identified.

Perhaps some are cases of self-defense? Someone shoots a criminal and decides it is better to take off rather than take a chance explaining a gun and a body to the Law.

Melanie said...

@ James Briggs AKA Playing Roots Backwards-

Nope, if a majority of the victims with unknown perps are black, it's a safe bet that those unknown perps are black. That's the way statistics crumble in the known cases. Most murders are intraracial, but of most interracial murder is black-on-white. Whites are smart, we're just not as gratuitously homicidal.

Larry H said...

"The cities Mr. Greenfield mentions as the epicenter of "Obamerica" - Chicago and Detroit - were once the crown jewels of white America, an expression of the type of community white individuals could collectively create.

In 2013 -- they represent the type of communities black individuals are capable of collectively creating."
NO year listed for white Chicago and white Detroit. Would that be before the mass migration of Blacks northward after WWI?