Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Walter Williams Exposes BRA; Gannett's Empire Crumbles

Williams tells the truth, but fails to understand what civil rights mean
Walter Williams is to be congratulated for his syndicated column from June 20th, though he is wrong about one important aspect of the civil rights movement. Here is that column and key quotes:
Most racist assaults are committed by blacks. What's worse is there're blacks, still alive, who lived through the times of lynching, Jim Crow laws and open racism who remain silent in the face of it.
In many of these brutal attacks, the news media make no mention of the race of the perpetrators. If it were white racist gangs randomly attacking blacks, the mainstream media would have no hesitation reporting the race of the perps. Editors for the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune admitted to deliberately censoring information about black crime for political reasons. Chicago Tribune Editor Gerould Kern recently said that the paper's reason for censorship was to "guard against subjecting an entire group of people to suspicion."
These racist attacks can, at least in part, be attributed to the black elite, who have a vested interest in racial paranoia. And that includes a president who has spent years aligned with people who have promoted racial grievance and polarization and appointed an attorney general who's accused us of being "a nation of cowards" on matters of race and has refused to prosecute black thugs who gathered at a Philadelphia voting site in blatant violation of federal voter intimidation laws.
Tragically, black youngsters – who are seething with resentments, refusing to accept educational and other opportunities unknown to blacks yesteryear – will turn out to be the larger victims in the long run.

Black silence in the face of black racism has to be one of the biggest betrayals of the civil rights struggle that included black and white Americans.
Remembering that Eric “My People” Holder’s Department of Justice has re-opened the Civil Rights Division, it becomes increasingly clear that it has nothing to do with Beat Whitey Night in Iowa; Knockout King in St. Louis; Chicago’s Mahogany Mob’s; or Atlanta’s descent into tyrannical police state to keep Black crime to a minimum this summer
Black kids engaging in mob attacks, like the one in Woodbridge, are merely perpetuating the civil rights struggle. The story of 50 Black kids attacking a white family in Akron on Independence Day 2009 and shouting “This is a Black world” were merely taking the civil rights struggle to its next logical step.
Since white privilege is all that keeps Black people down, Black-Run America (BRA) has created extra-equal Black privileges that ensure the toleration of these attacks by Black people on whites (and Asians) will continue unmolested. 
The Mainstream Media is complicit in remaining silent on the facts of Black criminality, accessories to not only mayhem, but many times murder and endangerment to society. Dr. Williams mentioned those three newspapers that refuse to report on the race of the criminal, and for their deceitful censorship of the truth, Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) in the media are rewarded. 
Promoted to an editor or managing editor position of a Gannett-owned paper or perhaps awarded a lucrative teaching position in a journalism department at university, this Perfidious White Journalists (PWJ) will ensure that only saccharine stories describing the horrors faced by the Black underclass at the hands of oppressive, racist whitey and the evils of white privilege will be churned out. 
A company that willingly censors the truth of Black crime across BRA
You see the civil rights movement is about one thing, and that is the accumulation of power in one direction and the rollback of power from another. The pendulum is firmly in the direction of Black-Run America right now and its many enablers who profit off of this unsustainable system. 
Nothing is more illustrative of Black-Run America’s ability to control the flow of information then having a company like Gannett (which owns USA Today) control so many local newspapers and dictate editorial policy from its headquarters in Washington D.C.
Owning papers all across the nation, Gannett and the PWJ’s it employees keep inflammatory stories out of the press and refuse to openly discuss the race of criminals. Having editorial decisions mandated by people only financially vested in your city means not offending Black people with negative stories that depict them as criminals (like what happened in Buffalo in 2010 where Black people threatened to burn the paper down and Pittsburgh, where producers and journalists gathered to discuss ways to highlight Black people in positive stories). 
With ad revenue, its stock value and circulation plummeting, Gannett just announced massive layoffs:  
Today, Bob Dickey, President of Gannett's U.S. Community Publishing Division, announced today in a confidential company memo that the division was cutting its' workforce by 2%.

The Sun Times has obtained a copy of the memo, which was posted on an unofficial employee blog.

The move is expected to affect 700 workers at the company's newspaper operations across the nation.
Here’s a list of Gannett assets
Knowing that Disingenuous White Liberals and PWJ’s are in charge of the editorial policy at The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, and Gannett assets, and openly admit to censoring stories of Black criminality, it’s easy to understand why many newspapers are losing subscribers and the ability to charge huge rates for national ad campaigns.
What Dr. Williams’ essay stated is exactly what an honest media would report daily. With PWJs running papers with a DWL mindset, no such truth will ever appear in The Baltimore Sun, Atlanta Journal Constitution or the Montgomery Advertiser. No Gannett asset will ever dare report what Dr. William’s syndicated column did.
People are abandoning a media that actively works to suppress news of Black crime, including Mahogany Mob attacks, and seeking their news elsewhere far from the ombudsman of the PWJ dying papers.
Dr. Williams has done admirable work, but he is wrong to say that the new generation of Black people participating in Mahogany Mobs, Polar Bear Hunting and random thuggery are betraying the civil rights movement; they only take it to its logical conclusion.
Nothing else needs to be said then to look at Rhodesia and South Africa for a glimpse of the inevitable in the United States. Eric “My People” Holder’s eternal quest for augmenting civil rights for the lucky few is proof of the legalistic measures those clinging to power in BRA will go to achieve their goal: The complete dispossession of America’s founding majority population.
Abstract ideas like freedom and liberty are illusory at this point. What Dr. William’s wrote in his essay is true, but as you have learned, there is an even more sinister veracity lurking in the details.
By reading this, you are an individual who either already is in the ranks of Those Who Can See, on your way to joining those growing ranks, or are vested in BRA. The only freedom you truly have left is what you do with that knowledge.


Anonymous said...

Nothing else needs to be said then to look at Rhodesia and South Africa for a glimpse of the inevitable in the United States. Eric “My People” Holder’s eternal quest for augmenting civil rights for the lucky few is proof of the legalistic measures those clinging to power in BRA will go to achieve their goal: The complete dispossession of America’s founding majority population.

This is the goal of BRA. The total annihilation of the founding majority population. Only then will it be satisfied. Black people will only and forever go And Then? until America as it was once known is destroyed.

Edwood said...

Dallas Morning News is more of the same. They actively suppress crime statistics. In fact, the whole city seems to be that way. Looking at the Dallas Police website, you can find racial statistics of crime victims, but not racial statistics of arrest. A few years ago there was an uproar when someone pointed out that Dallas was consistantly in the top 3 cities over a million people for crime in EVERY catagory per the FBI's annual list. The blog that pointed it out hasn't been updated since 2006. Maybe they killed him.

Discard said...

One of the advantages of having been discarded by this country is the calmness with which you can read about coming disaster. Newspapers going belly up? 700 journalists laid off? I can take it all with a smile.

Anonymous said...

"Perfidious White Journalists"

Pure Gold!!!

One of your best, Paul.

~AV~ said...

you have been linked to over on FreeRepublic on a thread discussing Rev Wright being in Baltimore stirring up shit among the feral blacks in the ghetto...

Sheila said...

What those few black right-liberals like Williams or Sowell always feel compelled to add is the fallacy that the deformations of BRA will "harm" black people the most. "Tragically, black youngsters . . . will turn out to be the larger victims in the long run." Well, boo hoo. After decades of affirmative action and government coddling and inflated self esteem and White people's money, black violence will harm . . . blacks? I don't think so.

I attempted to listen to the radio last week (it's been months; I can no longer bear the evasions and right-liberal assumptions of the "right-wing" talk radio hosts) and Mark Levin was thundering about the Mexican activist who testified before the Texas Senate, speaking Spanish after having lived in the U.S. for 23 years. He waxed poetic about a nation needing a uniting language, and then added the requisite right-liberal language: "Not learning English hurts Hispanics educationally and economically."

I DON'T GIVE A DAMN. I don't care about the purported "harm" that black racism theoretically causes to blacks, or that living in a Spanglish ghetto causes mestizo kids. I do not care. I care about my own children, my own people, and my own country. Even if learning English hurt Mexican illegals, it wouldn't and shouldn't matter. This country was founded by Englishmen, and English has been its historic language. Period.

I took my kid for a tetanus shot today so he could go to church camp. Because it would have cost over $100 even with insurance, I decided to grit my teeth and take him to the county medical office and pay $14 instead. I was almost the only White there, among various Indians in Saris, a Muslima in full shroud with her two daughters (in new and fashionable clothes) applying for Medicaid, and lots and lots of short, rotund, brown Mestizos. My taxpayer money at work. All the posters and brochures pictured White children, while the text was in Spanish. All the county employees doing the paperwork were bilingual and non-White. I'm so tired of only feeling like I'm in America when I'm home, or on the web. Multiculturalism is exhausting, and I refuse to devote any energy to caring what I'm supposed to feel or say or what people think. I'm done. The end of all of this, no matter what the means or the collateral damage, can't come soon enough.

Anonymous said...

If one belives in market economics, there must be a huge untapped market for honest reporting. I know that this is partly why Fox News has the best cable ratings as they are the only player that supplies establishment right wing news. If Gannett had been smart they would have built a slightly right or establishment right infrastructure across America to compete with the NY Times and Wapo family. It would not have protected them from Craigslist sucking away ad revenue, but it would have capture the half of America that the Ny Times doesn't know exists except to pretend to be disgusted by. Incredible that Gannett blindly followed ideology over staying in business or making more money. The shareholders deserved better.

Anonymous said...

Great article. Off topic, sad to see Lew Rockwell running articles by huckster Joe Mercola.

missbosslady said...


Another great, thought provoking piece.

Unfortunately for us all BRA will only end in climax, it will not go quietly into that good night, there is no other way.

This hijack has been aloud to go on for far too long; the takers are addicted to the free shit and will display violent withdrawl symptoms, their enablers will will claw at each other scrambling for higher ground, and the worst will be reserved for their apologists. The true believers that defended the system and meant it, the bleeding hearts, will be the first victims. On a bad day I almost feel that they deserve it, but on a good day I know that thought is too cruel even though they bear so much guilt.

We allowed ourselves to travel too far down this road, passing the point of no return, so that the only way to stop the vehicle is a full on crash. Some will be casualties and some will not.

As is necessary I now only consider this subject matter in the context of me. How will I ensure my own safety and the preservation of me and mine in the days ahead.

And though it saddens me, in ways so profound that I cannot put it into words, I accept that we are on a collison course. I know what some of you are thinking, but I assure you that I am no conspiracy theorist and in fact, have always been the eternal optimist.

Even now there is still the small measure of optimism in my heart and though I think bad days are ahead I believe that after the dust settles we will experience a rebirth.

It's just too bad that it will first have to become so ugly, and to you doubters; think that the day before the earthquake there were millions of Japanese that would have scoffed at the notion that there lives could change so dramatically and so swiftly.

We are about to experience an unnatrual disaster. I hope against hope that there is still a possibility of avoiding calamity, but as the days continue unchanged that hope dims. So, be smart, think safety.

~AV~ said...

@5:33 ANON...

and DrudgeReport...he is the only honst collector of REAL news stories...with no side line commentating BS like Huffington Post...

DrudgeReport is my first click on the computer...SBPDL is my second...VFR is my third...FreeRepublic that ORDER every morning...

I can only recruit on FR...and I tagline there proves it...

Now that we have an Uncle Tom...saying that nigger behavior is destructive...the stink will soon stick to Rush...LMAO!

But Rush needs to man up and SPEAK to what his eyes can see!

Anonymous said...

Re: the mob attack in Woodbridge, VA.
Locally, it's known as "Hoodbridge", and with good reason.

missbosslady said...

Good grief! Sorry, my post was a bit rambling and a lttle off. I'm very tired.

"This hijack has been aloud..." Of course, I meant; this hijack has been allowed...

Wow, these days are long and exhausting. I agree with Sheila, I wish we could just rip the bandage off and get to healing already!

Anonymous said...

"Black silence in the face of black racism has to be one of the biggest betrayals of the civil rights struggle that included black and white Americans."


Anonymous said...

I just want to know this- let's say that tomorrow the MSM starting reporting like you do..

..where they pointed out race and called it what it really they really are - HATE crimes/ epidemic black on white crimes- What is it that you would exactly expect the white population to do? In 2011? today, here & now?

I look around me and all I see in the real world are fat, soft, emasculated, unemployed 20-somethings & even 30 somethings stoned and unemployed (men) who don't just don't care anymore.. and who can blame them?

FEMINISM 3.0 has stripped them of all their legal rights- so what is there even to 'fight' for, or even 'care' about anymore? Can you honestly answer that question with a straight face- with all the rampant cheating by white women and high divorce rate initiated by women for financial gain? Or just to fuck some other guy?

I know that Feminism 3.0 and all it's intendant horrors & women's rights isn't the theme here, but can you really expect to keep going on operating in a vacuum? As if white apathy about black on white crime isn't inextricably tied to a lack of concern by white males who asked to even go to war would shrug their shoulders and ask.. "why?" What country in the West anymore is even worth saving?

I know I'm opening a can of worms here- but if you really want to get to the root of the problem- why whites have allowed the black problem to go so far - you really have to ask yourself these important questions first.

None of this could have happened without Feminism's Evil and all it's dumbing down and emasculating of men in white society.

I propose to you that you are addressing a 3 dimensional issue from a 2 dimensional plain.

Anonymous said...

"WASHINGTON — A Marine reservist who was detained during a security scare near the Pentagon last week has been linked to the shootings last year at the Marine Corps museum in Quantico and several D.C.-area military recruitment stations, officials said Wednesday.

Ballistics evidence appears to link Yonathan Melaku, 22, to the shootings, one official said. The two officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.

Melaku is being held without bail on unrelated larceny charges involving car break-ins that happened after the shootings. He has not been charged in last week's incident or the building shootings.

Melaku, a naturalized U.S. citizen FROM ETHIOPIA, was detained Friday after he was spotted carrying a suspicious backpack near the Pentagon containing what initially was feared to be bomb-making material. Authorities later said the suspicious items were not explosive."

Yes, let's import more of these traitorous African apes and continue to completely block European immigration. America has degenerated into a state of total fucking insanity.

Anonymous said...

RT Or Press TV should have a regularly scheduled show geared toward Western trads-paleocons-paleolibertarians, etc. Someone like Richard Spencer of Alt-Right would be a good host.

MrGJG said...

Anon 9:53, I disagree that pulling back the covers on the endemic black on white crime wouldn't cause an uproar among the white masses.

You're looking at it from a primarily fighting back mano a mano.
We need to open eyes so people understand the repercussions of who they vote for.
As they say, elections have consequences.

Once the blinders are off and people no longer fear being labeled a racist, things will change.
It's already happening.
The inevitable by-product will be people running for office unconstrained from pc verbiage.

The only chance we have is electing someone in 2012 who is fervently against amnesty or the DREAM act.
If either of those come to fruition, we're doomed.

Anonymous said...

Gannet also owns the Des Moines Register.

The D.M. Register used to be one of the top 10 newspapers in the country back in the 1970's.

After Gannet bought, there was a steady decline in quality. PC to the hilt.

As Iowa gets with more illegal aliens and displace more Iowans, the D.M. Rag, in general and columnist Rekha Basu in particular, insists on calling people who resent being supplanted and displaced, bigots, xenophobes, etc. (Pro-Amnesty all the way.)


Anonymous said...

The internet is destroying the MSM's lifeline because print media and broadcast news is quickly becoming obsolete. With the destruction of print media and broadcast news, which have high barriers to entry, so goes their monopoly on public thought.

MSM peddles crap to the masses, whether it's the inexplicable love affair with celebriwhores like the Khardashians, financial misinformation like bullishness in the stock market and housing market at the 2007 highs, or most importantly the complete disconnect between the reality of black criminality and what the media reports.

Fortunately there are always people who are resistant to the madness of crowds, and the internet enables them to find each other. If you are reading this, you are the resistance.

44 Magnum said...

One of your best, Paul. Of course Blacks know the score, but make excuses for their rage and horror as "being out of power".


The video is Larry Elder confronting a liberal black on the crime stats. Not only does the liberal KNOW and acknowledge the stats, but he then gives the stupid defense that "the black man has no power". My hope is that logical blacks will be spared and will serve blacks well in the Motherland.

Sheila said...

Anonymous at 9:53, you raise some valid points. Feminism is legitimately to blame for emasculating Western White men, but it was part and parcel of Gramsci's march and the Frankfurt school's plan. To isolate and indict feminism alone as the cause of our problems is overly simplistic, I believe. The military is one of the few places left where traditional, White men are allowed to behave like men, which is why it is under such sustained assault by the left and the government they totally control, bringing women in combat roles and open gays in uniform. I would argue (admittedly on anecdotal evidence) that many of the White soldiers are at least as opposed to foreign adventurism and nation building as many of us here; they enlist out of patriotism (for an America that no longer exists) and a desire for a "warrior" lifestyle. Of course, they then experience much higher rates of divorce because women today are taught they can "go it alone" and shouldn't ever sacrifice for their husband or his career (the constant whining in the press about the lot of the poor military spouse drives my husband, an army brat whose own mother had none of the support offered today, absolutely crazy). The military also comes under attack from the right (both right liberals and alt right) for neocon adventures, when the rank and file troops would rather kill bad guys and blow things up. Put them on the border and let them go to town (or let them surround and take over Dearbornistan or Detroit or Baltimore), and I think they'd be a lot happier and even more effective than they are now overseas.

I also take issue with your assumption that the fat and soft (an apt and legitimate description) population wouldn't do anything were black (and brown) pathology and crime not merely exposed, but trumpeted the way multiculturalism and miscegenation are pushed now. I mentioned in another thread that some immigrant neighbors were shocked when I explained blacks were only 13% of the population. People truly are ignorant of the scope of what's happening. Far too many get their news, if any, from the MSM and television and are blind to what's going on. Make their denial impossible and I think you'd see some substantial changes.

Anonymous said...

White men created democracy, and then handed it over to white women.

Feminism is white women's revenge for thousands years of being told what to do. I believe they will grow out of it soon, and ask to have their old fashioned, real white men back.

Anonymous said...

Again, I shouldn't be posting here because I am Active Duty Army (officer) and I am quite sure that this is a monitored 'hate site' per DoD directive somewhere but I am one of those suckers that did enlist for patriotism. I joined in 2003 because of Iraq and felt that the Republic was worth the effort. Being in the Army has taught me about what America is far more than my whitopia suburbs in the South or college or grad school could ever hope to do. The Army taught me, more than any other single thing, that America (hell, let's not call it that anymore. Let's call it "the 'kwa") is a toxic mess. We can't be warriors anymore and that mythic preserve where white men can be soldiers for a country of their own might exist in the Marines or Army SF but it sure as hell doesn't exist in the regular Army. Many, many, many times I have wondered why in the world I continue to do what I do when I know that this 'Kwa isn't worth serving. With all honesty, the Army taught me how to hate this thing we live in. Now, with Obama's Amerikwa showing us a future that looks more and more like that of South Africa, I think the only reason I continue to stay in is for the employment. I wish I were wrong. I wish I could love the country I fight for. I wish times could go back to the 80s I remember. But wishes don't change reality. A storm is coming and none of us know what it will look like. I just know that the last time Americans got a burr in the saddle over an irrepressible conflict almost 700,000 people died. It scares me.

Anonymous said...

That Larry Elder clip is priceless!!

Edwood said...

Anon at 10:28,

Come home safe.

Anonymous said...

To anon at 3:08 & Sheila at 9:08,
Though in slight disagreement, you are both dead on!
" Give my people eyes to see and ears to hear"
Perhaps if the truth were known there would be hope, but not as long as we live in continued willfull blindness and apathy. My people trip all over themselves trying to prove they're not racist as this cancer destroys our nation.

Left coast white guy

Sheila said...

Let me second Edwood's comment - Come home (to what's left of it) safe, anonymous. Thank you again for taking the risk of posting; I'll refer to you as ADO (active-duty officer). I'm forwarding your comment to my son who's considering making the military a career.

Sheila said...

Today I spent some time at mainstream conservative websites, trying to nudge and prod the right-liberals towards considering that views to the right of theirs are actually legitimate. As per usual, I have been castigated as "dumb," "ugly," and "racist." My crime? I questioned why they were all attacking little Jon Leibowitz (Stewart) for mocking Herman Cain, yet giving Cain a pass for responding with the race card ("He's attacking me because I'm black"). They are so desperate to support a black candidate who makes a few noises in a slightly right direction that they turn in fury on anyone who questions why they'd consider voting for him in the first place. The insults don't faze me; I just get tired of trying to get through the PC crap and right-liberal assumptions and the massive stupidity.

Anonymous said...

Things are bad but I'm encouraged. For one, this site exists. It is an intellectually challenging platform that I can't imagine could have existed-- even ten years ago. That's good. Second, BRA has massively overextended and its keepers know it. The DWLs are aware, on a submerged but cognitive level, that their charges have escaped them. All it will take is a spark to set the blaze, a pebble to cause the avalanche. When that happens, everything will change. I think it will happen sooner than later...

Anonymous said...

I don't know if anyone saw Stossel hosting some program about blacks on Fox News (Heather MacDonald was featured, too, and she's none too bright with her repetitive strawmans) but he was kissing Walter Williams' ass. He said, "But Walter Williams taught me..." and "But Walter Williams said..." I'd had more respect for Stossel if he said, "But my Mommy told me..."

Walter Williams makes no sense when he calls incidents of black-on-white crime "racist." It'd be just as stupid as saying all white-on-black crime is "racist." Sure, some B-on-W crime is racially motivated (the minority), i.e. they sought out a white to be a victim, but Williams' use of "racist" makes it seem like it's the flipside of the KKK burning crosses or bombing churches or lynching when it just isn't.

The reality is that when RANDOM whites are targeted by blacks - when crime is interracial - it's because whites are considered "easy" and "weak." Calling that racist - I don't know - I think it's more than a little bit misplaced. If it could clearly be showed these blacks went after innocent whites due to a DEEP-ROOTED hatred of white people because of XYZ, than I could agree. (Gang-bangers saying they themselves did it for pro-black reasons are full of shit; they're just talking.) When Williams says stuff like this...

"If it were white racist gangs randomly attacking blacks, the mainstream media would have no hesitation reporting the race of the perps." just rings hollow, at least to me. Are the perps "gangs of black racists" or just gangs out for the stereotypical easy target? I personally think these are gangs/gang members "putting in work," with easy victims happening to also be white.

I believe the Giants Fan beating - committed by a Latino - was also gang-related and the target, a white man, was certainly chosen because he was white.

B-on-W crime should be addressed honestly but not this way. I think Williams needs to go back to the draftboard. He's just wrong and it's wrong to inflame people's irrational emotions, IMO.

Sheila: "The military is one of the few places left where traditional, White men are allowed to behave like men"

Maybe that's not a good thing...

Anonymous: "It is an intellectually challenging platform"

I, too, like his site but he's rarely challenged.

Anonymous said...

Locust- what would you call a right wing conservative republican, who vote republican, but support the continued existence of BRA because they directly or indirectly benefit from it, they complain about everything, but would hate to see it all coming crashing down, either because they are old and wouldn't survive a collapse, or because they make money from BRA. I'm sure most republican conservatives are in this cat.

missbosslady said...

Anon @ 3:57,

Your citing Newsweek? Ha-ha! You do relaize that Newsweek is nothing more than a failed leftist rag, right?

I've got a news flash for you; we don't come here to challenge SBPDL, we come here to commiserate.

Anon @ 4:52,


44 Magnum said...

Anon @ 2:50

Negros interracial Rape is racist. In 2007 37,000 Whites were raped by negroids and ZERO negroids were raped by Whites. About 100 per day. Rape is about rage and control, therefore negroids are enraged and wish to control White women.

By the way, are you not banned?

Anonymous said...

"(Heather MacDonald was featured, too, and she's none too bright with her repetitive strawmans)"

1. Heather MacDonald is incredibly bright and erudite.
2. "None too bright" is a favorite expression of Diarrhea.

Diarrhea, you have no idea how obvious you are, I find it hilarious.

Laz said...

"Re: the mob attack in Woodbridge, VA.
Locally, it's known as "Hoodbridge", and with good reason.

Man, I am now so glad my family moved away from there when they did. They just started busing the blacks from across the county to my high school my last year at Garfield. School population went from 3000 to 4000. My eyes were pretty much opened that year. I had never seen fights between like 30-40 people and such brutality in real life before. I was also shot at, the one and only time of my life, that year- no relation to the story but, I wanted to add that because it was a life changing experience.

Anonymous said...

Racism is the belief that there are inherent differences in people's traits and capacities that are entirely due to their race, however defined, and that, as a consequence, justify the different treatment of those people, both socially and legally.

The reality is that when RANDOM whites are targeted by blacks - when crime is interracial - it's because whites are considered "easy" and "weak.

Anonymous said...

"The reality is that when RANDOM whites are targeted by blacks - when crime is interracial - it's because whites are considered "easy" and "weak.""

No, it's because blacks hate whites.

Hambone said...

I've heard through the grapevine that there are going to be some um..."undercover agents" (NOT COPS hehe) at the Iowa State Fair this year, in case the blacks want to try to repeat "Beat Whitey Night." A lot of people woke up here after the police tried to cover up the incident, and the county prosecutor failed to really prosecute any of the offenders.

Anonymous said...

Ret'd LAPD here. In my experience, blacks attack whites because of sheer racial hatred and a belief that whites owe them everything.

It doesn't matter who you are, how big, old, tall, whatever. Blacks set upon whites because it is a genetic drive to defeat their enemy using violence. The level of violence that I have seen blacks inflict on their victims, when the sheer terror of their actions was enough to render their victims compliant and frightened, was mind boggling.

Hate fueled savagery done with such ferocity, it must be genetic. Hundreds of thousands of years of tribal combat are in their genes and a few hundred years in the New World cannot suppress that.

Anonymous said...

"Ret'd LAPD here. In my experience, blacks attack whites because of sheer racial hatred and a belief that whites owe them everything."

100% correct. Blacks feel obligated to rob and steal from whites, and to harm them in any way possible.

And now that the entire negro population has been indoctrinated with the "you owe me" mentality, it will be virtually impossible to ever undo. Black on white violence will only get worse in the future.

Anonymous said...

At Anon,June 24, 2011 10:19 AM

I always thought that the amount of violence blacks inflict on their white victims was also proportionate to the envy they feel towards this particular group. I also find that they rarely fight on a one to one level with whiteys unless armed, it indicates a rather cowardly way to defeat the enemy. Am I right in my assessment?

Anonymous said...

"Hundreds of thousands of years of tribal combat are in their genes and a few hundred years in the New World cannot suppress that."

Not to mention being bred for size and lack of intellect. I wish it wasn't true but, it is.

"The reality is that when RANDOM whites are targeted by blacks - when crime is interracial - it's because whites are considered "easy" and "weak."

Wow, Desiree aka Frasier must have been frothing at the mouth when she wrote that one.

Anonymous said...

"Hate fueled savagery done with such ferocity, it must be genetic."

If you have some time, watch this "Vice Guide to Liberia". This shit is happening NOW in Liberia, Congo, Zimbabwe and elsewhere in Africa. Blacks are, quite possibly, subhuman. They're a bunch of freakish savages and 99% of them aren't fit to live with humans.

Here's another example of nigger savagery that was just posted on Drudge - 8 black guys beating 1 innocent white guy into a coma:

I am so, so sick of this shit. I've had a lifetime of being lectured to in school and by the media about the evils of whitey and his anti-black racism. Meanwhile, reality and personal experience paint a completely different picture.

The ONLY people I've ever been robbed by are blacks. (And it was in an area with a black population of 5%.) The ONLY neighborhoods I've ever had to avoid out of fear for my life and property are the black ones. The ONLY people who've attacked me for racial reasons on the job have been blacks. I'm fed up with pretending that blacks are anything but a bunch of destructive, malicious, useless niggers.

And yet...we're still treated to TV and movies that show black men as the noble, always-right, doctors, lawyers, military generals, presidents, etc. And I love the TV commercials showing the married black couples dining in their backyard with their two well behaved children. It's total bullshit! As most of you know, 70% of black kids are born out of wedlock! It's a big, fat lie meant to flatter blacks and lie to whites!

The media is FULL of lies. They lie like crazy about everything but especially race.

Sorry about the rambling post but that article on the 8 coons beating the white kid made me livid. I'm so goddamned sick of being lied to. Told to eat shit and pretend it's cake.

Discard said...

I don't see why people object to the characterization of White victims of Blacks as being "easy" and "weak". I would think that all criminals look for easy victims. Racial hatred is not enough to get little Denocious to square off with a couple of Navy SEALs. And does anyone here not think that today's Whites are, on average, much weaker than our grandparents? How many SWPLs were there in Jim Crow days? How often did hate-filled Blacks attack Whites in the 1930s?
I have of Moslems who say the exact thing about Europeans. "Cheese", meaning soft, is a common Arab term for Whites.

Anonymous said...

"I also find that they rarely fight on a one to one level with whiteys unless armed, it indicates a rather cowardly way to defeat the enemy. Am I right in my assessment?"

I don't think they're particularly cowardly compared to other ethnic groups (partly out of stupidity). I'd say white and black are the most likely to fight one on one. Obviously they do a lot of mob attacks too but so do all the other groups. I had lots of one on one fights with blacks growing up (plus lots of mob beat-downs) whereas other groups it was always mobs and never one on one.

Anonymous said...

At Anon. June 25, 2:11PM

"I don't think they're particularly cowardly compared to other ethnic groups (partly out of stupidity). I'd say white and black are the most likely to fight one on one. Obviously they do a lot of mob attacks too but so do all the other groups. I had lots of one on one fights with blacks growing up (plus lots of mob beat-downs) whereas other groups it was always mobs and never one on one. "

This question was not addressed at you Diarrhea, stop minimizing or aggrandizing black behavior because it suits your racist agenda.

Get the hell out of here! Your negro men are a bunch of cowards.

SDN said...

To "Kersey":

You claim that black criminality and violence is merely taking to the Civil Rights Movement to its logical conclusion but this is peremptory. The civil rights movement was about repelling Jim Crow laws and having blacks equal before the law with whites.

It's true that crime soared to pathological levels in the 60's but for others reasons explored by Thomas Sowell's obituary to James Q. Wilson. I once read a medical article about how the intelligentsia of that decade were promoting the idea of giving 'rights' to virtually everything, there was of course minority rights but among other things criminal rights which is explained by Sowell: "They claimed, we had to stop focusing on punishment and get at the "root causes" of crime. In other words, we had to solve the criminals' problems, in order to solve the problem of crime. This approach was not new in the 1960s. In fact, it went back at least as far as the 18th century. But what was new in the 1960s was the widespread acceptance of such notions in the legal system, including the Supreme Court of the United States. The crusade against punishment, and especially capital punishment, spread through all three branches of the federal government and into state governments as well. Even a murderer caught in the act had so many new "rights," created out of thin air by judges, that executing him could require a decade or more of additional litigation, even after he was found guilty. By 1974, the murder rate was more than twice what it had been in 1961. Between 1960 and 1976, a citizen's chances of becoming a victim of a major violent crime tripled. In another column he noted that this was not peculiar to the United States but it also happened in other countries like Canada, England, New Zealand and Australia (I'm not sure he named them all but some of them at least).

At the same time the civil rights movement was being overtaken by a 'Black Power' movement that had far more radical demands, dogmas that presented blacks as being perpetual victims of white racism were becoming increasingly mainstream, we often talk about 'White Guilt' but we should talk also about the other side of the coin 'Black Victimhood' (term used by John McWhorter) which tells blacks that all of their social problems (crime, unemployment, illegitimacy) is due to racism which is supposedly in every level of american society, coupled with this 'criminal rights legislation', this made black crime more and more excusable to the eyes of the intelligentsia which explains the minimalistic reaction to the 60's riots (Watts, Newark, Detroit, etc.)
Talking about these, one of the reasons I can't link 'civil rights' and the explosion of crime of that time is that most of these riots occurred in northern and western inner cities where segregation was not enacted. In fact most of them (such as those that happened in Philadelphia, Harlem, Watts, Newark, Detroit) because of police incidents where some black persons were being arrested by the police, this sparked protests which degenerated into outright hatred for the police and for the 'system' in general and escalated into riots. Which makes me say that 'Black Victimhood' and the dim view of the police it promoted among blacks is much more to be blame for these riots than desegregation.

To 44. Magnum:

The number "35000 white women raped by black men" is very common among white nationalists but they never quote their sources. Jared Taylor talks about '10,000 to 12,000 black-on-white rapes every year' in his 'you swine happy now?' video while Ann Coulter says "about 1,000-to-2,000 a year black-on-white rapes" and "It was much worse in the ’70s, ’80s" You probably added a zero for the purpose of exaggeration. "

SDN said...

Sorry for double posting but I would like to react again.

To Anon @ 4:58 :

What a bunch of bunkum. True black crime is a very tough issue but it needs to be examined truthfully not with demagoguery to stir up emotions. Blacks are indeed overrepresented in crime but the truth is black crime in the United States dropped at a higher rate than white crime over the last 20 years, using SHR data we find that, between 1991 and 2011, the black murder rate declined 55% while the white rate declined 44%, again UCRs shows that between 1995 and 2012, regarding burglary, aggravated rate and robbery the black rate declined 39%, 51% and 56% while the white rate declined 27%, 30% and 37%. As for interracial crimes which are so ominous for you it's true that the vast majority of them are committed by blacks but NCVS reports show that between 1994 and 2008 black-on-white victimizations dropped 62% while the other around declined 32%.
A white militant who is a frequent poster on admitted that black crimes were committed by 3% of the black population, talking 99% of 'savages'...

True 70% of black kids of born out of wedlock but as for teenage pregnancy, which is a hotbed for these kinds of births if you look at teenage pregnancy statistics from the DOJ you'll find that the black rate had a bigger drop than the white rate more so its drop is nearly equal to asian rate!

You talk about other countries, the documentary 'Vice Guide to Liberia' mainly talks about the terrible conditions in the West Point slum but it doesn't talk about the situation in the country as a whole. Jamaica, which is a black majority country had, until 1971, a murder rate LOWER than in the United States

Now if you have been mugged or abused by blacks in the past I understand you can be resentful but that's not an excuse for barking like wild dogs against black people.