Friday, August 12, 2011

Falling Skies: Derbyshire's "Black Tax", The Color of Crime and Hope

‘Oh, white girl bleeds a lot.' - Unidentified Black person who attacked Shaina Perry on July 4th in Milwaukee

Police say the teen told investigators whites were chosen because he considered them "easy targets." - A Black person, part of the massive Milwaukee Mahogany Mob that pulled white people from their cars at the Wisconsin State fair, calling white people "easy targets"

I've been watching the TNT television show Falling Skies. Aliens invade earth, wipe out 90 percent of humanity and our military defenses in the process (isn't that what BRA is trying to do, with Lockheed Martin mandating that the racial diversity of its employees and supplier diversity is a more important objective then building F-22 Raptors that can actually fly?) leaving only scattered bands of humanity capable of mustering any fight.

Our military is doing everything possible to diversify itself out of being an effective defense force (just do a search of this site to see what the Air Force, Marines, Navy, Army, the military academies, US Special Forces, Coast Guard, and Intelligence Gathering agencies are focusing upon as their primary objectives: hint, it has a lot to do with finding Black people suitable to be called valorous) so if there is alien life monitoring our planet and collecting data for an eventual assault, now is the time.

Anyways, back to Falling Skies. The show is set in Boston and follows the Second Massachusetts - a ragtag collection of civilians and surviving soldiers - who try and fight back against the aliens.

The primary message of the show is the need to instill hope among those who survived the initial alien attack and give people the courage to resist, to keep fighting. That no matter how daunting the task seems, how unlikely a positive outcome might be, you can never lose hope.

That's what this summer is all about. The summer of 2011 has shown that this system of government - what I call Black-Run America (BRA) - can not long endure. It will fall by its own hand, its own devices. The signs are all around us. The US Postal Service is bankrupt, primarily because being an employer of Black people - two of the top 10 jobs that employ the most Black people are with the US Postal Service - and performing a task that the private companies UPS and FedEX have perfected is a recipe for financial failure. Cutting jobs there, like cutting jobs at any Federal agency, will greatly impact Black people and shrink the artificial Black middle class further.

John Derbyshire is a writer I enjoy reading. He is wrong though, as he believes we are doomed. Black-Run America (BRA) is doomed, and it is stories like what is transpiring in Milwaukee that proves this point. Millions of people know something is wrong, that perhaps an ideology that runs counter to the concepts of freedom and liberty rules the land. When you can't criticize the character of Black people - an ever increasing percentage of Black people - you have no freedom, no liberty. You have absolute despotism.

The summer of 2011 is showing that people across the nation are losing faith in this system, a system that Derbyshire - writing at Takimag - calls, more or less, the Black Tax (we'll call it the Nigga Tax). In essence, his argument is that in times of economic growth, we could afford the Black Tax. Richard Spencer at Alternative Right noticed the Faustian Pact we made with Black people - and their higher rates of criminality - when it comes to the prison system, and how, this too, will be impacted in times of economic stagnation and depression.

We could afford the Black Tax,  even though it cost us a shot at Mars, but we can no longer afford to pay the Nigga Tax, which cripples the effectiveness of Federal Agencies and, worse, private industries and ultimately innovation.

Derbyshire notes:
As soon as you start to look at the numbers, though, you come up against the race issue. Here are the 2007-08 TANF tables—that’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, a federal program—broken up by state and race. So for example, in the state of Maryland, which is 30 percent black, 80 percent of TANF-receiving families are black.

It’s the same with food stamps, which nowadays come under SNAP—that’s the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The New York Times published a neat interactive graphic on SNAP usage a couple of years ago. The accompanying article tells us:
Nearly 12 percent of Americans receive aid—28 percent of blacks, 15 percent of Latinos and 8 percent of whites….Half of Americans receive food stamps, at least briefly, by the time they turn 20. Among black children, the figure was 90 percent.
There’s a lot of variation hiding in the overall numbers, as the Times was at pains to remind us. Owsley County, Kentucky’s population is 99.22 percent white: Half are on food stamps. Still, it’s plain that nationwide we’re looking at some big racial gaps.

Those gaps may be getting bigger. The Pew Research Center caused a stir the other day by releasing a report on the white/Hispanic/black wealth gaps. They are more dramatic than is commonly realized, and they’re apparently widening.

Leaving Hispanics out of it—I only have one pair of hands—I’m wondering how these white-black gaps and their consequences will carry forward into an age of austerity.

The gaps seem to be awfully intractable. You need to be over fifty to remember Jim Crow; you need to be somewhat older than that to remember a grandparent who was born in slavery. Yet still the needles on a lot of these dials have barely moved.

the scant supply of black math Ph.D.s.

For the less stellar there was plenty of government make-work on offer. This has especially been the case at the federal level. In 2007, the latest year for which I can find figures, black Americans were massively overrepresented in the federal workforce—by more than 800 percent in CSOS (Court Services and Offender Services).

Two entire generations of Americans have now grown up among these favors, preferences, and welfare-support discrepancies for black people. They are rationalized among non-blacks, though not without some resentment, as a “Slavery Tax”—as fair recompense for past injustices.

Following the black riots of the 1960s, non-blacks have seen these concessions as an implicit contract or treaty—as non-black America saying to black America: “We’ll give you this stuff if you promise not to break our windows.”

Yet fifty years on, we are still looking at these colossal, apparently intractable, gaps. And the Slavery Tax is expensive—$31 billion in state and federal expenditures in 2008 just for TANF. If black Americans, at 13 percent of the population, consumed TANF funds at the same rate as white Americans, the TANF bill would be less than $14 billion, a savings of $17 billion. A lot of money: not much to show for it.

If you think these numbers are not worth bothering about—mere billions in a sea of trillions—this is just one modest slice of the Slavery Tax I’m talking about. The massive government make-work programs, with all their salaries and benefits, must be far more, though beyond my ability to compute. And if we are talking about pruning the US Postal Service, with 2010 revenues of $67 billion, why not talk about TANF?

Can the Slavery Tax be maintained in an age of austerity? An age in which, moreover, increasing numbers of non-black Americans will feel justified in asking why, after so many decades of favors, concessions, preferences, and support, so many black Americans are still so desperately far behind?


Yet if the Slavery Tax is curtailed or abolished, what will be the consequences? Will it be taken as an abrogation of that implicit treaty, to be responded to with much breaking of glass?

The Slavery Tax was imposed in the robust USA of the 1960s and 1970s, when our country was a mighty engine of prosperity and our governments were swilling in cash. There was some complaining; but heck, we could afford it. We could afford anything!
We can no longer afford anything, and even Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac -organizations The Washington Post warns us can't be closed or else minorities, half of the employees of both organizations - will be screwed. 

So be it. The Black Tax can no longer be paid; the Nigga Tax is too great an expense. Judging by the actions of Arizona, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, and, if you remember, California in the 1990s before the courts overturned it, the Illegal Alien Tax is being rejected as well.

We have discussed the Mahogany Mobs rampaging across America, knowing that inevitably, the wrong member of one of these merry bands of looters will be shot and an England-style riot will commence. Over at The American Thinker, John T. Bennett has done some admirable work showing violent crime in America isn't decreasing, its only getting "less worse." Compared to 1950s America, we have a criminal problem -- read, Black violent crime problem -- that the disappearance of the Black Tax will only make more evident.

The skies are falling, but on Black-Run America. Communism in Russia died when the actual Russian people stopped believing in it, stopped pretending. 

Imagine the day private companies no longer have to bow down to the EEOC and can hire people based on merit; imagine the day colleges actually teach, accepting students based on merit and educating them instead of indoctrinating them; imagine the day Lockheed Martin decides actually engineers air crafts, a task they deem more important then performing social engineering experiments; imagine the day the military decides that "diversity must be the causality" in all of this. Imagine.

So I may have gotten a little carried away in the last paragraph, but everyone must have an endgame. Right?

The summer of 2011 has taught me a lot, with the primary lesson being that BRA is inherent unsustainable. Why? For two reasons: The Black Tax is too great a cost (Derb forgot to mention the prison aspect that Spencer did at Al Right) and two, the Mahogany Mobs rampaging across Cleveland, Milwaukee, Chicago, Peoria, Columbia, Boston (Memorial Day Weekend), Charlotte, St. Louis (a town to watch for a potential massive riot from the East-side), Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and plenty of other cities are doing more to erode the concept of "judging by the content of their character and the color of their skin" then any study on Black criminality could accomplish.

Like in the show Falling Skies, it is important to always keep hope alive. The future is unwritten. We are not doomed. We have had an entire establishment and generations of leaders in politics, the military, the academics, Hollywood, government, and in corporate America completely dedicated to the advancement of Black people, to the detriment of the overall health of each of these aforementioned entities. 

Their motto was "Damn the costs. Damn the consequence" (take a look at Detroit for those consequences; It has nothing to do with politics, but what happens when Black people are given the keys to the kingdom).

This will end.

Every time you visit a news site that publishes a story of a Mahogany Mob; leave a comment. Every time you discuss with friends why you don't live in the "bad" areas of town or the "ghetto," correct them and say, "you mean the Black area."

Never waver, nor falter in your belief that BRA is an evil system, that, if continued, will doom us all. Know that the day will come when many law-abiding Black people, themselves the unwanted beneficiary of Black-on-Black crime, Black behavior that endangers their communities (and spills over everywhere else with the Black Undertow) and high rates of illegitimacy, will ask us, "What took you so long to stop being so soft?"

I'll just respond, "White girl bled a lot. No more."

94 comments:

Midwestern said...

Get into their minds. Desiree has already told us how blacks think, but she is not alone. Here is why blacks riot.

Black victimology in a nutshell:

Of Course all White People are Racist by Joseph Harker

"White people need to accept that, no matter how many anti-racist demos they've marched on, they inevitably make assumptions, however subconscious, which are influenced by a racist society and which help to form their views and opinions. To refute this is to be in complete denial."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2002/jul/03/raceintheuk.comment#history-link-box

Anonymous said...

The skies are falling, but on Black-Run America. Communism in Russia died when the actual Russian people stopped believing in it, stopped pretending.

This is why it is important to tell the truth. One reason that communism collapsed in Eastern Europe is that people got tired of the lies. One Czech freedom fighter summed it up by saying that he simply told the truth and that was a revolutionary act (a sentiment which has been echoed at various times and places over the last century). This is why I speak up on various forums--including mainstream. Yeah, it causes outrage at first, but if you stick to the truth, and refuse to back down despite the howls of "racism," you establish your space and you inspire other people to also tell the truth. You also discredit the other side.

For example, simply citing violent crime statistics is enough to make a point. And it also discredits liberals (who are much of the problem) by showing how liberals cover up the truth. Similarly, citing studies of IQ or pointing out the failure of "majority rule" countries in Africa to produce viable societies. Take a few basic points and hit home with them. Publicize things like the flash mobs, and use them as a launch point to ask Americans why the media covers up these attacks, and why the DoJ does not prosecute them as "hate" crimes.

One thing I want to be able to say when this is all over with (and presumably we have won) is that I spoke the truth when the crisis hit.

It's a worthy thing to do.


--Californian

Anonymous said...

Thank you so much for the stats, the links are really good. Much effort and thought went into this article. I learned so much and I am grateful.

B

Anonymous said...

You're right, they are victims. Poor darkies can't seem to catch a break. Intelligent people would leave such an awful place, but not them...nope, they just stay right where they are and bitch and complain. They hate the crackers yet they won't stay away from them. Who can understand the negro mind?

Anonymous said...

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/update-ap-now-reports-black-wis-teen-admitted-he-was-targeting-whites/

Amarilloan said...

By writing this blog you are helping to keep hope alive.

Our people survived the black death and went on to conquer an entire continent.

Most of us will surely survive the calamity that is nearing. I wish you all sincere well being in the months and years ahead. Godspeed.

Anonymous said...

This is one of your best to date. Well done. Here in Chicago there has been a lot of drama in the affluent gay part of town with black criminals targeting the wealthier, more genteel gay crowd. This has resulted in a massive community backlash against the hitherto prevailing PC mentality, raising the awareness that most blacks (not all but most) are unable to live according to the norms of civilized society. The London riots have further illustrated that citizens need to be proactive, armed, and ready to step up in the event of any mob action. This is relevant to Chicago because we're hosting the NATO summit and the G8 summit next May. Sig Sauer P229 elite here, along with my K9 trained German Shepherd. For defensive purposes only though.

Marc B said...

"Every time you discuss with friends why you don't live in the "bad" areas of town or the "ghetto," correct them and say, "you mean the Black area."

That is one of the most powerful things for everybody to do; stop parsing your words on race issues. Do the same with everybody, even among NAM's. Don't go on long tirades, just be honest and use non-inflammatory speech and vocabulary, and you will be amazed how many people, even many DWL's will agree with you. Slowly things will change from person to person, and race reality will become the norm.

Everybody really knows what's going on anyway (especially law-abiding & productive minorities), and every year the state of BRA becomes more apparent, and the Emperor's new clothes are rather sparse. I've been doing that for more than a decade, and it is among the most freeing things you can experience. By not being silenced by having what you know is true not match the words you speak and instead always being congruent regardless of your audience makes life much richer. For every friend and associate it cost me it solidified my relationships with at least five more. A free man speaks his mind.

Let Freedom Ring!

Anonymous said...

White humiliation - this is as bad as it gets. Check the comment from Franz, brilliant the way it describes this neurotic sow.

http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2011/08/could-this-become-iconic-photo.html

Anonymous said...

I also enjoy messing with liberals by dividing them on their endangered species list. Who is at the pinnacle of the PC pyramid. I think muslims or gays are higher on the list than blacks. Example: The white girl/guy who was beat in burger king by 2 black girls. Press didn't go near it until it came out that this was not a normal white girl but transgendered. What a knot the mainstream media was in then. If I'm attacked and survive the first thing I'm telling the media is that I'm gay. Then watch the fun. If every white who is attacked does the same Imagine the fun. By the time they try to prove I'm not gay, too late it's already brought attention to BRA.

Laz said...

"Two entire generations of Americans have now grown up among these favors, preferences, and welfare-support discrepancies for black people."

Just two? When you have 40-45 year old grandmas on welfare it isn't just two generations, it's more like 3 or 4 generations.

Anonymous said...

@ Midwestern:

Good point. That's why I just laugh at people who tell me they aren't racist. Everybody makes assumptions about other people just by the way the look (even if it is subconsciously), it's human nature.

Anonymous said...

Press conference from Milwaukee about a murder and the State Fair Mob. (State Fair reaction starts about 4:00 mark)

http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/127622258.html

Tristero said...

Here's an interesting parallel from England, where the media and the elites are more worried over the "threat" from everyday white Englishmen than they are over nightly scenes of their cities burning down:

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10979/

Ex-prison guard said...

As horrible as the flash mob riots have been, it is since they became widespread that the foundation of what Paul Kersey calls "Black-Run America" has begun to crack. Half a century of govt sponsored social programs, tax credits, celebrations of diversity, lowered standards, and generally a lot of leeway being given has led to hordes of Black youth randomly assaulting non-Black people for fun.

The result is that it's become just a little less politically incorrect to point out that something has gone terribly wrong for a large segment of the Black community. To echo Marc B, I too have lost relationships due to telling the truth. Those who get most upset aren't law-abiding Black people, but rather whites who live in affluent liberal suburbs or places like Vermont.

Anonymous said...

Marc B

Great advice. We should all do this no matter how uncomfortable it makes us feel. The eventual alternative (blowing a gasket) will be much worse for all involved.

Anonymous said...

"That is one of the most powerful things for everybody to do; stop parsing your words on race issues. Do the same with everybody, even among NAM's. Don't go on long tirades, just be honest and use non-inflammatory speech and vocabulary, and you will be amazed how many people, even many DWL's will agree with you. Slowly things will change from person to person, and race reality will become the norm."


Yeah, because saying "black people suck" is really non-inflammatory and really gets people's camaraderie juices flowing.

Please! Talking about race necessitates finding a person of a specific skin hue and telling them this-and-that about their "people". Um, newsflash -- we're individuals.

I think you people don't get that blaming all of society's problems on a small fraction of 13% of the population makes no sense at all.

You can cite your so-called statistics until you're blue in the face but the reality is that it only affects the black population, if it even affects anyone individually who are not close to the miscreants or the communities in which they reside.

No one is going to agree with being racist against every black person. Why? Because it doesn't make sense. No one is going to deny innocent people's civil rights on the basis of some white guy getting beat up by black gangbangers.

Are you serious?

Yeah, "white girl" can "bleed a lot" but she can bleed with white folks, too. Matter of fact, she is more likely to bleed with white folks.

Listen, unless you live in the ghetto or near a ghetto or in a low income neighborhood, crime shouldn't and probably doesn't affect you.

These little things are something you people seem unable to grasp.

Yeah, hee-and-haw about black criminals but, AGAIN, WTF does that have to do with me?

Bob Siegel said...

I'm an awakened black man in the Southeastern US. I've been reading this site in silence for some time now. I agree with just about all of the information presented here and similar sites. This is by far one of your most succinct postings as of late, but I wanted to highlight MarcB's comment. Make sure you all read what he said. That's the key. Just use the truth always. Don't exaggerate. Save your opinion. State facts. Know where to direct your audience for additional information (sites like this). Build relationships, don't let out all your research in one setting - information overload causes people to retreat. It's mentally stressing and causes people to reject your message.

Most of you are white and therefore have to overcome the 'racist' card every time you attempt to enlighten the masses...well imagine the struggle those of us who are on the inside speaking the truth face...

My most successful strategy that always helps me get my message across? MarcB's recommendations..

Anonymous said...

"The US Postal Service is bankrupt, primarily because being an employer of Black people - two of the top 10 jobs that employ the most Black people are with the US Postal Service - and performing a task that the private companies UPS and FedEX have perfected is a recipe for financial failure."


How does the US Postal Service 'fail' because it employs black people? WTF did your friendly neighborhood black postman do to you?

Please cite how hiring black people is causing the Post to fail. Please explain this in explicit detail.

If you can write it down, you can explain it.

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

"the Mahogany Mobs rampaging across Cleveland, Milwaukee, Chicago, Peoria, Columbia, Boston (Memorial Day Weekend), Charlotte, St. Louis (a town to watch for a potential massive riot from the East-side), Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and plenty of other cities are doing more to erode the concept of "judging by the content of their character and the color of their skin" then any study on Black criminality could accomplish."


Bullshit. You never believed in 'content of character'; anyone with a brain would know you were attempting--and failed--to be clever and tongue-in-cheek.

You are essentially saying that whatever those blacks did in those cities is reason enough to discriminate against innocent black people, who comprise the vast majority of the black populace and have done nothing wrong.

I don't see, however, how you are going to get others on board with that.

And then you have individuals on this site who have the gall to ask, "Where did someone say ALL black people?"

BINGO, baby! Right there!

Why don't you fucking admit that you have no intention of trying to differentiate between good blacks--who comprise a vast majority of our population--and miscreants? Admit it. If the soggy-assed whites on this site can admit it, you should admit it, too.

Admit that you want black people DEAD.

Brother Anonymous said...

@Anonymous

"Admit that you want black people DEAD."

Crazy negro projection. Particularly in the light of the ongoing black-on-white violence.

Anonymous said...

"Yeah, because saying "black people suck" is really non-inflammatory and really gets people's camaraderie juices flowing."

It's not about saying "black people suck".

It's about honestly discussing the negro predisposition toward violence, rape, murder, illegitimacy, and numerous other anti-social behaviors.

Try again, loser.

Anonymous said...

"Um, newsflash -- we're individuals."

Newsflash: Any black person who dares to express an opinion different from the pack is called an Uncle Tom. Blacks refer to themselves using the singular term "the black community", and blacks vote over 90% in unison, bordering on 99% if the candidate is black.

Try again, loser.

Anonymous said...

"You are essentially saying that whatever those blacks did in those cities is reason enough to discriminate against innocent black people"

Essentially, most rattlesnakes have never bitten a human being, however, it is considered wise to discriminate against all rattlesnakes, and stay clear of them.

Similarly, it is wise to stay clear of negroes, although many have never committed rape or murder.

If you disagree, that's your opinion, and you are entitled to it. Please have the courtesy to respect the right of others to their own opinions. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

"And then you have individuals on this site who have the gall to ask, "Where did someone say ALL black people?""

You still haven't cited an example of anyone saying that ALL black people are savages/thugs/sub-humans.

And you're not man enough to admit you can't.

Oh, you're whiny too.

For the record, you should be advised that you are wasting your time here, your arguments have all been made before, and rejected every time.

Anonymous said...

"You can cite your so-called statistics until you're blue in the face but the reality is that it only affects the black population"

No, the reality is that negroes drag our entire culture down, you're just not bright enough to understand.

Anonymous said...

Actually, the Post Office goes where others don't, and is the last leg for deliveries by, for example, FedEx.

—GA

Anonymous said...

To Anon at 7:38


What is the "vast" majority of black people?

1 in 3 adult black males is a felon. In black communities, black people don't talk to the police. How innocent is that?

I don't want black people dead. I want them to get their act together, until that happens white people need to know the truth and that's what this site is all about.

Anonymous said...

Anon at 7:22

The post office is incompetent, it cannot compete with UPS or Fedex.

It is incompetent because it employs a great deal of black people, who are inefficient employees.

If not for being supported by the tax payer, the post office would have gone out of business many, many years ago.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, because saying "black people suck" is really non-inflammatory and really gets people's camaraderie juices flowing.

The dilemma has been that when people have tried to address racial issues reasonably, they get shouted down, fired, charged with "hate" crimes, and so forth. Thus, the tendency is to go to extremes since moderation does not work. If the multicultists would be willing to engage in a real dialog on race, with both sides getting an equal shake, then perhaps the race realist rhetoric might get toned down.


I think you people don't get that blaming all of society's problems on a small fraction of 13% of the population makes no sense at all.


Well, I would blame it on the elites who do have the power--and many of whom happen to be white--who use race as an issue against the majority population. In any event, there is a real concern these days among whites about being the victim of violent crime, with flash mobs being the latest incarnation. Should whites remain passive when they are being singled out for public battery?

You are essentially saying that whatever those blacks did in those cities is reason enough to discriminate against innocent black people, who comprise the vast majority of the black populace and have done nothing wrong.


Look at how it shakes out at the other end. White people today are being held accountable for slavery-segregation even though most whites had nothing to do with these things. Many whites even fought in the Civil War on the Union side against slavery. Yet whites are today demonized for the deeds of other whites simply because of the "color of their skin." And whites are forced to pay the price collectively in terms of ponying up for the welfare state, losing jobs to affirmative action, being forces into PC indoctrination sessions, being barraged with anti-white agitprop in the media, and now victimized via flash mobbery.

I'd venture to say that most whites would be happy to drop the collective responsibility business if the multicult race hustlers would do the same.

--Californian

Anonymous said...

You’re right. Never mind those stats. Why even consider the work of people compiling data and crunching numbers to define trends for analysis? Who does that, really? I should ignore all of it.

WHEW. None of this will ever affect me. For a minute there I was taking the abuse of the tax dollars coming out of my pocket personally! Here I thought that escalating numbers of attacks against people in business areas, downtown at dinner, fairs, fast food joints and minding their own business was a cause for concern. I mean..WOW how could I have thought that?? It slipped my mind that I have a trusty Bladar on my phone. I can easily tell “good Blacks” from miscreants with it. Color me relieved! There’s an APP for everything these days!

Anonymous said...

"How does the US Postal Service 'fail' because it employs black people? WTF did your friendly neighborhood black postman do to you?

Please cite how hiring black people is causing the Post to fail. Please explain this in explicit detail.

If you can write it down, you can explain it.

Thanks."

This statement is exactly why it's failing. There have been several posts about this exact thing but, the negro is too lazy to do any research. Read: Typical lazy negro= failed business

BTW: The USPS was fine for more than 100 years before they started hiring blacks and having problems.

Anonymous said...

"Every time you discuss with friends why you don't live in the "bad" areas of town or the "ghetto," correct them and say, "you mean the Black area.""


They used to say this about the Irish.

Anonymous said...

Ah yes, the "good blacks." Almost all blacks cheered when that murderer OJ Simpson was found guilty by a jury of his fellow blacks.

I'm not interested in associating with blacks, be they "good" blacks or ghetto underclass. I don't care where they go or what happens to them. just keep them away from me and mine.

Dissident said...

Desiree, can you please just stop the drama. I can't accept the notion that Paul or anyone else here wants "all black people dead". That's just utter silliness.

What WE DO want, is for black people like you and Bob Siegel to police your own. I understand that this is a daunting task as you'll be called traitor and uncle Tom and be utterly ostracized from your own community.

But hey, at least it's better than being called a Racist (TM) isn't it?

Silent Running said...

Our military is doing everything possible to diversify itself out of being an effective defense force

And if you believe that that very military will someday be tasked with destroying you, what a welcome sight this is. Imagine yourself a guerrilla tasked with holding what's left of a city. Do you want to face off against the Army Rangers, or a bunch of single mothers, bull dykes, foreign mercenaries promised citizenship, and Shameekwa's?

Um, newsflash -- we're individuals.

Um, newsflash -- libertarianism is a child's philosophy.

Why don't you fucking admit that you have no intention of trying to differentiate between good blacks--who comprise a vast majority of our population--and miscreants?

I take issue with your terms. Insofar as the nonviolent blacks make excuses for and otherwise rush to the defense of they hoodrat bruthuhs, there are no "good" blacks. What passes for a "good" black is someone like Nutter, who chides blacks for their misbehavior from one side of his face, and chides whites for their intolerance from the other side. The terms of the "good" blacks is that they are allowed to lecture on the myriad failings of the black race, but we are not. Those terms are unacceptable.

Admit that you want black people DEAD.

Do all race-liberals harbor such genocidal fantasies? Do you fear us that much? Personally, I think you all should merely be sent home, where you can revel in your African heritage without going through life feeling like a failure as you do here.

Anonymous said...

""Why don't you fucking admit that you have no intention of trying to differentiate between good blacks--who comprise a vast majority of our population--and miscreants?""

Who are the 'good' the blacks that are so numerous?

You mean the 'good' blacks that are constantly circling the wagons around their brethren? You mean the 'good' blacks that follow Black Liberation Theology? You mean the 'good' blacks that are Eric Holders people? You mean the 'good' blacks who are members of the NAACP? You mean the 'good' blacks represented by the Black Caucus? You mean the good blacks who agree with Affirmative Action, African American Studies, Black groups of every imaginable type from political & Lobbying groups to social and religious? You mean the 'good' blacks who think they can be racial but whites are racist? Exactly which 'good' blacks are you talking about?

Anonymous said...

Admit that you want black people DEAD.

Don't want black people dead unless they persist in violent anti-white behavior otherwise just don't want to live around them.

Anonymous said...

No one is going to agree with being racist against every black person. Why? Because it doesn't make sense. No one is going to deny innocent people's civil rights on the basis of some white guy getting beat up by black gangbangers.

I've said this before and I'll keep saying it. I will stop using demographic factors to make quick-and-dirty snap judgements about individuals the day after insurance companies stop doing it.

Insurance companies know damned good and well that to function,one can,and must,be able to make fast and reasonably accurate risk assessments on individuals. And like it or not,age,race,and other demographic factors influence risk.

Go look at a couple of used cars. One of the cars was owned by a little old lady. The other was the property of a 20 year old kid.

Both cars are more-or-less equivalent,and priced closely. Which car are you going to buy?

Walk down the sidewalk and a block away you see two groups of people. One is a group of young,black males,the other is a group of white males about the same age. Which group are you going to avoid?

Both choices will be influenced by the demographic factors of the parties involved,and you ignore these demographic factors at your peril. Getting back to those evil,capitalist,wicked insurance companies ( for the record,I don't exactly love them,either ),those mean old white coat and tie wearing moneygrubbers know that. If they didn't know that,and didn't apply that knowledge to their everyday business dealings,they'd be out of a job in a heartbeat.

So being racist against every black person very often makes perfect sense. Your well being and your very life may well depend on how racist you can be.

Why don't you fucking admit that you have no intention of trying to differentiate between good blacks--who comprise a vast majority of our population--and miscreants? Admit it. If the soggy-assed whites on this site can admit it, you should admit it, too.

I have no intention of trying to differentiate between the good and bad blacks. You-whoever you are-are making an important omission in your argument. What you're failing to take into account is the consequences of certain actions,or lack thereof. If I guess wrong about that car I was talking about,I have to tolerate mechanical problems,and in the worst case I can imagine,the car gets towed to a scrapyard and I at least get enough cash to pay for having it towed away.

If I guess wrong about the character of a black individual,I can very possibly wind up dead,or in the emergency room with a bunch of tubes running in and out of me.

Admit that you want black people DEAD.

No. I want them gone,and that isn't the same thing.

MrGJG said...

Paul, Don't know if you're aware of the latest BRA moment happening in of all places, Chicago and involving some guy named Rahm Emanuel.
Where have I heard that name?



http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/08/rahms_race_politics_showing.html

Anonymous said...

Admit that you want black people DEAD.

Judging by the amount of gun crime committed by blacks it is blacks who want to exterminate blacks!

Anonymous said...

So being racist against every black person very often makes perfect sense.

Bring fearful of black people because they commit the majority of crime is realist not racist.

Hating white people for no reason is racist

Van said...

"Yeah, "white girl" can "bleed a lot" but she can bleed with white folks, too. Matter of fact, she is more likely to bleed with white folks."

Actually, no, she's not. A white girl who associates only with blacks is much more likely to be the victim of violence than a white girl who associates only with whites.

I'd be willing to wager a large sum that there is not a single velociraptor on white person attack in all of recorded history. Certainly not in the last several thousand years, during which time the number of white on white assaults far outweighs the number of raptor on white assaults.

So by your logic, if we were able to travel back in time to the Cretaceous Period, we would have little to nothing to fear from the poor, misjudged raptors. They would probably passively go on about their business (something noble, no doubt), while whites assaulted each other left and right.

Anonymous said...

AA is something that should have been sunsetted out. 25 years or generation then nada. Instead what we have is a class of people who are literally dependent on AA.

Anonymous said...

Admit that you want black people DEAD.

If you want to play that game, then: Who is committing the farm murders in South Africa? And who are the victims? Who is committing the flash mob violence in America? And who are the victims? Who is committing a disproportionate number of violent crimes in Europe? And who are the victims?

Thing is, a lot of white people have this sneaking suspicion that they are being targeted on a global scale with violence by "people of color." Yet the media spin is to make blacks the victims. It's a curious inversion of reality.

--Californian

Van said...

More fun for anonymous/suspected Desiree:

For each of the following pairs of statements, (A) does not contradict (B). In other words, they are not mutually exclusive* - they can both be true at the same time.

(A) The overall impact of blacks on American society is negative.
(B) Some blacks have a positive impact on American society.

(A) Blacks are much more likely to commit violent crime than whites.
(B) Not all blacks commit violent crime, and some whites commit violent crime.

(A) Blacks are much more likely than whites to use welfare, food stamps, and other hand-out programs.
(B) Not all blacks use these programs, and some whites do.

This site, and most of the posters, take the point of few that (A)-type statements represent too big of a problem. You keep coming around reminding us of (B).

I you wish to continue this conversation, I have several questions for you. I want yes/no answers. I will ignore any attempt at explanation. No "yes, but..." answers.

Do you acknowledge the following:
1) black crime rates are much higher than white crime rates.
2) black on white attacks are much more common than the reverse.
3) the average black household takes in more in benefits from the government than it pays in taxes.
4) the recent cheating scandals in public schools are almost entirely a black problem, and result from attempting to increase the scores of black students to the level of white students.
5) Affirmative action in college admissions allows lesser qualified blacks in over more qualified whites.
6) When a city/county/town changes from majority white to majority black, nearly every measure of standard of living falls.
7) The most dangerous cities have a black majority (sometimes merely a plurality) while the safest cities are overwhelmingly white, and there is significant income variation among the safe white cities.

All seven (I could go on) are factual, well documented, and easily researched (look it up yourself if you wish, I'm working from memory), so the only honest, not-in-massive-denial, answer is "yes," those are true statements.

Assuming you're still with me, and you have been honest so far, the next (multi-part) question is this:

Why wouldn't I avoid blacks? The overall impact on my life of black people is negative. They provide nothing positive that can't be provided - better provided - by whites, yet they bring so many negatives that I don't get when I limit my interactions to whites. So why would I waste my time? Life is too short, there aren't enough hours in a day, to not make some inferences about groups of people; especially when I can be right 99% of the time. Why wouldn't we want you gone? When you are a drain on our civilization - we can't have the few who are beneficial without the many who drag us down; so why? Why would we want any of you here?

What do a few of you bring to the table that balances the crime; the need for high taxes to feed, house, and clothe you; the missed opportunities for our children so your under-qualified ones can take a few spots at the better schools, the diversion of resources to your schools, that weren't "failing" until you flooded them?

When it is easily shown that my society would be so much better in every meaningful way(other than "enrichment"), why wouldn't I want nothing to do with you, and hope for a day that we can part ways?

10mm AUTO said...

To Anon @ 7:38

"Admit that you want black people DEAD."

This is rich coming from a representative of a race that is beating us in the streets, at our fairs and in our waterparks, has Beat Whitey Nights, rapes 37,000 of our women every YEAR while we won't touch negroid women, who's race has produced an entire industry with hundreds of Rap "songs" calling for the genocide of Whites, whose largest black organization, Nation of Islam, calls openly for the genocide of Whites, a race that has destroyed 3 White colonies; Rhodesia and South Africa and Haiti, while turning to Whitey and begging for food, White Medicine and White Technology to keep them going.

Frankly, I don't think most on here want negroids dead, just off this Continent. There is no other answer and we are now waking up to that truth and beginning to work toward that goal. In the short term, we are waking up to the horror of having to defend ourselves from a foreign culture within our own Nation. For too long we have asked, "Why to they attack us?"

Whites have let themselves be convinced that it is evil merely to object to dispossession, much less to work for their own interests. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its place in history, only whites have been tricked into thinking that love for their own people is somehow either wrong or a “hatred” of others.

Analytical said...

You are essentially saying that whatever those blacks did in those cities is reason enough to discriminate against innocent black people, who comprise the vast majority of the black populace and have done nothing wrong.

Those "innocent" black people are the "village" that raised all those violent punks.  Those "innocent" black people have fostered a festering phenomenon of anti-white hatred while denouncing any white person who notices black misbehavior (not just attitudes) as "racist".

There is no collective innocence there.  You know what goes on, and you have made no attempt to stop it.  Have any racist blacks been fired from their jobs, businesses closed by protests, sued into pennilessness, forced to apologize for their sins?  If only!

Why don't you fucking admit that you have no intention of trying to differentiate between good blacks--who comprise a vast majority of our population--and miscreants?

But when white people do it, it's "racist".  You clean up your own house, bitch.

Admit that you want black people DEAD.

I want you to either behave or GTFO of this country.  Fostering the hatred and sense of entitlement you exhibit here is NOT behaving.  What you do to each other outside of Western civilization is no business, or problem, of mine.

If sending you to a black country means death, it means you can't live without Whitey.  It means you're just a parasite.  That says everything that needs to be said.

Anonymous said...

SBPDL,

Are you going to do a book/movie review on The Help? I'd be interested to hear your take on it.

Anonymous said...

Van:

Yours is actually quite interesting...

Assuming I am allowed to engage with you although this is not an intellectually free forum, I will answer your questions. Interestingly, you want no context because context typically invalidates your argument (NOTE: I personally have no problem with you wanting to stay with your kind, but only with your advocation of taking away people's rights). Remember: statistics without context are merely numbers that are not reasonably applicable to individuals.


"Do you acknowledge the following:"

Acknowledge using Y or N? Or acknowledge to your liking? I will assume the former to answer but know full well that you really want the latter...

1) black crime rates are much higher than white crime rates. Y
2) black on white attacks are much more common than the reverse. Y
3) the average black household takes in more in benefits from the government than it pays in taxes. This I do not know; what is your definition of 'benefit' and provide a link of support. Thanks.
4) the recent cheating scandals in public schools are almost entirely a black problem, and result from attempting to increase the scores of black students to the level of white students. This cannot be adequately answered with a Y or N.
5) Affirmative action in college admissions allows lesser qualified blacks in over more qualified whites. N
6) When a city/county/town changes from majority white to majority black, nearly every measure of standard of living falls. This cannot be adequately answered with a Y or N.
7) The most dangerous cities have a black majority (sometimes merely a plurality) while the safest cities are overwhelmingly white, and there is significant income variation among the safe white cities. Y to part 1; '?' to part 2.


Now, a question to you:

Given your 'list o' facts' about and your overly dramatic antipathy for blacks, what do you suppose is the answer to the negro problem, if we are so horrible?

What's your solution?

NOTE: please confine your answer--assuming you are allowed to see the question--to non-fantastic, logical solutions, which means no suggestion of mass deportations to Africa (not happening); no suggestion of an Apartheid, segregation/Jim Crow, or slavery redux (not going to fly with the majority of Americans); no secession from the Union (LOL); and no suggestion of genocide, either direct or indirect. Essentially, no violation of the US Constitution or usurpation of civil rights.

Okay... GO!

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

To answer No. 3:

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/character/FY2008/tab08.htm

Remember, Black people are only 13 percent of the US population.

I'm sure someone can supply the link to Food Stamps usage, free lunch (for Black children that lack a Black father present 72 percent of the time) program, etc.

Anonymous said...

Essentially, no violation of the US Constitution or usurpation of civil rights.

In other words, nothing that upsets the gravy train and completely asymmetrical and biased power system which you now enjoy.  (That one caveat means no abolishment of affirmative action, keeping "anti-redlining" laws which outlaw evaluation based on actual lending risk, etc.)

Nice try and fairly sophisticated for someone with a genetic handicap, but you're not bright enough to pull that one over on this crowd.

Anonymous said...

Diarrhea, why are you still posting here? You're a waste of space, just get on with your life, stop obsessing with this blog. We don't want you here, understood?

Laz said...

"Now, a question to you:

Given your 'list o' facts' about and your overly dramatic antipathy for blacks, what do you suppose is the answer to the negro problem, if we are so horrible?

What's your solution?

NOTE: please confine your answer--assuming you are allowed to see the question--to non-fantastic, logical solutions, which means no suggestion of mass deportations to Africa (not happening); no suggestion of an Apartheid, segregation/Jim Crow, or slavery redux (not going to fly with the majority of Americans); no secession from the Union (LOL); and no suggestion of genocide, either direct or indirect. Essentially, no violation of the US Constitution or usurpation of civil rights."

I can answer this one:

1. A time limit on entitlements of 3-5 years. No more lifelong welfare, foodstamps, etc.
2. Monthly drug tests for entitlements.
3. No organizations that cater to and only represent one segment of the population to the exclusion of every other race (NAACP).
4. Immigration reform. No more automatic citizenship when your parent(s) entered this country illegally.

Anonymous said...

"Given your 'list o' facts' about and your overly dramatic antipathy for blacks, what do you suppose is the answer to the negro problem, if we are so horrible?

What's your solution?"


Offer every Negro who reaches the age of sexual maturity $20,000 to be sterilized. The problem will eventually go away and it would be money well spent. We can have a sliding scale for those who have already produced offspring. Hell, we can probably get most of the men fixed for a nice shiny set of spinning rims. It does not violate anyone's rights as it would be voluntary.

Anonymous said...

"what do you suppose is the answer to the negro problem, if we are so horrible?"

This would be a nice start:
STOP forcing whites to associate with blacks, STOP forcing white kids to attend school with blacks, STOP forcing white employers to hire blacks, STOP forcing white stores/businesses to serve black customers, and STOP redistributing white tax dollars to subsidize atrocious black behavior.

Californian said...

Given your 'list o' facts' about and your overly dramatic antipathy for blacks, what do you suppose is the answer to the negro problem, if we are so horrible?

Fair enough question, and something race realists need to answer. It's the central issue of any political struggle: "What do you want in the real world?"

Here is a list of things which would be realistic, which would have the support of many if not most Americans, and which would go a long way to giving some justice:

1) Civil rights for White people. White people (heck, anyone) should be able to make the sorts of statements that are being made on this website without being shouted down in public forums, having their employment terminated, or facing "hate" crime persecution.

2) An end to all affirmative action, minority grants, forced busing, and other special government programs for minorities.

3) Enforcement of border controls and citizenship requirements.

4) Expansion of the right to bear arms, including concealed carry. This would solve much of the flash mob violence. 'Nuff said.

5) An open dialog on race, to include genetic factors of IQ and crime rates by race, and how they impact on public policies.

6) An end to publicly supported ethnic studies programs on campus--these have become centers for anti-White agitation. Alternatively, have publicly supported pro-White ethnic studies programs to balance them.

7) An overhaul of all welfare programs -- if not their outright abolition -- to end the cycles of pathology which they have produced over the last five decades. Institute welfare programs which reward recipients who marry, attain good grades in school, and stay out of jail.

8) Legal defense organizations which will stand up for the interests of White people in the same way as the NAACP, MALDEF, et alia do for their own races. Either that, or one big legal defense organization for all Americans.

9) A recognition that liberal guilt is a suicidal pathology and should be treated as such.

10) An end to all "diversity" and "sensitivity" agitprop programs. Along with this, recognize that multiculturalism is inimical to the interests of Western peoples -- to any civilization for that matter. Thus, multiculturalism must be completely discredited.

11) A mass boycott of the current anti-White media to bring it down once and for all. Replace it with alternative media that does not march lockstep in the liberal line. This can include every kind of media, from movies to rock music to videogames.

12) The creation of pro-Western cultural media and institutions. This must include a student front which will reclaim control of the campuses. The history of Western peoples needs to be glorified and people, especially the young, need to show pride in it.

13) An overhaul of globalization policies: outsourcing of jobs, importing of third world workers, foreign aid to failed states, endless mindless foreign wars for no strategic purpose, etc. These have to be reexamined and replaced. Which gets me to...

14) Support for American workers and American technologies. Perhaps it's time to get involved in union building? And while we are at it, resume the manned space program to ultimately colonize new worlds.

15) Support for other White people globally. Like providing protection for Whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe who are under the gun. And for the Geert Wilders of the world who are facing persecution for defending the West in Europe-Canada.

...and last but certainly not least...

16) Holding public officials and corporate heads accountable for their crimes against the people.

Sounds like a plan!

Anonymous said...

"To answer No. 3:"


SBPDL, this does not answer number 3. I want a link demonstrating the question asked. Assuming that 'benefits' means government assistance, I am still unsure about Van's question: do we (blacks) take in more government assistance than we pay in taxes.

He is asking about the 'average' black family. It could be Y, seeing that 24.7% of blacks are at or below poverty level (about 1 in 4), which could--by numbers alone--increase the amount of benefits taken in when the average is quantified.

Of course, this cannot be adequately answered with a Y or N, even if the answer to Number 3 was Y. But that I do not know.


"free lunch (for Black children that lack a Black father present 72 percent of the time) program"


SBPDL, what you are claiming here is that 72% of black kids are on free lunch. Where is this supported? Please provide a link.


Van:

Context--

(1) Blacks are more likely to be poor than whites and the stresses leading to crime are exacerbated by poverty.
(2) With scant exceptions, whites are not targeted by blacks because of their skin color or whiteness (which would denote 'hatred' similarly to white-orchestrated hate crime against PoC) but are usually 'there' or deemed as stereotypically weak when one could be 'putting in work' for a gang. This has nothing to do with hatred.
(3) refer to number 1.
(4) refer to number 1.
(5) This is an untrue stereotype created by AA opponents who fail to realize that AA has always mainly benefited white women; people opposing AA are usually white men who want to go back to the time when they had no competition with anyone but other white males.
(6) As an example, read about the making of Harlem into a ghetto; this will tell you all you need to know about why this can occur; in Harlem's case, white landlords simply stopped tending to buildings as blacks--who were middle class--moved in and whites moved out, which lowered the property values, making it easier for poorer blacks to move in. Then, the Broken Windows theory takes affect. This is how you make a ghetto. I've seen this first hand when I used to live in a poor, predominantly Latino 'barrio' when I was a child first living in my current city.
(7) refer to number 1.


"A white girl who associates only with blacks is much more likely to be the victim of violence than a white girl who associates only with whites."


This is not true. If you can verify that it is, by all means, please do.


"I'd be willing to wager a large sum that there is not a single velociraptor on white person attack in all of recorded history."


The rest of your post following this was totally ridiculous and frighteningly desperate. Another question: are you stupid? Think hard about the answer.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to address this for every white person on this site who thinks blacks should 'leave' or cannot live without whitey--

"I want you to either behave or GTFO of this country.... If sending you to a black country means death, it means you can't live without Whitey. It means you're just a parasite. That says everything that needs to be said."


This was stated by Analytical.

I fervently believe--100%--that blacks or Africans can not only create but sustain an economically viable and culturally important society.

Why? We've done it before. Before Portuguese 'discovery' of sub-Saharan Africa, Africa was known for its wealth. There were kingdoms all throughout Africa (Egypt goes without saying). The Great Zimbabwe fortification (sub-Saharan Africa) and society had trade routes to Asia, for example.

Being in the 21st century, this will only mean even greater societies.

The key to this--if the implantation is in an African country or in Africa, in general--is to remove every Western multi-national corporation, person, or flunky (this would be the African leaders who are merely proxies for Western capitalists; most African nations have failed because they are not truly FREE from Western imperialism) from Africa and/or the African country.

I believe blacks and Africans (as demonstrated by African immigrant disproportionate educational and economic success in this nation) possess the intellect to make this a reality.

Will it happen? Overcoming the absolute resistance to the removal of capitalists, in existence on the continent both directly and indirectly (via flunky leaders who enjoy Western capital), will be the hardest challenge, maybe impossible.

However, if achieved, I 100% believe that blacks and/or Africans can become power players in the world economy.

Beyond this, however, the suggestion of our removal from America is nonsensical and trite. Furthermore, it is offensive because we are Americans, even more so than most whites. Using our labor to jumpstart the American republic and then telling us to 'leave' is stupid.

We are Americans. We are from a long history of Americans, both black and white.

Question: why have you not gone to Europe? Answer: because most Europeans hate racist white fucks from America.

Remember: blame your white forebears for creating the black underclass; in the beginning of America, whites had the opportunity to choose egalitarianism. In fact, many English asked how can whites deny liberty based upon skin hue. But whites chose subjugation over egalitarianism, which resulted in the gradual restrictions of freedoms for blacks. This made it impossible for black educational pursuits, blacks to get work or start businesses, or for blacks to, in general, live as comfortably as their white counterparts.

According to LBJ's Kerner Commission report, whites have only themselves to blame. Remember: you get the populace you deserve.

By the way, the vast majority of blacks do not hate white people. That is a myth.

"Those "innocent" black people are the "village" that raised all those violent punks."


Innocent blacks do not raise violent punks. Is it safe to suggest, by your logic, that innocent whites raise 'violent punks' and, therefore, should be blamed for all white crime?

Van said...

"Given your 'list o' facts' about and your overly dramatic antipathy for blacks, what do you suppose is the answer to the negro problem, if we are so horrible?

What's your solution?"

End all explicit race-based legal policies. No AA, minority set asides, etc. End all "stealth" race based policies where the goal is to use tax payer money to improve the status of minorities (NCLB, provisions in the health care act, etc.). Equality UNDER THE LAW; and acceptance of inequality of reality. Restoration of respect for our heritage, even if it includes a time that you aren't proud of yours.

Basically, live and let live. We have different histories, and different futures. Blacks (as a group) will never, culturally and economically speaking, be a mirror image of whites. If we must inhabit the same land - because my ancestors forced yours here against their will - we need to come to an understanding. We are different. Its not some perversion of nature that results in different outcomes for the average black person and white person. Its a perversion of nature to try to force equality of outcomes.

Anonymous said...

"“You are essentially saying that whatever those blacks did in those cities is reason enough to discriminate against innocent black people,""

It is reason enough to be cautious and leery of all unknown black people. It is reason enough to racail profile. All snakes bite and some are poisonous. You naive and a fool if you don't proceed with caution until you know what kind of snake it is.

""who comprise the vast majority of the black populace and have done nothing wrong.”"

That is debatable but nevertheless the vast majority also overwhelming support their racial brethren and are racial.

Joel said...

"Essentially, no violation of the US Constitution or usurpation of civil rights."

Secession is not a violation of the U.S. Constitution, idiot. Sounds like you've fallen for the Lincoln lie.

10mm AUTO said...

"NOTE: please confine your answer--assuming you are allowed to see the question--to non-fantastic, logical solutions, which means no suggestion of mass deportations to Africa (not happening); no suggestion of an Apartheid, segregation/Jim Crow, or slavery redux (not going to fly with the majority of Americans); no secession from the Union (LOL); and no suggestion of genocide, either direct or indirect. Essentially, no violation of the US Constitution or usurpation of civil rights."

Easy! In fact, the framework has already passed. In the 1994 Welfare Reform Act, passed by Republicans and signed into law by President Clinton, negroids were not to get any further (increased) benefits for squeezing out more niglets. The legislation has been modified since then to weaken it, but there is little doubt that with a change in law, mandatory implant birth control for negroid females receiving ANY Federal benefits would not be an optimal solution!! The critical population here is the breeding sows ages 18 to 40. With that population essentially self sterilized, the negroid population would crash within two generations. Negroids are already breeding at less than replacement and have fallen 0.9% in the last census. There is nothing Unconstitutional about requiring Birth Control for being eligible for for Federal benefits as the requirement would apply as well to Whites seeking same.

This can be increased by stopping all importation of negroids from da mudderland by going back to pre-1965 immigration standards, easy enough when the Somali and Islamic groids cause so much trouble.

This is without getting into really exotic solution like bio-engineered solutions or radical changes in society. I would not take them off the table, however. I can see a very wealthy father of a murdered daughter or son seeking a biotech solution, like an attack on the melanin cascade, completely different in Whites than negroids. Or a rise in societal anger so great that a charismatic leader uses it to gain power, like Hitler. Looking over the 20th Century almost anything is possible. Who would have foreseen the Ukraine Famines of the 1930's that consolidated Stalin's power or the Jew hatred that triggered Hitler. There are a lot more people in today's society who would be willing to pull the switch on the negroid that were willing to blame the Jews in the 1930's. Jews didn't run at you with baseball bats and scream "It's a Black World" while they smashed your daughter to the ground.

Anonymous said...

"...what do you suppose is the answer to the negro problem, if we are so horrible?"

First, it's not "if" - you are bad.

Solution? As near to total avoidance as possible, combined with lethal force where necessary.

Laz said...

"4) Expansion of the right to bear arms, including concealed carry. This would solve much of the flash mob violence. 'Nuff said."

I'm thinking that's why we haven't had as much problems with the mahogany mobs here in Texas as you have in other states. The castle doctrine includes my home, vehicle, and place of employment. You try rioting/looting in Dallas you might get dead.

Anonymous said...

"I fervently believe--100%--that blacks or Africans can not only create but sustain an economically viable and culturally important society."

Fine. Now for fuck's sake...PLEASE get this through your thick fucking skull...

You are entitled to your opinions, and even though not a single person here agrees with you, no one is trying to change your mind about anything. In fact, you are encouraged to continue believing whatever it is you believe.

Please have the common courtesy to show the same respect in return.

You are like a broken record, repeatedly posting the same tired, unoriginal negro talking points. No one is interested in your long-winded diarrhea, no one listens to anything you say, and in fact, everyone here dismisses everything you write.

The fact that you waste weeks/months/years of your life arguing with people who collectively think that you're a racist imbecile strongly suggests that you have a low IQ.

Anonymous said...

“You are essentially saying that whatever those blacks did in those cities is reason enough to discriminate against innocent black people,"

Just the same as I discriminate against all rattlesnakes, even though most have never bitten a human.

Anonymous said...

"Admit that you want black people DEAD."

I want my garden free of weeds, but that won't happen either. What's your point?

Brother Anonymous said...

@Anonymous,

"Why? We've done it before. Before Portuguese 'discovery' of sub-Saharan Africa, Africa was known for its wealth. There were kingdoms all throughout Africa (Egypt goes without saying). The Great Zimbabwe fortification (sub-Saharan Africa) and society had trade routes to Asia, for example."

Damn! Then whitey came and took away all their space ships, and knocked the nose off the Sphinx.

Anonymous said...

"This is not true."

Of course it's true, however, if you disagree, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. No one is trying to change your mind about anything. In fact, you are encouraged to continue believing whatever it is you believe.

You do agree that everyone here is entitled to their own opinions...right?

Brother Anonymous said...

@Anonymous,

"The key to this--if the implantation is in an African country or in Africa, in general--is to remove every Western multi-national corporation, person, or flunky (this would be the African leaders who are merely proxies for Western capitalists; most African nations have failed because they are not truly FREE from Western imperialism"

The typical rationalization for savagery and genocide hidden beneath layers of post-colonial rhetoric. Once again, the African soul reveals itself.

Anonymous said...

"(1) Blacks are more likely to be poor than whites and the stresses leading to crime are exacerbated by poverty."

You are like a moronic broken record, stuck on stupid.

1. Blacks are less intelligent than whites so OF COURSE they are likely to be poorer.
2. Poverty does not cause crime. Poverty and crime both result from illegitimacy, as illustrated by the world's negro population.

Of course, if you disagree, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, no one is trying to change your mind about anything. In fact, you are encouraged to continue believing whatever it is you believe.

You do agree that everyone here is entitled to their own opinions...right?

Californian said...

I was going to answer these point by point...

(1) Blacks are more likely to be poor ...
(2) With scant exceptions, whites are not targeted by blacks because of their skin color or whiteness (which would denote 'hatred' similarly to white-orchestrated hate crime against PoC) but are usually 'there' or deemed as stereotypically weak ....
(3) refer to number 1.
(4) refer to number 1.
(5) This is an untrue stereotype created by AA opponents who fail to realize that AA has always mainly benefited white women; ...
(6) As an example, read about the making of Harlem into a ghetto...


...but these arguments point up the real problem among too many blacks and (especially) white liberals: the refusal to assume responsibility for their own dysfunctions and instead to blame it all on The Man:

It's all the fault of long dead slave owners. Or poverty. Or a landlord who does not fix broken windows. Or apartheid. Or big bad old corporations. Or the CIA for forcing inner city youth to smoke crack cocaine. Or White people for being sooooo weak they just invite in the flash mobs. Or something.

How about as a first step to being treated as an adult is taking responsibility for your own actions?

Anonymous said...

"I was going to answer these point by point..."

Don't bother.

In spite of the fact that it's all been refuted more times than I can count, she'll keep repeating the same tired bullshit over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over andand over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...

Anonymous said...

@ anonymous/Desiree:

A better question would be: Where is a black run entity that isn't bankrupt? Just find one, I dare you.

Pretty hypocritical to ask those questions when you know there isn't one enterprise blacks haven't run into the ground.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous,

"Why? We've done it before. Before Portuguese 'discovery' of sub-Saharan Africa, Africa was known for its wealth. There were kingdoms all throughout Africa (Egypt goes without saying). The Great Zimbabwe fortification (sub-Saharan Africa) and society had trade routes to Asia, for example."



Egyptians are not black. You cannot claim their accomplishments as your own. Hell Cleopatra was Greek. I know that has to hurt the undeserved ego of black women.

The "Great" Zimbabwe fortification is nothing to hang your hat on. It totaled 18,000 people at it's peak and is now just a bunch of stones, because the blacks didn't use mortar. Trade with China was only possible because the chinese had boats and went to Zimbabwe, as the Africans couldn't build a boat of their own.

Rome on the other hand had over a million people over a thousand years prior to your one weak example of Black masonry, and it's still a thriving city.

And thanks to the use of mortar, the 2,700 year old aquaducts still work.

Van said...

"This is not true. If you can verify that it is, by all means, please do."

That's easy. The disparity in crime that you already acknowledged. In reality, I probably won't be assaulted by a black. Not because they don't represent a threat, but because I'm rarely around them. For another example, I'm more likely to be bitten by my dog than a shark. The shark is the bigger threat, but I'm never around sharks. I'm around my dog everyday. Exposure is an important variable.

"The rest of your post following this was totally ridiculous"

It was meant to be. I was mocking your lack of understanding of the importance of exposure.

"Another question: are you stupid? Think hard about the answer."

I did spend a lot of time on this one. I reviewed my college and graduate school transcripts, looked over the results of several intelligence tests, took the Wonderlic, timed myself doing a few crossword puzzles, looked at my bank statements and investments, kept my own personal score while watching Jeopardy, and did a survey of people who know me. Indications are pretty strong that no, I am not stupid.

"kingdoms all throughout Africa (Egypt goes without saying)"

Egypt as a black civilization? Now I see, you've been screwing with us this whole time. I admit, you had me. I've been taking you seriously. Ancient Egypt as a black civilization! That's rich!

Van said...

"Jews didn't run at you with baseball bats and scream "It's a Black World" while they smashed your daughter to the ground."

Well, that would be an odd thing for Jewish thugs to yell while they pounded someone.
;)

Anonymous said...

(2) With scant exceptions, whites are not targeted by blacks because of their skin color or whiteness (which would denote 'hatred' similarly to white-orchestrated hate crime against PoC) but are usually 'there' or deemed as stereotypically weak when one could be 'putting in work' for a gang. This has nothing to do with hatred.


Knock down king.

Rashid Bebono

Anonymous said...

most African nations have failed because they are not truly FREE from africans.

Lee said...

Anonymous/Desiree:

Not only are you an idiot, you're a commie.

Anonymous said...

Desiree,

How many black people have you shown this site to? How many white people?

What was their reactions?

Analytical said...

Diarrhea is at it again!  Lying through her teeth.

(1) Blacks are more likely to be poor than whites and the stresses leading to crime are exacerbated by poverty.

Backasswards.  Poverty does not cause crime, criminals wind up poor (and stress and impoversh the people around them).  Blacks are poorer and more stressed because they are more criminal.

The children of rich blacks perform worse on the SAT than the children of poor whites.  Lifting blacks out of poverty does not make them equal; the disability is inherited, not acquired.  Your claim of causation is the opposite of the truth.

(2) With scant exceptions, whites are not targeted by blacks because of their skin color or whiteness

There's Diarrhea, and then there's "Beat Whitey Night".

(5) This is an untrue stereotype created by AA opponents who fail to realize that AA has always mainly benefited white women

At least white women have basic mental and cultural competence.  The sort of black who needs AA does not; the ones who have it don't need AA.

I 100% believe that blacks and/or Africans can become power players in the world economy.

Renounce your citizenship in the USA and emigrate to Africa, and I will personally pay for your plane ticket.  Go forth and be a light unto the world... if you can.

But of course she takes it all back in the next paragraph:

Beyond this, however, the suggestion of our removal from America is nonsensical and trite. Furthermore, it is offensive because we are Americans, even more so than most whites. Using our labor to jumpstart the American republic and then telling us to 'leave' is stupid.

You only "jumpstarted" the stoop-labor economy of the south, undercutting poor whites.  The industrial North started without you, and then paid and bled to free you.  You repay the descendants of those brave Union soldiers by creating no-go ghettos and flash-mobbing their social and cultural events.  That's why you should leave.

According to LBJ's Kerner Commission report, whites have only themselves to blame.

LBJ has been gone from office for 42 years and counting.  His Great Society is bankrupting the USA; its failure to achieve its putative objectives has proven that its premises were wrong.  One of those premises was that discrimination was the cause of black dysfunction.  While the effort to eradicate racism has become an authentic witch hunt targeting the innocent and violating the First Amendment and freedom of conscience, blacks are more dysfunctional in many ways than they were when Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote his report.

Innocent blacks do not raise violent punks.

Given the overwhelmingly (if not completely) black nature of the flash mob and flash rob crowds, there are a lot of very guilty black parents, aunts, uncles, neighborhood authority figures, and other role models... and very few guilty white ones.

Anonymous said...

If America had imported Chinese slaves instead of blacks, we'd all be typing this on the moon right now.

The space program was the only way for white people to leave black people behind.

Keyword is "was"

Californian said...

“Beyond this, however, the suggestion of our removal from America is nonsensical and trite.

The thing is, if the race hustlers keep pushing Whites, then we will no doubt see some kind of extreme backlash. And it would not be pretty, nor would it be something most people would like to see. But you can only push people so far before they turn on you. You might consider how after the Civil War, you had for a couple of decades some real hope for an end to racial conflict in the USA, with early civil rights legislation and so forth. But then the reaction set in leading to segregation. And at least some of this reaction was due to the violence and corruption which accompanied Reconstruction.

Now you might consider what kind of reaction is going to be created by flash mobs and AA and demands for reparations for slavery and the specter of London burning and so on and so forth. With the internet, more White people are becoming aware of what is behind the mainstream media disinformation. More people are becoming aware of what happens to Whites when they are minorities as in southern Africa and soon to be in London.

A question for the poster--if you could avoid what would surely be a most unpleasant backlash by stopping the race hustling and the guilt tripping, would you do it? How about giving up AA and the welfare state? Or would you push these things until the USA turns into something really, really ugly and we are all dragged down?

Something to consider as dark clouds gather on the horizon...

Anonymous said...

With scant exceptions, whites are not targeted by blacks because of their skin color or whiteness (which would denote 'hatred' similarly to white-orchestrated hate crime against PoC) but are usually 'there' or deemed as stereotypically weak when one could be 'putting in work' for a gang. This has nothing to do with hatred.

LMAO! The ultimate Liberal worldview. When we do it it is because of A or B & C or all other kinds of excuses. However when YOU do it, it is because you are evil motherfu...

Anonymous said...

SBPDL said:

Every time you discuss with friends why you don't live in the "bad" areas of town or the "ghetto," correct them and say, "you mean the Black area."

What most infuriates me is to hear "We have to move because the schools were getting so bad," when what they mean is "getting so Black." As a teacher it drives me insane that so many whites believe that schools that were perfectly functional when the population was 95% white suddenly forget how to teach when whites abandon the district. Whites who talk like this are only fooling themselves and do nothing to fix the problems. Whites who leave make things worse.

Maybe if more of us held our ground and did not move out to Whitetopias, our once beautiful cities and neighborhoods might remain so.

Anonymous said...

“Beyond this, however, the suggestion of our removal from America is nonsensical and trite."

The suggestion that we should all watch quietly as blacks destroy our nation is also nonsensical and trite.

Van said...

"This is an untrue stereotype created by AA opponents who fail to realize that AA has always mainly benefited white women”

More evidence of the fact that you simply lack the mental ability to understand statistics. Roughly 33% of the population is white women. Blacks make up 12-13% of the population. So OF COURSE the number of white women who receive AA would be higher than the number of blacks. Factor in high school graduation rates and the numbers shift even further.

But look at the actual boost given (per white woman compared to a black person), and the black person gets the bigger benefit.

For the record, I'm against AA for white women as well; but it hasn't had the same effect on our civilization.

Anonymous said...

From personal experience I have found that blacks are not innocent.

ALL blacks subscribe to the poisonous "black culture", which promotes black victimology, which in turn breeds hatred for the dominant culture (white, western), which ignites black rage and the black tendency to commit violent acts, which lands them in prison, which sends them deeper into poverty and squalor. They make one bad decision after another, including the creation of other "innocent" blacks, who are guaranteed to follow the exact same path. It is well planned by mamma and grandmamma and very intentional. Blacks don't want white people to know this. It is a legacy in the "black community".

Blacks need to feel less pride and more shame.

MrGJG said...

"Blacks need to feel less pride and more shame."

Black's are missing the shame gene and have an extra helping of the pride gene.
I don't know if it's just an African American phenomena or just a black thing period, but by and large, I've rarely met a black with humility.

It's kind of funny how the least accomplished race on the planet, has the highest self-esteem.
I guess their still resting on their laurels from inventing peanut butter.

Anonymous said...

I'm with the poster/teacher who is fed up with the term "failing schools." Schools don't fail, they don't even take tests! Kids do!

Discard said...

I've heard all this before. I'm slow sometimes, but that business about Africans being more successful than Whites is a giveaway, as is the Egypt-was-Black nonsense. Africans in America are more successful and productive than Whites only with respect to breeding large numbers of offspring, at White expense. Look at the Somalis of Lewiston, Maine. This Anon is an ignorant Afrodope, not worth arguing with. I do encourage others, who have more energy than I do to engage for the benefit of observers or casual visitors to the site.

mr_evergreen said...

"So being racist against every black person very often makes perfect sense. Your well being and your very life may well depend on how racist you can be."

I disagree. Racism would actually make my life harder. I'm African-American, getting a college degree in Geography(Bachelor), I'm not committing crime. In fact, this is how I feel about the crimes committed in Milwaukee: Those actions are repugnant, and the persons who were attacking people need to be prosecuted and put in prison.
There is a difference between people such as those who were attacking Whites, and people like me. I am Black and I would not go and attack White people, or anyone for that matter. I actually try and treat everyone as individuals.